Record of Site Condition # 213151 Record of Site

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # 213151
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Record of Site Condition Number
Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry
Certification Date
Current Property Use
Intended Property Use
Certificate of Property Use Number
Applicable Site Condition Standards**
Property Municipal Address
213151
2014/05/27
2014/03/18
Agricultural/Other
Residential
No CPU
ESA Phase 1
No Municipal Address
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.
Filed Record of Site Condition # 213151 on 2014/05/27
1 of 10
PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS
Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC
Owner Name
HUMBOLD PROPERTIES LIMITED
Authorized Person
MIGUEL SINGER
Mailing Address
369 RIMROCK ROAD, TORONTO
ONTARIO, CANADA
Postal Code
M3J 3G2
Phone
(416) 661-4000
Fax
(416) 661-4229
Email Address
[email protected]
Filed Record of Site Condition # 213151 on 2014/05/27
2 of 10
RSC Property Location Information
Municipal Address(es)
No Municipal Address
Municipality
Markham
Legal Description
See Attached Lawyer’s Letter
Assessment Roll
Number(s)
36030233800700000000
Property Identifier
Number(s)
03061-4331 (LT)
RSC Property Geographical References
Coordinate System
UTM
Datum
NAD 83
Zone
17
Easting
640,542.00
Northing
4,863,389.00
RSC Property Use Information
The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community
use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.
Current Property Use
Agricultural/Other
Intended Property Use
Residential
Certificate of Property
Use has been issued
under section 168.6 of the
EPA
No
Filed Record of Site Condition # 213151 on 2014/05/27
3 of 10
Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC
The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank
Filed Record of Site Condition # 213151 on 2014/05/27
4 of 10
PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S
STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS
Qualified Person's Information
Name
PAUL JAMES BLUNT
Type of Licence Under
Professional Engineers
Act
Licence
Licence Number
90227018
QP Employer Name
COFFEY GEOTECHNICS INC.
Mailing Address
20 METEOR DRIVE, TORONTO
ONTARIO, M9W 1A4 CANADA
Phone
(416) 213-1255
Fax
(416) 213-1260
Email Address
[email protected]
Municipal Information
Local or Single-Tier
Municipality
Markham
Upper-Tier Municipality
York
Ministry of the Environment District Office
District Office
York-Durham District Office
District Office Address
230 Westney Rd. S., 5th floor, Ajax ON L1S 7J5
Filed Record of Site Condition # 213151 on 2014/05/27
5 of 10
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report
Document used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates
in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components
of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a)
of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
Type of
Report
Name of Consulting
Company
P1 ESA
Report Title
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, Greensborough
Phase 4, Part Lot 19, Concession 8, Markham, Ontario
Date of Report
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2014/03/18
Author
of Report
Paul Blunt, P.
Eng., Teresa
Weatherhead,
B.Sc.
2014/03/18
COFFEY GEOTECHNICS
INC.
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment
Reports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or
otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment
Report Title
Date of Report
(YYYY/MM/DD)
Author
of Report
Name of Consulting
Company
N/A
Filed Record of Site Condition # 213151 on 2014/05/27
6 of 10
Site Condition Information
Certification date (YYYY/MM/DD)
2014/03/18
Total area of RSC property (in hectares)
1.27770
Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property
Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC
property
Soil brought from another property to this RSC property to remain there following the
filing of the RSC?
Filed Record of Site Condition # 213151 on 2014/05/27
No
7 of 10
Qualified Person’s Statements and Certifications
As the qualified person, I certify that:
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a
records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the
regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
As of 2014/03/18, no phase two environmental site assessment is required by the regulation for the
RSC property and based on the phase one environmental site assessment for the RSC property, in my opinion, it is not
necessary for any other reason to conduct a phase two environmental site assessment for the RSC property.
As of 2014/03/18, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment, there is no
evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that, if the RSC
property were put to any of the types of property uses listed in subsection 1 (2) of the regulation, are likely to
interfere with any of those types of property uses.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in
the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have
dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property,
in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles
and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the
same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held and my employer COFFEY GEOTECHNICS INC.
does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property
which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment
or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2014/03/18.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, PAUL JAMES BLUNT, a qualified
person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2014/04/11:
a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and
b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.
I Agree
Filed Record of Site Condition # 213151 on 2014/05/27
8 of 10
Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or Agent
The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment as part of the record of site condition
Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired
A Current plan of Survey
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Phase 1 Conceptual Site Model
Owner or agent certification statements
v 3.21.2
Filed Record of Site Condition # 213151 on 2014/05/27
9 of 10
Filed Record of Site Condition # 213151 on 2014/05/27
10 of 10
Request ID:
016337743
Demande n° :
Transaction ID: 53911972
Transaction n° :
Category ID:
CT
Catégorie :
Province of Ontario
Province de l'Ontario
Ministry of Government Services
Ministère des Services gouvernementaux
Date Report Produced: 2014/04/09
Document produit le :
Time Report Produced: 10:44:47
Imprimé à :
CERTIFICATE OF STATUS
ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE
This is to certify that according to the
records of the Ministry of Government
Services
D'après les dossiers du Ministère des
Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons
que la société
HUMBOLD PROPERTIES LIMITED
Ontario Corporation Number
Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)
001508734
is a corporation incorporated,
amalgamated or continued under
the laws of the Province of Ontario.
est une société constituée, prorogée ou née
d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la
Province de l'Ontario.
The corporation came into existence on
La société a été fondée le
DECEMBER 31 DÉCEMBRE, 2001
and has not been dissolved.
et n'est pas dissoute.
Dated
Fait le
APRIL 09 AVRIL, 2014
Director
Directeur
The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.
La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.
r lvii
c
ND EN
ROSS LLI
MINDEN GROSS
HARRISTERS & SOLICITORS
145 KING STREET WEST, SUITE 2200
TORON7O, ON, CANADA M5H 4o2
TEL4I6.362.3711 FAX416,864.9223
www.mindengross.com
DIRECrDIAL
E-MAIL
(416)3694113
dkumermindengross.com
FILE NUMnER
March 25, 2014
Ministry of the Environment
Operations Division
Floor 12A
2 St. Clair Avenue West
Toronto, ON 4V 1 L5
Dear Sirs:
Re:
Record of Site Condition Humbold Properties Limited
with respect to the lands in PIN 030614331 (LT)
—
We are the solicitors for 1-lumbold Properties Limited and have been requested to provide the following
information:
Municipal Address
not assigned
Legal Description
PIN 03061-433 1 (LT)
Part of Lot 19, ConcessionS (Markham) designated as Part 12, Plan 65R-32387, City of Markham
The foregoing information is based on our review of the following:
I.
2.
The parcel register for the Lands.
Plan 65R-32387.
Reaistered Owner
Humbold Properties Limited
n
iTt MERIAS LAW PFRMS WQR[DWII)L
Page 2
MINDEN
GROSS LI.?
Nature of Owner’s Interest
Fee Simple Land Titles Absolute
Assessment Roll Number
36 03 023380070 00000 00
Should you require anything thither, please do not hesitate to contact the writer.
Yours truly,
MINDEN GROSS LLP
Per:
David M.
DMKJr1
*on behalf of DAvID
#2173575
M. KuTNER PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED)
Ontario ServiceOntario
PT LT 19,
CON B
(MEN),
PT 12,
PAGE 1 OF 1
REGISTRY
OFFICE #65
*
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER
LAND
03061—4331
CERTIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND TITLES ACT
PREPARED FOR Rochelle
ON 2014/03/25 AT 13:33:38
(LT)
SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT
*
PL 65R32387;; TOWN OF MARKHAM
PROPERTY REMARKS:
ESTATE/OUALIFIER
FEE SIMPLE
ABSOLtTTE
RECENTLY,
DIVISION FROM 03061—3455
OWNERS’ NAMES
HUMBOLD PROPERTIES LIMITED
CAPACITY
RED. MUM.
“
PRINTOCT
DATE
INCLUDES A!
INSTRUMENT TYPE
DOCUMENT TYPES
LT942230
1993/10/20
TRANSFER
YR754079
2005/12/22
NOTICE
65R32387
2010/05/27
PLAN REFERENCE
PIN CREATION DATE:
2010/11/23
flA
PARTIES PROM
AMOUNT
(D, LETED INSTRUMENTS NOT INCLUDED)
CERT/
CHED
PARTIES TO
* *
HUNBOLD PROPERTIES LIMITED
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGI4T OF CANADA AS REPRESENTED BY
THE MINISTER OF TRANSPORT
•
NOTE, ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY.
NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL tSP.
C
C
c
g
z
Ow
fl
a
Jr
L
FOfl (JflICEISE ONLY:
—
‘lilt’
P
ii
La. iii
ii
I
ii
I
4
R
gr
¼
In
g
ill
‘a
Id
tie
lu.
an
if
I
cfl
s
S.2g1
9.
‘LiIi I
I
1W 1
pIr$
21a1
hti
—l
iE a
I
—
I
iiiqr t
4 aj
“Ii
flu
gt
a- opw
II
——7
FWafl
I.
ii
5
I
I
-Hi
I
I
I
a
it
I
I
I
I
•i
if
I
Si
I•1 r
0
I
ii
I’ ii
S
I.
r
Ir
I—.
p rn
S
I
S
D
I
S
IH
IL
t ir I
S
—
I
C
0
S
p
C
I
C-
F’,
a
-U
1*
C-,
-4
a
a
‘4.’
W&Y
I
I
“I
Il
K
hO
a
-4
IS
(
li’
Foa OFFIcE USE
0
C
S
I
i
a
N
d
J&1
Protq,nrnri
—.ir
—
/
•
*J ii 4itG.*fl 01 S4W14
TO
a?
17-t Seetlo;
2. Nan 66R-15789.
BY
Ii
Affidavit of Residence and
SWi.
19. Concession B. daalmmtad
es Porte 1
woØg Cyoorat1op as
eethi Coora4o pito a 40% jntweet pod
to p 40% thtareit
fltaSilPI0
dd
SAM JipmbolA ProDertios T4n.4
— ata
-
Alez Sfnzer
-
MAfl 0*7(4 AND SAY THA
T:
I. lain ti .11.* .
0
fl
C
11* ..
ill. k
A p.non In biN Hr wflo m. Ia
dat. —
m
OonW$d In O .aoY.daa
.q w
m.d MawPme la bIQl
@1 A twilan nsjwd Ifl lb. e11ow.-dnflid
g anaw%nd:
.,. b attain flI
a 11
(i) A liip.Hris MinK
ffi In. ib.y.-dnaOld IMWflMI
(5) Th• atdta,Uad iQIatat
SIMilar Sfl* fit 1111 tiwjitll
on tar 0i11 IMIN
fl**.yip
(a)
-
(a) Ire
Q
-
In pngnsfl)
(aJ.
do’adfltpiinmphi)
a
_Yr•3 —°
r!WCY.
(I) Aflndn.eanailabpa
%NIh(
finN $ t — q.s
.
)
mgs,wlo5
.Id,n$%5W
p..
(a (ci aflinc gsa — n..an a-bad Hr jIatw —
4
i_fl
a
(a)
flaai..s.
Waibb
.1 IM.mmflm11Iind
aCCflmya.lWkNaa
n
--
-
.afl..flitw.*
0)eW..,.haW
na 10
.neo*I11.pnra’—
.
. WI. IWM S.
5
tat Si .q..n
dm.lnhwWlun.el.
I ItSva InS ‘a canhldond
$50X3.
diIWbfl Cs w.qH ‘aly
raider it otai a a..
aatwu a 1.451 itt. aid Ia
1(1)05) Cs In. Ad. Th. line rcn
inait man two aIrØ. Sla
apd fit IlwCawi-daatae
y teNse..
rawp.ta
Sin na(aWu.fll.twiSy
_ .
,.S4...,_
ii.. tea sair a a
oant.a. moe man two .r41
Cite
leon
ISVV
SOI—
. fatly ladern.
fit
ne
dli
Ian
Cs an .w lat —
q
a I (Si raid ‘a cerirldwid
K—? ‘a .%S tar raS
NW dfllirona at oaniild
inI corpomlior ins Thoo
inS de ottt toanltg pen
coildam pamor .45 ‘a nap
s to .Com at In land lot attai
ndy I . 1(11(1
n lbe bid $M 451,57K
ote..d.ntpeISonu
) #5 In) at ii Ad
Inme iXn.alotad ev
S.tolifltM.Act P.C
na H. tanaNiN
d55
a
-
m
fl
C
-
-
-
4. THI TOTAL OCKIlOS
RATIOK VOR THIS TUMSAO
TION II AU.OCATID AS FOL
(a)Madiip.aalDt.p
LOWS,
tdm
a
jb)M0ll9.Oa. (I) AawMd
— bestS —
(u)awahasmwesu
(C) FtOpSIt(l IWflI?td lit ‘aW
qS
(5) Seajinlw noted Ia fita tiM
fli(S...
10AM
Cs (oat 5.11
i3
(a) Uee, Igidea, .anuIln and
matamnat 01151. to
wINS Halt 11 iIct
l) OUt natal. omaldam
no is(.d
a.
—
5
S
—
—
@VALU OF LAND, DUILOIN
O, FIXTURES AND GOODWI
LL SUIJECT
LAND TPANSFEII TM
f)Ml 00)10 (IL)
OÜVALUI OF ALL CHATTELS -
S
S
I
S
—a
.
I
TO
Nil
bmw Of tingitli pitittlil
pinpilty
a
aa
Sn 1b*d% Rtfl IS
(I) Otto, eddellot, fW
44545 —ø
flnuSie laffickldid
taL
(I) TOTAl.
IWde lb S
— a — Cs
we.’a
COWSIDIIIATION
I.
bepçftowne
Nil
S
I
t
S
PC-poe Cs coinw
ua1abeq
a U Its condinlan Ii
raatnL Isiw 1.05 suW.d Ia any
moitefli V
7. Olbir mlr.n ale .spa
nwas. wc.u.sy.
a
N/A
Stm.nb*eriestha
torn.
mIs
Gill floioità
Municipality of Metropol
itan Toronto
uitai
A Dn45In flaw. at lnutmlflnt
(I)Addmn&pop.iiy
tafll00
October
i.93
0w*75W-
(I) mgwitioi font., for lad
enywn ol
pinp
edy b.liQanfrmyed p.
(d)uga damipEon at p
styconapt Sam. iitt
Q40 at9.
t IUar5 Sm iddafli)
a ita Ufliren tcIIdUt
y..
go ma.,
Andrew P. Relob Ills
TORY TORY DBSLAIJRIBRS
A 8lNNINO1t1 SARRISTERS
Suite 3O Aetna 7e
a SOt.ICITORS
r. Po
.Bs
2* Tatwo-vonunioa
Seflool Tha IlIppod OIu
nbny fIeslk4 Sane
.. I.e aiplalsalon
0)
Ne ill IldiNCull nata
l.,.., nolan CaiioN
Cat IbloRn Otitatlo
1
‘taQ taoQ
0) N Wa. do all InOddual Uande
. ,RbIo to to Roman 0511155 S.pa
0) 0010
sal. Scod SlIppamlim?
flnflr... tan. math
lScoSg. !a b%tltIt
(U) I Va. do all HCMu.I
lb
Iranian., nIt I. 105P
IS
IlaltAibi
0fl It.. RiaCst Lan
maMa
fl
Va
No
U
Mfl 1112
f41M865-a)40
Phase One Property
RSC Property
“TABLE OF CURRENT AND PAST USES OF THE PHASE ONE PROPERTY”
(Refer to clause 16(2)(b), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)
Year
Name of Owner
Description of
Property Use
Property
1
Use
Other Observations from Aerial
Photographs, Fire Insurance
Plans etc.
Sept 1805Apr 1855
Isaac Davis
Agriculture or
other use
 Crown Patent
Apr 1855Nov 1855
William Anderson
Nov 1855Feb 1856
David Anderson
Feb 1856May 1856
Elijah Miller
May 1856Dec 1861
James D.
Harington
Dec 1861Nov 1866
Daniel R. Koch
Nov 1866Feb 1871
Harry Johnson
Feb 1871Mar 1872
George H. Burke
Mar 1872Feb 1887
James D.
Harrington
Feb 1887Oct 1907
Elizabeth Mustard
Oct 1907Apr 1911
Darius A.
Clendening,
Melissa
Clendening
John W. Cowie
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use
Apr 1911Oct 1915
Oct 1915Apr 1922
Gideon
Brownsberger
Apr 1922May 1953
Darius A.
Clendening,
Melissa
Clendening
Leonard Cox
May 1953Dec 1967
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
1874-1881 County Atlas
Map – agricultural
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
 1954 aerial photograph –
undeveloped vegetated land,
agricultural use
Dec 1967Mar 1969
Gordon Cox
Mar 1969Apr 1982
Markborough
Properties Limited
Apr 1982Jun 1982
Jun 1982Oct 1993
Twosing
Corporation,
Threesing
Corporation
Humbold
Properties Limited
Oct 1993Present
Humbold
Properties Limited
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
 1971 aerial photograph –
undeveloped vegetated land,
agricultural use
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use
 1978 aerial photograph –
undeveloped vegetated land,
agricultural use
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use – All
parts
Agriculture or
other use
Agriculture or
other use
 Site reconnaissance –
vacant land
Notes:
1 – for each owner, specify one of the following types of property uses (as defined in O.Reg. 153/04) that applies:
Agriculture or other use
Commercial use
Community use
Industrial use
Institutional use
Parkland use
Residential use
2 – when submitting a record of site condition for filing, a copy of this table must be attached
Phase One Conceptual Site Model – Part of Lot 19, Concession 8 (Markham) designated as Part 12,
Plan 65R-32387, City of Markham, Ontario
This Phase One Conceptual Site Model has been prepared based on information collected to date as part of
Coffey’s Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted at Part of Lot 19, Concession 8
(Markham) designated as Part 12, Plan 65R-32387, City of Markham, Ontario (Phase One Property).
Based on the Phase One ESA, no current and/or historic potentially contaminating activities as outlined in
Table 2 of Schedule D of O.Reg. 153/04, have been identified on the Phase One Property. The Phase One
Property has remained an undeveloped vegetated parcel of land. No structures have been constructed on the
property. As such, the property is not considered an Enhanced Investigation property as defined in O. Reg.
153/04, as amended.
No current and/or historic potentially contaminating activities within the Phase One Study Area as outlined in
Table 2 of Schedule D of O.Reg. 153/04, that may contribute to areas of potential environmental concern
(APEC) on the Site have been identified.
Based on the Phase One ESA, no APECs were identified on the Phase One Property. Similarly, no
contaminants of potential concern were identified.
Conceptual Site Model
The Phase One Conceptual Site Model consists of the following drawings:
Drawing 2
Phase One Conceptual Site Model (Existing buildings and Features)
Drawing 3
Phase One Conceptual Site Model (Phase One Property and Adjoining Properties)
These drawings depict the following:
i.
Current buildings and structures on the Phase One Property and adjoining properties.
ii.
Current water bodies located in whole or in part on the Phase One Study Area.
iii.
No areas of natural significance are located within the Phase One Study Area.
iv.
No potable water wells reportedly located on the Phase One Property and within the Phase One
Study Area
v.
All roads within the Phase One Study Area
vi.
All adjoining property uses
vii.
No potentially contaminating activities at the Phase One Property and within the Phase One Study
Area
viii.
No Areas of Potential Environmental Concern (APEC) at the Phase One Property
The Phase One Conceptual Site Model includes a description and assessment as follows:
i.
No areas where potentially contaminating activity on or potentially affecting the Phase One
Property have occurred.
ii.
No contaminants of potential concern.
iii.
The potential for underground utilities, if any present, to affect contaminant distribution and
transport.

The site representative reported that underground municipal water service lines are currently
present for a few of the future residential lots within the vicinity of the future location of Warton
Court. Fire hydrants were observed at the intersections of Alfred Paterson Drive and Cheswick
Court and Alfred Paterson Drive and Warton Court, south of the Phase One Property.
iv.
Available regional or site specific geological and hydrogeological information.

v.
Native soil at the Phase One Property generally consists of glacial deposits known as
Newmarket/Northern/Bowmanville tills comprised predominately of sandy silt to sand. These soils
are considered to be of moderate permeability and consequently, the groundwater is moderately
susceptible to contamination from surface spills. The Phase One Property is located within the
Rouge River watershed, and Little Rouge Creek subwatershed, which ultimately drains into Lake
Ontario. Little Rouge Creek runs through the northeast portion of the Phase One Study Area.
Uncertainty or absence of information


The components of the Phase One ESA in which uncertainty or absence of information may affect
the validity of the model include:
 Records Review: Based on the topographic maps, the direction of groundwater flow is
expected to be in an easterly direction towards Little Rouge Creek located approximately 200
m east of the Site. However, no groundwater monitoring wells have been installed at the
Phase One Property to confirm.
 Interview: None.
Site Reconnaissance: None
Little Rouge Creek
Approximate Location of
Tributary of Little Rouge Creek
COUSENS
DONALD
Y
PARKWA
Phase One Property
Part Lot 19, Concession 8
UE
EN
LEGEND
Phase One Property Boundary
Limit of Area 250m from Phase One Property Boundary
Approximate Location of Little Rouge Creek
Notes:
1. Drawing should be read in conjunction with associated report.
2. Phase One Property boundary adapted from survey prepared by
HOLDING JONES VANDERVEEN, OLS, Job No.02-1450-MPLAN 10,
dated January 9, 2014.
3. Satellite image: c 2011 Google and c 2012 Digital Globe.
4. Bar scale applies only to Phase One Property boundary. All other
features are not necessarily to scale.
0
20
40
60
80
100
METRES
F:\GEOT\ENVIRO\0 Projects\ENVSETOB 10000AA to ENVSETOB ---\0 - OLD Numbers with ENVS ETOB\07490AB - Ph 1, RSC Pt Lot 16 Con 9 Markham\2014 Phase One and RSC\Drawing\EE07490AB_GIS_Ph One_Mar_2014.dwg
drawn
approved
TW/MV
PJB
date
MAR. 2014
scale
AS SHOWN
original
size
Tabloid
AV
O
EM
TL
S
CA
RE
client:
MADISON HOMES
project:
title:
project no:
PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
GREENSBOROUGH PHASE 4
PART LOT 19, CONCESSION 8
MARKHAM, ONTARIO
PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
(EXISTING BUILDING AND FEATURES)
drawing no:
ENVSETOB07490AB
2
6553 Major Mackenzie Drive
(Former Residential / Agricultural)
6551 Major Mackenzie Drive
(Vacant)
(Former 6475 Major Mackenzie Drive;
Residential / Agricultural)
N
E
W
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L
H
O
M
E
S
Y
PARKWA
S
COUSEN
DONALD
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Soil Cut
E
S
W
I
D
E
N
H
O
M
E S
T
I
A
L
Phase One Property
Future Warton Co
Right-of-Way
R
E
Fence Line
Part Lot 19, Concession 8
Future
Ch w
e
s
Right-o ick Court
f-Way
ea
d Ar
Tree
N
OS
N
E
W
I
D
E
N
H
O
M
E S
T
I
A
L
ALFRED
PAT
ERS
O
R
U
I
D
E
N
H
O
M
E S
C
O
W
T
I
A
L
AY
S
E
DR
R
E
N
IVE
D
R
T
N
DRIVE
O
ED P
ATER
SON
S
EM
ALFR
E
AM
CHES
W
COUR ICK
T
DELRA
E
Y DRIV
WARTON
COURT
CO
UR
T
urt
Vacant
R
P a r k
270 Alfred Paterson Drive
(Sam Chapman Public School)
0
10
20
30
40
METRES
LEGEND
drawn
Fence Line
Soil cut
Adjoining and Neighbouring Property Boundary
Phase One Property Boundary
approved
Notes:
1. Drawing should be read in conjunction with associated report.
2. Phase One Property boundary and adjacent property boundaries
adapted from survey prepared by HOLDING JONES VANDERVEEN,
OLS, Job No. 02-1450-MPLAN 10, dated January 9, 2014.
3. Bar scale applies only to Phase One Property boundary. All other
features are not necessarily to scale.
F:\GEOT\ENVIRO\0 Projects\ENVSETOB 10000AA to ENVSETOB ---\0 - OLD Numbers with ENVS ETOB\07490AB - Ph 1, RSC Pt Lot 16 Con 9 Markham\2014 Phase One and RSC\Drawing\EE07490AB_GIS_Ph One_Mar_2014.dwg
TW/MV
PJB
date
MAR. 2014
scale
AS SHOWN
original
size
Tabloid
client:
MADISON HOMES
project:
title:
project no:
PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
GREENSBOROUGH PHASE 4
PART LOT 19, CONCESSION 8
MARKHAM, ONTARIO
PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
(PHASE ONE PROPERTY AND ADJOINING PROPERTIES)
drawing no:
ENVSETOB07490AB
3
50