SOC - UNESCO World Heritage Centre

Comments

Transcription

SOC - UNESCO World Heritage Centre
1.
Doñana National Park (Spain) (N 685bis)
Year of inscription on the World Heritage List 1994
Criteria (vii)(ix)(x)
Year(s) of inscription on the List of World Heritage in Danger N/A
Previous Committee Decisions see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/685/documents/
International Assistance
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved: USD 0
For details, see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/685/assistance/
UNESCO Extra-budgetary Funds
N/A
Previous monitoring missions
N/A
Factors affecting the property identified in previous reports
Toxic flow from a mine holding pool
Illustrative material see page http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/685/
Information presented to the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee in 1999
Summary of previous deliberations: At its twenty-second session (June 1998) the Bureau was informed
that a giant holding pool of the Aznalcollar mine owned by the Canadian-Swedish Boliden-Apirsa
Company burst resulting in an ecological disaster. Although the main toxic flow had been diverted away
from the National Park, the adjoining areas have been badly damaged. The Bureau was informed that
the spill could spread into the World Heritage area as pollutants dispersed more widely. The State Party
had submitted a number of technical reports on the situation and on actions taken to mitigate the threats.
The President of the Spanish MAB Committee had proposed the organisation of an international
conference to review actions taken and rehabilitation plans elaborated for the conservation of the site
and provided an outline for a project entitled “Dofiana 2005”. The Bureau had expressed its serious
concerns on the long-term restoration of the property and urged the State Party to undertake all possible
measures to mitigate the threats. Furthermore, the Bureau had requested the State Party to collaborate
with UNESCO, IUCN and the Ramsar Convention to prepare an international expert conference to
develop a long-term vision and to compile a detailed report in time for the twenty-second session of the
World Heritage Committee.
At its twenty-second extraordinary session (November 1998) the Bureau reviewed the findings of a
Centre mission to the site from 10 to 13 November 1998. The Centre received a number of documents
presented by the Spanish authorities on the actions undertaken since the June 1998 session of the
Bureau, including the Dofiana 2005 project. The project “Dofiana 2005 hydrological regeneration of the
watersheds and river channels flowing towards Dofiana National Park”- prepared by the Ministry for the
Environment, mainly proposes measures to:
 avoid the influx of contaminated water into the Dofiana marshes;
 restore the flow of waters towards Dofiana in the long term (drinking water; original hydrological
dynamism); and
 maintain the connections between the hydrological systems of Dofiana and the Guadalquivir
Estuary.
The Bureau noted that the World Heritage site and the Biosphere Reserve are currently little affected
whereas the Natural Park around the site has been impacted by the toxic spill. The Bureau and the
Committee (Kyoto, 1998) while noting and commending the substantial actions taken by the Spanish
authorities suggested that the State Party proceed with great caution in restarting mining activities and
requested that EIAs be carried out for each step. The Committee requested that the long-term impacts
of mining on both the World Heritage site and the UNESCO Biosphere Reserve be monitored
New information: IUCN has expressed its concerns regarding the reopening of the Aznalcollar mine,
which is in close proximity to Dofiana National Park. IUCN notes that the tailings dam should be fully
impermeable and that a hydrological study should be performed for modeling
potential infiltration of wastewater to the aquifers existing in the area. IUCN believes that the results of
these projects should be reviewed by an independent technical experts group prior to any decision being
made on the reopening of the mine. Second, according to national regulations, reopening of the mine
must follow a public hearing involving the Stakeholders Committee of Dofiana National Park, in
consultation with the Technological and Geo-mining Institute of Spain. In addition, IUCN strongly
believes that the Committee should also be consulted. IUCN is due to undertake a mission to the site,
in response to an invitation from the Provincial Government of Andalusia, to assess the area and to
evaluate progress achieved by corrective measures from 7 to 12 June 1999. IUCN will submit the report
of this mission to the twenty-third session of the Committee at the end of 1999. The Minister for the
Environment of Spain, via a letter of 21 March 1999 to the Director-General of UNESCO, has proposed
that the conference on the future of Dofiana be organized during May – June 1999. The Director of the
Centre, via his letter of 4 May 1999 to the Minister has suggested that more time should be given for
collaboration between the State Party, UNESCO, IUCN and the Ramsar Convention in preparing such
an important conference for developing a long-term vision for Dofiana. Furthermore, the Ambassador of
Spain by letter of 3 May to the Director of the Centre has submitted the following documents which were
requested by the Bureau in June 1998: (a) “Dofiana 2005 - hydrological regeneration of the watersheds
and river channels flowing towards Dofiana National Park” and its development; (b) copy of the decree,
i.e. the law 7/1999 concerning Dofiana 2005; and (c) information on the accident that occurred in 1998
and its implications for the conservation of the site as of 23 April 1999. These documents have been
transmitted to IUCN for review.
Action Required
The Bureau may wish to review the comments of IUCN on the documents (a), (b) and (c) and any new
information that may be available at the time of its session and take appropriate decisions thereupon.
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 1999
Previous deliberations:
Twenty-second session of the Committee – Chapter VII.25;
Twenty-third ordinary session of the Bureau – Chapter IV.39.
New information: IUCN notes that at its last session, the World Heritage Bureau:
(i)
expressed serious concerns regarding the possible reopening of the Aznalcollar mine, and
encouraged the State Party to give priority attention to implement key actions proposed by IUCN, i.e.,
(a) the tailings dam be fully impermeable; (b) a hydrological study should be undertaken for monitoring
potential penetration of waste water into the aquifers of the area; (c) the need for consultation with all
stakeholders; and (d) the need for co-ordinated and effective buffer zone management;
(ii)
encouraged the State Party to provide regular reports on implementation, including progress
achieved in the implementation of these priorities; and
(iii)
requested the State Party, the Centre and IUCN to collaborate in the organisation of the
conference on the future of Doñana.
An informative note was transmitted (dated June 1999) during the last session of the Bureau from the
State Party to the Centre and IUCN on the situation and measures taken following the breaching of the
Aznalcollar mine reservoir. It included a discussion of the recent hydrology of the area, steps taken as
a result of the mine accident, the initiation of the Green Corridor project and the Doñana 2005 project
and a reference to the possible reopening of the mine.
During 1998 and 1999 a number of actions were undertaken. According to representatives of the
Aznalcollar mine at the Doñana 2005 Conference, permission to resume operations was given by the
concerned Spanish authorities in March 1999. The first operation at the mine commenced in June 1999
and consisted of transferring the remaining toxic wastes from the holding pond, which had breached in
April 1998 (causing the spill into the Guadiamar River), to an old, unused mining pit. The clean up of the
affected areas of the Guadiamar basin has continued. The Government of Andalucia initiated the Green
Corridor project which is designed to acquire the affected farming areas adjacent to the Guadiamar
River and to reforest and rehabilitate the area.
An International Expert Meeting on the Regeneration of the Doñana watershed (Doñana 2005
Conference) took place from 4 to 8 October 1999 with the participation of the World Heritage Centre,
IUCN, the Secretary-General of the Ramsar Convention, WWF and other organizations. The meeting
produced a number of recommendations concerning steps that could be taken for improving the situation
of the decrease in the water table, diversion of surface water flows from entering Doñana and ensuring
that water entering the area is free of pollutants. In addition, discussions took place concerning the
necessity for strong co-operation between various activities being initiated in the region such as the
Doñana 2005 project and the Green Corridor project. Some suggestions included the construction of
large artificial lagoons for the control of water flows and reducing pollution and sediment loads. These
would be placed in areas outside the World Heritage site in land to be purchased or acquired from
agricultural companies or farmers. This recommendation could be of concern because the lagoon
construction and operation afterwards could have serious impacts on the hydrology of the region.
While IUCN welcomes the continued clean up effort of the Guadiamar basin and affected areas, the
Expert Meeting on the Regeneration of Doñana and the initiation of the Green Corridor project, there
are still some concerns.
It is not clear to what extent an impact study was undertaken to ensure that the toxic wastes which
will now be dumped into the old mine pit will remain there and not percolate into the surrounding aquifer.
It is not clear how the various authorities at the state and regional level intend to co-ordinate the
various activities undertaken to ensure that the integrity of Doñana is maintained.
It is not clear how resolution of conflicts between users of the watershed will be undertaken on a
regular basis, nor how regular monitoring of progress of the implementation of various activities will be
carried out.
In addition it is not clear how a number of the concerns raised by the 1998 and 1999 meetings of
the Committee and the Bureau (referred to above) have been or are being addressed.
In order to provide the basis for a thorough discussion of the present status of the Doñana National
Park, IUCN recommends that the State Party provide information on the following:
hydrological studies that indicate there will be no infiltration of toxic waste into the aquifer feeding
the World Heritage site;
-
plans for stakeholder consultations to identify conflicts and options to resolve them;
-
plans for regular independent monitoring of the hydrological parameters of the site;
arrangements for co-ordination and collaboration between the various activities in the area which
affect the hydrology of the region;
environmental impact studies on various proposals to restore the hydrology of the region, in
particular the construction of artificial lagoons in some of the areas presently used for agriculture; and
plans for keeping under review the progress in the implementation of the Green Corridor and
Doñana 2005 projects, as well as other related activities.
Following the Doñana 2005 Conference, the Centre contacted the authorities to obtain information
concerning the exact dates of authorization and production of the Azlacollar mine and clarification with
regard to the points raised by the World Heritage Bureau. No response has been received at the time
of the preparation of this document.
Analysis and Conclusions of the World Heritage Centre and IUCN
N/A
Decision Adopted: 23 BUR IV.B.39
At its twenty-second session the Bureau was informed that a giant holding pool of the Aznalcollar mine
owned by the Canadian-Swedish Boliden-Apirsa Company burst resulting in an ecological disaster.
Although the main toxic flow had been diverted away from the National Park, the adjoining areas have
been badly damaged. The Bureau was informed that the spill could spread into the World Heritage area
as pollutants dispersed more widely. The State Party had submitted a number of technical reports on
the situation and on actions taken to mitigate the threats. The President of the Spanish MAB Committee
had proposed the organisation of an international conference to review actions taken and rehabilitation
plans elaborated for the conservation of the site and provided an outline for a project entitled «Doñana
2005». The Bureau had expressed its serious concerns on the long-term restoration of the property and
urged the State Party to undertake all possible measures to mitigate the threats. Furthermore, the
Bureau had requested the State Party to collaborate with UNESCO, IUCN and the Ramsar Convention
to prepare an international expert conference to develop a long-term vision and to compile a detailed
report in time for the twenty-second session of the World Heritage Committee.
At its twenty-second extraordinary session the Bureau reviewed the findings of a Centre mission to the
site from 10 to 13 November 1998. The Centre received a number of documents presented by the
Spanish authorities on the actions undertaken since the June 1998 session of the Bureau.
The Bureau noted that the World Heritage site and the Biosphere Reserve are currently little affected
whereas the Natural Park around the site has been impacted by the toxic spill. The Bureau and the
Committee (Kyoto, 1998) while noting and commending the substantial actions taken by the Spanish
authorities, suggested that the State Party proceed with great caution in re-starting mining activities and
requested that EIAs be carried out for each step. The Committee requested that the long-term impacts
of mining on both the World Heritage site and the UNESCO Biosphere Reserve be monitored.
The Minister for the Environment of Spain, via a letter to the Director-General of UNESCO, has proposed
that the conference on the future of Doñana be organized during May – June 1999. The Director of the
Centre, via his letter to the Minister has suggested that more time should be given for collaboration
between the State Party, UNESCO, IUCN and the Ramsar Convention in preparing such an important
conference for developing a long-term vision for Doñana. Furthermore, the Ambassador of Spain by
letter of 3 May to the Director of the Centre, has submitted the following documents which were
requested by the Bureau in June 1998: (a) «Doñana 2005 - hydrological regeneration of the watersheds
and river channels flowing towards Doñana National Park» and its development; (b) copy of the decree,
i.e. the Law 7/1999 concerning Doñana 2005; and (c) information on the accident that occurred in 1998
and its implications for the conservation of the site as of 23 April 1999. These documents were
transmitted to IUCN for review.
IUCN informed the Bureau that a WCPA representative visited the site from 6 to 10 June 1999. IUCN
noted that restoration activities were successful and that monitoring programmes have been set up. The
State Party should be commended for these initiatives. Due to these measures, the World Heritage site
has not been directly affected, however there are important wetland areas surrounding the site, which
may have been affected, and which form part of the ecosystem. IUCN raised concerns about the
reopening of the Aznalcollar mine and noted that three issues need consideration: (a) to make the dam
for the collection of waste water fully impermeable; (b) the need for a hydrological study for monitoring
potential infiltration of waste water to the aquifers of the area and (c) the need for consultation with all
stakeholders. IUCN also noted the need for co-ordinated and effective buffer zone management.
Following the review of new information provided by IUCN, the Bureau requested the State Party, the
Centre and IUCN to collaborate in the organization of the conference on the future of Doñana. The
Bureau furthermore expressed serious concerns regarding the possible reopening of the Aznalcollar
mine, and the tailings dam which should be fully impermeable and for which a hydrological study should
be performed. The Bureau furthermore encouraged the State Party to give priority attention to implement
key actions as proposed by IUCN and to provide regularly progress reports on implementation, including
progress achieved in the implementation of these priorities. The Bureau requested IUCN and the Centre
to provide an up-to-date report including results of the conference to the extraordinary session of the
Bureau, and the State Party to submit a progress report by 15 September 1999.
Decision Adopted: 23 COM X.B.26
X.26 Doñana National Park (Spain)
The Committee recalled the reports from the twenty-third ordinary and the twenty-third extraordinary
session of the Bureau on the state of conservation of this property and adopted the following decision:
"The Committee noted that during 1998 and 1999 a number of actions were undertaken to mitigate the
impacts of the ecological disaster following the spill in April 1998, in particular the results of the
International Expert Meeting on the Regeneration of the Doñana Watershed in October 1999 with the
participation of the World Heritage Centre, IUCN, the Secretary-General of the Ramsar Convention,
WWF and other organizations.
The Committee commended the Spanish authorities for the continued clean up effort of the Guadiamar
Basin and affected areas. However, the Committee expressed its concerns for the re-opening of the
mine without taking into account the points raised by the twenty-second session of the Committee and
the twenty-third session of the Bureau. The Committee suggested that a review meeting be held during
the year 2000/2001 to review progress of the implementation of the Doñana 2005 project, taking into
account the points raised by IUCN and involving all concerned parties and institutions including the
international collaborators from the meeting on Doñana 2005 held in October 1999. The State Party is
encouraged to take into account the WCPA Position Statement on mining activities and protected areas,
which was reviewed by this Committee."

Similar documents