Summary of Submissions by Submitter

Transcription

Summary of Submissions by Submitter
Introduction
This is a Summary of Submissions by Submitter for Hamilton City’s
Proposed District Plan.
 This document presents a summary of the submissions received
on the Proposed District Plan.
 It is organised by Submitter number.
 An alphabetical list of submitters has also been included. Within
this list is the submitters submission number, along with a link to
their hardcopy submission that is available on Councils website.
From here you can open or download a copy of the full
submission.
 To search the summary of submissions online you can select ‘Ctrl
f’ and type a name or submission number into the box so as to
find your way around within the document.
Proposed District Plan Summary of Submissions by Submitter - Introduction
May 2013
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
1002
490 Grey Ltd as Trustee of the BDL
Commercial Investment Trust and
Homes for the Living Ltd
844
1258
223
804
789
1269
554
609
52
639
956
1061
1005
808
321
1270
252
1036
247
1054
80
719
736
578
1100
259
1066
861
Company/Organisation Name
A & A King Family Trust
A Jannine
Rhodes
Aaron
Aaron
Aaron Shaun
Adele
Dixon
Atkinson
Jack
Wirepa
A W Burns
AgResearch Ltd
Mr
Mr
Ms
Ailsa Betty
Aimee
Airini
Alan Francis
Alan Frederick & Barbara
Winifred
Alan Gordon
Alan Russell
Alana Kim
Alastair Philip
Alby
Alexander
Smith
Carlile-Clark
Forbes
Thomson
Julian
Alexandra
Alexandra Lee
Alexandra
Alfa Blondy
Dee
Simmons
Randell
Kepu
Alfreda Olive
Alice
Marshall
Brown-Haenga
Sharp
Bishop
Savage
Calder
Tate
Elliott
N.C. Engineering
GD Hamilton Ltd
The Lost Tribe
Claudelands Neighbourhood
Support Groups
Youth Justice North-Korowai &
Manaaki, CYFS
Align Surveyors
Willis
Wan
529
109
596
683
946
1074
Alisha
Allan Liang-chitz & Shirley Tzuling
Ally
Alma Ruth Paewai
Alton & Rebekah
Alysha Ann
Amanda
Amanda Gayle
363
564
429
Amanda Kaye
Amanda
Amanda Sue
Young
Smiler
Ruiz
Turner
Kohe
Taylor
Reti
Burney
Watts
Page 1 of 30
Auckland Central Facilities
Management
Tracvity
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
655
520
312
901
1289
508
867
296
202
104
951
371
Pearse
Rose
74
1058
1243
331
45
695
1105
532
583
1142
36
75
1215
857
930
1043
878
589
587
1287
1062
621
787
555
203
44
119
570
1184
1047
524
Amelia Edith
Ammon Kerry Shaun Preiss
Company/Organisation Name
AMP Capital Property Portfolio
Mr
Mr
Andrea
Andrew
Andrew Kelvin
Andrew Paul
Andrew
Andrew
Andy
ANG & SL
Graves
Bydder
James
Knox
Summerville
Yeoman
Lee
Clarke
Laras Holdings Ltd
Anglesea Medical Properties Ltd
Anmark Limited
Ann Bella
Ann Joyce
Anne & David
Anne & David
Anne
Annetta Margaret
Annitta
Anthea
Anthea Ruth Wiripina
Prof Anthony
Mr Anthony Lloyd James
Anthony
Anthony Paul
Anthony Shaun
Anton
Antonia Whilhelmina
Apihei
Apikara
Johnson
Pennell
Platts
Smyth
Ferrier-Watson
Peihopa
Nin
Kingi
Kingi
Endres
Fisher
Parker
Smart
Wilson
Osborne
Haronga
Hemi
Hemi
APN Outdoor Limited
Ariana
Murphy
Ariane Emma & Stephen Keola Josephs
Mr
Mr
Ariel Piripi
Arnold David
Art
Arthur
Arthur Tupou
Ashley
Ashley Rangitane Hiki
Ashton
Audrey
Metekingi
Stoneley
Gage-Brown
Giffney
Hettig
Nikora
Haeata
Frew
Pere
Page 2 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
918
-
607
214
185
775
602
741
1146
870
350
917
888
1242
168
837
1004
659
419
474
604
966
60
730
989
26
138
1247
204
30
32
53
76
1007
340
874
965
225
48
335
765
58
566
382
41
226
B & E.M Williams Family Trust
Company/Organisation Name
B.W & I.V Parsons
B/C 355972
Banda Trust
Barbara
Barbara Susan
Barry Dean
Barry
Barry James
Barry Laurence
Barry Lionel
Barry
Reneti
Campbell
Clark
Harris
Crawshaw
Flay
Pennell
McNair
Hamilton City Council
Barry Pohio Trust
Baz
Baz
Bee Chiew
Belinda R
Benjamin
Benjamin Dean
Bernard
Bernard & Shanette
Mrs Beth Ellen
Bethanie Jane
Bethenee
Ms Betty Janine (known as Jan)
Billy
Paama
Paama
Phee
Albulet
Danlon
Bryers
Ransley
Fulton
Germaine
Smith
Witt
Elliott
Grey
Blagojevic Family Trust
Mr
Blair
Thorpe
Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd
Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd
Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd
Blue Wallace Surveyors Ltd
Bo & Meggie
Han & Wang
Body Corporate 550337
Borman Parkside LP
Mr
Mr
Boyd
Bradley Clive
Bradley
Sarkovich
Kells
Friar
Brandon
Brenda Eileen
Brenda
Brent Noel
Brent
Brent
Kepa
McNamara
Price
Hunt
Turrell
Wilson
Braemar Hospital Limited
Ms
Mr
Mr
Page 3 of 30
McKibbin Properties Ltd
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
Company/Organisation Name
1266
Hopkins
Ruakura Motors Tractorparts Ltd
Mr
Brett
1149
1251
Brett
Erceg
Brett Thomas & Maria Elizabeth Coates & Crawford
497
892
1120
1095
1108
222
1202
718
944
277
483
868
731
910
968
959
890
361
33
700
232
619
991
546
77
785
611
299
752
1182
13
373
28
846
883
11
509
1057
957
961
2
Brian D
Brian
Brian James
Brian
Brian Trevor
Brian
Mr
Joyce
Haskell
Hollis
Smith
Pryor
Walker
Bridges Insurance Services
Mr
Britani
Bruce Alafoki
Bruce
Bruce
Bruce Maxwell
Bruce William
Bryce & Natasha
Watene-Zelezniak
Kaufana
Davidson
Gordon
Winders
Arkins
Carmichael
Bunnings Ltd
Bupa Care Services
CMVP
Cameron Graham
Ms Cara Sarah
Carl
Miss Carla Josephine
Carly
Carol
Carol Anne
Mrs Carole
Carolyn
Carolyn Suzan
Samarawickrema
Murray
Carter
Ormsby
Schneebeli
Gauthern
Turahui
Allan
McMinn
Lundquist
Nin
PFS Engineering Ltd
Casa Capital
Casey
Casey Mania
Clarke
Haeata
Castle Argh LTD
Catherine Helen
Mrs Catherine Meg
Murray
Battersby
CBNZ Ltd
CCS Disability Action Waikato
CDL Land New Zealand
Cedric T Kingi
Celeste Sarah Judith
Celia Karen
Ngarotata
Mulipola
Hope
Chad
Payne
Central Hamilton Gospel Trust
Mr
Page 4 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
758
173
174
1213
507
430
926
624
1236
1102
678
355
1171
613
392
542
548
1237
962
744
1147
477
766
1154
437
210
1282
Yean
McPherson
McPherson
Ruwhiu
Sunnex
Wallace Jr
Friedlander
Cammock
Ferris
Timu
Walker-Eketone
897
65
726
1126
278
1042
460
155
1239
Mr
Mr
Channeary
Charles Joseph Peter
Charles Joseph Peter
Charles Lowe Hyde
Charles
Charles
Charles William
Charlotte
Charlotte Esther
Charlotte W
Charmaine
Company/Organisation Name
Retired
Chartwell Investments Ltd
Chedworth Properties Ltd
Cherie
Cherry
Clark
Wainer
Chesterman Family Trust
Cheyanne Alys
Chick
Chris
Christine
Christine
Christine L
Christopher Murray
Christopher
Mrs Cindy
Southon
Tarawa-Rameka
Kershaw Training Enterprises
Chorus New Zealand Limited
Thompson
Makata
Bradley
Forbes
Earl
Simmerman
Borrie
City Limits Childcare Co Ltd and
Claudelands Property Trust
CKC Holdings Ltd
Claire
Clarissa Charlotte
Millington
Arkins
Claudelands Property Trust
Miss Claudia Anne Rebecca
Colby
Colene
Colin John
Colin Jones
478
558
974
Colin Leslie
Colleen
625
663
55
Conway Tarawhiti
Corey
Mason
Osborne
Herbert
Jowles
INwork NZ
Commercial and Industrial
Consultants Ltd
Bradley
Taylor
College Old Boys Rugby League
Club
Bradley
Dunham
Council of Elders
Page 5 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
746
348
169
488
773
1169
1027
616
417
581
241
261
1001
550
528
783
1063
995
712
1240
Courtney
Skinner
Craig Martin
Craig
Cyril
Cyrus Robert
Dale & Vicki
Dale
Dale Pateriki
Dan & Jean
Dan
Dan
Daniel
Daniel Rei
Daphne
Daphne Lois
Darnie Eden
Darren
Darren
Darryl Leslie & Suzanne
Winifred
Dave Hurae
David Anthony
David
David Charles
David Edward
David Evan & Karlene
David Francis
David
David
David Graeme
David John
David John
David John
David Murray & Karen Lee
David Robert
Dean Alexander
Dean
Dean Marshall & Lynn Cheryl
Tomlinson
Ormond
Gudeeon
Nicholls
McLunie & Martin
Clark
Anderson
Bourke
Fenwick
McDaid
Parker
Nin
Parsons
Bell
Paraha
Siteine
Siteine
Smith
Dean
Deane
Deanna - Rose
Deanne
Debbie Lorraine
Debbie
Westerlund
Pinny
Alexander
Freemantle
Neilson
Solomon
1068
638
308
330
952
1278
51
216
7
59
310
251
1261
1280
510
1203
618
1148
409
521
979
69
734
1065
Company/Organisation Name
CR & S Hammerton Trust
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Moeke
Pazi-Cope
Bennett Taylor
Ferguson
Coromandel
Chibnall
Morgan
Gonzalez
Gottschalk
McCall
Campbell
Rushbrooke
Thomson
Young
Searle
Crafar
Gauthern
Hutchinson
Page 6 of 30
Attic Home's
Dan Fenwick Builders Ltd
Landform Surveys Ltd
Blackout Electrical
David Gottschalk Trust
Equlation
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
Company/Organisation Name
782
282
1091
934
492
595
819
67
317
184
303
584
937
1272
56
1110
29
835
1107
985
1021
422
245
866
1020
1022
1024
427
433
629
723
544
1186
91
993
372
40
Attard-Manche
Fisher
Brunton
Hansen
Phillip
Karioi Osteopaths Ltd
1132
314
834
1227
1087
1103
1124
273
Deborah
Mrs Deborah June
Deborah Leigh
Debra Jane
Debra
Deecan Holdings Ltd
Delaine & Cyril
Delma
Gudgeon
Murray-Macgregor
Delta Property Group
Dr
Ms
Denis Richard
Denise
Denise
Denise Margaret
Dennis
Dennis Roy
Lauren
Clark
Howell
Frost
Harris
McLeod
Silverdale Residents Group
Department of Conservation
Department of Corrections
Ms
Derrick Ross & Robyn Mary
Desiree Joyce
Desmond Hetiri
DI & CA
Diana
Dianne
Marsters
Park
Te Tuhi
Bourke
Shurtz
Leathwick
DNZ Property Fund Limited
DNZ Property Fund Limited
DNZ Property Fund Limited
DNZ Property Fund Limited
Mr
Dolores
Don
Donald Jeffrey Waugh
Dora
Dorothy Betty
Douglas Kanuela
Duane
Duane
Barnhill
Childers
Burns
Ballantyne
Belbin
Strother
Skyes
Sykes
Eamonn
Munster
C.O.B. Rugby League
DV Bryant Trust Board
Infinity Property Management Ltd
Eastside Apostolic Foundation
Ecostream Irrigation
Mr
Eddie
Edmund
Edna Mabel
Edna Rivers
Edna Rivers
Edward William
Willison
Wilson
Johnson
Poulava
Poulava
Makin
Page 7 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
134
1137
444
994
436
889
963
1010
1012
1165
83
300
127
318
552
1071
1008
Skinner
Phillips
Brown
Tuitama
Costanzo
de Jong
de Jong
de Jong
de Jong
Witehira
Weller
Makin
Hettig
Edwin
Eileen
Elbert
Eleni
Elizabeth
Elizabeth
Elizabeth
Elizabeth
Elizabeth
Elizabeth Patricia
Elizabeth
Miss Ella Pax
Elletta Rachel
Elroy & Kate Thomson
Emma
Emmeline
Company/Organisation Name
C.O.B. Rugby League
Watene
Sunnex
Environmental Research Institute,
University of Waikato
809
829
1000
605
Erana
Eric
Erina Dee & Tony
Ernest George & Georgina Anne
Roa
Oler
Osborne
Morris
490
398
562
1234
428
939
942
1180
405
1181
344
390
403
950
70
796
600
147
571
1200
Ernie
Ernie
Errin Jay
Esta Vernice
Esteban
Estonie Jean
E'stonie Jean
Evan H
Evangeline
Eve
Le Heron
Ritz
Nin
Metekingi
Tirado
Funaki
Petersen
Smith
Donlon
McAnnalley
Everton Trust
Ewen
Fannie
Fay Ataarahiora
Fiona
Fiona Maxine
Fiona Natalie
Flu
Folau Paea Tukanua
Macdonald
Ritz
Coromandel
Green
Greenwood
Bell
Waikai
Ngaw
Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd
899
Forlongs Furnishings Limited
Page 8 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
307
407
506
793
396
608
Letford
Fitzpatrick
Adams
Maxwell
Hughes
213
96
761
229
620
1075
941
969
632
224
135
641
1284
1134
12
370
379
319
816
1078
559
840
306
896
1018
875
1208
411
240
368
1155
176
302
181
183
180
Frances Dene
Francis
Francis Peri
Fraser Christopher
Fred H
Company/Organisation Name
Riverlea Environment Society
Future Proof Implementation
Committee
G A Hughes and ass 2005 ltd
Gabrielle
Gabrielle
Mrs Gaenor
Gardiner James Gordon
Garrick Wayne
Gary Richard
Gavin
Gavin Roland Graham
Mr Gavin
Gavin Talmage Joseph
Gaylynn Leigh
Wilson
Wilson
Smith
Palmer
Parr
Wiseman
Sarkovich
Wallace
Smith
Scirkovich
Tunstall
Generation Zero Waikato
Mr
Mr
Genevieve
Geoff
Geoffrey Charles
Geoffrey Noel
Van Eden
C
Spooner
Felton
George Eugene
George Hape
George
George
George William
Gerard Francis
Lusty
Chase
Kaka
Tenwolde
Holland
Kelly
Behalf of owners of 19 & 21 Clifton
Road and Corner Rostrevor St &
Clifton Rd
Gilbass Developments Ltd
Gillian Anne
Gillian
Denny
James
Glaisdale Property Partnership
Limited (GPPL)
Glenn
Burgess
Glenview Community Centre
Glenview Medical Centre
Googie Pirika Whatu
Mr Gordon
Mrs Grace
Mr Graeme Ernest
Graeme Ernest
Graeme Ernest Goodwin
Apiti
Chesterman
McCarthy
Goodwin
Goodwin
Goodwin
Page 9 of 30
Hamilton Council
McPherson & Goodwin
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
Company/Organisation Name
882
Graeme Errol & Maureen
Gladys
Graham
Graham
Graham & Phillipa
Grant
Greg
Matthews
Matthews Bed and Breakfast
Mckelvey
Singelton
Cox & Wright
Hamilton
Gimblett
PFS Engineering
PFS Engineering
393
345
Greg
Harmeling
830
61
933
117
293
1115
Gretchen
Cume
Guy Anthony
Gwen
Gwyneth Ann
Perrett
Kipa
Verkerk
903
365
1025
375
630
Mr
Church Road Developments Ltd
Greig Family Trust Holdings
Limited
Group of Alandale Residents
Dr
894
47
Hamilton Central Business
Association
Hamilton Christian Nightshelter
Trust
Hamilton Citizens and Ratepayers
Association
Hamilton Cosmopolitan Club
Hamilton East Community Trust
1013
Hamilton East Community Trust
955
Hamilton Golf Club Incorporated
885
1117
Hamilton Grey Power
Hamilton Homezone Ltd and
Ingham Group
Hamilton JV Investment Company
Ltd
Hamilton Rowing Club Inc
Hamilton Youth Council
253
1248
1170
235
871
580
1232
1070
895
413
73
1098
1176
Hamish Paul
Hana Mariea
Harrisson Balabat
Harry & Lloyd
Harry Peter
McArthur
Haeata
Jull
Hoebergen & Seeney, et al
Gaastra
Hata
Hata
Puriri
Tipoki
Page 10 of 30
Taranaki District
Harvey Norman Stores Pty (NZ)
Ltd/Harvey Norman Properties
(NZ) Ltd
Temple View Heritage Society
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
Company/Organisation Name
660
275
38
947
468
124
1052
1133
479
1260
1252
500
148
1111
539
472
1191
805
1246
973
1123
87
931
1104
209
902
911
333
496
199
192
577
598
231
37
949
954
64
715
172
457
39
Heather
Mrs Heather Joan
Ms Heather Karen
Heather Margaret
Heidi-Anna Ruth
Heinrich
Helen Judith
Helena
Hemi
Hene
Hennie
Herani
Herawini
Hine
Makin
de Groen
Kaufana
Gordon
Hettig
Thomson
Maddison
Arthur
Chase
van Kooten
Ware
Rangi
Tracvity
Hillary
Hineawe
Hinemoa
Hira Te Rangipumanmao
Holly
Holly
Miss Hope
Daniels
Hapuku
Peke-Manawaiti
Selwyn
Lin
Snape
Allum
Mr
Ian Johnston
Goodman & Mayes
Van in
Watene
Curtice
MacDonald
Murphy
Townsend
Bridge
Taylor
Brownlee
Wu
Yen
Ormsby
Kazenbroot
Kilburn
Howard
Hugh & Katie
Hugo
Huiariki
Mr Iain Alistair
Dr
Iain Thomas
Ian Colin & Judy Elaine
Ian Harold & Jean Marie
Mr Ian Kenneth
Mr Ian Roderick
Ian Thomas & Margaret Ann
IFan
Mrs I-fang Grace Chou
Ike Ihaka
Mrs Imelda
Ina Margaret
Thorong La Limited
Hopper Developments Ltd
Hounsell Holdings Ltd
House of Montrose Limited
Infinity Property Management Ltd
1253
27
Taniwharau Rugby League Club
Highview Properties Limited
Hill Laboratories Limited
Inghams Enterprises (NZ) Pty Ltd
Ms
Irene Catharine Mary
van der Beek
Page 11 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
972
658
315
879
Iris & Fred
Isaac Roland
Isobel & Harold
Isobel Anne
Bryant
Hamon
Nielsen
Bennett
1129
635
1222
519
754
153
1263
Ivory
Tangaroa
334
165
648
755
560
832
594
24
79
1183
920
833
585
257
465
447
1140
186
854
1079
99
653
948
1220
408
654
823
551
1017
386
328
Company/Organisation Name
YWCA (Young Womans' Christian
Association) of Hamilton Inc
J.C Johnson Family Trust
Jack Haki & Mary Elizabeth
Jackie
Jackie Noki
Jackson Robin
Jacob Marinus & June Elizabeth
Jacqueline, Steward Charles
Jeffery
Jaden
Jaimee
Jake
Jamaal
James & Heather
James Enoka
Mr James Henry
Mr James Neil Scott
James
James
Jamey
Jamie
Mrs Jan
Jane
Jane
Janelle Moana
Miss Janice Ann
Janice Ann
Janie
Janine Mere
Janna June Margaret
Jared Edward
Jared Ezra
Jared Vaughan
Jared Worth
Jarom
Jasmine
Jason
Jason
Mr Jason
Daniels
Macdonald
Tainui
Takiari
Mans
Te Iti Rearea RLC
Peters
Paekan
Davies
Wheki
Tuia
Hely & Montgomerie
Tapsell
Riley
Chalmers
Ratana
Whetu
Etika
Hemi
Stewart
Griffin
Macdonald
Nikora
O'Leary
Verran
Edwards
Siteine
Fesolai
Coromandel
Hemi
Ormsby
Pease
Gudgeon
Tunstall
Lin
Brown
Hennessey
Page 12 of 30
Genesis Energy
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
980
1229
425
412
1231
1035
909
338
824
722
25
89
1093
297
586
612
733
735
498
1249
1205
68
298
415
1037
1286
Illsley
Katene
Bartholomew
Nikoia
Burgess
Walmsley
West
Bothwell
Jenkins
Atkinson
Stone
Atkinson
Tuau
Milne
Hemi-Nicholson
Forret
Forret
Vowles
Gush
Ponga
Ponga
Ponga
Belbin
Walters
Hay
Gallagher
530
615
1029
706
1175
131
285
435
18
445
100
459
190
122
669
316
242
337
1228
Jay R
Jeanette
Jeff
Jeff
Jenna Maria
Jenna
Jennifer & John
Jennifer Rita
Jenny
Jeremy
Mr Jesse
Jill
Jill Patricia
Mr Jim
Jo Leah Takuna
Joan & Michael
Joan B & (A) Michael
Joanne
Jocelyn
Jodhi & Uki
Jodhi
Jodhi Vanessa
Mrs Jodi N.
Jody
Joe
John
Mr
Mr
Dr
John
John & Susan
John A
John
John Charles
John
John Douglas
John Edward
John Elliott
John G
John Herangi
John Jordan
John Joseph
John Kieran
John Neil
John
John Ralph
John Vianney
Joihn Hoani Uru
Transfield
Chaloner
Kendall
Barnard
Paki
Devonshire
Bennion
Garza
Stevenson
Hughes
Searancke
Herbert
Graat
Hettig
Westerlund Jr
Nielsen
Leathwick
Conroy
Katene
Page 13 of 30
Company/Organisation Name
Fairview Downs Residents
Hay Family
J & G Gallagher Management Trust
Ltd Gallagher Group
Hillcrest Auto Services
Te Wharekura O Rakaumanga
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
1254
Jon Francis & Elizabeth Howie
Jarvis
727
143
471
455
784
1194
767
662
289
665
336
381
426
188
703
446
78
1055
636
798
103
1255
1177
115
116
975
88
111
290
491
569
1139
661
118
178
6
1179
378
818
470
Jonathon William
Jonelle
Jordan
Jordan
Arkins
Henry
Dennis
Kiro
Jordyn D H
Joseph Hans
Joshua
Josina Wilhelmina Maria
Joy
Joy Olive
Joyce
Joyce
Judith Clare
Julia Kim
Juliah
Julie Marie
Julie Nicole
Julienne Elizabeth
Justin
Justin
KD
Kahuwaero
Kara Ivy
Kare Eva
Karen Hoki
Karen
Kareve Harata
Karyn Marcia
Kasey
Kasmin Joy
Kasmin Joy
Katanna
Katarina
Katherine Mary
Kathleen Heather
Kathleen Joyce
Katie
Kay
Keaohiwahiwaofaluanui Kelsey
Smith
Hartog
Montomery
Ellis
Jackson
Tristram
Brooks
Brock
McDonald
Endres
Albulet
O'Carroll
Morley
Duncan
Greenwood
Sonnenberg
Silva
Katene
Witehira
Pompey
Parker
Stevenson
Witehira
Hayward
McCarty
Nikora
Nikora
Green
Koroheke
Luketina
McCaughtrie
Tipoki
See
Warrender
Daniels
Kel
Kellie
Kelly
Ormsby
Brown
Littlewood
699
475
206
Company/Organisation Name
Jordanielle Trust
Mrs
Mrs
Mrs
Mrs
Mrs
Ms
Mr
Page 14 of 30
Dollar Flash
Dollar Flash
Toncliff Limited
Living Streets Hamilton
Tracvity
Seeks Investment 2012 Ltd
Mitre 10 Mega Hamilton
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
523
1092
827
1044
82
1151
384
668
576
1257
34
737
16
279
643
504
667
601
139
421
593
557
157
281
284
286
464
120
1099
Pere
Williams
Shang & Wang
Graham
Whittaker
Arkley
Alexander
Rasor
Newman
Willmott
Ryan
Etika
Hall
Collins
Tunstall
Tamahou
Wenz
Fitzpatrick
Major
Shurtz
Beets
Tahere
Rose
Mr
Mr
Kelly
Ken
Ken & Hong
Kendall
Kenneth & Joyce
Kenneth
Kenneth F
Kenneth
Kerianne Moana
Kerry & Donna
Kerry Francis & Lynda May
Kerryn
Kevin Brian
Kevin
Kevin Harold
Kevin Kewena
Kevin Matthew
Kevin Patrick
Khan
Kim
Kimberley
Kimberley Ruth
Kimberly
Company/Organisation Name
King Family Trust
King Family Trust
King Family Trust
Kingi
Kiritahi
Dennis
Koroheke
Kirkdale Investments Ltd and
Kimbrae Farms Ltd
Kiwi Income Property Trust & Kiwi
Property Holdings Limited
1198
927
976
Kiwi Property Management
Limited
Kiwi Property Management Ltd
978
Kiwi Property Management Ltd
366
1090
565
831
458
1049
112
KiwiRail Holdings Limited
Kristen
Kristen
Kung-Yao
Kylie
Kylie Michelle
Lady
Hartley
Smith
Lin
Hohaia
Birks
King
Page 15 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
125
152
1119
1023
1233
842
1212
680
288
1094
998
717
964
748
385
549
161
250
451
1189
915
807
1197
774
1235
228
1082
847
647
423
651
803
673
545
1281
628
777
327
1174
721
694
561
443
649
1080
Moeke
Kama
Elkington
Lahaina
Laisa
Laitohi
Lana Charrell
Lance Edward
Lance
Lani Awhimai Michele
Miss Lauren Jay
Laurence John
Lavinia Maria
Lee-anne
Lei
Leilani
Lenna Maria
Lennox James
Leonard
Mr Les
Lesley
Leslie R
Lester
Levi-Che
Lili-Anne Amelia Hinemoa
Lillian
Lillian Winifred
Mr Lincoln
Lincoln Ivan
Linda
Linda
Linda
Lindsay Hixon
Lisa Jayne
Lisa
Lisa-Marie
Dr
Liz
Lloyd Elder
Kershaw-Ryan
Kendrick
Harvey
Emery
McDonald
Denny
Taitoko
Paama
Sarkovich
Uili
Alexander
Southon
Reid
Wooldridge
Lomas
Newman
Clarke
Ngawaka
Kershaw-Smiler
Singers
Kershaw
Archer
Reid
Fell
Ormsby
Shurtz
Hamon
Bust
Wilson
Watene
Halsey
Duncan
Company/Organisation Name
Lambert International Ltd
Kershaw Training Enterprises
COB League
NZRL
Longtail Pet Motel
Lori
Luana Wikitoria
Lucinda
Lucy Anne & Andrew Owen
Lucy
Luis
Luke
Lynda Kathleen Parewhakaruku
Silsbee
Paki
Atkinson
McKergow & Hughes
Tuia
Garcia
Ormsby
Briggs
Page 16 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
Company/Organisation Name
272
1168
450
1145
1050
999
397
815
1011
739
810
716
Lynda Marie
Lynden
Lynette Ann
Lynette
Lynette Joyce
Lynette Ramari
Lynn
Lynnette
M.P & R.G
Maari Rose
Malaea
Malakai
Findlay
Earl
McCheyne
Cassidy
Williams
Kauluwehi
Shomers
Vincent
Upsdell
Thompson
Cossey
Watene-Zelezniak
College Old Boys Rugby League
1112
193
1125
395
1040
Malcolm
Malcolm George
Manaoterangi Ernest
Mandy
Williams
Porteous
Forbes
Bishop
391
536
579
1096
1019
Manu
Maraea
Marama Karen Leslie
Marama
Maree Virginia
434
23
196
505
645
113
1089
339
770
794
670
476
1188
414
357
786
304
905
Ms
Mangakotukutuku Stream Care
Incorporated Group
Margaret Corina
Mrs Margaret Jane
Margaret Joyce
Margaret
Margaret
Mr
Mr
Maria
Marie Pere
Marie Theresa
Marilyn
Marilyn Cecil
Marina Jane
Mark
Mark Brian
Mark
Mark
Mark
Mark
Mark
Waa
Mita
Marshall
Mete
Pene
Sosa
Prenter
Davidson
Kahui
Watene
Koroheke
Joseph
Conroy
Bigland
Hayward
Westerlund
Bramley
Hague
Green
McLennan
Metekingi
Priscott
Sullivan
Page 17 of 30
Te Kotuku Whenua Environmental Agency for NgatiWairere
College Old Boys Rugby League
Charitable Trust
Barry and Sullivan Electrical Ltd
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
Company/Organisation Name
1267
709
681
410
1067
262
54
57
1276
486
1039
Mark Thomson
Mark Thomson
Maroea Gaylene
Maroni John
Marsden Boyd
Martin O'Neill
Martin
Martin
Mary Elizabeth
Mary
Matai Christian Parata Family
Mitchell
Mitchell
Harris
Westerlund
Gaabdora
Kirkby
Toop
Toop
Hamon
Jefferson
Baruchel Developments Ltd
Matthew Lester
Matthew Shane
Matthew
Maurice Conway
Mavis Ruth
Max Walker
Maxime
Maxine Roberta
Maxwell George
May
Simon
Watene
Taylor
Clarke
Duncan
Verran
Rouast
Fraser
Horsford
Tan
Mr
Mr
Mr
768
90
266
914
627
855
195
825
1225
872
175
702
1206
1195
McConnell Property Ltd
McConnell Property Ltd
McCracken Surveys Limited
McDonald's Restaurants (NZ) Ltd
1204
484
1031
582
1226
792
230
958
274
664
1178
676
110
633
322
329
9
McPherson Goodwin Surveyors
Limited
Mectildah
Megan
Megan Rona
Meiana Jenelle
Melanie
Miss Melanie Jane
Melanie Jane
Miss Melanie
Mellissa
Mere Marnie
Mr
Meri
Merieanna
Merran
Michael Cecil
Michael Kenneth
Michael
Chikwiri
Kendall
Kaho
Gray
Ballantyne
Rouse
Wiseman
Rouse
Castello
Edwards
Blakey
Graham
Powell
Paddy
Hall
Ler
Page 18 of 30
The NZ Labour Missionary Assn
Charitable Trust
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
Company/Organisation Name
14
389
126
756
201
438
212
287
Hull
Rose
Wilson
Powell
Le Prou
Lyon
Missiha
Jasper Ltd
877
1069
743
1156
574
764
456
1207
404
150
1060
323
101
512
349
387
575
467
93
828
105
749
219
1127
218
400
354
194
295
136
711
656
591
43
95
Michael Robert
Michael Seth
Michael
Michaela
Mrs Michelle
Michelle
Michelle
Midlands Health Network Limited
Mighty River Power Limited
Mikala T
Mike
Milford Rogers
Watene
Burton
Hamon
Milwood Trust
Ming-San (Arvin) & Meng-Chu
(Anna)
Miriama
Mischele
Missy
Misty
Moana Adalene Malissa
Moses Christopher
Murdoch Jason
Murray James
Murray Keith
Tang
Kingi
Rhodes
Shurtz
Kama
Rarere
Armstrong
Tahere
Johnstone
McDonald
Modern Transport Limited
CCNZ Alumni
Muthukumaraswamy Family Trust
No2
Mylee
Myles Aidan Tipene
Myles Aidan
Myles
Myles
Myra
Myra
Nagarajah
Nakeya
Mrs Nancy
Nandan & Shweta
Miss Natalie
Natalie Renee
Nathalie
Nathan Graeme
Nathaniel
Mr Neal Geoffrey
Neesha
Gordon
Watene
Watene
Watene
Watene
Evans-McLeod
Wineera
Manoharan
Quezada
Cooper
Modak
Jordan
McNamara
Lordemans
Hamon
Beets
Utting
Pahuru
Page 19 of 30
Ez-Pawn
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
742
932
149
1283
Pahuru
Brumblecomble
Rose
Neesha
Neil
Neil T
Company/Organisation Name
New Zealand Fire Service
Comission
New Zealand Heavy Haulage
Association Inc
New Zealand Institute of Architects
1290
42
1157
New Zealand Police Information
and Technology Group
924
New Zealand Transport Agency
740
1221
1158
46
603
236
514
788
1128
672
499
342
617
1077
541
540
264
813
858
543
501
108
4
503
590
217
1076
1160
537
1048
62
747
Mr
Mr
Ms
Ngamhe
Ngawati
Niall
Nicholas
Nick
Nicola Anne
Nicola
Nigel
Nihe Matilda Goots Enoka
Nihe Matilda
Nikeita
Nitinchandra M
Noel Henry & Joan
Noeleen Blanche
Noeline & Mike
Te Amo
Smiler
Baker
Smit
Murphy
Carroll
Hamon
Ballantyne
Warwick
Warwick
Campbell
Parulekar
Breed
Forbes
Bourke
Northview Partnership Ltd
NZ Horse Recreation Inc
O. Raihania
Timu
Oaklands Group Holdings Ltd
Opoia Trustees LTD
Mr
Ora Going
Ora Neill
Orion Salman
Ota
Otis J
Owen & Robyn
Owen
Pahemata Kay
Pamela Joy
Pamela Mabel
Pamela May
Pamela
Richardson
Kohe
Edwards
Tuaen
Fruean
Renton
Purcell
Apiti
McLanachan
Heremaia
Brown
Umuhozu
Page 20 of 30
Te Wananga
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
531
141
977
606
Pania Lee
Pania
Nin
Waikai
887
724
1121
997
970
171
431
248
677
494
936
140
215
Pat
Patrice Marama
Patricia Helen
Patrick
Patsy
Paul
Paul Raymond
Paul Robert
Paulette
Pauline
Pauline Norma
Pawhaure
Pearce Andrew
McNair
Arkins
Going
Taitoko
Karene
Morrison
Clever
Kennel
Leef
Gaudin
O'Brien
Brown
Watson
Peihana
Penelope Jane
Peni Rachel
Penni-Marie
Penny
Penrhyn Margaret (Penny)
Pera
Pera
Percy
Owen
Arkins
Golder
Harris
Allen
Allen
Paeka
Ratana
Te Hira
Peter
Peter & Barbara
Peter & Margaret
Peter & Rinske
Peter
Peter George
Peter H
Peter John
Peter John Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay, Peter John
Findlay & Donna Margaret
Findlay as trustees of the
Findlay Family Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
Dornauf
Ryan
Fairhead
Harris
Clarke
McCheyne
Bos
Paviour-Smith
Peter Marere Kaio
Peter
Mete-Smith
Mete-Smith
1086
732
817
684
246
227
151
137
1162
862
876
1006
324
772
759
449
346
19
912
1081
1118
Company/Organisation Name
Parkwood Gateway Limited
Parkwood Trade Centre Limited
Mr
Mr
Mr
Ms
Ms
Wizardsleeve Holdings Limited
Perry Group Limited
Peter Findlay, Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd
Page 21 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
485
207
1214
8
81
86
646
1113
779
326
790
904
Peter
Peter Richard
Peter S
Peter
Peter William
Peter William
Peti Hinewetea
Petra
Philip & Kelly
Philip & Patricia
Philip
Philip Edward & Frances Dene
O'Donnell
Clarke
Thomson
Singleton
Bennett
Bennett
Transfield
Reiter
Evans
Oh
Ballantyne
Letford
Philip
Philippa Jane
Phillip David
Siteine
Gerard
King
Phillip Shane Ikunui
Pierce Isaac Te Ngakau
Pirihi Te Ohaki (Bill)
Pita
Pita
Rose
Te Moni
Ruwhiu
Witehira
Witehira
760
249
1250
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Dr
522
992
1210
839
1166
925
Company/Organisation Name
Hamilton Amateur Radio Club (Inc)
PL & LJ Middlemiss Family Trust
1273
Population Health, Waikato DHB
1153
1164
984
1135
Porter Developments Ltd
Porter Properties Ltd
Portland Park Limited
Progressive Enterprises Limited
938
929
269
132
1193
142
1088
1016
687
568
1064
751
682
63
898
Property Council New Zealand
PRS Planning Services Limited
Pumice Food Group
Mr
Quintin Glenford
Quntin A
R
R Andrew
R.E.
Ra
Rachael
Rachel Elizabeth
Raechel Anne
Rakaipaka
Rakaipaka
Rakaipaka
Hapuku
Hapuku
Henry
Joseph
Mason-Riseborough
Harris
Nonoa
Thomson
Popping
Harris
Puriri
Puriri
Page 22 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
650
757
696
145
1217
1223
720
159
864
362
869
873
Hamon
Kite
Coutolleau
Anthony
Hemi
Hemi
King
Bourne
Cowie & Spriggs
Dong
Bird
Bird
Ralph Roland
Randall Tannea
Raphael
Rave
Rawiri
Rawiri Russell
Rawiri Wayne
Ray
Raylene & Saul
Raymond
Raymond John
Raymond John
1114
374
129
133
402
1053
567
205
1034
778
1172
686
130
144
341
469
Raymond Russell
Rebecca
Rebecca
Rebecca
Rebecca
Rebecca
Rebecca
Mrs Rebekah
Rei
Reihana Patrick
Reihana Patrick
Renaira Gaylene
Renata Immanuel
Renata
Park
Hamilton
Cutler
Hapuku
Harris
Hippolite
Nonoa
Kenny
Kendall
Nuku
Nuku
Harris
Kahuroa
Whitley
Rewa Pahemata Ruthina Tipu
Dewes
922
935
440
325
462
836
592
675
728
394
685
1101
588
1192
85
493
Rex Graeme
Rex
Rhonda
Richard
Richard Grant
Richard Grant
Richard
Richard
Richard Thomas
Ricky
Rinaira Gaylene
Ringihia Te Aroha
Ripeka C
Ripeka
Edge
Hannam
O'Hearon
Ward
Herewini
Herewini
Grey-Edwards
Herbig
Arkins
Shurtz
Horsford
Watene
Fruean
Hapuku
Rob
Jacobs
Company/Organisation Name
Le Gastronome t/a La Cave
Waikato Referees Association
Birds Plant & Equipment Trust
Birds Plant and Equipment Trust
Kendall Family
Revell Properties No.9 Limited
Mr
River Road Trust
Page 23 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
177
657
1106
Robert Edmund
Robert
Robert & Anna
Simms
Gordon
Moore & Cox
Robert & Lauryl
Robert Alan
Robert Andrew
Robert
Robert E
Robert Gordon
Robert James
Robert James
Robert W.
Roberta Lee
Robin
Robyn & Graham
Robyn & Rodney
Rod
Roena
Roger
Roger
Roimata Hazel
Roland & Wendy
Roland Olliver
Roman Catholic Bishop of
Hamilton
Romana
Ron
Ronald David
Ronald David
Rosemary
Rosemary Eleanor
Rosie
Rosina Aliana
Ross & Leonie
Crump
Mills
Joseph
Christmas
Rihehert
Bell
Davies-Colley
Davies-Colley
Belbin
Farrell CNZM FRSNZ FIAWS
Holdsworth
McBride
Dallin
Bowman
McCarthy
Hennebry
Hennebry
Hall
Spirig
Cooper
599
187
1187
424
495
1268
260
265
291
270
1262
943
388
221
1097
254
255
463
1279
347
704
1045
987
49
50
98
84
441
527
1265
1015
1032
309
369
886
923
283
1275
179
1277
Dr
Dr
Dr
Dr
Mr
Dr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Company/Organisation Name
Anglican Action / Poverty Action
Waikato
M&R
Silverdale Residents Group
Catholic Diocese of Hamilton
Graham
Phillips
Ford
Ford
Gordon
Stucki
Ibarra
Nin
Hopkins
Rotokauri Developments Ltd
Rototuna Holdings Ltd
Rototuna Ventures Ltd
Dr
Mr
Rowan
Rowena
Roy & Dayl
Roy McIver
Rudolf Johann
Russell
Bishop
Kaleopa
Carson
Daniel FRSNZ
Dudli
Cooper
Page 24 of 30
Ruakura Residents Group and
William Roy Cowie
Dudli Properties
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
3
690
797
1073
826
516
679
256
753
729
692
693
17
399
71
167
Mr
Knutson
Knaap
Knaap
Hamon
Robinson
Southon
Harris
170
1030
1109
1230
688
614
1152
154
640
556
689
1219
10
674
92
452
705
812
1141
652
820
713
197
1224
198
1085
884
597
1159
Mrs Saskia Maria
Russell
Russelle
Russelle
Ruth Lynne
Ruth
Rutha Lucy
Ryan Stacey
Company/Organisation Name
Nemesys Ltd
Safekids New Zealand
Samuel
Samuel Whiteford
Sandra Jean
Sandra Jean
Sandra Joan
Sarah
Sarah
Sash
Nowacki
Arkins
Talbett
Talbett
Fraser-Ball
Shurtz
Nichol
Stosic
Ashton Developments Ltd.
Fraser-Ball Ltd
Upper Central Zone of NZRL Inc.
Tomlinson
Schramm Property Trust
Scott
Scott
Sean
Seanna
Bready
McAnnalley
Harris
Carlile-Clark
Sekta Properties Limited
Senae
Shane
Shannon Asalele
Sharen
Sharianne Hinemoa
Shaun Baishang
Shaun
Shawney mei Atarangi
Shea Margaret
Sheena Alice
Sheree
Sheree Mere
Sherrill Macdonald
Sherry Te Amohaere
Sherry
Mrs Sheryl Margaret
Shing-long
Mrs Shirley May Gwynneth
Shirley T
Shona Betty
Shona Catherine Anne
Shona Mary
Mitchell
Carlile
Ta'ala
Reti
Hemi
Shen
Eketona
Kahi
Lawrence
Maclean
Fryer
Nikora
Hamon
Watene
Watene
Curtice
Lee
Caspari QSM
Rago
Shaw
Duggan
McClinchy
Page 25 of 30
Riverlea Environment Society
Murray V. Shaw Builders Ltd
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
189
534
35
1245
364
294
1009
900
983
356
Parulekar
Li
Graafhuis
Mrs Shubhangi
Shui
Simon Arend
Simon Dyke Farms Ltd
Mr
Simon Irvine
Simon Puttick
Young
Friar
Sink or Swim
SKYCITY Hamilton Ltd
Soleil
McDonald
Southern Cross Hospitals Limited
258
271
106
806
182
745
996
367
906
776
243
1
439
22
244
1190
691
156
1138
738
814
Company/Organisation Name
St Francis Cooperating Parish
St Paul's Collegiate School- Rowing
Club
Stacey
Scirkovich
Starship Childrens Health
Starship Trauma Service
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Mr
Stella Neale
Stephanie
Stephen
Stephen George
Stephen
Stephen
Steve Barry
Steve
Steven
Steven
Strantz Dalton
Stuart
Stuart
Sue
Summer
Kenyon
Phillips
Cox
Bigwood
Reneti
Tunnicliffe
Culhane
Easley
Richardson
Gale
Wihongi
Dillon
Poulava
Nikora
Kershaw
Summerset Villages (Hamilton) Ltd
380
637
1041
237
Susan
Susan
Susan Elizabeth
Mrs Susan
Oldridge
Cribb
Thomson
Hopkins
1264
94
821
453
211
517
526
Mrs Susan
Susan
Suzanne
Suzanne
Hopkins
Pahuru
Ings
Kyd
Cruise Investments
Ruakura Motors Tractorparts Ltd
Switched On Electrical
Sydney Taka
Tahir Loy
Smith
Nin
Page 26 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
986
128
1199
913
515
432
1173
780
626
208
795
725
697
547
623
123
97
160
1130
990
1144
1038
960
121
525
320
781
102
166
482
1201
Minhinnick
Watene
1033
Tahuata Nelson
Tainan Evarn
Company/Organisation Name
Tainui Group Holdings Limited
Tainui Group Holdings Ltd
Takiri Zan
Talbot T
Talmadge Temuera
Tania
Tania Rangirangi Mariana
Miss Tanya
Tanya Lisa
Tara Elissa
Tara Vanessa
Tashena Marie
Tasi Ann
Tau
Te Aroha
Te Awa
Te Naera
Te Reremoana
Te Rina Noelani
Te Waata R
Southon
Snow
Harris
Hennebry
Enoka
Jack
Whitehead
Arkins
Hills
Waru
Cammock
Moeke
Pahuru
Anderson
Tangaroa
Nelson
Ngawaka
Greening
Telecom New Zealand Limited
Terekia Rewiki James
Terina Lee
Terry Martyn
Terry
Tessa
TeUranga
Koroheke
Nin
Hume
Snipler
Siteine
Waikou
The Adare Company Ltd
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter
Day Saints Trust Board (The Trust
Board)
The Errol John Kendall Family
1167
The House Movers Section of New
Zealand Heavy Haulage Association
(Inc), Prestige Building Removals
Ltd, Willcox Building Removals Ltd
and The House Movers (Rotorua)
Ltd (together referred to as "House
Movers")
838
1256
The Ministry of Education
The National Trading Company of
NZ Ltd
Page 27 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
1196
The New Zealand Historic Places
Trust
The Riverlea Environment Society
1209
953
The Roman Catholic Bishop of the
Diocese of Hamilton
The Suit Shop Limited
The Trust Company Limited for
AETNZ Education Trust
The University of Waikato
The Waikato Tree Trust
1241
1122
1059
305
644
1238
332
311
518
553
146
945
1259
263
191
891
1285
416
988
401
220
849
572
267
1028
487
72
1163
1083
454
5
15
1084
343
280
114
982
66
Company/Organisation Name
Theresa
Thomas Tamai
Tim
Timothy Daniel
Tina Ann
Tipare
Tirohia
Albert
Kershaw
Stokes
Hunt
Rose-Dutton
Wharepapa
Smith
Titanium Park Joint Venture
Mr
Mr
Ms
Tiwini
Tobias
Todd & Heather
Tom (Alan Douglas)
Tom
Toni
Toni
Tony
Tony
Tony & Christine
Tony & Frances
Tony
Tony
Tracey
Tracey Laraine
Hemi
Braun
Hamilton
MacRae
Roa
Elkington
Swney
Matthews
Priscott
Lennon
Schramm
Begbie
Elkington
Bell
Sherman
Tracvity
WCA Trust
Tram Lease Limited
Transpower New Zealand Ltd
Mr
Trevor- Charles Te Metera
Trevor Francis
Trevor James & Lucy Gay
Tripoli Daniel
Kohu
McKee
Hancock
Tuau
Mckee Trust
Trust Waikato
Tui 2000
Tuini
Tyrone Jade
Ukinga
Koroheke
Kareitiana
AkaitiPonga
Page 28 of 30
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
1288
-
642
107
502
1056
1185
442
1046
420
448
710
622
1291
313
360
811
1116
791
698
Urlich Properties Limited / Z.I &
T Urlich
Valerie
Vanessa
Vatia
Velroy Crystal
Verdon Anthony
Veronica
Vicki
Vicky
Vilma
Vincent Matthew
Vivienne Shona Evelyn
Clark
Armstrong
Toetagata
Matthews
Bartlett
Gaiza
Wihongi
Shurtz
McCreadie
Heke
Cammock
Auckland Council
Vodafone New Zealand Limited
W.J. & M.R.
W.R & J.M
Waihanea Katarina
Waikaraka Emily
Laverty
Falconer
Timu
Ruwhiu
Waikato Biodiversity Forum
Waikato Chamber of Commerce
1003
Waikato Child and Youth Mortality
Review Group
Waikato District Council
Waikato District Health Board
Waikato Federated Farmers
Charitable Society
Waikato Innovation Park Limited
1211
708
701
1051
276
Waikato Property Investors
Association
Waikato Racing Club Incorporated
376
359
714
610
Waikato Regional Airport Ltd
Waikato Regional Council
Waikato Registered Master
Builders Association Inc
Waikato-Tainui Te Kauhanganui Inc
771
163
631
563
1143
666
1271
Company/Organisation Name
Waimarie
Hare
Wallace Raiti Peter
Wallace Raiti Peter
Walter Kevin
Warren
Reihana
Reihana
Ware
Stace
Page 29 of 30
Tigers
Waitomo Properties Ltd
Proposed District Plan - submissions received 2013
User
Title Full Given Name(s)
Submission
Number
Surname
489
31
916
Salon
Bowker
-
1216
919
763
822
511
971
750
466
573
418
21
Mr
Warren
Waylon
Wayne Maurice & Melanie Jane
Clarke Family Trust
Wayne Rikki Douglas
Wayne
Wei
Company/Organisation Name
Te Kira
Rogers
Lee
WEL Networks Limited
Wendy Joy
Wero
Westly Te haki
Whare
Sales
Karena
Howard
Dewes
Wi Te Kawepo
William Arthur
Ormsby
Featherstone
1072
928
762
William Kent
William Roy
William Roy & Raewyn Mary
Money
Cowie
Cowie
352
William Wie & Patricia Tekore
Moana
164
1244
1218
707
239
Willy
Wilson David
Winifred Rose
Beazley
Jolly
Hemi
Wiremu Taylor
Puke
461
538
533
1131
480
158
1292
1026
Yana Leah
Yi
Yi
Yongchao
Yorana
Yvette K
Hemi
Li
Li
Lin
Arthur
Rose
513
535
162
Zan Te Wakaiti
Zhuoying
Zoram
Whittle Family Trust
Mr
Mr
Nawton Community Presbyterian
Church
Envision Team
Wintec
Namtok Consultancy Ltd Ngati
Wairere
Z Energy Limited
Z Energy Ltd, BP Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
Southon
Shi
Watene
Page 30 of 30
Supplement 17th June 2013
This page is an updated summary of submissions which adds
the following summaries
City Wide – 25.13 Three Waters
Sub Name
Nagarajah
Manoharan
Sub Point Plan Provision
218.002
Summary Of Submissions
25.13 Three Waters
Sub Type Summary
Oppose
Submission relates to Rule 25.13.4.4 (General Standards - Water). The submitter states that meters are not required
and seeks that spending on water meters be stopped.
City Wide – 25.15 Urban Design
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.149
25.15.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support
Retain Policy 25.15.2.1c
Porter
Developments
Ltd
1153.028
25.15.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Oppose
Delete Policy 25.15.2.1c regarding internal and external amenity for occupants of residential, commercial and
community buildings.
Appendix 8 – Schedule 8A Built Heritage (structures buildings and associated sites)
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Frances Dene
Letford
307.001
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
associated sites
Oppose
Include the Rukuhia Soil Research Station, located within the Stage 1 of the Peacocke Structure Plan, in Schedule 8A:
Built Heritage (Structures, Buildings and Associated Sites).
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.007
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
associated sites
Oppose
Oppose Schedule 8A Built Heritage - structures, buildings and associated sites which has upgraded the Notre Dames
des Missions to an A ranked item. Develop additional criteria relating to the assessment of buildings that include state
of repair and earthquake risk as factors.
Peter Dornauf
876.001
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
associated sites
Support in Amend Schedule 8A Built Heritage structures buildings and associated sites by including additional items.
part
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.001
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
Oppose
Amend the Heritage Ranking for H39 Central Post Office.
Page 1 of 3
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
associated sites
Sink or Swim
1009.012
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
associated sites
Support
Retain the listing of the Municipal Baths as a ‘B’ ranking heritage item.
Hamilton East
Community Trust
1013.002
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
associated sites
Support in Supports the a Ranking for the Notre Dames de Missions building at 47 Clyde Street and requests that the Hamilton
part
Municipal Pools and Steele Park be given Category A heritage rankings.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.015
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
associated sites
Support in Undertake a systematic survey of the city in order to identify additional heritage structures, buildings and associated
part
sites and cultural and archaeological sites. Include the following heritage items and areas in Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and associated sites.
·
309 River Road
·
1 Victoria St
·
68 Pembroke St / Lake Domain
·
Innes Memorial Arch, corner Victoria & Bridge Street
·
24 Anglesea Street
·
150 Te Rapa Road
·
136 Pembroke St
·
371 Grey Street
·
23 Ruakiwi Road
·
Ruakura Homestead
·
Rukuhia Soil Research Station buildings
·
A block + Registry building, University of Waikato
·
58A Lake Crescent
·
Caro Street Telephone Exchange
·
Girl Guide Camp Fire, Parana Park
·
Annie McPherson Memorial Bridge, Parana Park
·
Former Parr house / caretaker’s residence, Parana Park
·
62 Alexandra Street
·
15-17 Vialou Street
·
106 Forest Lake Road
·
1335 Victoria Street, Hamilton
·
Fairfield Primary School
·
Hamilton West School – original school building
·
379-381 Grey Street
·
250 Grey Street
·
490 Grey Street
Page 2 of 3
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
120 Sandwich Road & 2 Marnane Terrace
21 Rostrevor Street
12 Little London Lane
7 Queen’s Ave, Frankton
Wooden piles associated with 1864 jetty
Piles of the Union Bridge, built 1879.
The remains of Roose Shipping Co.’s wharf
Richmond Estate Heritage Area -parts of Pembroke and Selwyn Streets
Church College Campus
33 Naylor St
Niall Baker
1158.018
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
associated sites
Support in Review Schedule 8A Built Heritage Structures Buildings and Associated Sites of the plan to consider the potential
part
heritage significance of other structures, buildings and associated sites within the city.
The New Zealand
Historic Places
Trust
1196.031
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
associated sites
Support in Amend the current content of Schedule 8A: Built Heritage to include additional items.
part
House, 32 Albert Street
Workers Dwelling, 84 Forest lake Road
Rukuhia soil Research station (former), at 3019 Ohaupo Road
Z Energy Limited
1292.004
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
associated sites
Oppose
Delete Historic Heritage B Ranking on the building located at 116 Grey Street
Or
Rezone 116 Grey Street to provide a suitable zoning for 116 Grey Street that provides restricted discretionary status
for the service station activity, as well as for alterations and additions to the existing service station, and to signage.
Page 3 of 3
Summary Of Submissions
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Steve Barry
Culhane
1.001
11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose
Flood Hazard Area
Categories Descriptions
Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 15 Patricia Avenue.
Upgrade stormwater infrastructure on Patricia Avenue.
Chad Payne
2.002
Features Map 18B
Oppose
Undertake more precise flood hazard modelling and investigation for 9 Glenwarrick Court.
Confirmation of measures to protect the 9 Glenwarrick Court and other properties from flooding.
Russell Knutson
3.001
Zoning Map 36A
Oppose
Map 36A-Rezone from Residential to Central City zone to reach the natural boundaries represented by Willoughby
park, Beetham park, Edgecumbe park and the river.
Orion Salman
Edwards
4.001
Zoning Map 17A
Oppose
The vacant land between Flagstaff Park and Endeavour Avenue not be rezoned to General Residential but be retained
as Community Facilities Zone or be rezoned to be included into Flagstaff Park.
Trevor Francis
McKee (Mckee
Trust)
5.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7. Opposes the interface rule in the Residential zone regarding the placement of garages.
Kathleen Heather
McCaughtrie
6.001
Zoning Map 10A
Support in Ensure Transport Corridor hierarchy recognises increased traffic on Tuhikaramea Road.
part
Ensure speed limits/controls for Tuhikaramea Rd are appropriate for a built up residential environment and are
enforced.
David Gottschalk
(David Gottschalk
Trust)
7.001
25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose
Peter Singleton
8.001
Zoning Maps
Michael Ler
9.001
11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose
Flood Hazard Area
Categories Descriptions
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 22 Roderick Place.
Shaun Baishang
Shen
10.001
26.3 Schedule of
Designations
Oppose
Oppose Designation I58: Hamilton Microwave Station (Newcastle Road) seeks its relocation.
CDL Land New
Zealand Ltd
11.001
Figure 15-6c
Support in Amend Figure 15-6c of Volume 2 by:
part
- extending the "Proposed Road Stopping" to the northern boundary of Lot 1 DPS 89636.
- correcting the road name "Sylvester Road" to "Brywood Rise"
Geoff C
12.001
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
No extension, increase in size or height to the Electricity Transmission Corridor within existing residential land in
Silverdale. Seek Council purchase of affected properties if no alternative is available.
Removal of section 25.7.3.
Support in Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 18 Te Aroha St.
part
Change the zoning between the Railway and O'Neil Street to encourage better use.
Page 1 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Castle Argh LTD
13.001
25.7.4 Rules – Activity Status Oppose
– Electricity Transmission
Corridors
Removal of section 25.7.4 relating to Electricity Transmission Corridors in its entirety.
Michael Robert
Hull (Jasper Ltd)
14.001
Features Map 43B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 118/120 Greenwood Street.
Trevor James &
Lucy Gay Hancock
15.001
23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Zone and All Special
Character Zones
Oppose
Oppose restrictions in Clause 23.7.3 relating to Large Lot Residential (Ruakura Structure Plan, SH26) as unrealistic in
relation to lot sizes under Clause 4.4.1 (2,500m2). A separate table for 'Large Lot Residential' zones under Clause
23.7.3 is sought with changes made to the following clauses:
a) 40m (from 15m)
d) 12 (from 5)- allotments served by a single right of way
h) 300m (from 50m) - private way length
i) 500m (from 75m) - maximum cul-de sac length
j) 1 (from 0) - private way accessing directly on to a cul-de-sac
Kevin Brian Hall
16.001
3.7.1 Structure Plan
Components
Support in Assurance that no flooding will occur due to Ruakura Structure Plan at the rear of 61A Nevada Rd
part
Sandra Joan
Fraser-Ball
(Fraser-Ball Ltd)
17.001
11.1 Purpose
Oppose
Sandra Joan
Fraser-Ball
(Fraser-Ball Ltd)
17.002
11.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose
Amend Objective 11.2.3 and Policy 11.2.3a to include a statement on legal implications resulting from adverse impacts
Sandra Joan
Fraser-Ball
(Fraser-Ball Ltd)
17.003
11.2 Objectives and Policies Oppose
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
Opposes an Industrial Park being set up so close to residential
John Elliott
Stevenson
18.001
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.3 Permeable Surface.
John Elliott
Stevenson
18.002
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.6 a), b) and d) so garages and carports have no setback from a transport corridor or Right-of-way.
part
John Elliott
Stevenson
18.003
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 b), c), d) and e) that relates to the design of dwellings and accessory buildings
John Elliott
Stevenson
18.004
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.8 to read "Boundary fences and walls shall have a maximum height of 1.8m", and delete remainder of
rule.
Amend 11.1c) by increasing the 40m setback to 70m from existing residential development to the south-east of the
Ruakura Structure Plan.
Page 2 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
John Elliott
Stevenson
18.005
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Support in Remove Rule 4.4.10 b) iv which relates to the location of Outdoor Living Areas.
part
John Elliott
Stevenson
18.006
5.4.2 Site Coverage
Support in Change site coverage for the Special Residential Zone, Clause 5.4.2 from 35% to 40%.
part
John Elliott
Stevenson
18.007
5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Oppose
Planting
John Elliott
Stevenson
18.008
5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rule 5.4.6 a) to be the same as for the building setbacks rule in the General Residential zone (Rule 4.4.6); and
part
Amend Rule 5.4.6c) to allow garages and carports facing a transport corridor to have a 0m setback.
John Elliott
Stevenson
18.009
5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
John Elliott
Stevenson
18.010
5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Support in Remove Rule 5.4.11. b) iv in relation to the location of outdoor living areas
part
Peter John and
Nancy Margaret
Paviour-Smith
19.001
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 4 Sycamore Place.
Peter John and
Nancy Margaret
Paviour-Smith
19.002
Features Map 17B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 4 Sycamore Place.
William Arthur
Featherstone
(Nawton
Community
Presbyterian
Church)
21.001
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 61 Livingstone Avenue.
part
Steven
Richardson
22.001
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Margaret Jane
Prenter
23.001
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 9 Kelvin Place.
part
James Henry Riley
24.001
22.1 Purpose
Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 43 Gordon Davies Lane.
part
Council to ensure hazard area plans are kept up to date and reflect any changes that are made to the land (e.g. as part
of a resource consent)
Jesse Stone
25.001
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove Rule 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting.
Remove Rule 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 19 Somerset Street.
Oppose flood hazards being identified on LIMS
Page 3 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 10 Vine Street.
Upgrade the storm water system to cope with a 100 year storm event.
Jesse Stone
25.002
13.1 Purpose
Support
Supports allowing more restaurants and shops within the Rototuna Town Centre
Betty Janine
(known as Jan)
Elliott
26.001
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 22B Hazelwood Avenue.
Irene Catharine
Mary van der
Beek
27.001
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Oppose
Remove the Residential Intensification Zoning from the properties bound by Short Street, Pearson Ave and Daisy
Street.
Catherine Meg
Battersby
28.001
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 9 Vine Street.
Department of
Corrections
29.001
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend definition of 'Offices' to include 'Premises for Corrections purposes (non-custodial facility), including
part
Community Work sites and Probation Centres' or to the like effect.
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
30.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) as part of Interface Between Public and Private.
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
30.002
1.4.1.6 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Remove rule 1.4.1.6(a) and (b) as part of Interface Between Public and Private.
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
30.003
5.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Remove Rule 5.4.7(b) as part of Interface Between Public and Private.
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
30.004
25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support
Table
Support Rule 25.2.3 (a) and (i) and retain the permitted activity status (earthworks ancillary and not ancillary to an
activity in the plan).
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
30.005
25.2.4.1 Earthworks in All
Zones
Retain the controls specified in Rule 25.2.4.1 a) to d) - Earthworks Standards
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
30.006
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Delete 25.2.5.1 Specific Standards For Earthworks
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
30.007
23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Oppose
Delete the average & maximum site areas for subdivision of Rule 23.7.1 b), j) and n)
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
30.008
23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Zone and All Special
Oppose
Delete Rule 23.7.3c), i) & j) in relation to subdivision
Support
Page 4 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Character Zones
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
30.009
25.2.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Delete 25.2.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities -Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria for Earthworks &
vegetation Removal
Waylon Bowker
31.001
19.2.3 Buildings and
Structures
Oppose
Remove 19.2.3h and allow landscaping on the site on which a heritage building is located to be undertaken without
any controls.
Waylon Bowker
31.002
19.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Remove 126 Forest Lake Road from Schedule 8A: Built Heritage
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
32.001
3.4.5.1 Proposed Staging of
Residential Development
Oppose
Delete Rule 3.4.5.1 b) and c) ii as it relates to staging of residential development for Peacockes Structure Plan
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
32.002
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1 by removing "Net" from the table heading "Net Site Area" and include provisions to allow for
comprehensive development.
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
32.003
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
Provide for Comprehensive Residential Development within the General Residential Zone as a Restricted Discretionary
Activity.
Cara Sarah Carter
33.001
26.3 Schedule of
Designations
Oppose
Designation H51 (Chorus Brymer Road exchange) all units should comply with noise limits, not just new equipment.
Remove any reference to 'new' from section 3 (noise conditions). Oppose any antennae being built on this and other
sites adjacent to residential property. Emergency electricity generating equipment should have a maximum duration of
use.
Kerry Francis &
Lynda May Ryan
34.001
Features Map 62B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 14 Lorraine Place.
Simon Arend
Graafhuis
35.001
11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose
Flood Hazard Area
Categories Descriptions
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 21 Oldfield Court.
Simon Arend
Graafhuis
35.002
22 Natural Hazards
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 21 Oldfield Court.
Oppose
Page 5 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Anthony Endres
36.001
20.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Environments
Support in Amend Appendix 9: Natural Environments Assessment Valuation Method & Criteria to provide more weight to
part
indigenous trees that meet the Objectives in 20.2.
Anthony Endres
36.003
9-1.1 The RNZIH Standard
Method of Evaluation
Support in Amend Appendix 9: Natural Environments Assessment Valuation Method & Criteria to provide more weight to
part
indigenous trees that meet the Purpose of 20.1 and Objectives in 20.2.
Ian Roderick
Taylor
37.001
22 Natural Hazards
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 17 Mabian Crescent.
Heather Karen de
Groen
38.001
Features Map 18B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 13 Glen Cree Avenue.
Heather Karen de
Groen
38.002
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 13 Glen Cree Avenue.
Infinity Property
Management Ltd
39.001
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Rule 6.3 aa) & bb) cafe, restaurants and licensed premises should be a permitted activity in the suburbs
Eamonn Munster
(Infinity Property
Management Ltd)
40.001
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Include 18 London Street within the Central City Downtown Precinct rather than the City Living Precinct.
Brent Turrell
41.001
Zoning Map 54A
Oppose
On Zoning Maps 54A & 55A 32-36 Kahikatea Drive, remove Community Facilities Zone and rezone General Residential.
New Zealand
Institute of
Architects
42.001
2.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Reword objectives and policies in 2.2 to use the words "should" and "reduce" in lieu of "shall" and "minimise"
part
New Zealand
Institute of
Architects
42.002
1.1.1 Purpose of the District
Plan
Support in Generally supportive of the aims and content of the Plan, but would prefer to see aspects of the Plan changed to
part
remove ambiguity and contradictions with regard to design issues.
Neal Geoffrey
Utting
43.001
20.1 Purpose
Support in Remove Culvert Block Flood Hazard Area from 54a Urlich Avenue.
part
Neal Geoffrey
Utting
43.002
20 Natural Environments
Support in Amend Culvert Block Flood Hazard Area relating to the Mangakotukutuku Stream catchment upstream of 54a Urlich
part
Avenue.
Arthur Giffney
44.001
Locality Plan
Oppose
Locality plan-Use traditional suburb names on all maps in the District Plan.
Anne & David
Smyth
45.001
Figure 15-5e Transport
corridor hierarchy plan
Support
Retain the proposed classification of Lake Domain Drive to local transport corridor within the transport hierarchy.
Nicholas Smit
46.001
Features Map 38B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 5 Finchley Place.
Page 6 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Hamilton East
Community Trust
47.001
6 Business 1 to 7 Zones
Oppose
Oppose B5 zoning of Waikato Regional Council site in Hamilton East. Rezone to Business Zone 1.
Hamilton East
Community Trust
47.002
Schedule 8A Built Heritage
structures buildings and
associated sites
Support
The Notre Dame des Missions building (H50) at 47 Clyde Street is identified as a Category A heritage building
Hamilton East
Community Trust
47.003
Appendix 8 Heritage
Support in The Hamilton Municipal Baths (H88) is identified as a Category A heritage building or structure
part
Bradley Friar
48.001
23.1 Purpose
Support in Set minimum standards for subdivision with flexibility in decision making process.
part
Ronald David Ford
49.001
Features Map 34B
Oppose
Amend Flood Hazard Area for 21 Karaka Street to be the same as 19 Karaka Street.
Ronald David Ford
50.001
22 Natural Hazards
Oppose
Amend Flood Hazard Area for 21 Karaka Street to be the same as 19 Karaka Street.
David Francis
Morgan
51.001
22 Natural Hazards
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 97A Fitzroy Avenue.
Ailsa Betty Smith
52.001
22 Natural Hazards
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 97B Fitzroy Avenue.
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
53.001
Zoning Map 52A
Support in That the land owned by Freelance Lands at 89 Amanda Ave be zoned Residential
part
Martin Toop
54.001
20 Natural Environments
Oppose
Amend the Plan to allow exotic shrubs and trees to be planted while retaining native vegetation as the dominant
choice
Martin Toop
54.002
20.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend the Plan to recognise the benefits of providing for exotic vegetation.
Council of Elders
55.001
25.6.3 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Amend 25.6.3 by inserting text on the type and design of lighting as set out in the submission to provide for new
part
technologies.
Council of Elders
55.002
24.4.1 Reserves Level of
Service
Support in Amend 24.4.1 to require development within the Industrial Zone to include minimum open space requirements
part
Council of Elders
55.003
24.3.3 Level of Contribution
Support in Supports the required level of Development Contributions in 24.3.3
part
Council of Elders
55.004
Key Features
Support in The development work promised for Rototuna such as the swimming pool promised 25 years ago has not eventuated.
part
Council of Elders
55.005
4 Residential Zones
Support in Concerned with the use of prescriptive rules such as location of garages that add to the cost of development.
part
Page 7 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Council of Elders
55.006
25.13.4.4 Water
Support in Amend 25.13.4.4 to include a policy to reduce the leakage of water from the reticulated system to less than 10%, over
part
3 years.
Council of Elders
55.007
1.1.6 How to Use this District Support in Plan is overly complex and timing of notification was not ideal.
Plan
part
Dennis Roy
McLeod
56.001
3.7 Ruakura
Oppose
Opposes the concept of an Inland Port.
Dennis Roy
McLeod
56.002
3.7.1.4 Knowledge Zone
Oppose
Opposes the concept of an Inland Port.
Dennis Roy
McLeod
56.003
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Insufficient green belt identified adjoining dwellings on the Ruakura Structure Plan - landuse plan
Dennis Roy
McLeod
56.004
Figure 2-15 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Transport
Network
Oppose
Identification of a greenbelt for the mitigation of noise and lighting on the Ruakura Structure Plan - Transport Network
Plan
Dennis Roy
McLeod
56.005
3.7.1.1 Ruakura Logistics
Zone – Inland Port
Oppose
Concerned at noise levels from trains and other activities associated with an Inland Port.
Martin Toop
57.001
25.7.2.3 Objective and
Policies
Oppose
Addition of "v. promote carbon sequestration" to policy 25.7.2.3d for network utilities & Electricity Transmission
Corridors
Brenda Eileen
McNamara
58.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rules 4.4.7 b), c) & d) from the Interface rule for residential zones
David Graeme
McCall
59.001
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 13 Keddell Street and 52 Lake Road via its joined title.
Beth Ellen
Germaine
60.001
Features Map 18B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 1011 River Road and
remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report.
Group of Alandale
Residents
61.001
Features Map 17B
Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for Alandale Lifestyle Village at 1199 River Road as these should be
part
recorded on the Land Title of the Body Corporates and not on the Title of individual houses that are unaffected.
Pamela May
Brown
62.001
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Rezone 737 Grey Street from Residential to Business Zone.
Rakaipaka Puriri
63.001
5.2.7 Objective and Policies
Temple View Zone
Oppose
All zoning and land use changes for the Temple View Area should be declined based on the treatment of their own
church members and the shift from a school that benefits tens of thousands to a development that will only benefits
the wealthy.
Rakaipaka Puriri
63.002
5.2.6 Objective and Policies
Oppose
All zoning and land use changes for the Temple View Area be declined.
Page 8 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Temple View Zone
I-fang Grace Chou
Yen
64.001
26.3 Schedule of
Designations
Oppose
Oppose the proposed conditions allowing any new mast(s) to be built at the Flagstaff Exchange (Commodore Ave)
(designation number H59). Do not allow any new mast(s) to be built.
Ensure no additional noise is generated. That noise from activity on the site shall not exceed the standards set out in
Rule 5.1.1 b) of the District Plan when measured at or within the boundary of any site in the Residential Zone.
That any radio frequency transmission exposures associated with the radio transmission to or from the site shall
comply with the limits in NZS2772.1:1999 Radio Frequency Fields Part 1: Maximum exposure levels 3 kHz-300 GHz.
If new facilities are built using the upper limits of the modified conditions, or taller, or bigger than the current building
that impact the nearby property, landowners would like to be reimbursed for loss of property values. Alternatively
residents can move out if Chorus /Telecom buy 4 Halcione Close.
Chorus/Telecom should consider other options such as additional designations and/or replacing parts within current
architecture and without generating extra noise.
Claire Millington
65.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ukinga
AkaitiPonga
66.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Delma MurrayMacgregor
67.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jodhi Vanessa
Ponga
68.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Deanne
Freemantle
69.001
Features Map 43B
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 39 Winning Terrace.
Oppose
Page 9 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Fiona Green
70.001
Zoning Map 38A
Oppose
Do not change the zoning to Residential Intensification in the area between Daisy Street and Short Street. Hamilton
needs suburbs that are pleasant to live in and close to town and other amenities and that are suitable for families.
Sarah Nichol
71.001
25.5.3.3 Permeable Fences
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.5.3.3 Permeable Fences to allow fences built to 1.8m to be built with 100% non see-through materials.
Tracey Laraine
Sherman
72.001
Features Map 39B
Oppose
Ensure LIM reports reflect the proposed effects of the 1 in 100 year flood for each property and not a general flood
alert.
Harvey Norman
Stores Pty (NZ)
Ltd/Harvey
Norman
Properties (NZ)
Ltd
73.001
Zoning Map 15A
Support
Map 15A-Retain Business 4 zoning of Harvey Norman site.
Harvey Norman
Stores Pty (NZ)
Ltd/Harvey
Norman
Properties (NZ)
Ltd
73.002
6.4.3 Building Setbacks
Support
Retain Rule 6.4.3(c) 5m minimum distance building setback within Business Zone 4
Harvey Norman
Stores Pty (NZ)
Ltd/Harvey
Norman
Properties (NZ)
Ltd
73.003
Table 15-2a Number of
parking loading and cycle
spaces
Support
Retain Table 15-2a(cc) that relates to minimum parking rates for bulky good retailers.
Harvey Norman
Stores Pty (NZ)
Ltd/Harvey
Norman
Properties (NZ)
Ltd
73.004
6.4.1 Maximum Building
Height
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.1a) to increase the maximum height limit in the Business 4 zone to 20m.
Harvey Norman
Stores Pty (NZ)
Ltd/Harvey
Norman
Properties (NZ)
73.005
6.4.5 Building Intensity
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.5 so that the maximum intensity ratio in the Business Zone 4 is 1.5 :1.
Page 10 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Ltd
Harvey Norman
Stores Pty (NZ)
Ltd/Harvey
Norman
Properties (NZ)
Ltd
73.006
25.10.5.7 Central City,
Oppose
Business 1 to 7 and Industrial
Zones
25.10.5.7 Central City, Business 1 to 7 and Industrial Zones - Requests existing signage rule in Operative District plan be
retained or alternative solutions.
Harvey Norman
Stores Pty (NZ)
Ltd/Harvey
Norman
Properties (NZ)
Ltd
73.007
1.1.1 Purpose of the District
Plan
Support in Any alternative, consequential, or further relief that may be required to give effect to a revision of the building height,
part
intensity and signage rules sought above.
Harvey Norman
Stores Pty (NZ)
Ltd/Harvey
Norman
Properties (NZ)
Ltd
73.008
6 Business 1 to 7 Zones
Support in Supports (in relevant part) all other relevant provisions in the Plan.
part
Anmark Limited
74.001
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 122 Old Farm Road and 80A Cameron Road.
Anthony Lloyd
James Fisher
75.001
Features Map 34B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 30 Karaka Street.
Blue Wallace
Surveyors Ltd
76.001
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.6 a) and b) to allow for the required 3m and 5m setbacks to be reduced to nil where a covered (but
not enclosed) veranda with a minimum width of 1.2m and a minimum length of 4m is provided along the transport
corridor frontage. The veranda should have an access door connected directly to the dwelling. Any steps from the
veranda to the transport corridor must terminate within the property boundary.
Carole Mc Minn
77.001
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.7.1 to allow residential lots within the Large Lot Residential Zone (Rototuna) +/- 500 square metres on
the flat areas while larger section of 1000 square meters on steeper slopes.
Julie Marie
O'Carroll
78.001
Features Map 18B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 9 Glen Cree Avenue.
Page 11 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Julie Marie
O'Carroll
78.001
Features Map 18B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 9 Glen Cree Avenue.
Julie Marie
O'Carroll
78.003
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 9 Glen Cree Avenue.
James Neil Scott
Chalmers
79.001
22.1 Purpose
Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 1 Bell St and 67 Te Aroha St.
part
Council to prepare a Flood Hazard Report based on actual historical (including actual 1 in 100 yr) flood data, showing
the differences that could be expected if the Climate Change model is correct.
Remove the barrier at the end of Bell St that prevents drainage of potential flooding to the East Coast Railway line
drains.
Alexandra Lee
Simmons
80.001
Features Map 20B
Oppose
Amend the Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area in Planning Map 20B to show the actual risk based on the
landscape features of 22 Stoneleigh Drive.
Amend the Flood Hazard Area in Planning Map 20B to show the real risk at 22 Stoneleigh Drive.
Alexandra Lee
Simmons
80.003
3.7.1.9 Stormwater
Oppose
Amend Rule 3.7.19 to ensure no use of streams for stormwater drainage associated with the Ruakura Structure Plan.
Alexandra Lee
Simmons
80.004
25.13.4.2 Stormwater
Support in Discontinue the use of the ephemeral stream located at the south end of 22 Stoneleigh Drive as a stormwater collector
part
Alexandra Lee
Simmons
80.005
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Support in Amendments to ensure that new construction will not put existing properties under increased risk from culvert
part
blockage and flooding.
Alexandra Lee
Simmons
80.006
3.7.1.6 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend Rule 3.7.1.6. Remove Medium Residential Density zoning and replace with low density residential with the
closure of Greenhill Road onto Tramway/Gordonton Roads; and ensure stormwater systems do not utilise local
streams as open drains.
Peter William
Bennett
81.001
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
Seeking relief for Amateur Radio Service within the Residential Zones as part of 4.3.1 Activity Status Table (Refer also
to Rule 25.7.3 Network Utilities and Electricity Transmission Corridors).
Peter William
Bennett
81.002
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.3 to provide for Amateur Radio Service within the Central City Zone
Peter William
Bennett
81.003
14.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 14.3 to provide for Amateur Radio Service.
Peter William
Bennett
81.004
4.4.4 Building Height
Oppose
Seeking relief for Amateur Radio Service within the Residential Zone as part of 4.4.4 Building Height.
Page 12 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Peter William
Bennett
81.005
4.4.5 Height in Relation to
Boundary
Oppose
Seeks relief for Amateur Radio Service within the Residential Zone as part of 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary.
Peter William
Bennett
81.006
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Seeks relief for Amateur Radio Service within the Residential Zone as part of 4.4.6 Building Setbacks.
Peter William
Bennett
81.007
4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Oppose
Medium-Density Residential
Zone
Seeking relief for Amateur Radio Service within the Residential Zone as part of 4.5.3 Activity Status Medium-Density
Residential Zone.
Peter William
Bennett
81.008
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses to support Amateur Radio Services.
Peter William
Bennett
81.009
7.4.6 Height in Relation to
Boundary
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.6 Height in Relation to Boundary to support Amateur Radio Services.
Peter William
Bennett
81.010
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks to support Amateur Radio Services.
Peter William
Bennett
81.011
14.4.3 Building Height
Oppose
Amend the Future Urban Zone section 14.4.3 Building Height to provide for Amateur Radio Service. Seeking relief for
Amateur Radio Service.
Peter William
Bennett
81.012
14.4.4 Height in Relation to
Boundary
Oppose
Amend the Future Urban Zone section 14.4.4 Height in Relation to Boundary to provide for Amateur Radio Service.
Peter William
Bennett
81.013
14.4.5 Building Setback
Oppose
Amend the Future Urban Zone section 14.4.5 - Building Setback to provide for Amateur Radio Service.
Peter William
Bennett
81.014
1.1.1 Purpose of the District
Plan
Oppose
Seeking relief for Amateur Radio Service and amateur radio configurations being permitted within all living zones up to
20 meters.
Kenneth & Joyce
Whittaker
82.001
Zoning Map 62A
Oppose
Map 62A-Oppose expansion of Glenview Suburban Centre.
Elizabeth Weller
83.001
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
Remove the Residential Intensification Zoning from the area between Short Street and Daisy Street and return it to a
General Residential Zoning.
Rosemary Eleanor
Stucki
84.001
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Oppose
Seek removal of the Residential Intensification zone from the area between Short Street and Daisy Street and replace
with General Residential zone.
Page 13 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Residential Zone
River Road Trust
85.001
Features Map 27B
Support in Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 667 River Road; or
part
Apply an alternative category of hazard notification for 667 River Road of "no to low risk".
Peter William
Bennett
86.001
25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose
Remove references to amateur radio service within 25.7.3 Network Utilities rules. Insert specific rules for amateur
service and an activity table or zone based rules for all living zones. Insert a definition of amateur service and amateur
radio configuration as per the Tauranga District Plan.
HOPE ALLUM
(THORONG LA
LIMITED)
87.001
11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose
Flood Hazard Area
Categories Descriptions
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 34D Campbell Street and 53 Grandview Road.
Karen Stevenson
88.001
Features Map 45B
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 3 and 3A Rothbrook Street.
Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 3 and 3A Rothbrook Street.
Jill Atkinson
89.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Matthew Shane
Watene
90.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Duane Skyes
91.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Shawney mei
Atarangi Kahi
92.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Myles Aidan
Tipene Watene
93.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Susan Pahuru
94.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Oppose
Page 14 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Neesha Pahuru
95.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Gabrielle Wilson
96.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Te Aroha Pahuru
97.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rosemary
Gordon
98.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Janine Mere
Siteine
99.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
John Herangi
Searancke
100.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Moses
Christopher
Armstrong (CCNZ
Alumni President)
101.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tessa Siteine
102.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 15 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Justin Sonnenberg
103.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Andy Lee
104.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Myles Watene
105.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Stacey Scirkovich
106.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Vanessa
Armstrong
107.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ora Neill Kohe
108.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Alma Ruth Paewai
Kohe
109.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Merieanna
Graham
110.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kareve Harata
Witehira
111.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 16 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Lady King
112.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Maria Koroheke
113.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tuini Koroheke
114.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kara Ivy Witehira
115.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kare Eva Pompey
116.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Gwen Kepa
117.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Katarina
Koroheke
118.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Arthur Tupou
Hettig
119.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 17 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Kiritahi Koroheke
120.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Terekia Rewiki
James Koroheke
121.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
John Kieran Hettig
122.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tau Moeke
123.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Heinrich Hettig
124.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lahaina Moeke
125.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Michael Wilson
126.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Elletta Rachel
Hettig
127.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tainan Evarn
Watene
128.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 18 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Rebecca Cutler
129.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Renata Immanuel
Kahuroa
130.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
John Devonshire
(Te Wharekura
Rakaumanga)
131.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Quintin Glenford
Hapuku
132.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rebecca Hapuku
133.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Edwin Skinner
134.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Gavin Talmage
Joseph Scirkovich
135.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Natalie Renee
McNamara
136.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 19 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Pera Ratana
137.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Billy Grey
138.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Khan Major
139.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Pawhaure Brown
140.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Pania Waikai
141.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
R Henry
142.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jonelle Henry
143.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Renata Whitley
144.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rave Anthony
145.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 20 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Tirohia Smith
146.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Flu Waikai
147.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Herawini Rangi
(Taniwharau
Rugby League
Club)
148.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Neil T Rose
149.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Misty Kama
150.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Pera Paeka
151.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Laisa Kama
152.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jackson Robin
Takiari (Te Iti
Rearea RLC)
153.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 21 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Senae Mitchell
154.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Colin John Jowles
(INwork NZ)
155.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Stuart Poulava
156.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kimberly Rose
157.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Yvette K Rose
158.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ray Bourne
(Waikato
Referees
Association)
159.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Te Awa Anderson
160.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Leonard Reid
(NZRL)
161.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Zoram Watene
162.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 22 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Waimarie Hare
(Tigers)
163.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Willy Beazley
164.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jaden Paekan
165.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
TeUranga Waikou
166.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Sash Stosic
(Upper Central
Zone of NZRL Inc.)
167.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Baz Paama
168.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Craig Martin
Tomlinson
169.001
Locality Plan
Oppose
Locality Plan-retain suburb names.
Saskia Maria
Tomlinson
170.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Oppose the change in the name of the suburb Hillcrest to Hillcrest West and the inclusion of the suburb name Riverlea.
Paul Morrison
171.001
11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose
Flood Hazard Area
Categories Descriptions
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 27 Oldfield Court
Page 23 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Imelda
Kazenbroot
172.001
26.3 Schedule of
Designations
Oppose
In relation to designation H51 (Brymer Exchange) and the proposed changes to conditions on the designation, the
submitter seeks that no conditions on H51 allow for masts and antenna to be erected. Additionally the submitter
seeks that no conditions applying to H51 allow for the increase of noise in terms of noise levels (dB) and/or duration
(hours) and/or time of day/week from what is currently permitted.
Charles Joseph
Peter McPherson
173.001
Zoning Maps
Support
Map 33A-Supports the inclusion of Lot 2 DP 425315 (Corner of Baverstock Road and Rotokauri Road) as part of the
Lake Waiwhakareke Natural Heritage Part as shown on Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan.
Charles Joseph
Peter McPherson
174.001
Zoning Maps
Support
Map 33A-Confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
McConnell
Property Ltd
175.001
19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 19.3. Activity Status Table needs to reflect the balance between protecting important heritage buildings
with safety, economic use and overall support for the CBD development and revitalisation.
McConnell
Property Ltd
175.002
19.2.3 Buildings and
Structures
Oppose
A new policy should be added to allow for a balance between heritage protection and safety, economic use and overall
support for CBD Development. A new Heritage Assessment Criteria be added to Volume 2 section 8-1.2 to assess the
"usefulness" of buildings.
Gordon
Chesterman
176.001
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Deleted Rule 4.4.7 b) regarding the siting of garages.
Robert Edmund
Simms
177.001
Zoning Map 16A
Support in Map 16A-Formalise accessway on Oakfield Crescent, and purchase land to continue the walkway through to The Base
part
over industrial land linking Karewa Place to Te Rapa Road.
Katherine Mary
Luketina
178.001
25.11.3 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Amend Rule 25.11.3 to prevent outdoor burning of green waste or any other waste in suburban areas.
part
Rudolf Johann
Dudli (Dudli
Properties)
179.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private.
Graeme Ernest
Goodwin
Goodwin
180.001
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Requests Ruakura industrial and logistics zone and Inland Port be rezoned to knowledge and rural residential zones or
residential
Graeme Ernest
Goodwin
(McPherson &
Goodwin)
181.001
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-1 to be consistent with the zoning map No 36A which shows all the properties on the west side of
Hardley Street within the Central City Zone.
Starship Trauma
Service
182.001
2.2.3 Objective and Policies
Urban Design Approach
Support in Retain 2.2.3 Objective and Policies Urban Design Approach with amendments to reference to safety and wellbeing of
part
children
Starship Trauma
182.003
2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support in Policy 2.2.13 should include reference to measures to promote child safety and wellbeing eg: locating playgrounds
Page 24 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Service
Sub Type Summary
Integrated Land Use,
part
Transport and Infrastructure
safely in relation to transport amenities, intersections, pedestrian crossings, footpaths, major roads and bus stops.
Starship Trauma
Service
182.004
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend policy 3.3.1c to ensure passenger transport is not only efficient by safe by inserting the word 'safe' into the
part
policy text.
Starship Trauma
Service
182.005
3.4.2.1 Community and
Recreation Facilities
Support in Amend 3.4.2.1 i) i, and j) by inserting references to child safety and safe pedestrian access principles into the criteria
part
for the location of neighbourhood parks within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area.
Starship Trauma
Service
182.007
3.4 Vision
Support in Amend the first paragraph of 3.4 to read as follows "The vision for the Peacocke area is that it will become a high
part
quality and safe urban environment that is based on urban design best practice, social well-being, and environmental
responsibility."
Starship Trauma
Service
182.008
3.4.1 Structure Plan
Components
Support in Amend Figure 3-4a, #6 in the key by adding the following text "that are clearly defined as vehicular access and clearly
part
separated from child play areas (public and private)" as set out in the submission.
Starship Trauma
Service
182.009
3.2 Principles
Support in Submitter seeks an additional Key Principle in Section 3.2 (Principles for Structure Plans) as follows: "Safety: The
part
layout of any future residential development considers the physical safety of children. This design will include vehicular
access in relation to the dwelling and any adjacent garden area to minimise the risk of injury/fatality from causes such
as child driveway run overs".
Starship Trauma
Service
182.011
3.4.3 Transport Network
Support in Amend 3.4.3e) to include "The designated arterial routes should not sever safe access to public recreational spaces."
part
Starship Trauma
Service
182.013
3.4.4 Interim Subdivision
Support in Amend 3.4.4c) to include reference to subdivision layout having consideration to maximise child safety.
part
Starship Trauma
Service
182.015
Peacocke Social Wellbeing
Support in Amend 3.4.6 to include child safety Principles and the text as set out in the submission.
part
Starship Trauma
Service
182.017
3.4.6 Objectives and Policies Support in Amend the Objectives and Policies in 3.4.6 to include child safety principles as set out in the submission.
part
Starship Trauma
Service
182.019
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Rule 4.4.6 Building Setbacks - The minimum distance from the transport corridor to the front of the garage or carport
be 6m.
Starship Trauma
Service
182.020
5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rules 5.4.6 a) and b) (Building Setbacks) so that the minimum distance from the transport corridor to the front
of the garage or carport be 6m (to accommodate one vehicle).
Starship Trauma
Service
182.021
1.4.3.3 Building Orientation
and Siting
Oppose
Rule 1.4.3.3. e) be amended to read as follows "The minimum distance from the transport corridor to the front of the
garage or carport be 6m (to accommodate one vehicle)."
Starship Trauma
Service
182.022
1.4.3.4 Access, Garages and
Parking
Oppose
Amend Design Guide and Design Assessment Criteria 1.4.3.4 Access, Garage and Parking.
Page 25 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Graeme Ernest
Goodwin
183.001
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential zoning under
the Waikato District Plan and be protected by permanent buffer zones
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.001
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.003
10.1 Purpose
Oppose
Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.005
10.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Requests logistics hub be relocated to Rotokauri or adjacent areas
part
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.006
10.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone
part
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.008
10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Requests the rejection of the Ruakura Logistics zone and/or establish appropriate standards within the Ruakura
part
Logistics Zone to minimise adverse effects.
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.010
10.4.3 Site Coverage
Oppose
Amend Rule 10.4.3 by reducing the site coverage for Ruakura Logistics Zone
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.011
10.4.4 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Amend Rule 10.4.4 by increasing the permeable surface for the Ruakura Logistics Zone.
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.012
10.4.5 Building Height
Oppose
Amend Rule 10.4.5 by reducing height allowances within the Ruakura Logistics Zone.
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.013
10.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rule 10.4.6 by increasing the setback to the Large Lot Residential area bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads.
part
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.014
10.4.7 Landscape Screening
Support in Amend Rule 10.4.7 by increasing the landscaping requirements for the Ruakura Logistics zone without giving up
part
Council land to meet landscaping and setback provisions.
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.015
10.4.8 Interface Standards
Support in Supports Rule 10.4.8b) regarding the exclusion of the Percival and Ryburn Road road reserve from calculating the
part
setback requirements.
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.016
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Delete the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone or modify to provide for high wealth industries supportive of the Research and
Development hub rather than low-end freight forwarding activities.
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.017
11.1 Purpose
Oppose
Reconsider purpose of the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Amend set back provisions to increase the setback to the
south-east and heavily plant around the Mangaonua Gully system.
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.018
11.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 11.2.1 by removing low-end freight-related industries from the vision and initiate a true future-based vision of
part
high-tech industry.
Denis Richard
184.019
11.2.3 Objective and Policies Support
Amend 11.2.3 to provide more effective buffers for residential, educational and the Knowledge Zone.
Page 26 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Lauren
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.020
11.4.3 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rule 11.4.3 d) and f) to ensure the minimum setback is 40m from residential, educational, Special Character
part
Zones and Knowledge Zone, and 200m to protect the Mangaonua gulley to the south-east within the Ruakura
Industrial Park Zone
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.021
11.4.6 Site Coverage
Oppose
Denis Richard
Lauren
184.022
11.4.7 Site Landscaping
Support in Amend Rule 11.4.7 to require 20% landscaping in addition to any parking requirements.
part
Banda Trust
185.001
Features Map 58B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 16 Balfour Crescent and any associated LIM Report.
Janice Ann
O'Leary
186.001
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 17 Saxbys Road
OR
Reroute stormwater away from the Mangakotukutu Stream
Robert Alan Mills
187.001
10.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend 10.1c) to accurately describe where the Inland Port is to be located and what existing activities it will be next
to, especially to recognise the proximity of the Inland Port to the University of Waikato and Waikato Expressway.
Robert Alan Mills
187.002
11.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend 11.1 Purpose to require a 200m setback from existing residential development to the south-east of the
Ruakura Structure Plan.
Robert Alan Mills
187.003
Zoning Map 48A
Support in Retain large lot residential zoning to the south of the Ruakura Structure Plan
part
Living Streets
Hamilton
188.001
25.14.2 Objectives and
Policies Transportation
Support in Supports Policies 25.14.2.1a i), iv) and 25.14.2.1b.
part
Requests remedial action on existing transport corridors to address safety issues to make cycling, walking and public
transport.
Living Streets
Hamilton
188.003
25.15.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Rule 25.15.1 to include older inner city suburbs and the CBD to provide safe, accessible routes for cycling and
part
walking, and public transport services with a frequency and reliability that makes them a viable alternative to the
private car. In particular Section d items ii, iii and iv.
Shubhangi
Parulekar
189.001
22.6 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 36A Greensboro Street.
Shubhangi
Parulekar
189.002
Transport Corridor Network
Oppose
Opposes 40 km/hour speed limits on suburban roads.
Road design should protect properties from traffic noise and vibration.
John Joseph Graat
190.001
Features Map 61B
Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 14 Deanwell Avenue.
part
Amend Rule 11.4.6 to reduce site coverage to make the total allowed non-permeable area, including parking and
vehicle areas, to be no more than 75%.
Page 27 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Todd & Heather
Hamilton
191.001
Features Map 18B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 7 Strathconnan Court.
Iain Thomas
MacDonald
192.001
26.3 Schedule of
Designations
Oppose
Prohibit Chorus/Telecom from erecting mast/antennas at the Flagstaff Exchange site (designation number H59) and
increasing the noise levels at the Flagstaff Exchange site.
Malcolm George
Porteous
193.001
Features Map 45B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 17 Masons Avenue.
Nandan & Shweta
Modak
194.001
22.1 Purpose
Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 7 Locksley Lane.
part
Nandan & Shweta
Modak
194.002
22.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Maxime Rouast
195.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Margaret Joyce
Davidson
196.001
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for 1 Balloch Street.
Sheryl Margaret
Curtice
197.001
1.1.1 Purpose of the District
Plan
Support
Confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke as shown on Map 33A and Figure 2-10: Rotokauri
Structure Plan - Reserve Network.
Shirley May
Gwynneth Caspari
QSM
198.001
1.1.1 Purpose of the District
Plan
Support
Confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke as shown on Map 33A and Figure 2-10: Rotokauri
Structure Plan - Reserve Network.
Iain Alistair
Curtice
199.001
1.1.1 Purpose of the District
Plan
Support
Confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke as shown on Map 33A and Figure 2-10: Rotokauri
Structure Plan - Reserve Network.
Michelle Le Prou
201.001
Zoning Map 33A
Support
Map 33A and Figure 2-10: Rotokauri Structure Plan - Reserve Network - Confirm Future Reserves surrounding Lake
Waiwhakareke.
Andrew Yeoman
202.001
4.4.5 Height in Relation to
Boundary
Support
Retain Rule 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary
Andrew Yeoman
202.002
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Rule 4.4.6 Building Setbacks - delete the 1.5m setback from right-of-ways and introduce provisions that establish no
setback requirements in the residential intensification zone.
Andrew Yeoman
202.003
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support
Retain Rule 4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Andrew Yeoman
202.004
4.4.9 Residential Buildings –
Separation and Privacy
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.9 Residential Buildings - Separation and Privacy to allow for a reduction in setback of upper floor
where opaque or obscure glazing is used or window height is 1.7m above floor level.
Andrew Yeoman
202.005
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.10 b) iv which relates to the location of Outdoor Living Areas.
Rule 22.3 Rules - Activity Status Table - Seeks clarity as to how to apply the Activity Status Table.
Page 28 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Andrew Yeoman
202.006
4.4.11 Service Areas
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.11 to include a provision to allow for communal service areas for apartments.
part
Andrew Yeoman
202.007
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone. Delete Rule 4.4.12 b).
Andrew Yeoman
202.008
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Amend Zoning Map 44A to make Frankton a Mixed Use Zone.
Art Gage-Brown
203.001
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 91 Lake Domain Drive.
Blair Thorpe
204.001
7.1.3 Precinct 3 – Ferrybank
Precinct
Support in Amend the Plan to allow office development in the Ferrybank Precinct.
part
Blair Thorpe
204.002
7 Central City Zone
Support
Blair Thorpe
204.003
2.2.7 Objective and Policies
The Waikato River
Support in Support in part. Make building lines and setbacks greater and more open for sites that have been identified as vistas,
part
particularly the Waikato River. Council should compulsory purchase land if necessary to ensure public access and
vistas are achieved.
Blair Thorpe
204.004
2.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Support in part. Make alternative transport modes a lot more attractive by requiring greater consideration and
part
planning for bus lanes and wider shoulders for cyclist's city wide.
Blair Thorpe
204.005
7.2.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend the Plan to remove the precinct approach and instead provide for a mix of all sorts of retail/entertainment/
service, art facilities within the Central City
Blair Thorpe
204.007
6.2.1 Objective and Policies
Sub-regional Centres
Oppose
Object to Policies 6.2.1a to c. Central City should be rejuvenated first with free public transport and free parking to
central city destinations.
Rebekah Kenny
205.001
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Change the proposed Frankton industrial zoning to a mixed use zone.
Rebekah Kenny
205.002
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone.
kelly littlewood
(Mitre 10 MEGA
Hamilton)
206.001
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone.
Peter Richard
Clarke
207.001
Zoning Map 44A
Amend Zoning Map 44A to change the Industrial Zoning In Frankton to Mixed Use.
Peter Richard
Clarke
207.006
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Oppose
Retain Policy 7.2.2.a 7.2.2.b.
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone.
Page 29 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Tanya Jack
208.001
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone.
House of
Montrose Limited
209.001
7 Central City Zone
Cindy Borrie
210.001
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone.
Switched On
Electrical
211.001
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Map 44A-rezone the Industrial Zoning in Frankton to Mixed Use.
Michelle Missiha
212.001
4.4 Rules – General
Standards – General
Residential, Residential
Intensification Zones and
Large Lot Residential Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for apartments.
G A Hughes and
ass 2005 ltd
213.001
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone.
G A Hughes and
ass 2005 ltd
213.004
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Map 44A- rezone the Industrial Zoning in Frankton to Mixed Use.
B/C 355972
214.001
22.1 Purpose
Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from The Sanctuary, Thomas Road.
part
Pearce Andrew
Watson
(Wizardsleeve
Holdings Limited)
215.001
25.8.3.2 Construction Noise
Oppose
Pearce Andrew
Watson
(Wizardsleeve
Holdings Limited)
215.002
25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Oppose
Standards for Activities in all
Zones Except Major Facilities,
Knowledge and Open Space
Zones
Section 25.8.3.7 (Noise Performance Standards for Activities in all Zones Except Major Facilities, Knowledge and Open
Space Zones) provides for maximum noise levels. Aldona Place has existing residential amenity and requests the best
practicable solution is put in place.
Pearce Andrew
Watson
215.003
25.6.2 Objectives and
Policies Lighting and Glare
25.6.2 Objectives and Policies Lighting and Glare. Amend the policy to also acknowledge managing the effects on
people’s health and the disturbance of sleep is also important to consider.
Support in Amend the Plan so that Brothels and R 18 Stores be restricted to Industrial and special Entertainment zones only.
part
Oppose
25.8.3.2 Construction Noise - Seeks certainty around the impact on noise and vibration from the Ruakura Industrial
Park that changes will have on their property at Aldona Place.
Page 30 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
(Wizardsleeve
Holdings Limited)
Pearce Andrew
Watson
(Wizardsleeve
Holdings Limited)
215.004
15.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Policy 15.2.7a to provide greater guidance on how neighbourhood open space should act as a buffer between
potentially incompatible activities. Include a requirement to engage with adjoining property owners.
Pearce Andrew
Watson
(Wizardsleeve
Holdings Limited)
215.005
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Requests assurance that adverse effects will be avoided, remedied and mitigated from the Ruakura Industrial Park.
David Gonzalez
216.001
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Map 44A- rezone the Industrial Zoning in Frankton to Mixed Use.
Owen & Robyn
Renton
217.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Owen & Robyn
Renton
217.002
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Nagarajah
Manoharan
218.001
3.7.1.1 Ruakura Logistics
Zone – Inland Port
Support in Amend 3.7.1.1 to ensure the Greenbelt for the Inland Port is 200m.
part
Nagarajah
Manoharan
218.003
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Do not upgrade Founders Theatre.
Myra EvansMcLeod
219.001
Zoning Map 33A
Oppose
Map 33A-Obtrusive to outlook.
Tony Priscott
220.001
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1 by replacing "Net Site Area", with "Average Site Area" .
Rod Bowman
221.001
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 434 Kahikatea Drive and any associated LIM report.
Brian Walker
222.001
11.1 Purpose
Oppose
Restrict development of the Ruakura Logistics Zone until existing industrial areas are fully occupied.
A W Burns
223.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
A W Burns
223.003
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3 to introduce maximum limits on impermeable surfaces and delete controls on the location of
permeable surfaces.
A W Burns
223.004
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Delete Rules 4.4.10 b) iii and 4.4.10 b)iv which relates to the location of Outdoor Living Areas.
Gavin Smith
224.001
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
That Lot: 1 DP: S68406 at Te Rapa East Road be included within Stage 1 of the Rotokauri Structure Plan - Staging and
Transport Network.
Page 31 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Bradley Clive Kells
225.001
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for apartments.
Brent Wilson
226.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Brent Wilson
226.002
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Seeks a review of the intended outcomes of controlling the height of fences and wall under Rule 4.4.8.
Penrhyn Margaret
(Penny) Allen
227.001
Zoning Map 38A
Oppose
Amend Planning Map 38A to Remove Residential Intensification from area bounded by Short/Pearsons/Daisy Streets
and retain current General Residential Zoning.
Lincoln Archer
228.001
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Map 44A- rezone around the rugby and cricket grounds, the lake domain and other key recreational areas to mixed
use zone.
Lincoln Archer
228.003
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone.
Gaenor Smith
229.001
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Support
Retain figures 2-8 in Appendix 2 (Structure Plans - Rotokauri) in so far as it identifies an industrial land use for Lot 1:
DP: S68406 (Te Kowhai East Road).
Gaenor Smith
229.002
Zoning Map 15A
Oppose
Map 15A-Lot 1 DP: S68406 at Te Kowhai East Road (and neighbouring properties that are subject to the same request)
be zoned Industrial.
Melanie Jane
Rouse
230.001
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Map 44A-rezone the Industrial Zoning in Frankton to Mixed Use.
Ian Kenneth
Bridge
231.001
1.1.1 Purpose of the District
Plan
Oppose
The Plan fails to achieve the purpose outlined in section 1.1.1 and the implementation of the Plan will result in
increased rates for residents.
Ian Kenneth
Bridge
231.002
2.2.4 Objective and Policies
Central City, Business and
Industry
Oppose
Opposes 2.2.4b and any further intensification of the CBD, instead focus on satellite areas such as Peacockes,
Tamahere. Lack of free parking in the CBD.
Ian Kenneth
Bridge
231.004
2.2.5 Objective and Policies
Business and Industry
Oppose
Poorly planned industrial development (particularly Ruakura Inland Port) is an anomaly in the Plan given its proximity
to residential neighbourhoods and the city centre. Better suited to Te Rapa Industrial Zone next to the existing rail
corridor.
Ian Kenneth
Bridge
231.005
5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Delete Rule 5.4.8 c) Fences and Walls.
Ian Kenneth
Bridge
231.006
Fences of a minimum height of 1.8m should be the rule for all open spaces adjacent to residences, schools, playcentres etc.
25.13.4.4 Water
Oppose
Delete 25.13.4.4 b) i (General Standards - Water - b Where any subdivision or development results in additional
allotments or buildings to be used for urban purposes, provision shall be made for: i. Water metering infrastructure,
and either). Instead, levy a special rate on high water users.
Page 32 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
carla josephine
schneebeli
232.001
22 Natural Hazards
Oppose
Council to review the data, methodology and potential impacts of flooding on 9 Glenwarrick Court
Brett Hopkins
(Ruakura Motors
Tractorparts Ltd)
234.001
3.7 Ruakura
Oppose
Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan and undertake consultation with the community to develop innovation precinct and
residential areas.
Hamilton Rowing
Club Inc
235.001
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
MAP 45a-Rezone Ferrybank and the Hamilton Rowing Club from Neighbourhood Open Space to Destination Open
Space.
Hamilton Rowing
Club Inc
235.003
15.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain the activities provided for in the Destination Open Space Zone.
Nicola Anne
Carroll
236.001
Features Map 36B
Oppose
Remove Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area from 17 Beerescourt Road.
Susan Hopkins
(Ruakura Motors
Tractorparts Ltd)
237.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain the status quo for the Riverlea Road area which caters for both light and heavy industry.
Wiremu Taylor
Puke (Namtok
Consultancy Ltd
Ngati Wairere)
239.001
19.2.4 Archaeological and
Cultural Sites
Support in Amend Policy 19.2.4a to include a requirement for land to be set aside for public reserves at the earliest stages of
part
subdivision; and amend policy 19.2.4d to add a reference to the terms of Section 6 (e) and the Historic Places Trust Act
1991. Support 19.2.4e.
Wiremu Taylor
Puke (Namtok
Consultancy Ltd
Ngati Wairere)
239.012
2.2.8 Objective and Policies
Tangata Whenua Waikato
Tainui
Oppose
Glenview
Community
Centre
240.001
Zoning Map 62A
Oppose
Map 62A-rezone the Glenview Community Centre (Corner of Tomin Rd and Glenview Terrace) from 'Residential' to
'Community Facilities'
Dan Fenwick (Dan
Fenwick Builders
Ltd)
241.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Dan Fenwick (Dan
Fenwick Builders
Ltd)
241.005
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.6 d) regarding a minimum building setback from Right-of-ways.
Oppose. Amend this section to include the 1.4 tangata whenua section pages 1.0 .20 - 1.0.24 from the Operative
District Plan 2012 in its entirety into the proposed District Plan. The inclusion of this section will better explain the
rationale behind policies 2.2.8a to 2.2.8d.
Additionally, an advisory note is included that developers and consent applicants seek consultation with the local hapu
or its representatives before lodging consents with the council.
Page 33 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Dan Fenwick (Dan
Fenwick Builders
Ltd)
241.007
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend rule 4.4.3 to introduce maximum limits on impermeable surfaces and delete controls on the location of
permeable surfaces.
Dan Fenwick (Dan
Fenwick Builders
Ltd)
241.009
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
John Ralph
Leathwick
242.001
10.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 10.2.1 by adding staging information, such as maps to identify the areas to be developed during the specified
part
time periods within the Ruakura Logistics Zone. Amend the Plan so that the areas furtherest from existing residential
activities are developed first.
John Ralph
Leathwick
242.003
10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Request the addition of provisions into the Ruakura Logistics Zone that provide mitigation from the activities occurring
part
on the Ruakura Logistics Zone land in proximity to the University of Waikato and Ruakura campus.
John Ralph
Leathwick
242.005
11.1 Purpose
Oppose
Requests greater buffers between industrial landuse and residential areas, research and education establishments
within the Ruakura Structure Plan.
Stephen
Tunnicliffe
243.001
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1 to change the minimum lot size in the Large Lot Residential zone in the Rototuna area from 1000m2
to 800m2.
Stephen
Tunnicliffe
243.007
4.4.2 Site Coverage
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.2 to increase the maximum site coverage in the Large Lot Residential zone from 20% to 40%.
Stephen
Tunnicliffe
243.009
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3 to reduce the 70% minimum permeable surface for the Large Lot Residential zone to 50%.
Stephen
Tunnicliffe
243.016
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) and d) regarding the siting of garages and primary entrances facing the road.
Stephen
Tunnicliffe
243.017
25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency
Measures
Oppose
The requirements in 25.13.4.5 (Water Efficiency Measures) should be removed or substantially reduced and apply to
new houses only.
Steven Gale
244.001
20.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove the Significant Natural Area Feature from 25 Tanekaha Place
Dianne Leathwick
245.001
10.1 Purpose
Oppose
Requests Ruakura Structure Plan is not approved until more clean green industrial, economic and business options
have been investigated to include detailed consultation with concerned parties.
Dianne Leathwick
245.005
11.2.1 Objective and Policies Support
Amend Policy 11.2.1b to clarify what noxious or offensive activities are to be avoided and whether that includes
chemicals associated with the Inland Port. Amend 11.2.1 to ensure the Ruakura Structure Plan does not undermine the
viability, vitality and vibrancy of the local community.
Dianne Leathwick
245.006
10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support
Seeks more detailed information on how adverse effects from the Ruakura Structure Plan will minimise effects on
residents in Silverdale Road.
Amend rule 25.2.5.1 (Earthworks Ancillary to Any Activity in This Plan and Earthworks Not Ancillary to Any Activity in
This Plan) to enable earthworks up to 120m3 in any 12 month period as a permitted activity and to enable a cut height
of 800mm and a fill depth of 1000mm.
Page 34 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Dianne Leathwick
245.008
11.1 Purpose
Support in The Ruakura Structure Plan does not proceed before other cleaner greener options have been investigated.
part
Dianne Leathwick
245.010
11.2.2 Objective and Policies Support
Amend 11.2.2. to ensure a high level of landscaping for residents from Silverdale Road within the Ruakura Structure
Plan.
Dianne Leathwick
245.012
11.2.3 Objective and Policies Support
Requests more detail how adverse effects from the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone would be mitigated for the affected
part of Silverdale Road.
Dianne Leathwick
245.014
10.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose
Requests clarification on what the positive environmental effects of the Ruakura Structure Plan are; and Information
on Hamilton's pattern of development as stated within the objective and policies.
Penny Allen
246.001
Zoning Map 38A
Oppose
Amend Zoning Map 38A by removing the Residential Intensification zoning from the area bounded by
Short/Persons/Daisy Streets.
Alexander Elliott
(Claudelands
Neighbourhood
Support Groups)
247.001
5.1.1.1 Claudelands West
Support in Amend 5.1.1.1 b) to include reference to low-density and medium-density development and historical infilling and
part
construction of apartments to better acknowledge the current moderate housing density (not low density as stated in
the plan).
Alexander Elliott
(Claudelands
Neighbourhood
Support Groups)
247.004
5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Support in Amend 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones relating to Claudelands
Residential, Special Heritage part
West as follows:
and Special Natural Zones
5.3.1 a - Accessory buildings on the front of properties in Claudelands West should be restricted discretionary
activities.
Include Claudelands West in the Dwelling Control Area in Appendix 4.
Change section c, in relation to Claudelands West, so all new buildings and alterations on front-facing aspects be RD.
Make Apartments NC in Claudelands West, as proposed.
Make duplex dwellings NC in Claudelands West, as proposed.
Alexander Elliott
(Claudelands
Neighbourhood
Support Groups)
247.005
5.4.1 Density
Support in Amend 5.4.1 Density Table 5.4.1a by increasing site area for detached dwellings on rear lots in Claudelands West to
part
600m2. Retain other provisions restricting density in the Claudelands West area.
Alexander Elliott
(Claudelands
Neighbourhood
247.006
Table 23.3a
Support
Retain section 5.4.6a (Building setbacks – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones - in relation to
the Claudelands West area).
Page 35 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Support Groups)
Alexander Elliott
(Claudelands
Neighbourhood
Support Groups)
247.007
5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support
Retain 5.4.6a (Building setbacks) in relation to Claudelands West.
Alexander Elliott
(Claudelands
Neighbourhood
Support Groups)
247.010
5.4.4 Building Height
Support in Support 7m maximum building height in Claudelands West Special Residential Zone in Table 5.4.4. a.
part
Amend Table 5.4.4b (Building height – Temple View and Peacocke Character Zones) so that it refers to 5.4.4a to
correct an error.
Alexander Elliott
(Claudelands
Neighbourhood
Support Groups)
247.011
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Planning Map 37A by changing the zoning north of 797 Heaphy Terrace from Business Zone 2 to Claudelands
part
West Residential Zone.
Alexander Elliott
(Claudelands
Neighbourhood
Support Groups)
247.013
6.4.1 Maximum Building
Height
Paul Robert
Kennel
248.001
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone.
Philippa Jane
Gerard
249.001
10.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose
Reject the development of the Ruakura Logistics Zone or if it proceeds add to the policy to provide for criteria in
relation to biosecurity surveillance, buffer zones & quarantine systems.
Philippa Jane
Gerard
249.003
10.4.7 Landscape Screening
Philippa Jane
Gerard
249.004
11.2.2 Objective and Policies Support
Amend the Plan to ensure a 100m landscaped parkland between southern residential areas and the Industrial Park and
wetland zones.
Philippa Jane
Gerard
249.005
11.4.3 Building Setbacks
Amend Rule 11.4.3 to provide a building setback of 100m for boundaries adjacent to a residential zone for the Ruakura
Industrial Park Zone.
Les Wooldridge
250.001
1.1.6 How to Use this District Oppose
Plan
Les Wooldridge
250.004
25 Citywide
Amend 6.3 the activity status for light industry, offices, retail, licensed premises, restaurants and cafes for remainder
of Business Zone 2 for Claudelands
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.1 to reduce the maximum height of buildings in Business Zone 2 (Claudelands) to 10m.
Support in Requests a greater planting strip between inland port and the expressway. Plantings of at least 5m high be required to
part
screen the facility from University of Waikato.
Oppose
The Plan is complex, hard to use and is too long. The interface standards will add additional costs for housing
construction.
Support in Request not to impose statutory requirements and allow solutions to be worked out in a harmonious manner. Provide
Page 36 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
part
underground holding tanks eg in designated park areas within the subdivision so the household rainwater is captured
and then pumped back to each household on a timer system so they can water there lawns/gardens when there is no
rainfall.
David John
Rushbrooke
251.001
25.14.3 Rules – Activity
Status Table
Oppose
25.14.3 Rules - Removal of the Arterial Transport Corridor Protection area from the Proposed District Plan.
David John
Rushbrooke
251.004
Figure 2-2 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
Oppose
Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network:
Delete the Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Area from the Proposed District Plan.
David John
Rushbrooke
251.005
25.14.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Remove criteria B3 referred to in section 25.14.6 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria (Transportation).
Alastair Philip
Calder
252.001
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Reject zoning for Ruakura Logistics Zone
Hamilton
Christian
Nightshelter Trust
253.001
4.2.6 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Rule 4.2.6d that allows for community facilities and community support activities (including managed care
facilities and residential centres).
Roger Hennebry
254.001
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i., 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or
wall is 1.8m.
Roger Hennebry
255.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.7 so that the garage set back, primary entrance, and habitable room sight line rules are as per the
Operative District Plan.
Safekids New
Zealand
256.001
4.1.5 All Residential Zones
Support in Amend the Plan to add driveway safety information, including within the residential design guidelines.
part
Jan Stewart
257.001
16 Community Facilities Zone Oppose
St Francis
Cooperating
Parish
258.001
16.5.1 Ancillary Retail
Activity
Support in Amend Rule 16.5.1(b) to allow greater ancillary retail floor area as follows:
part
"A maximum floor area (retail activity only) of the greater of 50m2 or 12.5% of the total floor area of the buildings on
the site"
Align Surveyors
259.001
23.6.5 Boundary
Adjustments
Support in Generally support Rule 23.6.5 (Boundary Adjustments) but with regards to (c) which states that "any allotment subject
part
to a boundary adjustment shall comply with all relevant development and performance standards", provide for
boundary adjustments that improve an area of non-compliance that may not fully comply with District Plan standards.
Retain 34 Saxbys Road (Stan Heather Park)as Community Facilities Zone or rezone as a greenfields area for community
use and enjoyment with special rules for the site.
Page 37 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Align Surveyors
259.003
4.4.1 Density
Support in Amend the definition for 'duplex' to provide flexibility to ensure two dwellings, split by a party wall between two
part
garages are also deemed to be duplex units.
Align Surveyors
259.004
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Support in Supports the intent of Rule 4.3.1bb) to allow small offices, other than home based offices in the residential zones;
part
Amend Appendix 1.7 by adding a definition for 'small office' which may identify maximum limits of both workers and
vehicle movements per day per site.
Align Surveyors
259.005
Table 23.3a
Support in Retain Rule 23.3 a) ii and iii. Amend Rule 23.3a) v to allow simple subdivisions to be controlled activities. Amend
part
23.3a) v (subdivision in hazard areas) to allow an assessment system for land containing hazard whereby subdivision
for land with only a small portion of land consisting of hazard (e.g. gully) does not automatically fall into the
discretionary category.
Align Surveyors
259.007
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Align Surveyors
259.008
4.4.9 Residential Buildings –
Separation and Privacy
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.9 a) regarding the requirement for a 3m separation between dwellings.
Align Surveyors
259.009
4.7.5 Home-based
Businesses
Support in Amend Rule 4.7.5 to allow for an additional employee other than person(s) residing on the site for Home-based
part
Business.
Align Surveyors
259.010
23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Zone and All Special
Character Zones
Oppose
Oppose 23.7.3 (d) (Subdivision standards - Maximum number of allotments served by a single private way) being 5.
Retain at 10. This will have a flow on effect to change (h) (Maximum private way length) which will need to be longer
e.g. 100m rather than 50m
Robert James
Davies-Colley
260.001
10.1 Purpose
Oppose
Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone from the structure plan as Ruakura is not an appropriate location for an Inland Port.
Robert James
Davies-Colley
260.002
11.1 Purpose
Support in Amend the Plan to provide a buffer between the Ruakura industrial park and residential properties to be increased to
part
200 m width and planted with native trees.
Amend the Plan so that Comprehensive Stormwater control at source is required on all industrial lots (as well as
central stormwater management)
Dan McDaid
(Landform
Surveys Ltd)
261.001
23.6.2 Company Leases and
Unit Title Subdivision
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.6.2 regarding standards for Company Leases and Unit Title Subdivision so that minor variations are
permitted as for 223 certificates.
Dan McDaid
(Landform
Surveys Ltd)
261.002
23.6.4 Cross-lease to
Freehold Subdivision
Oppose
Rule 23.6.4 (Cross-lease to Freehold Subdivision) section a) Allow minor variations to the cross lease plan where it can
be shown a better design outcome is achieved.
Page 38 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Dan McDaid
(Landform
Surveys Ltd)
261.003
Table 23.3a
Oppose
In table 23.3a (Subdivision Activity Status) section (v) (Fee simple subdivision), request as a controlled activity.
Subdivision in EPO areas should conform to the existing provisions.
Dan McDaid
(Landform
Surveys Ltd)
261.006
23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.7.1 a) so that the minimum lot size for semi detached dwellings in the Residential Zone is to be
determined by the design of the dwelling. Delete Rule 23.7.1 h) regarding lot sizes within the Large Lot Residential
Zone - Rototuna Structure Plan and rely instead on 23.7.1b) and noise protection for new buildings to address noise
issues with the proposed expressway.
Dan McDaid
(Landform
Surveys Ltd)
261.007
23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Zone and All Special
Character Zones
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.7.3 e) regarding minimum private way widths serving 1-4 allotments - to allow for a reduction in width
to 2.8m - 3m when ROW is serving one allotment. Amend Rule 23.7.3 f) Minimum private way width serving 5
allotments so it provides instead for 10 allotments. Amend Rule 23.7.3h) to extend the maximum private way length
from 50m to 75m.
Amend Rule 23.7.3 i) as right of ways are more suitable than building roads or extending cul-de-sac.
Dan McDaid
(Landform
Surveys Ltd)
261.008
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) Interface Between Public and Private
Martin O'Neill
Kirkby
262.001
4.9 Rules – Specific
Standards – Large Lot
Residential Zone
Support
Retain the Large Lot Residential Zoning between Nevada Road and Morrinsville Road.
Tobias Braun
263.001
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Map 44A-rezone the Industrial Zoning in Frankton to Mixed Use.
NZ Horse
Recreation Inc
264.001
1.1.2.2 Integration of the
Plan with Other Plans and
Documents
Support in Amend Section 1.1.2.2 to include a reference to the Regional Road Safety Strategy and the Regional Walking and
part
Cycling Strategy.
NZ Horse
Recreation Inc
264.003
15.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 15.2.2a to read: A representative mix of activities shall be accommodated.
part
NZ Horse
Recreation Inc
264.004
15.2.3 Objective and Policies Support
NZ Horse
Recreation Inc
264.007
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Amend Policy 15.2.3e provide clarity of the level of accessibility expected, for those with disabilities, to open space
areas.
Support in Amend the definitions for Informal recreation to include horse riding.
part
Insert a new definition for Greenways meaning shared paths for all non-motorised users which may include both offroad and on-road sections.
Insert a new definition for Bridleways meaning shared rights of way (paths, trails) for all non-motorised users –
Walkers, cyclists, horses, including disability devices and low speed motorised vehicles as permitted on footpaths or
Page 39 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
cycle-ways.
NZ Horse
Recreation Inc
264.009
23.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Include horses and the equestrian population in considering concept plans and subdivision.
part
NZ Horse
Recreation Inc
264.010
2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Either amend Policy 2.2.13e or add an additional policy to integrate cycle and pedestrian networks
Integrated Land Use,
part
with recreational networks to encourage uptake of commuting and improve recreational use.
Transport and Infrastructure
Robert James
Davies-Colley
(Silverdale
Residents Group)
265.001
10.1 Purpose
Oppose
Robert James
Davies-Colley
(Silverdale
Residents Group)
265.002
11.1 Purpose
Support in Amend the Plan to provide a buffer between the Ruakura industrial park and residential properties to be increased to
part
200 m width and planted with native trees.
Amend the Plan so that Comprehensive Stormwater control at source is required on all industrial lots (as well as
central stormwater management)
Matthew Taylor
266.001
4.1.5 All Residential Zones
Support in To ensure greater emphasis be made on keeping the community safe.
part
Matthew Taylor
266.003
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend 4.2.3 to include specific reference to driveway location and safety.
part
Matthew Taylor
266.004
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support in Add a new Policy 4.2.5vii) to "enhance the safety values of the Hamilton East Area".
part
Matthew Taylor
266.005
5.2.8 Objective and Policies
Peacocke Character Zone
Support in Amend Rule 5.2.8 Objectives and Policies Peacocke Character Zone to include new policy relating to separate
part
pedestrian, cycle and vehicle access.
Matthew Taylor
266.007
25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading
Spaces and Manoeuvring
Areas
Support in 25.14.4.2 Amend so that manoeuvring areas and other vehicle parking and access is separate to pedestrian and cycle
part
access.
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.001
2.2.3 Objective and Policies
Urban Design Approach
Support in Support in Part. Amend Policies to change 'shall' to 'should have regard to'.
part
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.004
2.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Support in Part. Replace 'shall' with 'should have regard to'.
part
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.005
2.2.6 Objective and Policies
Residential Development
Support in Support in part. Change the wording of the policies from 'shall' to "should have regard to".
part
Tony Begbie
267.006
2.2.10 Objective and Policies Support
Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone from the structure plan as Ruakura is not an appropriate location for an Inland Port.
Support. Retain some of Hamilton's character and heritage via the character zones.
Page 40 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
(WCA Trust)
Sub Type Summary
Hamilton’s Identity,
Character and Heritage
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.007
2.2.12 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Replace reference to “shall” with “should”.
Resource Efficiency
part
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.008
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend the Policies in 4.2.3 to replace the word 'shall' with "should ideally".
part
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.009
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend the Policies in 4.2.4 to replace the word 'shall' with "should ideally".
part
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.010
4.4.1 Density
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.1 by replacing 'net site area' with 'gross site area'.
part
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.011
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) Interface Between Public and Private
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.012
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i., 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii.
Amend Rule 4.4.8a) to provide general guidelines for the types of construction, materials and landscaping to be used.
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.013
4.4.9 Residential Buildings –
Separation and Privacy
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.9b) by reducing the required balcony, deck and upper level window boundary setbacks to 3m.
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.014
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.10b) iv to provide more flexibility as to the location of the outdoor living area.
part
Tony Begbie
(WCA Trust)
267.015
4.7.1 Ancillary Residential
Unit
Support
Supports Rule 4.7.1 Ancillary Residential Units
Pumice Food
Group
269.001
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Map 45A-Rezone the Hamilton Rowing Club and Ferrybank from Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to Destination
Open Space Zone.
Pumice Food
Group
269.003
15.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain the activities provided for within Rule 15.3 for the Destination Open Space zone.
Pumice Food
Group
269.004
Planning Maps
Oppose
Rezone the space containing the Hamilton Rowing Club and Ferrybank identified as Neighbourhood Open Space Zone
on Map 45A to Destination Open Space Zone.
Roberta Lee
Farrell CNZM
FRSNZ FIAWS
270.001
8.1 Purpose
Support
Retain the Knowledge Zone but oppose the Inland Port and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone which are not in keeping with
innovation and research functions.
Roberta Lee
Farrell CNZM
270.003
8.9 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Support
Amend 8.9 to remove the assessment criteria as it relates to the Knowledge Zone.
Page 41 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
FRSNZ FIAWS
Sub Type Summary
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Roberta Lee
Farrell CNZM
FRSNZ FIAWS
270.004
10.1 Purpose
Oppose
Roberta Lee
Farrell CNZM
FRSNZ FIAWS
270.005
10.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose
Delete the Inland Port, Ruakura Logistics and Industrial Park Zones from the Ruakura Structure Plan and amend 10.2.1
to provide for the protection of the Knowledge Zone, schools, significant natural areas and the Mangaonua Gully.
Roberta Lee
Farrell CNZM
FRSNZ FIAWS
270.006
10.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose
Amend Policy 10.2.2b to ensure that activities within the Ruakura Logistics Zone are consistent with and sensitive to
the education and environmental character of the area.
Roberta Lee
Farrell CNZM
FRSNZ FIAWS
270.007
10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone from its present location and relocate elsewhere outside of Ruakura.
part
Roberta Lee
Farrell CNZM
FRSNZ FIAWS
270.008
11.1 Purpose
Roberta Lee
Farrell CNZM
FRSNZ FIAWS
270.009
11.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose
Roberta Lee
Farrell CNZM
FRSNZ FIAWS
270.010
11.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Oppose development of the Inland Port and Logistics hub as there are other uses of the land consistent with the area,
part
including either an environmental reserve or a research park.
St Paul's
Collegiate SchoolRowing Club
271.001
15 Open Space Zones
Oppose
Rezone the St Pauls rowing club (Days Park) from Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to Sport and Recreation Open
Space Zone
St Paul's
Collegiate SchoolRowing Club
271.006
15.1 Purpose
Oppose
Rezone the St Pauls rowing club (Days Park) from Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to Sport and Recreation Open
Space Zone
St Paul's
Collegiate SchoolRowing Club
271.010
Locality Plan
Oppose
Rezone the St Pauls rowing club (Days Park) from Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to Sport and Recreation Open
Space Zone
Oppose
Delete the Ruakura Logistics Zone (which includes the Inland Port) in its existing location and relocate away from the
Knowledge Zone.
Delete Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Where any use allowed provide a minimum buffer of 200m.
Oppose the establishment of the Inland Port and Logistics hub. Amend the Plan to recognise the space as being of high
environmental, research and knowledge-value interest.
Page 42 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Lynda Marie
Findlay
272.001
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Rezone the area between Short and Daisy Streets, Claudelands to General Residential.
Edward William
Makin
273.001
Features Map 42B
Oppose
Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road.
Edward William
Makin
273.004
11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose
Flood Hazard Area
Categories Descriptions
Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road.
Edward William
Makin
273.005
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove the Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety.
Edward William
Makin
273.007
22.5.5 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Amend Rule 22.5.5 Fences and Walls so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas.
Edward William
Makin
273.009
22.5.6 New Buildings,
Replacement or Rebuilding
of Existing Lawfully
Established Buildings, and
Alterations or Additions to
Existing Buildings
Oppose
Amend Rule 22.5.6 New Buildings, Replacement or Rebuilding of Existing Lawfully Established Buildings, and
Alterations or Additions to Existing Buildings so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas.
Melanie Rouse
274.001
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone.
Heather Joan
Makin
275.001
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove the Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety.
Heather Joan
Makin
275.003
22.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Remove the Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety.
Heather Joan
Makin
275.004
22.5.5 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Amend Rule 22.5.5 Fences and Walls so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas.
Heather Joan
Makin
275.005
22.5.6 New Buildings,
Replacement or Rebuilding
of Existing Lawfully
Established Buildings, and
Alterations or Additions to
Existing Buildings
Oppose
Amend Rule 22.5.6 New Buildings, Replacement or Rebuilding of Existing Lawfully Established Buildings, and
Alterations or Additions to Existing Buildings so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas.
Page 43 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Heather Joan
Makin
275.006
11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose
Flood Hazard Area
Categories Descriptions
Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety.
Heather Joan
Makin
275.007
Features Map 42B
Oppose
Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road.
Waikato Property
Investors
Association
276.001
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1 by replacing 'net site area' with 'gross site area' for the General Residential zone.
Waikato Property
Investors
Association
276.002
4.2.6 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objective 4.2.6 regarding the restriction of commercial areas to dedicated areas.
Waikato Property
Investors
Association
276.004
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rules b), c), d), and e) Interface Between Public and Private.
Waikato Property
Investors
Association
276.006
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Support
Residential Intensification
Zone
Retain Rule 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size - Residential Intensification Zone
Waikato Property
Investors
Association
276.007
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Oppose Objective and policies 4.2.4 as being too vague and unclear.
Waikato Property
Investors
Association
276.008
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete 7.1.4 regarding Opoia Precinct and keep the focus on the CBD.
Waikato Property
Investors
Association
276.009
25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency
Measures
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency Measures.
Bruce Davidson
277.001
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1 by replacing 'net site area' with 'gross site area'.
Bruce Davidson
277.003
25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency
Measures
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.13.4.5 Water efficiency measures.
Bruce Davidson
277.005
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Claudia Anne
278.001
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Page 44 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Rebecca Mason
Sub Type Summary
Character Area
Area. Allow the demolition of current buildings owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Allow for new buildings that retain the distinctive character of Temple View.
Claudia Anne
Rebecca Mason
278.003
5.2.6 Objective and Policies
Temple View Zone
Support
Retain 5.2.6 Objective and Policies Temple View Zone. Allow for the demolition of current buildings. New buildings and
landscapes to have regard to the special character of the area.
Kevin Collins
279.001
Zoning Map 58A
Oppose
Amend Planning Map 58A by rezoning the Industrial area to "Riverlea Industrial Area".
Tui 2000
280.001
20.1 Purpose
Support
Retain the 20.1h) regarding trees and undertake planting project in the Mill Street area.
King Family Trust
281.001
Zoning Map 43A
Oppose
Amend Zoning Map 43A by rezoning lots fronting Greenwood Street between Killarney Road and Massey Street
Business Zone 6 - Suburban Centre Fringe.
King Family Trust
281.006
Features Map 43B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from the properties on the north western corner of Hall and Kent Street adjacent to the
Massey Street overbridge.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.001
3.1 Purpose
Oppose
Prior to a Structure Plan being included in the District Plan require the following:
1. Structure Plans to publicly provide an Environmental Impact Report prior to their inclusion in the District Plan.
2. Details of proposed adverse environment effects and the level of those effects.
3. Evidence of Open Consultation with anyone potentially affected by a Structure Plan.
4. Removal of current structure plans from the Proposed District Plan that have not met these conditions.
5. Require Industrial Structure Plans to provide a "Noise Management Plan" similar to that of Appendix 1-5-21 prior to
inclusion.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.002
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Remove Ruakura SP until more details are available, an environmental impact report available and the full and future
effects on the surrounding environment have been considered.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.003
3.7.1.1 Ruakura Logistics
Zone – Inland Port
Oppose
Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until the full impacts have been fully investigated.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.004
3.7.1.2 Ruakura Logistics
Zone – Logistics
Oppose
Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until the effects on the surrounding environments have been fully investigated.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.005
3.7.1.3 Ruakura Industrial
Park Zone
Oppose
Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until the effects on the surrounding environments have been fully investigated.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.006
3.7.1.4 Knowledge Zone
Support
Retain the Knowledge Zone
Deborah June
Fisher
282.007
3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Oppose
Amend 3.7.2 by inserting additional objectives and policies to protect the environment and amenity values of existing
residents.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.009
3.7.3.1 Ruakura Structure
Plan Area
Delete the Ruakura Structure Plan until further investigation into its impacts on surrounding areas has been
conducted.
b) Amend Map 2-15 to reflect the correct status of the Spine Road as a major arterial.
Oppose
Page 45 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Deborah June
Fisher
282.010
3.7.4 Provisions in Other
Chapters
Support in Delete Discretionary Assessment Criteria A2 - general criteria.
part
Deborah June
Fisher
282.012
1.1.1 Purpose of the District
Plan
Support in Amend Section 1.1.1. of the Plan to include reference to Section 7 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
part
Deborah June
Fisher
282.014
1.1.2.1 The Resource
Management Act 1991
Support in Amend Section 1.1.2.1 to include a specific reference to Section 7 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
part
Deborah June
Fisher
282.016
1.1.3 Plan Structure
Support in Amend section 1.1.3 of the Plan to include specific references to amenity values and the environment. Remove
part
Appendix 1.2 - Restricted Discretionary Activity - Matters for Discretion and Assessment.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.018
3.7 Ruakura
Oppose
Deborah June
Fisher
282.020
3.2 Principles
Support in Require structure plans to identify potential effects, positive and negative on the surrounding environment and how
part
these will be mitigated or managed.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.021
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Objective 3-3-5 to be amended to provide for any positive effect or adverse effects.
part
Deborah June
Fisher
282.022
3.3.5 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Deborah June
Fisher
282.023
3.3.6 Objective and Policies
Support in Add policy to recognise "adjoining land uses"
part
Deborah June
Fisher
282.024
9.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend the Plan to include a Definition, Objectives and Policies regarding Amenity Protection Area, what it is, where it
part
applies and what additional standards will be applied.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.025
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Deborah June
Fisher
282.026
10.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose
Amend Objective 10.2.3 to ensure the Ruakura Logistics Zone meets the same standards as in Chapter 9 Industrial
Zones that protect surrounding residential areas (Silverdale and Fairview Downs) from adverse amenity effects.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.027
10.4.7 Landscape Screening
Amend Rule 10.4.7 by requiring at least 3m by 8m wide with sufficient setback to allow adequate lighting for adjoining
properties.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.028
10.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Delete Ruakura Structure Plan until further consideration of the effects on the surrounding area have been
investigated and publicly notified.
b) ensure a "Noise Management Plan" is completed prior to inclusion of the Structure Plan.
Policies 3.3.5a) and b) to be amended to "avoid" adverse effects
Delete Chapter 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone, until further investigation into the effects and impacts of on the
surrounding environment have been completed and publicly notified and a Noise Management Plan completed
Delete Discretionary Criteria A2 - general criteria.
Page 46 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Deborah June
Fisher
282.029
10.6 Notification Rule
Oppose
Delete Rule 10.6 as it is unacceptable to remove the right to not notify affected persons.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.030
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Delete Chapter 11 Ruakura Industrial Park Zone until an environmental impact report is publicly available and a Noise
Management Plan is in place
Deborah June
Fisher
282.031
11.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose
Amend 11.2.3 to ensure more detail on adverse effects and their management is required to protect the amenity of
surrounding areas.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.032
11.6 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Delete criteria A2 from Rule 11.6.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.033
11.7 Notification Rule
Amend Rule 11.7 to ensure all affected persons are notified prior to consent being given.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.034
17.6.6 Claudelands Events
Oppose
Centre and Claudelands Park
Amend Rule 17.6.6.2a) regarding Claudelands Events Centre and Park to remove the maximum 5 displays per year in
favour of more consultation with local residents.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.035
17.9 Notification Rule
Delete Rule 17.9 to ensure that if rules or standards are not met then notification and approval of affected persons is
required.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.036
25.3.5.4 Events at Parana
Oppose
Park, Memorial Park,
Destination Open Space Zone
(excluding Garden Place),
Sport and Recreation Open
Space Zone (apart from
those covered in 25.3.5.2
and 25.3.5.3)
Deborah June
Fisher
282.037
25.3.5.6 Events in the Rest of Support in Delete Rule 25.3.5.6b) regarding the maximum number of events per calendar year.
the City
part
Deborah June
Fisher
282.038
25.3.7 Notification Rule
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.3.7 as affected people should retain the right to be notified.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.039
25.4.8 Notification Rule
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.4.8 Notification Rule.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.040
25.4.7 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Oppose
Delete Criteria A2 from 25.4.7 a) i.
Oppose
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.3.5.4b) regarding the maximum number of events per calendar year.
Page 47 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Deborah June
Fisher
282.041
Consent Status Matrix
Support in Amend 25.4.5.1 Consent Status Matrix by changing (y) Industrial Zone (Amenity Protection Area only) from ≤0.2 to
part
≤0.02 for Permitted and from >0.2 to >0.02 for Discretionary.
Amend 25.4.5.1 Consent Status Matrix by changing the exception for bb), cc), dd), ee) and ff), when within 30m of any
zone specified in a) to i), from ≤0.2 to ≤0.02 for Permitted and from >0.2 to >0.02 for Discretionary.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.042
25.5.3.1 Landscaping
Support in Amend Rule 25.5.3.1 (v)-Landscaping-Activities in the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone to "A 1.8m high close-boarded or
part
similar solid fence or wall, a 5m wide buffer strip and a 1.8m permeable fence--"
Deborah June
Fisher
282.043
25.5.4 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
25.5.4 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria. Remove Criteria A2 (Appendix
1.2).
Deborah June
Fisher
282.044
25.5.5 Notification Rule
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.5.5 Notification Rule (Landscaping and Screening).
Deborah June
Fisher
282.045
25.6.5 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
25.6.5 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria. Remove Criteria A2 (Appendix
1.2).
Deborah June
Fisher
282.046
25.6.6 Notification Rule
Oppose
Remove 25.6.6 Notification Rule (Lighting and Glare).
Deborah June
Fisher
282.047
25.8.3 Rules – Specific
Standards
Oppose
Oppose 25.8.3 Rules – Specific Standards
Deborah June
Fisher
282.048
25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Support in 25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Standards for Activities in all Zones Except Major Facilities, Knowledge and Open Space
Standards for Activities in all part
Zones. Requests Future Urban Zones to have same noise levels and time periods as current residential areas.
Zones Except Major Facilities,
Knowledge and Open Space
Zones
Deborah June
Fisher
282.049
25.8.4 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
25.8.4 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria (Noise and Vibration). Remove
Criteria A2
Deborah June
282.050
25.8.5 Notification Rule
Oppose
Remove 25.8.5 Notification Rule (Noise and Vibration).
Page 48 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Fisher
Deborah June
Fisher
282.051
25.11.4 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Delete 25.11.4 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria A2.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.052
25.11.5 Notification Rule
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.11.5 as affected people should retain the right to be notified.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.053
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support in Delete general restricted discretionary criteria A2(b)
part
Deborah June
Fisher
282.054
25.8.3.2 Construction Noise
Oppose
25.8.3.2 Construction Noise (Specific Standards). Provide the numerical limit for construction noise and require
construction sites to stipulate construction time frame and the cumulative effects of multiple construction sites in
close proximity.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.055
25.8.3.3 Construction
Vibration
Oppose
25.8.3.3 Construction Vibration (Specific Standards). Specify what German Standard DIN 4150-3:1999 Structural
vibration - Effects of vibration on Structures is, how it is measured and how it will be applied. Request construction
sites to specify anticipated construction timeframes and cumulative effects of multiple construction sites.
Deborah June
Fisher
282.056
1.5.21 Ruakura Structure
Plan (Noise – Inland Port)
Support in Request reference to Noise Management plan for Inland port in Chapter 3 and Ruakura logistics zone.
part
Deborah June
Fisher
282.057
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Add definition of "Amenity Value" as per RMA section 2 Add definition of "Natural and Physical Resources" as
part
contained in Chapter 1.
Roy McIver Daniel
FRSNZ
283.001
8.1 Purpose
Support
Oppose Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone and seeks activities similar to existing - research and innovation.
Roy McIver Daniel
FRSNZ
283.003
8.9 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support
Amend 8.9 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria to remove exemptions.
Roy McIver Daniel
FRSNZ
283.004
10.1 Purpose
Oppose
Oppose Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone near schools and residential development.
Roy McIver Daniel
FRSNZ
283.005
10.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose
Opposes Inland Port and Ruakura logistics and Industrial Park Zones.
Roy McIver Daniel
283.006
10.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose
Amend 10.2.2 to ensure that activities within the Ruakura Logistics Zone are consistent with and sensitive to the
Page 49 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
FRSNZ
education and environmental character of the area.
Roy McIver Daniel
FRSNZ
283.007
11.1 Purpose
Oppose
Delete Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Where any use allowed provide a minimum buffer of 200m.
Roy McIver Daniel
FRSNZ
283.008
11.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose
Oppose the establishment of the Inland Port and Logistics hub. Amend the Plan to recognise the space as being of high
environmental, research and knowledge-value interest.
Roy McIver Daniel
FRSNZ
283.009
11.2.3 Objective and Policies Oppose
Oppose Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone and seeks uses more consistent with the area, including either an
environmental reserve or research park.
King Family Trust
284.001
Zoning Map 43A
Oppose
Amend the Amenity Protection Area on Zoning Map 43A covering land on the western side of Greenwood Street,
between Killarney Road and Bandon Street to 20m.
King Family Trust
284.002
Features Map 43B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from properties on north western corner of Hall and Kent Street adjacent to the Massey
Street overbridge.
John Douglas
Bennion
285.001
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support
Support the planning provisions that affect Whyte Street
King Family Trust
286.001
Zoning Map 43A
Oppose
Amend Zoning Map 43A by zoning the land on the north western corner of Hall and Kent Street to Business 6.
Midlands Health
Network Limited
287.001
6.2.2 Objective and Policies
Suburban Centres
Support in Amend the Plan to recognise and provide for the expansion of primary care infrastructure.
part
Midlands Health
Network Limited
287.003
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Review activity status for health care services in business zones and request more permissive rules across the city.
part
Midlands Health
Network Limited
287.005
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Midlands Health
Network Limited
287.006
9.1 Purpose
Support in Amend the Plan to make Healthcare Services a permitted activity in the Industrial Zone. Change the way health care is
part
viewed within the purpose, objective and policy of the Industrial zone.
Midlands Health
Network Limited
287.007
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend the status of healthcare services listed in Rule 9.3 ee) to Restricted Discretionary, and the expansion of existing
medical centres up to 1000 sq m be Permitted and over 1000 sq m be Restricted Discretionary.
Midlands Health
Network Limited
287.008
16.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Supports the removal of healthcare from the Community Facilities Zone
Midlands Health
Network Limited
287.009
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Rezone from Residential to Business zone 7 for 1031 Heaphy Terrace; 6 Howden Road;
3 Winter Street.
Midlands Health
Network Limited
287.010
Zoning Map 55A
Oppose
Rezone from Residential to Business zone 7 at 3and 5 Urlich Ave.
Amend Rule 7.3 so that health care services greater than 250m2 are Permitted Activities.
Page 50 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Midlands Health
Network Limited
287.011
Zoning Map 47A
Oppose
Rezone from Residential to Business zone 7 at 5, 5A, 7 & 9 Masters Ave.
Midlands Health
Network Limited
287.012
6.1 Purpose
Support in The expansion of existing healthcare services should be more permissive in all zones, especially neighbourhood and
part
suburban centres.
Lauren Jay
McDonald
288.001
Features Map 42B
Oppose
Lauren Jay
McDonald
288.004
22.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 28A Hazelwood Avenue and other properties up the right of way (28B, 30A, 30B, 32A,
part
and 32B Hazelwood Avenue).
Lauren Jay
McDonald
288.006
22.8 Non-Complying
Activities in a Flood Hazard
Area
Support in Remove Flood Hazard Area from 28A Hazelwood Avenue and other properties up the right of way (28B, 30A, 30B, 32A,
part
and 32B Hazelwood Avenue).
Josina Wilhelmina
Maria Ellis
289.001
3.7 Ruakura
Support in Oppose Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone and seeks residential zoning.
part
Josina Wilhelmina
Maria Ellis
289.002
3.7.1.1 Ruakura Logistics
Zone – Inland Port
Oppose
Delete the Inland Port and Ruakura logistics Zone.
Karyn Marcia
Hayward
290.001
9 Industrial Zone
Oppose
Amend Chapter 9 to leave the Industrial Zone rules as they are in the Operative District Plan, not to impose further
restrictions.
Robert W. Belbin
291.001
Structure Plans Locality
Guide
Support in Include a Temple View Structure Plan within Appendix 2: Structure Plans.
part
Robert W. Belbin
291.003
3.1 Purpose
Support in Include a section for Temple View within Rule 3.0 Structure Plans
part
Robert W. Belbin
291.006
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Robert W. Belbin
291.010
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Retain Rule 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area.
Robert W. Belbin
291.012
5.5.3 Community Centres,
Tertiary and Specialised
Training Facilities, Schools
and Places of Worship
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.5.3a) (Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship) by
increasing gross floor area of all buildings.
Robert W. Belbin
291.014
5.5.5 Home-based
Businesses
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.5.5 Home-based Business to include home -based professional services as Permitted.
Robert W. Belbin
291.015
5.7 Notification Rule
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.7 Notification Rule by making notification of and approval from affected persons a requirement.
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 28A Hazelwood Avenue and other properties up the right of way (28B, 30A, 30B, 32A,
and 32B Hazelwood Avenue).
Page 51 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Robert W. Belbin
291.016
19.1 Purpose
Support
Retain protection of Historic Heritage through Rule 19.1.
Robert W. Belbin
291.018
19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain 19.3 Rules - Activity Status Table.
Robert W. Belbin
291.020
25.2.1 Purpose
Support
Retain Rule 25.2.1 Purpose.
Robert W. Belbin
291.022
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Robert W. Belbin
291.024
8-1.1 Rankings of Significance Support
Amend Rule 8-1.1 Ranking of Significance with regards to building rankings within Temple View.
Gwyneth Ann
Verkerk
293.001
3.7.1.6 Residential Zones
Oppose Rule 3.7.1.6, setting the staging of residential development within the Ruakura Structure Plan. A full structure
plan should be developed.
Gwyneth Ann
Verkerk
293.006
3.7.1.8 Open Space Network Support in Amend Rule 3.7.1.8 to include the southern gully areas, cycleways and provide opportunity within the transmission
part
corridors for community gardens.
Gwyneth Ann
Verkerk
293.007
3.7.3.5 Staging Rules for
Oppose
General Residential Zone and
Medium Density Residential
Zone in the Ruakura
Structure Plan Area
Review staging rules 3.7.3.5 for the large lot residential zone within the Ruakura Structure Plan
Gwyneth Ann
Verkerk
293.008
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
That the large lot residential area, between Morrinsville Road and the transmission line corridors be reviewed to
permit light commercial activities.
Gwyneth Ann
Verkerk
293.009
3.7.1.9 Stormwater
Support
3.7.1.9 Stormwater - request Council work with landowners to develop comprehensive plan for gully's ecological
amenity.
Gwyneth Ann
Verkerk
293.010
23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Zone and All Special
Character Zones
Oppose
Review 23.7.3 regarding the number of lots served by private ways and the restrictions on the length on private ways
under Subdivision Design Standards.
Table 23.3a
Oppose
Gwyneth Ann
Verkerk
293.012
Oppose
Carry out detailed planning in conjunction with landowners in the Large Lot Residential area of the Ruakura Structure
Plan.
Subdivision Activity Status Table 23.3a. Ensure restrictions placed on transmission line corridors are based on current
specifications and any extensions are not adopted.
Page 52 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Gwyneth Ann
Verkerk
293.013
23.6.6 Subdivision Activities
within Transmission
Corridors A or B
Support in 23.6.6 Subdivision Activities within Transmission Corridors A or B (Specific Standards). Request the zone standards
part
adopted by Council are consistent with current standards, and that Council does not adopt the extended zone
corridors.
Simon Puttick
Friar
294.001
25.15.2.3 Objective and
Policies
Support in Amend the wording of policy 25.15.2.3a to confine CPTED assessment to public spaces and layout aspects of
part
subdivision and development proposals.
Simon Puttick
Friar
294.002
5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.4.6 Building Setbacks to make the setback for building facing a transport corridor 5m.
Simon Puttick
Friar
294.003
5.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private clause b).
Simon Puttick
Friar
294.004
15.5.6 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Seek changes to Rule 15.5.6 Fences and Walls for rear yards
Natalie Jordan
295.001
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1 so that the 150m2 area per unit is a gross average area instead of a net site area per unit.
Natalie Jordan
295.002
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
That the site coverage rule in the residential zones apply to the gross lot area rather than the net area.
Natalie Jordan
295.003
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Exclude parking areas where permeable gobi blocks are used with both grass & open blocks for traction from Rule
4.4.3 Permeable Surface.
Natalie Jordan
295.004
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Amend Figure 4.4.10g to clarify how it should be applied to determine the location of living courts. Living courts
should be able to be located to the south east and south west of units.
Andrew
Summerville
296.001
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1 so that the 150m2 area per unit is a gross average area instead of a net site area per unit.
Andrew
Summerville
296.002
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend the Plan so the site coverage rule in the residential zones applies to the gross lot area rather than the net area.
Andrew
Summerville
296.003
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3 to exclude parking areas where permeable gobi blocks are used with both grass & open blocks for
traction.
Andrew
Summerville
296.004
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Amend Figure 4.4.10g to clarify how it should be applied to determine the location of living courts. Living courts
should be able to be located to the south east and south west of units.
Jim Milne
297.001
4.4.5 Height in Relation to
Boundary
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.5 a) regarding the measurement of the Height in Relation to Boundary controls, and Delete Rule
4.4.5a)ii.
Jim Milne
297.003
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i., 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or
wall is 1.8m.
Jim Milne
297.004
Features Map 16B
Oppose
Remove Waikato River and Gully Hazard Area and the Waikato River Bank Stability Area from 13 River Oaks Place.
Page 53 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Jim Milne
297.005
1.4.3 Residential Design
Assessment Criteria
(Residential and Special
Character Zones)
Oppose
Delete Figures 1.4.3f Building design that creates visual interest incorporating a range of features and 1.4.3.5g Garage
door forward of the front face of the building. Clarify the status of the Design Guide and Assessment Criteria in 1.4.5.3.
Jodi N. Belbin
298.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jodi N. Belbin
298.005
8-1.1 Rankings of Significance Support
Retain the ranking in schedule 8A Built Heritage given to heritage buildings within Temple View as notified and include
the Matthew Cowley Administration Building.
Casa Capital
299.001
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1 so that the 150m2 area per unit is a gross average area instead of a net site area per unit.
Casa Capital
299.002
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.2.1 a) so that the site coverage rule in the residential zones apply to the gross lot area rather than the
net area.
Casa Capital
299.003
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3 to exclude parking areas where permeable gobi blocks are used with both grass & open blocks for
traction.
Casa Capital
299.004
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Amend Figure 4.4.10g to clarify how it should be applied to determine the location of living courts. Living courts
should be able to be located to the south east and south west of units.
Casa Capital
299.005
1.1.1 Purpose of the District
Plan
Oppose
Ensure the rules contained in the Operative District Plan continue to apply.
Ella Pax Makin
300.001
Features Map 42B
Oppose
Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road.
Ella Pax Makin
300.005
11-1 Low, Medium and High Oppose
Flood Hazard Area
Categories Descriptions
Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety.
Ella Pax Makin
300.007
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Remove the Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road.
Ella Pax Makin
300.008
22.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Remove Low Flood Hazard Area in its entirety or remove the Flood Hazard Area from 137 Whatawhata Road.
Ella Pax Makin
300.009
22.5.5 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Amend Rule 22.5.5 Fences and Walls so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas.
Ella Pax Makin
300.011
22.5.6 New Buildings,
Replacement or Rebuilding
of Existing Lawfully
Established Buildings, and
Alterations or Additions to
Oppose
Amend Rule 22.5.6 New Buildings, Replacement or Rebuilding of Existing Lawfully Established Buildings, and
Alterations or Additions to Existing Buildings so that it does not apply in Low Flood Hazard Areas.
Page 54 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Existing Buildings
Grace McCarthy
302.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Grace McCarthy
302.002
8-1.1 Rankings of Significance Support
Strongly in favour of giving all buildings on former CCNZ Campus in Temple View the highest possible heritage rankings
as set out in 8-1.1 Rankings of Significance.
Denise Clark
(Silverdale
Residents Group)
303.001
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Opposes an Inland Port at Ruakura
Denise Clark
(Silverdale
Residents Group)
303.003
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Support in Amend the Plan to provide a buffer between the Ruakura industrial park and residential properties to be increased to
part
200 m width and planted with native trees.
Amend the Plan so that Comprehensive Stormwater control at source is required on all industrial lots (as well as
central stormwater management)
Mark Priscott
304.001
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1 so that the 150m2 area per unit is a gross average area instead of a net site area per unit.
Mark Priscott
304.002
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Amend Figure 4.4.10g to clarify how it should be applied to determine the location of living courts. Living courts
should be able to be located to the south east and south west of units.
Mark Priscott
304.003
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.2.1 a) so that the site coverage rule in the residential zones apply to the gross lot area rather than the
net area.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.001
20.1 Purpose
Support in Specifically identify the long tailed bat roosting within Significant Natural Areas
part
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.002
Significant Natural Areas
Support in Supports Objectives and Policies in 20.2.1 regarding the protection, maintenance, restoration and enhancement of
20.2.1 Objective and Policies part
Significant Natural Areas.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.004
20.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rule 20.3 to replace 'trimming' with 'pruning' and require arborist reports to be carried out for significant
part
trees.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.005
20.4.1 Trimming and
Maintenance
Support
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.007
20.4.2 Emergency Works to, Support in Retain Rule 20.4.2 Emergency Works to, or Removal of, an Indigenous Tree in a Significant Natural Area or a Scheduled
or Removal of, an Indigenous part
Tree with amendments to define a qualified arborist and to protect roosting sites for long tailed bats.
Tree in a Significant Natural
Area or a Scheduled Tree1
The Waikato Tree
305.008
20.6 Notification Rule
Support
Retain Rule 20.4.1 Trimming and Maintenance with amendments to replace 'Trimming' with 'pruning'
Retain 20.6 Notification Rule
Page 55 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Trust
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.009
9-1.16 Method of Applying a Support in Amend Appendix 9-1.16 Method of Applying a Monetary Value for significant trees by increasing the cost to $45 per
Monetary Value
part
unit
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.010
Schedule 9C Significant
Natural Areas
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.011
Schedule 9D Significant Trees Support
Amend Schedule 9D Significant Trees with amendments to correct Botanical Names of Trees
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.012
13-1 Areas with Historic
Heritage Values or Visual
Amenity Values
Support
Retain Appendix 13-1 Areas with Historic Heritage Values or Visual Amenity Values.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.014
24.2 Objectives and Policies
Financial Contributions
Support
Amend Policy 24.2.1 to correct a typographical error.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.015
24.3.1 Purpose of Financial
Contribution
Support
Retain the schedule in 24.3.1
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.017
24.3.3 Level of Contribution
Support
Supports 24.3.3 regarding levels of contribution.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.019
24.3.4 Credits
Support
Retain the schedule in 24.3.4
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.020
24.4.1 Reserves Level of
Service
Support in Increase the amount of reserves level of service from
part
'A minimum of 4ha per 1000 population ---"
to ' A minimum of 10ha per 1000 population --"
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.021
25.2.1 Purpose
Support
Supports 25.2.1 Purpose regarding the importance of trees.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.022
25.13.1 Purpose
Support
Supports 25.13.1 (Three Waters Purpose) as this is required to achieve a sustainable city.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.023
15.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Change all references in Rule 15.3 to 'Trimming' in the text to 'Pruning'
part
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.024
15.6.3 Organised Recreation Support
in the Natural and
Neighbourhood Open Space
Zone
Support
Include Whatukoruru Reserve - Fitzroy (Peacocks Rd area) - Long tailed bat roosting sites as a Significant Natural Area
Retain Rule 15.6.3 protecting and providing for the use of Open Space Zones
Page 56 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.025
9.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support
Need to assess planting of trees to offset carbon emissions and sequenting of carbon in each Industrial Zone, and to
connect vegetated linkages between Industrial Zones and open space landscapes/Waikato River.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.026
9.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support
Need to assess planting of trees to offset carbon emissions and sequenting of carbon in each Industrial Zone, and to
connect vegetated linkages between Industrial Zones and open space landscapes/Waikato River.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.028
9.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Objective 9.2.4 and the explanation to set limits on the future development of the Crawford Street Freight
part
Village and where soils are identified for horticulture or agriculture use.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.029
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.030
11.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Chapter 11 to ensure provisions that require that development adjoining residential or Significant Natural
part
Areas is offset by landscape formation planted with indigenous ecologically sourced plants to connect areas such as
streams, gullies and 'Significant Natural Areas'.
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.031
21.1 Purpose
Support
The Waikato Tree
Trust
305.033
21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support
Gerard Francis
Kelly
306.001
9.3.1 Comprehensive
Development Plan
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
David Bennett
Taylor
308.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Rototuna
Ventures Ltd
309.001
Zoning Map 10A
Oppose
Rototuna
Ventures Ltd
309.002
2.2.6 Objective and Policies
Residential Development
Support in Support in part. Retain Policy 2.2.6(a) but amend to encourage mixed use development outcomes.
part
Rototuna
Ventures Ltd
309.003
6.2.2 Objective and Policies
Suburban Centres
Support in Amend the Objective and Policies 6.2.2 to support establishment of residential activities above ground floor level in
part
Suburban Centres.
Rototuna
Ventures Ltd
309.004
6.2.3 Objective and Policies
Neighbourhood Centres
Support in Amend Objective and Policies 6.2.3 to support the establishment of residential activities above ground floor level in
part
Neighbourhood Centres.
Rototuna
Ventures Ltd
309.005
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Support the purpose of the Waikato River and Gully Systems Chapter
Support the Waikato River and Gully Systems Objective and Policies under 21.2.1
Oppose Zoning Map 10A - Request that the land located at 16 Horsham Downs Road and 109 Thomas Road be rezoned
from Residential to "Business 5 - Suburban Centre Core" to reflect current land use consent for mixed use
development.
Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and d), request they be changed to a Permitted Activity across all Business Zones.
Amend Rule 6.3 l), m) and n) regarding offices to replace the words "per site" with "per tenancy".
Page 57 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Amend Rule 6.3hh) so parking lots and parking buildings within the Suburban Centre Core are a Permitted Activity.
Amend Rule 6.3ll) so health-care services (250m2 - 1000m2) located at ground floor within the Suburban Centre Core
are a Permitted Activity.
Amend Rule 6.3xx) so residential apartments above ground floor in Suburban and Neighbourhood Centres are a
Controlled Activity.
Amend Rule 6.3zz) so that residential centres above ground floor level in Suburban Centres are a Restricted
Discretionary Activity.
Rototuna
Ventures Ltd
309.006
6.4.3 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.3 a) to require a 5m building setback only in relation to major arterial roads.
Rototuna
Ventures Ltd
309.007
6.4.9 Residential
Development
Oppose
Amend the Plan to add standards for residential apartments (i.e. density, outdoor living and service areas etc.) in the
Business Zones.
Rototuna
Ventures Ltd
309.008
6.4.10 Development
Flexibility
Support in Amend Rule 6.4.10a) Development Flexibility as the cross reference to Rule 6.4.7 is incorrect and should be Rule 6.4.6.
part
Rototuna
Ventures Ltd
309.009
25.14.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Rule 25.14.4.2 a) Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas - Quantity - Delete the text "or altered"
Rototuna
Ventures Ltd
309.010
Integrated Transport
Assessment
Oppose
Delete Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria V7 (network efficiency performance expectations) for Integrated
Transport Assessments.
David John
Campbell
310.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Timothy Daniel
Hunt
311.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.001
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Oppose
Amend the definition for ancillary retailing and offices to allow for these activities to occupy up to 25% of the total
floor area.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.002
Zoning Map 15A
Support
Map 15A-Retain Business Zone 4-Large Format Retail for the area known as The Boulevard.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.003
6.1 Purpose
Support
Retain Lots 15-17 DP 456477, Lot 2 DP 321305, Lots 37 & 38 DPS 73160, Pt Lots 1-5 DPS 73160, Sec 6 SO 416905 The
Boulevard within the "Te Rapa North Sub-regional Centre".
Page 58 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.004
6.2 Objectives and Policies
Business 1 to 7 Zones
Support in Amend 6.2 to include Objectives and Policies for Business Zone 4 - Large Format Retail that recognises the role of this
part
zone in providing a range of wide range of moderate to low intensity commercial (retail and office), community, and
service activities.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.005
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and c) so that new buildings, alterations and additions and minor works are Permitted Activities
part
across all Business Zones.
Amend Rule 6.3 e) by replacing the word "industry" with "Industrial activity", and amend the definition of "industrial
activity" so that it is clear that warehouse and bulk storage are deemed light industry.
Amend Rule 6.3 l), m) and n) so that Offices up to 500m2 are a Permitted Activity and Offices greater than 500m2 are a
Restricted Discretionary Activity in the Business 4 Zone.
Retain Rule 6.3 p) and k) but amend the definition of ancillary retail to allow for it to occupy up to 25%
Retain Rule 6.3 s), t) and w).
Amend Rule 6.3 and 6.3 d) aa), bb), cc), ee), jj), kk), ll), mm), oo), qq), rr) and ss) so that Wholesale and Trade Retail,
accessory buildings, licensed premises, cafes, restaurants, Commercial places of assembly (cinemas and bowling alleys
only), health-care services, Tertiary education and specialised training facilities are Permitted Activities in the Business
4 Zone.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.006
6.4.3 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.3a) so the 5m setback only applies to major arterial roads
Delete Rule 6.4.3c) as it is ambiguous and unclear what "any internal zone boundary" means and what setback
distance would apply.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.008
6.4.4 Minimum Floor Area
Oppose
Delete Rule 6.4.4a) as any retail activity less than 400m2 in Business Zone 4 is a Discretionary Activity.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.009
6.4.5 Building Intensity
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.5 a)(ii) in relation to Business Zone 4 so a maximum floor area to net site area ratio of 1.5 :1 applies.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.010
6.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Review Rule 6.6 in its entirety and make consequential amendments to Volume 2 to ensure maters of discretion and
assessment criteria relate only to the reason for why consent is being sought.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.011
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rule 9.3f) & g) to provide for ancillary retail up to 25% gfa. Amend Rule 9.3j) to remove segregation strips, and
part
make rules 9.3u) & v) permitted activities.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.012
9.4.1 Building Setbacks
(Except in Rotokauri
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.1a) so road setbacks only apply to major arterial roads. Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to
a boundary fronting a major arterial. Delete Rule 9.4.1 (d) in so far as it relates to Lots 20 & 21 DP 456477.
Page 59 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Employment Area)
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.013
9.4.3 Height in Relation to
Boundary
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.3 to delete the requirement for a height in relation to boundary plane in so far as it relates to Lots 20
& 21 DP 456477 and the adjoining Open Space Zone.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.014
9.5.2 Ancillary Retail
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.5.2(a) to allow for Ancillary Retail to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of any principal activity
on the site (i.e. delete reference to industrial).
Amend Rule 9.5.3(a) to allow for Ancillary Offices to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of any principal activity
on the site (i.e. delete reference to industrial).
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.015
9.7 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.7 and make consequential amendments to Volume 2 as necessary to ensure maters of discretion and
assessment criteria relate only to the reason for why consent is being sort.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.016
25.14.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 so that no Permitted Activity is required to prepare an Integrated Transport Assessment.
AMP Capital
Property Portfolio
312.017
6.4.1 Maximum Building
Height
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.1a) Business Zone 4 - Large Format Retail to increase the maximum height limit to 20m.
W.J. & M.R.
Laverty
313.001
3 Structure Plans
Support in Include a Structure Plan for Temple View in Section 3- Structure Plans as set out in the submission.
part
W.J. & M.R.
Laverty
313.002
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Support in Include a Structure Plan for Temple View within Appendix 2 - Structure Plans.
part
Ecostream
Irrigation
314.001
9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend policies to provide for yard-based retail and non-industrial activities that already exist at the time of Plan
notification.
Ecostream
Irrigation
314.001
Zoning Map 25A
Oppose
Map 25A- rezone 791-797 Te Rapa Road to an appropriate business zone.
Ecostream
Irrigation
314.004
9.4.1 Building Setbacks
(Except in Rotokauri
Employment Area)
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to a boundary fronting a major arterial.
Ecostream
Irrigation
314.005
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend 9.3(f) to provide for any office activity as a Permitted Activity, amend 9.3(g) to provide for any retail activity
part
occupying up to 150m2 or 1000m2 or more as a Permitted Activity, amend 9.3(l) to provide for office activities existing
at the time of Plan Notification as a Permitted Activity, amend Rules 9.3 (u) & (v) to be a Permitted Activity, and delete
reference to vehicle movements.
Ecostream
314.008
9.4.6 Site Layout
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.4.6 and require a 2.0m wide planting strip along the road corridor boundary.
Page 60 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Irrigation
Ecostream
Irrigation
314.008
9.4.5 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.5a) regarding permeability to apply to greenfield locations only.
Ecostream
Irrigation
314.010
9.5.3 Ancillary Offices
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.5.3 as it is too restrictive to only allow ancillary offices, due to large number of established offices on Te
Rapa Road which should be able to continue.
Ecostream
Irrigation
314.012
9.5.2 Ancillary Retail
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.5.2 as it is too restrictive to only allow ancillary retail.
Ecostream
Irrigation
314.014
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Oppose
Amend the definition for ancillary retailing and offices to allow for these activities to occupy up to 25% of the floor
space and or/yard based retail area.
Isobel & Harold
Nielsen
315.001
Zoning Map 21A
Support in Support 1000sq m. sections within the steeper areas, with smaller lots (-/+ 500sq m.) on flatter land within the Large
part
Lot Residential Area within Rototuna.
John Nielsen
316.001
Zoning Map 21A
Support in Support 1000sq m. sections within the steeper areas, with smaller lots (-/+ 500sq m.) on flatter land within the Large
part
Lot Residential Area within Rototuna.
Delta Property
Group
317.001
Zoning Map 26A
Oppose
Map 26A-rezone 449-455 Te Rapa Road and others as necessary to an appropriate business zone.
Delta Property
Group
317.002
9.2 Objectives and Policies
Industrial Zone
Oppose
Add a further policy to provide for non-industrial activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification.
Delta Property
Group
317.003
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Retain rules 9.3 h), j), k), x). Amend Rules 9.3 (u) & (v) to be a Permitted Activity, and delete reference to vehicle
part
movements. Amend Rule 9.3y) & z) to make provision for existing office and childcare facilities as permitted activities.
Delta Property
Group
317.004
9.5.1 Retail (Except
Wholesale Retail and Trade
Supplies)
Support in Amend Rule 9.5.1 to allow for office, and childcare activities to expand gross floor area by 10% if existing at time of
part
Plan notification.
Delta Property
Group
317.005
9.5.2 Ancillary Retail
Support in Amend Rule 9.5.2 (b) to allow for ancillary retail to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of 'any' principal activity
part
on the site (i.e. delete reference to "industrial").
Delta Property
Group
317.006
9.5.3 Ancillary Offices
Support in Amend Rule 9.5.3 (a) to allow for ancillary office to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of 'any' principal activity
part
on the site (i.e. delete reference to "industrial").
Delta Property
Group
317.007
17.2 Objectives and Policies
Major Facilities Zone
Support
Delta Property
Group
317.008
17.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Retain Rule 17.3 a) regarding a Restricted Discretionary Activity status for the approval or update of a Concept Plan.
part
Amend Appendix 1.7 by adding definitions for intensive and non-intensive horse grazing.
Retain Policy 17.2.1c regarding adverse effects generated from Major Facilities.
Page 61 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Amend Rule 17.3a) jj) so that intensive horse grazing within 100m of any boundary is a Restricted Discretionary
Activity.
Delta Property
Group
317.009
Y Major Facility Concept
Plans
Support in Retain Appendix 1.2 Y1 (b); Amend Appendix 1.2 Y3 to include consideration to adverse effects from intensive horse
part
grazing on adjoining activities.
Delta Property
Group
317.010
1.5.15 Concept Plan for
Major Facilities
Support in Retain Appendix 1.5.15 (e)(iv) requiring buffer areas to be shown on concept plans
part
Delta Property
Group
317.011
17.5.3 Provisions in Other
Chapters
Support
Retain Rule 17.5.3 regarding compliance with City Wide standards.
Delta Property
Group
317.012
25.11.3 Rules – General
Standards
Support
Retain Rule 25.11.3 a).
Delta Property
Group
317.013
25.11.2 Objectives and
Policies Smoke, Fumes,
Odour and Dust
Support
Retain Policy 25.11.2.1a.
Delta Property
Group
317.014
17.8 Restricted Discretionary Support
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Elroy & Kate
Thomson
318.001
Zoning Map 45A
Support in Map 45A-Insufficient consultation with key stakeholders of Opoia Precinct. Propose Amend Appendix 1.8 (Other
part
methods of implementation) to include a commitment to work with key stakeholders in developing a master plan for
the Opoia Precinct.
Elroy & Kate
Thomson
318.003
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Appendix 1.8 (Other methods of implementation) to include a commitment to provide information to key
part
stakeholders, to facilitate and coordinate discussion groups and to work with key stakeholders in developing a master
plan for the Opoia Precinct.
Elroy & Kate
Thomson
318.005
1.8.4 Collaboration and
Partnership
Support in Insufficient consultation with key stakeholders of Opoia Precinct. Propose Amend Appendix 1.8 (Other methods of
part
implementation) to include a commitment to provide information to key stakeholders, to facilitate and coordinate
discussion groups and work with key stakeholders in developing a master plan for the Opoia Precinct.
George Eugene
Lusty
319.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Terry Martyn
Hume
320.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Alan Russell
321.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
Retain the ability to consider a Concept Plan as a publicly notified application in Rule 17.8 a) i.
Page 62 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Bishop
Sub Type Summary
Table
part
Michael Cecil
Paddy
322.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Modern Transport
Limited
323.001
Zoning Map 15A
Oppose
Map 15A-rezone Lot 2 DPS 15248 at Te Kowhai Road to Industrial.
Modern Transport
Limited
323.002
Figure 2-8 Rotokauri
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support
Supports land described as Lot 2 DPS 15248 (SA13B/395) at Te Kowhai Road being identified for industrial land uses in
the Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan - Land Use.
Modern Transport
Limited
323.003
Figure 2-9 Rotokauri
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
Oppose
Requests that Lot 2 DPS 15248 (SA13B/395) at Te Kowhai Road be included within Stage 1 of the Figure 2-9 Rotokauri
Structure Plan – Staging and Transport Network.
Peter & Margaret
Fairhead
324.001
Zoning Map 18A
Oppose
Map 18A-rezone 144 Rototuna Road to Business Zone 5.
Richard Ward
325.001
Figure 2-2 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
Oppose
Revert back to the location of the "Eastern Link" Major Arterial Transport Corridors as shown in the Peacocke Structure
Plan within the Operative District Plan and use the existing designation for the minor arterial roads.
Richard Ward
325.002
3.4.3 Transport Network
Oppose
Amend 3.4.3 to align with the "Eastern Link" within Variation 14.
Philip & Patricia
Oh
326.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Lori Silsbee
327.001
11.4.3 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rule 11.4.3d) and f) to increase the minimum building setbacks within Ruakura Industrial Park Zone.
part
Lori Silsbee
327.003
11.6 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 11.6 a) iv air discharge permits to be restricted to nil (non-complying) under 100m and criteria applied to
Activities Matters of
part
100m and further
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Jason Hennessey
328.001
Figure 2-1 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Remove the 'future reserve' land use from property Lot 2 312185 (217 Peacocke Road) as shown on Figure 2-1
Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use.
Michael Kenneth
Hall
329.001
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Seeks that NZTA: erect suitable noise and visual barriers to enable 400m2 lot sizes adjoining the Waikato Expressway;
purchase 35/40m barrier zone at residential lot value; and purchase Land between expressway and Horsham Downs
Road.
David Charles
Ferguson
330.001
Zoning Map 30A
Oppose
Opposes land being zoned neighbourhood open space through the development of the Ruakura Structure Plan and
requests a residential zoning or purchase of land.
Page 63 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Anne & David
Platts
331.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Tim Stokes
332.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Hugo Van in
333.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Jacqueline,
Steward Charles
Jeffery Peters
334.001
4.4.1 Density
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.1 so within the Large Lot Residential area in Rototuna a 1000m2 minimum site area is applied to
part
elevated areas; and 500-600m2 minimum site area is applied to the flat contoured areas.
Jacqueline,
Steward Charles
Jeffery Peters
334.002
4.4.2 Site Coverage
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.2 to increase the maximum site coverage in the Large Lot Residential zone to 25 - 30%.
Jacqueline,
Steward Charles
Jeffery Peters
334.004
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support
Retain Rule 4.4.6 c) regarding the setbacks from the Waikato Expressway.
Jacqueline,
Steward Charles
Jeffery Peters
334.005
3.5.1 Objectives and Policies Support
3.5.1 Rototuna Structure Plan Objectives and Policies.
Supports Policy 3.5.1a;
Seeks a pedestrian/cycle path at a midway point between where Kay Road and Horsham Downs Road cross the
Expressway.
Jacqueline,
Steward Charles
Jeffery Peters
334.005
4.2.8 Objective and Policies
Support
Amend Objective and policies 4.2.8 to require all new dwellings in Large Lot Residential zones to have a rainwater
collection tank; and be required to have double-glazed windows.
Braemar Hospital
Limited
335.001
16.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 16.3 to specifically allow for Hospitals and Health Care Services to occur on the Braemar Hospital Site.
Joy Olive Tristram
336.001
Features Map 43B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area and do not include on any associated LIM report for Unit 1, 4 Krippner Place.
John Vianney
Conroy
337.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Jennifer Rita
Bothwell
(Fairview Downs
Residents)
338.001
Figure 15-5c Transport
corridor hierarchy plan
Oppose
Jennifer Rita
338.002
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Support in Relocate residential and commercial areas within the Ruakura Structure Plan to avoid industrial views and noise for
Retain Fifth Avenue unchanged and delete the proposed interchange at the extension of Fifth Avenue; Delete the
proposed North-South Arterial Transport Corridor to the East of Fairview downs or move it closer to the planned
position of the Waikato Expressway (SH1).
Page 64 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Bothwell
(Fairview Downs
Residents)
Sub Type Summary
Structure Plan-Land Use
part
existing homes. Retain natural stormwater drainage.
Submitter wants to speak to their submission at any hearing but states that proposed hearing times are inconvenient
for people who work, and would prefer that hearings are scheduled to account for working people.
Jennifer Rita
Bothwell
(Fairview Downs
Residents)
338.004
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Marie Theresa
Conroy
339.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Body Corporate
550337
340.001
Zoning Map 15A
Oppose
Map 15A-Rezone Lot 2 DPS 46742 from Industrial to a Business Zone, or amend the provisions in the Industrial Zone to
allow for office activity.
Body Corporate
550337
340.002
9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Add a further policy to provide for non-industrial activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification.
Body Corporate
550337
340.003
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Retain rules 9.3 h), i), j), k). Amend Rules 9.3 l) to make provision for existing offices, amend rule 9.3 (u) & v) to be a
part
Permitted Activities, and delete reference to vehicle movements.
Body Corporate
550337
340.004
9.4.1 Building Setbacks
(Except in Rotokauri
Employment Area)
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to a boundary fronting a major arterial.
Body Corporate
550337
340.005
9.4.5 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.5a) regarding permeability to apply to greenfield locations only.
Body Corporate
550337
340.006
9.4.6 Site Layout
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.4.6 and require a 2.0m wide planting strip along the road corridor boundary.
Body Corporate
550337
340.007
9.5.1 Retail (Except
Wholesale Retail and Trade
Supplies)
Support in Amend Rule 9.5.1 to allow for office, and childcare activities to expand gross floor area by 10% if existing at time of
part
Plan notification.
Body Corporate
550337
340.008
9.5.2 Ancillary Retail
Support in Amend Rule 9.5.2 (b) to allow for ancillary retail to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of 'any' principal activity
part
on the site (i.e. delete reference to "industrial"). Make consequential amendments to the definition of Ancillary
Retailing and Offices in Section 1.7
Body Corporate
550337
340.009
9.5.3 Ancillary Offices
Support in Amend Rule 9.5.3 a) to allow for ancillary office to occupy up to 25% of the gross floor space of 'any' principal activity
part
on the site (i.e. delete reference to "industrial"). Make consequential amendments to the definition of Ancillary
Offices in Section 1.7
Body Corporate
340.010
9.7 Restricted Discretionary
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.7 and make consequential amendments to Volume 2 as necessary to ensure maters of discretion and
Page 65 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
550337
Sub Type Summary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
assessment criteria relate only to the reason for why consent is being sort.
Revell Properties
No.9 Limited
341.001
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.3ee) and w) so that Parking Lots & Yard based Retail >400sqm are Restricted Discretionary Activities
with subsequential changes to assessment criteria so that parking lots are designed to fit with or enhance the existing
streetscape through careful treatment of pedestrian interface and can enhance pedestrian amenity through creative
and imaginative planting, screening and provision of public facilities.
Nitinchandra M
Parulekar
342.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Trust Waikato
343.001
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37a-rezone the Trust Waikato site from Residential Intensification to "Central City (City Living Precinct, Height
Overlay 2)" or another appropriate business zone which anticipates and provides for the existing office activity.
Everton Trust
344.001
Zoning Map 24A
Oppose
Map 24A-Amend the zoning of the southern lot of the Wintec site Lot 1 DP 450285 from Major Facilities to Residential.
Everton Trust
344.002
Zoning Map 25A
Oppose
Map 25A-Amend the zoning of the southern lot of the Wintec site recognised as Lot 1 DP 450285 from Major Facilities
to Residential.
Everton Trust
344.003
Figure 2-8 Rotokauri
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Amend Figure 2-8 to provide for the intended future use of the property recognised as Lot 1 DP 450285 for Residential
purposes.
Greig Family Trust
Holdings Limited
345.001
1.1.7 Explanation of Activity
Classes
Support in Retain Table 1.1.7 - Non complying activity "How Identified" description.
part
Amend Table 1.1.7 - Discretionary Activity "How Identified" description to also provide for the event where 'an activity
is listed in the Plan but not in the Activity status for a particular zone', as provided for in the submission.
Greig Family Trust
Holdings Limited
345.002
1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed
Support in Retain Rule 1.1.8.1 unaltered but with changes made to Rule 1.1.7 sought above in regard to discretionary activity
part
status description.
Greig Family Trust
Holdings Limited
345.005
2.2 Objectives and Policies
Strategic Framework
Oppose
Oppose. Delete Rule 2.2 as it sets a higher threshold that RMA s.104D for non-complying activities.
Greig Family Trust
Holdings Limited
345.007
2.2.4 Objective and Policies
Central City, Business and
Industry
Oppose
Oppose. Amend Policy 2.2.4a and Policy 2.2.5b by replacing 'shall' with 'should' and enable location of business and
development out of zone where appropriate.
Greig Family Trust
Holdings Limited
345.008
9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 9.2.1b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
part
Greig Family Trust
Holdings Limited
345.009
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.3 to provide for offices and retail activities in the Industrial Zone as a Restricted Discretionary Activity.
Page 66 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Greig Family Trust
Holdings Limited
345.010
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Reformat Appendix 1.2 to relate specifically to identified Restricted Discretionary Activities in the Activity Status Tables
with defined matters of discretion.
Peter H Bos
346.001
Table 15-2b Number of
Support
parking and loading spaces
required – Central City Zone
Retain Appendix 15, Table 15-2b: Number of parking and loading spaces required - Central City Zone.
Peter H Bos
346.004
Table 15-2a Number of
parking loading and cycle
spaces
Oppose
Lower the minimum car parking requirements in Table 15-2a
Peter H Bos
346.005
4.6.4 Residential Unit Size
Support in Amend Rule 4.6.4 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units.
part
Roland Olliver
Cooper
347.001
23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Support in Subdivision Design Standards - 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape (h) Large Lot Residential - Rototuna Structure Plan.
part
Requests where properties severed by the Expressway, be allowed to subdivide down to 400m2.
CR & S
Hammerton Trust
348.001
Zoning Map 15A
Oppose
Map 15A- rezone 56 The Boulevard and others as necessary around The Boulevard to an appropriate business zone.
CR & S
Hammerton Trust
348.002
9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Add a further Policy to provide for non-industrial activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification.
CR & S
Hammerton Trust
348.003
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rule 9.3 to provide for offices existing at the time of Plan notification as a Permitted Activity. Retain Rule 9.3h)
part
Permitted Activity status for trade and industry training facilities.
CR & S
Hammerton Trust
348.004
9.5.1 Retail (Except
Wholesale Retail and Trade
Supplies)
Support in Amend Rule 9.5.1 to allow for office, and childcare activities to expand gross floor area by 10% if existing at time of
part
Plan notification.
Murray James
Johnstone
349.002
Features Map 45B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area from 646 Grey Street.
Barry Laurence
Flay
350.001
Zoning Maps
Support
Retain Zoning Maps
Barry Laurence
Flay
350.003
5.1.3 Special Natural Zone
Support
Retain Rule 5.1.3 Special Natural Zone
Barry Laurence
Flay
350.004
Zoning Map 33A
Support
Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan -Retain the Open Space Zoning surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
Barry Laurence
350.005
Figure 2-8 Rotokauri
Support
Supports the inclusion of Lot 2 D P 425316 as part of the Future Reserves namely the Waiwhakareke Natural Heritage
Page 67 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Flay
Sub Type Summary
Structure Plan-Land Use
Park.
William Wie &
Patricia Tekore
Moana
352.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Oppose houses being built in the area as it will adversely affect the environment.
William Wie &
Patricia Tekore
Moana
352.003
Zoning Maps
Support in Supports in part Zoning Maps.
part
William Wie &
Patricia Tekore
Moana
352.004
Zoning Map 33A
Support in Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan - Retain the Open Space Zoning surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
part
Nancy Cooper
354.001
23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Support in Subdivision Design Standards - 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape (h) Large Lot Residential - Rototuna Structure Plan.
part
Requests where properties severed by the Expressway, be allowed to subdivide down to 400m2.
Chartwell
Investments Ltd
355.001
6.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Fig 6.1b so that Lot 1 DP 321305 (84991) 6 Parkinson Road is included within the zoning for Te Rapa North subregional centre.
Chartwell
Investments Ltd
355.002
6.2 Objectives and Policies
Business 1 to 7 Zones
Oppose
Amend 6.2 to include Objectives and Polices that relate to land zoned Business 1 - Commercial Fringe that is located
outside of a sub-regional centre.
Chartwell
Investments Ltd
355.003
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and c) so that new buildings, alterations and additions, and accessory buildings are Permitted
Activities.
Amend Rule 6.3n) so that the existing office activities undertaken on Lot 1 DP 321305 and Lot 2 DPS 39890 are a
Permitted Activities.
Amend Rules 6.3 s) and t) to allow retail activities greater than 400m2 as a Permitted Activity on Lot 1 DPS 84445 and
Lot 2 DPS 26655. Amend the inconsistency with Rule 6.4.6 which provides for maximum tenancy sizes in excess of
400m2.
Chartwell
Investments Ltd
355.004
6.4.6 Maximum Tenancy Size Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.6a) (i) to provide a maximum gfa of 4,000m2 on Lot 1 DPS 84445 and Lot 2 DPS 26655 (at Dinsdale
Suburban Centre).
Chartwell
Investments Ltd
355.005
6.4.10 Development
Flexibility
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.10a) Development Flexibility as the cross reference to Rule 6.4.7 is incorrect and should be Rule 6.4.6.
Chartwell
Investments Ltd
355.006
Zoning Map 15A
Oppose
Map 15A-Request ACC Offices at Lot 1 DP 321305 - 6 Parkinson Road be rezoned from Industrial to “Business Zone 1 –
Commercial Fringe”, or another appropriate business zone which anticipates and provides for the existing office
activity.
Page 68 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Chartwell
Investments Ltd
355.007
Zoning Map 26A
Oppose
Map 26A-Request 11 Ken Brown Drive be rezoned from Industrial to “Business Zone 1 - Commercial Fringe”, or
another appropriate business zone which anticipates and provides for the existing office activity.
Chartwell
Investments Ltd
355.008
Zoning Map 42A
Support
Map 42A-support zoning of Lot 1 DPS 84445 and Lot 2 DPS 26655 and remain as “Business Zone 5 – Suburban Centre
Core”.
Southern Cross
Hospitals Limited
(Bloxam Burnett
and Olliver Ltd)
356.001
6.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 6.1 (d)(iii) to recognise that that a suburban centre can also comprise Business 1 Zoning.
part
Southern Cross
Hospitals Limited
(Bloxam Burnett
and Olliver Ltd)
356.002
6.2.2 Objective and Policies
Suburban Centres
Support in The definition of Health Care Services currently excludes Hospitals so amend Policy 6.2.2g so it specifically refers to
part
hospital activities in Hamilton East.
Southern Cross
Hospitals Limited
(Bloxam Burnett
and Olliver Ltd)
356.003
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend the list of ‘Community’ activities within Rule 6.3 to enable hospitals as a Permitted Activity within the Business
1 Zone or on all sites owned by Southern Cross Hospitals Ltd in the (Hamilton East) Business 1 Zone.
Southern Cross
Hospitals Limited
(Bloxam Burnett
and Olliver Ltd)
356.004
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Map 45A-rezone Lot 11 DP 3278 and Part Lot 15 DP 3278 from ‘Residential Intensification Zone’ to ‘Business 1 Zone’
Southern Cross
Hospitals Limited
(Bloxam Burnett
and Olliver Ltd)
356.005
Features Map 45B
Oppose
Remove reference to archaeological site A113 from Lot 2 DP 17455 located on Planning Map 45B.
Mark McLennan
357.001
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1 by replacing 'net site area' with 'gross site area'; and reintroducing 'average site area'.
Waikato Regional
Airport Ltd
359.001
25.14.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend 25.14.1 c) to include specific reference to Regionally Significant Infrastructure as being a key component of the
wider transport network.
Waikato Regional
Airport Ltd
359.003
25.14.2 Objectives and
Policies Transportation
Oppose
Amend the explanation which follows Policy 25.14.2.1g by adding the following: "Buildings, structures and trees in
certain parts of the city could protrude into the flight path of planes departing and approaching Hamilton Airport. This
increases the risks to public safety both on the ground and in the air."
Waikato Regional
Airport Ltd
359.005
25.14.4.5 Height of
Structures – Horizontal and
Conical Obstacle Limitation
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.5 a) to clarify that no building, mast, tree or other object shall penetrate any of the horizontal and
conical obstacle limitation surfaces surrounding Hamilton Airport; Amend Note 2 in Rule 25.14.4.5 to clarify that the
Conical Obstacle Limitation Surface slopes upward and outwards from the periphery of the Horizontal Surface at a
Page 69 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Surfaces
gradient of 1 vertical to 20 horizontal to an elevation of 207m above Moturiki Datum.
Waikato Regional
Airport Ltd
359.006
25.14.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.6 a) v by adding a new assessment matter: V21
Waikato Regional
Airport Ltd
359.007
1 Plan Overview
Support in Seeks any consequential amendments that would have the same effect in relation to the specific submissions made by
part
Waikato Regional Airport.
Waikato Regional
Airport Ltd
359.008
V Transportation
Oppose
Insert a new assessment criterion in Volume 2 Appendix 1.2 (V Transportation) as follows:
Obstacle Limitation Surface for Hamilton Airport
"V21 The extent to which any building, mast, tree or other object creates a potential hazard to the flight paths of
aircraft or any other operations associated with Hamilton Airport."
W.R & J.M
Falconer
360.001
3 Structure Plans
Support in A Structure Plan for Temple View be developed for inclusion in Section 3 - Structure Plans.
part
W.R & J.M
Falconer
360.003
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Support in Amend Volume 2: Appendix 2 - Structure Plans by including a Temple View Structure Plan and make any subsequential
part
changes to other diagrams.
Cameron Graham
Murray (PFS
Engineering Ltd)
361.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain Rules 9.3 as notified.
Raymond Dong
362.001
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-Re-zone the south-western side of Clifton Road from Residential Intensification to City Centre – Precinct 2.
Raymond Dong
362.002
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct.
Amanda Kaye
Young
363.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Simon Irvine
Young
364.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Graham
Singelton (PFS
Engineering)
365.001
Zoning Map 18A
Support
Map 18A-Retain the zoning of the Riverlea area.
Graham
Singelton (PFS
365.002
Zoning Map 58A
Support
Map 58A-Retain the Industrial Zoning at Riverlea
Page 70 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Engineering)
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.001
2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support
Integrated Land Use,
Transport and Infrastructure
Support. Retain Policy 2.2.13e)
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.002
3.6.2.6 Passenger Transport
Facility
Support
KiwiRail supports the provision of PT facilities in the Structure Planning for Rotokauri.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.003
3.7 Ruakura
Support
Supports Ruakura Structure Plan
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.005
4.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policies 4.2.2b and 4.2.2c to include references to rail corridors as being a significant infrastructure; along with
part
wording to encourage the avoidance of locating too close to such infrastructure; and the management of reverse
sensitivities.
Delete policy 4.2.2d.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.006
8.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objective 8.2.2 and Policy 8.2.2c
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.007
9.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support
Supports the development of the freight village facility at Crawford Street identified in 9.2.4.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.009
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Support
Supports the retention of Policy 22.2.1h that states new regionally significant infrastructure can only be located in a
Flood Hazard area when it is not practicable to locate that infrastructure elsewhere and if flood event impacts are
minimised.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.010
22.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rules 22.3 h) to m) to specifically include 'structures'.
part
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.011
25.2.2 Objectives and
Policies Earthworks and
Vegetation Removal
Support
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.012
25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 25.2.3(d) to clarify that trimming and pruning of vegetation to protect all overhead electric and
Table
part
telecommunication lines is a Permitted Activity.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.013
25.8.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support
Support Objective 25.8.2.2 and Policy 25.8.2.2b for Noise and Vibration
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.015
25.8.2.3 Objective and Policy Support
Support Objective 25.8.2.3 and Policy 25.8.2.3a for Noise and Vibration
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.016
25.8.3.9 Noise-sensitive
Activities – Activities in all
Supports Objective 25.2.2.1 and Policy 25.2.2.1(a)(v) as earthworks and vegetation removal are both necessary in the
rail corridor for the safe and efficient operation of the network.
Support in Amend 25.8.3.9a and with amendments for correct cross referencing and inclusion of Designation F1a.
part
Page 71 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Zones
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.017
25.8.3.10 Operational
Vibration from Rail Lines –
Activities in All Zones
Support in Amend 25.8.3.10 Operational Vibration from Rail Lines with the addition of a note that explains the factors that need
part
to be taken into account when assessing potential vibration from passing trains.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.018
25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading
Spaces and Manoeuvring
Areas
Support
25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas - support
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.019
25.14.4.1 Vehicle Crossings
and Internal Vehicle Access
Support
Retain Rule 25.14.4.1 b) which states that new vehicle crossings should be at least 30m from any railway level crossing.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.020
25.14.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Support in Add 25.14.6 a) viii. "Any vehicle crossing near a railway level crossing that does not comply with the standards of Rule
part
25.14.4.1b)*" and Kiwirail may be notified; Retain the requirement that activities not complying with Rule 25.14.6 a) iv.
are a Restricted Discretionary Activity, AND that Kiwirail may be notified.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.021
25.14.4.4 Minimum Sight
Distances at Railway Level
Crossings
Support in Retain Rule 25.14.4.4 Minimum Sight Distances at Railway Level Crossings OR replace it with simplified standards.
part
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.022
25.14.7 Notification Rule
Support in Amend Rule 25.14.7 a) Notification Rule to clarify notification requirements and ensure that Kiwirail may be notified
part
with respect to proposals that do not comply with Rule 25.14.4.1 b) Minimum distance between any vehicle crossing
and a railway level crossing.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.023
26.1 Purpose
Support
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.024
26.2 Use of Designated Land Support
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.025
26.3 Schedule of
Designations
Support in Amend the two references to "NZRC" in the Schedule of Designations (section 26.3) to "KiwiRail".
part
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.026
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend the definition for Regionally Significant Infrastructure to include all KiwiRail managed railway lines that extend
part
through the City
Support 26.1 as it is important the Plan clearly indicates the use to which the designated land might be put to if a
designation is removed.
Retain 26.2(c) detailing instances where Council may waive the requirement for an Outline Plan.
Insert a new definition for Vibration Sensitive Activities which means residential activities, marae, hospitals and
educational establishments.
Amend the definition for Transport depot to include transit by rail.
Page 72 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.027
Zoning Maps
Support
Maps 6A, 14A, 15A, 24A, 25A, 34A, 35A, 37A, 38A, 39A, 40A, 43A, 44A, 45A, and 54A. KiwiRail supports the underlying
zoning of the designations F1 and F1a.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.028
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.3 to include Logistics and freighthandling infrastructure as a permitted activity in the Industrial Zone.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.029
12.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Seeks Logistics and Freighthandling Infrastructure to be provided for as a Permitted Activity within 12.3 Te Rapa North
Industrial Zone Activity Status.
KiwiRail Holdings
Limited
366.030
25.14.2 Objectives and
Policies Transportation
Support
Retain Policy 25.14.2.1e regarding adverse effects on the transport network.
Stephen Cox
367.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Glenview Medical
Centre
368.001
6.2.3 Objective and Policies
Neighbourhood Centres
Support in Amend Objective 6.2.3 to include provision for Health Care facilities within neighbourhood centres (Business Zone 7).
part
Glenview Medical
Centre
368.002
Zoning Map 55A
Oppose
Rowan Bishop
369.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Geoffrey Charles
Spooner
370.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Anglesea Medical
Properties Ltd
371.001
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Anglesea Medical
Properties Ltd
371.002
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support
Retain Rule 7.4.2 - Building Intensity regarding the increase in the permitted floor area ratio
Anglesea Medical
Properties Ltd
371.003
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support
Retain Rule 7.4.4 which increases the maximum building height from the Operative District Plan.
Anglesea Medical
Properties Ltd
371.004
Table 15-2b Number of
Support
parking and loading spaces
required – Central City Zone
Map 55A-rezone the sites at 3 and 5 Urlich Avenue from Residential to Business 7 Zone to allow for future expansion.
Amend Rule 7.3a) and b) so that new buildings and alterations or additions are a Controlled Activity.
Amend Rule 7.3 l), m) n), hh), t), ii), jj), kk), ll), mm) and tt) to allow for offices, retail greater than 250m2, health care
services, community centres, Tertiary education and specialised training facilities and visitor accommodation as
Permitted Activities.
Amend 7.3(x) to delete reference to “on sites fronting Victoria Street”
Delete 7.3(y) in its entirety.
Retain Appendix 15, Table 15-2b Number of parking and loading spaces required – Central City Zone.
Page 73 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Anglesea Medical
Properties Ltd
371.005
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.8 so that the side and rear boundary setback requirements are 0m except when adjoining a
Residential or Special Character Zone for Precinct 2, 3 and 4 where it should be 3m
Anglesea Medical
Properties Ltd
371.006
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages so that restrictions only apply to buildings containing ground floor retail activities.
Anglesea Medical
Properties Ltd
371.009
7.4.17 Awning Cover
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.17 so the awning requirement does not apply to Secondary Active Frontages.
Anglesea Medical
Properties Ltd
371.010
7.5.4 Residential
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.5.4 b), Figure 7.5.4e, Rule 7.5.4e), f) ii and h). Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) i) to delete the requirement for
outdoor living to be located north of east or west. Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) ii and 7.5.4 f) i to reduce the requirements for
outdoor living areas and minimum floor areas for studio, 1 and 2 bedroom units.
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.001
7.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objectives 7.2.1 to 7.2.5 and their associated policies regarding a diverse, vibrant and sustainable city centre
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.002
7.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objectives 7.2.1 to 7.2.5 and their associated policies regarding a diverse, vibrant and sustainable city centre
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.003
7.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objectives 7.2.1 to 7.2.5 and their associated policies regarding a diverse, vibrant and sustainable city centre
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.004
7.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objectives 7.2.1 to 7.2.5 and their associated policies regarding a diverse, vibrant and sustainable city centre
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.005
7.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objectives 7.2.1 to 7.2.5 and their associated policies regarding a diverse, vibrant and sustainable city centre
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.007
7.2.6 Objective and Policies
Downtown Precinct
Support in Amend Policy 7.2.6a to the effect that pedestrian orientated activities are ‘encouraged’, rather than ‘required’ at
part
ground floor level.
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.008
7.2.7 Objective and Policies
City Living Precinct
Support in Amend Objective 7.2.7 to include ‘medium scaled’ offices. Sufficient distinction is still maintained between offices in
part
the City Living and those in the Downtown Precinct.
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.009
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.3(n) so that offices greater than 500m2 gfa and less than 1000m2 gfa are Controlled Activities within the
City Living Precinct, with matters of Control limited to ‘design’, ‘amenity’ and ‘traffic’ (or similar effect);
Amend Rule 7.3 to provide for offices greater than 1000m2 gfa as a Discretionary Activity
Amend Rule 7.3 a) and b) so that ‘new buildings’ & 'alterations' are a Controlled Activity.
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.011
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-5 to include 50, 52 and 54 Collingwood Street within the Parking Buildings Overlay.
DV Bryant Trust
372.012
7.4.7 Street Wall
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.4.7. Amend Rule 7.4.4 and Table 7.4.4g to make provision for a single ‘height control bonus’ for
Page 74 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Board
developments which are ‘set-back’ 4m or more above a 13m wall height.
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.013
7.4.11 Service Areas
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.11a) (i) - Service Areas so there is a maximum service area requirement of 50m2.
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.014
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Oppose
Amend Appendix 5, Figure 5-7 to exclude the submitters Collingwood Street property from the Primary Active
Frontage and extend the Primary Active Frontage northwards along Alexandra Street for the submitters property.
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.015
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-7 to exclude the DV Bryant Trust’s Collingwood Street property as a Primary Active Frontage and
extend the Primary Active Frontage northwards along Alexandra Street for all Trust Board property.
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.016
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
DV Bryant Trust
Board
372.017
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 for earthworks so that it does not apply when an approved erosion and sediment control plan is
implemented for the duration of the earthworks activity.
Support in Amend the scope and nature of the ‘bonus amenities’ in Table 7.4.4(g) to broaden their scope and enable practical use
part
including greater use required for 'off-site' provision of amenities
Amend reference to Table 7.4.4g (m) and 7.4.4g (vi) appears to be an error.
Amend Table 7.4.4g (i) and (ii) so that the amenities may be provided either on site or off-site (in a location approved
by Council)
Amend Rule 7.4.4(f) to so that it applies to 7.4.4g iv - Through Site Links.
Catherine Helen
Murray
373.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Rebecca
Hamilton
374.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Grant Hamilton
375.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Waikato Racing
Club Incorporated
376.001
1.5.15 Concept Plan for
Major Facilities
Oppose
Waikato Racing
Club Incorporated
376.002
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Insert a new definition for Business activities associated with the racing industry.
part
Waikato Racing
Club Incorporated
376.003
17.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Delete reference to Chapter 16: Community Facilities Zone within Rule 1.5.15(b).
Amend Rule 17.3 to provide for additional Permitted activities within the Thoroughbred Business Park at the Te Rapa
Racecourse.
Page 75 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato Racing
Club Incorporated
376.004
17.4.1 Provision of Concept
Plans
Oppose
Amend Rule 17.4.1 a) so that the concept plan for Te Rapa Racecourse does not need to cover the Thoroughbred
Business Park.
Waikato Racing
Club Incorporated
376.005
17.6.7.1 Building Standards
Oppose
Amend Rule 17.6.7.1 a) so there is no maximum for site coverage within the Thoroughbred Business Park. Amend Rule
17.6.7.1 c) ii so that the height in relation to boundary rule applies to the Residential Zone as opposed to the
Community Facilities Zone.
Waikato Racing
Club Incorporated
376.006
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Waikato Racing
Club Incorporated
376.007
25.8.3.8 Noise Performance Support in Retain 25.8.3.8 Noise Performance Standards for Activities in the Major Facilities Zone, Knowledge Zone and Open
Standards for Activities in the part
Space Zones with amendments to reference the correct legal description of those properties the standard does not
Major Facilities Zone,
apply to.
Knowledge Zone and Open
Space Zones
Waikato Racing
Club Incorporated
376.008
25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 f) by deleting the requirement for an Integrated Transport Assessment for new vehicle accesses
from any site within the Major Facilities Zone.
Katie See (Seeks
Investment 2012
Ltd)
378.001
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2.
Katie See (Seeks
Investment 2012
Ltd)
378.003
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct.
Geoffrey Noel
Felton (Behalf of
owners of 19 & 21
Clifton Road and
Corner Rostrevor
St & Clifton Rd)
379.001
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2.
Geoffrey Noel
Felton (Behalf of
owners of 19 & 21
Clifton Road and
Corner Rostrevor
379.002
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct.
Delete Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on slopes.
Page 76 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
St & Clifton Rd)
Geoffrey Noel
Felton (Behalf of
owners of 19 & 21
Clifton Road and
Corner Rostrevor
St & Clifton Rd)
379.003
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct.
Susan Oldridge
(Cruise
Investments)
380.001
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2.
Susan Oldridge
(Cruise
Investments)
380.002
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct.
Joyce Brooks
(Toncliff Limited)
381.001
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2.
Joyce Brooks
(Toncliff Limited)
381.002
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2.
Joyce Brooks
(Toncliff Limited)
381.003
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct.
Brent Noel Hunt
(McKibbin
Properties Ltd)
382.001
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2.
Brent Noel Hunt
(McKibbin
Properties Ltd)
382.002
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-rezone the land on the southwest side of Clifton Rd from Residential Intensification to City Centre Precinct 2.
Brent Noel Hunt
(McKibbin
Properties Ltd)
382.003
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-1 by including the land on the SW side of Clifton Rd within the City Living Precinct.
Kenneth F
Alexander
384.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
A directive be issued for all building demolition in Temple View be halted until the Ngapuhi heritage submission is fully
investigated.
Page 77 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Lenna Maria
Alexander
385.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jason Brown
386.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Murray Keith
McDonald
387.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Robyn & Rodney
Dallin
388.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Michael Seth Rose
389.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ewen Macdonald
390.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Manu Waa
391.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Cherry Wainer
392.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Greg Harmeling
393.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 78 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Ricky Shurtz
394.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Mandy Bishop
395.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Fred H Hughes
396.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lynn Shomers
397.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ernie Ritz
398.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Sarah Shurtz
399.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Nakeya Quezada
(Ez-Pawn)
400.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tony Matthews
(Tracvity)
401.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 79 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Rebecca Harris
402.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Fannie Ritz
403.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Missy Shurtz
404.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Evangeline
Donlon
405.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Francis Fitzpatrick
407.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Francis Fitzpatrick
407.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Francis Fitzpatrick
407.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Francis Fitzpatrick
407.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Jared Vaughan
Ormsby
408.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Jared Vaughan
Ormsby
408.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Retain 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Jared Vaughan
Ormsby
408.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Jared Vaughan
Ormsby
408.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Support
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 80 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Dean Westerlund
409.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Dean Westerlund
409.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Dean Westerlund
409.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Dean Westerlund
409.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Maroni John
Westerlund
410.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Maroni John
Westerlund
410.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Maroni John
Westerlund
410.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Maroni John
Westerlund
410.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Glenn Burgess
411.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Glenn Burgess
411.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Glenn Burgess
411.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Glenn Burgess
411.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Jeff Nikoia
412.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Jeff Nikoia
412.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Jeff Nikoia
412.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Page 81 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Character Area
Area.
Jeff Nikoia
412.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Harry Peter
Gaastra (Taranaki
District)
413.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Harry Peter
Gaastra (Taranaki
District)
413.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Harry Peter
Gaastra (Taranaki
District)
413.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Harry Peter
Gaastra (Taranaki
District)
413.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Mark Green
414.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Mark Green
414.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Mark Green
414.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Mark Green
414.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Jody Walters
415.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Jody Walters
415.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Jody Walters
415.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Jody Walters
415.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Support
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 82 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Toni Elkington
416.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Toni Elkington
416.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Toni Elkington
416.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Toni Elkington
416.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Dale Pateriki
Anderson
417.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Dale Pateriki
Anderson
417.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Dale Pateriki
Anderson
417.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Dale Pateriki
Anderson
417.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Wi Te Kawepo
Ormsby
418.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Wi Te Kawepo
Ormsby
418.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Wi Te Kawepo
Ormsby
418.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Vicky Shurtz
420.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kim Shurtz
421.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 83 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Diana Shurtz
422.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Linda Shurtz
423.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Robert Christmas
(M&R)
424.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jeff Bartholomew
425.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Joyce Brock
426.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Dolores Barnhill
427.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Esteban Tirado
428.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Amanda Sue Ruiz
(Tracvity)
429.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 84 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Charles Wallace Jr
430.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Paul Raymond
Clever
431.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Talbot T Snow
432.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Don Childers
433.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Margaret Corina
Sosa
434.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
John Edward
Garza
435.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Elizabeth
Costanzo
436.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Christopher
Simmerman
437.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Michelle Lyon
438.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 85 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Steve Easley
439.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rhonda O'Hearon
440.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rosie Ibarra
441.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Veronica Gaiza
442.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Luis Garcia
443.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Elbert Brown
444.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
John G Hughes
445.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Juliah Albulet
446.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 86 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Jane Macdonald
447.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Vilma McCreadie
448.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Peter George
McCheyne
449.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lynette Ann
McCheyne
450.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lesley Lomas
451.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Shea Margaret
Lawrence
452.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Suzanne Kyd
453.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Trevor- Charles Te
Metera Kohu
454.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jordan Kiro
455.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 87 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Miriama Kingi
456.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ina Margaret
Kilburn
457.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kylie Hohaia
458.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
John Jordan
Herbert
459.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Colene Herbert
460.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Yana Leah Hemi
461.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Richard Grant
Herewini
462.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Roimata Hazel
Hall
463.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 88 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Kingi Dennis
464.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jane Griffin
465.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Whare Dewes
466.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Mylee Gordon
467.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Heidi-Anna Ruth
Gordon
468.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rewa Pahemata
Ruthina Tipu
Dewes
469.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Keaohiwahiwaofaluanui
Kelsey Daniels
470.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jordan Dennis
471.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Hillary Daniels
472.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 89 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Benjamin Dean
Bryers
474.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kellie Brown
475.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Mark Bramley
476.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Christine Bradley
477.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Colin Leslie
Bradley
478.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Hemi Arthur
479.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Yorana Arthur
480.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.001
Figure 2-1 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Retain Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use while providing the opportunity for changes to Figures 2-1 to 2-3
part
to reflect the designated Southern Links alignment.
The Adare
482.002
Figure 2-2 Peacocke
Support in Retain Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network while providing the opportunity for
Page 90 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Company Ltd
Sub Type Summary
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
part
changes to Figures 2-1 to 2-3 to reflect the designated Southern Links alignment.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.003
Figure 2-3 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Character
Areas and Neighbourhoods
Support in Retain Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan - Character Areas and Neighbourhoods while providing the opportunity for
part
changes to Figures 2-1 to 2-3 to reflect the designated Southern Links alignment.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.004
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Remove Policy 3.3.1(b) (Structure Plans - Housing densities) as it relates to greenfield development of the Peacocke
area and rely on the Master Plan exercise and minimum net site area subdivision provisions for the Peacocke
Character Areas to determine the appropriate density.
Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.005
3.4.1.1 Natural Character
Areas
Support in Renumber Figures 3.4a and 3.4b to reflect the section within which they are located (Section 3.4.1).
part
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.006
3.4.2.3 Commercial
Community Nodes
Support in Amend 3.4.2.3 to provide flexibility in the number of community nodes within the Peacocke Area.
part
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.007
3.4.6 Objectives and Policies Support in Amend 3.4.6 by adding Objectives and Policies for the Peacocke Natural Systems, as set out in the submission and
part
derived from the objectives and policies in Parts 9.2.3a, b and c of the Operative District Plan.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.008
5.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 5.2.1a as set out in the submission to address development in the Peacocke Structure Plan area, and
part
include a new policy under Objective 5.2.1 as set out in the submission, along with an additional statement in the
Explanation section. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Alternatively the Peacocke area should have its own chapter rather than trying to apply objectives and policies that are
genuinely design for ‘special character areas’.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.009
5.2.8 Objective and Policies
Peacocke Character Zone
Support in Amend Policy 5.2.8d (Objective and Policies - Peacocke Character Zone) to include reference to the Master Plan
part
Process and amend explanation of Objective 5.2.8. Peacocke Character Zone to refer to infrastructure capacity
limitations. Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.010
5.3.2.1 Master Plan – Process Support in Add new clause to Rule 5.3.2.1 Master Plan - Process within the Peacocke Character Area - as follows:
within the Peacocke
part
Character Zone
d) Land use consents required under Rule 5.4.13 shall be incorporated into the consent process for the Master Plan as
Discretionary Activities.
Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.011
5.3.2.3 Master Plan and
Comprehensive
Support in Amend Rule 5.3.2.3 Master Plan and Comprehensive Development Plan – Status of Activities by: amending clause a) as
part
set out in the submission to set up a 3-part rule where separate approval for development is only required where
Page 91 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan – Status
of Activities
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.012
5.3.2.4 Activity Status –
Peacocke Character and
Temple View Zones
development is inconsistent with an approved Master Plan; deleting clause b); amending clause c) for clarification
purposes as set out in the submission, and deleting clause f).
Support in Amend Rule 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones. Label each column A, B, C. Amend
part
the headings for the Peacocke Character Area to read follows:
- In the absence of a Master Plan;
- Forming part of the Master Plan process and approval;
- Not provided for in, or inconsistent with, an approved Master Plan.
Amend the category status for all activities in the Column B (the second column) from RD or NC to D.
Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.013
5.4.1 Density
Oppose
Remove Table 5.4.1b (Density – Peacocke Character Area) and remove cross-reference to Table 5.4.1b in Table 5.4.1a.
and add new provision to 5.4.1. (Density) such that in the Peacocke Character Area the residential unit net site area
shall be consistent with the thresholds set out in an approved Master Plan. Any consequential and/or similar
amendments that would have the same effect.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.014
5.4.2 Site Coverage
Support in Amend the tables for Rule 5.4.2 (Site Coverage) to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the Peacocke
part
Character Zone to read as follows:
"Standard after Master Plan approval and criteria to assess Master Plan against" to be inserted above four columns
(Terrace Area, Hill Area less than 5 degrees, Hill Area greater than 5 degrees and Gully Area).
Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.015
5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Support in Amend the table in Rule 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Planting to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the
Planting
part
Peacocke Character Zone to read as follows:
"Standard after Master Plan approval and criteria to assess Master Plan against" to be inserted above four columns
(Terrace Area, Hill Area less than 5 degrees, Hill Area greater than 5 degrees and Gully Area)
Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.016
5.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend the table in Rule 5.4.4 (Building Height) to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the Peacocke
part
Character Zone.
Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
Page 92 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.017
5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rule 5.4.6 (Building Setbacks) to include reference to the Master Plan Process in the Peacocke Character Zone.
part
Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.018
5.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 5.4.7 (Interface Between Public and Private) as well as associated Figures.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.019
5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Remove Rule 5.4.8 (Fences and Walls) including associated figures. Any consequential and/or similar amendments
that would have the same effect.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.020
5.5.11 Retail activities within Oppose
the Peacocke Character Zone
and Temple View Zone
Amend Rule (b) of 5.5.11 (Retail Activities within the Peacocke Character Zone and Temple View Zone) to only
reference Business Zones 5 and 7.
Any consequential and/or similar amendments that would have the same effect.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.021
5.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule a) (xxxvii) in 5.6 (Restricted Discretionary Activities: Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria) to
delete I24 and re-number it ZA9 (to reflect renumbering requested under separate submission point to remove
Peacocke area from the Heritage heading umbrella), and to delete point F3 (relating to a Centre Vitality Assessment
Report).
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.022
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Delete Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on slopes.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.023
25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose
Amend Rule 25.7.3 by adding fa) 'The installation of any network utilities listed in g-ss in association with an approved
subdivision or land use consent'.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.024
23.6.10 Subdivision in the
Peacocke Character Zone
Oppose
Amend 23.6.10 Subdivision in the Peacocke Character Zone to include provisions that allow interim solutions to meet
standards.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.025
Peacocke Special Character
Zone
Support in Amend 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment by renumber and relocate I16 to
part
I24 relating to Peacocke Special Character Zone.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.026
Design Element 2 Public
Interfaces
Oppose
Delete 1.4.2.1 Design Element 2-Public Interface d)
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.027
Design Element 5 Transport
Network Layout
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1, 1.4.2.1, Design Element 5-Transport Network, (a) (x) to reflect situations where topography and
natural features may mean cul-de-sac are the only efficient and effective means of providing access.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.028
1.4.3.2 Interface Between
Public and Private Land
Oppose
Delete 1.4.3.2 Interface Between Public and Private Land.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.029
1.4.3.3 Building Orientation
and Siting
Oppose
Delete 1.4.3.3(e) assessment criteria for Building Orientation and Siting and Note 4
The Adare
482.030
1.5.19 Master Plan for
Support in Amend Paragraph 3 of Appendix 1.5.19 Master Plan for Peacocke Character Zone.
Oppose
Page 93 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Company Ltd
Sub Type Summary
Peacocke Character Zone
Neighbourhoods
part
Support in Provide a mechanism to amend the Peacocke Structure Plan Fig 2-1 to 2-3 to reflect the Southern Links designation
part
when confirmed.
The Adare
Company Ltd
482.031
Figure 15-5e Transport
corridor hierarchy plan
Bruce Gordon
483.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Figure 4.5:Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts - as set out in the submission:
Seeks the recognition of the significant historical, religious, educational, social, and cultural values of the Temple View
community as a whole;
Delete reference to Temple View Character Area and replace with a Heritage precinct;
Recognise that there has been and still is an implicit social contract between the Church and the community in Temple
View;
The Envision Team/developers need to repurpose all of the current Campus buildings and housing as part of a Heritage
precinct.
Mectildah
Chikwiri
484.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Peter O'Donnell
485.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Mary Jefferson
486.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tracey Bell
487.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Craig Ormond
488.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Warren Salon
489.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 94 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Ernie Le Heron
490.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kasey McCarty
491.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Debra Phillip
492.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rob Jacobs
493.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Pauline Gaudin
494.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Robert E Rihehert
495.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Huiariki Watene
496.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Brian D Joyce
497.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 95 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Jocelyn Gush
498.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Nikeita Campbell
499.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Herani Ware
500.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ora Going
Richardson
501.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Vatia Toetagata
(Auckland
Council)
502.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ota Tuaen (Te
Wananga)
503.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kevin Kewena
Tamahou
504.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Margaret Kahui
505.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Francis Peri
Adams
506.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 96 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Charles Sunnex
507.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Andrew Kelvin
James
508.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Cedric T Kingi
Ngarotata
509.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
David Robert
Searle
510.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Wendy Joy Sales
511.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Murdoch Jason
Tahere
512.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Zan Te Wakaiti
Southon
513.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Nicola Hamon
514.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 97 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Takiri Zan
Southon
515.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rutha Lucy
Southon
516.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Sydney Taka
Smith
517.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tina Ann RoseDutton
518.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jackie Macdonald
519.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ammon Kerry
Shaun Preiss Rose
520.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Deane Pinny
521.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Phillip Shane
Ikunui Rose
522.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kelly Pere
523.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 98 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Audrey Pere
524.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Terina Lee Nin
525.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tahir Loy Nin
526.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rosina Aliana Nin
527.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Daphne Parsons
528.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ally Turner
529.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
John Transfield
530.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Pania Lee Nin
531.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 99 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Annitta Nin
532.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Yi Li
533.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Shui Li
534.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Zhuoying Shi
535.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Maraea Mita
536.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Pamela Joy
McLanachan
537.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Yi Li
538.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts;
Do not allow any more shops in Temple View.
Hill Laboratories
Limited
539.001
6.1 Purpose
Amend 6.1d) to provide a purpose for the Business 1 zones which reflects and supports the mixed use nature of these
areas and their location within easy walking distance of the City Centre.
Oppose
Amend 6.1g) to encourage residential activity as part of appropriate mixed use.
Hill Laboratories
Limited
539.002
6.2 Objectives and Policies
Business 1 to 7 Zones
Oppose
Amend 6.2 to include Objectives and Policies for the Business 1 zone recognising the close proximity of these areas
being within easy walking distance to the city centre; the established mix and scale of office and healthcare services,
Page 100 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
residential use; re-development potential as an employment area for a mix of land uses and higher density living to
support the viability and vitality of the City Centre.
Hill Laboratories
Limited
539.003
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.3 a), b), d), m), ww) and xx) so that in the Business 1 Zone, ‘New Buildings’ are a Controlled Activity and
‘Accessory Buildings’, ‘Alterations and Additions’, ‘offices with a gross floor area of up to 500m2‘ and ‘apartments’ are
a Permitted Activity. Amend the definition of ‘Industrial Activity’ in Appendix 1.7 by deleting ‘b) Laboratories and
research facilities’ and include in the definition of ‘Service Industry’ or Amend Rule 6.3 Activity Status Table to provide
for ‘Laboratories and Research Facilities’ as a Permitted Activity in the Business 1 Zone.
Hill Laboratories
Limited
539.004
6.4.1 Maximum Building
Height
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.1a) Business Zone 1 to increase the maximum height limit to 20m.
Hill Laboratories
Limited
539.005
6.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.6a) i, vi and x matters of discretion and assessment criteria for new buildings, alterations and additions
to buildings, and accessory buildings, offices and apartment buildings as they are overly excessive, inappropriate or
unnecessary.
Oppose
Review Appendix 1.2 Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria with a view of
streamlining and simplifying, ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the reason for consent for activities listed
in 6.6a) i, vi and x are considered.
Hill Laboratories
Limited
539.006
Features Map 45B
Amend Planning Map 45B by removing H100 on Lot 1 DPS 86312 and show on Lot 2 DPS 86312.
Hill Laboratories
Limited
539.007
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 so that the earthworks standards only apply within a Natural Hazard area and exclude works
ancillary to an approved subdivision or landuse consent.
Northview
Partnership Ltd
540.001
3.4.3 Transport Network
Oppose
Amend 3.4.3 to indicate that the roading layout within Stage 1 may change as a result of the Southern Links
Designation process.
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.001
7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.002
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.003
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.004
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a
Page 101 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.005
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.006
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.007
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.008
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.009
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.010
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.011
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.012
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.013
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.014
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.015
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.016
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.017
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.018
Design Guides
Oppose
Noeline & Mike
541.019
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1 b) to read "The existing open space along the river's edge, surrounding the rowing Club provides a
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Inclusion of Opoia Precinct within Central City has potential to dilute the vitality and viability of the Downtown
Precinct. Rezone Opoia to Residential Intensification. Delete Rules 1.2 B1 g) Opoia Design Guidance.
Page 102 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Bourke
Situation
Sub Type Summary
part
green 'book end' framing the river...”
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.020
1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend diagrams 1.4.7.4 for Opoia- remove notations and references to “proposed mixed use” and “new connections
part
to/along the river” on the area between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.021
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.022
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.023
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figures 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.024
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.025
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.026
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.027
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.028
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.029
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Noeline & Mike
Bourke
541.030
Zoning Map 45A
Support in Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
part
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Chesterman
Family Trust
542.001
Zoning Map 46A
Oppose
Amend Map 46A to rezone the land on the corner of Grey and Wellington Streets (refer to submission) to Business 5
Zone or Business 6 Zone.
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.001
7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.002
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Opoia Trustees
543.003
4.1.2 Residential
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
Delete 1.4.8 - Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Page 103 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
LTD
Sub Type Summary
Intensification Zone
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.004
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.005
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.006
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.007
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.008
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.009
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.010
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.011
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.012
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.013
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.014
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.015
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.016
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.017
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.018
Design Guides
Oppose
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Page 104 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.019
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.020
1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.021
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.022
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.023
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figures 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.024
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.025
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.026
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.027
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.028
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.029
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Opoia Trustees
LTD
543.030
Zoning Map 45A
Dorothy Betty
Belbin
544.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lisa-Marie
Watene
545.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Page 105 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Precincts
Carol Anne Allan
546.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tashena Marie
Waru
547.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Cheyanne Alys
Southon
548.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lennox James
Southon
549.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Daniel Rei Nin
550.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jasmine Tunstall
551.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Emma Watene
552.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tipare
Wharepapa
553.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 106 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Adele Wirepa
554.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Arnold David
Stoneley
555.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Shannon Asalele
Ta'ala
556.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kimberley Ruth
Tahere
557.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Colleen Taylor
558.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
George Tenwolde
559.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jamaal Tuia
560.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lucy Tuia
561.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Errin Jay Nin
562.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 107 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Wallace Raiti
Peter Reihana
563.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Amanda Smiler
564.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kristen Smith
565.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Brenda Price
566.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rebecca Nonoa
567.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rachael Nonoa
568.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kasmin Joy Nikora
569.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ashley Nikora
570.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 108 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Folau Paea
Tukanua Ngaw
571.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.001
7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.002
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.003
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.004
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.005
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.006
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.007
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.008
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.009
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.010
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.011
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.012
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.013
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Tony & Frances
572.014
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Page 109 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Schramm
Sub Type Summary
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.015
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.016
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.017
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.018
Design Guides
Oppose
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.019
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.020
1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.021
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.022
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.023
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figures 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.024
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.025
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.026
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.027
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.028
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Tony & Frances
572.029
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Page 110 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Schramm
Sub Type Summary
Site Locations
part
Tony & Frances
Schramm
572.030
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Whittle Family
Trust
573.001
7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Whittle Family
Trust
573.002
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Whittle Family
Trust
573.003
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.004
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Whittle Family
Trust
573.005
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.006
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Whittle Family
Trust
573.007
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.008
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.009
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.010
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.011
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.012
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.013
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.014
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Page 111 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Whittle Family
Trust
573.015
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.016
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.017
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.018
Design Guides
Oppose
Whittle Family
Trust
573.019
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.020
1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Whittle Family
Trust
573.021
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Whittle Family
Trust
573.022
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.023
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figures 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.024
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.025
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.026
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.027
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.028
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Whittle Family
Trust
573.029
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Page 112 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Whittle Family
Trust
573.030
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Milwood Trust
574.001
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Milwood Trust
574.002
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Milwood Trust
574.002
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
part
Milwood Trust
574.003
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Milwood Trust
574.004
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Milwood Trust
574.005
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Milwood Trust
574.006
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Milwood Trust
574.007
Design Guides
Oppose
Milwood Trust
574.008
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Milwood Trust
574.009
1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Milwood Trust
574.010
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Milwood Trust
574.011
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Milwood Trust
574.012
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Milwood Trust
574.013
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Milwood Trust
574.014
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Page 113 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Milwood Trust
574.015
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Milwood Trust
574.016
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Milwood Trust
574.017
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Milwood Trust
574.018
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Milwood Trust
574.019
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Milwood Trust
574.020
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Milwood Trust
574.021
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Milwood Trust
574.022
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Milwood Trust
574.023
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Milwood Trust
574.024
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Milwood Trust
574.025
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Milwood Trust
574.026
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Milwood Trust
574.027
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Milwood Trust
574.028
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Milwood Trust
574.029
7.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
575.001
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Page 114 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Family Trust No2
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.002
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.003
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.004
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.005
7.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.006
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.007
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.008
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.009
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.010
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.011
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Muthuku-
575.012
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Page 115 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
maraswamy
Family Trust No2
Sub Type Summary
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.013
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.014
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.015
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.016
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.017
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.018
Design Guides
Oppose
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.019
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.020
1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.021
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.022
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Page 116 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.023
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.024
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.025
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.026
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.027
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.028
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.029
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Muthukumaraswamy
Family Trust No2
575.030
Zoning Map 45A
Kerianne Moana
Newman
576.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.001
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.002
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
part
Oppose
Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Page 117 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.003
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.004
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.005
7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.006
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.007
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.008
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.009
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.010
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.011
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.012
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.013
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.014
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.015
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.016
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.017
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
577.018
Design Guides
Oppose
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Page 118 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Elaine Murphy
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.019
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.020
1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.021
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.022
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.023
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.024
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.025
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.026
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.027
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.028
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.029
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Ian Colin & Judy
Elaine Murphy
577.030
Zoning Map 45A
Alfreda Olive
Marshall
578.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Marama Karen
579.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Oppose
Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Page 119 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Leslie Marshall
Sub Type Summary
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Hamish Paul
McArthur
580.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.001
7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.002
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.003
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.004
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.005
1.4.7 Riverfront
Development Design Guide
Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a - 1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.006
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.007
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Supports Policy 4.2.5a
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.008
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.009
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.010
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.011
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Dan & Jean
581.012
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
Delete 1.2B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance.
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a
Page 120 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Bourke
Sub Type Summary
Control and Bonuses
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.013
Design Guides
Oppose
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.014
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.015
1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.016
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.017
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.018
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.019
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.020
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.021
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.022
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.023
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.024
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.025
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.026
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Dan & Jean
581.027
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Page 121 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Bourke
Sub Type Summary
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.028
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.029
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.030
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.031
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.032
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.033
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Dan & Jean
Bourke
581.034
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Megan Rona Kaho
582.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Anthea Kingi
583.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Denise Howell
584.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jamie Hemi
585.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jo Leah Takuna
586.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Page 122 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Hemi-Nicholson
Sub Type Summary
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Apikara Hemi
587.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ripeka C Fruean
588.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Apihei Hemi
589.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Otis J Fruean
590.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Nathaniel Beets
591.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Richard GreyEdwards
592.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kimberley Beets
593.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
James Enoka
Tapsell
594.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 123 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Precincts
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.001
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.002
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.003
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.004
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.005
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.006
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.007
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.008
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.009
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.010
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.011
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.012
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policies
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.013
Design Guides
Oppose
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.014
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.015
1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Page 124 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.016
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.017
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.018
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.019
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.020
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.021
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.022
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.023
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.024
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.025
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.026
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.027
7.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.028
7.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.029
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.030
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Page 125 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Deecan Holdings
Ltd
595.031
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Alton & Rebekah
Taylor
596.001
Features Map 61B
Oppose
Base Flood Hazard Areas on accurate maps and not old data; Separate risk areas; Identify what residents can be done
so it doesn't appear on LIM reports.
Shona Catherine
Anne Duggan
597.001
Features Map 61B
Oppose
Remove Flood Hazard Area for 13 Rhonda Avenue.
Ian Harold & Jean
Marie Townsend
598.001
Features Map 61B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 15 Rhonda Avenue.
Robert & Lauryl
Crump
599.001
Features Map 61B
Oppose
Amend to identify LIM "low" rather than "low/medium/high" for 14 Rhonda Ave
Fiona Natalie Bell
600.001
Features Map 61B
Oppose
Amend to identify LIM "low" rather than "low/medium/high" for 12 Rhonda Ave
Kevin Patrick
Fitzpatrick
601.001
Features Map 61B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area for 6 Rhonda Avenue.
Barbara Susan
Campbell
602.001
Features Map 61B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area for 2 Rhonda Avenue.
Nick Murphy
603.001
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Nick Murphy
603.002
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
part
Nick Murphy
603.003
7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Nick Murphy
603.004
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a
Nick Murphy
603.005
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Nick Murphy
603.006
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Nick Murphy
603.007
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Nick Murphy
603.008
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Page 126 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Nick Murphy
603.009
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Nick Murphy
603.010
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Nick Murphy
603.011
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Nick Murphy
603.012
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Nick Murphy
603.013
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Nick Murphy
603.014
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation.
part
Nick Murphy
603.015
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Nick Murphy
603.016
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Nick Murphy
603.017
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Nick Murphy
603.018
Design Guides
Oppose
Nick Murphy
603.019
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Nick Murphy
603.020
1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Nick Murphy
603.021
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Nick Murphy
603.022
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Nick Murphy
603.023
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Nick Murphy
603.024
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Delete 1.4.8 - Delete Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Page 127 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Nick Murphy
603.025
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Nick Murphy
603.026
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Nick Murphy
603.027
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Nick Murphy
603.028
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Nick Murphy
603.029
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Nick Murphy
603.030
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Map 45A-rezone “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Bernard Ransley
604.001
Features Map 62B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area and do not include on any associated LIM report for 2 MacDonald Road and 11A Saxbys
Road.
Ernest George &
Georgina Anne
Morris
605.001
Features Map 42B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area for 172 Rifle Range Road.
Ernest George &
Georgina Anne
Morris
605.002
Features Map 43B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area for 172 Rifle Range Road.
Parkwood Trade
Centre Limited
606.001
Zoning Map 15A
Oppose
Map 15A-8A Maui Street be rezoned to Business 7 - Neighbourhood Centre and 8B Maui Street be rezoned to Business
4 – Large Format Retail and both be incorporated into the Te Rapa North Sub-Regional Centre area as identified in
Figure 6.1b of the Proposed District Plan.
Parkwood Trade
Centre Limited
606.002
1.1.7 Explanation of Activity
Classes
Support in Retain Table 1.1.7 - Non complying activity "How Identified" description.
part
Amend Table 1.1.7 - Discretionary Activity "How Identified" description to also provide for the event where 'an activity
is listed in the Plan but not in the Activity status for a particular zone', as provided for in the submission.
Parkwood Trade
Centre Limited
606.003
1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed
Support in Support in Part. Retain rule 1.1.8.1 without modification.
part
Parkwood Trade
Centre Limited
606.004
6.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Figure 6.1b to include 8A and 8B Maui Street into the Te Rapa North Sub-Regional Centre.
part
Parkwood Trade
606.005
6.2 Objectives and Policies
Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 6.2.1 Sub Regional Centres with an additional Objective to recognise existing large
Page 128 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Centre Limited
Sub Type Summary
Business 1 to 7 Zones
part
format retail, office and commercial activities.
Parkwood Trade
Centre Limited
606.006
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards. Amend Rule
6.3 to provide for Licensed Premises / Restaurant on Lot 1 DP 332074, Offices on Lot 2 DP 444949, and Childcare
Facilities on Lot 2 DP 401042, as a Permitted Activities.
Parkwood Trade
Centre Limited
606.007
6.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.6a) and Delete Rule 6.6a) i so that in considering the assessment criteria the decision and/or conditions
will only relate to those matters that are directly applicable to the reasons for why a proposal is assigned a restricted
discretionary activity status and that any matter that is not directly applicable or which imposes obligations over and
above that set out in the relevant standards / rules in this District Plan are not be applied.
B.W & I.V Parsons
607.001
Figure 2-8 Rotokauri
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
That Figure 2-8 (Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use) be amended to delete reference to a Transport Corridor crossing
Lot 2 DPS 79420 and any other land that is outside of the Rotokauri Structure Plan area.
B.W & I.V Parsons
607.002
Figure 2-9 Rotokauri
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
Oppose
That Figure 2-9 (Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network) be amended to delete reference to a
Collector Transport Corridor crossing Lot 2 DPS 79420 and any other land (including those identified as containing a
Major Arterial Transport Corridor) that is outside of the Rotokauri Structure Plan area.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.001
1 Plan Overview
Support
Retain the map in the Foreword to the Plan but also add this to Chapter 2 – Strategic Framework.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.002
1.1.2.2 Integration of the
Plan with Other Plans and
Documents
Support in Amend Section 1.1.2.2(c) by adding additional wording relating to the Future Proof Strategy settlement pattern.
part
Amend Section 1.1.2.2(d) by adding additional wording relating to the proposed RPS and the Future Proof urban limits.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.003
2.1 Purpose
Support in Retain section 2.1 Purpose but add text to section 2.1 (c) as outlined in the submission to link this section between the
part
urban limits as outlined in Future Proof and the Proposed RPS, and the Proposed Plan.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.004
2.2 Objectives and Policies
Strategic Framework
Support in Retain the objectives and policies as outlined in the Strategic Framework chapter as they align with the Future Proof
part
guiding principles.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.005
3.1 Purpose
Support
Future Proof supports 3.1 Purpose and 3.2 Principles set out in the Structure Plan chapter and seeks the retention of
those sections as notified.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.006
3.2 Principles
Support
Supports the retention of the purpose and principles set out in the Structure Plan chapter.
Future Proof
608.007
3.3 Objectives and Policies
Support
Retain the Objectives and Policies under 3.3 Structure Plans
Page 129 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Implementation
Committee
Sub Type Summary
Structure Plans
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.008
3.4 Peacocke
Support
Retain 3.4 Peacocke.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.009
3.5 Rototuna
Support
Future Proof supports the retention as notified of the provisions relating to the Rototuna and Rotokauri Structure Plan.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.010
3.6 Rotokauri
Support
Retain section 3.6 Rotokauri Structure Plan
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.011
3.7 Ruakura
Support
Supports 3.7 Ruakura Structure Plan and requests it be retained.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.012
4.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the purpose of the residential zones, creating a compact city and providing opportunities for higher-density
living in the Central City; and the statements around the use of land more efficiently.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.013
4.1.4 Large Lot Residential
Zone
Oppose
Rezone the Large Lot Residential zone for the Percival and Ryburn road area in the Ruakura Structure Plan to Ruakura
Logistics zone.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.014
4.2 Objectives and Policies
Residential Zones
Support
Retain the objectives and policies in 4.2
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.015
6.1 Purpose
Support
Retain the Purpose of the Business 1-7 Zones
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.016
7.1 Purpose
Support
Retain the Purpose of the Central City Zone
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.017
7.2 Objectives and Policies
Central City Zone
Support
Retain Objectives and Policies in 7.2 which are consistent with Future Proof Strategy principles to make the
Metropolitan Hamilton CityHeart as a vibrant retail, business, arts and social heart of the sub-region.
Page 130 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.018
9.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the purpose of the Industrial Zone. Important this land is used in the most efficient and effective manner and
that it is not consumed by non-industrial uses which could locate elsewhere.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.019
9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain the Objective 9.2.1 and Policies 9.1.2a to 9.2.1c which ensure the limited Industrial Zoned land within the
District is used for industrial purposes.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.020
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Support and retain Rule 9.3f) & g) as notified.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.021
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Support
Retain Chapter 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.022
11.1 Purpose
Support
Retain 11.1 the Purpose of the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.023
11.2 Objectives and Policies Support
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
Retain 11.2 objectives and policies for the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.024
11.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain 11.5.1-11.5.3 to restrict activities in the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone to ancillary offices and retail.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.025
11.4.1 Permitted Activities
Support
Retain Rule 11.4.1 linking with the Ruakura structure plan staging in 3.7.3
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.026
11.4.2 All Other Activities
Support
Retain Rule 11.4.1 linking with the Ruakura structure plan staging in 3.7.3
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.027
18.1 Purpose
Support
Retain 18.1 Purpose for the Transport Corridor Zone.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.028
Transport Corridor Network
Support
Retain the objectives and supporting policies in 18.2.1 for the Transport Corridor Zone.
Page 131 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.029
25.1.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support
Retain Development Suitability objective 25.1.2.1 and supporting policies.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.030
25.1.4.1 All Development
Support
Retain rule 25.1.4.1 General standards for all development.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.031
25.13 Three Waters
Support
Retain the purpose, objectives, policies and rules in 25.13 relating to Three Waters.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.032
25.14 Transportation
Support
Retain the purpose, objectives, policies and rules in 25.14 relating to Transportation.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.033
25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Support
Retain Rule 25.14.4.3 regarding Integrated Transport Assessments.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.034
V Transportation
Support
Retain Appendix 1.2, Assessment Criteria V - Transportation, under Integrated Transport Assessments.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.035
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 of the Ruakura Structure Plan to identify Greenhill and Ruakura connections to the
part
Waikato Expressway and indicate that Powells, Ryburn and Ruakura Roads are being severed and a new underpass to
be undertaken at Percival Road. Designation and road stopping procedures to be undertaken.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.036
15-3 Integrated Transport
Support
Assessment Requirements –
Tables
Retain Appendix 15-3 Integrated Transport Assessments.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.037
15-5 Transport Corridor
Hierarchy Plan and
Definitions
Support
Retain Appendix 15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definitions.
Future Proof
Implementation
Committee
608.038
Zoning Map 40A
Support in Rezone the large lot residential zone to Ruakura Logistics Zone for Percival and Ryburn Roads on map 40A
part
AgResearch Ltd
609.001
1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed
Support in Oppose. Amend Rule 1.1.8.1 'Activity Not Listed' default from non complying to "discretionary".
part
Page 132 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
AgResearch Ltd
609.002
3.7 Ruakura
Support in Amend 3.7b by rewriting to ensure that it is not viewed as compromising the CBD. Delete 3.7h and associated staging
part
rules in Rule 3.7.3.6 as it affects the development of future innovation & research activities and the development of
supporting retail & commercial activities.
AgResearch Ltd
609.003
3.7.3.6 Staging Rule for the Oppose
Innovation Park Precinct of
the Knowledge Zone in the
Ruakura Structure Plan Area
AgResearch Ltd
609.004
3.7.1.4 Knowledge Zone
Support in Amend Rule 3.7.4.1 to remove the inference that the knowledge zone will compromise the central city.
part
AgResearch Ltd
609.005
3.7.1.5 Neighbourhood
Centre
Support in Amend Rule 3.7.1.5 to provide for a Suburban Centre rather than a neighbourhood centre.
part
AgResearch Ltd
609.006
3.7.1.7 Transportation
Network
Support in Amend 3.7.1.7 Transportation Network to indicate the indicative nature of both the spine road & open space corridor.
part
AgResearch Ltd
609.007
3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Delete Objective 3.7.2.2 and policy 3.7.2.2(a) and amend objective 3.7.2.4 in relation to the Ruakura Structure Plan and
part
ensure there is no inference it would compromise the Central City.
AgResearch Ltd
609.008
3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for
Support in
Ruakura Logistics Zone and part
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
in the Ruakura Structure Plan
Area
AgResearch Ltd
609.009
8.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 8.1(f) to provide for a Suburban Centre rather than a neighbourhood centre
part
AgResearch Ltd
609.010
8.2.3 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Delete last sentence of the explanation to 8.2.3 that relates to the staging of development in the Knowledge Zone
AgResearch Ltd
609.011
8.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Delete Policy 8.2.1f as it is considered that future development within the Knowledge Zone is beneficial to the City and
should not be restricted.
AgResearch Ltd
609.012
8.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Retain Rule 8.3 a) the permitted activity status for farming. Amend 8.3 b) to include external maintenance and amend
part
Rule 8.3c) to remove GFA requirement. Delete 8.3 d) as it is overly prescriptive. Amend Rule 8.3 e), g), h), j), K) & q) to
alter text and/or amend status of these activities. Add new permitted activity for specific work to buildings at
AgResearch & Waikato Innovation Park.
Add new permitted activity for commercial and industrial activities that are incidental to research & innovation
activities.
Delete staging rule for the Innovation Park Precinct of the Knowledge Zone 3.7.3.6 and 3.7(h)
Amend 3.7.3.4 b)i by rewording to require the Waikato Expressway to be completed and connected to the logistics
zone or other suitable means without compromising the transportation network.
Delete 3.7.3.4 b) ii and Amend 3.7.3.4 b) iii to ensure the management of development between 2021 & 2041 aligns
with the RPS.
Page 133 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
AgResearch Ltd
609.013
8.4 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Amend Rule 8.4 so that General Standards do not apply to Ag Research Ruakura Research Centre.
part
AgResearch Ltd
609.014
8.4.2 Site Coverage
Support in As an alternative to amending Rule 8.4 b) to ensure the rule does not apply to Ruakura Research Centre, Amend Rule
part
8.4.2 to increase site coverage rule to 70% coverage.
AgResearch Ltd
609.015
8.4.8 Building Design
Oppose
As an alternative to amending Rule 8.4 b) to ensure the rule does not apply to Ruakura Research Centre, Delete Rule
8.4.8 in relation to building design.
AgResearch Ltd
609.016
8.5.3 Ancillary Offices
Oppose
Delete rule 8.5.3 as it relates to ancillary offices within the Knowledge Zone
AgResearch Ltd
609.017
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Support in Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 earthwork standards so that they do not apply to activities identified as Permitted Activities or if
to Any Activity in This Plan
part
otherwise authorised by a resource consent
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
AgResearch Ltd
609.018
25.3.5.3 Events at Innes
Common, Hamilton Lake
Domain, Wintec (City and
Rotokauri), and Within the
Knowledge Zone
AgResearch Ltd
609.019
25.4.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 25.4.3 g) relating to Permitted Activities involving radioactive materials so that it also applies to research
Table
part
and innovation activities in the Knowledge Zone.
Delete Rules 25.4.3 j) and l) relating to activities involving High BOD5 substances.
AgResearch Ltd
609.020
Consent Status Matrix
Support in Amend the Consent Status Matrix for Hazardous Facilities in Rule 25.4.5.1 so that the Knowledge Zone is included in
part
the same category as the Industrial Zone.
AgResearch Ltd
609.021
25.5.3.1 Landscaping
Support in Amend Rule 25.5.3.1 (iii) so that it does not refer to the Knowledge Zone for landscaping adjoining any Residential,
part
Special Character or Open Space Zone.
AgResearch Ltd
609.022
25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Support in Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 h) to exclude specific Ruakura Research Centre activities from requiring resource consent and
part
Integrated Transport Assessment.
AgResearch Ltd
609.023
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Retain definition of "Research and Innovation Activities". Amend the definition of "Events".
part
AgResearch Ltd
609.024
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Ruakura Structure Plan - retain interchanges at Greenhill Road and Ruakura Road and delete all other options; delete
part
"Transport Corridors" within Ruakura Research Centre.
AgResearch Ltd
609.025
Figure 2-15 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Transport
Oppose
Support in Retain permitted activity status of events in Rule 25.3.3a).
part
Amend Rule 25.3.5.3(e) so the provision does not apply to a field day or open day for education of the public on the
research activities undertaken at the Ruakura Research centre.
Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2-15 Delete the “Possible Passenger Transport Route” and delete the "Local Transport
Corridor Roads" within AgResearch Centre.
Page 134 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Network
AgResearch Ltd
609.026
Figure 2-16 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Water
Infrastructure
Oppose
Delete the Transport Corridors within the AgResearch Centre on the Ruakura Structure Plan Fig 2-16
AgResearch Ltd
609.027
Figure 2-17 Ruakura
Oppose
Structure Plan-Waste Water
Infrastructure
Ruakura Structure Plan Fig 2-17 - Delete the Transport Corridors within the AgResearch Centre.
AgResearch Ltd
609.028
Figure 2-18 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Storm Water
Infrastructure
Oppose
Figure 2-18: delete the “Transport Corridors” located within the Ruakura Research Centre.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.002
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.6 d) regarding a minimum building setback from Right-of-ways.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.003
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3 to introduce maximum limits on impermeable surfaces and delete the controls on the location of
permeable surfaces on site.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.004
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards.
part
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.005
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Amend Rule 7.3 a) ,b), d) so that building works are permitted activities subject to standards.
part
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
610.006
4.4.9 Residential Buildings –
Separation and Privacy
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.9 regarding Residential Building Separation and Privacy to allow for the reduction in the separation
distances, as set out in the submission.
Page 135 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Association Inc
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.007
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i, 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or
part
wall is 1.8m; and exclude Large Lot Residential Zone.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.008
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Delete Rules 4.4.10 b) iii. and 4.4.10 b) iv. relating to the location of outdoor living areas.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.009
4.11 Notification Rule
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.11 so that activities not complying with residential housing standards are considered on a non-notified
basis and without the need for affected party approval.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.010
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Delete Policies 4.2.3b and 4.2.3d regarding residential sites adjacent to public spaces and building designs conforming
part
to natural topography.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.011
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Delete Policies 4.2.4e and 4.2.4f to enable the needs of the landowners to be met first before considering the need for
part
development to produce good off-site residential amenity (Objective 4.2.4).
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.012
4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 4.10 by deleting criteria B1 relating to design guides from consideration for Activities not complying with
Rules 4.4.3 and 4.6.5 (Permeable surface), Rule 4.4.7 (Interface between public and private), and Rule 4.4.8 (Fences
and walls)
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.013
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 to increase the permitted volume of earthworks to 120m3 and to exclude the standards from
applying when in accordance with directions from a suitably qualified engineer.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.014
25.2.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Review Appendix 1.2 to ensure only matters relevant to the reason for consent are considered. Opposes the criteria
R3, R4, R8 and T1 in rule 25.2.6 as it applies to earthworks less than 120m3.
Oppose
Page 136 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.015
25.2.7 Notification Rule
Support in Amend Rule 25.2.7 so that resource consents required for earthworks on sites with slopes less than 20 degrees are
part
non-notified.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.016
25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 25.2.3 so that resource consents required for earthworks and vegetation removal on sites with slopes less
Table
part
than 20 degrees are non-notified.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.017
25.15.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 25.15.1 so that it only relates to developments that do not meet specific standards for the various zones.
part
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.018
19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 19.3 h) and i) Activity Status Table to make the demolition of heritage structures or buildings ranked A or
B a Discretionary Activity.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.019
19.2.3 Buildings and
Structures
Oppose
Amend Policy 19.2.3a to include specific provisions for the management of buildings that have a poor earthquake
rating and may pose a safety risk.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.020
1.4.1.6 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete section 1.4.1.6 'Interface Between Public and Private'.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.021
1.4.1.7 Fences
Oppose
Delete 1.4.1.7 Fences and allow landowners to choose the level of boundary treatment to meet their needs within a
height limit of 1.8m.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.022
1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Delete 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces and replace with those in the Operative District Plan.
Waikato
Registered Master
610.023
C General
Oppose
Replace Appendix 1.1 C-General with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are
avoided, remedied or mitigated.
Page 137 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Builders
Association Inc
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.024
E Safe Environments
Oppose
Replace Appendix 1.1 E-Safe Environments - with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the
environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.025
1.4.2.2 General Residential
Zone
Oppose
Delete 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone design assessment criteria
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.026
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.3u) to make new buildings and alterations in the Industrial Zone a permitted activity.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.027
9.6 Controlled Activities
Matters of Control
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.6a)i as it will add unnecessary cost, uncertainty and delay and be subject to urban design scrutiny which
has no relevance to Industrial Zoned Buildings.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.028
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Delete Rule 4.4.12a) or reduce the minimum gross floor area for the different forms of residential units.
Waikato
Registered Master
Builders
Association Inc
610.029
1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose
Assessment Criteria
Delete references to the Appendix 1.4 - Design Guides
Carolyn Suzan Nin
611.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Joan & Michael
612.002
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3 to introduce maximum limits on impermeable surfaces and delete controls on the location of
Page 138 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Forret
permeable surfaces.
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.003
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards.
part
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.004
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Amend Rule 7.3 a) ,b), d) so that building works are permitted activities subject to standards.
part
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.005
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i, 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or
part
wall is 1.8m; and exclude Large Lot Residential Zone from the Rule.
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.006
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.007
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Delete Policies 4.2.3b and 4.2.3d
part
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.008
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Delete policies 4.2.4 e) and 4.2.4 f) from Objective 4.2.4 as these policies are unreasonably balanced in favour of public
part
amenity instead of private property rights.
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.009
4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 4.10 by deleting criteria B1 relating to design guides from consideration for Activities not complying with
Rules 4.4.3 and 4.6.5 (Permeable surface), Rule 4.4.7 (Interface between public and private), and Rule 4.4.8 (Fences
and walls)
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.010
1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose
Assessment Criteria
Delete Section 1.4 - Design Guides and Design Assessment Criteria
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.011
1.4.1.6 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete section 1.4.1.6 'Interface Between Public and Private'.
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.012
1.4.1.7 Fences
Oppose
Delete 1.4.1.7 Fences and allow landowners to choose the level of boundary treatment to meet their needs within a
height limit of 1.8m.
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.013
1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Delete 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces and replace with the limits in the Operative District Plan.
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.014
C General
Oppose
C-General replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are avoided,
remedied or mitigated.
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.015
E Safe Environments
Oppose
E-Safe Environments - delete and replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the
environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.016
1.4.2.2 General Residential
Zone
Oppose
Delete 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone design assessment criteria
Delete Rules 4.4.10 b) iii. and 4.4.10 b) iv. relating to the location of outdoor living areas.
Page 139 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.017
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.3u) to make new buildings and alterations in the Industrial Zone a permitted activity.
Joan & Michael
Forret
612.018
9.6 Controlled Activities
Matters of Control
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.6a)i as it will add unnecessary cost, uncertainty and delay and be subject to urban design scrutiny which
has no relevance to Industrial Zoned Buildings.
Cherie Clark
613.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Seanna CarlileClark
614.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
John & Susan
Chaloner
(Hillcrest Auto
Services)
615.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Dale Clark
616.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Noel Henry &
Joan Breed
617.001
5 Special Character Zones
Oppose
Amend Provisions in Rule 5 Special Character Zones relating density, building height and earthworks for development
in the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area. Amend the design guide for the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape
Area. Amend the zoning of the area to General Residential Zone.
Noel Henry &
Joan Breed
617.002
Zoning Map 33A
Oppose
Amend Map 33A by rezoning 173 Rotokauri Road (Lot 2 DP 425316) to Residential Zone.
Dean Gauthern
618.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Carly Gauthern
619.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Page 140 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Gardiner James
Gordon Palmer
620.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Ariane Emma &
Stephen Keola
Josephs
621.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Vivienne Shona
Evelyn Cammock
622.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tasi Ann
Cammock
623.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Charlotte
Cammock
624.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Conway Tarawhiti
Bradley
625.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tania Rangirangi
Mariana Enoka
626.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Mavis Ruth
Duncan
627.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lloyd Elder
Duncan
628.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 141 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Donald Jeffrey
Waugh Burns
629.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Greg Gimblett
(Church Road
Developments
Ltd)
630.001
6.2.1 Objective and Policies
Sub-regional Centres
Support in Retain Objectives and Policies for the Business 1-7 Zones with amendments to specifically include the sub regional
part
centre fringe.
Greg Gimblett
(Church Road
Developments
Ltd)
630.002
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards.
part
Amend Rule 6.3 Offices in the Business 1 zone to provide for multiple office activity within each site. Amend 6.3 to
include "Integrated Business Park Development" in the Business 1 zone as a Restricted Discretionary Activity.
Amend Rule 6.3 so that Licensed premises, restaurants and cafe’s are permitted activities within the Business 1 zone.
Greg Gimblett
(Church Road
Developments
Ltd)
630.003
6.4.1 Maximum Building
Height
Support
Retain Rule 6.4.1a) regarding the maximum building height of 15m within the Business 1 zone and remove the Amenity
Protection Area applied to the Business 1 Zone.
Greg Gimblett
(Church Road
Developments
Ltd)
630.004
6.4.3 Building Setbacks
Support
Retain Rule 6.4.3 regarding the building setback of 5m in the Business 1 zone.
Greg Gimblett
(Church Road
Developments
Ltd)
630.005
24.3 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
24.3. Amend to provide greater certainty as to the amount of any financial contribution that maybe imposed through a
conditions.
Waitomo
Properties Ltd
631.001
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.3a) and b) so that new buildings, alterations and additions are Permitted Activities subject to
compliance with performance standards for the zone, except on the 6 key development sites in Figure 5-9 of Appendix
5.
Amend the Plan to clarify that alterations and additions do not include changes to colour or the addition of signage to
buildings.
Waitomo
Properties Ltd
631.002
7.4.10 Building Entrance
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.4.10 Building Entrance in Central City
Waitomo
Properties Ltd
631.003
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages
Page 142 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waitomo
Properties Ltd
631.004
7.5.5 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.5.5 regarding having the primary entrance facing the street.
Waitomo
Properties Ltd
631.005
7.5.6 Retail, Commercial and Oppose
Commercial Car Parking
Buildings Sleeving
Delete Rule 7.5.6 regarding Retail, Commercial and Commercial Car Parking Buildings Sleeving
Waitomo
Properties Ltd
631.006
7.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.6 to simplify and reduce the number of assessment criteria by making more activities Permitted subject
to compliance with performance standards.
Waitomo
Properties Ltd
631.007
19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend 19.3 h) and i) Rules Activity Status Table to make the demolition of heritage buildings a Discretionary Activity
where there are safety concerns.
Waitomo
Properties Ltd
631.008
19.2.3 Buildings and
Structures
Support in Amend Policy 19.2.3a to include an exception for demolition of heritage buildings where a building poses a safety
part
hazard to people or property.
Waitomo
Properties Ltd
631.009
25.10.5.7 Central City,
Oppose
Business 1 to 7 and Industrial
Zones
Waitomo
Properties Ltd
631.010
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend the definition of "alterations and additions" in Appendix 1.7 to exclude changes to building appearance by
part
means of painting or signage.
Gavin Roland
Graham Wallace
632.001
7.5.2 Carparking
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.5.2 to remove the requirement to have underground parking in the Riverfront overlay area
Gavin Roland
Graham Wallace
632.002
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.8 to reduce the setback in the Riverfront Overlay table from 5 metres to 3 metres and reduce the
boundary of the Riverfront Overlay by 30m towards the Waikato River
Merran Powell
633.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
J.C Johnson
Family Trust
635.001
5.2.8 Objective and Policies
Peacocke Character Zone
Oppose
Amend Policy 5.2.8d of the Peacocke Character Zone Objective 5.2.8 to include reference to the Master Plan process.
J.C Johnson
Family Trust
635.002
Figure 2-1 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support
Retain Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use as notified.
J.C Johnson
Family Trust
635.003
Figure 2-2 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
Support in Retain Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network as notified.
part
J.C Johnson
635.004
Figure 2-3 Peacocke
Support
Amend Rule 25.10.5.7 regarding maximum signage controls within the Central City Zone to reflect the Operative
District Plan signage rules.
Retain Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan - Character Areas and Neighbourhoods as notified.
Page 143 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Family Trust
Sub Type Summary
Structure Plan-Character
Areas and Neighbourhoods
J.C Johnson
Family Trust
635.005
5.3.2.3 Master Plan and
Comprehensive
Development Plan – Status
of Activities
Support in That Council provides an undertaking to guarantee that the provisions of Rule 5.3.2.3 (Master Plan and Comprehensive
part
Development Plan – Status of Activities) when applied will operate in a manner consistent with that agreed and settled
via previous Environment Court mediation and the consent order entered into.
J.C Johnson
Family Trust
635.006
5.3.2.4 Activity Status –
Peacocke Character and
Temple View Zones
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.3.2.4 Activity Status – Peacocke Character and Temple View Zones.
That Council initiates a variation to the Proposed District Plan after undertaking full and meaningful consultation with
stakeholders to ensure that the provisions relevant to the Peacocke Character Zone reflect the true intent and spirit of
the mediated settlement embodied in the Environment Court Consent Order, or in the alternative
That all activities identified in the “with a approved master plan” column be provided for as controlled activities
provided that they were approved as part of the master plan process.
Julienne Elizabeth
Duncan
636.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Susan Cribb
637.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
David Anthony
Pazi-Cope
(Blackout
Electrical)
638.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Aimee CarlileClark
639.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Shane Carlile
640.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 144 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Gaylynn Leigh
Tunstall
641.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Valerie Clark
642.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kevin Harold
Tunstall
643.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Theresa Albert
(Granddaughter
of labour
missionary)
644.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Margaret Watene
(College Old Bous
Rugby League
Charitable Trust)
645.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Peti Hinewetea
Transfield
646.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Linda Ormsby
647.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jaimee Davies
648.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Luke Ormsby
649.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 145 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Ralph Roland
Hamon
650.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lindsay Hixon
Hamon
651.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Sherrill
Macdonald
Hamon
652.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Janna June
Margaret Fesolai
653.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jared Worth
Pease
654.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Amelia Edith
Pearse
655.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Nathan Graeme
Hamon
656.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Robert Gordon
657.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 146 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Isaac Roland
Hamon
658.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Belinda R Albulet
659.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Heather Hine
(Tracvity)
660.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Katanna Green
(Tracvity)
661.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Joshua
Montomery
(Dollar Flash)
662.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Corey Dunham
663.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Mellissa Castello
664.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Joy Jackson
(Dollar Flash)
665.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Walter Kevin
Ware
666.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 147 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Kevin Matthew
Wenz
667.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kenneth Rasor
668.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
John Neil
Westerlund Jr
669.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Marina Jane
Westerlund
670.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Nihe Matilda
Warwick
672.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lisa Wilson
673.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Shaun Eketona
674.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Richard Herbig
675.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 148 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Meri Blakey
676.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Paulette Leef
677.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Charmaine
Walker-Eketone
678.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ryan Stacey
Harris
679.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lani Awhimai
Michele Emery
680.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Maroea Gaylene
Harris
681.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rakaipaka Harris
682.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Alysha Ann Reti
683.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Penni-Marie
Harris
684.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 149 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Rinaira Gaylene
Horsford
685.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Renaira Gaylene
Harris
686.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ra Harris
687.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Sean Harris
688.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Sharen Reti
689.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Russelle Knaap
690.002
5.1.1.1 Claudelands West
Oppose
Delete 5.1.1.1 Purpose statement - Special Residential Zone - Claudelands West
Russelle Knaap
690.003
5.1.1.2 Hamilton East
Oppose
Delete Purpose Statement 5.1.1.2 (Hamilton East).
Russelle Knaap
690.004
5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Delete 5.4.8 Fences and Walls and retain provisions within Operative District Plan.
Russelle Knaap
690.005
Significant Trees
Oppose
Does not support the scheduling process for significant trees.
Russelle Knaap
690.006
1.4.3.4 Access, Garages and
Parking
Oppose
Delete 1.4.3.4 a),b) and c) Access, Garages and Parking.
Russelle Knaap
690.007
Design Speed Environment
Oppose
Opposes controls on the design of transport corridors regarding design speed environments.
Russelle Knaap
690.008
2.1 Purpose
Oppose
Concern over ongoing lack of parking in CBD which continues to detract from maintaining the primacy of the central
city as a viable and vibrant centre.
Russelle Knaap
690.009
7.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 7.2.2a) by replacing the words 'controlling the distribution, scale, character' with the word 'encourage'.
Page 150 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
part
Amend Policy 7.2.2b) so that the Central City is not identified as the 'preferred' location for major retail, office, cultural
and entertainment activities.
Amend Policy 7.2.2 d) to remove the 'recognition and managed' direction for Heritage Resources within the Central
City.
Amend Policy 7.2.2 e) by removing reference to sporting and entertainment facilities and environmental features.
Russelle Knaap
690.010
7.4.9 Car Parking
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.4.9a) regarding car parking on the front of a site.
Russelle Knaap
690.011
2.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Oppose. The CBD has insufficient parking.
Russelle Knaap
690.012
2.2.13 Objective and Policies Oppose
Integrated Land Use,
Transport and Infrastructure
Opposes the promotion of and public investment in passenger transport and active transport across the city.
Russelle Knaap
690.013
3.4.3 Transport Network
Oppose
Amend 3.4.4 to give priority to motorists in the development of the Peacocke Transport Network.
Russelle Knaap
690.014
7.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Delete Policy 7.2.1d as attractive, efficient and safe passenger transport and pedestrian and cycle links is not core
business.
Russelle Knaap
690.015
7.2.5 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Delete 7.2.5 - A Pedestrian Orientated Central City as people should be allowed to use their car to work in the city.
Russelle Knaap
690.016
25.14.2 Objectives and
Policies Transportation
Oppose
Opposes Policies 25.14.2.1 a)iv, d)v, and e)v regarding the encouragement of walking, cycling and passenger transport
modes.
Russelle Knaap
690.017
25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading
Spaces and Manoeuvring
Areas
Oppose
Opposes Rules 25.14.4.2 regarding the provision of cycle spaces and end of journey facilities.
Russelle Knaap
690.018
5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone
Oppose
Do not adopt 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone.
Russelle Knaap
690.019
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 c) Interface Between Public and Private
Stuart Dillon
691.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Sandra Jean
Talbett
692.001
Zoning Map 38A
Oppose
Map 38A-Rezone land bordered by Peachgrove Road, Daisy Street, Pearsons Avenue and Short Street to Residential
rather than Residential Intensification.
Sandra Jean
Talbett
692.002
Features Map 38B
Support
Support Jubilee Park and Southwell as Significant Natural Areas on Map 38B
Page 151 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Sandra Jean
Talbett (Ashton
Developments
Ltd.)
693.001
Zoning Map 38A
Oppose
Map 38A-Rezone land bordered by Peachgrove Road, Daisy Street, Pearsons Avenue and Short Street to Residential
rather than Residential Intensification.
Sandra Jean
Talbett (Ashton
Developments
Ltd.)
693.002
Features Map 38B
Support
Support the inclusion of bush located on Jubilee Park and Southwell as Significant Natural Areas on Map 38B
Lucy Anne &
Andrew Owen
McKergow &
Hughes
694.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Anne FerrierWatson
695.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Raphael
Coutolleau (Le
Gastronome t/a
La Cave)
696.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Tara Vanessa
Hills
697.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.001
2.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in That the introductory sentence to Rule 2.2 be amended to …
part
"a non-complying or discretionary activity should not contradict the objectives and the policies below."
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.002
2.2 Objectives and Policies
Strategic Framework
Support in Support in Part. Replace all reference to "shall' with 'must have regard to' across all policies in section 2, except policy
part
2.2.5 which should be retained.
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.003
3.3.2 Objective and Policies
Support in 3.3.2 Objectives and Policies part
Amend Policies 3.3.2b, 3.3.2c and 3.3.2e by deleting the word 'shall' and replacing with 'must have regard to'.
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.004
4.2 Objectives and Policies
Residential Zones
Support in Amend Policies in 4.2.1 to 4.2.9 to replace the word "shall" with "must have regard to"
part
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.005
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Support
Supports Rule 4.3.1(bb) Offices being discouraged in residential areas
Page 152 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Residential Zone
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.006
5.2 Objectives and Policies
Special Character Zones
Support in Amend 5.2 Objectives and Policies 5.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.4, 5.2.5, 5.2.6 and 5.2.7 - Special Character Zones - by
part
replacing the word "shall" with "must have regard to".
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.007
6.1 Purpose
Support in Amend the purpose of the Business 1-7 Zones to be less prescriptive
part
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.008
6.2 Objectives and Policies
Business 1 to 7 Zones
Support in Replace the word 'shall' with 'must have regard to' in the Objectives and Policies of the Business 1-7 Zones.
part
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.009
7.1.3 Precinct 3 – Ferrybank
Precinct
Support
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.010
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Support in Supports Policy 7.1.4 Opoia in principle but should not be an immediate priority, thus keeping regeneration and repart
development focus on the existing CBD Precincts. Extend Opoia Precinct North to Te Aroha Street and East to
Memorial Drive. Link Opoia to the CBD with a walkway bridge.
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.011
7.2 Objectives and Policies
Central City Zone
Support in Amend Policies 7.2.1a to 7.2.8d by replacing the word "shall" with "must have regard to".
part
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.012
8.1 Purpose
Support
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.013
9.2 Objectives and Policies
Industrial Zone
Support in Amend Policies 9.2.1a and 9.2.4b to replace use of the word 'shall' with 'must have regard to', to enable more
part
discretion for industrial development.
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.014
11.1 Purpose
Support
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.015
11.2 Objectives and Policies Support
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
Supports objectives and location of Ruakura Industrial (and logistics) Park.
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.016
7.1.2 Precinct 2 – City Living
Precinct
Supports 7.1.2 Precinct 2 - City Living Precinct
Waikato Chamber
of Commerce
698.017
7.1.1 Precinct 1 – Downtown Support
Precinct
Supports 7.1.1 Precinct 1 - Downtown Precinct.
Kel Ormsby
699.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Carl Ormsby
700.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Support
Oppose
Support 7.1.3 Precinct 3 - Ferrybank Precinct.
Supports the purpose and location of the Knowledge Zone
Supports the purpose, objectives and location of the Ruakura Industrial (and logistics) Park
Page 153 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Waikato
Federated
Farmers
Charitable Society
701.001
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5.4 Pedestrian Connections and Gateways Overlay Plan to include 159/169 London St.
part
Waikato
Federated
Farmers
Charitable Society
701.002
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 Parking Building Overlay to cover 159-169 London Street.
part
Waikato
Federated
Farmers
Charitable Society
701.003
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support
Site Locations
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.001
7.2.6 Objective and Policies
Downtown Precinct
Retain Figure 5-9. Request further collaboration with adjacent landowners for Key Development Site 4.
Support in Amend Policy 7.2.6(a) to recognise that commercial office space is appropriate at ground floor where they do not
part
compromise active building frontages.
Amend Policy 7.2.6f) so offices would be suitable in ground-floor locations away from active building frontages within
the riverfront overlay.
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.002
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.3a) and bb) so that ‘New Buildings’ and ‘Alterations and additions’ are Permitted Activities.
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.003
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity from Central City Zone
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.004
7.4.7 Street Wall
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.7 Street Wall so that it only applies to buildings that do not already have a setback from the road
frontage.
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.005
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks to exclude structures that are part of the riverfront pedestrian promenade and
setbacks associated with pedestrian arcades, plazas or through site linkages from setback requirements.
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.006
7.4.11 Service Areas
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.11 Service Areas so that the maximum service area required is 30m2
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.007
7.5.2 Carparking
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.5.2 to remove the requirement for carparking to be located underground in the Riverfront Overlay area
and precinct 4
Amend Rule 7.3s) in the Downtown Precinct by changing the status of retail >250m2 gfa to Restricted Discretionary.
Page 154 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.008
7.5.3 Setback from Waikato
River Reserve
Oppose
Amend 7.5.3 Setback from Waikato River Reserve to provide for the construction of a pedestrian promenade.
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.009
7.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rules 7.6a) i and xxi to remove reference to L3 for New buildings, including alterations and additions* and L3
and Z19 for New buildings, including alterations and additions within Key Development Site 3*
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.010
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Oppose
Amend Policy 22.2.1l to acknowledge that in some cases 'vulnerable' activities may be appropriate rather than being
'avoided'.
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.011
23 Subdivision
Support in Replace reference to 'allotments' with 'certificates of title' throughout the subdivision chapter.
part
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.012
23.6.2 Company Leases and
Unit Title Subdivision
Oppose
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.013
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.014
25.10.4 Rules – General
Standards
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.015
25.10.5.7 Central City,
Oppose
Business 1 to 7 and Industrial
Zones
Amend Rule 25.10.5.7(a)ii) to add to the maximum sign area to provide for rear sites.
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.016
25.12.3.1 Solid Waste
Storage Areas
Delete Rule 25.12.3.1 Solid Waste Storage Areas
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.017
1.4.6.3 Key Development Site Oppose
3 – Victoria on the River
Amend 1.4.6.3 Key Development Site 3 – Victoria on the River to align with proposed development on the site,
amending Concept figures accordingly; broaden the range of uses provided for to include small offices; acknowledge
the future potential of including a pedestrian bridge across the river from this site and remove the proposed mix of
uses on the site.
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.018
1.4.7 Riverfront
Development Design Guide
Oppose
Amend Figure 1.4.7a to show the correct location of the heritage buildings listed as H91 and H74; Amend Figures
1.4.7b and 1.4.7c to show an amended conceptual layout for ‘new built form’.
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.019
1.5.13 Integrated Transport
Assessment
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.5.13 a) so that resource consent applications for Discretionary and Non-complying Activities only
require an Integrated Transport Assessment if there are adverse traffic affects that require consideration.
McConnell
702.020
Table 15-2a Number of
Oppose
Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2a to reduce cycle parking requirements.
Amend 23.6.2(f) Company Leases and Unit Title Subdivision to reference the Resource Management Act 1991 rather
than the Building Act 2004
Delete Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on slopes.
Support in Amend rule 25.10.4(b) to clarify that signs are permitted over a transport corridor where compliance with Rule
part
25.10.5.10(verandah signs) is achieved.
Oppose
Page 155 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Property Ltd
Sub Type Summary
parking loading and cycle
spaces
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.021
Table 15-2e Number of
spaces required for less
mobile users – All Zones
Oppose
Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2e so that the requirement for car parking for less mobile users (Rule 25.14.4.2 c) ii.)
does not apply to offices.
McConnell
Property Ltd
702.022
Table 15-2g Number of
Oppose
bicycle end-of-journey
facilities required – Central
City Zone and Business Zones
1 to 7
Julia Kim Endres
703.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.001
16.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain 16.3(g) Ancillary residential units (e.g. clergy, caregiver, caretaker) as a permitted activity
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.002
16.4.7 Hours of Operation
Oppose
Extend hours of operation under 16.4.7 to start from 0500
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.003
16.5.2 Ancillary Residential
Unit
Oppose
Amend Rule 16.5.2 a) by adding a clause excluding clergy accommodation from the maximum of one ancillary
residential unit for places of assembly or community centres
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.004
19.2 Objectives and Policies
Historic Heritage
Oppose
Amend the Objectives and Policies for Historic Heritage to recognise:
- that many of the City’s heritage items have been confirmed as ‘earthquake prone buildings’, and that regard will be
given to the risks posed to human health and safety when managing the City’s heritage resources;
- that demolition of or effects to historical heritage may be appropriate in some circumstances;
- the financial viability of protecting features;
- incentives; and
- alignment with the RMA.
Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2g to clarify that end of journey bicycle facilities are required based only on the number
of staff bicycle spaces required.
Page 156 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.005
19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend 19.3 b) to give importance to the internal state of heritage items.
part
Amend 19.3 c) to make accessory buildings or new buildings on the same site as an A ranked item as a Controlled
Activity.
Support in part 19.3 k), but amend the activity status to a controlled activity.
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.006
8-1 Assessment of Historic
Buildings and Structures
Support in Amend 8-1 Assessment of Historic Buildings and Structures to include state of repair and earthquake risk as factors
part
that are considered when assessing the importance of a heritage item.
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.008
13.6 Rules – Activity Status
Table for Comprehensive
Development Plans
Oppose
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.009
13.7 Rules – Activity Status Oppose
Table for Activities Proposed
Within an Area with an
Implemented
Comprehensive
Development Plan
13.7 Rules – Activity Status Table for Activities Proposed Within an Area with an Implemented Comprehensive
Development Plan
Insert new activity:
ee) Ancillary Residential Unit as a Permitted Activity in the Community Precinct column.
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.010
Figure 7-2 Comprehensive
Development Plan AreasRototuna Town Centre
Figure 7-2 Comprehensive Development Plan Areas-Rototuna Town Centre:
Oppose
13.6 Rules – Activity Status Table for Comprehensive Development Plans (Rototuna Town Centre).
Insert new activity:
ggg) Ancillary Residential Unit as a Discretionary Activity in the Community Precinct column.
The Submitters/current owners have recently subdivided to separate area CDP H from CDP I.
Area CDP H has an area of 6.18ha. Area CDP I has an area of 3.3ha
AMEND:
Figure 7-2 Legend to reflect the correct areas within each CDP.
Roman Catholic
Bishop of
Hamilton
(Catholic Diocese
of Hamilton)
704.011
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
Amend the zoning of 51 Grey Street, Hamilton East to support the existing office activities that occur at that site.
Amend Rule 4.3.1 by adding a new activity specifically for that property as follows
'Bbb) Office on Lot 1 DPS 23474 (51 Grey Street) = P (General Residential column only).'
Page 157 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Sheena Alice
Maclean (Riverlea
Environment
Society)
705.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
John Barnard
706.001
Features Map 54B
Oppose
John Barnard
706.002
Schedule 9D Significant Trees Oppose
Remove tree T13 from Schedule 9D Significant Trees and Map 54B
John Barnard
706.003
1.3.2.9 Non-emergency
Oppose
Works to, Removal or
Transplanting of, a Scheduled
Tree
Amend Rule 1.3.2.9 Non-emergency works where removing or transplanting a scheduled tree by adding a provision
that takes into account amenity and risk to human life.
Wintec
707.001
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Amend Rule 7.3 cc) and dd) so that Parking Buildings are a Restricted Discretionary Activity in Precinct 1 - Downtown of
the Central City Zone.
Oppose
Remove tree T13 from Schedule 9D Significant and Map 54B
Amend Rule 7.3 ll) and mm) so that Tertiary education and specialised training facilities are Permitted Activities in
Precinct 1 - Downtown of the Central City Zone irrespective of gross floor area.
Wintec
707.002
Zoning Map 24A
Oppose
Map 24A-remove the Industrial Amenity Protection Area between Gilchrist Street and Avalon Drive whilst retaining the
underlying Industrial Zone.
Wintec
707.003
Zoning Map 25A
Oppose
Map 25A-remove the Industrial Amenity Protection Area between Gilchrist Street and Avalon Drive whilst retaining the
underlying Industrial Zone.
Wintec
707.004
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rules 9.3c), e), u), v), x) from Controlled to Permitted Activities.
Wintec
707.005
9.6 Controlled Activities
Matters of Control
Oppose
If not deleted (as applicable to the Rotokauri Employment Area) Rule 9.6 be amended to only relate to the following
criteria:
i. B.(a)i, ii
ii. B.(a)i, ii
iii. B.(a)i, ii
iv. B.(a)i, ii, iii
Wintec
707.006
17.2 Objectives and Policies
Major Facilities Zone
Oppose
Amend Policies 17.2.1a to 17.2.1f by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Delete Policy 17.2.1e and relevant
explanation.
Wintec
707.007
17.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 17.3 f) to make new buildings or relocated buildings not identified on an approved Concept Plan a
restricted discretionary activity. Delete Rule 17.3g). Amend Rule 17.3h) to remove reference to the interface area.
Amend Rule 17.7 so that it does not apply to the Waikato Hospital. Amend Rule 17.3 ll) to clarify the activity status of
activities within the Wintec City Campus.
Page 158 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Wintec
707.008
17.8 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 17.8a) i, vii, viii, xvii, xviii by deleting various matters and assessment criteria. Amend Appendix 1.2
Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria to streamline and simplify
provisions, ensure only relevant matters are considered, and that criteria are not prescriptive.
Wintec
707.009
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 so that the earthworks standards only apply within a Natural Hazard area and exclude works
ancillary to an approved subdivision or landuse consent.
Wintec
707.010
25.13.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Amend Rules 25.13.4.1 c) Integrated Catchment Management Plan, 25.13.4.2 d) Stormwater, 25.13.4.5 a) Water
Efficiency Measures, and 25.13.4.6 b) Water Impact Assessments so that they do not apply to development required to
operate under an approved Concept Plan as provided for in this plan.
Wintec
707.011
25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading
Spaces and Manoeuvring
Areas
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.2 a) Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas - Quantity to clarify that parking levels set
out in an approved Concept Plan apply instead.
Wintec
707.012
Figure 2-11 Rotokauri
Neighbourhood Centre
Oppose
Figure 2-11 Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre. That figure 2-11 be amended as per Appendix 2 attached to the
submission.
Figure 2-11 shows the “triangle” (Pt Lot 1 DPS 16911) as part of Wintec. This site has been zoned Industrial within the
proposed plan and is within the Rotokauri Employment Area. Therefore Figure 2-11 should be amended to reflect this.
Wintec
707.013
Table 15-2a Number of
parking loading and cycle
spaces
Oppose
Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces, to reduce the rate of car parking, and
cycle spaces required for Tertiary education and specialised training facilities within the Major Facilities Zone.
Waikato District
Health Board
708.001
17.2 Objectives and Policies
Major Facilities Zone
Oppose
Amend Policies 17.2.1a to 17.2.1f by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Delete Policy 17.2.1e and relevant
explanation.
Waikato District
Health Board
708.002
17.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Delete Rule 17.3g). Amend Rule 17.3h) to remove reference to the interface area. Amend Rule 17.7 so that it does not
apply to the Waikato Hospital.
Waikato District
Health Board
708.003
17.6.3.1 Building Standards
Oppose
Amend Rule 17.6.3.1 b) ii) Height Control Plane to correct two typographical errors.
Waikato District
Health Board
708.004
17.8 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 17.8a) i, vii, viii, xvi by deleting various matters and assessment criteria. Amend Appendix 1.2 Restricted
Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria to streamline and simplify provisions, ensure
only relevant matters are considered, and that criteria are not prescriptive.
Waikato District
Health Board
708.005
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 so that the earthworks standards only apply within a Natural Hazard area and exclude works
ancillary to an approved subdivision or landuse consent.
Page 159 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Waikato District
Health Board
708.006
25.10.5.4 Major Facilities
Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.10.5.4 e) to improve the clarity of this rule as it relates to signs.
Waikato District
Health Board
708.007
25.13.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Amend Rules 25.13.4.1 c) Integrated Catchment Management Plan, 25.13.4.2 d) Stormwater, 25.13.4.5 a) Water
Efficiency Measures, and 25.13.4.6 b) Water Impact Assessments so that they do not apply to development required to
operate under an approved Concept Plan as provided for in this plan.
Waikato District
Health Board
708.008
25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading
Spaces and Manoeuvring
Areas
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.2 a) Parking, Loading Spaces and Manoeuvring Areas - Quantity to clarify that parking levels set
out in an approved Concept Plan apply instead.
Mark Thomson
Mitchell
709.001
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Delete Policy 3.3.1b (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans - housing densities)
Mark Thomson
Mitchell
709.002
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Delete Policies 4.2.1a and 4.2.1b
Mark Thomson
Mitchell
709.003
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Mark Thomson
Mitchell
709.004
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Vincent Matthew
Heke
710.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Nathalie
Lordemans
711.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Darren Siteine
712.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Sherry Watene
713.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 160 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Waikato Regional
Council
714.001
1 Plan Overview
Support in a) In general, Waikato Regional Council supports the provisions of the PHDP. This submission is seeking some
part
amendments to the PHDP to further improve consistency with the above documents.
b) Ensure that the PHDP is consistent with the provisions of the Proposed Waikato Regional Policy Statement
(Decisions version, November 2012).
c) Include introductory paragraphs (or similar) in each chapter of the PHDP which provides linkages and describes the
relationship with the strategic framework provisions in Chapter 2.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.002
2.2.11 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Amend Objective 2.2.11 and policies 2.2.11a) and b) as suggested in the submission, to strengthen the
Natural Environments
part
wording and recognise that sometimes avoidance of development can provide better protection to the natural
environment.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.003
2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Retain objective 2.2.13 and policies 2.2.13a-2.2.13f. Add a new policy regarding optimising existing
Integrated Land Use,
part
transport networks and infrastructure before new infrastructure is provided.
Transport and Infrastructure
Waikato Regional
Council
714.004
3.1 Purpose
Support in 3.1 Purpose (Structure Plans)
part
Amend the diagram in 3.1a) to include reference to Strategic Framework objectives and policies.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.005
3.2 Principles
Support in a) Add an introductory paragraph explaining how the principles are to be taken account of and implemented.
part
b) Add a principle to 3.2(a) as follows:
'How existing values, and valued features of the area (including amenity, landscape, natural character, ecological and
heritage values, water bodies, high class soils and view catchments), will be managed'
Waikato Regional
Council
714.006
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain the Objectives and Policies under 3.3.1 Structure Plans
Waikato Regional
Council
714.007
3.3.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Objective 3.3.2 under Structure Plans with amendment to Policy 3.3.2c to ensure connection of transport
part
modes, connectivity of industrial areas to the transport network, integration of transport networks over district
boundaries and to ensure development does not hinder future infrastructure requirements.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.008
3.3.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 3.3.3 Structure Plans with amendments to include the safeguarding and
part
enhancement of freshwater bodies and additions to the list of matters under policy 3.3.3b for Integrated Catchment
Management Plans.
Page 161 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato Regional
Council
714.009
3.3.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 3.3.4 Structure Plans with amendments, as set out in the submission, to include
part
the improvement of safety of the transportation network under policy 3.3.4g and to clarify that adverse effects from
building new transport infrastructure need to be avoided, as well as minimised in 3.3.4f
Waikato Regional
Council
714.010
3.3.6 Objective and Policies
Support in a) Amend Policy 3.3.6a so that loss of SNAs is avoided, and opportunities for restoration and enhancement of
part
indigenous vegetation are sought wherever possible.
b) Amend Policy 3.3.6c to delete the words 'where practicable'.
c) Add a new policy 3.3.6e that recognises the importance of, and provides for, well connected and ecologically
functioning natural systems, based around the core ecological framework of the Waikato River and gully system.
d) Add a policy on biodiversity restoration and enhancement through structure plans as follows:
“Develop constructed wetlands and other green infrastructure in new growth areas to deal with urban stormwater
issues and to provide for increased habitat and ecosystems.”
Waikato Regional
Council
714.011
3.3.7 Objective and Policies
Support in 3.3.7 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans). Amend Policy 3.3.7b iv. by deleting the words 'Significant Natural Areas'
part
and replacing with the words: "areas where recreation use is compatible with conservation values".
Waikato Regional
Council
714.012
Peacocke Natural System
Support in Replace Objective 3.4.6.1 with an objective that provides for the protection and enhancement of all remnant natural
part
areas within the growth cell, as well as ecosystem functions and processes (including connectivity), indigenous habitats
and species requirements, and natural character.
Amend Policy 3.4.6.1a by removing reference to stormwater functions of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and Waikato
River margins, and adding references to ecological functions, indigenous biodiversity and habitats.
Amend Policy 3.4.6.1b by adding reference to opportunities for ecological and habitat enhancement and for
restoration of natural character
Amend Policy 3.4.6.1c to provide for the ecological restoration and enhancement (including revegetation with
appropriate native species) of gullies and river margins.
Amend Policy 3.4.6.1e to enhance riparian and aquatic habitat and control adverse effects on stream water quality and
habitat.
Add a new Policy to 3.4.6.1 that preserve the natural character of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and Waikato River
margins and protect it from inappropriate development and where natural character has already been compromised
utilise opportunities to restore and enhance it.
Page 162 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Add a new Policy to 3.4.6.1 that provides for a specific ecological restoration fund from financial or development
contributions from development adjacent to the river and gully edges.
Amend Objective 3.4.6.2 to Maintain and enhance the ecological and open space links to the river provided by the
Mangakotukutuku Gully.
Amend Policy 3.4.6.2a to Maintain the extent and enhance the quality of ecological (green) corridors of the
Mangakotukutuku Gully and Waikato River margins.
Amend Policy 3.4.6.2b to ensure the alignment of the roading network maintains and enhances the ecological, physical
and visual connections of the Mangakotukutuku Gully system and its connection to the Waikato River.
Amend Policy 3.4.6.2c to maintain and enhance the green corridor along the Waikato River to provide for natural
character, ecological functions, riparian and aquatic habitat and for public access and amenity.
Retain Objective 3.4.6.3 and Policies 3.4.6.3a and 3.4.6.3b
Add a new Policy to 3.4.6.3 to protect gully landform, natural feature and landscape elements from modification.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.013
Peacocke Built Environment
Oppose
Amend Objective 3.4.6.4, as set out in the submission, to include reference to maintains or enhances ecological
connectivity. Amend Policy 3.4.6.4d to support changes to Objective 3.4.6.4 by avoiding or reducing the impact of
movement routes on the ecological functions and connectivity of the Mangakotukutuku Gully and the Waikato River.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.014
Peacocke Social Wellbeing
Support in Amend Policy 3.4.6.13a by inserting the following text into the policy "for enhancement or re-creation of habitats,
part
ecological and physical" as set out in the submission.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.015
3.5.1 Objectives and Policies Support in 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies (Rototuna Structure Plan) part
Retain objective 3.5.1.3 and policy 3.5.1.3a in relation to ensuring the transport network is managed and developed in
a way that provides for all modes of transport in an integrated manner.
Add new objective and policies to address landscape features and natural features, ecological corridors, ecological
enhancement, retention of existing indigenous vegetation and habitat required to contribute to the viability of
ecological fragments.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.016
3.6.1 Objectives and Policies Support in 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies (Rotokauri Structure Plan).
part
a) Amend Objective 3.6.1.1 by referencing protection and enhancement of the ecological functioning of key natural
areas.
Page 163 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
b) Add new Policy 3.6.1.1c as follows:
'Subdivision and development provide for the protection and enhancement of ecological connections to, and
ecological functioning of, Lake Waiwhakareke'.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.017
3.7 Ruakura
Support in Move the Industrial Land Allocation table 3.7f to Chapter 2 Strategic Framework
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.018
3.7.1.2 Ruakura Logistics
Zone – Logistics
Support
Waikato Regional
Council
714.019
3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Retain Policy 3.7.21b, Amend Policy 3.7.2.1e to include reference to ecological corridors. Amend objective 3.7.2.3 to
part
include " that is supported by the effective and efficient transport links"
Add new policy to 3.7.2.3c to read: "A well functioning and efficient transport network is developed to support
logistics and freight handling activities".
Waikato Regional
Council
714.020
3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for
Support
Ruakura Logistics Zone and
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
in the Ruakura Structure Plan
Area
Retain staging rules for the Ruakura Structure Plan 3.7.3.4a to 3.7.3.4c
Waikato Regional
Council
714.021
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Policies 4.2.1a and 4.2.1b
Waikato Regional
Council
714.022
4.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.2b to strengthen the text to give effect to Policy 6 of the Proposed Regional Policy Statement to
part
reflect the effectiveness and efficiency of existing and planned regionally significant infrastructure is protected;
Relocate the newly worded policy to Chapter 2 'Strategic Framework'.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.023
4.2.6 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.6a to be consistent with Policy 6.15 of the Proposed Regional Policy Statement.
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.024
5.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 5.2.1e to delete the words 'wherever possible', and include new policy 5.2.1f under Objective 5.2.1
part
(Special Character Zones) regarding the protection and enhancement of Lake Waiwhakareke.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.025
5.2.5 Objective and Policies
Special Natural Zone
Support in Amend Objective 5.2.5 Special Natural Zone to delete the words 'where possible', and amend associated Policy 5.2.5a)
part
to provide wording as set out in the submission relating to protecting and enhancing ecological connections to Lake
Waiwhakareke.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.026
5.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Retain 3.7.1.2.b Structure Plan component of Ruakura Logistics Zone
Amend Rules 5.3 and 5.4 as they relate to the special natural zone to enable assessment of subdivision and
development impacts on ecological connections to, and ecological functioning of, Lake Waiwhakareke, including by
triggering assessment against the design guide in section 1.4.4 OR rezone the ecological stream connection (and an
appropriate buffer width) into Lake Waiwhakareke to Natural Open Space Zone.
Page 164 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato Regional
Council
714.027
5.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Amend Rules 5.3 and 5.4 to enable assessment of subdivision and development impacts on ecological connections to,
and ecological functioning of, Lake Waiwhakareke, including by triggering assessment against the design guide in
section 1.4.4, or rezone the ecological stream connection into Lake Waiwhakareke (and an appropriate buffer width)
to Natural Open Space Zone.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.028
6.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 6.1(j) to recognise the interaction between Hamilton East and Central City.
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.029
6.2.1 Objective and Policies
Sub-regional Centres
Support in Retain Objective 6.2.1and Policy 6.2.1c under Sub-Regional Centres. Amend Policy 6.2.1a to refer to 'development', not
part
'expansion'. Amend 6.2.1b to recognise that the range of activities should be predominantly retail.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.030
6.2.2 Objective and Policies
Suburban Centres
Support
Retain Policy 6.2.2f and the explanation that recognises Hamilton East under Suburban Centres
Waikato Regional
Council
714.031
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.3 for the Suburban Centre Core - Business Zone 5 by adding Offices greater than 500m² gross floor area
per site in Hamilton East as a discretionary activity.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.032
7 Central City Zone
Support in Add a new policy under Objective 7.2.1 regarding recognising, protecting and maintaining the strategic transport
part
function of the Hamilton Public Transport Centre.
Amend Appendix 15, Figure 15-5F to include reference to the Hamilton Public Transport Centre.
Amend Appendix 15 so that a Strategic PT network is incorporated in Figure 15-5F with further explanation included in
15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definition.
Include appropriate bus priority and infrastructure measures in the Central City Local Area Plan to improve the journey
time reliability for public transport.
Provide full consideration with regards to improving journey time reliability and reducing public transport travel times.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.033
7.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objective 7.2.1 and Policies 7.2.1a to 7.2.1g
Waikato Regional
Council
714.034
7.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Objective 7.2.2.. Amend Policy 7.2.2b to include the words "civic" and "administration" to increase consistency
part
with Policy 6.15 of the RPS.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.035
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Support in Add a new policy and amend Policy 7.2.9a to ensure development and activities in Opoia precinct are not of a nature
part
and scale that may affect the vitality and viability of the existing city centre on the western side of the Waikato River,
and other existing commercial centres.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.036
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.3 to encourage public transport facilities in the Central City Zone by making passenger transport
facilities a Permitted Activity in the Downtown and City Living Precincts and Discretionary Activities in the Ferrybank
Page 165 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
and Opoia Precincts.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.037
7.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support in Amend Rule 7.6a) i and ii so that new and relocated buildings are subject to matters and assessment criteria Q1-Q5.
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.038
9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 9.2.1a to reflect the intended provision for limited non-industrial uses where they are relevant to the
part
Industrial Zone.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.039
9.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support
Waikato Regional
Council
714.040
10.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 10.2.1a to make it clear it relates to the zone, move Policy 10.2.1a i to iii to the Structure Plan Chapter,
part
convert Policy 10.2.1a iv and v into rules or assessment criteria.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.041
10.2.2 Objective and Policies Support
Retain Objective 10.2.2 and Policies 10.2.2a to 10.2.2d.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.042
10.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Retain Rule 10.3 for Ruakura Logistics Zone in particular the Non-complying Activity status for general industrial
activities.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.043
11.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 11.2.1a to make it clear it relates to the zone and supports the Ruakura Inland Port and Logistics Zone.
part
Relocate Policy 11.2.1a i, ii and iii to 3.7 Ruakura Structure Plan. Amend Policy 11.2.1a iv and v to read as a rule or
assessment criteria.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.044
12.2.3 Objective and Policies Support
Retain Objective 12.2.3 and Policies 12.2.3a to 12.2.3g
Waikato Regional
Council
714.045
12.2.4 Objective and Policies Support
Retain Objective 12.2.4 and Policies 12.2.4a to 12.2.4c
Waikato Regional
Council
714.046
Natural Open Space Zone
Support in Retain Objectives and Policies in relation to Natural Open Space (15.2.5 and 15.2.6) with amendments to include
part
provisions relating to ecological values, indigenous vegetation and habitats, and riparian and aquatic habitat quality.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.047
15.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain Rule 15.3 ab) relating to the Removal of vegetation or trees
Waikato Regional
Council
714.048
Transport Corridor Network
Support
Retain Objective 18.2.1 and Policies 18.2.1a and 18.2.1b for the Transport Corridor Network.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.049
19.2.1 All Historic Heritage
Support in Retain Objective 19.2.1 and amend Policy 19.2.1 a) with regards to the considerations for effects subdivision, use and
part
development will have on built heritage.
Waikato Regional
714.050
19.2.2 Objective and Policies Support
Support
Retain Objective 9.2.4 and Policies 9.2.4a and 9.2.4b, as they are consistent with Policy 6.6 of the PRPS.
Retain Objective 19.2.2. All Historic Heritage and retain the associated policies a) to c).
Page 166 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Council
Waikato Regional
Council
714.051
19.2.3 Buildings and
Structures
Support
Waikato Regional
Council
714.052
19.2.4 Archaeological and
Cultural Sites
Support in Amend Objective 19.2.4 Archaeological and Cultural Sites to provide a greater level of clarity that such sites 'are'
part
protected from damage and destruction.
Amend policy 19.2.4 a) to ensure that subdivision, use and development should 'avoid' damage to sites.
Retain policy 19.2.4 d).
Waikato Regional
Council
714.053
19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Waikato Regional
Council
714.054
19.4 Rules Specific Standards Oppose
Add a new Rule 19.4.3 to control the effects of earthworks on Group 1 archaeological and cultural sites.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.055
20.1 Purpose
Support
Retain 20.1 d), h), Schedule 9D, and the approach of identifying and mapping Significant Natural Areas. Amend 20.1 f)
ii) to refer to the creation and enhancement of ecological buffers around, and corridors between, SNA's.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.056
Schedule 9C Significant
Natural Areas
Support
Retain the identification and mapping of Significant Natural Areas
Waikato Regional
Council
714.057
Schedule 9D Significant Trees Support
Waikato Regional
Council
714.058
Significant Natural Areas
Support in Retain Objective 20.2.1, Policies 20.2.1a, b, and d to n. Insert a new Objective regarding the maintenance and
20.2.1 Objective and Policies part
enhancement of indigenous biodiversity and the creation and enhancement of ecological buffers around, and corridors
between, SNA's. Amend Policy 20.2.1c by deleting i to ix. Amend Policy 20.2.1o to also refer to indigenous biodiversity
and habitats.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.059
Significant Trees
Support in Retain Objective 20.2.3 and Policies 20.2.3b to 20.2.3f. Amend Policy 20.2.3a by deleting parts i to vi.
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.060
20.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rules 20.3 a) and b) so that trimming, maintenance and removal of indigenous vegetation in Significant Natural
part
Areas are a Controlled Activity with appropriate matters of control.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.061
20.5 Restricted Discretionary Support in Retain Rule 20.5a) ii) and ii) with amendments to add new assessment criterion to J5 Natural Character and Open
Activities Matters of
part
Space.
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Waikato Regional
Council
714.062
21.1 Purpose
Oppose
Retain Objective 19.2.3. Buildings and Structures and associated policy 19.2.3 a.
Amend Rule 19.3 b) Activity Status Table to make internal alterations of buildings a controlled activity OR introduce a
new rule under 19.4.2 Rules - Specific Standards for controlling effects of internal alterations of buildings.
Retain the tree schedule and criteria around ecological value within Schedule 9D
Add new rules within Chapter 21 Waikato River and Gully Systems that control earthworks, impervious surfaces,
buildings and structures, and removal of indigenous vegetation.
Page 167 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Add new assessment criteria in appendix 1.2 that relate to ecological assessment.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.063
21 Waikato River Corridor
and Gully Systems
Support in Amend Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems chapter to highlight the ecological importance of the Waikato River
part
and Gullies
Waikato Regional
Council
714.064
21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain the Objective 21.2.1 and Policy 21.2.1a, and 21.2.1c to g. Amend Policy 21.2.1b to recognise adverse effects on
part
ecological values.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.065
21.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 21.2.2 by referring to ecological and natural character. Amend these provisions to emphasize
part
sensitive use and primacy to ecological, natural character, landscape and cultural values of the River and Gully System.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.066
21.2.4 Objective and Policies Support
Waikato Regional
Council
714.067
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Support in Retain Objective 22.2.1, Policies 22.2.1b to 22.2.1e and 22.2.1g to 22.2.1m regarding Natural Hazards.
part
Amend Policy 22.2.1a to improve consistency with the Proposed Regional Policy Statement regarding 'likely effects'
and 'tolerable or acceptable levels' of risk.
Amend Policy 22.2.1f to reduce the permissiveness of the wording.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.068
22.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Waikato Regional
Council
714.069
22.5.4 Removal of Trees and Oppose
Other Vegetation
Waikato Regional
Council
714.070
23.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective and Policy under 23.2.2 subdivision with amendments.
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.071
23.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Retain 23.2.5 Objective and Policies for Subdivision with amendments to Policy 23.2.5a to include gullies and their
part
banks and 23.2.5b to refer to indigenous vegetation.
Retain Objective 21.2.4 and Policies 21.2.4a to 21.2.4c of the Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems
Amend Rule 22.3 a) so that tree removal in the Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area requires resource consent as
a Restricted Discretionary Activity and include assessment criteria regarding bank instability and increased risk.
The standards in Rules 22.5.4(b)(i) and (ii) regarding the removal of Trees require assessment and therefore resource
consent must be required.
Amend Rule 23.8 by adding the matters and assessment and criteria sought by the submitter in its submission on
21.1d) Waikato River and Gullies.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.072
23.8 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 23.8 by adding the matters and assessment and criteria sought by the submitter in its submission on
Activities Matters of
part
21.1d) Waikato River and Gullies.
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Waikato Regional
Council
714.073
23.3 Rules – Activity Status
Tables
Support in Retain the activity status for subdivision in 23.3 Rules – Activity Status Tables with the addition of a discretionary
part
activity status for subdivision in the Special Natural Zone.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.074
24 Financial Contributions
Support in 24.2 Requests add a policy that identifies specific financial contributions to be taken from development alongside the
part
river and gully system for ecological restoration of those locations; add river and gully ecological restoration to Table
Page 168 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
24.3.3 d) and add in reasoning.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.075
25.2.1 Purpose
Support in Seeks amendments to 25.2.1 Purpose to add reference to the Waikato Regional Pest Management Plan and the need
part
for earthworks applicants to refer to rules within it.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.076
25.2.2 Objectives and
Policies Earthworks and
Vegetation Removal
Support in Seeks amendments to:
part
- Policy 25.2.2.1a i) to include the retention of existing ecological corridors and buffers.
- Policy 25.2.2.1a ii) to include restoration of natural processes and features.
- 25.2.1 to explain to district plan users that there will be situations where more stringent tests will be applied to
vegetation removal and earthworks (e.g. in Significant Natural Areas).
Waikato Regional
Council
714.077
25.7.2 Objectives and
Support in Amend 25.7.2 to include reference to the Regional Policy Statement.
Policies Network Utilities and part
Electricity Transmission
Corridors
Waikato Regional
Council
714.078
25.7.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support
Retain Objective 25.7.2.1 and Policies 25.7.2.1a to 25.7.2.1j
Waikato Regional
Council
714.079
25.7.2.3 Objective and
Policies
Support
Retain Objective 25.7.2.3 and Policies 25.7.2.3a to 25.7.2.3e
Waikato Regional
Council
714.080
25.13.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support in Retain Objective 25.13.2.1. Amend Policies 25.13.2.1a and 25.13.2.1b as set out in the submission regarding the
part
protection of riparian margins and enhancement of aquatic habitats.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.081
25.14.2 Objectives and
Policies Transportation
Support
Retain Objective 25.14.2 and Policies 25.14.2a to 25.14.2g regarding the transport system.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.082
25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Support
Retain Rule 25.14.4.3 regarding Integrated Transport Assessments.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.083
25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency
Measures
Support in Retain requirement for water sensitive techniques in Rule 25.13.4.5 (Water Efficiency Measures) with amendments to
part
refer to the broader range of techniques in the Plan's definitions, and encourage inclusion of these techniques in new
development.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.084
25.15.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support in Add a policy under 25.15.2.2 to retain natural topography when development is occurring, and increase or maintain
part
green spaces in these areas.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.085
A General Criteria
Support in Include a new clause in A2 which cross references Chapter 2 (strategic framework).
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.086
F Vitality of Centres
Support in Amend 1.2 by adding the following to criteria F3; A Centre Viability Assessment report is not required for office
part
developments on Business 1 or Business 5 zoned land in Hamilton East.
Page 169 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato Regional
Council
714.087
H Sites Adjoining the
Riverbank
Support in Requests additional assessment criteria regarding risk from natural hazards for development adjoining the riverbank.
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.088
1.3.2.4 Retail, Commercial
Oppose
and Office Activities – Central
City and Business 1 to 7
Zones
Waikato Regional
Council
714.089
1.4.3.10 Water Efficiency
Support in Clarify 1.4.3.10g) regarding Regional consent requirements for the discharge of untreated greywater.
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.090
1.4.4 Lake Waiwhakareke
Landscape Character Area
Design Guide
Support in Amend Section 1.4.4.3 c) to provide additional reference to protection and enhancement of continuous stream and
part
riparian corridors for Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.091
1.5 Information
Requirements
Support in Amend the information requirements for earthworks consent applications to require details of sediment control
part
measures.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.092
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Ruakura Structure Plan- Retain possible interchanges until certainty is provided on the locations.
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.093
Table 15-2b Number of
Support in Supports the no-minimum car parking rule for the Central City Zone provided Council ensures the overall parking
parking and loading spaces part
needs of the CBD are managed appropriately.
required – Central City Zone
Waikato Regional
Council
714.094
15-3 Integrated Transport
Support
Assessment Requirements –
Tables
Waikato Regional
Council
714.095
15-5 Transport Corridor
Hierarchy Plan and
Definitions
Waikato Regional
Council
714.096
15-7 Criteria for the Form of Support in Supports the inclusion of bus priority measures for transport corridors in the Central City Land Use Environment with
Transport Corridors
part
amendments so that bus priority measures are considered along the whole corridor and not just at intersections.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.097
Zoning Map 46A
Support in Map 46A-Retain the Business 1 zoning for Regional Council Offices at both 319 and 401 Grey Street.
part
Waikato Regional
Council
714.098
Features Maps
Oppose
Amend the name of the ‘gully hazard area’ to "Gully Ecological Area" or similar
Waikato Regional
Council
714.099
2.2.5 Objective and Policies
Business and Industry
Support
Support. Retain Objective 2.2.5 and Policies 2.2.5a and 2.2.5b which ensures there is appropriate integration of land
use and infrastructure, consistent with Policy 6.13 of the PRPS.
Amend Rule 1.3.2.4(a) and (d) – Retail, Commercial and Office Activities – Central City and Business 1 to 7 Zones to
expressly exclude sites in Hamilton East.
Retain Tables 15-3 Integrated Transport Assessment Requirements.
Support in Amend 15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definitions and Figures 15-5E and 15-5F to address issues around
part
consistency with corridors identified in the Regional Land Transport Strategy (Peachgrove Road and Bridge Street), the
function of Anglesea and Tristram Streets, and providing for the public transport network.
Page 170 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato Regional
Council
714.100
2.2.4 Objective and Policies
Central City, Business and
Industry
Support
Support. Retain Objective 2.2.4 and Policies 2.2.4a and 2.2.4b as the use of a commercial hierarchy manages demand
of commercial development in the city, while protecting and enhancing the economic and social functions of existing
commercial centres, as anticipated by Policy 6.15a of the PRPS.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.101
2.2.7 Objective and Policies
The Waikato River
Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 2.2.7 The Waikato River with amendments to Objective 2.2.7, and policies 2.2.7a
part
and 2.2.7d, and insert a new policy 2.2.7f.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.102
2.2.9 Objective and Policies
Waikato River
Support in Retain Objective and Policies under 2.2.9 Waikato River but consider rationalising with the Objective and Policies
part
under the Waikato River 2.2.7.
Reference the full text of the Vision and Strategy in Appendix 10 within the explanation to this Objective and Policies.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.103
1.1.2.2 Integration of the
Plan with Other Plans and
Documents
Support in Amend 1.1.2.2(e) - Integration with other Plans and Documents, by adding additional wording which describes the role
part
of the PRPS plays where there is an overlap of responsibilities.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.104
1.1.11 Local Authority Cross- Support in Amend 1.1.11 b) by adding wording that refers to the Waikato River Vision and Strategy.
boundary Issues
part
Add a new point to 1.1.11 which requires consultation with the Regional Council for resource consents with effects
that fall within the functions of the Regional Council.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.105
2.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support
Support. Retain Objective 2.2.1 and Policies 2.2.1a & 2.2.1b as they support the Future Proof Growth Strategy
principles also reflected in the Proposed RPS.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.106
2.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objective 2.2.2 and Policies 2.2.2a, 2.2.2b and 2.2.2d, as they reflect the importance of co-ordinating growth
with infrastructure as expressed in the PRPS and Future Proof Strategy.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.107
2.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objective 2.2.2 and Policies 2.2.2a, 2.2.2b and 2.2.2d, as they reflect the importance of co-ordinating growth
with infrastructure as expressed in the PRPS and Future Proof Strategy.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.108
2.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objective 2.2.2 and Policies 2.2.2a, 2.2.2b and 2.2.2d, as they reflect the importance of co-ordinating growth
with infrastructure as expressed in the PRPS and Future Proof Strategy.
Waikato Regional
Council
714.109
2.2.3 Objective and Policies
Urban Design Approach
Support
Retain Objective 2.2.3 and Policies 2.2.3a to 2.2.3c Urban Design Approach
Waikato Regional
Council
714.110
2.2.3 Objective and Policies
Urban Design Approach
Support
Retain Objective 2.2.3 and Policies 2.2.3a to 2.2.3c Urban Design Approach
Ike Ihaka Ormsby
715.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 171 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Malakai WateneZelezniak (College
Old Boys Rugby
League)
716.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lee-anne Paama
(COB League)
717.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Britani WateneZelezniak
718.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Alexandra Randell
719.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Rawiri Wayne
King
720.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lucinda Atkinson
721.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jeremy Atkinson
722.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Dora Ballantyne
723.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Patrice Marama
Arkins
724.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 172 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Tara Elissa Arkins
725.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Clarissa Charlotte
Arkins
726.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jonathon William
Arkins
727.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Richard Thomas
Arkins
728.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Samuel Whiteford
Arkins
729.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Bethanie Jane
Smith
730.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Bruce William
Arkins
731.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Penelope Jane
Arkins
732.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 173 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Joan B & (A)
Michael Forret
733.001
Zoning Map 58A
Oppose
Joan B & (A)
Michael Forret
733.002
9.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 9.2.3a in order to extend protection to Significant Natural Areas
part
Joan B & (A)
Michael Forret
733.003
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rule 9.3- Activity Status Table to include an additional column and specific provision for the 'Riverlea Industrial
part
Area'- (refer to the attachment to the submission)
Joan B & (A)
Michael Forret
733.004
9.7 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support in Amend Rule 9.7a) to include an additional activity for "Any industrial activity within the Riverlea Industrial Area" and
part
associated matters of discretion.
Joan B & (A)
Michael Forret
733.005
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support in Amend Restricted Discretionary Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria relating to Significant Natural Areas and
part
ecologically sensitive environments under C Site Development, Design and Layout and J Natural Character and Open
Space
Joan B & (A)
Michael Forret
733.006
9.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Purpose 9.1(c) to support ongoing mixed use within Riverlea Industrial Area, particularly ancillary residential
part
development.
Debbie Lorraine
Neilson
734.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Joanne Vowles
735.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Alfa Blondy Kepu
(Youth Justice
North-Korowai &
Manaaki, CYFS)
736.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kerryn Etika
737.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Summer Kershaw
738.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Map 58A-replace the Industrial Zone with 'Riverlea Industrial Area'
Page 174 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Maari Rose
Thompson
739.001
5.2.6 Objective and Policies
Temple View Zone
Support in Prohibit the following activities within the former CCNZ campus Temple View: Sunday play and trading, gambling,
part
alcohol consumption, use of tobacco products and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products.
Ngamhe Te Amo
740.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Barry Dean Clark
741.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Neesha Pahuru
742.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Mike Burton
743.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Chris Thompson
744.001
5.2.6 Objective and Policies
Temple View Zone
Chris Thompson
744.002
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support in
Comprehensive
part
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Stella Neale
Kenyon
745.001
5.2.6 Objective and Policies
Temple View Zone
Support in Prohibit the following activities within the former CCNZ campus Temple View: Sunday play and trading, gambling,
part
alcohol consumption, use of tobacco products and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products.
Figure 4-5: Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts Seek controls over certain retail and recreational activities occurring on the former CCNZ campus through the
introduction of specific planning provisions/overlays by :
- prohibiting the sale of liquor, alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products;
- prohibiting all Sunday Trading and Sunday Play (organised sports practices and games on Sunday);
- prohibiting all gambling including housie, lotto, raffles, pokies, scratches etc and the building of casinos;
- restrict Sunday Activities on the former CCNZ campus area to quiet family-type activities (which is in keeping with the
current special character of the area where Sunday is treated as a day of rest, for families to spend time together while
engaging in quiet family time).
Support in Prohibit the following activities, within the former CCNZ campus Temple View: Sunday play and trading, gambling,
part
alcohol consumption, use of tobacco products and the sale of alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products.
Page 175 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Courtney Skinner
746.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Pamela Umuhozu
747.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Leilani Uili
748.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Myles Watene
749.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Westly Te haki
Howard
750.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Raechel Anne
Popping
751.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Casey Clarke
752.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Samuel Nowacki
753.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Jackie Noki Tainui
754.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Oppose
Page 176 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Jake Wheki
755.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Michaela Powell
756.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Randall Tannea
Kite
757.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Channeary Yean
758.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Peter Clarke
759.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Philip Siteine
760.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
William Roy &
Raewyn Mary
Cowie
762.001
9 Industrial Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to retain the current Commercial Service zoning for Seddon Road
William Roy &
Raewyn Mary
Cowie
762.002
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Map 44A-Rezone Seddon Road Industrial to Commercial Service zoning (current commercial zone).
Wei Lee
763.001
3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a
Page 177 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential
zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan
Wei Lee
763.002
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a
100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential
zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan
Wei Lee
763.003
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a
100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential
zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan
Wei Lee
763.004
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a
100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential
zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan
Wei Lee
763.005
25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a
100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential
zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan
Wei Lee
763.006
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a
100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential
zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan
Wei Lee
763.007
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the area as rural residential without reference to any logistics in the future b) Provide a
100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund c) Ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road d) Ensure development rights are the same as provided for in the large lot residential
zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan
Ming-San (Arvin)
& Meng-Chu
(Anna) Tang
764.001
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone
c) Council purchase the properties
Ming-San (Arvin)
& Meng-Chu
(Anna) Tang
764.002
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone
c) Council purchase the properties
Page 178 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Ming-San (Arvin)
& Meng-Chu
(Anna) Tang
764.003
3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone
c) Council purchase the properties
Ming-San (Arvin)
& Meng-Chu
(Anna) Tang
764.004
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone
c) Council purchase the properties
Ming-San (Arvin)
& Meng-Chu
(Anna) Tang
764.005
25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone
c) Council purchase the properties
Ming-San (Arvin)
& Meng-Chu
(Anna) Tang
764.006
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone
c) Council purchase the properties
Ming-San (Arvin)
& Meng-Chu
(Anna) Tang
764.007
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain status quo for the area b) Provide a 100m buffer between the area and the Logistics Zone
c) Council purchase the properties
Brandon Kipa
765.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Christine L Forbes
766.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Joseph Hans
Hartog
767.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Matthew Lester
Simon
768.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Marilyn Bigland
770.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 179 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.001
1.1.2.2 Integration of the
Plan with Other Plans and
Documents
Support in 1.1.2.2 Integration of the Plan with Other Plans and Documents - After the third paragraph, insert the following text:
part
"The Vision and Strategy is to be interpreted in a manner that best furthers the Overarching Purpose of the Waikato
River Settlement; To Restore and Protect the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River for future generations".
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.002
1.8.4 Collaboration and
Partnership
Support
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.003
2.2.5 Objective and Policies
Business and Industry
Support in Support in part. Amend Objective 2.2.5 and Policy 2.2.5a) to also include 'cultural' wellbeing as suggested in
part
submission, as this is a key strategic driver for the identity of Hamilton and the wider Waikato region.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.004
2.2.7 Objective and Policies
The Waikato River
Support in Amend the Policies under Objective 2.2.7 The Waikato River to refer to enhancement.
part
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.005
2.2.8 Objective and Policies
Tangata Whenua Waikato
Tainui
Support in Support in part. Amend policy 2.2.8a) as Tangata Whenua have an intergenerational multi-faceted relationship with
part
the city that goes beyond a cultural and historic relationship as suggested.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.006
2.2.9 Objective and Policies
Waikato River
Support in Amend Policy under 2.2.9 Waikato River to provide for programmes of action to improve the health and wellbeing of
part
the Waikato River
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.007
2.2.11 Objective and Policies Support
Natural Environments
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.008
2.2.12 Objective and Policies Support in Oppose. Add a new policy that identifies the important role that location and access to infrastructure has in terms of
Resource Efficiency
part
the efficient development of natural and physical resources as suggested in the submission.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.009
2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support
Integrated Land Use,
Transport and Infrastructure
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.010
3.1 Purpose
Support in Amendments are sought, as set out in the submission, to the provisions in 3.1 (d) (Structure Plans Purpose) relating to
part
the purpose of a Structure Plan in order to strengthen the policy in respect of the landuse pattern and recognise the
need to provide for staging but in a way that recognises the uncertainties associated with long term growth.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.011
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Support
Support the Structure Planning Objective 3.3.1 “Optimised, long-term, positive, environmental, economic social and
cultural effects of Greenfield development”.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.012
3.7 Ruakura
Support
Supports the Ruakura Structure Plan and landuse identified.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.013
4.3 Rules – General
Residential, Residential
Support
Supports the Restricted Discretionary activity status for Rule 4.3.1 (l) Papakainga
Retain 1.8.4 Collaboration and Partnership provisions a), b) and c)
Support. Retain Objective 2.2.11 and policies.
Support Objectives and policies to enable a strategic planning approach and reduce environmental impacts of
activities.
Page 180 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Intensification and Large Lot
Residential Zones
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.014
4.4 Rules – General
Standards – General
Residential, Residential
Intensification Zones and
Large Lot Residential Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4 to exclude Papakainga.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.015
4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Support in Amend the activity status for Papakainga in Rule 4.5.3 i) from discretionary to restricted discretionary activity.
Medium-Density Residential part
Zone
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.016
4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 4.10 to review the assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission.
Add new Rule 4.10a that sets out the relevant matters of control for controlled activities.
Supports the activities identified as subject to Rule 4.11 - Notification Rule.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.017
19.2.1 All Historic Heritage
Support in Amend Chapter 19 to increase scheduling of historic sites and places of significance to Waikato-Tainui in particular
part
those of an intangible nature i.e. wahi tapu/wahi taonga.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.018
19.2.4 Archaeological and
Cultural Sites
Support
Amend Objective 19.2.4 Archaeological and Cultural Sites to include a generic accidental discovery protocol for
permitted activities in areas recognised as being of cultural significance.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.019
19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend 19.3 t) Rules Activity Status Table, to make earthworks involving less than 40m3 a Restricted Discretionary
Activity for Group 1 archaeological sites.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.020
Significant Natural Areas
Support
20.2.1 Objective and Policies
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.021
21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objectives and Policies of 21.2.1 of the Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems Chapter
part
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.022
25.3 Events and Temporary
Activities
Support in Exclude events on Marae from Rule 25.3.5.6 Events and Temporary Activities
part
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.023
25.13.2 Objectives and
Policies Three Waters
Support
Supports the protection of water resources from the adverse effects of subdivision and development.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.024
Schedule 8B Group 1
Archaeological and Cultural
Sites
Support
Supports the Schedule 8B Group 1 Archaeological and Cultural Sites.
Support the protection, restoration and enhancement of Significant Natural Areas
Page 181 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.025
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Ruakura Structure Plan identifies the Greenhill and Ruakura connections as “proposed” interchanges. Remove 5th
part
Avenue and State highway 26.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.026
Figure 2-15 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Transport
Network
Support in Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura connections as
part
“proposed” interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.027
Figure 2-16 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Water
Infrastructure
Support in Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura connections as
part
“proposed” interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.028
Figure 2-17 Ruakura
Support in Ruakura Structure Plan - supports the infrastructure and staging in Figures 2.15 – 2-19.
Structure Plan-Waste Water part
Infrastructure
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.029
Figure 2-18 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Storm Water
Infrastructure
Support in Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura connections as “proposed” interchanges. Remove
part
5th Avenue and State highway 26.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.030
Figure 2-19 Ruakura
Residential Staging
Support in Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 infrastructure and staging.
part
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.031
Appendix 10 Waikato River
Corridor and Gully Systems
Support
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.032
10-1.2 The Vision and
Strategy and the Hamilton
District Plan
Support in Include specific reference to interpreting the vision and strategy within Appendix 10 1.2 The Vision and Strategy and
part
the Hamilton District Plan in a manner that achieves the Overarching Purpose of the Waikato Rivers Settlement Act
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.033
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support
Retain B5-Waikato-Tainui Environmental Management Plan or Hapu Management Plan.
Waikato-Tainui Te
Kauhanganui Inc
771.034
1.3 Discretionary Activity
Assessment Criteria
Support
Retain 1.3 reference to 1.2 B5 Waikato-Tainui Environmental Management Plan or Hapu Management Plan.
Peter & Rinske
Harris
772.001
Features Map 42B
Support in Requests the Flood Hazard Areas not be noted on LIM's until all the city has been investigated and results better
part
understood.
Support the inclusion of the Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato Vision and Strategy for the Waikato River within
the appendices of the District Plan
Page 182 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Cyril Gudeeon
773.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lillian Singers
774.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Barbara Reneti
775.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Stephen Reneti
776.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Longtail Pet Motel
777.001
12.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in 12.3 Te Rapa North Industrial activity status table - seeks reconsideration of the activity status in light of the 30 year
part
timeframe before the area is developed so to support existing activities on-going viability and/or expansion during that
period.
Longtail Pet Motel
777.002
14.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 14.1 - Purpose by adding a new clause e) to recognise that the Future Urban Zone provisions apply to the Te
part
Rapa North Deferred Industrial Zone until the area is zoned Industrial, and any consequential or similar amendments
to have the same effect.
Longtail Pet Motel
777.003
14.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 14.2.1e to provide for the continued operation and expansion of established activities.
part
Longtail Pet Motel
777.004
14.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in The explanation of Objective 14.2.2 should recognise the on-going status of existing commercial uses in the Future
part
Urban Zone. Amend 3rd paragraph of 14.2.2: "Nevertheless, rural-residential development, non-farming related
industry and NEW commercial activities are discouraged in the zone". Any consequential or similar amendments to
have the same effect.
Longtail Pet Motel
777.005
14.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 14.3 by adding a new provision r) which provides for establishments for boarding domestic/pets as a
Discretionary activity.
Longtail Pet Motel
777.006
14.4.5 Building Setback
Oppose
Amend Rule 14.4.5 c) - Building Setback, to exclude buildings associated with establishments for boarding domestic
pets.
Longtail Pet Motel
777.007
Table 23.3b
Oppose
Amend Subdivision Activity Status Table 23.3b Medium Density Residential and Rototuna Town Centre Zones, and Te
Page 183 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Rapa North Industrial Zone.
Longtail Pet Motel
777.008
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Add a definition for "Establishment for boarding domestic pets"
part
Reihana Patrick
Nuku
778.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Philip & Kelly
Evans
779.001
Features Map 62B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 36 Sunnyside Road, seeks more detailed assessment of Flood Hazard Areas,
compensation and infrastructure improvements.
Tania Hennebry
780.001
4.2.8 Objective and Policies
Support in Support the intent of Objective 4.2.8 to encourage new residential dwellings to use water and energy efficient
part
technologies. Suggests an 'Other Method" to create partnerships with EECA (Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Authority) and other service providers within the region for affordable solar, electricity, water storage tanks etc at plan
stage, would be a meaningful step towards sustainable living and future proof living.
Tania Hennebry
780.002
25.13 Three Waters
Oppose
Seeks the encouragement of water storage tanks to collect stormwater/grey water.
Opposes changes that would allow for water metering.
Tania Hennebry
780.003
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Terry Snipler
781.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Deborah AttardManche (Karioi
Osteopaths Ltd)
782.001
Zoning Map 44A
Map 44A-No's 1a to 7 Somerset St area are all residential, offices, cafes and childcare centre. Rezone to allow mixed
use.
Daphne Lois Bell
783.001
4.7.6 Managed Care Facilities Oppose
Delete Rule 4.7.6 b) and f) regarding Managed Care Facilities.
Jordanielle Trust
784.001
Zoning Map 25A
Oppose
Map 25A-Rezone 712 Te Rapa Road to Business Zone from industrial.
Jordanielle Trust
784.002
9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Add policy to provide for non-industrial and retail activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification.
Jordanielle Trust
784.003
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rule Amend 9.3f) to provide for any office activity as a Permitted Activity, amend 9.3g) to provide for any retail
part
activity occupying up to 150m2 or 1000m2 or more as a Permitted Activity, retain 9.3k) amend 9.3l) to provide for
office activities existing at the time of Plan Notification as a Permitted Activity, amend Rules 9.3u) & v) to be a
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 as these provisions impinge on personal privacy and safety.
Page 184 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Permitted Activity, and delete reference to vehicle movements.
Jordanielle Trust
784.004
9.4.1 Building Setbacks
(Except in Rotokauri
Employment Area)
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to a boundary fronting a major arterial.
Jordanielle Trust
784.005
9.4.5 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.5a) regarding permeability to apply to greenfield locations only.
Jordanielle Trust
784.006
9.4.6 Site Layout
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.4.6 and require a 2.0m wide planting strip along the road corridor boundary.
Jordanielle Trust
784.007
9.5.2 Ancillary Retail
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.5.2 that limits retail to ancillary only as it is too restrictive
Jordanielle Trust
784.008
9.5.3 Ancillary Offices
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.5.3 as it is too restrictive to only allow ancillary offices, due to large number of established offices on Te
Rapa Road which should be able to continue.
Jordanielle Trust
784.009
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Oppose
Amend the definition for ancillary retailing and offices to allow for these activities to occupy up to 25% of the floor
space and/or yard-based retail area.
Carolyn Lundquist
785.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Mark Metekingi
786.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ariel Piripi
Metekingi
787.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Nigel Ballantyne
788.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Aaron Atkinson
789.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Philip Ballantyne
790.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 185 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Precincts
Waikato
Biodiversity
Forum
791.001
20.1 Purpose
Support
Retain 20.1 d), h), Schedule 9D, and the approach of identifying and mapping Significant Natural Areas.
Waikato
Biodiversity
Forum
791.002
20.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rules 20.3 a) and b) so that trimming, maintenance and removal of indigenous vegetation in Significant Natural
part
Areas are a Controlled Activity.
Waikato
Biodiversity
Forum
791.003
Significant Natural Areas
Support
20.2.2 Objective and Policies
Waikato
Biodiversity
Forum
791.004
20.5 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend the assessment criteria under Rule 20.5 to include noise and physical disturbance to the habitat of threatened
Activities Matters of
part
species
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Waikato
Biodiversity
Forum
791.005
20.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Environments
Waikato
Biodiversity
Forum
791.006
Significant Natural Areas
Support
20.2.1 Objective and Policies
Retain Policy 20.2.1o and add new objectives and policies that to meet the 10% threshold for habitat stability the
reconstruction and restoration of habitats outside the present Significant Natural Areas shall be promoted.
Waikato
Biodiversity
Forum
791.007
1.8.5 Economic Instruments
Support
Retain 1.8.5 Economic Instruments with amendments to include incentives for proposals to retain, plant or covenant
wetlands
Waikato
Biodiversity
Forum
791.008
21.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 21.1 e) to recognise the role as ecological corridors have in the City linking Significant Natural Areas.
part
Amend 21.2 to include new policies regarding development impact on ecological aspects of the River and Gully System
Waikato
Biodiversity
Forum
791.009
21.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 21.2.2 and its policies to include ecological values and promote ecological restoration and
part
enhancement of the River and Gully system.
Melanie
Ballantyne
792.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Objective 20.2.2 to raise public awareness and appreciation of Significant Natural Areas
Support in Amend to include an objective and policies to protect biodiversity outside of a Significant Natural Area
part
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 186 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Fraser Chistopher
Maxwell (Riverlea
Environment
Society)
793.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Marilyn Cecil
Hayward
794.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Tanya Lisa
Whitehead
795.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Fiona Maxine
Greenwood
796.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Russelle Knaap
797.001
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i, 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or
wall is 1.8m
Russelle Knaap
797.002
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Russelle Knaap
797.003
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) and e) Interface Between Public and Private
Justin Greenwood
798.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Lisa Jayne Bust
803.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Aaron Dixon
804.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 187 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Hinemoa PekeManawaiti
805.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Starship Childrens
Health
806.001
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.6 b) Building Setbacks from Transport Corridor boundary - arterial transport corridors from 8m to 6m
Starship Childrens
Health
806.001
25.14.4.1 Vehicle Crossings
and Internal Vehicle Access
Oppose
Amend property design (setbacks, the design of driveways, vehicle manoeuvring areas and the provision of separate
play areas) to improve child safety.
Levi-Che Ngawaka
807.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Alan Gordon
Sharp (N.C.
Engineering)
808.001
Zoning Map 25A
Oppose
Map 25A-Rezone 716 Te Rapa Road from Industrial Zone to a business zone to provide for non-industrial activities.
Alan Gordon
Sharp (N.C.
Engineering)
808.002
9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Add a policy to provide for non-industrial and retail activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification.
Alan Gordon
Sharp (N.C.
Engineering)
808.003
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule Amend 9.3f) to provide for any office activity as a Permitted Activity, amend 9.3g) to provide for any retail
activity occupying up to 150m2 or 1000m2 or more as a Permitted Activity, retain 9.3k) amend 9.3l) to provide for
office activities existing at the time of Plan Notification as a Permitted Activity, amend Rules 9.3u) & v) to be a
Permitted Activity, and delete reference to vehicle movements.
Alan Gordon
Sharp (N.C.
Engineering)
808.004
9.4.1 Building Setbacks
(Except in Rotokauri
Employment Area)
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to a boundary fronting a major arterial.
Alan Gordon
Sharp (N.C.
Engineering)
808.005
9.4.5 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.5a) regarding permeability to apply to greenfield locations only.
Alan Gordon
Sharp (N.C.
Engineering)
808.006
9.4.6 Site Layout
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.4.6 and require a 2.0m wide planting strip along the road corridor boundary.
Alan Gordon
Sharp (N.C.
808.007
9.5.2 Ancillary Retail
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.5.2 that limits retail to ancillary only as it is too restrictive
Page 188 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Engineering)
Alan Gordon
Sharp (N.C.
Engineering)
808.008
9.5.3 Ancillary Offices
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.5.3 as it is too restrictive to only allow ancillary offices, due to large number of established offices on Te
Rapa Road which should be able to continue.
Alan Gordon
Sharp (N.C.
Engineering)
808.009
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Oppose
Amend the definition for ancillary retailing and offices to allow for these activities to occupy up to 25% of the floor
space and/or yard-based retail area.
Erana Roa
809.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Malaea Cossey
810.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Waihanea
Katarina Timu
811.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Sheree Fryer
812.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
O. Raihania Timu
813.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Summerset
Villages
(Hamilton) Ltd
814.001
3.4 Peacocke
Support in Amend the Peacocke Structure Plan to relocate the collector road away from the submitters site or provide flexibility
part
to allow structure plan features to be located in different areas or in modified form from that shown in the structure
plan.
Summerset
Villages
(Hamilton) Ltd
814.002
Figure 2-1 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Amend Figure 2-1 Peacocke Structure Plan - Land Use to relocate indicative collector road in Stage 1 of Peacocke as set
part
out in the submission.
Page 189 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Summerset
Villages
(Hamilton) Ltd
814.003
Figure 2-2 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
Support in Amend Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network to relocate indicative collector road in
part
Stage 1 of Peacocke as set out in the submission.
Summerset
Villages
(Hamilton) Ltd
814.004
Figure 2-3 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Character
Areas and Neighbourhoods
Support in Amend Figure 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan - Character Areas and Neighbourhoods to relocate indicative collector road
part
in Stage 1 of Peacocke as set out in the submission.
Lynnette Vincent
815.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
George Hape
Chase
816.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Peni Rachel
Golder
817.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Kay Warrender
818.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Delaine & Cyril
Gudgeon
819.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Sherry Te
Amohaere
Watene
820.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Suzanne Ings
821.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Page 190 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
WEL Networks
Limited
822.001
2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support in Seeks the retention of Objective 2.2.13 and Policies 2.2.13a, 2.2.13b and 2.2.13d regarding Integrated Land Use,
Integrated Land Use,
part
Transport and Infrastructure and the amendment of Policy 2.2.13c to refer to infrastructure instead of development.
Transport and Infrastructure
WEL Networks
Limited
822.002
4.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Objective 4.2.2 and Policies 4.2.2a, 4.2.2b, and 4.2.2d
part
WEL Networks
Limited
822.003
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support
WEL Networks
Limited
822.004
4.2.8 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Objective 4.2.8. Amend Policy 4.2.8a o refer to energy efficient technologies, instead of a reduction of
part
reticulated electricity.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.005
Network Utilities
Infrastructure
Support in Retain Objective 18.2.3 regarding providing for network utilities to be accommodated within transport corridors and
part
amend Policies 18.2.3a and 18.2.3b to clarify intent and remove reference to compromising the amenity of the
transport network.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.006
Other Activities and
Structures
Support
Retain Objective 18.2.4 and Policy 18.2.4a regarding other structures located in transport corridors.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.007
20.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain Rules 20.3 a) ii, b) ii, e) i, h) i and i) that allows for the trimming, maintenance and removal of Trees to ensure
the continuing operation of Network Utilities
WEL Networks
Limited
822.008
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Support in Seeks the amendment of Policy 22.2.1h regarding new regionally significant infrastructure in Flood Hazard Areas to
part
replace the word ‘minimised’ with ‘mitigated’.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.009
23.2.2 Objective and Policies Support
Subdivision - Retain Policies 23.2.2a (v)(x)(xi)
WEL Networks
Limited
822.010
23.2.4 Objective and Policy
Support
Subdivision - Retain Objective 23.2.4 and Policy 23.2.4a
WEL Networks
Limited
822.011
Table 23.3a
Support
Retain Rule iv) in Subdivision Activity Status Table 23.3a General Residential, Residential Intensification, Large Lot
Residential, Central City, Business 1 to 7, Industrial, Knowledge, Ruakura Logistics, Ruakura Industrial Park, Future
Urban, All Open Space, Major Facilities, Community Facilities and Transport Corridor Zones and All Hazard Areas.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.012
Table 23.3b
Oppose
Amend Subdivision Activity Status Table 23.3b Medium Density Residential and Rototuna Town Centre Zones, and Te
Rapa North Industrial Zone
WEL Networks
Limited
822.013
23.6 Rules – Specific
Standards
Support in Subdivision - Add a new rule to 23.6 Rules - Specific Standards, to exclude subdivision for accommodating a network
part
utility.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.014
23.7 Subdivision Design
Standards
Support
Retain Policy 4.2.3a vi.
Retain 23.7a Subdivision Design Standards for network utility services
Page 191 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
WEL Networks
Limited
822.015
24.3.3 Level of Contribution
Support in 24.3.3 Add a new rule that requests any financial contribution imposed on new utility allotments reflects that of the
part
Council services required by the allotment.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.016
25.1.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support in Development Suitability-retain Objective 25.1.2.1 and 25.1.2.1a; Amend policy 25.1.2.1b to include
part
telecommunications and electricity; amend policy 25.1.2.1c to remove reference to 'Council's' planned infrastructure.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.017
25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support
Table
Seeks the retention of Rule 25.2.3(b) which provides for earthworks and vegetation removal involving trenching for
infrastructure and network utilities as a permitted activity and small scale earthworks required for day to day network
utility activities.
Seeks a new rule in 25.3.3 to clarify activity status should a standard in Rule 25.2.4.1 not be complied with.
Seeks a new rule to provide for increased earthworks cut depths for infrastructure and network utilities.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.018
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Support in
to Any Activity in This Plan
part
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Seeks the retention of Rule 25.2.3(b) which provides for earthworks and vegetation removal involving trenching for
infrastructure and network utilities as a permitted activity and small scale earthworks required for day to day network
utility activities.
Seeks a new rule in 25.3.3 to clarify activity status should a standard in Rule 25.2.4.1 not be complied with.
Seeks a new rule to provide for increased earthworks cut depths for infrastructure and network utilities.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.019
25.7.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.1 and Policies 25.7.2.1f, 25.7.2.1g, 25.7.2.1h, 25.7.2.1i and 25.7.2.1j.
part
Amend Policies 25.7.2.1a, 25.7.2.1b and 25.1.2.1d to correct errors and specifically refer to the upgrading of network
utilities.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.020
25.7.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.2 and Policies 25.7.2.1c and 25.6.2.1d.
part
Amend Policies 25.7.2.2a and 25.7.2.2e to recognise that network utilities should only be required to minimise
'adverse' effects and that in some cases minimisation may not be possible.
Replace Policy 25.7.2.2b with a new policy about network utilities complying with the International Commission on
Non-ionising Radiation Protection guidelines.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.021
25.7.2.3 Objective and
Policies
Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.3 and Policies 25.7.2.3a, 25.7.2.3b, 25.7.2.3c and 25.7.2.3d.
part
Amend Policy 25.7.2.3e, by removing iii relating to assured standards of long-term maintenance.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.022
25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Retain Rules 25.7.3 a), b), c), d), e), k), m), l), p), q), r) and qq).
part
Amend Rules 25.7.3 f), o), t), s), u), w), x), y), bb), pp) and ss) to alter or clarify the activity status of various network
Page 192 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
utilities.
Insert new Rules regarding non compliance of general standards and switching stations compliance with general
standards.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.023
25.7.4 Rules – Activity Status Support
– Electricity Transmission
Corridors
Retain Notes 5, 6 and 8 within 25.7.4 Activity Status - Electricity Transmission Corridors.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.024
25.7.5.1 Height
WEL Networks
Limited
822.025
25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width Support in Retain Rule 25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width of Antenna, Poles and Masts, provided that amendments requested by the
of Antenna, Poles and Masts part
submitter to Rule 25.7.3 are accepted.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.026
25.7.5.3 Separation Distance Support in Retain Rule 25.7.5.3 Separation Distance, provided that amendments requested by submitter to Rule 25.7.3 are
part
accepted.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.027
25.7.5.4 Size of Panels and
Dishes
Oppose
WEL Networks
Limited
822.028
25.7.5.5 Cabinets and Other
Structures
Support in Amend Rule 25.7.5.5(a) Cabinets and Other Structures to refer to 'equipment'. Retain Rules 25.7.5.5 a) to e) provided
part
amendments requested by the submitter to Rule 25.7.3 are accepted.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.029
25.7.5 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Amend 25.7.5 Rules - General Standards, to include a new standard in relation to Temporary Diesel-Fuelled Generation
part
Activities.
WEL Networks
Limited
822.030
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend definitions for; ‘building’, ‘buildings housing network utility equipment’, ‘electricity distribution’, ‘minor
part
upgrading’, ‘regionally significant infrastructure’ and ‘small and community-scale energy generation’
Support in Retain Rule 25.7.5.1 Height, provided amendments requested by the submitter to Rule 25.7.3 are accepted.
part
Delete Rule 25.7.5.4 a) and b) regarding the Size of Panels and Dishes and seeks inclusion of new note to 24.7.5.4
about the installation of distribution generation equipment.
Retain definitions for; 'cabinet', 'hazardous facility', 'line', 'network utility', 'notional boundary' and 'structures
associated with the generation, storage, transmission or distribution of any network utility’
WEL Networks
Limited
822.031
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Amend Ruakura Structure Plan-Land Use to provide for a network utilities corridor from Silverdale Road to the Waikato
part
Expressway designation; request provisions to enable network utility connections to transportation networks.
Jarom Gudgeon
823.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Jenny Jenkins
824.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Page 193 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Maxine Roberta
Fraser
825.001
25.14.1 Purpose
Support
Ruth Robinson
(Nemesys Ltd)
826.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Ken & Hong
Shang & Wang
827.001
3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around
Percival and Ryburn Roads
Ken & Hong
Shang & Wang
827.002
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around
Percival and Ryburn Roads
Ken & Hong
Shang & Wang
827.003
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around
Percival and Ryburn Roads
Ken & Hong
Shang & Wang
827.004
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around
Percival and Ryburn Roads
Ken & Hong
Shang & Wang
827.005
25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around
Percival and Ryburn Roads
Ken & Hong
Shang & Wang
827.006
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around
Percival and Ryburn Roads
Ken & Hong
Shang & Wang
827.007
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Amend the Plan to a) retain the current rural residential zoning and subdivision rights b) Provide a 100m buffer around
Percival and Ryburn Roads
Myles Aidan
Watene
828.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Eric Oler
829.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Gretchen Cume
830.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precinct.
Oppose
Supports 25.14.1 Transportation if older suburbs are retrofitted with safe pedestrian crossing points.
Page 194 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Kung-Yao Lin
831.001
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area.
b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the
university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead
of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the
low density residential lifestyle and quality.
Kung-Yao Lin
831.002
3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area.
b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the
university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead
of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the
low density residential lifestyle and quality.
Kung-Yao Lin
831.003
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area.
b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the
university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead
of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the
low density residential lifestyle and quality.
Kung-Yao Lin
831.004
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area.
b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the
university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead
of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the
low density residential lifestyle and quality.
Kung-Yao Lin
831.005
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area.
b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the
university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead
of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the
low density residential lifestyle and quality.
Kung-Yao Lin
831.006
25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) retain the rural residential and development rights including subdivision that exist for the area.
b) Provide a 100m buffer around Percival and Ryburn Roads with an earth bund. c) Retain more land around the
university for supporting uses. d) concentrate development on land located near existing facilities and industry instead
of creating new areas. e) Allow subdivision of the Percival and Ryburn Road area to 1000m2 lots to keep maintain the
low density residential lifestyle and quality.
Kung-Yao Lin
831.007
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential
zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by a green belt.
Page 195 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
James & Heather
Hely &
Montgomerie
832.001
3.7 Ruakura
Support in Amend Rules 23.7.3 d),e), f), i), j), k), h) to enable subdivision at 2500m2 in the Large Lot Residential Zone as a
part
Permitted Activity.
James & Heather
Hely &
Montgomerie
832.002
4.1.4 Large Lot Residential
Zone
Support in Amend Rules 23.7.3 (d),(e), (f), (i), (j), (k), (h) regarding access standards to enable development of the Large Lot
part
Residential Zone as a Permitted Activity and enable the early development of the residential land in the north of the
Ruakura Structure Plan.
James & Heather
Hely &
Montgomerie
832.003
23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Zone and All Special
Character Zones
Support in Retain Subdivision Design Standards 23.7.3 d, e, f, i, j, k, and h General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and
part
All Special Character Zones with amendments.
Jamey Etika
833.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Eddie Willison
834.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Derrick Ross &
Robyn Mary
Marsters
835.001
3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a
100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot
Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan.
Derrick Ross &
Robyn Mary
Marsters
835.002
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a
100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot
Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan.
Derrick Ross &
Robyn Mary
Marsters
835.003
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a
100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot
Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan.
Derrick Ross &
Robyn Mary
Marsters
835.004
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a
100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot
Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan.
Page 196 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Derrick Ross &
Robyn Mary
Marsters
835.005
25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a
100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot
Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan.
Derrick Ross &
Robyn Mary
Marsters
835.006
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the Rural Residential zoning without reference to industrial in the future. b) Provide a
100m buffer around Ryburn and Percival Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an
alternative road to Percival Road. d) ensure the development rights are the same as provided for in the Large Lot
Residential Zone for the southern end of the Structure Plan.
Derrick Ross &
Robyn Mary
Marsters
835.007
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential
zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by a green belt.
Richard Grant
Herewini
836.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Baz Paama
837.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
The Ministry of
Education
838.001
3.4.2.3 Commercial
Community Nodes
Oppose
Amend 3.4.2.3 to remove references and identification of a secondary school site in Peacocke Area.
The Ministry of
Education
838.002
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Oppose
Replace the definitions for 'schools', 'childcare facilities' and 'tertiary education institutions' with an all-encompassing
definition of "Education and Training Facilities" as contained in the Operative District Plan
The Ministry of
Education
838.003
Table 15-2a Number of
parking loading and cycle
spaces
Oppose
Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces to reduce the car and bus parking
requirements for Childcare Facilities, Schools, Trade and Industry Training Facilities and Tertiary education and
specialised training facilities.
Pita Witehira
839.001
Appendix 8 Heritage
Oppose
Amend 8-1 Assessment of Historic Buildings and Structures to ensure meaningful consultation with Iwi/Maori to
ensure structures of Significance to Maori and of National Importance are protected.
George William
Holland
840.001
2.2.3 Objective and Policies
Urban Design Approach
Support
Support, but seek amendments to ensure future development in Hamilton strongly places Tangata Whenua values and
appropriate cultural images and New Zealand natural heritage in the centre of these developments allowing for a New
Zealand landscape and native flora and fauna being observed in our neighbourhoods.
George William
Holland
840.002
2.2.8 Objective and Policies
Tangata Whenua Waikato
Support
Strongly support policy 2.2.8a) given its accordance with the Treaty of Waitangi, however it needs amendment to
ensure cultural icons are identified and developed (including Waikato flora and fauna) providing a strong ecological
Page 197 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Tainui
base for Tangata Whenua cultural development.
George William
Holland
840.003
2.2.10 Objective and Policies Support in Support in part. Add a new policy 2.2.10e to ensure Development shall be sensitive to and enhance the Natural
Hamilton’s Identity,
part
Landscape.
Character and Heritage
George William
Holland
840.004
5.1.3 Special Natural Zone
Support
Amend 5.1.3 Special Natural Area to ensure that development around Lake Waiwhakareke does not impact on the
Lake with particular attention given to drainage, plantings and animals.
George William
Holland
840.005
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Support
Amend Policy 7.2.9 so that more native, eco-sourced trees are planted.
George William
Holland
840.006
21.2.2 Objective and Policies Support
George William
Holland
840.007
25.3.5.5 Events or Activities Support in Amend Rule 25.3.5.5 to exclude motorised events on Lake Waiwhakareke.
Associated with Events on
part
the Waikato River, Lake
Rotokaeo (Forest Lake), Lake
Rotoroa (Lake Hamilton) or
Lake Waiwhakareke
(Horseshoe Lake) –
Motorised or Non-motorised
George William
Holland
840.008
25.5.2 Objectives and
Policies Landscaping and
Screening
Support
Amend Policy 25.5.2.1b to require the planting of native species around The Waiwhakareke Natural Heritage Park.
George William
Holland
840.009
Schedule 9C Significant
Natural Areas
Support
Add Crawshaw Park and Te Kooti Park to the Significant Natural Areas Schedule
George William
Holland
840.010
Schedule 9D Significant Trees Support
Lance Edward
Kendrick
842.002
3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for
Support in Amend Rule 3.7.3.4a by reducing the 20ha ratio. Amend Rule 3.7.3.4b stage 2 to reinstate the connections at Greenhill
Ruakura Logistics Zone and part
Road and Ruakura Rd.
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
in the Ruakura Structure Plan
Area
Lance Edward
Kendrick
842.003
11.2.3 Objective and Policies Support
Include additional provisions that relate to run off of pollutants into streams, particularly those that feed Lake
Waiwhakareke.
Add 7 trees in Hamilton East (21 Mooney Street, Bishops Lane & Odlin Crescent, Crawshaw Park, 103 and 103a Avalon
Drive) to the Schedule 9D Significant Trees
Supports Policy 11.2.3a
Page 198 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Lance Edward
Kendrick
842.004
11.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Retain the non-complying status for activities in Rule 11.3 f) to j). Amend Appendix 1.7 to clarify what is meant by
part
'noxious or offensive activities'
Lance Edward
Kendrick
842.005
25.8.3.5 Helicopter Landing
Area Noise
Oppose
Lance Edward
Kendrick
842.006
3.7.1.3 Ruakura Industrial
Park Zone
Support in Amend 3.7.1.3 to provide very wide buffer strips between the proposed Industrial areas and existing Residential areas.
part
A & A King Family
Trust
844.001
9.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 9.1 to recognise and provide for office/retail development in the industrial zone where it complements the City
part
Centre.
A & A King Family
Trust
844.002
9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend 9.2 to allow for service type retailing on Industrial Land where such land fronts major arterials, and provide
part
consistency in the use of Industrial Uses and Industrial Activities.
A & A King Family
Trust
844.003
9.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Objective 9.2.2a. Industrial developments should follow the principal that ‘form follows function’ especially in
part
the absence of true design guidelines for industrial development.
A & A King Family
Trust
844.004
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rule 9.3 to include activity status for Retail Activities (where providing a service for the local community).
part
Amend 9.3u) from Controlled to Permitted where the standards within Rules 9.4 and 9.5 are complied with and which
generate less than 100 vehicle movements per day.
Oppose 25.8.3.5 Helicopter Landing Area Noise limits.
Amend Rule 9.3(ff) to clarify which standards within either Rule 9.4 and/or 9.5 need to be met and then add a link to
assessment criteria for standards which are not met as part of the Restricted Discretionary Assessment criteria.
Remove any requirement for Urban Design assessment where no Urban Design Guidelines for Industrial and or
Commercial development have been prepared.
CBNZ Ltd
846.001
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.3.1(bb) to exclude the block of land bounded by Dillicar Street, Victoria Street and Boundary Road and
instead allow offices in this area as a Restricted Discretionary Activity.
Amend Rules 4.3.1 c), e) and f) so that ancillary residential units and detached dwellings (first and subsequent) are
Permitted Activities.
Linda Fell
847.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Tony & Christine
Lennon
849.001
22.1 Purpose
Oppose
Seeks that LIM's only note the relevant Flood Hazard Area.
Tony & Christine
Lennon
849.002
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Oppose
Seeks that LIM's only note the relevant Flood Hazard Area.
Page 199 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Tony & Christine
Lennon
849.003
Features Map 46B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 44 Cook Street.
Janice Ann Verran
854.001
5.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend 5.4.1 Density within the Special Character Zones by increasing the minimum area for all building activities to
600m2.
Janice Ann Verran
854.002
T Earthworks
Oppose
Amend to reduce the restrictiveness of earthworks criteria and be consistent with recommendations of Variation 18.
Janice Ann Verran
854.003
1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose
Assessment Criteria
The design guide does not reflect Councils decisions made at Variation 18 Hearing report 3.7.131. The Waiwhakareke
Landscape Character Area should be deleted from the Operative District Plan and the Residential Rules (4.1) apply.
Janice Ann Verran
854.004
Zoning Map 24A
Oppose
Map 24A-Retain land at 173 Rotokauri Road as Residential.
Janice Ann Verran
854.005
5.4.4 Building Height
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.4.4 Building Height to minimum of 1 storey.
Max Walker
Verran
855.001
5.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend 5.4.1 Density by increasing the minimum area required for all building activity to 600m2.
Max Walker
Verran
855.002
T Earthworks
Oppose
Amend to reduce the restrictiveness of earthworks criteria and be consistent with recommendations of Variation 18.
Max Walker
Verran
855.003
1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose
Assessment Criteria
The design guide does not reflect Councils decisions made at Variation 18 Hearing report 3.7.131. The Waiwhakareke
Landscape Character Area should be deleted from the Operative District Plan and the Residential Rules (4.1) apply.
Max Walker
Verran
855.004
5.4.4 Building Height
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.4.4. Building Height be amended to minimum of 1 storey.
Max Walker
Verran
855.005
Zoning Map 24A
Oppose
Map 24A-Retain land at 173 Rotokauri Road as Residential.
Anthony Paul
Smart
857.001
Figure 15-5f Transport
corridor hierarchy plan
Oppose
Retain current corridor - Opposes Tristram Street being identified as a Major Arterial Transport Corridor in the
Transport corridor hierarchy plan.
Anthony Paul
Smart
857.002
Zoning Map 36A
Oppose
Map 36A-retain current zoning on the Corner of Mill Street and Willoughby Street.
Oaklands Group
Holdings Ltd
858.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Allan Liang-chitz
& Shirley Tzu-ling
Wan
861.001
3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer
around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road
to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future.
Allan Liang-chitz
& Shirley Tzu-ling
Wan
861.002
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer
around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road
to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future.
Page 200 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Allan Liang-chitz
& Shirley Tzu-ling
Wan
861.003
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer
around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road
to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future.
Allan Liang-chitz
& Shirley Tzu-ling
Wan
861.004
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer
around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road
to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future.
Allan Liang-chitz
& Shirley Tzu-ling
Wan
861.005
25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer
around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road
to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future.
Allan Liang-chitz
& Shirley Tzu-ling
Wan
861.006
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer
around Percival and Ryburn Roads with a 4m high planted bund. c) ensure freight movements use an alternative road
to Percival Road. d) Delete reference to any logistics uses in the future.
Allan Liang-chitz
& Shirley Tzu-ling
Wan
861.007
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential
zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by a green belt.
Perry Group
Limited
862.001
7.1.2 Precinct 2 – City Living
Precinct
Oppose
Amend 7.1.2 so that there is additional focus on commercial activities as part of the mixed use City Living Precinct.
Perry Group
Limited
862.002
7.2 Objectives and Policies
Central City Zone
Oppose
Amend Policies in 7.2.1 to 7.2.7 by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Perry Group
Limited
862.003
7.2.7 Objective and Policies
City Living Precinct
Oppose
Oppose the residential focus of the City living precinct.
Perry Group
Limited
862.004
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Objective 7.2.7 to include Commercial mixed use development and remove reference to small scale offices.
Amend Rule 7.3 a) and b) by providing for new buildings and alterations in the City Living Precinct as a Controlled
Activity.
Amend 7.3n) by making offices > 500m2 gfa a Permitted Activity status in the City Living Precinct.
Perry Group
Limited
862.005
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.1a) by replacing the 60% maximum site coverage standard for the City Living Precinct with 80%.
Perry Group
Limited
862.006
7.4.9 Car Parking
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.9 a) so that it only applies to sites with a Primary Active Frontage.
Perry Group
Limited
862.007
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.4 g Public amenities qualifying for a single or double bonus to include Toilets available for public use
and to be used by the disabled and Provision of Riverbank Pedestrian Promenade in the development.
Page 201 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Amend the through site access requirements to allow for other measures of ensuring provision and maintenance of
the through site.
Perry Group
Limited
862.008
7.5.3 Setback from Waikato
River Reserve
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.5.3 Setback from Waikato River Reserve replacing the pedestrian promenades width of 5m with a
minimum of 3m and;
Add an advice note to Appendix 1.4.7.3 Riverfront Development Design Principles outlining Council responsibility
Perry Group
Limited
862.009
1.4.7.3 Design Principles
Oppose
i) Amend Rule 7.5.3 and Appendix 1.4.7.3b) by deleting the 5m minimum width for the Pedestrian Promenade and
substituting a 3m minimum width; Add an additional 'advice note' to the Design Principles that outlines Council
responsibilities for the promenade.
Perry Group
Limited
862.010
7.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.6a i and ii regarding new buildings, alterations and additions, and relocated buildings by removing
consideration of matters and assessment criteria C2 to C12.
Oppose
Review Appendix 1.2 with a view to streamlining and simplifying and ensuring that only matters that are relevant to
the reason for consent for activities listed are considered. All criteria must be clear as to meaning, non-prescriptive nor
read like a rule.
Perry Group
Limited
862.011
Building Separation
Amend Assessment Criteria for Z24 Building Separation removing specific requirements for building separation and the
interpretive diagrams Z24d and Z24e and add in a definition for internal boundaries.
Perry Group
Limited
862.012
1.4.6.3 Key Development Site Oppose
3 – Victoria on the River
Perry Group
Limited
862.013
1.4 Design Guides and Design Support in Add advice Note in Section 1.1.2.2. n) that any development requiring a land use consent including regard to urban
Assessment Criteria
part
design will not require consideration by the Urban Design Panel and the role of the Urban Design Panel be amended to
exclude consideration of developments that require land use consent.
Perry Group
Limited
862.014
9.2 Objectives and Policies
Industrial Zone
Oppose
Replace the use of 'shall' in Policies 9.2 with 'should', to reduce the rigidity of a policy being applied like a rule.
Perry Group
Limited
862.015
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rules 9.3u) & 9.3v) by replacing the Controlled Activity status with Permitted Activity status for ‘New Buildings’
and ‘Alterations and Additions’ as provided, and delete Rule 9.3ff). Add a new note to Rule 9.3 u) & v) & w).
Perry Group
Limited
862.016
Zoning Map 1A
Oppose
Map 1A -reduce the width of the Natural Open Space Zone over the land adjacent to the Waikato River bank north of
Hutchinson Road.
Perry Group
Limited
862.017
Zoning Map 2A
Oppose
Map 2A-reduce the width of the Natural Open Space Zone over the land adjacent to the Waikato River bank north of
Hutchinson Road.
Retain 1.4.6.3 Key Development Site 3 – Victoria on the River with amendments to broaden the possible mix of uses;
amend Figures 1.6.4 v – x to remove building footprints and delete the cross-sections.
Page 202 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Perry Group
Limited
862.018
Features Map 1B
Oppose
Amend the designation for the Waikato Expressway (E99a) to remove the designation from the redundant ‘dog leg
area’ as identified.
Perry Group
Limited
862.019
12.1 Purpose
Oppose
Seeks an amendment to 12.1a) Purpose, with the deletion of the word ‘limited’ in regard to providing for industrial
activity to develop.
Perry Group
Limited
862.020
12.2 Objectives and Policies
Te Rapa North Industrial
Zone
Oppose
Seeks replacement of 'shall' with 'should' in Policies 12.2.1a; 12.2.1b; 12.2.1c; 12.2.2a; 12.2.3a; 12.2.3c; 12.2.3d;
12.2.3f.
Perry Group
Limited
862.021
12.2.4 Objective and Policies Oppose
Seeks amendment to the explanation for 12.2.4 Objective and Policies, with the addition of 'coupled with the
flexibility' in regard to infrastructure and enabling development.
Perry Group
Limited
862.022
12.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Seeks amendments to Rules 12.3h) and 12.3n) Activity Status Table; and the insertion of a Note referencing that only
NZTA would be deemed an affected person for the purposes of notification.
Perry Group
Limited
862.023
12.4.1 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Seeks amendment to 12.4.1c) vi Building Setbacks to remove reference to Open Space Zone.
Perry Group
Limited
862.024
12.4.8 Transportation
Oppose
Seeks amendment to activity status for Rule 12.4.8a)ii) Transportation from Discretionary to Restricted Discretionary.
Perry Group
Limited
862.025
12.7 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Seeks deletion of Rule 12.7a) i and v, Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria.
Perry Group
Limited
862.026
b Concept Development Plan Oppose
for Stage 1B
Delete Appendix 1.1 D b) xiii in relation to requiring compliance with 25.13- Three Waters
Perry Group
Limited
862.027
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 so that the earthworks standards only apply within a Natural Hazard area and exclude works
ancillary to an approved subdivision or landuse consent.
Perry Group
Limited
862.028
25.13.4.6 Water Impact
Assessments
Oppose
Amend 25.13.4.6 (Water Impact Assessments) to exclude activities and development in accordance with an approved
Concept Development Plan for Stage 1B Te Rapa North Industrial Zone from requiring a Water Impact Assessment.
Perry Group
Limited
862.029
25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 h) ii) to exclude new activities in the Te Rapa North Industrial Zone where in accordance with an
approved Concept Development Plan from requiring an Integrated Transport Assessment.
Raylene & Saul
Cowie & Spriggs
864.001
3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted
buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the
Seeks amendment to Rule 12.7a) iv, Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria.
Page 203 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
property.
Raylene & Saul
Cowie & Spriggs
864.002
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted
buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the
property.
Raylene & Saul
Cowie & Spriggs
864.003
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted
buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the
property.
Raylene & Saul
Cowie & Spriggs
864.004
25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted
buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the
property.
Raylene & Saul
Cowie & Spriggs
864.005
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted
buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the
property.
Raylene & Saul
Cowie & Spriggs
864.006
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential
zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by a green belt.
Raylene & Saul
Cowie & Spriggs
864.007
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning with right to subdivide to 2500m2. b) Provide a 100m planted
buffer and bund around Percival and Ryburn Roads. c) Require that Tainui Group Holdings or Council purchase the
property.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
866.001
Zoning Map 26A
Support
Map 26A-Support the zoning of 446 Te Rapa Road as Business 4.
Andrew Paul Knox
(Laras Holdings
Ltd)
867.001
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Map 44A-Oppose rezoning of land within Seddon, Somerset, Lake and Hall sts/rds from commercial service to
industrial. Rezone this land to Central City Zone (City Living Precinct).
Bruce Maxwell
Winders
868.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Raymond John
Bird (Birds Plant &
Equipment Trust)
869.001
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Map 45A-delete Key Development site 1 criteria and replace with Central City Zone.
Raymond John
Bird (Birds Plant &
Equipment Trust)
869.002
Key Development Site 1
Cobham Drive
Oppose
Remove Key Development Site 1 Cobham Drive and rezone Central City Zone.
Barry James
870.001
Zoning Map 33A
Support
Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan - Confirm future reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
Page 204 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Crawshaw
Hamilton Youth
Council
871.001
19 Historic Heritage
Support
That HCC consider targeted educational programmes to familiarise young people with the history and heritage of their
city to raise their understanding of the city's rich history and heritage.
Hamilton Youth
Council
871.002
7 Central City Zone
Support
Supports the planned mixed-use precinct developments as they further economic growth within the city, and promote
a centralized hub of social and commercial activity.
Hamilton Youth
Council
871.003
Appendix 15 Transportation
Support
Supports the Transportation provisions emphasizing pedestrian, cycle and passenger transport and the integration of
land use and transport networks.
Hamilton Youth
Council
871.004
4 Residential Zones
Support
Supports the provisions to ensure diverse and well designed residential accommodation options within the central city
and high density areas for young people, particularly students.
Hamilton Youth
Council
871.005
2 Strategic Framework
Support
Supports the use of growth management strategies to make the city more sustainable in the future (particularly
affordability of infrastructure). Seek more dedicated consultation with Youth Groups to capture their views on these
strategic themes going forward.
May Tan
872.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Retain Rule 4.4.7c) noting that Council should consider how trees in the roads could block light and visibility and Figure
1.4.2e) regarding surveillance towards walkway links. Amend the Objectives and Policies to clearly articulate the
rationale for Rule 4.4.7. Undertake a review of the relationship between the provisions of Rule 4.4.7 and building
design, section size, shape or orientation and require garaging forward of the dwelling to have two clear glazed
windows facing the road.
Raymond John
Bird (Birds Plant
and Equipment
Trust)
873.001
Zoning Map 38A
Oppose
Map 38A-Rezone 5, 9, 11 and 13 Fifth Avenue Business 6 not Residential Intensification.
Borman Parkside
LP
874.001
Figure 2-4 Rototuna
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Figure 2-4 Rototuna Structure Plan-Land Use Seeks the deletion of 'The Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-4 and 'The Local Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-5.
Borman Parkside
LP
874.002
Figure 2-5 Rototuna
Structure Plan-Transport
Network
Support in Figure 2-5 Rototuna Structure Plan-Transport Network - Seeks the deletion of 'The Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-4
part
and 'The Local Transport Corridor' on Figure 2-5.
Borman Parkside
LP
874.003
Figure 2-6 Rototuna Cycling
and Walking Network
Support
Figure 2-6 Rototuna Cycling and Walking Network In the submitter's view, Figure 2-6 indicates a cycling and walking network path(s) along the north side of Future
Reserve. Should these objections not be upheld in their submission, Council as the future owner of the reserve will be
expected to provide the major funding for the corridors.
Gillian James
875.001
3.4.3 Transport Network
Oppose
Amend 3.4.3 to re-route the Arterial Route shown on the western side of the Mangakotukutuku Gulley as set out in
the submission.
Page 205 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Gillian James
875.002
Figure 2-2 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
Oppose
Amend Figure 2-2 Peacocke Structure Plan - Staging and Transport Network to re-route the Major Arterial Transport
Corridor Route shown on the western side of the Mangakotukutuku Gulley as set out in the submission.
Peter Dornauf
876.002
Schedule 8B Group 1
Archaeological and Cultural
Sites
Oppose
That archaeological / cultural sites that are list in Schedule 8C Group Archaeological and Cultural Sites 'for information
purposes', seems entirely inadequate.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.001
15.2 Objectives and Policies
Open Space Zones
Support in Retain Objectives 15.2.1 to 15.2.6 and insert a new Objective and Policy regarding renewable electricity generation
part
and the Waikato Hydro Scheme.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.002
15.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the activity status table in Rule 15.3v) to include boat ramps. Amend Rule 15.3.ad) and add new activities to
part
rule 15.3 to recognise the operating range of the Waikato Hydro System.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.003
15.7 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend the Matters of Discretionary and Assessment Criteria for Pontoon/Jetty in Rule 15.7 a) iv) to include new
Activities Matters of
part
assessment criteria. Add in a new controlled activity for discharge or intake structures and any ancillary structures.
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.004
1.1 Controlled Activities –
Matters of Control
Support in Add a further provision to the Controlled Activities Assessment Criteria for the Open Space Zones for Discharge or
part
Intake Structures and ancillary structures.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.005
W Surface of Water
Support in Amend Assessment Criteria 1.2W Surface of Water to include reference to the Waikato Hydro Scheme Operating
part
Range.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.006
1.3 Discretionary Activity
Assessment Criteria
Support in Amend 1.3 Discretionary Activity Assessment Criteria by adding reference to the Waikato Hydro System Operating
part
Range.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.007
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Support in Seeks the retention of policies 22.2.1a, 22.2.1b, 22.2.1c, 22.2.1d, 22.2.1h, 22.2.1i, 22.2.1j and 22.2.1k; amend
part
Objective 22.2.1, policies 22.2.1e, 22.2.1f and 22.2.1l regarding natural hazards to improve consistency with the
Proposed Regional Policy Statement terminology and improve clarity.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.008
22.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Seeks the retention of Rule 22.3;
part
Add new activity to Rule 22.3 that new water infrastructure within the Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area is a
Discretionary Activity.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.009
22.5 Rules – Specific
Standards
Support in Seeks the retention of Rules 22.5.6, 22.5.7, 22.5.8 and 22.8 as notified.
part
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.010
1.5.8 Flood Risk Assessment
Report
Support
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.011
1.5.9 Site Management Plan Support
Retain the information requirement in Appendix 1.5.8 regarding a Flood Risk Assessment Report.
Retain the information requirement in Appendix 1.5.9 regarding a Site Management Plan.
Page 206 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.012
1.5.10 Stormwater Disposal
Report
Support
Retain the information requirement in Appendix 1.5.10 regarding a Stormwater Disposal Report.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.013
25.7.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support in Amend 25.7.2.2 Objective and corresponding explanation to exclude renewable electricity generation activities.
part
Add a new objective in relation to the Waikato Hydro Scheme and the associated policy and explanation.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.014
25.7.2.3 Objective and
Policies
Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.3, Policies 25.7.2.3a, 25.7.2.3b, 25.7.2.3c, 25.7.2.3e, and Rule 25.7.3.
part
Amend Policy 25.7.2.3d iv. by deleting 'or compensation'.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.015
25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support
Retain Rules 25.7.3 nn) to ss).
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.016
25.13.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support
Retain Objectives 25.13.2.2 (Three Waters) and Policy 25.13.2.2a regarding promotion of water efficiency.
Mighty River
Power Limited
877.017
25.13.2.3 Objective and
Policies
Support
Retain Objective 25.13.2.3 (Three Waters) and Policies 25.13.2.3a, 25.13.2.3b, 25.13.2.3c and 25.13.2.3d regarding
promotion of water efficiency measures and the efficient staging of subdivision and development.
Antonia
Whilhelmina
Haronga
878.001
Features Map 43B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 64 Massey Street.
Isobel Anne
Bennett (YWCA
(Young Womans'
Christian
Association) of
Hamilton Inc)
879.001
19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend 19.3 i) of Rules Activity Status Table to make the demolition of a structure or building ranked B a Discretionary
Activity.
Graeme Errol &
Maureen Gladys
Matthews
(Matthews Bed
and Breakfast)
882.001
Zoning Map 38A
Oppose
Map 38A-Rezone land bordered by Peachgrove Road, Daisy Street, Pearsons Avenue and Short Street to Residential
rather than Residential Intensification.
Graeme Errol &
Maureen Gladys
Matthews
(Matthews Bed
and Breakfast)
882.002
Features Map 38B
Support
Support Jubilee Park and Southwell as Significant Natural Areas on Map 38B
Page 207 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
CCS Disability
Action Waikato
883.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: A Visionary District Plan, The Disabled Community, Ability
levels, Contrasting planning controls, Dwelling density, Older housing stock, Future population demographics, Inner
city development, Transport routes, Older persons villages, Restaurants and commercial properties, Provision for the
visually impaired, Consultation with the Disabled Community, An Accessible Environment. Refer submission for full
details.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.002
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.6 d) regarding a minimum building setback from Right-of-ways.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.003
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3 to introduce maximum limits on impermeable surfaces and delete controls on the location of
permeable surfaces.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.004
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards.
part
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.005
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Amend Rule 7.3 a) ,b), d) so that building works are permitted activities subject to standards.
part
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.006
4.4.9 Residential Buildings –
Separation and Privacy
Oppose
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.007
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i, 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to ensure the maximum height of any fence or
part
wall is 1.8m; and exclude Large Lot Residential Zone from the Rule.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.008
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Delete Rules 4.4.10 b) iii and 4.4.10 b) iv. relating to location of Outdoor Living Areas.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.009
4.11 Notification Rule
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.11 - Notification Rule to ensure certainty as to how a development will be managed through the
resource consent process.
Delete or amend Rule 4.4.9 Residential Buildings - Separation and Privacy as the 5m separation distance is too large.
Page 208 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.010
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Delete Policies 4.2.3b and 4.2.3d as it unreasonable to restrict privacy of landowners.
part
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.011
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Delete Policies 4.2.4 e) and f) as these policies unreasonably favour public amenity over private property rights..
part
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.012
4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Delete the assessment criteria for Rules 4.4.3 and 4.6.5 Permeable surface; Rule 4.4.7 Interface between public and
private; Rule 4.4.8 Fences and walls; Rule 4.4.9 Separation and privacy.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.013
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Seeks the deletion of Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on
slopes.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.014
25.2.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Seeks the deletion of assessment criteria in Rule 25.2.6 regarding earthworks.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.015
25.2.7 Notification Rule
Support in Seeks amendments so that resource consents for earthworks on sites with slopes less than 20 degrees are nonpart
notified.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.016
25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Seeks amendments so that resource consents for earthworks and vegetation removal on sites with slopes less than 20
Table
part
degrees are non-notified.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.017
25.15.1 Purpose
Support in Seeks amendments to Rule 25.15 Urban Design to ensure design guidance applies only to developments that do not
part
meet specific performance standards.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.018
19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend 19.3 h) and i) of Rules Activity Status Table to make the demolition of structures or buildings ranked A or B a
Discretionary Activity.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.019
19.2.3 Buildings and
Structures
Oppose
Amend Policy 19.2.3a Buildings and Structures to provide an exception to deal with buildings which have a poor
earthquake rating and may pose a safety risk.
Page 209 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.020
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Delete references to design guides.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.021
1.4.1.6 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete section 1.4.1.6 'Interface Between Public and Private'.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.022
1.4.1.7 Fences
Oppose
Delete 1.4.1.7 Fences and allow landowners to choose the level of boundary treatment to meet their needs within a
height limit of 1.8m.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.023
1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Delete 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces and replace with the limits in the Operative District Plan.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.024
C General
Oppose
E-Safe Environments - delete and replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the
environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.025
E Safe Environments
Oppose
E-Safe Environments - delete and replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the
environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.026
1.4.2.2 General Residential
Zone
Oppose
Delete 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone design assessment criteria
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.027
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Replace Rule 9.3u) with permitted activity status.
Shona Betty Shaw
(Murray V. Shaw
Builders Ltd)
884.028
9.6 Controlled Activities
Matters of Control
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.6a)i as it will add unnecessary cost, uncertainty and delay and be subject to urban design scrutiny which
has no relevance to Industrial Zoned Buildings.
Hamilton Grey
Power
885.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
This submission refers to the following themes: Purpose is to comply with Resource Management Act 1991, Primacy of
Central City is overall aim, Council discourages private motor vehicle use, Unnecessary restrictions, Increases to
building costs, Increased urban sprawl. Refer to the full submission for details.
Rowena Kaleopa
886.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Loss of property rights, Unnecessary restrictions on design of
homes and conformity to a rigid set of rules, Loss of private motor vehicle use in favour of walking, cycling and
Page 210 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
passenger transport, Human settlements where people will be brought in to the cities and off of rural lands. Refer to
the full submission for details.
Pat McNair
887.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Restrictions on property rights and personal freedom,
Restrictions on car use and prioritisation of pedestrians and bikes, Increased costs, Speed restrictions, Business
development. Refer to the full submission for details.
Barry McNair
888.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Restrictions on property rights and personal freedom,
Restrictions on car use and prioritisation of pedestrians and bikes, Increased costs, Speed restrictions, Business
development. Refer to the full submission for details.
Elizabeth de Jong
889.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Restrictions on property rights and personal freedom,
Restrictions on car use and prioritisation of pedestrians and bikes, Increased costs, Speed restrictions, Business
development. Refer to the full submission for details.
CMVP
Samarawickrema
890.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Restrictions on property rights and personal freedom,
Restrictions on car use and prioritisation of pedestrians and bikes, Increased costs, Speed restrictions, Business
development. Refer to the full submission for details.
Tom (Alan
Douglas) MacRae
891.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Restrictions on property rights and personal freedom,
Restrictions on car use and prioritisation of pedestrians and bikes, Increased costs, Speed restrictions, Business
development. Refer to the full submission for details.
Brian Haskell
892.001
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Oppose. This submission refers to the following themes: Purpose of District Plan, Primacy of Central City is overall aim,
Council is anti-private motor vehicle use, Unnecessary restrictions, Increased development and building costs, Rate
increases from more Council costs, Future residential developments, Increased building costs. Refer to the full
submission for details.
Hamilton
Cosmopolitan
Club
894.001
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-Rezone the Hamilton Cosmopolitan Club with Residential Intensification Zone and a Visitor Facilities Overlay.
Hamilton
Cosmopolitan
Club
894.002
Zoning Map 38A
Oppose
Map 38A-Rezone the Hamilton Cosmopolitan Club with Residential Intensification Zone and a Visitor Facilities Overlay.
Hamilton
Cosmopolitan
Club
894.003
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.3.1 to provide for 'Licensed Premises' as a Discretionary Activity in the Residential Intensification Zone.
Page 211 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Residential Zone
Harry & Lloyd
Hoebergen &
Seeney, et al
895.001
14 Future Urban Zone
Support in Seeks an expansion of the City's Boundary to include land from the current boundary to the west to Wallace Road.
part
Submitter would like their previous submission April 2010, 10/0106 to be considered in tandem with the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Trust board submission.
Gilbass
Developments Ltd
896.001
Zoning Map 54A
Oppose
Map 54A-Rezone the vacant industrial land south of Gilbass Avenue from Industrial to General Residential.
Gilbass
Developments Ltd
896.002
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Oppose
Amend definition of "Comprehensive Residential Development"
Gilbass
Developments Ltd
896.003
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.3.1 to provide for Comprehensive Residential Development as a Restricted Discretionary Activity in
General Residential Zone only.
Gilbass
Developments Ltd
896.004
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1a) by adding new standards for Comprehensive Residential Development, at 300m2 per residential
unit in the General Residential Zone.
Gilbass
Developments Ltd
896.005
4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 4.10 by adding Comprehensive Residential Development as a non notified activity.
Gilbass
Developments Ltd
896.006
23.6 Rules – Specific
Standards
Oppose
Amend Specific Standards 23.6.11 Comprehensive Residential Development
Gilbass
Developments Ltd
896.007
23.7 Subdivision Design
Standards
Oppose
Amend 23.7 Subdivision Design Standards to exclude Lot 3 DPS 20152 (CT:19B/1282), Allot 468 Te Rapa Parish
(CT:3A/132) and Lot 2 being a proposed subdivision of Pt Lot 2 DPS 19840 and Part Lot 1 DP 33638 Te Rapa Parish Allot
469
Gilbass
Developments Ltd
896.008
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend Chapter 4 to make provision for Comprehensive Residential Development as provided for in the Operative
District Plan.
Gilbass
Developments Ltd
896.009
4.7 Rules – Specific
Standards – All Residential
Zones
Support in Amend Rule 4.7 by inserting a new provision for Comprehensive Residential Development as follows:
part
'Minimum site area to undertake a Comprehensive Residential Development is 2000m2'
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.001
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Oppose
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.002
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
Support in Amend Rule 4.3.1 to change:
Delete Policy 4.2.4e as it is in conflict with Policy 4.2.1a i.
Page 212 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
part
Apartments in the General Residential Zone from Discretionary to Restricted Discretionary;
Apartments in the Residential Intensification zone from Restricted Discretionary to Controlled;
Duplex dwellings in the Large Lot Residential Zone to be Discretionary;
Retain Duplex dwellings in the General Residential Zone as Restricted Discretionary;
Insert new activity - Comprehensive Residential Development activity as provided for in the Operative District Plan.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.003
4.4.1 Density
Support in Amend 4.4.1a) by inserting the activity Comprehensive Residential Development with an average minimum net site
part
area of 300m2;
Amend 4.4.1a)i. by deleting text "400m2 per residential unit" for General Residential Zone and replace with "minimum
lot area of 350m2";
Amend 4.4.1a)iii. in the Residential Intensification zone by inserting the word 'average' immediately after the words
'minimum' and 'maximum';
Do not apply Net site Area to apartments in any residential zone.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.004
4.4.2 Site Coverage
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.2 to increase site coverage in General Residential and Residential Intensification Zone (except
part
Hamilton East Character Area).
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.005
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Support in Amend Rules 4.4.3a), 4.4.3b) and Figure 4.4.3d. to enable alternative options to meet permeability requirements;
part
exclude access paths and driveways; the permeable surface for Residential Intensification Zone be 10%.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.006
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.8 to express that "Close paling" for fencing over 1.2m high shall not use timber palings forward of a
part
house.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.007
4.4.9 Residential Buildings –
Separation and Privacy
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.9 a) ii and 4b) by amending existing or inserting further text to clarify other screening techniques and
part
options to be achieve the intent of the rule to ensure separation and privacy.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.008
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.10b)iv by inserting text 'where possible';
part
Amend 4.4.1.c)i. by reducing the outdoor living area from 60m2 to 40m2, and deleting "6m diameter circle. No
dimension less than 2.5m" and replace with '5m diameter circle, minimum dimension 2.5m';
Amend 4.4.1e by deleting text "and additional to " and replacing with 'but cannot contribute more than 50%'.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.009
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the Residential
Intensification zone.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.010
4.6.4 Residential Unit Size
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.6.4 to reduce the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units; and insert an additional
point iv. to provide a minimum gross floor area for "3 or more bedrooms".
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.011
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 b) Interface Between Public and Private
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.012
15-7 Criteria for the Form of Oppose
Transport Corridors
Replace 15-7 Criteria for the Form of Transport Corridors with reference to NZS4404 to provide for greater design
flexibility for transport corridors. If retained, seeks various amendments.
Page 213 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.013
4.5.1 Comprehensive
Development Plan Process
Support in Amend Rule 4.5.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Process - so that a Comprehensive Development Plan in the
part
Medium-density residential zone is not subject to notification; and the activity status changed to either 'Permitted' or
'Controlled'.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.014
4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Support in Amend Rule 4.5.3 Comprehensive Development Plan Process - so that a CDP in the Medium-density residential zone is
Medium-Density Residential part
not subject to notification; and change the activity status.
Zone
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.015
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.016
1.4 Design Guides and Design Support in Simplify 1.4 Design Guides and Design Assessment Criteria and reference "Vista".
Assessment Criteria
part
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.017
Zoning Map 62A
Support
Map 62A-Retain zoning of Stan Heather Park as General Residential Zone.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.018
Zoning Map 37A
Support
Map 37A-Retain proposed zoning on corner of Brooklyn and Heaphy Tce.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.019
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend 6.3 ww) and xx) so that Apartments in Business 2 Zone are a restricted discretionary activity.
Seeks the deletion of Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on
slopes.
Amend 6.3 f) so that Light industry in Business 2 Zone are a restricted discretionary activity.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.020
6.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support in Amend Rule in 6.6a) ii so that the non-notification Rule (6.7) applies to light industrial activities.
part
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.021
Table 23.3a
Oppose
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.022
23.7 Subdivision Design
Standards
Support in Amend 23.7 Subdivision Design Standards to exclude minimum/maximum areas from subdivision areas with an
part
approved land use consent.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.023
23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Support in Amend 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape to include a minimum average size of 300m2 for Comprehensive Residential
part
Development.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.024
23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Zone and All Special
Character Zones
Support in Delete all clauses within 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special Character Zones
part
except private way widths and retain current standards.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.025
23.7.4 Residential
Support in Delete all clauses within 23.7.4 Residential Intensification Zone except private way widths and retain current
Retain Rule 23.3a) iii. Amend the activity status for subdivision covered by Rule 23.3a) vi, v and viii to a less restrictive
status.
Page 214 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Intensification Zone
part
standards.
CKC Holdings Ltd
897.026
Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Map 44A-Oppose re-zoning of land in the general Frankton area to industrial. Retain existing zoning with an
introduction of mixed use residential.
Rakaipaka Puriri
898.001
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Oppose
Include posts on blog www.saveccnz.wordpress.com as independent submissions against 5.1.4 Temple View Zone.
Forlongs
Furnishings
Limited
899.001
25.3.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support in Amend Policy 25.3.1(b) to include the potential adverse effects on the efficiency and convenience of pedestrian
part
facilities and vehicle parking.
Forlongs
Furnishings
Limited
899.002
25.3.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support in Amend Policy 25.3.2.2a (iii) so consideration is given to matters of efficiency and convenience of pedestrian facilities
part
and vehicle parking.
Forlongs
Furnishings
Limited
899.003
25.3.2 Objectives and
Policies Events and
Temporary Activities
Support in Amend Policy 25.3.2 - Explanation by adding the words 'limited scale' to first sentence of the explanation.
part
Forlongs
Furnishings
Limited
899.004
25.3.5 Rules – Specific
Standards
Support in Add new Rules to 25.3.5 for 'Temporary Activities in a public place' to control temporary markets, stalls and retail
part
activities in public spaces.
Forlongs
Furnishings
Limited
899.005
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend the Definition of 'Temporary activities in a public place' to specify a maximum of 20 days or part days operation
part
per calendar year where a market can operate as a permitted activity.
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.002
Features Map 45B
Oppose
Amend Planning Map 45B by including the Central Post Office as a Built Heritage B Ranking.
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.003
19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Delete 19.5 a) iii) of Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria which relates to
Internal Alterations of buildings ranked A.
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.004
19.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Delete 19.5 a) iii) of Restricted Discretionary Activities, Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria in its entirety.
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.005
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Oppose
Amend the definition of "High Intensity Sign"
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.006
25.10.3 Rules – Activity
Status Table
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.10.3(f) in its entirety in relation to low intensity signs on heritage buildings.
Amend Policy 25.3.2.2b to refer to effects on surrounding activities, pedestrian facilities and vehicle parking.
Page 215 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.007
7 Central City Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.5.3 and Appendix 1.4.7.3 by deleting the 5m minimum width for the Pedestrian Promenade and
substituting a 3m minimum width.
Amend Appendix 1.4.7.3 Riverfront Development Design Guide - Promenade and Open Space by adding an Advice
Note about Council purchasing or taking as reserve contribution, any land on the riverbank side of the promenade for
vesting and developing as a recreation reserve.
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.008
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rules 7.3 ee) & ff) to make Parking Lots operating for up to 2 years a Restricted Discretionary activities and
longer than 2 years a Discretionary Activity.
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.009
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.4 g) Public amenities qualifying for a single or double bonus - to include Toilets available for public use
and to be used by the disabled and Provision of Riverbank Pedestrian Promenade in the development. .
Amend the through site access requirements to allow for other measures of ensuring provision and maintenance of
the through site.
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.010
7.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.6a i and ii regarding new buildings, alterations and additions, and relocated buildings by removing
consideration of matters and assessment criteria C2 to C12.
Review Appendix 1.2 with a view to streamlining and simplifying and ensuring that only matters that are relevant to
the reason for consent for activities listed are considered. All criteria must be clear as to meaning, non-prescriptive nor
read like a rule.
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.011
Building Separation
Oppose
Amend Assessment Criteria for Z24 Building Separation removing specific requirements for building separation and the
interpretive diagrams Z24d and Z24e and add in a definition for internal boundaries.
SKYCITY Hamilton
Ltd
900.012
25.15 Urban Design
Support in Rule 25.15 Urban Design - Seeks clarity on the role of the Urban Design Panel and VISTA in light of the urban design
part
focus of the Proposed District Plan.
Inclusion of an advice note in section 1.1.2.2. n) to make it clear that any development which requires a land use
consent including regard to urban design aspects will not require consideration by the Urban Design Panel;
Clarity of the role of the Urban Design Panel to exclude consideration of developments that require land use consent
including consideration of urban design aspects.
Andrea Graves
901.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Andrea Graves
901.002
9.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Give the Significant Natural Areas more protection from the effects of industrial activity - for example with respect to
part
distances between the activity and the Significant Natural Area.
Howard Ian
Johnston
902.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Page 216 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Graham Mckelvey
(PFS Engineering)
903.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Supports provisions that protect the ability of Industrial companies to continue to provide heavy engineering services
to the market in the greater Waikato by retaining the Industrial zoning. Amend the plan to increase the Environmental
protection area and heavy planting of native trees around the industrial area to provide a buffer from residential
property.
Philip Edward &
Frances Dene
Letford
904.001
Figure 15-5e Transport
corridor hierarchy plan
Support in Opposes the location of the proposed arterial transport corridor on Stage 2 of the Peacocke Structure Plan in relation
part
to 144 Hall Road.
Mark Sullivan
(Barry and
Sullivan Electrical
Ltd)
905.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.001
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Ruakura Structure Plan amend connections to be consistent with designations; include staging on the map from
part
staging rules; include 20m reserve along Wairere Dr.
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.002
Zoning Map 38A
Support in Map 38A-include a 20m wide ‘Future Reserve’ along the full length of Wairere Drive.
part
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.003
11.4.7 Site Landscaping
Support in Amend Rule 11.4.7 to require landscaping of the industrial park zone prior to development.
part
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.004
3.7.1.3 Ruakura Industrial
Park Zone
Support
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.005
3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support
Supports objective 3.7.2.5 and policies 3.7.2.5a and b for the creation of high quality industrial park zone.
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.006
11.2.1 Objective and Policies Support
Retain Objective 11.2.2, 11.2.3 and Policies 11.2.1b, 11.2.2a and 11.2.3a to create a high quality industrial park with no
adverse amenity impacts.
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.007
Figure 2-15 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Transport
Network
Support in Ruakura Structure Plan Figures 2-14 to 2-18 amend connections to be consistent with designations;
part
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.008
Figure 2-16 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Water
Infrastructure
Support in Ruakura Structure Plan - Amend Figs 2-14 to 2-18 to remove possible interchanges which are inconsistent with
part
designations.
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.009
Figure 2-17 Ruakura
Support in Ruakura Structure Plan -amend Figs 2-14 to 2-18 to remove interchange connections inconsistent with designations.
Structure Plan-Waste Water part
Infrastructure
Supports 3.7.1.3 as it indicates outcomes which enable the creation of high quality amenity industrial park zone.
Page 217 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.010
Figure 2-18 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Storm Water
Infrastructure
Support in Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 to remove the possible interchange connections to the Waikato Expressway which are
part
inconsistent with the Waikato Expressway Designation.
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.011
3.7 Ruakura
Support in Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies development of areas larger than what staging
part
provides for as a non-complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred
industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified.
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.012
3.7.3 Rules
Support in Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies development of areas larger than what staging
part
provides for as a non-complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred
industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified.
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.013
11.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies development of areas larger than what staging
part
provides as a non-complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred
industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified.
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.014
11.4 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies development of areas larger than what staging
part
provides as a non-complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred
industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified.
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.015
11.5 Rules – Specific
Standards
Support in Amend Chapter 3 or Chapter 11 to add a new rule that classifies development of areas larger than what staging
part
provides as a non-complying or prohibited activity or, Amend Figure 2-14 to rezone Stages 2 and 3 as 'deferred
industrial areas' that can only be development in the years specified.
Stephen George
Bigwood
906.016
3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for
Support in Amend Rule 3.7.3.4a) v with the removal of the words "or the industrial park area immediately north of the knowledge
Ruakura Logistics Zone and part
zone (ie west of the north-south spine road)" or amend Rule 3.7.3.4a) v by adding a proviso that the Fifth Avenue, Five
Cross Roads and Boundary Road transport Corridor has been upgraded to four lanes prior to development’
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
in the Ruakura Structure Plan
Area
Jennifer & John
West
909.001
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Opposes the Ruakura Structure Plan containing an Inland Port and the land alongside Silverdale and Ruakura Roads
being designated as "Industrial". If progressed, amend the plan to require mitigation measures to ensure effects do not
impact on either residents or places of education, including, hours of operation, glare, noise, dust, height restrictions,
visual amenity, recreation and ecological corridors, shading, biological security, noxious industry, nature of secondary
support and transportation activities.
Jennifer & John
West
909.002
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Opposes the Ruakura Structure Plan containing an Inland Port and the land alongside Silverdale and Ruakura Roads
being designated as "Industrial". If progressed, amend the plan to require mitigation measures to ensure effects do not
impact on either residents or places of education, including, hours of operation, glare, noise, dust, height restrictions,
visual amenity, recreation and ecological corridors, shading, biological security, noxious industry, nature of secondary
support and transportation activities.
Page 218 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Bryce & Natasha
Carmichael
910.001
3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot
residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and
vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road
f) purchase property.
Bryce & Natasha
Carmichael
910.002
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot
residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and
vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road
f) purchase property.
Bryce & Natasha
Carmichael
910.003
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot
residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and
vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road
f) purchase property.
Bryce & Natasha
Carmichael
910.004
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot
residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and
vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road
f) purchase property.
Bryce & Natasha
Carmichael
910.005
25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot
residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and
vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road
f) purchase property.
Bryce & Natasha
Carmichael
910.006
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain as rural residential and development rights b) provide a 100m buffer between large lot
residential and logistics/industrial park zones c) remove reference to any logistics in the future d) ensure lighting and
vibration does not adversely affect quality of life e) ensure freight movements use an alternative road to Percival Road
f) purchase property.
Bryce & Natasha
Carmichael
910.007
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential
zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by a green belt.
Hugh and Katie
Goodman and
Mayes
911.001
2.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
It is important that the extensive city wide infrastructure improvements are utilised before opening up new areas for
development, particularly at Ruakura. A new policy should be included in the District Plan to require at least 70%
uptake of existing industrial land before new industrial land is made available, including for logistics activities.
Hugh and Katie
Goodman and
Mayes
911.002
2.2.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
It is important that the extensive city wide infrastructure improvements are utilised before opening up new areas for
development, particularly at Ruakura. A new policy should be included in the District Plan to require at least 70%
uptake of existing industrial land before new industrial land is made available, including for logistics activities.
Hugh and Katie
911.003
3.7 Ruakura
Oppose
Delete Ruakura Structure Plan and requests consultation occurs with the community.
Page 219 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Goodman and
Mayes
Hugh and Katie
Goodman and
Mayes
911.004
3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for
Oppose
Ruakura Logistics Zone and
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
in the Ruakura Structure Plan
Area
Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) and undertake a plan variation once NZTA has made a decision on the location and style of
interchange on the Waikato Expressway. Delete Rule 3.7.3.4a) relating to release of 80ha of land in Ruakura prior to
2021.
Retain Rule 3.7.3.4 b) which supports the release of land post 2021 on completion of the Hamilton Waikato
Expressway.
Hugh and Katie
Goodman and
Mayes
911.005
10.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose
Oppose Policy 10.2.1a and 3.7.3.4 with the release of 80 ha within the Ruakura Structure Plan prior to 2021 without
the completion of the Waikato Expressway.
Hugh and Katie
Goodman and
Mayes
911.006
10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 10.2.3a(iv) to ensure adverse effects from logistics and industrial activities are appropriately minimised
part
when assessed from all existing residential properties.
Hugh and Katie
Goodman and
Mayes
911.007
10.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Retain general industrial activities and commercial activities in the logistics zone as non-complying and retain logistics
part
and freight-handling as restricted discretionary.
Hugh and Katie
Goodman and
Mayes
911.008
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend the definition of "Logistics and freight-handling infrastructure"
part
Hugh and Katie
Goodman and
Mayes
911.009
10.4.5 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 10.4.5 so that “Provision and use of artificial lighting, producing an illuminance in excess of 150 lux,
part
measured at any point on the site containing the light source, in a horizontal or vertical plane at ground level” is a
Discretionary Activity.
Hugh and Katie
Goodman and
Mayes
911.010
10.4 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Amend Rule 10.4 to add a standard to the Ruakura Logistics Zone that restricts glare.
part
Hugh and Katie
Goodman and
Mayes
911.011
25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Support
Standards for Activities in all
Zones Except Major Facilities,
Knowledge and Open Space
Zones
Retain noise standards in 25.8.3.7
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
912.001
4.3 Rules – General
Oppose
Residential, Residential
Intensification and Large Lot
The Residential Intensification Zoning ascribed to the landowners and/or areas referred to in the submission is
opposed.
Page 220 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
Residential Zones
Sub Type Summary
Adoption of the amendments outlined in the submission to the Residential Intensification Zone Activities and rules in
section 4.3.1 and the subsections of 4.3.1, or
The application of the amendments sought to the Residential Intensification Zone Activities and rules outlined in these
submissions to 4.3, 4.3.1 and the subsections of 4.3.1, to the area from Gwynne Place (also known as Gwynne St) to
1150 Victoria St, or to properties in Residential Intensification Zone that are currently used for Non-Residential
Purposes or are adjacent to properties that are currently used for Non-Residential purposes, or
For the properties from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria St to be included in the Central City Zone – City Living Precinct 2
(as per Appendix 5, Figure 5), or
For the properties from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria St to be included in the Central City Zone – City Living Precinct 2
to have the attributes, provisions and the features of the Central City Zone – City Living Precinct 2 incorporated in the
activities, provisions and rules that apply to the Residential Intensification Zone and the area specifically outlined, and
Incorporate a rule similar to Appendix 15, Table 15-2b that does not require on site parking in area from Gwynne Place
to 1150 Victoria St.
Any consequential or similar amendments that would have the same or a similar effect, or that serve to satisfy the
intent and content of the submission points.
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.002
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Support in Retain the Permitted Activity status for the activities in Rules a), d), h), i), j), m), v), y), z), ee), jj), mm), rr), ss), and tt).
part
Amend Rule 4.3.1b) and f) to be a Permitted Activity.
Amend Rule 4.3.1c) to be a Restricted Discretionary Activity.
Amend Rule 4.3.1e) to be a Permitted Activity in the Residential Intensification Zone.
Amend Rule 4.3.1g) to allow for duplex dwellings in the Residential Intensification Zone as a Permitted Activity.
Amend Rule 4.3.1s) to be a Permitted Activity in the Residential Intensification Zone, or confine the application of the
amendment of 4.3.1s) to the Residential Intensification Zone area from Gwynne Place – 1150 Victoria Street.
Amend Rule 4.3.1t) to a Restricted Discretionary Activity in the Residential Intensification Zone, or confine the
application of the amendment of 4.3.1t) to the Residential Intensification Zone area from Gwynne Place – 1150
Victoria Street.
Page 221 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Amend Rule 4.3.1u) to be a Permitted Activity where it is included in or adjoins a non-residential activity, and if a stand
alone facility as a Restricted Discretionary Activity.
Amend Rule 4.3.1x) to be a Permitted or Controlled Activity, or confine the less onerous Permitted or Controlled
Activity status amendment to the Residential Intensification Zone area from Gwynne Place – 1150 Victoria Street.
Amend Rule 4.3.1bb) to be a Permitted or Controlled activity and apply all of the Residential Intensification Zone Area
or to properties that are currently used for Non-Residential Purposes or are adjacent to properties that are currently
used for Non-Residential Purposes,
Or
To the properties from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria St.
Amend Rule 4.3.1dd) to a Controlled Activity.
Amend Rule 4.3.1gg) to be a Permitted Activity.
Amend Rule 4.3.1hh) to be a Permitted or Controlled Activity, or confine the less onerous Permitted or Controlled
Activity status amendment to the Residential Intensification Zone area from Gwynne Place – 1150 Victoria Street
Amend Rule 4.3.1 ii) to a Permitted Activity.
Include Comprehensive Development rules that facilitates development where the alternative is for an Activity Status
other than a Permitted Activity is considered to apply.
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
912.003
7 Central City Zone
Support in Amend Plan to enable the area from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria Street to be zoned as Central City Zone and part of
part
the City Living Precinct.
Page 222 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Associates Ltd)
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.004
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.3a) and b) so that new buildings and alterations or additions are a Controlled Activity.
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.005
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support
Retain 7.4.2 Building Intensity regarding the increase in permitted floor area ratio.
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
912.006
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support
Retain 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control.
Amend 7.3 l), m) n), hh), t), ii), jj), kk), ll), mm) and tt) to allow for offices, retail greater than 250m2, health care
services, community centres, Tertiary education and specialised training facilities and visitor accommodation as
Permitted Activities.
Amend 7.3(x) to delete reference to “on sites fronting Victoria Street”
Delete 7.3(y) in its entirety.
Page 223 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.007
7.5.4 Residential
Oppose
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.008
Table 15-2b Number of
Support
parking and loading spaces
required – Central City Zone
Retain Appendix 15, Table 15-2b regarding no minimum car parking requirements in the Central City Zone.
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
912.009
Zoning Map 36A
Map 36A-Rezone 1 Gwynne St, 1140 Victoria St, and the areas that include 1 Gwynne St and 1130 Victoria St to 1150
Victoria St from Residential Intensification to Central City-Living
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.5.4 b), Figure 7.5.4e, Rule 7.5.4e), f) ii and h). Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) i) to delete the requirement for
outdoor living to be located north of east or west. Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) ii and 7.5.4 f) i to reduce the requirements for
outdoor living areas and minimum floor areas for studio, 1 and 2 bedroom units.
Page 224 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.010
Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A -rezone 1 Gwynne St, 1140 Victoria St and the areas that include 1 Gwynne St and from 1130 to 1150 Victoria
St, to an appropriate mixed use zone (i.e. Central City Zone – City Living Precinct 2).
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.011
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan Precinct 2 to include Gwynne Place and 1130-1150 Victoria Street.
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
912.012
7.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Plan to enable the area from Gwynne Place to 1150 Victoria Street to be zoned as Central City Zone and part of
part
the City Living Precinct.
Page 225 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.013
4.4.1 Density
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.1a)i. so no maximum is included, or the maximum is 1,350m2 for the Residential Intensification Zone.
part
Amend Rule 4.4.1a)iv. so no maximum is included, or the maximum is 2,000m2 for the Residential Intensification
Zone.
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.014
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks, so that side and rear boundary setbacks are 0m unless adjoining a Residential or
Special Character Zone when it should be 3m.
Page 226 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.015
Features Map 36B
Oppose
Amend Feature Map 36B and make reference to Chapter 22 so that the submitters Gwynne St and 1140 Victoria Street
properties are not affected by rules related to land instability.
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
912.016
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Oppose
Seeks deletion of policy 22.2.1l;
amendments to Feature Map 36B or Chapter 22 so that the submitters Gwynne St and 1140 Victoria Street properties
are not affected by rules related to land instability; amendments to clarify land instability and ensure that
development can occur within the Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area.
Peter John
Findlay, Donna
Margaret Findlay,
Peter John Findlay
& Donna
Margaret Findlay
as trustees of the
Findlay Family
Trust, Riverside
Oak Estate Ltd
912.017
22.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Seeks that Rules 22.3(h), 22.3(j), 22.3(p) relating to new buildings, alterations and additions, and earthworks in the
part
Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area are Permitted Activities for Gwynne Street and 1140 Victoria Street.
Page 227 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
(Peter Findlay,
Peter Findlay &
Associates Ltd)
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.001
1.1.3 Plan Structure
Support in Amend 1.1.3 (Plan Structure) to allow a level of flexibility in relation to objectives and policies relating to Structure
part
Plans.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.002
1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed
Oppose
Amend Rule 1.1.8.1 'Activity Not Listed' default from non complying to "discretionary".
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.003
2.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support
Supports the objective of an increasingly sustainable urban form for Hamilton.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.004
2.2 Objectives and Policies
Strategic Framework
Oppose
Delete Rule 2.2 as it sets a higher threshold that RMA s.104D for non-complying activities.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.005
2.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 2.2.2b and 2.2.2c to allow flexibility for future landuse and market changes, and give effect to Method
part
6.13.3 of the Proposed RPS.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.006
2.2.12 Objective and Policies Oppose
Resource Efficiency
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.007
3.1 Purpose
Support in Retain the Purpose of the Structure Plan Chapter with amendments to include reference to future land use patterns,
part
staging of development and fiscal/financial/commercial feasibility, as set out in the submission.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.008
3.3 Objectives and Policies
Structure Plans
Support in Amend the introduction for 3.3 Objectives and Policies Structure Plans by deleting the word 'must' and replace with
part
'shall' and add the word 'general' as set out in the submission.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.009
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Structure 3.3.1 Objective and Policies with amendments to recognise that housing density targets will be
part
achieved over time and will exclude roads and open space zoned land. Include an explanation of achieving higher
densities (as set out in the submission).
Add a new policy to 2.2.12 that identifies the important role that location and access to infrastructure has in terms of
the efficient development of natural and physical resources as set out in the submission.
Make amendments to policy for interim land use to allow low density residential development and to focus on future
land use patterns rather than the long term vision.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.010
3.3.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 3.3.2a and delete Policy 3.3.2d to regarding infrastructure requirements for development. Amend Policy
part
3.3.2e so that the staging and sequencing of development only has to be in general accordance with staging indicated
on the relevant structure plan.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.011
3.3.4 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.012
3.7 Ruakura
Support in Amend 3.7b to update land area; reword 3.7d to relate to strengthening the CBD. Amend 3.7f footnote provides
part
flexibility if Waikato Expressway not completed; delete 3.7h and associated staging rules in 3.7.3.6.
Delete Policy 3.3.4b
Page 228 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.013
3.7.1.4 Knowledge Zone
Oppose
Amend 3.7.1.4b by deleting "in a manner that does not compromise the Central City"
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.014
3.7.1.5 Neighbourhood
Centre
Oppose
Amend 3.7.1.5 to change the Knowledge Zone Neighbourhood Centre to a Suburban Centre.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.015
3.7.1.7 Transportation
Network
Support in Amend 3.7.1.7 to create flexibility for the alignment of the transportation network and open space corridor.
part
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.016
3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Oppose
Delete objective 3.7.2.2 and policies 3.7.2.2a, 3.7.2.7a. Amend Objectives and Policies 3.7.2.4, 3.7.2.7 and 3.7.2.7b to
remove reference to compromising the Central City, and to replace the Neighbourhood Centre in the Knowledge Zone
with a Suburban Centre.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.017
3.7.3.3 Infrastructure
Delete 3.7.3.3 in relation to infrastructure
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.018
3.7.3.4 Staging Rules for
Support in Amend Rule 3.7.3.4a to provide flexibility in relation to the Waikato Regional Policy Statement. Delete 3.7.3.4(a)(ii) to
Ruakura Logistics Zone and part
(iv). Amend Rule 3.7.3.4b amend to provide flexibility for development in relation to the completion of the Waikato
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
Expressway.
in the Ruakura Structure Plan
Area
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.019
3.7.3.5 Staging Rules for
Oppose
General Residential Zone and
Medium Density Residential
Zone in the Ruakura
Structure Plan Area
Delete Rules 3.7.3.5(a) and 3.7.3.5(b) and replace with amended wording to align with the recent decision on the E1 to
Cobham Drive, or impacts of the location of connections to the Waikato Expressway.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.020
3.7.3.6 Staging Rule for the Oppose
Innovation Park Precinct of
the Knowledge Zone in the
Ruakura Structure Plan Area
Delete Rule 3.7.3.6 Staging rule for Innovation Park Precinct for the Knowledge Zone.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.021
4.1.4 Large Lot Residential
Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.1.4a)i and ii. to remove Large Lot Residential zone areas in the Ruakura Structure Plan. These areas
should be rezoned as either Ruakura Logistics or Ruakura Industrial Park zone.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.022
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.1a ii. regarding minimum residential density targets by replacing the words 'achieving, as a
part
minimum' with 'seeking to achieve over time'. Amend 4.2.1a to exclude roads and Open Space zoned land from the
calculation of density targets.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.023
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Oppose
Oppose
The zoning of the Ryburn Road / Percival Road area as Large Lot Residential is opposed and the substitution of a
Ruakura Logistics or Industrial Park zoning is supported. If this area were zoned Large Lot Residential any new
development should be constructed in a manner that reflects its location near regionally significant infrastructure
Page 229 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
including the Expressway, the main trunk railway line, and the IMT.
Amend Rule 4.3.1 (c) to make ancillary residential units in the Percival/Ryburn Road Area a restricted discretionary
activity.
Amend Rule 4.3.1(e) to make detached dwellings in the Percival/Ryburn Road Area a restricted discretionary activity.
Amend Rule 4.3.1(b) and (g) to make apartment buildings and duplex dwellings in the Large Lot Residential Area noncomplying activities.
Amend 4.3.1(p) to make farming activities a permitted activity in the General Residential Zone.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.024
4.4.1 Density
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.1a) regarding density to exclude duplex, detached and relocated dwellings on large lot residential sites
part
in Percival/Ryburn Roads (Ruakura Structure Plan area).
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.025
4.4.5 Height in Relation to
Boundary
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.5 Height in Relation to Boundary, specifically Rule 4.4.5a), and deletion of Rule 4.4.5a)ii.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.026
4.4.9 Residential Buildings –
Separation and Privacy
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.9b) Residential Buildings - Separation and Privacy, so the setbacks do not apply to windows of
habitable rooms.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.027
4.5.1 Comprehensive
Development Plan Process
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.5.1 d) so the default activity status for a Comprehensive Development Plan is Restricted Discretionary.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.028
4.5.2 Comprehensive
Development Plan Process
Once Consent Has Been
Granted
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.5.2 Comprehensive Development Plan Process Once Consent Has Been Granted.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.029
4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Support in Amending Rule 4.5.3 a), by deleting "and changes in the use once consent has been granted Note: See Rule 4.5.2(a) for
Medium-Density Residential part
once consent granted";
Zone
Amend Rules 4.5.3 a), b), c), d), e), f), h), i), k), l), n), dd) and ee) so that all forms of residential buildings, managed care
facilities, papakainga, residential centres, rest homes, childcare facilities (six or more children), marae, and places of
worship, are Restricted Discretionary Activities, and considered on a non-notified, without affected party approval
basis.
Amend Rules 4.5.3 m), o), z), aa) and hh) so that childcare facilities (up to five children), dairies, integrated retail
developments (Ruakura Comprehensive Development Plan Area A), community centres and relocated buildings, are
Controlled Activities.
Page 230 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Amend Rules 4.5.3 q), v), y), bb), ff) and ii) so that health care services, places of assembly, visitor accommodation,
general recreation, schools, and emergency service facilities, are Restricted Discretionary Activities.
Amend Rules 4.5.3 r) and s) so that home based business and homestay accommodation are Permitted Activities.
Amend Rule 4.5.3 by adding service stations as a new Restricted Discretionary Activity.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.030
4.6.2 Development Yield
Support in Delete Rule 4.6.2 Development Yield
part
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.031
4.6.3 Height in Relation to
Boundary
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.6.3 a) i. and delete Rule 4.6.3 a) ii. regarding height in relation to boundary.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.032
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.7 b) and delete Rule 4.4.7 c) regarding the interface between public and private realm.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.033
4.9 Rules – Specific
Standards – Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
Add a new rule regarding noise mitigation measures for new dwellings within the Percival/Ryburn Road area.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.034
4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 4.10 to review the assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission.
Add new Rule 4.10a that sets out the relevant matters of control for controlled activities.
Supports the activities identified as subject to Rule 4.11 - Notification Rule.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.035
4.11 Notification Rule
Support
Retain Rule 4.11 - Notification Rule.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.036
6.2.2 Objective and Policies
Suburban Centres
Support
Retain the Objective 6.2.2 and Policies 6.2.2a to 6.2.2g for Suburban Centres
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.037
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.3 by combining the Suburban Centre Core and Suburban Centre Fringe zones as a single zone.
Delete the floor area restrictions in Rule 6.3.
Amend Rule 6.3 hh) to make parking lots permitted activities.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.038
6.4.6 Maximum Tenancy Size Oppose
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.039
8.1 Purpose
Delete Rule 6.4.6 regarding Maximum Tenancy Size.
Support in Amend 8.1 to provide for a Suburban Centre instead of a Neighbourhood Centre in the Knowledge Zone. Amend 8.1e)
part
to remove reference to development staging. Delete 8.1g) regarding adverse effects on the Central City.
Page 231 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.040
8.2.3 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Objective 8.2.3 Explanation - remove reference to staging
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.041
8.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend the Knowledge Zone to provide for more Controlled Activities.
Amend Rule 8.3 so that it applies to the whole Knowledge Zone.
Amend the zoning of the mainstreet area to a Business Zone.
Amend Rule 8.3 d), e), j) and q) regarding new buildings, alterations and additions, commercialisation of activity
ancillary to research, innovation, education and laboratory activities and parking lots, to Permitted Activities
Amend Rule 8.3b) from Internal alterations to Minor works.
Amend Rule 8.3q) to remove Parking Buildings.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.042
8.5.3 Ancillary Offices
Oppose
Delete Rule 8.5.3a) regarding floor area restrictions for ancillary offices.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.043
8.9 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 8.9 to review the assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.044
8.10 Notification Rule
Support
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.045
10.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 10.2.1.
part
Amend Policy 10.2.1a to provide some staging flexibility for logistics and industrial development.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.046
10.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rules 10.3 a) and h) so that logistics and freight-handling activities, food and beverage outlets and dairies not
exceeding 100m2 floor area, are Permitted Activities.
Amend Rules 10.3 c) and e) so that new buildings, accessory buildings, alterations and additions, are Permitted
Activities outside of the Interface Design Control Area.
Amend Rule 10.3 d) so that new buildings, accessory buildings and alterations and additions, are Controlled Activities
within the Interface Design Control Area.
Amend Rules 10.3 l) and m) so that short-stay worker accommodation and ancillary residential units are Controlled
Activities.
Amend Rule 10.3n) so that Permitted Activities that fail to meet Rule 10.4.1 become Restricted Discretionary Activities.
Amend Rule 10.3o) so that all other activities that do not meet Rules 10.4.2 to 10.4.9 are Discretionary Activities.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.047
10.4.1 Permitted Activities
Oppose
Delete Rule 10.4.1c) regarding additional demands on Three Waters and Transportation infrastructure.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.048
10.4.5 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 10.4.5 to reduce the height of loading ramps, link spans, machinery rooms, cranes and other lifting and
part
stacking equipment outside the inland port. Amend Rule 10.4.5e to increase the maximum height of container stacking
Supports the activities identified as subject to Rule 8.10 - Notification Rule.
Retain Rule 8.10 notification rule as notified.
Page 232 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
outside of the inland port to 12m.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.049
10.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Delete rule 10.4.6 (iv) and (vii) Large lot residential building setback within the logistics zone
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.050
10.4.8 Interface Standards
Oppose
Delete 10.4.8 (b) and (c) regarding interface standard restrictions on inland port related activities within 40m of the
Large Lot Residential Area (Ruakura) and the Waikato Expressway.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.051
10.4.9 Ancillary Offices
Oppose
Delete Rule 10.4.9 a) regarding floor area restrictions for ancillary offices.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.052
10.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 10.5 to review the assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.053
10.6 Notification Rule
Support
Retain 10.6 Notification Rule
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.054
11.1 Purpose
Support
Retain 11.1 Purpose of Ruakura Industrial Park regarding the 40m setback from existing residential development to the
south east.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.055
11.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Retain Objective 11.2.1.
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone part
Amend Policy 11.2.1a to provide some staging flexibility for logistics and industrial development.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.056
11.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.057
11.4.1 Permitted Activities
Support in Delete Rule 11.4.1c) regarding additional demands on Three Waters and Transportation infrastructure.
part
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.058
11.5.2 Ancillary Offices
Oppose
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.059
11.5.3 Transportation Service Support
Centres
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.060
11.6 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 11.6 to review the assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission.
Activities Matters of
part
Discretion and Assessment
Supports the activities identified as subject to Rule 11.7 - Notification Rule.
Criteria
Amend Rule 11.3 a), c), e), y), and bb) so that new buildings, industrial activities (excluding 11.3 f) to i)), logistics and
freight-handling activities, parking lots and parking buildings, and alterations and additions are Permitted Activities
Amend Rule 11.3 b) so that new buildings, alterations and additions within an Interface Design Control Area (other
than minor works) are Controlled Activities.
Delete Rule 11.5.2 regarding floor area restrictions for ancillary offices.
Retain Rule 11.5.3 regarding Transportation Service Centres
Page 233 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.061
11.7 Notification Rule
Support
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.062
15.2.2 Objective and Policies Support
Retain Policy 15.2.2b of All Open Space Zones
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.063
18.1 Purpose
Amend Purpose of the Transport Corridor Zone 18.1 to adequately recognise the importance of property access and
facilitating commerce and business.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.064
23.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 23.2.1 and Policy 23.2.2a for Subdivision
part
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.065
23.2.3 Objective and Policy
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.066
23.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policies 23.2.5a to 23.2.5c by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'
part
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.067
Table 23.3a
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.3a) v, vii, and viii so that fee simple, cross lease and unit title subdivision are Controlled Activities.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.068
Table 23.3b
Oppose
Amend Rules 23.3b) iv, v, vii, viii and ix so they are Controlled Activities.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.069
23.6.1 Subdivision in the
Oppose
Ruakura Structure Plan Area
Delete Rule 23.6.1 regarding Subdivision in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.070
23.6.7 Subdivision in the
Oppose
Medium-Density Residential
and Rototuna Town Centre
Zones
Delete Rule 23.6.7 regarding Subdivision in the Medium-Density Residential and Rototuna Town Centre Zones
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.071
23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Amend Rule 23.7.1u) to reduce the minimum site area from 3500m2 to 500m2 within the Ruakura Logistics Zone and
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone. Replace Rule 23.7.1x) and Figure 23.1.7a with a 15 metre shape factor (diameter control)
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.072
23.7.2 Subdivision Suitability Oppose
Delete Rule 23.7.2(a) regarding Subdivision Suitability
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.073
23.7.5 Business 1 to 7 Zones, Oppose
Central City Zone, Te Rapa
North Industrial Zone,
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone,
Ruakura Logistics Zone and
Industrial Zone
Delete Rule 23.7.5 c), e), f), g), h) regarding access and private way widths.
Oppose
Oppose
Oppose
Retain 11.7 Notification rule
Delete Objective 23.2.3 and Policy 23.2.3a regarding subdivision not occurring in the Rototuna Town Centre Zone or
Medium Density Residential Zone without a Comprehensive Development Plan.
Page 234 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.074
24 Financial Contributions
Support in Amend Chapter 24 to ensure consistency and clarity between the development contribution policy and financial
part
contribution provisions
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.075
24.4.1 Reserves Level of
Service
Support in Amend 24.4.1 to clarify that where reserves are acquired in accordance with a Structure Plan, this will satisfy the
part
reserve requirement in the Proposed Plan; Amend 24.3.3 to clarify how the population rate would apply for a specific
development.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.076
25.1.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support in Amend Policy 25.1.2.1c regarding the servicing of land to refine its intent and give effect to method 6.13.3 of the
part
proposed regional policy statement.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.077
25.2.5 Rules – Specific
Standards
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 to increase the permitted earthworks volume to 250m3.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.078
25.3.5.3 Events at Innes
Common, Hamilton Lake
Domain, Wintec (City and
Rotokauri), and Within the
Knowledge Zone
Oppose
Amend 25.3.5.3 by deleting a) and b) regarding the number of people attending and the number of events per
calendar year.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.079
25.5.2 Objectives and
Policies Landscaping and
Screening
Oppose
Amend Policy 25.5.2.1a to recognise that screening and planting may not be the most appropriate method to achieve
good urban design outcomes.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.080
25.5.3.1 Landscaping
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.5.3.1a ix to specify external ground level parking spaces and require the planting of 1 tree per 5 parking
spaces for 20 or more parking spaces.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.081
25.5.3.7 Internal Planting
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.5.3.7 regarding internal planting so it does not apply to the Ruakura Logistics or Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.082
25.7.4 Rules – Activity Status Oppose
– Electricity Transmission
Corridors
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.083
25.8.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.084
25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Oppose
Standards for Activities in all
Zones Except Major Facilities,
Knowledge and Open Space
Zones
Amend Rule 25.7.4 to add a new activity 'New buildings, yard areas or additions to the building envelope of existing
buildings not associated with sensitive land uses' as a Permitted Activity in Electricity Corridor B, Discretionary in
Electricity Corridor A (Urban Areas), and Restricted Discretionary in Electricity Corridor A (Greenfield).
Support in Amend Policies 25.8.2.1a and 25.8.2.1d so that it focuses on the protection from unreasonable adverse noise effects as
part
opposed to protecting the existing residential ambient noise environment.
Amend Rule 25.8.3.7 by increasing the maximum noise levels permitted.
Page 235 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.085
25.13.2 Objectives and
Policies Three Waters
Support in Amend Policy 25.13.2.1a regarding subdivision and development avoiding adverse effects on water resources to
part
include "---remedy or mitigate--".
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.086
25.13.4.6 Water Impact
Assessments
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.13.4.6 so that the exclusion for a Water Impact Assessment applies to Integrated Catchment
Management Plans that have been approved prior to the Plan becoming operative irrespective of whether they are in
accordance with the information requirements of Volume 2, Appendix 1.5.5.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.087
25.14.2 Objectives and
Policies Transportation
Oppose
Amend Policy 25.14.2.1f so that Integrated Transport Assessments may be required for discretionary or non-complying
activities.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.088
25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Oppose
Seeks the deletion of Rule 25.14.4.3 regarding Integrated Transport Assessments.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.089
25.14.4.1 Vehicle Crossings
and Internal Vehicle Access
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.14.4.1 k) requiring vehicle crossings to be left-in left-out designs when accessing Major Arterial or
Strategic Transport Corridors, roads with more than 20,000 vehicle movements per day, or with four vehicle lanes.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.090
25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading
Spaces and Manoeuvring
Areas
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.2 a) to clarify when an assessment of compliance parking and end of journey facilities
requirements is triggered.
Amend Rule 25.14.4.2 by adding a new rule that the minimum parking space requirements detailed in Table 15-2a, 152d, 15-2e, 15-2f and 15-2g should become maximums for the Ruakura Logistics Zone and Ruakura Industrial Park Zone.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.091
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.2 matters and assessment criteria to address the matters raised in the submission.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.092
C Site Development, Design
and Layout
Oppose
Delete Appendix 1.1.2 C2(b) regarding stud heights.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.093
1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose
Assessment Criteria
Amend Appendix 1.4 - Design Guides and assessment criteria so they assist in achieving good urban design outcomes,
but are less prescriptive and focus on the key areas of concern.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.094
1.5.21 Ruakura Structure
Plan (Noise – Inland Port)
Support
Retain 1.5.21 requiring a Noise Management Plan for the Inland Port
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.095
1.5 Information
Requirements
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.5 Information Requirements to address the matters raised in this submission.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.096
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend the definition of "Interface Design Control Area". Insert a definition of "Greenfield Development". Amend the
part
definition of "Transport Corridor Zone" in a manner to allow stormwater management/linear wetland/landscaped
swales within the transport corridor setbacks.
Tainui Group
913.097
1.8.4 Collaboration and
Support
Retain 1.8.4 a), b) and c) Other Methods regarding Collaboration and Partnership.
Page 236 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Holdings Ltd
Sub Type Summary
Partnership
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.098
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Waikato Expressway connections as “proposed”
part
interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26 Waikato Expressway connections.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.099
Figure 2-15 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Transport
Network
Support in Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Waikato Expressway connections as “proposed”
part
interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26 Waikato Expressway connections. Supports Figures 2-15 and
2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.100
Figure 2-16 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Water
Infrastructure
Support in Amend Figures 2-14 and 2-15 to identify the Greenhill and Ruakura Waikato Expressway connections as “proposed”
part
interchanges. Remove 5th Avenue and State highway 26 Waikato Expressway connections. Supports Figures 2-15 and
2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging.
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.101
Figure 2-17 Ruakura
Support in Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging.
Structure Plan-Waste Water part
Infrastructure
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.102
Figure 2-18 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Storm Water
Infrastructure
Support in Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging.
part
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.103
Figure 2-19 Ruakura
Residential Staging
Support in Supports Figures 2-15 and 2-19 regarding infrastructure and staging.
part
Tainui Group
Holdings Ltd
913.104
Zoning Map 39A
Oppose
Amend Map 39A to include a Suburban Centre as identified within the submission.
Maurice Conway
Clarke
914.001
Zoning Map 15A
Oppose
Map 15A- the eastern portion of Pt Lot 1 DP S17176 at Te Kowhai East Road and other properties in the same position
be zoned Industrial.
Maurice Conway
Clarke
914.002
Zoning Map 14A
Oppose
Map 14A-The eastern portion of Pt Lot 1 DP S17176 at Te Kowhai East Road and other properties in the same position
be zoned Industrial.
Lester Clarke
915.001
Features Map 34B
Oppose
Amend Flood Hazard Area so that the crown of the road is not showing as the deepest part of flooding (Olive Road)
Wayne Maurice &
Melanie Jane
Clarke Family
Trust -
916.001
Zoning Map 15A
Oppose
Map 15A-Rezone land described as SEC 2 SO: 442251 at Te Kowhai East Road from Future Urban Zone to Industrial
Zone.
Wayne Maurice &
Melanie Jane
Clarke Family
Trust -
916.002
Zoning Map 14A
Oppose
Map 14A-Rezone land described as SEC 2 SO: 442251 at Te Kowhai East Road from Future Urban to Industrial.
Page 237 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Barry Lionel
Pennell
917.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
B & E.M Williams
Family Trust -
918.001
Features Map 38B
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from any LIM report for the submitters property.
Wayne Rogers
919.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Wayne Rogers
919.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Wayne Rogers
919.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Wayne Rogers
919.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
James Whetu
920.001
4.1.5 All Residential Zones
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.5a) by deleting reference to 'high quality urban design' as there is more to achieving a quality urban
part
environment than those solely.
James Whetu
920.002
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Objective 4.2.3 by deleting the word 'good';
part
Amend Policy 4.2.3a by deleting the word 'quality';
Amend Policy 4.2.3a v. by deleting the last eight words of the policy so that it reads: "Parking and manoeuvring areas
on-site";
Remove Policy 4.2.3b in its entirety.
James Whetu
920.003
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.4 by inserting the words 'over time'.
part
James Whetu
920.004
4.2.6 Objective and Policies
Support in 4.2.6 Objective and Policies part
Policy 4.2.6(a): Supports the intent of the policy but seeks a wording change as outlined in the submission to provide
clarity.
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Policy 4.2.6(c)(ii): Amend to delete the word 'avoid' and instead use the term "minor or less than minor".
Subsequent amendment to other policies and rules in the District Plan should be considered.
James Whetu
920.005
25.1.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Oppose
Remove or reword policy 25.1.2.2a ii to take into consideration the "avoidance" of adverse effects on water quality &
quantity is unreasonable; Remove the word enhance from 25.2.2.1 a i and add "wherever possible" to the end of the
sentence.
James Whetu
920.006
25.5.2 Objectives and
Support in Amend policy 25.5.2.1 to remove the "cultural connection" which is considered more suited in development of reserve
Page 238 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Policies Landscaping and
Screening
part
management plans.
James Whetu
920.007
25.15 Urban Design
Oppose
Remove Chapter 25.15 in its entirety.
Rex Graeme Edge
922.001
Features Map 61B
Oppose
Remove the flood hazard from 11 Rhonda Ave.
Roy & Dayl Carson
923.001
Features Map 61B
Oppose
Remove flood hazard from 9 Rhonda Ave and any reference to a LIM.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.001
1 Plan Overview
Support in Amend the activity status table for all zones by adding a note that clarifies that the activity status is subject to
part
compliance with the city wide provisions in the plan.
Amend all Notification Rules by adding wording stating the NZ Transport Agency will be notified as an affected party
where an activity is likely to affect the state highway network.
Any consequential amendments required to reflect changes made to the LTMA.
Simplify the structure of the plan to avoid the need to refer to multiple sections.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.002
2.2 Objectives and Policies
Strategic Framework
Support in Amend the Plan to clarify the relationship between the zone section objectives and policies and the strategic
part
objectives and policies and when to apply these.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.003
2.1 Purpose
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.004
2.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Objective 2.2.1 and Policy 2.2.1a as notified. Amend 2.2.1b to include 'minimising energy use and carbon
part
dioxide production'. Amend the explanation to include 'Access Hamilton'.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.005
2.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Objective 2.2.2, however, amend the Explanation to refer to infrastructure providers other than Council as
part
provided in their submission, and amend policy 2.2.2c.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.006
2.2.3 Objective and Policies
Urban Design Approach
Support
Retain Objective and policies in 2.2.3 as notified.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.007
2.2.4 Objective and Policies
Central City, Business and
Industry
Support
Retain Objective and policies in 2.2.4 as notified.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.008
2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 2.2.13 to include reference to 'Investment' in infrastructure, and amend the explanation to reflect
Integrated Land Use,
part
the need for coordination of investment across a number of parties to align infrastructure and development as
Transport and Infrastructure
suggested in the submission. Retain Policies 2.2.13a to 2.2.13f.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.009
3.1 Purpose
Support in principle to the City’s strategy of encouraging a compact and sustainable city by increasing development
densities within identified urban areas. Supports linking the non-statutory strategies into the District Plan.
Support in Amend 3.1 d)v. to read as follows "Identifying the financial feasibility of the development from a Council,
part
infrastructure provider and landowner perspective".
Page 239 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.010
3.2 Principles
Support
Retain 3.2 Principles as notified.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.011
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 3.3.1a to remove the word ‘general’ so that it reads 'in accordance with the relevant structure plan'. This
part
should apply throughout the Plan.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.012
3.3.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 3.3.2(a) (Structure Plans) and associated Explanation to ensure they apply to a broader range of
part
infrastructure than that for which Council is responsible by making amendments as set out in the submission.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.013
3.3.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Objective 3.3.4 by deleting the word "Council".
part
Amend Policy 3.3.4a: as set out in the submission to also refer to the defined range of considerations included in a
‘Broad Integrated Transport Assessment’ as set out in the definitions in Part 2. The Explanation will also require
amending to reflect this requested change.
Amend Policy 3.3.4b: to also refer to the defined range of considerations included in a ‘Broad Integrated Transport
Assessment’ as set out in the definitions in Part 2. The Explanation will also require amending to reflect this requested
change.
Amend this policy as requested to promote clarity and ensure that the policy is consistent with the subsequent
Explanation.
Insert a new policy as set out in the submission, to ensure that financial impacts are minimised alongside
environmental considerations.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.014
3.3.5 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 3.3.5b by deleting the word 'Sensitive' so that it reads as follows: "Land uses shall avoid effects on and
part
from regionally significant infrastructure".
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.015
3.3.7 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain 3.3.7 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans as notified.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.016
3.4 Peacocke
Support
Retain the Peacocke Structure Plan subject to specific amendments requested in the submission.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.017
3.4.3 Transport Network
Support
Retain 3.4.3e) Transport Network as notified
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.018
3.4.5 Indicative
Support
Infrastructural Development
Programme
Retain Rule 3.4.5 Indicative Infrastructural Development Programme as notified.
Page 240 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.019
3.4.5.1 Proposed Staging of
Residential Development
Support in Amend Rule 3.4.5.1 to ensure that the Proposed Staging of Residential Development provisions have the status of a
part
rule. Amend Rule 3.4.5.1 b) ii to clarify that the 80% dwelling trigger for Stage 1b development relates to consented
dwellings (not occupied dwellings). Amend Rule 3.4.5.1 c) ii to recognise that the solution for the transport effects on
the Dixon Road / State Highway 3 intersection may require works elsewhere.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.020
3.5 Rototuna
Support in Amend 3.5 to strengthen the weight given to the provisions (Rototuna Structure Plan).
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.021
3.5 Vision
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.022
3.5.1 Objectives and Policies Support
Retain Objective 3.5.1.4 (Rototuna Structure Plan) and policies 3.5.1.4b and 3.5.1.4c as notified.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.023
3.5.2.4 Transportation
Network
Support
Retain 2.5.2.4 a), c), d), e), f) and g).
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.024
3.6 Rotokauri
Support in Review and amend the Plan to recognise that the Te Rapa section of the Waikato Expressway has already been
part
constructed and is in operation. These provisions include (but may not be limited to): Policy 3.6.1.2a, sub-sections:
3.6.2.9a) - ‘Staging’, 3.6.3.2 and – ‘Roading’. The NZTA also notes that the function of the roads has changed since the
Expressway has opened, which should be reflected in the Plan.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.025
3.6.3.2 Roading
Support in Amend 3.6.3.2 d) as set out in the submission to remove reference to the 4-laning on Avalon Drive as this is now
part
complete.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.026
3.7 Ruakura
Support in Retain staging for Ruakura in 3.7 as notified
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.027
3.7.1.7 Transportation
Network
Support in Amend Ruakura structure plan once the location and number of interchanges to the Waikato Expressway are
part
confirmed.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.028
3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support
Amend Policy 3.7.2.1b to "optimise" rather than 'maximise' the use of existing infrastructure. Retain Policy 3.7.2.6a as
notified.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.029
4 Residential Zones
Support
Supports the intention of the residential section as it is largely consistent with the Built Environment section of the
Proposed Waikato Regional Policy Statement.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.030
4.1.4 Large Lot Residential
Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.1.4a)ii. to remove Large Lot Residential zone covering the Percival and Ryburn road area in the Ruakura
Structure Plan and rezone to the Ruakura Logistics zone.
New Zealand
924.031
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.1a i. by adding additional wording '...and the function of transportation corridors consistent with the
Retain ‘Vision’ for Rototuna in section 3.5 as notified.
Amend the Plan to recognise that a blanket approach to mitigation will not be appropriate for development to the
north-east of the Waikato Expressway Designation (aligned with our specific submission points on Chapter 13) and that
3.5.2.4 b) is amended to ensure this is made clear.
Page 241 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Transport Agency
Sub Type Summary
part
roading hierarchy' to emphasize that it is the function, not the capacity, or a road that is the relevant consideration for
the integration of land use and transportation.
Retain Policy 4.2.1b as notified.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.032
4.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policies 4.2.2.b and 4.2.2c to refer to both existing and planned regionally significant infrastructure and
part
strengthen the approach to manage reverse sensitivity matters. Delete Policy 4.2.2d. Amend the Explanation to refer
to 'planned' infrastructure rather than 'proposed' for consistency.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.033
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.3a iv to broaden its scope to include effects of noise generated from roads.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.034
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.4d by adding wording to clarify the environmental outcomes to be achieved.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.035
4.2.6 Objective and Policies
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.036
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Support in Add a column into activity status table 4.3.1 to show all residential activities in the large-lot Residential Zone (Rototuna
part
SP area) are non-complying until there is an approved Comprehensive Development Plan developed in consultation
with the NZTA. The Comprehensive Development Plan should be assessed as a discretionary activity.
Retain Policy 4.2.6c as notified.
Amend Rule 4.3.1 to show that all residential activities in the Rototuna Large Lot Residential Zone are non-complying
until there is an approved Comprehensive Development Plan. Make CDP's a Discretionary Activity and require
consultation with NZTA.
Add a provision to promote the safe and efficient functioning of major arterial roads.
Amend to ensure cross-referencing is made to this rule in all zone sections, preferably as part of the activity status
tables. This rule should over-ride all other activity classifications in all zones.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.037
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Opposes any residential development in the Rototuna Large Lot Residential zone. However if to proceed, should be
subject to a Comprehensive Development Plan conditional on the final design of the Waikato Expressway - Hamilton
Section.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.038
4.4.2 Site Coverage
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.2 by deleting the 20% site coverage in Rototuna Large Lot Residential and rely on the Comprehensive
Development Plan to determine the appropriate site coverage on physical constraints, characteristics of land and
surrounding land uses.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.039
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.6 c) Building Setback from Waikato Expressway by deleting Rule 4.4.6 c)ii.1. and 4.4.6 c)ii.2. and
part
inserting new Rule 4.4.6 c)ii.1. that states "written approval has been provided from the Requiring Authority (the NZ
Transport Agency)"
Page 242 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.040
4.5.2 Comprehensive
Development Plan Process
Once Consent Has Been
Granted
Support in Amend Rule 4.5.2 a) by deleting the text 'materially different effects' to ensure alignment with existing use rights
part
under s10 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.041
4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Support in Amend Rule 4.5.3 to include all Comprehensive Development Plans in the District Plan; or include a reference to Rule
Medium-Density Residential part
13.9.1
Zone
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.042
4.10 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 4.10 a) xvii, xxvi to xxx and xxxiii to xxxiv by including additional matters of discretion relating to
Activities Matters of
part
Transportation, specifically V1, V2, V3, V5, V7, V9,V10,V11,V12, V14, V17 and V18.
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.043
5.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 5.2.2a)iv) of Objective 5.2.2 All Special Character Zones to broaden the scope to include the effect of
part
noise generated from roads.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.044
5.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support in Amend matters of discretion in Rule 5.6 (Special Character Zones) relating to any sensitive activity to include reverse
part
sensitivity assessment criteria, and amend the following activities xx, xxvi, xxvii – xxxii, xxxv – xxxvii within Rule 5.6
Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria to include transportation assessment
criteria.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.045
6 Business 1 to 7 Zones
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.046
6.2.1 Objective and Policies
Sub-regional Centres
Support in Retain Policy 6.2.1a. Amend Policy 6.2.1c to provide greater protection to regionally significant roading infrastructure
part
and recognise the roading hierarchy.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.047
6.2.3 Objective and Policies
Neighbourhood Centres
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.048
6.2.4 Objective and Policies
Major Event Facilities
Support in Amend Policy 6.2.4b and its associated explanation regarding Major Event Facilities to recognise potential effects on
part
the transport network.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.049
6.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support in Amend Rule 6.6a) by including restricted discretionary matter and assessment criteria D4-D7 regarding reverse
part
sensitivity for all sensitive activities. Amend Rule 6.6a) xiv by including all restricted discretionary matters and
assessment criteria under V - Transportation.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.050
7 Central City Zone
Support in Retain Chapter 7 with the exception of amendments requested in the submission.
part
Provide further justification to support the changes to the function of roads in the hierarchy in the Central City and
consider providing an appropriate issue statement to demonstrate the linkages between the direction of the Plan and
Retain the Business 1-7 Zones as notified with the exception of specifically requested amendments in other submission
points
Retain Policy 6.2.3b for neighbourhood centres
Page 243 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
an environmental issue.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.051
7.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 7.1 c) Purpose by including Hamilton's six City Strategies (Access Hamilton, Active Communities, Economic
part
Development, Environmental Sustainability, Hamilton Urban Growth and Social Wellbeing).
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.052
7.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Policy 7.2.1g regarding housing densities.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.053
7.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support in Amend Rule 7.6 to include matters of Reverse Sensitivity for any sensitive activities.
part
Amend Rule 7.6 a) to include all assessment criteria in Appendix 1.2 V: Transportation for activities not complying with
the relevant standards.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.054
8.1 Purpose
Support
Retain 8.1 Purpose of the knowledge zone as notified.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.055
8.2 Objectives and Policies
Knowledge Zone
Support
Retain 8.2 Objectives and Policies Knowledge Zone as notified
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.056
8.9 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support in Amend Rule 8.9 by including the following wording for the assessment criteria for any sensitive activity.
part
"..and all provisions under Vol. 2, Appendix 1.2 D4 - D7 (‘Reverse Sensitivity’)."
Amend Rule 8.9a) xii and xiii by adding V1-V2, V4-V17, and V17-V18.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.057
9 Industrial Zone
Support
Retain the Industrial Zone section and preserving Industrial Land for Industrial activities.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.058
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the activity status in Rule 9.3 i), u), w), x) & y) for flood and beverage outlets, new buildings, drive through
part
services, ancillary residential units, and childcare facilities, to Discretionary Activities. Delete Rule 9.3k) and include
yard based retailing (along specified transport corridors) as restricted discretionary activities. Delete Rule 9.3l)
regarding Retail activity.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.059
9.3.2 Effect of the
Comprehensive
Development Plan
Support in Amend reference in 9.3.2a) from "vehicular" to "transport"
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.060
9.3.3 Te Kowhai Road
Comprehensive
Development Plan
Support in Amend 9.3.3b) iv) to seek a minimum 15m (not 5m) setback. Review and amend the relevant provisions in the Te
part
Kowhai Comprehensive Development Plan (9.3.3 and 9.3.4) to recognise that the Te Rapa section of the Waikato
Expressway has already been constructed and is in operation.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.061
9.4.1 Building Setbacks
(Except in Rotokauri
Employment Area)
Support
Support Rule 9.4.1 as notified.
Page 244 of 541
Sub Name
New Zealand
Transport Agency
Sub Point Plan Provision
924.062
9.7 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Sub Type Summary
Support in Amend Rule 9.7 by including the following wording for the assessment criteria for any sensitive activity.
part
"..and all provisions under Vol. 2, Appendix 1.2 D4 - D7 (‘Reverse Sensitivity’)."
Retain Rule 9.7a) vi. as notified, particularly criteria V1-V18.
Amend Rule 9.7a) xi. by including criteria V1-V2.
Amend Rule 9.7a) xii. by including criteria V1-V2.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.063
10.2.1 Objective and Policies Support
Retain Policy 10.2.1a regarding staging provisions for the Ruakura Logistics Zone.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.064
10.4.5 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 10.4.5a) and b) to ensure the height of buildings/containers adjoining the Waikato Expressway within the
part
logistics zone be reduced to mitigate adverse affects.
Amend the Plan to clarify the application of rules 10.4.6ii to rule 10.4.5e) and Section 25.6 to 10.4.5e). If the provisions
of 25.6 and 10.4.6ii do not apply then his rule should be amended to ensure no light spill or visual distractions from
these structures will affect the Waikato Expressway.
Amend numbering in Rule 10.4.5 to refer to e) rather than c).
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.065
10.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support in Retain Rule 10.4.6 regarding building setbacks in relation to the Waikato Expressway.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.066
10.4.7 Landscape Screening
Support in Amend Rule 10.4.7 to add a new provision for the Ruakura Logistics zone to be screened from the Waikato
part
Expressway.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.067
10.4.8 Interface Standards
Support in Retain Rule 10.4.8 subject to the proposed amendment to Rule 10.4.7 and demonstration that container stacking will
part
not create any shading or icing hazards for the Waikato Expressway.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.068
10.4 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Amend Rule 10.4 to ensure no advertising signage is visible from the Waikato Expressway.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.069
11.2.1 Objective and Policies Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.070
11.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 11.2.2a to relate to Transport Corridors.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.071
11.4.4 Building Height
Support in Ensure the height of buildings / containers adjoining the Waikato Expressway within the Industrial Park does not
part
generate adverse effects, amend Rule 11.4.4a) to reduce building heights and/or increase building setbacks to ensure
such effects do not occur.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.072
11.4.7 Site Landscaping
Support in Amend Rule 11.4.7 by adding a new provision for the industrial park zone to be screened from the Waikato
part
Expressway.
Retain the staging provisions within Policy 11.2.1a as notified.
Page 245 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.073
11.5.3 Transportation Service Oppose
Centres
Amend Rule 11.5.3 a) by removing reference to direct access to a state highway and add as a matter to which
discretion has been restricted.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.074
11.6 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 11.6 so that all restricted discretionary activities are assessed against the relevant criteria, in particular
Activities Matters of
part
transport related criteria under V. Also clarify which activities are to be assessed under V19.
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.075
11.4 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Amend Rule 11.4 to add a new rule for the industrial park zone to ensure no advertising signage is visible from the
part
Waikato Expressway.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.076
12 Te Rapa North Industrial
Zone
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.077
12.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 12.2.2a, to include reference to interface between the zone and the Waikato Expressway.
part
Also seeks the relevant explanation to add reference to ensuring entrances to Hamilton are attractive and contribute
to the experience of Hamilton as a tourist destination.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.078
12.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 12.2.4c to include reference to the state highway in relation to reverse sensitivity.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.079
12.4.3 Height in Relation to
Boundary
Support in Amend Rule 12.4.3a) Height in Relation to Boundary with addition of 'state highway' reference.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.080
12.4.7 Landscaping
Support in Amend Rule 12.4.7c) Landscaping, to delete the exception to the rule for service stations within Stage 1B.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.081
12.4.8 Transportation
Support in Amend Rule 12.4.8a) and e) Transportation, including no direct property access to Te Rapa Road or Waikato
part
Expressway as part of 12.4.8a) i Stage 1A; amend the note to a rule; and amend the name "Te Rapa Interchange" to
'Horotiu Interchange'.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.082
13.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 13.1 (b) Purpose (Rototuna Town Centre Zone) to delete the word 'general' or similar amendments to achieve
part
the same outcome.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.083
13.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 13.2.2 (Rototuna Town Centre) as notified; amend Policy 13.2.2 (b) to include the text "and other
part
infrastructure providers".
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.084
13.2.4 Objective and Policies Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.085
13.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 13.2.5 (Rototuna Town Centre Zone) as notified.
part
Amend Policy 13.2.5f to insert the word "Waikato" prior to 'Expressway' to remove any ambiguity and align this
Retain all provisions in Chapter 12 Te Rapa North Industrial Zone, with the exception of the requested amendments by
NZTA.
Retain 13.2.4 Objective and Policies (Rototuna Town Centre Zone) as notified.
Page 246 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
wording with the wider Proposed District Plan.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.086
13.2.6 Objective and Policies Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.087
13.2.7 Objective and Policies Support in Include a new policy 13.2.7d (Rototuna Town Centre) and amend the explanation to include the transportation
part
network.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.088
14 Future Urban Zone
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.089
14.2.2 Objective and Policies Support
Retain Objective 14.2.2 and Policy 14.2.2g as notified.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.090
14.4.5 Building Setback
Amend Rule 14.4.5 - to require a 25m building setback from arterial transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.091
14.7 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 14.7 - (Matter of Discretion and Assessment Criteria) to include consideration of reverse sensitivity effects
Activities Matters of
part
for standards iv - building setbacks and vi - building standards.
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.092
15.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy 15.2.4a to include traffic as a potential adverse effect
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.093
Natural Open Space Zone
Support in Amend Policy 15.2.6b to include the safe and efficient operation of the transportation network for activities on the
part
surface of water.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.094
Sport and Recreation Open
Space Zone
Support in Amend Policy 15.2.8a under Sport and Recreation Open Space Zone to include the transportation network as an area
part
to be considered for adverse effects from development and use of sites within this zone.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.095
15.4 Rules – Definition of the Support in Amend Rule 15.4 to become an appendix or explanation and ensure that the NZTA is a party to defining the
Neighbourhood Open Space part
Neighbourhood Open Space Zone in the Ruakura Structure Plan Area.
Zone in the Ruakura
Structure Plan Area
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.096
15.7 Restricted Discretionary Support in Include all provisions under Volume 2, Appendix 1.2 V (Transportation) for Rule 15.7 a) i, x, xii and xv.
Activities Matters of
part
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.097
16.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
New Zealand
924.098
16.4.4 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rule 16.4.4 a) to increase the required building setback in the Community Facilities Zone from 5m to 15m
Support
Oppose
Retain Policy 13.2.6c (Rototuna Town Centre Zone - residential densities) as notified.
Retain the Future Urban zone provisions subject to specific submission points by NZTA. NZTA support the protection of
these areas from interim development.
Retain Rule 16.3b) new community facilities buildings, relocated buildings which interface with a public place as a
restricted discretionary activity if discretion includes effects on major arterial roads and the opinion of NZTA
Page 247 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Transport Agency
Sub Type Summary
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.099
16.6 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria for new buildings, relocated buildings, alterations and additions
Activities Matters of
part
interfacing with a public place and schools to include a reference to Vol.2, Appendix 1.2 V1 - V18 (Transportation).
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Include reverse sensitivity considerations to any activities that do not comply with the building set back rule; in
particular D4, D5, D6 and D7.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.100
17.4.1 Provision of Concept
Plans
Support in Amend Rule17.4.1 to include parking lots as part of the Concept Plan requirement.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.101
17.5.1 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rule 17.5.1b) Building Setbacks to differentiate between minor and major arterial transport corridors.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.102
17.8 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 17.8 Restricted Discretionary Activities Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria in relation to 17.8)i,
Activities Matters of
part
with an inclusion of references V1-V18 in Appendix 1.2.
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.103
18.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 18.1 to reference permission being required from the relevant road controlling authorities for the use of
part
transport corridors for non-transport related purposes.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.104
18.2 Objectives and Policies
Transport Corridor Zone
Support in Amend 18.2 to add an additional objective and policy to specifically provide for the safe and efficient operation of
part
regionally significant infrastructure, to improve consistency with the Operative and Proposed Regional Policy
Statement.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.105
Transport Corridor Network
Support in Amend Objectives, Policies and Explanations in 18.2 to improve consistency with the Transport Management Act 2003
part
and Proposed Regional Policy Statement, and to clarify terminology and intent of policies and explanations.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.106
Network Utilities
Infrastructure
Support
Retain Policy 18.2.3b regarding network utilities locating in roading corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.107
Other Activities and
Structures
Support
Retain 18.2.4a recognising that safe and efficient roads form an important part in a good urban design.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.108
18.4 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain Rule 18.4 a) to c) regarding the activity status of maintenance and new transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.109
22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Support in Amend 22.2 to ensure the maintenance and operation of existing infrastructure in natural hazard areas is a permitted
part
activity.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.110
23.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 23.2.1 or 23.2.2 by adding a new policy regarding reverse sensitivity measures for subdivision close to
part
transport corridors.
New Zealand
924.111
23.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Policies 23.2.2a iv, viii to xiv. Amend 23.2.2 by adding a new policy regarding facilitatin good amenity and urban
Page 248 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Transport Agency
Sub Type Summary
part
design outcomes.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.112
23.2.4 Objective and Policy
Support
Retain Objective 23.2.4 and Policies 23.2.4a i to iv.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.113
23.6.8 Subdivision in the Te
Rapa North Industrial Zone
Support
Retain Policy 23.6.8a) i and ii
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.114
23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Support in Retain Rule 23.7.1c) regarding Allotment Size and Shape. Delete Rule 23.7.1h) as the submitter opposes residential
part
development in this location, alternatively this area should be subject to a Comprehensive Development Plan
addressing the concerns of the submitter.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.115
23.8 Restricted Discretionary Support in
Activities Matters of
part
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 23.8 so that additional Transportation and road controlling authority matters of discretion and
assessment criteria apply to subdivision dependent on access to or potentially affecting major arterial roads, and
amendments so that such subdivision is a Restricted Discretionary Activity with consequential amendments to clarify
that this over rides a more permissive status.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.116
24 Financial Contributions
Support
Retain Chapter 24 Financial Contributions
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.117
24.3.2 Nature of
Contributions
Support in Amend Rule 24.3.2 d) iv and e) by providing for other infrastructure providers.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.118
24.3.3 Level of Contribution
Support
Retain Rule 24.3.3 a)
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.119
24.3.4 Credits
Support
Retain Rule 24.3.4 d)
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.120
25.1.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support in Retain objective 25.1.2.1, Policies 25.1.2.1.a and 25.1.2.1.b. Amend Policy 25.1.2.1c to recognise the need to protect
part
planned infrastructure of other infrastructure providers and additional or alternative design requirements may be
required by NZTA for infrastructure that affects a state highway.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.121
25.1.4.5 Transportation
Support
Retain Rule 25.1.4.5 a) requiring compliance with transportation related rules and standards.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.122
25.2.2 Objectives and
Policies Earthworks and
Vegetation Removal
Support
Retain Policy 25.2.2.1a regarding earthworks and vegetation removal occurring in a way that ensures the safe, efficient
use of land and infrastructure
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.123
25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Retain Rule 25.2.3 to ensure earthworks in relation to the repair, sealing or resealing of a transport corridor as a
Table
part
Permitted Activity is exempt from Rule 25.2.5.1.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.124
25.2.4.2 Earthworks Within
all Transmission Corridors
Support in Retain Rules 25.2.4.2d) and e) regarding exemptions from controls applying to earthworks within transmission
part
corridors.
Page 249 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.125
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Amend Rule 25.2.5.1 to ensure earthworks associated with road operations and maintenance are exempted from
having to comply with Rule 25.2.5.1.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.126
25.3.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support
Retain Policy 25.3.2.1b regarding the effects of events and temporary activities on the transportation network.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.127
25.3.4 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Add new Rule 25.3.4c) requiring a transport management plan to be submitted and approved by Council prior to the
part
event. Details of any consultation and approval by NZTA should be included.
Include a threshold for the number of people to clarify what constitutes an event.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.128
25.3.5.1 Information to be
Provided with Resource
Consent Applications for
Events
Support in Add a new note to Rule 25.3.5.1 a) to clarify when an event is likely to impact on the state highway network NZTA will
part
assess the adequacy of the Transport Management Plan.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.129
25.3.5.2 Events at Hamilton Support in Add new Rule 25.3.5.2 c) v. E. requiring parking and transport options for the event to be included in the information
Gardens, Central City Zone – part
provided to the public prior to the event.
Downtown Precinct
(including Garden Place, Civic
Square and Hood St) and
Central City Zone –
Ferrybank Precinct
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.130
25.5.3.1 Landscaping
Support in Amend the Plan to clarify that Rules 25.5.3.1 a) i, v, viii, xii and xiii regarding landscape planting adjacent to transport
part
corridors apply to structure plan and zone areas and that in the case of conflict the most onerous provision applies.
Retain Rule 25.5.3.1 b), c) and d) regarding the use of planting areas and frangible species.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.131
25.5.3.5 Planting Strips
Support
Retain Rule 25.3.5 i) as it relates to landscaping along major transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.132
25.6.2 Objectives and
Policies Lighting and Glare
Support
Retain Policy 25.6.2.1a for Lighting and Glare
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.133
25.6.3 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Clarify that the rules contained in City Wide - Lighting and Glare apply to all activities and take precedence over any
part
other plan provisions.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.134
25.8.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support
New Zealand
924.135
25.8.2.3 Objective and Policy Support in Amend Objective 25.8.2.3, Policy 25.8.2.3a and the associated explanation regarding reverse sensitivity measures to
Retain Objective 25.8.2.2 ii and Policies and 25.8.2.2b
Page 250 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Transport Agency
Sub Type Summary
part
include major arterial roads.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.136
25.8.3.2 Construction Noise
Support in Amend Rule 25.8.3.2a) to exempt construction noise from state highways.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.137
25.8.3.3 Construction
Vibration
Support in Amend Rule 25.8.3.3a) to exempt construction noise from state highways.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.138
25.8.3.4 Design and
Construction of New and
Altered Roads
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.139
25.8.3.9 Noise-sensitive
Activities – Activities in all
Zones
Support in Amend Rule 25.8.3.9 b) and c) so that noise insulation is applied to ‘protected premises and facilities’ within 100m of
part
an arterial road and delete the final sentence of Rule 25.8.3.9 c) regarding the completion of the Waikato Expressway.
Amend Rule 25.8.3.9 e) to use the internal sound levels set out in the AS/NZS 2107:2000 which will provide a more
appropriate effects based control.
Amend rule 25.8.3.9 g) regarding ventilation to ensure all habitable spaces are captured and to use ‘air changes per
hour’ as a measure which can be subject to design and checking.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.140
25.9.2 Objectives and
Policies Public Art
Support in Add Policy 25.9.2.1e to ensure public art does not distract motorists, create confusion and interrupt sightlines, all of
part
which can potentially affect traffic safety.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.141
25.10.2 Objectives and
Policies Signs
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.142
25.10.4 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Add a new Rule 25.10.4i) to require minimum lettering height of signs on roads with speeds greater than 60kmph;
part
Amend Rule 25.10.2.1 d) to require comments from NZTA adjoining a State Highway with greater speed than 60kmph.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.143
25.12.3.1 Solid Waste
Storage Areas
Support in Amend Rule 25.12.3.1 Solid Waste Storage Areas to include safe access for waste collection
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.144
25.14 Transportation
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.145
25.14.2 Objectives and
Policies Transportation
Support in Seeks amendments to:
part
- Policy 25.14.2.1a to clarify the meaning of Spatial Framework.
- Policy 25.14.2.1d ii regarding the undersupply of parking for activities along major arterials and financial
contributions.
- Policy 25.14.2.1e regarding the remediation as an appropriate means of addressing adverse effects, cumulative
effects of development, connectivity and safe and efficient functioning of the transport network.
- Policy 25.14.2.1f regarding consultation with the NZTA for activities generating adverse effects on the state highway
network.
Retain Rule 25.8.3.4 regarding Noise and the Design and Construction of New and Altered Roads.
Retain Policy 25.10.2.1c for signs.
Retain Chapter 25.14 - Transportation, subject to the specific amendments sought.
Page 251 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.146
25.14.4.1 Vehicle Crossings
and Internal Vehicle Access
Support in Amend Rule 25.14.4.1 g) iii to discourage direct vehicle access to a strategic network or arterial transport corridor.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.147
25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Support in Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 a) to alter the Integrated Transport Assessment requirements for activities on the Sensitive
part
Transport networks and require consultation with the NZTA where there are potential impacts on the state highway
network.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.148
25.15.1 Purpose
Support in Amend 25.15.1 d) to include reference to movement and accessibility of people around and through urban
part
environments. Retain 25.15.1 e) as notified.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.150
25.15.2.4 Objective and
Policies
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.151
25.15.2.5 Objective and
Policies
Support in Amend Objective 25.15.2.5 to replace the word 'behaviour' with 'networks'.
part
Amend Policy 25.15.2.5b to include the text 'and accessibility'.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.152
26.2 Use of Designated Land Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.153
26.3 Schedule of
Designations
Retain Policy 25.15.2.4b as notified.
Retain 26.2 c) regarding waiver of outline plan in specific circumstances
Support in Amend 26.3 - Schedule of Designations to include map references for all designations listed.
part
Delete part of Designation E99 (Te Rapa Bypass) from the Schedule in 26.3 and Planning Map 14B.
Delete part of Designation E99a (Te Rapa Bypass/Waikato Expressway) from the Schedule in 26.3 and Planning Map
1B.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.154
A Hazardous Facilities
Support
Retain Appendix 1.1 A iii regarding hazardous facilities and the safety of transport routes.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.155
Ba Building Design External
Appearance and
Configuration
Support
Retain Appendix 1.1B a Building Design External Appearance and Configuration regarding designing to ensure the safe
and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.156
b Site Layout
Support
Retain Appendix 1.1B b Site Layout regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of
transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.157
c Vehicular and Pedestrian
Access
Support
Retain Appendix 1.1B c Vehicular and Pedestrian Access regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function
and amenity of transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.158
d Landscaping
Support
Retain Appendix 1.1B d Landscaping regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of
transport corridors.
New Zealand
924.159
Ca Building Design External
Support
Retain Appendix 1.1C a i to vi Building Design External Appearance and Configuration regarding designing to ensure
Page 252 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Transport Agency
Sub Type Summary
Appearance and
Configuration
the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.160
b Vehicular and Pedestrian
Access
Support
Retain Appendix 1.1C b Vehicular and Pedestrian Access regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function
and amenity of transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.161
c Landscaping
Support
Retain Appendix 1.1C c Landscaping regarding designing to ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of
transport corridors
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.162
a Concept Development Plan Support
for Stage 1A
Retain Appendix 1.1D a Concept Development Plan for Stage 1A (Te Rapa North Industrial Zone) regarding designing to
ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.163
b Concept Development Plan Support
for Stage 1B
Retain Appendix 1.1D b Concept Development Plan for Stage 1B (Te Rapa North Industrial Zone) regarding designing to
ensure the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.164
A General Criteria
Retain Appendix 1.2 A1-A4 regarding recognition of cumulative effects to ensure the safe and efficient function and
amenity of transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.165
Structure Plans and Concept Support
Plans
Retain Appendix 1.2 B2 to B4 regarding structure planning and the safe and efficient function and amenity of transport
corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.166
C General
Support
Retain Appendix 1.2 C4 b) to f), C5 g), h) and j) regarding the design of activities in residential developments to ensure
the safe and efficient function of transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.167
Reverse Sensitivity
Support
Retain Appendix 1.2 D4 and D5 regarding need to assess the reverse sensitivity effects of development on the safe and
efficient function of transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.168
F Vitality of Centres
Support
Retain Appendix 1.2 F4 and F5 regarding landscape and screening design that promotes the safety, efficiency and
amenity of transport corridors.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.169
G Landscaping and Screening Support in Retain Appendix 1.2 G1 a), b), d), e), g), G2, G3 regarding landscape and screening design that promotes the safety,
part
efficiency and amenity of transport corridors with an amendment to clarify the term 'sympathetic'.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.170
Peacocke Special Character
Zone
Support in Retain Appendix 1.2 I18 and I19 Peacocke Special Character Zone regarding landscape taking into account the effects
part
of development on the proposed arterial transport corridors with an amendment to clarify whether ‘Peacocke Special
Character Zone’ should come under ‘Heritage Values’.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.171
N Events and Temporary
Activities
Support in Add a new assessment criteria in Appendix 1.2 N Events and Temporary Activities regarding Temporary Management
part
Plans from relevant road controlling authorities.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.172
P Nuisance and Health
Support in Amend Appendix 1.2 P4 to recognise the temporary nature and importance of road works and maintenance.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.173
U General
Support in Amend Appendix 1.2 U1 regarding consultation with the NZTA for boundary adjustment subdivisions and the safe and
part
efficient function of the state highway network.
Support
Page 253 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.174
V Transportation
Support
Retain Appendix 1.2 V Transportation subject to specific amendments.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.175
V General
Support in Amend Appendix 1.2 V3 b) regarding property access and the function of major arterial roads and state highways.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.176
Parking
Support in Amend Appendix 1.2 V Transportation, V8 and V9 regarding sufficient on-site vehicle manoeuvring areas and impacts
part
of allowing lesser amounts of parking.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.177
Z10 General
Support
Retain Appendix Z, Key Development Sites -Z10e regarding the promotion of alternative modes of transport.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.178
1.3.2.1 Hazardous Facilities
Support
Retain Appendix 1.3.2.1 c) regarding hazardous facilities and the safety of the transportation network.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.179
1.3.2.12 Schools on the
Rototuna Secondary School
Site
Support in Amend Appendix 1.3.2.12 a) Schools on the Rototuna Secondary School Site to ensure the safe and efficient function
part
of the Waikato Expressway.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.180
1.4.1 Medium-Density
Support in Amend 1.4.1 Medium-Density Residential Design Guidelines to clarify the status and application of the guidelines as
Residential Design Guidelines part
standards or assessment criteria.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.181
1.4.1.4 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend 1.4.1.4 c) Building Setbacks, to simplify and ensure that NZTA is able to manage any activity affecting the
part
Waikato Expressway designation.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.182
Design Element 5 Transport
Network Layout
Support
Retain Appendix 1.4.2.1, Subdivision Design Assessment Criteria, Design Element 5 - Transport Network Layout.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.183
1.4.3.8 Acoustic Amenity
Support
Retain Appendix 1.4.3.8 Acoustic Amenity regarding residential units being designed with appropriate acoustic
insulation.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.184
1.4.6 Key Development Site
Design Guidance
Support in Amend Appendix 1.4.6 Key Development Site Design Guidance to require development to consider potential impacts
part
on the safe, efficient and effective function of the transportation network.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.185
1.4.6.1 Key Development Site Oppose
1 – Cobham Drive
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.186
1.4.6.4 Key Development Site Support in Amend Appendix 1.4.6.4 Key Development Site 4 – Warehouse Kmart Transport Centre referring to protect the public
4 – Warehouse Kmart
part
transport function of the Transport Centre.
Transport Centre Site
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.187
1.4.9.2 Part 2 Guidelines for
the Rototuna Town Centre
Support in Amend Appendix 1.4.9.2 Part 2 Guidelines for the Rototuna Town Centre to include larger setbacks for development
part
adjoining the Waikato Expressway Designation.
New Zealand
924.188
1.4.9.3 Part 3 General
Support
Amend Appendix 1.4.6.1 Key Development Site 1 – Cobham Drive to address concerns about potential adverse effects
on the wider transportation network from future development on this site.
Retain Appendix 1.4.9.3c) Part 3 General Principles for Comprehensive Development Plans, regarding consideration of
Page 254 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Transport Agency
Sub Type Summary
Principles for Comprehensive
Development Plans
the design and layout of transport corridors in Comprehensive Development Plans
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.189
k Transport Network
Support
Retain Appendix 1.4.9.4 Part 4: Principles and Assessment Criteria for Precincts, k Transport Network, for the
transportation network for all precincts in the Rototuna Town Centre.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.190
1.5.2 Additional Information Support in Retain the consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.2 a) i and 1.5.2 d). Amend 1.5.2 e) vii to
Requirements
part
specifically include assessment of effects and proposed mitigation on the road to be accessed as part of a 'site
analysis'.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.191
1.5.12 Harvesting of Forestry Support in Review Appendix 1.5.12 Harvesting of Forestry and forestry related provisions.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.192
1.5.13 Integrated Transport
Assessment
Support in Amend Appendix 1.5.13 Integrated Transport Assessment to ensure restricted discretionary activities it applies where
part
access is proposed to state highways and other major arterial roads.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.193
1.5.14.2 Transport
Management Plan
Support
Retain consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.14.2 Transport Management Plan.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.194
1.5.18.1 Context Analysis
Plan
Support
Retain consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.18.1a) and b) Context Analysis Plan.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.195
1.5.18.3 Concept Plan
Support
Retain consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.18.3 a) i) Concept Plan.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.196
1.5.19 Master Plan for
Peacocke Character Zone
Neighbourhoods
Support
Retain consent application information requirements in Appendix 1.5.19 a) to g) - Master Plan for Peacocke Character
Zone Neighbourhoods.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.197
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Seeks various relief to retain, delete or amend the following definitions: Accessory Buildings, Access Way, Ancillary
part
Retailing, Comprehensive Development Plan, Community Facilities, Development Agreement, Drive-through Services,
Effect, Expressway, Frontage, Green Corridors, Home-based Business, Incidental, Industrial Activity, Infrastructure,
Integrated Transport Assessment, Interface Design Control Area (Ruakura Logistics Zone and Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone), Local Movement System, Logistics and Freight Handling Activities, Motorway, Network Utility, Permeability
(transport), Planned Infrastructure, Public Place, Regionally Significant Infrastructure, Retail - Bulky Goods, Road
Controlling Authority, Service Station (within the Rototuna Town Centre Zone), Structure Plan, Temporary Activities,
Traffic Management Plan, Transport Corridor, Transport Depot, Transport Infrastructure, Transport Network,
Warehouse, Wholesale Retail and Trade Supplier, Yard-based Retailing.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.198
Figure 2-4 Rototuna
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support
New Zealand
924.199
Figure 2-5 Rototuna
Support in Amend Figure 2-5 to include proposed/indicative Pubic Transport networks in the Rototuna Structure Plan area
Retain Figure 2-4 Rototuna Structure Plan - Land Use as notified, subject to changes requested in the wider
submission.
Page 255 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Transport Agency
Sub Type Summary
Structure Plan-Transport
Network
part
transport plan as per the maps in Variation 12 (Plan Change 1, Operative District Plan).
Support in Amend Figures 2-4 (Rototuna Structure Plan - Land Use), 2-5 (Rototuna Structure Plan - Transport Network), and 2-6
part
(Rototuna Cycling and Walking Network) to correctly show consistent walking and cycling networks.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.200
Figure 2-6 Rototuna Cycling
and Walking Network
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.201
Appendix 3 Residential Zones Support in Retain Figures 3-1 to 3.3 as notified, subject to any consequential amendments to align with earlier submission points.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.202
Appendix 5 Central City Zone Support in Retain Figures 5-1 to 5-9 as notified, subject to any consequential amendments to align with earlier submission points.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.203
Appendix 6 Industrial Zone
Support in Retain Figures 6-1 to 6-2 as notified, subject to any consequential amendments to align with earlier submission points.
part
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.204
Appendix 7 Rototuna Town
Centre
Support
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.205
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Amend Figure 2-14 upon identification of the preferred location and number of connections to the Waikato
part
Expressway.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.206
15-5 Transport Corridor
Hierarchy Plan and
Definitions
Support in Amend Appendix 15-5 Transport Corridor Hierarchy Plan and Definitions to ensure the correct roading hierarchy is
part
shown and ensure that all state highways are identified as major arterials.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.207
Figure 15-5b Transport
corridor hierarchy plan
Support in Amend Figure 15-5b Transport corridor hierarchy plan, to include all land inside the ‘envelope’ created by the
part
Expressway to the North of Hamilton.
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.208
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
New Zealand
Transport Agency
924.209
2.2.12 Objective and Policies Support
Resource Efficiency
Retain the Objective and Policies in 2.2.12 relating to efficient use of existing infrastructure.
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.002
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3 Permeable Surface to replace the minimum permeable limits with maximum impermeable limits and
delete controls on the location of permeable surfaces
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.003
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards.
part
Retain Figures 7-1 to 7-4 as notified, subject to any consequential amendments to align with earlier submission points.
Map 40A-rezone the large lot Residential Zone for Percival and Ryburn Roads in the Ruakura Structure Plan area to the
Ruakura Logistics Zone.
Page 256 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.004
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Amend Rule 7.3 a) ,b), d) so that building works are permitted activities subject to standards.
part
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.005
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.8a) Fences and Walls by deleting the exceptions set out in Rule 4.4.8a)i, 4.4.8a)ii. and 4.4.8a)iii. to
part
ensure the maximum height of any fence or wall is 1.8m; and exclude Large Lot Residential Zone from the Rule.
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.006
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.007
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Delete Policies 4.2.3b and 4.2.3d as it favours public rights over land owners privacy.
part
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.008
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Delete Policies 4.2.4e and 4.2.4f as they are unreasonably in favour of public amenity and against private property
part
rights.
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.009
4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 4.10 by deleting the assessment criteria for Restricted Discretionary Activities not complying with Rules
4.4.3 and 4.6.5 Permeable surface; Rule 4.4.7 Interface between public and private; Rule 4.4.8 Fences and walls.
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.010
1 Plan Overview
Oppose
Delete references to design guides.
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.011
1.4.1.6 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete section 1.4.1.6 'Interface Between Public and Private'.
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.012
1.4.1.7 Fences
Oppose
Delete 1.4.1.7 Fences and allow landowners to choose the level of boundary treatment to meet their needs within a
height limit of 1.8m.
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.013
1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Delete 1.4.1.2 Permeable Surfaces and replace with those in the Operative District Plan.
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
925.014
C General
Oppose
C-General - delete and replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the environment are
avoided, remedied or mitigated.
Delete Rules 4.4.10 b) iii and 4.4.10 b) iv relating to Outdoor Living Areas
Page 257 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Family Trust
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.015
E Safe Environments
Oppose
E-Safe Environments - delete and replace with higher level criteria that aim at ensuring adverse effects on the
environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.016
1.4.2.2 General Residential
Zone
Oppose
Delete 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone design assessment criteria
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.017
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.3u) with permitted activity status.
PL & LJ
Middlemiss
Family Trust
925.018
9.6 Controlled Activities
Matters of Control
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.6a)i as it will add unnecessary cost, uncertainty and delay and be subject to urban design scrutiny which
has no relevance to Industrial Zoned Buildings.
Charles William
Friedlander
926.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.001
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to reduce the areas of Active Frontages.
part
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.002
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Amend Rule 7.4.16 by reducing the amount of required clear glazing to at least 5 m or 75% (rather than 80%) of the
part
active frontage (whichever is the greater).
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.003
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses by deleting the height controls for Height Overlay 1
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.004
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-2 by deleting the height controls for Height Overlay 1.
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.005
7.4.7 Street Wall
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.4.7 Street Wall and Appendix 5, Figure 5.3 Street Wall Height Overlay.
Page 258 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.006
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Oppose
Overlay Plan
Delete Rule 7.4.7 Street Wall and remove Figure 5.3 Street Wall Height Overlay Plan.
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.007
7.5.6 Retail, Commercial and Oppose
Commercial Car Parking
Buildings Sleeving
Amend Rule 7.5.6 Retail, Commercial and Commercial Car Parking Buildings Sleeving, deleting the requirement to
sleeve ground floor retail units greater than 2000m2.
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.008
25.10.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.10.4 b) to clarify that it does not preclude canopy signage; Delete Rule 25.10.4 d) regarding signs not
creating a distraction to motorists.
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.009
Table 15-2a Number of
parking loading and cycle
spaces
Oppose
Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces, to use the Operative District Plan
minimum car parking requirements for the Central City.
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.010
25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading
Spaces and Manoeuvring
Areas
Oppose
Amend Rules 25.14.4.2(a)(ii) and (iii) and (b) to remove or lessen the cycle parking requirements.
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.011
25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 so that Integrated Transport Assessments are not triggered for any further development at
Centre Place.
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.012
1.1 Controlled Activities –
Matters of Control
Oppose
Delete Volume 2 assessment criteria 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 and replace with provisions that minimises the extent of criteria,
avoids duplication, focus exclusively on matters of concern, avoid direct reference to compliance with objectives and
policies, references relevant design guide and assessment criteria and requires adequate and focused assessment of
effects on the CBD that might arise from developments outside of the CBD.
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.013
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Delete 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 and amend section 1.2 in a manner that minimises the extent of the criteria whilst maximising
their effectiveness, and provide that the design guides and design assessment criteria in Volume 2 Appendix 1.4 are
relevant only to the extent that they illustrate methods which are deemed to comply with relevant Criteria.
Kiwi Property
Management
Limited
927.014
1.3 Discretionary Activity
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Delete 1.3 and replace to minimise the extent of the Criteria whilst maximising their effectiveness, avoid unnecessary
duplication, focus exclusively on matters identified as being of concern in the objectives and policies; avoid direct
reference to compliance with the objectives and policies.
Kiwi Property
Management
927.015
7.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.6a) l for any activity not complying with car parking sleeving requirements in Rule 7.5.6 are able to be
considered without notification or the need to obtain approval from affected persons.
Amend Rule 7.6a) l for any activity not complying with car parking sleeving requirements in Rule 7.5.6 are able to be
considered without notification or the need to obtain approval from affected persons.
Page 259 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Limited
Sub Type Summary
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
William Roy
Cowie
928.001
3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning
and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2.
William Roy
Cowie
928.002
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning
and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2.
William Roy
Cowie
928.003
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning
and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2.
William Roy
Cowie
928.004
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning
and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2.
William Roy
Cowie
928.005
25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning
and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2.
William Roy
Cowie
928.006
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Provide a 100m buffer with 4m high planted earth bund. b) Remove the deferred logistics zoning
and retain a large lot residential zoning with subdivision to 2500m2.
William Roy
Cowie
928.007
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Remove the deferred Logistics Zone from the area bound by Ryburn and Percival Roads; Retain the Large Lot
Residential Zoning and provide a buffer between residential and industrial activity.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.001
1.1.7 Explanation of Activity
Classes
Support in Retain Table 1.1.7 - Non complying activity "How Identified" description.
part
Amend Table 1.1.7 - Discretionary Activity "How Identified" description to also provide for the event where 'an activity
is listed in the Plan but not in the Activity status for a particular zone', as provided for in the submission.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.002
1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed
Support in Support in Part. Retain rule 1.1.8.1 without modification.
part
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.003
2.2 Objectives and Policies
Strategic Framework
Oppose
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.004
2.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Support in Part. Amend Policies 2.2.1a and 2.2.1b as per submission.
part
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.005
2.2.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
a) That Objective 2.2.2, Policy 2.2.2a and Policy 2.2.2c are amended to specifically relate to Greenfield Development in
new Growth Areas, and allow flexibility by being 'generally' in accordance with the approved structure plans.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.006
2.2.3 Objective and Policies
Urban Design Approach
Oppose
Oppose. Amend the text of the policies to apply only when development does not meet standards for permitted
activities, remove the application of CPTED principles where development is not intended to be used by members of
the public as suggested in submission.
PRS Planning
929.007
2.2.4 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Oppose. Amend Policy 2.2.4a by replacing 'shall' with 'should' and enable location of business and development out of
Oppose. Amend rule 2.2 to reflect that discretionary or non complying resource consents 'should not be contrary to
the achievement' of the objectives and policies below.
Page 260 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Services Limited
Sub Type Summary
Central City, Business and
Industry
zone where appropriate.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.008
2.2.5 Objective and Policies
Business and Industry
Oppose
Oppose. Amend policy 2.2.5b to 'should' and allow business and industrial development to occur out of zone where
appropriate.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.009
2.2.8 Objective and Policies
Tangata Whenua Waikato
Tainui
Oppose
Oppose. Policy 2.2.8d be deleted, as it is presumed any relevant Iwi Management Plans have been considered at the
District Plan development stage, and it is unreasonable to be referenced in a policy when the implications of this
document are unknown.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.010
2.2.12 Objective and Policies Oppose
Resource Efficiency
Oppose. Replace reference to “shall” with “should”.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.011
2.2.13 Objective and Policies Oppose
Integrated Land Use,
Transport and Infrastructure
Oppose. Replace 'shall' with 'should' in all policies. Amend 2.2.13b) to suggest "Development 'should not
compromise' future infrastructure needs..." as provided for in the submission. Delete Policy 2.2.13c).
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.012
3.3 Objectives and Policies
Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the introductory paragraph to Rule 3.3 (Objectives and Policies, Structure Plans) to be consistent with that
used in Rule 2.2 (as sought to be amended by this submission).
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.013
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
3.3.1Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans:
Amend Policy 3.3.1bi. to reflect the intention that densities per hectare are to be achieved exclusive of roads by
rewording (new text in brackets) as follows:
'16 dwellings per hectare (excluding land to be vested as roads and reserve) for greenfield development.'
Delete Policy 3.3.1b ii) in its entirety.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.014
3.3.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
That the word "shall" in Policies 3.3.2a, 3.3.2b, 3.3.2c, 3.3.2e (Structure Plans) be replaced with the word "should".
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.015
3.3.3 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 3.3.3b: (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans) to clearly identify when Integrated Catchment
Management Plans are required.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.016
3.3.4 Objective and Policies
Oppose
3.3.4 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans):
That Policies 3.3.4a and 3.3.4b be deleted;
That the word "shall" in Policies 3.3.4c, 3.3.4d, 3.3.4e, 3.3.4f, 3.3.4g be replaced with the word "should".
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.017
3.3.5 Objective and Policies
Oppose
3.3.5 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans):
That the word "shall" in Policies3.3.5a, 3.3.5b be replaced with the word "should".
Page 261 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.018
3.3.6 Objective and Policies
Oppose
3.3.6 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans):
That the word 'shall' in Policies 3.3.6a, 3.3.6b, 3.3.6c, 3.3.6d be replaced with the word 'should'.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.019
3.3.7 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend 3.3.7 Objective and Policies (Structure Plans) to clarify the status of the referenced Open Space Plan/Strategy.
If this is unavailable then the Policy should be deleted or replaced with one that references the future reserves
identified on the relevant structure plan.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.020
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 4.2.1a 1. and 2. include wording to clarify that land vested as roads and reserves is excluded from the
density calculation.
Amend Policy 4.2.1a 2. by deleting the word 'Areas' and using the terminology 'Residential Intensification Zones' used
in other parts of the plan.
Delete Policy 4.2.1a 3.
Amend Policy 4.2.1c by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.021
4.2.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 4.2.2a and 4.2.2b by replacing the word "shall" with "should"; and delete Policy 4.2.2c.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.022
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend the Policies in 4.2.3 by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should';
Amend Policy 4.2.3a(iii) by deleting the text 'storage space and';
Delete Policies 4.2.3a iv. and 4.2.3a vi;
Delete Policy 4.2.3b.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.023
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend the Policies in 4.2.4 by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'; Delete Policy 4.2.4c.
Amend Policy 4.2.4d to include the text ' and also to meet the needs and convenience of residents';
Amend 4.2.4e to include the words 'not detract from or degrade'.
Delete Policy 4.2.4f.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.024
4.2.6 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 4.2.6a to replace reference to 'less than minor' with the test of whether the effects can be 'avoided,
remedied or mitigated'. Amend Policy 4.2.6c to ensure alignment with objective 4.2.6 and so it is not so prescriptive
and rule based.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.025
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.3.1 by changing the activity status for Apartment Buildings and Detached Dwellings in the Residential
Intensification Zone;
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.026
Amend Rule 4.3.1 by changing the activity status for Second and Subsequent Detached Dwellings in the General
Residential and Large Lot Residential zones.
Amend Rule 4.4.1a)i) to reduce the minimum net site area for detached dwellings to 350m2.
Amend Rule 4.4.1a)ii) to read 150m2 average site area per unit.
Page 262 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.027
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3a) to refer to 'front yard setback' rather than 'forward of the front building line of the dwelling' and
increase the minimum areas to 100% excluding areas required for vehicle access purposes; Delete Figures 4.4.3c and
4.4.3d
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.028
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.6 d) regarding a minimum building setback from Right-of-ways.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.029
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 c) as people should be able to provide for their privacy as they see fit. Delete Rule 4.4.7 d) or amend
to indicate that the entrance are of a dwelling is to be visible from the transport corridor.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.030
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support
Retain Rule 4.4.8a).
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.031
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.032
4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Oppose
Medium-Density Residential
Zone
Delete Rule 4.5.3 z) Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) from the Activity Status Table as there is
no justification for such a provision and is contrary to the Proposed District Plan.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.033
4.8.1 Integrated Retail
Development (Ruakura CDP
Area A only)
Oppose
Delete 4.8.1 Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) in its entirety as there is no justification in
terms of objectives and policies in either the Residential Zone or centres hierarchy for the establishment of such a
retail development.
Noting also - this submission MUST not be used as the basis for inserting objectives or policies into the District Plan
which provide for the establishment of an integrated retail activity within the Medium Density Residential Zone.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.034
4.7.3 Community Centres,
Tertiary and Specialised
Training Facilities, Schools
and Places of Worship
Oppose
That Rule 4.7.3(d) (Community Centres, Tertiary and Specialised Training Facilities, Schools and Places of Worship) be
amended to delete the requirement for no exterior indication of the activity.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.035
4.7.5 Home-based
Businesses
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.7.5 a) (Home-based Businesses), 4.7.5 a)(i) and 4.7.5 a)(ii) to read as follows:
Amend Appendix 1.7 by adding a new definition of Boundary Fence/Wall to clarify that it means a fence or wall located
on the legal boundary of a site only.
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.10 b) ii) and 4.4.10 b) iv relating to Outdoor Living Areas
"a) Rule 4.7.5 a) Home based businesses shall:
b) Rule 4.7.5 a)(i) Employ no more than 4 people, one of whom must reside on the site on a permanent basis.
c) Rule 4.7.5 a)(ii) Not exceed 30% of the total coverage of buildings permitted to be erected on the site."
PRS Planning
929.036
4.7.8 Show Homes
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.7.8 c) as no timeframe for the duration of a show home is necessary.
Page 263 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Services Limited
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.037
4.7.10 Visitor
Accommodation
Oppose
That the Heading to Rule 4.7.10 be amended to read:
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.038
4.10 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend 4.10a)i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi, vii, viii, ix, x, xi, xii by removing any assessment criteria that are not directly relevant to
the nature of the land use under consideration.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.039
6.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.6a)(i) - (xi) so that reference to any criteria that are not directly relevant to the nature of the land use
under consideration are deleted.
'Visitor Accommodation (Outside Visitor Facilities Area)'
Amend the Plan so that Public Art is a Restricted Discretionary Activity in the Business 1 to 7 Zones.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.040
7.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend 7.6a) i to xiii to remove reference to any criteria not directly relevant to the nature of land use under
consideration.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.041
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.3. so that Public Art in the Central City Zone is a Restricted Discretionary Activity.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.042
9.7 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.7(a)(i)-(x) so that reference to any criteria that are not directly relevant to the nature of the land use
under consideration are deleted.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.043
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.3u), v) & x) to remove reference to Rules 9.4 and 9.5 and vehicle movements. Amend Rule 9.3ff) to
remove reference to rule 9.3u) & x).
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.044
23.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose
Subdivision - Amend 23.2.2 Objective and Policies by replacing 'shall' with 'should'
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.045
23.2.4 Objective and Policy
Oppose
Retain Subdivision 23.2.4 Objective and Policies with amendments replacing 'shall' with 'should'
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.046
23.2.5 Objective and Policies Oppose
Retain Subdivision 23.2.5 Objective and Policies with amendments replacing 'shall' with 'should'
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.047
Table 23.3a
Amend Subdivision Table 23.3a to include boundary relocations
Oppose
Page 264 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.048
Table 23.3b
Oppose
Amend Subdivision Table 23.3b to include boundary relocations
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.049
Table 23.3c
Oppose
Amend Subdivision Table 23.3c to include boundary relocations
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.050
23.6.5 Boundary
Adjustments
Oppose
Amend Subdivision 23.6.5 Boundary Adjustments to include boundary relocations
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.051
23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Oppose
Amend Subdivision 23.7.1 Allotment Size and Shape to minimum net site area to 350m2
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.052
23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Zone and All Special
Character Zones
Oppose
Subdivision - Remove rules 23.7.3i and j for General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All Special
Character Zones
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.053
24.3.2 Nature of
Contributions
Support in Rule 24.3.2(b) amend to make it clear a financial contribution must not be imposed fro any purpose covered by a
part
development contribution.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.054
24.3.3 Level of Contribution
Oppose
Amend rule 24.3.3(d) to reword the preamble so the imposition of conditions be limited to the matters specifically
listed in the table; add an additional matter for consideration that relates to where previous payments have been
made; the reason for contributions under the heading reserves be amended to remove "money and/or"; the reason
for Offset Effects be added to.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.055
25.1.4.1 All Development
Oppose
Delete rule 25.1.4.1 General Standards for All Development.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.056
25.1.4.2 Site-specific
Oppose
Constraints on Development
Delete 25.1.4.2 General Standards for Site-Specific Constraints on Development.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.057
25.1.4.3 Earthworks and
Vegetation Removal
Oppose
Delete 25.1.4.3 General Standards Earthworks and Vegetation Removal.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.058
25.1.4.4 Three Waters
Oppose
Delete 25.1.4.4 General Standards Three Waters.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.059
25.1.4.5 Transportation
Oppose
Delete rule 25.1.4.5 General Standards Transportation.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.060
25.1.4.6 Landscaping and
Screening
Oppose
Delete rule 25.1.4.6 General Standards Landscaping and Screening.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.061
25.1.4.7 Financial
Contributions
Oppose
Delete rule 25.1.4.7 General Standards Financial Contributions.
Page 265 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.062
25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support
Table
Seeks the retention of Rule 25.2.3(a) regarding earthworks as a permitted activity.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.063
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1 a) i to increase the permitted earthworks volumes and linking cut heights and fill
depth; and deletion of Rules 25.2.5.1 a) ii and iii.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.064
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend section 1.2 by including an introductory statement to the effect that only those matters directly applicable will
be considered.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.065
A General Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 1.2A1 to read:"The actual and potential effects on the environment resulting from an activity not
complying with any relevant standard(s) in this district plan. Note: this excludes any activity which is a Restricted
Discretionary Activity solely by appearing in an activity list in the relevant zone."
Delete rules 1.2A2, 1.2A3 and rule 1.2A4.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.066
Design Guides
Oppose
Amend Rule 1.2B1 to narrow the scope of design guide criteria to the area of non-compliance.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.067
Structure Plans and Concept Oppose
Plans
Delete 1.2.B5 (Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria).
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.068
C General
Oppose
Various amendments and deletions to Site Development, Design and Layout assessment criteria to focus the scope of
assessment to areas of non compliance.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.069
Service and Storage Areas
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.2 C13 and C17 regarding service and storage areas so they apply only when the proposal does not
comply with a standard or term.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.070
Site Coverage and
Impermeable Surfaces
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.2.C18 regarding impervious surfaces so it applies only when the proposal does not comply with a
standard or term; Amend C20 to consider effects based on whether or not they can be avoided, remedied or
mitigated.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.071
Height
Oppose
Amend Rule 1.2 C21 to narrow scope of assessment.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.072
D Location of the
Development
Oppose
Delete Rule 1.2 D1.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.073
E Safe Environments
Oppose
Amend Rule 1.2 E1 and E2 to require CPTED principles to be applied only for buildings intended to attract or be used
by the public.
PRS Planning
929.074
G Landscaping and Screening Oppose
Amend assessment criteria 1.2 G1-4 to ensure the imposition of landscaping conditions is not in excess of what is
Page 266 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Services Limited
required in Section 25.5.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.075
K Dairies
Oppose
Amend criteria 1.2 K1 and add a new K3 in relation to assessment of effects of Dairies on residential character.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.076
S Sustainable Use of
Resources
Oppose
Delete assessment criteria 1.2 S1.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.077
Parking
Oppose
Delete Appendix 1.2 V12 regarding the restriction of car parks forward of a front building line and V13 regarding
landscaping and design of parking in relation to surrounding architecture and public spaces.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.078
Ruakura Structure Plan Area Oppose
Clarify the meaning and intent of V19 - Ruakura structure plan traffic modelling reports.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.079
X General
Oppose
Provide additional assessment criteria to 1.2 X for activities within the Knowledge Zone as the scale of potential
development of this site could have adverse effects on neighbouring residential and commercial areas.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.080
Y General
Oppose
Opposes 1.2 Y1.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.081
1.4.2.2 General Residential
Zone
Oppose
Add explanatory text in 1.4.2.2 General Residential Zone to exclude being applied to infill development creating 1-5
lots and where no new roads are created.
PRS Planning
Services Limited
929.082
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend the definitions of "Apartment Building" and "Duplex Dwellings" and a new definition for "Boundary
part
Fence/Wall".
Anthony Shaun
Wilson
930.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Anthony Shaun
Wilson
930.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4.
Anthony Shaun
Wilson
930.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Anthony Shaun
Wilson
930.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.001
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Amend Rule 7.3 pp) so that apartments at ground floor level in primary active frontage overlay areas are a NonComplying Activity in the Downtown Precinct and Restricted Discretionary Activities in other Precincts. Also amend the
rule so that Ground floor level apartments are Restricted Discretionary Activities in secondary active frontage overlay
areas, and Permitted Activities in the Central City Zone when not in any active frontage area.
Oppose
Page 267 of 541
Sub Name
Hopper
Developments Ltd
Sub Point Plan Provision
931.002
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Sub Type Summary
Oppose
Amend Appendix 5 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan to include Sonning carpark in Height Overlay 1.
Amend Maximum Height Controls to allow for a height of 24m with double bonus in Height Overlay 2
Amend Rule 7.4.4 g) Public amenities qualifying for a single or double bonus - to include Toilets available for public use
and to be used by the disabled.
Amend the through site access requirements to allow for other measures of ensuring provision and maintenance of
the through site.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.003
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan by showing the Sonning carpark site as being located in Height Overlay 1 or
allow for a maximum height of 24m with Double Bonus in Height Overlay 2.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.004
7.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.6a) xxiv regarding new buildings, alterations and additions within Key Development Site 6 by removing
consideration of matters and assessment criteria C2 to C12.
Review Appendix 1.2 with a view to streamlining and simplifying and ensuring that only matters that are relevant to
the reason for consent for activities listed are considered. All criteria must be clear as to meaning, non-prescriptive nor
read like a rule.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.005
Building Separation
Oppose
Amend Assessment Criteria Z24 Building Separation removing specific requirements for building separation and the
interpretive diagrams Z24d and Z24e and add a definition for internal boundaries.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.006
18.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend 18.1 b) ii describing "place" to be consistent with NZS4404:2010.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.007
25.14.4.1 Vehicle Crossings
and Internal Vehicle Access
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.14.4.1 k) requiring vehicle crossings to be left-in left-out designs when accessing Major Arterial or
Strategic Transport Corridors, eg roads with more than 20,000 vehicle movements per day, or with four vehicle lanes.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.008
Integrated Transport
Assessment
Oppose
Delete Appendix 1.2 V7 Integrated Transport Assessments, regarding expectation levels for safe and efficient transport
networks.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.009
1.4.6 Key Development Site
Design Guidance
Oppose
Amend 1.4.6.6c) Key Development Site 6 – Sonning, with amendments to the mix of uses on site and indicative
concept figures.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.010
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Oppose
Delete the Secondary Active Frontage from Figure 5-7.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.011
25.15 Urban Design
Support in Rule 25.15 Urban Design - Seeks clarity on the role of the Urban Design Panel and VISTA in light of the urban design
part
focus of the Proposed District Plan.
Page 268 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Inclusion of an advice note in section 1.1.2.2. n) to make it clear that any development which requires a land use
consent including regard to urban design aspects will not require consideration by the Urban Design Panel;
Clarity of the role of the Urban Design Panel to exclude consideration of developments that require land use consent
including consideration of urban design aspects.
Hopper
Developments Ltd
931.012
24 Financial Contributions
Support in 24 Financial Contributions -Request adoption of the “Developer Agreement” approach in regard to financial
part
contributions and development contributions for significant developments.
Neil
Brumblecomble
932.001
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 and reinstate the density provisions of the Operative District Plan.
Neil
Brumblecomble
932.002
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Opposes Rule 4.4.1 Density
Neil
Brumblecomble
932.003
25.13.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Seeks that water meters be required for all residential and commercial properties.
Guy Anthony
Perrett
933.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Guy Anthony
Perrett
933.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Guy Anthony
Perrett
933.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Guy Anthony
Perrett
933.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Debra Jane
Hansen
934.001
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Support
Support Rule 1.4.8b i) ii), iii) & iv) Opoia Design Guidance.
Debra Jane
Hansen
934.002
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support
Support Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation and alcohol free zones in public/shared space outside of
commercial/restaurant premises
Debra Jane
Hansen
934.003
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Support in Support 7.1.4 regarding Opoia Precinct subject to pedestrian bridge across river and vehicular access & parking being
part
addressed.
Rex Hannam
935.001
3.4 Peacocke
Support
Retain provisions within the Plan (Parts 3.4, 5.2.8, 5.3-6, 23.3, 23.6 and Appendix 2.2) that manage interim and future
development within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area and Peacocke Character Zone.
Rex Hannam
935.002
5.2.8 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain provisions within the Proposed District Plan that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke
Page 269 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Peacocke Character Zone
Structure Plan Area.
Rex Hannam
935.003
5.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain provisions within the Proposed District Plan that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke
Structure Plan Area.
Rex Hannam
935.004
23.3 Rules – Activity Status
Tables
Support
Retain provisions that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area.
Rex Hannam
935.005
Figure 2-1 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Amend Appendices 2.1-3 Peacocke Structure Plan Maps by relocating the Proposed Southern Links Arterial Corridors
and amending the neighbourhood and character areas as set out in the submission.
Rex Hannam
935.006
25.14.3 Rules – Activity
Status Table
Oppose
Delete provisions in 25.14.3 and 25.14.5 relating to Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Areas (ATCPA) and amend
Appendix 2 Structure Plans to replace ATCPA with designations or Indicative Future Arterial Corridors.
Rex Hannam
935.007
25.14.5 Rules – Specific
Standards
Oppose
Delete provisions in 25.14.3 and 25.14.5 relating to Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Areas (ATCPA) and amend
Appendix 2 Structure Plans to replace ATCPA with designations or Indicative Future Arterial Corridors.
Rex Hannam
935.008
Figure 2-2 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
Oppose
Seeks the deletion of provisions in 25.14.3 and 25.14.5 relating to Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Areas and
amend Appendix 2 Structure Plans to replace Arterial Transport Corridor Protection Area with designations or
Indicative Future Arterial Corridors.
Rex Hannam
935.009
Figure 2-3 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Character
Areas and Neighbourhoods
Oppose
Amend Appendices 2-3 Peacocke Structure Plan-Character Areas and Neighbourhoods by relocating the proposed
Southern Links Arterial Corridors and amending the neighbourhood and character areas as set out in the submission.
Rex Hannam
935.010
23.6 Rules – Specific
Standards
Support
Retain provisions that manage interim and future development within the Peacocke Structure Plan Area.
Pauline Norma
O'Brien
936.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Pauline Norma
O'Brien
936.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Pauline Norma
O'Brien
936.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Pauline Norma
O'Brien
936.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Denise Margaret
Frost
937.001
Zoning Map 45A
Map 45A-Rezone the entire Municipal Pools site Sport and Recreation zone; and provide for restaurants as a permitted
activity.
Oppose
Page 270 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Property Council
New Zealand
938.001
2.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Retain Objective 2.2.1. Replace Policy 2.2.1a to provide opportunities and identify locations for urban intensification.
part
Amend Policy 2.2.1b by deleting reference to minimising energy and carbon use and to replace the word 'shall' with
'should'.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.002
2.2.3 Objective and Policies
Urban Design Approach
Support
Property Council
New Zealand
938.003
2.2.4 Objective and Policies
Central City, Business and
Industry
Support in Retain Objective 2.2.4. Amend Policies 2.2.4a and 2.2.4b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
part
Property Council
New Zealand
938.004
2.2.5 Objective and Policies
Business and Industry
Support in Retain Objective 2.2.5. Amend Policies 2.2.5a and 2.2.5b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
part
Property Council
New Zealand
938.005
2.2.6 Objective and Policies
Residential Development
Support
Retain Objective 2.2.6. Amend Policies 2.2.6a and 2.2.6b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.006
2.2.7 Objective and Policies
The Waikato River
Support
Retain Objective 2.2.7 regarding the Waikato River.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.007
2.2.13 Objective and Policies Oppose
Integrated Land Use,
Transport and Infrastructure
Amend Policy 2.2.13b so that development does not have to allow for future infrastructure needs over and above its
own needs. Also, replace the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.008
2.2.10 Objective and Policies Oppose
Hamilton’s Identity,
Character and Heritage
Amend Policies 2.2.10a to 2.2.10d by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.009
2.2.11 Objective and Policies Oppose
Natural Environments
Amend Policies 2.2.11a and 2.2.11b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.010
2.2.12 Objective and Policies Oppose
Resource Efficiency
Amend Policies 2.2.12a to 2.2.12c by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.011
3.3 Objectives and Policies
Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend 3.3 (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans) so that “Any discretionary or non-complying activity should not
be contrary to the objectives and policies below”
Property Council
New Zealand
938.012
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 3.3.1b to read: “Housing densities in greenfield locations should achieve over time a gross density
excluding roads of 16 dwellings per hectare”
Property Council
New Zealand
938.013
3.3.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 3.3.2b, 3.3.2c, and 3.3.2e by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Property Council
938.014
3.3.4 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 3.3.4a to 3.3.4c and 3.3.4e, to 3.3.4g by replacing the word “shall” with “should”.
Amend Policy 2.2.3b to apply only when development does not meet standards for permitted activities and remove
the application of CPTED principles where development is not intended to be used by members of the public as
suggested in submission. Also, replace with word 'shall' with 'should'.
Page 271 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
New Zealand
Property Council
New Zealand
938.015
3.3.5 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 3.3.5a and 3.3.5b by replacing the word “shall” with “should”.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.016
3.3.6 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 3.3.6a to 3.3.6d by replacing the word “shall” with “should”.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.017
3.3.7 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 3.3.7a and 3.3.7b by replacing the word “shall” with “should”.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.018
4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies in 4.2.1 by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Amend Policy 4.2.1a)ii. by deleting #3;
Insert additional policy '4.4.1a)iii. 150m2 minimum average site area per residential unit';
Amend Appendix 1.7 by adding a new definition for 'average site area'.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.019
4.2.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 4.2.2b by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.020
4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 4.2.3a to 4.2.3d by replacing the word “shall” with “should”
Property Council
New Zealand
938.021
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 4.2.4a by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Amend Policy 4.2.4e to widen the scope to enable consideration of changes in character.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.022
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 4.2.5a by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.023
4.2.6 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 4.2.6c, 4.2.6d and 4.2.6e by replacing the word "shall" with "should"; Retain Objective 4.2.6 and Policy
4.2.6a.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.024
4.2.7 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 4.2.7a by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.025
4.2.9 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 4.2.9a and 4.2.9b by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.026
4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.3.1 by providing for Comprehensive Residential Development as a Controlled Activity on sites in excess
part
of 2000m2 in the General Residential Zone. A Comprehensive Residential Development should achieve a minimum
average site density 300 m2;
Delete Policy 4.2.3a iv.
Amend Rule 4.3.1 by providing for Town-house development on residential sites that are within 500m of any Business
Zone as a Controlled Activity. A townhouse development in these areas should achieve a minimum average site
Page 272 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
density of 250 m2;
Amend Rule 4.3.1b) so that Apartment Buildings in the Residential Intensification Zone are a Controlled Activity;
Amend Rule 4.3.1f) so that Detached Dwellings: second and subsequent detached dwellings per site in the General
Residential Zone are a Controlled Activity;
Retain Rule 4.3.1g) duplex dwellings;
Amend Rules 4.3.1 h), i), j), k) - to ensure consistency and certainty with regard to Activity Status;
Amend Rule 4.3.1n) so that Residential Centres in the Residential Intensification Zone are a Controlled Activity;
Retain Rule 4.3.1bb) Office, other than as a home-based business.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.027
4.4.1 Density
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.1a)i) to require the density for residential unit in the General Residential Zone to be reduced to 375m2
Property Council
New Zealand
938.028
4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3a) to require 100% of the specified front setback (excluding access points and manoeuvring areas) be
planted in grass, shrubs or trees; Delete Figures 4.4.3c and 4.4.3d
Property Council
New Zealand
938.029
4.4.5 Height in Relation to
Boundary
Support
Retain Rule 4.4.5 b) as this provision will ensure better design outcomes.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.030
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.6 d) to allow a minimum building setback of 0.5m from a right of way.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.031
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.7 b) to allow garages forward of the front building line where the wall facing the street consists of at
least 20% glazed materials. Delete Rule 4.4.7 c)
Property Council
New Zealand
938.032
4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.8 regarding Fences and Walls by deleting reference to 'boundary'
part
Property Council
New Zealand
938.033
4.4.9 Residential Buildings –
Separation and Privacy
Oppose
Property Council
New Zealand
938.034
4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 to reduce the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units in the residential
intensification zone; Delete Rule 4.4.12 b).
Property Council
New Zealand
938.035
4.5.1 Comprehensive
Development Plan Process
Amend Rule 4.5.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Process - by changing the activity status to Controlled; and allow
a Comprehensive Development Plans to be approved on a site by site basis.
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.9 regarding Residential Building Separation and Privacy to allow for the reduction in the separation
distances, as set out in the submission.
Page 273 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Property Council
New Zealand
938.036
4.6.2 Development Yield
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.6.2 Development Yield and include residential development yields as a guideline in 1.4.1 MediumDensity Residential Design Guidelines.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.037
4.6.4 Residential Unit Size
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.6.4 a) by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units; Delete Rule 4.6.4b).
Property Council
New Zealand
938.038
4.7.5 Home-based
Businesses
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.7.5a)(i) (Home-based Businesses) to read as follows:
Property Council
New Zealand
938.039
4.7.8 Show Homes
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.7.8c) regarding show homes as placing a time duration serves no resource management purpose.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.040
4.7.9 Rest Homes
Oppose
4.7.9 Rest Homes - seek amendment of Rule 4.7.9(c) to specify individual minimum outdoor living requirements.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.041
4.11 Notification Rule
Oppose
Review Volume 2, Appendix 1 - Assessment Criteria to ensure that only matters relevant to reason for the resource
consent are considered.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.042
5.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 5.2.1a, b, d and e by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.043
5.2.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 5.2.2a by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.044
5.2.3 Objective and Policies
Special Residential Zone
Oppose
Amend Policies 5.2.3d, f, g and h by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.045
5.2.4 Objective and Policies
Special Heritage Zone
Oppose
Amend Policies 5.2.4a, b, c and d by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.046
5.2.5 Objective and Policies
Special Natural Zone
Oppose
Amend Policies 5.2.5a and 5.2.5b by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.047
5.2.6 Objective and Policies
Temple View Zone
Oppose
Amend Policies 5.2.6a to 5.2.6j by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.048
5.2.7 Objective and Policies
Temple View Zone
Oppose
Amend Policies 5.2.7a to 5.2.7j by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.049
5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Oppose
Residential, Special Heritage
and Special Natural Zones
Amend Rules 5.3.1 k)-n) to ensure consistency and certainty with regard to the Activity Status of Managed Care
Facilities. Retain Rule 5.3.1z) regarding offices (other than home based business)
Property Council
938.050
5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Oppose
Amend Rule 5.4.3a) to require 100% of the specified front setback (excluding access points and manoeuvring areas) to
'Have at least one person, including the principal operator of the home-based business reside on the site.'
Page 274 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
New Zealand
Sub Type Summary
Planting
be planted in grass, shrubs or trees. Delete associated Figures 5.4.3a and 4.4.3b.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.051
5.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.4.7b) to allow for garages to be located forward of the front building line where the wall facing the
street consists of at least 20% glazed materials. Delete 4.4.7 c).
Property Council
New Zealand
938.052
5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Support in Amend Rule 5.4.8 a) regarding Fences and Walls by deleting reference to "boundary".
part
Property Council
New Zealand
938.053
5.4.9 Residential Buildings –
Separation and Privacy
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.4.9 Residential Building - Separation and Privacy - to allow for reduction in setback in certain
circumstances as per the Operative District Plan.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.054
5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Delete Rule 5.4.11 b) (iv) (Outdoor Living Area) and Figure 5.4.11e
Property Council
New Zealand
938.055
5.5.5 Home-based
Businesses
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.5.5 a) (i) relating to number of people allowed to be employed in a home-based business.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.056
5.5.8 Show Homes
Oppose
Delete Rule 5.5.8 c) as no timeframe for the duration of a show home is necessary.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.057
5.5.9 Rest Homes
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.5.9c) to specify what the individual minimum outdoor living requirements area is.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.058
5.7 Notification Rule
Oppose
Review Volume 2, Appendix 1 (District Plan Administration) with a view of streamlining and simplifying.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.059
6.2.1 Objective and Policies
Sub-regional Centres
Oppose
Amend Policies 6.2.1a to 6.2.1f by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Amend Policy 6.2.1f to encourage
residential activity as part of appropriate mixed use.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.060
6.2.2 Objective and Policies
Suburban Centres
Oppose
Amend Policies 6.2.2a to 6.2.2g to replace the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Amend 6.2.2 to add a new policy to generally encourage mixed use residential activity where appropriate.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.061
6.2.3 Objective and Policies
Neighbourhood Centres
Support in Amend Policies 6.2.3a and 6.2.3b by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
part
Amend 6.2.3 to add a new Policy to encourage residential activity as part of appropriate mixed use.
Amend Rule 6.3r) Retail Activity 150-399m to be in line with the explanation of Neighbourhood Centres
Property Council
New Zealand
938.062
6.2.4 Objective and Policies
Major Event Facilities
Oppose
Amend Policies 6.2.4a and 6.2.4b by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.063
6.1 Purpose
Oppose
Combine Business 5 and 6 Zones with consequential amendments.
Amend 6.1g) to encourage residential activity as part of appropriate mixed use.
Page 275 of 541
Sub Name
Property Council
New Zealand
Sub Point Plan Provision
938.064
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Sub Type Summary
Oppose
Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and xx) so that new buildings and Apartments above ground floor are Controlled Activities, and
alterations and additions and accessory buildings are Permitted Activities.
Amend Rule 6.3 e) by replacing the word "industry" with "Industrial activity", and amend the definition of "industrial
activity" so that it is clear that warehouse and bulk storage are deemed light industry.
Amend Rules 6.3 l), m) and n) so that Offices up to 500m2 are a Permitted Activity and Offices greater than 500m2 are
a Discretionary Activity.
Amend Rules 6.3 r), aa) and bb) so that Retail up to 399m2, licences premises up to 200m2, restaurants and cafes up to
200m2 are Permitted Activities in Neighbourhood Centres.
Amend Rules 6.3 s) and t) so that retail activities greater than 399m2 are Permitted Activities in Suburban Centres.
Amend Rules 6.3 and 6.3 f) so that Wholesale and Trade Retail and light industry are Permitted Activities in the
Business 4 Zone.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.065
6.4.1 Maximum Building
Height
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.1a) to increase the maximum height limit for Business Zones 3 and 4 to 20m.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.066
6.4.3 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.3a) so the 5m setback only applies to major arterial roads and does not apply to signs.
Delete Rule 6.4.3c) as it is ambiguous and unclear what "any internal zone boundary" means and what setback
distance would apply.
Amend Rule 6.4.3b) to clarify that signs do not need to comply with setbacks.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.067
6.4.5 Building Intensity
Oppose
Amend 6.4.5 a) to allow the Business 4 Zone a maximum ratio of floor area to of 2:1.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.068
6.4.6 Maximum Tenancy Size Oppose
Delete Rule 6.4.6 regarding maximum Tenancy size or amend 6.3t) so that the activity status for retail activities in
Suburban Centre and Neighbourhood Centre Zones correspond with those in Rule 6.4.6.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.069
6.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Review of Volume 2, Appendix 1 with a view of streamlining and simplifying, ensuring that only matters that are
relevant to the reason for consent is required are considered, and that criteria is not prescriptive or read like a rule.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.070
7.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 7.2.1a to 7.2.1e, and 7.2.1g by replacing the word "shall" with "should"
Property Council
New Zealand
938.071
7.2.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 7.2.2a to 7.2.2f by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Page 276 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Property Council
New Zealand
938.072
7.2.3 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 7.2.3a to 7.2.3c by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.073
7.2.4 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 7.2.4a by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.074
7.2.5 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 7.2.5a to 7.2.5c by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.075
7.2.6 Objective and Policies
Downtown Precinct
Oppose
Amend Policies 7.2.6a to 7.2.6g by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.076
7.2.7 Objective and Policies
City Living Precinct
Oppose
Amend Policies 7.2.7a to 7.2.7h by replacing the word "shall" with "should". Amend Objective 7.2.7 to delete "small
scale" in relation to offices to recognise there are existing large scale offices in the City Living Precinct.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.077
7.2.8 Objective and Policies
Ferry Bank Precinct
Oppose
Amend Policies in 7.2.8a, b and d by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.078
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Delete Objectives and Policies in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.079
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend the numbering of Rule 7.3 as there are two a)’s
Amend Rule 7. 3 a) and b) so 'new buildings' and 'alterations' are a Controlled Activity
Amend Rule 7.3 to delete the Opoia Precinct.
Amend Rules 7.3 m), n) o) s), u), x), y), a), ll, mm) hh), ii) tt) to allow for offices, retail activities in excess of 250m2
when it is sleeved with smaller retail units, tourism ventures and information centres, places of assembly, Restaurants,
cafes and licensed premises, visitor accommodation, health care services , community centres, and Tertiary education
and specialised training facilities, as Permitted Activities
Amend Rule 7.3v) and w) so that Yard based retail is a Restricted Discretionary Activity.
Delete the Parking Building Overlay and amend Rules 7.3 (cc) and (dd) to provide Parking Buildings as Restricted
Discretionary Activity.
Amend Rules 7.3 ee) and ff) so that Parking Lots are a Restricted Discretionary Activity and delete the 6 month
duration limit.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.080
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.4.1 Site Coverage
Property Council
New Zealand
938.081
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Property Council
New Zealand
938.082
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Oppose
Amend maximum heights in Rule 7.4.4 to be consistent with the Operative District Plan and align the height control
areas with the Precinct Areas.
Page 277 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Property Council
New Zealand
938.083
7.4.7 Street Wall
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.4.7 Street Wall
Property Council
New Zealand
938.084
7.4.9 Car Parking
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.9 a) so that it only applies to sites with a Primary Active Frontage.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.085
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.16 a) by removing the requirement for buildings to contribute to retail appearance and function of the
city and; amend vehicle access requirements across active frontages
Property Council
New Zealand
938.086
7.4.17 Awning Cover
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.17 so the awning requirement does not apply to Secondary Active Frontages.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.087
7.5.4 Residential
Oppose
Delete Rule 7.5.4 b), Figure 7.5.4e, Rule 7.5.4e), f) ii and h). Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) i) to delete the requirement for
outdoor living to be located north of east or west. Amend Rule 7.5.4 d) ii and 7.5.4 f) i to reduce the requirements for
outdoor living areas and minimum floor areas for studio, 1 and 2 bedroom units.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.088
7.5.5 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.5.5 to clarify that it applies to residential development (e.g. incorporate with Rule 7.5.4). Delete Rule
7.5.5 b) regarding fences, walls, landscaping and planting.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.089
7.5.6 Retail, Commercial and Oppose
Commercial Car Parking
Buildings Sleeving
Amend Rule 7.5.6a) to provide an alternative option to sleeving of 70% minimum glazed frontage
Property Council
New Zealand
938.090
7.5.7 Yard-Based Retailing
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.5.7 regarding yard based retailing to clarify "rear of site"
Property Council
New Zealand
938.091
7.5.8 Office and Industry
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.5.8 by incorporating within Rule 7.4.16.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.092
7.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Review Appendix 1.2 with a view to streamlining and simplifying and ensuring that only matters that are relevant to
the reason for consent for activities listed are considered. All criteria must be clear as to meaning, non-prescriptive nor
read like a rule.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.093
9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies 9.2.1a to 9.2.1c to replace 'shall' with 'should', and add new policy to provide for non-industrial and
retail activities that already exist at the time of Plan notification.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.094
9.2.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 9.2.2a to replace the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.095
9.2.3 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 9.2.3a by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.096
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.3l) to include existing retail and office activities as a Permitted Activity. Delete Rule 9.3f) & g). Add
definition of Trade and Industry Training facilities in section 1.6. Retain rule 9.3j), amend rule 9.3k) to allow
Page 278 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
establishment on any industrial site fronting an arterial road. Amend Rules 9.3u) & v) for non-gateway sites to be
Permitted activities, and delete reference to vehicle movements.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.097
9.4.1 Building Setbacks
(Except in Rotokauri
Employment Area)
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.1a) so road setbacks only apply to major arterial roads. Amend Rule 9.4.1b) so a 5m setback applies to
a boundary fronting a major arterial.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.098
9.4.5 Permeable Surfaces
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.4.5a) to apply to greenfield locations only.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.099
9.4.6 Site Layout
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.4.6 and instead require a 2.0m wide planting strip along the road corridor boundary.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.100
9.5.2 Ancillary Retail
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.5.2 regarding floor space limits for ancillary retail as it is too restrictive.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.101
9.7 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.7 and make consequential amendments to Appendix 1 as necessary to ensure maters of discretion and
assessment criteria relate only to the reason for why consent is being sort.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.102
Transport Corridor Network
Oppose
Amend 18.2.1 by adding a new policy that relates to property access being a key function of the transport corridor.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.103
23.2.1 Objective and Policies Oppose
Amend Policy 23.2.1a by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'
Property Council
New Zealand
938.104
23.2.2 Objective and Policies Oppose
Amend Policy 23.2.2a by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'
Property Council
New Zealand
938.105
23.2.3 Objective and Policy
Oppose
Amend Policy 23.2.3a by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should' and amend Policy 23.2.2a ix to allow targets to be met
over time.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.106
23.2.4 Objective and Policy
Oppose
Amend Policies in 23.2.4 by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'
Property Council
New Zealand
938.107
23.2.5 Objective and Policies Oppose
Property Council
New Zealand
938.108
Table 23.3a
Amend Policies 23.2.5a to 23.2.5c by replacing the word 'shall' with 'should'
Support in Amend Appendix 1.7 to define 'Boundary adjustment" and "Company Lease". Amend Rule 23.3a by adding boundary
part
relocation as a controlled activity. Retain Rule 23.3a iii and vi. Amend Rule 23.3a v and viii to provide for Fee simple
and Unit Title subdivision as a controlled activity except in a Hazard Area where it should be a restricted discretionary
activity. Amend Rule 23.3a vi, x and xi to provide for Cross lease subdivision and subdivision of an allotment containing
a scheduled heritage site or a significant natural area as restricted discretionary activities.
Page 279 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Property Council
New Zealand
938.109
Table 23.3c
Oppose
Amend Subdivision Table 23.3c to include all Special Character Zones
Property Council
New Zealand
938.110
23.5.1 Telecommunication,
Electricity, Gas and
Computer Media
Support in Amend Rule 23.5.1 to allow for wireless telecommunication and computer media.
part
Property Council
New Zealand
938.111
23.6.2 Company Leases and
Unit Title Subdivision
Oppose
Delete Rule 23.6.2d) and amend Rule 23.6.2 f) regarding Company Leases and Unit Title Subdivision by referring to
s224 of the Resource Management Act, not the Building Act.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.112
23.6.4 Cross-lease to
Freehold Subdivision
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.6.4 regarding cross lease plans to recognise that not all plans have exclusive areas identified.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.113
23.6.5 Boundary
Adjustments
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.6.5 regarding Boundary Adjustments by replacing additional "allotments" with additional "certificates
of title".
Property Council
New Zealand
938.114
23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.7.1 to allow for a density of 375m2 net site area per residential unit in the General Residential Zone
and delete the average net site area requirement. Amend Rule 23.7.1 s) to provide for Industrial Zone sites to be a
minimum of 500m2 and Rule 23.7.1x) to allow for Industrial Zone sites to only have a 15m diameter shape factor
circle.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.115
23.7.2 Subdivision Suitability Oppose
Delete Rule 23.7.2 regarding the suitability of the site for future development.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.116
23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Zone and All Special
Character Zones
Oppose
Delete Rules 23.7.3 a), c) and j). Amend Rule 23.7.3 d) to increase the number of allotments off a right of way. Amend
Rule 23.7.3 f) regarding minimum private way widths to apply to 5 or more allotments. Amend Rule 23.7.3h) to
increase the maximum length of a private way. Amend Rule 23.7.3i) to increase the maximum cul-de-sac length.
Amend Rule 23.7.3k) to allow cul-de-sac to access other cul-de-sac.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.117
23.7.4 Residential
Intensification Zone
Oppose
Delete Rule 23.7.4b) regarding a minimum rear boundary width of a front site.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.118
23.7.5 Business 1 to 7 Zones, Oppose
Central City Zone, Te Rapa
North Industrial Zone,
Ruakura Industrial Park Zone,
Ruakura Logistics Zone and
Industrial Zone
Amend Rule 23.7.5c) to reduce access widths to 7m. Delete Rule 23.7.5 e) regarding access widths onto an Arterial
Road.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.119
23.8 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 23.8 and Appendix 1 to streamline and simplify provisions, ensure only relevant matters are considered,
and that criteria are not prescriptive.
Page 280 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Property Council
New Zealand
938.120
24.3.2 Nature of
Contributions
Support
Retain 24.3.2 Nature of Contributions
Property Council
New Zealand
938.121
24.3.3 Level of Contribution
Oppose
Amend 24.3.3 Level of Contribution to "---shall be calculated in accordance with, the following matters ...”
Property Council
New Zealand
938.122
25.2.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.2.4.1 c) to ensure the provision does not restrict materials being removed off site (i.e. trucked away
from the work site).
Property Council
New Zealand
938.123
25.2.5 Rules – Specific
Standards
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.2.5 regarding earthworks to increase the permitted volume to 250m3.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.124
25.13.4.6 Water Impact
Assessments
Support in Amend Rule 25.13.4.6 (Water Impact Assessments) so that ICMPs that have been approved prior to the Plan becoming
part
operative do not have to be in accordance with the information requirements of Volume 2, Appendix 1.5.5.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.125
25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading
Spaces and Manoeuvring
Areas
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.2 a) to clarify when an assessment for parking and end of journey facilities is triggered and that it
does not apply to building alterations.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.126
25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 so that Permitted Activities are not required to prepare an Integrated Transport Assessment.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.127
1.1 Controlled Activities –
Matters of Control
Oppose
Review Appendix 1 to streamline and only require assessment of those matters relevant to the reason for the consent.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.128
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Review Appendix 1 with a view of streamlining and simplifying, ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the
reason for consent is required are considered.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.129
V General
Oppose
Delete Appendix 1.2, Transportation, V7 regarding expectations for network performance.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.130
1.3 Discretionary Activity
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Review Appendix 1 with a view of streamlining and simplifying, ensuring that only matters that are relevant to the
reason for consent is required are considered.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.131
1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose
Assessment Criteria
Review Section 1.4 - Design Guides with a view to simplifying and streamlining, with no conflict between urban design
and transport outcomes.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.132
1.5.20 Centre Viability
Assessment Report
Oppose
Amend 1.5.20 to outline circumstances when a Centre Viability Assessment Report is required.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.133
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend Appendix 1.7 by adding new definitions for 'Household', 'Average Site Area', 'Gross Density excluding roads',
part
'Boundary adjustment', 'Trade and Industry Training Facilities'. Clarify the definition of 'Industry' and 'Net Site Area'.
Page 281 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Amend the definition of 'Ancillary Retailing and Offices'
Property Council
New Zealand
938.134
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct. The area should instead be zoned Residential Intensification.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.135
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Oppose
Amend Figure 5-2 Height Overlay Plan so that the Height Overlay Areas align with the Precinct Areas.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.136
Table 15-2b Number of
Support
parking and loading spaces
required – Central City Zone
Property Council
New Zealand
938.137
Table 15-2g Number of
Support in Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2g to remove the requirement for lockers as part of the end of journey facilities for
bicycle end-of-journey
part
cyclists.
facilities required – Central
City Zone and Business Zones
1 to 7
Property Council
New Zealand
938.138
Table 15-1j Internal vehicle
access widths
Oppose
Amend Appendix Table 15-1j Internal vehicle access widths to ensure consistency with the Subdivision Chapter.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.139
Planning Maps
Oppose
Amend Business 5 and 6 to create one zone; rezone Te Rapa Road to reflect the non-industrial uses; Rezone new areas
for residential intensification; Rezone old Avalon Drive to enable regeneration; Rezone Frankton from industrial to a
more enabling zone e.g. mixed-use; Remove Opoia from the Central City Zone; Reduce the extent of the Business 2
Zone at Claudelands.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.140
2.2 Objectives and Policies
Strategic Framework
Oppose
Amend 2.2 to reflect that discretionary or non complying resource consents 'should not be contrary to' the objectives
and policies below.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.141
4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.10 b);
Retain Table 15-2b Number of parking and loading spaces required – Central City Zone.
Amend Rule 4.4.10 c) iv. by deleting the text "where communal open space is provided";
Amend Rule 4.4.10 f) to allow for the reduction of individual outdoor living areas when a communal area is provided.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.142
6.2 Objectives and Policies
Business 1 to 7 Zones
Oppose
Amend the Objectives and Policies within 6.2 to specifically mention land zoned Business 1 and 4 that is outside of a
Sub-Regional Centre.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.143
6.4.9 Residential
Development
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.4.9 to add standards for residential apartments (i.e. density, outdoor living and service areas etc.) for
the Business Zones.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.144
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Page 282 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Property Council
New Zealand
938.145
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks so that signs do not need to comply.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.146
9.2.4 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policies in 9.2.4 to replace the word 'shall' with 'should'
Property Council
New Zealand
938.147
9.5.3 Ancillary Offices
Oppose
Delete Rule 9.5.3 as it is too restrictive, and unclear if it only applies to industrial activities or the full range of activities
anticipated by the Zone.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.148
25.14.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.14.4.1 k) requiring vehicle crossings to be left-in left-out designs when accessing roads with more than
20,000 vehicle movements per day, or with four vehicle lanes.
Property Council
New Zealand
938.149
4.7.10 Visitor
Accommodation
Oppose
Amend the title of Rule 4.7.10 to read "Visitor Accommodation outside of the Visitor Facilities Area"
Estonie Jean
Funaki
939.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Estonie Jean
Funaki
939.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Estonie Jean
Funaki
939.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Estonie Jean
Funaki
939.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Gary Richard
Wiseman
941.001
5 Special Character Zones
Oppose
Amend the provisions within Section 5 (Special Character Zones) in relation to development within Lake Waiwhakareke
Landscape Character Area by increasing the minimum area to 600m2 for all building activity, amending the minimum
number of storeys from two to one, deleting the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape provisions and replacing them with
normal residential provisions.
Gary Richard
Wiseman
941.002
Zoning Map 33A
Oppose
Map 33A-retain Lot 2 DP 425316 as residential and amend Lot 2 DP 425316 173 Rotokauri Rd from residential to
residential reserve.
E'stonie Jean
Petersen
942.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
E'stonie Jean
Petersen
942.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
E'stonie Jean
Petersen
942.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Page 283 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
E'stonie Jean
Petersen
942.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Robyn & Graham
McBride
943.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Bruce Alafoki
Kaufana
944.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Bruce Alafoki
Kaufana
944.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Bruce Alafoki
Kaufana
944.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Bruce Alafoki
Kaufana
944.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Titanium Park
Joint Venture
945.001
3.7 Ruakura
Oppose
Amend 3.7(f) to update the table 'Industrial Land Allocation in the Future Proof Area' to take account of the appeal by
Titanium Park Joint Venture to the Waikato Regional Policy Statement.
Amanda Burney
946.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Heather Margaret
Kaufana
947.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Heather Margaret
Kaufana
947.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Heather Margaret
Kaufana
947.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Heather Margaret
Kaufana
947.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Jared Edward
Coromandel
948.001
5.1 Purpose
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 284 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Jared Edward
Coromandel
948.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Jared Edward
Coromandel
948.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Jared Edward
Coromandel
948.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Ian Thomas &
Margaret Ann
Brownlee
949.001
1.1.7 Explanation of Activity
Classes
Support in Support in Part. Amend Restricted Discretionary description in Table 1.1.7 by deleting text 'and the activity complies
part
with the relevant standards specified in rules,' as provided for in the submission.
Ian Thomas &
Margaret Ann
Brownlee
949.002
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Ian Thomas &
Margaret Ann
Brownlee
949.003
Appendix 5 Central City Zone Support in Amend Figures 5-1 to 5-7 and 5-9 to incorporate Lots 1-5 DPS 16910, Allotment 69 Town of Hamilton West and Lots 5
part
and 6 DPS 4473 from Residential to Central City Zone.
Ian Thomas &
Margaret Ann
Brownlee
949.004
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1showing the location of the Ferrybank precinct to include Lots 1-5 DPS 16910.
part
Ian Thomas &
Margaret Ann
Brownlee
949.005
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend location of the height overlay 2 in Figure 5-2 to include Lots 1-5 DPS 16910.
part
Ian Thomas &
Margaret Ann
Brownlee
949.006
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Amend Rule 7.4.4g) i and ii regarding Maximum Height Control and Bonuses to allow amenities to be provided on or
part
off site to gain bonuses, add Home Star ratings and to reduce the required Certification for Green Star Design rating
from 6 to 4 stars.
Ian Thomas &
Margaret Ann
Brownlee
949.007
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Seeks the deletion of Rule 25.2.5.1 regarding earthworks controls on volume, cut depth, fill height, and earthworks on
slopes.
Fay Ataarahiora
Coromandel
950.001
5.1 Purpose
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Map 45A-Rezone Lots 1-5 DPS 16910 located at 8-10 Bridge Street and 6 Tisdall Street from Residential Intensification
Zone to Central City Zone – Ferrybank Precinct; Rezone Allotment 69 Town of Hamilton West and Lots 5 and 6 DPS
4473 to Central City Zone.
Page 285 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Fay Ataarahiora
Coromandel
950.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Fay Ataarahiora
Coromandel
950.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Fay Ataarahiora
Coromandel
950.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
ANG & SL Clarke
951.001
Zoning Map 48A
Support in Map 48A-Retain Large Lot Residential Zone in relation to Lot 3 DP 379687 but reduce the extent of the Natural Open
part
Space Zone to match the extent of the Significant Natural Area.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.002
Zoning Map 49A
Support in Map 49A-Retain Large Lot Residential Zone in relation to Lot 3 DP 379687 but reduce the extent of the Natural Open
part
Space Zone to match the extent of the Significant Natural Area.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.003
Features Map 49B
Oppose
ANG & SL Clarke
951.004
Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Retain the Large Lot Residential Zone. Delete the Open Space notation relating to the secondary stormwater flow path
part
in relation to Lot 3 DP 379687.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.005
3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Exclude the Large Lot Residential Zone from Policy 3.3.1b (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans - housing density)
ANG & SL Clarke
951.006
3.3.2 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Add new objectives and policies to 3.3.2 for Large Lot Residential and Future Urban zoned areas where reticulated
infrastructure is not available as the current objectives and policies are more relevant to urban development with
reticulated services.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.007
3.7 Ruakura
Support in Amend 3.7a) to add the Large Lot Residential Zone to the Ruakura Structure Plan vision.
part
ANG & SL Clarke
951.008
3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Amend 3.7.2 to add objective and policies for the Large Lot Residential zone that enable subdivision and development.
part
ANG & SL Clarke
951.009
3.7.3.5 Staging Rules for
Oppose
General Residential Zone and
Medium Density Residential
Zone in the Ruakura
Structure Plan Area
ANG & SL Clarke
951.010
4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.4f by deleting reference to Large Lot Residential Zone; and add a new policy regarding Large Lot
part
Residential zone development being sympathetic to the existing character of the area.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.011
4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Delete the Waikato Riverbank and Gully Hazard Area from the front of 187A State Highway 26 (Lot 3 DP 379687)
Amend Rule 3.7.3.5 to enable the immediate release of residential zoned land in the Ruakura Structure Plan areas.
Retain Rule 4.4.6 c) regarding Building Setbacks from Waikato Expressway.
Page 286 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Amend Rule 4.4.6 e) to increase the side and rear building setbacks to 5m in the Large Lot Residential Zone.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.012
4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private - to exclude the Large Lot Residential Zone
ANG & SL Clarke
951.013
Table 23.3a
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.3a) v, ix, and xi regarding fee-simple subdivision in the Large Lot Residential Zone and containing
Electricity Transmission Corridors A or B or a Significant Natural Areas by deleting the Discretionary Activity status and
replacing with Controlled Activities.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.014
23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Zone and All Special
Character Zones
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.7.3 d), e) and f) for the Large Lot Residential Zone to increase the number of allotments able to use a
private way and increase minimum private way widths. Delete Rules 23.7.3 h) to l) for the Large Lot Residential Zone.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.015
23.5.2 Provision of Esplanade Oppose
Reserves and Strips
Amend Rule 23.5.2 a) regarding the Provision of Esplanade Reserves and Strips to be consistent with s230 of the RMA
1991.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.016
25.7.4 Rules – Activity Status Oppose
– Electricity Transmission
Corridors
Amend Rule 25.7.4 to clarify that a change in activity from rural to residential curtilage associated with but not
including a residential unit is not a non-complying activity under Rule 25.7.4c) in the Large Lot Residential Zone.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.017
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Amend the Plan to require a stormwater management plan preceding any development in the Ruakura Industrial Park
zone with opportunity for community input.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.018
11.6 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 11.6a) so that development does not occur on a non-notified basis without an approved stormwater
management plan for the entire area. A stormwater management plan should precede any development in the
Ruakura Industrial Park zone with opportunity for community input.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.019
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Amend the Plan to require a stormwater management plan preceding any development in the Ruakura Logistics zone
with opportunity for community input.
ANG & SL Clarke
951.020
10.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Amend Rule 10.5a) so that development does not occur on a non-notified basis without an approved stormwater
management plan for the entire area. A stormwater management plan should precede any development in the
Ruakura Industrial Park zone with opportunity for community input.
David Edward
Coromandel
952.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
David Edward
Coromandel
952.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
David Edward
952.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Oppose
Oppose
Page 287 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Coromandel
Sub Type Summary
Character Area
Area.
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
David Edward
Coromandel
952.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Hamilton
953.001
3.5.2.7 Schools
Support in Retain 3.5.2.7 (a) (Schools in Rototuna Structure Plan area) with amendment to reference future plans of the Roman
part
Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Hamilton (RCBDH).
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Hamilton
953.002
13.1 Purpose
Support in 13.1 d): Sub clause (v) should amended to read ‘Community Precinct’ to align with the text set out in the applicable
part
rules (13.3 – 13.10). As a consequence the text set out in the legend for Figure 7 – 1: Rototuna Town Centre Concept
Plan should be amended to read ‘Community Precinct’ also.
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Hamilton
953.003
13.2.1 Objective and Policies Support
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Hamilton
953.004
13.7 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 13.7 to include Places of Worship as a permitted activity. Amend the footnote for Rule 13.7 (a) to include
Table for Activities Proposed part
reference to 'Schools'.
Within an Area with an
Implemented
Comprehensive
Development Plan
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Hamilton
953.005
16.2.1 Objective and Policies Support
Retain Objective 16.2.1, supporting policies 16.2.1a and 16.2.1b and explanation under Community Facilities Zone.
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Hamilton
953.006
16.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend the Rule 16.3 - Activity Status Table in the Community Facilities Zone to allow schools (excluding Rototuna
Secondary School site) and new buildings, relocated buildings, alterations and additions interfacing a public place as
permitted activities. Delete Rule 16.6 a) i and ii as a consequence.
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
953.007
16.4.1 Site Coverage
Oppose
Amend Rule 16.4.1a) to exclude places of worship and schools from maximum site coverage rule.
Retain objective 13.2.1 for the town centre to become the focal point for the Rototuna Area.
Page 288 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Hamilton
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Hamilton
953.008
16.4.6 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Delete Rule 16.4.6 regarding Fences and Walls from the Community Facilities Zone.
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Hamilton
953.009
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support
Provide a definition for ‘community facilities’
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Hamilton
953.010
Figure 7-2 Comprehensive
Development Plan AreasRototuna Town Centre
Support in Amend Figure 7-2: Comprehensive Development Plan Areas – Rototuna Town Centre to include text on the land
part
labelled ‘I’ as future primary school and parish church site.
The Roman
Catholic Bishop of
the Diocese of
Hamilton
953.011
Planning Maps
Support in Amend planning maps to label Feature Maps as A and Zoning Maps as B.
part
IFan Wu
954.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
IFan Wu
954.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
IFan Wu
954.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
IFan Wu
954.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Hamilton Golf
Club Incorporated
955.001
Zoning Map 26A
Oppose
Amend Planning Map 26A by rezoning 62 and 64 St Andrews Terrace to Residential Intensification.
Airini Forbes
956.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Airini Forbes
956.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Airini Forbes
956.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Airini Forbes
956.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Retain definitions of ‘places of worship’ and ‘school’.
Page 289 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Celia Karen Hope
957.001
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Melanie Jane
Wiseman
958.001
Zoning Map 33A
Oppose
Map 33A- retain a residential zoning on Lot 2 DP 425316 and rezone Lot 2 DP 425316, 173 Rotokauri Road from
Residential to Residential reserve.
Melanie Jane
Wiseman
958.002
5 Special Character Zones
Oppose
Amend the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Character Area to increase the minimum area to 600m2 for all building
activity, amend the minimum number of storeys from two to one, make amendments to the design guide, and delete
the Lake Waiwhakareke Landscape Area so that the area is dealt with as General Residential.
Bupa Care
Services
959.001
17.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rule 17.3f) to clarify the status for new buildings and activities where there is no Concept Plan.
part
Amend the Plan to clarify the assessment criteria for resource consent applications for activities where there is no
concept plan.
Amend the Plan to clarify that the Major Facilities Zone provides for a full range of care and accommodation for the
elderly.
Telecom New
Zealand Limited
960.001
25.1.4.1 All Development
Support in Amend 25.1.4.1 a) General Standard for all development to ensure that it does not have the effect of requiring
part
network utilities provided for in the network utilities section to also meet all zone standards.
Telecom New
Zealand Limited
960.002
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Support in Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1a) to exempt earthworks for pile foundations and excavations for concrete pad
to Any Activity in This Plan
part
foundations for network utility poles/masts not exceeding 2m in depth from having to comply with these standards.
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Telecom New
Zealand Limited
960.003
25.5.3 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Amend 25.5.3 Rules - General Standards to exclude small utility buildings/cabinets not exceeding 10m2/3m high, and
part
other equipment.
Telecom New
Zealand Limited
960.004
25.7.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Oppose
Amend Objective 25.7.2.2 including addition of reference to design and balancing of objective with the benefit to the
community.
Delete Policies 25.7.2.2a ii, d and e. Delete Policy 25.7.2.2b or amend so it does not apply to telecommunications
networks.
Telecom New
Zealand Limited
960.005
25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose
Amend the activity status in Rules 25.7.3 u), w) and x) to Permitted Activities.
Delete Rule 25.7.3bb) relating to the installation of telecommunications facilities in Transport Corridor Zone adjoining
Page 290 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
an area having historic heritage values or visual amenity values.
Telecom New
Zealand Limited
960.006
25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width Oppose
of Antenna, Poles and Masts
Amend Rule 25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width of Antenna, Poles and Masts, at least in relation to antennas and any
antenna support arms/mounts, to 5m in all Industrial, Business 1-6, Major Facilities, Central City and Knowledge Zones.
Telecom New
Zealand Limited
960.007
25.7.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.7.6a) to include a specific set of assessment criteria within Volume 2 Appendix 1.2 that address the
need to minimise adverse effects, but also recognise their functional and operational constraints and the benefits to
the community. This should be a self-contained set of criteria for network utilities such that other criteria do not apply.
Central Hamilton
Gospel Trust
961.001
Zoning Map 38A
Oppose
Map 38A-rezone 164-166 Peachgrove Road from General Residential to Business 7.
Chorus New
Zealand Limited
962.001
25.1.4.1 All Development
Support in Amend rule 25.1.4.1 a) General Standards for All Development to ensure it does not have the effect of requiring
part
network utilities provided for in the network utilities section to also meet all zone standards.
Chorus New
Zealand Limited
962.002
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Support in Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1a) to exempt earthworks for pile foundations and excavations for concrete pad
to Any Activity in This Plan
part
foundations for network utility poles/masts not exceeding 2m in depth from having to comply with these standards.
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Chorus New
Zealand Limited
962.003
25.5.3 Rules – General
Standards
Support in Amend 25.5.3 Rules - General Standards to exclude small utility buildings/cabinets not exceeding 10m2/3m high, and
part
other equipment.
Chorus New
Zealand Limited
962.004
25.7.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support in Delete Policies 25.7.2.2a ii, d and e or such relief that remedy the concerns outlined.
part
Chorus New
Zealand Limited
962.005
25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Oppose
Chorus New
Zealand Limited
962.006
25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width Oppose
of Antenna, Poles and Masts
Amend Rule 25.7.5.2 Cross-section Width of Antenna, Poles and Masts, at least in relation to antennas and any
antenna support arms/mounts, to 5m in all Industrial, Business 1-6, Major Facilities, Central City and Knowledge Zones.
Chorus New
Zealand Limited
962.007
25.7.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Amend Rule 25.7.6a) to include a specific set of assessment criteria within Volume 2 Appendix 1.2 that address the
need to minimise adverse effects, but also recognise their functional and operational constraints and the benefits to
the community. This should be a self-contained set of criteria for network utilities such that other criteria do not apply.
Elizabeth de Jong
963.001
15-7 Criteria for the Form of Oppose
Transport Corridors
Opposes Appendix 15-7 Criteria for the Form of Transport Corridors regarding design speeds for transport corridors.
Lei Sarkovich
964.001
5.1 Purpose
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Amend the activity status in Rules 25.7.3 u), w) and x) to Permitted Activities.
Delete Rule 25.7.3bb) relating to the installation of telecommunications facilities in Transport Corridor Zone adjoining
an area having historic heritage values or visual amenity values.
Oppose
Support
Page 291 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Lei Sarkovich
964.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Lei Sarkovich
964.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Lei Sarkovich
964.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Boyd Sarkovich
965.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Boyd Sarkovich
965.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Boyd Sarkovich
965.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Boyd Sarkovich
965.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.001
4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2 d) iv to read 'Between the Waikato River and river Road and east of Memorial Drive'
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.002
7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.003
7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.004
Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.005
Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.006
Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.007
Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Bernard &
966.008
Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Page 292 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Shanette Fulton
Sub Type Summary
Overlay Plan
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.009
Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.010
Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.011
Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.012
7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.013
7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.014
7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.015
7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.016
7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.017
7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.018
7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.019
1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.020
Design Guides
Oppose
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.021
1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Delete 1.4.8 -Opoia Design Guidance and rezone residential intensification.
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.022
4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Supports Objective 4.2.5 and Policy 4.2.5a.
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.023
Appendix 5 Central City Zone Support in Amend Figures 5-1 to 5-7 and 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Support
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidelines.
Page 293 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.024
Appendix 5 Central City Zone Support in Amend Figures 5-1 to 5-7 and 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.025
Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.026
7.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.027
7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.028
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.029
4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.030
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.031
7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Bernard &
Shanette Fulton
966.032
7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Bunnings Ltd
968.001
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Amend Rule 6.3 to provide for "building improvement centres" as a Permitted Activity in the Business 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7
zones.
Amend Rule 6.3 so that new buildings and additions and alterations to existing buildings in all Business zones, Central
City zones and Industrial zones are Permitted Activities.
Bunnings Ltd
968.002
Zoning Map 26A
Support in Map 26A-Retain the Business 4 zoning for the Bunnings site at 446 Te Rapa Road.
part
Bunnings Ltd
968.003
7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rule 7.3 to provide for “building improvement centres” as a permitted activity in Precinct 1, 2 and 3 of the
Central City zone.
Amend Rule 7.3a) and b) so that new buildings, additions and alterations to existing buildings as a permitted activity.
Bunnings Ltd
968.004
Table 15-2a Number of
parking loading and cycle
spaces
Support
Retain the parking ratios for “building improvement centres” and “nurseries and garden centres" in Appendix 15, Table
15-2a Number of parking loading and cycle spaces.
Page 294 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Bunnings Ltd
968.005
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support
Retain the definition for "Building Improvement Centre"
Bunnings Ltd
968.006
9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 9.3 to provide for "building improvement centres" as a permitted activity in the Industrial zone.
Gavin Sarkovich
969.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Gavin Sarkovich
969.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Gavin Sarkovich
969.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Gavin Sarkovich
969.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Patsy Karene
970.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Patsy Karene
970.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Patsy Karene
970.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Patsy Karene
970.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Wero Karena
971.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Wero Karena
971.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Wero Karena
971.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Wero Karena
971.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Iris & Fred Bryant
972.001
Zoning Map 33A
Oppose
Map 33A and Rotokauri Structure Plan-confirm the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke.
Iris & Fred Bryant
972.002
Figure 2-8 Rotokauri
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Seeks confirmation of the Future Reserves surrounding Lake Waiwhakareke in its entirety as shown on the Rotokauri
Structure Plan and on Zoning Map 33A
Page 295 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Holly Lin
973.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Holly Lin
973.002
5.1.4.1 Temple View Heritage Support
Area
Support the Temple View Heritage Area set out in 5.1.4.1.
Holly Lin
973.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Holly Lin
973.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
College Old Boys
Rugby League
Club
974.001
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Oppose
Oppose map Figure 4-5 and all supporting clauses. Oppose Mixed Use CDP and the Community Facilities CDP as set out
in 5.1.4.2. c), h) and i). Increase the heritage ranking of all heritage items within the Temple View Area and require the
LDS Church to retain and re-purpose the listed heritage buildings. Undertake a long-term CDP for all of its
landholdings in and around Temple View.
College Old Boys
Rugby League
Club
974.002
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose the inclusion of the map Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts along
with the activities being proposed within each of the Areas/Precincts;
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Seeks the creation of a 'Smoke Free, Alcohol Free, and No Sunday Trade/Play Precinct' over the entire Church College
Campus and Temple grounds;
Seeks the zoning of the current sports ground, grandstand and hilled area be recreational.
College Old Boys
Rugby League
Club
974.003
5.2.7 Objective and Policies
Temple View Zone
Support in Proposes to prohibit the sale on the former CCNZ campus area of liquor, alcohol, coffee, tea, tobacco related products,
part
prohibit the use of tobacco and alcohol, and prohibit all Sunday play, which are not in keeping with the current special
character of the former CCNZ campus area.
Karen Hoki Parker
975.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Karen Hoki Parker
975.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Karen Hoki Parker
975.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Karen Hoki Parker
975.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Kiwi Property
976.001
2.1 Purpose
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Support in Support in Part. Part 2 fails to acknowledge the history and current problems faced by the CBD or to express a
Page 296 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Management Ltd
Sub Type Summary
part
rationale for the proposed controls. In absence of this explanation, the objectives, polices and other provisions in this
part of the Proposed Plan will not be effective. Suggested amendments to Part 2 are provided in Annexure 2 of their
submission.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.001
Zoning Map 29A
Oppose
Map 29A-rezone Lot 1 DP 444645 – 4 Gordonton Road to Business 5 - Suburban Centre Core Zone and Lot 3 DP 444645
– 370 Tramway Road be rezoned to Business 6 -Suburban Centre Fringe Zone.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.002
Features Map 29B
Oppose
Remove the Culvert Block Flood Hazard Area on Lot 3 DP 444645 that is located outside of the Waikato River and Gully
Hazard Area.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.003
1.1.7 Explanation of Activity
Classes
Support in Support in Part. Retain Table 1.1.7 - Non complying activity "How Identified" description.
part
Amend Table 1.1.7 - Discretionary Activity "How Identified" description to also provide for the event where 'an activity
is listed in the Plan but not in the Activity status for a particular zone', as provided for in the submission.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.004
1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed
Support in Support in Part. Retain rule 1.1.8.1 without modification.
part
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.005
4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Oppose
Medium-Density Residential
Zone
Delete Rule 4.5.3 z) Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) from the Activity Status Table as there is
no justification for such a provision and is contrary to the Proposed District Plan.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.006
4.8.1 Integrated Retail
Development (Ruakura CDP
Area A only)
Oppose
Delete 4.8.1 Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) in its entirety as there is no justification in
terms of objectives and policies in either the Residential Zone or centres hierarchy for the establishment of such a
retail development.
Noting also - this submission MUST not be used as the basis for inserting objectives or policies into the District Plan
which provide for the establishment of an integrated retail activity within the Medium Density Residential Zone.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.007
6.2.2 Objective and Policies
Suburban Centres
Support
Retain Objective 6.2.2 and Policies 6.2.2a to 6.2.2e for Suburban Centres
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.008
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted across all zones subject to compliance with
standards.
Amend Rule 6.3 to provide for apartments at ground floor on Lot 3 DP 444645 as restricted discretionary activities.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.009
6.4.6 Maximum Tenancy Size Support in Amend Rule 6.4.6a)xii for maximum retail tenancy size for the following lots;
part
Ruakura - Lot 1 DP 444645 = 600m2
Ruakura - Lot 3 DP 444645 = 1500m2
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.010
6.4.9 Residential
Development
Support in Amend Rule 6.4.9b) be exclude Lot 3 DP 444645.
part
Parkwood
977.011
6.6 Restricted Discretionary
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.6a) and Delete Rule 6.6a) i so that in considering the assessment criteria the decision and/or conditions
Page 297 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Gateway Limited
Sub Type Summary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
will only relate to those matters that are directly applicable to the reasons for why a proposal is assigned a restricted
discretionary activity status and that any matter that is not directly applicable or which imposes obligations over and
above that set out in the relevant standards / rules in this District Plan are not be applied.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.012
25.1.4.1 All Development
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.013
25.1.4.2 Site-specific
Oppose
Constraints on Development
Delete 25.1.4.2 General Standards for Site-Specific Constraints on Development.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.014
25.1.4.3 Earthworks and
Vegetation Removal
Oppose
Delete 25.1.4.3 General Standards Earthworks and Vegetation Removal.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.015
25.1.4.4 Three Waters
Oppose
Delete 25.1.4.4 General Standards Three Waters.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.016
25.1.4.5 Transportation
Oppose
Delete rule 25.1.4.5 General Standards Transportation.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.017
25.1.4.6 Landscaping and
Screening
Oppose
Delete rule 25.1.4.6 General Standards Landscaping and Screening.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.018
25.1.4.7 Financial
Contributions
Oppose
Delete rule 25.1.4.7 General Standards Financial Contributions.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.019
25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support
Table
Seeks the retention of Rule 25.2.3 a) regarding earthworks as a Permitted Activity.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.020
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1 a) i to increase the permitted earthworks volumes and linking cut heights and fill
depth; and deletion of Rules 25.2.5.1 a) ii, iii and iv.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.021
25.2.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.6 a)(i) and (iii) so that the discretion for non-compliance with Rule 25.2.4.1 or 25.2.5.1
is is restricted only to matters in Appendix 1.2, T1 – Earthworks.
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.022
Oppose
Delete rule 25.1.4.1 General Standard for All Development.
Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.6 a)(ii) so that the discretion for non-compliance with Rule 25.2.4.2 is restricted only
to matters in Appendix 1.2, M5 – Electricity Transmission.
Amend section 1.2 by including an introductory statement to the effect that only those matters directly applicable will
be considered.
Page 298 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.023
A General Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 1.2 A1 to read:"The actual and potential effects on the environment resulting from an activity not
complying with any relevant standard(s) in this district plan. Note: this excludes any activity which is a Restricted
Discretionary Activity solely by appearing in an activity list in the relevant zone; delete rule 1.2 A2, 1.2 A3,and 1.2 A4.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.024
Design Guides
Oppose
Amend Rule 1.2 B1 to narrow the scope of design guide criteria to the area of non-compliance.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.025
Structure Plans and Concept Oppose
Plans
Delete rule 1.2 B5.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.026
C General
Oppose
Various amendments and deletions to Site Development, Design and Layout assessment criteria within C to focus the
scope of assessment to areas of non compliance.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.027
Service and Storage Areas
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.2 C13 and C17 regarding service and storage areas so they apply only when the proposal does not
comply with a standard or term.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.028
Site Coverage and
Impermeable Surfaces
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.2 C18 regarding impervious surfaces so it applies only when the proposal does not comply with a
standard or term and amend C20 to consider effects based on whether or not they can be avoided, remedied or
mitigated.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.029
Height
Oppose
Amend criteria C21 to only assess extent of height non-compliance against the maximum height limit in the zone.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.030
Figure 2-15 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Transport
Network
Oppose
Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2-15 amend to delete the Major Arterial Transport Corridor and Arterial Corridor
Protection Area from land located outside of the Structure Plan Area.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.031
Figure 2-16 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Water
Infrastructure
Oppose
Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2.16 amend to delete Stage 1 interim water connection point A from land located
outside of the Structure Plan Area, or alternatively that it be made clear that this notation does not relate to either
Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.032
Figure 2-17 Ruakura
Oppose
Structure Plan-Waste Water
Infrastructure
Ruakura Structure Plan - Fig 2-17 delete the Stage 1 interim wastewater connection points A & B from land located
outside the Structure Plan Area, or make it clear these do not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645.
Parkwood
Gateway Limited
977.033
Figure 2-18 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Storm Water
Infrastructure
Oppose
Figure 2.18 be amended to delete Stage 1 interim stormwater connection point A from land located outside of the
Structure Plan Area, or it be made clear this does not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645.
Kiwi Property
Management Ltd
978.001
1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Add a definition for "Merchandising Area"
part
Kiwi Property
Management Ltd
978.002
7.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Chapter 7 to identify the adverse effects that have been experienced by the CBD core and that explain the
part
causes of those changes and the need to address those causes.
Page 299 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Amend Rule 7.3 to distinguish between the nature and extent of activities (including in particular retail activities) that
are to be enabled in the various precincts and explain the reasons for those distinctions.
Add a definition of “Merchandising Area”
Deanna - Rose
Alexander
979.001
3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary;
or purchase property.
Deanna - Rose
Alexander
979.002
4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary;
or purchase property.
Deanna - Rose
Alexander
979.003
10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary;
or purchase property.
Deanna - Rose
Alexander
979.004
11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary;
or purchase property.
Deanna - Rose
Alexander
979.005
25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary;
or purchase property.
Deanna - Rose
Alexander
979.006
Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to ensure no logistics or industrial activities are permitted within 100m of the large lot zone boundary;
or purchase property.
Deanna - Rose
Alexander
979.007
Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Provide a buffer zone between Large Lot Residential Zone and Logistics Zone for the area bound by Ryburn
and Percival Roads.
Jay R Illsley
980.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Tyrone Jade
Kareitiana
982.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Soleil McDonald
983.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 300 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Portland Park
Limited
984.001
Zoning Map 29A
Oppose
Map 29A- rezone Lot 1 DP 444645 – 4 Gordonton Road to Business 5 - Suburban Centre Core Zone and Lot 3 DP
444645 – 370 Tramway Road to Business 6 - Suburban Centre Fringe Zone.
Portland Park
Limited
984.002
Features Map 29B
Oppose
Remove the Culvert Block Flood Hazard Area on Lot 3 DP 444645 (370 Tramway Road) that is located outside of the
Waikato River and Gully Hazard Area.
Portland Park
Limited
984.003
1.1.7 Explanation of Activity
Classes
Support in Support in part. Retain Table 1.1.7 - Non complying activity "How Identified" description.
part
Amend Table 1.1.7 - Discretionary Activity "How Identified" description to also provide for the event where 'an activity
is listed in the Plan but not in the Activity status for a particular zone', as provided for in the submission.
Portland Park
Limited
984.004
1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed
Support in Support in Part. Retain rule 1.1.8.1 without modification.
part
Portland Park
Limited
984.005
4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Oppose
Medium-Density Residential
Zone
Delete Rule 4.5.3 z) Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) from the Activity Status Table as there is
no justification for such a provision and is contrary to the Proposed District Plan.
Portland Park
Limited
984.006
4.8.1 Integrated Retail
Development (Ruakura CDP
Area A only)
Oppose
Delete 4.8.1 Integrated Retail Development (Ruakura CDP Area A only) in its entirety as there is no justification in
terms of objectives and policies in either the Residential Zone or centres hierarchy for the establishment of such a
retail development.
Noting also - this submission MUST not be used as the basis for inserting objectives or policies into the District Plan
which provide for the establishment of an integrated retail activity within the Medium Density Residential Zone.
Portland Park
Limited
984.007
6.2.2 Objective and Policies
Suburban Centres
Support
Retain Objective 6.2.2 and Policies 6.2.2a to 6.2.2e under Suburban Centres
Portland Park
Limited
984.008
6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted across all zones subject to compliance with
standards.
Amend Rule 6.3 to provide for apartments at ground floor on Lot 3 DP 444645 as restricted discretionary activities.
Portland Park
Limited
984.009
6.4.6 Maximum Tenancy Size Support in Amend Rule 6.4.6a)xii for maximum retail tenancy size for the following lots;
part
Ruakura - Lot 1 DP 444645 = 600m2
Ruakura - Lot 3 DP 444645 = 1500m2
Portland Park
Limited
984.010
6.4.9 Residential
Development
Support in Amend Rule 6.4.9b) be exclude Lot 3 DP 444645.
part
Portland Park
Limited
984.011
6.6 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.6a) and Delete Rule 6.6a) i so that in considering the assessment criteria the decision and/or conditions
will only relate to those matters that are directly applicable to the reasons for why a proposal is assigned a restricted
discretionary activity status and that any matter that is not directly applicable or which imposes obligations over and
above that set out in the relevant standards / rules in this District Plan are not be applied.
Page 301 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Portland Park
Limited
984.012
25.1.4.1 All Development
Oppose
Delete 25.1.4.1 General Standards for All Development.
Portland Park
Limited
984.013
25.1.4.2 Site-specific
Oppose
Constraints on Development
Delete 25.1.4.2 General Standards for Site-Specific Constraints on Development.
Portland Park
Limited
984.014
25.1.4.4 Three Waters
Oppose
Delete 25.1.4.4 General Standards Three Waters.
Portland Park
Limited
984.015
25.1.4.5 Transportation
Oppose
Delete rule 25.1.4.5 General Standards Transportation.
Portland Park
Limited
984.016
25.1.4.7 Financial
Contributions
Oppose
Delete rule 25.1.4.7 General Standards Financial Contributions.
Portland Park
Limited
984.017
25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support
Table
Seeks the retention of Rule 25.2.3 a) regarding earthworks as a Permitted Activity.
Portland Park
Limited
984.018
25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1 a) i to increase the permitted earthworks volumes and linking cut heights and fill
depth; and deletion of Rules 25.2.5.1 a) ii, iii and iv.
Portland Park
Limited
984.019
25.2.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.6 a)(i) and (iii) so that the discretion for non-compliance with Rule 25.2.4.1 or 25.2.5.1
is restricted only to matters in Appendix 1.2, T1 – Earthworks.
Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.6 a)(ii) so that the discretion for non-compliance with Rule 25.2.4.2 is is restricted only
to matters in Appendix 1.2, M5 – Electricity Transmission.
Portland Park
Limited
984.020
1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Amend section 1.2 by including an introductory statement to the effect that only those matters directly applicable will
be considered.
Portland Park
Limited
984.021
A General Criteria
Oppose
Amend 1.2 A1 to read:"The actual and potential effects on the environment resulting from an activity not complying
with any relevant standard(s) in this district plan. Note: this excludes any activity which is a Restricted Discretionary
Activity solely by appearing in an activity list in the relevant zone"; delete rules
1.2 A2, 1.2 A3,1.2 A4.
Portland Park
Limited
984.022
Design Guides
Oppose
Amend Rule 1.2 B1 to narrow the scope of design guide criteria to the area of non-compliance.
Page 302 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Portland Park
Limited
984.023
Structure Plans and Concept Oppose
Plans
Delete 1.2 B5 (Restricted Discretionary Activities - Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria).
Portland Park
Limited
984.024
C General
Oppose
Various amendments and deletions to Site Development, Design and Layout assessment criteria C to focus the scope
of assessment to areas of non compliance.
Portland Park
Limited
984.025
Service and Storage Areas
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.2 C13 and C17 regarding service and storage areas so they apply only when the proposal does not
comply with a standard or term.
Portland Park
Limited
984.026
Site Coverage and
Impermeable Surfaces
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.2 C18 regarding impervious surfaces so it applies only when the proposal does not comply with a
standard or term and amend C20 to consider effects based on whether or not they can be avoided, remedied or
mitigated.
Portland Park
Limited
984.027
Height
Oppose
Amend Rule 1.2 C21 to narrow scope of assessment.
Portland Park
Limited
984.028
Figure 2-15 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Transport
Network
Oppose
Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2.15 amend to delete the Major Arterial Transport Corridor and Arterial Corridor
Protection Area from land located outside of the Structure Plan Area.
Portland Park
Limited
984.029
Figure 2-16 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Water
Infrastructure
Oppose
Ruakura Structure Plan - Figure 2.16 amend to delete Stage 1 interim water connection point A from land located
outside of the Structure Plan Area, or alternatively that it be made clear that this notation does not relate to either
Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645.
Portland Park
Limited
984.030
Figure 2-17 Ruakura
Oppose
Structure Plan-Waste Water
Infrastructure
Ruakura Structure Plan - Fig 2-17 delete the Stage 1 interim wastewater connection points A & B from land located
outside the Structure Plan Area, or make it clear these do not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645.
Portland Park
Limited
984.031
Figure 2-18 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Storm Water
Infrastructure
Figure 2.18 be amended to delete Stage 1 interim stormwater connection point A from land located outside of the
Structure Plan Area, or it be made clear this does not relate to either Lots 1 or 3 DP 444645.
Desmond Hetiri
Te Tuhi
985.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Tahuata Nelson
Minhinnick
986.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Ron Phillips
987.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Oppose
Oppose
Page 303 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Toni Swney
988.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Bethenee Witt
989.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Te Reremoana
Nelson
990.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Carol Turahui
991.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Pierce Isaac Te
Ngakau Te Moni
992.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Duane Sykes
(C.O.B. Rugby
League)
993.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Eleni Tuitama
(C.O.B. Rugby
League)
994.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Darren Siteine
995.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 304 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Precincts
Stephanie Phillips
996.001
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Oppose Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Patrick Taitoko
997.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Patrick Taitoko
997.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Patrick Taitoko
997.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Patrick Taitoko
997.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Lavinia Maria
Taitoko
998.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Lavinia Maria
Taitoko
998.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Lavinia Maria
Taitoko
998.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Lavinia Maria
Taitoko
998.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Lynette Ramari
Kauluwehi
999.001
5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Lynette Ramari
Kauluwehi
999.002
5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Lynette Ramari
Kauluwehi
999.003
5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Lynette Ramari
Kauluwehi
999.004
Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 305 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Precincts
Erina Dee & Tony
Osborne
1000.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Erina Dee & Tony
Osborne
1000.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Erina Dee & Tony
Osborne
1000.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Erina Dee & Tony
Osborne
1000.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Daniel Parker
1001.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Daniel Parker
1001.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Daniel Parker
1001.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Daniel Parker
1001.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
490 Grey Ltd as
Trustee of the
BDL Commercial
Investment Trust
and Homes for
the Living Ltd
1002.001 6 Business 1 to 7 Zones
Amend 7.1 a) by referring to Hamilton East north of Clyde Street (reflecting submitters request to change shown on
planning maps 45A and 46A.
Amend Rule 7.3 to remove all floor area limitations for offices within the Central City Zone precincts.
Amend Rule 7.6 to specify the matters over which discretion is restricted and distinguish those from assessment
criteria.
Oppose
Or
Amend 6.1 d) to replace the description of a hierarchy of centres with a statement that the city contains a range of
business centres comprising one or more business zones, and insert reference to a new Hamilton East Business Zone.
Amend 6.1 j) to replace the words “again don’t undermine” with “support”
Amend Objective 6.2.2 to replace the words “not undermining the primacy, vitality or viability of the Central City” with
“providing enhanced urban design outcomes”
Amend Policy 6.2.2d by deleting the reference to control of size and scale.
Page 306 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Amend Policy 6.2.2f by deleting the reference to including the Central City.
Amend planning maps 45A and 46A by rezoning the Business 1 and Business 5 within the area east of the Waikato
River to one block east of Grey Street and south of Dawson Street to Wellington Street to a new “Hamilton East
Business Zone”.
Amend Rule 6.3 to include a Hamilton East Business Zone containing the same provisions as those for the Suburban
Centre Core Zone but with all floor area limitations for offices removed, retail tenancies up to 500 m2 as a permitted
activity and retail tenancies in excess of 500 m2 as a restricted discretionary activity
Amend Rule 6.6 to specify the matters over which discretion is restricted and distinguish those from assessment
criteria.
Delete matters and assessment criteria (C2–C23, D3-D5, E1-E3, F2-F6, G1, N1-N5, S1, V1-V18) from Rule 7.6.a) iv, 6.6.a)
v. and vi:
Delete Discretionary Activity Assessment Criteria1.3.2.4 regarding Retail, Commercial and Office Activities in the
Central City and Business 1 to 7 zones.
Delete Information Requirement 1.5.20 regarding Centre Viability Assessment Report.
490 Grey Ltd as
Trustee of the
BDL Commercial
Investment Trust
and Homes for
the Living Ltd
1002.002 7 Central City Zone
Oppose
Amend 7.1 a) by referring to Hamilton East north of Clyde Street (reflecting submitters request to change shown on
planning maps 45A and 46A.
Amend Rule 7.3 to remove all floor area limitations for offices within the Central City Zone precincts.
Amend Rule 7.6 to specify the matters over which discretion is restricted and distinguish those from assessment
criteria.
Or
Amend 6.1 d) to replace the description of a hierarchy of centres with a statement that the city contains a range of
business centres comprising one or more business zones, and insert reference to a new Hamilton East Business Zone.
Amend 6.1 j) to replace the words “again don’t undermine” with “support”
Amend Objective 6.2.2 to replace the words “not undermining the primacy, vitality or viability of the Central City” with
“providing enhanced urban design outcomes”
Amend Policy 6.2.2d by deleting the reference to control of size and scale.
Amend Policy 6.2.2f by deleting the reference to including the Central City.
Amend planning maps 45A and 46A by rezoning the Business 1 and Business 5 within the area east of the Waikato
River to one block east of Grey Street and south of Dawson Street to Wellington Street to a new “Hamilton East
Business Zone”.
Amend Rule 6.3 to include a Hamilton East Business Zone containing the same provisions as those for the Suburban
Centre Core Zone but with all floor area limitations for offices removed, retail tenancies up to 500 m2 as a permitted
activity and retail tenancies in excess of 500 m2 as a restricted discretionary activity
Amend Rule 6.6 to specify the matters over which discretion is restricted and distinguish those from assessment
Page 307 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
criteria.
Delete matters and assessment criteria (C2–C23, D3-D5, E1-E3, F2-F6, G1, N1-N5, S1, V1-V18) from Rule 7.6.a) iv, 6.6.a)
v. and vi:
Delete Discretionary Activity Assessment Criteria1.3.2.4 regarding Retail, Commercial and Office Activities in the
Central City and Business 1 to 7 zones.
Delete Information Requirement 1.5.20 regarding Centre Viability Assessment Report.
490 Grey Ltd as
Trustee of the
BDL Commercial
Investment Trust
and Homes for
the Living Ltd
1002.003 1.3.2.4 Retail, Commercial
Oppose
and Office Activities – Central
City and Business 1 to 7
Zones
Delete 1.3.2.4 the Discretionary Assessment Criteria for Retail, Commercial and Office Activities.
490 Grey Ltd as
Trustee of the
BDL Commercial
Investment Trust
and Homes for
the Living Ltd
1002.004 1.5.20 Centre Viability
Assessment Report
Delete 1.5.20 Centre Viability Assessment Report
490 Grey Ltd as
Trustee of the
BDL Commercial
Investment Trust
and Homes for
the Living Ltd
1002.005 Appendix 5 Central City Zone Oppose
Amend Figures in Appendix 5 so that the area east of the Waikato River, west of Peachgrove Road and north of Clyde
Street is within the City Living Precinct.
490 Grey Ltd as
Trustee of the
BDL Commercial
Investment Trust
and Homes for
the Living Ltd
1002.006 Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Maps 45A & 46A- Rezone Business 1 and Business 5 within the area east of the Waikato River, west of Peachgrove
Road and north of Clyde Street to Central City Precinct 2.
490 Grey Ltd as
Trustee of the
BDL Commercial
Investment Trust
1002.007 Zoning Map 46A
Oppose
Maps 45A & 46A-rezone Business 1 and Business 5 within the area east of the Waikato River, west of Peachgrove Road
and north of Clyde Street to Central City Precinct 2.
Oppose
Page 308 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
and Homes for
the Living Ltd
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.001 3.2 Principles
Support in Amend 3.2 regarding Structure Plan Principles to insert a new principle regarding the design of development to
part
maximise child safety.
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.002 3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 3.3.1c Structure Plans with amendments to include the maximisation of Child Safety and amend the
part
associated explanation to highlight that density targets will not compromise safety requirements.
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.003 4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.3a v. to add the words "whilst minimising the risk to children through slow speed run overs" to the
part
end of the sentence.
Amend 4.2.3a by inserting a new iv. as follows:
"The design layout should consider all aspects of child safety including that garden play areas are physically separated
from areas of vehicular access".
Amend the Explanation as set out in the submission to make reference to safe outdoor living space (particularly for
children).
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.004 3.3.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 3.3.4g as set out in the submission, to ensure that arterial routes do not sever safe access between
part
residential and recreational spaces.
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.005 4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policies 4.2.4b to 4.2.4d and the associated explanation to emphasise safety for the householders in all aspects
part
of design.
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.006 3.3.5 Objective and Policies
Support in 3.3.5 Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans:
part
Amend Policy 3.3.5a by adding a second sentence: "Any increased risk to safety that may result from these adjacent
activities should be considered and mitigated against".
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.007 4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.008 3.4 Peacocke
Support in Amend 3.4 c) Concentration, to add at the end of the sentence: "that considers all aspects of child safety".
part
Amend 3.4 by adding an additional key principle as follows:
Safety: The layout of any future residential development considers the physical safety of children. This design will
include vehicular access in relation to the dwelling and any adjacent garden area to minimise the risk of injury/fatality,
Amend Rule 4.4.7b) to provide for a 6m minimum distance from the transport corridor to the front of the garage or
carport (to accommodate one vehicle).
Page 309 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
such as through slow driveway run over.
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.009 23.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Subdivision Objectives and Policies 23.2.1 with amendments to address child safety.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.010 3.4 Vision
Support in Amend 3.4 to include reference to "safe" urban environment.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.011 3.4.1 Structure Plan
Components
Support in Amend Figure 3.4a, #6 to define a separation between vehicle and pedestrian space.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.012 3.4.2.1 Community and
Recreation Facilities
Support in Amend 3.4.2.1b), d), and j) to ensure consideration of the need for pedestrian safety.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.013 3.4.2.2 Neighbourhoods
Support in Amend 3.4.2.2 b) to ensure the safety of children.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.014 3.4.3 Transport Network
Support in Amend 3.4.3 e) to ensure arterial routes do not sever safe access to public recreational space.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.015 3.4.3 Transport Network
Support in Amend 3.4.3 e) to ensure arterial routes do not sever safe access to public recreational space.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.016 3.4.4 Interim Subdivision
Support in Amend 3.4.4c) to include reference to subdivision layout having consideration to maximise child safety.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.017 Peacocke Social Wellbeing
Support in Amend the introduction to 3.4.6.11 Peacocke Social Wellbeing to insert text to ensure safety, with specific reference to
part
children is identified within the residential areas.
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.018 3.5 Rototuna
Support in Section 3.5 (Rototuna) part
Amend 3.5 b) and 3.5 c) as per submission to explicitly incorporate the aspect of safety into the plan.
Waikato Child and
1003.019 3.5 Rototuna
Support in 3.5 - Rototuna
Page 310 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Youth Mortality
Review Group
Sub Type Summary
part
Amend 3.5 b) and 3.5 c) to explicitly incorporate the aspect of safety into the plan, as set out in submission.
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.020 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies Support in 3.5.1 Objectives and Policies part
Add a new policy to 3.5.1.4 (Objectives and Policies - Structure Plans) as follows:
'3.5.1.4d Provide layout that minimises risk to children (such as slow speed run overs).'
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.021 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies Support in 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies (Rotokauri Structure Plan) part
Add a new sentence to the end of first paragraph under 3.6.1: "Subdivision for residential purposes should give full
consideration to safety such as minimising risk of driveway run over".
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.022 3.6.2.2 Residential
Support in 3.6.2.2 Residential - Rotokauri.
part
Amend 3.6.2.2a) to read:
"residential development is indicated in four distinct residential environments where the layout will maximise safety to
all householders while engendering a sense of community"
Amend 3.6.2.2.a)i. by inserting the words 'and safe'
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.023 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Support in Amend Policy 3.7.2.6.c to ensure the aspects of safety is explicitly incorporated.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.024 4.1 Purpose
Support in Ensure that urban intensification does not jeopardise personal safety.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.025 4.1.1 General Residential
Zone
Support in Amend 4.1.1 General Residential Zone to incorporate safety as a key Principle.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.026 4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend 4.1.2 Residential Intensification Zone to include safety as a key principle
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.027 4.1.5 All Residential Zones
Support in Amend 4.1.5 All Residential Zones to include explicit reference to 'safety'.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.028 4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.1a by adding new policy point 'iii) safety requirements';
part
Incorporate text, as set out in the submission to highlight that density targets should only be sought if there is no
increased risk to householders.
Page 311 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.029 4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend 4.2.5 so child safety is recognised in the explanation.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.030 4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.6 b) Building Setback from transport corridor boundary - arterial transport corridors from 8m to 6m to
improve the safety of children.
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.031 5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.4.6 Building Setback to reflect a minimum distance from transport corridor to front of garage or carport
be 6m.
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.032 13.2.6 Objective and Policies Support in Seeks amendments 13.2.6 Rototuna Town Centre Objectives and Policies to ensure safety, especially of children is
part
emphasised.
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.033 23.7.4 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 23.7.4 c) to f) to address design concerns regarding child safety from driveway accidents.
part
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.034 1.4.3.3 Building Orientation
and Siting
Oppose
Amend 1.4.3.3e) assessment criteria for Building Orientation and Siting to bring garage/carports further to the front of
the property (6m from the road).
Waikato Child and
Youth Mortality
Review Group
1003.035 1.4.3.4 Access, Garages and
Parking
Oppose
Amend 1.4.3.4a) Access, Garages and Parking to bring garage/carports further to the front of the property (6m from
the road); Amend 1.4.3.4c) to improve site and building design.
Bee Chiew Phee
1004.001 4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to
2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties
from Percival/Ryburn Roads.
Bee Chiew Phee
1004.002 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to
2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties
from Percival/Ryburn Roads.
Bee Chiew Phee
1004.003 11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to
2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties
from Percival/Ryburn Roads.
Bee Chiew Phee
1004.004 25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to
2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties
from Percival/Ryburn Roads.
Page 312 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Bee Chiew Phee
1004.005 Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to
2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties
from Percival/Ryburn Roads.
Bee Chiew Phee
1004.006 Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential
zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by permanent buffer zones.
Bee Chiew Phee
1004.007 3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Purchase the residents property or amend the Plan to: a) retain rural residential zoning and allow subdivision to
2500m2. b) Provide a 100m buffer and planted earth bund. c) Ensure no heavy vehicles access to industrial properties
from Percival/Ryburn Roads.
Alan Frederick &
Barbara Winifred
Julian
1005.001 3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property.
Alan Frederick &
Barbara Winifred
Julian
1005.002 4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property.
Alan Frederick &
Barbara Winifred
Julian
1005.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property.
Alan Frederick &
Barbara Winifred
Julian
1005.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property.
Alan Frederick &
Barbara Winifred
Julian
1005.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property.
Alan Frederick &
Barbara Winifred
Julian
1005.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Require screening and buffering for Ryburn Road; or purchase the property.
Alan Frederick &
Barbara Winifred
Julian
1005.007 Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential
zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by permanent buffer zones.
Alan Frederick &
Barbara Winifred
Julian
1005.008 25.6 Lighting and Glare
Oppose
Put in place mitigation measures to screen residential areas in proximity to the Ruakura Logistics Zone from effects of
lighting
Page 313 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Peter & Barbara
Ryan
1006.001 3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that
approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area.
Peter & Barbara
Ryan
1006.002 4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that
approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area.
Peter & Barbara
Ryan
1006.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that
approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area.
Peter & Barbara
Ryan
1006.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that
approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area.
Peter & Barbara
Ryan
1006.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that
approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area.
Peter & Barbara
Ryan
1006.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Prevent logistics or industrial activities within 100m of the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require a 100m
buffer and planted earth bund. d) Control the use of surrounding land so that nuisance effects are limited to levels that
approximate a semi-rural lifestyle area.
Peter & Barbara
Ryan
1006.007 Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential
zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by permanent buffer zones.
Bo & Meggie Han
& Wang
1007.001 3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls
to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road.
Bo & Meggie Han
& Wang
1007.002 4 Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls
to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road.
Bo & Meggie Han
1007.003 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
Page 314 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
& Wang
the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls
to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road.
Bo & Meggie Han
& Wang
1007.004 11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls
to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road.
Bo & Meggie Han
& Wang
1007.005 25.8 Noise and Vibration
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls
to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road.
Bo & Meggie Han
& Wang
1007.006 Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
Amend the Plan to: a) Retain the rural residential zoning and development rights without reference to any logistics in
the future. b) Require a 100m landscaped earth bund buffer around the Large Lot Residential Zone. c) Require controls
to mitigate light, noise and vibration effects on Ryburn Road.
Bo & Meggie Han
& Wang
1007.007 Zoning Map 40A
Oppose
Map 40A-Large lot residential zone bounded by Percival and Ryburn Roads to be equivalent to the rural residential
zoning under the Waikato District Plan and be protected by permanent buffer zones.
Environmental
Research
Institute,
University of
Waikato
1008.001 21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Reinstate the Environmental Protection Overlay from the Operative District Plan or include similar provisions.
part
Environmental
Research
Institute,
University of
Waikato
1008.002 21.2 Objectives and Policies
Waikato River Corridor and
Gully Systems
Environmental
Research
Institute,
University of
Waikato
1008.003 Significant Natural Areas
Support in Amend Objective 20.2.1 to prohibit the disturbance or loss of Significant Natural Areas. Retain Policy 20.2.1m
20.2.1 Objective and Policies part
regarding the eradication of non-native pest species. Amend Policy 20.2.1o to clarify the 10% threshold for habitat
stability.
Environmental
Research
Institute,
University of
Waikato
1008.004 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies Support in Amend Objective 3.6.1.1 (Rotokauri Structure Plan) to include the protection and enhancement of the ecological
part
functioning of key natural areas.
Support in Add a new plan provision that enables significant habitat or fauna outside of the Significant Natural Areas to be
part
recognised and considered.
Page 315 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Environmental
Research
Institute,
University of
Waikato
1008.005 3.3 Objectives and Policies
Structure Plans
Support in 3.3 Objectives and Policies Rotokauri Structure Plan part
Add new Policy 3.6.1.1c
'Subdivision and development provide for the protection and enhancement of ecological connections to, and
ecological functioning of, Lake Waiwhakareke'.
Environmental
Research
Institute,
University of
Waikato
1008.006 Natural Open Space Zone
Support
Environmental
Research
Institute,
University of
Waikato
1008.007 5.2 Objectives and Policies
Special Character Zones
Support in Amend Policy 5.2.5a i) and add a new policy 5.3.1f) protecting and enhancing Lake Waiwhakareke.
part
Environmental
Research
Institute,
University of
Waikato
1008.008 5.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rules 5.3 and 5.4 as they relate to Lake Waiwhakareke OR rezone ecological stream connection into Lake
Waiwhakareke (and an appropriate buffer width) to Natural Open Space Zone, OR identify the ecological stream
connection into Lake Waiwhakareke as an esplanade reserve priority in section X of the plan.
Environmental
Research
Institute,
University of
Waikato
1008.009 5.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Amend rules 5.3 and 5.4 as they relate to Lake Waiwhakareke OR rezone ecological stream connection into Lake
Waiwhakareke (and an appropriate buffer width) to Natural Open Space Zone OR identify the ecological stream
connection into Lake Waiwhakareke as an esplanade reserve priority in section X of the plan.
Sink or Swim
1009.001 Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Map 45A-Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to “Sport and Recreation
Open Space Zone”
Sink or Swim
1009.002 Features Map 45B
Support
Retain Municipal Baths as a 'B' Heritage Ranked item
Sink or Swim
1009.003 Neighbourhood Open Space Oppose
Zone
Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to Sport and Recreation Open Space
Zone which has more appropriate objectives and policies.
Sink or Swim
1009.004 15.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to Sport and Recreation Open Space
Zone.
Amend the Activity Status of Restaurants from a Discretionary Activity to a Permitted Activity within the Sport and
Recreation Open Space Zone.
Oppose
Retain Objective 15.2.5 Natural Open Space
Page 316 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Sink or Swim
1009.005 15.5.1 Site Coverage
Oppose
Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to Sport and Recreation Open Space
Zone
Sink or Swim
1009.006 15.5.2 Gross Floor Area
Oppose
Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to Sport and Recreation Open Space
Zone
Sink or Swim
1009.007 15.5.3 Number of Buildings
Oppose
Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to Sport and Recreation Open Space
Zone
Sink or Swim
1009.008 15.5.4 Building Height
Oppose
Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to “Sport and Recreation Open Space
Zone”
Amend Rule 15.5.4 Building Height so that it only applies to boundaries adjoining a Residential, Special Character or
Future Urban Zone.
Sink or Swim
1009.009 15.5.5 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 15.5.6 Fences and Walls so that the Municipal Pool site is specifically excluded from fence height limits.
Sink or Swim
1009.010 15.5.7 Hours of Operation
Oppose
Rezone the Hamilton Municipal Pools from "Neighbourhood Open Space Zone" to Sport and Recreation Open Space
Zone
Amend Rule 15.5.7 Hours of Operation to allow early morning usage from 5:30am
Sink or Swim
1009.011 19 Historic Heritage
Support in Support Policies 19.2.3e & g.
part
Support the non-complying activity status for demolition of both 'A' and 'B' ranked items.
Support Rule 19.5.ii.
Ensure that applications for alterations and additions to 'B' ranked heritage items will be publically notified.
Elizabeth de Jong
1010.001 4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Elizabeth de Jong
1010.002 5.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Remove b), e), and f) from rule 5.4.7 Interface Between Public and Private
Elizabeth de Jong
1010.003 5.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.4.6 Building Setbacks, remove b).
Elizabeth de Jong
1010.004 4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Elizabeth de Jong
1010.005 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Remove b) and c) i) from rule 5.4.8 Fences and Walls
M.P & R.G Upsdell
1011.001 Zoning Map 36A
Oppose
Map 36A-rezone 444(a) and (b) Ulster Street, 448(b) Ulster Street, and the rear half of 452 Ulster Street from
Residential to Business 5; Rezone the land at 1359 Victoria Street from Business 7 to Business 5.
Elizabeth de Jong
1012.001 22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Oppose
Remove the Flood Hazard Area from and LIM report for 41 Pelorus Street
Page 317 of 541
Sub Name
Hamilton East
Community Trust
Sub Point Plan Provision
1013.001 6 Business 1 to 7 Zones
Sub Type Summary
Oppose
Rezone the Regional Council Building and the site on the corner of Cook and Grey Streets from Business 6 Zone to
Business 1 Zone.
Undertake research on the effects of the loss of employees on Hamilton East.
Hamilton East
Community Trust
1013.003 Zoning Map 45A
Support in Map 45A-requests that heritage building sites and places are not adversely affected by inappropriate high density
part
development and rezoned accordingly.
Hamilton East
Community Trust
1013.004 Zoning Map 46A
Support in Map 46A-rezone the area surrounding Steele Park to a mixed use of commercial fringe and residential.
part
Hamilton East
Community Trust
1013.005 15 Open Space Zones
Support in Rezone Steele Park from Sport and Recreation Zone to Neighbourhood Open Space Zone
part
Hamilton East
Community Trust
1013.006 2.2.10 Objective and Policies Support
Hamilton’s Identity,
Character and Heritage
Support, however important existing retail and commercial centres are given heritage recognition in the plan,
particularly Hamilton East and Franklin villages, perhaps through structure planning. Streetscape plans for the
Hamilton East Village should be included in the District Plan for future development.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.001 4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Amend Policy 4.2.1a ii) so it is consistent with Future Proof by clarify that the target densities will be achieved over
time and the average gross density targets exclude roads and Open Space zoned areas.
Oppose
Delete Policy 4.2.1a ii) 3.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.001 3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 3.3.1b to recognise average gross density targets can be achieved over time:
'Housing densities in greenfield locations should achieve over time an average gross density target, excluding roads
and Open Space zoned land of 16 dwellings per hectare.'
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.002 4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.3a) to require 50% of the specified front setback (excluding access points and manoeuvring areas) be
planted in grass, shrubs or trees; Delete Figures 4.4.3c and 4.4.3d
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.003 4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.6 d) by reducing the minimum building setback from a right of way to 0.5m
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.004 4.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4.7 b); delete Rule 4.4.7 c); and add a new Rule 4.4.7 ba) that permits garages forward of the front of
the building if the wall facing the transport corridor consists of at least 20% glazed materials.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.005 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.10 b) Outdoor Living Area
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.006 4.5.1 Comprehensive
Development Plan Process
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.5.1 Comprehensive Development Plan Process - by changing the activity status to Controlled; and allow
a Comprehensive Development Plan to be approved on a site by site basis.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.007 4.6.2 Development Yield
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.6.2 Development Yield as the yields should be a guide only.
Page 318 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.008 5.4.3 Permeable Surface and Oppose
Planting
Amend Rule 5.4.3. Permeable Surface and Planting by increasing area of front setback required to be planted in grass,
shrubs or trees. Delete associated Figures.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.009 5.4.7 Interface Between
Public and Private
Oppose
Amend (b) of rule 5.4.7 to allow garages forwards of the dwelling and delete 5.4.7 (d).
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.010 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area
Oppose
Delete (b) (iv) from Rule 5.4.11 Outdoor Living Area. Consequential amendment: Delete Figure 5.4.11e.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.011 Table 23.3c
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.3c to identify and provide for the other Special Character Zone areas. Amend Rule 23.3c to provide for
fee simple subdivision in the Special Natural Zone as a controlled activity.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.012 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1 to increase the permitted earthworks volume to 250m3.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.013 1.4 Design Guides and Design Oppose
Assessment Criteria
Review Section 1.4 - Design Guides to simplify and streamline.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.014 1.4.4.2 Designing for
Topography
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.4.4.2 Designing for Topography to provide for earthworks necessary to achieve density and
maximum lot size requirements of section 4.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.015 Figure 2-9 Rotokauri
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
Oppose
Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network - Amend Figure 2-9 to include the entire suburban
centre zone within Stage 1.
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.016 3.6.2.3 Suburban Centre
Oppose
3.6.2.3 Suburban Centre Delete 3.6.2.3c
Rotokauri
Developments Ltd
1015.017 1.5.7 Comprehensive
Development Plan
Oppose
Amend the information requirements for 1.5.7 Comprehensive Development Plans to focus on connectivity, legibility,
open space and streetscape.
R.E. MasonRiseborough
1016.001 22.1 Purpose
Support in Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 7 Guy Place.
part
R.E. MasonRiseborough
1016.002 Features Map 54B
Support in Remove the Flood Hazard Area from 7 Guy Place.
part
Jason Lin
1017.001 Figure 7-1 Rototuna Town
Centre Concept Plan
Support in Figure 7-1 Rototuna Town Centre Concept Plan
part
a) That the whole of the property legally described as Lot 1 DPS 48598 (49 North City Road, Rototuna) be zoned as
Retail 2.
Page 319 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
And
b) Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the
concerns of the submitter.
Gillian Anne
Denny
1018.001 10 Ruakura Logistics Zone
Oppose
Amend Chapter 10 as it is inconsistent with the guiding principles in the introduction of the Plan regarding high quality
urban design, protection of character areas, restoration and protection of natural environments and heritage. An
Inland port 100m away from a residential area is not high quality urban design and this character area is not being
protected. The Ruakura Farm and its associated buildings should be recognised and protected for their heritage values.
Gillian Anne
Denny
1018.002 11 Ruakura Industrial Park
Zone
Oppose
Amend Chapter 11 as it is inconsistent with the guiding principles in the introduction of the Plan regarding high quality
urban design, protection of character areas, restoration and protection of natural environments and heritage. An
Inland port 100m away from a residential area is not high quality urban design and this character area is not being
protected. The Ruakura Farm and its associated buildings should be recognised and protected for their heritage values.
Maree Virginia
Pene (Te Kotuku
Whenua Environmental
Agency for NgatiWairere)
1019.001 1 Plan Overview
Support
Consultation with Ngati Wairere should be considered.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1020.001 7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Amend Rule 7.4.1 Site Coverage to provide a new maximum site coverage in Precinct 2 of 100% that applies to Key
part
Development Site 5 as identified on Figure 5.9 of Appendix 5.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1020.002 7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Amend Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity to provide a new maximum building intensity in Precinct 2 of 4:1 that applies to
part
Key Development Site 5 in Figure 5.9 of Appendix 5.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1020.003 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Amend Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces to provide a minimum permeable surface area in Precinct 2 of Nil that applies to
part
Key Development Site 5 in Figure 5.9 of Appendix 5.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1020.004 7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Oppose
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1020.005 1.4.6.5 Key Development Site Support in Delete 1.4.6.5 Key Development Site 5 – Countdown Site, Anglesea North or amend design guide Key Development
5 – Countdown Site,
part
Site 5 – Countdown Site, Anglesea North.
Anglesea North
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1020.006 Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5.5: Parking Building Overlay Plan to delete the preferred parking building location from Key
part
Development Site 5.
DI & CA Bourke
1021.001 4.1.2 Residential
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2vi) to read 'Between the Waikato River and River Road and east of Memorial Drive'.
Delete Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation.
Page 320 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Intensification Zone
Sub Type Summary
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.002 4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.003 7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
DI & CA Bourke
1021.004 7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.005 7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.006 7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.007 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.008 7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.009 7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.010 7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.011 7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.012 7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.013 7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.014 7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.015 B Consistency with Plans and Oppose
Design Guides
DI & CA Bourke
1021.016 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Page 321 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
DI & CA Bourke
1021.017 1.4.7 Riverfront
Development Design Guide
Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a - 1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
DI & CA Bourke
1021.018 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
DI & CA Bourke
1021.019 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.020 Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
DI & CA Bourke
1021.021 7.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.022 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.023 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.024 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.025 Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.026 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.027 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.028 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
DI & CA Bourke
1021.029 4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1022.001 7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Amend Rule 7.4.16 so that it does not apply to “Secondary active frontage”
part
Amend Appendix 5, Figure 5.7 to delete the Primary Active Frontage and the Secondary Active Frontage on the block
bounded by Bryce Street, Anglesea Street, Ward Street and Tristram Street;
Delete 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance and rezone to residential intensification.
Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Retain Objective 4.2.5 and Policies
Amend Appendix 5, Figure 5.5 to delete the preferred parking building location from the submitters land
Page 322 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Delete Design Guide 1.4.6.4 for Key Development Site 4 or amend to delete indicative concept plans and cross
sections, Key Design Principle b) vii, and Medium to long term priority outcome d) ii.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1022.002 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5.7 to delete the Primary Active Frontage and the Secondary Active Frontage on the block bounded by
part
Bryce Street, Anglesea Street, Ward Street and Tristram Street.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1022.003 1.4.6.4 Key Development Site Support in Amend the Central City Zone Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages to delete reference to “Secondary active frontage”;Amend
4 – Warehouse Kmart
part
Appendix 5:Central City Zone, Figure 5.7: Active Frontages and Overlay Plan to delete the Primary and Secondary
Transport Centre Site
Active Frontage on the block bounded by Bryce Street, Anglesea Street, Ward Street and Tristram Street; Amend
Appendix 5: Central City Zone, Figure 5.5: Parking Building Overlay Plan to delete the parking building location from
the submitters land; Delete 1.4.6.4 Key Development Site 4 – Warehouse/Kmart/Transport Centre' Or make
amendments.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1022.004 Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5.5: Parking Building Overlay Plan to delete the preferred parking building location from Key
part
Development Site 4.
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.001 4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2vi) to read 'Between the Waikato River and River Road and east of Memorial Drive'.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.002 4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.003 4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.004 7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.005 7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.006 7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.007 7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.008 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.009 7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.010 7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Retain Objective 4.2.5 and Policies
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Page 323 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.011 7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.012 7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.013 7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.014 7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.015 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.016 1.4.7 Riverfront
Development Design Guide
Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a - 1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.017 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.018 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.019 Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.020 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.021 7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.022 7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.023 Design Guides
Oppose
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.024 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.025 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Lambert
1023.026 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Delete 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance and rezone to residential intensification.
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Page 324 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
International Ltd
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.027 Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.028 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.029 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Lambert
International Ltd
1023.030 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1024.001 Zoning Map 25A
Oppose
Map 25A-Rezone all sites fronting Te Rapa Road between Vardon and Wairere Drive as Business 4 Zone OR amend the
Industrial Zone to allow for retail activity.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1024.002 Zoning Map 26A
Oppose
Map 26A-Rezone all sites fronting Te Rapa Road between Vardon and Wairere Drive to Business 4 or retain industrial
zone but amend Purpose, Policies and rules to recognise the existing commercial development along the Te Rapa
corridor.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1024.003 9.1 Purpose
Oppose
Opposes the Industrial Zoning of Te Rapa Road and re-zone as Business 4, or amend Chapter 9 Purpose, Objectives,
Policies, Rules to recognise existing commercial development along Te Rapa Rd corridor.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1024.004 9.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Opposes Industrial Zoning of Te Rapa Road and re-zone as Business 4, or amend Chapter 9 Purpose, Objectives,
Policies, and Explanations to recognise existing commercial development along Te Rapa Rd corridor.
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1024.005 1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Oppose
Amend the definition for Wholesale retail and trade supplies to separate into two discrete definitions
DNZ Property
Fund Limited
1024.006 9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Opposes the Industrial Zoning of Te Rapa Road and re-zone as Business 4, or amend Chapter 9 Purpose, Objectives,
Policies, Explanation and Rules to recognise existing commercial development along Te Rapa Rd corridor. Provide
separate definitions for "Wholesale Retail" and "Trade Supplies".
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.001 4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2vi) to read 'Between the Waikato River and River Road and east of Memorial Drive'.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.002 4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.003 4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Graham & Phillipa
1025.004 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Oppose
Retain Objective 4.2.5 and Policies
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Page 325 of 541
Sub Name
Cox & Wright
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Precinct
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.005 7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.006 7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.007 7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.008 7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.009 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.010 7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.011 7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.012 7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.013 7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.014 7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.015 7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.016 7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.017 1.4.7 Riverfront
Development Design Guide
Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a - 1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.018 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.019 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Delete 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance and rezone to residential intensification.
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Page 326 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.020 Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.021 7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.022 Design Guides
Oppose
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.023 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.024 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.025 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.026 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.027 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.028 Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.029 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.030 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Graham & Phillipa
Cox & Wright
1025.031 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.001 25.1.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.002 25.1.2.3 Objective and
Policies
Support in Amend policies 25.1.2.3a and 25.1.2.3b to remove the reference to ‘potentially contaminated land’.
part
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Development Suitability-Retain objective 25.1.2.3 and Policy 25.1.2.3c.
Page 327 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.003 25.1.3 Rules – National
Environmental Standards
Support
Retain Section 25.1.3 that relates to National Environmental Standards.
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.004 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Seeks the retention of note 4 to Rule 25.2.3 regarding National Environmental Standard on Assessing and Managing
Table
part
Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health.
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.005 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.006 25.4.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support in Retain Objective 25.4.2.1 and Policies 25.4.2.1a to 25.4.2.1d and 25.4.2.1f regarding hazardous facilities and amend
part
Policy 25.4.2.1e to recognise the role of design and installation of hazardous facilities in avoiding adverse effects of
natural hazards.
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.007 25.4.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.008 25.4.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rules 25.4.3d and 25.4.3e to remove the reference to ‘Occupational Health and Safety’, to provide for the
Table
part
storage of LPG in multiple as well as single vessels and to remove the requirement for compliance with the
performance standards in Rule 25.4.4.
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.009 25.4.4.5 Wash-Down Areas
Support in Amend Rule 25.4.4.5 Wash-Down Areas to avoid the inclusion of controls and/or consent requirements relating to
part
discharges to land and water (regional council functions).
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.010 25.4.4.6 Spill Containment
Systems
Support in Amend Rule 25.4.4.6 Spill Containment Systems to avoid the inclusion of controls and/or consent requirements
part
relating to discharges to land and water (regional council functions) and to clarify the standards that relate to aboveground storage only.
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.011 A Hazardous Facilities
Oppose
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.012 25.13.4.2 Stormwater
Seeks amendments to either the definition of earthworks in Appendix 1.7 or Rule 25.2.3 to exempt the removal or
replacement of fuel storage systems from the specific earthworks standards.
Retain Objective 25.4.2.2 and Policy 25.4.2.2a regarding protection of existing hazardous facilities from reversesensitivity effects.
Amend the matters of control set out in Appendix 1.1 A in relation to hazardous facilities to remove reference to
transport routes and to identify updated HSNO standards applicable to below ground petroleum storage systems.
Retain references in Appendix 1.1A to the MfE Guidelines for Water Discharges from Petroleum Industry Sites and the
AS/NZS 1596: 2008 – Storage and Handling of Liquid Petroleum Gas.
Support in Amend Rule 25.13.4.2d) (Stormwater) to clarify the meaning of the term ‘level’ in relation to stormwater discharges,
part
by referring to the 'volume and rate' of stormwater discharge, instead of the word 'level'.
Page 328 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.013 1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Retain the definitions of Pre-development, Contaminated Land, Hazardous Substance and Spill containment system.
part
Delete the definitions of Storage and Use (in relation to hazardous substance facilities).
Amend the definition of Hazardous Facility to clarify the type of vehicles intended to be captured by the term
‘hazardous facility’
Z Energy Ltd, BP
Oil NZ Ltd and
Mobil Oil NZ Ltd
1026.014 1.5.11 Hazardous Facilities
Oppose
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.001 4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2vi) to read 'Between the Waikato River and River Road and east of Memorial Drive'.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.002 4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.003 4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.004 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.005 7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.006 7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.007 7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.008 7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.009 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.010 7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.011 7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.012 7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Amend Appendix 1.5.11 by removing the requirement to provide information on transport routes in relation to
applications for hazardous facilities; clarify that parts n), o) and p) apply only to activities that require discretionary
activity consent under Chapter 25.4 Hazardous Facilities.
Retain Objective 4.2.5 and Policies
Page 329 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.013 7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.014 7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.015 7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.016 7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.017 1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.018 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.019 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.020 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.021 Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.022 7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.023 Design Guides
Oppose
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.024 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.025 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.026 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Dale & Vicki
1027.027 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Delete 1.2 B1(g) - Opoia Design Guidance.
Delete 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance and rezone to residential intensification.
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Page 330 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
McLunie & Martin
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.028 Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.029 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.030 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Dale & Vicki
McLunie & Martin
1027.031 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Tony Elkington
1028.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Tony Elkington
1028.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Tony Elkington
1028.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Tony Elkington
1028.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
John A Kendall
1029.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
John A Kendall
1029.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
John A Kendall
1029.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
John A Kendall
1029.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.001 7.1 Purpose
Oppose
Amend Purpose 7.1 d) to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.002 4.2.5 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objective 4.2.5 and Policies
Schramm
1030.003 4.4.4 Building Height
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.4 Building Height to specifically reference the East Side of Opoia Road
Page 331 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Property Trust
Sub Type Summary
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.004 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.005 7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.006 7.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Delete references to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.3.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.007 7.4.1 Site Coverage
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.1 regarding site coverage.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.008 7.4.2 Building Intensity
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.2 Building Intensity.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.009 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.3 Permeable Surfaces.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.010 7.4.4 Maximum Height
Control and Bonuses
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.4 Maximum Height Control and Bonuses (Height Overlay 4)
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.011 7.4.8 Building Setbacks
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.8 Building Setbacks and delete Note 1
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.012 7.4.13 Fences and Walls
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.13 Fences and Walls.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.013 7.4.14 Hours of Operation
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.14 Hours of Operation.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.014 7.4.16 Active Frontages
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.4.16 Active Frontages.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.015 7.5.1 Protection of the
Riverbank
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.1 Protection of the Riverbank.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.016 7.5.4 Residential
Support in Delete reference to the Opoia Precinct in Rule 7.5.4 Residential.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.017 Design Guides
Oppose
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.018 1.4.7.1 Analysis of Existing
Situation
Support in Amend 1.4.7.1b) to only reference the open space surrounding the rowing club.
part
Delete 1.2 B1g) - Opoia Design Guidance
Page 332 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.019 1.4.7.4 Design Interventions Support in Amend Figures 1.4.7a -1.4.7c to remove notations and reference to 'Proposed Mixed Use' and 'New Connections
part
to/along the river' between Opoia Road and the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.020 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance Oppose
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.021 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-1 Central City Zone Precinct Plan to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.022 Figure 5-2 Height Overlay
Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-2 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.023 Figure 5-3 Street Wall Height Support in Amend Figure 5-3 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Overlay Plan
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.024 Figure 5-4 Pedestrian
Connections and Gateways
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-4 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.025 Figure 5-5 Parking Building
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-5 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.026 Figure 5-6 Views and Vistas
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-6 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.027 Figure 5-7 Active Frontages
Overlay Plan
Support in Amend Figure 5-7 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.028 Figure 5-9 Key Development Support in Amend Figure 5-9 to remove the Opoia Precinct.
Site Locations
part
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.029 Zoning Map 45A
Oppose
Schramm
Property Trust
1030.030 4.1.2 Residential
Intensification Zone
Support in Amend Rule 4.1.2vi) to read 'Between the Waikato River and River Road and east of Memorial Drive'.
part
Megan Kendall
1031.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Megan Kendall
1031.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Megan Kendall
1031.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Megan Kendall
1031.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Support
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Delete 1.4.8 Opoia Design Guidance and rezone to residential intensification.
Map 45A-replace “Central City Zone” with “Residential Intensification Zone” on land situated between Opoia Road and
the Waikato River, including Riro Street.
Page 333 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.001 Zoning Map 3A
Support in Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on
part
Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11;
Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot
Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation;
Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the
concerns of the submitter.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.002 Zoning Map 4A
Support in Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on
part
Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11;
Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot
Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation;
Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the
concerns of the submitter.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.003 Zoning Map 5A
Support in Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on
part
Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11;
Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot
Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation;
Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the
concerns of the submitter.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.004 Zoning Map 11A
Support in Retain the Large Lot Residential zoning for the land on the northern side of the Waikato Expressway, as shown on
part
Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11;
Amend Maps 3, 4, 5 and 11 to include a 20m wide strip of Neighbourhood Open Space zone to separate the Large Lot
Residential zone and the Waikato Expressway designation;
Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the
concerns of the submitter.
Rototuna
1032.005 4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Objective 4.2.1
Page 334 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Holdings Ltd
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.006 4.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.2d to state that residential land uses should be managed to avoid or mitigate potential significant
part
adverse effects, such as noise, from transport corridors and state highways.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.007 4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.3d to add the words "as much as practicable" so that the policy reads as follows;
part
“Buildings should be designed to conform to natural topography as much as practicable.”
Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the
concerns of the submitter.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.008 4.2.4 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 4.2.4e by adding the following text to the end of the sentence: "except that Greenfield development
part
should be consistent with the character envisaged for the underlying zone.”
Such other additional or consequential relief as is necessary to achieve consistency with the above and to satisfy the
concerns of the submitter.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.009 4.4.1 Density
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.1a) for Rototuna Large Lot Residential zone to enable density to be determined by final gradient as
part
provided for in the submission.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.010 4.4.2 Site Coverage
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.2a) to enable sites between 500m2 - 750m2 in the Rototuna Large Lot Residential zone to have the
part
same maximum site coverage as that for General Residential Zone;
Consequential amendments to clarify extent of rules that are applicable to the development (e.g. Policy 4.2.4e iv.
verses Rule 4.4.6c) which may restrict the development potential of the Rototuna Large Lot Residential Zone area.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.011 4.4.3 Permeable Surface
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.3 Permeable Surface so that lots (between 500m2 and 750m2) within the Large Lot Residential zone in
part
Rototuna have the same minimum permeable surface percentages as the General Residential Zone.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.012 4.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.6c)ii.2, to exclude these setbacks applying to Rototuna Large Lot Residential zone where there is a
part
buffer as set out in the submission.
Amend Rule 4.4.6e)iv. to exclude Large Lot Residential.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.013 Table 23.3a
Support
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.014 23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Support in Amend 23.7.1h) to provide for minimum net site areas based on final average gradient for the Large Lot Residential
part
Zone (Rototuna Structure Plan) and clarify the activity status for subdivision failing to comply with standards in Rule
23.7.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.015 25.8.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support in Retain Noise and Vibration Policy 25.8.2.1a and amend 25.8.2.1b with amendment to include anticipated noise
part
sensitive activities.
Retain the activity status table in Rule 23.3a
Page 335 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.016 25.8.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support
Retain Noise and Vibration Policy 25.8.2.2b for noise sensitive activities locating near transport corridors.
Rototuna
Holdings Ltd
1032.017 25.8.3.9 Noise-sensitive
Activities – Activities in all
Zones
Support
Retain Rule 25.8.3.9 ‘Noise Sensitive Activities – Activities in all Zones’
The Errol John
Kendall Family -
1033.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
The Errol John
Kendall Family -
1033.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
The Errol John
Kendall Family -
1033.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
The Errol John
Kendall Family -
1033.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Rei Kendall
(Kendall Family)
1034.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Rei Kendall
(Kendall Family)
1034.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Rei Kendall
(Kendall Family)
1034.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Rei Kendall
(Kendall Family)
1034.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Jenna Walmsley
1035.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Jenna Walmsley
1035.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Jenna Walmsley
1035.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Jenna Walmsley
1035.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 336 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Precincts
Alby Tate (The
Lost Tribe)
1036.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Alby Tate (The
Lost Tribe)
1036.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Alby Tate (The
Lost Tribe)
1036.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Alby Tate (The
Lost Tribe)
1036.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Joe Hay (Hay
Family)
1037.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Joe Hay (Hay
Family)
1037.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Joe Hay (Hay
Family)
1037.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Joe Hay (Hay
Family)
1037.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Te Waata R
Greening
1038.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Te Waata R
Greening
1038.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Te Waata R
Greening
1038.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Te Waata R
Greening
1038.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Matai Christian
1039.001 5.1 Purpose
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Support
Page 337 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Parata Family
Matai Christian
Parata Family
1039.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Matai Christian
Parata Family
1039.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Matai Christian
Parata Family
1039.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.001 1 Plan Overview
Reword the plan to ensure it provides for the protection, restoration and maintenance of stream, river and gully
systems.
Oppose
Ensure the relevant provisions give effect to the proposed RPS and then review District Plan within 1 year of the RPS
becoming operative to take account of any changes to RPS.
Publically notify all technical specifications/development manual the plan refers/relies on for its implementation.
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.002 Peacocke Natural System
Support in Amend Objective 3.4.6.1 to maintain connectivity for movement of native animals, including passage for fish and bats"
part
Add a new policy to 3.4.6.1 to ensure unimpeded movement for native animals (e.g. fish and bats) through the stream
and gull network, including road crossings;
Amend policy 3.4.6.1a by inserting the word 'natural';
Amend policy 3.4.6.1e by inserting the word 'avoid'.
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.003 20.1 Purpose
Support in Amend the Plan to provide for the protection of in-stream Significant Natural Area values addressing both terrestrial
part
and aquatic biodiversity.
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.004 Significant Natural Areas
Support in Amend Objective 20.2.1 to clarify the link between maintenance and enhancement and to and to include the
20.2.1 Objective and Policies part
protection of threatened species. Amend Objectives and Policies in 20.2.1 to provide for the protection and
enhancement of areas of "non-significant' natural vegetation.
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
1040.005 20.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the Plan to provide for the establishment of native fish reserves at key sites where no fishing is allowed and to
part
protect and enhance areas of "non-significant' natural vegetation.
Page 338 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Incorporated
Group
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.006 21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support
Amend 21.2.1 to ensure the level of indigenous vegetation in the gully systems is improved and that the connectivity
and buffering of indigenous ecosystems by the Waikato River Corridor and gully system is restored.
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.007 21.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend 21.2.2 to ensure the level of indigenous vegetation in the gully systems is improved and that the connectivity
part
and buffering of indigenous ecosystems by the Waikato River Corridor and gully system is restored. Amend Policy
21.2.2g to consider impacts of drainage on stream ecology where drainage is not necessary to protect life or property.
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.008 21.2.4 Objective and Policies Support
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.009 23.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Subdivision Objectives and Policies under 23.2.1 with amendments to address adverse effects on stream
part
hydrology and aquatic habitat.
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.010 23.2.5 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policies 23.2.5a, b and c to provide for the protection and enhancement of the Waikato River and Gully
part
Systems
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.011 25.13.4.1 Integrated
Catchment Management
Plan
Support in Seeks specific provisions in 25.13.4.1 (Integrated Catchment Management Plan) for the development of an Integrated
part
Catchment Management Plan for the Mangakotukutuku Stream catchment in accordance with section 1.5.5
(Information Requirements - Integrated Catchment Management Plans).
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.012 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency
Measures
Support in Amend design principles and requirements for stormwater treatment systems, including low impact design features.
part
Reference is also made to Auckland Council's TP124 and NZTA's Stormwater Treatment Standards.
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.013 1.8.4 Collaboration and
Partnership
Support in Add an additional explanation at 1.8.4 to collaborate and develop partnerships with groups already involved in Urban
part
ecological restoration.
Amend 21.2.4 to ensure the level of indigenous vegetation in the gully systems is improved.
Page 339 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.014 1.8.3 Council Projects and
Initiatives (Subject to Long
Term Plan and Annual Plan)
Support in Add two more methods at 1.8.3 preamble for the development of ecological restoration plans.
part
Mangakotukutuku
Stream Care
Incorporated
Group
1040.015 Appendix 10 Waikato River
Corridor and Gully Systems
Oppose
Amend Appendix 10 Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems to include objectives and policies which will implement
the Tainui Vision and Strategy provision to enhance the stream and stormwater systems draining into the Waikato
River.
Susan Elizabeth
Thomson
1041.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Susan Elizabeth
Thomson
1041.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Susan Elizabeth
Thomson
1041.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Susan Elizabeth
Thomson
1041.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Colby Osborne
1042.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Colby Osborne
1042.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Colby Osborne
1042.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Colby Osborne
1042.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Anton Osborne
1043.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Anton Osborne
1043.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Anton Osborne
1043.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Anton Osborne
1043.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Support
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 340 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Kendall Graham
1044.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Kendall Graham
1044.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Kendall Graham
1044.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Kendall Graham
1044.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Romana Graham
1045.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Romana Graham
1045.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Romana Graham
1045.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Romana Graham
1045.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Vicki Wihongi
1046.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Vicki Wihongi
1046.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Vicki Wihongi
1046.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Vicki Wihongi
1046.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Ashton Frew
1047.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Ashton Frew
1047.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Ashton Frew
1047.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Page 341 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Ashton Frew
1047.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Pamela Mabel
Heremaia
1048.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Pamela Mabel
Heremaia
1048.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Pamela Mabel
Heremaia
1048.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Pamela Mabel
Heremaia
1048.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Kylie Michelle
Birks
1049.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Kylie Michelle
Birks
1049.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Kylie Michelle
Birks
1049.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Kylie Michelle
Birks
1049.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.001 3.1 Purpose
Support
Retain the flow chart in 3.1 Purpose of Structure Plans.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.002 3.2 Principles
Support in Principles - Structure Plans - 3.2 a) i. - Replace ‘any land-use constraints and opportunities’ within this paragraph with
part
‘any land-use considerations’.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.003 3.3.6 Objective and Policies
Support in 3.3.6 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans - Insert an additional policy statement in regard to the recognition and
part
protection of heritage features.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.004 3.3.7 Objective and Policies
Oppose
3.3.7 Objective and Policies - Structure Plans: Policy 3.3.7b - Review this section to ensure cultural heritage values are
not to be sacrificed to open space requirements.
Page 342 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.005 2.2.10 Objective and Policies Support
Hamilton’s Identity,
Character and Heritage
Support. Retain Objective 2.2.10 and policies.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.006 19.3 Rules Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend 19.3 Rules Activity Status Table by:
a) Including Subdivision.
b) Adding rules to control alterations and additions to identified interior heritage features.
c) Adding rules to control alterations and additions to identified interior heritage features.
d) Establish a hierarchy of management for A and B buildings. A single, unitary built heritage schedule, in which
demolition is non-complying for all scheduled items, is recommended. Alternatively review Schedule 8A and make
demolition of less significant B ranked items a Discretionary activity.
e) Maximum thresholds for earthworks specified in 25.2.5(a) should include an advisory note that a lower threshold
has been set for Group 1 Archaeological and Cultural Sites.
f) 19.3 p) Retain.
g) 19.3 w) is opposed as the rule statement is incomplete. Assuming that it refers to Group 2 Archaeological and
Cultural Sites the activity status should be amended here to allow for information about the site to be shared with the
owner and impacts upon potential heritage values to be appropriately managed.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.007 25.2.5 Rules – Specific
Standards
Support in Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5 a) advising that a lower threshold for earthworks has been set for Group 1
part
Archaeological and Cultural Sites.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.008 7.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support in Amend Policy 7.2.2 Policies to recognise heritage resources within the Central City.
part
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.009 19.1 Purpose
Support in Add a policy in section 19.2 that promotes the preparation of Conservation Management Plans for Archaeological and
part
Cultural Sites, as well as Buildings and Structures.
Delete ‘historical validity’ and insert ‘heritage significance’.
Add a reference to the statutory protection of archaeological sites as set out in the Historic Places Act.
Delete the phrase ‘where practicable’ from the paragraph.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.010 19.2.3 Buildings and
Structures
Support in Amend Heritage Objectives, Policies and Rules in Chapter 19 to ensure consistency and the ability of council to achieve
part
outcomes inline with the Purpose, Objectives and Policies of the chapter.
Support policy 19.2.3a.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.011 19.2.4 Archaeological and
Cultural Sites
Support in Amend Policy 19.2.4e to ensure that destruction or damage to Archaeological and Cultural Sites is not being tacitly
part
encouraged. Amend Policies and Rules within Chapter 19 to ensure that explanatory notes are given effect to and
ensure that they address the sharing of information and working relationships.
Page 343 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.012 19.4 Rules Specific Standards Support in Amend Rule 19.4 Rules Specific Standards to include reference to the value of conservation plans as a guide to
part
undertaking maintenance and repairs.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.013 19.5 Restricted Discretionary Oppose
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Clarify and amend 19.5 a) iii) of Restricted Discretionary Activities – Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria by
aligning it with new rules for a Controlled Activity status for the protection of interior heritage features.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.014 8-1 Assessment of Historic
Buildings and Structures
Support
Retain 8-1 Assessment of Historic Buildings and Structures
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.016 5.1 Purpose
Support in Support the inclusions of special character and heritage areas in the District Plan. But 5.1e) incorrectly characterises all
part
the city’s Special Character Areas as ‘primarily for residential purposes’ and this is not the case for the Temple View
Character Area. Elsewhere in 5.1 the same inaccurate characterisation can also be found, either explicitly or implicitly
e.g. 5.1c). Amend Chapter 5 to adequately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be,
identified and protected within the Plan. Amend text to place a stronger emphasis on the defining role historic
heritage items may play within character areas and the importance given to their ongoing protection.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.017 5.1.1.3 The Dwelling Control Support in Amend Rule 5.1.1.3d) The Dwelling Control Area by either linking it to objectives, policies and rules OR delete. Confirm
Area
part
if "Soldier Cottages" warrant scheduling as heritage items.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.018 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.019 5.1.4.1 Temple View Heritage Oppose
Area
Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts and instead develop a Structure
Plan for Temple View.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.020 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Oppose
Delete Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts and develop a Structure Plan for
Temple View.5.1.4.2. Amend plan so the Temple View Character Area is elevated to a Heritage Area.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.021 5.2 Objectives and Policies
Special Character Zones
Support in Amend Chapter 5 to adequately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and
part
protected within the Plan. Provide stronger emphasis on the defining role historic heritage items may play.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.022 5.2.6 Objective and Policies
Temple View Zone
Oppose
Amend 5.2.6 Objectives and Policies -Temple View, so that it is consistent with other special character areas so it
promotes special character and heritage value rather than development. Do not promote the development plan.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.023 5.2.7 Objective and Policies
Temple View Zone
Oppose
Amend 5.2.7 Objectives and Policies Temple View so that it is consistent with other special character areas so that it is
focused on special character and heritage values not development. Do not promote the development plan.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.024 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Oppose
Residential, Special Heritage
and Special Natural Zones
Amend Chapter 5 to adequately describe all of the special character areas that have been, or may be, identified and
protected.
Remove the Permitted activity status in 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural
Zones for demolition of non-residential buildings in Special Character and Heritage Areas.
Oppose
Relocate 5.1.2 Special Heritage Zone to Chapter 19 Historic Heritage.
Page 344 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.025 5.3.2 Activity Status –
Peacocke Character and
Temple View Zones
Oppose
Delete all references to the Comprehensive Development Plans for Temple View within Chapter 5.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.026 5.4.1 Density
Oppose
5.4.1 Density - Delete all references to the Comprehensive Development Plans for Temple View within Chapter 5.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.027 7.1.3 Precinct 3 – Ferrybank
Precinct
Support in Amend 7.1.3 d) Precinct 3 - Ferrybank Precinct by deleting the word "existing" from the beginning of the paragraph
part
relating to heritage and character buildings.
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.028 Table 23.3a
Support in Amend Rule 19.3 Historic Heritage Activity Status to include 'subdivision' and align with Rule 23.3a) x.
part
Lynette Joyce
Williams
1050.029 19 Historic Heritage
Support in Amend Chapter 19 Historic Heritage to ensure it is linked to the City's Heritage Strategy, including the framework for
part
financial incentives for property owners.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.001 3.7 Ruakura
Support in Amend 3.7d to identify employment opportunities are centred on "innovation and research". Amend 3.7h to enable
part
development of a suburban centre.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.002 3.7.1.4 Knowledge Zone
Oppose
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.003 3.7.3.6 Staging Rule for the Oppose
Innovation Park Precinct of
the Knowledge Zone in the
Ruakura Structure Plan Area
Amend staging rules in 3.7.3.6 to enable earlier development of the suburban centre.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.004 3.7.1.5 Neighbourhood
Centre
Amend 3.7.1.5 to relate to a Suburban Centre
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.005 3.7.2 Objectives and Policies Oppose
Amend objectives and policies to provide for in "general" accordance with the structure plan; Delete Objective 3.7.2.2
and its policy; amend 3.7.2.4 so as to remove reference to not compromising the Central City; amend objective 3.7.2.7,
policy 3.7.2.4a and b; Delete Policy 3.7.2.7a;
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.006 8.1 Purpose
Amend Purpose 8.1 to provide for a suburban centre and delete words in relation to compromising the Central City.
Oppose
Oppose
Amend 3.7.1.4b to delete reference to "in a manner that does not compromise the Central City"
Page 345 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.007 8.2 Objectives and Policies
Knowledge Zone
Oppose
8.2 Replace "shall' with "should" in the Objectives and Policies for the Knowledge Zone.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.008 8.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Delete Policy 8.2.1f.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.009 8.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
For AgResearch and Waikato Innovation Park amend Rules 8.3b) to e), and j) to make the following permitted activities
- maintenance, alterations and additions to existing buildings, new buildings and Commercialisation of activity ancillary
to research, innovation and education and laboratory activities.
For Waikato Innovation Park amend Rule 8.3 to provide for permitted and discretionary activities as identified in Rules
25B.4 to 25B.10 of Schedule 25B of the Waikato District Plan, and include Schedule 25B in Chapter 8.
Delete Rule 8.5.3 or amend to provide clarify that an ‘ancillary office activity’ does not include office related research
and innovation activities and any associated administrative office space.
Amend Rule 8.3 k) to clarify that the activities identified are an inclusive list.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.010 8.4 Rules – General
Standards
Oppose
Delete or amend rules 8.4 to reflect the rules outlined in Schedule 25B of the Waikato District Plan.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.011 8.4.8 Building Design
Oppose
Delete Rule 8.4.8a); Amend Rule 8.4.8b) to clarify the rule does not apply to internal private accessways within
Waikato Innovation Park.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.012 8.9 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Delete Rule 8.9ai and 8.9 ii; amend Rule 8.9 to remove unnecessary and unjustified matters of discretion.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.013 15.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend the Activity Status Table for the Open Spaces Zone to include Carparking, Stormwater Detention and Livestock
Grazing at Waikato Innovation Park as Permitted Activities
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.014 15.5.3 Number of Buildings
Oppose
Amend Rule 15.5.3 for the Number of Buildings on a Park within the Neighbourhood Open Space Zone to ensure it is
not unreasonably restricted.
Or exclude the Waikato Innovation Park from this rule
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.015 20.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 20.3 k) Significant Trees so that Non-emergency works to, removal or, or transplanting of scheduled tree
identified as T75 is changed from a Discretionary to a Controlled Activity, and include specific matters of control.
Remove those trees within the Waikato Innovation Park with a score less than 1000 listed as Significant Trees from the
Significant Tree Schedule.
Page 346 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.016 25.2.5.1 Earthworks Ancillary Oppose
to Any Activity in This Plan
and Earthworks Not Ancillary
to Any Activity in This Plan
Seeks amendments to Rule 25.2.5.1 so that the earthworks standards only apply within a Natural Hazard area and
exclude works ancillary to an approved subdivision or landuse consent.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.017 25.5.3.1 Landscaping
Amend Rule 25.5.3.1a)iii so as to remove the requirement for landscaping for the Knowledge Zone.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.018 25.6.4.3 Major Facilities Zone Oppose
and Knowledge Zone
Amend 25.6.4.3b) under Major Facilities Zone and Knowledge Zone to correct cross referencing within the Plan.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.019 25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 h) ii) to exclude new activities on the Waikato Innovation Park site in accordance with Schedule
25B (see section 8.12) of the Waikato District Plan from requiring an Integrated Transport Assessment.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.020 Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Ruakura Structure Plan -Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 to identify Local Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation
Park as indicative internal accessways and re-align.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.021 Figure 2-15 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Transport
Network
Oppose
Ruakura Structure Plan - Figures 2-14 to 2-18 amend by identifying the Local Transport Corridors within Waikato
Innovation Park as indicative internal accessways and re-align Local Transport Corridors; delete cycleways/walkways
shown on Figure 2-15 within Waikato Innovation Park.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.022 Figure 2-16 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Water
Infrastructure
Oppose
Ruakura Structure Plan - Figures 2-14 to 2-18 amend by identifying the Local Transport Corridors within Waikato
Innovation Park as indicative internal accessways and re-align Local Transport Corridors.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.023 Figure 2-17 Ruakura
Oppose
Structure Plan-Waste Water
Infrastructure
Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 by identifying the Local Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative
internal accessways and re-alignment of the Local Transport Corridors.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.024 Figure 2-18 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Storm Water
Infrastructure
Oppose
Amend Figures 2-14 to 2-18 by identifying the Local Transport Corridors within Waikato Innovation Park as indicative
internal accessways and re-alignment of the Local Transport Corridors.
Waikato
Innovation Park
Limited
1051.025 8.3 Rules – Activity Status
Oppose
Amend Rules 8.3 b) – e) so requirements for alterations and additions to existing buildings are a permitted activity.
Amend Chapter 8 by inserting Schedule 25B of the Waikato District Plan into the Knowledge Zone as 8.12. Amend Rule
8.3 f) to refer to Schedule 25B. Delete rule 8.5.3 or amend to provided certainty and clarity in relation to ‘ancillary
office activity’; Amend Rule 8.3 j) as a permitted activity; amend Rule 8.3k) to add in the words "(but not limited to").
Helen Judith
1052.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Oppose
Page 347 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Thomson
Helen Judith
Thomson
1052.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Helen Judith
Thomson
1052.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Helen Judith
Thomson
1052.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Rebecca Hippolite
1053.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Rebecca Hippolite
1053.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Rebecca Hippolite
1053.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Rebecca Hippolite
1053.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Alexandra Dee
1054.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Alexandra Dee
1054.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Alexandra Dee
1054.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Alexandra Dee
1054.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Julie Nicole
Morley
1055.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Julie Nicole
Morley
1055.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Julie Nicole
Morley
1055.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Page 348 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Julie Nicole
Morley
1055.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Velroy Crystal
Matthews
1056.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Velroy Crystal
Matthews
1056.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Velroy Crystal
Matthews
1056.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Velroy Crystal
Matthews
1056.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Celeste Sarah
Judith Mulipola
1057.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Celeste Sarah
Judith Mulipola
1057.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Celeste Sarah
Judith Mulipola
1057.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Celeste Sarah
Judith Mulipola
1057.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Ann Bella Johnson
1058.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Ann Bella Johnson
1058.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Ann Bella Johnson
1058.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Ann Bella Johnson
1058.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 349 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
The University of
Waikato
1059.001 8.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Purpose 8.1 to recognise existing facilities in addition to future ones.
part
The University of
Waikato
1059.002 8.2.5 Objective and Policies
University of Waikato
Support in Retain Objectives and Policies 8.2.5, 8.2.5a, 8.2.5b, 8.2.5c, 8.2.5d and 8.2.5e as notified. Amend the explanation to
part
8.2.1 so it does not apply to the University. Amend 8.2.5f to enable the university to develop a long term plan for its
campus.
The University of
Waikato
1059.003 8.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support in Retain rule 8.3 Activity Status v)– z), aa) and cc) – tt);
part
Delete reference to performance standard for 100 vehicle movements per day in 8.3 aa) and tt) as notified; Delete
Rule 8.3bb);Delete Rule 8.3uu).
The University of
Waikato
1059.004 8.4 Rules – General
Standards
Support
The University of
Waikato
1059.005 8.6.1 Provision of Concept
Plan
Support in Delete the exclusion provisions in 8.6.1 a), b) and c); Retain Rules 8.6.1 d), e), f), g) and h);Amend Rule 8.6g) as it
part
relates to Concept Plans; Delete 8.6.1j).
The University of
Waikato
1059.006 8.6.2 Building Setbacks
Support
Retain Rule 8.6.2 Building Setback as notified.
The University of
Waikato
1059.007 8.6.3 Building Standards
Support
Retain Rule 8.6.3 Building Standards as notified.
The University of
Waikato
1059.008 8.6.4 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Retain Rule 8.6.4 Permeable Surfaces subject to Council clarification on rationale for 20% net site permeability and
part
amend cross reference 8.6.3b) (height planes) to 8.6.2 (building).
The University of
Waikato
1059.009 8.7 Provisions in Other
Chapters
Support in Amend 8.7 Provisions in Other Chapters by removing reference to Chapter 21.
part
The University of
Waikato
1059.010 8.8 Controlled Activities
Matters of Control
Support in Retain 8.8a) i as notified and delete 8.8a)ii.
part
The University of
Waikato
1059.011 8.9 Restricted Discretionary
Activities Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Support in Amend Rule 8.9, heading for the Restricted Discretionary criteria; Transfer the RD criteria for any Concept Plan-Rule
part
8.9viii to xxiii; Retain 8.9.xx , 8.9.xxi) and 8.9.xxii); Insert new Rule 8.9.xxiii)to provide
Any Permitted Activity which does not comply with the performance standards in Rules 8.6 to 8.7.
The University of
Waikato
1059.012 8.10 Notification Rule
Support in Amend Rule 8.9xxii so that it is non-notified
part
The University of
Waikato
1059.013 8.11 Other Resource Consent Support in Retain 8.11 Other resource consent information as notified.
Information
part
The University of
Waikato
1059.014 10.1 Purpose
Retain 8.4a) General Standards as notified.
Support in Amend the Plan to ensure the correct balance is achieved between promoting Ruakura and maintaining the
part
environmental and social objectives of existing facilities and neighbourhoods.
Page 350 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
The University of
Waikato
1059.015 10.2.3 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective and Policies in 10.2.2 and 10.2.3 to provide additional emphasis on amenity and environmental
part
values of the surrounding neighbourhoods and facilities.
The University of
Waikato
1059.016 10.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
The University of
Waikato
1059.017 10.4.1 Permitted Activities
Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the
part
logistics zone outside the inland port.
The University of
Waikato
1059.018 10.4.2 All Other Activities
Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the
part
logistics zone outside the inland port.
The University of
Waikato
1059.019 10.4.3 Site Coverage
Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the
part
logistics zone outside the inland port.
The University of
Waikato
1059.020 10.4.4 Permeable Surfaces
Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the
part
logistics zone outside the inland port.
The University of
Waikato
1059.021 10.4.5 Building Height
Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the
part
logistics zone outside the inland port.
The University of
Waikato
1059.022 10.4.8 Interface Standards
Support in Retain Rule 10.4.8 regarding interface standards for the Ruakura Logistics Zone.
part
The University of
Waikato
1059.023 10.5 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 10.5 to review the efficiency and appropriateness of the matters of discretion and assessment criteria
Activities Matters of
part
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
The University of
Waikato
1059.024 11.1 Purpose
The University of
Waikato
1059.025 11.2.2 Objective and Policies Support
Retain 11.2.2, 11.2.2a, 11.2.3 and 11.2.3a for the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
The University of
Waikato
1059.026 11.2.3 Objective and Policies Support
Retain 11.2.2, 11.2.2a, 11.2.3 and 11.2.3a for the Ruakura Industrial Park Zone
The University of
Waikato
1059.027 11.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Retain the non-complying activity status in Rules 11.3 f) to j) attributed to heavy or 'dirty' industry. Amend Rule 11.3
part
m) to enable limited retail activities for serving the local catchment.
The University of
Waikato
1059.028 11.4.1 Permitted Activities
Support
Retain Rules 11.4.1
The University of
1059.029 11.4.2 All Other Activities
Support
Retain Rules 11.4.2
Retain Activity Status Table 10.3
Support in Amend the Plan to ensure the correct balance is achieved between promoting Ruakura and maintaining the
part
environmental and social objectives of existing facilities and neighbourhoods.
Page 351 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato
The University of
Waikato
1059.030 11.4.3 Building Setbacks
Support in Retain Rules 11.4.3 with amendments to Rule 11.4.3 d) to provide a 15m setback.
part
The University of
Waikato
1059.031 11.4.6 Site Coverage
Support
Retain 11.4.6 Site Coverage
The University of
Waikato
1059.032 11.4.7 Site Landscaping
Support
Retain 11.4.7 Site Landscaping
The University of
Waikato
1059.033 11.4.8 Site Layout
Support
Retain 11.4.8 Site layout
The University of
Waikato
1059.034 11.4.9 Interface Standards
Support
Retain 11.4.9 Interface Standards
The University of
Waikato
1059.035 11.4.10 Provisions in Other
Chapters
Support
Retain 11.4.10 Provisions in Other Chapters
The University of
Waikato
1059.036 11.6 Restricted Discretionary Support in Review the efficiency and appropriateness of the matters of discretion and assessment criteria to ensure the amenity
Activities Matters of
part
values of the surrounding neighbourhoods and facilities are protected.
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
The University of
Waikato
1059.037 25.6.4.3 Major Facilities Zone Support
and Knowledge Zone
Retain Rule 25.6.4.3 Major Facilities Zone and Knowledge Zone with correction to cross-referencing within the Plan.
The University of
Waikato
1059.038 25.8.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Noise and vibration -Retain the Objective 25.8.2.1 and all policies
The University of
Waikato
1059.039 25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Oppose
Standards for Activities in all
Zones Except Major Facilities,
Knowledge and Open Space
Zones
Requests reassess the provisions under 25.8.3.7 Noise Performance Standards as they apply to the Ruakura logistics
and Ruakura industrial Park Zone.
The University of
Waikato
1059.040 25.8.3.8 Noise Performance Support
Standards for Activities in the
Major Facilities Zone,
Knowledge Zone and Open
Space Zones
Retain 25.8.3.8 Noise Performance Standards for Activities in the Major Facilities Zone, Knowledge Zone and Open
Space Zones
The University of
1059.041 25.10.5.8 Knowledge Zone
Retain Rule 25.10.5.8 signs for the Knowledge Zone.
Support
Support
Page 352 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikato
The University of
Waikato
1059.042 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading
Spaces and Manoeuvring
Areas
Support
Retain Rule 25.14.4.2a) regarding parking requirements for the University of Waikato using parking standards in
Appendix 15- 2 as a guide only.
The University of
Waikato
1059.043 25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 a) to increase the Integrated Transport Assessments consent trigger thresholds for the
University of Waikato and delete Rule 25.14.4.3 f) iv that requires consent and ITA for new vehicle access from the
University.
The University of
Waikato
1059.044 1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend the definition of "Interface Area"
part
The University of
Waikato
1059.045 Features Map 47B
Support
Support provisions in the plan that protect the heritage and ecological sites on the University Campus seen on
Features Map 47B
The University of
Waikato
1059.046 Zoning Map 47A
Support
Map 47A-Support the provisions that protect the heritage and ecological sites on the University Campus (features
map)
The University of
Waikato
1059.047 1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Review the format, content and nature of the Restricted Discretionary Assessment criteria to achieve a more efficient
and effective framework for the assessment of applications.
The University of
Waikato
1059.048 10.4.6 Building Setbacks
Support in Amend Rules 10.4.1 to 10.4.6 to reduce the height of crane and stacking equipment from 35m to 20m within the
part
logistics zone outside the inland port.
Moana Adalene
Malissa Rarere
1060.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Moana Adalene
Malissa Rarere
1060.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Moana Adalene
Malissa Rarere
1060.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Moana Adalene
Malissa Rarere
1060.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Alan Francis
Thomson
1061.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Alan Francis
1061.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Page 353 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Thomson
Alan Francis
Thomson
1061.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Alan Francis
Thomson
1061.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Ariana Murphy
1062.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Ariana Murphy
1062.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Ariana Murphy
1062.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Ariana Murphy
1062.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Darnie Eden
Paraha
1063.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Darnie Eden
Paraha
1063.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Darnie Eden
Paraha
1063.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Darnie Eden
Paraha
1063.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Rachel Elizabeth
Thomson
1064.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Rachel Elizabeth
Thomson
1064.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Rachel Elizabeth
Thomson
1064.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Page 354 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Rachel Elizabeth
Thomson
1064.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Debbie Solomon
1065.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Debbie Solomon
1065.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Debbie Solomon
1065.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Debbie Solomon
1065.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Alisha Willis
1066.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Alisha Willis
1066.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Alisha Willis
1066.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Alisha Willis
1066.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Marsden Boyd
Gaabdora
1067.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Marsden Boyd
Gaabdora
1067.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Marsden Boyd
Gaabdora
1067.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Marsden Boyd
Gaabdora
1067.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Dave Hurae
Moeke
1068.001 5.1 Purpose
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Support
Page 355 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Dave Hurae
Moeke
1068.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Dave Hurae
Moeke
1068.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Dave Hurae
Moeke
1068.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Mikala T Watene
1069.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Mikala T Watene
1069.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Mikala T Watene
1069.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Mikala T Watene
1069.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Harrisson Balabat
Jull
1070.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Harrisson Balabat
Jull
1070.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Harrisson Balabat
Jull
1070.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Harrisson Balabat
Jull
1070.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Emmeline Sunnex
1071.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Emmeline Sunnex
1071.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Emmeline Sunnex
1071.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Emmeline Sunnex
1071.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 356 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
William Kent
Money (Envision
Team)
1072.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
William Kent
Money (Envision
Team)
1072.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
William Kent
Money (Envision
Team)
1072.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
William Kent
Money (Envision
Team)
1072.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Ruth Lynne
Hamon
1073.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Ruth Lynne
Hamon
1073.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Ruth Lynne
Hamon
1073.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Ruth Lynne
Hamon
1073.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Amanda Gayle
Watts (Auckland
Central Facilities
Management)
1074.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Amanda Gayle
Watts (Auckland
Central Facilities
1074.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Page 357 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Management)
Amanda Gayle
Watts (Auckland
Central Facilities
Management)
1074.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Amanda Gayle
Watts (Auckland
Central Facilities
Management)
1074.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Garrick Wayne
Parr
1075.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Garrick Wayne
Parr
1075.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Garrick Wayne
Parr
1075.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Garrick Wayne
Parr
1075.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Owen Purcell
1076.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Owen Purcell
1076.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Owen Purcell
1076.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Owen Purcell
1076.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Noeleen Blanche
Forbes
1077.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Noeleen Blanche
Forbes
1077.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Noeleen Blanche
1077.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Page 358 of 541
Sub Name
Forbes
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Character Area
Area.
Noeleen Blanche
Forbes
1077.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
George Kaka
1078.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
George Kaka
1078.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
George Kaka
1078.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
George Kaka
1078.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Janie Edwards
1079.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Janie Edwards
1079.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Janie Edwards
1079.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Janie Edwards
1079.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Lynda Kathleen
Parewhakaruku
Briggs
1080.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Lynda Kathleen
Parewhakaruku
Briggs
1080.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Lynda Kathleen
Parewhakaruku
Briggs
1080.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Lynda Kathleen
Parewhakaruku
1080.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Support
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 359 of 541
Sub Name
Briggs
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Peter Marere Kaio
Mete-Smith
1081.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Peter Marere Kaio
Mete-Smith
1081.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Peter Marere Kaio
Mete-Smith
1081.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Peter Marere Kaio
Mete-Smith
1081.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Lincoln Ivan Reid
1082.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Lincoln Ivan Reid
1082.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Lincoln Ivan Reid
1082.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Lincoln Ivan Reid
1082.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.001 1.1.2 Statutory Context of
the District Plan and
Relationships with Other
Plans
Retain Section 1.1.2 and Figure 1a.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.002 2.2.13 Objective and Policies Support
Integrated Land Use,
Transport and Infrastructure
Support. Retain Objective 2.2.13 and Policies 2.2.13a), b) and d) without modification.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.003 Figure 2-4 Rototuna
Structure Plan-Land Use
a) Retain Figure 2-4: Rototuna Structure Plan – Land Use in Appendix 2 including the identification of Transpower’s
existing electricity transmission lines and the electricity transmission corridor without modification.
Support
Retain the structure of the Proposed District Plan in relation to Rules relating to Network Utilities and Electricity
Transmission are in the same chapter.
Support
b) Adopt any other such relief, including additions, deletions or consequential amendments necessary as a result of the
matters raised in these submissions, as necessary to give effect to this submission
Page 360 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.004 Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support
Ruakura Structure Plan – Retain Figure 2-14
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.005 Figure 2-1 Peacocke
Structure Plan-Land Use
Support in Amend Figure 2-1: Peacocke Structure Plan – Land Use to identify Transpower’s Hamilton Communications Centre and
part
remove the indicative transport corridor link from traversing the site.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.006 3.3.5 Objective and Policies
Support in 3.3.5 Objective and Policies part
Amend 3.3.5b by inserting the word 'adverse' as set out in the submission:
'Sensitive land uses shall avoid adverse effects on and from regionally significant infrastructure'.
Insert a new Policy 3.3.5c
'Manage subdivision, use and development to avoid adverse effects on the safe, efficient and effective operation and
use of existing or planned infrastructure'.
Adopt any other such relief, including additions, deletions or consequential amendments necessary as a result of the
matters raised in these submissions, as necessary to give effect to this submission.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.007 3.4.1.1 Natural Character
Areas
Support in Amend 3.4.1.1c) to make reference to the Transpower’s National Control Centre in Hall Road.
part
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.008 Peacocke Built Environment
Support in Insert new objectives and policies, as set out in the submission, into 3.4.6.4 Peacocke Built Environment to ensure that
part
existing regionally significant infrastructure is not compromised by the development of the structure plan area.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.009 3.7.1.9 Stormwater
Support in Amend 3.7.1.9 to indicate that other land use could adversely affect transmission lines.
part
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.010 4.5.3 Activity Status Table – Support
Medium-Density Residential
Zone
Retain the Advice Note to the 4.5.3 Activity Status Table relating to Electricity Transmission Corridors.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.011 8.3 Rules – Activity Status
Support
Retain Note to activity table that relates to Electricity Transmission Corridors
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.012 10.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain the advice note to the activity status Rule 10.3 as it relates to Electricity Transmission Corridors
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.013 11.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain the advice note to the activity status table 11.3 as it relates to Electricity Transmission Corridors as notified.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.014 14.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain advice note 1 under the Rule 14.3 - Activity Status Table as notified.
Page 361 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.015 15.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain the advice note to the Activity Status Table for Open Space Zones.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.016 16.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain the advice note to Rule 16.3 Activity Status Table for Community Facilities Zones.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.017 18.4 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Amend 18.4 to add an advice note for activities and buildings in the Electricity Transmission Corridors to see Chapter
25.7: City-wide – Network Utilities and Electricity Transmission Corridor.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.018 20.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Retain the advice note below Rule 20.3 regarding activities and buildings in the Electricity Transmission Corridors.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.019 4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Support
Retain the Advice Note Rule 4.3.1 relating to Electricity Transmission Corridors.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.020 22.2 Objectives and Policies
Natural Hazards
Support in Seeks the retention of Objective 22.2.1 and Policies 22.2.1a i) and iii) and Policy 22.2.1f; and amendments to Policy
part
22.2.1h to clarify the extent to which the flood risk is managed.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.021 22.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.022 23.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 23.2.2 and Policies 23.2.2a x, xi, and xv. Amend Policy 23.2.2a xvi to reflect the new terminology
part
promoted by the submitter in its Corridor Management Approach.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.023 Table 23.3a
Support in Amend Rule 23.3a ix to reflect the new terminology promoted by the submitter in its Corridor Management Approach.
part
Insert an advice note following Table 23.3 regarding the need for consultation with Transpower when undertaking
subdivision within and Electricity Transmission Corridor.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.024 23.6.6 Subdivision Activities
within Transmission
Corridors A or B
Support in Amend Rule 23.6.6 regarding Subdivision Activities within Transmission Corridors A or B with amendments to reflect
part
the new terminology promoted by Transpower in its Corridor Management Approach.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.025 23.8 Restricted Discretionary Support in Amend Rule 23.8a) ii to refer to new Matters of Discretion and Assessment Criteria MXX sought by the submitter on
Activities Matters of
part
Chapter 25.7 and reflect new terminology promoted by the submitter in its Corridor Management Approach.
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.026 25.2.2 Objectives and
Policies Earthworks and
Vegetation Removal
Support
Seeks the retention of Rule 22.3rr regarding lifeline utilities (above ground level) as a Permitted Activity.
Seeks the retention of Objective 25.2.2.1 regarding minimisation of adverse effects of earthworks and vegetation
removal.
Page 362 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.027 25.2.3 Rules – Activity Status Support
Table
Seeks the retention of advice note 3 to 25.2.3 regarding the relationship between the National Environmental
Standard for Electricity Transmission Activities and the Plan, and the cross reference from 25.2.3 d) to Chapter 25.7:
Network Utilities and Electricity Transmission Corridors.
Seeks a new rule to require Non-complying Activity consent for any earthworks within an Electricity Transmission
Corridor that cannot comply with the permitted activity standards set out in Rule 25.2.4.2
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.028 25.2.4.2 Earthworks Within
all Transmission Corridors
Support in Amend Rule 25.2.4.2 relating to earthworks within electricity transmission corridors to reflect the new terminology
part
within Transpowers Corridor Management Approach.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.029 25.7.1 Purpose
Support in Retain 25.7.1 Purpose b), c), d) and f) without modification.
part
Amend 25.7.1e) to clarify the consenting implications of the Electricity Transmission Corridor.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.030 25.7.2.1 Objective and
Policies
Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.1 and Policies 25.7.2.1a to 25.7.2.1f.
part
Amend 25.7.2.1 explanation to acknowledge risks to people and property.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.031 25.7.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Support in Retain Objective 25.7.2.2.
part
Amend Policies 25.7.2.2a and 25.7.2.2e to provide for an appropriate balance between the potential adverse effects of
network utilities and the constraints imposed on network utilities by their technical and operational characteristics
Amend Policy 25.7.2.2e to clarify what locations it applies to.
Delete Policy 25.7.2.2b as intent is unclear.
Retain Policies 25.7.2.2c and 25.7.2.2d.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.032 25.7.2.4 Objective and
Policies
Support in Amend Objective 25.7.2.4 to relate more specifically to new resources.
part
Retain Policies 25.7.2.4a to 25.7.2.4f and 25.7.2.4h.
Amend Policy 25.7.2.4g to provide for an appropriate balance between the potential adverse effects of network
utilities and the constraints imposed on network utilities by their technical and operational characteristics
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.033 25.7.3 Rules – Activity Status Support in Retain the text under the heading for Table 25.7.3 Activity Status
part
Amend Rule 25.7.3 e) to clarify relationship with Electricity (Hazards from Trees) Regulations 2003.
Retain Rules 25.7.3 g), i) and j).
Insert a new activity into Rule 25.7.3 to provide for the minor upgrading of Electricity Transmission at and above 110kV
Page 363 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
to be carried out as a permitted activity and other upgrading to be carried out as a restricted discretionary activity
Retain the electricity transmission lines on the Planning Maps
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.034 25.7.4 Rules – Activity Status Support in Amend Rule 25.7.4 relating to Electricity Transmission Corridors in order to reflect Transpower’s refined Corridor
– Electricity Transmission
part
Management Approach.
Corridors
Amend advice notes 1 and 2 to Rules 25.7.3 and 25.7.4 to include relevant references to the city wide rules as well as
the zone rules
Retain advice notes 3 to 9to Rules 25.7.3 and 25.7.4 without modification (other than correcting the reference to the
NESETA and NZECP34)
Add a new cross reference to the assessment criteria set out in Appendix 1.2, Volume 2, with respect to the restricted
discretionary activity status of buildings or structures associated with non-sensitive land uses in the Electricity
Transmission Yard in existing Urban Areas
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.035 M Electricity Transmission
Support in Amend Appendix 1.2-M1 to M5 - Electricity Transmission in order to:
part
· Require consideration of the effect of subdivision and development on the ability to access transmission
infrastructure for maintenance, inspections and upgrading;
· Recognise that visual effects are a subset of reverse sensitivity effects, along with amenity and nuisance effects;
· Draw attention to the fact that compliance with NZECP34:2001 is mandatory;
· Provide further guidance (through amendments to M2 and M3) with respect to how the design and layout of
subdivision can avoid adverse effects on transmission lines;
· Include an additional assessment criteria to consider complying with safe separation distances required by
NZECP34:2001.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.036 1.7 Definitions Used in the
District Plan
Support in Amend the definition of Electricity Transmission Corridors, building, Minor Upgrading, and Sensitive Land Use
part
Retain the definition of earthworks, electricity transmission network, Lifeline Utilities, and ‘regionally significant
infrastructure’ to the extent that it includes the national grid.
Delete the definition of ‘electricity transmission line’.
Transpower New
Zealand Ltd
1083.037 26.3 Schedule of
Designations
Support in Retain designation references J79 and J79a Ruakura Road substation or combine into a single listing as set out in the
part
submission.
Tripoli Daniel
Tuau
1084.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Tripoli Daniel
Tuau
1084.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Page 364 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Tripoli Daniel
Tuau
1084.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Tripoli Daniel
Tuau
1084.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Shirley T Rago
1085.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Shirley T Rago
1085.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Shirley T Rago
1085.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Shirley T Rago
1085.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Peihana Owen
1086.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Peihana Owen
1086.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Peihana Owen
1086.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Peihana Owen
1086.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Edna Mabel
Johnson
1087.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Edna Mabel
Johnson
1087.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Edna Mabel
Johnson
1087.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Edna Mabel
Johnson
1087.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 365 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
R Andrew Joseph
1088.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
R Andrew Joseph
1088.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
R Andrew Joseph
1088.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
R Andrew Joseph
1088.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Marie Pere
Joseph
1089.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Marie Pere
Joseph
1089.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Marie Pere
Joseph
1089.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Marie Pere
Joseph
1089.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Kristen Hartley
1090.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Kristen Hartley
1090.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Kristen Hartley
1090.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Kristen Hartley
1090.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Deborah Leigh
Brunton
1091.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Deborah Leigh
Brunton
1091.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Deborah Leigh
1091.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Page 366 of 541
Sub Name
Brunton
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Character Area
Area.
Deborah Leigh
Brunton
1091.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Ken Williams
1092.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Ken Williams
1092.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Ken Williams
1092.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Ken Williams
1092.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Jill Patricia Tuau
1093.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Jill Patricia Tuau
1093.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Jill Patricia Tuau
1093.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Jill Patricia Tuau
1093.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Laurence John
Denny
1094.001 3.7.1.8 Open Space Network Oppose
Amend 3.7.1.8 by adding a new paragraph to relate to the open space network near Silverdale being a high level of
landscaping and screening.
Laurence John
Denny
1094.002 Figure 2-14 Ruakura
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Ruakura Structure Plan - add to 3.7.1.8 Open Space Network a new clause to recognise a high level of landscaping and
screening.
Brian Smith
(Spotswood)
1095.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Brian Smith
(Spotswood)
1095.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Brian Smith
(Spotswood)
1095.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Page 367 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Brian Smith
(Spotswood)
1095.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Marama Mete
1096.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Marama Mete
1096.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Marama Mete
1096.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Marama Mete
1096.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Roena McCarthy
1097.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Roena McCarthy
1097.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Roena McCarthy
1097.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Roena McCarthy
1097.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Hata Puriri
(Temple View
Heritage Society)
1098.001 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Amend 5.1.4.2 to extend the Temple Heritage Precinct by including the Temple View Character Area.
Oppose
Amend Appendix 1.5 to add Historic heritage to the information requirements for preparing Comprehensive
Development Plans to ensure the importance of the city’s historic heritage resources addressed.
Delete Appendix 4, Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Area and Precincts.
Council to ask the owners maintain the special character of the area by preserving the David O McKay building for use
as a Stake Centre.
Council to ensure the owners of the buildings and their representatives “take all reasonable and proper care to keep in
a state of good order and repair all buildings and other permanent improvements forming part of the Board's
property”.
Page 368 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Council to ask the owners to consult with the community to determine ways that all of the campus buildings can be
repurposed.
Amend the Plan to rezone the area opposite the boys dormitories on Tuhikaramea Rd from ‘future residential’ to
residential.
Council encourages the owners to consider the request of local sports clubs and other community organisations
regarding the use of the CCNZ Campus grounds.
Council does not approve changes to Tuhikaramea Road with the addition of two round-a-bouts, parking bays and
additional landscaping
Hata Puriri
(Temple View
Heritage Society)
1098.002 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Amend 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character Area by including the area into the Temple Heritage Precinct.
Add Historic heritage to the list of information requirements for those parties preparing Comprehensive Development
Plans in order to ensure that applicants are aware of the importance of the city’s historic heritage resources.
Delete Appendix 4, Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Area and Precincts.
Seeks Council to ask the owners to make the changes to the David O McKay building that will enable it to be
repurposed as a Stake Centre.
Seeks Council to ensure that the owners of the buildings and their representatives, “take all reasonable and proper
care to keep in a state of good order and repair all buildings and other permanent improvements forming part of the
Board's property”.
Seeks Council to ask the owners to consult with the community to determine ways that all of the campus buildings can
be repurposed.
Seeks the rezoning of the area opposite the boys dormitories on Tuhikaramea Rd that is currently zoned ‘future
residential’ as residential.
Seeks Council to encourage the owners to consider the request of local sports clubs and other community
organisations regarding the use of the CCNZ Campus grounds.
Opposes changes to Tuhikaramea Road with the addition of two round-a-bouts, parking bays and additional
landscaping.
Page 369 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Kirkdale
Investments Ltd
and Kimbrae
Farms Ltd
1099.001 13.1 Purpose
Support
Supports 13.1 - Purpose - Rototuna Town Centre Zone.
Kirkdale
Investments Ltd
and Kimbrae
Farms Ltd
1099.002 1 Plan Overview
Support
Generally supportive of the provisions relating to the Rototuna Town Centre so long as they remain consistent with
recent decisions related to Variation 12. Address submissions raised by the submitter appropriately and provide for
any consequential amendments necessary to give effect to the submission and the RMA.
Kirkdale
Investments Ltd
and Kimbrae
Farms Ltd
1099.003 4.1 Purpose
Support
Amend the Plan to be consistent with the recent Variation 12 decision, including as amended in future through agreed
resolutions of the Variation 12 appeals.
Kirkdale
Investments Ltd
and Kimbrae
Farms Ltd
1099.004 Figure 7-1 Rototuna Town
Centre Concept Plan
Support in Figure 7-1 Rototuna Town Centre Concept Plan:
part
The planning provisions need to be framed in such a way that there is flexibility to ensure desirable changes and
refinements can be accommodated without introducing an unnecessarily complex legal process.
Provision of clarity that the two main land uses to be accommodated within the Active Recreational Reserve Area
(identified as Area "P" of the CDP Area Map, Appendix 7 Figure 7-2) are the sports fields and a stormwater detention
system/drainage swale. Consequential amendments as a result upon areas "Q" & "R" and associated roading network.
Clarification of the location and activity mix within area "A", the Town Square and associated roading network.
Kirkdale
Investments Ltd
and Kimbrae
Farms Ltd
1099.005 Figure 7-2 Comprehensive
Development Plan AreasRototuna Town Centre
Support in Figure 7-1 Rototuna Town Centre Concept Plan:
part
The planning provisions need to be framed in such a way that there is flexibility to ensure desirable changes and
refinements can be accommodated without introducing an unnecessarily complex legal process.
Provision of clarity that the two main land uses to be accommodated within the Active Recreational Reserve Area
(identified as Area "P" of the CDP Area Map, Appendix 7 Figure 7-2) are the sports fields and a stormwater detention
system/drainage swale. Consequential amendments as a result upon areas "Q" & "R" and associated roading network.
Clarification of the location and activity mix within area "A", the Town Square and associated roading network.
Kirkdale
Investments Ltd
and Kimbrae
1099.006 1.4.9.2 Part 2 Guidelines for
the Rototuna Town Centre
Support in 1.4.9.2 Part 2 Guidelines for the Rototuna Town Centre. The Design Guide may be compromised by the inclusion of
part
specific requirements which limit the range of design outcomes and inhibit innovative design. Request expressed in
terms of broad principles.
Page 370 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Farms Ltd
Alice BrownHaenga
1100.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Alice BrownHaenga
1100.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Alice BrownHaenga
1100.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Alice BrownHaenga
1100.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Ringihia Te Aroha
Watene
1101.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Ringihia Te Aroha
Watene
1101.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Ringihia Te Aroha
Watene
1101.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Ringihia Te Aroha
Watene
1101.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Charlotte W Timu
(Retired)
1102.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Charlotte W Timu
(Retired)
1102.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Charlotte W Timu
(Retired)
1102.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Charlotte W Timu
(Retired)
1102.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Edna Rivers
1103.001 5.1 Purpose
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Support
Page 371 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Poulava
Edna Rivers
Poulava
1103.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Edna Rivers
Poulava
1103.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Edna Rivers
Poulava
1103.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.001 2.2 Objectives and Policies
Strategic Framework
Oppose
Oppose. Replace all reference to "shall' with 'should' across all policies in section 2.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.002 2.2.3 Objective and Policies
Urban Design Approach
Oppose
Policy 2.2.3a uses highly subjective language. Delete and replace with amended text as per submission. Delete Policy
2.2.3c.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.003 3 Structure Plans
Oppose
Figures relating to the Rotokauri Structure Plan (Figure 3.6.2a, b, c, d, e, f, and g) should be included in the Appendix 2.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.004 Appendix 2 Structure Plans
Oppose
(Figures 3.6.2a, 3.6.2b, 3.6.2c, 3.6.2d, 3.6.2e, 3.6.2f, and 3.6.2g relating to the Rotokauri Structure Plan should be
included in the Appendix 2.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.005 3.3.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
3.3.1 (b) Objective and Policies - Structure Plans. Reword 3.3.1 (b) to include the word 'progressively' so that the first
line reads "Housing densities should progressively achieve.."
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.006 3.3.6 Objective and Policies
Oppose
3.3.6(b) Objective and Policies - Structure Plans: Reword Policy 3.3.6(b) to include the wording "..retains features of
the landscape identified on structure plans".
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.007 3.6.1 Objectives and Policies Oppose
3.6.1 Objectives and Policies (Rotokauri Structure Plan):
3.6.1.1b
Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10
3.6.1.2a
Delete second sentence in policy.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.008 3.6.2.1 Suburban Centres
Concept Plan
Oppose
The notation of School on the submitter's land be deleted from Figure 2-11 (Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre) or is
clearly shown as “indicative” in the text and maps. Specific provision be made for a school shown on a Structure Plan
as a Permitted Activity.
Hounsell Holdings
1104.009 3.6.2.3 Suburban Centre
Oppose
3.6.2.3 Suburban Centre Page 372 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Ltd
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
Remove staging from Rotokauri Suburban Centre.
1104.010 3.6.2.5 Open Space Network Support in 3.6.2.5 Open Space Network (Rotokauri):
part
Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10.
Include policy on the form and function of the “Central North South Collector Transport Corridor”.
Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10
The reference to the 50m central green corridor requires review given that the stormwater system has proven to be
impractical.
Add as 3.6.2.5 v)
“School sites – sports fields and other informal recreation space available for public use.”
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.011 3.6.2.7 Transportation
Network
Oppose
3.6.2.7 Transportation Network (Rotokauri Structure Plan): Enable use of designation process for protection and
acquisition of any transport corridors in order to achieve network outcomes.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.012 3.6.2.9 Staging
Oppose
3.6.2.9 Staging (Rotokauri Structure Plan) and Figures 3.6.2a, 3.6.2b, 3.6.2c, 3.6.2d, 3.6.2e, 3.6.2f, and 3.6.2g.
For each Figure include reference to where the various cross sections apply.
Delete second sentence in policy 3.6.2.9
Include additional areas to the north and west of the suburban centre as Part of Stage 1.
Include commentary that fully explains the rationale of staging:
“The extent of Stage 1 will facilitate efficient development of infrastructure and provide necessary critical mass for the
provision of local services. The extent of Stage 1 will facilitate completion of a road network with a desirable level of
connectivity.”
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.013 3.6.2.8 Industrial
Oppose
3.6.2.8 Industrial (Rotokauri Structure Plan). Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green
corridor on Figure 2-10.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.014 3.6.3.1 Water, Wastewater
and Stormwater Services
Oppose
Amend 3.6.3.1 Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Services (Rotokauri) to ensure up-to-date commentary that
reflects work/studies undertaken to date (i.e. the extension of the wastewater interceptor/stormwater management
recent modeling and catchment planning).
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.015 3.6 Rotokauri
Oppose
Provide Rules in all zones so that any activity that compromises the ability to give effect to a structure plan outcome
requires consent as a Restricted Discretionary Activity Discretion would be restricted to matters relating to alternative
Page 373 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
methods and locations that can avoid adverse effects on structure plan outcomes, and include conditions that limit
consent duration.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.016 4.1.1 General Residential
Zone
Oppose
Opposes 4.1.1 b) as it is inconsistent with Policy 4.2.1a
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.017 4.2 Objectives and Policies
Residential Zones
Oppose
Amend the Policies in 4.2 to replace the word "shall" with "should".
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.018 4.2.1 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 4.2.1a so that the achievement of a residential density of 16 dwellings per hectare is a long term
intention. .
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.019 4.2.3 Objective and Policies
Oppose
Amend Policy 4.2.3a.elete the word 'quality'
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.020 4.4 Rules – General
Standards – General
Residential, Residential
Intensification Zones and
Large Lot Residential Zone
Oppose
Amend Rule 4.4 to ensure appropriate provisions that support residential intensification (e.g. comprehensive
development plans where permitted standards are not met as a controlled activity on sites over 3000m2 and where
the minimum net site area is 350m2).
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.021 4.4.8 Fences and Walls
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.4.8Fences and Walls
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.022 4.5 Rules – Medium-Density Oppose
Residential Zone
Amend Rule 4.5 so that Comprehensive Development Plans are a Controlled activity.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.023 5.4.1 Density
Oppose
5.4.1 Density - Amend 5.4.1a)a) and 5.4.1a)b) relating to Ridgeline Character Area by reducing the minimum net site
area from 800m2 to 600m2.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.024 6.2.2 Objective and Policies
Suburban Centres
Support in Amend the Plan to remove the distinction between core and fringe zoning and rules for suburban centres.
part
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.025 23.2 Objectives and Policies
Subdivision
Oppose
Amend Objectives and Policies in 23.2 -Subdivision to clarify how subdivision will contribute to residential yield
requirements.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.026 23.5.1 Telecommunication,
Electricity, Gas and
Computer Media
Oppose
Delete Rule 23.5.1 a) regarding the provision of Telecommunication, Electricity, Gas and Computer Media services.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.027 23.7.1 Allotment Size and
Shape
Oppose
Amend Rule 23.7.1 a) and k) by reducing the minimum net site area in the General Residential Zone from 400m2 to
350m2 and in the Special Natural Zone (Ridgeline Character Area) from 800m2 to 600m2
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.028 23.7.3 General Residential
Zone, Large Lot Residential
Oppose
Amend Subdivision Design Standards in Rule 23.7.3 General Residential Zone, Large Lot Residential Zone and All
Special Character Zones to support residential intensification
Page 374 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Zone and All Special
Character Zones
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.029 24.3.3 Level of Contribution
Oppose
24.3.3 Level of Contribution - Amend to take into account the existing capacity that is available and add the following
matters: forecast need; existing open spaces resources; shared use opportunities; and other local circumstances.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.030 24.4.1 Reserves Level of
Service
Oppose
Reserves levels of service are based on outdated assumptions, and should be planned through structure planning
ahead of development to take account of need; Delete Rules 24.4.1 a) and b) or refer to standards as maxima, not
minima.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.031 25.2.6 Restricted
Discretionary Activities
Matters of Discretion and
Assessment Criteria
Oppose
Seeks the deletion of matter R4 relating to water quality, water courses, land stability, erosion, sediment, and
stormwater from consideration for any activity that does not comply with the earthworks standards in Rule 25.2.5.1.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.032 25.13.2 Objectives and
Policies Three Waters
Oppose
Amend all policies in 25.13.2 (Objectives and Policies - Three Waters) to replace the word "shall" with "should".
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.033 25.13.4.2 Stormwater
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.13.4.2 regarding stormwater discharges.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.034 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency
Measures
Oppose
Delete Rule 25.13.4.5 regarding Water Efficiency Measures.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.035 25.13.4.6 Water Impact
Assessments
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.13.4.6 (Water Impact Assessments) so that a Water Impact Assessment is not required where an
approved Integrated Catchment Management Plan is in place.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.036 25.14.2 Objectives and
Policies Transportation
Oppose
Amend all Policies in 25.14.2 by replacing the word "shall" with "should".
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.037 25.14.3 Rules – Activity
Status Table
Oppose
Amend the footnotes of 25.14.3 to cross reference transport related activities in zone chapters.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.038 25.14.4.3 Integrated
Transport Assessment
Requirements
Oppose
Amend Rule 25.14.4.3 to increase the general minimum threshold for an Integrated Transport Assessment to at least
250 vehicles per day and 1,500 vehicles per day for a structure planned area; delete Rule 25.14.4.3 e) relating to area
specific traffic generation thresholds prior to the opening of the Te Rapa Bypass.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.039 25.15 Urban Design
Oppose
Delete the reference to 'high quality design' and refer to 'good quality'.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.040 25.15.2 Objectives and
Policies Urban Design
Oppose
Replace the word “shall” with “should” in all policies under 25.15.2
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.041 25.15.2.2 Objective and
Policies
Oppose
Delete policy 25.15.2.1.c
Page 375 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.042 26.3 Schedule of
Designations
Oppose
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.043 1.2 Restricted Discretionary
Activities – Matters of
Discretion and Assessment
Criteria
Oppose
Review Volume 2, Appendix 1 with a view of streamlining and simplifying, ensuring that only matters that are relevant
to the reason for consent is required are considered.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.044 1.5.13 Integrated Transport
Assessment
Oppose
Amend to increase the threshold for an Integrated Transport Assessment to 250 vehicles per day, remove the
requirement for an ITA when in Structure Plan Areas (except for high traffic generating activities) and improve linkages
to Appendices 1.5.13, 1.2V and 15-3.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.045 Figure 2-8 Rotokauri
Structure Plan-Land Use
Oppose
Figure 2-8 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Land Use Amend Figure 2-8 in accordance with the attached Figure set out in the submission to show Medium density
residential development extending to the north of the Suburban Centre; and
Include staging boundary on Figure 2-8.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.046 Figure 2-9 Rotokauri
Structure Plan-Staging and
Transport Network
Oppose
Amend Figure 2-9 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Staging and Transport Network to include additional areas to the north and
west of the suburban centre as Part of Stage 1 as shown on attachments set out in the submission.
1104.047 Figure 2-10 Rotokauri
Structure Plan-Reserve
Network
Oppose
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
Add the Stormwater Channel at Rotokauri to Schedule of Designations.
Add the Collector road link between Ruffell Road and Gilchrist Street that is not covered by an approved CDP to the
Schedule of Designations (See submission attachment for details)
Provide an alternative route for the central north south collector that avoids the need for a large cut and overpass.
Amend Figure 2-10 Rotokauri Structure Plan-Reserve Network title to 'Open Space Network' to:
Show specific location of central green corridor;
Show the stormwater drainage pattern that has been developed as part of the Catchment Management Plan for
Rotokauri;
Show the “recreational nodes” on the Figure and include in the legend with separate symbol.
Clarify terminology and/or identify the location of the central green corridor on Figure 2-10. The green central
corridor route should be designated.
Include policy on the form and function of the “Central North South Collector Transport Corridor”.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.048 Figure 2-11 Rotokauri
Neighbourhood Centre
Oppose
Amend Figure 2-11 Rotokauri Neighbourhood Centre to show the indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through
suburban centre including:
• Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre
• Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose.
Page 376 of 541
Sub Name
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
Sub Point Plan Provision
1104.049 Figure 2-12 Rotokauri
Interface Areas
Sub Type Summary
Oppose
Amend Figure 2-12 Rotokauri Interface Areas to show the indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through
suburban centre including:
• Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre
• Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.050 Figure 2-13 Rotokauri
Suburban Centre Primary
Frontages
Oppose
Amend Figure 2-13 Rotokauri Suburban Centre Primary Frontages to show the indicative proposal for stormwater
drainage through suburban centre including:
• Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre
• Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.051 Figure 3-2 Rotokauri
Oppose
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas –
Medium Density Residential
Zone
Figure 3-2 Rotokauri Comprehensive Development Plan Areas – Medium Density Residential Zone.
Show indicative proposal for stormwater drainage through suburban centre including:
• Stormwater directed to the north of the suburban centre
• Neighbourhood green located to the north and having a dual stormwater purpose.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.052 Zoning Map 14A
Oppose
Amend Map 14A to add land to Stage 1 of Rotokauri Structure Plan.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.053 Zoning Map 23A
Oppose
Map 23A-increase the area of Stage 1 Rotokauri Structure Plan. The Special Natural Zone/Ridgeline Character Area
extends too far down Lee Road. The residential Zone will provide an appropriate transition to medium density
residential.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.054 Zoning Map 24A
Oppose
Map 24A-increase the extent of Stage 1 to include additional residential areas to the north and west of the existing
first stage. Medium density residential zoning to be shown extending to the north of the Suburban Centre. Any loss of
employment land can be addressed through an extension to the north of Ruffell Road, which is currently shown
outside the structure plan area.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.055 Zoning Map 15A
Oppose
Amend Map 15A to extend Stage 1 Rotokauri to include additional industrial land to the south of the Te Kowhai Road
Extension.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.056 Features Map 14B
Oppose
Amend Features Map 14B by including a designation for the Green Central Corridor.
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.057 Features Map 23B
Oppose
Amend Features Map 23B by including a designation for the Green Central Corridor.
Page 377 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Hounsell Holdings
Ltd
1104.058 Features Map 24B
Oppose
Amend Features Map 24B by including a designation for the Green Central Corridor.
Annetta Margaret
Peihopa
1105.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Annetta Margaret
Peihopa
1105.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Annetta Margaret
Peihopa
1105.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Annetta Margaret
Peihopa
1105.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Robert & Anna
Moore & Cox
(Anglican Action /
Poverty Action
Waikato)
1106.001 4.4.2 Site Coverage
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.2 to increase site coverage in General Residential and Residential Intensification Zone (except
part
Hamilton East Character Area).
Robert & Anna
Moore & Cox
(Anglican Action /
Poverty Action
Waikato)
1106.002 4.4.10 Outdoor Living Area
Support in Amend Rule 4.4.10 b) iv text to add in 'where possible' as the rule as presently written is too restrictive in the
part
Residential Intensification zone.
Robert & Anna
Moore & Cox
(Anglican Action /
Poverty Action
Waikato)
1106.003 4.4.12 Residential Unit Size – Oppose
Residential Intensification
Zone
Amend Rule 4.4.12 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units; and inserting an
additional point iv. to provide for a minimum gross floor area for "3 or more bedrooms".
Robert & Anna
Moore & Cox
(Anglican Action /
Poverty Action
Waikato)
1106.004 4.6.4 Residential Unit Size
Amend Rule 4.6.4 by reducing the minimum gross floor area requirements for residential units; and inserting an
additional point iv. to provide for a minimum gross floor area for "3 or more bedrooms".
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Amend Rule 4.4.10 c) i. to reduce the outdoor living areas requirements for detached and duplex dwellings.
Amend Rule 4.4.10 e), as set out in the submission by deleting the text and replacing with "In the General Residential
Zone, any communal open space shall be optional, but cannot contribute more than 50% of the above provisions".
Oppose
Page 378 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Robert & Anna
Moore & Cox
(Anglican Action /
Poverty Action
Waikato)
1106.005 Zoning Map 44A
Oppose
Map 44A-rezone the Industrial Zone around Frankton to a mixed use residential zone.
Desiree Joyce
Park
1107.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Desiree Joyce
Park
1107.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Desiree Joyce
Park
1107.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Desiree Joyce
Park
1107.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Brian Trevor Pryor
1108.001 12.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support
Supports 12.3 Activity Status Table.
Brian Trevor Pryor
1108.002 Zoning Map 1A
Support
Map 1A-Retain Te Rapa North Industrial Zone for Bern Road
Scott Bready
1109.001 Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-delete residential zoning and retain the existing commercial zoning for the west side of Clifton Road.
Department of
Conservation
1110.001 Peacocke Natural System
Support
Retain Objectives 3.4.6.1, 3.4.6.2 and 3.4.6.3 and related policies as notified
Department of
Conservation
1110.002 15 Open Space Zones
Support in Retain the chapter provisions subject to amendments sought by the submitter.
part
Department of
Conservation
1110.003 15.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Policy for All Open Space Zones under 15.2.2c, so adverse effects on amenity, natural and heritage values of
part
those areas are avoided, remedied or mitigated rather than minimised.
Department of
Conservation
1110.004 20 Natural Environments
Department of
Conservation
1110.005 Significant Natural Areas
Support in Retain Objective 20.2.1 and Policy 20.2.1o. Amend Policy 20.2.1c vi to align with the RMA regarding avoiding,
20.2.1 Objective and Policies part
remedying or mitigating. Amend Policy 20.2.1m and 20.2.1n to clarify wording.
Department of
1110.006 Significant Natural Areas
Support in Amend existing objectives, policies and methods related to the maintenance of indigenous biological diversity.
part
Include implementation methods for management of Natural Environments, vegetation removal and protection of
biodiversity values.
Support in Retain Objective and Policies 20.2.2a and 20.2.2b. Amend the explanation to replace references to 'weed eradication'
Page 379 of 541
Sub Name
Conservation
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
20.2.2 Objective and Policies part
with 'pest control'
Department of
Conservation
1110.007 Significant Trees
Support
Retain Objective 20.2.3 and Policies 20.2.3a to 20.2.3f regarding Significant Trees
Department of
Conservation
1110.008 20.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rule 20.3 to recognise that habitats for indigenous species may be adversely affected by the removal of exotic
part
vegetation.
Department of
Conservation
1110.009 21.1 Purpose
Support in Amend Chapter 21 to provide clear and robust implementation methods for the management of Waikato River and
part
Gullies values, vegetation removal and protection of biodiversity values.
Department of
Conservation
1110.010 21.2.1 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 21.2.1 and Policies 21.2.1a to 21.2.1g subject to further consideration of implementation methods.
part
Amend the explanation to clearly acknowledge potential conflict between values and use of the River and Gullies, and
that not all activities will be appropriate in all areas.
Department of
Conservation
1110.011 21.2.2 Objective and Policies Support in Amend Objective 21.2.2 to recognise natural values for the Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems.
part
Department of
Conservation
1110.012 21.2.4 Objective and Policies Support in Retain Objective 21.2.4 and Policies 21.2.4a to 21.2.4c for the Waikato River Corridor and Gully Systems.
part
Highview
Properties
Limited
1111.001 Zoning Map 8A
Oppose
Map 8A-Remove the Natural Open Space Zone from Lots 500 and 505 DP 419036 and rezone as General Residential,
with those parts of Lot 505 falling outside proposed Lot 191 being rezoned Residential Medium Density; Amend the
provisions of Natural Open Space and Medium Density Areas considering how they interact.
Highview
Properties
Limited
1111.002 15 Open Space Zones
Oppose
Delete the Natural Open Space Zone from Lots 500 and 505 DP 419036 and rezone as General Residential, with those
parts of Lot 505 falling outside proposed Lot 191 being rezoned Residential Medium Density.
Highview
Properties
Limited
1111.003 4.1.3 Medium-Density
Residential Zone
Oppose
Rezone land in the Eton Estate residential development (refer to plan in submission) from Natural Open Space to
General Residential and Residential Medium Density.
Highview
Properties
Limited
1111.004 24 Financial Contributions
Oppose
Review the provisions of section 24. Pre 223/224 payment of LTCCP fees should be held by Council as 'unit credits'
against future development.
Malcolm Williams
1112.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
Petra Reiter
1113.001 9.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend the rules to retain the mix of residential/light industrial and service industries of the Riverlea Road area.
part
Amend the provisions of Natural Open Space and Medium Density Areas to clarify how they interact, affect density
and existing approved resource consents.
Page 380 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Raymond Russell
Park
1114.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Raymond Russell
Park
1114.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Raymond Russell
Park
1114.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Raymond Russell
Park
1114.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.001 2.2.4 Objective and Policies
Central City, Business and
Industry
Support
Support. Retain Objective 2.2.4
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.002 2.2.5 Objective and Policies
Business and Industry
Support
Support. Retain Objective 2.2.5 which recognises the role of industry and commercial activities have in supporting the
economic wellbeing of the city.
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.003 2.2.7 Objective and Policies
The Waikato River
Support
Retain Objective 2.2.7 The Waikato River
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.004 4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Support
Retain Rule 4.3.1bb).
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.005 5.5.5 Home-based
Businesses
Oppose
Amend Rule 5.5.5 (a) to allow for the employment of people other than people residing on the site.
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.006 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Support
Residential, Special Heritage
and Special Natural Zones
Retain Rule 5.3.1 z) Activity Status – Special Residential, Special Heritage and Special Natural Zones as offices should be
discouraged in residential areas.
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.007 7.1.4 Precinct 4 – Opoia
Precinct
Delete the Opoia Precinct.
Oppose
Page 381 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.008 7.2 Objectives and Policies
Central City Zone
Oppose
Amend 7.2 to include controls over strip clubs and strip bars so they are a non compliant activity in the CBD
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.009 7.2.9 Objective and Policies
Opoia Precinct
Oppose
Delete Objectives, Policies and explanation in 7.2.9 regarding the Opoia Precinct.
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.010 7.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Policy 7.2.3a) regarding increased residential accommodation within and close to the Central City.
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.011 7.2.2 Objective and Policies
Support
Retain Policy 7.2.2b regarding the Central City as the preferred location for retail office, cultural and entertainment
activities.
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.012 Figure 5-1 Central City Zone
Precinct Plan
Oppose
Delete the Opoia Precinct. The area should instead be zoned Residential Intensification.
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.013 Table 15-2b Number of
Support
parking and loading spaces
required – Central City Zone
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.014 Table 15-2g Number of
Support in Amend Appendix 15, Table 15-2g to remove the requirement for lockers for cyclists.
bicycle end-of-journey
part
facilities required – Central
City Zone and Business Zones
1 to 7
Hamilton Central
Business
Association
1115.015 Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A-reducing the Business 2 Zoning around Claudelands Events Centre.
Waikaraka Emily
Ruwhiu
1116.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Waikaraka Emily
Ruwhiu
1116.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Waikaraka Emily
Ruwhiu
1116.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Retain Appendix 15, Table 15-2b regarding no minimum car parking requirements in the Central City Zone
Page 382 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Waikaraka Emily
Ruwhiu
1116.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Hamilton
Homezone Ltd
and Ingham
Group
1117.001 Zoning Map 26A
Support in Map 26A-Rezone Lot 1 DP 388507 (Land north of Ingham Motors Site) from Industrial to Business zone 1 and retain
part
Business 1 zone for Lot 1 and 2 DP 440887 and Lot 2 DP 388507.
Hamilton
Homezone Ltd
and Ingham
Group
1117.002 6.1 Purpose
Support
Hamilton
Homezone Ltd
and Ingham
Group
1117.003 6.2.1 Objective and Policies
Sub-regional Centres
Support in Amend 6.2.1 to make direct reference to the Business 1 (sub regional centre fringe) zone within the objectives and
part
policies of Chapter 6 Business 1-7 Zones.
Hamilton
Homezone Ltd
and Ingham
Group
1117.004 6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Support in Amend Rules 6.3 a), b) and d) so that building works are permitted subject to compliance with standards.
part
Amend Rule 6.3 Offices in the Business 1 zone to provide for multiple office activity within each site. Amend 6.3 to
include "Integrated Business Park Development" in the Business 1 zone as a Restricted Discretionary Activity.
Amend Rule 6.3 so that Licensed premises, restaurants and cafe’s are permitted activities, up to 400m2 within the
Business 1 zone.
Amend Rules 6.3 p) to hh) to provide for an integrated or comprehensive retail activity across a site like Home Straight
Park.
Amend Rules 6.3 w) and x) to provide for yard based retail activities within the Business 1 zone.
Amend Rule 6.3 to clarify that yard based retail activities include new vehicle sales yard activities and associated
support activities.
Amend Rule 6.3 to provide for commercial Places of Assembly as permitted activities within the Business 1 zone and
amend the definition for Places of Assembly to include ‘commercial’.
Hamilton
Homezone Ltd
and Ingham
Group
1117.005 6.4.1 Maximum Building
Height
Support
Retain Rule 6.4.1a) regarding the maximum building height of 15m within the Business 1 zone and remove the Amenity
Protection Area applied to the Business 1 Zone.
Hamilton
Homezone Ltd
and Ingham
1117.006 6.4.3 Building Setbacks
Support
Retain Rule 6.4.3 regarding the 5m building setback in residential and special character zones.
Retain Section 6.1 i) of the purpose for the Business 1-7 Zones
Page 383 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Group
Hamilton
Homezone Ltd
and Ingham
Group
1117.007 24.3.3 Level of Contribution
Oppose
Amend 24.3.to provide greater certainty for plan users as to the amount of any financial contribution that maybe
imposed through a condition of resource consent.
Hamilton
Homezone Ltd
and Ingham
Group
1117.008 25.14.4.2 Parking, Loading
Spaces and Manoeuvring
Areas
Support
Retain Rule 25.14.4.2 for shared parking provision in the Business 1 Zone
Peter Mete-Smith
1118.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Peter Mete-Smith
1118.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Peter Mete-Smith
1118.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Peter Mete-Smith
1118.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Laitohi Elkington
1119.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Laitohi Elkington
1119.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Laitohi Elkington
1119.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Laitohi Elkington
1119.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Brian James Hollis
1120.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Brian James Hollis
1120.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Brian James Hollis
1120.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Brian James Hollis
1120.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Comprehensive
Support
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Page 384 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Patricia Helen
Going
1121.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Patricia Helen
Going
1121.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Patricia Helen
Going
1121.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Patricia Helen
Going
1121.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
The Trust
Company Limited
for AETNZ
Education Trust
1122.001 4.7.2 Childcare Facility
Oppose
Delete Rule 4.7.2c) regarding maximum floor areas for childcare facilities.
The Trust
Company Limited
for AETNZ
Education Trust
1122.002 4.3.1 Activity Status Table –
General Residential Zone,
Residential Intensification
Zone and Large Lot
Residential Zone
Oppose
Amend 4.3.1s) so that "Childcare facility for up to five children" is Permitted (within the Residential Intensification
Zone).
Amend Rule 4.3.1t) so that "Childcare facility for six or more children" is Controlled (within the Residential
Intensification Zone)".
Add a new Rule before Rule 4.10 specifying matters of control for controlled activities for childcare centres of 10 or
more children.
Amend Rule 4.10 to delete the matters of discretion for childcare facilities for 6 or more children.
The Trust
Company Limited
for AETNZ
Education Trust
1122.003 6.3 Rules – Activity Status
Table
Oppose
Amend Rule 6.3 oo) so that Childcare facilities as a Permitted activity (within the Business 2 Zone)
Holly Snape
1123.001 25.13.4.5 Water Efficiency
Measures
Support in Amend Rule 25.13.4.5 so that rainwater tanks for non-potable reuse systems (min 5,000L) and automated grey-water
part
reuse systems are mandatory for all new dwellings.
Supports an incentives based approach to the promotion of water conservation as opposed to a disincentives based
one.
Replace Policy 6.2.4a with one that provides for the establishment of complementary community and service activities
on the fringe of major events facilities
Page 385 of 541
Sub Name
Sub Point Plan Provision
Sub Type Summary
Edna Rivers
Poulava
1124.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Edna Rivers
Poulava
1124.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Edna Rivers
Poulava
1124.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Edna Rivers
Poulava
1124.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Manaoterangi
Ernest Forbes
1125.001 5.1 Purpose
Support
Supports the Special Character Zones as set out in 5.1 Purpose
Manaoterangi
Ernest Forbes
1125.002 5.1.4 Temple View Zone
Support
Supports the Temple View Zone as set out in 5.1.4
Manaoterangi
Ernest Forbes
1125.003 5.1.4.2 Temple View
Character Area
Support
Support the concept of Comprehensive Development Plans and Precincts as set out in 5.1.4.2 Temple View Character
Area.
Manaoterangi
Ernest Forbes
1125.004 Figure 4-5 Temple View
Support
Comprehensive
Development Plan Areas and
Precincts
Supports Figure 4-5 Temple View Comprehensive Development Plan Areas and Precincts.
Claudelands
Property Trust
1126.001 2.1 Purpose
Oppose 2.1. Provide for Early Childhood Centres throughout Hamilton, by providing consistent planning controls and
zoning, particularly as permitted activities subject to meeting specific performance standards.
Oppose
Future proof ECE centres provisions to allow flexibility if changes to existing centres are required, to reflect changing
industry standards and licence requirements.
Claudelands
Property Trust
1126.002 Zoning Map 37A
Oppose
Map 37A- rezone sites of City Limits childcare and the Casalinga café from Special Residential Zone to either Business
zone 2 or 7; amend to change the area of the Special Residential Zone at Claudelands.
Claudelands
Property Trust
1126.003 Features Map 37B
Oppose
Amend Map 37B to exclude existing business and medium density residential development from Claudelands West
Area.
Claudelands
Property Trust
1126.004 1.1.8.1 Activity Not Listed
Oppose
Oppose. Amend the default status for activities not listed, from a Non-complying to a Permitted Activity. Only list
genuine activities as non - complying if warranted.
Claudelands
1126.005 2.2.3 Objective and Policies
Support in Objective and policies uses ambiguous wording and need to reflect outcomes being sought. Add 'compact city' as an
Page 386 of 541
Sub Name
Property Trust
Sub Point Plan Provision
Urban Design Approach
Sub Type Summary
part
objective with supporting policies to limit urban sprawl and increase building densities.
Claudelands
Property Trust
1126.006 5.1.1.1 Claudelands West
Oppose
Amend 5.1.1.1 b) the description of Claudelands West to include activities such as businesses, flats, railway line etc
that affect the character of the area. Amend 5.1.1.1 c) by deleting reference to preserving existing character and allow
for high density residential development.
Claudelands
Property Trust
1126.007 5.2.3 Objective and Policies
Special Residential Zone
Oppose
5.2.3 Objective and policies
Amend objective 5.2.3 and its associated policies, so that they do not apply to Claudelands West;
Add new Objective 5.2.3A specifically for Claudelands West;
Delete policies 5.2.3e, 5.2.3f and 5.2.3g.
Claudelands
Property Trust
1126.008 5.3.1 Activity Status – Special Oppose
Residential, Special Heritage
and Special Natural Zones
5.3.1 Activity Status Table –
Amend the list of activities to promote development of Claudelands West as a future high density residential and
mixed use zone, supporting Claudelands Stadium and the Central City as set out in the submission.
Cl