Letter to Richard Jordan May 9, 2000
Transcription
Letter to Richard Jordan May 9, 2000
Donald Sommer 2200EnglishAve. Indianapolis,IN 46201 RichardJordan P.O.Box 97 Bloomingdale,IL 60108 Ivan Burgener Paul Sadler G@PY May 9, 2000 Dear Mr. Jordan, Greetingsin Christ. 1. I appreciatedour shortdiscussionlast Saturdayduring the Bible ConferenceandI enjoyedthe messageyou deliveredon forgiveness.I alsohada discussionwith Dan Grosswho encouragedme to contactyou directly regardingthe many longstandingreportsconcerningyour reputatioq consistentstoriesfiom peoplethat I know andrespect. 2. Becausethey involve your integrity, pleaseconfinrr,deny or correctthe information in the following storiesasI havereconstructedthern 3. Before you werehired by the BereanBible Societyyou wereactivelypromoting the doctrinethat the King JamesBible was the perfectlypreservedword of God for the English speakingpeople. You advocatedthat therewereno errorsin the Englishtranslationof the KJV aswe haveit today. You believedthat if someone correctsthe translationbasedon the Greekthat they arein effect alteringGod's word. You were instructedandgreatly influencedby a Bible teacherin Pensacola"FL namedPeterRuckman who wasa very strongadvocateofthat position. At somepoint you cameinto conflict with Ruckmanbecauseof your views aboutmid-Acts dispensationalism.A small group of othermenwere dismissedfrom a Bible Schoolthat PeterRuckmanoperatedbecauseof their mid,dctsposition,amongthosewere Art WatkinsandE.C. Moore. You did not leave wilh thesemen. 4. For a time you pastoreda churchin Selm4 AL which held stronglyto the view that the KJV is the perfectlypreservedword of God. You werealsoactiveas a speakerat Bible conferencesand other activities in Alabamaandneighboring states. Sometime in the late 70'sor early 80'syou madecontactwith C.R. Stam. Eventuallyyou were askedto join the BBS as its president. At somepoint you madean agreementwith Mr. Stamthat you, asthe presidentof the BBS, would not makean issueof your position on the natureof the KJV. Thereis a tape RichardJordanFromDonaldSommer May 10,2000PageI of 5 ' ijr -: ,fit . -,- \\ --.' recordedmeetingofthe BereanBible FellowshipboardofFeb. 5, 1988on which you statethat suchanagreementexistedandyou did in fact breakthat agreement. PastorStambelievedstronglythat the KJV wasa very reliable translationandhe too defendedits authoritybut neverwent to the point of claiming it to be a perfectly preservedtranslation. Likewise, in his writings he frequentlysuggested altematetranslationsofwords andevenwould go to the point of suggestingthat somepassagesrnaynot havereadin the original asthey do in the KJV (e.g.Rom. 8 :l) 5. In the early 80'syou begana Bible training programat the BereanBible Society which eventuallydevelopedinto what today is GraceSchoolof the Bible. While Mr. Stamwasawarethat theseclasseswere going on, he was not awareof all that was beingtaught. It was in theseclassesthat you were teachingthis group ofmen that the KW wasthe perfectlypreservedword ofGod for the Englishspeaking peopleandthat therewasno needto alter the translationbasedon the Greek. Therewere apparentlyother doctrinesaswell that causedcontroversy, particularly on the natureofprayer, but they turnedout to be secondaryissues when comparedto the amountof firror that aroseover the natureofthe KJV. 6. Eventually newswasfiltering backto individuals in the leadershipof the BBS that you were in fact teachingthat the KJV wasa perfectly preservedBible, the translationofwhich couldnot be altered.The issuewentbeyondthe choiie betweenthe TextusReceptusvs. the WestcottandHort text but includedthe actualtranslationofthe words into English. PastorStamandthe bomd ofthe BBS learnedofwhat you wereteachingthroughlettersandtelephonecalls which they receivedfrom individualsthat had heardyou say suchthings at various conferencesand speakingengagements.Peoplewere also learningthesethings through someof the men you weretraining in your schoolat the BBS. I wastold that at onepoint Ted Fellows,who wasattendingyour classes,related to Dick Ware,the pastorat the time in GenoaCity, someof the thingshe had beentaughtin your classes.Dick recognizedimmediatelythat thesewere problematicdoctrines. Among thosedoctrinal issueswasthe abovementioned teachingaboutthe natwe of the KW. 8. At first PastorStamdid not acceptthe storiesthat you wereteachingtlre doctrine of a perfectlypreservedKJV. He choseinitially to ignorethe reports.Becausethe numberofstoriesweremountinghe decidedto confrontyou on theissue.At that time you reassuredPastorStamthat you believedessentiallythe sameas he did aboutthe natureof the KJV. In orderto proveyour sincerityhe askedyou to write an article for the Berean Searchlight statingyour position. The result of that meetingwasthewell-knownadicleof Novermber1986entitled"Reverence Due the King JamesVersionof theBible." 9. Soonafter the article waspublishedthere wasa meetingofthe BBS boardto discusstheseissuesof doctrine,particularlythe issueofthe KJV. Atthat meeting RichardJordanFromDonaldSommer May 10,2000Page2 of 5 G@trYr you apologizedfor all the troublethat the organizationhad experiencedbecause ofyou. You seemedto be truly contrite andrepentant.Accordingto paul Sadler anyoneobservingthe meetingwould comeaway believingthat you admittedto having causeddivision asa result ofyour teachings,that you were sorryyou had doneso, andthat you would try not to further the controversy.A letter was written by PastorSadleressentiallystatingthosefacts.You andthe other board membersreadthe letter beforeit was mailed. No one contestedthe contentof tha letter. 10. At the 1986ThanksgivingDay conferencein Riverdale,IL therewasa heated discussionover the Searchlight article. Therewere severalmenthat hadbeen influencedby your teachingwho wereupsetbecausethey felt that the article deniedthe very things which they hadbeentaughtby you. At onepoint yow wife approachedyou with the article and confiontedyou saying,"This is not what you believe." You wereoverheardto havereplied, "Thesewords don'tmeanwhat you think they do." You were alsoreportedto havesaidto someofthe menthat supportedyou, "Dont believeeverythingyou hear,I believewhat IVe always believed. " 1 1. Whenthe story ofthese statementsreachedPastorStamhe now felt that the issue went beyondthe doctrinebut involved a credibility problemaswell. The issue had now becomepublic andtempersandtensionswere escalating.PastorStam againmet with you severaltimes after the Novemberconferenceto discussthe matter. After thosemeetingshe relatedto Paul Sadlerthat you talkedfor hours andyet he (Stam)still could not figure out exactlywhat your positionwas. 12. It was reportedto me by Paul Sadlerthat PastorStamdiscoveredyou usedthe BBS audio duplicatingequipmentto producea setoftapes that very clearly outlined your position on the KJV. You alsoproduceda secondserieson the issueat a later time (which I believeis the setI listenedto) in which your terminologywas muchmorereserved. 1 3. Eventually everythingreacheda headin August 1987. At this time PastorStam was convincedthat you could not be trustedandthat you did in fact teachthat the KW was a perfectlypreservedBible which could not be corrected.PastorStam also strongly disagreedwith your teachingon prayer. At that boardmeetingit was decidedthat you would be separatedfrom the BBS. Therewasdivision amongthe boardmembersin that somewantedsimply to acceptyour resignation and othersdemandedthat you be fred in order to demonstratehow seriousthey believedyour actionswere. The sidefor terminationwon over andthat ended your relationshipwith the BBS. l+. At somepoint after your terminationfrom the BBS someof the peoplethat were on its mailing list beganto receiveunsolicitedliteraturefrom you. As the newsof this filtered backto the BBS leadershipit becameclear that you obtainedthese namesfrom the BBS offrce. Whenconfrontedwith this fact vou would resoond RichardJordanFromDonaldSommer May 10,2000Page3 of 5 -:\, /i\ -.-)\-\ :-n \\!) ., . r.' that friendsofthose receivingthe mailings hadrequestedthat cbrtainnamesb€ put on your list. However,there was clear evidencethat thesenameswere gatheredthroughrecordsin the office ofthe BBS. They deducedthis by the fact that therewereseveralaccountsof individuals whoserecordon the BBS mailins list had minor errorsin the spelling of their name,a middle initial, the title they usedor someother suchthing. Whenthey receivedliteraturefrom you the same errorswereon t}readdresses of the mailings theyreceived. A story suchasthis was relatedto me by a friend. Many more havetold me that they.neversignedup to receiveinformationfrom you, but their nameswere on the BBS mailing list andthey assumedthat is whereyou got their addresses.No one claimsthat you left the BBS with all the information on the mailing list, but a greatnumberare convincedthat you took namesand addressofa selectgroupof individualsfrom the organizationsrecords. 1 5. I wastold by PastorSadlerthat PastorStamactuallytalked to the postmasterin Chicagoandhe wastold that it is a federaloffensefor an employeeto take information from an organiztion's mailing list whenhe leavesthe organization. The postmasterencouragedthe BBS to prosecute,but after discussionthey believedthat it would be an unscripturalact to bring a fellow believerto court. 1 6. The final story in this sagarevolvesaroundan attemptby someofyour supporters within the BereanBible Fellowshipto try to influencethe vote for boardmembers to favor your doctrinalposition. Therehad beena greatdealof controversyafter your terminationfrom the BBS asto whetheror not you shouldbe allowedto speakat the 1988summerconferenceofthe BBF. Therewas a factionon the boardthat wantedthe BBF to be controlledby thosewho suppoftedyou personallyanddoctrinally. Apparentlya plan wasdevisedby an individual namedRalph Balog (now deceased)to usea political techniqueknown as "bullet voting." He composeda letter in which he encouragedpeoplethat were not membersof the BBF to join the organizationandto vote for only oneof tlree nameson the ballot in the pastoralcategoryeventhoughthereweretwo spots openon the boardin that category. The onethey wererequestedto vote for was Tom Bruschawho was supportiveof you personallyand doctrinally. Ivan Burgenersharedwith me copiesof two lettersin which Balog describedthe plan or in which he encouragedindividualsto vote accordingto his suggestion. According to Ivaq his son-in-lawwas at your houseduringthe springof 1988 when he overhearda groupofmen supportiveofyou discussingbullet voting in your presence.He did not know exactlywhat they weretalking about,but after the plan was later exposedhe realizedthat they musthavebeendiscussingthe idea RalphBalog waspromoting. 17. AlthoughBalog'splanmighttechnicallybejust a politicaltechniqueandnot illegal, it wasviewedby manywithin the BBF asan unethicalway of trying to influencean electionin a Christianorganization. WhenBalog'splan was exposed Tom Bruscharemovedhis namefrom the ballot. The BBF boardremovedRalph Balog'snamefromthe ballotandchargedhim with "official misconduct."This RichardJordanFromDonaldSommer May 10,2000Page4 of 5 ,FrA\ \-\27\/ PY' incident apparentlyinfluencedthe opinion of manypeopleagaiastyou. During the 1988summerBBF conferenceyou did not show up for the messageyou had beenscheduledto deliver,howeverit was reportedthat you wereat the conferencegroundsduring the conferenceand met with individualsthat attended. It wasreportedthat you wrote two very unkind lettersto Ivan Burgenerand the BBF boardwhich werereadat the conferencegrounds. I wastold that someof your supporterswent to your homeduring that week andearnestlyrequestedyou to apologizefor thoselettersbut you refirsed. 18. As I saidabove,this letter waswritten becauseI was encouraged by Dan Grossto firrd su1if ths rhingsthat havebeensaidaboutyou weretrue. I arnpresentingthis information to you andrequestingyou to respondto it, eitherto confirln, denyor correctits accuracy. Sincerelyin Cbristy Eozo49z.*."/ -" fronatd Sommer/' / FromDonaldSommer Mav 10,2000Page5 of 5