C di I h i ardiac Ischemia in the Critically Ill
Transcription
C di I h i ardiac Ischemia in the Critically Ill
Cardiac C di IIschemia h i in the Critically Ill M Jacka J k MD MS MSc U of Alberta [email protected] Summary Myocardial injury Common Deleterious STEMI - invasive therapy NSTEMI - non-invasive therapy Anticoagulation g Statin 65 y male post gastrectomy NSTEM ACB 10 y ago DES 2 mo ago Heparin bleeds NSTEMI ?ASA ?statin ?plavix ?BB Diagnosis / Significance Definition > 99th ptle of biomarker + Symptoms/ EKG/ Echo/ Nuclear Med Categories I: STEMI II: NSTEMI III, IV, V: related to invasive cardiac procedure Rivers E et al. NEJM 2001; 345: 1368-77 Sepsis 1 p = 0.02 0 75 0.75 Survival Trop NEG Trop POS 0.5 0.25 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Ammann P. J AM Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 2004-9 COPD 1 p = 0.002 0 75 0.75 Survival Trop NEG Trop POS 0.5 0.25 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Baillard C. Int Care Med 2003; 29: 584-9 CHF Horwich TB. Circulation 2003; 108: 833-8 Subarachnoid hemorrhage Tung P. Stroke 2004; 35(2): 548-52 Mortality vs time by ‘troponin elevation group’ Troponin T < 0.01 ng/L Trop T > 0.01 ng/L 12.5% 29.5% Day 30 13.7 34 0.001 Year 1 25 56 0 001 0.001 Year 2 32 66 0.001 Year 3 37 74 0.001 Jacka2 Trop I < 0.15 0 15 mcg/L Trop I > 0.15 0 15 mcg/L 26% 50% Babuin et al1 p ICU C ((n=1657)) Hospital ( 335) (n=335) 0.01 Mortality y vs Troponin p Level 60 p=0 0.0007 0007 50 40 30 Mortality 20 10 0 0-0.14 0.15-0.37 > 0.37 Troponin I (mcg/L) ICU Troponin & Mortality Risk Lim W. Arch Int Med 2006; 166: 2446-54 Classical MI : Presentation Inflammation TNFα IL-1 IL-6 Coagulation PAI 1 PAI-1 FVIII AIII Plts ‘ ‘Stress’ Epi NEpi MI Hypoxia O2 Inflammation (& Coagulation) C l ti ) Hansson G. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1685-1695 Inflammation and MI N = 2457 Serology for inflammatory markers Medical therapy : LMWH vs placebo Invasive therapy stratified by IL-6 IL 6 Lindmark E. JAMA 2001; 286: 2107-13 Inflammation and Myocardial y Injury in Sepsis Trop > 0 0.1 1 Trop < 0 0.1 1 TNF (pcg/mL) p 13 5.7 0.0007 Soluble TNF 1.05 0.43 0.0001 IL-1 0.65 1 0.11 IL-6 358 29 0.0007 IL 8 IL-8 85 65 0 26 0.26 CRP 258 144 0.0002 Ammann P. J AM Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 2004-9 Stress St Landesberg G. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37(7): 1839-45 Management (NSTEMI) Inflammation Coagulation Stress/ Catecholamine State Inflammation Rho Nf KB MMP PGE2 NO LeManach Y et al. Anesthesiology 2008; 108: 1141-6 Statin Withdrawal : ACS Observational Data Platelet Receptor Inhibition In Ischemia Syndrome (PRISM) Statins and ACS: n= 1616 Heeschen C et al. Circulation 2002; 105: 1446-52 How fast do statins work? 8 healthy volunteers, atorvastatin 80 mg OD X 1/52 Laufs U et al. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 1306-7 n = 33, dyslipidemia, atorvastatin 80 mg vs placebo Taneva E et al. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 1002-6 n = 120, vascular surgery, atorvastatin 20 mg vs placebo Durazzo AE et al. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 967-76 Mouse volunteers, endothelium Laufs U et al. Circulation 2000; 102: 3104-10 And…. a word of caution! Kruger PS. Int Care Med 2008; Epub Coagulation Mangano D. NEJM 2006; 354: 353-65 Procoagulant Risk N = 67000 Privately ate y contracted co t acted (by BAYER!) “Increased Increased mortality mortality, renal failure, heart failure,, and stroke associated with aprotinin use” Hiatt WR. NEJM 2006; 355: 2171-3 “ If the FDA asks for bad news news, then we have to have to give (it). But if we don’t have itit, then we can’t can t give it ” Bayer senior executive Hiatt WR. NEJM 2006; 355: 2171-3 Revascularizing with Stents? Shuchman M. N Engl J Med 2007;356:325-328 Survival after Stenting Shuchman M. N Engl J Med 2007;356:325-328 Real World Adoption of DES – Brigham and Women's Women s Hospital P-DES FDA Approval S-DES FDA Approval 100 80 % 60 % ≥ 1 DES % only BMS 40 20 0 Apr 2003 JJun n A Aug g Oct Dec Feb Apr JJun n A Aug g 2004 Jonas et al. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2007;70:175–83 Complications Increase with Off - Label Use of DES 24 Death, MI or target lesion revascularization Off-Label On-Label 18 % 12 6 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Time after initial procedure (months) No. at Risk Off-Label 1817 1757 1514 1476 1428 1313 1253 O L b l 1506 1475 1363 1343 1311 1215 1182 On-Label Win et al. JAMA; 2007;297:2001-9 Aspirin Inhibits cyclo-oxygenase both COX-1 (constitutive) and COX-2 Platelet aggregation response returns after 20% recovery i.e., within 2-4 days Sanderson et al. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:370-80 ASA ‘resistance’ resistance Causes Compliance Dosage <75 mg/day No advantage to doses > 150 mg/day routinely but 325 mg/day required in perioperative period Sanderson et al. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:370-80 Mueller RL. Best Pract Res Clin Haem 2004;17:23-53 ASA – Drug g Interaction with NSAIDs NSAIDs block access of ASA to its binding site on COX-1 Sanderson et al. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:370-80 Thienopyridines Clopidogrel (Plavix) Permanent alteration in the platelet P2Y12 ADP Inhibition of ADP-induced platelet activation and aggregation C ll Collagenand d th thrombin-induced bi i d d activation ti ti also l inhibited Jacobson AK. Best Pract Res Clin Haem 2004;17:55-64 Thienopyridenes Lau WC and Gurbel PA Pharmaceut Res 2006;23:2691-2708 Stress St Beta Blockade History : MI n RRR BHAT : JAMA 1982 247(12): 1707-14 3837 27% Hjalmarson: Lancet 1981 2(8251): 823-7 1395 36% Anon : NEJM 1981 304(14):801-7 1884 45% Patience, Patients! 10 CAST study n = 1689 8 6 placebo 4 Tx 2 0 Echt DS. NEJM 1991; 324: 781-8 Mortality Non-fatal MI 0.08 8 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 Risk HR(95%CI)=0.70(0.56-0.86), p=0.0007 0.06 HR(95%CI)=0.83(0.70-0.99), p=0.035 0.06 0.08 8 Primary Outcome Metoprolol # at Risk 0 P 4177 M 4174 0.0 0.0 Placebo 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 Days 3915 3959 3873 3909 3853 3879 4177 4174 3923 3976 3882 3922 3859 3889 P M All Death 0.0 02 0.01 Risk 0.03 HR(95%CI)=1.33(1.02-1.74), p=0.032 Metoprolol 0.0 Placebo 0 No. at Risk 4177 P 4174 M 10 20 30 Days 4116 4113 4091 4066 4069 4038 0.0 020 Stroke Metoprolol 0.010 Placebo 0.0 0.005 Risk 0.015 HR(95%CI)=2.17(1.26-3.73), p=0.005 0 No. at Risk 4177 P 4174 M 10 20 30 Days 4102 4085 4076 4038 4055 4011 Myocardial infarction Biomarker increase X ULN in patients with MI Biomarker X ULN Metoprolol (N=4174) Placebo (N=4177) P < 4.3 86 92 0.65 > 4.3 74 129 0.0001 • Nonfatal myocardial infarctions – – – – 36% experienced ischemic symptoms (64% asymptomatic) 16% CHF 7% went on to coronary revascularization 3% nonfatal cardiac arrest Independent p postoperative p p predictors of death Predictor HR 95% CI stroke 12 74 12.74 7 77-20 7.77 20.88 88 hypotension 4.32 3.22-5.80 symptomatic MI 3.51 2.02-6.11 y p MI asymptomatic 2.80 1.87-4.19 bradycardia 1.99 1.35-2.92 bleeding l 1.54 1.09-2.16 Summary Myocardial injury Common Deleterious Invasive therapy - STEMI Non-invasive therapy Anticoagulation g Statin Thank you!