Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD) vs Citrix VDI – Why You Should Be Migrating (8)

Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD) vs Citrix VDI – Why You Should Be Migrating (8)

Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD) vs Citrix
VDI – Why You Should Be Migrating
Windows Virtual Desktop
Windows Virtual Machines is Microsoft’s flagship Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
(VDI) solution, completed hosted in Microsoft Azure Public Cloud. It incorporates
the security, scalability, and next-generation technology that is the staple of
Microsoft Azure environments.
It allows organizations to adopt a low-cost alternative to more traditional Virtual
Desktop Infrastructure, such as comparable Citrix solutions. It provides a featurerich environment for users to be more productive and grants access to their critical
business applications through a virtual desktop or streamed directly to the enduser's device.
With cost-effective pricing, simplified management, and soon-to-be-released latest
features, Azure Virtual Desktop is gaining ground as an alternative to Citrix and
VMware and seizing market share.
Azure Virtual Desktop Vs Citrix VDI
1. Cost Efficiency
Azure Virtual Desktop utilizes Microsoft Azure’s native scaling model to allow
organizations to pay for what they use. In comparison, Citrix traditionally
concentrates on heavy capital investment for on-premises hardware and software to
provide an end-to-end solution.
A typical Citrix on-premises deployment consists of on-premises servers,
Windows Server Operating System licensing, Microsoft RDS CALS, Citrix
licensing, other Microsoft Office licensing, and ongoing support services. For a 50user organization, this can potentially require a £100,000-£150,000 upfront
investment.
On the other hand, across the same sized organization, Azure Virtual Desktop will
require a Microsoft Azure Subscription, smaller amounts of consultancy, and
Microsoft 365 licensing. An estimated deployment price for this type of solution
would equal closer to £30,000 per annum.
In this example scenario, that is a possible £100,000+ saving on the initial
investment for a similar deployment solution.
2. Accessibility for Smaller Businesses
Azure Virtual Desktop is much more accessible than Citrix for small to mediumsized businesses. Admittedly, Citrix has many advanced features that need
additional cost to implement and maintain. However, not all businesses need them
in the short term, nor do a way to support them long-term.
The rapid deployment of Azure Virtual Desktop is another reason why it’s
becoming a firm favorite for mid-market and enterprise clients alike. The lower
cost makes this a great option for mid-market firms which require a Hosted VDI
environment and don’t want to be delayed with complex deployment models and
higher levels of investment.
3. Ongoing Servicing
The complexity of providing ongoing support for a Citrix environment can be
challenging and costly due to the skills required from internal staff or partners to
maintain the Citrix infrastructure. In contrast, WVD is delivered in Microsoft
Azure and utilizes existing skills many organizations already have.
Minimizing the new skills required for existing employees makes the WVD
environment easier to maintain and manage and reduces the need for an overall
cost of expensive specialist contractor support to maintain and service the
environment.
Conclusion
As a Microsoft Gold partner with a services strategy and expertise in Azure,
Connection can help your organization adopt Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD).
Presently, Virtual server hosting providers like Apps4Rent take entire
responsibility for providing the uptime of the Virtual platform and providing
support to their customers which makes them excellent partners to choose for the
service. They even have expertise in Desktop as a Service for Individuals for
business processes all over United State.