Untitled - City of Victoria, TX

BUILDING AND STANDARDS
COMMISSION
BUILDING AND STANDARD COMMISSION MEETING
700 MAIN CENTER Suite 205 (CONFERENCE ROOM UPSTAIRS)
Thursday, February 4, 2016
5:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Sherri Strickland
Bobbye Thomas
Nick Hinojosa
Eric Mercer
Harold Cade
Rawley McCoy, Chairman
Victor Marshall
A:
STAFF PRESENT:
Grace Garcia, CEO Supervisor
Juan Garcia, CEO
Steven Solis, CEO
Isaac Solis, CEO
Thomas Gwosdz, City Attorney
Allison Marek, Assistant City Attorney
Rick Madrid, Building Official
Dora Gomez, Development Specialist
Denyce Beyer, Administrative Assistant
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m.
B:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETING:
The minutes of the October 22, 2016 meeting were approved as delivered.
Chairperson Rawley McCoy was not present at the meeting so Sherri Strickland presided over the meeting.
She asked if there was any information from the staff before the meeting starts. Grace Garcia stated the next
BSC Meeting is July 21, 2016.
C:
DISPOSITION OF THE FOLLOWING CASES:
1. 511 S MOODY
BILLY OLIVER, PLATINUM HOME INVESTMENTS, LLC
Grace Garcia stated on November 6, 2015 Code Enforcement conducted an inspection of this structure at
the request of Building Official Rick Madrid. We observed some holes on exterior walls and portions of brittle stucco.
We were unable to enter the interior of the structure.
Ms. Garcia noted that on on December 12, 2015 Code Enforcement received the Inspection worksheet from
Bldg Official Rick Madrid, containing the following inspection notes:
•
•
9/30/14 the building was proposed to be used as a Storage/Office bldg. Building Official Rick Madrid met
with owner Billy Oliver and discussed the condition of the bldg. It was explained to Mr. Oliver that the he
would need to repair the exterior walls because they show deterioration thru the studs and the wall crumbles
with hand pressure. Mr. Oliver was instructed by the Building Official to expose exterior walls 2-3ft high to
determine repairs. Also noted were roof leaks at the building juncture. A six month timeline was given to
accomplish repairs. Since that meeting all attempts to Contact the owner have failed and no progress has
been made.
January 14, 2016, Code Enforcement arrived on site and posted the Public Hearing Notice and Red tag
notice on site. The structure has been painted and has signs of being occupied. Advertising signs for
ABCO Roofing & Construction are posted on the building and the structure was painted.
The Findings of Facts are # 2,4,5,6, and 9. Ms. Garcia stated that Code Enforcement recommends the structure be
declared unsafe and for the Commission issue an order to repair the structure as previously outlined by the Building
Official.
a)
Public Hearing to Determine if Structure is Unsafe
Ms. Strickland opened the Public Hearing.
Billy Oliver, 1515 Martin Luther King, Beaumont, Texas, 77701, stated when he purchased the property it
had been vacant for several years. He stated that he came and spoke with Mr. Madrid. Mr. Madrid stated the water
and sewer could not be hooked up until we got a permit to do repairs. He stated he did what Mr. Madrid requested
him to do. Mr. Oliver stated that he wants to remodel the building. He stated it is not going to fall down and it does
not leak anywhere. The building is secure where you cannot get into it. He stated Mr. Madrid stated they would
hook the water up if the electrical inspection was okay. The electrical was inspected and it did pass. He then noted
that was then able to get water and electrical hooked-up. He stated that he does store supplies in the building. Mr.
Oliver stated he does want to remodel the front of the building. He reported that the Fire Marshall came out before
he was able to open and was told he had to repair a few things. He stated he had to put a fire extinguisher in the
building and had to put locks on the doors. He stated his plans are to repair the building. He stated he then pulled
permits to put signs on his business. He stated he would like to buy the property on the side of the building and
behind it.
Ms. Strickland asked Mr. Oliver if he disagreed with what the City’s findings were. He stated he disagreed if
they said the building was dangerous. He stated there is no water getting into that building. Mr. Madrid stated when
the inspection was done there was obvious signs of a roof leak. He stated all that should have been taken care of
during repairs on the inside of the building. Mr. Oliver stated the building does have some problems. He stated the
foundation is good. Mr. Madrid stated the problem with the structure is the things that have not been done. He
stated that is to repair what Mr. Oliver said he was going to repair. Mr. Madrid stated there are cracks on all of the
walls. Mr. Oliver needs to find out why the walls are cracking, repair them and then put the stucco over the cracks.
He stated Mr. Oliver was given some time lines and the City was allowing him to occupy the building and to hang
signs. Mr. Madrid stated Mr. Oliver was supposed to come and talk to him to find out how to repair those walls. Mr.
Madrid stated what is wrong with the foundation in the walls is that at the bottom sill is completely rotten and usually
the studs are rotten about 6 or 8 inches up. Mr. Madrid stated he could rip the studs out with his hand. Mr. Madrid
stated the building is in a deteriorated condition, it does not meet code and it needs to be repaired or it will just get
worse. He stated the building is just band-aided and it will just get back to where it was before because we are not
addressing the structural part of it. He stated we need to get into it and expose from 18 inches to 2 foot and found
out how we need to repair all of that so the walls will quit deteriorating so the structure can be repaired.
Mr. Mercer stated our job is to determine if the building is safe or not. Mr. Madrid stated if the building
meets certain criteria it can be considered unsafe. He stated it is in deteriorated shape and it is an eyesore and he
stated later on it will be in front of this board.
Thomas Gwosdz, City Attorney stated the first determination this board has to make it whether the building
is safe or not. He stated you use the Staff’s recommendation and their findings in order to make that determination.
He stated what we appear to have here today is a factual dispute between the property owner and staff as to whether
or not the building is unsafe. He stated that Mr. Oliver needs to look at the findings of facts that have been made
and then the committee needs to make a decision as to whether or not you agree with the findings of the facts and if
the building is safe or unsafe.
Mr. Oliver stated his intention here is he wants to repair the building. He stated he wants to do everything
possible to make the building safe. He stated he wanted to work with the City and noted he wanted to remodel the
building.
Mr. Madrid stated the work is not getting done. He stated that the building is unsafe. He stated if the
bottom seals are gone, that is what anchors the building down and the building is in the flood zone. Mr. Madrid
stated that the structure needs to be repaired. Mr. Mercer asked Mr. Madrid what he would like this committee to do.
Mr. Madrid stated he would like some timelines that Mr. Oliver needs to follow.
Ms. Strickland closed the public hearing.
b) Public Hearing to Determine if Structure is Unsafe
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the building is unsafe. Mr. Hinojosa seconded the motion. Motion carried.
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the building is less than 50% damage. Mr. Hinojosa seconded the motion.
Motion carried.
c) Consideration of Orders to Issue
Mr. Cade made a motion that the owner start repairs within 90 days and submit a detailed plan to the
Development Center and obtain a permit. If the repairs are not completed in 90 days the owner must return to the
next Building and Standards Meeting (July 21, 2016). Mr. Mercer seconded the motion. Motion carried.
2. 703 FORREST (705)
GEORGE VELASQUEZ ETUX, ROSIE YBARRA VELASQUEZ, INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, EXCALIBUR II LLC
Mr. Solis stated that on October 30, 2015 Code Enforcement observed the deteriorated roof in need of complete
replacement. Deteriorated rafters are especially visible on the side of the home including the interior ceilings which are
also water damaged due to lack of roof covering. Holes in the roof has caused weather damage to the fascia
and there are also broken and unsecured windows.
Mr. Solis noted on December 12, 2015 we received an office visit from the property owner, Mr. Velasquez. He stated
that Contractor Jose Leal would be going by to look at the structure to give an estimate for the repairs.
Mr. Solis stated on January 15, 2016 we received another office visit from the property owner Mr. Velasquez.
He was inquiring if there is anything he can do on this structure to avoid it from being torn down. Mr. Velasquez was
provided a Building and Standard Commission, (BSC) Detailed Plan packet to fill out for all the repairs that need to be
performed to the structure. It was explained to Mr. Velasquez that the envelope of the structure needs to be
repaired/secured from all elements and then the inside can be repaired as long as proper permits are obtained. It was
also explained that if he needs more than 90 days to repair the structure, he must provide a detailed plan to the board
members.
Mr. Solis stated today at 10:09 a.m., we observed all windows had been boarded and secured. No progress
on the repairs to the roof or structure. Yesterday, on February 3, 2016, the property owner pulled a permit for repairs.
Code Enforcement recommends the structure be declared unsafe and for the Commission to issue an order to
demolish.
The Findings of the Facts are #1,2,5,7,9, and 10.
(a) Public Hearing to Determine if Structure is Unsafe
Ms. Strickland opened the public hearing.
George Velasquez, 708 E Church, stated he took pictures yesterday and then presented a plan to the
committee. He stated he plans to remodel the structure. He stated no one can get into the structure and the floor is
still good. He stated he is going to put on a new metal roof. He also noted he had his permits and license to start
repair.
Ms. Strickland then closed the public hearing.
Mr. Gwosdz stated you can table this and take it up at the next meeting to see if there is any progress on
the structure. He stated he would encourage the committee asked the Code Enforcement Staff about that and if they
think the building is likely to endure the spring. He stated if the staff thinks it is in an unsafe condition, then you may
want to take action now. Ms. Strickland stated she thinks the owner has a great plan. She stated if the owner follows
his plan she feels it would be fine.
(b) Consideration of Orders to Issue
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the structure is unsafe. Mr. Cade seconded the motion.
AYES: Thomas, Mercer, Cade
NAYES: Hinojosa
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the structure is less than 50% damaged. Mr. Cade seconded the motion.
Motion carried.
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the owner follow the time frame of the detailed plan for repairs that was
submitted. The owner must communicate with Development Services on the progress of repairs. Mr. Cade
seconded the motion. Motion carried.
3. 1605 GOODWIN
NCS PROPERTIES INC, VOLUNTEERS OF VICTORIA INC (FKA MILLENNIUM HOUSING,
INC), BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC
Mr. Briones stated that on July 23, 2015 this structure was presented for a second time to the Building and
Standards Commission, (BSC). The Board declared the structure unsafe and less than 50% damaged. The Board
issued an order for the owner to meet with the City Building Official and the Assistant Director of Development
Services to define the scope of the existing permit and identify all the substandard and unsafe issues of the building
within 10 days. The owner was to also obtain a list of all repairs needed for the structure to meet code. Once the
owner obtained the list from the City, the Order also required for a signed copy of the scope and timeline be
submitted to the board, along with a status update at the next meeting.
On August 4, 2015 Assistant Director Julie Fulgham and Building Official Rick Madrid met with Property
Owner Noel Smith. Mr. Smith was presented a City of Victoria hand out for repairs of dilapidated structures. Also
discussed were the repairs to the numerous dilapidated housing conditions.
On October 22, 2015 this structure was presented for a third time to the Building and Standards
Commission. The Board accepted Staff recommendation of the structure to be declared unsafe and for the
Commission to issue an order to continue to repair and return to the next BSC Meeting.
On January 14, 2016 Code Enforcement observed repairs to wash rooms and siding had been completed,
but there has been no progress in repairing the roof.
Mr. Briones stated that the Findings of the Facts are #2,5,7, and 10.
Mr. Briones stated that Building Official Rick Madrid met with the property owner’s wife. He stated that the
siding, windows and exterior have all been approved. The wash rooms, roof areas that need repair, decking and
entire replace of roof covering the structure is required. Mr. Briones stated that Code Enforcement recommends the
structure be declared unsafe and for the Commission to issue an order to continue repairs.
(a) Public Hearing to Determine if Structure is Unsafe
Ms. Strickland opened the Public Hearing.
Cindy Smith, 417 Stehle Road, Victoria, Texas, stated that she pulled the permit a week ago to start with
the wash room roof and then the other roof. Ms. Strickland asked the property owner if they have ever submitted a
plan. She stated her husband typed one out he was going to do last year. The owner stated that they were going to
do the windows and siding first before they did any of the other repairs. Ms. Garcia stated everything has been
approved but the roof.
Ms. Thomas asked Ms. Garcia when the first time was Mr. Smith came before the board. Ms. Garcia stated
April 23, 2015.
in July.
Mr. Mercer asked how long they would need to complete the entire roof. Ms. Smith stated by the meeting
There being no more comments, Ms. Strickland closed the public hearing.
(b) Consideration of Orders to Issue
carried.
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the building is still unsafe. Ms. Thomas seconded the motion. Motion
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the building is damaged less than 50%.
motion. Motion carried.
Mr. Hinojosa seconded the
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the roof repairs need to be completed up to City Code by next Building and
Standards Meeting (July 21, 2016). If not completed by then, the building will need to be vacated until proper repairs
can be made. Ms. Thomas seconded the motion. Motion carried.
4. 1602 ALVIN
MATTIE TODD c/o MEL M ALLEN, MARGIE GIRDY, JOHNNY MAC TODD
Steven Solis stated on June 4, 2015 Code Enforcement observed yellow caution tape around the structure. Smoke
and fire damage was visible to the front siding of home directly under the fascia of the roof. We walked around to the back
side of the home facing S Laurent and observed heavy fire damaged. We determined this was the possible point of origin
of fire. All windows and doors have been secured.
On May 5, 2015, we received the Fire report, the following are excerpts from the report:
•
•
•
•
Victoria Fire Department arrived to find a single story, single family dwelling with fire and smoke at the rear of the
building.
The fire created its own vent hole in the rear of the structure.
The dining room is listed as the area of fire origin.
Heat source, item first ignited, type of material first ignited, and factor contributing to ignition
are all listed as undetermined.
As of January 14, 2016 there has been no progress.
Mr. Solis stated the Findings of Facts are # 1,2,5,7,8,9, and 10.
Mr. Solis stated that Code Enforcement recommends the structure be declared unsafe and for the
Commission to issue an order to demolish.
(a) Public Hearing to Determine if Structure is Unsafe
closed.
Ms. Strickland opened the Public Hearing. No one was present to speak, the public hearing was then
(b) Consideration of Orders to Issue
Ms. Thomas made a motion that the structure is unsafe. Mr. Cade seconded the motion. Motion carried.
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the structure is more than 50% damaged. Mr. Hinojosa seconded the
motion. Motion carried.
The structure will be demolished.
5. 203 MARVELLE (INCLUCING ACCESSORIES)
ARABELA CEDILLO, AREBELA S CEDILLO, LVNV FUNDING LLC, AMANDA AGUIRRE
(a) Public Hearing to Determine if Structure is Unsafe
(b) Consideration of Orders to Issue
Grace Garcia stated on November 16, 2015, Code Enforcement observed deteriorated front paneling on the
home. The foundation had signs of shifting and there was damage on the roof at the rear and south side of the
home. The exterior envelope of the structure needed repair where the siding, window trims, porches, sills, and
girder (beam) are deteriorated and possibly termite infested. There are accessory structures on site which also have
foundation, roof, and siding deterioration. Due to legal issues listed below, the structure has not been repaired and
the property is not being maintained.
•
•
•
•
•
May 24th 2014 - Code Enforcement presented this structure before the Building and Standard Commission,
(BSC).
The appraised value of this property in 2014 was $17, 670 (Homesite Value); $980 (Land)=$18,650; but the
current value is now assessed at $40,530 (Homesite Value); $980 (Land)=$41,510.
The building was declared unsafe and an order was issued to Secure and obtain proper permits within
fourteen (14) calendar days (August 7, 2014). The structure was secured within fourteen days but no
permits obtained.
The property owner's granddaughter, Lisa Rodriguez, was present at the meeting and informed she
retained a lawyer to have the title switched into her and her husband's name and would then began repairs.
August 8, 2014, Code Enforcement received a call from Mr. Rodriguez informing there is another heir
(cousin), and he is refusing to sign the property transfer
The Findings of the Facts are: #1,4,5,6,7,9, and 10.
Ms. Garcia stated that Code Enforcement recommends the structure be declared unsafe and the
Commission issue an order to demolish including the accessory structure.
(a) Public Hearing to Determine if Structure is Unsafe
Ms. Strickland opened the Public Hearing. No one was present to speak. Ms. Strickland closed the Public
Hearing.
(b) Consideration of Orders to Issue
carried.
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the structure was unsafe. Ms. Thomas seconded the motion. Motion
Mr. Mercer made a motion that the structure was more than 50% damaged. Ms. Thomas seconded the
motion. Motion carried.
The structure will be demolished.
6. 2402 BRAZOS (ACCESSORY ONLY)
KEVIN R GRAHMANN, KEVIN GRAHMANN, CPL EASEMENT, HOUSTON PIPE LINE COMP,
Mr. Briones stated on March 26, 2015 Code Enforcement observed an accessory structure in the back yard
with no roof covering and rotting beams and joists.
On January 5, 2016 Code Enforcement received a phone call from property owner Kevin Grahmann and Mr.
Grahmann stated he would have the accessory structure demolished.
As of January 15, 2016 there has been no progress.
The Findings of Facts # 1,2,4,6,7,8, 9, and 10.
Mr. Briones stated that Code Enforcement recommends the accessory structure be declared unsafe and for
the Commission to issue an order to demolish.
(a) Public Hearing to Determine if Structure is Unsafe
Ms. Strickland opened the Public Hearing. No one was present to speak. The Public Hearing was closed.
(b) Consideration of Orders to Issue
carried.
Mr. Mercer made a motion to declare the building unsafe. Mr. Hinojosa seconded the motion. Motion
Mr. Hinojosa made a motion that the structure was more than 50% damaged. Mr. Mercer seconded the
motion. Motion carried.
The structure will be demolished.
7. 1805 POLK
MICHAEL G RIVERA, NOELIA ANDRADE
Steven Solis stated that on October 15, 2016, Code Enforcement observed that the structure had major fire
damage. The fire damage appeared to be more than 50% of the interior of the home. The roof of the garage was
severely damaged and the structure was unsecured. On December 3, 2015, Code Enforcement observed all but the
roof, which is covered by a tarp, had been secured. A permit was posted on the window for remodel and repair which
expired October 24, 2016.
On January 14, 2016, there had not been any repairs to the structure.
Mr. Solis stated that today at 1:31 pm they went to the property and observed the property owner working
on roof repairs on the northwest side where it had fire damage. The front door was fully secured and able to lock;
windows that were broken out were replaced and are able to close and are secured. The roof repairs are temporary
just to secure and will take off and repair it properly. Steven Solis stated the property owner stated they will start
working on the inside repairs first and work their way out when ready to complete. The property owner obtained a
contractor license to soda blast the smoke damage frame. All doors are fully secured. Code Enforcement
recommends the structure be declared unsafe and for the Commission to issue an order to continue repairs for the
duration of the permit.
The Findings of the Facts are: #1,2,5,7,8,9, and 10.
(a) Public Hearing to Determine if Structure is Unsafe
Mr. Michael Rivera, 1807 E Polk, stated that the fire started in October 3, 2015. He stated that there were
tenants there at the time and the Fire Marshal found a bad cord. He stated what is slowing the process down is that
he could not get insurance on the house. He stated he did get liability on the home. He stated he spent two months
just cleaning the house. He stated he found a company that soda blasts. He stated it neutralizes the smell plus it
takes the soot off of the wood. It then exposes the wood that is good.
Ms. Strickland asked Mr. Rivera if he had a plan. He stated he does not have a list to hand out, but he does
have a plan. He then presented his plan to the committee. Mr. Mercer asked Mr. Rivera if he could finish the home
before the permit ends in October. He stated he could do the wiring and get it sheet rocked up, but did not know if he
would be completed with the fixtures. Mr. Mercer stated as long as the outside of the structure is secure and the
building is safe that is the concern of the committee. Mr. Solis stated the reason the structure is unsafe is because of
the temporary repair on the roof. Mr. Solis stated everything else is secured.
Mr. Mercer asked Mr. Madrid if the structure looked safe. Mr. Madrid stated yes.
Ms. Strickland then closed the public hearing.
(b) Consideration of Orders to Issue
Mr. Mercer made a motion to declare the building safe and continue with the work. Mr. Hinojosa seconded
the motion. Motion carried.
8.
5003 KINNEY (MOBILE HOME ONLY)
CHARLES A & JOSEPHINE A MC CLAUGHERTY, CHARLES A MC CLAUGHERTY SR.,
JOSEPHINE A TAM MC CLAUGHERTY, MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, VICTORIA COUNTY TAX
ASSESSOR, EASEMENTS: CPL
The structure has been demolished.
D:
ITEMS FROM BUILDING AND STANDARDS COMMISSION - None
E:
ITEMS FROM STAFF
Ms. Garcia introduced the new Assistant City Attorney, Allison Marek.
F:
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
Approved:_____________________________________________
Sherri Strickland, Vice-Chairperson
Approved:_____________________________________________
Jared Mayfield, Secretary
Director of Development Services
Agenda Item #: C-1
July 21, 2016
CASE: 1500879
ROBLES (ACROSS 3602 ROBLES)
Legal Description:
JEWETT LOT 49 BLOCK 4
PID #: 52037
Land Use:
RESIDENTIAL
Owner(s):
GUADALUPE L & SAN JUANA F HERNANDEZ
c/o JOSEPHINE H CANO
Staff Contact:
ISAAC SOLIS, CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
LOCATION MAP:
Agenda Item #: C-1
Pg. 2
CASE HISTORY:
On March 10, 2015 Code Enforcement observed the exterior of this structure has deteriorated siding,
rafters, ceiling joists, and roof covering. A large portion of the roof has caved in and several pieces of
deteriorated wood siding have fallen off. Staff was unable to view the interior of the structure due to the
collapsed portions of the structure.
On March 19, 2015 Code Enforcement received an office visit from the property owners daughter,
Josephine H Cano. She stated that her father is in the hospital and the neighbor maintains the property
because they use it. Mrs. Cano said that she was told there is program that might be able to help her with
the demolition of the structure. We advised her to inquire with Darlah Simms in Development Services to
see if the building would qualify for demolition through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
program. Mrs. Cano returned to our office after speaking with Darlah and said that it would not qualify. We
supplied a list of demo contractors and Mrs. Cano said that they would work on getting the structure
demolished.
On April 10, 2015 we were contacted by Contractor Clinton Hammonds that he was contacted by the
property owner concerning the demolition and would keep us posted.
On April 30, 2015 we received an additional office visit from Mrs. Josephine Cano that her father passed
away and they are unsure what to do with this property. Mrs. Cano informed that she went to talk to the
neighbors next door that had been helping themselves to her dad's lot the past 15 years. She said she told
the neighbors they could continue using the lot, but with the stipulation that they knock the structure down
and maintain it. The neighbor became verbally belligerent, so Mrs. Cano informed them that they needed to
remove all of their stuff. She said that the contractors we gave her had not contacted her either. Mrs. Cano
asked what would happen if they just let the property go. We explained to her that if we mow and demo the
structure a bill would be assessed and if not paid in 60 days we would place a lien on the property. Mrs.
Cano inquired about the city just taking the piece of land. We advised her to contact and consult with our
Legal dept in regards to that. We also advised her to check with the Tax Office to see if maybe they could
give it away to the County. Staff also explained to her that the legal owner of record is her mother, so they
could even check into her mother gift deeding the property to the neighbor or to the County.
As of June 29, 2016, There has no progress in the demolition of the structure.
Findings of Facts # 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 9, and 10 to be signed by Chairman:
• The building, structure or any part thereof is liable to partially or fully collapse.
• The structure or any part thereof was constructed or maintained in violation of any provision of the
City’s Building Code, or any other applicable ordinance or law of the city, state or federal
government.
• Any walls or other vertical structural members list, lean, or buckle to such extent that a plumb line
passing through the center of gravity falls outside the middle third of its base.
• The foundation or the vertical or horizontal supporting members are 25% or more damaged or
deteriorated
• The non supporting walls, ceilings, roofs, or floors are 50% or more damaged or deteriorated.
• The structure has improperly distributed loads upon the structural members or they have insufficient
strength to be reasonable safe for the purpose used
• The structure or any part thereof has been damaged by fire, water earthquake, wind vandalism, or
Agenda Item #: C-1
•
•
•
Pg. 3
other cause to such an extent that it has become dangerous to the public health, safety and welfare.
The structure or any part thereof has inadequate means of egress as required by the City's Building
Code.
The structure does not have adequate light, ventilation, or sanitation facilities as required by the
City’s Building Code and Plumbing Code.
The structure or any part thereof is a fire hazard, or is substandard, dilapidated, or otherwise unfit
for human habitation, and is a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare
CASE DETAILS:
Taxes Owed:
$48.34
Historic Value:
None
VCAD Value:
$360 (LAND) $1,350 (HOMESITE VALUE) TOTAL: $1,710
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Code Enforcement recommends the structure be declared unsafe and for the Commission to issue an order
to demolish.
PHOTOGRAPHS:
Agenda Item #: C-1
Pg. 4
Agenda Item #: C-2
July 21, 2016
CASE: 1503677
1007 S EAST
Legal Description:
Land Use:
VICTORIA, BLOCK 225, S 1/2 OF LOT 1,
PID #: 63952
RESIDENTIAL
Owner(s):
JUAN & SABINA GONZALES
Staff Contact:
ISAAC SOLIS, CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
LOCATION MAP:
Agenda Item #: C-2
Pg. 2
CASE HISTORY:
On November 13, 2015 Code Enforcement observed the front door and door to the rear of the structure
were unsecured. On the exterior, staff also observed deteriorating floor joists, rafters, and roof covering.
The interior of the structure appeared to be in sound condition except for water spots on the ceiling from the
deteriorated roof and there was some scattered debris and materials inside.
On June 27, 2016, Code Enforcement received an office visit from Sabina Gonzales inquiring about the
notices they received. She only speaks Spanish so Code Enforcement Supervisor Grace Garcia explained
the notices, the BSC detailed plan form, and the importance of attending the BSC meeting. Mrs. Gonzales
stated that they have secured the structure in all areas that were open, including siding; They plan to place
a new roof on the structure in August. Their plans also include the remodel of the entire structure including:
repair of the rotted floor joists around the foundation, windows, electric, plumbing, driveway, mechanical and
cosmetic repair. Mrs. Gonzales stated that she was informed that the permits they would need to obtain
would be $300. Mrs. Gonzales also requested info on Waste Management to inquire about renting a
dumpster to place the debris from the re-roof. Waste Management information and their phone number was
provided.
As of June 29, 2016, there has not been any progress in repairing the structure.
Findings of Facts # 1,2,6,7,8, 9, and 10 to be signed by Chairman:
• The building, structure or any part thereof is liable to partially or fully collapse.
• The structure or any part thereof was constructed or maintained in violation of any provision of the
City’s Building Code, or any other applicable ordinance or law of the city, state or federal
government.
• The structure has improperly distributed loads upon the structural members or they have insufficient
strength to be reasonable safe for the purpose used
• The structure or any part thereof has been damaged by fire, water earthquake, wind vandalism, or
other cause to such an extent that it has become dangerous to the public health, safety and welfare.
• The structure or any part thereof has inadequate means of egress as required by the City's Building
Code.
• The structure does not have adequate light, ventilation, or sanitation facilities as required by the
City’s Building Code and Plumbing Code.
• The structure or any part thereof is a fire hazard, or is substandard, dilapidated, or otherwise unfit
for human habitation, and is a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare
CASE DETAILS:
Taxes Owed:
$0.00
Historic Value:
None
VCAD Value:
$1,380 (LAND) $18,240 (HOMESITE VALUE) TOTAL: $19,620
Agenda Item #: C-2
Pg. 3
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Code Enforcement recommends the structure be declared unsafe and for the Commission to issue an order
to demolish.
PHOTOGRAPHS:
Agenda Item #: C-2
Pg. 4
Agenda Item #: C-3
July 21, 2016
CASE 1503654
511 S MOODY
Legal Description:
VICTORIA TIF 12500 E 1/2 OF S 1/2 OFLOT 1 BLOCK 63 1/2
PID #: 62828
Land Use:
COMMERCIAL
Owner(s):
BILLY OLIVER
Staff Contact:
GRACE GARCIA, CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR/RICK MADRID, BUILDING
OFFICIAL
LOCATION MAP:
Agenda Item #: C-3
Pg. 2
CASE HISTORY:
On February 4 2016, Code Enforcement presented a report to the Building and Standards Commission on
this property, at the request of the Building Official, Rick Madrid. The Building Official presented his case
comments to the board members, regarding the December 12, 2015 Inspection Report provided to Code
Enforcement. The report stated that on September 30, 2014; the Building Official reported that the owner
Mr. Oliver, proposed to use the structure as a Storage/Office building. The Building Official explained to Mr.
Oliver that the exterior walls show deterioration through the studs and would need to be repaired because
the wall crumbles with hand pressure. He was also instructed by the Building Official to expose exterior
walls 2 to 3 feet high to determine the extent of repairs needed. Also noted on the report were roof leaks. A
six month timeline was given to accomplish repairs, which have not been started. Mr. Oliver continues to
occupy the structure and advertising signs for ABCO Roofing & Construction remain posted on the building.
The order issued by the Commission gave the owner ninety (90) days to get started with repairs; which
included the requirement to submit a detailed plan to Development Center, and obtain a permit; or return to
the July 21, 2016 meeting if the owner did not comply with the order.
The owner has not complied, and as of May 27, 2016, the Building Official reported that he met onsite with
Mr. Oliver (owner) and, as suspected, the studs in the walls of the front stucco structure are rotted and need
to be replaced. Mr. Oliver was also advised that an asbestos survey is required prior to any work performed
on the wall(s). Mr. Oliver contacted Axis Demolition and received a quote for the asbestos inspection, but
no additional progress has been made.
On June 7, 2016, Code Enforcement observed that there is deterioration around the front window frames
and door. Although the structure has been covered with stucco, the walls have extensive cracking;
especially on the south side of structure. There is foundation or support issues that have caused large
cracks on the south east corner of the building including to the edge of the roof, also on the south side.
Findings of Facts # 2,4,5,6, and 9, to be signed by Chairman:
•
•
•
•
•
The structure or any part thereof was constructed or maintained in violation of any provision of the
City’s Building Code, or any other applicable ordinance or law of the city, state or federal
government.
The foundation or the vertical or horizontal supporting members are 25% or more damaged or
deteriorated.
The non supporting covering of walls, ceilings, roofs, or floors are 50% or more damaged or
deteriorated
Has improperly distributed loads upon the structural members, or they have insufficient strength to
be reasonably safe for the purpose used.
The structure does not have adequate light, ventilation, or sanitation facilities as required by the
City’s Building Code and Plumbing Code.
Agenda Item #: C-3
Pg. 3
CASE DETAILS:
Taxes Owed:
$0
Historic Value:
None
VCAD Value:
$4,800 (LAND) $6,560 (HOMESITE VALUE) TOTAL:$11,360
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Code Enforcement recommends the structure be declared unsafe and for the Commission to issue an order
to repair the structure as previously outlined by the Building Official .
PHOTOGRAPHS:
Agenda Item #: C-3
Pg. 4
Agenda Item #: C-4
July 21, 2016
CASE: 1601605
713 JUAN LINN
Legal Description:
Land Use:
VICTORIA TIF 12950 PT OF LOT 4 BLOCK 216
PID #: 63897
RESIDENTIAL
Owner(s):
GEORGE A VELASQUEZ
Staff Contact:
ISAAC SOLIS, CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
LOCATION MAP:
Agenda Item #: C-4
Pg. 2
CASE HISTORY:
On May 26, 2016 Code Enforcement observed the east side wall is leaning due to a collapsed roof. Staff
observed, through the window, daylight coming through the remains of the roof. It appears that the steel wall is
bent toward the inside of the structure and the foundation lining is starting the pull apart. At the rear of the structure,
the metal siding has fallen from the wooden framing.
On June 21, 2016, Code Enforcement observed a hole in the wall in front of the structure, which gave view to the inside
of the structure. Staff also observed junk items inside damaged by water and other elements. There are deteriorated
rafters and more than 50% of the roof has collapsed.
On May 27, 2016, property owner obtained a permit for repair which expires October 17, 2016.
Findings of Facts # 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 9, and 10 to be signed by Chairman:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The building, structure or any part thereof is liable to partially or fully collapse.
The structure or any part thereof was constructed or maintained in violation of any provision of the City’s
Building Code, or any other applicable ordinance or law of the city, state or federal government.
Any walls or other vertical structural members list, lean, or buckle to such an extent that a plumb line passing
through the center of gravity falls outside the middle third of its base.
The foundation or the vertical or horizontal supporting members are 25% or more damaged or deteriorated.
The non supporting covering of walls, ceilings, roofs, or floors are 50% or more damaged or deteriorated.
The structure has improperly distributed loads upon the structural members or they have insufficient strength
to be reasonable safe for the purpose used.
The structure or any part thereof has been damaged by fire, water earthquake, wind vandalism, or other
cause to such an extent that it has become dangerous to the public health, safety and welfare.
The structure or any part thereof has inadequate means of egress as required by the City's Building Code.
The structure does not have adequate light, ventilation, or sanitation facilities as required by the City’s
Building Code and Plumbing Code.
The structure or any part thereof is a fire hazard, or is substandard, dilapidated, or otherwise unfit for human
habitation, and is a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare
CASE DETAILS:
Taxes Owed:
$0.00
Historic Value:
None
VCAD Value:
$4,230 (LAND) $26,360 (HOMESITE VALUE) TOTAL:$ 30,590
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Code Enforcement recommends the structure be declared unsafe and for the Commission to issue an order to
demolish.
Agenda Item #: C-4
PHOTOGRAPHS:
Pg. 3
Agenda Item #: C-4
Pg. 4
Agenda Item #: C-5
July 21, 2016
CASE: 1503607
703 E FORREST (705 FORREST)
Legal Description:
Land Use:
VICTORIA E 84' OF LOT 8 BLOCK 219
PID: 63921
RESIDENTIAL
Owner(s):
GEORGE VELASQUEZ ETUX
Staff Contact:
ISAAC SOLIS, CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
LOCATION MAP:
Agenda Item #: C-5
Pg. 2
CASE HISTORY:
On October 30, 2015 Code Enforcement observed the deteriorated roof in need of complete replacement.
Deteriorated rafters are especially visible on the side of the home including the interior ceilings which are
also water damaged due to lack of roof covering. Holes in the roof has caused weather damage to the fascia
and there are also broken and unsecured windows.
On February 4, 2016, we received a detailed plan outlining the schedule of repairs. The following are excerpts
from the plan:
• Obtained a Permit for repairs
• 2-16-16 Secure House
• 3-30-16 Start to level the structure.
• 4-30-16 Repair roof to get ready for new roof R-22 panels, metal roof.
• 6-30-16 For inside cleaning prep work.
• 7-15-16 Bath & kitchen sink E-R Plumbing Mr. Rudy Ramos
• 7-30-16 Bring electric to Par 3-C to Electrical Mr. Cano
As of June 21, 2016, there has not been any further progress on the repairs or securing of the structure.
Code Enforcement observed new construction in the rear of the structure. There is wooden framing, but floor
bearers or floor joists have not been added.
Findings of Facts # 1,4,5,8, 9, and 10 to be signed by Chairman:
•
•
•
•
•
•
The building, structure or any part thereof is liable to partially or fully collapse.
The foundation or the vertical or horizontal supporting members are 25% or more damaged or
deteriorated.
The non supporting covering of walls, ceilings, roofs, or floors are 50% or more damaged or deteriorated
The structure or any part thereof has inadequate means of egress as required by the City's Building
Code.
The structure does not have adequate light, ventilation, or sanitation facilities as required by the City’s
Building Code and Plumbing Code.
The structure or any part thereof is a fire hazard, or is substandard, dilapidated, or otherwise unfit for
human habitation, and is a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare
CASE DETAILS:
Taxes Owed:
$0.00
Historic Value:
None
VCAD Value:
$2,350 (LAND) $36,080 (HOMESITE VALUE) TOTAL:$38,430
Agenda Item #: C-5
Pg. 3
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Code Enforcement recommends the structure be declared unsafe and for the Commission to issue an order to
demolish.
PHOTOGRAPHS:
Agenda Item #: C-5
Pg. 4
Agenda Item #: C-5
Pg. 5
Agenda Item #: C-6
July 21, 2016
CASE: 1601272
2304 N DEPOT
Legal Description:
Land Use:
QUEEN CITY W 1/2 OF LOT 2 BLOCK 8
PID #: 59259
RESIDENTIAL
Owner(s):
LEONA STOVALL
Staff Contact:
GRACE GARCIA, CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
LOCATION MAP:
Agenda Item #: C-6
Pg. 2
CASE HISTORY:
On April 22, 2016 Code Enforcement arrived onsite and observed a deteriorated addition to the back of the
structure. The addition was filled with junk, trash, and covered with overgrown brush. It appears to be
deteriorating to the point of collapsing. Staff also observed the roof was is buckling and appears to bow in
the center. There was also signs of cracking of the foundation on the northeast side of the structure.
On May 2, 2016, staff received information from the property owners daughter, Michelle Peoples, stating
that they have made contact with the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Coordinator Darlah
Sims. We have learned that on June 21, 2016 Mrs. Peoples has signed all required documents for the
CDBG demolition. She was also advised that she would still need to attend the BSC meeting.
Findings of Facts # 1,2, 4, 7,8, 9, and 10 to be signed by Chairman:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The Building structure or any part thereof is liable to partially or fully collapse
The structure or any part thereof was constructed or maintained in violation of any provision of the
City’s Building Code, or any other applicable ordinance or law of the city, state or federal
government.
The foundation or the vertical or horizontal supporting members are 25% or more damaged or
deteriorated.
The structure or any part thereof has been damaged by fire, water, earthquake, wind, vandalism, or
other cause to such an extent that it has become dangerous to the public health, safety and welfare.
The structure or any part thereof has inadequate means of egress as required by the City’s Building
Code.
The structure does not have adequate light, ventilation, or sanitation facilities as required by the
City’s Building Code and Plumbing Code. The structure is substandard, dilapidated, and otherwise
unfit for human habitation.
The structure or any part thereof is a fire hazard, or is substandard, dilapidated, or otherwise unfit
for human habitation, and is a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare
CASE DETAILS:
Taxes Owed:
$0.00
Historic Value:
None
VCAD Value:
$5,000 (LAND) $8,670 (HOMESITE VALUE) TOTAL: $13,670 (HOMESTEAD CAP
LOSS) -$4,826 TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE: $8,844
Agenda Item #: C-6
Pg. 3
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Code Enforcement recommends the structure be declared unsafe and for the Commission to issue an order
to demolish.
PHOTOGRAPHS:
Agenda Item #: C-7
July 21, 2016
CASE: 1601174
103 ANTELOPE CIRCLE
Legal Description:
Land Use:
STEPHENSON SEC III, BLOCK 4, LOT 13
PID #: 60863
RESIDENTIAL
Owner(s):
NINO MARIA SANJAUNITA
Staff Contact:
STEVEN SOLIS, CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
LOCATION MAP:
Agenda Item #: C-7
Pg. 2
CASE HISTORY:
Code Enforcement performed an onsite inspection on April 22, 2016 and observed an unsecured mobile
home on the property. There are portions of the floor that are missing on the south east side of the trailer.
There is a section of the trailer home with exposed drywall repairs and insulation and the porch (on the east
side entrance) was dilapidated. The sliding glass doors were also open and staff was able to view
remodeling being performed in the kitchen, living room area, and other rooms.
On June 29, 2016, Code Enforcement received an office visit from the property owner, Maria Nino, stating
that she received the notice of substandard building conditions.. Staff advised her of the meeting and
explained that the immediate action that needs to be taken is to completely secure the structure. Staff also
gave the information to present a detailed plan of the repairs needed.
Findings of Facts # 2, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10 to be signed by Chairman:
•
•
•
•
•
•
The structure or any part thereof was constructed or maintained in violation of any provision of the
City’s Building Code, or any other applicable ordinance or law of the city, state or federal
government.
The non supporting covering of walls, ceilings, roofs, or floors are 50% or more damaged or
deteriorated.
The structure or any part thereof has been damaged by fire, water, earthquake, wind, vandalism, or
other cause to such an extent that it has become dangerous to the public health, safety and welfare.
The structure or any part thereof has inadequate means of egress as required by the City’s Building
Code.
The structure does not have adequate light, ventilation, or sanitation facilities as required by the
City’s Building Code and Plumbing Code. The structure is substandard, dilapidated, and otherwise
unfit for human habitation.
The structure or any part thereof is a fire hazard, or is substandard, dilapidated, or otherwise unfit
for human habitation, and is a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare.
CASE DETAILS:
Taxes Owed:
$0.00
Historic Value:
None
VCAD Value:
$14,520 (LAND) $2,650 (HOMESITE VALUE) TOTAL: 17,170
Agenda Item #: C-7
Pg. 3
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Code Enforcement recommends the structure be declared unsafe and for the Commission to issue an order
to secure and repair.
PHOTOGRAPHS: