fluid nitrogen/sulfur formulations to mitigate sulfur deficiencies and
Transcription
fluid nitrogen/sulfur formulations to mitigate sulfur deficiencies and
FLUID NITROGEN/SULFUR FORMULATIONS TO MITIGATE SULFUR DEFICIENCIES AND MAXIMIZE COTTON YIELDS IN THE UPPER SOUTHEAST COASTAL PLAIN William “Hunter” Frame Field Crops Agronomist/ Assistant Professor Virginia Tech Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center Suffolk, VA Febraury 21, 2017 2017 Fluid Fertilizer Forum Scottsdale, AZ JUSTIFICATION • Sulfur is an essential plant nutrient, though required in smaller quantities than N, P and K. • Used to create proteins which regulated photosynthesis and N metabolism. • Sulfur is mobile in soil systems and is taken up by plants as sulfate, SO42-, thus making it prone to leaching like nitrate (NO3-). • Sulfur in immobile in plants, therefore remobilization of S will not occur and deficiencies will be observed in the upper portion of the canopy • The Clean Air Act has resulted in cleaner air with lower S deposition and more common S deficiencies occurring in cotton WET SULFATE DEPOSITION OBJECTIVES • Evaluate granular and fluid N sources with varying S application rates on in-season NDVI measurements, petiole and leaf S status during the first week of bloom, and lint yield of cotton in the upper southeast coastal plain. • Determine the effect of high N:S ratios in side-dress fluid N sources at varying N application rates on NDVI, petiole and leaf N:S ratios, and lint yield in the upper southeast coastal plain. • Three locations during 2016 • Randomized complete block design with 17 treatments and 4 replications • Compared granular and fluid side-dress sources • Urea + ammonium sulfate (AMS) • UAN32 + ammonium thiosulfate (12-0-026S) • • • 24-0-0-3S 24-0-0-6S 24-0-0-9S • NDVI measured from a week after fertilizer application for five weeks (data not shown) • Petiole and leaf tissue samples were collected from each plot during the first week of bloom • Yield was measured from the center two rows of the four row plot • PROC GLIMMIX was used for ANOVA with an alpha = 0.05. • Treatment design was • • 2 S Sources x 4 S rates 4 Fluid Formulations x 3 N rates MATERIALS AND METHODS NITROGEN AND SULFUR TREATMENTS Trt N-S Formulations Total N Side-dress N Sulfur Total N:S Fluid Fertilizer N:S ------------- lbs acre-1 ------------No Applied N or S Control 2ǂ Urea 100 80 0 100:0 3ǂ Urea + AMS† 100 80 10 10:1 4ǂ Urea + AMS 100 80 20 5:1 5ǂ Urea + AMS 100 80 30 3:1 6 32-0-0 60 40 0 60:0 32:0 7ǂ 32-0-0 100 80 0 100:0 32:0 8 32-0-0 140 120 0 140:0 32:0 9 24-0-0-3S 60 40 5 12:1 8:1 10ǂ 24-0-0-3S 100 80 10 10:1 8:1 11 24-0-0-3S 140 120 15 9.33:1 8:1 12 24-0-0-6S 60 40 10 6:1 4:1 13ǂ 24-0-0-6S 100 80 20 5:1 4:1 14 24-0-0-6S 140 120 30 4.67:1 4:1 15 24-0-0-9S 60 40 15 4:1 2.66:1 16ǂ 24-0-0-9S 100 80 30 3:1 2.66:1 17 24-0-0-9S 140 120 45 3.11:1 2.66:1 †AMS = granular ammonium sulfate (21-0-0-24S) ǂ Treatments to be compared to evaluate sulfur application rates and granular vs fluid N-S sources. 1 PLANTING AND TREATMENT APPLICATION DATES Location Planting Date Side-dress N/S Application Date Suffolk, VA Southampton, VA (SHC) 4/26/2016 5/10/2016 6/27/2016 7/5/2016 Lewiston, NC (LEW) 5/19/2016 7/7/2016 PRE-PLANT SOIL AMMONIUM AND NITRATE-N Sampling Depth in. TAREC NH4+-N NO3--N Southampton NH4+-N NO3--N Lewiston NH4+-N NO3--N ppm 0-6 2.03 2.55 1.15 1.81 0.79 1.26 6-12 1.85 0.99 0.96 1.59 0.83 1.13 12-24 2.11 1.14 1.08 1.16 0.60 1.93 24-36 2.65 2.25 5.31 1.08 1.37 2.21 Total 8.63 6.93 8.50 5.63 3.59 6.52 RESULTS GRANULAR N/S FORMULATIONS VERSUS FLUID N/S FORMULATIONS PETIOLE S CONCENTRATION AND FERTILIZER SOURCE 1800 1600 Urea + AMS UAN32 + ATS A Petiole Sulfur (ppm) 1400 A B 1200 1000 B 800 600 400 200 0 Suffolk SHC LEW PETIOLE SULFUR DURING 1ST WEEK OF BLOOM 2000 1800 Petiole Sulfur (ppm) 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 Suffolk, VA Southampton, VA Lewiston, NC 600 400 200 0 0 10 20 30 -1 Sulfur Application Rate (lb. S ac ) PETIOLE SULFUR AND LEAF SULFUR COTENT 0.8 Suffolk SHC Lew 0.7 Lint Yield = 0.32 + 3.4e-4*SRate - 1.14e-7*(Srate) R2 = 0.42 2 Leaf S (%) 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Petiole Sulfur (ppm) 1400 1600 1800 FERTILIZER SOURCE AND PETIOLE NITRATE-N AT 100 LB N ACRE-1 14000 Urea + AMS UAN32 + ATS A Petiole Nitrate-N(ppm) 12000 A 10000 8000 6000 B A 4000 B B 2000 0 Suffolk SHC LEW PETIOLE NITRATE-N AND SULFUR RATE DURING THE 1ST WEEK OF BLOOM 12000 0 lb S acre-1 10 lb S acre-1 20 lb S acre-1 30 lb S acre-1 Petiole Nitrate-N(ppm) 10000 A 8000 AB 6000 B B 4000 2000 0 Suffolk SHC Lew LINT YIELD AND N/S SOURCE SUFFOLK, VA 1400 1200 L in t Y ie ld (lb . a c -1 ) 1000 Urea + AMS UAN32 + ATS 800 600 Urea + AMS 2 Lint Yield = 1208 + 5.66*SRate - 0.11*(Srate) 2 R = 0.99 400 UAN32 + ATS Lint Yield = 1115 + 14*SRate - 0.39*(Srate) 2 R = 0.99 200 0 0 10 20 30 -1 Sulfur application rate (lb. S ac ) 2 LINT YIELD AND N/S SOURCE Southampton, VA Lewiston, NC 1400 1400 Urea + AMS UAN32 + ATS 1200 1200 1000 1000 L in t Y ie ld (lb . a c -1 ) L in t Y ie ld ( lb. a c -1 ) Urea + AMS UAN32 + ATS 800 600 800 600 400 400 200 200 0 0 0 10 20 Sulfur Application Rate (lb. S ac-1) 30 0 10 20 30 -1 Sulfur Application Rate (lb. S ac ) RESULTS FLUID N/S FORMULATIONS AND VARYING NITROGEN RATES PETIOLE NITRATE-N AND NITROGEN RATE 18000 A 16000 60 lb. N ac-1 100 lb. N ac-1 140 lb. N ac-1 Petiole Nitrate-N(ppm) 14000 B 12000 A 10000 B 8000 C 6000 C A B 4000 C 2000 0 Suffolk SHC LEW PETIOLE SULFUR FOR FLUID N/S FORMULATIONS 2000 A 32-0-0 24-0-0-3S 24-0-0-6S 24-0-0-9S A 1750 A A Petiole Sulfur (ppm) 1500 AB 1250 BC 1000 A A 750 C B B C 500 250 0 Suffolk SHC LEW FLUID N/S FORMULATIONS AND LINT YIELD 1400 32-0-0 24-0-0-3S 24-0-0-6S 24-0-0-9S 1400 -1 60 lb. N ac 100 lb. N ac-1 140 lb. N ac-1 A A 1200 A A 1200 A B 1000 L in t Y ie ld ( lb . a c - 1 ) L in t Y ie ld (lb . a c - 1 ) 1000 800 A 600 A B 800 600 400 400 200 200 0 0 Suffolk SHC LEW B Suffolk SHC LEW WEATHER DATA FOR LOCATION TAREC SHC 2750 8 90 7 80 6 2000 1750 1500 1250 1000 750 70 5 60 4 50 3 40 2 30 1 20 0 500 250 0 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec D a ily P re c ip ita tio n ( in .) 2250 T e m p e r a tu r e ( o F ) G r o w in g D e g r e e D a y s ( D D 6 0 ) 2500 100 Max. Daily Temperatures Min. Daily Temperatures Daily Precipitation (Season Total = 26.6 in.) Growing Degree Days (DD60) (Season Total = 2,444 DD60) WEATHER DATA FOR LOCATION TAREC Lewiston 110 8 2500 7 90 6 80 2000 1500 1000 o T em perature ( F ) G row ing D egree D ays (D D 60) 100 70 5 60 4 50 3 40 30 500 2 20 1 10 0 0 May 0 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct D aily P recipitation (inches) 3000 Max. Daily Temperature Min. Daily Temperature Daily Precipitation (Season Total = 32.2 inches) Cumulative DD60 (Season Total = 2,453 DD60)