Definisi Penilaian Kinerja - MMPT

Transcription

Penilaian Kinerja
Tenaga Pendidik
dan
Kependidikan
Titi Savitri Prihatiningsih
Magister Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi
Sekolah Pascasarjana
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Free Powerpoint Templates
Page 1
Topik Presentasi
Definisi Penilaian Kinerja
Tujuan Penilaian Kinerja
Bagaimana cara melakukan
Penilaian Kinerja?
Manfaat Penilaian Kinerja
Page 2
Definisi Penilaian Kinerja
Penilaian kinerja adalah suatu sistem manajemen formal yang
melakukan evaluasi terhadap mutu kinerja individu di dalam stuatu
organisasi.
Kinerja adalah ‘hasil kerja’
Page 3
Tujuan Penilaian Kinerja
Page 4
(Grote, 2002)Free Powerpoint Templates
Page 5
(Grote, 2002)
Page 6
Performance Cycle
Page 7
Performance
Planning
Performance
Renewal
Performance
Review
Perforamnce
Execution
Performance
Assessment
Page 8
Performance Planning
Page 9
Page 10
Setting Goals
Page 11
SMART
Page 12
Performance Execution
Page 13
Superior’s Duties
Page 14
Employee’s Responsibility
Page 15
Performance Assessment
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Performance Review
Page 21
Superior’s Responsibility
Page 22
Page 23
Performance Appraisal Form
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Appraisal Methods
Graphic Rating Scale Techniques
Alternation Ranking Method
Paired Comparison Method
Critical incident method
Behaviorally anchored rating scales
Page 28
Who?
Immediate supervisor
Peer Appraisal
Rating Committee
Self-Rating
Subordinates
Page 29
Evaluating Academic Staff
Performance
Page 30
Key Requirements
Practicallity
Relevance
Comprehensive
Evaluation
Sensitivity
Freedom from
contamination
Reliability
Acceptability
Page 31
Key Guidelines for
Process Requirements
Process is
important
Willingness to
change
Expect
Resistance
Flexible
Individual
differences
Several review
levels and
appeal process
Evaluate the
programme
Page 32
Key Guidelines
A clear linkage
with academic
rewards
Complete and
accurate way
In line with
Government
regulation
To improve
quality of faculty
performance
Participatory
approach
Transparant
performance
standards
Triangulation
Reliable and
valid data
Supported by
top-level
Good
administrative
backup
Training of
evaluators
The cost vs the
benefits
Page 33
Precautions
Evaluation by competent persons
Instrument should be designed openly
Individual items and the contexts
Avoid power play
Comprehensive evaluation
Page 34
Evaluating
Teaching Performance
Reconceptualize the task
Make teaching a priority
Create a context that is faculty centred
Be concrete and specific in setting performance expectations
Establish expectations for continuous review
Minimize the potential for conflict
Recognize and support improvement
Page 35
The Use of Students Rating
Formative feedback
for teaching
Evaluation for
teaching
effectiveness
Programme
Evaluation
Programme
Improvement
• Focused on what can be learned
• Useful, valid and reliable
• Support and mentoring
• Greatest opportunity to observe teaching
• The intended beneficiaries
• Accreditation requirement
• Focused on teaching methods and learning outcomes
• Course and curriculum review
• Course and curriculum revision
Page 36
Abuses of Student Ratings
Overreliance on Student Ratings in teaching evaluation
Too much too little
Not enough information to make an accurate judgement
Questionable administrative procedures
Using the instrument in appropriately
Insufficient attention to selecting/developing an instrument
Failure to conduct research to support the validity and
reliability of students rating
Page 37
Evaluating Faculty Research
Publication as a senior author
Authorship of scholarly books
Leadership of a programme with extramural funding
National and international awards for recognition
Editorial appointments for professional journals
Active involvement in professional associations
Page 38
Evaluating Faculty Research
Favourable reviewed grant proposals
Invited talks, lectures, readings, performances
Leadership of a programme with extramural funding
Appointment of committees
Citations by other scholars
Organizer of national or international conferences
External Examiners
Supervision of PhD Students
Page 39
Guidelines for
Evaluating Researches
Recognize the
purpose of
evaluation
Evaluate the
impact
Read reference
letter
Disciplinespecific ways
Context of the
research
Recognize life
cycle factors
Interdisciplinary
Page 40
Evaluating
Community Services
• Values to Institutions and Departments
• Systematic Documentations
• Impact to society
Page 41
Page 42

Definisi Penilaian Kinerja - MMPT

Transcription

Similar documents

Blue Work Silhouette - Henry Cort Community College

Blue Work Silhouette

Everyday Assistive Technology (AT) in the Classroom

Hexaflexagons! 1 Flexagons - Washington University in St. Louis

Terese Bird [email protected] December 2012

3D Life Sized Cowboy Boot Cake

I ntroduction to PowerPoint

Lifetouch Yearbooks®. We`ll make it easy, you`ll make it great.

Our Design Templates. A Users Guide.

Cath kidston Blad_final

SCALA INFOCHANNEL 5

Ralph H. Houghton