- National Association of Counties

Using Juvenile Receiving Centers
to Improve Safety & Outcomes
September 25, 2014
2
Tips for viewing this webinar:
• The questions box and buttons are on the right side of the
webinar window.
• This box can collapse so that you can better view the
presentation. To unhide the box, click the arrows on the
top left corner of the panel.
• If you are having technical difficulties, please send us a
message via the questions box on your right. Our organizer
will reply to you privately and help resolve the issue.
3
Webinar Recording and Evaluation Survey
• This webinar is being recorded and will be made available
online to view later or review.
• After the webinar, you will see a pop-up box containing a
webinar evaluation survey. Thank you in advance for
completing this survey. Your feedback is important to us.
4
Question & Answer Session Instructions
• Type your question into the questions box at any
time during the presentation, and the moderator
will read the question on your behalf during the
Q&A session.
5
NACo’s Work with Models for Change
Strategic partnership designed to:
• Build county leadership capacity, expertise, and
commitment for juvenile justice reform across the
country
• Promote model programs for juvenile justice reform
by providing thought leadership, education,
technical assistance, and peer networking
opportunities to county officials and staff
For more information about NACo’s Criminal Justice Programs
and to view the recorded webinar, please visit:
http://www.naco.org/justice.
6
Today’s Speakers:
Josh Campbell
Calcasieu Parish, La.
Kolby Brown
Tulsa County, Okla.
7
Calcasieu Parish
Multi-Agency Resource Center
William Sommers, Director
Josh Campbell, MARC Manager
Calcasieu Parish Police Jury
Office of Juvenile Justice Services
www.cppj.net
Discussion Overview
History and Development
 Overview of Structure and Processes
 Lessons Learned
 Review of Results

Demographics/Structure
Population
197,702
Median Household Income
$45,470
Race and Ethnic Categories (2000)
Caucasian:
(73.6%)
African American:
(24.0%)
Native American:
(0.3%)
Asian:
(0.6%)
Other:
(1.5%)
Juvenile Services:
serves six municipalities and nine law enforcement agencies
works under the supervision of the Calcasieu Parish Police Jury
and serves our Juvenile and Family court through a memorandum
of understanding.
Funding Sources
$576,787
$90,000
$75,000
$106,171
$4,474,638
Ad Valorem
Private Foundation
State Grants
Interest Income
State Rev Sharing




Calcasieu Parish Reform
Annie E. Casey Foundation “Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative”
MacArthur Foundation “Models for Change”
Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) – Pilot Site
The Vera Institute, New York, NY observed and documented how the parish
currently responds to status offenders. A paper was published on the four
elements of Calcasieu’s system that stood out as consistent with national best
practice.
“The Need for Change”
“In Calcasieu Parish, we realized that although we did not have
the answers, we knew we had a lot of room for improvement.
We decided to change the way we do business!”
•
•
•
•
•
Number of juveniles referred to court and/or to detention was not
decreasing
Due to the above, we were not providing effective programming for
our kids
Overall we were not being efficient enough to provide quality
services
We were not always focusing on the “right kids”
Timing in our parish was “ripe” for change
Need for
a
Catalyst!
http://www.calcypb.org/
Multi-Agency Resource Center
The mission of the MARC is to provide a single entry
point and coordinated approach to juvenile services
for the youth and families of Calcasieu Parish.
The center is a collaborative
project of the Calcasieu Parish
Children and Youth Planning
Board Member agencies.
MARC Video: http://youtu.be/59T1CMiBecQ
MARC Goals/Criteria
MARC Goals
•Provide youth and families with a
single access point.
• Provide on-site screening and
assessments of youth.
• Reduce Law Enforcement
processing times.
• Reduce time between arrest and
intake.
• Promote public safety and
wellbeing.
MARC Criteria
• Walk-in cases (Families requesting
information or assistance)
• Status and Delinquent cases
• 5-17 years old
•Not intoxicated or Injured
The MARC Benefits
Law Enforcement:
• Eliminate time spent waiting on parents to arrive at the
station/location.
• Fast Custody Exchange – Goal is 12 minutes or less.
• Assistance in dealing with Status Offenders.
• Reduce recidivism.
• 24 hour “Help Line”
Community:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Faster processing times from arrest to intake.
Non-traditional hours.
Single Entry Point to reduce service duplication.
Pooling of resources to save Taxpayer Dollars.
Evidence Based programming to address needs.
A data driven center that can be modified to address
community needs.
MARC Layout
Secure Area
Public Area
Staff Area
The MARC Flow-
MARC Process






Law Enforcement:
The juvenile is transported and
Detention Admission Form is
completed.
The case is staffed with the District
Attorneys Office.
An intake interview is completed and
the JIFF Assessment is administered.
The JIFF Assessment provides a snapshot of the youths life domains, that
guide the Diversion Process.
If the family consents, a diversion
program is setup to address pending
issues.
If the family declines diversion, the
case is staffed the DA’s Office for
possible formal charges.



Community Agencies:
Families report to the center.
The JIFF is administered and
provided to parties.
Any other assessments under
MOU will be administered.
JIFF Assessment
JIFF Scales
Training:

All staff involved in the administration of
the JIFF shall:
• Review the JIFF® Quick-Start Guide
and JIFF Assessor Training
• Review the JIFF Video- Webinar Video
Administration and Case Plan
Development:



All MARC Staff shall be trained on how to
administer and utilize the JIFF Software.
Designated JIFF stations will be provided
for youth access to the assessment.
The assessment will be administered only
to youth over the age of 10.

School

Picked on By Peers

Noncompliance in Home

Family Environment

Peer Influences

Unsafe Community Behavior

Feelings

Self-Harm Potential

Substance Abuse

Health Related Needs
MAYSI Assessment
Training
 All staff members involved in the
administration of the MASYI shall
complete training on:
 View the MAYSI-2 Administration Video
 Suicide Prevention
Administration:

Upon recommendations from the JIFF
Matrix, the Staff Member shall
administer the MAYSI.

After reviewing the results of the MAYSI,
if scores indicates "Caution" or Warning",
one or more the following steps must be
taken:
•
Case will be staffed with a supervisor.
•
Case will be staffed with on-site
counselor (if during working hours)
•
Crisis and Response Team (CART) will be
contacted for further assessment.







MAYSI Scales
Alcohol/Drug Use
Angry-Irritable
Depressed-Anxious
Somatic Complaints
Suicide Ideation
Thought Disturbance
Traumatic Experiences
SASSI Assessment
Training:
 Review SASSI
Administration Video and
Manuals
Administration:
 Upon recommendations
from the JIFF Matrix the,
staff member shall
administer the SASSI-A2.
 Only trained staff members
will grade the assessment.


SASSI Scales
High Probability
Low Probability
Assessing Beyond The Charge
JIFF Goals Top 4
School 59%
• Improve Grades, Attendance, Addressing Academic
needs
Non-Compliance in Home- 40%
• Family Relations / Ungovernable Behavior / Home
Aggression
Unsafe Community Behaviors 18%
• Community Aggression / Gang Associations/ Legal
Issues
Feelings- 28%
• Depression / Anxiety / Trauma
Case Dispositions
Case Outcomes
Types of Services






Provide information to families
Counsel and release - Counsel the
youth, and close the case.
Referral to services to include
evidence based programming that
will address the family’s needs.
Pre-Court Diversion - Counsel the
youth, require participation in
programs, or refer the family to the
appropriate and necessary
services. The case will be
monitored for compliance.
Filing of Petition – staff will consult
with Supervisor for possible filing
of a formal Petition.








Crisis Intervention
Shelter Care
Big Brothers/Big Sisters
Functional Family Therapy
Multi-systemic Therapy
Shoplifting Accountability Program
Evening Reporting Center
Teen Court
Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment
Data
Status of Data
• Youth Served
• Foot Traffic
Vera Outcome
• Measures/Evaluation
• Processing Times
• Recidivism
• Service Quality
Intakes By Year
1400
1289
1200
1238
1000
800
789
Intakes
Petitions
600
400
200
150
186
195
0
2011
2012
2013
500
450
400
MARC Foot Traffic By Year
476
399
350
300
250
320 316
249
309
245
214
2012
2013
200
150
100
50
0
Walk Ins
Status
Referrals
Delinquent
Referrals
Law
Enforcement
Referrals
MARC Outcome
Research Questions
Are youth referred to MARC more likely to be
successfully diverted compared to prior system
youth?
 Does MARC produce a net-widening effect?
 How well are youth assessed and referred to the
appropriate services based on their needs?
 Did the implementation of MARC increase the
speed of service delivery and case processing of
youth?


MARC Benefits
Reduced FINS referrals

MARC Benefits
Reduced time to re-referrals
◦ Pre-MARC days to new referral- 125
◦ Post-MARC days to new referral- 159

MARC Benefits
Reduced processing times
Lessons Learned
The Art of Listening!
“I recall being asked to comment on the
issues law enforcement experienced with
juveniles. I distinctly remember explaining
that we knew what to do when kids
commit a felony. However, the problem
was what to do with guardians when they
call and kids won’t clean their rooms, do
homework and other non-specific things
that were behavioral and not necessarily
criminal”
More “Tools in the Toolbox”
Lessons Learned

•
•

•
•



Engaging Court Officials:
Understand their roles in the system and identify how they will
benefit from reform.
Acknowledge barriers up front and propose practical solutions to
removing them
Engaging School Officials:
Face to face contact works better than emails or phone calls.
Address how this effort aligns with their agency objectives
Engaging Law Enforcement:
Engage law enforcement not only from the onset, but at every
stage of reform. A strong foundation only increases sustainability.
Acknowledge that system change is reciprocal with Law
Enforcement. This requires a understanding of their operating
systems.
Listening to Results
“Now that we have the center which is
open it has dramatically changed the
process for handling juveniles in our
community, as well as provide law
enforcement with a valuable option
that enables them to first be able to
keep the juvenile safe and at the same
time allow them to return back to their
respective duties.”
More “Tools in the Toolbox”
Systemic Cultural Sustainability
• Continuous, ongoing training through
the Academy
• Reviewing and analyzing the data
• Educating the public on the results
Accepting the “My Child” challenge
• It requires understanding, commitment, and
tools.
MY CHILD TEST – DO WE PASS?
Questions???
Contact:
Josh Campbell
Calcasieu Parish Police Jury
Office of Juvenile Justice Services
P.O. Box 2073
Lake Charles, LA 70602
337-721-3951
[email protected]
Tulsa Area
Community Intervention Center
Kolby Brown, Director
911 Civic Center Plaza, Suite C
Tulsa, OK 74103
918-596-7580
Email: [email protected]
Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center
Table of Contents














Why CIC was Created
History and Background
Goal of Community Intervention Centers
Mission
Juvenile Trends and Statistics
Fiscal Year 2015 Funding
Simplified Flowchart
Voluntary Screening Assessments
Community Referrals
Juvenile Population Monthly Comparison
Law Enforcement Utilization
Juveniles Served by Race and Age Group
Most Frequent Offenses in Schools
Reported Gang Affiliation
Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center
Why CIC was Created?
• Create an avenue to intervene with juveniles at risk
of becoming more serious, violent, and chronic
offenders.
• Short-term reception facility that will hold juveniles
up to not exceeding 24 hours of admission.
• One-stop centralized intake, assessment and
referral system for arrested juveniles.
• Bridges the gap between non-secure youth shelters
and Juvenile Bureau Detention Centers.
Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center
History and Background
• In 1995 representatives from Office of Juvenile
Affairs and Youth Services began discussing the
concept of juvenile CIC’s.
• Resulted in the establishment of 8 sites in
Oklahoma.
• Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center is the 9th
CIC in the state of Oklahoma.
• Joint venture between the Office of Juvenile Affairs,
City of Tulsa and Youth Services.
Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center
Goal of Community Intervention Centers
• To provide early intervention for juveniles with law
violations including delinquent and misdemeanor
charges, who are not eligible for detention.
• To provide a quick drop-off for Law Enforcement
Officers – permits officers to return to their duties
within 15 minutes.
• To connect juveniles/youth back with their parents
as soon as possible.
Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center
Mission
• Assist law enforcement
officers by providing a 24-hour
short term retaining facility for
quick drop-off of juveniles so
officers can return to their
duties in the community;
• Provide a safe and secure
environment for juveniles who
have been arrested;
• Reduce recidivism of juvenile
offenders by delivering
immediate consequences for
delinquent behavior;
• Detect and address the
underlying causes of
delinquent or problem
behavior on the front end as a
preventive measure;
• Intervene before problems
escalate into chronic or more
serious offenses; and
• Create a more effective and
efficient alliance between
police, parents, juvenile justice
and treatment providers.
Juvenile Trends and Statistics
FY 2014
•
1453 Total juveniles served at the CIC
•
736 Juveniles admitted to the CIC
•
629 Juveniles processed and diverted to the Juvenile Bureau Detention Center
•
22 (1.5%) Juveniles paperwork only processed
•
66 (4.5%) Inappropriate (Runaway/DLM Eligible)
•
1145 Docket numbers generated for juveniles
•
13.25 minutes – Average Law Enforcement Officer time
•
149 Assessments scheduled; 57 assessments completed with referrals to community
agencies for counseling, education, medical, mentoring, independent living, and
employment resources, etc.
•
657 of 112 (17%) Recidivism – CIC 1st Admits
Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center
Fiscal Year 2015 Funding
 Office of Juvenile Affairs reduced funding by almost
30%
 City of Tulsa reduced funding by 10%
 Total loss between our major funders of $111,000
 Currently working to confirm other surrounding
municipality funders will continue to support our
operation.
Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center
Simplified Flowchart
Arrest
Released To
Parent/Guardian
CIC Processed
Screen, Search, Photograph, Fingerprint, Generate Court Docket
Number, Schedule Municipal Court Date
Detention
Admitted
CIC
Admitted
Community Intervention Center Functions:
•Intake Screening – OJA-5 Assessment
•Enter/Update JOLTS
•Juvenile Justice Background Information
•Secure Signed Promise to Appear
•Voluntary Comprehension Assessment
•Community Referrals/Follow-Ups
•Released to Parent, Guardian or Responsible Adult
•Transmit Information to Court Systems
Municipal
Court
District
Court
Voluntary Screenings & Assessments
1. Office of Juvenile Affairs - Initial Screening
a. School Status
b. Home Safety
c. Risk of Suicide
d. Substance Abuse
2.
Tulsa Area CIC Comprehensive Assessment
a. Explore underlying causes of delinquent and problem
behavior
b. Helps reduce recidivism
c. Generates Community Referrals
Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center
Community Referrals
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Youth Services
Adult Learning Service Center
Neighbor for Neighbor
Neighbors Along the Line
Positive Behavior Strategies
Parent/Child Center
YMCA
CASA
Planned Parenthood
Food Handlers Permit
Mentoring to the Max
Man Up! Program
Center for Therapeutic Intervention
Big Brothers/Sisters
Alateen
Life Connection Counseling Center
Child Support Enforcement
Work Force Oklahoma
Talking Leaves Job Corps
Tristesse Grief Counseling
Street School
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Counseling & Recovery Services
Get Reading Oklahoma
Calm Center
Tulsa Dream Center
Cornerstone Car Repair Program
Tulsa Star - Alternative Education
Indian Health Care Resource Center
Twilight Academy Alternative Education
Family and Children’s Services
Catholic Charities
Christ for Humanity
Shadow Mountain
CREOKS Behavioral Health Services
Man Up Program
Oklahoma Counseling Services
Department of Human Services
Girls Inc. of Tulsa County
Metropolitan Tulsa Urban League
Oklahoma Virtual High School
Palmer Drug Abuse Agency
Tulsa County Health Department
Juvenile Population Monthly Comparison
180
163
158
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
132
142 139
130
124
141
132 134
136 139
144
128
130
129
110
114
138
137
115
89
127
115
106
107
132
132
119
112
126
111
113
97
82
2012
2013
2014
Law Enforcement Frequency by Utilization
Municipality Frequency by Utilization
FY 2012
Municipality
Bixby PD
BNSF PD
Broken Arrow PD
Claremore PD
Collinsville PD
Glenpool PD
Jenks Campus PD
Jenks PD
OHP
Owasso PD
Sand Springs PD
Sapulpa PD
Skiatook PD
Sperry PD
TCSO
Tulsa Fire Dept.
Tulsa PD
Tulsa – TIA
Tulsa Pub. Sch. PD
Total
Total YTD
13
0
55
0
5
6
18
9
8
21
28
1
0
7
80
4
1168
0
165
1588
% of Use
0.8%
0%
3.5%
0%
0.3%
0.4%
1.1%
0.6%
0.5%
1.3%
1.8%
0.1%
0%
0.4%
5%
0.3%
73.5%
0%
10.4%
100%
FY 2013
Total YTD
4
0
59
0
6
4
7
14
11
23
21
0
0
2
63
10
1154
0
92
1470
% of Use
0.3%
0%
4%
0%
0.4%
0.3%
0.5%
1%
0.7%
1.6%
1.4%
0%
0%
0.1%
4.3%
0.7%
78.5%
0%
6.2%
100%
FY 2014
Total YTD
11
3
78
4
4
3
7
5
11
13
40
0
2
3
72
5
1108
0
84
1453
% of Use
0.7%
0.2%
5.4%
0.3%
0.3%
0.2%
0.5%
0.3%
0.7%
0.9%
2.7%
0%
0.1%
0.2%
5%
0.3%
76.2%
0%
6%
100%
Tulsa Police Department
TPD Gang Unit 2.2%
Tulsa Police Divisions
Detective 1.7%
Detective 1.7%
Riverside Division 29.7%
Gilcrease Division 35%
Gilcrease Division 35%
Mingo Valley Division 31.4%
Riverside Division 29.7%
TPD Gang Unit 2.2%
Mingo Valley Division
31.4%
Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center
Juvenile Offenses
Juvenile Frequency by
Destination
2.1%
.9%
Felonies 29%
29%
Transferred
JBDC 46%
Misdemeanors
71%
46%
51%
71%
Admitted
to CIC 51%
Juveniles Served by Race
Race of Juveniles
Native American 5.8%
Multiraial 0.7%
Eastern Indian 0.1%
Hispanic/Latino
13.7%
African American 46%
Asian 0.2%
Afican American 46%
Caucasian 33.5%
Eastern Indian 0.1%
Hispanic/ Latino 13.7%
Caucasian 33.5%
Multiracial 0.7%
Native American 5.8%
Asian
0.2%
Juveniles Served by Age Group
Total Juveniles By Age Group
8 - 11 years old 34
8 - 11 years old 34
12 - 14 years old 341
12 - 14 years old 341
15- 17 years old 1078
15 - 17 years old 1078
Most Frequent Offenses in Schools
• Aggravated Assault & Battery/ Assault &
Battery
• Assault on school employee
• Possession CD w/in 1000ft. school
• Possession marijuana w/in 1000ft. school
• Possession drug paraphernalia
• Threaten a violent act
Reported Gang Affiliation















107 Hoover Crip
456 Piru Blood
52nd Blood
54th Hoover Crip
57th Garrison Block Crip
57th Hoover Crip
Blood
Central Valley Gangster
Crip
CUG 13
Five Tre
Grape St. Crips
Hoover Crip
Juaritos
Juggalos
4
3
3
3
1
6
23
5
15
1
2
1
22
2
2














Latin Kings
MS-13
Neighborhood Crip
Norte (Nortenos)
Piru Blood
Red Mob
Shotgun Crip
Southside 13
Surreno 13
Tre Seven
Westside Criminals
Westside Crips
Westside Locos
White Fang Mercenary Grp.
1
1
12
2
2
2
1
3
12
1
2
2
1
1
Tulsa Area Community Intervention Center
Other Data and Statistics
Juveniles Frequency by Zip Code
Most Frequent Charges Committed In the Community
Most Frequent Charges Community In Schools
Juvenile Frequency by School Served
TPS Elementary, Middle, & HS
TPS Private Schools
Alternative Schools etc.
Other Districts – Surrounding Communities
THE BIG PICTURE
 Immediate intervention for juveniles
 Getting juveniles help quick – community referrals
 Connecting juveniles with parents/responsible adults
 Reducing recidivism - deterring future crime
 Prevention from going to higher levels in the criminal
justice system (Detention, DL Moss etc)
 Ultimately provides for Safer communities
QUESTIONS
QUESTIONS
MORE QUESTIONS
ANY MORE QUESTIONS
Tulsa Area
Community Intervention Center
Kolby Brown, Director
911 Civic Center Plaza, Suite C
Tulsa, OK 74103
918-596-7580
Email: [email protected]
Question & Answer Session Instructions
• Type your question into the questions box at any
time during the presentation, and the moderator
will read the question on your behalf during the
Q&A session.
63
NACo 2015 Health, Justice and Public Safety
Forum: Optimizing Health, Justice and
Public Safety in Your County
Join us in Charleston County, SC to learn how to bolster
leadership in local health and justice systems. We will discuss:
– Behavioral health interventions
– Health coverage and the justice system
– Collaborative partnerships
– Emergency management roundtable
• When: January 21-23, 2015
• Go to www.naco.org/2015healthjusticeforum for more
information
• Contact: Emmanuelle St. Jean, Program Manager at
[email protected] or 202.942.4267
64
Thank you for participating in NACo’s webinar.
For more information about
NACo’s Criminal Justice programs, visit:
http://www.naco.org/justice
For more information about
Models for Change, visit:
http://www.modelsforchange.net/
http://www.naco.org/programs/csd/Pages/Models-forChange.aspx
With any questions about this webinar, please contact:
[email protected]
65