Fiscal Year 2004/05 - Hyperion Treatment Plant

Transcription

COLLECTION SYSTEM
SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
ANNUAL REPORT
Fiscal Year
2004/05
September 30, 2005
City of Los Angeles
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
BUREAUS OF
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
ENGINEERING
SANITATION
…
… ttoo pprrootteecctt ppuubblliicc hheeaalltthh aanndd tthhee eennvviirroonnm
meenntt
(This page was intentionally left blank.)
C ITY OF L OS A NGELES
BOARD OF
CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS
––
––
COMMISSIONERS
BUREAU OF SANITATION
––
––
RITA L. ROBINSON
DIRECTOR
CYNTHIA M. RUIZ
PRESIDENT
JOSEPH E. MUNDINE
EX EC UT IV E O FF IC E R
DAVID SICKLER
VICE PRESIDENT
ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA
PAULA A. DANIELS
MAYOR
PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE
VAROUJ S. ABKIAN
TRACI J. MINAMIDE
ENRIQUE C. ZALDIVAR
ASSISTANT DIRECTORS
YOLANDA FUENTES
433 S OUT H S PR ING S T RE ET
L O S A NG E L E S , CA 90013
TEL: (213) 473-7999
FAX: (213) 473-8100
VALERIE LYNNE SHAW
September 30, 2005
Kathi Moore, Chief
Clean Water Act Compliance (WTR-7)
Water Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Attention: Mr. Ken Greenberg
Jonathan S. Bishop, Executive Officer
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
320 W. 4th Street, Suite 200
Los Angeles, Ca. 90013
Attention: Mr. Sam Unger
Greetings:
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1 FOR PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2005
COLLECTION SYSTEM SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL ORDER (CIVIL ACTION
NO. 01-191-RSWL AND NO. 98-9039-RSWL CONSOLIDATED)
The City of Los Angeles is pleased to present the first annual report on the status of compliance
with the Collection System Settlement Agreement and Final Order (CSSA). The report was
prepared and submitted for the period ending June 30, 2005 pursuant to Section VI-G
(Paragraph 70 to 72) of the CSSA. The provisions of the CSSA are designed to protect
neighborhoods and improve water quality throughout Los Angeles through a comprehensive
program of sewer cleaning, upgrades and repairs. In partnership with the City’s Department of
Public Works’ Bureaus of Contract Administration, Engineering and Sanitation, the City
Attorney’s Office and other City offices, consultant and contractors, this report demonstrates the
City’s diligent efforts in improving its performance. Our commitment has not only resulted in
compliance but, in fact, surpassed the requirements of the CSSA and has resulted in excellent
results.
The City has embraced this opportunity and has, in deed, assigned the CSSA compliance
program the highest priority and provided the necessary resources to meet or exceed the
requirements of the CSSA. Following an aggressive public outreach campaign that included
over 1.5 million notices and 60 community meetings to inform the public about the importance of
the CSSA and the need for additional funding, the City Council authorized sewer rate increases
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY — AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Recyclable and made from recycled waste
September 30, 2005
USEPA/RWQCB
CSSA 1st Annual Progress Report – Period ending June 30, 2005
Page 2 of 3
over the next five years to provide the needed resources on February 2, 2005. In addressing
the necessary staff resources, the City Council also authorized the addition of 21 staff to the
Bureaus of Engineering and Sanitation on June 7, 2005.
Because of the complexity and time sensitive nature of the CSSA and the City’s commitment to
the CSSA, a committee called the Settlement Agreement Committee (SAC) was created in
September 2004. With representation from the various bureaus of the Department of Public
Works and the City Attorney’s Office, SAC oversees the progress of the CSSA compliance
efforts. The SAC meets monthly to review and coordinate compliance activities and reports
quarterly to the Board of Public Works.
The City is in full compliance with the CSSA and, in most cases, has exceeded the
requirements. The great majority of projects have been completed ahead of the scheduled
dates. Sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) are steadily declining. For fiscal year 2004-05, SSOs
were approximately 45 percent less than those in the baseline year of 2000-01. It is noteworthy
to mention that spills continued to decline even with the City’s recent second wettest season on
record. Over the last two years, as a result of a focused chemical root control and sewer
cleaning activities, root-caused SSOs have been reduced by 53 percent. SSOs caused by fats,
oils and grease (FOG) were reduced by 80 percent since the inception of the FOG control
program and as compared to those in the baseline year of 2000-01.
More sewers are being repaired. New sewers are being built. More sewers are being cleaned
and inspected. New and state-of-the-art odor control facilities are being built. SSOs and odors
continue to be on a steady decline. As a result of these efforts, our neighborhoods and the
environment are getting healthier and safer.
A progress review meeting is being tentatively schedule for October 27, 2005 at 10:00 AM at
our office at 2714 Media Center Drive. Formal notification will be made as soon as the date is
confirmed.
In keeping up with our mission “to protect public health and the environment”, I am grateful for
the contributions of our dedicated staff to the success stories of this report. We all realize there
is much more to do but I believe we have a good foundation and beginning.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this report or the CSSA, please contact
Mr. Adel Hagekhalil at (323) 342-6225.
RLR/AHH:tn/cr
I:\SA\1Annual Reports\2004-05\Actual Report\Annual Progress Report No 1 Final cover letter 093005.doc
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
BUREAU OF ENGINEERING
BUREAU OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
COLLECTION SYSTEM
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1
FOR PERIOD ENDING ON JUNE 30, 2005
September 30, 2005
CERTIFICATION DECLARATION
I certify under penalty of law that this Annual Progress Report No. 1 for the Period Ending June
30, 2005 was prepared either by me personally or under my direction or supervision in a
manner designed to ensure that qualified and knowledgeable personnel properly gathered and
presented the information contained herein. I further certify, based on my personal knowledge
or on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief the information is true, accurate, and complete. I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information and willful submission
of a material false statement.
__________________________________
Adel H. Hagekhalil
Division Manager
Wastewater Engineering Services Division
Bureau of Sanitation
________9/30/2005____________
Date
Collection System Settlement Agreement (CSSA) Annual Progress Report No. 1
For the Reporting Period Ending on June 30, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................v
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
Purpose .....................................................................................................................................1
Background ...............................................................................................................................1
An Overview of the Annual Report ............................................................................................2
ANNUAL REPORT .......................................................................................................................5
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
l.
m.
n.
o.
p.
q.
r.
Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects ......................................................5
Rehabilitation and Replacement – Mileage Requirements .............................................10
Sewer Relief Projects ......................................................................................................10
Capacity Exceptions List .................................................................................................13
Wastewater Capital Improvements .................................................................................23
Sewer Cleaning ...............................................................................................................23
Sewer Line Television Assessment - Mileage.................................................................25
Sewer Line Television Assessment – Condition Ratings ................................................26
Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Program..............................................................27
Primary and Secondary Basin Plans:..............................................................................30
MOUSE Model ................................................................................................................39
Chemical Root Control ....................................................................................................39
Significant Program Implementation ...............................................................................40
Failure to Comply Projects ..............................................................................................41
Odor Outreach Plan ........................................................................................................41
Odor Control Facilities Construction Progress ................................................................42
Independent Review of the Sewer Odor Control Program ..............................................45
Annual Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs) Status Report.............................47
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FIGURES
Figure ES-1: Overall SSOs by Fiscal Year .................................................................................. vi
Figure 1: Sewer Cleaning Progress ............................................................................................24
Figure 2: Sewer Line Television Assessment Progress..............................................................26
Figure 3: Condition Assessment Results ....................................................................................27
Figure 4: FOG-Related SSOs by Fiscal Year .............................................................................30
Figure 5: Primary Basin Plans in Progress .................................................................................33
Figure 6: Secondary Sewershed Plans Completed ....................................................................37
Figure 7: Root Control Progress .................................................................................................39
Figure 8: Root-Caused SSOs .....................................................................................................40
TABLES
Table 1: Status of Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects.....................................6
Table 2: Status of Sewer Relief Projects.....................................................................................11
Table 3: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 75%.....................14
Table 4: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 50% But Less
Than or Equal to 75%.................................................................................................18
Table 5: Fiscal Year 2004-05 Sewer Cleaning Data ...................................................................24
Table 6: Television Assessment Overview .................................................................................25
Table 7: Condition Assessment Results .....................................................................................26
Table 8: Summary of FOG Program Results ..............................................................................27
Table 9: Referral Investigation Summary....................................................................................29
Table 10: Status of Primary Sewer Plans ...................................................................................30
Table 11: Completed Secondary Basin Plans.............................................................................35
Table 12: Construction Status of Odor Control Facilities ............................................................43
Table 13: Summary and Status of Independent Review Recommendations..............................45
Table 14: Summary of Progress on SEPs ..................................................................................48
ATTACHMENTS
A: Wastewater Capital Improvement Program Summary
B: Summary Status of CSSA Deliverables
C: Summary Status of the North Atwater Creek Restoration & Water Quality
Enhancement Project
ii
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Acronym or
Abbreviation
ATF
Baykeeper
CCTV
CDO
City
COS
CSSA
d/D
ECA
ECIS
ERIS
ERP/ERG
FOG
FSE
FY
GBIS
In.
IRP
LARWQCB
MH
MOUSE
NCOS
NEIS
No.
NORS
NOS
NOV
NPDES
PDWF
SAC
SEP
SMARTS
SOPs
SSOs
SSRP
USEPA
VSLFRS
WCCD
WCIP
WCSD
WLAIS
Definition
Air Treatment Facility
Santa Monica Baykeeper
Closed-Circuit Television
Cease and Desist Order
City of Los Angeles
Coastal Interceptor Sewer
Collection System Settlement Agreement
Flow depth (inches)/Pipe Diameter (inches)
Engineering Contractors Association
East Central Interceptor Sewer
Eagle Rock Interceptor Sewer
Enforcement Response Plan and Enforcement Response Guide
Fats, Oil and Grease
Food Service Establishment
City of Los Angeles’ Fiscal Year (July 1 through June 30)
Glendale-Burbank Interceptor Sewer
Inches
Integrated Resource Plan
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
Maintenance Hole
Model of Urban Sewer Evaluation
North Central Outfall Sewer
Northeast Interceptor Sewer
Number
North Outfall Replacement Sewer
North Outfall Sewer
Notice of Violation
National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System
Peak Dry Weather Flow
Settlement Agreement Committee
Supplementary Environmental Project
Sewer Management Automated Repair Tracking System
Standard Operating Procedures
Sanitary Sewer Overflows
Secondary Sewer Renewal Program
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Valley Spring Lane & Forman Relief Sewer
Wastewater Conveyance Construction Division
Wastewater Capital Improvement Program
Wastewater Collection System Division
West Los Angeles Interceptor Sewer
iii
iv
For the Reporting Period Ending June 30, 2005
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Los Angeles is pleased to present the first annual report on the status of compliance
with the Collection System Settlement Agreement and Final Order (CSSA). The report was
prepared and submitted for the period ending June 30, 2005 pursuant to Section VI-G
(Paragraphs 70 through 72) and Paragraphs 36, 53, 57, and 94 of the CSSA. This report is also
available on the Bureau of Sanitation’s website at http://www.lasewers.org/CSSA/arno1.pdf. The
provisions of the CSSA are designed to protect neighborhoods and improve water quality
throughout Los Angeles through a comprehensive management program including sewer
cleaning, upgrades, and repairs. In partnership with the City’s Department of Public Works’
Bureaus of Contract Administration, Engineering, and Sanitation, the City Attorney’s Office and
other City offices, consultants, and contractors, this report demonstrates the City’s diligent
efforts which have not only resulted in compliance but, in fact, have surpassed the requirements
of the CSSA with excellent results.
The City has embraced this opportunity and has, indeed, assigned the CSSA compliance
program the highest priority and provided the necessary resources to meet or exceed the
requirements of the CSSA. On February 2, 2005, the City Council authorized sewer rate
increases for the next five years following an aggressive public outreach campaign that included
over 1.5 million notices and 60 community meetings to inform the public about the importance of
the CSSA and the need for additional funding. On June 7, 2005, the City Council authorized the
addition of 21 staff to the Bureaus of Engineering and Sanitation to address the need for
adequate staffing.
Because of the complexity and time sensitive nature of the CSSA, a committee called the
Settlement Agreement Committee (SAC) was created in September 2004. With representation
from the various Bureaus of the Department of Public Works and the City Attorney’s Office, the
SAC oversees the progress of the CSSA compliance efforts. The SAC meets monthly to review
and coordinate compliance activities and reports progress quarterly to the Board of Public
Works.
The City is in full compliance with the CSSA and, in most cases, has exceeded the
requirements. The great majority of required projects have been completed ahead of the
scheduled dates. Sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) are steadily declining. As shown in Figure
ES-1, the overall SSOs in Fiscal Year (FY) 2004-05 were approximately 45 percent less than
those of the baseline FY of 2000-01. It is noteworthy that spills continued to decline even with
the City’s recent second wettest season on record. Over the last two years, as a result of a
focused chemical root control and sewer cleaning activities, root-caused SSOs have been
reduced by 53 percent. SSOs caused by fats, oils, and grease (FOG) were reduced by 79
percent since the inception of the FOG control program in Fiscal Year 2000-01.
The City is fully committed to meeting all of the requirements of the CSSA as evidenced by its
solid start during Year One of the CSSA. The accomplishments listed in this report show, in
most cases, that the City moved beyond the requirements of the CSSA. Each future annual
report will show additional enhancements to the wastewater collection system operation,
v
maintenance, and management. The City looks forward to continuing to support the ultimate
objective of the CSSA, which is to protect our neighborhoods and improve water quality.
Figure ES-1: Overall SSOs by Fiscal Year
1,000
900
800
700
687
647
# of SSOs
613
600
Baseline
Year
500
400
6%
Reduction
From
Baseline
Year
300
11%
Reduction
From
Baseline
Year
200
444
369
35%
Reduction
From
Baseline
Year
100
46%
Reduction
From
Baseline
Year
0
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Fiscal Year
The following is a brief summary of the City’s compliance efforts during FY 2004-05:
•
•
•
•
•
Forty-five of the 127 deliverables that are due during the 10-year term of the CSSA have
been completed in Year One of the CSSA or ahead of schedule with the remaining
deliverables being on target.
Twenty-six of the 55 projects designated by the CSSA for the first three years have been
completed, most of them ahead of schedule.
The two largest sewer relief projects, the East Central Interceptor Sewer and the
Northeast Interceptor Sewer, have been completed.
The City continues to implement its sewer-cleaning program, including hot spot cleaning.
In FY 2004-05 the City cleaned 82,000 pipe reaches, which is 36 percent more than the
60,000 reaches required in the CSSA. In addition, the City’s quality assurance and
follow-up inspection programs ensure that cleaning operations are effective.
Using Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) technology and utilizing both City crews and
contractors, the City assessed the structural and maintenance conditions of 821 miles of
sewer lines, 36 percent beyond the 600 miles required by the CSSA.
vi
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The sewer line condition assessment in this report for the 821 miles inspected by CCTV
indicates that 87 percent of the sewers assessed are in good to excellent condition.
All 7,832 permitted food service establishments (FSEs) have been inspected at least
once as part of the City’s FOG Control Program. A total of 15,000 inspections were
conducted with a total of 944 notices of violation issued with 462 cases forwarded for
further enforcement. Since the inception of the FOG Program in 2001, FOG-related
SSOs have been reduced by 79 percent.
The City has made excellent progress on the development of its primary and secondary
sewer master plans.
The City has completed the development of the “R” modeling factors for the basins
within the MOUSE predictive model.
474 miles of root-infested sewers were chemically treated, far in excess of the CSSA
requirement of 150 miles. This has resulted in significant reduction in root-caused
SSOs.
The City issued four quarterly reports summarizing the sewer overflows. Total SSOs for
FY 2004-05 were approximately 45 percent less than those experienced in the baseline
year of 2000-01.
The City amended its sewer design manual as required in Section V-D (Paragraph 20) of
the CSSA to accommodate excessive wet weather flow.
The City has paid all negotiated civil penalties and attorney fees on schedule as set forth
in the CSSA.
The City has implemented all of the required odor control and response modifications.
The City’s sewer odor hotline is in place and odor response measures, including
chemical addition, are being employed. Odor control activities are routinely reported to
the community Odor Advisory Board.
During this reporting period, four interim odor scrubbers were placed in operation. Two
additional scrubbers under construction are 70 percent complete. Permanent air
treatment facilities are in design.
Recommendations from the independent consultant for sewer odor control are being
implemented.
The City has initiated the development of work plans for the Supplemental
Environmental Projects (SEPs). The work plan for the North Atwater Creek Restoration
and Water Quality Enhancement Project is currently being reviewed by the Los Angeles
Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) staff. The next scheduled work plan
is for the Hazard Creek and Wetlands Restoration Project which will be completed by
March 2006.
The City Council authorization of a sewer rate increase and 21 additional staff positions
are significant program modifications that will contribute to the sustained success of this
program.
The Settlement Agreement Committee will continue to provide oversight and support to
the City’s CSSA compliance program.
vii
viii
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
This first annual progress report (Annual Report) has been prepared by the City of Los
Angeles (City) to comply with Section VI-G (Paragraphs 70 through 72) and Paragraphs 36,
53, 57, and 94 of the Collection System Settlement Agreement and Final Order (CSSA). This
Annual Report summarizes the City’s compliance efforts during the year ending on June 30,
2005. This report is also available on the Bureau of Sanitation’s website at
http://www.lasewers.org/CSSA/arno1.pdf.
Background
During February 1998, the wettest February in Los Angeles’ history, sanitary sewer overflows
(SSOs) occurred in a number of communities with the majority occurring in the Eagle Rock
and South Los Angeles areas. In response to these SSOs, the Los Angeles Regional Water
Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) issued a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) requiring
construction of several new sewer lines to prevent additional wet weather overflows. These
projects were to be completed within seven years and approached a cost of $600 million.
During the same time period, the Santa Monica Baykeeper (BayKeeper) filed a Federal
lawsuit against the City asking for injunctive relief due to the SSOs. In January 2001, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), the LARWQCB and a number of community
groups representing residents in South Los Angeles joined the BayKeeper in its lawsuit
against the City. The plaintiffs alleged that the City’s SSOs and odor problems violated the
Clean Water Act and the terms and conditions of the National Pollutants Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permits for the Hyperion and the Terminal Island Treatment
Plants for the operation and maintenance of the City’s sewer system.
With the City’s enhancements to its sewer system and renewed commitment by all parties to
reach a manageable settlement that would protect neighborhoods and improve water quality
throughout Los Angeles, the parties were able to reach this landmark settlement in August
2004. The objectives of the CSSA were: to resolve the pending consolidated litigation; to set
out a program that the City would implement to reduce SSOs through a comprehensive
program of sewer cleaning, upgrades, and repairs; and to investigate, resolve, and mitigate
sewer odors to the maximum extent practicable. The CSSA was signed by all parties and
filed with the court on August 5, 2004. On October 29, 2004, the United States Central
District Court officially approved and entered the CSSA.
The following is a brief summary of the terms of the CSSA, which requires the City to:
1) Enhance the City’s sewer condition assessment program. Assess a minimum of 600
miles of sewers annually with focus on older sewers and those susceptible to
blockages.
1
2) Increase the City’s sewer repair, rehabilitation, and replacement efforts. Commit to
the current program for the first three years and evaluate future needs with a minimum
commitment of renewal of 60 miles per year after the third year.
3) Continue with the City’s Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Program and enhance
the inspection and enforcement of the Program.
4) Upgrade the sewer cleaning efforts with focus on those sewers that are prone to
blockages. Commit to a minimum annual sewer cleaning of 60,000 pipe reaches or
approximately 2,600 miles.
5) Continue with current chemical root control efforts in sewers prone to blockages and
expand the program to meet needs.
6) Increase the City’s collection system capacity evaluation and assurance efforts.
Implement identified relief sewer projects for the first three years and evaluate needs
for the future. Revise the City's sewer design criteria to account for wet weather flow.
Perform the necessary master planning for both large and small sewers and upgrade
computer modeling capabilities to be used as enhanced planning tools.
7) Operate the sewer odor hotline and the necessary odor control efforts while expanding
it Citywide. Construct the planned odor control facilities and continue the odor
assessment and mitigation measures including the preparation of a Citywide odor
control master plan.
8) Implement $8.5 million in supplemental environmental enhancement projects in lieu of
penalties.
9) Continue with the sewer spill reporting on a quarterly basis.
10) Abide by the term of the CSSA (10 years) with possible early termination.
An Overview of the Annual Report
This Annual Report presents the City’s progress in its efforts to comply with the terms of the
CSSA for the year ending on June 30, 2005. The content and structure of this Report are
based on the requirements set forth in Section VI-G (Paragraphs 70 through 72) and
Paragraphs 36, 53, 57, and 94 of the CSSA. The Annual Report's sections appear in the
same alphabetical order (“a” through “n”) used in Section VI-G of the CSSA and continue with
additional sections (“o” through “r”) in response to Paragraphs 36, 53, 57, and 94 of the
CSSA.
The following lists the Report sections and provides a brief summary of compliance
with the CSSA requirements:
a. Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects: Twenty-six of the 55 projects
designated by the CSSA for the first three years have been completed, most of them
ahead of schedule.
b. Rehabilitation and Replacement – Mileage Requirements: This provision applies to
Years Four through Ten of the CSSA.
2
c. Sewer Relief Projects: The CSSA designated construction of ten sewer relief projects
during the first three years. The two largest of these projects have been completed (East
Central Interceptor Sewer and the Northeast Interceptor Sewer).
d. Capacity Exceptions List: As required, this report includes the current capacity
exceptions list. Listed are the sewers flowing at depth greater than 75 percent of the pipe
diameter during peak dry weather flow (PDWF), along with the City’s planned action for
these locations. Also listed are the sewers with PDWF depth exceeding 50 percent but
less than or equal to 75 percent of the pipe diameter. Many of these locations are already
part of our ongoing planning and capacity assurance efforts.
e. Wastewater Capital Improvements: The City expended $225 million in wastewater
capital improvement in FY 2004-05, of which $130 million (58 percent) was spent for
collection system improvements. For FY 2005-06, the projected total wastewater capital
improvement expenditure is $280 million with $160 million (57 percent) designated for the
collection system. Attachment “A” is a summary of the City’s current 10-year capital
improvement expenditure plan. A complete copy of the current 10-year Wastewater
Capital Improvement Program (FYs 2005-06 through 2014-15) is available at
http://www.lacitysan.org/fmd/WCIPBook05-06.pdf. A summary of the program is provided
as Attachment A. The Wastewater Capital Improvement Program is currently undergoing
its annual review and update.
f. Sewer Cleaning: The City continues to implement its sewer-cleaning program, including
hot spot cleaning. The City cleaned 82,000 pipes in FY 2004-05, 36 percent more than
the 60,000 pipes required in the CSSA. In addition, quality assurance and follow-up
inspection programs continue to ensure the effectiveness of cleaning operations.
g. Sewer Line Television Assessment – Mileage: Using Closed Circuit Television (CCTV)
technology and utilizing both City crews and contractors, the City assessed the structural
and maintenance conditions of 821 miles of sewer lines, 36 percent beyond the 600 miles
required by the CSSA.
h. Sewer Line Television Assessment - Condition Ratings: The sewer line condition
assessment in this report for the 821 miles inspected by CCTV indicates that 87 percent
of the sewers assessed are in good to excellent condition.
i. Fats, Oils and Grease (FOG) Control Program: All permitted food service
establishments (FSEs) have been inspected at least once as part of the City’s FOG
Control Program. This report contains detailed information on the program
implementation.
j. Primary and Secondary Basin Plans: The City has made excellent progress on the
development of its primary and secondary sewer master plans. Eight Primary Basin Plans
are scheduled for completion by July 2006, and all 25 are scheduled for completion by
March 2009. A total of nine Secondary Basin Plans have been completed to date, and
twelve more are scheduled for completion by July 2006.
k. MOUSE Model: The City has completed the development of the “R” modeling factors for
the basins within the MOUSE predictive model.
l. Chemical Root Control: During FY 2004-05, 474 miles of root-infested sewers were
chemically treated, far in excess of the CSSA requirement of 150 miles. This has resulted
in significant reduction in root-caused SSOs, as indicated by the 53 percent reduction in
root-related SSOs since program inception in FY 2002-03.
3
m. Settlement Agreement Implementation: The City Council authorization of a sewer rate
increase and 21 additional staff positions are significant program modifications that will
contribute to the sustained success of this program. The formation of the Settlement
Agreement Committee; organizational changes; and improved planning, design, and
operation and maintenance processes will provide further support to and focus on the
CSSA compliance program.
n. Failure to Comply Projects: The City has complied with all requirements of the CSSA to
date.
The following is additional information on topics outside of those required by Section
VI-G of the CSSA:
o. Odor Outreach in accordance with Paragraph 36 of CSSA: The City has implemented
all of the required odor control and response modifications. The City’s sewer odor hotline
is in place and odor response measures, including chemical addition, are being employed.
Odor control activities are routinely reported to the community Odor Advisory Board.
p. Odor Control Facilities per Paragraph 53: During this reporting period, four interim
odor scrubbers were placed in operation. Two additional scrubbers under construction
are 70 percent complete. Permanent air treatment facilities are in design.
q. Independent Review of the Sewer Odor Control Program per Paragraph 57:
Recommendations from the independent odor control consultant are being implemented.
r. Supplemental Environmental Projects per Paragraph 94: Status reports for SEPs are
included in this report. Detailed progress on the North Atwater Creek Restoration SEP is
also attached.
4
ANNUAL REPORT
a. Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects
Appendix “B” of the CSSA includes a list of designated sewer rehabilitation and replacement
projects to be completed during the first three years of the CSSA. Table 1 summarizes
completed projects and the current status of each ongoing project.
The City has been aggressively pursuing the implementation of all projects required by the
CSSA and assigned them the highest priority and the necessary resources. As shown, 26 of
the 55 projects listed in Appendix “B” have been completed to date, all of them well ahead of
schedule. Of the remaining projects, only one, the Wilshire Area Northeast Sewer
Rehabilitation Project, was not completed by its original scheduled completion date of August
30, 2005 due to unforeseen construction conditions. An extension to the schedule was
granted by USEPA and the LARWQCB based on unforeseen conditions. The new
completion date is November 30, 2005. However, the project was actually completed on
September 9, 2005.
5
Table 1: Status of Designated Rehabilitation and Replacement Projects
Shaded items indicate completed projects.
CSSA
Construction
End Date
Completed?
(Yes or No)
Project Status
EQ RPR SWRS U298
12/14/2004
Yes
Completed 6/9/04.
Completed 188 days ahead of schedule.
EQ RPR SWRS U277
01/13/2005
Yes
Completed 7/20/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U269
01/13/2005
Yes
Completed 7/20/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U290
02/11/2005
Yes
Completed 6/10/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U289
02/11/2005
Yes
Completed 6/10/04.
SAN PEDRO AREA SWR
REHAB
02/28/2005
Yes
Completed 9/7/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U346
03/16/2005
Yes
Completed 5/4/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U344
03/16/2005
Yes
Completed 5/4/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U373
04/15/2005
Yes
Completed 5/12/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U369
04/15/2005
Yes
Completed 5/12/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U327
05/16/2005
Yes
Completed 6/23/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U317
05/16/2005
Yes
Completed 6/23/04.
SOUTH LA CSRP U - 6
07/30/2005
Yes
Completed 8/4/04.
SOUTH LA CSRP U - 5
07/30/2005
Yes
Completed 8/4/04.
SOUTH LA CSRP U – 3
07/30/2005
Yes
Completed 12/22/04.
Project Title
Comments
6
Project Title
CSSA
Construction
End Date
Completed?
(Yes or No)
Project Status
Comments
WILSHIRE AREA NE SWR
REHAB
Original 08/30/05
Revised 11/30/05
No
On Schedule
Working closely with the contractor to complete
construction by November 30, 2005.
MT WASHINGTON AREA
SWR REHAB
09/30/2005
Yes
Completed 11/2/04.
S BOYLE AREA SWR REHAB
12/8/2005
Yes
Completed 8/10/05.*
HOLLYWOOD AREA PRIM
SWR REHAB
12/30/2005
Yes
Completed 3/2/05.
4TH SHATTO VERMONT SWR
REHAB
12/30/2005
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U274
03/16/2006
Yes
Completed 10/6/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U340
04/15/2006
Yes
Completed 3/25/05.
EQ RPR SWRS U283
04/15/2006
Yes
Completed 3/25/05.
HARBOR AREA CSRP U- 6
05/30/2006
Yes
Completed 8/2/05.*
NICHOLS CYN ESMT SWR
REPLC
05/31/2006
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U300
07/15/2006
Yes
Completed 11/15/04.
EQ RPR SWRS U299
07/15/2006
Yes
Completed 11/15/04.
LAS PULGAS CANYON SWR
REPLC
07/30/2006
No
On Schedule
Construction is 15% complete.
Bid & Award is 95% complete.
7
CSSA
Construction
End Date
Completed?
(Yes or No)
Project Status
HOLLYWOOD AREA CSRP U2
07/30/2006
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U295
09/15/2006
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U292
09/15/2006
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U291
09/15/2006
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U354
10/14/2006
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U339
11/15/2006
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U338
11/15/2006
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U320
12/15/2006
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U316
12/15/2006
No
On Schedule
WASHINGTON FLOWER
GRAND SWR REPLC
12/30/2006
No
On Schedule
CENTRAL AREA CSRP U-5
12/30/2006
No
On Schedule
CENTRAL AREA CSRP U-3 &
U-4
12/30/2006
No
On Schedule
Bids were opened on June 22, 2005. Bid &
Award is 90% complete.
12TH HILL SWR REHAB
12/30/2006
No
On Schedule
SAN FERNANDO PSDNA
SWR REHAB
12/31/2006
No
On Schedule
Design was completed on August 10, 2005.
Project Title
Comments
8
CSSA
Construction
End Date
Completed?
(Yes or No)
Project Status
EQ RPR SWRS U294
01/13/2007
Yes
Completed 6/15/05.
EQ RPR SWRS U293
01/16/2007
Yes
Completed 6/15/05.
EQ RPR SWRS U319
02/15/2007
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U318
02/15/2007
No
On Schedule
HARBOR AREA CSRP U-3
03/03/2007
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U342
03/15/2007
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U341
03/15/2007
No
On Schedule
FLINT AVE G ST SWR REPLC
03/24/2007
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U304
04/14/2007
No
On Schedule
EQ RPR SWRS U296
04/14/2007
No
On Schedule
HOOVER ST SWR REHAB
05/02/2007
No
On Schedule
Design is 93% complete.
LINCOLN 83RD SWR REPLC
06/30/2007
No
On Schedule
HARBOR AREA CSRP U- 5 &
WILM U-20
06/30/2007
No
On Schedule
Project Title
Comments
9
b. Rehabilitation and Replacement – Mileage Requirements
For Years four through Ten of the CSSA, the City is required to report the number of miles of
sewer pipes that have been rehabilitated and replaced in the previous Fiscal Year, and, for
Years Six through Ten, to report the three-year average of sewer pipes rehabilitated and
replaced in the previous three Fiscal Years. There is no reporting requirement in this reporting
period.
c. Sewer Relief Projects
Appendix A of the CSSA includes a list of designated sewer relief projects to be completed
during the first three years of the CSSA. Table 2 summarizes completed projects and the
current status of each on-going project.
The City has been diligently pursuing the implementation of all projects required by the CSSA
and assigned them the highest priority and the necessary resources. As shown, two of the ten
projects have been completed to date. Of the remaining projects, five are in the bid and award
process and two are under construction. Only one, the Avenue 45 Arroyo Drive Relief Sewer
Project, is behind schedule.
The Avenue 45 Arroyo Drive Relief Sewer Project was to be completed by October 6, 2006.
The project will construct 12,500 linear feet of new sewer to relieve an overloaded primary
sewer system in the Eagle Rock and Highland Park Areas. The delay was due to unforeseen
construction difficulties related to groundwater levels, access, easements and soil conditions.
These unforeseen conditions also resulted in major complications in the bid and award of the
construction contract, including limited and abnormally and excessively high bids. The City
requested extension of the construction completion date to October 30, 2009 in a letter to
USEPA and LARWQCB and dated August 25, 2005.
10
Table 2: Status of Sewer Relief Projects
CSSA
Construction
End Date
Completed?
(Yes or No)
Project Status
EAST CENTRAL
INTERCEPTOR SEWER
08/27/2004
Yes
Completed 8/9/04.
NORTH EAST INTERCEPTOR
SEWER, PHASE 1
10/30/2005
Yes
Completed
5/27/05.
AVE 45 ARROYO DR RELIEF
SEWER
10/06/2006
No
Behind Schedule
EAGLE ROCK INTERCEPTOR
SEWER
10/30/2006
No
On Schedule
BAYWOOD BENEDICT
EASEMENT SEWER
10/31/2006
No
On Schedule
FLOWER WASHINGTON PICO
SEWER
10/31/2006
No
On Schedule
BUCKINGHAM ROAD
DIVERSION SEWER
11/11/2006
No
On Schedule
SEPULVEDA SHERMAN OAKS
/VALLEY MEADOW RELIEF
SEWER
12/30/2006
No
On Schedule
Project Title
Comments
Revising Construction Plans with a new project
schedule. Request was made to Government
Plaintiffs on August 25, 2005 for extension of
Construction End Date to 10/30/2009.
11
Table 2: Status of Sewer Relief Projects
CSSA
Construction
End Date
Completed?
(Yes or No)
Project Status
NOS DIVERSION AT
HUMBOLDT STREET BTW AVE
18 & SAN FERNANDO ROAD
12/31/2006
No
On Schedule
SLAUSON / VAN NESS / COS
EXTERNAL BYPASS
12/31/2006
No
On Schedule
Design was completed on June 28, 2005.
Currentlyin Bid & Award.
Project Title
Comments
12
d. Capacity Exceptions List
The Capacity Exceptions List is provided below in Tables 3 and 4. Table 3 lists sewer
gauging locations that exhibit peak dry weather flow (PDWF) levels exceeding 75 percent of
the pipe diameter. Table 4 lists locations that exhibit PDWF levels exceeding 50 percent of
the pipe diameter but less than or equal to 75 percent of the pipe diameter. The CSSA
requires the City to report planned actions on the locations that exceed the City trigger flow
level of 75 percent of the pipe diameter.
Many of these locations are either being addressed through an existing capital improvement
project or being evaluated throughout master planning efforts. Some of the locations were
reported to exhibit PDWF levels exceeding 50 percent of the pipe diameter based on the
latest gauging data although the historical trend does not support this result. As such, these
locations are being reviewed with the City’s maintenance and engineering staff for necessary
action.
13
Table 3: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater Than 75%
No.
MH No.
Location
Size (in.)
1
46715026 R/W 800' S/O ECHO ST AT
AVE 50
18
2
53401077 GRANVILLE @
BROOKHAVEN
30
3
55807059 60TH PL 330'W/O
NORMANDIE AV
34
4
55807066 WESTERN AV CL 300' S/O
60TH PL
18
5
55807126 NORMANDIE AV AT 64TH ST
30
6
55812097 FLORENCE AV 350' E/O
VERMONT AV
20
d/D
Planned/Proposed Action
Flowing Full The Avenue 45 Arroyo Dr Relief Sewer, which is currently in
design, will provide relief to this location. The completion of the
Eagle Rock Interceptor Sewer (ERIS) in spring 2006 will also help
relieve this sewer.
Flowing Full Maintenance issue. The West Los Angeles Interceptor Sewer
(WLAIS) Maintenance Hole (MH) Addition project will provide new
MHs and will clean the WLAIS System. Projected future flow does
not indicate any need for future relief. After the WLAIS System is
cleaned, the City will continue to reevaluate future capacity needs.
Flowing Full Debris in the sewer contributes to high d/D. The Florence Avenue
Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement project will be built to replace
the sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS-Slauson and the
Vermont Relief Sewer Florence-Slauson will address ultimate relief
for this system.
Flowing Full Debris in the Florence Avenue Sewer and resulting high flow
contributes to the high d/D at this location. The Florence Avenue
the Florence Avenue Sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer ECISSlauson and the Vermont Relief Sewer Florence-Slauson will
address ultimate relief for this system.
Flowing Full Debris in the sewer contributes to high d/D. The Florence Avenue
the sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS-Slauson and the
Vermont Relief Sewer Florence-Slauson will address ultimate relief
for this system.
Flowing Full Debris downstream of this sewer contributes to the high d/D. The
Florence Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement project will be
built to replace the downstream sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer
14
No.
MH No.
Location
Size (in.)
7
61309059 KING AV 50' S/O ALTON ST
18
8
62009134 HARBOR BL E/S AT 2ND ST
S/PL
21
9
53806111 SOTO ST 260 S/O LUGO ST
27
10
55812086 FLORENCE AV 300' E/O
NORMANDIE AV
30
11
55812093 FLORENCE AV 300' W/O
VERMONT AV
30
12
62013031 HARBOR BL R/W
33
13
55807086 62ND ST N/S 33' E/O
HARVARD BL.
54
d/D
ECIS-Slauson and Vermont Relief Sewer Florence-Slauson will
address ultimate relief for this system.
Flowing Full Past Gauging data does not suggest a capacity problem. Further
investigation underway.
96%
Maintenance Issue. Placed on a Regular Maintenance Program.
Sewers will be monitored through the regular gauging program.
There is no capacity issue.
95%
MH 53806129 is an existing Venturi Flume measuring flow between
the City of LA and City of Vernon downstream of this location. The
flume restricts flow and creates upstream backwater conditions.
The Soto St Gauging Chamber Modification project will modify the
chamber.
90%
Debris in the sewer contributes to high d/D. The Florence Avenue
the sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS-Slauson and Vermont
Relief Sewer Flor-Slauson Projects will address ultimate relief for
this system.
89%
Debris in the sewer contributes to the high d/D. The Florence
Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation/Replacement project will be built to
replace the sewer. The Vermont Relief Sewer ECIS-Slauson and
Vermont Relief Sewer Flor-Slauson Projects will address ultimate
relief for this system.
89%
The high d/D reading was due to construction activities for the
Siphon Harbor Crossing Relocation, which was recently completed.
Additional gauging will be requested to verify post-construction
sewer conditions.
88%
The construction of the Slauson/Florence Diversion to the Central
Outfall Sewer (COS) will provide relief for this sewer. Currently in
15
No.
MH No.
Location
Size (in.)
d/D
14
55807040 60TH ST N/S 1ST MH W/O
ST. ANDREWS PLACE
39
86%
15
55806217 62ND ST E/O HAAS AV
54
86%
16
55806220 VAN NESS AV AT 59TH ST
54
85%
17
53504136 M.L.KING BL AT RODEO RD
(35' S/O N/CURB)
44306177 ACAMA ST AT FAIR AV
54
85%
57
84%
51806192 CRESCENT HEIGHTS BL AT
AIRDROME ST
49208174 MARTEL AV. 400' N/O
OAKWOOD
39
83%
72
82%
18
19
20
Bid & Award process. High d/D is caused by the hydraulic
restriction downstream.
Sewer Rehabilitation project will be built to replace the sewer.
Ultimate relief will be addressed by the Vermont Relief Sewer
ECIS-Slauson and Vermont Relief Sewer Flor-Slauson.
The construction of the Slauson/Florence Diversion to the COS will
provide relief for this sewer. Currently in Bid & Award process.
The construction of the Slauson/Florence Diversion to COS will
High flow is due to reduction of flow at the Donald C. Tillman Water
Reclamation Plant (DCTWRP) due to construction activities for the
nitrogen removal projects. Long-term relief is being addressed in
the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The Valley Spring Lane &
Forman Relief Sewer (VSLFRS), Glendale-Burbank Relief
Interceptor Sewer (GBIS) and Northeast Interceptor Sewer (NEIS)
Phase II will provide relief to this sewer. The draft Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the IRP, which will address GBIS and NEIS
Phase II, will be out for public review by the end of the year.
Past gauging events did not show any indication of high flow.
Review and validation of the recent gauging results is underway.
High flow is due to reduction of flow at DCTWRP due to
construction activities for the nitrogen removal projects and due to
diversion of flow away from sewers prone to wet weather overflow.
The Diversion will cease with the completion of the Eagle Rock
Interceptor Sewer. Long-term relief is being addressed in the IRP.
The GBIS and NEIS Phase II will provide relief to this sewer. The
16
No.
21
22
23
MH No.
Location
55802143 4TH AV W/S 75' N/O
SLAUSON AV
51815096 ADAMS BL AT BURNSIDE AV
(NORTH)
46713275 S.F. RD E/S 2ND MH S/O
ELM ST.
Size (in.)
d/D
75
82%
21
81%
18
78%
24
55806046 ALLEY E/O VAN NESS AV 30'
S/O 59TH ST
39
77%
25
46816021 NEWELL ST. 250' NE/O
BLAKE AV
53410035 VICTORIA AV @ BUTLER AV
24
76%
36
75%
26
draft EIR for the IRP, which will address GBIS and NEIS Phase II,
will be out for public review by the end of the year.
The Adams Blvd Relief Sewer project will provide relief for this
sewer. Currently in Design.
The Eagle Rock Interceptor Sewer (ERIS) will provide relief to this
sewer. ERIS is currently in construction and scheduled for
completion in spring 2006.
the sewer. Ultimate relief will be addressed by the Vermont Relief
Sewer ECIS-Slauson and Vermont Relief Sewer Flor-Slauson.
The ERIS will provide relief to this sewer. ERIS is currently in
construction and scheduled for completion in spring 2006.
Maintenance issue. The WLAIS MH Addition will provide new MH
and will clean the WLAIS System. Projected future flow does not
indicate any need for future relief. After the WLAIS System is
cleaned future capacity needs will be evaluated.
Notes: in. = inches
d/D = measured depth of flow (in.)/pipe Diameter (in.)
MH No. = Maintenance Hole Number
PDWF = Peak Dry Weather Flow
17
Table 4: Gauging Locations with Peak Dry Weather Flow d/D Greater
Than 50% But Less Than or Equal to 75%
No.
MH No.
1
2
3
53410035
35809050
53602139
4
5
55807098
53603048
6
53401147
7
39515015
8
9
55812135
49401178
10
53503180
11
51816109
12
38809101
13
14
55706031
39212013
15
39913010
16
17
18
55803144
49307156
49204111
19
51716017
20
51807118
21
53604056
22
46812095
23
51810122
Location
VICTORIA AV @ BUTLER AV
FOX ST AT OMELVEN AV
ARLINGTON AV E/S 175'S/O 36TH
ST
WESTERN AV AT GAGE AV
JEFFERSON BL S/S E/O
GRAMERCY PL
NATIONAL BLVD., 200' E/O
BARRINGTON
SHERMAN WAY N/S 300' W/O
ASMAN AV
VERMONT AV E/S AT 75TH ST
LOCKWOOD AV 350' E/O VIRGIL
AV
LA BREA AV W/O W/PL 729' N/O
RODEO RD
ADAMS BL S/S AT PALM GROVE
AV
WOODMAN AV E/S (IN PKWY) 600'
S/O TERRA BELLA ST
AVALON BL AT 59TH ST NE/MH
PLUMMER ST. S/S 25' S/O CL 50'
E/O HANNA AV
SHERMAN WY 650' W/O
HAZELTINE AV
NORMANDIE AV AT 58TH ST
MAPLEWOOD AV AT HOBART BL
VISTA ST W/S 235' S/O ROMAIN
ST (E & W MHS)
22ND ST N/S 50' E/O RAYMOND
AV
GENESEE AV. 144' S/O PICO
BLVD
JEFFERSON BL 12' S/O CL 1ST
MH E/O CATALINA ST
EAGLE ROCK BL. E/S 110' S/O
AVE 30 CL PROJECTED
STEARNS DR AT GUTHERIE AV
Size (in.)
d/D
36
18
30
75%
73%
73%
18
20
73%
73%
24
73%
24
72%
27
15
72%
71%
54
70%
15
70%
21
69%
18
18
69%
68%
27
68%
16
16
42
68%
67%
67%
18
67%
78
67%
14
67%
24
66%
39
66%
18
No.
MH No.
24
25
26
27
55802170
55709117
61311104
42701116
28
29
30
61314067
56104084
49513076
31
51713017
32
53401133
33
34
49216010
49208011
35
51814202
36
39510064
37
49413010
38
53407095
39
51712108
40
41
42
43
53803144
56107230
51814134
51805019
44
39808045
45
46
53603058
51805082
47
55701114
Location
SLAUSON AV AT CIMARRON ST
74TH ST 1ST MH E/O HOOVER ST
D ST 210' E/O MCFARLAND ST
LANKERSHIM BL. W/S AT HAMLIN
ST W/INT.
A ST AT MARINE AV
ZANJA ST 50' W/O WALNUT AVE
GIBBONS ST 475' S/O NORTH
MAIN ST.
VIRGINIA RD 1ST MH N/O 23RD
ST
NATIONAL BL 200' E/O
BARRINGTON AV
MARTEL AV E/S 50' S/O 3RD ST
ORANGE DR E/S 320' S/O
WILLOUGHBY AV
VENICE BL S/S 260' E/O DAUPHIN
AV
WOODLAKE AV E/S 417' S/O
SATICOY ST
NORTH CORONDOLET ST AT
COUNCIL ST
VENICE BL S/S 100' E/O
WESTWOOD BL
BUDLONG AV W/S AT 20TH ST
S/S
CONCORD ST AT OPAL ST
WASHINGTON ST
FAIRFAX AV. 495' S/O SMILEY DR
SHENANDOAH ST E/S 3RD MH
S/O PICO BL.
VAN NUYS BL 330' N/O BLYTHE
ST
JEFFERSON BL AT BRIGHTON AV
SHENANDOAH ST E/S 90' S/O
PICKFORD ST
BROADWAY AT 58TH ST
Size (in.)
d/D
42
36
16
15
66%
66%
66%
65%
18
18
24
65%
64%
64%
15
63%
30
63%
72
18
63%
63%
24
63%
15
63%
15
63%
60
62%
15
62%
14
42
98.5
33
62%
62%
62%
62%
15
62%
18
33
62%
61%
16
61%
19
No.
MH No.
48
49
50
55710098
53614020
49513015
51
51812090
52
56007001
53
54
49316080
49510098
55
56
57
53203036
55702109
52115200
58
46812105
59
51814020
60
61
44202135
56108008
62
63
49509071
51810137
64
49311066
65
49204019
66
67
68
51703076
51509057
51814132
69
70
71
56007106
51803032
49210068
Location
Size (in.)
d/D
AVALON BL E/S N/O 71ST ST
4TH AV 50' S/O VERNON AV
AVE 17 CL N/O ALBION ST. E/S
21
75
54
61%
61%
61%
ORANGE DR 5' W/O CL ALLEY S/O
WASHINGTON BL
HAVELOCK AV 200' W/O
MARSHALL DR
VERMONT AV S/O 4TH ST
NORTH BROADWAY AT SICHEL
ST.
PCH @ 200" W/O ENTRADA DR
MAIN ST AT 58TH ST
PCH W/S 336' N/O OLD PUMP
PLANT
EAGLE ROCK BL. W/S 350' S/O
AVE 30
WASHINGTON BL N/S 30' SW/O
FWY OFFRAMP CL
MILBANK ST AT MAMMOTH AV
ALLEY N/O HAYWRD ST AT MARR
ST
AVE 18 220' S/O PASADENA AV.
GENESEE AVE W/S 2ND MH S/O
VENICE BL
WESTERN AV 1ST MH S/O
BEVERLY BL
ORANGE DR E/S AT 320' S/O
FOUNTAIN AV
IROLO ST 225' S/O 7TH ST
MISSION BL. AT 4TH ST.
SMILEY DR 1ST MH E/O CLYDE
AV
RANDALL ST AT BEATRICE ST.
8TH ST W/O SIERRA BONITA AV
LA CIENEGA BL W/S 2ND MH S/O
BEVERLY BL
45
60%
24
60%
20
15
60%
60%
42
16
30
59%
59%
59%
18
59%
15
59%
18
24
59%
59%
24
84
59%
58%
14
58%
15
58%
20
48
15
58%
58%
58%
27
78
18
58%
57%
57%
20
No.
MH No.
72
73
49505104
39611031
74
53602042
75
76
43008001
49308082
77
39713166
78
79
80
42710069
49503014
52016161
81
82
83
53604022
42815021
49505067
84
85
86
87
88
49214055
42715053
38805133
39913052
42813007
89
55702119
90
51608130
91
52016164
92
93
94
95
53613008
53609063
56102019
56003108
Location
Size (in.)
d/D
S.F. RD E/S 300' N/O HURON ST
SATICOY ST N/S 270' W/O OSO
AV
ARLINGTON AV E/S 175'S/O 30TH
ST
24
15
57%
57%
24
57%
LOUISE AV 195' S/O VICTORY BL
NEW HAMPSHIRE AV W/S 400'
W/O MELROSE AV
CREBS AND VANOWEN 450'
UPSTREAM OF 397-13-169.
TUJUNGA AV E/S AT COLLINS AV
AVE 43 500' SE/O FIGUEROA ST.
AMHERST AV AT ALLEY N/O PICO
BL
VERMONT AV E/S AT 30TH ST
CHANDLER BL AT ETHEL AV
S.F. RD W/S AT 400' N/O HURON
ST.
SAN VINCENTE BL AT 6TH ST
BILOXI AV
PIERCE ST 330' SW/O VARNA AV
HAZELTINE AV E/S AT GAULT ST
CHANDLER BL 10' S/O N/RDWY
AT CALHOUN AV
AVALON BL E/S 250' N/O
SLAUSON AV
LOS ANGELES ST E/S 100' S/O
3RD ST
GRANVILLE AV E/S 2ND MH S/O
CLAYRES AV
VERNON AV 75' E/O 11TH AV
BRONSON AV 150' S/O 41ST ST
MAIN ST 244' N/O SUNSET AV
HAVELOCK AV 218' E/O
LINDBLADE DR
18
24
57%
56%
36
56%
15
21
24
56%
56%
56%
14
48
14
56%
55%
55%
21
27
21
24
42
54%
54%
54%
54%
54%
18
54%
36
54%
30
53%
66
66
48
15
53%
53%
53%
53%
21
No.
MH No.
96
46707081
97
39513114
98
51814001
99
51704174
100
101
51613046
44307150
102
103
104
105
106
49316104
61306052
51704146
53703007
51805165
107
38805021
108
51705024
109
44305264
110
42813015
111
44305072
112
53602148
113
56504042
114
51813160
115
116
117
118
51601061
49514040
49506084
51806094
Location
AVE 50 W/S 230' S/O MENDOTA
AV.
VANOWEN ST 16' N/O CL 390' E/O
SHELTONDALE AV
LA CIENEGA BL W/S 400' N/O
VENICE BL
NORMANDIE AV W/S 30' N/O SAN
MARINO ST
UNION AV W/S AT 23RD ST
LANKERSHIM BL 320' N/O VALLEY
SPRING LANE
BERENDO ST S/O 5TH ST
GULF AV 300' S/O M ST
9TH ST AND BERENDO
GRIFFITH AV AT 15TH ST
SHENANDOAH ST E/S 460' N/O
18TH ST
PIERCE ST BTWN STANWIN AV
AND ARLETA AV
11TH ST 8' S/O CL 1ST MH E/O
LUCERNE BL
VALLEY SPRING LN N/S 25' E/O
BECK AV
CHANDLER BL 10' S/O N/RDWY
430' W/O RANCHITO AV
WOODBRIDGE ST 150 FT W/O
RADFORD AVE
ARLINGTON AV W/S 75' S/O 36TH
PL
VERMONT AV E/S 1ST MH N/O
MANCHESTER AV
SHENANDOAH ST W/S 130' N/O
OLIN ST
HOOVER ST AT LEEWARD AV
AVE 17 AT MOZART ST
AVE 33 AT POST ST
CRESCENT HEIGHTS BL E/S @
SATURN ST
Size (in.)
d/D
12
53%
18
53%
18
53%
27
53%
20
24
53%
53%
20
18
18
40
42
52%
52%
52%
52%
52%
18
52%
45
51%
48
51%
54
51%
48
51%
42
51%
27
51%
48
51%
20
20
16
21
51%
51%
51%
51%
22
No.
MH No.
119
120
56102092
44307151
Location
BROOKS AV 150' W/O PACIFIC AV
CAHUENGA BL 260' N/O VALLEY
SPRING LN
Size (in.)
d/D
15
18
51%
51%
Notes:
in. = inches
d/D = measured depth of flow (in.)/pipe Diameter (in.)
MH No. = Maintenance Hole Number
PDWF = Peak Dry Weather Flow
e. Wastewater Capital Improvements
The City expended $225 million in wastewater capital improvement in FY 2004-05, of which
$130 million (58 percent) was for collection system improvements. For FY 2005-06, the
projected total wastewater capital improvement expenditure is $280.5 million with $160 million
(57 percent) designated for the collection system. For the next ten years (FYs 2005-06
through 2014-15), the projected total expenditure is $3.5 billion with $2.7 billion (77 percent)
designated for the collection system.
A complete copy of the latest 10-Year Wastewater Capital Improvements Program is
available at http://www.lacitysan.org/fmd/WCIPBook05-06.pdf. A summary of the Program is
provided as Attachment “A” to this Annual Report.
f.
Sewer Cleaning
A summary of the sewer cleaning program progress is provided in Table 5 and Figure 1
below. As shown, the City complied with all requirements for Year One and exceeded the
mandated cleaning of 60,000 pipe reaches by more than 22,000 reaches. Per the provisions
of the CSSA, the City is allowed to “bank” the excess pipe reaches cleaned over the required
60,000 pipe reaches. The banked reaches can be used in the future to augment the quantity
of sewer cleaning performed if it falls below the required 60,000 pipe reaches. The City is
proposing to “bank” 22,030 pipe reaches.
23
Table 5: Fiscal Year 2004-05 Sewer Cleaning Data
60,000
2,600 Miles (approx.)
Number or Length of
Pipe Reaches
Completed
82,030
3,699 Miles
Not Applicable
22,030
35,000
60,873
Not Applicable
2,745 Miles
CSSA Requirement for
Year One
Compliance Item
Number of Pipe Reaches
Length of Pipe Reaches
Proposed Number of Pipe
Reaches Banked
Number of Hot Spot Pipe
Reaches Cleaned
Length of Hot Spot Pipe
Reaches
Figure 1: Sewer Cleaning Progress
90,000
82,030
80,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
35,000
Completed by City
40,000
Required
by CSSA
50,000
60,873
Completed by City
60,000
60,000
Required by CSSA
No. of Pipes Cleaned
70,000
0
Total No. of Pipe Reaches Cleaned
No. of Hot Spot Pipes Cleaned
The City continues to review its sewer maintenance efforts and to adjust the sewer cleaning
schedule and cleaning frequencies accordingly. As a result, cleaning goals are established on
24
an annual basis to meet revised cleaning needs. The following is an estimated breakdown of
the sewer cleaning for FY 2005-06:
•
Total Pipe Reaches to be Cleaned as required in the CSSA: 60,000 pipes. However,
the City has established an internal goal for cleaning of 90,000 pipe reaches.
•
Total Hot Spot Pipe Reaches to be Cleaned as required in the CSSA: 35,000 pipes.
However, the City has established an internal goal for hot spot cleaning of 60,000 pipe
reaches.
g. Sewer Line Television Assessment – Mileage
A summary of the sewer line television assessment is provided in Table 6 below. As shown in
Figure 2, the City complied with the requirement of the CSSA, exceeding the mandated
inspection goal of 600 miles of pipe by 221 miles. Per the CSSA, the City is allowed to “bank”
a percentage of the excess amount over 600 miles to be used in the future to augment the
quantity of sewer line television assessment performed if it falls below the 600-mile
requirement. The percentage of excess that can be banked is equal to the miles of pipe
assessed for the first time divided by the total miles of pipe assessed. The City is proposing
to “bank” 196 miles.
Table 6: Television Assessment Overview
Compliance Item
Sewer Pipes Inspected
Sewer Pipes Inspected for the
First Time
Sewer Pipe Inspected for the
First Time As Percentage of
Total Inspected
Inspected Sewer Pipes
Proposed to Be Banked
CSSA Requirement for
Year One
600 Miles
Completed in
Year One
821 Miles
Not Applicable
728 Miles
Not Applicable
87%
Not Applicable
196* Miles
Note: * {196 miles = (821miles – 600 miles)*(87%)}
25
Figure 2: Sewer Line Television Assessment Progress
900
821
800
700
Completed by
City
500
Required by
CSSA
Miles of Pipe
600
600
400
300
200
100
0
Miles of Sewer Pipe Assessed
h. Sewer Line Television Assessment – Condition Ratings
A summary of the sewer line television assessment findings is provided in Table 6 and Figure
3 below. As shown, 87% of the pipe assessed was found to be condition rating “C” or better.
Table 7: Condition Assessment Results
Condition
Rating
Condition
Description
A
B
C
D
E
Total
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Emergency
Pipe Assessed for
the First-Time
(Miles)
Total Pipe
Assessed
(Miles)
Percent of
Total
100
323
213
79
13
728
110
363
246
86
16
821
13%
44%
30%
11%
2%
100%
26
Figure 3: Condition Assessment Results
400
363
350
No. of Miles
300
246
250
200
150
110
86
100
50
16
0
A
B
C
D
E
Condition Ratings
Condition “E” sewers are referred to the Bureau of Engineering for immediate emergency
repair. In FY 2004-05, 514 emergency sewer work requests were authorized and completed,
requiring more than $20 million. This is equivalent to approximately 12 miles of sewers
repaired during FY 2004-05. Projects to repair, rehabilitate, and/or replace Condition “D”
sewers are scoped and then placed in the City’s Wastewater Capital Improvements Program.
i.
Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) Control Program.
As summarized in Table 8 below, the City continues to implement its FOG Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPs) and Enforcement Response Plan and Enforcement Response
Guide (ERP/ERG). These procedures include permitting of FSEs, investigating referrals from
Wastewater Collection System Division (WCSD), and taking enforcement actions against
noncompliance. The ERP/ERG includes activities such as issuing Notices of Violation
(NOVs), taking enforcement actions, and requiring grease interceptor installations.
Table 8: Summary of FOG Program Results
Summary of Weekly FOG Reports
CSSA Summary FY 04-05
Permitted Food Service Establishment (FSE) as of 7/1/2004
FSEs Inspected - Annual Inspections Conducted
Total for
FY 04-05
7,832
7,832
27
Table 8: Summary of FOG Program Results
Summary of Weekly FOG Reports
% Completed
Total for
FY 04-05
100
Inspection Activity Summary
Total Inspections of FSEs
15,002
Notice of Violation (NOV) Activity Summary
Total NOVs Issued
NOVs Forwarded for Enforcement
944
462
Enforcement Case Summary
Active Cases as of 6/30/2005
Completed Cases
Total Enforcement Cases Processed
106
462
568
Wastewater Collections System Division (WCSD) Referrals Summary
Received
142
Investigated
142
FSEs Identified as Source of FOG Blockage – See Table I.2
0
FSEs Issued NOV during Investigation – See Table I.2
11
FSEs with an Enforcement Case – See Table I.2
4
FSEs Ordered to Install Grease Interceptor – See Table I.2
1
Conditional Waivers Processed
Granted
Revoked
Denied
0
0
0
Modifications to the SOPs, ERP/ERG, and implementation of Conditional Waivers were
pending Government Plaintiffs’ approval of implementation plans presented in "The FOG
Report," as required by Paragraph 59 of the CSSA, and submitted to the Plaintiffs on April 22,
2005. The approval was granted on September 29, 2005.
One of the SOPs that the City implements as part of the FOG Control Program is that of
conducting a field investigation of each referral from WCSD. When an investigation reveals
noncompliance with the FOG Ordinance, the City activates its ERP/ERG. Table 9 identifies
the City’s ERP/ERG activities resulting from field investigations of WCSD referrals and names
the FSEs affected.
28
Table 9: Referral Investigation Summary
FSEs Identified as Source of FOG Blockage
None
FSEs Issued Notice of Violation (NOV) During Investigation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Acapulco Restaurant #53, 750 Sampson Way, San Pedro
BBQ Unlimited, 12980 Sherman Way, North Hollywood
Fay’s Foods, 10650 Burbank Blvd., North Hollywood
Flores Meat Market, 1200 W. Anaheim St., Wilmington
Hop Li Sea Food, 10974 W. Pico, Los Angeles
Jack in the Box #292, 4210 Crenshaw Blvd., Los Angeles
KFC #x610126, 8515 S. Central Ave., Los Angeles
La Perla Blanca Seafood, 5400 S. Avalon Blvd., Los Angeles
M & M Soul Foods, 3552 W. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Los Angeles
Mount Carmel Treatment Center, 801 W. 70th St. Los Angeles
Tommy’s Burgers #1, 137 E. Anaheim St., Wilmington
FSEs with an Enforcement Case
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hop Li Sea Food, 10974 W. Pico, Los Angeles
BBQ Unlimited, 12980 Sherman Way, North Hollywood
M & M Soul Foods, 3552 W. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Los Angeles
FSEs Ordered to Install Grease Interceptor
1.
Since the inception of the FOG Control Program in 2001 and the enhanced sewer cleaning
and public outreach, FOG-caused SSOs were reduced by over 80 percent, as shown in
Figure 4.
29
Figure 4: FOG-Related SSOs by Fiscal Year
300
290
# of FOG-Related Spills
250
200
197
Baseline
Year
174
150
32%
Reduction
from
Baseline
Year
100
117
40%
Reduction
from
Baseline
Year
50
60%
Reduction
from
Baseline
Year
79%
Reduction
from
Baseline
Year
62
0
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Fiscal Year
j.
Primary and Secondary Basin Plans
The CSSA requires completion of all 25 Primary Sewer Plans by the end of Year Five. Eight
plans are currently in progress, including the Lincoln Heights Primary Sewer Plan, which is 95
percent complete. The remaining seven plans are all more than 50 percent complete. The
City has prepared a completion plan and schedule for the Primary Sewer Basin Plans. A
summary of the current status of each is provided in Table 10. A map showing the locations
of the 25 basins is provided as Figure 5.
Table 10: Status of Primary Sewer Plans
Primary Sewer Plan
Projected
Completion Date
November 2005
95% Complete
January 2006
80% Complete
March 2006
80% Complete
4. Tarzana Primary Sewer Plan
April 2006
75% Complete
5. Baldwin Hills Primary Sewer Plan
June 2006
75% Complete
1. Lincoln Heights Primary Sewer Plan
2. Venice Primary Sewer Plan
3. Northridge Primary Sewer Plan
Current Status
30
Table 10: Status of Primary Sewer Plans
Primary Sewer Plan
Projected
Completion Date
June 2006
75% Complete
7. Central City Primary Sewer Plan
July 2006
50% Complete
8. NOHO Primary Sewer Plan
July 2006
50% Complete
6. Granada Hills Primary Sewer Plan
Current Status
9. Highland Park Primary Sewer Plan
September 2006
Scheduled for future years.
10. Wilshire Primary Sewer Plan
December 2006
11. CBD Primary Sewer Plan
March 2007
12. Boyle Heights Primary Sewer Plan
March 2007
13. West LA Primary Sewer Plan
March 2007
14. Hollywood Primary Sewer Plan
March 2007
15. N.E. Wilshire Primary Sewer Plan
March 2007
May 2007
17. Encino Primary Sewer Plan
December 2007
18. Pacoima Primary Sewer Plan
February 2008
19. Westchester Primary Sewer Plan
16. South LA Primary Sewer Plan
February 2008
20. Brentwood Primary Sewer Plan
March 2008
21. Wilmington Primary Sewer Plan
March 2008
22. San Pedro Primary Sewer Plan
March 2008
May 2008
December 2008
March 2009
23. Woodland Hills Primary Sewer Plan
24. Van Nuys Primary Sewer Plan
25. Chatsworth Primary Sewer Plan
31
32
Granada Hills/ Van Nuys/
Mission Hills
Sylmar
75%
118
Chatsworth
Pacoima
Northridge
North Hollywood/Sunland
405
80%
50%
210
Woodland Hills/
Canoga Park
Tarzana
80%
5
170
Northeast Los Angeles/
Burbank/Glendale
101
134
Encino/Studio City
101
210
134
Griffith Park
2
110
Hollywood
Brentwood/
Pacific Palisades
101
Northeast
Wilshire
405
West
Los Angeles
Baldwin
Hills
75%
1
Wilshire
5
Lincoln
Heights
95%
Silverlake/
Central
City North
10
110
10
Central
Business
Boyle Heights
5
Venice
Primary Basin
Plans in Progress
80%
South
Los Angeles
90
710
Westchester
105
Baldwin Hills (78%)
Granada Hills/Mission Hills (75%)
North Hollywood/Sunland (50%)
Northridge (80%)
91
Tarzana (80%)
Venice (80%)
Lincoln Heights (95%)
110
Figure 5
405
GIS Group
Wastewater Engineering Services Divsion
City of Los Angeles
Created September 14, 2005
0
1
2
4
6
Wilmington
San Pedro
8
Miles
S:\gisunit\bprojects\sewershedmaps\status\PrimaryPlanningStatus.mxd
Thomas Bros Data reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS MAP
34
The CSSA requires Secondary Basin Plans for the 100 highest priority basins to be
completed by the end of Year Ten of the CSSA. To date, a total of nine Secondary Basin
Plans have been completed, as shown in Table 11. Current projections are to complete an
additional 12 Plans by the end of FY 2005-06. Figure 6 shows the locations of the secondary
basins with completed Plans.
Table 11: Completed Secondary Basin Plans
Plan Name
Secondary Sewer Basin
Plan for Basin S02
Plan for Basin H27
Plan for Basin C04
Plan for Basin U04
Plan for Basin P03
Plan for Basin H30
Plan for Basin H32
Plan for Basin H28
Plan for Basin A02
Completion
Date
Sewer Miles in
Basin
Sewer Miles
Identified for
Renewal
5/11/05
40.3
5.2
5/24/05
27.7
6.8
5/25/05
9.1
3.4
5/27/05
20.6
5.5
7/6/05
14.5
4.4
8/3/05
45.1
10.7
8/10/05
24.3
9.5
9/21/05
39.0
17.0
9/28/05
44.1
9.8
35
36
ANTELOPE VALLEY FRWY
FO
O
TH
L
IL
W
FR
Y
118
O
G
LD
EN
E
AT
ST
405
W
FR
Y
210
N
VE
TU
F
RA
RW
Y
GL EN DA
LE FRW
Y
5
170
101
134
210
134
101
2
H28
H27
N
AD E
PA S
H32
H30
HO
L
405
LY
W
5
N
SA
OO
DF
101 RW
Y
S
PA
AD
EN
A
W
FR
DI
O
EG
W
FR
Y
U04
A02
1
N
SA
TA
MO
N
IC
AF
Y
P03
O
PO M
RW
Y
RW Y
NA F
60
N
SA
TA
O
EG
A
Y
710
W
FR
Y
HARBOR FRWY
AN
W
FR
90
POM ONA FRW
Y
5
S02
DI
C04
SA
N
10
110
10
110
FRW Y
SAN TA MON ICA
WY
A FR
N
SA
TA
AN
A
W
FR
105
HF
RW
BE A
C
91
ARTESIA FRWY
LO N
G
HARBOR FRWY
ARTESIA FRWY
110
LONG BEACH FRWY
A02
C04
H27
H28
H30
H32
Figure 6
P03
S02
U04
605
Y
Secondary Sewershed
Plans Completed
SAN GABRIEL RIVER FRWY
Y
GLENN M ANDERSON FWY & TRANSIT
GIS Group
Wastewater Engineering Services Division
City of Los Angeles
Created September 14, 2005
0
1
2
4
6
8
Miles
S:\gisunit\bprojects\sewershedmaps\SecondaryPlanngStatusAsize.mxd
Thomas Bros Data reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS MAP
405
605
FRWY
38
k. MOUSE Model
As requested, “R” factors for all MOUSE model basins were developed based on historical
rainfall and sewer flow data. A report on the “R” factors was submitted on April 29, 2005. The
City will continue its wet-weather calibration and validation of the “R” factors as additional
data is collected.
l.
Chemical Root Control
The City continues its proactive root control program. A total of 11,608 pipes or 474 miles of
root-infested sewers were chemically treated with root inhibitors. As shown in Figure 7, this
corresponds to more than 3 times the CSSA requirement of 150 miles per year. Over the last
two years alone, sewer overflows caused by roots were reduced by 53 percent (Figure 8).
Figure 7: Root Control Progress
474
500
450
400
Miles of Pipe
350
300
250
200
150
Completed
by
City
150
100
50
Required
by CSSA
0
Miles of Pipe Treated with Root-Control Chemicals
39
Figure 8: Root-Caused SSOs
350
# of Root-Related SSOs
300
290
234
250
200
First Year of
Root Control
Program
19% Reduction
from First Year
of Program
150
100
137
53% Reduction
from First Year
of Program
50
0
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
Fiscal Year
m. Significant Program Implementation
A summary of other significant program modifications and achievements made during the FY
2004-05 that affect compliance with the CSSA requirements is provided herein.
-
On February 2, 2005, following an extensive public outreach campaign that included more
than 1.5 million notices and 60 community meetings to inform the public about the CSSA
and the necessary rate increase, the City Council authorized the necessary sewer rate
increase over the next five years to provide the necessary resources.
-
On June 7, 2005, the City Council authorized an additional 21 staff to support the
implementation of the CSSA in the Bureaus of Engineering and Sanitation.
-
Representatives from the Department of Public Works and other City offices continue to
meet monthly as part of the Settlement Agreement Committee (SAC) to review and track
progress and coordinate activities. Quarterly updates are given to the Board of Public
Works.
-
The City is currently launching a root control outreach and education program for private
properties. The focus will be on areas where private laterals are prone to root intrusion
and as evidenced by sewer television inspection.
-
The City has implemented state-of-the-art field automation of our sewer maintenance
trucks (FAST). All maintenance equipment is now equipped with an on-board computer
with sewer information, work orders, etc. This has facilitated and streamlined work, as
40
evidenced by a reduction in response time and increased productivity demonstrated by
the sewer maintenance crews.
-
In an effort to improve communications and facilitate the timely completion of the CSSA
deliverables, the City’s Bureau of Contract Administration is reorganizing its sewer
construction inspection staff. The plan will move sewer projects currently managed by
three divisions and combine them under one division – the Wastewater Construction
Division. The Emergency Sewer Repair Group was transferred to the Wastewater
Construction Division.
-
In an effort to ensure the availability of adequate resources in the construction community,
the City is working closely with the Engineering Contractors Association (ECA), which
represents many of the sewer contractors in the area. The ECA contractors felt confident
that they could deliver the anticipated sewer repair and rehabilitation workload. The City
and ECA agreed to meet on a semi-annual basis to review progress and coordinate
activities.
-
The City is currently evaluating various options to streamline the contracting process to
expedite the bid and award of projects, including pre-qualification of contractors that will
be bidding on sewer projects.
-
The City’s Bureau of Engineering has undergone necessary reorganization to
accommodate the construction of the CSSA-required projects. A new construction
division named the Wastewater Conveyance Construction Division (WCCD) was created
and staffed for the construction management of sewer projects.
-
The City’s Bureau of Engineering has implemented a design tool called the Sewer
Management Automated Repair Tracking System (SMARTS). SMARTS functions as a
one-stop shop of information for Secondary Sewer Renewal Program (SSRP) engineers,
using mapping resources and GIS technology to help engineers deliver design projects
faster, more accurately, and more efficiently. SMARTS allows sewer information to be
rendered on top of City base map components like parcels, streets, and freeways to better
represent the location of damaged pipe. In addition, SMARTS renders data relating to
condition assessment, sewer wyes, storm drains, substructures, aerial photographs, and
existing projects to help engineers identify other factors critical to the sewer repair.
n. Failure to Comply Projects
The City has complied with all requirements of the CSSA for Year One.
o. Odor Outreach Plan
As required by Section V-G (Paragraphs 34 and 36) of the CSSA, the City is required to
update the Odor Outreach Plan for advertising the Sewer Odor Hotline and report progress on
the implementation of the updated Odor Outreach Plan. A summary of the progress to date is
provided herein.
The Draft Odor Hotline Publicity Outreach Plan, hereafter referred to as the Draft Outreach
Plan, was developed and copies were provided to the Odor Advisory Board. The Odor
Advisory Board input and comments as stated in the Board’s meeting minutes over the last
41
two years were reviewed and incorporated into the Draft Outreach Plan. The Draft Outreach
Plan was presented to the Odor Advisory Board at its meeting of March 14, 2005. The issue
of effective outreach was discussed at length and the Board’s comments were incorporated.
The Final Odor Hotline Publicity Outreach Plan was submitted on April 27, 2005.
The City designed magnets and flyers that include updated contact and reporting procedures
for both 3-1-1 and the Odor Hotline in both English and Spanish. The City ordered and
received 1,500 magnets and is printing 5,000 flyers for distribution starting in October 2005.
Meanwhile, the City is using various outreach materials that contain Odor Hotline information
to inform the residents at many public events or meetings, including the following:
-
Boyle Heights 3rd Annual Resource Fair
Southeast LA Awareness Walk Community Outreach Event
Film Arts Community Outreach Event
2004 Coastal Bay Clean-up Event
Solid Resources Collection North Central Yard Open House Event
Solid Resources Collection South LA Yard Open House Event
Solid Resources Collection West LA Yard Open House Event
Neighborhood Clean Up event at Green Meadow Recreation Center
Studio City Residents Association Presentation on the City of Los Angeles’ Odor Control
Effort
Winnetka Neighborhood Council-Public Works Committee
Tarzana Neighborhood Council Meeting
Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council Meeting
p. Odor Control Facilities Construction Progress
A summary of the construction status of the odor control facilities is provided in Table 12.
42
Table 12: Construction Status of Odor Control Facilities
CSSA
Construction
End Date
Completed?
(Yes or No)
Project Status
5/23/08
No
On Schedule
Mission & Jesse
No
On Schedule
23rd & San Pedro
No
On Schedule
Design is 100% complete. Currently In bid and
award.
Jefferson Siphon
No
On Schedule
NORS Connection
No
On Schedule
No
On Schedule
No
On Schedule
No
On Schedule
Humboldt
No
On Schedule
Richmond
No
On Schedule
Yes
Completed
Yes
Completed
Yes
Completed 8/26/04
Completed 1 day ahead of schedule.
23 & San Pedro
Yes
Completed 8/26/04
Jefferson Siphon
Yes
Completed 8/26/04
Project Title
Air Treatment Facility (ATF) –
ECIS/NORS
ATF – NCOS
5/23/08
Jefferson & Rodeo
ATF – NEIS
3/26/09
Interim Carbon Scrubber –
NCOS
ECIS/NORS
Mission & Jesse
rd
8/27/04
Comments
Design is 100% complete. Currently In bid and
award.
43
Table 12: Construction Status of Odor Control Facilities
CSSA
Construction
End Date
Completed?
(Yes or No)
Project Status
Yes
Completed 8/27/04
No
On Schedule
An additional carbon scrubber was installed at
the Division Street site and placed in service on
May 27, 2005.
Humboldt
No
On Schedule
Richmond
No
On Schedule
Project Title
NORS Connection
NEIS
10/30/06
Comments
44
q. Independent Review of the Sewer Odor Control Program
The Final Report prepared by the designated independent review consultant issued in March
2004 included 16 recommendations in section 9.2 of the report. The City prepared the Draft
“Responses to the Recommendations from Independent Review of the City of Los Angeles’s
Sewer Odor Control Program.” The responses were presented to the Odor Advisory Board at
its meeting of March 14, 2005. These recommendations were discussed at length at the
meeting and the Board’s comments were incorporated into the Final Report issued on April 27,
2005.
Table 13 provides the status of the 16 recommendations from the independent consultant
report.
Table 13: Summary and Status of Independent Review Recommendations
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Recommendation
Status
Conduct “before and after” monitoring of
headspace pressures in both the north
and south branches of the NOS.
If headspace pressures in the “Maze”
NOS are not sufficiently reduced to
prevent widespread odor releases,
proceed with the siting and design of air
extraction/treatment systems.
COMPLETED - “Before and after” ECIS on
line pressure tests were conducted between
April and October 2004.
NEEDS FURTHER EVALUATION - After the
construction of “Slauson/VanNess/COS
External Bypass” project, the City will
conduct another pressure test in the S.
Maze. Based on results of the testing, the
City will decide whether the odor releases
have been controlled or if further action is
required.
NOT APPLICABLE - The City proceeds with
the application of magnesium hydroxide;
therefore, testing is not needed.
Proceed with the full scale testing of
continuous magnesium hydroxide
addition to reduce the intensity of odors
emitted from the south branch of the
NOS.
Increase the design air flows for ATFs
Monitor wastewater characteristics and
headspace H2S and pressure levels in
major interceptors outside the “Maze.”
Expand the odor hotline and complaint
database to all areas of the City.
Evaluate the feasibility of routing all odor
complaints through the odor hotline.
COMPLETED.
COMPLETED.
COMPLETED.
COMPLETED.
45
Number
Recommendation
Status
8
Maintain a sewer odor advisory board
with representatives from various sectors
of the City affected by sewer odors.
9
The Odor Advisory Board should prepare
a report that summarizes its
accomplishments, conclusions, and
recommendations.
Strive to become a center of excellence
in the field of sulfide odor and corrosion
research, working with local universities,
experts in the field, and such
organizations as the Water Environment
Research Foundation.
ONGOING - During FY 2004-05, the Odor
Advisory Board conducted five meetings on
Nov. 8 and Dec. 12, 2004; and Jan. 10, Mar.
14, and May 9, 2005.
NOT APPLICABLE TO THE CITY.
10
11
Meet regularly with County Sanitation
Districts of Los Angeles County and the
Orange County Sanitation District.
12
Change the design criteria of the Sewer
Design Manual to flow 50 percent full.
Research the adequacy of current design
guidelines for air jumpers.
13
The City continues to work with experts in
the odor field. In April 2004, the City
presented the topic “Los Angeles Selects
Bio-Trickling/ Activated Carbon for Collection
System” at the Water Environment
Federation/Air & Wastewater Management
Association (WEF/WMA). The presentation
was subsequently selected as one of the
best at this conference and the City was
invited to be on the panel for the American
Water Works Association Conference in
June 2004. The City is also joining CH2MHill
in proposing to support the Water
Environment Research Foundation research
project, “Prevention and Minimization of
Odors and Related Corrosion in Collections
Systems”. This project will examine the
effectiveness of odor mitigation strategies
that have been used to minimize odors and
reduce corrosion within collection system.
The City prefers to share/exchange
information on odor/corrosion control
strategies with other agencies, but in the
forum of ad hoc meetings and discussions.
COMPLETED.
The work plan for the siphon air jumpers
research will be recommended in the Odor
Master Plan.
46
Number
14
15 & 16
Recommendation
Status
Re-evaluate the design of gas trap
maintenance holes.
Inventory of the trap maintenance hole
structures was conducted. Crew interviews
will be conducted to see if there is an existing
structure type that the City owns and
operates that is more reliable and requires
less maintenance than the currently standard
design in use.
COMPLETED.
Create an Odor Control Section with
adequate staff.
r. Annual Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEPs) Status Report
As required in Section VIII, Paragraph 94 of the CSSA, the following is a status report on each
Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) for which a SEP Completion Report has not been
submitted. The project status and a list of eligible SEP costs for each Tier 1 SEP are provided
below in Table 14. In addition, a detailed update on the North Atwater Creek Restoration is
provided as Attachment C.
47
Table 14: Summary of Progress on SEPs
Name
Project Description
Status
North Atwater Creek
Restoration & Water Quality
Enhancement Project
Construct water quality improvements to an
area along the Los Angeles (LA) River in
the vicinity of North Atwater Park.
South Los Angeles Storm
Water Treatment Project at
54th and Avalon St.
Construct an advanced system for capture
and treatment of urban runoff.
Hazard Creek and Wetlands
Restoration Project
Restore and enhance a one-half-mile reach
of the Hazard Creek corridor and 2.5 acres
of wetlands habitat in the Lincoln Heights
area of Los Angeles.
Address high bacteria levels at Inner
Cabrillo Beach.
The draft work plan was submitted to the
Regional Water Quality Control Board on
August 30, 2005 for review prior to
proceeding with design. Additional
information on this project is provided in
Attachment C.
The work plan is scheduled for
completion in August 2007. The work
plan may be expedited based on the
availability of additional funding.
Seeking community and LARWQCB input
to develop project work plan. The work
plan is scheduled for completion in March
2006.
Awaiting test results of a wave generator
machine at Dana Point Harbor to reduce
bacteria count in the water. The work
plan is scheduled for completion in
August 2008.
The site has been selected. The work
plan is scheduled for completion in
August 2009.
Inner Cabrillo Beach Pollution
Control and Water Circulation
Enhancement Project
Downtown Los Angeles
Storm Drain Low-Flow
Diversion Project
Construct a storm drain low-flow diversion
structure to divert low flow from a storm
drain in the Downtown Los Angeles area
that discharges to the LA River.
Eligible
Costs
$70,300
None
None
None
None
48
ATTACHMENT A
WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM SUMMARY*
* The City’s Wastewater Capital Improvement Program (WCIP) is currently undergoing its annual review
and update. A complete copy of the City’s current 10-year (FYs 2005-06 through 2014-15) WCIP is
available at http://www.lacitysan.org/fmd/WCIPBook05-06.pdf.
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
¾
COLLECTION SYSTEM
DONALD C. TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT
EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY
HYPERION TREATMENT PLANT
LA-GLENDALE WATER RECLAMATION PLANT
PUMPING PLANTS
SYSTEMWIDE
TERMINAL ISLAND TREATMENT PLANT
CATEGORIES:
(FISCAL YEARS 2005/06 – 2014/15)
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
AND
10-YEAR EXPENDITURE PLAN
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WASTEWATER
5TH DISTRICT
JACK WEISS
6TH DISTRICT
TONY CARDENAS
2ND DISTRICT
WENDY GREUEL
3RD DISTRICT
DENNIS P. ZINE
BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS
9TH DISTRICT
JAN PERRY
8TH DISTRICT
BERNARD PARKS
7TH DISTRICT
ALEX PADILLA
12TH DISTRICT
GREIG SMITH
11TH DISTRICT
BILL ROSENDAHL
10TH DISTRICT
VACANT
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION
WASTEWATER CONVEYANCE ENGINEERING DIVISION
D.C.TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DIVISION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION
INFORMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS DIVISION
LOS ANGELES-GLENDALE WATER RECLAMATION PLANT
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS DIVISION
WASTEWATER ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION
WASTEWATER CONSTRUCTION DIVISION
BUREAU OF CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
JOHN L. REAMER, JR. – INSPECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
BUREAU OF ENGINEERING
GARY LEE MOORE, P.E. – CITY ENGINEER
15TH DISTRICT
JANICE HAHN
14TH DISTRICT
VACANT
13TH DISTRICT
ERIC GARCETTI
RITA L. ROBINSON – DIRECTOR
CYNTHIA M. RUIZ, PRESIDENT
DAVID SICKLER, VICE PRESIDENT
PAULA A. DANIELS, PRESIDENT PRO-TEM
VALERIE LYNNE SHAW, COMMISSIONER
YOLANDA FUENTES, COMMISSIONER
4TH DISTRICT
TOM LABONGE
1ST DISTRICT
ED REYES
COUNCIL MEMBERS
ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA
MAYOR
Page 1
5,618,212
5,737,970
2,898,709
5,477,963
28,366,220
31,805,663
27,853,500
31,805,663
0
18,301,080
31,755,663
0
16,667
9,998,840
0
33,333
12,600,000
31,607,663
0
0
48,520
0
0
0
27,611,663
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
TOTAL WCIP 280,595,989 346,454,173 377,132,850 375,685,074 430,330,132 420,383,418 425,358,643 346,589,945 265,638,398 252,381,874
13,719,947
5,844,663
0
50,000
10,431,140
0
99,999
16,660,052
13,945,863
13,751,820
513,853
18,372,700
0
666,667
12,075,532
20,094,180
3,502,707
34,232,129
0
3,539,873
23,102,256
6,816,460
3,371,667
54,349,256
0
3,555,893
SYSTEM WIDE
828,740
4,454,560
92,829,258
4,000,000
10,982,060
5,817,425
2,871,898
69,811,933
10,900,000
42,468,436
PUMPING PLANTS
th
10 Year
2014/15
6,337,342
th
9 Year
2013/14
LA-GLENDALE WATER RECLAMATION PLANT
th
8 Year
2012/13
38,716,901
th
7 Year
2011/12
th
6 Year
20010/11
18,000,000
th
5 Year
2009/10
EARTHQUAKE (ASRP)
th
4 Year
2008/09
37,429,010
rd
3 Year
2007/08
D. C. TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT
nd
2 Year
2006/07
134,533,003 193,777,687 238,486,437 282,731,445 366,926,931 340,658,315 355,118,341 286,484,362 221,382,215 224,770,211
ST
1 Year
2005/06
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
CATEGORY
PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
ST
939,860
AVE 45 ARROYO DR RLF SWR
Page 3
BEACHWOOD CANYON MH ADDITION
BAYWOOD BNDCT ESMT SWR
161,260
1,439,720
97,260
464,000
ASSESSMENT ACT SWRS
BALDWIN HILLS AREA SWR REHAB
306,906
0
ARLINGTON RELIEF SEWER
APPLE ST RLF SWR
320,000
2,183,000
AIR TREATMENT FAC NORS
ALVARADO CRANDALL RLF SWR
400,320
AIR TREATMENT FAC NEIS
4,935,680
787,190
AIR TREATMENT EQUIP BIOTRICK
AIR TREATMENT FAC NCOS SIPHON
543,600
ADAMS BL RELIEF SEWER
12,437,720
0
71ST AVALON SWR REHAB
AIR TREATMENT FAC ECIS
0
1,016,480
0
29TH CONGRESS RLF SWR
12TH HILL SWR REHAB
9TH BERENDO NORMANDIE SWR RLF
24,100
461,320
4TH SHATTO VERMONT SWR REHAB
6TH ST ABANDN DIV TO NOS
0
1 Year
2005/06
4TH AVENUE SLAUSON SWR REHAB
PROJECT TITLE
CS PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
369,480
1,120
140,240
12,821,870
464,000
5,680
0
4,918,000
3,741,120
8,093,500
3,713,680
8,842,410
338,620
525,960
0
0
2,053,840
0
124,200
0
331,060
nd
2 Year
2006/07
163,640
0
0
138,120
0
0
495,000
th
4 Year
2008/09
1,292,570
0
1,849,900
17,352,385
464,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,583,215
CS
128,520
0
1,017,620
17,399,890
464,000
0
0
1,814,000
1,918,680
6,637,940
855,400
2,137,830
222,480
14,952,725
157,080
0
0
0
0
0
456,940
rd
3 Year
2007/08
1,847,735
0
10,400
4,949,195
464,000
0
73,360
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,368,238
124,920
0
149,720
0
0
8,470,850
th
5 Year
2009/10
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
th
1,847,735
0
0
0
464,000
0
76,460
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,289,042
179,000
0
697,370
0
0
7,702,010
6 Year
20010/11
602,800
0
0
0
464,000
0
867,660
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,760
2,290,420
0
1,322,330
0
0
54,880
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
464,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,388,740
0
45,540
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
960
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
464,000
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
0
0
0
0
464,000
th
10 Year
2014/15
PROJECT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
COLLECTION SYSTEM (CS)
ST
0
0
CENTRAL BUS DST RLF SWR PH-5
6,309,719
EAGLE ROCK INTER SWR
393,440
51,160
FLOW MON REAL TIME & SCADA INT
FLOW MON REAL TIME-PILOT STUDY
586,260
Page 4
302,400
GLENDALE-BURBANK IN SWR (GBIS)
3,150,000
386,340
FLORENCE AV SWR REHAB
FLOWER WASHINGTON PICO SWR
407,005
0
103,000
0
165,800
9,060,000
FIGUEROA ST SWR REPLC
FIGUEROA MERIDIAN YORK RLF SWR
EXPOSITION BL SWR REHAB
ENTERPRISE ST SIPHON MOD
EMERGENCY SEWER REPLACEMENT
88,740
2,150,000
COS REHAB NORS DIV 4 TO MARKET
EAST LA AREA PRIM SWR REHAB
0
COS REHAB MARKET ST TO RODEO
2,500,000
649,440
COLL SYS ADV PLANNING (BOS)
945,600
3,293,300
136,720
1 Year
2005/06
CENTRAL AREA CSRP U-3 & U-4
BUCKINGHAM DIVR SWR
BUCHANAN RELIEF SEWER
PROJECT TITLE
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
803,020
2,121,320
398,760
48,600
499,280
6,328,500
960
0
107,000
0
331,590
6,060,000
88,920
104,080
1,080,000
454,360
2,500,000
0
16,080
2,240
169,140
20,450
134,880
nd
2 Year
2006/07
368,900
0
0
0
0
715,566
th
4 Year
2008/09
0
7,660,500
0
0
0
3,372,720
0
197,900
1,078,486
192,800
0
6,060,000
1,525,030
0
18,963,600
1,666,600
1,450,000
CS
0
3,660,500
0
0
0
10,222,020
0
18,900
688,814
130,520
1,175,750
6,060,000
413,218
0
400,000
1,824,480
1,600,000
105,560
1,378,636
0
0
0
1,162,414
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,830,080
0
0
0
0
0
237,440
0
834,520
0
6,060,000
1,172,172
0
14,445,760
1,620,720
300,000
368,900
th
5 Year
2009/10
CITY OF LOS ANGELES,
th
0
0
0
0
0
0
13,217,937
0
0
0
0
0
1,596,660
0
1,740,120
0
6,060,000
10,320
0
1,220,720
18,070,995
150,000
2,372,200
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
0
0
0
0
43,894,382
0
0
0
0
0
2,979,970
0
9,120
0
6,060,000
0
0
0
18,120,562
0
7,965,180
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
43,790,415
0
0
0
0
0
725,170
0
0
0
6,060,000
0
0
0
17,697,323
0
3,880,840
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
43,790,415
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,060,000
0
0
0
211,120
0
21,920
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
0
31,626,111
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,060,000
th
10 Year
2014/15
ST
295,986
Page 5
0
268,800
NEIS PH 2
NE WILSHIRE AREA CSRP U-3
2,900,000
0
220,000
NEIS PH 1
NHIS CAHUENGA TO LCSFVRS
N BROADWAY SWR REHAB
5,750,000
990,000
NICHOLS CYN ESMT SWR REPLC
NORMANDIE FLORENCE SEWER REPL
0
MID NOS REHAB (U2) SANTEE ST
110,360
MANCHESTER CENTRAL & AVALON
0
770,000
MAINTENANCE HOLE RESETTING
MANHATTAN 4TH SWR REHAB
459,236
0
796,876
LCIS REHAB & RELOC RODEO BLKWR
LCIS REHAB BLACKWELDER MELROSE
558,906
1,055,000
576,171
1,891,467
0
LAS PULGAS CANYON SWR REPLC
HOOVER ST SWR REHAB
HOLLYWOOD AREA PRIM SWR REHAB
HOLLYWOOD AREA CSRP U-2
HIGHLAND PK EAGLE ROCK SWR RHB
1,544,546
49,280
HARBOR CSRP U-5 & WILM U-20
1,358,280
1 Year
2005/06
PROJECT TITLE
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
1,280
15,440
6,641,440
0
0
2,590,000
8,625,000
0
89,420
6,880
171,760
810,000
248,744
650,900
5,476,860
240
665,000
0
0
0
814,934
0
1,705,060
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,840
0
th
4 Year
2008/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
150,000
1,938,140
0
98,980
0
0
0
1,259,960
68,168
2,358,190
890,000
0
1,219,800
1,525,920
CS
1,259,600
7,122,040
0
0
851,000
2,185,000
0
808,860
56,380
1,366,150
860,000
0
1,316,280
5,491,724
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
55,622,695
0
345,420
0
0
0
1,063,620
299,112
9,520
950,000
0
13,641,840
th
5 Year
2009/10
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
th
0
0
0
0
0
52,144,775
0
345,420
0
0
0
20,387,195
1,120
0
990,000
0
19,908,780
0
0
0
0
0
156,460
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
0
0
0
55,746,658
0
2,646,340
0
0
0
14,991,725
0
0
1,030,000
0
16,578,700
0
0
0
0
0
134,960
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
45,583,272
0
8,771,600
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,070,000
0
55,520
0
0
0
0
0
1,855,600
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,933,200
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,110,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,752,100
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,600
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,150,000
th
10 Year
2014/15
ST
1,284,600
NOS REHAB VAN NESS TO TRINITY
Page 6
SLAUSON/FLORENCE DIVR TO COS
1,276,362
0
447,960
SEWER FLOW MONIT UPGR PH 2
SLAUSON COMPTON SWR REHAB
50,000
1,811,874
SEWER FLOW MONIT UPGR PH 1
SEPULVEDA VAL MEADOW RLF SWR
0
22,560
SAN PEDRO CSRP U-8
SECONDARY SWR RENEWAL PROG (SSRP)
164,808
0
1,084,724
300,000
0
815,000
SAN PEDRO CSRP U-4
SAN PEDRO 92ND SWR REPLC
SAN FERNANDO PASADNA SWR REHAB
RODEO/ARLINGTON SWR MAINT FAC
PLANNED UPGR REPLC PROG
ODOR CTRL SIERRA BONITA
0
303,520
NOS REHAB TRINITY 6TH MISSION
ODOR CTRL - FUTURE
6,484,340
184,500
1,152,250
0
NOS REHAB SIPHON TO LCIS JCT
NOS REHAB MISSION TO HUMBOLDT
NOS REHAB MAZE PHASE 5
NOS REHAB HUMBOLDT TO LAG
29,909,805
NOS REHAB HTP TO SIPHON
0
3,191,024
1 Year
2005/06
NOS DIV HUMBOLDT AV 18 & SFR
NE WILSHIRE AREA CSRP U-5
PROJECT TITLE
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
725,658
0
4,060
0
1,757,756
0
1,113,240
702,272
16,480
274,516
0
0
397,000
2,000,000
1,711,920
1,059,160
20,223,448
642,500
7,383,250
0
21,911,730
5,368,167
41,840
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
360,000
th
4 Year
2008/09
0
328,320
0
0
0
1,550,000
0
0
320
0
0
0
0
4,000,000
17,426,335
532,480
0
349,200
1,763,000
1,295,400
CS
2,160
244,580
0
0
0
1,550,000
3,360
0
503,420
0
0
0
0
4,000,000
13,590,430
1,062,000
19,415,267
642,600
7,383,250
556,600
238,880
19,600
2,314,160
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
0
0
307,800
0
0
0
1,550,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,000,000
12,670,415
13,512,850
0
3,918,600
0
1,295,400
th
5 Year
2009/10
th
0
0
0
0
1,916,560
0
0
0
52,720,000
0
0
0
0
0
36,710,000
0
4,000,000
135,520
16,062,900
0
12,561,300
0
1,295,400
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
0
0
6,981,800
0
0
0
55,220,000
0
0
0
0
0
81,490,000
0
0
0
11,708,090
0
12,561,400
0
1,003,580
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
1,540,320
0
0
0
57,720,000
0
0
0
0
0
81,490,000
0
0
0
124,560
0
2,973,500
0
7,595,520
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
60,220,000
0
0
0
0
0
81,490,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24,328,500
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
0
0
0
0
0
62,720,000
0
0
0
0
0
81,490,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41,254,500
th
10 Year
2014/15
ST
Page 7
94,840
292,500
SSRP S02B LA BREA & CRENSHAW
SSRP SC05 LINCOLN & SUNSET
349,172
SSRP S02A RODEO RD & 52ND ST
57,420
0
SSRP H35 HOLLYWOOD
SSRP P03B SOTO ST & 10 FWY
0
SSRP H32 HOLLYWOOD
29,900
0
SSRP H30 HOLLYWOOD
SSRP P03A GOLDEN STATE & 10 FWY
0
SSRP H28 HOLLYWOOD
338,100
SSRP H27C CAHUENGA & HOLLYWOOD
0
SSRP H26 HOLLYWOOD
332,900
0
SSRP H04 HOLLYWOOD
SSRP H27B CAHUENGA & MELROSE
0
SSRP H01 HOLLYWOOD
228,300
0
SSRP E02 NO HOLLYWOOD SUNLAND
SSRP H27A BARHAM & CAHUENGA
0
190,000
0
67,460
SSRP C08 BRENTWOOD P PALISADES
SSRP C04 ROSE & WASHINGTON
SSRP A02 BALDWIN HILLS
SOUTH LA CSRP U - 1
171,792
SOUTH BOYLE AREA SWR REHAB
0
102,900
1 Year
2005/06
SOTO ST GAUGING CHAMBER MOD
SOTO PICO SWR REPLC
PROJECT TITLE
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
0
1,807,120
775,935
670,539
533,860
278,300
0
0
0
0
68,080
5,760
1,448,320
0
0
0
0
0
544,000
0
1,402,920
0
740,460
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
6,480
0
0
167,580
th
4 Year
2008/09
0
808,255
698,887
4,425,882
2,307,602
0
20,113,500
2,569,590
31,594,400
1,939,960
1,226,260
532,300
22,434,000
1,928,700
0
1,794,000
4,112,460
4,290,000
12,192,600
CS
0
2,553,710
2,207,254
2,452,638
1,278,638
0
252,450
0
3,952,800
3,400,000
3,400,000
2,040,880
2,694,600
0
0
0
0
3,693,000
2,176,200
742,920
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
0
21,200
10,960
2,240,640
0
23,258,570
0
0
0
0
0
16,770,100
250,560
40,735,400
54,258,580
9,000
0
0
0
0
579,720
th
5 Year
2009/10
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
th
0
0
0
0
0
32,392,720
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23,074,880
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
852,300
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,584,460
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,934,160
th
8 Year
2012/13
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
th
10 Year
2014/15
ST
165,380
VOS WASHINGTON SWR REHAB
400,252
412,092
WEST LA INT SWR MH ADDITION
WEST LA INT SWR REHAB OVERLAND - BARRY
0
0
WILSHIRE AREA SYS SWR REHAB
WILSHIRE WSTMORELAND SWR REHAB
Page 8
5,571,336
0
0
113,100
1,809,660
828,366
4,151,080
474,340
412,092
2,387,528
62,120
45,520
774,660
1,723,596
1,147,600
2,834,240
987,140
0
0
0
287,900
292,200
nd
2 Year
2006/07
9,047,508
45,000
104,800
119,020
2,262,400
1,145,114
5,826,800
849,380
6,341,832
0
69,380
46,240
0
564,904
1,125,600
24,830,851
1,221,960
162,780
77,180
0
1,959,100
1,988,400
rd
3 Year
2007/08
2,112,336
16,000
27,840
91,560
0
0
60,640
7,496,890
9,665,320
0
1,178,580
785,720
0
0
7,960,633
26,628,215
8,000
198,560
62,240
2,006,010
2,275,100
2,310,200
th
4 Year
2008/09
5,000
5,000
0
250,000
2,303,580
3,415,120
0
0
0
15,404,990
84,000
0
0
0
0
0
10,201,845
19,592,134
0
178,400
526,620
19,310,230
th
5 Year
2009/10
th
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
34,400
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,942,322
222,880
0
2,108,814
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35,200
0
0
2,764,364
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
718,282
th
8 Year
2012/13
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
th
10 Year
2014/15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CS
July 1, 2005
TOTAL CS 134,533,003 193,777,687 238,486,437 282,731,445 366,926,931 340,658,315 355,118,341 286,484,362 221,382,215 224,770,211
449,400
0
WILSHIRE AREA OLYM SWR REHAB
WORKMAN MOZART INTER SWR
247,760
0
397,240
WILSHIRE AREA JEFF SWR REHAB
WILMINGTON CSRP U-7
WESTERN 35TH RLF SWR
0
63,480
WASH OXFRD BEACH RLF SWR
WEST LA RLF SWR
22,720
WASH GRIFFITH LB SWR REPLC
2,074,820
626,800
VERMONT RLF SWR FLOR-SLAUSON
WASH FLOWER GRAND SWR REPLC
1,789,920
VERMONT RLF SWR ECIS-SLAUSON
0
VERMONT AV SWR REPLC
149,680
0
VAN NUYS SYLMAR SWR REHAB
VERMONT MANCHSTER SWR REHAB
0
100,200
SSRP U04B VENICE BLVD & 10 FWY
SSRP U18 WEST LOS ANGELES
102,400
1 Year
2005/06
SSRP U04A BEVERLYWOOD & 10 FWY
PROJECT TITLE
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
ST
124,000
1,618,559
436,280
14,968,005
DCT NDN - CHEMICAL ADD SYSTEM
DCT NDN - EQUIP PROCUREMENT
DCT NDN - SEC CLAR SKIM AUTO
DCT NITROGEN REM CONVERSION
Page 145
DCT PHASE II BARCREENS REPLC
DCT ODOR CONTROL SYSTEM
800,000
1,000,000
219,785
1,097,997
DCT NDN - BLOWER PROCUREMENT
DCT NITROGEN REMOV CONV SC MODS
5,672,070
290,600
DCT LAB FACILITY
DCT NDN - BLOWER FACILITY
600,000
61,355
386,070
0
97,159
DCT IRRIGATION CONV POT WATER
DCT FILTER UPGRADE
DCT EMERGENCY BACKUP POWER
DCT ELECTRICAL POWER SYS MODS
DCT DCS STANDARDIZATION
0
669,000
DCT CHANNEL 2 CONC REHAB @ PH2
DCT DCS REPLACEMENT
1,129,400
165,000
DCT CAPITAL STR REPLC PROG
DCT CHANNEL 2 CONC REHAB @ PH1
105,000
7,863,480
1 Year
2005/06
DCT CAPITAL EQP REPLC
DCT ADDL TERT FILTRATION
PROJECT TITLE
DCT PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
0
3,000,000
194,125
6,930,820
3,176,900
877,878
0
5,899,999
5,992,930
3,135,905
1,800,000
166,145
3,177,200
0
55,779
0
1,255,000
0
50,500
210,000
5,735,610
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
760
0
0
0
3,499,540
22,260
0
0
33,333
th
4 Year
2008/09
DCT
0
1,000,000
0
0
42,310
0
0
2,439,030
0
975,580
600,000
188,380
1,056,640
4,000,000
0
0
0
0
0
90,000
rd
3 Year
2007/08
th
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,706,540
0
0
0
833,333
5 Year
2009/10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
666,667
th
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
99,999
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33,333
th
8 Year
2012/13
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
th
10 Year
2014/15
DONALD C. TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT (DCT)
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Page 146
37,429,010
30,000
DCT UPGRADE LANDSCAPING
0
80,000
15,250
TOTAL DCT
ST
1 Year
2005/06
DCT PREFILTER MIXING IMPR
DCT POWER/ENERGY MGMT
DCT PLC REPLACEMENT
PROJECT TITLE
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
42,468,436
0
43,645
52,000
714,000
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
0
3,555,893
th
4 Year
2008/09
DCT
10,982,060
0
52,120
255,000
283,000
rd
3 Year
2007/08
th
0
0
0
0
3,539,873
5 Year
2009/10
th
0
0
0
0
666,667
6 Year
20010/11
th
0
0
0
0
99,999
7 Year
2011/12
th
0
0
0
0
33,333
8 Year
2012/13
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
th
10 Year
2014/15
DONALD C. TILLMAN WATER RECLAMATION PLANT (DCT)
Page 173
CS EARTHQUAKE REPAIR WORK
PROJECT TITLE
10,900,000
10,900,000
TOTAL EQ 18,000,000
nd
2 Year
2006/07
18,000,000
1 Year
2005/06
ST
EQ PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
EQ
4,000,000
4,000,000
rd
3 Year
2007/08
th
4 Year
2008/09
0
0
th
5 Year
2009/10
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
0
0
th
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
0
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
th
10 Year
2014/15
EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY (EQ)
ST
0
614,000
300,000
0
HTP CAPITAL STR REPLC PROG
HTP CAPITAL UTILITY REPLC PROG
HTP CENTRAL SOLIDS HNDLNG FAC
826,886
252,590
HTP DIG GAS COMP FAC
HTP DIG GAS DESULF FAC IMPR
482,672
280,000
265,840
214,000
432,000
264,904
HTP DIG SCREENING FAC SCRUBBER MOD
HTP DISMANTLING UNUSED FAC
HTP FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS
HTP GRIT HANDLING IMPROVEMENT
HTP INFLUENT CHANNEL REHAB
HTP IPS ODOR CNTRL IMPR
Page 177
585,390
HTP DIG GAS SILOXANE REMOV
0
144,200
HTP DIG EXPANSION IMPR
HTP DIG GAS FLARE REPLC
346,553
1,454,220
HTP DIG CEN WET CAKE PUMP IMPR
HTP DCS REPLACEMENT
818,280
2,071,000
HTP CAPITAL EQP REPLC PROG
HTP CLASS A BATCH PROCESS EX
405,500
51,060
1 Year
2005/06
HTP BOILER NO 3 OPTIMIZATION
HTP BIOFILTER TESTING
HTP 1 & 5 MILE OUTFALL REHAB
PROJECT TITLE
HTP PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
1,308,640
0
4,400,000
0
4,250,000
0
0
248,690
317,035
4,843,293
0
6,552,464
1,639,966
1,637,420
500,000
355,000
603,650
2,365,000
238,500
0
370,575
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,504,680
2,660,160
95,948
0
0
9,165,460
0
6,729,000
365,000
150,250
1,650,000
0
0
7,276,240
th
4 Year
2008/09
HTP
1,210,700
0
1,100,000
0
0
0
0
399,200
3,824,750
19,542,215
0
1,901,000
27,025,152
0
700,000
360,000
353,650
1,215,000
0
0
576,325
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,243,020
0
0
0
0
0
0
23,631,500
370,000
150,250
1,400,000
0
0
5,700,700
th
5 Year
2009/10
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
th
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17,739,500
6 Year
20010/11
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
th
10 Year
2014/15
HYPERION TREATMENT PLANT (HTP)
987,502
1,141,394
HTP PRIM SOLIDS CENTRIFUGE
HTP REACT NITRGN PURGE SYS
199,000
455,615
HTP STANDBY BOILER #4
HTP SUBSTATION SEPARATION
Page 178
552,040
HTP SERVICE WATER FAC EXP
38,716,901
977,220
0
HTP SEC CLARF FLOW MEASUR
HTP SEC CLARF EXPANSION
186,965
236,660
HTP PRIM SLUDGE PREHTR INST
HTP REACT SELEC MIXER REMOTE
229,558
1,122,974
HTP PRIM BATT C MOD
HTP PRIM POLYMER FACILITY
13,797,775
HTP PRIM BATT B MOD
114,704
HTP PRIM AND SEC SCUM HANDLING
2,365,506
HTP ODOR CTRL PRIM SCRUB PROC
308,000
4,860,853
HTP ODOR CTRL PRIM SCRUB EXP
HTP PARKING STRUCTURE REHAB
144,640
HTP ODOR CTRL HDWRKS SYS RPL
289,000
206,000
HTP LPGH FLAME ARRESTER
HTP OUTFALLS ASSESSMENT
643,000
60,000
HTP LANDSCAPING
HTP LIQUID SLUDGE STORAGE FAC
29,400
TOTAL HTP
ST
1 Year
2005/06
HTP LAG & DCT MONITORING
PROJECT TITLE
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
0
69,811,933
2,447,600
1,160,000
3,401,140
0
0
0
0
7,376,541
0
932,530
773,225
19,084,465
564,200
597,000
1,424,000
538,360
572,085
289,554
228,000
733,000
60,000
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
0
0
54,349,256
0
0
0
0
284,428
0
0
0
0
0
17,810,771
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,657,319
th
4 Year
2008/09
HTP
92,829,258
2,212,698
48,000
1,180,050
0
0
0
0
12,519,558
0
582,750
15,376,645
1,211,730
0
0
0
0
0
1,429,835
0
0
60,000
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
0
0
34,232,129
0
0
0
0
610,944
0
0
0
0
0
2,607
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,123,108
th
5 Year
2009/10
th
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,372,700
0
0
0
0
633,200
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,431,140
0
0
0
0
10,431,140
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,998,840
0
0
0
0
9,998,840
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
48,520
0
0
0
0
48,520
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
th
10 Year
2014/15
HYPERION TREATMENT PLANT (HTP)
ST
Page 223
LAG TERTIARY FILTER REPL
LAG SURGE TANKS REPLACEMENT
TOTAL LAG
LAG PROG LOGIC/DISTRIB CNTRL SYS UPGRADE
6,337,342
0
200,000
2,511,200
0
2,493,388
LAG NITROGEN REMOVAL CONV
LAG PROCESS PIPING REPLACEMENT
120,954
LAG NDN - EQUIP PROCUREMENT
0
298,000
LAG NDN - CHEM ADDITION SYS
LAG POWER/ENERGY MGMT IMPL
645,800
0
LAG ELECTRICAL POWER SYST MODS
LAG NDN - BLOWERS MAN SYS
0
68,000
1 Year
2005/06
LAG DCS REPLACEMENT
LAG CAPITAL EQUIP REPL PROG
PROJECT TITLE
LAG PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
2,871,898
96,380
0
0
250,000
0
2,214,418
59,720
0
208,380
0
0
43,000
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
3,371,667
3,355,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16,667
th
4 Year
2008/09
LAG
4,454,560
247,880
0
0
0
206,600
0
80
0
0
4,000,000
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
3,502,707
3,086,040
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
416,667
th
5 Year
2009/10
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
0
513,853
180,520
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
333,333
th
6 Year
20010/11
0
50,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50,000
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
16,667
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16,667
th
8 Year
2012/13
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
th
10 Year
2014/15
LA-GLENDALE WATER RECLAMATION PLANT (LAG)
192,344
175,676
ODOR CONTROL BALLONA CREEK PP
ODOR CONTROL DACOTAH PP SCRUBB
Page 237
448,000
VENICE PP SLUICE GATE REPLC
5,817,425
26,085
4,470,720
VENICE PP HIGH RES GROUNDING
VENICE PP DUAL FORCE MAIN
15,600
125,000
NORTH PULGA PP639 UPGRADE
TEMESCAL CANYON PP634 REHAB
364,000
TOTAL PP
ST
1 Year
2005/06
DACOTAH PP VFD REPL
PROJECT TITLE
PP PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
0
0
0
0
0
828,740
0
106,700
722,040
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
0
0
th
4 Year
2008/09
0
0
0
0
0
20,094,180
0
0
20,094,180
PP
6,816,460
0
0
6,816,460
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
0
0
0
13,751,820
0
0
13,751,820
th
5 Year
2009/10
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
th
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
th
10 Year
2014/15
PUMPING PLANTS (PP)
ST
196,000
J G CODE IMPROV
386,000
644,800
161,663
OPEN SYSTEMS WAN
SCADA REPLACEMENT FOR WCSD
SMURRF
Page 247
5,000,000
351,000
LAG S.A.F.E. COLLECTION CENTER
TA-PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
636,000
97,900
687,500
75,000
LABORATORY EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT
J G SHOIN BLD IMPR
J G KAWANA PAVILION
J G IRRIGATION
0
161,377
J G & ADMIN BLD CCTV REPL
J G CSRP
422,000
60,000
HTP S.A.F.E. COLLECTION CENTER
GREEN ACRES CERP
0
360,000
EMD LIMS REPLACEMENT
EQP UPGR/REPLC TREATMENT PLANT
661,585
4,850,000
500,000
0
20,000
1 Year
2005/06
DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CONTRACT
COMM INVLVMNT & PROJ MITIGAT
COLL SYS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SEPs
BALBOA LAKE IMPRV PH 2
PROJECT TITLE
SW PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
0
0
161,663
344,800
46,000
0
350,000
150,500
229,500
0
200,000
0
0
0
455,000
0
910,000
0
4,850,000
500,000
500,000
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
161,663
0
0
0
440,000
0
0
0
200,000
0
0
0
10,000
0
0
0
3,000,000
500,000
1,150,000
th
4 Year
2008/09
SW
0
161,663
0
0
0
71,000
0
6,732,000
0
200,000
0
0
0
330,000
0
230,000
0
3,000,000
500,000
1,050,000
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
161,663
0
0
0
314,300
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,000
0
0
0
3,000,000
500,000
1,250,000
th
5 Year
2009/10
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
th
0
0
161,663
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26,700,000
0
0
3,000,000
500,000
1,200,000
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
161,663
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26,700,000
0
0
3,000,000
500,000
1,200,000
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
161,663
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26,700,000
0
0
3,000,000
500,000
1,150,000
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
0
161,663
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26,700,000
0
0
3,000,000
500,000
1,000,000
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
July 1, 2005
0
161,663
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26,700,000
0
0
0
500,000
th
10 Year
2014/15
SYSTEMWIDE (SW)
250,000
WW SYS FINANCIAL CNSLT (BONDS)
Page 248
ZOO DRAINAGE FACILITY
23,102,256
2,000,000
40,000
501,500
WW NETWORK SERVERS CERP
WW SYSTEM AUDITOR
989,000
WW FACILITIES PLAN
2,450,000
WW COLLECTION YARD IMPR
402,800
WCSD YARD CLARIFIER INSTALLS
1,100,000
58,200
WCSD CCTV STORAGE CABINETS
WISARD REPLACEMENT
39,931
TOTAL SW
ST
1 Year
2005/06
VIDEO CONFERENCING IMPLEMENTAT
PROJECT TITLE
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
12,075,532
1,000,000
40,000
200,000
218,000
682,000
500,000
600,000
0
0
138,069
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,844,663
0
42,000
200,000
141,000
th
4 Year
2008/09
SW
13,945,863
1,000,000
42,000
200,000
129,200
0
0
300,000
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,477,963
0
42,000
200,000
th
5 Year
2009/10
th
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31,805,663
0
44,000
200,000
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31,805,663
0
44,000
200,000
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31,755,663
0
44,000
200,000
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31,607,663
0
46,000
200,000
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
27,611,663
0
50,000
200,000
th
10 Year
2014/15
SYSTEMWIDE (SW)
ST
74,400
TITP DIG MODERNIZATION
38,000
TITP POWER/ENERGY MGMT
Page 281
TITP RENEWABLE ENERGY SLUDGE PIPING
206,400
2,382,454
37,000
TITP OUTFALL ASSESSMENT
TITP RENEWABLE ENERGY
81,900
TITP KNIFE GATE HP GASKET REPL
3,410,000
134,420
TITP HEADWORKS IMPROVEMENTS
TITP INTERIM CENTRIFUGE IMP
900,000
TITP FUTURE UTIL CONCEPT RPT
2,334,000
137,340
TITP DIG GAS CONDIT FAC
TITP FINAL TANK STRUCTRL REHAB
122,780
TITP CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE
403,000
650,000
TITP CENTRATE WET WELL REHAB
TITP EFF PUMP SUCTN VALV REPL
850,000
TITP CAPITAL STR REPLC
0
TITP AWTF PH2
216,000
0
TITP AWTF MEMB FILT PROC PH2
TITP CAPITAL EQP REPLC
3,119,940
151,018
TITP AWTF INTERIM LIME SATUR SYS
TITP AWTF LIME SATURATOR SYS
257,980
1 Year
2005/06
TITP AWTF BRINE LINE MODS
PROJECT TITLE
TITP PLANNED EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
0
7,280
0
0
368,000
163,000
0
6,480,000
246,275
0
2,170,800
0
402,400
382,650
165,562
0
710,000
43,000
0
0
1,319,260
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
663,920
0
0
0
1,519,857
902,350
363,338
0
372,000
0
1,808,915
107,590
th
4 Year
2008/09
TITP
0
0
0
0
0
40,000
1,121,730
0
0
0
914,811
2,312,610
820,751
0
372,000
0
0
0
36,310
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31,739
0
0
0
372,000
0
1,942,670
552,300
th
5 Year
2009/10
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
th
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
372,000
0
21,967,440
2,926,780
6 Year
20010/11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
372,000
0
21,700,140
2,681,360
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
372,000
0
5,329,080
th
8 Year
2012/13
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
th
10 Year
2014/15
TERMINAL ISLAND TREATMENT PLANT (TITP)
Page 282
TITP SOLIDS HANDLING MODS
TITP SEC AIR MOD / SCUM REMOV
PROJECT TITLE
TOTAL TITP
16,660,052
0
1,153,420
1 Year
2005/06
ST
FISCAL YEAR 2005/06 - 2014/15
13,719,947
0
1,261,720
nd
2 Year
2006/07
0
0
0
0
5,737,970
th
4 Year
2008/09
TITP
5,618,212
rd
3 Year
2007/08
0
0
2,898,709
th
5 Year
2009/10
th
0
28,366,220
3,100,000
6 Year
20010/11
0
27,853,500
3,100,000
th
7 Year
2011/12
0
18,301,080
12,600,000
th
8 Year
2012/13
0
12,600,000
12,600,000
th
9 Year
2013/14
0
0
0
July 1, 2005
th
10 Year
2014/15
TERMINAL ISLAND TREATMENT PLANT (TITP)
ATTACHMENT B
SUMMARY STATUS OF CSSA DELIVERABLES
Attachment B - Collection System Settlement Agreement - Requirements Summary
Shaded Items indicate completed projects.
No.
Requirement
Frequency
SA Due Date
SA 1
Interim Scrubber at ECIS (Mission & Jesse)
One time
8/27/2004
SA 2
Interim Scrubber at ECIS (23rd & San Pedro)
One time
8/27/2004
SA 3
Interim Scrubber at ECIS (Jefferson Siphon)
One time
8/27/2004
SA 4
Interim Scrubber at ECIS (NORS)
One time
8/27/2004
SA 5
EAST CENTRAL INTERCEPTOR SEWER
One time
8/27/2004
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
One time
10/29/2004
Completed on
07/01/04.
Ongoing
10/29/2004
Completed on
07/01/04.
Ongoing
10/29/2004
Completed on
07/01/04.
One time
11/28/2004
Completed.
One time
10/9/2004
Completed on
11/08/04.
One time
12/13/2004
Completed.
Quarterly
1st Q
10/30/2004
2nd Q
01/30/2005
3rd Q
04/30/2005
4th Q
07/30/2005
1st Q Completed
10/26/2004.
2nd Q Completed
01/26/2005.
3rd Q Completed
04/29/2005.
4th Q Completed
07/29/2005.
Quarterly
1st Q
10/30/2004
2nd Q
01/30/2005
3rd Q
04/30/2005
4th Q
07/30/2005
1st Q Completed
10/26/2004.
2nd Q Completed
01/26/2005.
3rd Q Completed
04/29/2005.
4th Q Completed
07/29/2005.
Quarterly
1st Q
10/30/2004
2nd Q
01/30/2005
3rd Q
04/30/2005
4th Q
07/30/2005
1st Q Completed
10/26/2004.
2nd Q Completed
01/26/2005.
3rd Q Completed
04/29/2005.
4th Q Completed
07/29/2005.
SA 6
SA 7
SA 8
SA 9
SA 10
SA 11
SA 12
SA 13
SA 14
SA 15
The City will monitor all the odor control facilities as necessary to comply with
all regulatory and permit requirements.
The City will modify its Odor Complaint Response Form to include a
qualitative description of the wind condition (By entry 10/29/04)
The City will make an initial return call to the community member filing the
sewer odor complaint through the Sewer Odor Hotline (complainant) within 1
week from the receipt of the hotline complaint if requested by the
complainant and the complainant has provided call back information (By
entry 10/29/04)
The City will investigate the sewer odor complaint received by the Sewer
Odor Hotline and shall call the complainant to attempt to report findings and
actions within 30 days from the receipt of the Sewer Odor Hotline complaint if
requested by the complainant and the complainant has provided call back
information (By entry 10/29/04)
Within 30 days after the Effective Date of this Settlement Agreement (By
entry 10/29/04), the City shall pay the United States the sum of $800,000 as
a civil penalty.
Within two months after ECIS becomes operational, the City will conduct
monitoring of hydrogen sulfide gas levels, air pressure, and other necessary
parameters. Within 3 months after ECIS, share the result with the Odor
Advisory Board.
Within 45 days after the Effective Date of this Settlement Agreement, the City
shall pay Baykeeper $1,600,000; the Intervenors $ 425,000; and the
Regional Board $71,745 (By entry 10/29/04).
For the first year after the entry into this Settlement Agreement, the City will
prepare quarterly reports reviewing the Sewer Odor Hotline program. The
final report, including any findings and recommendations for improvement,
shall be posted on the sewer hotline web page.
The City will report quarterly to the Odor Advisory Board, or more frequently if
requested by the Odor Advisory Board, on the removal levels for hydrogen
sulfide at each of the odor control facilities (interim scrubbers and permanent
ATFs) showing inlet concentration and outlet concentration. The information
will also be posted on the odor hotline web site.
On the thirtieth day of January, April, July, and October (30 days after the end
of the fiscal quarter) of each year until this Settlement Agreement is
terminated, the City shall submit to Plaintiffs a summary of all SSOs occurring
during the previous fiscal quarter.
Status
Completed on
08/26/04.
Completed on
08/26/04.
Completed on
08/26/04.
Completed on
08/26/04.
Completed on
08/09/04.
B-1
No.
Requirement
Frequency
SA Due Date
SA 16
EQ RPR SWRS U298
One time
12/14/2004
SA 17
EQ RPR SWRS U277
One time
1/13/2005
SA 18
EQ RPR SWRS U269
One time
1/13/2005
SA 19
EQ RPR SWRS U290
One time
2/11/2005
SA 20
EQ RPR SWRS U289
One time
2/11/2005
SA 21
No later than six months after entry of this Agreement (estimated at 4/29/05),
the City shall submit a report that evaluates the need for modifications to its
current FOG Control Program Standard Operating Procedures (“SOPs”) and
Enforcement Response Plan and Enforcement Response Guide (“ERG”),
and applicable sections of its existing rules and regulations implementing its
Grease Control Ordinance.
One time
4/29/2005
Completed on
04/22/05.
SA 22
SAN PEDRO AREA SWR REHAB
One time
2/28/2005
Completed on
09/07/04.
One time
4/29/2005
Completed on
11/17/04.
One time
4/29/2005
Completed on
06/01/04.
One time
4/29/2005
Completed on
04/29/05.
SA 23
SA 24
SA 25
Within six months after the entry of this Agreement, the City shall submit a
report on the City’s progress on the wet weather Calibration and Validation of
the City’s MOUSE model
Within six months from the entry of this Settlement Agreement, the City shall,
if practicable, arrange for calls to the Sewer Odor Hotline to be answered and
documented by a live person rather than a recording.
Within six months from the entry into this Settlement Agreement, the City will
develop an updated Odor Outreach Plan for advertising the Sewer Odor
Hotline. As part of the City's Odor Outreach Plan, the City will develop a
community feedback system.
Status
Completed on
06/09/04.
Completed on
07/20/04.
Completed on
07/20/04.
Completed on
06/10/04.
Completed on
06/10/04.
SA 26
Within six months of the entry into this Settlement Agreement, the City will
prepare written procedures for the odor control measures the City currently
employs including the addition of chemicals for sewer odor control.
One time
4/29/2005
Completed on
04/27/05.
SA 27
Within six months from entry into this Settlement Agreement, the City will
prepare an implementation plan for implementing the recommendations
made as part of the Independent Review of the Sewer Odor Control Program
for the City of Los Angeles.
One time
4/29/2005
Completed on
04/27/05.
SA 28
EQ RPR SWRS U346
One time
3/16/2005
SA 29
EQ RPR SWRS U344
One time
3/16/2005
SA 30
EQ RPR SWRS U373
One time
4/15/2005
SA 31
EQ RPR SWRS U369
One time
4/15/2005
SA 32
EQ RPR SWRS U327
One time
5/16/2005
SA 33
EQ RPR SWRS U317
One time
5/16/2005
Annual
6/30/2005
Annual
6/30/2007
Annual
6/30/2005
One time
6/30/2005
SA 34
SA 35
SA 36
SA 37
Starting with FY 04/05, the City shall clean a minimum of 60,000 sewer Pipe
Reaches annually.
Starting with FY 06/07, maintain a Three-Year Rolling Average of 65,000
sewer Pipe Reaches cleaned.
Starting with FY 04/05, at a minimum, the City shall use CCTV to inspect 600
miles of pipes annually.
No later than 6/30/05, the City shall add the agreed to language to its design
manual
Completed on
05/04/04.
Completed on
05/04/04.
Completed on
05/12/04.
Completed on
05/12/04.
Completed on
06/23/04.
Completed on
06/23/04.
82,030 reaches were
cleaned.
N/A
821 miles were
inspected.
Completed on
12/13/04.
B-2
No.
Requirement
Frequency
SA Due Date
Status
SA 38
No later than 6/30/05, the City shall utilize all current and past valid flow data
to complete the development of all “R” Factors for all model basins within the
City’s MOUSE model.
One time
6/30/2005
Completed on
11/17/04.
SA 39
Starting FY 04/05, the City shall inspect all permitted FSEs annually.
Annual
6/30/2005
100 % of the FSEs
were inspected.
SA 40
On an annual basis, or as requested by the Odor Advisory Board, the City will
share summary data with the Odor Advisory Board regarding the odor control
measures utilized by the City and any relevant information
Annual
10/1/2005
Completed on
07/30/05.
SA 41
SOUTH LA CSRP U - 6
One time
7/30/2005
SA 42
SOUTH LA CSRP U - 5
One time
7/30/2005
SA 43
SOUTH LA CSRP U - 3
One time
7/30/2005
SA 44
WILSHIRE AREA NE SWR REHAB
One time
Original
8/30/2005
Revised
11/30/2005
SA 45
MT WASHINGTON AREA SWR REHAB
One time
9/30/2005
Annual
10/1/2005
Annual
10/1/2005
SA 46
SA 47
The City will report on the construction progress of the odor control facilities
as part of the annual report
By October 1, 2005 and on September 1 of each following year this
Settlement Agreement remains in effect, the City shall submit an Annual
Progress Report
Completed on
08/04/04.
Completed on
08/04/04.
Completed on
12/22/04.
On schedule. Working
closely with contractor
to complete
contstruction by
11/30/2005.
Completed on
11/02/04.
Completed on
09/30/05.
Completed on
09/30/05.
Completed on
05/27/05.
Completed on
08/10/05.
Completed on
03/02/05.
On schedule.
Construction is 15%
complete.
Completed on
10/06/04.
Completed on
03/25/05.
Completed on
03/15/05.
Completed on
08/02/05.
SA 48
NORTH EAST INTERCEPTOR SEWER, PHASE 1
One time
10/30/2005
SA 49
S BOYLE AREA SWR REHAB
One time
12/8/2005
SA 50
HOLLYWOOD AREA PRIM SWR REHAB
One time
12/30/2005
SA 51
4TH SHATTO VERMONT SWR REHAB
One time
12/30/2005
SA 52
EQ RPR SWRS U274
One time
3/16/2006
SA 53
EQ RPR SWRS U340
One time
4/15/2006
SA 54
EQ RPR SWRS U283
One time
4/15/2006
SA 55
Harbor Area CSRP U- 6
One time
5/30/2006
SA 56
NICHOLS CYN ESMT SWR REPLC
One time
5/31/2006
On schedule. Bid &
SA 57
No later than 6/30/06, the City shall submit a Capacity Report and Plan
One time
6/30/2006
On schedule.
One time
6/30/2006
On schedule.
Annual
7/1/2005
SA 58
SA 59
No later than 6/30/06, the City shall submit a Rehabilitation and Replacement
Report and Plan.
In FY 04/05 and FY 05/06, the City shall apply chemicals to a minimum of
150 miles of sewers annually to control the growth of roots.
SA 60
EQ SWR RPR U300
One time
7/15/2006
SA 61
EQ RPR SWRS U299
One time
7/15/2006
474 miles were treated
in FY 04-05.
Completed on
11/15/04.
Completed on
11/15/04.
B-3
No.
Requirement
Frequency
SA Due Date
Status
SA 62
LAS PULGAS CANYON SWR REPLC
One time
7/30/2006
SA 63
HOLLYWOOD AREA CSRP U- 2
One time
7/30/2006
SA 64
The City will complete the preparation of its Odor Master Plan within 2 years
from the entry into this Settlement Agreement.
One time
10/29/2006
SA 65
EQ RPR SWRS U295
One time
9/15/2006
SA 66
EQ RPR SWRS U292
One time
9/15/2006
SA 67
EQ RPR SWRS U291
One time
9/15/2006
SA 68
No later than 9/30/06, the City shall submit an evaluation of the effectiveness
and applicability of its use of root control chemicals.
One time
9/30/2006
On schedule.
Revising Construction
Plans with a new project
schedule. On August
25, 2005, a request was
made to Government
Plaintiffs for extension
of the Construction End
Date to 10/30/2009.
On schedule.
Construction is 85%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 98%
complete.
On schedule.
On schedule.
Construction is 99%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 99%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 99%
complete.
SA 69
AVE 45 ARROYO DR RLF SWR
One time
10/6/2006
SA 70
EQ RPR SWRS U354
One time
10/14/2006
SA 71
Interim Scrubber at NEIS (Humboldt)
One time
10/30/2006
SA 72
Interim Scrubber at NEIS (Richmond)
One time
10/30/2006
SA 73
EAGLE ROCK INTER SWR
One time
10/30/2006
SA 74
BAYWOOD BNDCT ESMT SWR
One time
10/31/2006
On schedule. Bid &
SA 75
FLOWER WASHINGTON PICO SWR
One time
10/31/2006
On schedule. Bid &
SA 76
BUCKINGHAM DIVR SWR
One time
11/11/2006
SA 77
EQ RPR SWRS U339
One time
11/15/2006
SA 78
EQ RPR SWRS U338
One time
11/15/2006
SA 79
EQ RPR SWRS U320
One time
12/15/2006
SA 80
EQ RPR SWRS U316
One time
12/15/2006
On schedule.
Construction is 99%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 70%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 70%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 62%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 30%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 85%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 85%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 99%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 99%
complete.
B-4
No.
Requirement
Frequency
SA Due Date
Status
SA 81
SEPULVEDA VAL MEADOW RLF SWR
One time
12/30/2006
On schedule. Bid &
SA 82
WASHINGTON FLOWER GRAND SWR REPLC
One time
12/30/2006
On schedule. Bid &
SA 83
One time
12/30/2006
On schedule. Bid &
SA 84
CENTRAL AREA CSRP U-3 & U-4
One time
12/30/2006
On schedule. Bid &
SA 85
12TH HILL SWR REHAB
One time
12/30/2006
On schedule. Bid &
SA 86
NOS DIV HUMBOLDT AV 18 & SFR
One time
12/31/2006
On schedule. Bid &
SA 87
SLAUSON/VAN NESS/COS EXTERNAL BYPASS
One time
12/31/2006
On schedule. In Bid &
Award.
SA 88
SAN FERNANDO PSDNA SWR REHAB
One time
12/31/2006
On schedule. Design
completed 08/10/2005.
SA 89
EQ RPR SWRS U294
One time
1/13/2007
SA 90
EQ RPR SWRS U293
One time
1/16/2007
SA 91
EQ RPR SWRS U319
One time
2/15/2007
SA 92
EQ RPR SWRS U318
One time
2/15/2007
SA 93
Harbor Area CSRP U- 3
One time
3/3/2007
SA 94
EQ RPR SWRS U342
One time
3/15/2007
SA 95
EQ RPR SWRS U341
One time
3/15/2007
SA 96
One time
3/24/2007
SA 97
EQ RPR SWRS U304
One time
4/14/2007
SA 98
EQ RPR SWRS U296
One time
4/14/2007
SA 99
HOOVER ST SWR REHAB
One time
5/2/2007
SA 100
One time
6/30/2007
On schedule. Bid &
SA 101
Harbor Area CSRP U- 5 & WILM U-20
One time
6/30/2007
On schedule. Bid &
SA 102
ATF at ECIS (Mission & Jesse)
One time
5/23/2008
On schedule. Design is
75% complete.
Completed on
06/05/05
Completed on
06/05/05
On schedule.
Construction is 50%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 50%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 35%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 25%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 25%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 90%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 16%
complete.
On schedule.
Construction is 16%
complete.
93% complete.
B-5
No.
Requirement
Frequency
SA Due Date
SA 103
ATF at ECIS (23rd & San Pedro)
One time
5/23/2008
SA 104
ATF at ECIS (Jefferson Siphon)
One time
5/23/2008
SA 105
ATF at ECIS (NORS)
One time
5/23/2008
SA 106
ATF at NCOS (Jefferson and Rodeo)
One time
5/23/2008
One time
5/23/2008
On schedule.
One time
5/23/2008
On schedule.
One time
5/23/2008
On schedule.
Annual
6/30/2008
On schedule.
The City will develop written maintenance and operations manual for each of
the ATFs.
SA 108
The City will install an indicator light on the outside wall of each ATF
With the completion of each of the ATFs, the City will extend an invitation to
SA 109
the Odor Advisory Board to tour the facility.
In FY 07/08 through FY 13/14, the City shall rehabilitate or replace 50 miles
SA 110
minimum.
SA 107
Status
On schedule. Project is
in Bid & Award.
90% complete.
90% complete.
On schedule. Project is
in Bid & Award.
60% complete.
60% complete.
SA 111
ATF at NEIS (Humboldt)
One time
3/26/2009
SA 112
ATF at NEIS (Richmond)
One time
3/26/2009
One time
6/30/2009
On schedule.
One time
6/30/2009
On schedule.
One time
6/30/2009
On schedule.
Annual
9/1/2010
N/A
One time
6/30/2014
On schedule.
One time
N/A
On schedule.
One time
N/A
On schedule.
One time
N/A
On schedule.
One time
N/A
On schedule.
One time
N/A
On schedule.
One time
6/30/2014
On schedule.
One time
6/30/2014
On schedule.
One time
6/30/2014
On schedule.
One time
6/30/2014
On schedule.
One time
6/30/2014
On schedule.
SA 113
SA 114
SA 115
SA 116
SA 117
SA 118
SA 119
SA 120
SA 121
SA 122
SA 123
SA 124
SA 125
SA 126
SA 127
No later than 6/30/09, the City shall have expanded its MOUSE model to
include all Primary Sewers.
No later than 6/30/09, the City shall complete and submit its Integrated
Resources Plan (IRP)
No later than 6/30/09, the City shall complete all Primary Basin Plans.
If, in any three-Year period starting with the three-Year period comprising FY
7/08 through FY 09/10, the City rehabilitates or replaces, on a Three-Year
Average, more miles of pipe than is required pursuant to the approved
Rehabilitation and Replacement Report and Plan submitted pursuant to
Subsection VI.D. of this Settlement Agreement, the City may "bank" the
excess miles of pipe.
No later than 6/30/14, the City shall complete Secondary Basin Plans for the
100 highest priority secondary basins.
The City shall submit Work Plan for the following SEP:
North Atwater Creek Restoration Project
South Los Angeles Storm Water Treatment Project at 54th
and Avalon St.
Hazard Creek and Wetlands Restoration Project
Inner Cabrillo Beach Pollution Control and Water
Circulation Enhancements
Downtown Los Angeles Storm Drain Low-Flow
Diversion Project
The City shall complete the following SEP:
North Atwater Creek Restoration Project
South Los Angeles Storm Water Treatment Project at 54th
and Avalon St.
Hazard Creek and Wetlands Restoration Project
Inner Cabrillo Beach Pollution Control and Water Circulation
Enhancements
Downtown Los Angeles Storm Drain Low-Flow Diversion Project
B-6
ATTACHMENT C
SUMMARY STATUS OF THE NORTH ATWATER CREEK
RESTORATION & WATER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
NORTH ATWATER CREEK RESTORATION & WATER QUALITY
ENHANCEMENT PROJECT
PROJECT LOCATION
Area in Atwater Village located adjacent to the L.A. River in the Upper Los Angeles River
Watershed.
DESCRIPTION (Refer to Figure C1)
The North Atwater Creek Restoration and Water Quality Enhancement Project will construct
water quality physical and structural improvements to an area along the Los Angeles (LA) River.
The project will restore wetlands for stormwater runoff capture and treatment and provide
habitat linkage to the LA River. This will begin a restoration and revitalization of the LA River
and its vicinity where wetlands existed along the riverbanks. The project will reconstruct an area
along the LA River in the North Atwater community and restore wetlands to treat runoff from the
North Atwater Creek storm drain. Water for irrigation of the site could potentially be pumped
from the LA River, treated and applied to the landscape. In addition, runoff Best Management
Practices will be implemented to minimize waste from horses using the LA riverbank from
entering the LA River. This will directly benefit the East and Northeast LA communities, which
are predominantly low income and minority.
The Los Angeles River through an area known as the Glendale-Narrows still contains a
naturalized streambed and supports a rich diversity of bird life, as well as aquatic species. This
project will create wetlands, a seasonal creek, trails and footbridges for the public to enjoy, as
well as educational information so that the public can understand the fuller riparian ecosystem
that once existed here. Water for the wetlands will be provided through stormwater runoff;
irrigation water by pumping from LA River, treating it, and applying it to the landscape. The
surrounding residential neighborhood is predominantly low income and minority. On the other
side of the site are active recreation fields and equestrian amenities. The benefits this project
provides are numerous: demonstrating that Los Angeles can revive its ecosystems with water
that is currently discarded and thus at the same time show that the City can augment water
supply by utilizing this water for landscaping; improving water quality through on-site treatment;
restoring habitat; increasing open space, places for passive recreation and education;
implementing non-point source Best Management Practices; as well as flood hazard mitigated
through the use of the storm water capture and treatment. A significant planning effort is
underway to revitalize the Los Angeles River from an economic, ecologic, and social
perspective. This park and wetlands will provide early proof of many of the concepts that have
been discussed for river revitalization and have a significant impact on the pace of the
revitalization effort. Currently the site is used primarily for storage of tree cuttings. Implementing
this project will provide a great opportunity to demonstrate how the City can turn the liability of
runoff into an asset and start the process of becoming more sustainable in the use of regional
water resources. It will also provide an opportunity for visitors to see a working wetland and
enjoy nature as it once existed. Given its close proximity to active recreation, the project takes
advantage of visitor use already, and provides ready opportunities for education.
C-1
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the project are:
- Wetlands creation and utilization of runoff;
- Restoration of riparian and upland habitat;
- Demonstration of sustainable use of local water resources;
- Implementation of non-point source Best Management Practices;
- Increased open space and passive recreation;
- Safe and pleasurable access to the Los Angeles River and bikeway;
- Ecosystem education;
- Improved water quality; and
- Post-project monitoring to understand the effectiveness and maintenance of the systems
installed.
WATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
-
Ecosystem restoration*
Environmental and habitat protection and improvement*
Water supply reliability*
Flood management*
Groundwater management*
Recreation and public access*
Storm water capture and management*
Water conservation*
Water quality protection and improvement*
Water recycling*
Wetlands enhancement and creation*
Conjunctive use
Desalination
Imported water
Land use planning
NPS pollution control
Surface storage
Watershed planning
Water and wastewater treatment
Water transfer
* Pursuant to CWC §§ 79562.5 and 79564, these water management strategies must be
considered to meet the minimum IRWM Plan Standards.
Ecosystem Restoration: Much of the ecosystem of the Los Angeles River has been lost or
degraded. This project will put back ecosystem function by creating a wetland and seasonal
creek that typically would have existed along the river. Old maps of the Los Angeles River show
a braided river with vast areas of wetlands and creeks, some ephemeral. This will mimic that
function and structure.
C-2
Environmental Protection and Habitat Improvement: The wetlands and surrounding area planted
in California natives will provide high quality habitat adjacent to a naturalized portion of the LA
River. The project will provide a habitat linkage to the river from an upland area. Educational
materials can foster an appreciation of nature and expand the constituency to care and protect
these special places.
Water Supply Reliability: Although minor in its immediate impact on water supply, this project
can demonstrate how the region can better utilize its existing water resources without
necessarily treating storm water to drinking water standards. It is estimated that 40-60% of all
water use in Southern California is for landscaping. By using this resource for landscaping and
habitat creation, the City can reduce its dependence on imported water.
Flood Management: The utilization of runoff from the surrounding area will keep some of the
water out of the Los Angeles River and mitigate flood potential.
Recreation and Public Access: The site is already adjacent to a park with active recreation; this
will enhance recreational opportunities and provide access to one of the naturalized streambed
portions of the river. When the bike path along the river is eventually completed, this could
provide an opportunity to create an entry point to the bike path, with the ability to bike all the
way to Long Beach.
Storm Water Capture and Management: The primary objectives of the project are to use a
wetland to capture and treat stormwater; install non-point source Best Management Practices in
the parking lot; and treat the water pumped from the river for irrigation purposes.
Water Conservation: By eliminating the use of potable, imported water, the project conserves
water for drinking purposes. The use of native plants will further conserve irrigation water.
Water Quality Protection and Improvement: All the water utilized on the project will be treated
and improved. The project will remove typical constituents found in urban runoff such as oils,
grease, and trash. It will also remove constituents such as nutrients from high quality effluent
from upstream sewage treatment plants that discharge to the river.
Water Recycling: Much of the dry weather flows in the Los Angeles River are from the Donald
C. Tillman and Los Angeles/Glendale sewage treatment plants. This project will recycle the
water from those plants for irrigation purposes.
Wetlands Enhancement and Creation: This creates wetlands where none currently exists.
NPS Pollution Control: Urban runoff is ubiquitous; yet this project will capture the runoff from the
surrounding neighborhood and treat it through a wetland. Best Management Practices installed
on the parking lot on site will also treat NPS pollution. Both of these will prevent pollutants from
entering the Los Angeles River.
Surface Storage: The wetland will provide surface storage of water.
Watershed Planning: This project has been identified as a key project in the Integrated Regional
Water Management Plan, and with its multiple benefits and elements, is a good example of
watershed planning and implementation.
C-3
Water and Wastewater Treatment: The urban runoff will be directly treated through Best
Management Practices and the wetland system. Additional wastewater treatment will be
somewhat indirect, yet real, in that the primary source of dry weather flows in the river that will
be pumped to the site are high quality effluent from the sewage treatment plants, which will be
further treated through nutrient removal.
PARTNERSHIPS
The City of Los Angeles is the only agency needed to implement the project. However, the Los
Angeles County Department of Public Works is also supportive of the project. There is
consensus within the City of Los Angeles - Bureau of Engineering, Bureau of Sanitation,
Recreation and Parks Department, Department of Water and Power, Los Angeles River Ad Hoc
Committee, and local City Council District are all in support of the project.
POLLUTION CONTROL
The project collects urban runoff and will reduce pollutant loads associated with the captured
urban stormwater runoff, thereby incrementally reducing current and any future TMDL
requirements (trash, bacteria, metals, etc) for the Los Angeles River. The project may also
utilize various treatment techniques to improve water quality. Construction of the proposed
wetlands will undoubtedly reduce the amount of nutrients downstream and will likely result in
reduction of other pollutants.
WATER QUALITY MONITORING
WPD will monitor water quality before and after construction of the wetlands. The success of
plant establishment and percentage of the native vegetation will be documented. Wildlife
utilization of the wildlife corridor will be documented before and after project implementation.
Water quality monitoring will be coordinated with Los Angeles County Department of Public
Works to assist in data collection. Project success will be quantifiably measured through the
improvement of water quality. The project will be monitored prior to construction to establish
baseline water quality conditions. This will be accomplished by utilizing strategically located flow
measuring devices, surface water and water quality monitoring devices. A final list of specific
constituents to be monitored by the water quality monitoring program will be developed in
collaboration with the stakeholders. For the first five years of project implementation,
stormwater sampling will occur at least quarterly. Thereafter, a yearly sampling will be done
unless otherwise determined through the analysis of the previously collected data. Currently, the
City leads an established stormwater sampling program that can accomplish pre-project water
quality monitoring.
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
One of the key objectives of this project is to be a demonstration site for numerous technologies
from created wetlands to installation of Best Management Practices. Monitoring will provide key
information on the operation of the project and adjustments will be made throughout the life of
the project, especially as Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) are implemented on the river
and watershed management is implemented in the region. Through the monitoring results, the
C-4
project flow rates and treatment systems can be adjusted if necessary, along with maintenance
operations.
DATA MANAGEMENT
The data will be gathered and tracked by the existing staff of the City of Los Angeles Bureau of
Sanitation Watershed Protection Division. Results will be made available to the public primarily
through the use of the City's website: http://www.lastormwater.org. The data will also be
incorporated with the Friends of the Los Angeles River (FoLAR) Riverwatch program that has
been conducting water quality sampling along the river. The Los Angeles and San Gabriel
Rivers Watershed Council has an extensive website and there will be a link from their website to
the City's website. Finally, results of monitoring from this project, as well as others in the region
will be presented at Watershed Council Stakeholder meetings.
CONNECTION TO LOCAL PLANNING
This project has been identified in the Integrated Regional Water Management Plan for the
Upper Los Angeles River, as part of the early planning for the Los Angeles River Revitalization
Master Plan, and as a Supplemental Environmental Project as part of a settlement for sewage
overflows.
STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT
Leading the effort are the City of Los Angeles agencies, including the Recreation and Parks
Department, the Council District, and the Bureaus of Engineering and Sanitation. Additional
stakeholders include park users, the local Audubon Society, homeowner associations,
Neighborhood Councils, and local businesses. Regulatory stakeholders include the California
Department of Fish and Game, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the US Army Corps
of Engineers, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Los Angeles County Vector Control
District. Planning efforts have been ongoing for several years. These efforts have resulted in
discussion among many of the stakeholders listed above, as well as public meetings intended to
gather community input. Feedback has been very positive and supportive, and contacts have
been excited about the implementation of a sustainable project that brings multiple benefits to
the community and the watershed as a whole.
BENEFIT TO A DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY
The project is located in and provides a direct benefit to many disadvantaged communities.
Matching funds will not be provided directly by the community and, therefore, the funding
requirements will not pose a hardship to the community.
C-5
Figure C-1: LAYOUT AND SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED PROJECT
C-6
…
… ttoo pprrootteecctt ppuubblliicc hheeaalltthh aanndd tthhee eennvviirroonnm
meenntt

Fiscal Year 2004/05 - Hyperion Treatment Plant

Transcription

Similar documents

every drop counts - San Francisco Public Utilities Commission

After Party Flyer

All Warthog sewer tools are sold through StoneAge authorized

quadex lining system (qls)

Friday, May 6, 2016 At Luminarias Restaurant

BWSC Downspout Disconnection Program

DELCORA final d:Layout 1

View how the story appeared on the page (in PDF)

The Lima Story: First Integrated Plan Approval in Ohio and USEPA

PC Minutes - Warwick Township