program book national university debating championship

Transcription

PROGRAM BOOK
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIP
(NUDC)
Mercu Buana University, July 31-August 5, 2016
MINISTRY OF RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY AND HIGHER EDUCATION
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF LEARNING AND STUDENTS AFFAIRS
2016
Remark from the Director General of Learning and
Students Affairs
Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh,
Dear debaters,
I am delighted to extend my warmest welcome and to congratulate you
all for participating in this very inspiring event. The National University
Debating Championship (NUDC) has had a prestigious and successful
history and, this year we are delighted to once again continue that
tradition in Jakarta where people can taste the nicest blend of
competitiveness in cultural attractions. In the past 8 years, the NUDC
has enabled thousands of university students to get involved in a
unique and rewarding competition.
The NUDC 2016 comes within the efforts of The Ministry of Research
Technology and Higher Education to support and promote the art of
debate and critical thinking and to build the foundations of this
discipline in the Indonesian Education. The NUDC falls within the
framework of our efforts to spread this skill and raise awareness
amongst youth of its importance in the preparation of future
generations and shaping future leaders based on the foundations of the
Indonesian excellence.
The Ministry constantly seeks to promote the art of debating and its
important use as an educational tool to encourage students to utilize
critical thinking, research and study, and refines their leadership and
language skills. Repeating the championship for the ninth time is
tangible evidence of its success in specifically targeting Indonesian
students with the aim of raising the level of debating and encouraging
National University Debating Championship
i
dialogue, freedom of expression and open discussion in Indonesia in
particular and the world in general.
I affirm that the wider goals of the NUDC are deepening the relations
and ties in the areas of educational and students Affairs for
participating varsities, presenting an opportunity to consolidate the
bonds of friendship and closer links, which produces knowledge and
opens the door for rich diversity. I assure you that our focus at the
Ministry is primarily the provision of care for and interest in students,
as they represent our hope in a bright future that meets people's
aspirations for a decent life based on justice, equality and free debate
which is encouraged within them through the critical thinking and
healthy dialogue. We seek to raise Indonesians critical sense to become
more aware of all the blessings granted to us and which allow us to
exercise our right of opinion, understanding our differences and being
able to live with this reality.
Last, I would like to express my wish for the championship to be a
resounding success and a new achievement added to the record of
Indonesia’s achievements in the world of debate. I hope all participants
will be back home carrying the debating spirit, appreciating its
importance and determined to spread the message among their
colleagues.
Wassalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh.
Jakarta, August 2016
Prof. Intan Ahmad, Ph.D
ii
Welcome Address from Rector of Mercu Buana
University
Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh,
Firstly, we would like to express our gratitude that it is due to Allah
SWT’s blessings that Mercu Buana University is ready to host the
National Universities Debating Championship, from July 31st to August
5th, 2016. It is such an honour and pride for us to host this biggest
annual debating championship.
We highly appreciate the Ministry of Research Technology and Higher
Education, for trusting Mercu Buana University to run this important
event. Now our main goal is to make this National University Debating
Championship (NUDC) successful. In this special occasion, I would like
to express my warm welcome to all participants. Welcome to Jakarta, a
dynamic vibrant city, and the capital of the nation.
More than a mere verbal or performance skill, the NUDC embodies the
ideals of reasoned argument, tolerance for divergent points of view,
and rigorous self-examination. This is the best way to gear up students’
critical thinking as well as to maintain democracy in accordance to the
government’s goal. Therefore, I strongly believe that this competitive
debate needs to take place consistently in the world of education to be
the safeguard of the future generations.
On behalf of Mercu Buana Univeristy, I would like to express my most
gratitude and thanking the Ministry of Research Technology and
Higher Education. Please accept our apology for all the inconvenience
and shortcoming in organizing this event.
iii
A special thank goes to all parties involved. Although much work
remains ahead of us, we have on our side strong collective desire to
work together to make this event successful.
To the beloved 112
Teams: with 224 Debaters and 112 N1
Adjudicators from 14 Kopertis Regions, by attending this event you are
special and all are already winners. I wish you all the success in your
competition.
Wassalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh.
Rector
Dr. Arissetyanto Nugroho, MM
iv
Message from the Convenors
Dear Debaters,
On behalf of all those involved we wish you a very warm welcome to
this year's NUDC. As the biggest and best competition of its kind in
Indonesia (with over 1000 students participating in fourteen regional
selections this year) we are sure that every one of its debates will be an
enjoyable experience that will test and improve your debating skills.
Debating is not simply about natural ability; it is about experience,
preparation and practice. We hope this competition will help you
achieve all of these things. Remember, there are valuable lessons to
learn even in defeat, often from your competitors: after all, some of the
best student speakers in Indonesia participate in this competition.
Never be too critical of yourself after a debate; and instead enjoy the
experience and remember to stay involved by attending later rounds
even if you are no longer in the competition.
Believing how hard your preparation for this national scale event, we
appreciate how difficult and demanding the competition is. You are
developing your rhetoric skills and increasing your knowledge of a
broad range of important issues at the same time.
We hope that this year NUDC gives you valuable skills on how to
construct cases and helps develop your self-confidence in your
debating ability. We have come to thank Mercu Buana University for
energizing its squads to succeed this competition. We also would be
very thankful to Ministry of Research Technology and Higher
Education, and Mercu Buana University
which organise the
competition. The Ministry has long and impressive histories in the
v
approaches of empowerment and has, in recent years, showed
strongest desire to develop quality of debaters in Indonesia.
We wish all this year's entrants the best of luck.
Happy Debating!
Rachmat Nurcahyo, Dora Aruan Angelina, Nur Rifai Akhsan, Tiur
Simanjuntak
vi
CONTENTS
Remark from the Director General for Learning and Students Affairs ..... i
Welcome Address from Rector of Mercu Buana University ........................ iii
Message from the Convenors ...................................................................................... v
CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ vii
A. MERCU BUANA UNIVERSITY AT A GLANCE ................................................1
B. NUDC 2016 AT A GLANCE ....................................................................................6
C. RULE OF CONDUCT OF THE TOURNAMENT ...............................................7
D. FORMAT OF THE TOURNAMENT ......................................................................8
D.1. Overview of the Format ..............................................................................8
D.2. The Preliminary Rounds .............................................................................8
D.3. Selection of teams for the elimination rounds ..................................9
D.4. The Main Competition elimination rounds ..................................... 10
E. RUN DOWN ............................................................................................................... 10
F. COMMITTEE ................................................................................................................1
1.
Streering Committee (SC) ..........................................................................1
2.
Organizing Committee (OC) ......................................................................1
3.
Executive Committee....................................................................................1
G. PARTICIPANTS ..........................................................................................................5
H. NICE PLACESTO VISIT IN JAKARTA .............................................................. 28
I.
BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM ............................................................ 14
Part 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 14
Part 2 Definitions ................................................................................................... 18
Part 3 Matter ............................................................................................................ 20
Part 4 Manner .......................................................................................................... 22
Part 5 The Adjudication ...................................................................................... 24
vii
A. MERCU BUANA UNIVERSITY AT A GLANCE
INTRODUCTION
Mercu Buana University Jakarta was founded by Mr. H. Probosutedjo
(Chairman of Menara Bhakti Foundation / Founder of Mercu Buana
University), on October 22, 1985, beginning with just 118 students. In
the academic year of 2014 – 2015 the university welcomed 25,000
active students on 24 programs. 2 Diploma programs, 16
undergraduate programs and 6 post graduate programs. All courses
have been accredited by the National Accreditation Board of the
Republic of Indonesia.
Mercu Buana University is considered to be one of the leading private
universities of both Indonesia and its capital, the modern megalopolis
of Jakarta.
VISION
To be an excellent and leading university to produce professionals who
are ready to meet the expectations of both industries and the society.
MISSION
1. Organizing Education, Research and Community Services.
Applying academic excellence to educate students to
professional standards.
2. Executing an effective and efficient education management,
through work development networks, cooperation with industry
and sustainable partnerships with national and international
institutions.
3. To develop competence of students, teaching faculties and
transfer their entrepreneurial spirit as well as professional skills
ethics to students to make a contribution to the development of
improving the quality of life.
1
INSTITUTIONAL ETHICS
Discipline, honesty and integrity are the principles of UMB's
institutional ethics. These three things have to become the breath of
UMB's faculty members and students.
Be creative: Creativity is a value of an individual who wants to create a
better life for himself and his environment. Problems are not meant to
be obstacles but stimuli for finding solutions, means to improve
ourselves and our circumstances.
Be environmental friendly: The 20th century has taught the world
that the negative effects of neglecting our ecological footprint always
come back to us. UMB is thoroughly committed that all working unit,
employees and lecturers shall always take care of their environment.
Local wisdom: Enhancing creativity within local communities is
crucial to be winners in a global competition. UMB is committed our
local wisdom is also in line with a domestic resource based policy.
THE PHILOSOPHICAL MEANING OF MERCU BUANA
The word Mercu Buana is derived from the word "Mercu" means the
lighthouse tower and "Buana" means the earth. The tower is indicating
strong building which serves as lighthouse, while the word "Buana" is
the symbol of the society or the people.
It is intrinsically mentioned on the symbol that the University of Mercu
Buana shall be the leading university which bring benefits to the nation
in achieving prosperous and intended society as stated on Indonesia
ideology, Pancasila.
2
THE MEANING OF MERCU BUANA LOGO
The logo of Mercu Buana is by the power of flame it consists of three
divisions. It represents three basic philosophies of higher education in
Indonesia, education, research and community services. The
educational philosophy is represented by the middle flame, while the
research and community services philosophy are indicated
consecutively by the right and left flames.
DEGREE PROGRAMS
Degree Programs at six faculties:
Engineering: Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Industrial
Engineering, Civil Engineering and Architecture Engineering.
Design: Interior Design, Product Design, Visual Communication Design.
Business: Management, Accounting.
Communication:
Communication.
Public
Relations,
Broadcasting,
Marketing
Psychology: Psychology.
Computer: Information System, Informatics Engineering.
Post Graduate Programs:
Master of Industrial Engineering
Master of Electrical Engineering
3
Master of Management
Master of Communication Science
Master of Accounting.
Doctor of Management (Dr.)
COOPERATION
Development Cooperation and International Office
In moving into a World-Class University, MBU have been responding
positively to the dynamic change in the severe higher education
competition. Progresses achieved by MBU in the third decade have
shown significant development, either in MBU's academic environment
as well as in the international cooperation with foreign Higher
Education Institutions. The cooperation is established among
universities from China, Malaysia, Europe, Australia, Korea, Thailand,
United Emirate Arab and Japan:
Deakin University, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Guangxi Normal
University, Universiti Industri Selangor, Geomatika College. NIIT
Antilles NV, Beijing Institute of Technology, University of Malaya,
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Bohai University, Rangsit University,
Guangdong University, Nagasaki University, Dong-Ah Institute of Media
and Arts, Paris 8 University, Insset Universite Picardie,France, Spiru
Haret University, Budapest Business School Chienkuo Technology
University, Bahrain Institute of Banking, Finance Global Cyber
University, Aldersgate University, Lyceum University, The Manila
Times College, and Cardiff Metropolitan University.
The International cooperation would enable students to be exposed
into global environment through exchange of students. Inviting foreign
lecturers with a world-class expertise will facilitate the development of
MBU students into globally qualified professionals. While the widearrays of business and industry cooperation nationally as well as
internationally, would enable a quality internship, credit earnings,
twinning and double degree programs for students of different
4
faculties at MBU. International programs are managed by International
Office of Mercu Buana University.
Multi-national teaching faculty members, of the partnering academic
institutions, as well as exchange students, or MBU students who will
continue their further studies abroad at the partner institutions, would
be taken care by partner internationally staffs of MBU International
Office.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Rector
Vice Rector for Academic,
Research, Technology and
Student Affairs
Vice Rectror for
Institutional and
Resources
Vice Rector for
Innovation, Alumni, and
International Relations
Management
Director of Innovation,
Alumni, and International
Relations
Director of Academic and
Research and Technology
Director of Finance
Director of Resources
Director of Marketing Reg
1
Director of Marketing Reg
2
Director of Student Affairs
Director of Graduate
Programs
Director of Information
Technology
Director of Authoriy for
Campus Cibubur
: Dr. Arissetyanto Nugroho, MM
: Prof. Dr. Ngadino Surip, MS
: Dr. Purwanto SK, M.Si
: Prof. Dana Santoso, M.Eng.Sc. Ph.D
: Prof. Dana Santoso, M.Eng.Sc. Ph.D
: Prof. Dr. Ngadino Surip, MS
: Dr. Purwanto SK, M.Si
: Yuli Harwani, Dra., MM
: Dr. M. Mukti Ali, MM
: Yenon Orsa, Ir. MT
: Endi Rekarti, SE, ME
: Prof. Dr. Didik J. Rachbini
: Dr. Mujiono, MT
: Henny Gambiro, Ir., M.Si
5
Faculty Member
Dean of Design And
Creative Art Faculty
Dean of Engginering
Faculty
Dean of Computer Science
Faculty
Dean of Economics and
Busniess Faculty
Dean of Communication
Science Faculty
Dean of Psychologycal
Faculty
: Edi Muladi, Ir. M.Si
: Prof. Dr. Chandrasa Soekardi
: Dr. Bambang Hariyanto, MT
: Prof. Wiwik Utami, Ak., MS., CA.
: Dr. Agustina, M.Si
: Dr. A. A. Anwar Prabu M, M.Si
B. NUDC 2016 AT A GLANCE
Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of National
Education administered the first ever Indonesia-wide
debate
tournament between varsities debaters in 2008. This national level
debating contest becomes an annual national program in the office.
This is the National University Debating Championship! Using British
Parliamentary style, what makes the tournament unique is its fastpaced and highly dynamic atmosphere
The year of 2016 marks the 9th NUDC that is projected to join together
approximately 336 of the most brilliant debaters and adjudicators in
Indonesia. Through the years, Directorate General of Learning and
Student Affairs, Ministry of Research Technology and Higher Education
has granted 14 KOPERTIS (Offices for Private Higher Education)-based
regions in Indonesia to conduct British Parliament debating
championship as a part of regional selection joined by both state and
private varisties the the region. This year NUDC would gather 112
teams from 14 KOPERTIS regions in Indonesia. For sure, it will be a
6
tournament that convenes the best and brightest Indonesian varsities
debate teams.
Stepping its 9th years, the NUDC consistently maintains its high quality
of debate by involving the best adjudicators Indonesia ever has.
Bringing its achievement in the past WUDC 2013, where two debaters
from ITB were crowned as EFL Champion, and in WUDC 2014,
Universitas Gadjah Mada was in the first ESL breaking team and
Universitas Indonesia succesfully reached ESL Grandfinal, and in 2015,
Champion: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 1st Runner Up: Universitas
Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, 2nd Runner Up: Universitas Indonesia,
3rd Runner Up: Universitas Brawijaya. This year championship would
be more spiritful. Hopefully, the high-spirited level of fierce
competition will be accompanied by the opportunity to build golden
bridges with individuals of mixed ethnics from vast arrays of
Indonesian culture.
C. RULE OF CONDUCT OF THE TOURNAMENT
1. Participants must sign the attendance list.
2. Formal-casual dressing is allowed. However, institution uniforms
are compulsory during the debate.
3. Electronic recording of debates is allowed by official participants
and observers affiliated with a university attending the NUDC and
by other individuals authorized by the NUDC Committee or the
tournament host.
4. Decision confidentiality. It is up to the discretion of judges to decide
if they wish to reveal their decisions. Adjudicators desiring to reveal
their decisions must wait until all white copies of ballots for that
7
debate are delivered to a bona-fide representative of the
Tournament Director. Adjudicators must still provide a written
ballot for all preliminary rounds.
5. No Smoking Policy. All rooms in which the NUDC competition takes
place shall be declared No Smoking Areas, where smoking shall be
prohibited. Host universities shall post signs announcing this rule.
6. Alcohol and Controlled Substance Policy. The use of controlled
substances and alcohol shall be prohibited in rooms in which the
NUDC competition takes place.
7. Debaters and adjudicators must attend debating and adjudicating
seminars,
8. All regulation related to lodging is under hotel management,
D. FORMAT OF THE TOURNAMENT
D.1.
Overview of the Format
1. There hall be seven preliminary rounds of debate, involving
all teams eligible to debate in the Championships.
2. Following the seven preliminary rounds, there shall be an
elimination round consisting of the top 32 teams from the
preliminary round.
D.2.
The Preliminary Rounds
1. All teams eligble to debate at the Championships compete in
the preliminary rounds
2. Composite or "swing" teams must be added by the
Tournament Director to under the following circumstances:
a. If the number of eams eligible to debate in the preliminary
rounds is equal to a number divisible by four, no
composite teams are allowed; or
8
b. If this is not the case, then composite teams may be added
until the number of teams in the preliminary round is
equal to a number divisible by four.
3. If a team withdraws from competition before or during the
preliminary rounds then they shall be removed from the
draw and either :
a. replaced wih a composite team; or
b. the number of composite teams is reduced to ensure that
the number of teams in the competition is still equal to a
number divisible by four.
4. Following each round, teams shall be ranked by the
adjudication panel and awarded points (Team Points) as
follows:
a. 1st ranked team: 3 oints;
b. 2nd ranked team: 2 points;
c. 3rd ranked team: 1 point;
d. 4th ranked team: 0 points.
D.3.
Selection of teams for the elimination rounds
1. At the conclusion of the seven preliminary rounds, teams are
to ranked in consecutive order (from highest to lowest) as
follows:
a. Total aggregate Team Points accumulated by the team;
and
b. Where teams have an equal number of aggregate team
points, on the basis of aggregate Team Scores accumulated
by the team; and
9
c. Where this is also equal, on a count-back of the number of
times that each team has ranked 1st, 2nd and 3rd, with a
team ranking higher if it has been ranked 1st more often,
and so on; and
d. Where the teams still cannot be distinguished, by drawing
lots
2. The highest 32 ranking teams will participate in the Main
Competition elimination rounds, and shall be ranked from 1st
to 32nd.
D.4.
The Main Competition elimination rounds
1. At the conclusion of each of the Octo-Finals, Quarter Finals
and Semi Finals, the adjudication panel shall select two
winning teams from each debate. These two teams shall
progress to the next elimination round.
2. In the Final, the adjudication panel shall select the one
winning team and the three runners-up.
E. RUN DOWN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10:00
12:00
13:00
15:00
15:15
17:15
12:00
13:00
15:00
15:15
17.15
17:30
6:30 7:00
7:30 8:30
8:30 9:00
9:00 10:00
Day 01/ Jul 31
Registration and Check-in
Break Lunch
Debating Seminar and Adjudicator Seminar
Coffee Break
Exhibition and Adjudicator Accreditation
Announcement – Back to Hotel
Day 02/ Aug 01
Leaving for Mercu Buana University
Registration
Roll Call
Opening Ceremony
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
10:00
10:15
12:15
13:15
13:45
15:45
16:00
16:30
18.30
18.45
5:30
6:30
7:00
7:30
8:00
10:00
10:15
10:45
12:45
14:00
14:45
16:45
17:00
17.30
10:15
12:15
13:15
13:45
15:45
16:00
16:30
18:30
18.45
6:30
7:00
7:30
8:00
10:00
10:15
10:45
12:45
14:00
14:45
16:45
17:00
17:30
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
5:30 6:30
6:30 7:00
7:00 7:30
7:30 8:00
8:00 9:30
9:30 9:45
9:45 11:00
11:00 11:30
11:30 12:30
44
12:30 14:00
Match Up & Motion Release
Preliminary Round 1
Break & Lunch
Preliminary Round 2
Break
Preliminary Round 3
Announcement
Back to the hotel
Day 03/ Aug 02
Breakfast
Roll Call
Match up and Motion Release
Preliminary Round 4
Break
Preliminary Round 5
Break & Lunch
Preliminary Round 6
Break
Announcement
Back to the Hotel
Day 04/ Aug 03
Breakfast
Roll Call
Preliminary Round 7
Break
Tabulation
Breaking Teams Announcement
Break & Lunch
Preliminary Round Reviews: Workshop on
Argumentation
11
45
46
47
48
49
50
14:00
16:00
16:15
16:45
18:15
18:30
16:00
16:15
16:45
18:15
18:30
6:30
7:00
7:30
9:30
10:00
11.00
13:00
14:00
15:30
17:30
19:00
19:30
21:00
Main Draw Octofinals + Novice Quarterfinals
Break
Main Draw Quarterfinals + Novice Semifinals
Announcement
Back to the Hotel
Day 05/ Aug 04
Breakfast
Main Draw Semifinals
Break & Grandfinal Announcement
Preparation for Novice Grandfinal
Novice Grandfinal
Break & Lunch
Preparation for Grandfinal
Main draw GRANDFINAL
Break & Dinner
Preparation for Closing Ceremony
Awards and Closing Ceremony
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
5:30
6:30
7:00
7:30
9:30
10.00
11:00
13:00
14:30
15:30
17:30
19:00
19:30
64
65
Day 06/ Aug 05
06:00 9:00 Breakfast
10:00 12:00 Check out
12
F. SKETCH AREAS
REKTORAT BUILDINGS
13
MERCU BUANA AREA
1
TOWER - THEATER ROOM
2
Rules of Conduct at University of Mercu Buana during competition date:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Not allowed to wear sandals
Not allowed to wear T-shirts
Not allowed for littering
Strictly forbidden to smoke in the campus area
Strictly forbidden to use, distribute drugs and liquor
Strictly forbidden to carry and use weapons and other dangerous
objects
Not allowed to eat and drink on the 7th floor auditorium
Using a name tag while on campus
Wearing BATIK at the closing ceremony
During the Competition, the bus will leave the Mega Anggrek Hotel
towards Mercu Buana University at 6:30 am. If there is remaining
participants, they must be responsible for his own departure to Mercu
Buana University
G. COMMITTEE
1. Streering Committee (SC)
Patron / Adviser
: Prof. Intan Ahmad, Ph.D.
(Director General of Learning and Student
Affairs)
Person in Charge
: Dr. Didin Wahidin, MPd.
(Direktur Kemahasiswaan)
Chair
: Dr. Widyo Winarso, M.Pd
Vice Chair
: Joki Nugroho
Secretary
: Yudi Harianto
Vice Secretary
: Staf Subdit Kemahasiswaan
2. Organizing Committee (OC)
General Person in
: Dr. Ir. Arissetyanto Nugroho, MM (Rektor
Charge
Universitas Mercu Buana)
Technical Person in
: Prof. Dana Santoso, M.Eng.Sc.Ph.D
Charge
(Wakil Rektor Bidang Inovasi, Alumni dan
Hubungan Internasional Universitas Mercu
Buana)
3. Executive Committee
1
Chair
Vice Chair
: Dr. Adi Nurmahdi, MBA
: Dr. Ponco Budi Sulistyo, M.Comm.
Secretary
: Suryaning Hayati, SE., MM.
Treasurer
: Warto SE., MM.
Sub Units
Unit Secretariat
:
: Kasiyo, SE (Coordinator)
1. Diana Harma Saputri, SE
2. Mutiara Permata, S.Ikom
: Rizki Faradilla, SE. (Coordinator)
Unit Run-down
1. Anindita, S.Pd.,M.Ikom
2. Mahasiswa MBEC
: Trival Apriyadi, SE.,MM (Coordinator)
Unit Facilities &
Venue
1. Dede Surahmat, SE.
2. Mahasiswa MBEC
Unit Transportation i : Tri Sunu Djoko Rahardjo, SH. (Coordinator)
1. Joko Priyono, SE
2. Mahasiswa MBEC
Unit Accommodation
: Ir. Zainal Arifin, MT. (Coordinator)
1. Putri Saparningtyas, S.Ikom
2. Resti Fahyanty, S.Ikom
Unit Consumption
: Sri Anah,SE.,MM. (Coordinator)
1. Reni Septiani, S.Ikom.
2. Nina Zatina, S.Ikom
Unit IT
: Nuruliyani, M.Kom. (Coordinator)
1. Afni Fathia Asih, S.Kom
2
2. Muhammad Najib, S.Kom
Unit Liaison Officer
: Cut Edwina Safia Oebit, SE.,MM. (Coordinator)
1. Gina Permata Putri, SE.,M.Ak.
2. Mahasiswa MBEC
: Irmulansati, SH.,M.Si. (Coordinator)
Unit Publication &
Documentation
1. Noviana Pakasi, S.Ikom
2. Riko Noviantoro
Unit Health Services
: Abdul Rahmat, SE.,MM. (Coordinator)
1. Rosita, S.Ikom
2. Mahasiswa MBEC
Unit Security
: Ir. Joko Sugiharjo, MM. (Coordinator)
1. Moestanuzul Indrawan, S.Kom
2. Mahasiswa MBEC
4. Adjudication Core
1
Marchella Febryanti
2
Jane Revevalin
3
Indriani Pratiwi
4
Boby Andika Ruitang
5
Rivera Kathrin
Windra
Universitas Bina Nusantara
Universitas Teknologi Bandung
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Universitas Indonesia
5. Tabulators
1
Prasetyo Nugraha Gema
2
Andi Fahmi
3
Stella Emada Bestio
6. Invited Adjudicatos
1 Leo Wibisono
2 Fiski Aditya
3 Alris Alfharisi
Institut Pertanian Bogor
Institut Teknologi Bandung
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Muhammad Lutfi
Reza Syahdan
Widia Eka Putri
Melisa Irene
Yufendy
Zelly Sidi Zamzami
Muhamad Fahri Akbar
Yeremia Dimpudus
Edward Sutanto
Haekal Muhammad
Noel Hasintongan
Syadza Annisa Salsabil
Astri Agustina
Andriano Panca Sumule
Roderick Sibarani
Dennys Victor Kapa
Gabriel Charlotte Wajong
Revaldi Wirabuana
Retno Rahma Safitri
Tika Destiratri Setiawan
Westra Tanribali
Wira Agung Swadana
Revian Wirabuana
Saagar Teckchandani
Sekartiyasa Kusumastuti
Politeknik Ganesha Medan
Universitas Andalas
Universitas Brawijaya
Universitas Diponegoro
Universitas Hasanuddin
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Universitas Padjajaran
Universitas Padjajaran
Universitas Parahyangan
Universitas Pelita Harapan
Universitas Sanata Dharma
4
H. PARTICIPANTS
No.
Region
1
01
2
Colleges
Name
As
Fhadilah Fitri Avianda Sari
Debater
01
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Daniel Ronaldo Hutabarat
Debater
3
01
Agung Pratama Sinulingga
Adjudicator
4
01
Universitas Negeri Medan
Putri Bestari Sormin
Debater
5
01
Ilham Pratama
Debater
6
01
Cucu Nistiya Ningrum
Adjudicator
7
01
Universitas Muslim Nusantara Medan
Seyu Fani
Debater
8
01
Sastra Buana Ginting
Debater
9
01
Agus Salim Hasibuan
Adjudicator
10
01
Universitas Sari Mutiara Indonesia
Putri Purba
Debater
11
01
Sintha Veronica Aritonang
Debater
12
01
Salinah R Siallagan
Adjudicator
13
01
Jenny
Debater
14
01
Ricky Tionardy
Debater
15
01
Fanny Falencia
Adjudicator
16
01
STIE Informasi, Teknologi dan Bisnis
Medan
Medan
Medan
STMIK Mikroskil
Januarto Naibaho
Debater
17
01
STMIK Mikroskil
Aristo
Debater
18
01
Hanto
Adjudicator
19
01
Darul Hasyim Siregar
Debater
20
01
Sumarlina Darma
Debater
21
01
Yasmita Sari
Adjudicator
22
01
STMIK Mikroskil
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera
Utara
Utara
Utara
Politeknik Informasi, Teknologi dan Bisnis
Veronica Simshintya
Debater
23
01
Elvie
Debater
24
01
Gunawan Tjokro
Adjudicator
25
01
Politeknik Negeri Medan
Mario Rinaldi Sitorus
Debater
26
01
Dalaal Mahmudah
Debater
27
01
Muhammad Fachry Surbakti
Adjudicator
28
02
Universitas Lampung
Muhammad Fikri Hasan
Debater
29
02
Universitas Lampung
I Ketut Dharma Putra Yoga
Debater
30
02
Universitas Lampung
Cahya Awaludin
Adjudicator
31
02
STMIK Teknokrat Lampung
M. Abdul Aziiz
Debater
32
02
M. Irfan Daeng Mangemba
Debater
33
02
Mahdy Eka Putra
Adjudicator
5
No.
Region
Colleges
Name
34
02
Universitas Sriwijaya
Muhammad Nazali Yusuf
Debater
35
02
Fathan Mustagfirin
Debater
36
02
Mohammad Zolakusuma
Adjudicator
37
02
Universitas Bina Darma Palembang
Hesti Duwina Putri
Debater
38
02
Siti Tanti Hardiyanti
Debater
39
02
Dewi Purnamasari, M.Pd.
Adjudicator
40
02
STBA Teknokrat
Yurisa Yulia Yunara
Debater
41
02
STBA Teknokrat
Ardian Adiwiranata
Debater
42
02
STBA Teknokrat
Tri Lestari
Adjudicator
43
02
Universitas Bengkulu
Putri Agustinos
Debater
44
02
Sella Ramadhani Syahputri
Debater
45
02
Alheru Akbar
Adjudicator
46
02
AMIK Teknokrat
I Wayan Murjaya
Debater
47
02
AMIK Teknokrat
Siti Rodiah
Debater
48
02
AMIK Teknokrat
Adjudicator
49
03
50
03
M. Cali Andika
Muhammad Haris Zamaludin
S
Charlie Sanjaya
51
03
Fitriana Rahma Puspita
Adjudicator
52
03
Revaldi Nathanael Wirabuana
Debater
53
03
Gabriel Charlotte Wajong
Debater
54
03
Regina Dhamayanti
Adjudicator
55
03
Stella Ermada Bestio
Debater
56
03
Willem Chua
Debater
57
03
Pandu Noer
Adjudicator
58
03
Monica
Debater
59
03
Debater
60
03
61
03
Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya
Jenice Melinda
Muhammad Ahwy
Karuniyado
Theodorus Nico
62
03
Julina Adistasya
Debater
63
03
Livina Septiana
Adjudicator
64
03
Universitas Multimedia Nusantara
Hansen Edrick Harianto
Debater
65
03
Justine
Debater
66
03
Samuel Sandro Setiawan
Adjudicator
67
03
Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Arry Andriansyah
Debater
68
03
Leini Nadira Rambe
Debater
69
03
Andrian Santosa
Adjudicator
70
03
Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Desi Aulia
Debater
As
Debater
Debater
Adjudicator
Debater
6
No.
Region
Colleges
Name
71
03
Rosiana
Debater
72
03
Juri Pelawi
Adjudicator
73
03
Universitas Bakrie
Arie Trifiantie
Debater
74
03
Universitas Bakrie
Ranitania Yohana A
Debater
75
03
Rifa Nabillah N
Adjudicator
76
03
Ririn Muji Astuti
Debater
77
03
Siti Cotijah
Debater
78
03
Agung Kharisma
Adjudicator
79
03
Universitas Bakrie
Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof.Dr.
Hamka
Hamka
Hamka
Politeknik LP3I
Rahmat Trisandy
Debater
80
03
Politeknik LP3I
Gita Puspa Lestari
Debater
81
03
Politeknik LP3I
Nur Haris Effendi
Adjudicator
82
04
Calvin
Debater
83
04
Yosephine Gita Asaria H
Debater
84
04
I Made Arisanto
Adjudicator
85
04
Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Revian Wirabuana
Debater
86
04
Jeanne Sanjaya
Debater
87
04
Michael Putra
Adjudicator
88
04
Universitas Padjadjaran
Risanto Mulyo
Debater
89
04
Wira Agung Swadana
Debater
90
04
Cynthia Mutiara
Adjudicator
91
04
Politeknik Negeri Bandung
Zefanya Alanza C L
Debater
92
04
Sarah Siti Jubaedah
Debater
93
04
Nadiah Alhusna
Adjudicator
94
04
Politeknik Manufaktur Bandung
M. Apriyanto Wijaya
Debater
95
04
Ezza Aliya Nashrullah
Debater
96
04
Dia Ginanjar
Adjudicator
97
04
Universitas Telkom
Chantique Putri A. T
Debater
98
04
Universitas Telkom
Tubagus M Reza H
Debater
99
04
Universitas Telkom
Yunita Anggraini
Adjudicator
100
04
Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung
Benedictus Arie Moniaga
Debater
101
04
Adrian
Debater
102
04
Windya Sefniza Putri
Adjudicator
103
04
Universitas Wiralodra
Triana Siska
Debater
104
04
Cyndiyach
Debater
105
04
Indri Tsalisti Nurhalim
Adjudicator
106
04
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Hafiz Priyansyah
Debater
107
04
Wahyu Armi Fitriani
Debater
As
7
No.
Region
Colleges
Name
108
04
Cut Ansi Faradhiba
Adjudicator
109
04
STBA Yapari Bandung
Ariefinara Hernawan
Debater
110
04
STBA Yapari Bandung
Sulistia Ningsih
Debater
111
04
STBA Yapari Bandung
Andika Renaldi Umboh
Adjudicator
112
04
STKIP Siliwangi
Yeni Latifah
Debater
113
04
STKIP Siliwangi
Bagus Legowo
Debater
114
04
STKIP Siliwangi
Deri Afriansyah
Adjudicator
115
05
Aryanda Putra Tony
Debater
116
05
Aldila Irsyad
Debater
117
05
Sandy Sanjaya Awaluddin
Adjudicator
118
05
Tyas Wahyukirana
Debater
119
05
Christopher Tjia
Debater
120
05
Ivonne Kezia
Adjudicator
121
05
Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Ambarukmo
Evi Hidiyahwati
Debater
122
Febryan Pratama Karendra
Debater
123
05
05
Lucky Novia Ekawati
Adjudicator
124
05
Muhamad Urfan Taufik
Debater
125
05
Dea Dwi Novita
Debater
126
05
Naning Pratiwi
Adjudicator
127
05
Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Annisa Puspa Kurnia Kariimah
Debater
128
05
Niken Fatma Putri
Debater
129
05
Hardanisa Kumaratri
Adjudicator
130
05
Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
Dimas Sigit Pambudi
Debater
131
05
Sekar Gandhawangi
Debater
132
05
Mario N. Tey Seran
Adjudicator
133
05
Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana
Pinkan Pertiwi Kariodimedjo
Debater
134
05
Michael Abadi Santoso
Debater
135
05
Maria Septiyani, S.Pd.,M.Hum
Adjudicator
136
05
Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta
Wawan Prasetyo
Debater
137
05
Rizqi Sabrina
Debater
138
05
Afan Setiawan
Adjudicator
139
06
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Mafridho Bagus Yusuf
Debater
140
06
Ayudhia Ratna Wijaya
Debater
141
06
Yoga Adityatama
Adjudicator
142
06
Frederica Vania Agustina
Debater
143
06
Albert Ghana Pratama
Debater
144
06
Gabe Dhiar Simorangkir
Adjudicator
145
06
Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Aldy Pratama
Debater
As
8
No.
Region
Colleges
Name
146
06
Florentino Bintang
Debater
147
06
Sulistya Ayuningtyas
Adjudicator
148
06
Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
Nadya Rahmalia Puteri
Debater
149
06
Mochamad Hadi
Debater
150
06
Maharensi Ariyansyah
Adjudicator
151
06
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Fatmawati Tri Tuwuhingtyas
Debater
152
06
Hafizh Rachman
Debater
153
06
Ruth Yuliana Salim
Adjudicator
154
06
Politeknik Negeri Semarang
Sri Handayani
Debater
155
06
Enis Dwi Rizki
Debater
156
06
Syukron Alhakim
Adjudicator
157
06
Universitas PGRI Semarang
Puguh Dwi Siswoyo
Debater
158
06
Faradilla Fahra Shahdinar
Debater
159
06
Anika Handayani
Adjudicator
160
06
Putri Maharani
Debater
161
06
Asih Porwandari
Debater
162
06
Rizki Rian Pratiwi
Adjudicator
163
06
Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara
Sukoharjo
Sukoharjo
Sukoharjo
Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
Jeffrey Prawira Assaji
Debater
164
06
R. Gargista Gustamas
Debater
165
06
Uda Makiya Syauqillah
Adjudicator
166
07
Debater
167
07
168
07
Leiditya Naristi
Muhammad Afdhal Anugrah
Abdillah
Farida
169
07
Politeknik Negeri Malang
Ratna Fitri R.
Debater
170
07
Novia Fitri S.
Debater
171
07
Tiani Khusnul R.
Adjudicator
172
07
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Muhammad Itqon Askary
Debater
173
07
Azzam Al Hanif
Debater
174
07
M. Abdan Syakura
Adjudicator
175
07
Universitas PGRI ADI Buana Surabaya
Putri Mei Asih
Debater
176
07
Achmad Syarifuddin
Debater
177
07
Lutfi Prahara
Adjudicator
178
07
Universitas Airlangga
Mutiara Kasih Ramadhani
Debater
179
07
Nur Pratama Abdi M.
Debater
180
07
Oktaviana Verbaya Sagala
Adjudicator
181
07
Universitas Hang Tuah Surabaya
Narumi Inoue
Debater
As
9
Debater
Adjudicator
No.
Region
Colleges
Name
182
07
Musthafa
Debater
183
07
Yesicca Maria
Adjudicator
184
07
Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya
Aji Machmudi
Debater
185
07
Rosyita Firdaus
Debater
186
07
Safira Maj'maal Bachrain
Adjudicator
187
07
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Sazi Ajeng Ayu Virginia
Debater
188
07
Landry Dwiyoga Daniswara
Debater
189
07
Peggy Stefany Dano
Adjudicator
190
07
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Alhamdu Ramadhan
Debater
191
07
Zaenal Abidin
Debater
192
07
Marchatus Solichah
Adjudicator
193
07
Universitas Negeri Malang
Tedy Tri Wicaksono
Debater
194
07
Lisa Ramadhani Harianti
Debater
195
07
M. Iqbal Darmawan
Adjudicator
196
08
Politeknik Negeri Bali
Ni Putu Novi Arini Putri
Debater
197
08
Cyntha Poppy Sugianto
Debater
198
08
Ni Komang Alit Ary Sumartini
Adjudicator
199
08
Universitas Mataram
Bq. Yunia Eka Diana Putri
Debater
200
08
Universitas Mataram
Iqbal Maulana
Debater
201
08
Universitas Mataram
Adjudicator
202
08
Universitas Udayana
203
08
Universitas Udayana
Wawan Suriadi
A. A. Sagung Mirah
Prabandari
Ni Putu Virgin Kartika Sari
204
08
Universitas Udayana
Nola Nur Aini Sri Handayani
Adjudicator
205
08
Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira
Elia Simon
Debater
206
08
Sisilia Gracella Tunga
Debater
207
08
Elisabet A. Werang, S.Pd
Adjudicator
208
08
STIKES Bali
Kadek Ayu Ristianti
Debater
209
08
STIKES Bali
NI Putu Wisma Ekawati
Debater
210
08
STIKES Bali
I Gusti Ayu Utari Harmoni
Adjudicator
211
08
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Putu Dika Pratiwi
Debater
212
08
Ketut Aryati Utami
Debater
213
08
Ni Luh Okassandiari
Adjudicator
214
09
Andriano P.Sumule
Debater
215
09
Debater
216
09
217
09
Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado
Khatibul Umam
Prof. Dr. Noer Jihad Saleh, M.
A
Jesica Gloria Mogi
218
09
Tjoa Nathasia
Debater
As
10
Debater
Debater
Adjudicator
Debater
No.
Region
Colleges
Name
219
09
Dimas Prakoso
Adjudicator
220
09
Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Khairunnisa A. Yahya
Debater
221
09
Nur Atikah Harmianty
Debater
222
09
Andi Mangeppe M
Adjudicator
223
09
Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare
Sapri
Debater
224
09
Muhammad Amin Rais
Debater
225
09
Zulwahyuni Namrullah
Adjudicator
226
09
Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
Mujib Hasib
Debater
227
09
Sulastiani
Debater
228
09
Muh. Aswar
Adjudicator
229
09
Universitas Tadulako
Dewi Nur Qamariah
Debater
230
09
Frilly Andrelia Utami
Debater
231
09
Danish Lufhli
Adjudicator
232
09
Doni Markus
Debater
233
09
Yuni Rutniyanti
Debater
234
09
Hamirullah
Adjudicator
235
09
Universitas Sembilanbelas November
Kolaka
Kolaka
Kolaka
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Nur Aqmarina Sanad
Debater
236
09
Errol Roboth
Debater
237
09
Farid Muhammad, S.Pd., MA
Adjudicator
238
10
Universitas Riau
Syafira Yasmin Nasution
Debater
239
10
Universitas Riau
Rizka Amelia Isty
Debater
240
10
Universitas Riau
Rahmat Hanif
Adjudicator
241
10
Universitas Internasional Batam
Jhonson Halim
Debater
242
10
Carvin
Debater
243
10
Stiven Mandala Putra
Adjudicator
244
10
Universitas Andalas
Dian Septiari
Debater
245
10
Universitas Andalas
Kevin Ilham Kurniawan
Debater
246
10
Universitas Andalas
Melati Dwi Anugrah Khalik
Adjudicator
247
10
Politeknik Negeri Padang
Azizul Hakim
Debater
248
10
Nissa Erlina
Debater
249
10
Andri Riza Othman
Adjudicator
250
10
Politeknik Caltex
Ivanny Shintia
Debater
251
10
Politeknik Caltex
Ganda Purnama Sari
Debater
252
10
Politeknik Caltex
Ronaldo Agung
Adjudicator
253
10
Universitas Mahaputra M. Yamin
Jang Karno
Debater
254
10
Gerial Berkah Danesa
Debater
255
10
Ica Puspita
Adjudicator
As
11
No.
Region
Colleges
Name
256
10
Politeknik Negeri Batam
Erdayosi
Debater
257
10
Daning Wiranty
Debater
258
10
Dedi Kurniawan
Adjudicator
259
10
Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Payakumbuh
Muhammad Afdal
Debater
260
10
Widia Siska Yenti
Debater
261
10
Indri Wahyu Putri
Adjudicator
262
11
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Rizha Juniansyah Anwary
Debater
263
11
Rizky Hasbi Yudhi Azhari
Debater
264
11
Anita Zulrakhmida Fajriani
Adjudicator
265
11
Universitas Mulawarman
Dini Hariyatti
Debater
266
11
Richa Rachmawati Afay
Debater
267
11
Virhans Dipa Alanson
Adjudicator
268
11
Universitas Tanjung Pura
Cristine Devi Claudia
Debater
269
11
Gintini Oktavia
Debater
270
11
Muaffi Alif
Adjudicator
271
11
Politeknik Banjarmasin
Muhammad Irfan El Siami
Debater
272
11
Septian Dwi Wijaya
Debater
273
11
Aringga Malga Alfion
Adjudicator
274
11
Universitas Palangkaraya
Debater
275
11
276
11
Evan Kristanto Gampa
Andreyan Aditya Septian
Nugraha
Raynaldi Adilasta Kesuma
277
11
STIE Mulia Singkawang
Hermandus
Debater
278
11
Vega Juniati
Debater
279
11
Alfian
Adjudicator
280
12
Sartika Putri Sailuddin
Debater
281
12
Universitas Khairun
Universitas Khairun
Aulia Dwiyanti
Debater
282
12
Universitas Khairun
Sutrisno Adam, S.S,M.Hum
Adjudicator
283
12
Sescha C.O. Matitaputty
Debater
284
12
Universitas Pattimura
Henry Latuheru
Debater
285
12
Barnev T.R. Soukotta
Adjudicator
286
12
Ardiansyah
Debater
287
12
Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara
Herawati Teapon
Debater
288
12
Adi F. Mahmud
Adjudicator
289
12
Rafeli A. Redjeb
Debater
290
12
Universitas Pasifik Morotai
Exsa Rava Iwisara
Debater
291
12
Saifudin S. Adam
Adjudicator
292
12
Universitas Krisisten Indonesia Maluku
Chalvin K. Tehuayo
Debater
293
12
Vikry Paais
Debater
As
12
Debater
Adjudicator
No.
Region
Colleges
Name
294
12
Marthevient Y.H.T. Soumokil
Adjudicator
295
12
STIKOM Ambon
Nurhayaty Narwawan
Debater
296
12
STIKOM Ambon
Suryatman
Debater
297
12
STIKOM Ambon
Sepsy Caroline Th, SS,M.Hum
Adjudicator
298
13
Universitas Syiah Kuala
Wilsen Yungnata
Debater
299
13
Zaudhatul Ulya
Debater
300
13
Yuliana, S.Pd, MA
Adjudicator
301
13
STKIP Bina Bangsa Getsempena
Sundari Apprillia
Debater
302
13
Raisa Guswita
Debater
303
13
Sri Wahyuni, M.Pd
Adjudicator
304
13
Universitas Abulyatama
Heena Anasha
Debater
305
13
Riqa Putri Asyura
Debater
306
13
Ema Dauyah,M.Ed, ST
Adjudicator
307
13
Universitas Samudra
Firman
Debater
308
13
Universitas Samudra
Fitri Lidya Hasibuan
Debater
309
13
Universitas Samudra
Chairuddin,S.Pd, MS
Adjudicator
310
13
Universitas Serambi Mekkah
Ayu Fitria
Debater
311
13
Alan Fadinata
Debater
312
13
Zayana Putri, S.Pd. M.Pd
Adjudicator
313
13
Universitas Malikussaleh
Andrianta Bangun
Debater
314
13
Ferdiansyah
Debater
315
13
Teuku Azhari, S.Pd.I. M.Ed
Adjudicator
316
14
Universitas Papua
Denilo Hokhumala
Debater
317
14
Universitas Papua
Everista Iriani
Debater
318
14
Universitas Papua
Mario Vincencius Junior
Adjudicator
319
14
Universitas Musamus Merauke
Arin M. Anggawirya
Debater
320
14
Galang Restu Abadi
Debater
321
14
Marta Betaubun
Adjudicator
322
14
Universitas Sains Dan Teknologi Jayapura
Yuan Daniel
Debater
323
14
Meho Bernard
Debater
324
14
Heribertus Mangu
Adjudicator
325
14
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong
Moh. Mifta Toha Baria
Debater
326
14
Sri Hastina
Debater
327
14
Ahmad Wael, S.Pd, M.Pd
Adjudicator
328
14
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Papua
Ratih I. W Kamati
Debater
329
14
Cici Umul Khairiah
Debater
330
14
Maxwel Wiliams, SS, M.Hum
Adjudicator
331
14
Universitas Ottow Geissler Jayapura
Chatrine Karubuy
Debater
As
13
No.
Region
Colleges
Name
As
332
14
Benita F. Manurung
Debater
333
14
Gisbert Sitanala, SS
Adjudicator
I. BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM
Part 1
Introduction
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
The format of the debate
The debate will consist of four teams of two persons (persons
will be known as "members"), a chairperson (known as the
"Speaker of the House" or "Mister/Madame Speaker" and an
adjudicator or panel of adjudicators.
Teams will consist of the following members:
Members will deliver substantive speeches in the following
order:
(1) Prime Minister;
(2) Opposition Leader;
(3) Deputy Prime Minister;
(4) Deputy Opposition Leader;
(5) Member for the Government;
(6) Member for the Opposition;
(7) Government Whip;
(8) Opposition Whip.
Opening Government:
" Prime Minister" or "First Government member" and
" Deputy Prime Minister" or "Second Government member";
Opening Opposition:
" Leader of the Opposition" or "First Opposition member" and
" Deputy Leader of the Opposition" or "Second Opposition
member";
14
Closing Government:
" Member for the Government" or "Third Government
member" and
" Government Whip" or "Fourth Opposition member";
Closing Opposition:
" Member for the Opposition" or "Third Opposition member"
and
" Opposition Whip" or "Fourth Opposition member".
1.1.4
Members will deliver a substantive speech of seven minutes
duration and should offer points of information while
members of the opposing teams are speaking.
1.2 The motion
1.2.1
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.4
The motion should be unambiguously worded.
The motion should reflect that the World Universities
Debating Championship is an international tournament.
The members should debate the motion in the spirit of the
motion and the tournament.
Preparation
The debate should commence 15 minutes after the motion is
announced.
Teams should arrive at their debate within five minutes of the
scheduled starting time for that debate.
Members are permitted to use printed or written material
during preparation and during the debate. Printed material
includes books, journals, newspapers and other similar
materials. The use of electronic equipment is prohibited
during preparation and in the debate.
Points of Information
15
1.4.1
1.4.2
1.4.3
1.4.4
1.4.5
1.4.6
1.4.7
1.4.8
1.5
1.5.1
1.5.2
1.5.3
1.5.4
Points of Information (questions directed to the member
speaking) may be asked between first minute mark and the
six-minute mark of the members’ speeches (speeches are of
seven minutes duration).
To ask a Point of Information, a member should stand, place
one hand on his or her head and extend the other towards the
member speaking. The member may announce that they
would like to ask a "Point of Information" or use other words
to this effect.
The member who is speaking may accept or decline to answer
the Point of Information.
Points of Information should not exceed 15 seconds in length.
The member who is speaking may ask the person offering the
Point of Information to sit down where the offeror has had a
reasonable opportunity to be heard and understood.
Members should attempt to answer at least two Points of
Information during their speech. Members should also offer
Points of Information.
Points of Information should be assessed in accordance with
clause 3.3.4 of these rules.
Points of Order and Points of Personal Privilege are not
permitted.
Timing of the speeches
Speeches should be seven minutes in duration (this should be
signaled by two strikes of the gavel). Speeches over seven
minutes and 15 seconds may be penalized.
Points of Information may only be offered between the first
minute mark and the six minute mark of the speech (this
period should be signaled by one strike of the gavel at the first
minute and one strike at the sixth minute).
It is the duty of the Speaker of the House to time speeches.
In the absence of the Speaker of the House, it is the duty of the
Chair of the Adjudication panel to ensure that speeches are
timed.
1.6 The adjudication
16
1.6.1
1.6.2
1.6.3
The debate should be adjudicated by a panel of at least three
adjudicators, where this is possible.
At the conclusion of the debate, the adjudicators should confer
and rank the teams, from first placed to last place. (see Part 5:
The Adjudication).
There will be verbal adjudication of the debate after the first
six preliminary rounds of the tournament. The verbal
adjudication should be delivered in accordance with clause 5.5
of these rules.
17
Part 2
Definitions
2.1 The definition
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.1.3
The definition should state the issue (or issues) for debate
arising out of the motion and state the meaning of any terms in
the motion which require interpretation.
The Prime Minister should provide the definition at the
beginning of his or her speech.
The definition must:
a) have a clear and logical link to the motion - this means that
an average reasonable person would accept the link made
by the member between the motion and the definition
(where there is no such link the definition is sometimes
referred to as a "squirrel");
b) not be self-proving - a definition is self-proving when the
case is that something should or should not be done and
there is no reasonable rebuttal. A definition is may also be
self-proving when the case is that a certain state of affairs
exists or does not exist and there is no reasonable rebuttal
(these definitions are sometimes referred to as "truisms").
c) not be time set - this means that the debate must take place
in the present and that the definition cannot set the debate
in the past or the future; and
d) not be place set unfairly - this means that the definition
cannot restrict the debate so narrowly to a particular
geographical or political location that a participant of the
tournament could not reasonably be expected to have
knowledge of the place.
2.2 Challenging the definition
2.2.1
2.2.2
The Leader of the Opposition may challenge the definition if it
violates clause 2.1.3 of these rules. The Leader of the
Opposition should clearly state that he or she is challenging
the definition.
The Leader of the Opposition should substitute an alternative
18
definition after challenging the definition of the Prime
Minister.
2.3 Assessing the definitional challenge
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.5
2.3.6
The adjudicator should determine the definition to be
‘unreasonable’ where it violates clause 2.1.3 of these rules.
The onus to establish that the definition is unreasonable is on
the members asserting that the definition is unreasonable.
Where the definition is unreasonable, the opposition should
substitute an alternative definition that should be accepted by
the adjudicator provided it is not unreasonable.
Where the definition of the Opening Government is
unreasonable and an alternative definition is substituted by
the Opening Opposition, the Closing Government may
introduce matter which is inconsistent with the matter
presented by the Opening Government and consistent with the
definition of the Opening Opposition.
If the Opening Opposition has substituted a definition that is
also unreasonable, the Closing Government may challenge the
definition of the Opening Opposition and substitute an
alternative definition.
If the Closing Government has substituted a definition that is
also unreasonable (in addition to the unreasonable definitions
of the Opening Government and Opening Opposition, the
Closing Opposition may challenge the definition of the Closing
Government and substitute an alternative definition.
19
Part 3
Matter
3.1 The definition of matter
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
Matter is the content of the speech. It is the arguments a
debater uses to further his or her case and persuade the
audience.
Matter includes arguments and reasoning, examples, case
studies, facts and any other material that attempts to further
the case.
Matter includes positive (or substantive) material and rebuttal
(arguments specifically aimed to refute the arguments of the
opposing team(s)). Matter includes Points of Information.
3.2 The elements of matter
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.2.3
3.2.4
3.2.5
3.2.6
Matter should be relevant, logical and consistent.
Matter should be relevant. It should relate to the issues of the
debate: positive material should support the case being
presented and rebuttal should refute the material being
presented by the opposing team(s). The Member should
appropriately prioritize and apportion time to the dynamic
issues of the debate.
Matter should be logical. Arguments should be developed
logically in order to be clear and well reasoned and therefore
plausible. The conclusion of all arguments should support the
member’s case.
Matter should be consistent. Members should ensure that the
matter they present is consistent within their speech, their
team and the remainder of the members on their side of the
debate (subject to clauses 2.3.4, 2.3.5 or 2.3.6 of these rules).
All Members should present positive matter (except the final
two members in the debate) and all members should present
rebuttal (except the first member in the debate). The
Government Whip may choose to present positive matter.
All Members should attempt to answer at least two points of
information during their own speech and offer points of
20
information during opposing speeches.
3.3 Assessing matter
3.3.1
The matter presented should be persuasive. ‘The elements of
matter’ should assist an adjudicator to assess the
persuasiveness and credibility of the matter presented.
3.3.2
Matter should be assessed from the viewpoint of the average
reasonable person. Adjudicators should analyze the matter
presented and assess its persuasiveness, while disregarding
any specialist knowledge they may have on the issue of the
debate.
3.3.3
Adjudicators should not allow bias to influence their
assessment. Debaters should not be discriminated against on
the basis of religion, sex, race, color, nationality, sexual
preference, age, social status or disability.
3.3.4
Points of information should be assessed according to the
effect they have on the persuasiveness of the cases of both the
member answering the point of information and the member
offering the point of information.
21
Part 4
Manner
4.1 The definition of manner
4.1.1
4.1.2
Manner is the presentation of the speech. It is the style and
structure a member uses to further his or her case and
persuade the audience.
Manner is comprised of many separate elements. Some, but
not all, of these elements are listed below.
4.2 The elements of style
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.2.4
4.2.5
4.2.6
The elements of style include eye contact, voice modulation,
hand gestures, language, the use of notes and any other
element which may affect the effectiveness of the presentation
of the member.
Eye contact will generally assist a member to persuade an
audience as it allows the member to appear more sincere.
Voice modulation will generally assist a member to persuade
an audience as the debater may emphasize important
arguments and keep the attention of the audience. This
includes the pitch, tone, and volume of the member’s voice and
the use of pauses.
Hand gestures will generally assist a member to emphasize
important arguments. Excessive hand movements may
however be distracting and reduce the attentiveness of the
audience to the arguments.
Language should be clear and simple. Members who use
language which is too verbose or confusing may detract from
the argument if they lose the attention of the audience.
The use of notes is permitted, but members should be careful
that they do not rely on their notes too much and detract from
the other elements of manner.
22
4.3 The elements of structure
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3.3
The elements of structure include the structure of the speech of
the member and the structure of the speech of the team.
The matter of the speech of each member must be structured.
The member should organize his or her matter to improve the
effectiveness of their presentation. The substantive speech of
each member should:
The matter of the team must be structured. The team should
organize their matter to improve the effectiveness of their
presentation. The team should:
a) contain a consistent approach to the issues being debated;
and
b) allocate positive matter to each member where both
members of the team are introducing positive matter; and
c) include: an introduction, conclusion and a series of
arguments; and
d) be well-timed in accordance with the time limitations and
the need to prioritize and apportion time to matter.
4.4 Assessing manner
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
Adjudicators should assess the elements of manner together in
order to determine the overall effectiveness of the member’s
presentation. Adjudicators should assess whether the
member’s presentation is assisted or diminished by their
manner.
Adjudicators should be aware that at a World Championship,
there are many styles which are appropriate, and that they
should not discriminate against a member simply because the
manner would be deemed ‘inappropriate Parliamentary
debating’ in their own country.
Adjudicators should not allow bias to influence their
assessment. Members should not be discriminated against on
the basis of religion, sex, race, color, nationality, language
(subject to Rule 4.2.4), sexual preference, age, social status or
disability.
23
Part 5
The Adjudication
5.1 The role of the adjudicator
5.1.1
The adjudicator must:
a) Confer upon and discuss the debate with the other
adjudicators;
b) Determine the rankings of the teams;
c) Determine the team grades;
d) Determine the speaker marks;
e) Provide a verbal adjudication to the members; and
f) Complete any documentation required by the
tournament.5.1.2 The adjudication panel should attempt to
agree on the adjudication of the debate. Adjudicators
should therefore confer in a spirit of cooperation and
mutual respect
5.1.3
Adjudicators should acknowledge that adjudicators on a panel
may form different or opposite views of the debate.
Adjudicators should therefore attempt to base their
conclusions on these rules in order to limit subjectivity and to
provide a consistent approach to the assessment of debates.
5.2 Ranking teams
5.2.1
5.2.2
5.2.3
Teams should be ranked from first place to last place. First
placed teams should be awarded three points, second placed
teams should be awarded two points, third placed teams
should be awarded one point and fourth placed teams should
be awarded zero points.
Teams may receive zero points where they fail to arrive at the
debate more than five minutes after the scheduled time for
debate.
Teams may receive zero points where the adjudicators
unanimously agree that the Member has (or Members have)
harassed another debater on the basis of religion, sex, race,
24
5.2.4
color, nationality, sexual preference or disability.
Adjudicators should confer upon team rankings. Where a
unanimous decision cannot be reached after conferral, the
decision of the majority will determine the rankings. Where a
majority decision cannot be reached, the Chair of the panel of
adjudicators will determine the rankings.
5.3 Grading and marking the teams
5.3.1
5.3.2
Grade
The panel of adjudicators should agree upon the grade that
each team is to be awarded. Each adjudicator may then mark
the teams at their discretion but within the agreed grade.
Where there is a member of the panel who has dissented in the
ranking of the teams, that adjudicator will not need to agree
upon the team grades and may complete their score sheet at
their own discretion.
Team grades and marks should be given the following
interpretation:
Marks
Meaning
180-200
Excellent to flawless. The standard you would expect to
see from a team at the Semi Final / Grand Final level of
the tournament. The team has much strength and few, if
any, weaknesses.
B
160-179
Above average to very good. The standard you would
expect to see from a team at the finals level or in
contention to make to the finals. The team has clear
strengths and some minor weaknesses.
C
140-159
Average. The team has strengths and weaknesses in
roughly equal proportions.
D
120-139
Poor to below average. The team has clear problems
and some minor strength.
A
25
E
100-119
Very poor. The team has fundamental weaknesses and
few, if any, strengths.
5.4 Marking the members
5.4.1
5.4.2
Grade
After the adjudicators have agreed upon the grade that each
team is to be awarded, each adjudicator may mark the
individual members at their discretion but must ensure that
the aggregate points of the team members is within the agreed
grade for that team.
Individual members’ marks should be given the following
interpretation:
Marks
Meaning
90-100
Excellent to flawless. The standard of speech you would
expect to see from a speaker at the Semi Final / Grand
Final level of the tournament. This speaker has much
strength and few, if any, weaknesses.
B
80-89
Above average to very good. The standard you would
expect to see from a speaker at the finals level or in
contention to make to the finals. This speaker has clear
strengths and some minor weaknesses.
C
70-79
Average. The speaker has strengths and weaknesses and
roughly equal proportions.
D
60-69
Poor to below average. The team has clear problems and
some minor strength.
E
50-59
Very poor. This speaker has fundamental weaknesses
and few, if any, strengths.
A
26
5.5 Verbal adjudications
5.5.1
5.5.2
5.5.3
5.5.4
5.5.5
5.5.6
At the conclusion of the conferral, the adjudication panel
should provide a verbal adjudication of the debate.
The verbal adjudication should be delivered by the Chair of the
adjudication panel, or where the Chair dissents, by a member
of the adjudication panel nominated by the Chair of the panel.
The verbal adjudication should:
The verbal adjudication should not exceed 10 minutes.
The members must not harass the adjudicators following the
verbal adjudication.
The members may approach an adjudicator for further
clarification following the verbal adjudication; these inquiries
must at all times be polite and non-confrontational.
a) identify the order in which the teams were ranked
b) explain the reasons for the rankings of team, ensuring that
each team is referred to in this explanation; and
c) provide constructive comments to individual members
where the adjudication panel believes this is necessary.
5.5.4
5.5.5
5.5.6
The verbal adjudication should not exceed 10 minutes.
The members must not harass the adjudicators following the
verbal adjudication.
The members may approach an adjudicator for further
clarification following the verbal adjudication; these inquiries
must at all times be polite and non-confrontational.
27
J. Prosedur for Filling in and Submission of SPPD Form
There is no reimbursement policy from Directorate of Learning and Students
Affairs, Ministry of Research Technology and Higher Education for observer,
supervisor or other delegations, a part from appointed participants. Only
three appointed participants (2 debaters + 1 adjudicator) can be claimed for
reimbursement.
Requirements:
1. All participants must bring original SPPD (Surat Perintah Perjalanan
Dinas) that has been signed and stamped by relevant official from home
university (in the upper right box and bottom left). See example of
SPPD form below.
2. Bring the original and a fotocopy of the return ticket (airplane or other
mean of transportation).
3. Bring the original and a fotocopy of departure boarding pass from
home university.
4. All the files must be submitted to the committee table at Mercu Buana
University with due date for registration on Monday August 1st, 2016
at 12.00 WIB.
5. The committee will submit all files to Directorate of Learning and
Students Affairs, Ministry of Research Technology and Higher
Education for further processing.
28
SPPD FORM
I. Berangkat dari
(Tempat kedudukan)
Ke
Pada Tanggal
Kepala
:
:
:
:
………………………………
II. Tiba di
Pada Tanggal
Kepala
:
:
:
Berangkat dari
Ke
Pada Tanggal
Kepala
:
:
:
:
:
………………………………
III. Tiba di
Pada Tanggal
Kepala
:
:
:
………………………………
Berangkat dari
Ke
Pada Tanggal
Kepala
:
:
:
:
:
………………………………
IV. Tiba di
Pada Tanggal
Kepala
:
:
:
………………………………
Berangkat dari
Ke
Pada Tanggal
Kepala
:
:
:
:
:
……………………………….
V. Tiba di
Pada Tanggal
Kepala
:
:
:
………………………………
Berangkat dari
Ke
Pada Tanggal
Kepala
:
:
:
:
:
………………………………
VI. Tiba di
Pada Tanggal
Kepala
:
:
:
………………………………
Telah diperiksa dengan keterangan bahwa perjalanan tersebut di
atas perintahnya dan semata-mata untuk kepentingan jabatan
dalam waktu yang sesingkat-singkatnya
………..…………………….
Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan
Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen
Afriyudianto
NIP. 19760426 201012 1 002
VII. Catatan Lain-Lain
VIII. PERHATIAN :
PPK yang menerbitkan SPD, pegawai yang melakukan perjalanan dinas, para pejabat yang mengesahkan tanggal
berangkat/tiba, serta bendahara pengeluaran bertanggung jawab berdasarkan peraturan-peraturan Keuangan Negara
apabila Negara menderita rugi akibat kesalahan, kelalian, dan kealpaannya
29
K. NICE PLACESTO VISIT IN JAKARTA
Monas - The National Monument
As an icon of the city and a symbol of the struggle of Indonesia, Monas is a
place worth visiting. In addition to the monument, you can also find The
National History Museum in the area around Monas. In this museum there are
many dioramas depicting the history of Indonesia. In addition to learning
about the history of Indonesia, it is quite interesting to take pictures with
Monas as a background. Be creative and make your own unique picture! The
monument and the museum are located in central Jakarta. They are open daily
from 08.00 – 15.00 throughout the week except the last Monday of each
month. The best time to visit Monas is in the evening just before the sunset.
Taman Mini Indonesia Indah
TMII (literary translated as Beautiful Indonesia Miniature Park) Jakarta is
located in the eastern part of the city and is a very interesting place to visit to
learn Indonesian culture. This place is practically a miniature of Indonesia.
Although I personally found that riding a cable car in TMII is quite scary, the
scenery that can be seen from above is quite rewarding. We could see the pool
with a decorative map of Indonesia. Besides the pavilions of each province of
Indonesia there are also many museums in the TMII area worth visiting.
Ancol Beach
Honestly, to this day I do not understand why we have to pay for the beach in
Jakarta. Supposedly the beach is a public place that is free for everyone to
visit! Well anyway, let’s not focus on that thing. Ancol is a beach park, one area
with Dufan, the amusement park. Please, do not imagine a beach with white
sand and clear water. Sorry to say, but Ancol is quite a dirty beach. Ancol
beach could be an option if you want to enjoy the sunset while sitting in a cafe
30
after visiting Dufan. If you love photography, photographing around Ancol is
quite exciting as well.
Dunia Fantasi
Dufan or Dunia Fantasi is one big complex with the beach that I’ve talked
about earlier. This is the biggest amusement park in Indonesia (probably?
There is also Trans Studio Makassar and Bandung too, I have never been there
so I am not really sure). Playing around for a full day in Dufan is like a short
getaway from the busyness of Jakarta. I can tell that going to Dufan for some
Indonesians who live on another island than Java is like a dream come true. As
for me, spending one day with a bunch of friends in Dufan is definitely going
to be a super fun day! Don’t go there on the weekend since it will be
ridiculously busy.
Old Town
Old Town or Old Batavia has a very strong historical value, but it is
unfortunate that most of the buildings in the Old Town are not well preserved.
Around the Old Town, there are several interesting museums to visit. The
Jakarta History Museum (Fatahillah Museum), Museum of Fine Art and
Ceramic as well as the Puppet Museum are all around Batavia. Usually, local
people explore around the area of the old town by renting an old-fashioned
bike (it cost around $3). You can cycle around the area to the Sunda Kelapa
harbour. Afterwards you can relax, eat and drink at Cafe Batavia. A restaurant
that serves good coffee and has an interesting design.
31

program book national university debating championship

Transcription

Similar documents

EC-Council Appointed Universitas Mercu Buana as Academic partner

QS STARS Rating System

EBUMY2036 - Digital Repository

Buku IQF-II B-Inggris-rev5-forPDF.cdr

Newsletter

first post-world war ii basketball championship 1946

Untitled - Dhoto - Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya

Issue 19 2014 June 18 2014 - The Hills Christian Community

bicyclists` response to bikeways in yogyakarta

UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA PROFILE