Banco del Estado de Chile
Transcription
Banco del Estado de Chile
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CREDIT OPINION 17 June 2016 Banco del Estado de Chile Update to Credit Strengths & Challenges Update Summary Rating Rationale Moody's assigns a baa2 standalone baseline credit assessment (BCA) to Banco del Estado de Chile (Banco Estado) in line with its superior funding access and high liquidity, as well as improving asset risk. RATINGS Banco del Estado de Chile Domicile Chile Long Term Rating Aa3 Type LT Bank Deposits - Fgn Curr Outlook Stable Please see the ratings section at the end of this report for more information.The ratings and outlook shown reflect information as of the publication date. As Chile's sole government-owned bank, Banco Estado plays an important public policy role by (i) catering to low-income individuals with an explicit mandate towards promoting home ownership and national savings, (ii) offering financing to small and mid-sized enterprises (SMEs) and (iii) providing banking services to remote rural areas that are not served by private sector alternatives. The bank's mandate also includes the promotion of entrepreneurship and microfinance. Exhibit 1 Rating Scorecard - Key Financial Ratios Contact Felipe Carvallo 52-55-1253-5738 VP-Senior Analyst [email protected] Busy Juarez 52-55-1253-5735 Associate Analyst 1 [email protected] Maria Valeria 5411-3752-2611 Azconegui VP–Senior Analyst [email protected] Aaron Freedman 52-55-1253-5713 Associate Managing Director [email protected] CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 Source: Moody's Financial Metrics The bank's large branch network and the expectation that it would receive government support ensures it advantageous access both to stable core deposits from the largest individual client base in Chile as well as to the capital markets, providing it a strong funding profile. While the bank's nonperforming loan1 ratio of 3.3% as of March 2016 remains above the system average, it has improved steadily over the past four years. However, the baa2 BCA also considers the bank's weak capitalization and profitability. As a result of high operating expenses related to the bank's mandate and extensive geographic coverage, a loan mix geared towards low-yielding commercial and mortgage financing, its high liquidity, and FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE higher tax burden, the bank's net income of just 0.7% of tangible assets is well below that of its peers in Chile. In addition, the Superintendencia de Bancos e Instituciones Financieras (SBIF) reports a Tier 12 capitalization ratio of 7.2%, the country's lowest. Banco Estado's Aa3 long-term global local and foreign currency deposit ratings reflect Moody's assessment of very high government support in line with its 100% ownership by the Republic of Chile, its significant policy roles and its status as Chile's largest deposittaking institution and mortgage lender. As such, government support translates into a substantial five notch uplift to Aa3, from Banco Estado's BCA and Adjusted BCA of baa2. Moody's also assigns long-/short-term Counterparty Risk Assessments (CR assessments) of Aa3 (cr)/P-1(cr) to Banco Estado. Credit Strengths » Superior funding access and high liquidity » Improving asset risk in line with lower mortgage nonperforming loans » Banco Estado's BCA is supported by Chile "Strong +" Macro Profile Credit Challenges » Capitalization is low, despite being regulatory compliant » Profitability vis-à-vis peers, reflects social mission, business mix and higher tax rate Rating Outlook The outlook is stable. Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade The bank's low capitalization is a significant constraint on its standalone BCA. Given very high government support, an upward movement on Chile's government bond rating of Aa3 would lead to upwards ratings pressure on the bank's debt and deposit ratings. Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade Downward pressure on the bank's BCA would emerge if the bank's profitability and asset quality deteriorate substantially. Given very high government support, a downgrade of the bank's BCA would not likely translate into a downgrade of the bank's debt and deposit ratings. Key Indicators Exhibit 2 Banco del Estado de Chile (Consolidated Financials) [1] Total Assets (CLP billion) Total Assets (USD million) Tangible Common Equity (CLP billion) Tangible Common Equity (USD million) Problem Loans / Gross Loans (%) Tangible Common Equity / Risk Weighted Assets (%) Problem Loans / (Tangible Common Equity + Loan Loss Reserve) (%) Net Interest Margin (%) PPI / Average RWA (%) 3-162 12-152 12-142 12-132 12-122 Avg. 32558.8 48678.0 585.3 875.1 3.3 2.8 54.8 2.5 2.2 32549.6 45934.9 604.9 853.7 3.1 3.0 51.5 2.7 2.6 28116.2 46331.3 426.4 702.6 3.3 2.4 63.3 2.9 3.3 25560.3 48644.5 433.9 825.9 3.6 2.7 62.8 3.1 3.1 23153.3 48356.8 634.4 1324.9 4.1 4.3 57.4 3.0 3.4 8.93 0.23 -2.03 -9.83 3.54 3.05 58.04 2.84 2.95 This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2 17 June 2016 Banco del Estado de Chile: Update to Credit Strengths & Challenges FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE Net Income / Tangible Assets (%) Cost / Income Ratio (%) Market Funds / Tangible Banking Assets (%) Liquid Banking Assets / Tangible Banking Assets (%) Gross loans / Due to customers (%) 0.7 61.3 21.8 35.1 90.1 0.4 55.3 20.4 36.8 85.6 0.6 50.0 19.5 36.6 86.1 0.5 52.8 17.9 38.7 80.5 0.5 48.2 20.9 36.9 87.2 0.54 53.54 20.14 36.84 85.94 [1] All figures and ratios are adjusted using Moody's standard adjustments [2] Basel I; IFRS [3] Compound Annual Growth Rate based on IFRS reporting periods [4] IFRS reporting periods have been used for average calculation [5] Basel I & IFRS reporting periods have been used for average calculation Source: Moody's Financial Metrics Detailed Rating Considerations SUPERIOR FUNDING ACCESS AND HIGH LIQUIDITY Funding and liquidity are key strengths of Banco Estado, reflected in its stable core deposit base, moderate loan-to-deposit ratio, and ample store of high quality liquid assets. Banco Estado is the largest deposit-taking institution in Chile, with a 19.7% market share as of March 2016, and is the market leader in savings deposits, with the largest number of clients (11 million), debit cards (9.5 million) and internet clients (2.6 million), as of March 2016. Core deposits comprise almost three quarters of the bank's funding, with customer deposits comprising the majority, while the rest comes from institutional sources. Debt, issued both locally and abroad, constitutes another 17.2%, as of March 2016. Banco Estado would likely benefit from flight-to-quality in times of stress. Though market funds are somewhat high at 21.8% as of March 2016, it is among the lowest levels in the Chilean banking system and largely in line with the bank's aim at matching its large residential mortgage book through long-term mortgage bonds (letras hipotecarias) and issuances, that have a duration of about 11 years. Furthermore, in recent years the bank has diversified its market funds by tapping global markets at advantageous terms. Its USD3 billion multicurrency global MTN program has allowed the bank to diversify its investor base by tapping the U.S., European and Asian markets. Banco Estado in fact could fund its loan book entirely with deposits if necessary, as reflected in its low loan-to-deposit ratio of just 90.1% as of March 2016, well below the system average of 118.9%, as of March 2016. Well above the system average, liquid assets represent about a third of tangible banking assets and comprise a mix of cash, Aa3-rated Chilean sovereign or central bank securities, or obligations issued by local financial institutions. The bank's investment portfolio is generally of short duration, protecting the balance sheet against wide moves in interest rates. CAPITALIZATION IS LOW, DESPITE BEING REGULATORY COMPLIANT A significant constraint on Banco Estado's standalone strength is its overall low capitalization, even if we assess a high likelihood that its high holdings of deferred tax assets (DTAs) could be realized because of (i) its government ownership and (ii) the Chilean government's high rating (Aa3 stable). Moody's capitalization seeks to emulate Common Equity Tier 1 and as such deducts intangibles because of their low loss absorption ability in times of stress. Banco Estado's high holdings of DTAs reflect i) a much higher effective tax rate (additional 40% corporate tax rate versus other banks' 24% in 2016), and ii) the large amount of "additional", or voluntary, countercyclical provisions the bank has taken in recent years. The deduction of DTAs from Banco Estado's reported TCE therefore results in a low capitalization ratio. Moody's nevertheless acknowledges that given Banco Estado's government ownership and the government's high rating of Aa3, there is a high likelihood that its DTAs could be realized and as such our score for capitalization includes a substantial positive adjustment, which nevertheless continues to exhibit capitalization as Banco Estado's weakest financial factor. The bank's capitalization also includes the government's November 2015 injection of USD200 million in capital remaining from its 2014 total commitment of USD450 million; the previous USD250 million are reflected in 2014 year-end data. We note that Banco Estado continues to be compliant with regulatory capital requirements of the Chilean regulator, with a total capital ratio of 11.5% as of March 2016, up from 11.3% as of March 2015, well above the 8% minimum, and a 4.1% leverage ratio, up from 3.7%, versus the 3% minimum. 3 17 June 2016 Banco del Estado de Chile: Update to Credit Strengths & Challenges FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE IMPROVING ASSET RISK IN LINE WITH LOWER MORTGAGE NONPERFORMING LOANS Banco Estado's asset quality continues to improve, with delinquencies declining to 3.3% as of March 2016, from 3.5% as of March 2015. The decline mainly reflects the reduction in residential mortgage NPLs via the government's debt restructuring program for low income customers and as well as more conservative underwriting and provisioning standards. Residential mortgages comprise a high 38% of the bank's total loans. Residential mortgage NPLs declined to 6.1% of loans, from 6.5% as of March 2015, but are still more than twice the system aggregate average of 2.8%. However, 26% of the mortgage portfolio benefits from government guarantees that ensure full recovery. The bank also maintains provisions equal to 5.5% of the mortgage book. In the past the government asked Banco Estado to increase both mortgage and SME lending under its stimulus program, a risk that is somewhat offset by the partial government guarantees tied to the new loans. Today, the bank's mandate is based on increasing the competitiveness of SMEs and entrepreneurship. The performance of the bank's unsecured consumer loan portfolio has weakened over the past year and compares slightly worse than the system averages. Consumer loan delinquencies increased to 2.4% as of March 2016, up from 1.4% as of March 2015. The performance of the bank's commercial loan portfolio is more in line with the system, exhibiting a much stronger and a more stable performance. As such, commercial loan delinquencies were 1.5% as of March 2016, slightly better than the system average. Reserve coverage of problem loans has risen consistently for the past three years, to 92.9% as of March 2016, from 83.1% as of March 2015. The bank's large corporate borrower concentrations remain a latent risk, as in the case of most Chilean banks, however these borrowers continue to present very low delinquencies. PROFITABILITY VIS-À-VIS PEERS, REFLECTS SOCIAL MISSION, BUSINESS MIX, AND HIGHER TAX RATE Banco Estado is the market leader in residential mortgages and the third largest lender overall. Its net interest margin remains firm and fee capture has been improving aided by its marketing focus on growth in electronic payment, account management and card services, as well as insurance and mutual funds services. Banco Estado's profitability remains lower than that of its private sector peers primarily because of its asset mix and policy mandate, for a net interest margin of 2.5%, versus the banking system's 3.1% as of March 2016. The bank's asset mix reflects the bank's emphasis on low-yielding residential mortgages and corporate loans as well as a higher proportion of liquid assets, which tend to be lower yielding than loans. The bank's higher operating costs are in part related to its nationwide distribution network that is designed to serve customers throughout Chile. The cost-to-income ratio tends to be higher than that of private sector peers at 61.3%, versus the system's 54.7%, and has increased substantially in the last three years in line with the bank's investment plan, from a low of 50.0% as of year-end 2014. The bank is working on improving this ratio going forward through a more efficient use of costs. In addition, the bank is assessed a very high tax rate that includes a 40% additional tax charged to all state-owned companies, on top of the 24% of other commercial banks. Banco Estado reported pre-tax income of CLP261.8 billion as of year-end 2015 and generated CLP68.4 billion during the first three months of 2016, expanding 46% when compared to same period last year. Such expansion derives from a combination of a 11% - 12% increase in net interest and non-interest income, aided by lower taxes and stable operating expenses While credit costs increased by 26% from last year, as a reuslt of new regulatory provisions for mortgages, these were financed by a release of additional provisions, which allowed the bank to have a lower effective tax rate of 17%, versus first quarter 2015's 57%. BANCO ESTADO'S BCA IS SUPPORTED BY A “STRONG+” MACRO PROFILE Chile's macro profile benefits from solid macroeconomic fundamentals and an established track record of policy credibility and predictability. The country’s moderate susceptibility to event risk is reflected its stable political environment, a favorable government liquidity position offset by a slightly heightened external vulnerability due to a weaker international investment position. Chile's private sector credit to GDP is among the highest in the region, but has been relatively stable, and is supported by strong credit culture and credit risk management. While wholesale sources represent the lion's share of most banks' funding, customer deposits comprise the majority, and refinancing risk is also mitigated by the relative depth of Chile's credit and capital markets. 4 17 June 2016 Banco del Estado de Chile: Update to Credit Strengths & Challenges FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE Notching Considerations GOVERNMENT SUPPORT We assume a very high probability of government support of Banco Estado because of its government ownership, its significant policy roles, and its large deposit and loan market shares. Banco Estado caters to low-income individuals with the key objectives of fostering home ownership and finance and promoting national savings. The bank also lends to microfinance entities. Banco Estado acts as a primary dealer of government securities and provides payroll and other transaction services to both government and private sector enterprises. The bank is an important source of liquidity in the banking system and has played a countercyclical lending role from time to time as in the case of the 2008 global financial crisis and Chile's 2014 economic stimulus program. COUNTERPARTY RISK ASSESSMENT Moody's assigns long- and short-term CR Assessments to Banco Estado of Aa3 (cr) and Prime-1 (cr). The CR Assessment benefits from five notches of government support, in line with our support assumptions on deposits and senior unsecured debt. This reflects our view that any support provided by governmental authorities to a bank which benefits senior unsecured debt or deposits is very likely to benefit operating activities and obligations reflected by the CR Assessment as well, consistent with our belief that governments are likely to maintain such operations as a going-concern in order to reduce contagion and preserve a bank's critical functions. About Moody's Bank Scorecard Our Scorecard is designed to capture, express and explain in summary form our Rating Committee's judgment. When read in conjunction with our research, a fulsome presentation of our judgment is expressed. As a result, the output of our Scorecard may materially differ from that suggested by raw data alone (though it has been calibrated to avoid the frequent need for strong divergence). The Scorecard output and the individual scores are discussed in rating committees and may be adjusted up or down to reflect conditions specific to each rated entity. Historical Ratios For the problem loan ratio and profitability ratio, we review the latest three year-end ratios as well as the most recent intra-year ratio where applicable, and base our starting point ratio on the weaker of the average of this period and the latest reported figure. For the capital ratio, we use the latest reported figure. For the funding structure and liquid asset ratios, we use the latest year-end figures as we believe them to be the most representative and reliable. Rating Methodology and Scorecard Factors Exhibit 3 Banco del Estado de Chile Macro Factors Weighted Macro Profile Strong + 100% Historic Ratio Macro Adjusted Score Credit Trend Assigned Score Key driver #1 Key driver #2 Solvency Asset Risk Problem Loans / Gross Loans 3.3% a3 ↑ a3 Expected trend Sector diversification Capital TCE / RWA 2.8% caa3 ←→ b3 Access to capital Profitability Net Income / Tangible Assets 0.5% baa2 ↑ baa1 Earnings quality Financial Profile Factor Combined Solvency Score 5 17 June 2016 ba2 Return on assets ba1 Banco del Estado de Chile: Update to Credit Strengths & Challenges FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE Liquidity Funding Structure Market Funds / Tangible Banking Assets Liquid Resources Liquid Banking Assets / Tangible Banking Assets Combined Liquidity Score Financial Profile Business Diversification Opacity and Complexity Corporate Behavior Total Qualitative Adjustments Sovereign or Affiliate constraint: Scorecard Calculated BCA range Assigned BCA Affiliate Support notching Adjusted BCA Instrument Class Counterparty Risk Assessment Deposits Senior unsecured bank debt 20.4% baa1 ←→ a2 Deposit quality Term structure 36.8% a1 ←→ a1 Stock of liquid assets Quality of liquid assets Government Support notching Local Currency rating 4 5 5 Aa3 (cr) Aa3 -- Foreign Currency rating -Aa3 Aa3 a3 Loss Given Failure notching 1 0 0 Additional notching 0 0 0 a2 baa2 0 0 0 0 Aa3 baa1-baa3 baa2 0 baa2 Preliminary Rating Assessment baa1 (cr) baa2 baa2 Source: Moody's Financial Metrics Ratings Exhibit 4 Category BANCO DEL ESTADO DE CHILE Outlook Bank Deposits Baseline Credit Assessment Adjusted Baseline Credit Assessment Counterparty Risk Assessment Senior Unsecured Moody's Rating Stable Aa3/P-1 baa2 baa2 Aa3(cr)/P-1(cr) Aa3 BANCO ESTADO, NEW YORK BRANCH Outlook Bank Deposits Counterparty Risk Assessment Senior Unsecured MTN Stable Aa3/P-1 Aa3(cr)/P-1(cr) (P)Aa3 Source: Moody's Investors Service 6 17 June 2016 Banco del Estado de Chile: Update to Credit Strengths & Challenges FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE Endnotes 1 Nonperforming loans equal the SBIF's defintion of cartera morosa a 90 días, or 90+ days past due loans, as can be found in the SBIF's Reportes Mensuales. Nonperforming loans include consolidated loans past due for more than 90 days even when only one of or some debt payments (capital or interest) are past due, as defined by the SBIF. 2 SBIF's capital básico (Tier 1) as a percent of risk-weighted assets, as reported in the SBIF's Indicadores Solvencia report 7 17 June 2016 Banco del Estado de Chile: Update to Credit Strengths & Challenges MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS © 2016 Moody's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., Moody's Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, "MOODY'S"). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES ("MIS") ARE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ("MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS") MAY INCLUDE MOODY'S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY'S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY'S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY'S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY'S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY'S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody's Publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY'S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY'S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody's Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Corporation ("MCO"), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody's Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading "Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy." Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY'S affiliate, Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody's Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to "wholesale clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY'S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a "wholesale client" and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to "retail clients" within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY'S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY'S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. ("MJKK") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody's Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody's SF Japan K.K. ("MSFJ") is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 1030986 8 17 June 2016 Banco del Estado de Chile: Update to Credit Strengths & Challenges
Similar documents
Credit Opinion BAWAG P.S.K.
About Moody's Bank Scorecard Our Scorecard is designed to capture, express and explain in summary form our Rating Committee's judgment. When read in conjunction with our research, a fulsome present...
More informationSparkasse KoelnBonn
us to assign a capital score of ba3, one notch above the b1 macro-adjusted capital score. Prior to this expected conversion, SKKB reported a weak regulatory CET1 ratio of 7.0% as of year-end 2015 (...
More information