Bremerton School District No. 100-C

Transcription

March 15, 2012
Study and Survey
Prepared by:
Study and Survey
1
Prepared by
NAC|Architecture
March 15, 2012
2
Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012
Executive Summary
The Bremerton School District had a Study and Survey performed on the facilities in the District. This Study and Survey
included a full review of the existing facilities, development of a long range plan that included community and District
participants who identified facility needs and education direction.
Facilities
A 2006 Bond Issue provided additions to the High School and Middle School sites. The existing buildings on these sites
were not modernized and are aging. The elementary school buildings are also aging. Most of these buildings will need
capital investment to prolong the life of the building and improve the educational setting. The original High School building,
West Hills Elementary and Kitsap Lake Elementary are currently eligible for Capital Assistance from the State while the
other buildings are not eligible until after 2020.
The aging condition means that many of the building systems are near the end of their usable life and require more
resources to keep the buildings operational. The District will need to consider full modernization and/or new-in-lieu
replacement of most of the inventory within the next 15 years.
Long Range Educational Plan
The Bremerton School District prides itself on meeting the needs of ALL students. The School District recognizes that there
is wonderful diversity within their population and that many of the students in the District learn in different ways. To meet
the needs of all students, the District has made an effort to provide options and support to meet different students’ needs
in different ways.
Input from educators, administrators, community members, facilities personnel, and others provided input to frame the
Long Range Plan. The District’s Long Range Educational Plan is to continue this focus on providing options and support for
students. These options range from Special Education, to programs for Highly Capable Students, to alternative programs
such as a Spanish Immersion Elementary, a Montessori School, and a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math)
focused school, in addition to providing comprehensive schools for all K-12 learners. It is important that the facilities in the
District support this long range plan.
The educational options and special education services provided at the schools require space and put a higher demand
on building area and flexibility of the spaces to serve the programmatic needs. As a result the District does not have any
surplus space and some programs need more space to better meet the educational needs.
Demographic Data
The general demographic information indicates that the population is generally stable and outlook indicates current stability with the possibility of modest growth. There is reason to belive that the educational options will increase enrollment at
a faster rate than the predicted population growth.
3
Ability to Provide Capital Funds
The Bremerton School District meets the statutory and fiscal requirements for eligibility to compete for state assistance for
construction projects. The Bremerton School District currently has available bonding capacity. It is noted that the average
home value is lower in this District compared with others in the Puget Sound region; accordingly capital bond and levy
efforts need to be sensitive to the fact that Bremerton voters are required to accept a higher percentage of taxes on their
homes to raise an equivalent amount of capital funds compared to wealthier districts.
Housing Emergency and Racial Imbalance
There is not a housing emergency nor is there a racial imbalance.
New and/or Additions to Existing School Facilities
New building area is needed to properly accommodate the growing STEM school and Montessori school at West Hills STEM
Academy. The current enrollment levels and OSPI area per student ratios indicate that this addition is not eligible for State
Capital assistance funds.
Modernization or Replacement of Existing School Facilities
The aging inventory of buildings in the District will need to be addressed over the next 10-15 years with Modernizations
and New-in-Lieu construction. These projects are expected to be eligible for state funding assistance.
4
Additionally, the District has some support buildings that do not house direct instruction that need to be replaced. Also
there are several small works projects that need to be addressed to provide the needed functionality and/or extend the life
of buildings that are not otherwise targeted for modernization in the near term. These projects are not expected to receive
state funding assistance.
None of the proposed work is a result of defered maintenance, the District has remained active in the upkeep of their
buildings.
Time Line
The time line provided in the Study and Survey reflects a pace that makes sense for facility needs; funding will need to be
addressed for these items. The time line is dependent on funding which will require School Board action and approval by
the voters.
Underutilized School Facilities in Neighboring Districts
The neighboring districts do not have underutilized facilities that would be appropriate for the needs of the Bremerton
School District.
Table of Contents
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
PRELIMINARIES
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Board Approval
Form 1066
CHAPTER 1
Inventory and Area Analysis of Existing Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
School Addresses
School District Map
Inventory and Area Analysis
Bremerton High School
Renaissance High School
Mountain View Middle School
Armin Jahr Elementary School
Crownhill Elementary School
Kitsap Lake Elementary School
Naval Avenue Early Learning Center
View Ridge Elementary School
5
West Hills S.T.E.M. Academy
West Sound Technical Skills Center
Administration Building
CHAPTER 2
CHAPTER 3
CHAPTER 4
CHAPTER 5
CHAPTER 6
CHAPTER 7
CHAPTER 8
Consolidated Facilities
Child Nutritional Services Center
Long-Range Educational Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245
Demographic Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255
Ability to Provide Capital Funding Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261
Existence of a Housing Emergency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Racial Balance or Imbalance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Type and Extent of New and/or Additions to Existing Facilities . . .
Cost Benefit Analysis for Modernization or Replacement of Existing
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
School Facilities .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 265
. 269
. 273
. 277
CHAPTER 11
Estimated Capital Cost to Restore Major Facility Systems Due to Deferred Maintenance . . . . 287
Time Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
Inventory of Unused or Underutilized School Facilities in Neighboring Districts . . . . . . . . . 295
CHAPTER 12
Need to Adjust School Attendance Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
CHAPTER 9
CHAPTER 10
6
Chapter 1
Inventory and Area Analysis
(1)
An inventory and area analysis of existing school facilities within the District,
a description of the types and kinds of systems and subsystems used in those
facilities and their physical condition.
7
8
School Addresses
Bremerton School District #100-C
134 Marion Avenue North
Bremerton, WA 98312-3542
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-1000
(360) 473-1040
1500 13th Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-0800
(360) 473-0820
3400 1st Street
Bremerton, WA 98312
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-1080
(360) 792-1350
Mountain View Middle School (7-8)
2400 Perry Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98310
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-0600
(360) 473-0620
Mountain View Middle School (Annex)
2442 Perry Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98310
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-0700
(360) 473-0720
800 Dibb Street
Bremerton, WA 98310
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-4100
(360) 473-4120
1500 Rocky Point Road NW
Bremerton, WA 98312
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-4200
(360) 473-4210
1111 Carr Boulevard
Bremerton, WA 98312
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-4300
(360) 473-4320
900 Olympic Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98312
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-4400
(360) 473-4420
Schools
9
3250 Spruce Street
Bremerton, WA 98310
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-4500
(360) 473-4520
520 National Avenue South
Bremerton, WA 98312
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-4600
(360) 473-4620
101 National Avenue North
Bremerton, WA 98312
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-0550
(360) 478-5090
Educational Support Facilities
10
3400 1st Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-1000
(360) 473-1040
200 Bruenn Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98312
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-0500
(360) 473-0520
1300 East 30th Street
Bremerton, WA 98310
Phone:
Fax:
(360) 473-4716
(360) 473-4743
School District Map
9
5
3
4
6
1
7
8
13
11
12
2
11
10
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
92
227,338
K-5
K-5
PS-3
Main Building
2P
Totals
Main Building
2P
Totals
Main Building
P 19 & 20
P 24 & 25
P 37 & 38
Boys & Girls Club
Totals
900 Olympic Avenue
1111 Carr Boulevard
1500 Rocky Point Road
800 Dibb Street
23
23
37,342
26
48,932
37,342
26
28
47,815
48,932
28
24
34,895
47,815
24
34,895
137,519
TOTAL MS Area
K-5
57
137,519
Main Building
P 24 & 25
P 26 & 27
P 28
P 29 & 30
Totals
40
17
227,338
1
193,953
27,985
5,400
91
OSPI Area Classrooms
98,568
38,951
2400 Perry Avenue
2442 Perry Avenue
3400 1st Street
1300 High Avenue
1500 13th Street
Site Address
Main Building
6th Grade Building
4P
Totals
6-8
11-12
Renaissance Alternative High School
P1&2
P3&4
P5&6
P7&8
P 9 & 10
Totals
TOTAL HS Area
9-12
Grade
Level
Main Building
2006 Addition
Auto Shop
P 604 & 605
P Drawbridge
Totals
School/Facility
12
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,800
7,200
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,800
900
1,800
6,300
3,600
3,600
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,800
1,800
9,000
1,800
4,600
6,400
Portable
Area
2
2
2
2
8
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
7
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
10
2
4
6
Portable
Classrooms
377
505
512
369
881
136
1,722
Students FTE
11/2010
484
528
528
481
1,274
1,671
Capacity
6.35
10.65
10.64
11.18
22.52
4.30
29.42
Acres
68.43
78.66
82.56
81.22
83.02
98.57
N/A
76.88
90.77
52.95 (Auto Shop)
Bldg Rating
1994 Add & Mod
1957
1992
1996
1987 Addition
1993 Add & Mod
1968
1993
2008
2002
1988
2006
1940's
Year(s) Built
N/A
N/A
N/A
(old Junior High building)
TOTAL Other Area
N/A
N/A
31,500
N/A
200 Bruenn Avenue
278,650
136,359
40,100
N/A
15
70,691
3400 1st Street
1,800
1,800
15
70,691
11-12
1,800
1,800
1,800
900
900
1,800
1,800
1,800
9,000
Portable
Area
West Sound Technical Skills Center - Regional
Main Building
PCC
Totals
101 National Avenue
27
48,207
620,032
27
48,207
23
37,984
TOTAL K-12 Area
520 South National Avenue
23
37,984
OSPI Area Classrooms
255,175
PS-6
Main Building
KCR
Totals
3250 Spruce Avenue
Site Address
TOTAL Elementary Area
K-5
Grade
Level
Main Building
P 21 & 22
P 23
P 24
P 25 & 26
P 27 & 28
P 29 & 30
Totals
School/Facility
13
N/A
N/A
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
10
Portable
Classrooms
N/A
1,247
Currently off roles
N/A
515
528
528
Capacity
N/A
N/A
505
516
403
Students FTE
11/2010
31.05
3.50
4.30
16.44
15.84
23.36
Acres
51.36
36.84
71.38
80.09
76.63
79.25
Bldg Rating
1956
1960
1962
1967
1978
1947
1985
1945
1977
1988
1988
1960 Addition
1967 Addition
1994 Add & Mod
1952
Year(s) Built
14
15
Aerial Photo
16
A. General – Facility Basic
Information
Name
Address
1500 13th Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
Academic Grade Levels
9-12
Area of Site
29.42
Tax Parcels
3797-010-001-009; 3797-008-001-0102; 142401-1-019-2008; 142401-1-027-2008;
3797-011-010-006
Building Area (to date)
227,338
Number of Buildings
3 (HS, physical ed, auto shop)
Year Built
1988
Modernizations and
Additions, Date and (Sq Ft)
2006 addition (27,985)
Total number of classrooms
93
Capacity/Current Enrollment
1,671/1,722
B. Site
The high school is sited at the south end of the property. Six tennis courts sit to the
northwest of the school and a track/football field and bleachers are situated at the
northeast side of the property. There are two large rectangular practice fields adjacent
the school building and the football field.
C. Exterior Walls
Split faced structural concrete block construction.
D. Roof
Concrete tile roof over metal decking with metal trusses.
E. Storm Water Control
City storm water.
F.
Boiler with large central air handlers for each floor and large area. The auditorium is
air conditioned with a heat pump.
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Gas.
H. Controls
ATS.
I.
City water.
Water
17
J.
Electrical
Schedule 26.
K. Security System
Auto shop only has Mountain Alarm.
L. Intercom System
Dimensional.
M. Clocks
With intercom.
N. Fire Alarm
Edwards.
18
19
BREMERTON HIGH SCHOOL SITE
20
BREMERTON HIGH SCHOOL
21
22
Area Calculations for:
Bremerton, Washington
Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals
First Floor Academic Wing
1
37,529
Second Floor Academic Wing
1
41,595
Third Floor Academic Wing
1
37,529
Auditorium/Stage
1
15,855
Gym/Music/Commons First Floor
1
27,210
Gym/Music/Commons Second Floor
1
34,235
Auto Shop
1
5,400
Vocational Ed Building
1
1,200
2007 Additions: Choir, Media,
Commons Extension, Fitness Center
1
27,985
227,338
23
BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm
SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict
FacilityName: BremertonHighSchool(1988buidling)
BuildingName: MainBuilding
Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter
Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict
Date: 10/31/2011
BuildingType:HighSchoolͲMultiͲStory
Component
24
A10ͲFoundations
A1010ͲStandardFoundation
A20ͲWalls
A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1010ͲFloorConstruction
B1020ͲRoofConstruction
B1080ͲStairs
B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures
B2010ͲExteriorWalls
B2020ͲExteriorWindows
B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles
B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents
B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures
B3010ͲRoofing
B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances
B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations
B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures
C10ͲInteriorConstruction
C1010ͲInteriorPartitions
C1020ͲInteriorWindows
C1030ͲInteriorDoors
C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates
C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction
C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst.
C20ͲInteriorFinishes
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2020ͲInteriorFabrications
C2030ͲFlooring
C2040ͲStairFinishes
OverallBCAScore: 76.88
ComponentScore
87%
90%
90%
NotRated
90%
90%
47%
90%
72%
86%
33%
90%
39%
75%
60%
60%
90%
90%
45%
90%
90%
30%
72%
90%
90%
90%
BCAScore
0.92
0.92
0.00
0.00
1.88
1.88
NotRated
0.86
0.86
10.03
6.82
2.76
0.44
9.67
5.57
3.94
0.12
0.05
2.19
1.52
0.19
0.02
0.45
8.31
4.28
1.80
0.54
0.05
0.00
1.65
7.13
1.73
0.09
4.86
0.36
OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm
Component
C2050ͲCeilingFinishes
D10ͲConveying
D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems
D20ͲPlumbingFixtures
D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution
D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage
D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems
D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir
D30ͲHVAC
D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems
D3020ͲHeatingSystems
D3030ͲCoolingSystems
D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D4010ͲFiresSuppression
D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties
D50ͲElectrical
D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration
D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution
D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
D6010ͲDataCommunications
D6020ͲVoiceCommunications
D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication
D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring
D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity
D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection
D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance
D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm
D80ͲIntegratedAutomation
D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls
E10ͲEquipment
E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment
E1030ͲCommercialEquipment
E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment
E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment
E1090ͲOtherEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
E2010ͲFixedFurnishings
E2050ͲMovableFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
48%
0.10
0.50
0.50
5.42
3.59
1.74
0.09
NotRated
14.06
0.01
2.34
11.53
0.12
0.06
2.29
2.28
0.01
8.41
0.01
0.90
0.76
6.75
1.47
0.45
0.30
0.54
0.18
0.67
0.30
0.18
0.19
0.09
0.09
2.32
0.09
0.27
1.03
0.27
0.67
0.66
0.60
0.06
99%
91%
90%
90%
NotRated
90%
60%
90%
60%
60%
100%
100%
90%
90%
90%
86%
90%
60%
90%
90%
60%
90%
93%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
60%
60%
25
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
BremertonSchoolDistrict
BremertonHighSchool(1988buidling)
MainBuilding
KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter
NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict
10/31/2011
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Softspots,swellingorsettling
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Settling
Componentand
ComponentAssessmentCategories
BuildingProfileType:
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
F
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
36%
27%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
14%
9%
41%
27%
27%
23%
9%
32%
27%
23%
6%
32%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
HighSchoolͲMultiͲStory
90%
NotRated
90%
90%
87%
Component
Score
boilerroomandsomeothersmallsmall
walls
Notes
Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired.
Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired.
Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired.
Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or
replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired.
Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired.
BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm
26
Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc.
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc.
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Warpage,swellingorsettling
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Windowinsulationfailure
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
P
U
27
N/A
23%
27%
41%
11%
3%
6%
27%
45%
23%
23%
9%
14%
14%
36%
27%
9%
36%
14%
6%
8%
8%
3%
6%
3%
45%
23%
23%
9%
15%
15%
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.25
0.3
0.45
Weight
39%
90%
alotofdamagedtilethroughoutallareas
oftheroof.Flatroofareaisalsofailing.
installedin1987andcannotgetpartsfor
doorhardware
installedin1987
86%
33%
structuralblockwallssomewater
problemsrequiringthewalltobesealed
heavytileroofneedsevaluation;concern
forlongͲtermroofstructure
Notes
72%
90%
47%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.)
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Cracks,separations,damagedormissing
materials,weathersealant,etc.
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.)
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor
settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.)
Componentand
E
0.55
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.45
x
x
x
0.4
0.1
x
x
x
x
0.5
0.5
x
x
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.35
0.15
0.5
x
x
x
0.4
Weight
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
x
x
x
x
U
x
x
x
x
P
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
28
23%
27%
41%
50%
41%
24%
6%
9%
6%
45%
45%
27%
14%
14%
36%
21%
9%
30%
6%
15%
9%
15%
15%
9%
15%
15%
36%
0%
Assessment
CategoryScore
90%
90%
45%
90%
90%
60%
60%
75%
Component
Score
hardwarefailingandnopartsavailable
entryandotherareasareshowingwear
Notes
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
Structuraldamage(sagging,separation,
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc.
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
P
U
29
N/A
5%
9%
9%
8%
18%
5%
14%
36%
27%
14%
14%
36%
23%
14%
9%
32%
14%
45%
23%
23%
8%
5%
6%
21%
9%
90%
5%
5%
9%
54%
9%
0.3
0.25
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.6
0.1
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.3
Weight
91%
99%
48%
90%
90%
90%
72%
30%
Component
Score
Noabrasivenosingorcontrastingcolor
wearinginstalledin1988
somebentsupprotsandwaterdamage
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
FansͲSupply&Exhaust
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties
UptoDateInspection
Componentssecure
Componentand
x
0.95
0.05
0.3
0.3
0.4
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.3
0.4
x
x
x
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.5
0.5
1
x
x
x
x
x
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.45
0.25
0.3
95%
5%
100%
18%
18%
24%
18%
18%
24%
50%
32%
9%
33%
21%
6%
45%
45%
59%
9%
14%
9%
45%
45%
9%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.5
0.5
Weight
x
x
N/A
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
U
x
x
x
x
P
0.1
0.05
0.05
x
x
x
F
x
x
G
x
x
E
30
Notes
Inlibrarycomputerareaandnewaddition
tomainbuidling
90%
100%
100%
60%
60%
25yearoldsystemcontinuestooperate,
butrequiresregularmaintenanceand
repair
60%
90%
NotRated inshopsareaonly;andfiresystemworks
asdesigned
90%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
31
N/A
14%
14%
36%
27%
23%
5%
23%
23%
18%
50%
41%
50%
9%
9%
18%
41%
23%
9%
18%
39%
15%
6%
59%
23%
9%
59%
23%
9%
39%
15%
6%
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.55
0.45
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
Weight
60%
90%
90%
60%
90%
86%
90%
90%
90%
Component
Score
stillworkingonacardsystem
AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ
saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years
tͲ8'sinstalled2010
onlyemergencypanelispoweredbythis
unit
Notes
12/28/20
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Generalequipmentcondition
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Generalfurnishingcondition
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
E
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
x
x
x
x
0.75
0.25
x
x
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
x
x
x
x
0.75
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
Weight
x
x
N/A
0.75
0.25
U
x
x
P
0.65
0.25
0.1
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
32
45%
15%
45%
15%
68%
23%
68%
23%
68%
23%
68%
23%
68%
23%
59%
23%
9%
6%
9%
14%
55%
9%
41%
23%
9%
18%
Assessment
CategoryScore
60%
60%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
93%
90%
Component
Score
startingtoshowwear
gateswork
Edwardspaneldifficulttoprogramandfix
asrequestedbytheprincipal
Notes
12/28/20
FacilityName: BremertonHighSchoolNewAdditions(2007)
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
BuildingType:Junior/SeniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory
Component
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
100%
100%
100%
NotRated
90%
90%
100%
NotRated
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
100%
100%
100%
100%
NotRated
BCAScore
1.33
1.33
0.00
0.00
2.04
2.04
NotRated
0.72
0.72
13.23
9.11
4.12
NotRated
13.08
8.67
3.94
0.42
0.05
4.88
3.86
0.25
0.02
0.75
11.89
4.35
1.00
1.10
0.05
N/A
5.39
11.16
3.51
0.10
7.35
NotRated
33
Component
34
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
100%
0.20
0.00
NotRated
6.75
4.47
2.13
0.10
0.05
6.41
0.01
5.90
NotRated
0.30
0.20
2.79
2.78
0.01
10.73
NotRated
1.00
1.34
8.39
1.52
0.50
0.30
0.54
0.18
0.38
NotRated
0.18
0.20
0.09
0.09
2.17
0.09
0.30
1.14
NotRated
0.64
1.60
1.50
0.10
NotRated
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
NotRated
100%
100%
100%
100%
NotRated
100%
100%
100%
100%
60%
90%
90%
NotRated
90%
99%
90%
90%
100%
100%
NotRated
100%
100%
100%
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
BremertonHighSchoolNewAdditions(2007)
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30%
25%
10%
35%
15%
10%
45%
30%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
27%
36%
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
30%
25%
10%
35%
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
Assessment
CategoryScore
G
Componentand
E
Junior/SeniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory
90%
NotRated
100%
100%
100%
Component
Score
partialburiedwallononesideofbuilding
Notes
35
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
N/A
Weight
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
x
x
x
x
x
0.25
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
x
x
x
x
25%
10%
25%
50%
25%
25%
20%
25%
25%
10%
10%
10%
30%
15%
40%
15%
30%
15%
15%
40%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
35%
10%
10%
45%
23%
27%
41%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.45
U
x
x
x
P
0.3
F
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
E
36
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
NotRated
100%
90%
Component
Score
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
E
G
F
P
U
37
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10%
25%
15%
25%
25%
35%
15%
50%
30%
15%
15%
40%
50%
50%
30%
20%
40%
10%
55%
45%
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.55
0.45
N/A
N/A
N/A
10%
25%
25%
40%
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.25
0.3
0.45
40%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.4
Weight
N/A
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Component
Score
Notes
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.5
0.25
0.25
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
25%
15%
10%
35%
15%
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
x
x
x
x
x
10%
60%
10%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.6
0.1
25%
15%
10%
35%
15%
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
30%
15%
15%
40%
30%
15%
15%
40%
30%
25%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
15%
30%
Assessment
CategoryScore
x
x
x
x
Weight
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
N/A
x
x
x
x
U
0.3
0.25
P
x
x
F
0.15
0.3
G
x
x
E
38
100%
NotRated
100%
NotRated
100%
100%
100%
100%
Component
Score
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
E
G
F
P
U
39
N/A
10%
5%
5%
65%
10%
15%
10%
50%
50%
45%
25%
30%
50%
50%
55%
35%
10%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
30%
30%
40%
30%
30%
40%
100%
95%
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
1
0.95
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
0.05
0.05
Weight
100%
100%
100%
100%
NotRated
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Component
Score
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
59%
23%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
x
x
x
59%
23%
9%
0.65
0.25
0.1
39%
15%
6%
45%
25%
10%
20%
55%
10%
15%
20%
55%
45%
x
x
x
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
x
x
x
x
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
25%
5%
25%
25%
20%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
N/A
x
x
x
x
U
0.55
0.45
P
x
x
x
x
x
F
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
E
40
NotRated
tiedintothemainbuidlingsystem
tiedintomainbuidlingsystem
90%
90%
AgingVOIPsystem;componenetsfailingͲ
Manygreenfeatures
Notes
60%
100%
100%
100%
100%
NotRated
Component
Score
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
F
P
U
41
N/A
NotRated
41%
23%
9%
18%
9%
10%
15%
55%
10%
59%
23%
9%
68%
23%
75%
25%
75%
25%
NotRated
NotRated
75%
25%
75%
25%
75%
25%
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
Weight
100%
100%
100%
NotRated
100%
100%
gratsciencelabs
Usesthemainbuidlingsystem
90%
90%
partofthemainbuidlingEdwardspanel
whichisdifficulttomaintainandchange
tiedintothemainbuidlingsystem
Notes
99%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
FacilityName: BremertonHighSchoolAutoShop
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
BuildingType:HighSchoolͲSingleStory
Component
42
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
51%
51%
63%
60%
60%
60%
57%
N/A
35%
18%
30%
68%
33%
72%
60%
NotRated
90%
75%
60%
74%
N/A
30%
47%
60%
81%
N/A
BCAScore
2.04
2.04
0.00
0.00
2.84
2.84
0.00
0.72
0.72
3.71
0.00
3.71
N/A
3.81
2.83
0.83
0.12
0.03
1.69
1.49
0.18
0.02
NotRated
8.41
4.50
1.50
0.73
0.04
N/A
1.65
6.10
1.16
0.06
4.78
N/A
Component
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
48%
0.10
0.00
N/A
5.76
3.89
1.74
0.09
0.05
2.47
0.01
2.34
NotRated
0.06
0.06
2.61
2.60
0.01
7.80
NotRated
0.69
0.60
6.51
1.44
0.42
0.30
0.54
0.18
0.49
0.30
NotRated
0.19
0.09
0.09
2.32
0.09
0.27
1.03
0.27
0.67
0.66
0.60
0.06
N/A
91%
90%
90%
90%
90%
60%
NotRated
30%
60%
100%
100%
NotRated
60%
60%
83%
84%
60%
90%
90%
60%
NotRated
93%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
60%
60%
43
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
BremertonHighSchoolAutoShop
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Settling
Componentand
E
x
G
x
x
x
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
x
x
x
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
x
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
U
x
P
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
18%
24%
18%
18%
18%
24%
9%
9%
27%
18%
9%
15%
6%
21%
9%
15%
6%
21%
Assessment
CategoryScore
HighSchoolͲSingleStory
60%
60%
63%
51%
51%
Component
Score
Pitforservicingcars
1940'sbuildingbuiltfortransitcompany
Notes
44
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
P
x
U
45
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
5%
9%
12%
9%
5%
0%
5%
6%
8%
8%
3%
3%
3%
30%
15%
23%
3%
15%
15%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
21%
3%
6%
27%
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.5
0.25
0.25
15%
18%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.25
0.3
0.45
Weight
33%
68%
30%
18%
35%
N/A
57%
60%
Component
Score
1986roof
Gettingveryoldandused
singlepanewithorginalwoodframes
brickwallsuninsulated
Asphaltshingleroofnotleaking
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
0.4
0.1
x
x
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.55
0.45
0.3
0.2
x
x
x
0.5
0.5
x
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
33%
41%
24%
6%
18%
12%
30%
45%
27%
14%
14%
36%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.35
0.15
0.5
6%
15%
15%
36%
0%
Assessment
CategoryScore
6%
15%
9%
15%
15%
0.4
Weight
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
x
x
x
x
U
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
P
x
x
x
F
46
N/A
74%
60%
75%
90%
Notes
Installedbymaintenanceovertheyears
NotRated none
60%
72%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
P
U
47
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
23%
9%
9%
32%
9%
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
54%
9%
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.6
0.1
8%
5%
6%
21%
9%
18%
9%
9%
24%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
9%
5%
9%
24%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
8%
0.3
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
5%
9%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.3
Weight
91%
N/A
48%
N/A
81%
60%
47%
30%
Component
Score
paintedblockandbrick
somebentsupprotsandwaterdamage
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentssecure
Componentand
x
0.95
0.05
x
0.3
0.3
0.4
1
x
x
x
0.3
0.3
0.4
95%
5%
100%
18%
18%
24%
9%
9%
12%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
45%
45%
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.5
0.5
x
x
41%
23%
27%
33%
21%
6%
0.45
0.25
0.3
x
x
x
45%
45%
59%
9%
14%
9%
9%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.5
0.5
Weight
x
x
N/A
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
U
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
P
0.1
0.05
0.05
x
x
x
F
x
x
G
x
x
E
48
100%
100%
60%
30%
NotRated
60%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Component
Score
Oldheatingboxesanddisitribution
newboilerswiththeoldheatingboxesand
distribution
inshoparea
Notes
12/28/20
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
49
N/A
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
15%
3%
15%
15%
12%
33%
27%
50%
6%
9%
18%
41%
23%
9%
12%
39%
15%
6%
59%
23%
9%
59%
23%
9%
39%
15%
6%
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.55
0.45
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
Weight
60%
90%
90%
60%
84%
83%
60%
60%
NotRated
Component
Score
Sonitol
tͲ8'sinstalled2010
Oldsystem
Notes
12/28/20
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
E
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
x
x
x
x
0.75
0.25
x
x
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
x
x
x
x
0.75
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
Weight
x
x
N/A
0.75
0.25
U
x
x
P
0.65
0.25
0.1
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
50
45%
15%
45%
15%
68%
23%
68%
23%
68%
23%
68%
23%
68%
23%
59%
23%
9%
6%
9%
14%
55%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
60%
60%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
93%
NotRated
Component
Score
startingtoshowwear
liftshavebeenreplacedasneeded
gateswork
Notes
12/28/20
51
Aerial Photo
52
A. General - Facility Basic
Information
Name
Address
3400 1st Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
11-12
Area of Site
4.3
Tax Parcels
152401-4-017-2003
Building Area to date
9,000
Number of Buildings
5 portables
Year Built
2002
Modernizations and
N/A
10
Capacity/Enrollment
XXX/136
B. Site
Renaissance High School consists of five double portables situated around a central
“courtyard”. The School shares its property with the Administration Building. Directly
north of the portables there is a long grassy expanse, reaching to the far north
property line. Adjacent the east property line is a narrow greenbelt separating a
community track and field.
C. Exterior Walls
Wood frame double portable classrooms with temporary foundations. Wood panel
siding,
D. Roof
Asphalt shingle roof
City storm
F.
About half are strip heating with A/C the rest have heat pumps
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Electric
H. Controls
Honeywell programmable thermostats
53
I.
Water
City water
J.
Electrical
Schedule 24 meter at each portable
K. Security System
Sonitrol
L. Intercom System
none
M. Clocks
none
N. Fire Alarm
Edwards
54
55
RENAISSANCE HIGH SCHOOL SITE
Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals
1/2
Classrooms (2)
1
1,800
3/4
Classrooms (2)
1
1,800
5/6
Classrooms (2)
1
1,800
7/8
Classrooms (2)
1
1,800
9/10
Classrooms (2)
1
1,800
9,000
56
57
Aerial Photo
58
Information
Name
Address
2400 Perry Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98310
6-8
Area of Site –
22.52
Tax Parcels
122401-4-120-2000
137,519
Number of Buildings
2
Year Built
1993 (Main Building)
Modernizations and
Additions, (Date and Sq Ft)
2008 Addition (6th Grade Building) (38,951)
57
Capacity/Enrollment
900/881
B. Site
Mountain View is surrounded on the north and east sides by three separate fields all at
different elevations. To the south east is a soccer/football field, in the northeast corner
are two baseball diamonds and directly to the north are two more baseball diamonds
(totally six). A clump of trees separates the two northern fields and a narrow string of
trees lines the length of the east property line, separating the fields from a residential
zone.
C. Exterior Walls
Both buildings are steel frame with metal stud walls. The gym area is tilt up concrete
construct. The main/older building is brick exterior and the newer building is partial
brick with metal siding.
D. Roof
Main building has metal roof with the insulation between the metal roof and the
supporting metal pan deck. The new building has asphalt shingle roofing
All drain into the city storm water system around the school. The storm detention
pond that has an overflow that drains into county system at times
F.
Hydronic heat pump system with a heat pump for each room area. There are 2
multi-step electric boilers to provide heat and a cooling tower for cooling in the main
building and two gas fired boilers and a cooling tower for the newer building.
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Electric only for main building, Gas heating for the newer building.
H. Controls
ATS controls for both buidings
59
I.
Water
City water
J.
Electrical
Main building is schedule 43 and the newer building is schedule 25
K. Security System
none
L. Intercom System
Electrocom
M. Clocks
With intercom
N. Fire Alarm
Edwards in new building and Simplex in older builiding.
60
61
MOUNTAIN VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE
62
MOUNTAIN VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL
First Floor Plan
63
MOUNTAIN VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL
Second Floor Plan
Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals
Main Building First Floor
1
60,847
Main Building Second Floor
1
37,721
6th Grade Building First Floor
1
27,222
6th Grade Building Second Floor
1
11,729
137,519
64
FacilityName: MountainViewMiddleSchool
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
BuildingType:Middle/JuniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory
Component
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
87%
N/A
90%
NotRated
90%
90%
80%
83%
72%
47%
60%
83%
63%
90%
83%
75%
90%
90%
60%
90%
90%
83%
81%
60%
74%
83%
BCAScore
1.16
1.16
0.00
N/A
1.84
1.84
NotRated
0.72
0.72
13.16
9.11
3.28
0.78
8.37
6.24
1.83
0.25
0.04
3.24
2.43
0.23
0.02
0.56
9.97
3.92
0.90
0.66
0.05
0.00
4.45
8.81
2.84
0.06
5.40
0.33
65
Component
66
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
86%
0.17
0.57
0.57
6.03
4.02
1.92
0.09
NotRated
10.22
NotRated
5.31
4.50
0.24
0.16
2.79
2.78
0.01
9.29
0.01
0.90
1.21
7.17
1.47
0.45
0.30
0.54
0.18
0.35
NotRated
0.17
0.18
0.09
0.09
1.67
0.00
0.20
0.77
0.20
0.50
1.42
1.35
0.07
98%
90%
90%
90%
NotRated
NotRated
90%
90%
81%
81%
100%
100%
90%
90%
90%
86%
90%
60%
90%
90%
NotRated
84%
90%
90%
90%
68%
68%
68%
68%
90%
68%
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
MountainViewMiddleSchool
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
14%
9%
41%
27%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
27%
36%
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
27%
23%
6%
32%
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
Assessment
CategoryScore
G
Componentand
E
Middle/JuniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory
90%
NotRated
90%
N/A
87%
Component
Score
Notes
67
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
N/A
Weight
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
x
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
x
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.45
x
U
x
x
x
P
0.3
x
F
x
G
68
23%
6%
23%
45%
15%
23%
12%
15%
15%
6%
6%
6%
9%
0%
24%
14%
9%
14%
14%
36%
45%
23%
15%
21%
9%
9%
41%
23%
27%
41%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
63%
83%
sealantandflashingisfailinginplaces
weatheringstrippingispoorandcannotbe
foundforreplacing
47%
60%
bricksurfaceneedstobesealed;concerns
forwaterinfiltrationduetopriorrepairs
andvaporbarrier
somewaterproplemsalongearthquake
joints
Notes
72%
83%
80%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
U
69
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
23%
14%
15%
23%
32%
14%
30%
27%
14%
14%
36%
45%
45%
18%
12%
24%
6%
50%
41%
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.55
0.45
23%
27%
41%
9%
23%
23%
36%
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.25
0.3
0.45
12%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.4
Weight
90%
90%
60%
90%
90%
75%
83%
90%
Component
Score
wireglassforfirerating
Notes
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
x
E
N/A
Weight
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
x
x
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.25
U
x
x
P
0.15
0.3
x
F
x
x
G
70
9%
54%
9%
90%
3%
5%
23%
9%
9%
32%
14%
45%
23%
15%
23%
5%
6%
32%
9%
18%
9%
9%
24%
27%
9%
9%
36%
27%
15%
14%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
90%
98%
86%
83%
74%
60%
81%
83%
Component
Score
wearingcarpetbecomingatrippinghazard
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
x
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
F
P
U
71
N/A
9%
5%
5%
59%
9%
14%
9%
45%
45%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
50%
32%
9%
50%
32%
9%
18%
27%
36%
18%
27%
36%
100%
95%
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
1
0.95
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
0.05
0.05
Weight
Notes
occupancysensorsinrooms
81%
100%
100%
81%
coolingtower;recentlyreplacedmotor,
coilsaging
90%
90%
NotRated allelectricbuilding
NotRated
90%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/201
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
E
59%
23%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
x
x
x
59%
23%
9%
39%
15%
6%
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
41%
23%
9%
18%
50%
9%
9%
18%
50%
41%
23%
5%
23%
23%
18%
14%
14%
36%
27%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
x
x
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.55
0.45
x
x
x
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
Weight
x
x
x
x
x
N/A
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
U
x
x
x
x
P
0.05
x
F
x
G
72
NotRated
90%
90%
60%
90%
86%
90%
90%
90%
Component
Score
tͲ8's;nooccupancysensorforlights,no
daylightswitching
Notes
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
U
73
N/A
N/A
N/A
45%
23%
45%
23%
45%
23%
45%
23%
68%
23%
45%
23%
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
59%
23%
9%
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.75
0.25
3%
9%
14%
55%
9%
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
68%
23%
41%
23%
9%
12%
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.75
0.25
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
Weight
68%
90%
68%
68%
68%
68%
90%
90%
90%
84%
Component
Score
agingpanel,hardtoprogram
Notes
12/28/20
FacilityName: MountainViewSixthSchool
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
BuildingType:Middle/JuniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory
Component
74
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
96%
N/A
80%
NotRated
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
87%
100%
100%
100%
100%
NotRated
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
99%
90%
99%
94%
100%
BCAScore
1.28
1.28
0.00
N/A
1.62
1.62
NotRated
0.80
0.80
15.18
10.12
4.12
0.94
13.03
8.67
3.94
0.37
0.05
4.13
3.86
0.25
0.02
NotRated
11.81
4.35
1.00
1.10
0.05
0.00
5.31
10.77
3.16
0.10
6.91
0.40
Component
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
100%
0.20
0.58
0.58
6.75
4.47
2.13
0.10
0.05
11.41
0.01
5.90
5.00
0.30
0.20
2.79
2.78
0.01
10.74
0.01
1.00
1.34
8.39
1.54
0.50
0.30
0.54
0.20
0.36
NotRated
0.18
0.18
0.09
0.09
1.57
N/A
0.27
1.03
0.27
NotRated
1.60
1.50
0.10
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
60%
90%
100%
NotRated
90%
90%
90%
N/A
90%
90%
90%
NotRated
100%
100%
75
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
MountainViewSixthSchool
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30%
40%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
9%
3%
41%
27%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30%
25%
6%
35%
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
Assessment
CategoryScore
G
Componentand
E
Middle/JuniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory
100%
NotRated
80%
N/A
96%
Component
Score
somesettlementinthegymandother
areasthatarecausingsomeconcern
buildingopennedinJan2008
Notes
76
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
F
P
U
77
N/A
30%
25%
30%
45%
35%
10%
10%
45%
50%
25%
25%
30%
15%
15%
40%
30%
15%
40%
15%
18%
23%
23%
6%
9%
9%
50%
25%
25%
10%
25%
25%
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.3
Weight
100%
100%
87%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Component
Score
automatichandicapcloseriseasily
damagedbystudentscausingtheneedfor
constantrepair
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.4
0.1
x
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.2
x
x
0.55
0.45
0.5
0.5
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
x
x
x
x
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
25%
30%
45%
55%
45%
40%
10%
30%
20%
50%
50%
30%
15%
15%
40%
10%
25%
25%
40%
0.35
0.15
0.5
40%
Assessment
CategoryScore
10%
25%
15%
25%
25%
Weight
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
x
x
x
U
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
P
x
x
x
x
F
0.4
G
x
E
78
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
NotRated
100%
100%
Component
Score
Notes
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
F
P
U
79
N/A
14%
30%
30%
25%
27%
14%
14%
36%
30%
14%
15%
40%
25%
9%
10%
35%
15%
50%
25%
25%
25%
15%
10%
35%
15%
90%
5%
5%
10%
60%
10%
0.3
0.25
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.6
0.1
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.3
Weight
100%
100%
100%
100%
94%
99%
90%
99%
Component
Score
telegraphingslabcracks
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
1
0.95
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Weight
0.5
0.5
N/A
x
x
U
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
P
x
x
x
x
F
0.1
0.05
0.05
G
x
x
x
E
80
95%
100%
30%
30%
40%
30%
30%
40%
55%
35%
10%
55%
35%
10%
50%
50%
45%
25%
30%
50%
50%
65%
10%
15%
10%
10%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Component
Score
firesystemonly
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
E
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
F
P
U
81
N/A
5%
15%
15%
40%
30%
25%
5%
25%
25%
20%
55%
45%
55%
10%
15%
20%
45%
25%
10%
20%
39%
15%
6%
59%
23%
9%
65%
25%
10%
NotRated
NotRated
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.55
0.45
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
NotRated
100%
90%
60%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Component
Score
Notes
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
0.75
0.25
x
x
NotRated
NotRated
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
68%
23%
0.75
0.25
x
x
75%
25%
75%
25%
68%
23%
0.75
0.25
x
x
68%
23%
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
59%
23%
9%
9%
9%
14%
50%
9%
41%
23%
9%
18%
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
x
x
0.75
0.25
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.1
Weight
x
x
x
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
U
x
x
x
x
x
P
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
F
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
E
82
100%
100%
NotRated
90%
90%
90%
N/A
90%
90%
90%
Component
Score
ratedwithmainbuilding
Notes
12/28/20
83
Aerial Photo
84
Information
Name
Address
800 Dibb Street
Bremerton, WA 98312
K-5
Area of Site
11.18
Tax Parcels
4585-000-002-0201
34,895
Number of Buildings
2
Year Built
1968
Modernizations and
1987 Addition (2,097), 1993 (13,282) Modernization & Addition
24
Capacity/Enrollment
481/369
B. Site
Armin Jahr is surrounded by dense woods to the north and west sides, and in the
southwest corner of the property. A playground with play structure exists along the
northwest length of the building. Immediately northwest of the playgrounds is a large,
irregular shaped field outlined by the woodlands.
C. Exterior Walls
Wood frame with brick exterior
85
D. Roof
Metal roof on metal trusses over an old flat roof
City water
F.
Boiler and cooling tower with hydronic water loop to heat pumps for each room to
heat and cool building has A/C
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Electric
H. Controls
ATS
I.
City water
Water
J.
Electrical
Schedule 43
K. Security System
None
L. Intercom System
Electricom
M. Clocks
With intercom
N. Fire Alarm
Edwards
86
87
ARMIN JAHR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE
1
4
88
3
2
ARMIN JAHR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals
1
Classroom Building
1
15,772
2
Gymnasium
1
2,954
3
1987 Addition
1
2,887
4
1992 Classroom Addition
1
12,382
5
Covered Play
.5
900
34,895
89
FacilityName: ArminJahrElementarySchool
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
BuildingType:ElementarySchoolͲSingleStory
Component
90
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
83%
N/A
90%
N/A
90%
N/A
77%
N/A
86%
65%
50%
60%
63%
83%
68%
71%
90%
75%
45%
90%
NotRated
90%
81%
81%
78%
N/A
BCAScore
3.19
3.19
0.00
N/A
3.66
3.66
N/A
0.72
0.72
2.23
N/A
2.23
N/A
10.25
7.52
2.47
0.24
0.03
4.63
3.88
0.21
0.01
0.53
9.66
3.48
0.75
0.54
0.05
NotRated
4.85
7.33
2.68
0.08
4.41
N/A
Component
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
83%
0.17
0.00
N/A
10.12
7.33
2.70
0.09
N/A
11.57
NotRated
7.66
3.53
0.24
0.14
2.34
2.33
0.01
9.36
NotRated
1.03
1.21
7.13
1.13
0.35
0.30
0.36
0.12
0.31
NotRated
0.14
0.17
0.07
0.07
0.90
0.00
0.27
0.07
0.06
0.50
1.08
1.02
0.06
N/A
87%
90%
90%
N/A
NotRated
71%
71%
81%
69%
90%
90%
NotRated
90%
90%
86%
71%
60%
60%
60%
NotRated
71%
85%
68%
60%
90%
60%
60%
68%
60%
60%
91
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
ArminJahrElementarySchool
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
X
X
G
X
F
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
27%
36%
N/A
N/A
N/A
14%
9%
41%
27%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
15%
9%
32%
Assessment
CategoryScore
ElementarySchoolͲSingleStory
90%
N/A
90%
N/A
83%
Component
Score
Nosignsofmoistureonthefloor
None
slabingoodshape
Pavementaroundthebuildingwithpretty
gooddrainageinmostareas
Notes
92
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
X
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
P
U
93
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
14%
9%
36%
18%
9%
24%
14%
12%
15%
8%
3%
9%
3%
30%
15%
15%
6%
23%
23%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
32%
9%
9%
27%
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.5
0.25
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.3
Weight
Theweatherstrippingandthedooorsare
showingsignsofuse.Mostoftheother
componentsarechangedastheyfail.
50%
63%
Newmetalroofisdoinggood.Thegutter
sealantsarefailing.
Metalframedwindowinstalledin70'sand
doublepanewithfairlygoodprotection
capability
65%
60%
Mostwallsbuiltinthe60'soutof
masonry,stuccoandshotcrete,andinfair
togoodshape
Pitchedmetalroofinstalledin80sover
originalflatroof.Metalroofisnotbuiltto
resistshear.Nostructuraldamagehas
occurredyet.noinsulation,nostructural
deckatroofplane
Noneexcepttoattic
Notes
86%
N/A
77%
N/A
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
P
U
94
N/A
50%
41%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.25
0.3
0.45
24%
6%
9%
6%
30%
45%
27%
14%
14%
36%
32%
9%
30%
9%
15%
14%
15%
15%
9%
15%
23%
36%
12%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.55
0.45
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.4
Weight
Notes
installedin1994
wireglassdoesnotmeetcurrentsafety
andfirecodes
Redonein1994andingoodshape.
someofthecoverwalkareashowssigns
ofneedingattention
Somesealsarestartingtofail
Reworkedin1994andonlyflashingstothe
roofarestartingtocauseconcern
NotRated None
90%
45%
75%
90%
71%
68%
83%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
95
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
23%
9%
6%
32%
9%
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
54%
9%
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.6
0.1
23%
9%
6%
32%
14%
27%
9%
9%
36%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
27%
9%
9%
36%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
23%
0.3
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
14%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.3
Weight
87%
N/A
83%
N/A
78%
81%
81%
90%
Component
Score
None
showingsignsofwear
showingsignsofwear
inprettygoodshapebutused
Overallasinstalledin1994
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
E
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.1
0.05
0.05
Weight
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
x
x
x
1
0.95
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.55
0.35
0.1
86%
90%
18%
27%
24%
18%
27%
36%
33%
32%
6%
33%
32%
6%
NotRated
NotRated
0.5
0.5
x
N/A
N/A
N/A
45%
45%
59%
9%
14%
9%
6%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.5
0.5
U
x
x
P
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
96
fordrysprinkleronly
Notes
90%
certifiedsprinklersystemand
extinguishers
certifiedextinguishersannuallyand
properlysecured
couldusemorecleaningandmaintenace,
controlledbyDDCsystem
69%
90%
somedamageovertheyears,controls
updatedtwice,filterschangedandbelts
checked3timesayear
hydrinicsystem,coolingtowerreplaced
2009,somecompressorsandmotors
replacedastheyfail
installedin1994hydronicheatpump
systemelectricboiler,workingasdesigned
81%
71%
71%
NotRated Noneallelectricbuilding
N/A
90%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
97
N/A
5%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
23%
5%
23%
23%
18%
50%
41%
50%
9%
9%
18%
27%
23%
9%
12%
39%
15%
6%
39%
15%
6%
39%
15%
6%
NotRated
NotRated
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.55
0.45
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
NotRated none
60%
60%
60%
71%
Nooccupancysensors
meetscode
90%
86%
installedin1994andmeetscodeschedule
43powerwithtransformeronporperty
Notes
90%
NotRated None
Component
Score
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.1
Weight
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.75
0.25
x
x
x
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
U
0.65
0.25
0.1
x
P
x
x
x
x
F
98
45%
15%
45%
15%
45%
23%
45%
15%
45%
15%
68%
23%
45%
15%
39%
23%
6%
3%
9%
9%
55%
9%
27%
23%
9%
12%
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
60%
60%
68%
Allareshowingwear.bookcasesarevery
old,kitchenequipmentingoodshapeand
tablesaregood.
servicablebutisshowingwear
servesneedsoftheschool
continuallyupdatedbutshortlifeand
needtokeepcurrentismorethanbudget
allows
playgroundequipmentisshowingwear.
Musicisgood
60%
60%
kitchenandjanitorialequipmentisupto
date
Gatesworkandareusedasneeded
Worksasdesignedbuthasasome
componentfailuresthathavebeenfixed.
olderpanelandaproblemgettingboards
orprograming.Pasttheconfidencetests
andworksasdesigned
Asrequestedbyprincipal
Notes
90%
60%
68%
85%
71%
Component
Score
12/28/20
99
Aerial Photo
100
Information
Name
Address
1500 Rocky Point Road
Bremerton, WA 98312
K-5
Area of Site
10.64
Tax Parcels
152401-2-027-2005
47,815
Number of Buildings
1
Year Built
1996
Modernizations and
N/A
28
Capacity/Enrollment
528/512
B. Site
At the northwest corner of the property lies a baseball diamond, with a narrow stretch
of trees on the west edge separating the field from a residential area. To the northeast
lies court and playground. At the south end lies a paved playground with foursquare
courts and a soft-surface, semi-circular playground with play structure.
C. Exterior Walls
Metal frame with brick and stucco exterior
101
D. Roof
Asphalt shingle roof over wood decking
City storm water
F.
Boiler with heating unit for each room. No A/C
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Gas
H. Controls
Barber Coleman DDC
I.
City water
Water
J.
Electrical
Schedule 25
K. Security System
Sonitol
L. Intercom System
Dimensional
M. Clocks
With intercom
N. Fire Alarm
Edwards
102
103
CROWNHILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE
CROWNHILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
First Floor
Second Floor
104
Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals
First Floor
1
32,912
Second Floor
1
14,083
Covered Play
.5
820
47,815
105
FacilityName: CrownhillElementarySchool
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
BuildingType:ElementarySchoolͲMultiͲStory
Component
106
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
90%
N/A
90%
NotRated
90%
83%
80%
90%
90%
86%
87%
90%
45%
83%
90%
NotRated
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
86%
86%
78%
83%
BCAScore
1.20
1.20
0.00
N/A
1.84
1.84
NotRated
0.72
0.72
12.47
8.35
3.28
0.85
11.58
7.80
3.37
0.37
0.05
1.96
1.74
0.21
0.02
NotRated
10.75
3.92
0.90
0.99
0.05
0.05
4.85
9.32
3.00
0.09
5.73
0.33
Component
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
86%
0.17
0.57
0.57
6.03
4.02
1.92
0.09
0.00
5.75
0.01
5.31
NotRated
0.27
0.16
2.79
2.78
0.01
9.66
NotRated
0.90
1.21
7.55
1.47
0.45
0.30
0.54
0.18
0.65
0.30
0.18
0.17
0.09
0.09
1.64
0.00
0.20
0.68
0.09
0.67
1.24
1.15
0.09
98%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
NotRated
90%
81%
100%
100%
NotRated
90%
90%
90%
90%
60%
90%
90%
60%
90%
85%
90%
60%
68%
60%
90%
90%
68%
90%
107
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
CrownhillElementarySchool
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
F
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
36%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
14%
9%
41%
27%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
23%
9%
32%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
ElementarySchoolͲMultiͲStory
90%
NotRated none
greatshape
None
N/A
90%
mostofthebuildingisonpilingwithgrade
beamsinstalledin1995.2storybuilding
Notes
90%
Component
Score
108
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
U
109
N/A
27%
15%
27%
41%
21%
9%
9%
41%
45%
23%
23%
27%
14%
14%
36%
27%
9%
36%
14%
18%
23%
23%
9%
9%
6%
45%
23%
23%
3%
15%
15%
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.3
Weight
45%
90%
87%
86%
90%
90%
80%
83%
Component
Score
asphaltshinglesarefailingandneeded
repairedeveryyear;mobilesafetyanchors
agoodwindowsystem
asphaltshinglesarefailingandneeded
repairedeveryyear
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
0.55
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.45
x
x
x
0.4
0.1
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.2
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.35
0.15
0.5
23%
27%
41%
50%
41%
36%
9%
27%
18%
45%
45%
27%
14%
14%
36%
9%
23%
14%
23%
23%
9%
15%
23%
36%
12%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.4
Weight
x
x
N/A
0.5
0.5
U
x
x
x
P
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
110
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
NotRated
90%
83%
Component
Score
Notes
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
111
N/A
14%
27%
27%
23%
27%
9%
14%
36%
27%
9%
14%
36%
23%
9%
6%
32%
9%
45%
23%
15%
23%
9%
9%
32%
14%
90%
3%
5%
9%
54%
9%
0.3
0.25
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.6
0.1
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.3
Weight
90%
98%
86%
83%
78%
86%
86%
90%
Component
Score
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
1
0.95
x
x
x
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
95%
100%
18%
27%
36%
27%
27%
36%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.55
0.35
0.1
x
x
x
50%
32%
9%
0.55
0.35
0.1
x
x
x
45%
45%
41%
23%
27%
0.5
0.5
0.45
0.25
0.3
x
x
x
45%
45%
59%
9%
14%
9%
9%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
x
x
0.5
0.5
Weight
x
x
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
U
x
x
x
x
P
0.1
0.05
0.05
x
F
x
x
x
G
x
E
112
100%
100%
81%
90%
Notes
installednewboilersin2008and2009
fordrysprinklersystemonly
fanneedmorecleaning
ingoodshape
NotRated None
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
113
N/A
5%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
23%
5%
23%
23%
18%
50%
41%
50%
9%
14%
18%
41%
23%
9%
18%
39%
15%
6%
59%
23%
9%
59%
23%
9%
39%
15%
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.55
0.45
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
60%
mostlyoperatorerrorandsensitiveto
motionlikeceilinghangingdisplays.
Notenoughbudgettokeepcurrent
becauseoftechnologychanges
90%
90%
TͲ8withoccupancysensors;nodaylight
zoneswitching
meetscode
Notes
60%
90%
90%
90%
90%
NotRated None
Component
Score
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
E
0.75
0.25
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.1
Weight
x
x
x
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
x
x
x
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
U
0.75
0.25
x
P
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
114
68%
23%
45%
23%
68%
23%
68%
23%
45%
15%
45%
23%
45%
15%
59%
23%
9%
3%
9%
9%
55%
9%
41%
23%
9%
18%
6%
Assessment
CategoryScore
gatesworkokay
60%
90%
68%
1996ornewerandrepalcedasneeded
updatedin1994
someplaytoysareold
90%
90%
Alwayschangingandnotenoughbudget
tokeepup
60%
68%
WebbasedDDCrecentlyupdated,other
systemwork
Panelneedstobeupdated
camerasasprincipalrequests
Notes
90%
85%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
115
Aerial Photo
116
Information
Name
Address
1111 Carr Boulevard
Bremerton, WA 98312
K-5
Area of Site
10.65
Tax Parcels
3719-002-047-0205; 3719-002-028-0109; 3719-002-028-0208; 3719-002-028-0307;
3719-002-028-0406; 3719-002-029-0108
48,932
Number of Buildings
2
Year Built
1992
Modernizations and
N/A
26
Capacity/Enrollment
528/505
B. Site
Kitsap Lake Elementary is situated centrally within its property boundaries. To the east
and south of the building lies a large grassy expanse. Between the building and the
grassy zone, a smaller playground occurs. Along the entire length of the west property
line is a narrow, densely wooded area.
C. Exterior Walls
Wood frame with brick exterior
D. Roof
Asphalt shingles over wood deck support by wood trusses
City storm water
F.
Boiler with heating unit for each room. No A/C
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Gas
H. Controls
Barber Coleman DDC
I.
City water
Water
117
J.
Electrical
Schedule 25
K. Security System
none
L. Intercom System
Dimensional
M. Clocks
With intercom
N. Fire Alarm
Silent Knight
118
119
KITSAP LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE
120
KITSAP LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
121
B10Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals
First Floor
1
35,535
Second Floor
1
12,567
Covered Play
.5
820
48,932
122
FacilityName: KitsapLakeElementarySchool
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
Component
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
87%
N/A
90%
90%
90%
90%
69%
90%
90%
72%
84%
83%
53%
60%
60%
65%
65%
90%
90%
90%
90%
74%
90%
90%
78%
90%
BCAScore
1.16
1.16
0.00
N/A
1.92
1.84
0.08
0.72
0.72
12.80
9.11
2.84
0.85
11.03
7.80
2.84
0.35
0.04
2.67
2.03
0.15
0.01
0.48
8.75
2.81
0.90
0.99
0.05
0.05
3.96
9.50
3.16
0.09
5.73
0.36
123
Component
124
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
78%
0.16
0.57
0.57
6.03
4.02
1.92
0.09
0.00
6.07
0.01
5.63
NotRated
0.24
0.18
2.79
2.78
0.01
9.66
NotRated
0.90
1.21
7.55
1.47
0.45
0.30
0.54
0.18
0.20
NotRated
NotRated
0.20
0.09
0.09
2.03
0.00
0.27
1.03
0.07
0.67
1.22
1.15
0.07
99%
90%
90%
90%
90%
90%
96%
NotRated
81%
90%
100%
100%
NotRated
90%
90%
90%
90%
60%
90%
90%
NotRated
NotRated
100%
90%
90%
90%
90%
68%
90%
68%
68%
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
KitsapLakeElementarySchool
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
F
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
14%
9%
41%
27%
27%
27%
36%
27%
36%
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
27%
23%
6%
32%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
90%
90%
90%
N/A
87%
Component
Score
thebackofthebuidlinghassomestanding
water
Notes
125
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
N/A
Weight
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.25
x
x
x
0.1
0.25
x
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.25
0.25
x
x
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.5
0.25
0.25
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.45
U
x
x
x
x
P
0.3
x
F
x
G
126
8%
6%
15%
45%
23%
15%
18%
23%
23%
9%
6%
6%
18%
5%
36%
14%
27%
14%
14%
36%
45%
23%
23%
11%
9%
9%
41%
23%
27%
41%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
53%
83%
84%
72%
90%
90%
69%
90%
Component
Score
asphaltrooffailing,libraryofminimal
slopeandguttersseemundersizedinareas
backdraftdampersneedsomehelp
startingtoshowwear
cannotfindtheweatherstrippingforthe
windows
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
127
N/A
24%
6%
15%
15%
24%
6%
15%
9%
15%
15%
21%
14%
30%
18%
9%
14%
24%
45%
45%
27%
18%
36%
9%
50%
41%
23%
27%
41%
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.55
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.45
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.4
Weight
90%
90%
90%
allgrillsandrollupdoorsworkproperly
reworkedin2011toputinsiesmic
sheetingontheexistingframethatwas
notalwaysplumb
65%
90%
frontentryisdiscoloring,otherareasare
showingsignsofwear
gettingoldinstalledin1992
Notes
65%
60%
60%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
x
E
x
0.1
0.6
0.1
x
x
x
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
x
x
x
x
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.9
0.05
0.05
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.3
0.25
0.15
0.3
Weight
x
N/A
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
U
x
x
x
x
x
P
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
128
9%
54%
9%
90%
5%
5%
15%
9%
9%
32%
14%
45%
23%
23%
23%
5%
6%
32%
14%
27%
14%
14%
36%
27%
14%
14%
36%
18%
15%
14%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
90%
99%
78%
90%
78%
90%
90%
74%
Component
Score
carpetinstalledin1992isbecoming
trippinghazard
somedamagedandbentbecauseofwear
overtheyears
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
x
x
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
F
P
U
129
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
45%
45%
55%
32%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
18%
27%
36%
27%
27%
36%
100%
95%
0.5
0.5
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
1
0.95
45%
45%
0.5
0.5
41%
23%
27%
59%
9%
14%
9%
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.3
9%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
0.05
0.05
Weight
100%
100%
90%
81%
Notes
boilershavebeenreplacedandDDC
undatedin2010
forfiresprinklerdrysystemonly
replacefiresystemin2010
Notabletogetenoughfreshairinto
buidlingasdesigned
NotRated None
96%
90%
90%
90%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
x
E
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
x
x
x
x
59%
23%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
x
x
x
59%
23%
9%
0.65
0.25
0.1
39%
15%
6%
41%
23%
9%
18%
50%
9%
14%
18%
50%
41%
x
x
x
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
23%
5%
23%
23%
18%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
x
x
x
x
N/A
0.55
0.45
U
x
x
P
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
G
130
Notes
TͲ8'swithoccupancysensorsthroughout
thebuidling
NotRated None
90%
90%
60%
90%
90%
90%
90%
NotRated None
Component
Score
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
x
x
x
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
F
P
U
131
N/A
N/A
N/A
68%
23%
68%
23%
45%
23%
68%
23%
45%
23%
45%
23%
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
59%
23%
9%
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.75
0.25
10%
10%
15%
55%
10%
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
68%
23%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.75
0.25
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
Weight
68%
68%
90%
68%
90%
90%
90%
90%
100%
Notes
1992showingwearandneedsupdated
1992itwasnew
playgroundequipmentisshowingwear
gateswork
firesystemreplacedandtocurrentcodes
in2010
NotRated None
Component
Score
12/28/20
132
133
Aerial Photo
134
Information
Name
Address
900 Olympic Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98310
PS-3
Area of Site
6.35
Tax Parcels
142401-3-048-2009
37,342
Number of Buildings
1
Year Built
1957
Modernizations and
1994 Modernization & Addition (6,578)
23
Capacity/Enrollment
484/377
B. Site
The Naval Avenue property is divided by bus only road that go between public
streets to the north and south of the property. To the east is a long grassy playfield
surrounded by a path that fills the eastern portion of the site. To the west of the road,
between the road and school building are two separate play areas and portables. The
southernmost play area contains three play structures.
C. Exterior Walls
Concrete base walls with metal frame to support the old flat roof structure. There is
window infill and framed wall in between the structural colums.
D. Roof
Metal roof over wood frame deck and supports that were installed in 1986 over the
flat roof.
City storm water system
F.
Gas fired boiler for hydronic heat system with a unit for each 4 classrooms located
in the attic space with a heat coil to adjust the heating into each classroom. No air
conditioning
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Gas
H. Controls
ATS DDC heating controls
I.
Water provided by the city
Water
135
J.
Electrical
Schedule 25 electric with schedule 24 to the portables
K. Security System
None
L. Intercom System
Electrocom
M. Clocks
With intercom system
N. Fire Alarm
Edwards installed in 1994
136
137
NAVAL AVENUE EARLY LEARNING CENTER SITE
138
NAVAL AVENUE EARLY LEARNING CENTER
Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals
Original Building
1
29,834
1992 Additions
1
6,578
Covered Play
.5
930
37,342
139
FacilityName: NavalAvenueElementarySchool
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
Component
140
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
74%
N/A
86%
N/A
60%
83%
77%
N/A
68%
74%
48%
68%
53%
80%
57%
45%
72%
90%
72%
60%
NotRated
69%
72%
77%
74%
N/A
BCAScore
2.84
2.84
0.00
N/A
3.48
3.48
N/A
0.48
0.48
2.23
0.00
2.23
N/A
9.01
5.93
2.82
0.23
0.03
3.78
3.23
0.20
0.01
0.34
8.29
2.79
0.90
0.86
0.03
NotRated
3.72
6.75
2.38
0.08
4.15
N/A
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
69%
N/A
69%
65%
75%
90%
90%
77%
NotRated
60%
60%
100%
100%
NotRated
90%
60%
90%
90%
60%
90%
90%
NotRated
90%
88%
90%
60%
90%
68%
60%
NotRated
60%
60%
0.14
0.00
N/A
7.83
5.82
1.94
0.08
0.00
8.62
0.01
8.32
NotRated
0.18
0.12
2.60
2.59
0.01
9.34
NotRated
1.03
0.80
7.51
1.47
0.45
0.30
0.54
0.18
0.36
NotRated
0.18
0.18
0.09
0.09
0.41
0.00
0.27
0.08
0.06
NotRated
1.08
1.02
0.06
141
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
NavalAvenueElementarySchool
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
18%
24%
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
9%
41%
27%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
18%
15%
9%
32%
Assessment
CategoryScore
60%
N/A
86%
N/A
74%
Component
Score
Oldslabsomesettling
None
Notes
142
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
P
x
U
143
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
14%
9%
36%
27%
9%
24%
14%
12%
8%
8%
6%
9%
6%
30%
15%
23%
6%
23%
0%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
21%
6%
9%
41%
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.5
0.25
0.25
15%
27%
41%
18%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.3
Weight
53%
68%
Metalroofgood.Guttersareundersized
anddrainsallsmall.Causingblockage
whichcancausewatertogetinthe
building.
newin1994
newin1994
74%
48%
watercomesinwhenguttersblockeddue
topoordesignandinstall
None
N/A
68%
Oldflatroofcoverwithwoodsupported
metalframeroofinthe80's
Notes
77%
83%
Component
Score
12/28/2
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
33%
27%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.25
0.3
0.45
36%
6%
18%
12%
45%
45%
18%
9%
9%
36%
21%
9%
15%
6%
15%
14%
15%
8%
6%
15%
23%
36%
24%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.55
0.45
0.4
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
x
x
Weight
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
N/A
x
x
U
0.4
x
P
x
F
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
E
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
144
NotRated
60%
72%
90%
72%
45%
57%
80%
Component
Score
allworkasdesigned
installedin1994
manywallsareblockwallinstalledin1956
Installedinthe80'swithtehroofand
startingshowwear!!
sealsaregettingold,andupperwindows
intheclassroomshavesomeproblems
Flashingarestartingtoshowwear
Notes
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
U
145
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
15%
9%
9%
32%
9%
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
36%
6%
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.6
0.1
15%
5%
9%
32%
9%
18%
9%
14%
36%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
18%
9%
9%
36%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
18%
15%
0.3
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
9%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.3
Weight
69%
N/A
69%
N/A
74%
77%
72%
69%
Component
Score
Someofthepipingwasinstalledin1956
Oldoriginalceilingrefinishedin1994and
isshowingwear!!
startingtoshowwear
someblockwallsinbuidlingthatshoware
notpleasanttoappearance
Manyceilingsareglueontilethatwas
reworkedin1994
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
0.1
0.05
0.05
Weight
0.95
x
0.3
0.3
0.4
x
x
x
1
0.3
0.3
0.4
95%
100%
18%
18%
24%
18%
18%
24%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.55
0.35
0.1
x
x
x
50%
21%
6%
0.55
0.35
0.1
45%
45%
41%
23%
27%
x
0.45
0.25
0.3
30%
45%
39%
6%
14%
6%
9%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.5
0.5
x
x
x
0.5
0.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
U
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
P
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
E
146
100%
100%
60%
60%
Notes
replacingsmallcondensateboilersas
needed
Onfiresprinkler
Partofsewerpipinginstalledin56
someofthesewersysteminstalledin1956
supplyandreturnaircouldbetter
NotRated None
77%
90%
90%
75%
65%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
147
N/A
5%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
23%
5%
23%
23%
18%
33%
27%
50%
9%
14%
18%
41%
23%
9%
18%
39%
15%
6%
59%
23%
9%
59%
23%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.55
0.45
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
NotRated
90%
90%
60%
90%
90%
60%
90%
Notes
TͲ8'swithoccupancysensors
someolderpanelsandwiringstillinuse
NotRated None
Component
Score
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
x
x
x
x
45%
15%
45%
15%
NotRated
NotRated
0.75
0.25
45%
23%
68%
23%
45%
15%
59%
23%
9%
6%
9%
9%
55%
9%
41%
23%
9%
18%
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
45%
15%
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.1
Weight
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
U
0.75
0.25
P
x
x
x
x
x
F
148
60%
60%
NotRated
60%
68%
90%
60%
90%
88%
90%
Component
Score
showingwear
showingwear
Playgroundequipmentwearing
Gateswork
PanelisoldDOSsystemneedstobe
replaced
Asrequestedbytheprincipal
Notes
12/28/20
149
Aerial Photo
150
Information
Name
Address
3250 Spruce Street
Bremerton, WA 98310
K-5
Area of Site
23.36
Tax Parcels
3972-000-001-0502; 3972-000-002-0006; 3972-000-002-0150; 3972-000-003-0005;
3972-000-003-0104
37,984
Number of Buildings
1
Year Built
1952
Modernizations and
1960, 1967, 1994 Modernization & Addition (6,235)
23
Capacity/Enrollment
528/403
B. Site
The View Ridge site contains 3 baseball fields, two to the east and one to the south.
There is a playground with play structure, and soccer field directly to the north of the
building. The property line also severs a football field and track, which is shared with
the Bremerton Junior High property, at its southeast edge. A densely wooded area is
located in the far southeast corner of the lot.
C. Exterior Walls
Wood frame with some brick and some concrete metal frame and window infill
D. Roof
Flat built-up roof over wood decking. Some areas sloped shingle.
City storm
F.
Boiler for hot water system that supplies a roof top heating unit for each 4 classrooms
with a heating coil to adjust final heat into classroom. No A/C
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Gas
H. Controls
ATS heating controls
151
I.
Water
City water
J.
Electrical
Schedule 25
K. Security System
none
L. Intercom System
Dimensional
M. Clocks
With intercom
N. Fire Alarm
Edwards with panel being change to Silent Knight in Nov 2011
152
153
VIEW RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE
4
3A
4
3
5
4
2
6
7
8
9
1
154
VIEW RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals
1
Existing Classrooms
1
8,723
2
Classroom Addition
1
4,480
3
Administration
1
3,608
3A
Administration Addition
1
1,755
4
Existing Classrooms
1
8,540
5
Library
1
2,989
6
Music Room Addition
1
1,392
7
Gymnasium
1
4,800
8
Kitchen Addition
1
560
9
Covered Play Area
0.5
1,137
37,984
155
FacilityName: ViewRidgeElementarySchool
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
Component
156
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
83%
83%
83%
N/A
69%
N/A
47%
N/A
86%
86%
60%
75%
29%
63%
75%
50%
90%
90%
90%
90%
NotRated
83%
90%
90%
74%
N/A
BCAScore
3.19
3.19
0.00
0.00
3.36
3.36
N/A
0.55
0.55
1.36
N/A
1.36
N/A
11.12
7.52
3.27
0.29
0.04
2.30
1.76
0.16
0.02
0.37
9.95
3.48
0.90
1.07
0.05
NotRated
4.45
7.39
2.98
0.09
4.15
N/A
Component
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
86%
0.17
0.00
N/A
10.11
7.33
2.70
0.08
0.00
9.87
0.01
9.46
NotRated
0.24
0.16
2.60
2.59
0.01
9.74
NotRated
1.03
1.21
7.51
1.27
0.41
0.30
0.38
0.18
0.33
NotRated
0.16
0.17
0.09
0.09
0.87
0.00
0.20
0.08
0.09
0.50
1.22
1.15
0.07
N/A
87%
90%
75%
90%
60%
87%
NotRated
81%
81%
100%
100%
NotRated
90%
90%
90%
83%
60%
63%
90%
NotRated
81%
85%
90%
90%
68%
68%
90%
68%
68%
68%
157
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
ViewRidgeElementarySchool
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
18%
24%
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
6%
41%
27%
27%
15%
9%
32%
27%
15%
9%
32%
Assessment
CategoryScore
69%
N/A
83%
83%
83%
Component
Score
carpetswearingcreatingsome
tippinghazards
boilerroomisonlylocation
Notes
158
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
P
x
U
159
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
9%
14%
36%
27%
9%
36%
14%
12%
15%
15%
6%
6%
6%
45%
15%
15%
9%
0%
8%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
11%
6%
3%
27%
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.5
0.25
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.3
Weight
29%
75%
60%
86%
86%
N/A
47%
N/A
Component
Score
flatroofthatneedstobereplaced,
downspoutsareundersizeandneedtobe
upgraded
replacedin1994
replacedin1994
flatroofneartheendofit'slife,
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
50%
41%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.25
0.3
0.45
36%
9%
27%
18%
45%
45%
27%
14%
14%
36%
11%
9%
30%
9%
15%
14%
15%
23%
9%
15%
15%
24%
12%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.55
0.45
0.4
0.1
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.2
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.4
Weight
x
x
N/A
0.5
0.5
U
x
x
x
x
P
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
160
NotRated
90%
90%
90%
90%
50%
75%
63%
Component
Score
installedin1994
oldsystemisfailingandbeingreplacedby
woodsheatingasneeded
showingwear
showingwear
Notes
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
U
161
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
23%
5%
6%
32%
9%
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
54%
9%
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.6
0.1
23%
9%
9%
32%
14%
27%
14%
14%
36%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
27%
14%
14%
36%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
15%
0.3
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
14%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.3
Weight
87%
N/A
86%
N/A
74%
90%
90%
83%
Component
Score
carpetswearingcreatingsometripping
hazards
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.1
0.05
0.05
Weight
0.95
0.3
0.3
0.4
95%
100%
27%
18%
36%
18%
27%
36%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.4
50%
32%
6%
30%
30%
41%
23%
27%
45%
30%
59%
9%
14%
9%
6%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.5
0.5
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.45
0.25
0.3
1
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.5
0.5
U
x
P
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
E
162
100%
100%
81%
81%
Notes
onsamemeterastheoldJuniorHigh
building.Willneedotbechangedwhen
buidlingisdemolished
forfiresprinklersystemonly
somevelocityproblemsduetodesign
causingdraftyareas
NotRated None
87%
60%
90%
75%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
163
N/A
5%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
23%
5%
23%
23%
18%
50%
41%
50%
9%
14%
18%
41%
15%
9%
18%
39%
15%
6%
39%
15%
9%
59%
23%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.55
0.45
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
NotRated
90%
63%
60%
83%
90%
90%
90%
Notes
tͲ8'swithoccupancysensors
Partofschedule31campuswitholdJunior
Highbildingthatisclosed.Willhavetobe
changedwhenJrhighisdemolished
NotRated None
Component
Score
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
E
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.1
Weight
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.75
0.25
x
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
x
x
x
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
x
0.75
0.25
U
x
x
x
P
0.65
0.25
0.1
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
164
45%
23%
45%
23%
45%
23%
68%
23%
45%
23%
45%
23%
68%
23%
59%
23%
9%
3%
9%
9%
55%
9%
41%
23%
6%
12%
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
68%
68%
68%
90%
68%
68%
90%
90%
85%
81%
Component
Score
startingtoshowsomewear
Playgroundequipmentiswearingand
needstobereplaced
gateswork
olddospanelneedstobereplacedbutis
stillprovidingcoverageforadequatefire
protection
asrequestedbytheprincipal
Notes
12/28/20
165
Aerial Photo
166
Information
Name
Address
520 National Avenue South
Bremerton, WA 98312
PS-6
Area of Site
15.84
Tax Parcels
222401-2-043-2006; 222401-2-070-2002; 222401-2-075-2007; 222401-2-099-2009
48,207
Number of Buildings
4
Year Built
1988
Modernizations and
N/A
27
Capacity/Enrollment
528/516
B. Site
The West Hills building is located at the far west side of its property. To the east of the
building are two playgrounds with play structures and further east lies a large bootshaped field outlined by a walking path. At the far northeast corner of the property is a
densely wooded area.
C. Exterior Walls
Wood frame with stucco exterior.
167
D. Roof
Concrete tile roof over a wood deck with wood .trusses
In the county but storm is into the city storm
F.
Boilers with central units for each end of the building and the gym No A/C
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Gas
H. Controls
Barber Coleman DDC
I.
City water
Water
J.
Electrical
Schedule 25
K. Security System
None
L. Intercom System
Electricom
M. Clocks
With intercom
N. Fire Alarm
Edwards
168
169
WEST HILLS S.T.E.M. ACADEMY SITE
Covered Play
170
WEST HILLS S.T.E.M. ACADEMY
171
Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals
Lower Floor
1
29,015
Upper Floor
1
23,176
Covered Play Area
0.5
2,016
48,207
172
FacilityName: WestHillsElementary
BuildingName: STEM
Date: 10/31/2011
Component
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
69%
51%
90%
NotRated
81%
83%
60%
90%
81%
72%
66%
90%
38%
83%
53%
60%
77%
90%
78%
90%
83%
90%
81%
90%
86%
90%
BCAScore
0.92
0.92
0.00
0.00
1.84
1.84
NotRated
0.65
0.65
11.67
8.35
2.47
0.85
10.18
7.02
2.84
0.28
0.05
2.11
1.45
0.21
0.01
0.45
10.02
3.33
0.90
0.86
0.05
0.04
4.85
9.74
2.84
0.09
6.28
0.36
173
Component
174
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
83%
0.17
0.57
0.57
6.05
4.05
1.92
0.09
N/A
5.74
0.01
5.31
NotRated
0.24
0.18
2.79
2.78
0.01
9.28
NotRated
0.90
1.21
7.17
1.47
0.45
0.30
0.54
0.18
0.37
NotRated
0.18
0.19
0.09
0.09
2.03
0.00
0.27
1.03
0.07
0.67
1.11
1.02
0.09
99%
91%
90%
90%
N/A
90%
90%
NotRated
81%
90%
100%
100%
NotRated
90%
90%
86%
90%
60%
90%
90%
NotRated
90%
93%
90%
90%
90%
90%
68%
90%
60%
90%
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
WestHillsElementary
STEM
10/31/2011
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
15%
6%
21%
14%
9%
41%
27%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
18%
36%
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
27%
15%
6%
21%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
81%
NotRated
somedrainageproblemsareaddressed
eachyear
gymwallandotherbelowgradewallsare
inprettygoodshape
51%
90%
mostofbuidlinghassomebelowgrade
aspectsthathavehadsomewater
problems
Notes
69%
Component
Score
175
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
P
U
176
N/A
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.3
Weight
15%
3%
8%
45%
23%
23%
12%
15%
15%
9%
9%
6%
9%
14%
36%
14%
18%
14%
14%
36%
45%
23%
23%
11%
3%
6%
41%
15%
27%
41%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
38%
90%
66%
72%
81%
90%
60%
83%
Component
Score
tileroofsystemisdisappearingandneeds
toberepalced
doorsandhardwareareshowingsignsof
use
Windows/sealshaveneededreplacing
Sealsatjointsrequireregularmaintenance
tileroofisfallingandinneedofconstent
repairtokeepwaterintrusiondown
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
x
U
177
N/A
12%
9%
15%
23%
36%
9%
0%
14%
15%
15%
21%
9%
30%
18%
14%
9%
36%
45%
45%
18%
18%
36%
6%
50%
41%
15%
27%
41%
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.55
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.45
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.4
Weight
83%
90%
78%
90%
77%
60%
53%
83%
Component
Score
showingwearsinceinstalledin1988
partitionbyfrontentryhaswaterdamage
thatkeepsreoccurring
Skylightsbythefrontentryhavealways
leakedandcannotfindacontractoror
solutiontothisproblem.Thesealsand
glazingareshowingwearfromage
Notes
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
x
E
N/A
Weight
x
0.1
0.6
0.1
x
x
x
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
x
x
x
0.9
0.05
0.05
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.25
U
x
x
P
0.15
0.3
x
F
x
x
G
178
9%
54%
9%
90%
5%
5%
15%
14%
9%
32%
14%
45%
23%
23%
23%
9%
9%
32%
14%
27%
14%
14%
36%
18%
14%
14%
36%
27%
23%
14%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
91%
99%
83%
90%
86%
90%
81%
90%
Component
Score
carpethasbeenreplacedbutisshowing
wearagain
waterdamagefrontentry,manyhallways
havemuralsaspaintedbythestaff
Nottocurrentcode,butnotfailures
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
x
x
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
F
P
U
179
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
45%
45%
50%
32%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
18%
27%
36%
27%
27%
36%
100%
95%
0.5
0.5
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
1
0.95
45%
45%
0.5
0.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
59%
9%
14%
9%
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.3
9%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
0.05
0.05
Weight
100%
100%
90%
81%
Notes
replacecondensateboildersasneeded
onsprinklersystemonly
hardtogetmakeupairintothesystem;
questionfulloverheadintakelevels
NotRated None
90%
90%
N/A
90%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
E
59%
23%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
59%
23%
9%
39%
15%
6%
x
x
x
0.65
0.25
0.1
41%
23%
9%
18%
0.65
0.25
0.1
x
x
x
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
50%
9%
9%
18%
50%
41%
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
23%
5%
23%
23%
18%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
x
x
N/A
0.55
0.45
U
x
x
P
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
180
NotRated
90%
90%
60%
90%
86%
90%
90%
Notes
tͲ8'sinstalled2010;notincurrentcode
compliancefordaylightcontrols
reachingloadcapacitiesinsomeareas
NotRated None
Component
Score
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
F
P
U
181
N/A
N/A
N/A
68%
23%
68%
23%
45%
23%
68%
23%
45%
15%
68%
23%
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
59%
23%
9%
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.75
0.25
6%
9%
14%
55%
9%
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
68%
23%
41%
23%
9%
18%
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.75
0.25
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
Weight
wearingoutandreplacingformicaas
needed
showingwear
90%
playgroundequipmentneedstobe
replaced
Gateswork
firepanelworksbutneedstobereplaced
Asrequestedbytheprincipal
Notes
60%
90%
68%
90%
90%
90%
90%
93%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
182
183
Aerial Photo
184
Information
Name
Address
101 National Avenue North
Bremerton, WA 98312
11-12 (ages 16-19)
Area of Site
16.44
Tax Parcels
3777-001-001-0101
70,691
Number of Buildings
2
Year Built
1977
Modernizations and
1998 miscellaneous tenant improvement type work for program support.
15
Capacity/Enrollment
500/505
B. Site
The Technical Skills Center is flanked at the west and northwest property lines by a
heavily wooded canopy. A paved zone separates the building from the east edge of the
property, which is grassy and spotted with trees.
C. Exterior Walls
Concrete tilt up walls painted on the exterior and CMU
D. Roof
Single ply Stevens roof installed in 1990
City storm water
F.
Heat pumps to all the areas
185
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Electric schedule 43. Some gas to kitchen and paint booth.
H. Controls
ATS
I.
City water
Water
J.
Electrical
Schedule 43
K. Security System
None
L. Intercom System
Electricom
M. Clocks
None
N. Fire Alarm
Edwards
186
187
WEST SOUND TECHNICAL SKILLS CENTER SITE
188
WEST SOUND TECHNICAL SKILLS CENTER
FacilityName: WestSoundTechnicalSkillsCenter
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
BuildingType:SkillsCenter
Component
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
74%
N/A
57%
90%
90%
44%
57%
N/A
51%
77%
6%
60%
53%
80%
NotRated
60%
86%
90%
33%
90%
N/A
69%
86%
60%
38%
N/A
BCAScore
2.94
2.94
0.00
N/A
2.57
2.57
0.00
1.08
1.08
3.71
0.00
3.71
N/A
7.76
4.18
3.53
0.02
0.03
3.01
2.36
0.20
NotRated
0.45
7.90
4.28
1.80
0.40
0.05
N/A
1.38
4.52
2.14
0.06
2.21
N/A
189
190
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
56%
N/A
90%
44%
75%
90%
NotRated
63%
63%
69%
78%
100%
100%
NotRated
84%
90%
86%
60%
60%
60%
60%
NotRated
NotRated
90%
60%
90%
68%
68%
NotRated
68%
60%
60%
0.11
0.00
N/A
4.83
3.87
0.84
0.08
0.05
10.74
NotRated
2.46
8.07
0.14
0.08
2.61
2.60
0.01
8.61
NotRated
0.97
0.90
6.75
1.08
0.30
0.30
0.36
0.12
0.18
NotRated
NotRated
0.18
0.06
0.06
4.06
0.09
1.44
2.03
NotRated
0.50
0.66
0.60
0.06
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
WestSoundTechnicalSkillsCenter
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
27%
36%
27%
36%
0.3
0.4
9%
3%
27%
18%
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
18%
15%
9%
32%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
SkillsCenter
90%
90%
57%
N/A
74%
Component
Score
Inautomotiveareathepitsaredry
Notes
191
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.3
Weight
0.25
0.1
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
x
x
x
U
0.5
0.25
0.25
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
P
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
192
15%
6%
8%
30%
15%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
3%
18%
9%
36%
14%
9%
9%
9%
24%
N/A
N/A
N/A
11%
3%
3%
41%
8%
9%
27%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
53%
60%
Roofing21yearsoldandduefor
replacement.flatroofslopedsomeusing
insulationin1990
exposedtoelementssince1977andin
needofreplcement
notmanywindowandreworkedin2009
77%
6%
CracksintiltͲupcont,jointsshowwear,
requiremonitoring.Noknownstruct
damage.
singleplyroofinstalledin1990showing
sigsofwearandrequiresrepairseachyear
heaviliycracked
Notes
51%
N/A
57%
44%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
P
U
193
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6%
15%
14%
15%
NotRated
21%
9%
30%
27%
9%
14%
36%
45%
45%
9%
6%
12%
6%
50%
41%
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.55
0.45
N/A
N/A
N/A
6%
15%
23%
36%
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.25
0.3
0.45
24%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.4
Weight
N/A
90%
33%
Allworkasdesigned
hardwarefailingandnopartsavailable
mostareconcreteblock,Temporary
movablepartitionsintheofficeareas
someclassroomareasneedtobereplaced
86%
90%
entryandotherareasareshowingwear
andhavebeeninstalledasbudgetspermit
Notes
60%
NotRated
80%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
E
x
x
x
X
X
x
x
G
Weight
x
x
x
X
X
x
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
x
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
x
x
x
x
X
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
U
0.15
0.3
x
x
x
x
P
x
F
194
9%
54%
9%
N/A
N/A
N/A
15%
5%
6%
21%
9%
N/A
N/A
N/A
15%
5%
3%
11%
5%
18%
9%
9%
24%
27%
9%
14%
36%
18%
15%
9%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
90%
N/A
56%
N/A
38%
60%
86%
69%
Component
Score
wearinginstaledin1977shopareashave
exposedinsulationwhichisnotdarkand
grudgey
somebentsupportsandwaterdamage
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
x
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
U
195
N/A
9%
5%
5%
20%
6%
9%
9%
30%
45%
41%
23%
27%
NotRated
NotRated
33%
21%
9%
33%
21%
9%
18%
27%
24%
27%
27%
24%
100%
95%
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
1
0.95
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
0.05
0.05
Weight
inshopsareaandfiresystemworksas
designedNewcompressorinstalledin
2010fortheshoparea
mainsewerlineinthebudilinghasasag
andneedsconstantmaintenance
Notes
100%
100%
78%
69%
63%
63%
Heatpumponeastsidearefrom1989,
agingandgenerallypoorcondition,HPon
westside(shops)installedin2004inshop
areasinfairtogoodcondition.
seenoteaboveforheatpunmps
NotRated Electricbuilding.Gastothekitchenand
paintboothonly(notheating)
90%
75%
44%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
E
x
39%
15%
6%
NotRated
NotRated
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
x
x
x
x
x
x
39%
15%
6%
39%
15%
6%
0.65
0.25
0.1
x
x
x
27%
15%
6%
12%
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
50%
9%
9%
18%
50%
41%
23%
5%
23%
23%
12%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
x
x
x
x
x
N/A
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
U
x
x
P
0.55
0.45
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
196
NotRated
60%
60%
60%
60%
86%
90%
84%
NotRated
Component
Score
tͲ8'sinstalled2010
Notes
12/28/201
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
E
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
P
U
197
N/A
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
3%
9%
14%
55%
9%
39%
15%
6%
68%
23%
45%
23%
45%
23%
NotRated
NotRated
45%
23%
45%
15%
45%
15%
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
Weight
60%
60%
68%
NotRated
68%
68%
90%
60%
90%
NotRated
Component
Score
gateswork
Notes
12/28/20
198
199
Aerial Photo
200
Information
Name
Address
3400 1st Street
Bremerton, WA 98337
N/A
Area of Site
4.3
Tax Parcels
152401-4-017-2003
31,500
Number of Buildings
1
Year Built
1945
Modernizations and
N.A
Capacity/Enrollment
N/A
B. Site
The Administration Building shares its property with the Renaissance High School.
There is a long grassy expanse directly east of the building, reaching to the far north
property line. Adjacent the east property line is a narrow greenbelt separating a
community track and field. Renaissance uses the gym area for PE.
C. Exterior Walls
Concrete with metal frame in-filled with windows and stucco.
201
D. Roof
Sloped shingle roof with wood trusses over flat roof
City storm water
F.
Boiler with unit ventilators in larger spaces and small units in attic for smaller offices.
No A/C
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Gas
H. Controls
Pneumatic with time clocks
I.
City water
Water
J.
Electrical
Schedule 25
K. Security System
Mountain Alarm
L. Intercom System
None
M. Clocks
None
N. Fire Alarm
Edwards
202
203
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
FacilityName: AdministrationBuilding
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
BuildingType:Administrative
Component
204
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
90%
81%
86%
N/A
NotRated
83%
63%
N/A
69%
81%
80%
60%
48%
56%
65%
75%
90%
90%
90%
90%
N/A
90%
99%
99%
83%
N/A
BCAScore
4.74
4.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0.00
NotRated
6.97
3.13
3.84
N/A
8.63
4.50
2.43
1.60
0.10
3.41
3.21
0.07
0.06
0.07
7.62
2.48
0.22
3.66
0.09
N/A
1.18
9.54
0.91
0.04
5.19
N/A
Component
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
86%
3.40
0.00
N/A
3.07
0.67
0.51
1.89
0.00
7.87
1.02
5.77
NotRated
0.82
0.26
3.15
2.71
0.44
13.38
0.00
3.86
0.26
9.25
1.92
0.73
0.97
0.22
NotRated
0.72
0.24
0.24
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0.00
0.37
0.22
0.15
N/A
73%
90%
45%
72%
90%
56%
NotRated
36%
36%
90%
90%
90%
90%
60%
96%
90%
60%
90%
NotRated
100%
100%
96%
0%
90%
90%
90%
N/A
90%
90%
90%
205
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
AdministrationBuilding
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Componentand
E
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
G
N/A
N/A
N/A
NotRated
NotRated
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
9%
41%
27%
18%
23%
9%
32%
27%
23%
9%
32%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
X
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
P
X
F
Administrative
NotRated
N/A
86%
81%
90%
Component
Score
somesettlingovertheyears
structuralysound
Notes
206
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
G
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
F
X
X
P
U
207
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
18%
14%
14%
24%
27%
9%
36%
9%
18%
15%
23%
9%
9%
6%
30%
15%
15%
6%
23%
8%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
11%
6%
6%
41%
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
N/A
N/A
N/A
15%
27%
41%
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.5
0.25
0.25
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.3
Weight
48%
60%
80%
81%
69%
N/A
63%
83%
Component
Score
Asphaltroofisinneedofreplacement
windowsinstalledinthe80'saredouble
pane
Asphaltroofisinneedofreplacement
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.55
0.45
0.4
0.1
X
X
X
X
0.3
0.2
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.4
Weight
X
X
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.5
0.5
U
X
X
X
X
X
P
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
X
X
X
X
X
F
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
G
208
N/A
N/A
N/A
50%
41%
36%
9%
27%
18%
45%
45%
27%
14%
14%
36%
32%
14%
30%
6%
8%
14%
15%
23%
9%
8%
15%
24%
12%
Assessment
CategoryScore
N/A
90%
90%
90%
90%
75%
65%
56%
Component
Score
Notes
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
X
X
X
X
X
X
E
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
x
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
G
X
x
x
F
P
U
209
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
15%
14%
9%
32%
14%
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
36%
9%
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.6
0.1
23%
9%
9%
32%
14%
30%
14%
15%
40%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
30%
14%
15%
40%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
27%
23%
0.3
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
14%
27%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.3
Weight
73%
N/A
86%
N/A
83%
99%
99%
90%
Component
Score
showingwearsincesomeisglueontile
thatasrefinishedin1997butisstartingto
bedated
installedin1997andstartingtoshow
somewear
1997
redonein1997
Notes
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
X
X
E
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
0.95
1
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.55
0.35
0.1
X
X
0.5
0.5
0.45
0.25
0.3
x
x
X
X
0.5
0.5
Weight
X
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
X
U
X
X
X
X
X
P
0.1
0.05
0.05
x
F
X
X
G
210
95%
90%
18%
18%
0%
18%
18%
0%
17%
0%
NotRated
50%
0%
6%
45%
45%
41%
23%
9%
45%
0%
59%
9%
14%
9%
9%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
aircontrolswithatimeclockneeds
updatedfixedsupplyairlouvers
aircontrolsforheating
nosprinklersinthebuilding
Notes
100%
90%
36%
36%
None
Manyunitvetalatorsforeachlargespace.
Installedinthe80'sandnoiseyplusvery
littlecontrolforcomfort
NotRated evaporatorinSupsarea,andACin
computerserververarea
56%
90%
72%
45%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
X
X
X
E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
G
x
x
x
X
X
F
P
U
211
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
14%
14%
36%
27%
23%
5%
23%
23%
18%
33%
27%
55%
9%
14%
18%
41%
23%
9%
18%
39%
15%
6%
59%
23%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
65%
25%
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.55
0.45
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.05
Weight
100%
Notes
someveryoldpanelsinforsomeareas
NotRated None
90%
60%
90%
96%
60%
90%
90%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
x
x
U
N/A
Weight
X
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
X
X
0.75
0.25
X
X
N/A
N/A
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
x
x
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
x
x
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
x
x
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
0.65
0.25
0.1
X
X
X
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
P
X
X
X
X
F
0.1
X
X
X
G
X
E
212
68%
23%
68%
23%
68%
23%
N/A
N/A
68%
23%
68%
23%
68%
23%
0%
0%
0%
9%
9%
14%
55%
9%
45%
25%
10%
20%
10%
Assessment
CategoryScore
90%
90%
90%
N/A
90%
90%
90%
0%
96%
100%
Component
Score
None
audio/visualequipmentisgood
gatesonlyandtheywork
Noneusepnumaticcontrolsforheating
Notes
12/28/20
213
Aerial Photo
214
Information
Name
Address
200 Bruenn Avenue
Bremerton, WA 98312
N/A
Area of Site –
3.5
Tax Parcels
3826-000-002-0004
40,100
Number of Buildings
1
Year Built
1947
Modernizations and
1985 converted to support building
N/A
Capacity/Enrollment
N/A
B. Site
Consolidated Facilities sits on an industrial site, This site is the location for the District
transportation, warehouse, grounds and maintenance departments. Needs parking for
busses,,trucks, and service equipment and maintenance vehicles and parking for bus
drivers and maintenance people.
C. Exterior Walls
Masonry and wood frame
215
D. Roof
Wood frame flat roof with built up roofing system
City storm
F.
Electric resistance heating in all occupied spaces
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Electric
H. Controls
In some individual thermostats with an old load shedding controls
I.
Water
City
J.
Electrical
PSE schedule 43
K. Security System
none
L. Intercom System
none
M. Clocks
none
N. Fire Alarm
Old Gamewell Zans 200
O. Fire Sprinkler
In paint shop and fire storage room
216
217
CONSOLIDATED FACILITIES SITE
218
CONSOLIDATED FACILITIES
Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals*
Main Building
1
30,673
30,673
219
FacilityName: ConsolidatedFacilities
BuildingName:
Date: 10/31/2011
BuildingType:MaintenanceandOperations
Component
220
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
ComponentScore
38%
N/A
56%
30%
39%
24%
14%
N/A
47%
14%
48%
30%
0%
23%
26%
30%
17%
NotRated
60%
N/A
51%
53%
33%
30%
41%
N/A
BCAScore
0.81
0.81
0.00
N/A
4.92
4.92
0.00
1.15
1.15
1.44
0.00
1.44
N/A
8.75
1.99
1.78
4.96
0.02
0.32
0.00
0.06
0.04
0.23
0.35
0.09
NotRated
0.15
N/A
0.00
0.11
0.92
0.04
0.03
0.81
N/A
Component
D10ͲConveying
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
33%
0.03
0.00
N/A
4.60
3.79
0.71
0.06
0.05
3.35
NotRated
3.20
N/A
NotRated
0.15
0.82
0.81
0.01
5.39
NotRated
0.87
0.30
4.23
3.60
1.80
1.80
NotRated
NotRated
0.17
NotRated
NotRated
0.17
0.00
NotRated
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
N/A
0.08
0.18
NotRated
0.18
N/A
72%
71%
60%
90%
NotRated
41%
N/A
NotRated
48%
60%
60%
NotRated
83%
30%
36%
90%
90%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
85%
NotRated
60%
60%
60%
N/A
60%
NotRated
60%
221
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
10/31/2011
ConsolidatedFacilities
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Componentand
E
G
X
X
X
X
F
X
X
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
X
X
X
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
U
X
X
X
X
P
9%
12%
9%
9%
12%
5%
6%
27%
18%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
15%
3%
11%
Assessment
CategoryScore
MaintenanceandOperations
oldboilerroomisblowgradeandhas
waterproblemsandcondensateproblem
becauseoflackofventalation
Asbestosareaandconnotenterbuthave
beentoldthereisstandingwaterunder
sounthendofthebuidling
39%
Slabongradeinpartofthewarehouse
areathatwasinstalledinthe80's
None
Old1040'sfoundationstillholdingbutis
startingtohaveproblems
Notes
30%
56%
N/A
38%
Component
Score
222
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
X
G
X
X
X
X
X
F
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
P
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
U
223
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
9%
5%
24%
9%
0%
0%
5%
6%
23%
8%
6%
3%
3%
15%
8%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
0%
0%
0%
14%
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.5
0.25
0.25
15%
9%
0%
18%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.3
Weight
Oldwoodframeindowswithsingleply
glass.Puttyisfailingandaredifficultto
open.
Olddoorswithadequatelocksand
hardwareforsecurity.
Oldventsthatareneededforrestrooms
andotherareaswork.Therearenot
screens.
Flatroofwithnoupgradedsafetysystems.
Guttersundersizedandmanymiising
sealantsthathavecrackedorbeen
damagedbybirdsovertheyears
14%
48%
30%
0%
None
N/A
keepsoutelemetsbutisinpoorshape
withnomaintenaceperformedoverthe
past20years.Needsinsulation.
flatroofisinbadshapeandhasbeen
patchedforthepast20yearstoattempt
tokeepoutwater.
14%
47%
woodfloorislevelbutinpoorshape.No
finishleftandisdeteriating.
Notes
24%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
G
X
X
X
NotRated
NotRated
0.5
0.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.55
0.45
15%
9%
27%
N/A
N/A
24%
6%
18%
12%
0%
5%
0%
12%
11%
5%
15%
6%
8%
5%
8%
0%
3%
0%
8%
12%
0%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.4
Weight
0.4
0.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
U
0.3
0.2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
P
X
X
X
F
224
51%
N/A
60%
Notes
Mostarelatheandplasterandhave
erosionfromwaterandpeelingpaint.
porchesinpoorshape
allinverypoorshape
Allflashinghavefailedandarenow
caulkingmaterial.Everyhtingelseisold
anddeteriating.
woodflooringislevelbutwearing
None
Lockssecureareasandthatisaboutit.
NotRated None
17%
30%
26%
23%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
E
X
X
G
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
F
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
P
X
X
X
U
225
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8%
5%
3%
21%
5%
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
N/A
N/A
N/A
9%
36%
9%
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.6
0.1
0%
5%
3%
21%
5%
9%
5%
5%
12%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
9%
0%
0%
24%
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
18%
8%
0.3
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
9%
18%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.3
Weight
Systemisoldbutwellmaintained
None
N/A
72%
Waterdamagedceilingwithpatchwork
coveringareas,therestisinneedof
maintenance
None
N/A
33%
concreteokayforwarehousebuttherest
oftheflooringisinverypoorshape
Allinpoorshape
30%
41%
Waterdamageandpeelingpaintorno
paintleft.
Wherethereisgridiswasinstalledinthe
80'sandhassomewaterdamge.
Notes
33%
53%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
G
X
X
X
X
X
F
X
X
X
X
P
U
226
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.95
1
86%
60%
18%
18%
12%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.55
0.35
0.1
17%
21%
3%
NotRated
NotRated
0.5
0.5
0.55
0.35
0.1
41%
23%
27%
45%
15%
39%
9%
14%
9%
9%
5%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
0.1
0.05
0.05
Weight
compressorsforshopsareadequateand
working.
tiedtothecitysewersystemandthereis
nofireloop
Inoldprintroomandnotused.
Allelectricstripresistanceheat.Wall
thermastatcontrols
90%
60%
48%
sprinklersysteminthepaintshopanda
storageroom.
extinguishersarewhererequiredand
certifiedannually
ventsworkasdesignedandwindowsopen
NotRated None
N/A
41%
Notes
oldbutisworkingfine
NotRated Allelectric
90%
60%
71%
Component
Score
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
G
X
X
F
X
X
X
X
X
P
U
227
N/A
5%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
23%
5%
23%
15%
18%
17%
14%
17%
3%
5%
12%
41%
23%
9%
18%
59%
23%
9%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
0.55
0.45
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
oldtechnologywitht12"sinplacedas
needed.Switchcontrols.
upgradedin2008
36%
90%
NotRated None
NotRated None
NotRated None
upgradedin2008
Stillsomefusepanelswiththeoldwiring
leftinthebuilding.
30%
90%
Newserviceinstalledinthe80'swhen
kitchenwashereandisingoodshape
Notes
83%
NotRated None
Component
Score
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
X
E
X
G
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
X
X
X
X
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
X
X
45%
15%
NotRated
NotRated
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
45%
15%
N/A
N/A
45%
15%
45%
15%
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
45%
15%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.75
0.25
9%
6%
9%
55%
6%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
Weight
N/A
N/A
N/A
X
X
U
N/A
N/A
P
X
X
X
X
X
F
228
adequateforbuilding
None
60%
adequateforbuilding
NotRated None
60%
N/A
shopequipmentadequate
adequateforbuilding
60%
60%
docksgatesandequipmentworkandare
serviceble
Oldfirepanelstillpassesconfidencetests
butusesolddevices.
Notes
60%
NotRated
85%
NotRated None
Component
Score
12/28/20
229
Aerial Photo
230
Information
Name
Address
Bremerton, WA 98310
7-8
Area of Site –
31.05
Tax Parcels
122401-2-037-2006
136,359
Number of Buildings
1
Year Built
1956
Modernizations and
1960, 1962, 1967, 1978 (Removed from OSPI roles 2007)
57
Capacity/Enrollment
1,247/Currently off roles
B. Site
The Child Nutritional Services Center sits on 31 acres which includes a baseball field,
softball field and four tennis courts. The property line serves a football field and track,
which is shared with the View Ridge Elementary property, at its northeast corner.
Further to the northeast is a heavily wooded area separating the property from a
residential neighborhood.
C. Exterior Walls
Concrete with metal frame with windows infill. Most windows are broken
D. Roof
Built up roof on a slope over existing flat roof system
City storm
F.
Boiler for gym area only and a gas force air system for the kitchen area
Mechanical System
G. Fuel Source
Gas
H. Controls
None
231
I.
Water
City water
J.
Electrical
Schedule 31 campus with View Ridge
K. Security System
Sonitrol
L. Intercom System
None
M. Clocks
None
N. Fire Alarm
Silent Knight
232
233
CHILD NUTRITIONAL SERVICES CENTER
Area
Number
Area Name
SF Factor
Totals*
1
1954 Main Building
1
74,975
2
1954 Classroom Building G
(D-Wing)
1
4,800
3
Gymnasium
1
18,760
4
1960 C-Wing Addition
1
4,306
5
1962 B-Wing Addition
1
6,720
6
1967 Small Gym Addition.
1
7,984
7
1967 H-Wing Addition
1
2,304
8
1978 Science Building (I-Wing)
1
5,040
9
1978 A-Wing Addition
1
6,720
10
1978 Office Addition
1
4,750
234
136,359
* Actual square footage figures are approximate. No accurate data available.
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
BuildingType:CentralKitchen
Component
A10ͲFoundations
A20ͲWalls
A40ͲSlabsonGrade
A4040ͲPitsandBases
B10ͲSuperstructure
B1080ͲStairs
B3010ͲRoofing
C2010ͲWallFinishes
C2030ͲFlooring
D10ͲConveying
CentralKitchen(ratingkitchenareaonly,smallportionofbuilding)
OldBremertonJuniorHighSchool
10/31/2011
OverallBCAScore:
ComponentScore
57%
50%
60%
N/A
51%
60%
47%
N/A
60%
35%
81%
60%
38%
45%
38%
60%
65%
45%
48%
44%
N/A
NotRated
51%
42%
48%
N/A
33%
N/A
68%
86%
51.36
BCAScore
3.24
3.24
0.00
0.00
4.70
4.70
N/A
0.24
0.24
2.42
0.00
2.42
N/A
8.81
7.15
0.70
0.80
0.17
2.45
2.38
0.02
0.02
0.03
6.71
3.26
0.06
3.34
0.05
N/A
NotRated
6.40
1.13
0.52
2.94
N/A
1.81
0.00
N/A
5.76
1.05
1.20
235
Component
236
D30ͲHVAC
D3060ͲVentilation
D40ͲFireProtection
D50ͲElectrical
D5040ͲLighting
D60ͲCommunication
E10ͲEquipment
E20ͲFurnishings
ComponentScore
BCAScore
60%
N/A
3.50
N/A
4.89
0.70
2.37
N/A
1.44
0.38
1.92
1.49
0.43
1.86
NotRated
0.23
0.19
1.44
0.08
0.04
0.04
N/A
NotRated
0.13
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.00
0.00
1.65
0.10
0.71
0.00
N/A
0.84
0.09
0.06
0.03
60%
50%
N/A
60%
51%
60%
60%
NotRated
39%
30%
36%
60%
60%
N/A
NotRated
60%
60%
82%
0%
53%
53%
60%
N/A
60%
30%
30%
SchoolDistrict:
FacilityName:
BuildingName:
Evaluator'sName:
Evaluator'sCompany:
Date:
CentralKitchen(ratingkitchenareaonly,smallportionofbuilding)
OldBremertonJuniorHighSchool
10/31/2011
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterLeaks
Cracks&Separation
Drainage
Vegetation
WaterPenetration
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
A4040ͲPitsandBases
Settling
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
Drainage
Membraneintegrity
Componentand
E
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
P
U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
18%
24%
0.3
0.4
9%
6%
27%
18%
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
18%
15%
6%
11%
18%
15%
3%
21%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.1
0.35
Weight
CentralKitchen
oldboilerroom
50%
51%
N/A
60%
Partofthebuilding.Onlyratingthe
kitchenarea
Notes
57%
Component
Score
237
Settling
Levelness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Structuraldamage
B1080ͲStairs
Structuraldamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterPenetration
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
WaterPenetration
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Hinges
Locks
Door
Closers
Windows&Grills
Weatherstripping
Structuraldamage
Screens
Componentssecure
B3010ͲRoofing
Safetysystems
Slopesandrunoffs
Componentand
E
x
x
x
G
0.3
0.15
0.4
0.15
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.1
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.3
0.45
0.3
Weight
x
x
0.25
0.1
0.25
0.5
0.25
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
x
U
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
P
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.1
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
238
8%
3%
15%
30%
15%
15%
18%
23%
23%
6%
6%
6%
9%
5%
12%
9%
18%
9%
9%
24%
N/A
N/A
N/A
11%
6%
3%
27%
15%
18%
27%
9%
Assessment
CategoryScore
38%
60%
81%
35%
60%
N/A
47%
60%
Component
Score
mostdownspoutsundersized
oldsinglepaneglazingwithmetalframe
hippedroofoverflatroof.Inpoorshape
onlyrepairingtheareaoverthekitchen
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Levelness
Structuraldamage
Lites
Structuraldamage
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherhoods
Flashings
Componentssecure
Weatherseals
Glazing
Supportstructure
Componentssecure
Coverings
WaterDamage
Plumbness
Structuraldamage
Structuraldamage
Locks
Closers
Componentand
E
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
P
U
239
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6%
8%
9%
8%
8%
21%
9%
30%
18%
14%
9%
24%
15%
30%
18%
12%
12%
6%
17%
27%
0.1
0.25
0.15
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.55
0.45
N/A
N/A
N/A
6%
8%
8%
24%
0.1
0.25
0.25
0.4
0.25
0.3
0.45
12%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.4
Weight
N/A
44%
48%
45%
65%
60%
38%
45%
Component
Score
Notes
12/28/20
Levelness
Componentssecure
breakage.etc.)
WaterDamage
C2010ͲWallFinishes
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
C2030ͲFlooring
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Sealant
StructuralDamage
Settling
Componentssecure
WaterDamage
Aesthetics
Structuraldamage
Penetrations
InspectionsCurrent
Aesthetics
Functionality
Pressure
Waterquality
Leakage
Componentand
E
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
P
x
x
U
240
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.9
0.05
0.05
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.15
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
9%
36%
9%
N/A
N/A
N/A
8%
0%
0%
21%
5%
N/A
N/A
N/A
15%
5%
3%
21%
5%
9%
5%
5%
24%
18%
5%
5%
24%
NotRated
NotRated
0.3
0.25
0.3
0.15
0.15
0.4
NotRated
NotRated
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.15
0.3
Weight
Notes
68%
N/A
33%
N/A
48%
42%
51%
oldglueontileceilinginpoorshape
oldflooringshowingseverewear
yearsofwearsince1956
NotRated oldglueontileceilinginpoorshape
Component
Score
12/28/20
Fixtures
Waterheaters
Backflowprevention
Flow
Vents
Traps
Cleanouts
Sewer/SepticSystem
Fireloop
Compressor
Distribution
Controls
Distribution
Controls
HeatingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
CoolingUnit
Controls
SupplyAir
Supply&Return
Ducting/Piping
Controls
D3060ͲVentilation
Ducting/Piping
Controls
UptoDateInspection
UptoDateInspection
Componentand
E
x
x
x
x
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
P
U
241
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
18%
18%
24%
9%
18%
24%
60%
57%
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
1
0.95
33%
11%
6%
0.55
0.35
0.1
0.55
0.35
0.1
30%
30%
0.5
0.5
30%
30%
0.5
0.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
59%
9%
9%
9%
0.65
0.1
0.15
0.1
0.45
0.25
0.3
6%
3%
5%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
0.05
0.05
Weight
60%
60%
51%
60%
N/A
50%
60%
N/A
60%
86%
Component
Score
installednewductingforroofexistingroof
topunit
usingrooftopsystemsinceslabfloor
heatngsystemisfailing
Notes
12/28/20
Componentssecure
Testschedule
Maintenanceschedule
Generatorunit
Controls
Transformers
Vaults
MainSubpanels
EMT,wiring
Motors
Branchpanels
Branchwiring
D5040ͲLighting
Fixtures
Switches,wiring
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Connectivity
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Distribution
Componentand
E
G
x
x
39%
15%
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
N/A
N/A
N/A
39%
15%
6%
27%
15%
6%
12%
17%
3%
5%
12%
17%
14%
0.65
0.25
0.1
0.65
0.25
0.1
x
x
x
0.55
0.1
0.15
0.2
x
x
x
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.55
0.45
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
NotRated
0.15
0.15
0.4
0.3
15%
3%
8%
8%
6%
3%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.05
Weight
x
x
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
x
x
x
U
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.25
0.2
P
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
242
60%
NotRated
N/A
60%
60%
36%
30%
39%
NotRated
Component
Score
comesthroughaseparateroominthe
closedpartofthebuilding
everythingisold
Notes
12/28/20
Controls
Components
Distribution
Controls
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
UptoDateInspection
Coverage
Components
Distribution
Controls
Components
Controls
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Functionality
Componentand
x
E
G
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
F
x
x
x
x
x
x
P
x
x
x
U
243
45%
15%
23%
8%
23%
8%
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
45%
8%
0.75
0.25
N/A
N/A
45%
8%
0.75
0.25
0.75
0.25
0%
0%
0%
0.65
0.25
0.1
N/A
N/A
6%
6%
9%
55%
6%
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.55
0.1
45%
15%
27%
15%
6%
12%
0.45
0.25
0.1
0.2
0.75
0.25
6%
Assessment
CategoryScore
0.1
Weight
N/A
N/A
N/A
30%
30%
60%
N/A
60%
53%
53%
0%
82%
60%
Component
Score
couldbemorefunctionaliflayedout
differently
gateswork
Alsocoverstheclosedpartofthebuilding
Notes
12/28/20
244
Chapter 2
Long Range Educational and Facilities Plan
(2)
Long Range (i.e., minimum of six years) educational and facilities plan setting forth the projected facility needs and
priorities of the District based on the educational plan.
245
246
2. Long-Range Educational and
Facilities Plan
Community
The Bremerton School District is located in Kitsap County and primarily serves people in the City of Bremerton though there are
areas of the School District that include unincorporated Kitsap County beyond the city limits. The City of Bremerton has a population of approximately 38,000, while the District encompasses a larger area with a population of approximately 45,000 people.
Bremerton is located on the Puget Sound. The city fronts waterways in multiple directions with Sinclair Inlet to the south, Dyes
Inlet crosses between east and west Bremerton, and Port Orchard Bay is to the east. Bremerton is a transportation hub for the
Olympic Peninsula area with car ferry service connection to downtown Seattle and highways connecting Bremerton to the rest of
the peninsula as well as to the Tacoma Narrows. Bremerton is the largest city on the Olympic Peninsula.
The Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Naval Base Kitsap are the largest employers in Bremerton; Harrison Hospital is the largest
private employer. Additionally there are many small and mid-sized business as well as significant retail stores.
School District
The School District serves a student population of approximately 5,200 students in Kindergarten through Grade 12. The District
also offers preschool and Early Childhood Care and Education Partnership (ECEAP) programs.
Improving student achievement is the District’s primary goal.
The Bremerton School District supports a diverse population and prides itself on meeting the needs of ALL students. It has
established its HOPE Goals:
H - Hold high expectations for students, staff and parents
O - Offer options of opportunities for students to achieve
P - Provide safe, supportive, respectful, informative learning environments for students and staff.
E - Encourage partnerships with families/communities
To support this mission, the District makes a focused effort to support programs and initiatives that reach out to a variety of
students and families across the District. The School District provides free All-Day Kindergarten Programs and a broad range of
special education and Title I programs. These programs have received state and national recognition. After-school and earlymorning tutoring programs are available to help students reach both their educational goals and state standards.
The student population is very diverse, 45% of the population is Non-white and / or multi-racial. Approximately 60% of the
students are on free or reduced lunch plans (compared to the state average of 43%). To better respond to the diversity of the
population and the diversity of learning styles and student needs, the District provides a broad variety of educational options for
students.
247
The efforts of the District are somewhat successful as reflected in the recent graduation rates. For 2010, the estimated on time
graduation rate was 81% and the actual cohort graduation rate was 75%, both exceeding the state average of 76% and 72%
respectively. This graduation rate reflects significant improvement from a rate that was frequently below 50% 8-10 years ago.
Standardized test scores are generally at or slightly below state averages, the District continues to focus on improvement this
area as well.
School Facilities
The Bremerton School District has the following facilities for PK-12 education:
Grade Level
School Name
Special focus/ Programs
PK-3
Comprehensive K-3, Spanish emersion option K-4
PK-5
Comprehensive Elementary
PK-5
Crown Hill Elementary School
PK-5
PK-5
PK-6
West Hills STEM Academy
Comprehensive K-3, STEM 4-6, Montessori 4-8 by 2013 option K-3
6-8
Comprehensive Middle School
9-12
Comprehensive High School
11-12
Alternative High School
11-12
West Sound Regional Skill Center
Bremerton is the Host District for the Regional Skills Center
248
Additionally the District offers the Alliance Academy for Partnership and support of Home School Students and parents; this does
not have a spate facility.
Educational Programs
Goals
+
Increase achievement by offering options for students and families
+
+
Increase achievement by providing services and programs to support a broad variety of student needs.
Develop partnerships with community
+
Support Students needs early to foster development of academic skills in younger learners
General
The curriculum at the Bremerton School District follows current best practices that include project based learning which engages
the student beyond traditional lectures. Students will frequently work independently and in small groups as well as with the full
class. This educational delivery method inherently uses more space than old lecture format education because students need
space to move, meet in small groups or focus on independent work while other students are working on different activities
nearby.
Special Education
All Bremerton schools, grades PK-12, follow an inclusion model for teaching students with special needs. This model helps
students learn in the classroom setting along with their peers. Each school has an inclusion classroom which provides additional
support for students needing more direct instruction in small groups. Every effort is also made to keep students at their home
school. By recognizing each child’s differences, the District provides the instruction and support services needed to help make
sure that every child achieves. To assist with this, the District provides services such as Occupational Therapy (OT), Speech
Language Pathology (SLP), Physical Therapy (PT), English Language Learners (ELL) and Psychological Services at every school.
The Bremerton School District recognizes there is a high “at risk” population in Bremerton. The homeless population has
doubled; the District provides Family Rooms at some schools that are valuable to supporting core needs of these at risks
students. The District collaborates with other community organizations in this effort. More space is needed to accommodate
family rooms.
The special education services provided at the schools require a significant amount of building area for the specialist to work
with students. The extent of these programs puts a high demand on the building areas throughout the District such that all
permanent facilities are fully utilized and portables are needed at some schools to support the needs of Special Ed Programs.
The Special Education program also includes a Highly Capable Program for students that can benefit from a more challenging
academic load. This is offered for students after first grade who have been assessed by the District to be highly capable.
Preschool
The District provides to a network of Early Childhood Care and Education Partnership (ECEAP) programs for 3-5 year old
students. This has proven to be successful preparing students for kindergarten; prior to this program (started in 2001) 4% of
the kindergarten students in Bremerton knew their letters, that number is now 64%. Bremerton works in partnership with early
education and preschool providers including preschools, head start programs, and faith based programs to increase foundational
skills in literacy, math, focus and self-control.
The Bremerton School District also provides services to special needs pre-school students. There are currently 4 classrooms in the
District dedicated to these students.
Future needs – Provide a Preschool at each elementary to improve achievement by building strong foundations and
reducing transitions.
Kindergarten
Bremerton offers free full day kindergarten for all students which provides students added learning time. On average, between
88% - 98% of the kindergarteners are reading at or above the benchmark by the yearend.
Future needs – Meet the need of the stated proposal that in 2015 all schools will have state funded full-day
kindergarten. Continue to monitor Kindergarten programs, best practices, student achievement and student needs.
249
Elementary
Comprehensive - The School District offers a fully comprehensive elementary school curriculum for K-5 students, this includes
in-class instruction following the District’s standard curriculum with regular specialist including Music, Health and Fitness, and
Multi-media. The elementary schools also provide special education services to assist students with specific needs based on
their IEP. Special Education programs are as noted previously in this chapter. In following the inclusive model, each school has a
special education support room, and each elementay school has a full time interventionist.
Future needs – Engineering is Elementary (EIE) is a STEM type program that is being integrated into the core
curriculum at all elementary schools. Another new program is ACHIEVE 3000. A program geared to enhance
informational learning in Science and Social Studies. No added space is currently attributed to these programs.
Additionally, provide better infrastructure to support future technology needs. Conditions at schools are not always
conducive for education – refer to Building Conditions and chapters 7 and 8 for specific changes proposed.
Spanish Immersion – Naval Avenue Early Learning Center offers an optional Spanish immersion program for K-4 students. This
program is intended for non-Spanish speaking students to learn the standard core elementary school curriculum in a Spanish
speaking setting so that students learn the Spanish language inclusively with other core subjects. This program is open to all
students in the district and to out of District students too. The program currently has 7 classrooms of students.
250
Future needs – The program is planned to grow to provide a K-8 Spanish Immersion option. Added classroom space
may be needed at that time.
Montessori - A free public Montessori option is offered for grades 1-3 at West Hills STEM Academy.
Future needs - The program will expand in school year 2012-13 to add another classroom and expand the grade
levels served. Added classroom space is required to accommodate this.
STEM – In school year 2011-12, The District began offering a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) focused
academy for preschool and 4-6 grade learners. This is housed at West Hills STEM Academy. This curriculum follows STEM
principals for a deeply integrated/cross department approach. The student learning is project based and through the course of
the project the students will learn and apply skills in math, science, writing, social studies, and reading along with the integrated
use of technology and engineering. STEM programs typically require more space than traditional programs because of the
integrated nature of the program requires the uses of different equipment and facilities (such as science labs and technology
labs) routinely though the day rather than as a scheduled class. The STEM program in Bremerton has open enrollment and
accepts all students from the district and from other Districts. The number of out of district attendees is expected to increase as
the program becomes more established.
Future needs - This program is scheduled to expand to include 7th grade in school year 2012-13, and 8th grade
the following year (2 classes per grade have are proposed). The longer range vision includes integrating some STEM
principals into the standard education for K-3 students. The District plans to use the “Project Lead the Way”
curriculum for middle school students. With the added enrollment and grade levels, added space will be needed for
classrooms, labs, technology, as well as added space for lunchroom and health and fitness programs to accomodate
the added students
Middle School
Comprehensive –The School District offers a full comprehensive middle school curriculum for 6-8 grade students at Mountain
View Middle School. The typical school day is set up with 8 periods (including lunch) blocked into 2 parts and follows a departmental model. Students have a broad offering of programs including core academic and elective classes that are geared toward
preparing student for high school. The Middle School also provides special educatin and Title 1 for students as well as honors
classes.
Future needs - Middle School curriculum is planned to introduce more STEM type programs and options into the
comprehensive school. No facility changes are proposed with this program.
STEM Middle School – As noted above, the West Hills STEM Academy will expand to provide the STEM option for middle
school age students. West Hills STEM Academy is geographically located in a different part of the District from Mountain View
Middle School so West Hills could be a geographic option for Middle School Students on the west part of Bremerton.
High School
Standard – The School District offers comprehensive high school curriculum for 9-12 grade students that generally follows
a departmental model. Students have 8 periods in the typical school day including lunch. The School has a broad offering
of programs including core academic courses and elective classes as well as Special Education, a behavioral program and a
“Drawbridge” program which merges two subjects in one class. The academic program is designed to prepare students for
higher education, the work place and to be good citizens.
251
Future needs - Improve infrastructure for technology.
Alternative - The School District offers an alternative high school at a separate campus as a school of choice. This School offers
all required curriculum for earning a Washington State High School Diploma with options available for the foreign language
requirement necessary to attend a 4-year university for 11th-12th grade.
Future needs - The Alternative school option is planned to expand to offer programs for 9th and 10th grades.
Technical Skill Center – 10th and 11th grade students may attend the regional technical skills center which offers career
specific training in various technical fields. The skill center has a separate 10 year plan document that is being produces
separately from this study and survey
Future needs - Future needs / changes will be addressed in the separate 10 year plan. They have been submitted to
OSPI for skill centers.
252
The Long-Range Facilities Plan of the
District
The District constructed new facilities as additions at the High School and Middle School Level in 2005-2008. The other school
facilities range from 18-25 years old or since their last modernization. These buildings reflect the issues to be expected from
buildings of this age in that many core components are at the end of their usable life. Additionally the some of the spaces and
layouts of the schools are not conducive to the current educational needs.
The District obtained input from the following sources to identify the long-range plan.
+
The Citizen’s Facilities Advisory Committee
+
+
+
The Capital Facilities Plan
Functional needs observed or reported by District staff
Maintenance needs observed or reported by District staff
+
District Leadership Committee
Based on the input collected from these sources, the following long-range needs were identified:
+
+
Facility Issues to address in 1-4 Years:
– Roof replacement at Bremerton HS and West Hills STEM Academy
– Middle School STEM program Addition at West Hills STEM Academy
–
–
–
–
New central kitchen /Child Nutritional Services Center
Upgrade fire alarm panels to meet new codes
Roof replacement at Kitsap Lake, Crown Hill, View Ridge and Administration Building
General energy upgrades
–
Updated student technology Facilities
Facility Issues to address in 5-9 Years:
– Replace Naval Avenue Elementary school*
– Improve restrooms and concession area at Memorial Stadium
– Replace carpeting at schools
– Replace or rebuild the Facilities/Transportation building
–
–
–
Replace telephone system
Add additional surveillance cameras for safety
Demolish old East High building except for gyms
253
+
Facilities Issues to address in 10+ Years:
–
–
–
Replace the BHS Auto Shop *
Replace boilers in need of replacement
Fix parking and traffic issues at West Hills, Crown Hill, Kitsap Lake, View Ridge, Armin Jahr, and Bremerton HS.
–
–
Upgrade sports fields at Mountain View Middle School, Memorial Stadium, and old East High site
Add fire sprinklers to the Administration Building
–
–
–
–
Purchase additional classroom technology
Upgrade building access with electronic access control
Replacement of View Ridge – possibly on the Trenton site*
Modernization or replacement of Armin Jahr*
–
–
Modernization of Kitsap Lake*
Modernization and addition to West Hills STEM Academy
* indicates that the project is anticipated to receive OSPI matching funds
Anticipated Outcomes of the Study
The anticipated outcomes of the study and resultant actions are:
254
1.
To ensure that students are housed in facilities that are safe, healthful and supportive.
2.
To ensure that facilities are capable of supporting the Bremerton School District’s educational programs.
3.
To ensure that - at various points in time - the student capacities of school facilities are matched to the expected
number and location of students.
4.
To ensure that school facilities are provided and operated through the most cost-effective process including reduced
maintenance needs and energy cost.
Chapter 3
Demographic Data
(3)
Demographic data including population projections and projected economic growth and development.
255
256
3. Demographic Data
Census Data
The 2010 census information for the City of Bremerton reports 37,729 people, this is a 1.3% increase from 2000; this percentage increase is significantly lower than the Statewide population change which increased by 14.1%. Some other notable areas
where the Bremerton’s census information compares with the statewide average:.
Bremerton
Statewide average
Racial diversity (% of whites)
74.0%
77.3%
High School Graduates
88.6%
89.4% (based on % of people over 25 and older)
People with bachelor’s degrees 19.6%
30.8% (based on % of people over 25 and older)
Home Ownership rate
41.5%
65.3%
Per capita income
$21,726
$29.320
People in poverty
19.4%
11.8%
At the time this study and survey was written, the unemployment rate is listed at 7.5% compared to a state average of 9.1%.
Evaluation of Data
The overall population of Bremerton has remained somewhat level since the 1970s (approximately 36,000 then), over this same
time period the State population has basically doubled, so by comparison Bremerton has become a smaller city relative to other
places in the state. Based on the history of Bremerton and the current data, the population and general demographics are likely
to remain stable inside the City. The City had developed a plan to foster growth but due to the recession, the City has not seen
the anticipated growth; it remains to be seen if that grown will occur after economic recovery has taken place.
The lower than average home ownership rate in Bremerton reflects the impact of the Navy population that is more transient and
needs rentals. Other factors are that a large portion of the housing stock is aging (from the 1940s and 50s), newer houses that
meet the contemporary buyers needs are more frequently developed outside of the City, thus the older houses generally remain
in Bremerton as rentals while new home ownership expands outside of the City. The aging homes tend to have lower rents
and provide housing for the lower income population which then affects the overall averages listed in the census. Some new
housingdevelopments are occurring in Bremerton including a large proposed multi-phased redevelopment of the West Park area.
The first phase of work at the Bay Vista Development at West Park is a mix of commercial with residential, the developer has
agreed that the project will have an impact of an added 53 students in the next couple of years.
Implications to School District
Educationally, the implications are that the School District population tends to have higher free and reduced lunch and higher
special needs among students. The general demographics indicate that the parents in Bremerton are less likely to have college
degrees (other data indicates that their children of parents who have not attended college are less likely to attend college
themselves). While the census shows the level of higher education is significantly lower, the high school graduation rate
essentially matches the state average. The Bremerton School District can take some level of credit for that because the School
District has a relatively high graduation rate despite the challenges of this demographic.
257
The Bremerton School District includes area beyond the City of Bremerton; the total population listed in the area of the School
District is 44,966. Kitsap County on the whole has grown significantly in the past 10 years, some of that growth has been in
unincorporated areas around Bremerton. The areas of Enetai and Tracyton in east Bremerton have seen more growth than the
city. This area has a fairly strong commercial area along Wheaton Way, the area includes Harrison Hospital and it generally has
higher housing values.
The Cohort projections from OSPI (at end of this section) indicate very modest growth in the next 5 years. The demographic
information appears to support a similar expectation. The School District has taken on new programs such as free all-day
kindergarten, a Montessori program option, and STEM elementary option that may prove to be attractive for prospective families
to start their children in Bremerton and continue in the District. Due to these types of changes, the enrollment in the District
is expected to grow at a rate faster than the census growth or Cohort projections would indicate. The Census and Cohort do
not account for changes (that data looks back on what has happened). The District will need to track the success of the new
programs to better project how they will affect enrolment beyond the effect of the total population growth.
Economic
The top employers in Bremerton include Naval Base Kitsap, the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Harrison Hospital, Teletech, the
Bremerton School District and Olympic College.
258
The retail core of Kitsap county has somewhat shifted to Silverdale over the preceding decades. The City of Bremerton’s comprehensive plan and vision is that the revitalized downtown core will be an incentive for more housing and better density, which can
then better support more business and jobs.
From early 2000 to the start of the recession in 2008, the City of Bremerton had made notable efforts to improve economic
vitality in the City. This includes several projects to revitalize the downtown core of Bremerton, the Ferry terminal and the
waterfront. This development was to be a basis to spur further private development. The recession stalled several of these
programs; however some are showing signs of returning to life. The first phase of the West park housing development is in
progress, economic recovery will bring on further development.
The Navy and Shipyard have provided a certain level of stability in Bremerton, potential changes in federal spending could affect
this to some degree but there is no reason to believe there would be any significant changes in the next 6 years. Slow economic
recovery currently tempers expectations of noticeable growth, so the current demographic information indicates continued
stability of the population and likely limited increase in the economic base.
Due in part to the history of the shipyard, Bremerton has a long tradition of skilled manufacturing and production work beyond
the shipyard. This includes production and manufacturing of aerospace products. Recent growth at Boeing is expected to have a
noticeable effect on Bremerton in the role of machining and producing components in support of Boeing’s manufacturing.
OSPPI Cohort Enrollment Projections
259
2010 Census Data for City of Bremerton, WA
Further information
Want more? Browse data sets for Bremerton (city)
People QuickFacts
260
Bremerton
Washington
Population, 2010
Population, percent change, 2000 to 2010
Population, 2000
Persons under 5 years, percent, 2010
Persons under 18 years, percent, 2010
Persons 65 years and over, percent, 2010
Female persons, percent, 2010
37,729
1.3%
37,259
7.0%
19.5%
11.9%
46.9%
6,724,540
14.1%
5,894,121
6.5%
23.5%
12.3%
50.2%
White persons, percent, 2010 (a)
Black persons, percent, 2010 (a)
American Indian and Alaska Native persons, percent, 2010 (a)
Asian persons, percent, 2010 (a)
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, percent, 2010 (a)
Persons reporting two or more races, percent, 2010
Persons of Hispanic or Latino origin, percent, 2010 (b)
White persons not Hispanic, percent, 2010
74.0%
6.7%
2.0%
5.5%
1.3%
7.6%
9.6%
69.5%
77.3%
3.6%
1.5%
7.2%
0.6%
4.7%
11.2%
72.5%
Living in same house 1 year & over, 2005-2009
Foreign born persons, percent, 2005-2009
Language other than English spoken at home, pct age 5+, 2005-2009
High school graduates, percent of persons age 25+, 2005-2009
Bachelor's degree or higher, pct of persons age 25+, 2005-2009
74.6%
7.4%
11.0%
88.6%
19.6%
81.1%
12.1%
16.5%
89.4%
30.8%
Housing units, 2010
Homeownership rate, 2005-2009
Housing units in multi-unit structures, percent, 2005-2009
Median value of owner-occupied housing units, 2005-2009
Households, 2005-2009
Persons per household, 2005-2009
Per capita money income in past 12 months (2009 dollars) 2005-2009
Median household income 2005-2009
People of all ages in poverty - percent, 2005-2009
17,273
41.5%
42.5%
$210,200
15,009
2.32
$21,726
$38,060
19.4%
2,885,677
65.3%
25.9%
$277,600
2,512,327
2.52
$29,320
$56,384
11.8%
Business QuickFacts
Total number of firms, 2007
Black-owned firms, percent, 2007
American Indian and Alaska Native owned firms, percent, 2007
Asian-owned firms, percent, 2007
Hispanic-owned firms, percent, 2007
Women-owned firms, percent, 2007
Manufacturers shipments, 2007 ($1000)
Merchant wholesaler sales, 2007 ($1000)
Retail sales, 2007 ($1000)
Retail sales per capita, 2007
Accommodation and food services sales, 2007 ($1000)
Geography QuickFacts
Land area in square miles, 2010
Persons per square mile, 2010
Bremerton
2,450
S
S
S
F
31.7%
NA
177,409
696,388
$19,850
64,932
Bremerton
28.41
1,328.2
Washington
551,340
S
1.2%
6.8%
3.2%
28.7%
112,053,283
76,790,966
92,968,519
$14,380
12,389,422
Washington
66,455.52
101.2
Chapter 4
Ability to Provide Capital Funding Support
261
262
4. Ability to Provide Capital Funding
Support
TThe Bremerton School District is currently a district that meets the statutory and fiscal requirements for eligibility to compete for
state assistance for construction projects. The Bremerton School District currently has available bonding capacity.
Assessed Valuation
Assessed valuation in 2011
Non voted capacity
Remaining capacity
Outstanding debt
= $3,454,947,204
=
$12,971,981
= $149,991,634
=
$22,967,273
Allowable bonded indebtedness
=
$177,458,900
There is a current outstanding bond amount of $30,578,525 with 14 years remaining to pay off. The tax rate on that bond is
1.07 / $1000
There is a current $ $43,000,000 M&O levy that is in year 1. The tax rate on the levy is $3.065.
State Assistance
The 2011 state Construction Cost Allowance is $188.55.
The Bremerton School District match ratio in 2011 is 56.33.
The School District has capital facilities that are eligible for matching funds and the District intends to address maintenance and
facility needs that are not matchable.
Per the proposed Phase I plan, the District would seek voter approval of a Capital Levy in 2012 of approximately $7.5-8.0
million over 4 years.
Additionally, the Phase II plan would propose a Capital Bond in or around 2016 that would seek another $40 +/- million in
local funds. This amount would be supplemented by anticipated state matching funds to complete the proposed projects.
263
264
Chapter 5
Existence of a School Housing Emergency
265
266
5. Existence of a School Housing
Emergency
No housing emergency exists per the definition contained in WAC 180-27-115(1). No current district schools have been
damaged from catastrophes or natural disasters such as fire, earthquakes, wind damage, or other related structural failures.
267
268
Chapter 6
Racial Balance or Imbalance
(6)
The need to improve racial balance and/or avoid creation or aggravation of racial balance.
269
270
6. Racial Balance or Imbalance
Racial Minorities make up approximately 45% of the district’s population. Minority enrollment is well distributed among the
District’s schools.
The Bremerton School District prides itself on its goal of meeting the needs of ALL students. The District is supportive toward
diversity and providing an inclusive learning environment for students from diverse backgrounds. There are no schools in
Bremerton that have a disproportionate minority population relative to other schools in the District of the same grade span. The
need does not exist to improve racial balance between the schools.
271
272
Chapter 7
Type and Extent of New and/or Additions to Existing School Facilities
(7)
The type and extent of new and/or additions to existing school facilities required and the urgency of need for such
facilities.
273
274
7. Type and Extent of New and/or
Additions to Existing School Facilities
Space Needs and Usage Throughout the District
The current OSPI formulas for Square foot per student are such that the Bremerton School District is not due matching funds for
unhoused students. The OSPI formulas for area per student do not correlate accurately with the spatial needs of a District like
Bremerton that is committed to meeting the broad spectrum of student needs and special program required for its population, as
a result, the District has needs for additional space to support student learning.
General curriculum needs at Bremerton required more space than the state formulas because the curriculum at the Bremerton
School District follows current best practices that include project based learning. This educational delivery method inherently
uses more space than old lecture format education because students need space to move, meet in small groups or focus as an
individual while other students are working on different activities nearby.
Bremerton’s focus on meeting the needs of all learners includes offering options for students to respond to different learning
styles in a diverse population. Options mean more programs which often require added space . This use of space is not fully
accounted for in the OSPI formulas.
275
Meeting the Special Education and Special Needs programs in Bremerton also requires space that is not fully accounted for in
the OSPI formulas. The inclusive model of special education (as described in Chapter 2) is a valuable component in the improved
student achievement that Bremerton has seen. The variety of special programs require space, even with multiple special ed
programs sharing common spaces, the net result is that many spaces within schools are used for student areas in special
education programs.
Description of Needs for New Facilities and/or Additions to Existing
Schools
In following the long range educational plans listed in Chapter 2 of this Study and Survey, West Hills STEM academy needs to
provide additional area to support the growth in the STEM program and in the Montessori Program.
The STEM program is scheduled to expand from K-6 to add 7th grade in school year 2012-13 and then 8th grade the subsequent year. This growth will require at least 2 – 3 added classrooms per grade level plus an added science room and an added
Computer / Technology Lab.
West Hills STEM academy is also home to the District’s Montessori option program. This program is planned to grow by one
grade level in school year 2012-13, so one added classroom is needed for this program.
The added grade levels and enrolment place an added burden on the core facilities. Specifically the current Multi-purpose room
which provides both Gym and Lunchrooms functions. To accommodate the growth at the school, it is proposed that a new Gym
space is constructed for Health and Fitness classes and the multipurpose room continue to serve as a lunch room with expanded
serving periods to accommodate the larger enrollment.
The increase in both the Montessori and STEM programs at West Hills reflects the District’s commitment to providing options.
These programs are both open to out of District Students, the number of these students is expected to grow so the District
will need added space. The location of West Hills is near the highway and convenience for out of district parents. Space is also
needed because the STEM program was put into an existing elementary school. The Addition will provide improved facilities for
Science and Technology. STEM programs typically require more space than traditional programs because the integrated nature of
the program requires students to use different equipment and areas (such as science labs and technology labs) routinely though
the day as part of project work rather than as a scheduled class.
Proposed Added Areas/Cost
Program Space
276
Area SF
Qty
Tot Area
Cost / SF
Tot Cost
Montessori Classroom
930
1
930
200
186,000
7th Grade Classroom
930
3
2,790
200
558,000
8th Grade Classroom
930
2
1,860
200
372,000
Science Lab
1,100
1
1,100
230
253,000
Tech Lab
1,100
1
1,100
200
220,000
Gym incl Storage
3,200
1
3,200
210
672,000
3,520
200
704,000
Grossing Factor *
Subtot Construction Cost
14,500 SF
2,965,000
Soft Cost**
1,035,000
Total Cost
4,000,000
* Grossing Factor approx. 32% of net area for circulation, stairs, and small support areas
** Soft cost approx. 35% for permitting, taxes, design fees, surveys and other non-construction cost
Cost listed are in 2011 dollars based on current costs and bid climate.
Chapter 8
Cost Benefit Analysis for Modernization or Replacement of Existing
School Facilities
(8)
A cost/benefit analysis on the need to modernize and/or replace existing school facilities in order to meet current educational needs and the current State building code.
277
278
8. Cost Benefit Analysis for Modernization
or Replacement of Existing School
Facilities
General
The Bremerton School District has an aging stock of buildings throughout the District. The following is not the entire list of
buildings, rather a list of the main educational buildings:
School
View Ridge Elementary
Naval Ave Early Learning Ctr
Armin Jahr Elementary
Kitsap Lake Elementary
Crown Hill Elementary
Mountain View MS Main Bldg
Mountian View MS 6th Grade Bldg
Bremerton HS Main Bldg
Bremerton HS Addition
Bremerton HS Auto Shop
Year built
1952
1957
1968
1988
1992
1996
1993
2008
1988
2006
1940’s
Last modernized
1994
1994
1993
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
1970
Year Eligible
2024
2024
2023
now
2012
2026
2023
2038
now
2036
now
OSPI SF
37,984
37,342
34,895
48,207
48,932
47,815
98,568
38,951
90,363
26,785
5,400
Projects eligible for the State Construction Assistance Program are planned to receive state matching funds. As of 2011: the
construction cost allowance is 188.55/SF of eligible space; Bremerton’s match is 56.33%. The state also provides a partial level
of matching funds for project soft costs such as VE, Constructability, Ed Specs, ELCCA, Construction Management, etc.
Costs listed in the following analysis are in 2011 dollars and based off current market conditions. Inflation and escalations
factors will effect actual budgetting for year work occurs.
General Consideration for Modernization or New-in-Lieu Construction
A modernization generally has a lower basic construction cost option since it re-uses some of the existing building components.
A modernization of a school would typically improve the building condition score and the functionality though the aging
components often require more ongoing maintenance in the future. An evaluation would need to be done of the existing building to confirm that modernizing the existing spaces can allow the building to adequately meet the educational specifications and
program needs at the school.
New-in-lieu construction is often a better option if the existing building and/or site layout are inherently inefficient, ineffective or
otherwise compromise the use, functionality, and safety of the school.
Modernization of an occupied school also adds complexity for phasing. Portables can provide temporary classrooms to vacate
279
a portion of the building though there is a cost for the portables and the multiple moves of programs. Some spaces are unique
such as Gyms, kitchens and boiler rooms and cannot be relocated to portables; special accommodations and / or compromises
may be needed to allow construction in these areas. New-in-lieu construction can avoid these phasing problems if the site has
adequate space to construct the new building while the existing building is occupied. If the site does not have space or the space
is a poor location for the new building, then a new-in-lieu option is subject to the same phasing issues as a modernization.
A School District may consider that some cost premium for new in lieu is a better long term value over a modernization. Factors
that are often considered are: if the new in lieu construction offers a better use of the site, better response to the educational
needs, reduced long term maintenance and operational cost, improved safety, improved health (such as air quality), and reduced
disruption to learning during construction.
Description of Needs for Modernization and/or Replacement of School
Facilities
1.
The School District has identified the building at Naval Avenue as high priority for replacement. This school is has the lowest
building condition rating in the District, it requires a high level of maintenance, and it is the worst energy performer in the
District. The building is 1-story and has 7 portables (typically double-room portables); this sprawling campus is less conducive to
supporting the District’s goals for integrated, inclusive education and connection with the community.
280
The building was originally constructed in 1957 of moderate to lower construction quality. It received a modernization and small
addition in 1994 that has extended the life of the building, yet the aging facility requires increasing resources from the District to
maintain it.
The layout and use of the site is poor in that there is no parking along the front of the building; supervision of visitors to the
building is not ideal since visitors do not need to walk past the office to enter the building. A driveway to the parking area
crosses between the building and the playfield which requires added supervision.
The Naval Avenue site has adequate and approriate space to locate new-in-lieu construction. The estimated project cost indicates
about a 10% premium for a new-in-lieu option. Considering the benefit of improving the site layout, building layout and ability
to meet programatic needs as well as reduce disruption during construction would appear to make the new-in lieu option a
better value for this site. A more detailed analysis will be expected when funds allow for this project to proceed.
Naval Modernization Option
mod (a.)
site
selective demo
ext GCs (b.)
contingency (c.)
Naval New-in-Lieu Option
qty
unit
$/unit
cost
37,342
SF
150
5,601,300
700,000
new/lieu (a.)
1
LS
37,342
SF
2
74,684
12
mo
12,000
144,000
ext GCs
782,398
contingency
12%
site
demo
qty
unit
$/unit
cost
37,342
SF
205
7,094,980
1
LF
37,342
SF
10%
7,302,382
soft cost
temp housing (d.)
TOTAL
920,953
10
CR
100,000
1,000,000
11,223,335
1,000,000
5
186,710
828,169
9,109,859
soft cost
temp housing
TOTAL
3,188,451
0
12,298,310
Footnotes:
a. Assumed no addition. If final programming indicated added area is needed there will be added cost.
b. Mod of occupied building requires phasing that is anticipated to extend construction period by 12 months, Contractor will have addedoverhead
cost for phasing and extended time on site.
c. Mod typically has higher change order rate for unknown conditions, allow 2% extra contingency for that.
d. Mod of occupied building will require temporary classrooms in order to vacate a portion of the existing building. Assume
10 added portable classrooms are required (approximately 1/3 of the program areas) during construction.
Estimated State match assistance approximately 34,342 x 188.55 x ~15%* x 56.33 = 4,561,000, this same amount of
assistance applies to either Modernization of New-in-lieu. OSPI records indicate building is not eligable until after 2024 for State
Capitol Assistance Program.
*15% represents approximation of match on soft costs
2.
The School District has identified specific needs at West Hills that need to be address due to an aging building. The Building was
originally constructed in 1988 of moderate construction quality and remains in fair condition. Several components or systems
within the building are nearing the end of their useful life including the roof, flooring, and mechanical components.
Also, the use of the building has changed to become a STEM focused school will that serve grades K-8. An addition is required
as noted in chapter 7. The STEM program has adapted reasonably well into the existing building though significant interior
remodel is needed to respond to program needs. The layout generally works well and the building is well located on the site.
Improvements to the parking and drop-off areas are needed to improve poor site circulation.
The West Hills site has adequate and approriate space to locate new-in-lieu construction. The estimated project cost indicates
about a 19% premium for a new-in-lieu option. Considering the general adequacy of the existing building and use of the site,
Modernization would appear to be a better value for this project.
West Hills Modernization Option
mod (a.)
site
selective demo
ext GCs (b.)
contingency (c.)
West Hills New-in-Lieu Option
qty
unit
$/unit
cost
48,207
SF
125
6,025,875
1
LS
700,000
new/lieu (a.)
site
48,207
SF
1.5
72,311
12
mo
12,000
144,000
ext GCs
833,062
contingency
12%
demo
qty
unit
$/unit
cost
48,207
SF
205
9,159,330
1
LF
48,207
SF
10%
7,775,248
soft cost
temp housing(d.)
10
CR
TOTAL
100,000
5
241,035
1,040,037
11,440,402
3,110,099
soft cost
1,000,000
temp housing
11,885,347
1,000,000
TOTAL
4,004,141
0
15,444,542
- See Naval Avenue for footnotes (pg 284)
Estimated State match assistance approximately 48,207x 188.55 x ~15%* x 56.33 = 5,888,000, this same amount of
assistance applies to either Modernization of New-in-lieu. Building is currently eligible for the State Capital Assistance Program.
281
3.
View Ridge Elementary
View Ridge Elementary was originally constructed in 1952, received additions in 1960, 1967, and 1994 and was modernized in
1994. The condition of the building is fair yet it is aging and requires significant improvement to many systems and components.
The layout of the building is somewhat fragmented due to the nature of additions that have occurred at different times and in
different areas. The site layout is unusual in that the main parking area is across the city street from the entrance, though the
primary traffic on the street is for the school, yet people must cross the road to go from the parking and drop-off area to the
entrance.
The location of the school is only ½ mile away from Armin Jahr elementary, it would be preferable to if the elementary schools
were each more central to their draw area. The District does own property on Trenton Way approximately 1 mile away which
would allow better separation of the elementary schools.
A cost comparison shows that new-in-lieu will likely cost about 14% more than modernization. Further analysis beyond a Study
and Survey may be needed to determine if modernization can reasonably meet the educational specifications for the View Ridge.
There is room on the current site to accommodate new-in-lieu construction while leaving the existing building occupied but the
the District may determine that the Trenton location is better and that would be the compelling driver for new-in-lieu.
View Ridge Modernization Option
282
mod (a.)
site
selective demo
ext GCs (b.)
contingency (c.)
View Ridge New-in-Lieu Option
qty
unit
$/unit
cost
37,984
SF
140
5,317,760
1
LS
37,984
SF
2
75,968
12
mo
12,000
144,000
ext GCs
748,527
contingency
700,000
12%
new/lieu (a.)
site
demo
qty
unit
$/unit
37,984
SF
190
1
LF
37,984
SF
10%
6,986,255
soft cost
temp housing (d.)
2,794,502
10
CR
TOTAL
100,000
1,000,000
10,780,758
cost
7,216,960
1,000,000
5
189,920
840,688
9,247,568
soft cost
temp housing
TOTAL
3,236,649
0
12,484,217
- see naval avenue footnotes (pg 284).
Estimated State match assistance approximately 48,207x 188.55 x ~15%* x 56.33 = 4,639,000, this same amount of
assistant applies to either Modernization of New-in-lieu. OSPI records indicate building is not elligible until after 2024 for State
Capital Assistance Program.
4.
Bremerton High School Auto Shop
The Auto Shop is a stand alone building that was originally constructed in 1940 for Kitsap Transit and purchased by the District
in 1970. It has not been improved and it is in poor condition. The building location is across the street from the rest of the High
School which requires students to cross the arterial to get to and from class. A safer option would be to reconstruct the building
area on the main schools site. The current Auto Shop land could be used to improve parking and traffic around the school.
The premium for new-in-lieu is about 5%. There is very little value in the existing building. A replacement appears to be a better
value considering it offers more flexibility for the use of space and routing of utilities. A new-in-lieu option would allow the
District the flexibility to construct this area to serve a different program if the District determined that a different elective would
better serve the educational needs in the District.
Auto Shop Modernization Option
mod (a.)
site
selective demo
ext GCs (b.)
contingency (c.)
Auto Shop New-in-Lieu Option
qty
unit
$/unit
cost
5,400
SF
115
621,000
new/lieu (a.)
1
LS
300,000
site
5,400
SF
2
10,800
NIC
12%
demo
ext GCs
111,816
contingency
qty
unit
$/unit
cost
5,400
SF
130
702,000
1
LF
5,400
SF
temp housing (d.)
417,446
NIC
TOTAL
27,000
102,900
1,131,900
soft cost
temp housing
1,461,062
5
NIC
10%
1,043,616
soft cost
300,000
TOTAL
396,165
NIC
1,528,065
- See Naval Avenue for footnotes (pg 284)
Estimated State match assistance approximately 5400x 188.55 x ~15%* x 56.33 = 659,000, this same amount of assistant
applies to either Modernization of New-in-lieu. Building is currently eligible for the State Capital Assistance Program.
283
Modernization Replacement of Educational Support Facilities
5.
The Districts transportation and maintenance departments operate from the consolidated facilities building. This is a former
elementary school that was built in the 1947 that had been converted in 1985 to for its current use. The building has not
received a proper modernization, it is aging and in generally in poor condition. It has received maintenance as needed though
the primary focus of District resources on toward maintaining school buildings.
This is also the transportation center for the district; the current layout of the site is not condusive for all of the District buses. The
site is large enough but the building layout blocks effective use of the site. The existing building is approximately 40,000 SF, it is
reasonable to expect that a replacement building could be 25,000 SF and likely meet the needs with improved efficiency from
spaces designed for the intended uses.
Consolidated Facilities New-in-Lieu
qty
unit
$/unit
new
25,000
SF
170
site
1
LS
40,000
SF
selective demo
contingency
cost
4,250,000
1,000,000
5
200,000
10%
545,000
5,995,000
284
soft cost
2,098,250
temp transportation lot
200,000
TOTAL
8,293,250
This is anticipated to receive NO State matching funds as the facility is not for direct instruction.
6.
Child Nutrition Services
Child Nutrition Services provide the central food service to the schools in the District. This facility is currently located in the former
Junior High building. This building was rated poor in the 2005 Study and Survey and was recommended to be demolished at that
time. The District did not have the funds for demolition at that time nor did it have a location for the Student Nutrition Services to
be located if it were demolished. The building is 6 years older and remains in poor condition. New facilities are required for the
food services.
Student Nutritional Services New
qty
unit
$/unit
cost
new
3,000
SF
400
1,200,000
site
1
LS
equipment*
40,000
SF
contingency
10%
400,000
5
300,000
200,000
2,090,000
soft cost
TOTAL
836,000
2,926,000
* assumes reuse and relocation of some equipment.
This is anticipated to receive NO State matching funds as the facility is not for direct instruction.
7.
Miscellaneous Projects
The following are other smaller capital works projects identified as necessary in the district. These are not eligible for State
Capital Assistance Program Matching funds.
Project Name
Approx. Cost
Bremerton High School Re-Roof
2,000,000
West Hills Re-Roof
700,000
Kitsap Lake Re-Roof
600,000
Crown Hill Re-Roof
600,000
View Ridge Re-Roof
600,000
Administration Building Re-Roof
500,000
Memorial Stadium Restroom / Concessions
400,000
Upgrade Fire Alarm Panels multiple sites
500,000
Update student technology
500,000
Replace carpeting– multiple sites
900,000
Replace telephone system – District wide
300,000
Add Surveillance cameras
100,000
Demolish old East High building except for gyms
1,200,000
Fix parking and traffic issues at West Hills,
Crown Hill, Kitsap Lake, View Ridge, Armin Jahr,
and Bremerton HS.
1,200,000
Upgrade sports fields at MVMS,
Memorial Stadium, and old East High site
1,500,000
Add fire sprinklers to the Administration Building
Comments
May be done as part of a modernization
285
286
Chapter 9
Estimated Capital Cost to Restore Major Facility Systems Due to
Deferred Maintenance
(9)
The need and the estimated capital cost to restore, to design specifications, the major systems and subsystems in the
facilities that have deteriorated due to deferred maintenance.
287
288
9. Estimated Capital Cost to Restore
Major Facility Systems Due to Deferred
Maintenance
Deferred Maintenance
Bremerton School District has been vigilant in the maintenance of the District’s facilities. While most of the schools are aging,
they have been consistently cared for, protecting the original investment. Many school systems are, despite this on-going care,
near the end of their useful life and modernization is proposed on that basis.
Upon review of these facilities and the required Capital Projects, none can be described as being the result of deferred
maintenance. Any projects anticipated are the result of Educational needs, required code or ADA upgrades, WSSP related energy
efficiency upgrades, or replacement of systems due to age.
289
290
Chapter 10
Time Line
(10) A documentation of the District’s time line for completion of the school facilities project.
291
292
10. Capital Facilities Project Timelines
West Hills
West Hills
Bremerton
STEM Add
Re-Roof
HS Re-Roof
Misc Proj
Naval
Replacement
West Hills View Ridge
STEM
Mod/NL
Mod
01/16
01/17
04/15
04/16
04/17
03/16
03/17
03/18
06/16
06/17
06/18
08/13
07/17
07/18
07/19
09/13
09/17
09/18
09/19
01/12
Start Design
04/12
04/12
04/12
Bid
10/12
10/12
10/12
Construction
01/13
04/13
04/13
Move-In
08/13
08/13
Start School
09/13
09/13
Ongoing 2012-2016
01/15
Master Planning
293
294
Chapter 11
Inventory of Unused or Underutilized School Facilities in Neighboring
Districts
(11) An inventory of accessible unused or under-utilized school facilities in neighboring school districts and the physical
condition of such school facilities, letters from adjacent school districts regarding their ability to provide facilities to house
non-resident students, and the physical condition of any such facilities.
295
296
11. Inventory of Unused or Underutilized
School Facilities in Neighboring
Districts
A survey of neighboring School Districts was conducted to determine if unused or underutilized space was available that would
be appropriate for the identified needs of the Bremerton School District. Letters were sent to the adjacent School Districts:
Central Kitsap School District and South Kitsap School District. The potential space available will not meet the identified needs of
the Bremerton School District without significant capital investment.
The Bremerton School Board of Directors passed a resolution stating that the survey has been completed. A copy of the
resolution is included in this chapter along with copies of the returned survey letters.
297
298
299
300
Chapter 12
Need to Adjust School Attendance Areas
(12) The need for adjustments of school attendance areas among or within such districts.
301
302
12.Attendance Boundaries
As indicated in Chapter 2 – Long-Range Educational and Facilities Plan, the District has made changes to various educational
programs; proposed future facility improvements will accommodate more students in these programs. Adjustments to attendance
boundaries within the District may be required at some point in the future, but no adjustments are specifically identified as
required based on this Study and Survey.
303
304

Bremerton School District No. 100-C

Transcription

Similar documents

Eco linE 60/245 – 260 W

04-20 Silverdale burglaries

Untitled - MBTA.com

MARK40 - Eurolaite

Temperature Indicators and Industrial Coatings

Final Chapter 8 PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL