Getting from AEDGs to Zero Energy Buildings
Transcription
Getting from AEDGs to Zero Energy Buildings
3/3/2016 Getting from AEDGs to Zero Energy Buildings (Edifícios com necessidades quase nulas - NZEB) Drury B. Crawley, Ph.D. FASHRAE, AIA, BEMP, FIBPSA Portugal Chapter Bentley Systems, Inc. 3 March 2016 Energy Use Worldwide by Sector 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% Industrial Transportation Residential Commercial 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% EIA 2013, Eurostat 2014 1 3/3/2016 U.S. Buildings’ Energy Use Commercial Residential Buildings Buildings Energy Energy End-Uses End-Uses 2014 2014 Lighting, 14.8% Water Heating, 12.4% Heating, 14.3% Cooling, 9.2% Transportation Ventilation, 8.6% Lighting, 7.2% 27.3% Refrigeration, 5.1% Cooling, 8.1% Televisions, 4.6% ClothesRefrigeration, Dryers, 3.1% 6.1% Heating, 29.3% Residential 22.0% Buildings 40.8% Cooking, Water2.6% Heating, 4.5% Fans and Pumps, 2.1% Office Equipment, 3.6% Industrial Computers,32.0% 1.7% Commercial 18.8% Computers, 1.6% Dishwashers, 1.3% Freezers, 1.1% Cooking, 1.5% Clothes Washers, 0.4% Other Uses,Other 19.8%Uses, 37.0% Energy Information Administration. 2015. Annual Energy Outlook 2015, EIA-0383 (2015). Washington, D.C. First Steps to Zero — Advanced Energy Design Guides (AEDGs) 2 3/3/2016 AEDGs? 50%? Advanced Energy Design Guide (AEDG): multiple ways, but not the only way to build energy-efficient buildings that use significantly less energy than a code-minimum building (ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004) Six original guides targeted 30% energy savings: Small Office, Small Retail, K-12 Schools, Small Warehouse, Small hotel, and Small Hospital Five 50% guides recently completed, 50% progress toward a net zero energy building Five 50% Guides 3 3/3/2016 AEDG Development Collaboration among four organizations DOE provided research funding for national labs and technical reports Volunteer effort (2250 - 5000 hours each guide) Two Peer Reviews Educational guidance – not a Standard Development Original 30% guides target: contractors, designers, and design/build firms; focus on simple prescriptive recommendations 50% guides assume higher level of modeling expertise and design integration Easy to use with prescriptive recommendation tables, “how-to” guidance and bonus savings 50% Guides add “Performance” design strategies and/or energy targets 4 3/3/2016 Focus New Construction Also applicable to: Complete/Major Renovations Building Additions Remodeling/Modernization Projects Systems Upgrades AEDG requirements include Opaque Envelope, Fenestration, Daylighting, Lighting, HVAC, SWH, Plug, Kitchen Equipment, Quality Assurance – Cx, M&V, benchmarking Includes Additional Bonus Savings Example Outline (Schools) Foreword – Message to School Boards & Administrators Chapter 1 – Introduction Chapter 2 – Integrated Design Process & Best Practices Chapter 3 – Performance Targets & Whole Building Case Studies Chapter 4 – Prescriptive Recommendations by Climate Zone Chapter 5 – How-to Implement Recommendations with Technology Examples Appendices: bonus savings 5 3/3/2016 Recommendations by Climate Zones (Std 169/90.1-2016) World Climate Zones -Standard 169-2013 6 3/3/2016 Europe Climate Zones (Std 90.1/169) Recommendations Tables 7 3/3/2016 How-to Tips Tables of Information Climate Zones Specified Highlighted Information How-to Tips Illustrations of Concepts 8 3/3/2016 AEDG for Small to Medium Office Buildings: 50% Savings Scope Offices up to 10 000 m2 Buildings: administrative/professional, government, bank/financial, and medical offices (without diagnostic equipment) Space Uses: private and open plan offices, conference, lounge, lobby, corridor, stairway, storage, restroom, mechanical/electrical rooms Excludes specialty spaces such as data centers 9 3/3/2016 Baseline Office Prototypes 2000 m2 small office 30 m x 30 m, 3.6 m high concrete block construction 20% WWR DX air conditioner with gas furnace air source heat pump with electric supplemental heat 5000 m2 medium office 50 m x 30 m, 4 m high steel frame construction 33% WWR DX air conditioner with VAV air distribution electric Heat (CZ 1-4) or hot water baseboard heat (CZ 5-8) Analytical Approach Two representative prototypes: 2000 m2 small office and 5000 m2 medium office Recommendations for 8 climate zones plus humid/dry (16 locations) Energy Savings vs 90.1: 90.1-2004: 50-61% 90.1-2007: 46% 90.1-2010: 31% 90.1-1999: 55% 10 3/3/2016 General Design Strategy Minimize envelope heating/cooling loads, both sensible and latent Minimize internal loads construction, solar, infiltration, water vapor diffusion, and thermal mass Lighting and plug loads Maximize mechanical system performance Ventilation loads HVAC Equipment and system efficiencies Service Water heater equipment efficiencies Medium Office with Radiant System 11 3/3/2016 Medium Office with VAV System Prescriptive Recommendations Envelope – Insulation, Vestibules Fenestration – Orientation, SHGC, U-factor Daylighting – VT/SHGC, EA Interior Lighting – LPD, Controls Exterior Lighting – Facades, Parking lots Plug Loads – Equipment, Controls SWH/ HVAC Systems Packaged Single-zone, WSHP, VAV-DX, VAV CHW, Fan Coils, Radiant Systems Quality Assurance – Cx, M&V, benchmarking 12 3/3/2016 Prescriptive Requirements 13 3/3/2016 14 3/3/2016 50% AEDGs Available Small to Medium Offices K-12 Schools Medium to Big Box Retail Large Hospitals Grocery Stores All the AEDGs available as free PDF download from: www.ashrae.org/aedg Technical support documents describing the process and results are available here: henergy.gov/eere/buildings/advanced-energy-design-guides 15 3/3/2016 30% AEDGs Directly Influenced Standard 90.1-2010 National lab supporting Standard 90.1 also supported development of 30% savings AEDGs (and 50% savings AEDGs) Reviewed AEDGs to identify energy savings measures to reach 30% target of 90.1-2010 90.1-2010 is ~25% savings relative to 90.1-2004 ~110 addenda of which ~50 are energy-related. Of these, ~20 were drawn from the AEDGs Estimate that AEDGs directly contributed ~10% of 25% savings (or 40%) Increased Stringency Standards 90.1/189.1 110 100 Standard 90-75 Standard 90A-1980 14% Savings 90 4% Savings Standard 90.1-1989 Standard 90.1-1999 Energy Use Index (1975 Use = 100) 80 11% Savings Standard 90.1-2007 Standard 90.1-2004 70 60 Standard 90.1-2010 Standard 189.1-2009 50 Standard 189.1-2011 40 30 Standard 90.1-2013 Standard 189.1-2014 20 10 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 Year 2000 2005 2010 2015 Source: DOE Building Energy Codes Program 16 3/3/2016 Can we get to Net Zero Energy Buildings? What is an Zero Energy Building (ZEB)? An energy-efficient building, where on a source energy basis, the actual annual delivered energy is less than or equal to the on-site renewable exported energy. 17 3/3/2016 Boundaries Building and its site Campus: set of closely related buildings Community of buildings Portfolio of buildings (single owner, different locations) ZEB Definition Variations Zero Energy Campus Zero Energy Portfolio An energy-efficient campus where the actual annual source energy consumption is balanced by on-site renewable energy. An energy-efficient portfolio where the combined actual annual source energy consumption is balanced by on-site renewable energy. Zero Energy Community An energy-efficient community where the actual annual source energy consumption is balanced by on-site renewable energy. 18 3/3/2016 Technical Potential Assessment of the Technical Potential for Achieving Net Zero-Energy Buildings in the Commercial Sector www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/41957.pdf Methodology for Analyzing the Technical Potential for Energy Performance Across the Commercial Sector www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/41956.pdf ASHRAE Research Project 1651-RP (completed in 2016) updated this analysis for ASHRAE energy standards development; savings of >45% over 90.1-2010. Report free for members: rp.ashrae.biz/researchproject.php?rp_id=674 ZEB Characteristics Number of floors impacts ability to reach ZEB goal 40% 25% LZEB 2025 • Roof area • Daylighting 13% 6% 19 Percent savings needed to reach ZEB goal 90 10 59 67 73 64 53 50 43 6 Va can t Oth Sk ille e r dn urs Re ing frig Lab era or ted Wa atory reh ou se 70 Lo dg Fo ing He od alth Se rvi C are ce Pu bli Inp co ati rde en t ra nd sa fet y He alth Fo od ca re (ou sales tpa tien t) Wa Off reh ice ou /pr se All ofe (no nre ssion frig al era ted ) Re tai Ed l (e uca xcl ti ud ing on ma Pu ll) blic ass em bly Re Se ligi rvi ou s w ce ors hip 3/3/2016 Energy Efficiency 90 91 77 80 96 54 62 44 43 58 30 32 5 -10 Subs e ctor Need 60% to 70% decrease in energy consumption of commercial buildings in order for renewables to supply the balance Great Potential in Commercial Buildings 20 3/3/2016 Great Potential: Real ZEB Commercial Buildings High-Performance Buildings Database First Database with Net-Zero Energy Buildings: http://commercialbuildings.energy.gov/ Location Floor Area, ft2 (m2) Annual Purchased Energy, kBtu/ft2-y (MJ/m2-y) Aldo Leopold Legacy Center Baraboo, WI 11,300 (1050) -2.02 (-24.9) Audubon Center at Debs Park Los Angeles, CA 5,020 (465) Challengers Tennis Club Los Angeles, CA 3,500 (325) -0.096 (-1.09) Environmental Tech. Center, Sonoma State Rohnert Park, CA 2,200 (205) -1.47 (-16.69) Kailua-Kona, HI 3,600 (335) -3.46 (-39.29) San Jose, CA 6,560 (610) -0.00052 (-0.0059) Oberlin College Lewis Center Oberlin, OH 13,600 (1265) -4.23 (-48.036) Science House St. Paul, MN 1,530 (145) 0 Building Hawaii Gateway Energy Center IDeAs Z2 Design Facility 21 3/3/2016 System Details Building Building Use PV System Size, kW % Savings w/o PV Floors HVAC System Type Aldo Leopold Commercial office 406 70% 1 GSHP; Radiant Slab; Earth-Tube; Natural Ventilation Audubon Center Recreation; Park 25 - 1 Solar Hot Water; Absorption Chiller; Natural Ventilation Challengers Tennis Club Recreation 6 60% 2 Natural Ventilation Environmental Tech. Higher education; Center, Sonoma State Laboratory 3 80% 1 Natural Ventilation; Passive Solar Heating/Cooling; Thermal Mass; Radiant Heating Hawaii Gateway Commercial office 20 80% 1 Natural Ventilation; Cold Sea Water to Cool Air IDeAs Z2 Commercial office 30 60% 2 GSHP; Radiant Slab Oberlin College Higher education; Library; Assembly 160 54% 2 GSHP; Radiant Slab Science House Interpretive Center 8.8 60% 1 GSHP; Natural Ventilation; Passive Solar Heating Large Zero Energy Building! 22 3/3/2016 Objectives Critical Stretch Health and Life Safety Net zero energy LEED Platinum Energy Star Most energy efficient building in world LEED Platinum Plus ASHRAE 90.1 + 50% Goal 220,000 ft2 (20, 00 m2) 800 people 35 kBtu/ft2-y (400 MJ/m2-y) 100 kW data center Flexible BIM / energy model Complete in 2010 23 3/3/2016 Energy End-Use kBtu/ft2-y MJ/m2-y Space Heating 8.58 Space Cooling 0.85 9.65 Pumps 0.48 5.45 Ventilation Fans 1.88 21.35 Domestic Hot Water 0.90 10.22 Exterior Lights 0.12 1.36 Lights 2.07 23.51 Office Plug Loads 7.87 89.36 Task Lights 0.10 1.14 12.11 137.53 Data Center Cooling 0.02 0.23 Data Center Fans 0.20 2.27 Data Center Power 97.44 Technologies to Get to Zero? Modularity Massing (long axis E-W) Double skin Daylighting – Shading Natural Ventilation Thermal labyrinth Data center heat recovery Data center cooling PV 24 3/3/2016 What did they achieve? LEED Platinum 58 of 69 LEED-NC points Operating at net zero-energy including and site mounted PV (since July 2011) Energy use: 35.4 kBtu/ft2-y (400 MJ/m2-y) vs predicted 35.1 kBtu/ft2-y Peak plug loads of 0.35 W/ft2 (3.7 W/m2) vs predicted 0.55 W/ft2 (6 W/m2) 100% of workstations are daylit Peak LPD of 0.3 W/ft2 (3.2 W/m2) Workspace for 1300 staff, 360,000 ft2 (33,500 m2) http://www.nrel.gov/sustainable_nrel/rsf.html roof Walgreens Evanston, Illinois 25 3/3/2016 Walgreens Objectives First net-zero energy retail store in the US LEED Platinum Living Building Challenge Net Zero Certification Open in 14 months – design and construction What Technologies Did They Use? Ultra-high-efficiency mechanical and refrigeration system CO2 refrigerant Geothermal heat pump All LED lighting – 0.9 W/ft2 (10 W/m2) Daylighting, with 5 zones Natural ventilation with operable windows Building automation 850 solar panels (220,000 kWh annually) Two wind turbines 26 3/3/2016 How did they do? 40% less energy than conventional store Model for future stores and remodels First year they were 15% short – corrective actions made Bullit Center Seattle, Washington 27 3/3/2016 Bullit Center Objectives Greenest building in the world Meet all requirements of the Living Building Challenge: Net-zero energy Net-zero water Non-toxic materials Increased functional ecosystem area Enhance human health Contribute to social equity Emphasize beauty Integrated Building Design Living laboratory 28 3/3/2016 Bullitt Center McGilvra Place 29 3/3/2016 What Features Did They Incorporate? EUI of 16 kBtu/ft2-y (180 MJ/m2-y) Triple-glazed, low-e, operable windows (natural ventilation) Daylighting for all occupants Rainwater harvesting, vortex, ceramic filters (reverse osmosis) and UV treatment for potable water Composting toilets Durability – structure designed for 250-year life Local and safe materials Ground-source heating pump Solar canopy (242 kW) covers roof and provides overhangs Passive Heating/Cooling 30 3/3/2016 Radiant Heating What did they achieve? Living Building Challenge Certified LEED Platinum Operating at net-zero energy and water 31 3/3/2016 Bullitt Center Performance 60,000 50,000 Electric Consumption, kWh 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 -10,000 -20,000 -30,000 -40,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov SCL Power Used PV Exported to SCL PV Used by Bullitt Savings over Baseline Bullitt Building Use Est. Code Baseline SCL Net Meter - SVC 4 Proposed Tenant Building Dec Jan Proposed Building Energy Use 32 3/3/2016 NZEB Worldwide http://batchgeo.com/map/net-zero-energy-buildings IEA BCS Annex 52, 2013 Many new ZEBs and ZECs! New Buildings Institute. 2014. Getting to Zero Status Update, Vancouver, WA. www.newbuildings.org/zero-energy 33 3/3/2016 NZEB of the Future? Probably More Like NREL RSF Or These Recent NZE Buildings 34 3/3/2016 Summary Today’s energy standards are pushing buildings to use 60% less energy than 40 years ago Beyond those energy standards and codes: Possible today to cost-effectively construct buildings that use substantially less energy Guidelines exist to help designers those savings another 50% Low and net zero energy buildings are being constructed and operated today No Single Metric Tells the Building Performance Story Energy Demand Cost Water IEQ Carbon Business (student, occupied room, sales, beer) 35 3/3/2016 Obrigado! Questões? Dru Crawley [email protected] @DruCrawley DruCrawley 50% AEDGs Available Small to Medium Offices K-12 Schools Medium to Big Box Retail Large Hospitals Grocery Stores All the AEDGs available as free PDF download from: www.ashrae.org/aedg Technical support documents describing the process and results are available here: http://energy.gov/eere/buildings/advanced-energy-design-guides 36 3/3/2016 50% AEDG Technical Support Documents Medium Box Retail www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/42828.pdf Grocery Stores www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/42829.pdf Highway Lodging www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-18773.pdf Medium Office Buildings www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-18774.pdf General Merchandise www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/46100.pdf Small Office Buildings www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-19341.Pdf Large Hospital www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/47867.pdf Large Office www.nrel.gov/docs/fy10osti/49213.pdf Quick-Service Restaurant www.pnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-19809.pdf More on the NZEB NREL Research Support Facility NREL RSF web site: http://www.nrel.gov/sustainable_nrel/rsf.html "The Design-Build Process for the Research Support Facility” http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/51387.pdf Energy Performance Update http://www.nrel.gov/sustainable_nrel/pdfs/rsf_operations.pdf Reducing Data Center Loads for a Large-Scale, Net Zero Office Building http://www.nrel.gov/sustainable_nrel/pdfs/52785.pdf 37