February 27, 2012 Council Agenda Package Revised

Transcription

THE CITY OF CAMROSE
REVISED
A G E N D A
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING #4
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2012
Opening Prayer
5:00 P.M., Council Chambers.
Page
A. ADOPTION OF AGENDA/MINUTES:
1
2
3
Adoption of Agenda.
● Amended Report: Item C-11
● Additions: Item D3 and D4
Regular Council Meeting #3 held February 13, 2012.
Committee of the Whole Meeting #C3 held February 21, 2012.
3-10
11-13
B. PUBLIC COMMENTARY
C. NEW BUSINESS:
1
2
3
Public Hearing - Bylaw 2696/12 - 2012 City Center Camrose Business
Revitalization Zone Tax, Tax Rate, Supplementary Assessment and
Supplementary Tax.
City Center Camrose 2012 Budget.
By-Law 2696/12 - 2012 City Center Camrose Business Revitalization
Zone Tax, Tax Rate, Supplementary Assessment and Supplementary Tax.
4
5
6
7
8
City Center Camrose - 2011 Annual Report and Financial Statements.
City Center Camrose - Funding Disbursement.
City Center Camrose - Board of Directors Appointment - Cody McCarroll.
Camrose and District Senior Centre Society Update.
Camrose Performing Arts Centre (CPAC) - Borrowing By-Law 2639/12
Update.
9
10
11
Budget Adjustment - 2012 Local Improvement Projects.
2012 Equipment and Truck Purchases.
Member at Large Appointments - Social Planning Advisory Committee
and Camrose Public Library Board.
- Resignation - Krista Laroque from Camrose Public Library Board and
Page 1 of 94
15
17-18
19-27
29-38
39-40
41-49
51-54
55
57-58
59-63
65-66
Page
C. NEW BUSINESS:
Social Planning Advisory Committee
D. COMMITTEE/DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS:
1
Camrose Affordable Housing Committee Meeting Minutes - January 18,
2012.
2
3
4
City Center Camrose Board Meeting Minutes - January 11, 2012.
Camrose Police Commission Meeting Minutes - December 20, 2011.
Camrose Police Commission Meeting Minutes - January 17, 2012.
67-70
71-74
75-77
79-80
E. CORRESPONDENCE:
1
Ruth Muzika - Concerns Camrose Performing Arts Centre (CPAC) February 23, 2012.
2
3
Battle River Watershed Alliance Newsletter - The Current - Winter 2012.
Camrose Sport Development Society - Sponsorship - American Swiss
Hockey Game - January 25, 2012.
4
Camrose Railway Station - 100th Birthday Celebration - Thank You For
Your Support - February 8, 2012.
5
Camrose Open Door Association - 2012 Toque Campaign - Thank You
For Your Support.
6
Mike Edwards - The Cost of Gravel in Alberta - February 14, 2012.
F. ADJOURNMENT
Page 2 of 94
81
83-86
87
89
91
93-94
Agenda Item # A2 ...
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING #3
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 13, 2012
The Regular Meeting of Council of the City of Camrose was held in Council Chambers, City
Hall on Monday, February 13, 2012, with the following persons in attendance:
Council:
Mayor M. Chalmers; Councillors G. Galenza; D. Shillington; R.
McIsaac; M. Lindstrand; J. Howard; E. Berry; B. Blatz and G. Wood.
Absent:
Administration:
City Manager - D. Herle; General Manager Corporate and Protective
Services, K. Isaak; General Manager Community Services - P. Nielsen;
Acting General Manager, Engineering Services - J. Enarson; General
Manager, Financial Services - D. Urkow; Inspector; L. Foreman, and
Administrative Assistant to the City Manager - C. Johnson
Mayor Chalmers called the meeting to order at 5:00 pm and Pastor Kirby Schmidt-Teigen
offered a prayer.
A
ADOPTION OF AGENDA/MINUTES:
A-1
Adoption of Agenda.
-
Amendment to Agenda – Addition to Item C-7, attachment 2.
MOTION# 61/12
Moved by Wood - seconded by Howard that the agenda of the Regular
Council Meeting #3, dated February 13, 2012, be adopted as amended.
MOTION CARRIED
A-2
Regular Council Meeting #2 held January 23, 2012.
MOTION# 62/12
Moved by Shillington - seconded by Blatz that the minutes of the
Regular Council Meeting #2 held January 23, 2012, be approved as
circulated.
MOTION CARRIED
A-3
Committee of the Whole Meeting #C2 held February 6, 2012.
MOTION#63/12
Moved by Blatz - seconded by Berry that the minutes of the Committee
of the Whole Council meeting #C2 be amended to include a missed
motion to revert to an open meeting between Motion #58/12 and
#59/12.
MOTION CARRIED
21
Page 3 of 94
Regular Council
February 13, 2012
B
PUBLIC COMMENTARY
C. Johnson, Administrative Assistant to the City Manager reported that there is one registered
person to speak at public commentary, David Kotyk. Mr. Kotyk provided his personal opinion
in opposition to the Camrose Performing Arts Centre Debenture Borrowing By-Law 2693-12.
C
NEW BUSINESS:
C-1
Alberta Health and Safety Association (AMHSA) – Certificate of
Recognition.
K. Isaak, General Manager, Corporate and Protective Services provided an overview of the
report.
M. Chalmers, Mayor and D. Herle, City Manager and K. Isaak, General Manager, Corporate
and Protective Services presented a Certificate of Recognition to each department and work
area who participated as part of the Joint Health and Safety Committee.
MOTION#64/12
Moved by Galenza - seconded by Blatz that Council extend
congratulations to the Joint Health and Safety Committee and all City
staff for a job well done in achievement of the Certificate of
Recognition from the Alberta Municipal Health and Safety Association.
MOTION CARRIED
C-2
Camrose and District Support Services – Report on the Cost of Poverty
K. Isaak, General Manager, Corporate and Protective Services introduced Margaret Holliston,
Director, Camrose and District Support Services. Ms. Holliston provided Council with an
overview of the Report on the Cost of Poverty.
MOTION#65/12
Moved by Lindstrand - seconded by McIsaac that the report and
presentation be received for information.
MOTION CARRIED
C-3
Security Alarm Systems Report and By-Law 2695/12
L. Foreman, Inspector Camrose Police Service and L. Knutson, Chairman, Police Commission
provided an overview of the Security Alarm Systems report and By-Law 2695/12.
MOTION#66/12
Moved by Galenza - seconded by Wood that the Security Alarms
Systems Report and By-Law 2695/12 be received as information.
MOTION CARRIED
22
Page 4 of 94
Regular Council
February 13, 2012
MOTION#67/12
Moved by Blatz - seconded by Shillington that the Security Alarm
Systems By-Law 2695/12 be amended to add section:
5.2 The Chief will render his decision on an appeal made pursuant to
this By-Law and thereafter send a notice of his decision to the
appellant within 30 (thirty) days of the receipt of the written
appeal.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#68/12
Moved by Blatz - seconded by Howard that first reading be given to the
Security Alarm Systems By-Law 2695/12, as amended.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#69/12
Moved by Lindstrand - seconded by Berry that second reading be given
to the Security Alarm Systems By-Law 2695/12, as amended.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#70/12
Moved by Galenza - seconded by McIsaac that By-Law 2695/12 as
amended, be presented for third reading.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MOTION#71/12
Moved by Shillington - seconded by Blatz that third and final reading be
given to By-Law 2695/12, as amended.
MOTION CARRIED
C-4
Tax Recovery Reserve Bids
D. Urkow, General Manager, Financial Services provided a review of the Tax Recovery
Reserve Bids report and the Tax Recovery process.
MOTION#72/12
Moved by Lindstrand - seconded by Howard that Council approve the
reserve bids for the following parcels of land offered for sale at public
auction on April 12, 2012.
ROLL #
8900
98700
124100
145100
235900
244200
638100
664500
783800
858300
897500
CERTIFICATE
of
TITLE
NUMBER
012067183
972083814
902067710
082214227
215-E-201
072130518
022242144
0028603900
072734319
082457359
092316503012
PLAN
RN28
9075S
7018AA
2100AN
824MC
3880MC
9824438
0024248
0625510
0825064
0921847
BLOCK
3
9
PTA
22
14
13
B
1
1
LOT
1-3
5,6
1&2
8
3
7
35
30
UNIT 8
UNIT 13
RESERVE
BID
$50,380
$119,000
$83,120
$162,400
$127,330
$219,720
$518,970
$477,660
$191,270
$86,740
$3,000
23
Page 5 of 94
Regular Council
February 13, 2012
897600
897700
897800
897900
898000
898100
898200
898300
898400
898500
898600
898700
898800
898900
899000
899100
092316503013
092316503014
092316503015
092316503016
092316503017
092316503018
092316503019
092316503020
092316503021
092316503022
092316503023
092316503024
092316503025
092316503026
092316503027
092316503028
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
0921847
UNIT 14
UNIT 15
UNIT 16
UNIT 17
UNIT 18
UNIT 19
UNIT 20
UNIT 21
UNIT 22
UNIT 23
UNIT 24
UNIT 25
UNIT 26
UNIT 27
UNIT 28
UNIT 29
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
$3,000
MOTION CARRIED
C-5
City Center Camrose – Business Revitalization Zone Tax.
K. Isaak, General Manager, Corporate and Protective Services provided a review of the City
Center Camrose – Business Revitalization Zone Tax report.
MOTION#73/12
Moved by Blatz - seconded by Berry that the 2012 estimates for City
Center Camrose (CCC) of which $65,000.00 is to be raised by the 2012
CCC Business Revitalization Zone Tax, be received and that the
necessary notice be given to every person assessed for business
purposes in the area pursuant to Section 381 of the Municipal
Government Act, RSA 2000, and Regulations thereto.
MOTION CARRIED
C-6
Statistics Canada Information.
R. Telford, Economic Development Officer provided and overview of the Statistics Canada
Information report.
D. Herle, City Manager undertook to answer a question raised by Council in regards to the
Federal Census.
MOTION#74/12
Moved by Galenza - seconded by McIsaac that the Economic
Development report on the Statistics Canada Information report be
received as information.
MOTION CARRIED
C-7
Safety Codes Inspections and Activity Summary – 2007 to 2011 and
Building Inspection Monthly Report – January 2012.
24
Page 6 of 94
Regular Council
February 13, 2012
J. Enarson, Acting City Engineer provided a detailed overview of the Safety Codes Inspections
and Activity Summary – 2007 to 2011 and Building Inspection Monthly Report – January 2012
to all those present.
MOTION#75/12
Moved by McIsaac - seconded by Blatz that the Safety Codes
Inspections and Activity Summary – 2007 to 2011 and that the Building
Inspection Monthly Report – January 2012 report be received as
information.
MOTION CARRIED
Councillor Howard left Council Chambers at 6:38 pm and did not return.
C-8
Traffic By-Law 2691/12 (2nd and 3rd Reading)
J. Enarson, Acting City Engineer provided an overview of Traffic By-Law 2691/12 report.
MOTION#76/12
Moved by Lindstrand - seconded by McIsaac that Administration amend
Section 806 to modernize the language to the gender pronouns, “he”
and “him”, to the noun “owner”.
Discussion ensued on the need to modernize all by-laws with a blanket
term to cover gender pronouns.
806 OWNER RESPONSIBLE
The owner of a motor vehicle or trailer which is involved in any
contravention of this By-Law, is guilty of an offence unless the
owner proves to the satisfaction of the judge that at the time of the
offence, the motor vehicle or trailer was not being driven or was
not parked or left by the owner or by any other person with the
owners content, expressed or implied.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#77/12
Moved by Shillington – seconded by Wood that the Traffic By-Law
2691/12 report be received for information.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#78/12
Moved by Berry - seconded by Blatz that second reading be given to
Traffic By-Law 2691/12.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#79/12
Moved by Lindstrand - seconded by McIsaac that third and final reading
be given to By-Law 2691/12.
MOTION CARRIED
C-9
Dangerous Goods By-Law 2692/12.
MOTION#80/12
Moved by Lindstrand - seconded by Blatz that Section (2)(H)(ii) of By25
Page 7 of 94
Regular Council
February 13, 2012
Law 2692/12 be amended to become more general neutral to read as
follows:
(2)(H)(ii) Particulars obtained by a Peace Officer, under this Section
and submitted by the Peace Officer as evidence in Court shall
be prima facie proof of the particulars thereon submitted in
evidence without proof of the signature or official capacity of
the person signing the document.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#81/12
Moved by McIsaac – seconded by Shillington that Section (4)(A) of ByLaw 2692/12 be amended to read as follows:
(4)(A) that By-Law 2489/06 is repealed on the date approved by the
Minister or his designate under 4(B).
MOTION CARRIED
Mayor Chalmers called a recess at 6:57 pm and reconvened at 7:02 pm with all those
previously record in attendance.
J. Enarson, Acting City Engineer advised that there is an error in Section (4)(A) of the
Dangerous Bylaw 2692/12 that By-Law 2489/06 should be By-Law 2498/06.
MOTION#82/12
Moved by Shillington – seconded by McIsaac that Section (4)(A) of ByLaw 2692/12 be amended to read as follows:
(4)(A) that By-Law 2498/06 is repealed on the date approved by the
Minister or his designate under 4(B).
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#83/12
Moved by Wood - seconded by McIsaac that the Dangerous Goods ByLaw 2692/12 be received as information.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#84/12
Moved by Galenza - seconded by Wood that first reading be given to
the Dangerous Goods By-Law 2692/12.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#85/12
Moved by Shillington - seconded by Berry that second reading be given
to By-Law 2692/12.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#86/12
Moved by Blatz - seconded by McIsaac that By-Law 2692/12 be
presented for third reading.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
MOTION#87/12
Moved by Lindstrand - seconded by Berry that third and final reading be
given to By-Law 2692/12.
26
Page 8 of 94
Regular Council
February 13, 2012
MOTION CARRIED
C-10
Road Closure By-Law 2694/12 Road Plan 9021582 to the Owner of Lot
69A, Block 15, Plan 1995TR.
Galenza declared a pecuniary interest and left Council Chambers at 7:40 pm.
On behalf of Brenda Hisey, Director, Planning and Development, J. Enarson presented the
report and Road Closure By-Law 2694/12 to Council. Mr. Enarson mentioned that there is an
error in the report under the heading Background, in the first paragraph, “City Council” should
read “Committee of the Whole”.
MOTION#88/12
Moved by Shillington - seconded by Lindstrand that the Road Closure
By-Law 2694/12 be received as information.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#89/12
Moved by Wood - seconded by Berry that first reading be given to Road
Closure By-Law 2694/12.
MOTION CARRIED
Councillor Galenza returned to Council Chambers at 7:07 pm.
D
COMMITTEE/DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS:
D-1
Camrose Green Action Committee Meeting Minutes – November 15,
2011.
MOTION#90/12
Moved by Berry - seconded by McIsaac that minutes of the Camrose
Green Action Committee meeting held November 15, 2011, be received
as information.
MOTION CARRIED
D-2
Community Transportation Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes –
December 14, 2011.
MOTION#91/12
Moved by Galenza - seconded by Blatz that the minutes of the
Camrose Transportation Advisory Committee meeting held December
14, 2011, be received as information.
MOTION CARRIED
D-3
Camrose Affordable Housing Committee Minutes – November 16,
2011.
MOTION#92/12
Moved by Shillington - seconded by Berry that the minutes of the
Camrose Affordable Housing Committee meeting held November 16,
2011, be received as information.
MOTION CARRIED
27
Page 9 of 94
Regular Council
February 13, 2012
D-4
By-Law Enforcement Statistical Report for the 4th Quarter Year of 2011.
MOTION#93/12
Moved by Berry - seconded by Galenza that the By-Law Enforcement
Statistical report for the 4th quarter year of 2011, be received as
information.
MOTION CARRIED
D-5
Fire Department Monthly Report – January 2012.
Council asked Administration for further information in regards to false alarm responses by the
Camrose Fire Department.
MOTION#94/12
Moved by McIsaac - seconded by Shillington that the Fire Department
monthly report of January 12, 2011, be received as information.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#95/12
Moved by Wood - seconded by Galenza that the Regular Council
Meeting #3 of February 13, 2012 be adjourned at 7:11 pm.
MOTION CARRIED
MAYOR
GENERAL MANAGER,
CORPORATE AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
28
Page 10 of 94
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COUNCIL MEETING C-3
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
The Committee of the Whole Council Meeting of the City of Camrose was held in Council
Chambers, City Hall on Tuesday, February 21, 2012, with the following persons in attendance:
Council:
Mayor M. Chalmers; R. McIsaac; Councillors; D. Shillington; M.
Lindstrand; J. Howard; E. Berry; B. Blatz and G. Wood.
Absent:
Councillor G. Galenza
Administration:
City Manager – D. Herle; General Manager, Community Services - P.
Nielsen; Acting City Engineer – J. Enarson; General Manager, Financial
Services – D. Urkow; Economic Development Officer – R. Telford;
Director, Infrastructure Services – M. Barrett; and Administrative
Assistant to the City Manager – C. Johnson.
Mayor Chalmers called the meeting to order at 5:04 pm.
A
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
MOTION#96/12
Amendments to Agenda - Supplementary Information Item B-1,
and Item B-2.
Moved by Lindstrand - seconded by Howard that the agenda of
the Committee of the Whole Meeting #3 held February 13, 2012,
be approved, as amended.
MOTION CARRIED
B
AGENDA ITEMS
B-1
Industrial Land in Camrose.
R. Telford, Economic Development Officer distributed supplementary information for
Item B-1 and then proceeded to provide an overview of the report to all those present.
D. Herle, City Manager clarified that lots 15 through 19 are designated for the new
Public Works Facility.
MOTION#97/12
Moved by Shillington - seconded by Blatz that the Industrial Land
in Camrose report be received as information.
MOTION CARRIED
B-2
Mohler Industrial Subdivision.
J. Enarson, Acting City Engineer distributed supplementary information for Item B2
and then proceeded with an overview of the Mohler Industrial Subdivision report to all
those present.
29
Committee of the Whole Meeting #C3 held February 21,
2012.
Page 11 of 94
Committee of the Whole
February 21, 2012
MOTION#98/12
Moved by Lindstrand - seconded by Wood that the Mohler
Industrial Subdivision report be deferred to a future Committee of
the Whole meeting.
MOTION CARRIED
B-3
Core Services Review Update.
M. Chalmers, Chairman of the Core Services Committee provided an overview of the
Core Services Review Update report to all those present.
MOTION#99/12
Moved by Howard - seconded by McIsaac that Administration be
authorized to utilize up to $10,000, of the $40,000 Core Services
Review budget allocation to complete a current services
inventory, and that the inventory be presented to the Core
Services Review Subcommittee and Committee of the Whole
Council by no later than June 18, 2012, and further, that following
the presentation of the current services inventory, a draft Request
For Proposal be presented to the same Committees.
MOTION CARRIED
B-4
Statistics Canada - Census Information.
D. Herle, City Manager provided a review of the details of the report to all those
present.
MOTION#100/12
Moved by Lindstrand - seconded by Berry that the Statistics
Canada – Census Information report be received for information
purposes.
MOTION CARRIED
Mayor Chalmers called a recess at 5:55 pm and reconvened at 5:59 pm with all those
previously listed in attendance.
MOTION#101/12
Moved by Shillington - seconded by Berry that the Committee of
the Whole go In-Camera.
MOTION CARRIED
C
IN-CAMERA AGENDA ITEMS
C-1
Legal Matter - Sec. 27(1)(a) FOIP.
C-2
Contract Negotiation - Sec. 25(1) and 24(1) FOIP.
30
2012.
Page 12 of 94
Committee of the Whole
February 21, 2012
C-3
Land Matter - Sec. 25(1) and Sec. 24(1) FOIP.
MOTION#102/12
Moved by Wood - seconded by McIsaac that the Committee of
the Whole revert to the open meeting.
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION#103/12
Moved by Blatz - seconded by Berry that the Committee of the
Whole meeting C-3 of February 21, 2012, be adjourned at 8:03
pm.
MOTION CARRIED
MAYOR
GENERAL MANAGER,
CORPORATE AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
31
2012.
Page 13 of 94
Page 14 of 94
Agenda Item # C1 ...
Public Hearing - Bylaw 2696/12 - 2012 City Center
Camrose Business Revitalization Zone Tax, Tax Rate,
Page 15 of 94
Page 16 of 94
Page 17 of 94
Page 18 of 94
;_;%, City of Camrose
Administrative Report
,s_2
sE=
To:
Mayor and Council
From:
City Assessor
Re:
2012 Business Revitalization Zone Tax, Business Revitalization Zone Tax Rate,
Supplementary Business Revitalization Zone Assessment and Supplementary
Business Revitalization Zone Tax By-Law
Date: February 27, 2012
RECOMMENDATION:
That this report be received for information.
BACKGROUND:
This By-Law 2696/12 is ready for three readings upon Council's approval of the CCCBRZ
proposed budget.
The purpose of the assessments and assessment rolls is to levy a 2012 Business Revitalization
Zone Tax and Supplementary Tax in accordance with section 18 of the Business Revitalization
Zone Regulation AR 377/94 (BRZ Reg.) and section 379 of the Municipal Government Act,
R.S.A. 2000, and Chapter M-26 (MGA).
The CCCBRZ was established in 1988 under By-Law #1514/88 and continues today under ByLaw #2673/11. At tonight's meeting, City Council received the proposed 2012 CCCBRZ budget.
The amount of revenue to be raised by the CCCBRZ levy was estimated at $65,000. On
February 14, 2012, the Administration mailed a notice indicating the date (February 27, 2012)
and place of the council meeting when the proposed budget would be presented for Council's
approval. The notice was mailed to all businesses operating in the CCCBRZ in accordance with
section 11(1) of the BRZ Reg.
Section 18 of the BRZ Reg. directs Council to pass a BRZ Tax by-law before May 1, 2012 and
set a BRZ tax rate sufficient to raise the amount the CCCBRZ board will receive from the City as
set out in the board's approved budget. The BRZ Tax by-law specifies the method to be used to
prepare the assessments. The assessments are based on the floor space occupied for the
purposes of the business and the dollar rate per unit of floor space are described in Schedule
“B" of the by-law. The BRZ Tax by-law also establishes a procedure for prorating and rebating
BRZ taxes for businesses that may close or move out of the CCCBRZ during 2012. The liability
to pay the tax for sub-leases is also addressed in the by-law.
To ensure businesses that; operate for a temporary period, move or open new branches of
existing premises, begin operating, or expand existing premises, during 2012 are subject to a
levy for the period of the year they are operating in these new premises, Council needs to pass
a 2012 BRZ Supplementary Tax by-law. As well, Council needs to authorize the City Assessor
By-Law 2696/12 - 2012 City Center Camrose Business
Revitalization Zone Tax, Tax Rate, Supplementary
Page 19 of 94
to prepare supplementary BRZ assessments in accordance with Section 379 of the MGA. A
portion of the month is considered to be a full month.
The following outlines the breakdown of the 2012 business assessment and CCCBRZ tax rolls
by tax levy and minimum tax:
# Of Businesses
Asmt.
Min. Tax
102
189,770
$11,220.00
$0.00
$11,220.00
170
2,111,350
$0.00
$53,269.36
$53,269.36
$512.97
$512.97
$49,681.09
$65,002.33
2 (Pro-rated)
21,680
Calculated Tax
Total
Total
266
2,322,800
$11,220.00
MUNICIPAL DIRECTIVES:
Municipal Government Act
Business Revitalization Zone Regulation 377/94
City of Camrose By-Law #2673/11
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the By-law allows administration to continue with existing procedures to meet the
approved revenue tax requirements of the CCCBRZ.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed City of Camrose By-Law #2696/12
SUBMITTED BY:_______
Travis Lantz, AMAA
City Assessor
Page 20 of 94
BY-LAW# 2696/12
OF THE
CITY OF CAMROSE
PROVINCE OF ALBERTA
A BY-LAW OF THE CITY OF CAMROSE IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA TO
AUTHORIZE THE 2012 BUSINESS REVITALIZATION ZONE TAX , BUSINESS
REVITALIZATION ZONE BUSINESS TAX RATE, SUPPLEMENTARY
BUSINESS REVITALIZATION ZONE ASSESSMENT AND SUPPLEMENTARY
BUSINESS REVITALIZATION ZONE TAX.
Whereas, pursuant to the Municipal Government Act, and AR 377/94, the
Business Revitalization Zone Regulation, Council has established the City Center
Camrose Business Revitalization Zone;
And Whereas, pursuant to section 18(2) of AR 377/94, Council must pass a
business revitalization zone tax by-law prior to May 01, 2012;
And Whereas, pursuant to section 18(6) of AR 377/94, a business revitalization
zone tax may establish maximum and minimum amounts to be paid under it;
And Whereas, pursuant to section 19(1) of AR 377/94, Council that has passed a
business revitalization zone tax by-law must pass a business revitalization zone
tax rate by-law annually;
And Whereas, pursuant to section 379(1) of the Municipal Government Act, RSA
2000, c. M-26, as amended Council may pass a supplementary business
revitalization zone assessment by-law authorizing supplementary assessments
be prepared for business;
And Whereas pursuant to section 379(1) of the Municipal Government Act RSA
2000, c. M-26, as amended, Council must pass a supplementary business
revitalization zone tax by-law imposing a supplementary tax in respect to those
businesses for which supplementary assessments are prepared.
And Whereas pursuant to Section 12 of AR 377/94, the estimates for revenue in
the amount of $72,500.00 ($65,000 – 2012 levy) and expenditures in the amount
of $72,500.00 for the City Center Camrose Business Revitalization Zone for 2012
have been approved by Council.
And Whereas in order to meet such expenditures, it will be necessary to levy a
business revitalization zone levy on all business assessments as shown on the
City Center Camrose Business Revitalization Zone assessment and tax rolls for
2012, in the total amount of $65,000.00.
And Whereas the total City Center Camrose Business Revitalization Zone
business assessment for the City of Camrose for the year 2012 is $2,322,800.
Page 1 of 7
Page 21 of 94
By-Law 2696/12
And Whereas pursuant to section 20 of AR 377/94, the business tax provisions of
the Municipal Government Act apply with necessary modifications to the
business revitalization zone tax;
Now Therefore the municipal council of the City of Camrose, duly assembled,
and by virtue of the powers vested in it pursuant to Section 381 and 379 of the
Municipal Government Act, being Chapter 26, R.S.A. 2000, enacts as follows:
1.
TITLE
This by-law may be cited as the 2012 City Center Camrose Business
Revitalization Zone Tax, Tax Rate, Supplementary Assessment and
Supplementary Tax By-Law.
2.
DEFINITIONS
(a)
“Business” means any activity or undertaking of a commercial,
merchandising or industrial nature and includes a trade, profession,
occupation, employment or calling and the providing of goods or
services.
(b)
“City” means the City of Camrose.
(c)
“City Assessor” means the person appointed by the City of
Camrose to the position of designated officer to carry out the duties
and responsibilities of an assessor.
(e)
“Floor space” means the superficial area of every floor in the
building in which business is carried on.
(f)
“Person” includes a partnership or corporations as well as a natural
person.
(g)
“Premises” means
(i)
land and buildings on the land;
(h)
(ii)
a building or part of a building, or
(iii)
a store, office, warehouse, factory, building, enclosure, yard
or any space occupied or used for the purpose of a Business
within the boundaries of the City Center Camrose Business
Revitalization Zone.
“Storage capacity” means the volume of tanks used for the
distribution of oil and gasoline.
Page 2 of 7
Page 22 of 94
By-Law 2696/12
3.
4.
5.
6.
(a)
Every taxable business operating in premises will be assessed by
the City Assessor for the purpose of imposing a business
revitalization zone tax.
(b)
Business premises will be classed in accordance with Schedule “B”
which is attached to and forms part of this by-law.
(c)
Assessments will be prepared based on the following methods:
i.
Floor space occupied for the purpose of that business.
ii.
Gasoline distributors shall be calculated on the tank
storage capacity in addition to any amount calculated
under clause 3(c) i of this by-law.
In determining the business assessment referred to in Section 3, the city
assessor shall:
(a)
determine which area each business is within as shown in
Schedule “A” attached hereto;
(b)
determine the appropriate combined rate from Schedule “B”,
attached hereto, that is within the applicable size range for the area
of the business as determined under clause 4 (a) hereto;
(c)
calculate the storage capacity and the floor space occupied for the
purpose of the business, and
(d)
apply the appropriate combined rate as determined under clause 4
(b) hereto to the amount calculated under clause 4 (c) hereto.
(a)
The city assessor will each year prepare a business assessment
roll for the purpose of generating a business revitalization zone
tax roll for the current year; and,
(b)
In each year, the city assessor will enter on the business
assessment roll the name of every person operating a business in
a premise, together with the name of the assessed business and
business assessment prepared for the business.
When the business assessment roll has been prepared, the City will mail
to every Person whose name appears on the roll an assessment notice
containing the information shown on the roll which pertains to that person.
Page 3 of 7
Page 23 of 94
By-Law 2696/12
7.
(a)
(b)
8.
Where a person carried on a business within the City in any year in
respect of which a business tax is imposed by the by-law:
(i)
if he carries on the business therein during every month of
that year he is liable for the payment of the full annual
business revitalization zone tax in respect of that business,
but
(ii)
if he does not carry on the business therein during every
month of that year, he is only liable for the payment of that
part of the full annual business revitalization zone tax in
respect of that business which is in proportion to the number
of months of that year during which he carried on that
business therein, a portion of a month being taken as a full
month.
Notwithstanding subsection 7 (a) hereto, where the person carried
on the business during the whole or any part of one or more days in
that year but not exceeding any aggregate of thirty (30) days in that
year, he is not liable for the payment of the business revitalization
zone tax in respect of the business for that year.
A supplementary business assessment will be prepared:
(a)
for each business that operates for a temporary period and whose
name is not entered on the business revitalization zone tax roll
(b)
for each business that moves into new premises or opens new
premises or branches of an exiting business, although the
business’s name is entered on the business revitalization zone tax
roll;
(c)
for each business that begins operating and whose name is not
entered on the business revitalization zone tax roll; and
(d)
for each business that increases the storage capacity or floor space
of the premises occupied for the purpose of a business after the
business revitalization zone tax roll has been prepared.
9.
Sections 3, 4, 5(b) and 6 of this by-law apply to the imposition of a
supplementary business assessment.
10.
Where a person carried on more than one class of business on the same
premises, the business revitalization zone tax shall be levied in
accordance with the area occupied by each class of business.
Page 4 of 7
Page 24 of 94
By-Law 2696/12
11.
A refund of any overpayment of business revitalization zone tax shall be
made only when an application therefore is received by the Manager of
Financial Services or before December 31st of the year following the year
of the business revitalization zone tax levy.
12.
The occupant of any building is liable for business revitalization zone tax
every year though he may also be owner of the premises and liable as
owner to taxation on land and improvements.
13.
For the purpose of meeting the 2012 expenditures of the City Center
Camrose:
(a)
A business revitalization zone tax rate of 0.025230 is hereby
imposed on all City Center Camrose business assessments for the
year 2012; and
(b)
A minimum annual levy on any business assessed for City Center
Camrose Business Revitalization Zone tax purposes for the year
2012 shall be $110.00 pursuant to section 18(6) Business
Revitalization Zone Regulation AR 377/94.
14
A supplementary business revitalization zone tax shall be levied upon any
Person who is subject to a supplementary business assessment prepared
in accordance with section 8 of this by-law.
15
That by-law #2674/11 and all amendments thereto are hereby repealed.
16
This by-law shall come in to force and effect upon the date of final passing
thereof.
READ a FIRST time in COUNCIL this 27th day of February, A.D. 2012.
READ a Second time in COUNCIL this 27th day of February, A.D. 2012.
Read a THIRD time in COUNCIL and FINALLY PASSED this 27th day of
February, A.D. 2012.
____________________________________
MAYOR
____________________________________
GENERAL MANAGER,
CORPORATE & PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Page 5 of 7
Page 25 of 94
By-Law 2696/12
SCHEDULE “A”
Page 6 of 7
Page 26 of 94
By-Law 2696/12
SCHEDULE “B”
A.
Main Floor (in dollars)
Size
0-46
46-93
93-186
186-279
Range m2
Area #1
K0
K 1000
K 2000
K 9000
AR 86.11 AR 64.58 AR 53.82 AR 16.14
Area #2
K0
K 800
K 1600
K 7200
AR 68.90 Ar 51.67 AR 43.05 AR 12.90
Area #3
K0
K 500
K 1000
K 4500
AR 43.06 AR 32.29 AR 26.91 AR 8.07
Area #4
K0
K 400
K 800
K 3600
AR 34.44 AR 25.83 AR 21.52 AR 6.45
Note: All Area Rates are expressed in dollars per m2.
279-465
K 11250
AR 8.07
K 9000
AR 6.45
K 5625
AR 4.09
K 4500
AR 3.22
465
&
over
K0
AR 32.30
K0
AR 25.83
K0
AR 16.14
K0
AR 12.91
B.
Basement, 2nd floor and 3rd floor areas in buildings that are constructed
with a passenger elevator shall be calculated at 75% of main floor rate.
C.
Basement floor areas not included in Section B shall be calculated at 20%
of main floor rate.
D.
2nd and 3rd floor areas not included in Section B shall be calculated at 40%
of main floor rate.
E.
Gasoline distributors shall be calculated on the tank storage capacity at a
rate of $0.10 per litre in addition to any amount calculated in accordance
with Section A.
F.
K = Constant
AR = Area Rate
Page 7 of 7
Page 27 of 94
Page 28 of 94
City Center Camrose - 2011 Annual Report and Financial
Statements.
Page 29 of 94
Statements.
Page 30 of 94
Statements.
Page 31 of 94
Statements.
Page 32 of 94
Statements.
Page 33 of 94
Statements.
Page 34 of 94
Statements.
Page 35 of 94
Statements.
Page 36 of 94
Statements.
Page 37 of 94
Statements.
Page 38 of 94
Page 39 of 94
Page 40 of 94
City Center Camrose - Board of Directors Appointment Cody McCarroll.
Page 41 of 94
Page 42 of 94
Page 43 of 94
Page 44 of 94
Page 45 of 94
Page 46 of 94
Page 47 of 94
Page 48 of 94
Page 49 of 94
Page 50 of 94
Page 51 of 94
Page 52 of 94
Page 53 of 94
Page 54 of 94
Camrose Performing Arts Centre (CPAC) - Borrowing ByLaw 2639/12 Update.
Page 55 of 94
Page 56 of 94
Page 57 of 94
Page 58 of 94
City of Camrose
Administrative Report
To:
Mayor and Council
Date:
February 27, 2012
From:
Public Works – Director of Purchasing, Fleet Management and Safety
Re:
2012 Equipment and Truck Purchases
RECOMMENDATION:
That the tenders submitted by the following be accepted:
a.) Finning (Canada) for supply of one (1) 2012 CAT 950K wheel loader for a net cost (after
trade-in) of $141,534 plus GST;
b.) Finning (Canada) for supply of one (1) 2012 CAT 930K wheel loader for a total of
$190,000 plus GST;
c.) Camrose Chrysler for supply of one (1) 2012 DODGE 3500 Crew Cab and chassis for a
total of $28,867.55 plus GST;
With funding for the wheel loaders and crew cab truck as approved in the City of Camrose 2012
Capital Budget.
BACKGROUND:
Loaders:
Tenders for the supply of two wheel loaders were posted on Alberta Purchasing Connection for
equipment dealers to view. For both loaders, dealers were advised that the tenders would need
to meet 65 qualification specifications in order to be considered by the City. These
specifications included such items as minimum equipment horsepower, compatibility with
existing City peripheral equipment, specific safety features, and proximity to Camrose for
servicing purposes. Tenders were opened on February 6, 2012 at 10:00am.
Eight tenders were received for the 2012 High Lift 4 Yard Wheel Loader and eleven tenders for
the 2012 Parallel 2 ½ Yard Wheel Loader. There was considerable research completed on all
units prior to determining the recommended units.
Of the eight tenders received for the larger loader, the Cat 950K loader supplied by Finning
(Edmonton) was the unit with the lowest net cost to the City that met all of the City’s additional
requirements. As part of this deal, Finning has offered the City $150,000 for the existing 2007
Cat 950H loader. The net cost to the City’s equipment replacement reserve for the new loader
would be $141,934 plus GST, which is lower than the budgeted amount of $160,000 (capital
project #12-00049).
Page 59 of 94
Of the eleven tenders received for the mid-sized loader, the CAT 930K loader supplied by
Finning (Edmonton) was the cheapest unit that met all of the City’s requirements. A trade for
the City’s existing mid-sized loader (2002 John Deere TC44) is not recommended as part of this
tender, but will be sold by the City through public auction once the new loader arrives in
Camrose. The total cost to the City’s equipment replacement reserve for the mid-sized loader
would be $190,000 plus GST, which is equivalent to the amount approved in the 2012 budget.
Trade-in for the existing loader is expected to bring in more than the $50,000 that was included
in the budget (capital project #12-00051).
Truck:
Tenders for the supply of one 2012 Dodge 3500 Crew Cab and Chassis were received by three
local dealers. Tenders were opened on Friday February 10, 2012 at 10:00 am. All local dealers
met the 35 tender specifications prepared by Administration. The low tender for the truck was
Camrose Chrysler for the sum of $28,867.55 plus GST.
MUNICIPAL DIRECTIVES:
The funds were approved in the 2012 City of Camrose Capital Budget and the tender decisions
were made as per the City of Camrose Purchasing Policy.
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
Pending Council approval of these purchases, Administration will contact all bidders to advise
whether or not they were successful on these tenders.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Tender Comparison for 2012 Parallel Lift Wheel Loader
2. Tender Comparison for 2012 High Lift Wheel Loader
3. Tender Comparison for 2012 3500 Crew Cab Truck
SUBMITTED BY:
Doug Campbell
Director of Purchasing, Fleet
Management and Safety
Page 60 of 94
TENDER COMPARISON FOR
2012 PARALLEL LIFT WHEEL LOADER – 2 ½ YD. BUCKET
Supplier
Make
Model
Price
Specifications Met
Woodland Equipment
Kamloops, BC
Hyundai
HL740TM9
$167,324
No
Strongco
Edmonton, AB
Volvo
L60G
$173,000
No
C.E.M.
Taber, AB
Hyundai
HL740TM9
$176,500
No
Finning
Edmonton, AB
Cat
930K
$190,000
Yes
Cervus Equipment
Edmonton, AB
JCB
2011-426HT
$190,314
No
C.E.M.
Taber, AB
Hyundai
757TM9
$190,500
No
Cervus Equipment
Edmonton, AB
JCB
2012-426HT
$195,285
No
SMS Equipment
Edmonton, AB
Komatsu
WA250P2-6
$206,762
No
Hi Way Services
Edmonton, AB
Case
821F XR
$210,136
Yes
Brandt Equipment
Edmonton, AB
John Deere
544K
$222,150
Yes
Hi Way Services
Edmonton, AB
Kawasaki
70TMV-Z
$237,324
No
Reasons for selecting CAT 930K:
1.) Meets all of our required tender specifications
2.) Was low bid for all specifications required
3.) With the purchase of two cat machines, there is a huge benefit in supply of service, parts and also the ease for
operation for our operators.
Page 61 of 94
2012 HIGH LIFT WHEEL LOADER - 4 YD. BUCKET
Supplier
Make
Model
Price
Trade
Net
Spec. Met
Woodland
Equipment
Kamloops, BC
Hyundai
HL760XTD9
$235,965
$117,000
$118,965
No
C.E.M.
Taber, AB
Hyundai
HL760XT09
$243,800
$120,000
$123,800
No
Strongco
Edmonton, AB
Volvo
L110G
$258,000
$125,000
$133,000
No
Finning
Edmonton, AB
Cat
950K
$291,934
$150,000
$141,934
Yes
Hi Way Service
Edmonton, AB
Case
821FXR
$278,865
$120,000
$158,865
No
SMS Equipment
Edmonton, AB
Komatsu
WA380-T
$311,860
$115,000
$196,860
No
Hi Way Service
Edmonton, AB
Kawasaki
85ZU-2
$314,054
$120,000
$194,054
Yes
Brandt Equip.
Edmonton, AB
John Deere
644K High Lift
$319,015
$120,000
$199,015
Yes
Reasons for selecting CAT 950K:
1.)
2.)
3.)
4.)
5.)
Met all of our required tender specifications.
Was low bid for all specifications required.
Existing loader is a Cat 950H and proved to be an excellent machine for the life of the unit.
Cat loader also handles our Vohl4000 Snow blower easily and safely.
Shown in the above comparison, Cat has an excellent trade value over competitor models.
Page 62 of 94
2012 3500 CREW CAB TRUCK
Supplier
Make
Model
Price
Specifications Met
Camrose Chrysler
Dodge
3500
$28,867.55
Yes
McClellan Wheaton
Chevrolet
Silverado 3500
$33,704.62
Yes
Lamb Ford Sales
Ford
3500
$34,089.50
Yes
Reasons for selecting Dodge 3500 Crew Cab:
1.) All suppliers met our specification in the tender.
2.) Camrose Chrysler was low bid.
Page 63 of 94
Page 64 of 94
Member at Large Appointments - Social Planning
Advisory Committee and Camrose Public Library Board.
Page 65 of 94
Member at Large Appointments - Social Planning
Advisory Committee and Camrose Public Library Board.
Page 66 of 94
Agenda Item # D1 ...
Camrose Affordable Housing Committee Meeting
Minutes - January 18, 2012.
Page 67 of 94
Page 68 of 94
Page 69 of 94
Page 70 of 94
City Center Camrose Board Meeting Minutes - January
11, 2012.
Page 71 of 94
11, 2012.
Page 72 of 94
11, 2012.
Page 73 of 94
11, 2012.
Page 74 of 94
Camrose Police Commission Meeting Minutes December 20, 2011.
Page 75 of 94
Page 76 of 94
Page 77 of 94
Page 78 of 94
Camrose Police Commission Meeting Minutes - January
17, 2012.
Page 79 of 94
Camrose Police Commission Meeting Minutes - January
17, 2012.
Page 80 of 94
Agenda Item # E1 ...
Ruth Muzika - Concerns Camrose Performing Arts Centre
(CPAC) - February 23, 2012.
Page 81 of 94
Page 82 of 94
Battle River Watershed Alliance Newsletter - The Current Winter 2012.
Page 83 of 94
Page 84 of 94
Page 85 of 94
Page 86 of 94
Camrose Sport Development Society - Sponsorship American Swiss Hockey Game - January 25, 2012.
Page 87 of 94
Page 88 of 94
Camrose Railway Station - 100th Birthday Celebration Thank You For Your Support - February 8, 2012.
Page 89 of 94
Page 90 of 94
Camrose Open Door Association - 2012 Toque
Campaign - Thank You For Your Support.
Page 91 of 94
Page 92 of 94
Mike Edwards
32 Crestview Estates
Calgary, Alberta T3R 1E1
11 February 2012
[email protected]
Mr. Marshall Chalmers
Mayor, City of Camrose
5204 - 50 Avenue
Camrose, Alberta T4V 0S8
NUMBLR
DATE RECEIVED ki 1
1) /
V
-
BARGED TO
/2/;13
- /(ai
•IN'IllATF: TO
Dear Mayor Chalmers,
The purpose of this note is to apprise your government about the cost of gravel in Alberta.
According to (preliminary) information from Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), we have
the most costly gravel in the whole country. The attached data sheet shows an Alberta gravel
cost at the pit exit about 75% higher than the overall average for the "Rest of Canada".
We have forwarded this information to the provincial government and requested it to
investigate further with NRCan and seek to confirm if this is so and, if it is, determine why.
Although these 2010 statistics are not yet fmal, final numbers for 2009 did show that the
Alberta cost was 83% higher than the Rest of Canada during that year. ($10.58/$5.78 = 183%)
Possible partial explanations include a 'demand pull' component due to Alberta's somewhat
higher economic growth in recent years. In addition, Alberta allows for a unique 'tax' of up
to $.25/tonne on sand and gravel, but no other heavy materials such as fill to go under a
roadbed, payable by the producer to the local municipality for wear and tear on roads. We
call it the "Community Aggregate Payment Levy" regulation and it started out as a
recommendation from a Task Force with members from the Alberta Sand and Gravel
Association, the Alberta Roadbuilders and Heavy Construction Association and the AAMDC
— hardly a disinterested bunch — but not AUMA. We suspect the true reason behind this
program is to make permitting easier.
A problem with this 'tax' is that it is not uniform across the board (most heavy haulers do not pay
it) and the recipient municipality, in addition to being a financial beneficiary, is also the
approving authority. Nevertheless, Municipal Affairs, in its wisdom, chose to bring this into
regulation six years ago, and extend it a year ago. Not all municipalities have opted to
participate.
Cheers,
Mike Edwards
Enc NRCan Data
Mike Edwards - The Cost of Gravel in Alberta - February
14, 2012.
Page 93 of 94
Sou rce: Natura l Resources Canada 26-202 Ta ble 1 andNotes
76
cl- C0
oj
•r1- CO
N
CO CO
CV
M
to
0
ril
e-I
CO
0
+_,
e'l
N.
CU
1--:
Lri c.6
CD
CV 1-0
.,_
+_. Q .....,
+,
-..,
---,
ry
a
L.)
_0
<
li
H
co
c7
F._ CD 0 00
H
r4 cc\J
03
bn
Al
Z
N 00 CO
0 -1—
r-N r-.
1-- Ln
-
VD 0
1.r)
2
CC)
CQ
h 0 1—
00 CY)
L.0
-.—
tN
L6 (0
CV
CO
d- CO
O CO
c5
LU
co
0
Cr;
.71-
4:D
n
0) CD 0)
0 00
N U')
CV
r
0
S
a-
Y
›-
<
Z
<
2
0)
CV
(.0
1—
L.6 CD
co Lo
Z ai
'cl- 1-0
0C
O
c0
Ls.,
Li)
Ca
LL.1
1— CO
D
6 1■
7 Uri
cr — CO
N
0') CY)
N.
N-
co 0
0) Tr
co- L.6
CV
OU
OD
N N C
0) 0 co
,—
,--
O 1.0
1—
CO.
2010 1:1
'e lim inary
O
5. Mineral production o
f sand and gravelfor Nunavut isincluded inNorthwest Territories.
Mike Edwards - The Cost of Gravel in Alberta - February
14, 2012.
Prelim inary San d an d Grave l Production by Province 2010
-
s_
a,
_c
to)
LE
■
1
in
r..
*Z1
c
co
U
ul 10
ro
.—
U
a)
0.1
'6
a)
f1:1 _C
a.)
0
[12 -'
,,,
Q
0) C
_10 _C
RI
T 4--,
O
O
0
0
E
7)1(
N
▪ 0
0
VI
ra
C
U
4.1
0
a)
4.)
tri
Page 94 of 94

February 27, 2012 Council Agenda Package Revised

Transcription

Similar documents

Event Poster - Whistle Stop Golf Course

2016-06-05

2016-05-29

Huron County Special Council Minutes April 9 , 2015

Augustana Campus THE CITY OF CAMROSE AGENDA REGULAR

Annual Report - Battle River Community Foundation

2012 Annual Report - Camrose Police Service

Huron County Special Council Minutes April 10 , 2015

Wedding Package 2015-2016 Edition