Artificial Insemination in Endangered Species
Transcription
Artificial Insemination in Endangered Species
Artificial Insemination in Endangered Species – Challenges and Successes Budhan Pukazhenthi Center for Species Survival Smithsonian National Zoological Park Objectives of this Lecture • Importance of wildlife research • Role of artificial insemination in management of endangered species • Tools for understanding male and female reproductive biology • Semen collection and cryopreservation • Artificial insemination techniques • AI successes in endangered species • Remaining challenges • Conclusions Wildlife Research Challenges • Lack of knowledge • Small, geographically dispersed collections • Animals - timid to dangerous • Requires genetic management to retain viability Usually 90% gene diversity for the next 100 years Numbers of Described Mammals, Reptiles, Fishes, Amphibians and Birds Reptile, 7,500 13% Mammal, 5,500 10% 48% 18% Bird, 10,200 11% Amphibian, 5,921 Fish, 27,000 Amazing Diversity in Reproduction < 1% of annual lifespan reproducing Sperm storage (mo) No males required Reproductive Diversity Among Species Species Seasonality Distinguishing features Domestic dog None • Spontaneous ovulation Bush dog None • Male reduces inter-estrous interval Maned Wolf Strict (Oct – Feb) • Ovulation only in presence of a male Gray wolf Strict (Jan – Apr) • Behavioral dominance regulates reproductive success (alpha female) African wild dog Strict (Apr – Jul) • Reproduction in alpha female, behavioral and estrogen suppression of subordinates • Litter size up to 20 pups Island Fox Strict (Jan – Mar) • Ovulation only in presence of a male Number of Reproduction Publications for Wildlife Species, Jan 1999 - Sep 2009 Journals Total reproductive science manuscripts Wildlife related (%) Animal Reproduction Sciences 1,434 125 (8.7) Biology of Reproduction 3,991 286 (7.2) 197 58 (29.4) 36 32 (88.9) Molecular Reproduction and Development 1,598 53 (3.3) Reproduction 1,604 149 (9.3) Reproduction of Domestic Animals 680 31 (4.5) Reproduction Fertility and Development 650 134 (20.6) 1,852 259 (13.9) 76 69 (90.8) 12,118 1,196 (9.9) Cryobiology Journal of Mammology Theriogenology Zoo Biology Total 90% of publications are on common, already-studied species Wildt et al., 2009 Taking this Basic Information to Affect Species Management • Consistency • Contributing to maintaining gene diversity while moving the ‘population needle’ Role of Artificial Insemination in Managing Wildlife Species • Management tool for enhancing conservation breeding Behavioral incompatibility Poor reproductive performance Anatomical defects • Maintain genetic diversity in small populations Low number of founders Limited gene pool in population • Movement of gametes for conservation strategies Species Survival Plans (SSPs) Genome Resource Banks (GRBs) Information Critical for Developing Artificial Insemination • • • • • Male Seasonality Age Semen collection Gene diversity and ejaculate quality Cryopreservation • • • • • • • • Female Seasonality Age Ovulation mechanism Control of ovarian function Time of insemination Site of insemination Sperm concentration Impact of stress and/or anesthesia • Seasonality – Pallas cat (distinct seasonality), cheetah (seasonality not evident) • Age – onset of puberty; impact on sperm DNA integrity • Semen collection – electroejaculation; rectal massage (rarely artificial vagina) • Low gene diversity – poor semen quality • Cryopreservation – low post-thaw sperm survival Androgens (ng (ng/g) /g) Male Reproduction 1800 Pallas cat 1200 600 0 Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Major Challenges Working with Endangered Species Sperm High incidence of abnormal sperm Diversity in sperm morphology Equidae Avian Bovidae Felidae Poor sperm cryosurvival Motility Clouded leopard Black footed ferret Elephant ~30% ~30% ~50% Acrosome Integrity ~20% ~30% ~60% Cheetah 600 600 Bred 400 Birth 400 200 200 0 -20 0 0 20 40 60 Days 80 100 120 Progestogens (mg/g feces) • Non-invasive hormone monitoring (feces, urine, saliva, hair) • Ultrasonography • Laparoscopy Estradiol (ng/g feces) Tools for Understanding Female Reproductive Biology Female Reproduction – Control of Ovarian Function • • • • • Felids (eCG-hCG; eCG-GnRH; pFSH-pLH) Canids (GnRH agonist) Bovids (CIDR + PGF2α; PGF2α at 12 d interval) Cervids (CIDR for 12-14 d +/- PMSG) Equids (Altrenogest + GnRH) 120 180 100 160 140 80 120 100 60 80 40 60 40 20 20 0 Spontaneous 0 1 11 21 31 41 of 51 sample 61 71 81collection 91 101111121131141151161171 Day 200 120 180 100 160 140 80 120 Induced 100 60 80 40 60 40 20 20 0 Day of sample collection 0 Progesterone metabolites (mg/g feces) 200 Progesterone metabolites (µg/g feces) Ovulation Mechanisms Sensitivity of Felids to Exogenous Gonadotropins Leopard cat Domestic cat Ocelot Clouded leopard Snow leopard Puma Cheetah Tiger Weight (kg) 3 4 9 15 30 35 35 250 eCG (iu) 100 100 500 75 600 200 200 1,000 hCG (iu) 75 75 225 50 300 100 100 750 Diversity in Optimal Time of Insemination After hCG • Leopard cat (36-38 h) • Ocelot (39-43 h) • Cheetah (44-48 h) Scimitar horned oryx (Morrow et al., 2000) Follicle Diameter +/- GnRH • White rhinoceros (>26 mm) • Indian rhinoceros (>130 mm) After 2nd PGF2α White rhinoceros (Hermes et al., 2009) • Mhorr gazelle (48-60 h) • Scimitar-horned oryx (56-72 h) • Gerenuk (66-96 h) • Blackbuck (72-96 h) anLH ovLH 30 20 0.4 10 0.2 0.0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Days 200 350 300 160 250 120 200 80 150 100 40 0 -40 -20 50 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Day from Estrogen Peak Urinary Progestins (ng/mg Cr) Urinary Estrogens (ng/mg Cr) 40 1.0 0.8 0.6 LH (ng (ng/ml) /ml) Progestagens (ng/ml) ng/ml) Hormone Profile as Cue for Insemination Timing Integration of Hormone Monitoring/ Ultrasonography and AI • • • • • Elephant Marine mammals Rhinoceros Equids Wolves 10000 AI #1 6:00 p.m. AI #2 3:30 p.m. 9000 200 8000 Ovulation 5000 100 4000 P4 ng/mg Cr 6000 3000 2000 1000 0 Date of Urine Collection Estrogen Conjugates (E1C) Day 81 9/ 2/ 06 0 8/ 23 /0 6 8/ 24 /0 6 8/ 25 /0 6 8/ 26 /0 6 8/ 27 /0 6 8/ 28 /0 6 8/ 29 /0 6 8/ 30 /0 6 8/ 31 /0 6 9/ 1/ 06 E1C ng/mg Cr 7000 Progesterone (P4) (Stoops et al., 2007) Insemination Techniques Urogenital Sinus Insemination Endoscopic Cervical/Intrauterine Insemination (Allen et al., 2008) (Hildebrandt et al., 1998) Laparoscopic Intrauterine Insemination (Howard et al., 1992) Intramagnal-Intraovarian Pocket Insemination (Blanco et al., 2009) Other ‘Consistent’ Species Ocelot Cheetah (Howard et al., 1997) (Swanson et al., 2009) Giant panda (Howard et al., 2009) Other ‘Consistent’ Species Eld’s deer Scimitar-horned oryx (Monfort et al., 1993) (Morrow et al., 2000) Other ‘Consistent’ Species Koala Elephant 25 calves produced by AI (Allen et al., 2008) White rhinoceros (Saragusty et al., 2009) (Hermes et al., 2009) Repeated AI successes Killer whale Bottlenose dolphin Pacific white-sided dolphin Robeck, O’Brien, Steinman Busch Entertainment Corporation's SeaWorld and Busch Gardens Repeated AI successes Killer whale Bottlenose dolphin Pacific white-sided dolphin Calves from sex-sorted sperm Robeck, O’Brien, Steinman Busch Entertainment Corporation's SeaWorld and Busch Gardens AI Successes in Marine Mammals Species Live Offspring Produced Killer Whale (Orcinus orca) Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) 4 11* Pacific White-Sided Dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) 5 Beluga Whale (Delphinapterus leucas) 3 * Six calves with sex sorted sperm Robeck, O’Brien, Steinman Busch Entertainment Corporation's SeaWorld and Busch Gardens AI Success in Birds Consistently Benefiting from Reproductive Science Whooping crane (G. Gee, G. Archibald) White-naped crane (W. Lynch) Artificial Insemination in Birds (Species Managed with Artificial Insemination) • • • • • • • • Houbara bustard Whooping crane Hispaniola parrot Philippine eagle Spanish imperial eagle Bonelli’s eagle Peregrine falcon Kiwi (free-ranging) Challenges/Opportunities • Low numbers of animals • Optimize methods to control ovarian function • Improve sperm collection and cryopreservation technologies • Develop novel tools for insemination • Optimize conditions for maintaining pregnancy • Pregnancy diagnosis Acknowledgments • David Wildt, Nucharin Songsasen, Janine Brown, JoGayle Howard (National Zoo) • Justine O’Brien, Todd Robeck (Busch Entertainment Corporation's SeaWorld and Busch Gardens) • Terri Roth, William Swanson, Monica Stoops (Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden) • Juan Blanco (Centro de Estudios de Rapaces Ibericas, Spain)