Development of a Public Internet Database
Transcription
Development of a Public Internet Database
SCIPAS report nr. 5 Development of a Public Internet Database of Science Shops Jill Chopyak July 2001 Study financed by the EC-DG XII programme Improving the Human Research Potential and the Socio-Economic Knowledge Base (IHP) Strategic Analysis of Specific Political Issues (STRATA) (HPV1-CT-1999-00001) Contact: Jill Chopyak, The Loka Institute, P.O. Box 355, Amherst, MA USA Tel. +1 413 559 5860, Fax. + 1 413 559 5811, E-mail [email protected] Colophon Title: Author: Serie: Pages: Date: ISBN: Development of a Public Internet Database of Science Shops Jill Chopyak SCIPAS report nr. 5 25 July 2001 90-5209-118-8 Publisher: Science Shop for Biology, Utrecht University Padualaan 8 3584 CH Utrecht, the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Tel: ++.31.30.2537363 Fax: ++.31.30.2535795 Cover design: Lay out: Norbert Steinhaus Caspar de Bok Use and single copy/print of this reports is free. The use of parts of the text, tables, figures etc. of the report is allowed free of charge when full reference is made to the report. © Copyright on the report remains with the authors. When referring to this report please state the authors + title + publisher + date (European Commission financed project SCIPAS - HPV1-CT-1999-00001) The SCIPAS consortium appreciates any notification of the public use of this publication through an e-mail to the SCIPAS secretariat at [email protected] or a copy of the publication to the Science Shop for Biology. Acknowledgment This report is the output of workpackage 5 of the SCIPAS project (Study and Conference on Improving Public Access to Science through Science Shops). It was awarded financial support by the European Commission through the contract HPV1-CT-1999-00001 under the 5th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (1998 to 2002), and its specific programme “Improving the Human Research Potential and the Socio-Economic Knowledge Base” (“Strategic Analysis of Specific Political Issues”). This financial support by the EC was essential for the production of this report. Information and feedback from members of the SCIPAS consortium, participants at the Living Knowledge conference in Leuven and especially those who attended the workshop on the database and journal contributed to this report. Also, Munex, Inc. and Tortus-Tek, Inc. contributed to the technical aspects of the report and database design. Appendix 1 and 2 were developed by technicians at Tortus Tek, Inc. Jill Chopyak Amherst MA, USA July 2001 SCIPAS 3 Report nr 5 Table of contents Acknowledgment................................................................................................................. 3 Summary.............................................................................................................................. 5 1 1.1 1.2 2 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 6 Science Shops..................................................................................................... 6 The SCIPAS project............................................................................................. 6 Background.............................................................................................................. 9 3 3.1 3.2 Objectives ...............................................................................................................10 Technical objectives ...........................................................................................10 Content objectives ..............................................................................................10 4 Methods...................................................................................................................11 5 Results.....................................................................................................................12 5.1 Technical ............................................................................................................12 5.2 Content...............................................................................................................12 5.2.1 Overview .....................................................................................................12 5.2.2 Public-access screens .................................................................................12 5.2.3 Registered organisations and administrator administrative screens.............14 6 6.1 6.2 6.3 7 Conclusions and recommendations......................................................................17 Database maintenance .......................................................................................17 Additional technologies .......................................................................................17 Translation issues and capabilities .....................................................................18 References ..............................................................................................................19 Appendix 1 Data structure ............................................................................................20 Appendix 2 SCIPAS database public access screens diagram..................................22 Appendix 3 SCIPAS database administrative screen .................................................23 SCIPAS 4 Report nr 5 Summary Community-based research is a methodology gaining greater recognition world-wide. Institutions that promote and conduct community-based research are called by different names in different locales (“science shops” in Europe and “community research centers” in the United States), but the basic purpose is the same: to provide independent, participatory research support in response to concerns experienced by civil society. In general, the organisational structures (heretofore referred to as “science shops”) have the following objectives: • provide civil society with knowledge and skills through research and education; • provide their services on an affordable basis; • promote and support public access to and influence on science and technology; • create equitable and supportive partnerships with civil society organisations; • enhance understanding among policymakers and education and research institutions of the research and education needs of civil society; • enhance the transferable skills of students, community representatives and researchers. The term 'science' is used in its broadest sense, incorporating social and human sciences, as well as natural, physical, engineering and technical sciences. The following report is one of the workpackages of the SCIPAS (Study and Conference on Improving Public Access to Science) project funded under the Fifth Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities, under the program “Improving the Human Research Potential and the SocioEconomic Knowledge Base.” As part of the SCIPAS project, the following report examines the need for an electronic means of network communication, focusing on the development of an Internet-based, publicly-accessible database of science shops and science shop activities. The report argues how an electronic communications infrastructure can enhance the development of an international network, and outlines the design of the web-based database, concluding with recommendations for further development. The database will allow network members – and the general public – to search for science shop activities world-wide. It will also provide an infrastructure for future analysis of science shop activities, and will provide the basis for a network website, including a web-based location for publishing and advertising the journal Living Knowledge. SCIPAS 5 Report nr 5 1 Introduction 1.1 Science Shops In addition to the demands made on research and development by commerce and industry, “civil society” organisations have their own research needs. Diffusion of knowledge often focuses on communication from researchers to society, but increasingly there is a demand for communication from society to researchers. This is the concept of ”social demand” for knowledge. (Valenduc and Vendramin 1995, p.52). Different types of interfaces exist between researchers and society, one of which is the so called ”science shop”. Science shops are organisations created as mediators between citizen groups (trade unions, pressure groups, non-profit organisations, social groups, environmentalists, consumers, residents associations, etc.) and research institutions (universities, independent research facilities). Science shops are important actors in community-based research (CBR). There are many differences in the way science shops are organised and operate, as well as some important parallels. A science shop provides independent, participatory research support in response to concerns experienced by civil society. There is not one dominant organisational structure defining a science shop. How science shops are organised and operate is highly dependent on their context. The above definition of a science shop might also include organisations that do not self-define as a science shop. Organisations that meet the definition of a science shop and do provide civil society with knowledge and skills through research and education on an affordable basis will be taken into account. The term 'science' is used in its broadest sense, incorporating social and human sciences, as well as natural, physical, engineering and technical sciences. All science shops seek to: • provide civil society with knowledge and skills through research and education; • provide their services on an affordable basis; • promote and support public access to and influence on science and technology; • create equitable and supportive partnerships with civil society organisations; • enhance understanding among policymakers and education and research institutions of the research and education needs of civil society; • enhance the transferable skills and knowledge students, community representatives and researchers. 1.2 The SCIPAS project This document is one of the seven documents of the project called SCIPAS (Study and Conference on Improving Public Access to Science through science shops). It has been awarded financial support by the European Commission through the contract HPV1-CT1999-00001 under the 5th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (1998 to 2002), and its specific programme "Improving the Human Research Potential and the Socio-Economic Knowledge Base" ("Strategic Analysis of Specific Political Issues"). SCIPAS 6 Report nr 5 The SCIPAS project led to seven reports and a scientific conference. The executive consortium consisted of institutes from The Netherlands, Germany, Austria, Northern Ireland, Denmark, Israel, Romania, South Africa and the USA. The seven studies that were done in preparation to the conference are: 1. Compiling an inventory of different ways to organise and operate a science shop in different countries, including the participating countries. Identify best practices, and internal and external pros and cons of various operational options. Investigate the impact on the social and environmental conditions of citizen groups. 2. Compile a report on success and failure in starting new science shops and lessons to be learned to facilitate and support the creation of new science shops. 3. Make an inventory of needs and resources for training programs for science shop staff members. Identify mechanisms for matching science shop staff with training programs. 4. Describe the options for setting up an international science shop magazine or other means (e.g., an Internet archive) for publishing science shop research results and policy issues internationally. 5. Set up a free, publicly available Internet database of existing science shops and facilitate Internet contacts among science shops. Make an inventory of options for using automated translation facilities and interesting links. 6. Investigate the impact and develop strategies for how science shops can contribute, and are contributing, to the development of university education and research, i.e., their impact on curricula and research agenda's. 7. Investigate the potential benefits of, and the conditions for, transnational co-operation among science shops, including transnational research collaborations. The conference ‘Living Knowledge’, was held in Leuven, Belgium, from 25-27 January 2001. It was attended by 106 people from 19 different countries over 4 continents. This conference was the starting point for the European network of science shops, provisionally entitled ‘Living Knowledge’. Beyond its intrinsic value, the conference and the project documents are an indispensable milestone for laying the foundation of an international or European network of science shops. This network includes the four dozen science shops currently existing within the European Union and can facilitate the creation of new science shops throughout Europe (including less-favoured regions). The network can also develop collaborative relationships with science shop-like institutions and networks outside of Europe. Ultimately, the benefits will be: 1. Increased visibility and accessibility: Science shops become more publicly visible, thus more accessible to potential client groups. It opens avenues for support from universities and citizens, as well as policy makers. 2. Improved documentation and evaluation: New participants (e.g. newly erected science shops) get support more easily, by standardisation of documents, protocols, etc without neglecting their regional context. 3. Dissemination of results: Research results become more widely disseminated (including internationally). Successful research models can be replicated and further developed. SCIPAS 7 Report nr 5 4. Collaboration: Collaboration yields synergy and helps utilising previous experience. More comprehensive studies can be done. Citizen groups driven studies on transnational issues become more practicable. Science shop policy and strategies will also benefit from co-operation. 5. Quality control: A network enables standardisation in documenting, evaluating, archiving and retrieving science shop research results. This report, along with the reports of the other six workpackages, are milestones in achieving such a European network. In other studies in the SCIPAS project (e.g. workpackage 1 (Gnaiger and Martin, 2001) is concerned with best practices and workpackage 3 (De Bok, 2001) deals with training programmes) more attention will be paid to how science shops or their equivalents (e.g. wetenschapswinkel, intermediu, wissenschaftsladen, videnskapbutikken, community based research centre) are organised and how they operate. One of the aspects of creating an international network is effective communication between Network members. Technical advances of the past decade have made networking across geographical borders possible in ways that were previously inconceivable. Electronic communication is now one of the primary means of communicating world-wide. On-line databases are becoming more widely used by commercial and non-commercial organisations to share information, increase organisational output, and improve project results. The use of such a database for sharing information about community-based research and science shop activities has been tested in the U.S. with considerable success. This workpackage explores trends in electronic communication worldwide, and offers suggestions for the development and maintenance of an online database for science shop activity. SCIPAS 8 Report nr 5 2 Background The development of any network is based on a belief that sharing information, resources, strategies and ideas creates a synergy of relationships making the “output” of the network larger than the sum of its parts. In addition, it is the belief that bringing together members of a community – in whatever way – encourages debate, deliberation and resolution of shared issues, and allows for greater input from diverse stakeholders (London, 1997). Organisations have internally used a variety of information-sharing tools – such as databases – for years. They have been used as a means of tracking and sharing information as well as managing client or customer lists. With the rise of electronic communication over the past twenty years, such information sharing has moved from internal organisational communication to the sharing of information between organisations or between individuals geographically located in different areas. Combining the resources of electronic communication with traditional information-sharing techniques has allowed networks of all types to increase their scope and have more impact on a global level. On-line database development has increased, particularly in the past ten years (Quay, 1998), and has allowed organisations to increase their capacity for sharing knowledge, information, and resources. In the development of an international network of science shops, electronic communication and sharing of information is an essential part of the network’s development. On-line communication will help to facilitate collaboration among science shop projects and practitioners. Today, where information is power, the ability to share knowledge is particularly important in creating positive social change. With this in mind, the Loka Institute launched the Community Research Network in 1995 with the vision of a society in which individuals have access to the information they need to become effective decision-makers within their communities. In an effort to enhance the Community Research Network infrastructure, the Loka Institute developed an on-line database as a tool for community-based research practitioners worldwide. It’s initial development aimed at linking community and grassroots activists with researchers that could help them in solving problems they face in their communities. This initial database was a list of organisations and individuals who conduct community-based research, and listed specific topic areas and methodologies used in their projects. With over 100 entries, this database provided the basis for establishing a more dynamic and userfriendly infrastructure that could network activities internationally and enhance the development of the international science shop network. SCIPAS 9 Report nr 5 3 Objectives The primary objective of this workpackage is to develop a framework for a free, publicly available Internet database of existing science shops that provides a support infrastructure to facilitate collaboration among science shop projects and practitioners. 3.1 Technical objectives The SCIPAS database aims to have a data architecture that allows for extensive content components. The database will use software that allows for greater flexibility in terms of searches, adding and deleting information, database management, and international capability. The database will be housed at a commercial Internet Data Center that will handle data backups, statistical traffic analysis, disaster preparedness and application software maintenance. 3.2 Content objectives The SCIPAS database will provide the user with information about science shops, science shop projects, publications, research tools, methodology, and other resources. It will also allow the user to search by a variety of options, including: organisation type, research project, science shop staff, client type, project location, methodology, project output, project impact, and publication references. Database content will be entered by individuals via the Web, and will be maintained by them through a login/password system that provides only the author of the record access to that record’s maintenance page. The network secretariat (or an agreed-upon appointed organisation) will be responsible for the overall database maintenance. Database content is owned by the SCIPAS consortium and is available to the public at no charge. SCIPAS 10 Report nr 5 4 Methods The construction of the database requires the ability of an individual with the technical skills and understanding of on-line database construction. Thus the database design was subcontracted, while the SCIPAS partners brainstormed the various components desired. A prototype of the database was developed and presented to the SCIPAS consortium, to participants of the “Living Knowledge” conference in January 2001, and to SCIPAS project reviewers. Comments from these various individuals were then incorporated into the database design. SCIPAS 11 Report nr 5 5 Results 5.1 Technical The database will be designed using a UNIX-based software. This will allow for greatest flexibility in terms of future growth and development of the database design. It will also allow for universal use across borders. The database will initially be housed in the U.S. at a secure server, with data backups, statistical traffic analysis, disaster preparedness and application software maintenance. 5.2 Content 5.2.1 Overview The online database will include the following elements: 1. List of organisations, projects and related information; 2. Administrative screens for database administrator to create certain limited-choice data fields; 3. User screens to allow the public access to the information through a variety of search and browse functions; 4. Registration Request for organisations who wish to contribute to the database project; 5. Approval & Publication rights for database administrator. Registration requests will be held in a staging area of the database but will not go live until reviewed and approved by administrator; 6. Secure login for registered users to access and modify their organisation’s information; 7. Administrative screens for registered users to input new project information. By logging in on the site, they will be able to modify their organisation listing or any project data related to that organisation; 8. Global login for database administrator to monitor and edit all database information; 9. An embryonic Website at www.living-knowledge.org to place the database access screens into context, including: a. Database Home Page b. Search the Database c. Frequently Asked Questions d. Email the Database Administrator 5.2.2 Public-access screens The following screens will be available – for free – to any user coming to the site. • Default/Home Page with Navigation System: While attractive, integrated and technically flawless pages are essential for the entire site, the Home Page is the most important. The Home Page establishes the navigation system and provides an overview of the database. This page will contain links to the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page, the Search page, the Login screen and to the Lost Password Retrieval Screen as described in Appendix B. • Frequently Asked Questions: This will be a listing of questions and answers generated from a database table and maintained by database administrator. At this time no search function will be included on SCIPAS 12 Report nr 5 this portion of the site, but this feature may be of value as the number of questions increases. • Search the Database: This page will present both search and browse functions. The user will have the option to browse the organisations and projects data (select a choice from a dropdown list) from each of the following fields: • Browse by Organisation Type: Selecting an entry in the Organisation Type list will bring up a list of Organisation names, alphabetical by name. • Projects Listing: Selecting an organisation will bring the user to the project listing for that organisation. Each line in the projects list will show the project name, and field location. A link at the top of the project listing will bring the user to a screen displaying the organisation information. Organisation Information – brings up a detail screen with all fields in the Organisations table (see Appendix for field names). The Email address field will link directly to a mailto screen, and URL’s will spawn a new browser instance. This screen will also include a link to the Key Staff screen. Key Staff – A link on the organisation detail screen will spawn a popup window listing all key staff associated with the organisation. Each staff person will list all available information, including Name, Title and Email. Email addresses will be directly clickable to spawn a mailto link. Project Details – Selecting a name from the Projects listing will bring up project details including all information held in the projects database. Available Email addresses will link directly to a Mailto window, and URL’s will spawn a new browser instance. Each project detail screen will also include a link to the References listing for the project. References Listing – This popup window will list each reference by Title and year of publication. Each listing will be a hyperlink to the complete Reference Detail screen. Reference Details – This popup window will list all available data for the particular reference. • Browse by Organisation Selecting from this list will bring the user directly to the Projects Listing for that Organisation • Browse by Project Theme Selecting from this list will bring the user to the Projects Listing for that project theme. • Browse by Client Type Selecting from this list will bring the user to the Projects Listing for that client type. • Search Because of the large number of fields to be searched and the volume of data anticipated, we will construct several separate search input filters which will each search only a section of the database. SCIPAS 13 Report nr 5 Search Choices will include the ability to search by Organisations, Projects, References. When conducting the search by the different categories, it will scan the following fields: Organisations – Name, State, Country Key Staff – Last Name Projects – Title, Description, Output, Impact, Funding Sources, Methodology, Field Location References – Title, Author, Publication Date Search Results • • • • Search Organisations will bring up the Organisation list for the search criterion Search Key Staff will bring up the Key Staff list for the search criterion Search Projects will bring up the Projects listing for the search criterion Search References will bring up the References listing for the search criterion 5.2.3 Registered organisations and administrator administrative screens This includes two sections – the screens which are used by the database administrators and the screens which are used by Registered Organisations to maintain their data. The site administrators’ screens will be reached via the web on a site administrative interface provided by the contractor. The Registered Organisation’s administrative screens will be reached via a secure login on the Database home page as described above. Registered organisations administrative screens • Add Your Organisation This screen contains a submittable form that collects all relevant information to be added to the Organisation’s table of the database, including a dropdown list for Organisation Type. The bottom of the form will contain a “continue” button which brings the user to the Add Key People screen. • Add your Key People This screen will contain the three necessary fields to add a new person to this table. At the bottom an “add another” button will store that data and present a new blank screen. A “finished” button will close this screen and submit all people and the organisation record to the database • Login Once the user has entered in their organisational information and has conducted an initial registration with the database, the user can then return to edit organisational and project information through the login function. Clicking on the login button on the main public screen will bring up a login dialog box which contains spaces for the user’s login and password. Valid logins will bring the user to the Main Administrative Screen. • Main Administrative Screen This will allow the user to select from the following choices: Registered Organisation Edit, SCIPAS 14 Report nr 5 Key People Listing Edit, and Project Listing. Each of these is a link to another administrative screen as described below. Registered Organisation Edit – This screen allows the organisation to make changes to their approved listing, and includes a dropdown listing for Organisation Type. Since the organisation has already been approved and published live, there is no secondary approval process before the changes go live. A “Submit” button sends the information to the online database and returns the user to the Main Administrative Screen. Organisation Key People Listing Edit – This will bring the user directly to the appropriate organisation’s Key People Listing. Edits can be performed on the existing list, and an “Add New Person” button will bring up the New Key Person administrative screen. New Key Person – This screen will look similar to the “Add Your Key People” screen described above, but will have a single “Submit” button which will return the user to a refreshed “Key People Listing” screen showing the newly-added person. • Organisation Project Listing This will be similar to the Projects Listing described above under Public-Access Screens, but will contain a two links next to each project title. The first link will allow the user to proceed to the Organisation Project Edit screen. The second link will bring the user to the Project References Listing for that Project. Unlike the Public Access screen, it will not contain a link to the Organisation information screen. Organisation Project Edit – This screen will be a submittable form including fields for all data fields contained within the Projects table of the database, including dropdown lists for Project Theme and Client Type. A “Submit” button will add the data to the site database and return the user to a refreshed Project Listing screen showing the newly added project. Since the organisation has already been approved for publication, any new projects will be published live to the site database without any review/approval process. Project References Listing – This will be presented as a listing by title only of each reference for the selected Project. Each listing will be a link to the appropriate Project References Edit screen. An “Add New Reference” button brings up the New Reference screen. Project References Edit – This screen will be a submittable form which displays all data fields for the selected Reference. A “Submit” button sends the information to the live database and returns the user to a refreshed Project References Listing. New Reference – This screen is essentially the same as the Project References Edit screen, but displays all blank fields. Administrative Navigation – For simplicity, each administrative screen will contain a link back to the Main Administrative Screen. Database administrator screens • New Registration Notification Whenever a new registration is submitted, an email notification will be sent to a designated email box of the database administrator informing staff of the pending new registration. A link within the Email will bring the user to the New Registration Approval screen. SCIPAS 15 Report nr 5 • New Registration Approval This screen is the same form as “Add Your Organisation” but displays the appropriate data for the record being reviewed. All fields are editable. The bottom of the form contains an “Approve” and a “Reject” button. Approve publishes the information to the live public database. Reject sends out a rejection email. Note: since there is no way for the administrator to know whether the key people listings are right or wrong, there is no facility for these listings to be edited before publication. If an organisation is approved, the key people listings are automatically approved at the same time. Rejection Email – This is sent out automatically to the email address supplied during the organisation setup. It will contain the submitted organisation information (but not the key people listings), state that the listing has been rejected and that the organisation may contact the administrator for further information. • Site Administrative Interface This screen is for use by database administrator and will contain links to two subscreens: Edit Organisation Information and Edit FAQ Listing Edit Organisation Information – This screen will contain a dropdown window containing all of the Organisations in the database. Selecting any organisation brings the user to the Main Administration Screen (see above) for that organisation. Edit FAQ Listings – This screen is a scrolling form displaying all FAQ’s in the database, grouped by topic. The top listing on the page will be blank as an Add New Listing form, and a Save button next to each listing will submit the entire form to the database and return the user to a refreshed Edit FAQ listings page showing a new blank record at the top of the listing. • Edit Dropdown Lists This screen contains several windows which allow the user to edit and add new records to the following lists: Organisation Types, Project Themes, Client Types. SCIPAS 16 Report nr 5 6 Conclusions and recommendations From this report, it is clear that the future development and maintenance of communication technologies are an important part of developing an international science shop network. The SCIPAS database provides network members with the ability to track and share information about research projects, publications, methodologies, and impacts. The Database is a key component of the Network’s infrastructure. A free, publicly accessible database will make the development and recruitment of Network members internationally possible. The database will provide the basis for the technology component of the Network, such as a website, listserve, and other technologies. The database will also report on the results and output of projects conducted by network members. Such information can be used as a tool for evaluating the overall network, activities of network members, and general analysis of community-based research/science shop activities. The Internet and electronic communication provide geographically dispersed communities the ability to share information, strategies, solutions, and resources. The SCIPAS on-line Database is just one component of a longer-term technology strategy that needs to be developed by Network members. Issues that require discussion include database maintenance, the use of other communication technologies (e.g. listserve, website), and translation issues and capabilities. 6.1 Database maintenance The database is designed to minimize the need for extensive content management by the network secretariat. As an organisation or individual enters his/her information into the database, they will be provided with a login and password that will allow them to edit and monitor their information. However, there is need for continued administration and maintenance of the site, and an individual who is available for questions or technical difficulties. A future Network proposal should provide resources for such an individual. There is also need for continued maintenance of the site on the technical end. Discussion should include the possibility of mirroring the database for location on multiple servers in different locations as the network expands. 6.2 Additional technologies As stated above, the use of communication technologies will play an important role in the development of the Network, and a long-term technology strategy needs to be developed with Network members. 6.2.1 Website In the immediate term, there is a need for a Living Knowledge website. The domain registration for the site (www.living-knowledge.org) has already been secured and will be used as the Home Page for the Database. The Living Knowledge conference site http://www.bio.uu.nl/living-knowledge is an initial framework for the development of a Network site, and the current content needs to be moved to the formal Living Knowledge Web Page. SCIPAS 17 Report nr 5 Site content could include: • SCIPAS database link; • other links/resources • bulletin page that is updated with daily stories that have a science and technology interest; • threaded discussion capabilities; • project description and development; • network member information. Website development would require resources – both staff and monetary. This would also be extended to a staff person within the secretariat responsible for the website’s continuous development and maintenance. 6.2.2 Listserve In preparation for the SCIPAS conference, January 25-27, 2001, a Living Knowledge list was established to discuss the development of the Network. The longer-term continuation of this list needs to be discussed by Network members. The Community Research Network List (CRN-List) currently exists as a discussion forum for individuals interested in communitybased research. The merging of these lists is possible in the future. 6.2.3 Other technologies The incorporation of other communication technologies could assist the Network in its development. For example, video conferencing, Web-based instant communications tools, and promotional media such as video could not only be an essential part of promoting communication between Network members but also be an important way to promote community-based research and science shop activities. Another technology that could be of value is a way to pull the data out of the database to do general analysis (such as SPSS) of the overall nature of the network. Such technologies may then be linked to the site for such analysis to be done on-line. 6.3 Translation issues and capabilities An international network needs to provide the capacity for sharing of information in the native languages of Network members. Rudimentary, free translation software is currently available via the Web (e.g. see http://www.thefreecountry.com/ecentricity/translation.shtml and also http://translator.go.com/) However, to fully develop the Network’s international membership and resources, a more sophisticated translation capability is necessary. This makes available documents, research reports and other resources to a broader audience that would otherwise be hampered by language barriers. Future resources are needed to build the capacity in the website and other technology. SCIPAS 18 Report nr 5 7 References Bensleben, Erik and Gary Orthuber (2000) “Introduction to Databases.” Compumentor. http://www.compumentor.org/resources/articles/107.html. Cravens, Jane (1996) “Database, Software and Technology Use Tip Sheets.” Coyote Communications Database & Software Tip Sheets. Coyote Communications http://www.coyotecom.com/database/index.html. De Bok, Caspar (2001) “Training programmes for science shops” SCIPAS report nr. 3. Science Shop for Biology. Utrecht, the Netherlands. http://www.bio.uu.nl/living-knowledge Gnaiger, Andrea and Eileen Martin (2001) “Operational Options”. SCIPAS report nr. 1. Science Shop for Biology. Utrecht, the Netherlands. http://www.bio.uu.nl/living-knowledge London, Scott (1997) “Civic Networks: Building Community on the Net.” Paper prepared for the Kettering Foundation http://www.scottlondon.com/reports/networks.html. Murray, Bruce (1995) “Society, Cyberspace and the Future: How Can Interactive Communication Technology Enhance Harmonious and Functional Communities at all Scales Worldwide?.” Report of an Exploratory Aspen Workshop. http://www.cco.caltech.educ/~rich/aspen.html. Quay, Ray (1998) “The Electronic Village: Impact of Electronic Communication Trends on the Form and Function of Local Communities.” http://www.asu.edu/caed/proceedings97/quay1.html. SCIPAS 19 Report nr 5 Appendix 1 Data structure LEGEND: Table Name Primary Key Field Foreign Key Field Standard field Required field* Table #1 Organisation Types Organisation Type ID Organisation Type* Table #2 Organisations Organisation ID Organisation Type ID* Organisation Name* Description Address1* Address2 City* State* Zip* Email Address* Telephone Fax URL Login Password Password Question Password Response Record Create Date Record Last Edit Date Table #3 Key People Person ID Prefix First* Middle Last* Suffix Title Email Table #4 Project Themes Project Theme ID Project Theme* Table #5 Client Types Client Type ID Client Type* SCIPAS 20 Report nr 5 Table #6 Projects Project ID Organisation ID* Project Theme ID Project Title* Client Type ID Client Field Location Project URL Key Participants Project Lead Email Address Description Methodology Output Impact Funding Sources Staff Hours to Complete Project Budget Record Create Date Record Last Edit Date Table #7 References Reference ID Project ID Publication Title Author Year of Publication SCIPAS 21 Report nr 5 Appendix 2 SCIPAS SCIPAS database public access screens diagram 22 Report nr 5 Appendix 3 SCIPAS SCIPAS database administrative screen 23 Report nr 5 SCIPAS REPORTS SCIPAS report 1: Science Shops: Operational options Andrea Gnaiger & Eileen Martin FBI, Innsbruck, Austria & Science Shop Queen’s University Belfast, UK SCIPAS report 2: Success and failure in starting Science Shops Henk Mulder, Thomas Auf der Heyde, Ronen Goffer & Carmen Teodosiu Chemistry Shop, University of Groningen. Groningen, the Netherlands SCIPAS report 3: Training programmes for science shops Caspar de Bok Science Shop for Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands SCIPAS report 4: The development of an international science shop magazine Norbert Steinhaus Wissenschaftsladen Bonn,. Bonn, Germany SCIPAS report 5: Development of a public Internet database of science shops Jill Chopyak The Loka Institute, Amherst MA, USA SCIPAS report 6: The impact of science shops on university curricula and research Merete Hende and Michael Søgaard Jørgensen Science Shop Technical University of Denmark. Lyngby, Denmark SCIPAS report 7: Living Knowledge: the network Accomplishments and further opportunities for developing an international network of science shops. Maaike Lürsen & Dick Sclove Science Shop for Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands SCIPAS report 8: Living Knowledge: conference proceedings 2001 Maaike Lürsen & Caspar de Bok (eds.) Science Shop for Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands All SCIPAS reports are available as pdf-files at http://www.bio.uu.nl/living-knowledge or by contacting the Science Shop for Biology ([email protected], tel. ++31.30.253 7363) For conditions of use see the colophon. SCIPAS 24 Report nr 5