ffi ena.

effi
mlsr$ ft
rT{ qi+ Enril?Tt?T.
gS{ 3rll&('€ 3rqr6r
fi.
24912013
1.{lqTilT+qs.A
2.qqltfi;ilq+E+-r)
slttrT{fidrfiril'dt
ertflPtr
fu'oq
1.etqEt€sr)
z.erflilqieq-A
dtrrrrEflarqiqlor
BffiPTT
z+zerqD
Fffirdrd
t. ffi'r+nfrq erftrf,ffi qdq{ qifr qlr&ry 3Tqtf, q;.1821t2 qti fr.:rlsl2013
k+eTiFTutqrhoq srfooreffqnTilqtq sT) qi-+w{r+ 3rqrfr qr;qrqrf,q-dEt-wr
tS
ffi
2.
ena.
qfriil?fi qi-+ eTfi-f, qr orqffio eTnrdqro eiTi. Brfudrrtr q eflrefi qiqr
xtqt tq* ffift
Wlq"nqTal qt&qT q.q{ Ffin rFUTd
qqtf,
sqil rr-{ut eTR-&q
tB2tI2 qertf, wfu,rr-rflq erftr+Tfr qd{T{ qi-qT
fr.:t/os/zor: ql+qr qrfurqlrRM Et-$r Erwr
vqr+ wi errr8qq sTqtd
qer{"r 3ilt. E,.qlnZo,t+, 1u1212014, 7glt2l2ot4, 261212015, t6/4l2ot5 E
qffi
3
iffi
2sl06lz0ts arsiil Erfi e ,kffi-{ u€r} E Fq.i* 3{rrwr gq-dqrq sr
;qrqrtrqrfl uar ffial nre etE* gtF{ut etfudpfig ETmfuuts H[rs rT61 ar$
kqq++.qlsruurkrqq,q-d-+srutf, srq{T+.uiqnl.r+.erB.
3. qr.
sqf-"q qTzrTFFr, q-m
ffir qrl
,'AIR
1963 SUPREME COURT 146(1) (V 50 C t4)
(From Madhya Bharat :Madh BLJ1955 H.C.R. 569 ) 2"d May, 1962
J.L.Kapur, K.C.DAs GUPTA AND RAGHUBAR DAYAL,JJ.
Civil appeal No. 469 of 1960, Dl2-5-t962.
Thakur Sukhpal Singh, Appellant v.Thakur Kalyan Singh and another, Respondents.
q1fury6q-rroi$qA-d 31Tist, "lfte
Appellata eouar i6 nnr &aund ta de*ide an apped.
an m.eflitt on tfrp, eooio
tfie nufsdsl, on 'er44d. utfrpn tfrp appellanf qppeatr at tfrp ft%xhry
"{
eur dop,r rut adduoo ffip etutd. Jt can di,smi.ro tfu appea!, {"stL delaulr, ( garun I 6,20
)
Jt it tfie drrty tfrz a,ppellant ta oftntatfrsr ffie fud$n nt unden opp*l, ia erstnnzoua
"1,
qpa.6ara and
wtah
ir i6 onlry alrprL tne appellanr fia.t ofrnun tnk tfiaf tfra appettnte
kL
Aur* - utMU
tfrp
lt i,s onlq tfrcn tfrp tfrnt
qll,
confoin
tfrB uatiswr matto,c nmtfunet. in
t" nq@ ta tfie cantmtfun.
can
lru!
SLS|'0- 41' q ffie appellant oulmitn nslfring
k-L it^ cnruidetation, tfrn, appellare eout can
delide tfr"
ufifraut arul u'fumee ta aru1 pucexdhg at tfrp eaub i|"!r* and, in dstng
"pp*l
oo, il can. 6imp@ oag tfrat tfia appellanta ftaw nat, utg.ed, aryrfrirrq ufrkh uuuff ten"d te
ofraru tfiat tfre,judgnmr and depep wdptl appeal. uret^e ratfing.. (gaxaa 618
),'
trqil
sTqiETd otfuf,rpfi qi-+
gscr+ st
oilqm g-ffilqnqr
qqeqq
qifi
M
qraq
ffi
++flrrTfr tr|-T} ql.gqlqq-q56q;q1:ffie
qrflq{qrs
eqq-o{y-q-fli
deautt
4.
qTqr
+dr {r6t wfqqrrlq
qT{dKq
sTqtf,
srcrw
fi.182112 qC q.rdd
enid t fu q F{rqTqr& .vi+ qffi}
rydrufu qr< qT qrirrcrirrcr qrq{
arfrlq;rfr q6q{
eiqtm
rt can dismiss the appeal for
stE{zr*.fr errwrr*. ent.
{qqqlqrmlf,rqlierrtvrideilt.
drr
1.
31fu6ryqaa6uqT-d +d er-t
z.
qqtqrqo orrkrqr#d.
:.ffivqq*rd{
B-+TUT.-
TiErW
ftqim.-<tj
t2ots
ro:- qfuopffErfl{rPfl
a.
ffisE
,-'\V,(
Lz
irl" I
)r{^
ffi
-----------316 i o-a \ ferr{k6rFTfirftri-dr{r
kI:-ilokf,qnqiqt-mr qiq
27-qtqilq"fTfl mrrT-qTyfr1
6pqq'R ilf,Tdt fi q,f;-d ftiftrain drffi-rd
rqrquft m'oqemqrqr$nrerrqmqm+f, *lqiffi nrsrclgqqidqrfl srrEr.