price discovery, transparency and volatility in beef markets
Transcription
price discovery, transparency and volatility in beef markets
P.O. Box 80299, Lincoln, NE 68501 | (402) 421-4400 PRICE DISCOVERY, TRANSPARENCY AND VOLATILITY IN BEEF MARKETS Issue: Volatility in the futures markets and “thin” cash markets for cattle have raised concerns with the ability of these markets to determine the value of cattle for market participants. As such, alternatives are being discussed to help provide better pricing information in beef markets. Background: Futures markets for feeder cattle have become increasingly volatile. The volatility has made it difficult for participants in the industry to use futures for risk management and price discovery. The increase in volatility can be traced to many issues. Low levels of liquidity have always been an issue in cattle futures and it appears to be getting worse. With low trading volumes, it doesn’t take too many traders getting in (or out) for the prices to have dramatic swings. Also, due to the use of computerized, high frequency trading, the speed of the price swings can be magnified. The influx of large traders from outside agriculture who are managing portfolios with different goals not related to the market fundamentals can also add volatility. Changes in trading hours and daily price limits have also allowed markets to adjust faster. All the above might be contributing factors to the increased volatility. At the same time, concerns have been expressed with the “thinness” of cash markets for fed cattle in some parts of the U.S. According to Beef Magazine, (When cash was king of the beef market, Wes Ishmael, April 7, 2016) around 80% of all fed cattle traded in the U.S. are sold under Alternative Marketing Arrangements like formulas and forward contracting. Overall, studies have shown the national markets are fine. However, local cash markets in the southern Plains are largely gone. Nebraska is generally thought to have a fairly robust cash market and some have suggested efforts should be made to maintain it in the future. The thinness in the cash markets in parts of the U.S. raises questions of whether cash markets effectively communicate the signals necessary for participants in the industry. The shrinking cash market and futures’ unreliability as a risk management tool are inter-linked in that price discovery in cattle markets. Some market participants believe the industry will need to act soon to address the issues. Farm Bureau Policy: 221 / COMMODITY FUTURES AND OPTIONS 1. Commodity futures and options trading serves a useful purpose for a number of commodities by providing a means to transfer certain types of risk. 2. We support: 2.1 Maintaining the integrity of all U.S. commodity futures and options exchanges as a pricing mechanism by the members of the exchanges and their overseeing governing bodies. Such integrity includes consistent convergence between cash prices at delivery points and futures prices at contract expiration; 1 2.11 Changes in current futures contracts if research shows that such changes will result in maintaining or increasing liquidity of value. 310 / LIVESTOCK MARKETING 1. Livestock producers should have access to competitive markets for price discovery that accurately determine the value of their products. 2. We support: 2.3 Rights of producers and packers to enter into formula pricing, grid pricing, and other marketing arrangements and contract relationships. Policy Questions? 1. Is volatility in the feeder cattle futures markets creating problems for cattle producers in your area? 2. Should private industry and associations work cooperatively to resolve price discovery and volatility issues? Or should government seek to regulate the markets more? 3. Should regulations limit futures market participants to only those in the beef industry? 4. Should feeders and market participants who use AMA’s pay a fee to help maintain cash markets? 5. Is a possible solution to smaller cash markets to create e-markets that might help provide price discovery? 2