Level Crossings as Access-point for Suicide on the Railways

Welkom
Reduction And Displacement Of
Suicides After The Removal Of Level
Crossings In The Netherlands
Bart Hoogcarspel, ProRail
GLXS 2016, Helsinki, June 15th
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
1
Some unwanted events on the railways
Event
Year 2015
Copper theft
150
Coin
100
Graffiti
70
Suicide
200
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
2
Outline presentation
• Why a prevention programme?
• New approach: Most Probable Access point
• Effect of the removal of level crossings
• Areas without level crossings
• NEW: preliminary results pilot Eindhoven-area
• Extra information (not presented)
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
3
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
4
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
5
New approach:
Most Probable Access point
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
6
Most Probable Access point
• Station + level crossing poses as station
• Station differs from level crossing
• Distance of influence for level crossing is approx. 500m
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
7
MPA: level crossing 1980-2010
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
8
MPA: level crossing
• Accounts for 50% (1980-2003) and risen to 60% (from
2008) of all suicides on railways in NL
• Rise due to more fences along the tracks (?)
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
9
Effect removal of level
crossing:
Difference before - first 2
years after
10
Conclusion 1
• Displacement!
• Memory-effect in the first two years connected to the
(removed) level crossing
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
11
Effect removal of level
crossing:
Difference before-after
Aanpak suïcide op het spoor
12
Conclusion 2
• First 150m: reduction
• 175-500m: increase
• When calculated over 5000m: no change
• Hopeless?
• No: maybe there are too many level crossings left
• So: optimize greater areas
• And: … (next slides)
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
13
Green: no level
crossings
Blue: study area
for removal of
level crossings
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
14
Red: no level crossings
Blue: study for removal of level crossings
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
15
Conclusion 3
• Areas with level crossings:
• Average 12%
• Areas without level crossings (and in general good
fences):
• Average 7%
• No level crossings means 40% less suicides
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
16
Pilot Eindhoven-area
• 37 line kilometers:
• Fences along tracks (1.80 m high)
• Removing hidingplaces
• Anti-trespass-panels at level crossings
• Installed in 2014
• Preliminary evaluation: 2011-2014 compared with 2015
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
17
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
18
Preliminary results
Event
Copper theft
2011 – 2014
Mean per year
2015
6
1
33
15
Coin
Graffiti
Suicide
11
No reduction, but more (country
wide in 2015)
Only on level crossings
No increase
at stations
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
19
Summary
• Removing a single level crossing means 40% reduction
on that location, but results in displacement when other
level crossings are nearby
• No level crossings in a big area results in 40% less
suicides
• A level crossing is an access point for unwanted events
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
20
Thank you for your attention!
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
21
Questions or information:
Programme Suicide Prevention ProRail:
Programme manager:
Angela van der Veer: [email protected]
Registration and effect analysis:
Bart Hoogcarspel: [email protected]
22
Extra information
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
23
ProRail programme Prevention of Suicide
on railways (2010-2015) (1)
Assigned by the ministery of Transportation: There is insight in railway suicide
for the purpose of developing and implementing effective measures to reduce
incidents.
Goals:
1.  Prevention of railway suicide
2.  Reduction of railway breakdown time
24
ProRail programme Prevention of Suicide
on railways (2010-2015) (2)
Emphasis on 4 key projects:
1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
Registration & effect analysis (analysis of effectiveness of
preventive measures & improving registration)
Measures & pilots (determining ‘hard’ & ‘soft’ measures)
(Scientific) Research & Development and Communication
Improving incident management & decreasing breakdown time
25
ProRail + NS: new programme Prevention
of Suicide on railways (2016-2020) (3)
Ministry of Infrastructure & Environment asks for a seconds fase of
the programme, where:
1. key projects are continued
2. more effort is put in:
•  cooperation with mental health care and
• 
decreasing breakdown time
26
Facts and figures suicides
•  On average 200 suicides a year
•  Major impact on railway personnel (at least 3 days l.t.i.)
•  On average 2.5 hours breakdown time (availability of the railway)
•  58% access at level crossings, 22% off platforms, 18% incidents along the
tracks, 2% other locations
•  60% of the suicidal people are/were treated at a mental health institution
(nearby).
•  Most victims commit suicide in a delusional phase
•  Sensational appeal in the media. Unwanted high risk of copy cat behaviour.
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
27
Facts and figures railway suicide
•  An average of 190 suicides a year on the tracks in the Netherlands (12% of
the total number of suicides (1500). One almost every day. In 2012 there were
201 suicides.
•  75% of the attempts is fatal.
•  On average 145 minutes breakdown time (availability of the railway)
•  58% at level crossings, 22% off platforms, 18% incidents along the tracks
(vrije baan), 2% other locations,
•  60% of the suicidal people are/were treated by a mental health institution
(nearby).
•  Most victims commit suicide in a delusion. Creating a distraction to change
one’s mind during that time can help to find a different solution.
•  Custom made measures at a risk location can result in a reduction of the
number of incidents (case near Eindhoven in 2005,
30%
but can 28
GLXS
2016reduction)
- Bart Hoogcarspel
Welkom
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
29
Welkom
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
30
Welkom
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
31
Welkom
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
32
Welkom
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
33
Welkom
GLXS 2016 - Bart Hoogcarspel
34