The Soviet Woman in Estonian Art

Transcription

1 2010
1
Let’s refuse to be what we are (supposed to be)!
Airi Triisberg
5
Eva gives birth to earth
Johannes Saar
7
Around the Golden Soldier Agne Narusyte
10
An artist and his double
Anu Allas
13
Work-based solidarity is killed
Interview with Eiki Nestor
16
18
21
24
Forum
Marge Monko
Art and Identity: The Soviet Woman in Estonian Art
Michael Schwab
The queue as a social statement
Maria-Kristiina Soomre
Five pictures of Flo Kasearu
Kaido Ole
28
The avant-garde is not dead
Interview with René Block
30
Politics of pop art: a private dream or a social practice
Mari Laanemets
34
Ideological and poetic topic of land in the 1930s. Eerik Haamer
Tiina Abel
38
Russian artists in Estonia
Interview with Nikolai Kormašov
43
Leila Pärtelpoeg and the Soviet antique
Mart Kalm
48
Public urban space in the new centre of Tartu
Henn Runnel
51
National kitsch
Interview with Andres Tolts
54
56
Exhibitions
New books
1 2010
All issues of Estonian Art are also available on the Internet: www.einst.ee/Ea/
Those wishing to obtain a
copy of Estonian Art, please
send the Estonian Institute an
International Reply Coupon to
cover the postal expenses.
Estonian Institute: P.O. Box 3469
10 506 Tallinn, Estonia
http://www.einst.ee
email: [email protected]
phone: (372) 631 43 55
fax: (372) 631 43 56
Let’s Refuse to Be What We Are (Supposed to Be)!
Airi Triisberg
Based on the title Let’s Talk About Nationalism!,
it would be tempting to look at this exhibition*
in relation to theories of public space, as it
is precisely the medium of talk that constitutes a core notion in the liberal concept of
the public sphere, most notably elaborated by
Jürgen Habermas. The curatorial statement by
Rael Artel seems to support the parallel with
Habermas, insofar as it stresses the importance
of contemporary art as a site for holding public
discussions. Nevertheless, the curator’s preoccupation with conflict actually indicates a different dynamics of democratic politics, where
‘talk’ proves insufficient as a tool for political
participation. Therefore, a critical account of
the liberal concept of the public sphere also
raises interesting questions in relation to the
exhibition.
However, as much as the concept of the
liberal public sphere is a contested one, to
some extent, the exhibition Let’s Talk About
Nationalism! seems to have been shaped by
one of its key propositions, in the sense that
the curator’s intention of challenging the ‘currently prevalent national discourse, and to
create a counterweight in the public sphere’
doesn’t give a definite answer as to whether
the focus is on the concept of a single, comprehensive public sphere or on a competing
(counter) public spheres. It is not only the
uneasy relationship between the exhibition
and its venue, in terms of whether the national
art museum is supposed to form a part of the
dominant or the counter-public sphere in this
particular case, but also the fact that the notion
of identity is almost exclusively addressed as an
instrument for engendering normativity rather
than a potential tool of empowerment that I
find problematic in this context. At the same
time, it should also be noted that even the
Habermasian definition of the public sphere
appears to be quite operative, insofar as it
allows a conceptual distinction from the state
which has effectively been put to use in the
framework of Let’s Talk About Nationalism! in
order to criticize the ideological and institutional manifestations of the state.
This place between ideology and identity
that forms the focal point of Let’s Talk About
Nationalism! seems to be precisely the framework of political and cultural institutions that
nation-states use in order to shape our contemporary realities and subjectivities. From that
perspective, the exhibition addresses various
ways in which state power is enacted and reproduced in the dominant public sphere, such
as through the education system, media etc.
Nevertheless, it is not so much the legitimacy
of the nation-state that is in question as the
particular processes of subjugation and of making subjects which are de-constructed by showing the performative and repetitive aspects that
form a crucial basis of the formation of national
identities, such as in Katarina Zdjelar’s video
Don’t Do It Wrong! or Jens Haaning’s collage
Estonia, Thursday, November 12, 2009.
One of the main contentions against the liberal concept of the public sphere is based on arguments that reveal the impossibility of possessing
a fully closed identity. In contemporary critical
Katarina Zdjelar
Don’t Do It Wrong! 2007
Video and sound installation
10 min 13 sec
Front cover: Jens Haaning. Estonia, Thursday, November 12, 2009. 2010. Collage. 42 x 59 cm. Detail
Back cover: Siima Škop. Proper Breeding of Young Cattle Guarantees Rich Milk Production. 1954. Offset print.
83.4 x 57.4 cm. Art Museum of Estonia. From the exhibition The Soviet Woman in Estonian Art in Kumu Art Museum, 2010.
Estonian Art 1/2010 (26). Published by the Estonian Institute 2010. ISSN 1406-3549
(online version ISSN 1406-5711)
Editorial board: Tiina Abel, Andres Kurg, Piret Lindpere, Mart Meri, Johannes Saar
Editors: Liina Siib, Eero Epner
Graphic design: Angelika Schneider
Translator: Tiina Randviir
Language editor: Richard Adang
We thank: Cultural Endowment of Estonia, The Art Museum of Estonia, The Museum of Estonian Architecture,
Estonian Theatre and Music Museum, Renita Raudsepp, Hello Upan, Orest Kormašov and Rewill.
Photo credits: Stanislav Stepaško: pp 2–5, 18–20, 24–26, 30–32, 34–37, 41; Foksal Gallery Foundation: p 2;
Reimo Võsa-Tangsoo: pp 3–4, 7–9; Marge Monko: p 6, pp 16–17; Epp Kubu: p 6; Terje Lepp/EPL: p 7; Allfilm: pp 10–12;
Tellervo Kalleinen & Oliver Kochta-Kalleinen: p 13; Tallinn Art Hall: pp 14–15; Alar Kivilo: p 21; Marko Mumm/EPL:
p 22; Rene Suurkaev/EPL: p 22–23; Toomas Huik/Postimees: p 22; Tõnis Saadoja: p 23, 26; Tanel Rannala:
p 23; Ute Klophaus: p 28; Heimar Lenk: p 30; Jüri Okas: p 33; Arne Maasik: p 38–40; The Museum of Estonian
Architecture: p 31, pp 44–47; Orest Kormašov: p 42; Henn Runnel: pp 49–50; Tanel Veenre: p 52; Velvet: pp 52–53;
Kristo Nurmis/EPL: pp 52–53.
Printed at Aktaprint
L e t ’s r e f u s e to b e w hat we are (supposed to be)!
Tanja Muravskaja
Estonian Race. 2010
Digital C-print
á 110 x 87 cm
Artur Żmijewski
Them. 2007
Video. 26 min 25 sec
Foksal Gallery Foundation
L et’s refuse to be what we are (supposed to be)!
theory, identities are seen to be formed through
political struggles, conflicts and antagonisms that
simultaneously constitute and destabilize identities. Moreover, public spaces are conceived as
pluralist battlegrounds where conflicts emerge
without any possibility of achieving a rational
consensus. Such irreconcilability of conflict is
addressed in the works Monuments by Tanja
Muravskaja and Children of the Revolution by John
Phillip Mäkinen, which accentuate the confrontation between the nationality-based division line
of two memory collectives striving for hegemony
in the particular context of Estonia. However,
the frontiers of conflict visualized by Muravskaja
and Mäkinen leave virtually no room for the possibility of transgressing the essentialist notion of
fixed identities in order to shift and reconstitute
antagonistic relations. An important question
emerges: How can contemporary art create an
arena where social identities can be negotiated
and contested?
The exhibition Let’s Talk About Nationalism!
presents two scenarios of how the conflictual
nature of the public sphere(s) can be mediated
through art practices. The video Them by Artur
Z·mijewski could perhaps be interpreted as an
attempt to control social conflict by creating
a set of rules that allow group identification
and conflict to be produced and articulated,
while limiting the struggle over meaning and
hegemony within the realm of visual images.
From that perspective, the ostensible failure
of communication that is evident in the final
episode of the video shouldn’t be seen as being
too pessimistic here, since the stakes are actually not very high: Z·mijewski seems to be more
concerned with proving that the consensual
model is non-functional rather than providing a horizon into which re-negotiated social
relations can be channelled after leaving the
‘social studio’ he has created.
Joanna Rajkowska
Airways. 2008
2-channel video installation
22 min 20 sec
John Phillip Mäkinen
Children of the Revolution. 2007
Installation (textile)
Art Museum of Estonia
Airways by Joanna Rajkowska, or more precisely the part of it documenting a flight over
Budapest, also depends on creating a controlled
framework which is not determined by a fixed
set of rules but rather by the fragility of a situation in which a violent articulation of conflict
can become fatal to all the passengers on board.
Moreover, Rajkowska’s departure point is different from Z·mijewski’s in the sense that she
reverses the power relations that are prevalent
‘outside’, in society. By creating a situation in
which minorities become a majority, Rajkowska
abandons the discourse of victimization that,
in my opinion, forms a bit of a weak point of
the exhibition Let’s Talk About Nationalism!,
insofar as the exhibition predominantly stresses
exclusions, segregations and discriminations that
(ethno-)nationalism produces. In relation to the
L e t ’s r e f u s e to b e w hat we are (supposed to be)!
Johannes Saar
Jens Haaning
Eesti (Estonia). 2010
Mural, installation
882 x 657 x 396 cm
exhibition, it isn’t that the critique of the ethnocentrically constructed public sphere – in the
form prevalent specifically in Eastern Europe,
but also elsewhere – isn’t urgent and necessary.
On the contrary. I want to point out the relative lack of attention to the processes through
which the ethno-national systems of power and
knowledge can be challenged. From that perspective, Joanna Rajkowska’s Airways forms a
notable exception that contests the individualizing effects of identification processes administrated by the ethno-nationally oriented state
apparatuses and offers ways to resist and alter
the subjectivities that are dictated by the ‘norm’.
In that sense, Rajkowska points out another
urgency, besides necessity, for taking a critical
stance towards the subjectification mechanisms
administrated by nation-states: it is of equal
importance to continuously generate new subjectivities and identities, to refuse to be what
nation-states allow us to be.
L et’s refuse to be what we are (supposed to be)!
Tanja Muravskaja
Monuments. 2008
Limestone, glass
* The exhibition Let’s Talk About Nationalism! Between Ideology and
Identity (curated by Rael Artel) took place at the Kumu Art
Museum from 5 February to 25 April 2010. Airi Triisberg
(1982), art critic and cultural theoretician.
Eva Labotkin (b 1982) is a young Estonian video
artist, whose works are still in search of a critical
background system. However, her undertakings
are already producing benevolently ‘oldfashioned’, competing interpretative chains. The
air is thick with Blut-und-Boden (blood and soil)
rhetoric, existential breakdowns and slumbers,
a kind of finalism. Fatalist proverbs bubble up
to the lips, so why not a ritual funereal mood –
earth to earth? Neo-conservatism in younger
Estonian video art? Plus post-Freudianism? Or
perhaps Eva Labotkin, together with Epp Kubu
(b 1982) and Marge Monko (b 1976), leading
the feminist protest against the conservative
depiction of women?
What to think of Labotkin’s video of 2007,
Woman in the Field – a metaphor of woman who
gives birth to a bellyful of black earth? The
never-ending repetitions of rise and decline in
a semiotic dead end? Good old Sigmund would
Eva Labotkin
Woman in the Field. 2007
Video. 3 min 6 sec
Video stills
Installation by Eva Labotkin
displayed at the exhibition
Let’s Talk About Nationalism!
in Kumu Art Museum.
In the front:
Separated Ground. 2010
Installation. Soil, wood.
Back on the left:
Belt. 2010.
Video. 6 min 20 sec
Back on the right:
Woman in the Field. 2007
Video. 3 min 6 sec
probably not lose his head: procreation and
death drives, hand-in-glove, Eros and Thanatos.
Puffing on his cigar, he contentedly returns to
his armchair.
On the other hand, there’s the feministSocratic question: why is woman mainly defined
by giving birth? Don’t certain images or, in other
words, an iconographic strategy, suggest desolate biologism? You have been born a woman
and thus you will remain … Doesn’t patriarchal
providence force the feminist war of liberation
to start with deriding social roles? A pretty floral
smock worn by Marge Monko, black earth spilling from Eva Labotkin’s phantom pregnancy,
and Epp Kubu thrashing around in public space
in model feminine fits of hysterics, exactly as
described in psychiatry textbooks. All this contains so much slavish applause to the sexist
iconography of women that the whole thing
turns into a masquerade, posturing and myth.
Komar and Melamid, if I am allowed this distant
parallel, undermined the ideological hagiography of the Soviet Union, and successfully, with
too shiny icons. Cindy Sherman – apologies for
a bit more obvious comparison – dramatised
the social gender into no less than one-woman
theatre. Let us then try to fend off the chauvinist devil with the weapon of theatricality in
Estonia as well.
And so it has happened: the tormenting
intellectual body of knowledge has been provided with excessively moving illustrations. This
‘excess’, which turns the established framework
into social carnival, is precisely the remedy for
iconographic hegemony. Everybody knows why
Grandma had such a large mouth but, after Eva,
Epp and Marge, they also know why the Red
Riding Hood had such red cheeks. Because this
is what Mister Artist wanted.
I’ve got myself into a mess here. I tend to
answer the ‘old school’ question “What does
it represent?”. What do women want? Shall I
reply to this too? Of course not. I really wanted
to avoid the discourse where woman constitutes
the question to which man has an answer. No
success, alas. Instead, what we have here is a
session of questions and answers. I tended to see
these artists as a task needing to be solved, and
for some reason I was convinced that the solution ‘lies within them’. At best, this prejudice
confirms only the following: Labotkin, Kubu
and Monko are justifiably fed up with being
mere illustrations to the male way of thinking,
and with a society that tries to cultivate the
‘unhealthy’ femininity in them: the fickle mind
and consenting to gender restrictions.
Marge Monko
I Don’t Eat Flowers. 2009
Colour photograph
100 x 70 cm
Epp Kubu
Weeping and Moaning. 2009
Video
Eva g ives birth to earth
Johannes Saar
(1965), art critic and curator, head of the Center for
Contemporary Arts, Estonia. See also www.cca.ee
Kristina Norman
After-War. 2009
Installation
Display at theTallinn Art Hall
in 2010
Around the Golden Soldier
Agne Narusyte
Kristina Norman’s installation After War has
brought me back to questions I had safely tucked
under the label ‘no longer important’. The ‘I’ is
significant because this piece pricks the sense
of identity; it rouses memory, thus pointing
to the particular place where art disturbs an
individual viewer, where it really works rather
than remaining mute like an alien object.
The relocated
Bronze Soldier in the
Military Cemetery.
Tallinn, 9 May 2010
So, who is the ‘I’ to whom all the works presented in the Kunsthalle speak?* It is a ‘proper’
Lithuanian without a mixed background who
knows that history has finally corrected its mistakes and there is no longer a need to harbour
hatred towards others. This ‘I’ has followed the
troubles of the Bronze Soldier in Estonia with
a mixture of relief and apprehension, always
silently supporting the Estonian cause and seeing how people from other European countries,
who have never felt the earth vibrate under
approaching Soviet tanks, cannot understand
the situation adequately.
By making the Golden Soldier, however,
Kristina Norman has disrupted the pleasant layer
of self-evident ‘truths’ that had been protecting
the safety of my convictions. The installation
works by establishing opposing points of view
A round the Go lden Sol dier
Kristina Norman
First Encounter. 2010
Drawing
Kristina Norman
We Are Not Alone In The
Universe. 2010
Installation
In front: 1:1 copy of the
sculpture by Mati Jakson
Kristina Norman
Community. 2009
Installation
and constantly shifting them, denying the viewer
a safe and stable position. Everything revolves
around the horizontal figure of the golden soldier; there is neither beginning nor end. Yet, to
me, it starts with the video of Russians putting
flowers at the feet of the Bronze Soldier, still in
its original place; then my gaze zooms into a
tiny opening – a screen showing footage from
the Soviet years, when the same ceremony was
formalized, performed with orchestrated respect
and grandeur. It flickers and disturbs the peaceful ritual of present day, ‘real,’ Russians – a motley crowd of weary, but likeable people who, nevertheless, hold onto this single sacred object to
affirm their identity. This tiny screen is like the
past haunting the present, a powerful memory
underneath every moment of today that does
not allow me to identify fully with the action on
the big screen. I see blood, betrayal and death
under the black-and-white aesthetics, which
destroys the apparent innocence of the red flowers laid at the soldier’s feet in the present.
This feeling is enhanced by the sounds from
another video: the riot, windows smashing, the
shouting, the sirens. These are the same people,
I realise, the people bringing flowers. To me, the
riot in Tallinn in protest against the removal of
the soldier signifies another night almost twenty
years ago: then Soviet tanks crushed people in
Vilnius and, even though the soldiers were of
different nationalities, they were obeying orders
given in Russian. This is also a memory that still
shapes our present. The installation is disturbing
because it shows how the removal of an object
A round the Gol den So ldier
has torn a hole in the fabric of our new reality – so easily – and let the rage and the threat of
the past back in. But, and this is most important,
it does not let me adopt an unambiguous position, because I don’t know who should be held
more responsible for the outburst: those who
were smashing windows (bad guys, no doubt)
or those who wanted to delete the last trace of
traumatic history by mindlessly excising a part
of Russian identity?
The last footage of the artist bringing a
‘golden’ soldier to replace the bronze one shifts
the point of view again. In the presence of other
videos already discussed, the artist’s interference
with the public space and national feelings seems
to be equally mindless: whatever her intentions,
it may just be the spark needed to blow up the
peace of everyday life. The same people who
had been laying flowers come back; they do not
care that the soldier – now golden – is not the
same. There is a man here phoning somebody
to say, excitedly: ‘Come here, quickly, the soldier
is back!’ This is where, hearing the sincerity of
his voice, I am shaken: what if the artist ends up
disturbing, not the peace, but indifference? The
indifference that makes sure that uncomfortable
feelings, identities and memories stay buried.
Kristina Norman’s After War works because it
denies the possibility of a clear answer; it makes
me see the situation from positions I don’t want
to be in; it even makes me internalise opposing
views – the way that the artist with a double,
Russian and Estonian, background can feel it,
I imagine. From the moment I saw the exhibition, the two irreconcilable interpretations of
events have stayed with me, uneasily, constantly
shifting like the advertisement template used in
the installation: the square with the soldier and
without. I leave with a question instead of the
statement which I came here with.
On the other hand, I suspect that Kristina
Norman has also subtly undermined the seriousness with which we take the question of national
identity. The soldier floats horizontally rather
than standing – is he a fallen soldier in the war of
ideas? The ‘gold’ is fake; in fact, the material it is
made of is less durable, lighter and more humble
than bronze. Is this the Golden Calf of the Soviet
Empire meant to replace the truth with bliss-
ful oblivion? Isn’t the artist also questioning the
attitudes of Russians who don’t even notice that
the material is wrong? Russians who have also lost
something by having focused on a piece of metal?
Who worship misinterpreted symbols of the past
and would, perhaps, be better off if they tried to
live in the present instead? Or does it represent
the ‘golden’ solution of the Estonian government
that has thus destroyed the possibility of peaceful
co-existence?
The other installations in the Kunsthalle
seem to confirm the idea that Kristina Norman
is questioning the reasons of both sides. The
glass cross**, which was supposed to shine but
doesn’t, is a parody of itself. The space next to
its pompous religiousness becomes even more
conspicuously empty – so empty, in fact, that
it can only be filled with something imaginary,
maybe even more threatening to what the cross
represents than a simple bronze statue of a soldier.
And then, the whole war over statues boils down
to the UFO that was seen (or not) by somebody
who wanted to believe (or not) and that now
gives a false aura of significance to an insignificant
place and community. It shows the relativity of
all deeds and the meaning we like to wear in our
lives. The bronze soldier, rather than being the
centre of controversy, could be like the UFO: a
temporary flash that fades into the oblivion of
history. As I look at it hanging in the air, I cannot
help thinking that, ironically, the best resolution
of national conflict would probably mean that this
work of art became irrelevant, a piece of history
to be discussed in boring art history classes with
the same somnolent appreciation as we dedicate
to, say, Trajan’s Column, struggling to remember what it was exactly that the emperor did to
deserve such a long story carved in stone.
* The exhibition We Are Not Alone In The Universe by Kristina
Norman (curator Anders Härm) took place at the Tallinn
Art Hall from 10 April to 9 May 2010.
** The glass cross or the so-called The War of Independence
Victory Column in the center of Tallinn. See also Linda
Kaljundi’s article The Spatialisation of Politics and/or the
Politicisation of Space in the Estonian Art 2/2009.
Kristina Norman
(1979), artist, represented Estonia at the 53rd Venice
Biennale International Art Exhibition in 2009.
Agne Narusyte
(1970), PhD, art historian, published a monograph on the
aesthetics of boredom. Currently Head of Art History
and Theory Department, Vilnius Academy of Arts.
A round the Go lden Sol dier
An artist and his double
Anu Allas
Toomik’s Film. Director Marko Raat;
camera Heilika Pikkov and Marko Raat; editor Madli Lääne;
sound Ivo Felt; producer Ivo Felt. 78 min, Allfilm 2008
Father, Son and the Spirit of Theatre. Director Marko Raat;
camera Marko Raat, Rein Kotov and Heilika Pikkov;
editor Madli Lääne; sound Ivo Felt; producer Ivo Felt. 40 min, Allfilm 2009
Marko Raat’s two portrait documentaries –
Toomik’s Film and Father, Son and the Spirit of
Theatre – are rather similar and linked in many
ways, although the protagonists and the different contexts and scales of the films give common features dissimilar meanings. The first
portrays Jaan Toomik, one of the best known
Estonian artists internationally since the late
1990s, who has become a sort of embodiment – either of glory or misery – of contemporary art in Estonian society. The other film
focuses on Alar Sudak, a night guard and a
‘life artist’ whose dream is to appear on stage.
Toomik’s Film is among the films introducing
Estonian artists, commissioned by the Artists’
Association in the last decade, and is certainly
one of the most ambitious and interesting of
them all. Father, Son and the Spirit of Theatre
was part of the series of Estonian Stories commissioned by Estonian National Broadcasting
and the Estonia Film Foundation, which compiles grass-roots cultural-historical chronicles,
recording the ‘life around us’ in all its diversity.
The first film concentrates on ‘art’ and the
‘artist’ (according to the director, the main
issue here is: how do nightmares become works
of art?), and on Toomik’s idea of making a fulllength feature film. The second film depicts
‘life’, dominated by a hopeless and obsessive
desire to become an actor, plus various parallel stories, the colourfulness of which always
overshadows Sudak’s real attempts in theatre. Toomik’s Film contains fragments of the
artist’s videos and performances, a number of
close-ups and long shots of his paintings, which
harmonise and reveal Toomik’s searching and
doubts, but form a certain constant level in
contrast to the film’s general spirit of being
unfinished. Whatever Toomik says or whatever others say about him, the works lead their
own lives – in art history, museums and exhibitions – and this very strong core withstands
the most diverse interpretations. Excerpts of
Sudak’s (artistic name Elaan) performances at
summer art festivals, in a drama school hall and
elsewhere primarily cause embarrassment and
indecision, unexpectedly disrupting and even
disturbing the viewer who is trying to follow his
‘genuine’ life, controlled by fantasy and urges.
In Toomik’s case, there are any number of possible keys to his works; in Sudak’s case, there
are none, not even the knowledge of whether
his performances and productions should be
regarded as signs of hope or as failures, confirmations of the fact that ‘art’ can often come
second to ‘life’ – or whether we should consider all of them as events worthy of attention,
although they are always overshadowed by the
personality of the protagonist.
Besides the general parallels of the two films,
Toomik and Sudak are also directly connected, as
Elaan is among the characters linked to Toomik
who has taken part in his videos and performances. In Toomik’s Film, Sudak turns up in the very
first minutes, as the main character in Toomik’s
short film Communion (2007) and earlier in his
video Untitled (Man) (2001). Toomik, however, is
not mentioned in Sudak’s film, as there the protagonist has three ‘father figures’ – the judge, the
accused and imagined dialogue partners rolled
into one – the theatre directors Eino Baskin,
Kalju Komissarov and Elmo Nüganen. At vari-
Jaan Toomik in Toomik’s Film.
Director Marko Raat, Allfilm
2008
Alar Sudak aka Elaan in
Father, Son and the Spirit of
Theatre. Director Marko Raat,
Allfilm 2009
10
A n artist and his doubl e
ous times, these three have excluded Sudak from
one or another drama school, or instead have
given him hope.
It would be tempting to say that Toomik
and Sudak both personify the same energy
in different forms, one on the one side of the
often fragile and moving border between ‘artist’ and ‘madman’, and the other on the other
side. Thus, Sudak becomes a kind of distorting mirror of Toomik. Several shots in the films
strengthen this (e.g Toomik’s dances in the videos Dancing Home, 1995, and Dancing with My
Father, 2005, as well as Sudak’s dance on the
stage of the Haapsalu community hall; Toomik
jogs in the forest, listening to baby crying in his
earphones, and Sudak disappears between the
trees in Communion). Equally, the material of
both films, and their main elements allow us to
put together the completely opposite story, i.e.
on the basis of Sudak’s life the myth of a man of
genius (always unrecognised) is presented, and
shows Toomik as a weird martyr. Their activities
nevertheless contain some essential differences,
which in the end turn out to be crucial: Toomik’s
silence, concentration and self-restraint, and
Sudak’s lavish and partly charming rhetoric,
which being incessant, manages to exhaust itself.
Toomik’s doubts and revaluations contrast with
Sudak’s constant compulsive self-expression.
Toomik and his works could therefore provide
material for a few other films, whereas Sudak
would probably remain essentially the same
throughout.
The failures on which both films are based –
Toomik’s film-making proceeds slowly and laboriously and is never completed, while Sudak’s
stage dreams are never properly fulfilled – play
different roles in defining the protagonists.
Making a feature film is something new for
Toomik, something that he has not yet ‘mastered’ and that requires the artist to adopt new
role models and ways of thinking. Compared
with his habitual undertakings, such a loose
process reveals something different in himself
as well. If Toomik’s film had been realised, the
focus of the portrait would have been placed
elsewhere. Going along with this probably
unsuccessful idea shows the director’s trust in
his ‘subject matter’, as well as constituting one
of the main values of the film: it does not try to
A n artist and his doub le
11
Toomik’s Film.
Director Marko Raat
Allfilm 2008
complete a human being, but leaves him open
(the film ends with Toomik’s question: what do
you think?). Sudak, on the other hand, does
not undergo great changes during the film; his
desire to perform on stage acquires new dimensions and finds new outlets (including his confusing court trials), finally culminating in the
Old Testament truth that the sins of the father
are visited upon the son (Sudak’s son has been
excluded from a drama school, allegedly because
of his father). In Toomik’s case, failure makes
it possible to shatter the image of an ordinary
artist who purposefully moves towards his new
masterpieces, and instead show him as a human
riddled with doubts. In Toomik’s case, the risk is
well justified because of his solid work, so that
no fantasy of his, no failure or doubt, will totally
define him (this could easily happen with a portrait film about a young and unknown artist,
should anyone commission one). Making a film
about Toomik thus offers many possibilities and
choices, as well as freedom, if the attempt is
bold. As for Sudak, failure is an inseparable part
of him, and without it there would be no film;
the core of the story lies in his human qualities
in an extremely intense form: obsessions, illusions, fantasies and a rigid refusal to re-evaluate
or abandon them, which inevitably adds a touch
of the sublime and tragic.
Toomik’s Film received a lively, succinct
and mainly positive response in the Estonian
media. At the same time, it showed how many
pretensions are evoked by portraying a controversial person such as Toomik, who is, after
all, a significant ‘hero’ for a small culture. It
also showed how many debates emerged about
whether the film-makers allowed the ‘right’
people to have their say, whether the artist was
shown in ‘suitable’ situations, whether it all had
to do with the personal experience and ideas
of one or another person regarding Toomik,
and whether the emerging picture was in fact
‘objective’. On the other hand, nobody had
any pretensions concerning Sudak and how he
was portrayed; it wouldn’t have mattered if it
had been a longer film, as he does not have to
represent anyone but himself. This, of course,
is the advantage of a ‘madman’ compared to
an ‘artist’.
Jaan Toomik
(1961), painter, video and performance artist.
Alar Sudak
(1964), performer.
Marko Raat
(1973), director of several documentaries and features,
video art works, shorts, TV productions. Has been
involved in several art projects.
Anu Allas
Alar Sudak in Father, Son and
the Spirit of Theatre. Director
Marko Raat, Allfilm 2009
12
Interview with Eiki Nestor
Based on the exhibition Blue-Collar Blues*
(1977), art historian and critic.
Eero Epner: It is typical that an exhibition
about workers has been organised by
intellectuals. The issue here is not only
that they are art historians, but there
is also a wider political spectre, where
Social Democrats are called ‘the party
of intellectuals’; they have no extensive
workers’ support, but nevertheless see
themselves as a party representing bluecollar interests.
Eiki Nestor: This is by no means peculiar to
Estonia. The Social Democratic parties in
our part of the world, i.e. in Finland, Sweden,
Norway and Denmark, have more or less
the same electorate: centrist or centreleft intellectuals, plus an active contingent
of workers. The more passive part of the
workers’ movement votes for communists or
fascists – exactly as in Estonia. The difference
in popularity [Estonian Social Democrats are
only the fourth largest party – Ed] is caused by
the fact that the group of salary-earners is not
as organised, active or knowledgeable of their
rights.
Tellervo Kalleinen &
Oliver Kochta-Kalleinen
I Love My Job. 2008
4 channel video installation
Video still
Why so little self-confidence? Because of
the Soviet era?
Exactly. Had perestroika happened 10–15 years
earlier, the Estonian trade union movement
would be much stronger than it is now.
However, perestroika occurred at a moment
when society was undergoing extensive
changes and was increasingly becoming an
information society. So many things coincided.
Incidentally, the membership in Western trade
unions is also diminishing. Why? Because trade
unions are rather conservative and alter their
collective identity very slowly, and all of the
Wo rk-based so lidarity is ki ll ed
13
trade unions in the West missed the change to the
information society.
In Estonia, the most difficult issue to tackle in
workers’ social inactivity are the terms and
symbols violated by the Soviet power. My younger
son, enrolled in one of the elite schools in
Tallinn, got a ‘2’ [the lowest mark – Ed], because
he said to the headmaster in a lesson of social
science that trade unions stood for the rights
of their members. ‘No-no,’ said the headmaster,
‘trade unions are Soviet-era organisations that
distributed vouchers for sanatoriums and fridges,
and this is no longer necessary in the market
economy.’
Besides, there is now a duty to belong to a party.
If you are not a member, you will not get a job
or you will be sacked. Imagine! And if you join a
trade union, we will throw you out of the party.
It happens quite often. How can you then tell
people: come, let’s see what can be done; let’s
show some solidarity…
Dario Azzellini & Oliver Ressler
5 Factories – Worker Control in Venezuela. 2006
6-channel video installation. Video still
Dénes Farkas
SUPERSTRUCTURE
(these are not bloody exit signs).
2009
installation
Fear?
Yes, there is fear. However, the trade unions are
not totally without blame either; they have not
been able to establish themselves. People need
more than pretty slogans; they want something
more specific.
With my first question, I also meant that
intellectuals and art exhibitions fighting for
the rights of blue-collar workers inevitably see
things from ’the outside’, as it were. Does this
mean greater idealism and less pragmatism,
being less ’specific’, as was mentioned above?
The background, jobs and education of people
are very different, but they are united by their
tolerance. Social Democrats are normally elected
by people who are able to understand other
kinds of people or people in different situations.
An intolerant person will never vote for Social
Democrats. He could have ten university degrees,
but if he is angry he will not choose Social
Democrats. Blue-collar workers, by the way,
always think that ‘there are too many employees
in offices’, who are all free-loaders, do not
understand blue-collar needs, and are eating up
‘money earned by us’.
Most visitors to that art exhibition were probably
also salary-earning white-collar workers,
with a few unemployed thrown in. If I were an
unemployed Tallinner who learned about this
exhibition, I might have gone too. The unemployed
perhaps feel better knowing that someone is
thinking about them.
How much solidarity does Estonian society feel
with blue-collar workers?
Ten years ago, the lack of solidarity worried me
more, but the problem still exists, and I see an
14
Johnson and Johnson
The End of Work. 2009
Live web stream
interesting paradox here. On the one hand,
Estonians show enormous solidarity, for
example in singing at song festivals or in joint
undertakings to clean up the countryside
or tackle other such worthy tasks. In the
past, people did not merely go to song
festivals to perform some pieces of music.
They went there to sing TOGETHER; t h i s
was the whole idea. There are many other
similar manifestations of solidarity born out
of nationality in Estonia, e.g singing against
or for something etc. However, work-based
solidarity was killed off a long time ago. In
the 1930s, Finnish or Swedish trade unions
were no stronger than Estonian trade unions,
but now the differences are drastic, and all
due to the 50 years of occupation. Job-based
solidarity was destroyed, and to bring it to life
again... sighs
Why am I saying all this? Because there is
another interesting paradox: it has been easier
to set up stronger trade unions where people
work on their own, for example among bus
drivers. It’s practically impossible to get those
who work together every day to join trade
unions. Transport workers, sailors, aviation
workers – there is plenty of solidarity there. In
trade, banking and construction work, there
are constant and almost totally useless efforts.
When the idea of trade unions was introduced
at Swedish-owned banks, the hall was bursting
with people, but not a single union was formed.
Why?
There is a right-wing myth that ‘it is not
necessary’. As an MP, I took part in trying to
establish trade unions for ambulance workers,
and I remember how the boss stared pointedly
at one of the initiators and said: ‘But we have
always looked after you, haven’t we?’ That
man was, fortunately, not frightened off...
Passions can really flare. Grown-up men have
phoned me and wept, because debates about
collective contracts or some other issues had
become really heated. Insults, outbursts, all
this is part of the game.
Santiago Sierra
89 Huichols
2006
Blue-collar workers used to have a very
positive image; they were depicted in
literature, art and elsewhere as heroes.
Today, I cannot recall a single work of art
showing this image.
One of the most drastic shocks in the past
twenty years has been connected with the
prestige of working life. A place of work that
used to mean a lot might count for nothing
now. At granny’s birthday party in the mid1980s – a typical Estonian feast with shots
of vodka, potatoes and jellied meat – when
the topic of jobs came up, I remember how
proudly people said: ‘I am working at the
Kirov collective fishery farm.’ Everybody
was impressed. And now? ‘What’s that place
called?’ I have a specific case in my own
family: someone works in a shop selling spare
parts for cars, and it’s talked about only in
whispers – it’s embarrassing! During the Soviet
era, such a shop was honoured by ministers!
Because of your job, you are a totally different
person than you were twenty years ago. How
do you think these people feel?
* Exhibition Blue-Collar Blues (curator Anders Härm) was shown
in the Tallinn Art Hall and the Tallinn Art Hall Gallery from
21 December 2009 to 31 January 2010.
Eiki Nestor
(1953), member of the Estonian Parliament since 1992,
has held several ministerial posts and has been chairman
of the Social Democratic Party.
Wo rk-based so lidarity is ki ll ed
15
Forum
Marge Monko
I first photographed the Krenholm textile factory
in Narva in autumn 2008, at a time when the
media were talking about the economic slump
and a bill dealing with a new employment contract. I read in the papers that over 1200 people
had been made redundant at factory in early
summer, most of whom were women with no
knowledge of the official language.
To be honest, on my way to Narva I had no
idea how I, as an artist, could describe the given
problem.
The manufacturing complex was founded in
1857. Both of my great-great-grandmothers on
my mother’s side worked there. One reputedly
vowed that she would not let her own daughters
slave away in the textile factory. During the
Soviet era, Krenholm was one of the largest
textile manufacturers in the whole empire. The
complex is now sitting almost totally abandoned.
The factory buildings with their massive 19th
century architecture are certainly impressive.
Total silence reigns in the endless inner courtyards, so that every tiny sound seems eerie.
Beyond the wall, scarcely 30 m away across the
River Narva, is Russia – the apartment houses
of Ivangorod. And, for some reason, the whole
place is crawling with cats.
After my second visit to Narva, I decided
that I would not photograph the women made
redundant from Krenholm. An image of a northeastern Russian-speaking unemployed woman is
probably fixed in our minds anyway.
On 8 October, I watched the political programme Foorum on Estonian TV. It discussed
the new employment contract law. The par-
16
FORU M
ticipants included the Minister of Justice
Rein Lang, Tarmo Kriis from the Estonian
Employers’ Confederation, Harri Taliga from the
Confederation of Estonian Trade Unions, Jaak
Aab representing the Centre Party and the host
Andres Kuusk. The law is shaped by neo-liberal
labour policy. Its main aim is to guarantee that
an enterprise can re-profile itself if necessary, and
get rid of its workforce as quickly and cheaply
as possible. The opposition can only argue over
details. The new law focuses on flexibility and
constant individual development of employees,
and also remarkable knowledge of job legislation. Nobody has bothered to think about how
mothers at home with small children can possibly maintain their competitiveness, and that
the new law will totally cast aside people aged
50–60, because flexibility is now placed above
experience. It seems scandalous that not a single woman or anyone speaking Russian as their
mother tongue took part in that, or subsequent,
television debates. And when Rein Lang said:
“Krenholm is precisely one of those [enterprises]
which can only exist in a situation where there are
a large number of low-wage unqualified workers,
and this, thank heavens, is constantly diminishing
in Estonia”, I decided to use the material of the
programme in my work.
I decided to stage a video where the programme guests are the same kind of women of
whom Lang talked, behind their backs, with
undisguised right-wing arrogance. This form of
staging was suggested to me by the Soviet-era
workers’ theatre model and the productions of
the Rimini Protocol operating in Germany.
Marge Monko. Forum
2010. Single channel video
23 min 42 sec
By the time I started to work on the video,
the law on the new employment contract had
already been passed, and the number of unemployed was rapidly moving towards one hundred thousand. I managed to find the actors
through an announcement placed on the labour
market board website. I met Jekaterina, Larissa,
Ljudmilla, Olga and Ljuba in November 2009,
and Zinaida joined us later. They are all unemployed women over 50.
At the beginning of the video, the host introduces the actors by their first names and explains
their roles. The alienation effect introduced by
Brecht should preserve the viewers’ sense of
criticism towards the text. As a result of discus-
sions during the rehearsals, we decided to add
to the first staged part another part in which
the women talk about their own experience in
job-seeking. The title Forum comes from the
Latin word used by the original programme,
and denoted a meeting place in ancient Rome
where people gathered to have public political
debates.
An excerpt of the video is available at
www.margemonko.com
Marge Monko
(1976), artist and curator, Associate Professor of
Photography at the Estonian Academy of Arts.
FORU M
17
Art and Identity: The Soviet Woman in Estonian Art
Michael Schwab
View of the exhibition
The Soviet Woman
in Estonian Art
in Kumu Art Museum, 2010
The exhibition The Soviet Woman in Esto
nian Art (8 April–26 September 2010) at the
Kumu Art Museum in Tallinn, curated by
Katrin Kivimaa and Kädi Talvoja, introduces
two controversial topics. On the one hand, it
looks at a clearly identified image of ‘woman’
in the art of a particular time and place; on the
other, it introduces examples of artistic practice
for which additional stylistic and artistic
considerations are relevant. Both themes are
notoriously difficult to address, even when they
are approached independently. By linking them
together, the exhibition sets itself up to add yet
another dimension to the discussions.
The exhibition’s concern is spread across two
seemingly different domains: the artistic and the
political. By being shown in a museum of fine
art, The Soviet Woman suggests that however
propagandistic the art of the Soviet area might
have been, there is still a way to readdress the
works on display as ‘art’. The challenge lies in
finding an understanding of art through which
this collection of works (mostly paintings) can
be ‘liberated’ from its politically pre- or overdetermined subject matter. This sets in motion
an additional expectation concerning gender
politics: provided such a liberating operation
were possible, what understanding of ‘the Soviet
woman’, or ‘woman’ in general, would we be
left with?
18
I should state that any comment I may make
is firmly rooted in what is termed ‘contemporary
art’ in the Western capitalist context, within
which I have lived and worked all my life. For
better or worse, the global phenomenon of
contemporary art has a disregard for national
particularities, which are, from its perspective, ‘folklore’. This would be the case when
addressing any national or regional art and is
not specific to the Estonian or post-communist
context, although, seen from the perspective of
contemporary art, the negotiation of identity
after communism is a high-risk operation: if
successful, identity is not restored into some
cultural or national body, but kept in a state of
suspense; if unsuccessful, an image of identity is
produced that is more desired than real, which
tends to be of interest only to those (locals) who
harbour this desire.
Ernst Hallop’s exciting painting Producing
Milk in the Väimela Dairy School (1948) can be
used to illustrate a ‘bridge’ that has since been
built between Soviet art and Western contemporary art by Ilya Kabakov and the Moscow
Conceptualists. Brown cows and milkmaids
dressed in white are embedded in a picturesque
landscape and are placed in close proximity
to each other in the middle of the canvas as a
brown/white symbiotic body. A cluster of white
coats in the foreground leads the eye into that
A rt and I dentity: The Soviet Wo man in Estonian A rt
Ernst Hallop
Producing Milk in Väimela
Dairy School
1948. Oil, canvas.
89.4 x 166.2 cm
Art Museum of Estonia body, which spreads its brown towards the horizon. The scene is at once artificial (the dairy
industry) and natural (the landscape), abstract
(through the distribution of colour) and representative (as an everyday scene), while it is
conceptual with regards to the mode in which
all those elements are combined. Against all
the visual ambivalences, this conceptual dimension must surely have been fore-grounded as
the work’s initial message: the creation of a
new productive body through political will.
Seen at least from today’s perspective, however,
the underlying visuality of the painting is not
unlike Kabakov’s Universal System for Depicting
Everything, for example, which is an equally
conceptual construct pierced by visual, postconceptual openings.
In Hallop’s painting, the artistic questioning
of the concept has survived its political end and
appears surprisingly fresh, particularly when
compared to most of the other paintings in the
show. However, although depicting working
women, in its ambivalence the painting seems
to exceed the exhibition’s theme of the ‘Soviet
Art a n d I d e n t i t y: Th e Soviet Wo m an in Estonian A rt
19
The queue as a social statement
woman’. In fact, in the rest of the show, the curators appear not to have sought an equal sense of
ambivalence as to the question of gender: the
choice of works mostly offers a withdrawal from
the public into the personal, through a number
of representational portraits displayed along the
longest wall of the gallery. The withdrawal from
the public to the private is even made the theme
in Lola Liivat’s strong painting Portrait of Singer
and Actress Elo Tamul, Recipient of the Stalin Prize
(1954), where the actress turns away from the
limelight that shines on the medal attached
to her chest. Beyond such turning away from
the state, female identity is presented mostly
through minor forms and smaller formats,
restricting the female claim to the political to a
mere memory of political activism and sought
identity. As a result, although potentially torn,
the ‘Soviet Woman’ is still presented as an identity that is little affected by questions of a more
fundamental kind of ambivalence. Whether this
is a reflection of a Soviet history that failed to
provide any other works of art, or whether it is
a message from the curators, who fail to address
the possible complexity of the ‘Soviet Woman’, is
difficult if not impossible to tell, based on what
is after all highly complex material.
Michael Schwab
(1966), German artist and researcher based in London.
He is a tutor at the Royal College of Art, research
associate at the Bern University of Arts, Switzerland
and research fellow at the Orpheus Institute in Ghent,
Belgium. He is the editor-in-chief of the forthcoming
Journal for Artistic Research (JAR).
Lola Liivat
Portrait of Singer and
Actress Elo Tamul
1954. Oil
Estonian Theatre and
Music Museum
20
A rt and Identity: The Soviet Woman in Estonian Art
During the first months of 2010, a long-forgotten
phenomenon, which in some way clearly defines
the essence of the new era – the queue – was
fixed in the Tallinn urban space and, via that,
in the Estonian unconscious. With the arrival of
spring, this phenomenon, as expected, reached
the stage of propaganda posters. The most vivid
recollections of queues of the adult Estonian
population are firmly connected with the Soviet
era, or with the coupon period of the early
1990s, when shop counters were mostly bare and
people were prepared to stand for hours in the
hope of getting hard-to-find goods (occasionally even foreign goods). At some point, queues
disappeared from the urban picture almost completely; only on rare occasions did people meet
while queueing for cheap air tickets or toilet
paper during a shopping centre, or travel agency,
campaign. Queues became so exceptional that
almost always either the print media or television cameras turned up. The triumph of capitalism brought abundance and choices, but didn’t
have enough time, before the crash, to develop
fully into the other extreme – to the queue as
the ultimate expression of consumer appreciation, as a promise, and a sign of quality. This is
familiar to us from world metropolises, where
enthusiastic hordes of consumers often snake
along to doors of trendy eating places or shops,
as well as museums. Defying a certain mass psychotic moment of competition that goes hand
in hand with queues, most consumers finally
manage to satisfy their desires. It is always possible to produce more pizza, and an exhibition
can be visited the next day: people queueing in
a society of affluence have no need to worry;
they merely have to be certain of their wish to
consume.
The most famous queue in Tallinn in the
winter of 2010 was a social statement, a political action, an orchestrated cry for help from the
imaginary ‘other Estonia’, which is not often
reflected on the front covers of our newspapers.
In mid-February, the Tallinn city government
organized a job exchange in the rooms of the
Tallinn Song Festival Grounds. By that time,
the economic crisis had been biting the country
for over a year; unemployment had increased to
Alar Kivilo. Drinks.
Lihula, Estonia. 1988
tragic proportions, and was growing. Politicians
were uttering big promises and trying to seem
reassuring. The capital city decided to offer an
alternative (with a populist flavour): ‘real’ work.
People came in the thousands and stood in frigid
winter weather. This queue was a social statement, a living reproach to society, government,
politicians and the economic crisis. Only 400 of
the 5000-strong queue got public jobs – a chance
to travel on public transport as attendants at
minimal wages, thus continuing the social performance on the mundane level. The attendants
have now become mascots of the new economic
situation. In certain conditions, they can be
regarded as a type of social art – performers who
are not letting their fellow travellers forget the
situation on the labour market, forcing everyone
to subconsciously take a stand.
The same queues at the Song Festival
Grounds we so often saw in the media soon
turned up on propaganda posters in the election campaign, where the Centre Party (the
party in power in Tallinn) set the freezing queue
of the unemployed against the obviously complacent prime minister from the Reform Party.
The visual solution, in the spirit of the British
Tory campaign of 1978, was naturally harnessed
to the campaign carriage of the Centre Party.
The aim was to grab the position of prime min-
Th e queue as a socia l statem ent
21
ister, while solutions to the job market problems and issues caused by the feeble economy
tend to be populist rather than constructive.
The ‘new jobs’ created by the Centre Party and
its satellite institutions – performers in urban
space at minimum wages – obviously do not
provide people with any sense of social security
or a necessary standard of living, but they still
form perhaps a more human form of populism
than the right-wingers’ focus on meeting the
European Union requirements or endless babble about economic-theoretical issues, which all
makes it seem as if these politicians are trying to
simply ignore the problem. Using disappointed
citizens, the despair of the unemployed in the
advertising campaign photo shoot, is certainly
not an ethical method, but the autumn elections will show whether average voters appreciate the fact that at least someone noticed their
problems. There are quite clear-cut client relations in Estonian society between ‘the people’
and ‘politicians’ – people do not actually expect
any sensible programmes from those who aspire
to power, or an opportunity to be ideologically
positioned on the political axis. The parties have
taken advantage of this and have abandoned
classic campaigns based on views. What matters is the brand, the slogan, stars and enemies
to stand against. Promises will do, and for their
sake people are prepared to queue. After this
skilfully and cynically orchestrated campaign,
queues in Estonia probably do not mean what
they used to mean.
The Centre Party campaign can indeed be
regarded in the context of social art. However,
the party ideologues are playing in totally dif-
Hoping for a job.
Job exchange at the Tallinn Tram and Trolleybus
Company, May 2009 and …
22
The queue as a socia l state ment
ferent categories, and thus such an analysis is
too artificial. It is, however, not by chance that
this spring another queue appeared in the Art
Hall in central Tallinn, near the city government building, this time a real art project – Art
Queue 100×100 EEK, under the aegis of Culture
Capital 2011. For the competition of events preparing for the Culture Capital, the artist Flo
Kasearu and her colleagues suggested that the
grant received from the foundation (allocated
as production support for weekly mini projects)
should be divided between those gathered at the
Art Hall, according to position in the queue. By
means of an artificially created queue – a living sculpture – the organisers wished to attract
attention to the art institution, the most classic
white cube in town, which was at the moment
standing empty between exhibitions. The rather
art world-specific action (in the context of earlier
actions, however, it probably had an undertone
of political comment) posed questions about the
relationship with the audience. It also offered a
critical comment on the economic logic increasingly dominating the cultural field – evaluating cultural institutions and events solely on the
basis of the size of the audience, or the length
of the queue. The first one hundred people in
the queue on 5 April received a blue banknote
(100 EEK) from the organisers, and so an audience was attracted by a totally honest business
transaction, referring to the obvious: it is a piece
of cake to assemble a queue.
Paradoxically, the action happened at the
moment when there were queues at the very
same spot at the Art Hall: in March, the private art collector Enn Kunila was exhibit-
ing his paintings. This was a project that had
had exceptionally intense marketing and thus
attracted huge masses, who very much appreciated the safe classical paintings. The record
size of the audience made it into the papers
and encouraged opinions in the media about
‘permanent values’ and art that ‘addresses people’ – and thus against contemporary social art.
A bit earlier, in February, largely the same people who enjoyed traditional paintings in the
overcrowded Art Hall had jostled at the doors
of the Kadriorg Art Museum, where an ancient
portrait painting from Italy that had been examined in Estonia, was displayed for only one week.
The alleged author’s legendary name – Leonardo
da Vinci – attracted huge masses and the media.
Many people went to an art museum for the first
time. Although essentially connected with mass
psychology, these two queues that shook and
rattled local art institutions were statements as
well. Not that there was anything specific about
the queues; after all they can be seen even in the
local art world: when entrance is free, queues
at the Kumu Museum are nothing exceptional.
What makes these queues significant – and
especially against the background of the Centre
Party’s actions – is the readiness of the masses
to storm art as part of a campaign, and to prefer
unfinished solutions, largely based on appearance.
The grand collection of a wealthy private collector cannot really be compared with a display at
an art museum, but the enthusiasm of the masses
appeared almost ecstatic: this reaction was obviously caused by the garnish of the professional
market. The queue itself – especially if it makes
it into the news – can be a significant marketing
Job exchange at the Tallinn
Song Festival Grounds,
February 2010.
… at the Tallinn Song Festival
Grounds, February 2010.
argument, and mass psychosis feeds upon itself.
In the increasingly stagnating Estonian society,
brand-politicians and employees enjoying their
positions to the full indeed prefer to appeal to
the masses and their taste – an argument which
primarily helps to cement conservative-national
views and phenomena. A queue in such a society, reflecting the approval of the masses, no
doubt forms the basis of success. The interest
of the public, or lack of it, which is usually only
examined as a ‘statistical’ factor, can become a
propaganda lie, against uncomfortable cultural
phenomena and for more populist projects. The
seemingly conditional boundary between these
phenomena does exist, and this should be kept in
mind: professional standards, specialists’ opinions,
should maintain the gravitas that politicians are
desperately trying to abolish (calling social scientists ‘Red professors’, accusing the critics of a
propagandist monument of self-serving motives).
It is essential to remember, especially in the cultural area, that a queue is a quantitative format
which provides no reason to make decisions on
the quality of either those who stand in it, or on
the purpose for standing in the queue. Cultural
experience is no more valuable if it takes place in
the macho-like ‘first come, first served’ hierarchy;
every museum visit is a separate value, especially
in our lively art life, with its multiple programmes,
where the main value and cultural policy statement should continue to be independence and
essential quality.
(1978), curator of contemporary art at Kumu Art
Museum. Art critic and columnist in Estonian cultural
press since 2000.
Hoping for 100 EEK.
Art Queue at the Tallinn Art
Hall, April 2010
Th e queue as a socia l statem ent
23
Kaido Ole
It is only natural that you should have a fairly good knowledge of
someone you want to write about, although in my case I fear I hardly
know anybody except myself. Besides, my memory is not what it
used to be, so that when talking with people about the past it is occasionally difficult to understand whether we are in fact talking about
the same thing. In a situation like this, I thought it best to focus on the
few incidents connected with Flo which I certainly remember quite
precisely and also my own relevant emotions. I call these descriptions pictures.
Flo Kasearu
She Answered
2006. Oil, canvas
195 x 166 cm
24
The first picture: I was a lecturer and Flo a student in the same department. However, I have
no recollections of her at entrance exams, only
from her second year onwards. This is quite
strange because Flo, as a rule, is someone whom
people remember. Anyway, at that time we were
having a January workshop, conducted by an artist from abroad. The task was to deal with him,
actively think along and also paint something
good within a week, because there was going to
be an exhibition afterwards. The guest was an
artist, not an artist and a lecturer combined, who
was used to an extremely professional approach,
just as he did things in his own studio. Our students were diverse – some managed to keep up,
some didn’t. Flo was among those who left a
positive impression, although she was younger
than most of them. Her painting, although big
and bold, was a bit weird. She depicted herself
as a small girl mischievously lifting her skirt. Not
painted after an old photograph in trendy photorealism, but after memory, presenting a Fauvist
colour display. Exchanging impressions with the
guest lecturer afterwards, we both agreed that
there was something in that girl. Something
essential and universal that makes an artist of
one person, but not of another, although that
other person might produce better works for a
long time. I remember saying about that painting that, although it was not bad, it certainly
wasn’t right. I also thought that, whatever her
paintings were like in the future, they would not
resemble this painting. There was some sort of
contradiction with her personality. I can now
say that I was partially right, but perhaps not in
the most essential way.
Close-up of Flo Kasearu’s
installation. 2008
Mixed media. 3 x 4.5 m
The second picture: the same school about a
year later, I was still lecturing, but now also the
head of the department, and Flo was a student.
This time her works were definitely the best in
her class. The marking of the works took place
in the academy gallery and all passers-by stared
at hers. The main work, which also attracted the
most attention, was huge, a wall rather than a
picture, where an incredible number of handmade strange boxes with handles sat on small
shelves. Both the shelves and the boxes were
painted faded rusty red. Plus, there were a few
paintings. Everything was still a bit shaky, but
really worked. I was truly pleased because, after
some very strong years, the current situation in
our department was not exactly brilliant, and
the marking was quite tedious. However, an
excellent work always loosens the tongue and
the discussion becomes lively.
This is exactly what happened, although
a bit differently than I had hoped in my complacency. When Flo was given the floor, she
did not talk about her work as expected, but
immediately launched into an attack on me
and the department, listing all the faults and
drawbacks she could think of, why we did one
thing but not another, and so on and so forth.
What made things even worse was that she was
right in nearly everything, and I took the blame,
promising to start improving matters at once.
Flo attacked and I defended myself, feeling everybody’s eyes drilling into the back of my head.
I hadn’t felt that awful for a long time. There
were a lot of people from other departments,
as the marking took place in the busiest place,
and what I thought would be the most enjoyable
moment of the day instead became a nightmare.
It is one thing to analyse your activities yourself
(in your mind), giving easy promises and dates
to improve things. It is, however, quite a different kettle of fish if a second-year student takes
you to task. You, who were just about to look
kindly upon her good work from your elevated
position.
1
25
Kaido Ole, professor of the
Chair of Painting, working
on the still life prepared by
a student, and a student
of painting recording the
process. 2008. Video,
17 h 52 min
Paintings of an unnamed
object by Kaido Ole,
professor of the Chair of
Painting, associate professor
Laurentsius (Lauri Sillak),
contracted lecturer Tõnis
Saadoja and student Flo
Kasearu, who suggested the
object to be painted.
Painting by Kaido Ole of an
unnamed object suggested
by student Flo Kasearu.
2008. Oil, canvas.
100 x 200 cm
Exhibition of Flo Kasearu
and Tõnis Saadoja in the
Tallinn City Gallery, 2008
The third picture: Flo and Tõnis [Tõnis Saadoja
(1980), painter – Ed] were compiling an exhibition; the main topic of their conversation was
teaching painting and whether the teachers
themselves could actually paint. We proved it by
painting the same little box with a handle made
by Flo, only this time it was bigger and placed
in a typical still-life setting with folds of textiles
and falling light. The topic, after all, was not
just mastery of painting, but mystical classical
painting skills. Flo filmed everybody painting,
at the same time bombarding us with questions.
The atmosphere was much nicer than at that
dreadful marking, almost enjoyable. I had not
painted an object for a long time so realistically,
and I also kept answering her questions, getting rather carried away. Later results showed
that Tõnis painted the longest and probably
the most carefully, and I talked the most. This
time, Flo’s questions were not that sharp, or
perhaps I was better prepared. We both seemed
pleased, although the teachers did not paint as
well as Flo had hoped, at least not according
to the given rules. Flo herself did not produce
a wonderful painting either. The idea was that
the professionals would paint first, and then
Flo, having learned from us, would attempt to
produce the same thing again, but in a new way.
For some reason I, and probably she too, liked
the first slightly faulty version better.
The fourth picture: Flo and I were making art
together, on a perfectly equal basis, fully democratic. It is a relatively old form of cooperation,
with my architect friend and myself. A large
number of creative people with different backgrounds and work experience, from beginners
to prominent people, take part at various times.
The result, as a rule, is a short video; the playfully regulated creative process reminds me most
of all of the past undertakings of Fluxus. We
invited Flo when we needed to start a new cycle
with new people. I suggested Flo, as I was certain
that she would be brave enough to participate
in anything, without abandoning her critical
attitude, because we needed both participation
and criticism. Flo immediately blended into our
diverse group and was more confident than I
had dared to hope. Knowing her honesty and
sincerity, I was certain that, if we got totally
muddled, it would be she who would point this
out. I often get carried away to the extent that
I lose all sense of criticism. Everybody seemed
well pleased with her part and hopefully we can
do this again in the future.
Flo Kasearu
21.05.09. 2010
Video still
Flo Kasearu
Hurrah Berlin,
Carmen Lansberg,
Urmas Muru,
Kaido Ole
Push Buttons Disappeared from
the Remote Control
2009. Video still
26
The fifth and the last picture: I was in a gallery in
the capital’s greatest square, watching Flo’s video
about a white horse in a rainy and semi-dark
Tallinn. I was consumed by professional envy.
The whole thing worked, and my mind raced
heaven knows where, urged on by the enchanting
soundtrack. At some point I realised, with some
surprise, that the white horse was just as naïve
and vulnerable as the painting described in the
first picture, where small Flo was playing around
with her skirt. Still, the significant part of my prediction back then ended up wrong, because her
continuous choices in somewhat childish topics
and/or solutions are in fact something permanent
and essential. Another clear change is that she is
no longer painting, although I can’t bring myself
to lament it too much. The painted white horse
made me shrug my shoulders and expect the girl
to come up with something exciting any minute.
That’s now happened. After visiting the gallery
several times, it dawns on me, with some glee,
that this work has the potential to become a hit,
which could well overshadow even some of her
future works.
That’s all. I do not actually know Flo that
well, and we are quite different in character.
(1985), artist, studied painting at the Estonian
Academy of Arts (BA). Currently doing MA at the Chair
of Photography at the Academy. She spent the year
2009/2010 in Istanbul with an Erasmus grant.
Kaido Ole
(1963), artist, 2003–2010 Professor and Head of the
Department of Paiting at the Estonian Academy of Arts.
See also www.kaidoole.eu
27
The avant-garde is not dead
Interview with René Block
Joseph Beuys
How to Explain Pictures to a
Dead Hare
26 November 1965
Performance documentation
at Galerie Alfred Schmela,
Düsseldorf
Eero Epner: In 1964, when you were 22
years old, you opened your first gallery
in Berlin, where you showed work by
fairly unknown artists, such as Beuys,
Broodthaers, Paik, Polke, Richter and
Vostell. How did you find them, and how did
you choose them? What was it like to run a
gallery in 1964?
René Block: You find artists with whom you
want to work when you keep your eyes and
ears open. This is a clear example of the
snowball effect. When you have found an
interesting artist, he or she in turn knows
other similar artists still waiting to be
discovered. This was true in 1964 of the young
German artist generation, and it is valid
today when I take an interest in artists in the
Balkans or Turkey. The essential thing is to find
someone who seems to be the ‘right’ artist.
This determines the entire future trend.
Running a gallery in West Berlin in 1964 was a
true gamble.
Why did you give up your job in 1979?
After fifteen years, I was too young to become
an art dealer, although I belonged to the
German Society of Progressive Art Dealers,
which in 1967 in Cologne organised the first
art market ever. My situation was thus a bit
contradictory. The first art markets were not
commercial undertakings, but artistic. This
was changed by Basel becoming another
Kunstmarktstadt.
To be honest, I already wished to close down
my Berlin gallery in 1974, i.e ten years after
opening it. But then I had the excellent idea
of opening a gallery in New York. It opened in
1974 with Joseph Beuys’s action I like America
and America Likes Me. In it, he continued
the dialogue started in the dead hare
performance, this time with a living coyote.
Since the 1970s, you have been a curator
and have organised many biennials. In
December last year, you presented a paper
titled Biennials in Eastern Europe, Asia and
Australia, and life with art. What fascinated
you in the art of Eastern Europe in the early
1990s that made you decide to take it up?
Is whatever you liked back then, still there?
I began curating as early as 1972, when I also ran
the gallery. Large exhibitions, such as New York,
Downtown Manhattan: SoHo (1976), where I could
use my New York experience, or To Eyes and Ears
(1979), about the links between music and art in
the 20th century, made me decide to exchange
the small gallery room for larger institutions.
28
The avant- garde is not dead
The first biennials I was allowed to curate – in 1985
in Hamburg and in 1990 in Sydney – cautiously
peeked into Eastern Europe. It was only at the
Istanbul biennial in 1995 that I was able to tackle
the art in neighbouring south-eastern countries
more intensely. For these countries, Istanbul
is the traditional cultural centre. The artists I
discovered there led me to other artists, and
together they opened a totally new view of art
and the world for me. The experience I gained
in 1995 influenced my 10-year-long work at
Fridericianum Kunsthalle. This culminated in
2003 with the Balkan Trilogy at the exhibition In
the Gorges of the Balkans in Kassel and Love it or
Leave it, a biennial in Cetinje (Montenegro). My
love for the Turkish artists found back then is
still going strong. So we established a separate
Kunsthalle in Berlin for contemporary Turkish art.
What has been widely discussed in recent
years is the possible future of exhibitions that
rely on geographical or national peculiarities,
as such peculiarities in the globalising world
are gradually fading. What is your opinion?
Globalisation has indeed diminished peculiarities
but, at the same time, has considerably expanded
our horizons.
You have talked about the future of biennials.
How would you now answer the question ‘What
is the future of biennials?’
I was interested in the future of biennials
when there were very few of them, and when
they played a significant informative role in
peripheries, for example in São Paulo, Havana,
Sydney or Istanbul. Fifteen years later, however,
we are witnessing an inflation of biennials,
both numerically and qualitatively. Most are
unbearably boring. Curators have little to say and
cannot be bothered to travel. They do not rely
on the specifics of a region, but concoct random
topics. The workshop atmosphere of earlier
biennials, the dialogue between the local scene
and international visitors is lacking. In 2000, I
chose that as the theme for the Kassel exhibition
The Song of the Earth. Things have not improved
since then, however.
Is the avant-garde dead?
No. Of course not. But since it is avant-garde, we
probably won’t see it. ‘Being dead’ could then
constitute our problem.
...
How to Explain Pictures to a Dead Hare.
Joseph Beuys’s action in the René Block
Gallery
I wouldn’t want to suggest that the dead hare
symbolised the petite bourgeoisie, because
Beuys’s aim after all was to explain his idea of
art to everybody. He had been tirelessly doing
that since the 1970s, placing the expanded
understanding of art in the centre of his works.
If Beuys chose a hare as his conversation
partner, it was because – in his own words – a
hare symbolised incarnation for him. ‘It digs a
den into the ground, builds a house for itself
there. It incarnates into the ground and is thus
already significant. By putting honey on my
head I am clearly doing something involved with
thinking. Human ability is not to produce honey,
but to think, to produce ideas. A hare seems to
be directly connected with birth... A hare makes
whatever man has in his thoughts very real.‘
In this action, where Beuys completely
separated himself from the public (the action
could only be seen through a narrow slice of
window outside the gallery), I see a meditative
conversation with himself, and as such it has a
highly universal character.
What happened to the hare after the action?
This I cannot quite remember. In 1964, there was
an action in Berlin with two hares, Der Chef, and
there we ate the hares after the action, together
with some friends. The hare used in the action
Eurasia (1966) in my gallery was later stuffed and
is now at New York’s MoMA, leaning against a
panel that was produced during the action.
Inspired by the action of Joseph Beuys, How
To Explain Pictures To a Dead Hare, Theatre
NO99 staged a production of the same name
in 2009.
It tackled issues of cultural politics, whereas
the word ‘hare’ in the title referred to the
Estonian minister of culture Laine Jänes
(Jänes – Hare).
René Block
(1942), has worked as an art dealer, curator and museum
director. He has collaborated with such significant artists
as Sigmar Polke, Joseph Beuys, Gerhard Richter and Nam
June Paik, and is closely associated with the promotion
and study of the Fluxus movement.
As the director of the Museum Fridericianum in Kassel, he
continues to explore the wider realms of contemporary
art. He has curated major biennial exhibitions in Sydney,
Istanbul, Kwangju and elsewhere.
Eero Epner
(1978), art critic, dramaturge at Theatre NO99.
The avant- garde is not dead
29
Politics of pop art: a private dream or a social practice
Mari Laanemets
Peeter Urbla. Assemblage
Kasatchok in the exhibition
Estonian Progressive Art in Café
Pegasus, 1970. Unlike the
works of American pop art,
the context of Estonian pop
was not the white cube of
the gallery but the café.
Andres Tolts, Ando Keskküla.
Poster of the exhibition of
independent student works
at the State Art Institute.
1968
30
Po litics of pop art
It is a bit surprising that the first exhibition
dedicated to pop art was opened in the Kumu
Art Museum only last year*. Pop art, after all,
constitutes one of the most legendary phenomena in Estonian non-official art and, despite its
episodic nature, pop art has earned the title of
‘avant-garde’ from art historians. The meaningfulness resting on a few vague photographs
and only a few works surviving from that period
seems rather remarkable. Finally, the exhibition
POPkunst Forever! promised a chance to take a
closer look at the legend.
Pop art appeared in Soviet Estonian art in
the mid-1960s, when ANK’64 group members presented their brightly coloured paintings, labelled in the exhibition as Cheerful Pop.
Following the general trend of interpretation
in Estonian art history, this seemed to indicate
that the adoption of pop art was restricted to
purely aesthetic innovation of the language of
colour and imagery. The honour of genuine
interpretation of pop art was ascribed to the
group SOUP’69, who launched ‘union-pop’ with
their legendary exhibition in the Pegasus Café in
1969. Thus, Leonhard Lapin called local pop art,
which adopted methods, but used strictly local
material. This original interpretation of pop
art was represented by two groups: SOUP’69
and Visarid, established in 1967. A third part
of the exhibition, Urban Utopia, dealt with the
contemporary artificial environment, one of the
original themes of local pop art and its unique
feature.
Pop art emerged in America and England,
and a bit later in the rest of Europe, at the
pinnacle of the post-war economic boom, as
a result of the altered mass industrial society,
extensive commercialisation and aestheticisation of everyday life. Pop art reflected the new
situation; it was either critical or affirmative,
depending on the context and the viewer’s perspective. In Europe – including this side of the
Iron Curtain – pop art became synonymous not
only with the new American art, but also with
the rock-music, literature and sub-cultures: the
lifestyle of the new generation that opposed
authority and the existing normative life models,
aspiring to openness and freedom.
The interpretation of pop art offered by the
Kumu exhibition indeed saw it as the dream of
the young people of one generation, and hence
a revolt against ‘all restricting borders’, in order
to break through the routine in the academy and
in daily life. When pop art became the official
avant-garde in the 1990s, it was largely because
its rebellious nature was easy to regard as ‘resistance to the system’, as the shrewd undermining of the system became the authentic and
original topic of East-European art. At the same
time, it was treated as being related to private
dreams and not reality, not as social practice,
but as a protest functioning only on an aesthetic level, absurd rather than constructive.
This was emphasised by the exhibition design
of Andres Tolts, which focused on strictly individual approaches.
The avant-garde, or pop art, policy nevertheless seems to be something more complicated
than mere opposition to the system and the
art mainstream, also because the clear border
between official and non-official art started to
fade in the late 1960s, and at least some pop art
works were officially exhibited. It is thus difficult
to think about it as an activity only directed at
a narrow circle of friends. All of the exhibitions,
which were often rather provisional, actively
strove to spread their ideas.1 And art critics
noticed and acknowledged the new movement
immediately, pointing out the political and critical aspects of the works of the younger generation of artists who were associated with pop art.
In the official art magazine Kunst in 1971, Ene
Lamp, for example, described the works at the
Spring Exhibition of Young Artists as a protest
Sirje Runge.
Proposal for the Design of Areas
in Central Tallinn. 1975
100 x 100 cm
Museum of Estonian
Architecture
Ludmilla Siim. Yellow Room
1970. Oil, canvas
120 x 120 cm
against ‘cosy and well-organised bourgeois life’.
The article was illustrated by Ando Keskküla’s
Self-portrait (1970) – one of the hits of Estonian
pop – and Ludmilla Siim’s Yellow Room (1970).
The latter in particular, with its modernity and
light atmosphere, is very attractive, stressing
the ambivalence that characterised the relations in the mass culture society, where deficit
reigned instead of abundance. The promised
power and potency embodied in consumergoods-turned-fetishes are reflected in Lapin’s
Indian ink drawing Open “Lee’s”, showing an
erect penis sticking out of a pair of Lee jeans.
Local mass products did not cause any orgasms
and it was impossible to talk about them with
desire and adoration. (Popular) culture imbued
in Soviet ideology and its heroes was an object
of derision, parodied in various ways; hence,
the impression was that local ‘union-pop’ was
intellectual, critical and ambiguous. The best
examples of union-pop interpreted in that way
are Tolts’s collages depicting bizarre ‘scenes’ of
Soviet life. His poster of the exhibition of independent student works at the State Art Institute
in 1968 [together with Ando Keskküla – Ed] is a
montage of scaffolding and construction workers
bursting with health, ironically indicating the
image of the artist in the Soviet system, who, in
the role of a worker, was building up socialism,
the precise image that the group of pop artists
wanted to change.
Adopting pop art thus occurred within the
framework of different popular-cultural and
media-technological possibilities, and also in
a different society. It seemed in the 1960s that
the ‘world was within reach’, whereas the social
climate changed radically after the suppression
of the Prague Spring in 1968. Vanishing hopes
made people withdraw into themselves and focus
on material well-being, which Andres Kurg,
for example, regards as a significant impetus
for the development of local pop art.2 As for
non-official art, it is customary to talk about
escaping the surrounding grim reality into art,
where it is possible to build up a harmonius
world. However, artworks and texts of that time,
instead, sometimes even didactically, revealed a
social sensitivity in which art was not considered
P o litics of pop art
31
a refuge, but a means to shape the new cultural
environment. This idea cropped up in various
ways in the programmes of ANK, Visarid and
SOUP’69.
In the opening text, titled Situation 1968, of
the first booklet by Visarid, dedicated to French
art, Tõnis Vint interpreted pop art as a new universal (art) system, which similarly to the works
of the romantics and Pre-Raphaelites was trying
to restore the integrity of culture.3 Pop art only
differed from the above-mentioned in that it
turned to contemporary forms, synthesising and
not ignoring popular culture. This interpretation was radically different from, if not totally
opposite, the ideas of American pop art. Besides
criticism of mass culture and its levelling nature,
we thus find an idea of future art as ‘an indispensable element in the automated, spare-time
society’ of tomorrow.4 This was certainly more
alluring than withdrawing into oneself.
This interpretation – the peculiarity of local
pop art – is based on several factors. Pop art
and American/Western pop culture arrived here
simultaneously and almost as synonyms. The
exhibition displayed tattered record sleeves,
but not, for instance, the German edition of
Lucy Lippard’s Pop Art (1966), which Lapin
brought from Budapest. On the other hand,
local art was significantly influenced by the
ideology of design. Warhol had enjoyed a successful career as an advertising artist, whereas
Estonian pop art mainly developed thanks to
design and architecture students. Although
the design faculty was associated with an ideologically more liberal education, it still had its
specific ideology and aims, which influenced
the understanding of art and the paradigm
change in Western art. Finally, design stood
for the greatest promise of the avant-garde, i.e
the chance to unite aesthetics and politics and
thus reform society.
As Lapin declared in his speech at the exhibition of independent works in 1971, the interest in the mundane, popular and low could not
be restricted to its reflection in art, as ‘presenting the objects of life on canvas’, but instead
required intervention. The aim of art should
be to shape the environment.5 The exhibition
itself culminated with the joint action Colouring
the Elephant, where the children’s playground
was painted over. The most remarkable work
of this kind was Sirje Runge’s diploma work at
the State Art Institute in 1975, Proposal for the
Design in Areas of Central Tallinn. Blending poplike aesthetics and new technological means,
32
Po litics of pop art
Villu Järmut, Jaan Ollik.
Teabags in the exhibition of
independent student works
at the State Art Institute.
1974
Leonhard Lapin. Open “Lee’s”.
1972. Indian ink, gouache
40 x 40 cm
Runge designed a dynamic and flexible urban
environment that offered freedom and choices
(services and information).
Pop art’s dream was thus total art, and a
new culture. Not small changes, but a ‘transformation of the psychical-sensory extent of the
whole environment and people’s attention and
imagination.’6 Visarid, SOUP and ANK were
convinced that art (and the artist) must and
could change consciousness, and through the
reality in which we live, plus values and ideals
that we follow. ‘We heal the sick!’ announced
the poster of the only joint exhibition of pop
art groups, titled Estonian Progressive Art, in
the Café Pegasus in 1970. The purpose of that
kind of art was not just depicting daily life but
changing it. Western pop art – or rather the
effect caused by pop art – helped to explain
how aesthetics was subjected to the interests
of capitalism, how to become aware of the
manipulations of the cultural industry, and
finally how to develop opposition, for example
by evoking ‘progressive’ needs. The emancipation of the senses, increasing people’s sensitivity and imagination, seemed to be one of
the aims of local pop art, which would help
to change, if not the system, at least the way
of life. The surrounding environment became
direct material for art. It was not just a matter
of replacing souvenirs or wooden spoons with
prettier products, or attempts to make the town
more beautiful, as seen in Runge’s project; it
was almost the Marcusean idea of retrieving
life through art, which might be truly called
avant-garde. It must, however, be admitted
that this criticism was closely connected with
official discourses, such as design, and cannot
be fully understood as just a negation.
Instead of de-constructing the myth of pop
art, POPkunst Forever! however limited itself to
reproducing it. The accompanying text emphasised the collective character of the phenomenon, but the display only contained the works
of the leaders. Visitors searched in vain for any
works by Gunnar Meier or Rein Mets, whose
names were mentioned on the SOUP’69 exhibition poster. Photographic enlargement of
Keskküla’s destroyed paintings to their original
size and displaying them among other paintings
was awkward and problematic. Was that a snub
to pop art? Nobody else’s destroyed works were
restored, although there were a large number
of works from that period that have not survived. Practically everything ever produced
by Lapin, Tolts and Keskküla was exhibited,
whereas several other experiments characteristic of the period were ignored, for example
Jüri Okas’s narrow films, mostly documenting
joint actions, or Villu Järmut and Jaan Ollik’s
Georgian teabags and bus tickets, which constituted part of the local pop art phenomenon,
to name just a few.
1 Although the works of ANK’64 seem today like reflections of an introverted, elaborate and inaccessible inner
world, this mostly indicates the situation in art’s reception, meaning long-lasting, occasionally public, but mainly
intimate conversations and discussion, a kind of alternative ‘academy’.
2 Andres Kurg, Almanac Kunst ja Kodu 1973–1980. – Kunsti
teaduslikke Uurimusi 2 (13), 2004.
3 Tõnis Vint, Olukorrast kunstis 1968. – Visarid 1, 1968, p 55.
4 VISARID Manifesto. Kunstirühmitus Visarid, Tartu 1967–1972.
Tallinn, 1977, p 55.
5 Leonhard Lapin, Taie kujundamas keskkonda (1971). –
L. Lapin, Kaks kunsti. Valimik ettekandeid and artikleid
kunstist ning ehituskunstist 1971–1995. Tallinn, 1997, p 18.
The text by Keskküla and Tolts has unfortunately not survived. It was supposed to appear in the magazine Noorus,
together with an overview of the exhibition SOUP’69. The
display shows a page with large white empty spaces. We
thus do not know to this day how precisely they interpreted
pop art.
6
See VISARID Manifesto, p 55: ’In the future, individual artists will no longer produce original work; instead, artists’
collectives will reorganise the entire environment.‘
* POPkunst Forever!, exhibition at the Kumu Art Museum from
27 November 2009 to 11 April 2010. It was curated by
Sirje Helme.
Mari Laanemets
(1975), PhD, art historian and artist.
P o litics of pop art
33
Ideological and poetic topic of land in the 1930s.
Eerik Haamer
Tiina Abel
Richard Uutmaa
Rye Harvesters (Rye Harvesting)
1941. Oil, canvas
103.5 x 118.5 cm
34
The declaration that established the Republic
of Estonia in the final stages of World War I
and the building of the Republic during the
next two decades, coincided with a period
of increasing cultural conservatism. By the
1930s, modern art had lost most of its radical
nature and followed the requirements of
Ideo log ical and poetic topic of land in the 1930s. Ee r i k Ha a me r
monumentality, nationalism, truthfulness to
nature and classicism. According to the new
hierarchy of values, the ideas of (home)land,
work and family in art were especially vividly
reflected in the choice of topics and motifs;
in political rhetoric. The idea of nationalism
and regionalism triumphed over the notion of
art’s international character. In Estonia, the
intelligentsia of the inter-war period continued
to dream of the dominance of intellectual values
in society and an ‘Estonian idea’ that would
unite the interests of the individual, the nation
and the state. In this situation, a kind of state
nationalism quietly emerged, whereas political
discussions became markedly one-sided after the
coup d’état of Konstantin Päts, who later became
president, in 1934. The propaganda apparatus
used the delight about the independent
country and a sense of national self-confidence
as tools of political manipulation. The idea
of nationalism blended with the ambitions
of the political regime. Artists, who once felt
free and able to enjoy the more radical part of
international modern art, were in the 1930s
suddenly surrounded by the rhetoric of official
art and a wall of conservatism.
The Estonian art of the 1930s thus returned
to nature and the figure. The idea of closeness to
nature and realism as a method led artists’ interests to the topic of peasants’ labour. For realists,
the symbol of callous urban life was the slum,
whereas rural life represented traditional way of
life, persistence and truths that seemed eternal.
The image of agreeable rural life, was among the
most persistent myths of the 1930s. In Estonia,
this tendency was supported by historical stereotypes (including the idea of Estonians as peasant
people), a tradition of depicting farm milieu that
reached back to the 19th century, and socialpolitical circumstances: the majority of the supporters of President Konstantin Päts’s politics
lived in rural areas. During the inter-war period,
the idea of morally beautiful rural life as an idea
of paradise on earth was established not only in
Estonia, but in various European countries as
well. The struggle between the idea of chaos
and order in the art of the 1920s was gradually
replaced by fascination with the organic and
a more sober attitude to machine aesthetics.
The cult of land and work easily took root in
Estonian art. A strong metaphorical connection
appeared between the physical Estonian turf and
the imaginary reliefs of the homeland.
The slogan of a return to a simple, close-tothe-earth world proclaimed all over Europe in
the 1930s, contained a hidden image of home
and homeland. The strength of the country and
its people was tied to the universal source of
vitality – the land. The depiction of peasant
life, which followed the inevitable rhythm of the
seasons, also conveyed essential communications in art. Harmonious life in the lap of nature,
poeticising morale-enhancing, useful (country)
labour, seemed European, topical and attractive
to artists. Poeticising rural labours enabled them
to connect the events in nature and human life,
avoiding the private, purely consumerist and
trifling character of life. The artistic instinct
recognised the intersection of reality and art,
an opportunity to transform reality into poetry.
The work of artistic ‘reproducers’ of rural life
represented, according to Mikhail Bakhtin,
the special type of restoring the folkloric era in
which the main realities of idyllic tranquillity
(topical both in the human as well as in the
political-ideological plan), such as love, work
and family, operated.
The land-image of Estonian art in the 1930s
focused on the island of Saaremaa. Considering
Saaremaa’s meagre nature, barren land and hard
everyday life, the artistic interpretation inevitably moved to the level of philosophising generalisation. Eerik Haamer [1908–1994], the epic
painter of the islands of Saaremaa and Ruhnu,
was not only born in Saaremaa, but as a painter
he was totally one with it. The issue of centreperiphery that arose during the decade, introduced the topic of regionalism and locality in
European art. On the axis of Haamer’s personal
geography, the centre as a source of inspiration
was one’s place of birth.
As for the sense of eternity in Haamer’s
paintings, it is again worth referring to Mikhail
Bakhtin, who has drawn attention to the links
between time and space, to organic serfdom, and
relations, where the events in one’s life are associated with home. This centuries-long attachment, even if only in imagination, also tended
to level the facets of time in Haamer’s work. In
his work, time becomes an endlessly repeated
current moment, a temporal constant that intertwines with the spatial, where the dimension of
eternity and the topic of the ancestral land are
Kaarel Liimand. Autumn
1934. Oil, canvas
109.3 x 88.6 cm
Id eolo g i ca l a n d p o e t i c to p i c o f l a nd in the 1930s. Eerik Haa mer
35
Eerik Haamer. An Ox in Mud
1943. Oil, canvas
89 x 145.5 cm
Eerik Haamer
Young Mother (Mother). 1940
Oil, canvas. 116.5 x 89 cm
revealed. Haamer was a humanist, an archaeologist and balladeer of human existence, for whom
the land is the source of vitality.
Haamer’s attachment to the land was almost
physical. It is evident in coarse dry layers of soil
and bottomless blood-coloured quagmires (An
Ox in Mud, 1943, Art Museum of Estonia), in
the darkness of the grave (Virgin Land, 1942,
Art Museum of Estonia), and in his colours. A
thick layer of paint seems to replace the soil, and
the artist’s means of livelihood is regarded as
identical with those of country people. Haamer’s
land therefore has the dimensions of home or
even the homeland, the territory of joy and sorrow, but also of refuge and tenacity. A layer of
soil is always there, and it does not betray. Just
like people in Haamer’s paintings, the heroicised land also tends to present the ideology of
endurance that was typical of the decade and
became its symbol. Toiling on the land is consecrated, and ties with the land determine destiny.
Caring for the land shows concern for one’s
(home)land, and this, in turn, is transformed
into caring for the soul.
The connection of nature as an organic whole
with the topic of vitality and the home(land) is
also reflected in Haamer’s depiction of women,
where the physical contact with the land seems
to be part of a kind of fertility ritual. In the
woman-land-child triangle, the artist placed
female physical fertility alongside an image of
the land’s power of procreation. Uniting the
spiritual and physical side of motherhood in the
figure of the Madonna, Haamer inevitably added
a Christian dimension at a time when different
versions of the Blut und Boden ideology, which
shaped the decade’s cultural climate in Europe,
were hovering in the distance.
Tiina Abel
(1951), art historian, curator at the Kumu Art Museum.
Main area of research: Estonian art history from 1850
to 1940.
Eerik Haamer. Virgin Soil. 1942. Oil, canvas. 79.6 x 67 cm. Art Museum of Estonia
36
Ideo log ical and poetic topic of land in the 1930s. E e r i k H a a me r
Id eolo g i ca l a n d p o e t i c to p i c o f l a nd in the 1930s. Eerik Haa mer
37
Orthodox Church of
St Nicholas in Tallinn
Interview with Nikolai Kormašov
Eero
Epner: I apo
logise for my ignorance of Russian artists
in Estonia, although there
have always been quite a few. You
have dealt with this problem extensively. What is the role of Russian artists in Estonian culture?
Nikolai Kormašov: I think it is very difficult to
measure the impact and quality, as the cultural
integration has been rather slow, almost invisible
to the naked eye. If we talk about Russian culture
in Estonia, we have to talk in terms of millennia.
Now, for example, we are discovering the oldest and
extremely rare iconostasis in the country, in the
Church of Bishop St Nicholas [The current church
was built in 1827, although there had been a church
on that spot for hundreds of years – Ed]. Only ten
years ago, we did not known that it had survived,
from the very beginning when the altar was built!
In 1682, the double tsars Ivan V Alekseyevich and
Peter I Alekseyevich, together with Ivan’s sister Sophia
Alekseyevna, acceded to the
throne, and it was a custom
on the accession of a tsar to
give gifts to various churches
and monasteries. Among others, Orthodox Church of St
Nicholas in Reval got a new
iconostasis. A brand new one.
It was made in Pskov by local
masters, but some parts came
from artists at the Moscow
Armoire, such as the žalovannõi
[hired, commissioned from
above – Ed] Sergei Rozhkov –
a prominent icon painter.
This particular iconostasis is
remarkable because it forms
a whole ensemble, which is
very rare even in Russia. After
the earlier famous iconostases –
38
Bernt
Baroque iconostasis made
by Ivan Zarudnyi in 1720 in
Notke’s altar in
the Orthodox Church of the
the Holy Spirit Church
Transfiguration of Our Lord
in Tallinn
and Hermen Rode’s in St
Nicholas – this is the third oldest set, and its cultural meaning is
huge, not only because of its size, but
also because of the quality.
So, the first impact of Russian culture
on Estonian art and culture occurred at the
level of church, monastery and religion. The
Orthodox faith began rapidly spreading in the
mid-19th century, involved the whole country and
naturally influenced culture too [it spread quickly
because those who converted were promised land –
Ed]. Orthodox churches were built especially on the
islands and along the coast. What does Orthodoxy
actually mean? It is iconostasis, it is reading the
Word of God. It is not just a faith; to some extent, it
is culture as well.
Does this include the culture of particular small
prayer houses in Setumaa, in
south-east Estonia?
The whole territory, especially
from the 16th century onwards,
was Orthodox, and this automatically meant churches,
chapels and convents – religion and culture hand-in-hand.
I think, and can prove it with
examples, that, besides the
Orthodox faith, Setumaa has
preserved the ancient language
and dialect, as well as the tradition of important anniversaries, and all this is connected to
the Orthodox faith. People still
wear national costumes and
use pagan symbols, which are
the symbols of motherhood and
the matriarchate, plus all the
necklaces and other such items.
Setu is thus a brilliant example
39
1
2
3
4
1. Interior view of Küllatüvä Nahtsi (Anastasia) tsässon. In
1940–1990, the building did not serve as a sacred building and
its interior items and roof were completely destroyed. In the
1990s, the house was renovated, a stove was installed and
since 1996, it is again used as a tsässon. Village reunions take
place next to it. The gable-roofed tsässon is separated by the
gates of the iconostasis into a prayer room and altar room.
2. Mikitamäe Tuumapühäpäävä (Toomapühapäeva, for Setos
also ollõtuspühä or kõllapühäpäivä or väiko lihavõõdõ) tsässon
(chapel). According to dendrodating, the oldest tsässon that
has survived within the Estonian territory of Setomaa was
built probably in 1694.
3. Interior view of Pelsi Anne tsässon. The tsässon is dedicated
to Anna (Annõ) who is regarded as the mother of Virgin Mary
in the church tradition. According to the Julian calendar,
annõpäiv – the day (Mother of God) Saint Anne’s death is 7
August. Near the tsässon, there is a healing sacrificial stone
of Annõ where people used to take sheep wool, milk products
and ram heads or slaughtered sheep since Annõ had been the
protector of sheep and cattle for Seto people.
4. New Võmmorski Nelipühi (Suvistepüha) tsässon, built and
consecrated in 1999. The village chapel erected opposite the
old Võmmorski tsässon across the road was inaugurated in
1999. The tsässon was constructed under the leadership of
Priest Rafael (Raul Hindrikus), the then Orthodox priest of
Võru and Obinitsa. Võmmorski tsässons are also known as
tsässons of the Holy Trinity.
40
of a pearl that should be preserved by both
Estonians and Russians, because the Russians
themselves no longer have such a tradition.
The same was, incidentally, true in Tallinn.
All the local Russians who went to St Nicholas’
Orthodox Church differed (they still do) from
other Russians, because they did not lose their
roots, their culture. At the same time, they were
totally integrated, working in the city council,
active in trading etc.
Another pearl of Russian culture is the
baroque iconostasis made by Ivan Zarudnyi
in 1720 in the former Cistercian nunnery [now
Orthodox Church of the Transfiguration of Our
Lord – Ed], the first of its kind in Tallinn. It’s a masterpiece! Zarudnyi in fact only made three iconostases: in Moscow, in St Petersburg and here.
Or the small wooden Church of Our Lady
of Kazan near the Olympia Hotel. In 1920, the
remaining Russian troops gave all their field
iconostases to this church. This is a tradition.
Unfortunately, only one or two survive, because
the rest were stolen in the 1960s. It was suspected
at the time that this was done by exile Russians,
the ‘Whites’, who remembered that the regimental treasures were left there. Whatever the truth,
the fact is that one night someone drove up with
a lorry and took away all the extremely valuable
17th and 18th century iconostases.
When was the start of Russian figurative art
in Estonia?
As early as the 19th century. Two major artists
then arrived in Tartu; one of them was Mikhail
Lebedev, a superb landscape painter. Excellent!
He came from Tartu, studied in St Petersburg,
then abroad, and his landscapes can be compared to, or are even better than, those of
Shtshedrin or Vorobyov, who are both classics.
In the 20th century, there were a great
number of Russian artists in Estonia. Call it
what you like: colonisation or the creeping of
the Orthodox faith into Estonia. The University
of Tartu was teaching in German, but the impact
of Russian society was clearly felt too, as many
lecturers were Russian professors. There were
quite a few, all closely connected with Estonia,
and they naturally exerted some influence.
On the other hand, in the early 20th century, many young Estonian artist studied in
St Petersburg, and they formed a national
Estonian school! So the links between Estonian
and Russian painting were close, and not only
in painting. There is a lot to say about Russian
culture in Estonia. I also mean here applied arts,
wood processing, sewing, weaving, embroidery
and so on, even ironwork.
Andrei Jegorov.
Boats on the Sea. 1922
Oil, cardboard.
Private collection
What happened during the independent
Republic of Estonia, between 1920 and
1940?
Suddenly a huge number of Russian emigrants
arrived, between 1917 and 1940. This was an
extensive wave. Among the arrivals were artists, but also theatre people and graphic artists,
for example excellent poster artists. Let’s take
Sergei Slastnikov: the very first poster artist in
Estonia, who had a strong impact on the entire
poster art field in the country.
Some arrivals stayed for a year, some for two
or three, then left. Some stayed for decades.
Among the latter were the painters Kaigarodov,
Grinev, Sokolov and Jegorov.
The other wave of artists was just passing
through, as it were, but nevertheless had an
influence on local art. For instance Obolyaninova:
the first theatre costume artist in Estonia. Or
the extremely popular Rundaltsov, who even did
an engraving of the tsar’s family, and certainly
helped develop Estonian graphic art.
Several artists lived in Narva: Loginov, Leshkin
and Kulkov. The latter was famous for the fact
that his works cost more than those of any
Estonian, because a great deal of his work was
bought in Germany. By the way, many Russians
who settled in Estonia had views similar to those
of Baltic Germans and actually departed with
41
Leila Pärtelpoeg and the Soviet antique
Mart Kalm
In 2010, the Estonian state gave the interior architect Leila Pärtelpoeg (b 1927) a lifetime achievement award worth one million EEK. During
the Soviet era, she was deeply concerned about
antique furniture. Today, this seems a normal issue
of the wealthy, but during the post-war modernist
decades, when history was despised, and under
the conditions of Soviet rule, which called the old
upper classes exploiters, this attitude truly involved
swimming against the current.
Aleksander Kulkov
Male Nude with a Dagger. 1925
Ink, paper.
them in 1939, when Hitler invited the Baltic
Germans to return home. Kulkov did not leave.
When the war broke out, he went back to Russia
and ended his life somewhere in Central Asia, in
total obscurity. Or Kaigorodov, who ran a hugely
popular studio and taught many Estonian artists
as well.
And, of course, Georg Krug. His family came
from St Petersburg, but he was born in Narva.
Krug studied at the Pallas Art School, together
with the best Estonian artists, and was very
highly regarded. I have got his drawings from
the Pallas period. They are superb, and his whole
body of work should be a part of classic Estonian
art, but unfortunately very little is known about
Krug. He later travelled to Paris and became a
prominent icon painter. He was so famous that
on the Holy Mountain in Greece – a place where
only monasteries stand against the backdrop
of the mountain – he was considered one of the
leading icon painters in the world.
Nikolai Kalmakov. A remarkable person! At
the beginning of the century, he was regarded
as a doubtful and scandalous symbolist. His
paintings – on Oriental topics, very exotic – were
full of complicated symbols, elaborate forms
and other such things. At great exhibitions in
Moscow and St Petersburg, he was sometimes
praised highly and sometimes derided. When
he came here, probably in 1918, he continued
42
Georg Krug. Portrait of Father
1920s. Charcoal, paper
his rather stormy creative activities and was
commissioned by the government – after a competition – to produce a painting in honour of the
24th of February [the Republic of Estonia was
declared on 24 February 1918 – Ed] Kalmakov!
A Russian! The work is not that significant from
the point of view of national art, but is fascinating historically, because it fixes with absolute
precision the portrait of every single character.
In addition, it is in the form of a coat of arms:
something the Estonian artists might perhaps
never have thought of because they have a different way of thinking. For that reason, the picture was fiercely criticised by Estonian artists,
naturally also because such a task had been
entrusted to a foreigner.
What is the situation in researching Russian
culture in Estonia today?
There is a Society of Russian artists, the Russian
Cultural Centre organises exhibitions, some articles appear, etc. I personally know about a great
many cultural monuments, both Estonian and
Russian. But even I do not know enough, because
so much is concealed under various cultural layers and in people’s memories ….
Nikolai Kormašov
(1929), painter. See also Estonian Art 2/2009.
INTERIOR ARCHITECT IN SOVIET ESTONIA
Interior architects are not taken very seriously at
present. They combine temporary designs with
ready-made products, which are soon replaced by
new, fresh and more modern versions. Although
Soviet Estonian architects probably did look down
a bit on interior architects, the builders practically
never properly completed what the architects had
planned, the process dragged on indefinitely and
there were always other things going wrong. Thus
the architects were in no position to boast, and
their reputation was rather poor. The much less
time-consuming work of interior architects, on
the other hand, was finished fairly quickly; they
offered modern bits of spaces that looked almost
‘like abroad’, and this is what people behind the
Iron Curtain certainly desired. The other factor
envied by Western colleagues was the opportunity
to make original furniture. The furniture industry
in the Soviet Union was so underdeveloped that
ready-made furniture was basically hopeless, and
small workshops thus bravely produced furniture
and various details according to the designs of
interior architects. There was a huge difference
during the Soviet era between rooms furnished
with the usual factory products and the original
designs of interior architects; the latter had a
special aura and were highly valued.
ESTONIA and ANTIQUE FURNITURE
Estonia has never had much historical furniture, because the country is not wealthy and
has suffered many wars. During the unrest in
1905, Estonian peasants burned down Baltic
German manors with a vengeance. When the
Republic of Estonia was established in 1918,
many manors were abandoned; some owners
left for Germany, while others stayed and tried
to make do with the little land that they could
still keep, but were often forced to sell their
property. After the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in
1939, the Baltic Germans left Estonia. As they
could not take much with them, they had to sell
their antiques to Estonians at ridiculously low
prices. The Soviet regime, in turn, persecuted
and deported the Estonians who had acquired
antique furniture; some fled to the West emptyhanded at the end of the war. As a result, there
are no old houses in Estonia where generations
of inhabitants have accumulated antique furniture and various interior items over several
centuries. This, therefore, adds extra value to
Pärtelpoeg’s role in researching, collecting (the
biggest collection today is in Sagadi manor) and
appreciating the Estonian history of furniture,
both in her own work and in her job as a lecturer
on the history of interior architecture at the
State Art Institute in Soviet Estonia, today’s
Academy of Arts.
ANTIQUES and RED SUPREMACY
On the one hand, for ideological reasons the communists were not supposed to adorn their lives
with the luxuries of the previous exploiters. On
the other hand, the state institutions had to look
dignified and decorous. The leadership of Soviet
Estonia simply took over the official rooms of the
pre-war Republic of Estonia. In the 1930s, under
President Päts, the Toompea Castle in Tallinn,
where the government and several ministries
worked, as well as the president’s residence in
Kadriorg Palace, with its new office building, were
all in such excellent condition that the Soviet
authorities had no need to undertake any major
renovation work.
Pärtelpoeg, whose competence in historical
interiors the Soviet Estonian leadership trusted,
played a significant role in preserving the prewar interiors, partly furnished with antiques and
partly with 1930s furniture. The Soviets recognised their ignorance and tried to take advantage of professional help. Pärtelpoeg’s personal
preferences were for great historical styles, such
as the enfilade dating from the 1770s in the governor’s flat in the former Provincial Government
L e ila P ä rt el poeg and the soviet antique
43
2
3
4
5
1, 6. Palmse was the first
manor (originates from the
rebuilding accomplished in
1782–1785) in Estonia that
was restored as a complex to
give a full picture of a typical
Baltic manorial estate. The
restoration of the mansion
took place in 1975–1985.
Interiors were designed by
Leila Pärtelpoeg.
2. Manor house of Sagadi
(18th century), interior
design by Leila Pärtelpoeg
(from 1977 to the end of
1980s)
3, 4, 5. Rägavere was the
second manor (1770–80s),
to be restored in the
1970s. Interior architect
Leila Pärtelpoeg
44
1
L ei la Pärte lpoeg and the soviet antique
6
because it was not in accordance with the official Soviet doctrine, which saw the German
legacy as the root of evil. After World War II,
the Soviet Union was ruled by Germanophobia
and was not always able to distinguish Fascists
from Germans. The justification for spending
large sums of money on manor houses was heritage protection, because most manors were state
protected as architecture or art monuments.
building on Toompea Hill. However, she also
had to look after the expressionist Parliament
building from the early 1920s, which she did not
regard very highly then. During the Soviet era,
she was not that keen on the style prevalent in
the Republic of Estonia, which beside the genuine Empire style and Biedermeier seemed far too
modern. Still, during the Soviet rule, Estonians
never criticised the independence period of
the 1920s and 1930s, not even in private conversations. In the mid-1990s, when Pärtelpoeg
supervised the renovation of the Parliament
building and took a closer look at expressionist
architecture, she discovered its true worth and
enjoyed her renovation task to the full.
A narrow-minded puritan might stress her
cooperation with the occupying powers. She
did cooperate, but an (interior) architect needs
clients and it was actually lucky that the important interiors in Soviet Estonia were entrusted to
the only interior architect of her generation to
be interested in antique furniture. This was the
best chance for state-owned antique furniture
to survive the occupation period.
RESTORED COLLECTIVE FARM MANORS
Throughout history, Estonians were peasants
and Germans were the manor lords. In the
newly independent Republic of Estonia in the
early 1920s, the former manorial lands were
distributed amongst the peasants, and many
manor houses stood empty. Some were used as
46
L eila P ärtelpoeg and the soviet antique
schoolhouses, community halls, hospitals and
other institutions. When the first collective
farms were set up in 1949, many established
their offices in the old mansions. In the 1960s
and 1970s, the collective farms prospered, and
among other things built modern offices. In the
1960s, the medieval section of Tallinn and its
renovation became fashionable; in the 1970s
the wealthier collective farms adopted the idea
and began restoring old manor houses in their
territory, turning them into community halls or
official buildings. One of the intellectual leaders
of this movement was Pärtelpoeg, who saw an
excellent opportunity to provide historical
interiors with antique furniture. The paintings
and the stucco, and sometimes the parquet as
well, all cried out for a new lease on life, for
furniture and pictures, carpets and curtains. A
number of manor houses were thus revived, such
as those at Palmse (the administrative centre
of Lahemaa National Park), Sagadi, Rägavere,
Saku and Järlepa; the manor houses of Vihula,
Kolga and others were left unfinished.
Restoring the manor houses, together with
their interiors and parks, was a huge radical
change – this was not merely a demonstration
of the might and wealth of some collective farms
but it also symbolised the fact that Estonians
were coming to terms with historical injustice,
and learning to forgive the departed Germans
for flogging their ancestors in manor stables.
The whole undertaking was made even sweeter
Tallinn Town Hall (built in
1404), interior architect
Leila Pärtelpoeg, 1973–1975
ORIGINAL OR COPY
It was obvious that there was not enough genuine antique furniture left in Estonia to provide
for all mansions. Some furniture was found in
specialised shops in Leningrad, but Pärtelpoeg,
with her amazing energy, managed to get the collective farm wood workshops to produce copies
of antique furniture. Relying on her knowledge
of history, she often had chairs copied that had
originally come from a particular manor house
and, if specific information was missing, something typical of the area was copied. These ‘newold’ pieces of furniture were naturally not of very
high quality, due to insufficient skills, technical equipment or wood, but the effort itself was
remarkable. The mansion halls had historically
never been full of rows of chairs, but this was now
required if these halls were to be used, and a few
large rooms had to accommodate a few hundred
‘new-old’ chairs. It undoubtedly seemed strange
when Pärtelpoeg had Empire style writing desks
at the Kolga manor steward’s house made for
all the artificial inseminators, veterinarians and
bookkeepers. Contemporary functions in a historical building could perhaps have been served
by modern furniture, but Pärtelpoeg’s ability to
inspire her contemporaries to consider historical
styles certainly deserves admiration.
MODERNISM and HISTORICAL INTERIORS
Pärtelpoeg’s historical settings were encouraged by the popularity of post-modernist design;
until that time she cultivated modernist designs.
Among the most outstanding of them were the
Tallinn Town Hall interiors, completed in 1975
and meant to be the official rooms of the city
council. Restorers had already demolished the
19th century ceiling in the Citizens’ Hall, thus
making it two storeys high. What emerged was
the pure Gothic hall with six vaults completed
in 1404. She designed clearly modernist oak and
leather chairs, although with a touch of history,
and modern lamps for the ceiling, emphasising
the height of the vaults. The missing doors were
produced in a piano factory, and were highly
polished, which produced a synthesis of Gothic
dignity and the enthusiasm for the new polyester varnish. In true medieval fashion, the walls
had to be covered with tapestries, which were
designed by Anu Raud in the style of geometric
minimalism. The more traditionalist side of heritage protection has never been able to accept
this modernist interior of the Citizens’ Hall, and
thus in 2008 copies were made of the Brussels
tapestry preserved in the City Museum, which
had been added to the Hall in the 16th century.
This solution certainly seems prettier to the common taste, and the copies were also approved of
by Pärtelpoeg, although it is a pity that the bold
approach of the 1970s was abandoned.
Leila Pärtelpoeg has led a diverse and fascinating life: a childhood in Tallinn in the 1930s,
post-war younger years filled with tennis, skiing
and piano-playing, and a Stalinist education at
the Tallinn State Applied Art Institute. The two
sides were split into two in the mid-1950s, when
she was able to design light modernist pieces of
furniture on slender legs, and at the same time
acted on her enchantment with classical style
furniture. These two poles have accompanied
her throughout her life.
Café Pegasus, Tallinn
(1965), interior architects
Väino Tamm, Allan Murdmaa
and Leila Pärtelpoeg
Mart Kalm
(1961), PhD, historian of art and architecture; Dean of
the Faculty of Art and Culture at the Estonian Academy
of Arts. Main area of research: history of the Estonian
architecture in the 20th century.
L e ila P ä rt el poeg and the soviet antique
47
Public urban space in the new centre of Tartu
Henn Runnel
If we add a bit of red, a grain of yellow and a thin stripe of green to the light blue ellipse
surrounding the most intense junction in town, we get the image of the new centre of Tartu
in the general urban planning. The rather more colourful area taking shape in the physical
space, where the most radical transformation of the Tartu city centre in the last two decades
has taken place, runs from the Riga-Turu crossroads towards the boiler-house in the southeast. On the one side, it is bordered by the Emajõgi River, and on the other side by Turu
Street. This constitutes the most contemporary urban fragment, which aspires to expand
the territory perceived as the city centre, but how well is it going to succeed? Does the area
have enough energy, layers, different users, spontaneity and all the other things that make
a public space function?
The simplest way to measure would be to set
the ‘fairly successful’ Old Town of Tartu as the
yardstick to the public space in the new centre.
However, Panu Lehtovuori warns that the concept of ‘public urban space’ is too often perceived
through the past. It is common, in the light of
excellent and clearly positive historical examples, that contemporary public urban spaces are
somehow worse and duller. Referring to Doreen
Massey, he writes that the public space actually
lacks any straightforward ‘foundation’ to lean
on. This is an object of constant negotiations
and conflicts, which is repeatedly put in danger
when it is taking shape; ‘negotiations’, however,
make the urban space truly public. How strong
the positions are of the parties at such ‘negotiations’ is an altogether different matter.
Unlike the Old Town of Tartu, the buildings
of the new centre do not constitute a uniform
group; rather, each new house tries to attract
attention to itself and add an architecturally exciting accent. The high-rise Pläsku ning
Tigutorn (Flask and Snail Tower) firmly and
frequently tend to organise the pictorial space
of photographs depicting today’s Tartu. The
plans of the 1990s determined the large bulks
of the buildings – occasionally the same as in
some quarters in the Old Town – but for that
48
P ub lic urban spac e in the new centre of Tartu
reason they are more monotonous and contain
walls with fewer entrances. Despite that, the
space between buildings intertwines more with
the commercial space than in the Old Town.
The invitation to enter extended by the Tasku
(Pocket) department store is perhaps even too
insistent, indicated by the alternative path –
the windy and grim corridor between Tasku
and Pläsku. Although the intertwining of the
internal and external seems exciting, it is also a
drawback, as some areas of movement disappear
outside business hours. The gates are closed and
the appeal of the environment diminishes. The
insufficient vibration is also indicated by the lack
of night-life, except for the car park between the
petrol station and fast-food restaurant. Unlike
the Old Town, no festivals or student activities
have been held here.
The open market behind the business centre
offers an interesting contrast. The active space
that enriches the social life and diversity during
the daytime becomes an ugly barracks at night,
guarded by fierce dogs. The situation of the market is also fascinating because it used to be the
reason why the whole town emerged in the first
place: it was the heart of the town, later repeatedly relocated. Today it once again finds itself
in the way of more profitable businesses, and it
The new centre in Tartu aspiring towards the metropolitan look…
... although there is not enough similar urban quality for every nook and cranny
Removing the embankment from the picture. Väike-Turu Street walled in by the
Tigutorn parking house
The back wall of the open market that blocks the embankment
P u bl i c u r ba n s pac e in the new centre of Tartu
49
has been seriously suggested that the market
and the bus station should be removed. This
would be a severe blow to the quality of the
public space of the new centre. According to
Henri Lefebvre, there can be no town or urbanity without an energetic centre, without lived
moments independent of exchange rates and
exciting encounters, which both the market
and the bus station could certainly generate.
Influenced by Lefebvre, Bernard Tschumi
claims that social practices must be accommodated in good physical environments, which
pedestrians can use smoothly and easily .
Personal pedestrian experience is much more
than moving from point A to point B – it means
seeing and perceiving space, an act of communication depending on space, other people and
various events, a social practice that includes
a rich set of impulses. This could be a most
effective measure to evaluate urban space; one
indicator would be the same smoothness factor
mentioned by Tschumi.
The biggest problem is not cars, although
the spacious car park forms a significant structural element in the new centre. For some
reason, the large number of cars here is less
disturbing than the few cars on the streets of
the Old Town. The positive aspect of car-friendliness in the new centre is that simple access
helps the area and city centre compete with
the huge supermarkets on the outskirts (and
perhaps survive). Besides, the journey of one
or several pedestrians either starts or ends at
each parked car. However, the same care lavished on car traffic should be applied to the
main flows of pedestrian movement and conflict
places. Some current problem areas could be
sorted out fairly easily, for example the confusing area around the Turu pedestrian bridge and
the Turu-Riga crossroads that pedestrians use
only infrequently.
A significant problem of the new structure
is its relationship to the riverbank. In other
areas, the banks of the river are essential axes
of public space, and they smoothly link different urban quarters. In the new centre near the
fenced-in harbour, the riverbank becomes an
abandoned and filthy ‘back yard’ and, despite
the oft-repeated truth that the town should
turn its face more towards the river, the new
structure seems to favour the existing situation.
Instead of the river, the best facades of the new
buildings overlook the street on the opposite
side. The back of the market and the car park of
Tigutorn form a wall that cuts off the riverbank
and turns Väike-Turu Street into an unfriendly
transport corridor. The roads are more topical
flows than the river.
On the other hand, this might actually be
an advantage – an increase in the quality and
diversity of the public space – that not all segments of space have achieved the planned aims;
they have not been ‘sorted out’, and contain
areas without any proper programme. Such
undetermined segments outside all planning
might contain the more space-related ‘poetic’
and ‘mythical’ experiences mentioned by Michel
de Certeau. In the back yards along the riverbank, the aspirations of other areas behind them
to appear bigger and more urban are quickly
forgotten. Besides, it is still possible to strap
on skis here and disappear quickly towards the
meadows.
1 Lehtovuori, P. 2010. Experience and conflict: The Production of
Urban Space. Pp 42–43
2 Kuidas lahendada liiklusprobleemid linna suurimal ristmikul.
Tartu Postimees. 11.03.2005
3 Merrifield, Andy. 2006. Henri Lefebvre. A Critical Introduction.
Routledge. P 72
4 Avermaete, T., and K. Havik. 2009. ’Accommodating the
Public Sphere’. Oase 77.
5 Lehtovouri, P. 2010. P 32.
Henn Runnel
View of Emajõgi business centre – Pläsku and Tasku
50
Pub lic urban spac e in the new centre of Tartu
(1983), MA in Urban Landscapes at the Estonian
Academy of Arts in 2010. Previously studied landscape
architecture in Tartu and Norway and participated in
various competitions and landscape art workshops.
See also http://henn.runnel.ee
National kitsch
Interview with Andres Tolts
Eero Epner: Andres Tolts, we were just talking about the President of Estonia, Toomas
Hendrik Ilves, who occasionally turns up in
national costume. At the presidential reception on the anniversary of the Republic of
Estonia, several ladies wear clothes adorned
with stylised ‘national patterns’. A new product was recently launched: trainers with
‘national patterns’. What’s your reaction to
all this?
Andres Tolts: Using national elements in fashion
is often kind of ready-made, as the inspiration
is provided by folk art, although the original
roots are severed. The coat of President Ilves,
for example, is a version of the long-coat that
was widespread in the 17th and early 18th centuries, and is today also worn, for instance, by
Orthodox Jews.
I have never been a fan of national costumes
myself, except Bavarian jackets, which are neutral and durable.
Neutral in what sense?
They are adapted to changing fashion, without being particularly ethnographic. They, of
course, contain ethnographic details, but the
cut changes. We do not have typical national
costumes that can be worn today as a natural
part of an outfit.
As for patterns, it is totally all right to take over
the geometry, as it is so archetypal that it is not
aggressive. By being aggressive, I mean a narrative ethnographic element. Our patterns are
more general and, if they have been traditional
elements of national costumes, then why not
use them.
Editing the magazine Kunst ja Kodu (Art and
Home) in the 1970s and 1980s, you often
fought against national kitsch. How do you
define it?
National kitsch is an imitation, which only
gives a vague idea of something archaic. It is
a forced-thinking ethnography. Something like
today’s building of log-houses: such buildings
of round logs are not at all typical of ancient
Estonian farm architecture. In proportions and
construction, they resemble the ethnographic
architecture in Nizhni Novgorod; they
are some sort of ‘little houses on chicken
feet’ – ambiguous tales of ethnography. Old
threshing barns had precise proportions and
technology came second. What matters in
such kitsch is the pseudo or illusion. Without
knowing the topic, deceptive semblances are
accepted after a brief examination.
What is the ideological plan of such kitsch?
On the one hand, the aim is probably to oppose
the standard, but then it turns into the standard
itself. The naïve idea of the unique has caused the
way of thinking to be standard too. Something
unique cannot be mass-produced. If the mass
starts hoping that it is unique, a new standard
inevitably follows. Something similar happens in
fashion: if people start thinking that light green
is unique, everyone wears light green.
On the other hand, it is pseudo-nationalism. It is
not an essential sense of a whole, but is seeking
apparent visual signs or standard symbols. The
same goes for the new green eco: log houses
are considered to be ecological. They can, in a
sense, indeed be ecological, but I cannot see why
ecological has to be so ugly.
What causes national kitsch?
Imitation. Not an individual creative approach,
but imitation. For me, kitsch started with rococo, when Chinese porcelain became popular
and innumerable porcelain figurines appeared
that were skilfully made, but their form was
ridiculous. Kitsch is not personalised; it only
seems to be personalised, but there is hardly
anything less animated than kitsch.
On the other hand, people want to recall
and remember, associate themselves with a
location, and this is what various items hope
for: wooden dolls in national costumes and
small butter knives, as well as souvenirs sold
in London and Paris. The merchants of such
kitsch will probably be successful forever...
They are selling materialised memory.
Nationa l kitsch
51
1
2
During the Soviet era, national kitsch was
also produced industrially, e.g a little lamp
named after the famous Tallinn weathervane
Old Toomas; this was officially approved, even
encouraged. What ideological purposes did
national kitsch serve which for ordinary people probably often meant ‘returning to their
roots’ and denying the Soviet reality?
I think both Soviet and national kitsch had the
same parents. Both were equally repulsive. I can
not see any difference between the tradition of
song festivals and Soviet propaganda. After all,
as the choirs had to sing predominantly Soviet
songs and only at the very end performed one
little pseudo-national number, it was clear that
the whole song festival was a skilful Soviet propaganda undertaking.
Do you now go to Song Festivals?
No. They do not offer any artistic experience
and I do not need the feeling of blending into
the masses. Or, let’s take dance festivals: a large
percentage of the dances are pseudo-dances, socalled new folk dances, which have nothing to do
with ethnography. For me, the German reinlander
is more of an Estonian national dance than the
thematic ones invented in the 1950s.
Do you see the song and dance festivals as
being a part of national kitsch?
Certainly. They might give you a positive sense
of unity, but I wouldn’t call this art. The aim of
a song festival is different; it does not offer any
aesthetic impressions. But it fulfils its purpose.
1. Aldo Järvsoo. Red Passion:
Folkcouture. 2006. Fashion
design in Estonian national
stripe patterns.
2. The Youth Song and
Dance Festival, 2007
3. Trainers with Estonian
national pattern made in
China
4. Souvenir of our President
in his favourite national
costume
Is it possible today to use national moments
without being ridiculous?
There are thousands of opportunities to be ridiculous. Huge rock concerts can become equally
ridiculous, because their aims are almost the
same.
If no changes take place, if an event remains
just an ethnographic undertaking, it is fine. For
example, creating new folk dances is a popular
rather than national activity. I have no objections
to that at all, because there are differences, big
differences, between national and ethnographic
nationalism.
Was your fight all those years ago against
national kitsch generational, as the parents
who remembered the free republic in the
1920s and 1930s could not have done this?
We felt very acutely that we were being manipulated. Let’s take the song festival: the regime
used it as a chance for people to let off steam;
tens of thousands were gathered together and
were allowed to sing. This was total manipulation. It would have been much more dangerous
to actually abolish the festivals. There were no
conflicts with the older generation in our ‘fight’,
but there were no results either.
It seems to me that, since the Bronze Night, a
wave of a kind of naïve nationalism has washed
over the local visual world of images.
That could well be and, in the sense of political self-defence, emphasising certain national
elements seems an understandable reaction.
However, I do not believe that this new wave of
national spirit is limited to Estonia. The other day
I looked at pictures of the Beijing EXPO pavilions,
where at least four or five were decorated on the
outside with national ornamentation. It could be
a wider reaction, for example against globalisation. On the other hand, it is a cliché: in order
to make one’s own pavilion stand out from the
others, national costume patterns were used,
and – surprise, surprise – they turn out to be
rather similar the world over.
Have you ever felt an urge to link yourself to
national memory?
I want to link myself to my personal memory. I
have nothing against nationalism if it is identical
with a place or the creative work of a community
which has maintained one tradition or another
for a long time. But souvenirs have nothing to
do with nationalism; the connection is just illusory.
3
52
Nationa l kitsch
Andres Tolts
(1949), painter.
4
Nationa l kitsch
53
exhibitions
Kumu Art Museum
Kadriorg Art Museum
Tallinn City Gallery
Draakon Gallery
Weizenbergi 34 / Valge 1, Tallinn
www.ekm.ee/eng/kumu.php
Open: May–Sept Tue–Sun 11 am–6 pm;
Oct–April Wed–Sun 11 am–6 pm
Kadriorg Palace, Weizenbergi 37, Tallinn
Mikkel Museum, Weizenbergi 28, Tallinn
www.ekm.ee/eng/kadriorg.php
Open: May–Sept Tue–Sun 10 am–5 pm
Oct–April Wed–Sun 10 am–5 pm
Harju 13, Tallinn
www.kunstihoone.ee
Open: Wed–Sun 12 am–6 pm
Pikk 18, Tallinn
www.eaa.ee/draakon/eindex.htm
Open: Mon–Fri 10 am–6 pm, Sat 10 am–5 pm
until 18 July
22 July–8 Aug
12 Aug–29 Aug
2 Sep–19 Sep
23 Sep–10 Oct
14 Oct–31 Oct
4 Nov–21 Nov
25 Nov–12 Dec
16 Dec–Jan 2011
until 10 July
12 July–24 July
26 July–7Aug
9 Aug–21 Aug
23 Aug–4 Sep
6 Sep–8 Sep
20 Sep–2 Oct
4 Oct–16 Oct
18 Oct–30 Oct
1 Nov–13 Nov
15 Nov–27 Nov
29 Nov–11 Dec
13 Dec–31 Dec
until 8 Aug
Čiurlionis and His Time in Lithuanian Art (1875–1911)
until 5 Sep
The Dialogue of Earth and Water. Sculptures by
Eero Hiironen
until 12 Sep
Tracing Neo-impressionism: Mägi and Finch
until 26 Sep
Soviet Woman in Estonian Art
until 10 Oct
Painting in Process. Estonian Contemporary Painting
until 12 Dec
Metaphysical Landscapes in 1970s Estonian Graphic Art
3 Sep–Jan 2011 Estonian Art in Exile
24 Sep–2011
John Constable. From the Collections of the Victoria & Albert Museum
8 Oct–2011
Estonian Ex-pat Photography
30 Oct–3 Jan Sirje Runge. Great Love (painting)
8 Dec–June 2011 Personal and Public Space in 1970s Estonian Graphic Art
Museum of Estonian Architecture
Ahtri 2, Tallinn
www.arhitektuurimuuseum.ee
Open: 19 May–30 Sept Wed–Fri 12 am–8 pm;
Sat–Sun 11 am–6 pm
1 Oct–18 May Wed–Sun 11 am–6 pm
basement gallery Apple Blossoms. Alvar Aalto
14 July–5 Sep European Union Prize for Contemporary Architecture. Mies van der Rohe Award 2009
until 25 July Young Architecture from University of Applied Sciences
Estonian Museum of Applied Art and Design
Lai 17, Tallinn
www.etdm.ee
Permanent exhibition: Patterns of Time 3
Survey of Estonian applied art and the
development of design
until 12 Sep Classics. Textile artist. Mall Tomberg
until 12 Sep Ceramics by Jutta Matvei
28 Sep–9 Jan 2011 Scripta Manent IV
Adamson-Eric Museum
Lühike jalg 3, Tallinn
www.ekm.ee/eng/adamson.php
Permanent exhibition
Works by Adamson-Eric. Adamson-Eric (1902–1968) is one of
the most outstanding Estonian painters of the 20th century.
He also devoted much of his time to applied art. The museum’s
permanent exhibition consists of a display of Adamson-Eric’s
works (painting, ceramics, porcelain painting, leather art, metal
forms, jewellery, decorative tiles, textile, and furniture).
19 Jun– 4 Nov Adamson-Eric.
The Diversity of One Creator
20 Nov–Mar 2011 Ernst Jõesaar (1905–1985)
54
The dates may change. Please consult the homepages of respective galleries/museums for updated information
E xhibitions
Permanent exhibitions:
Kadriorg Palace: Paintings from the 16th–18th century. Dutch, German,
Italian and Russian masters. Western European and Russian applied
art and sculpture from the 18th–20th centuries.
Mikkel Museum: Collection of Johannes Mikkel: the Art of Western Europe,
Russia, and China from 16th–20th centuries
until 29 Aug
until 31 Oct
Baltic Biedermeier
Tension. German Expressionism from the Collection ot the Art Museum of Estonia
Niguliste Museum
Niguliste 3, Tallinn
www.ekm.ee/eng/niguliste.php
Permanent exhibitions:
Ecclesiastical Art from the 14th–20th centuries The Silver Chamber
31 May–Jan 2011 Villem Raam 100
Tallinn Art Hall
Vabaduse Sq 8, Tallinn
www.kunstihoone.ee
19 June–25 July
31 July–5 Sep
11 Sep–17 Oct
23 Oct–28 Nov
4 Dec–21 Jan 2011
Annual Exhibition of the Estonian Artists’ Association
Jüri Ojaver
Hannah Hoech (Germany)
Revenge
COBRA (Belgium)
Tallinn Art Hall Gallery
Vabaduse Sq 6, Tallinn
www.kunstihoone.ee
until 11 July
16 July–8 Aug
13 Aug–5 Sep
10 Sep–3 Oct
8 Oct–7 Nov
12 Nov–5 Dec
10 Dec–Jan 2011
Andro Kööp
Malle Leis
Enn Põldroos
Marge Monko
Enno Hallek
Marko Mäetamm
As Sweet As We Can. Kurt Fleckenstein
Vaal Gallery
Tartu mnt 80d, Tallinn
www.vaal.ee
Open: Tue–Fri 12 am–6 pm, Sat 12 am–4 pm
6 Aug–24 Aug
27 Aug–7 Sep
10 Sep–28 Sep
1 Oct–19 Oct
21 Oct–9 Nov
Kadri Alesmaa
Lembit Sarapuu
Leida Mätas
Laurentsius
Elis Saareväli
Marko Nautras
Ott Kadarik
Jass Kaselaan
Kadri Klementi & Helis Heiter
Taaniel Raudsepp & Sigrid Viir
Eva Labotkin
Karel Koplimets & Ivar Veermäe
Erkki Luuk & Chaneldior
Santiago Sierra (Mexico)
ArtDepoo Gallery
Jahu 12, Tallinn
www.artdepoo.com
Open: Tue–Fri 10 am–6 pm
Sat 11 am–4 pm
2 July–31 July
4 Aug–28 Aug
1 Sep–25 Sep
29 Sep–23 Oct
27 Oct–27 Nov
Sven Saag & Andres Koort
00130 Gallery: Jonna Johansson &
Juan Kasari
Jaan Elken
taRRvi LaamaNN
Urmas Viik
Hobusepea Gallery
Hobusepea 2, Tallinn
www.eaa.ee/hobusepea/english/
Open: Wed–Mon 10 am–6 pm
until 12 July 14 July–26 July
28 July–9 Aug
11 Aug–23 Aug
25 Aug–6 Sep
8 Sep–20 Sep
22 Sep–4 Oct
6 Oct–18 Oct
20 Oct–1 Nov
3 Nov–15 Nov
17 Nov–29 Nov
1 Dec–13 Dec
15 Dec–3 Jan
Alvar Reisner
Alice Kask
Mare Vint & Vilen Künnapu
Mall Paris
Dénes Farkas
Raul Rajangu
Vano Allsalu
Ivar Veermäe
JIM. Johannes Säre, Iti Kasser, Maido Juss
Marko Mäetamm
Andres Tali
Maarit Murka
Olivia Verev & Eva Labotkin
Vabaduse Gallery
Vabaduse Square 6, Tallinn
Open: Mon–Fri 10 am–6 pm, Sat 11 am–3 pm
1–21 July
22 July–11 Aug
12 Aug–1 Sep
2 Sep–15 Sep
16 Sep–29 Sep
30 Sep–20 Oct
21 Oct–16 Nov
17 Nov–1 Dec
2 Dec–22 Dec
23 Dec–12 Jan
Mari Roosvalt. Paintings
Eveli Varik. Prints and collages
Rafael Arutjunjan
Applied Art Exhibition
Kelli Valk
Kaie Parts
Sirje Eelma
Evald Okas
Marju Bormeister
Eva Jänes
Külli Laikre
Laura Põld & Veiko Klemmer
Jaanika Okk
Mari-Liis Tammi, Andres Koort, Ene Luik
Karel Koplimets
Liina Kalvik
Lii Pähkel
Andrus Rõuk
Helen Melesk
Anna Hints
Kristi Kongi
slippery terrain. Nina Lassila (FI/SE),
Juliana Espana Keller (CA/UK),
Thora Gunnarsdottir & Elin Thorisdottir (IS)
Sandra Jõgeva
HOP Gallery
Hobusepea 2, Tallinn
www.eaa.ee/hop
Open: Thu–Tue 10 am–6 pm
until 6 July
9 July–27 July 30 July–17 Aug
21 Aug–7 Sep
10 Sep–28 Sep
1 Oct–19 Oct
22 Oct–9 Nov
12 Nov–30 Nov
3 Dec–21 Dec
Kalevipoeg. Leather art department of the Estonian Academy of Arts
Women’s World. Aet Ollisaar
Living Jewel. Jewellery from Hungary and Estonia
Leena Kuutma
Monika Grasiene-Zaltauskaite,
Severija Incirauskaite-Kriauneviciene, Monika Järg (Lithuania, Estonia)
Little Red House. Anna Rikkinen, Nelli Tanner (Finland)
Mille fleurs. Liisu Arro, Jaak Arro
Raul Erdel
Pilvi Ojamaa
Tartu Art Museum
Raekoja Sq 18, Tartu
www.tartmus.ee
until 22 Aug
Tartu University graduates’ paintings
27 Aug–17 Oct They’re here! Estonian contemporary graphic art
22 Oct–28 Nov Tanja Muravskaja
Art and culture sites
www.cca.ee/?lang=en True Guardian – The official blog of the Center for
Contemporary Arts, Estonia
ekkm-came.blogspot.com The Contemporary Art Museum of Estonia
www.foku.ee The Union of Photography Artists in Estonia
www.culture.ee Estonian cultural events
Exhibitions
55
new books
Lost Eighties. Problems,
Themes and Meanings in the
Estonian Art of the 1980s
Compiled by Sirje Helme
Edited by Andreas Trossek,
co-edited by Johannes Saar
Design by Andres Tali
464 pages
in Estonian and English
Published by the Center for
Contemporary Arts, Estonia
Tallinn 2010
A presentation day, Lost Eighties,
organized by the Center for
Contemporary Arts, Estonia and the
Estonian Society of Art Historians, was
held at the Rotermann Salt Storage
on 9 December 2003. The progress of
this collection from the initial idea to a
finished book is rather long for several
reasons. However, the experience
of putting together the previous
collection Nosy Nineties showed that,
although the authors’ approach, styles
of writing and methodologies might
differ, the data itself does not. A history
of Estonian art in several volumes was
in the process of being written – and
still is – but no compilation can replace
smaller comprehensive insights, which
can be provided by a collection such as
this one.
56
N ew books
Bernt Notke – Between Innovation
and Tradition
The Soviet Woman in Estonian Art
Anu Mänd, PhD
Designed by Liina Siib
96 pages
Published by the Art Museum of
Estonia
Tallinn 2010
Texts by Katrin Kivimaa and
Kädi Talvoja
Designed by Külli Kaats
96 pages
Published by the Art Museum of
Estonia
Tallinn 2010
The recently published book Bernt
Notke – uuenduste ja traditsioonide
vahel / Bernt Notke – Between Innovation
and Tradition is a catalogue of the
exhibition of the same name. The
catalogue provides an overview of the
life and main works of Bernt Notke
(c 1440–1509), one of the most famous
and talented painters of the late
medieval Baltic Sea region. The book
also introduces the events in Tallinn
in 2009, when the Niguliste Museum
celebrated the 500th anniversary of
Notke’s death. The catalogue is richly
illustrated and bilingual: in Estonian
and English.
Catalogue of the exhibition The Soviet
Woman in Estonian Art (Kumu Art
Museum, 8 April–26 September 2010).
The exhibition introduces forgotten or
little known works from early Soviet
Estonian art, concentrating on the
image of the ‘new Soviet femininity’,
which played an important role in
Soviet ideology and culture. The works
of art in this exhibition show that the
representation of Soviet femininity in
Estonian art was heterogeneous and
that, in addition to the usual features
of a specifically Soviet identity,
e.g women workers and collective
farmers, there existed a whole array
of other images.
Jugendstil Architecture in Tallinn.
Jacques Rosenbaum (1878–1944)
Karin Hallas-Murula
Supervised by Jaak Kangilaski
Designed by Piret Niinepuu-Kiik
128 pages
Published by
The Museum of Estonian Architecture
Tallinn 2010
Jacques Rosenbaum was one of the
most prominent architects in Tallinn in
the early 20th century. His buildings
constitute the most notable part of
Tallinn’s late Historicist and Jugendstil
architecture. The book also presents
Rosenbaum’s numerous projects that
were never realised. The research
offers new data and documents on the
architect’s work.
Marju Mutsu
Compiled by Herald Eelma
Texts by Elnara Taidre et at
Edited by Tiiu Viirand
Designed by Pärtel Eelma
191 pages
Tallinn 2009
Marju Mutsu (1941–1980) was among
the most prominent Estonian graphic
artists in the 1970s. Her creative
legacy includes about 150 etchings or
prints in other techniques, drawings
and watercolours. Her work is
characterised by a poetic approach,
spontaneous self-expression and a
free treatment of lines. She often
depicted the emotional world and
nature of young people. The current
book is the first monograph on Marju
Mutsu.
The study maps the trajectory of
gradual appearance of non-material,
objectless and communicative
artistic ideas into the Estonian
cultural field, which apparently
repeats the earlier developmental
patterns of international art – the
rejection of traditional materials
and the introduction of electronic
technologies.
Tallinn Architecture
1900–2010. Architecture Guide
Compiled by Karin Hallas-Murula
Designed by Angelika Schneider
160 pages
in English
Published by
The Museum of Estonian Architecture
Tallinn 2010
The book opens with a short historical
overview of Estonian architecture.
This is followed by a guide to the
city, divided into sections in which
the buildings are grouped and
listed according to their location.
The numbered entries start in the
Old Town and continue in various
directions along the main roads –
Pärnu Road, Tartu Road and Narva
Road, leading to Merivälja, Kalamaja,
Kopli, Kakumäe, Mustamäe and
Nõmme. The text is illustrated with
mostly new but also some historical
photographs.
New books
57

The Soviet Woman in Estonian Art

Transcription

Similar documents

Margus Friedenthal - International Seed Testing Association

The war of memories

WelcomeTO TALLINN!

Youngsters from Strzyzow (Poland) went to Polva (Estonia)

lithuania developing nuclear plant partnership

Services of Enterprise Estonia for exporting companies

Students Acting to Reduce Speed (STARS) project

Overview of the transferred project – methodology, activities, outcomes

High-resolution poster