Study of the Comprehensive System of Sustainable Mobility for the
Transcription
Study of the Comprehensive System of Sustainable Mobility for the
Study of the Comprehensive System of Sustainable Mobility for the Toluca Valley Mario Molina Center 2014 Abstract In Toluca’s Metropolitan Area (ZMT), the current transportation system’s weakness and shortcomings in urban planning have detonated cross affectations on sustainability in its environmental, social and economic spheres. Reversing this situation requires a paradigm shift in urban planning and mobility in the ZMT. To achieve this, the Mario Molina Center (MMC) developed a portfolio of recommendations on policy, institutional, operational and mobility planning, which integrate urban aspects and influence on all means of transportation. service, in part due to the poor condition of the Constant population and industrial growth in the units, 43% of which are over 10 years old. The newest ZMT has brought expansion in its urban surface at result of these inefficiencies in public transportation a rate eight times higher than that of its inhabitants is the growing shared taxi service, which is the main in the past three decades [1], resulting in increased mode of transportation for 11% of the population [3]. demand for housing and public services, pressure In this context, the proposals from the MMC articto ecosystems, damages to the environment and, in ulate public transportation routes with desirable urgeneral, to the region’s sustainability. Largely, this is ban planning, considering the collateral effects that due to a missing element in urban planning: mobility in terms of urban mobility will be generated with the with a focus on sustainability. construction of the Toluca-Mexico City railway. 1 Introduction A dense, compact and articulated urban growth with efficient public transportation has the potential to detonate in a well-planned manner the economic activity of a city, reduce the need for long journeys and promote the use of non-motorized transportation, whose positive impacts on air quality are relevant in a city where air quality standards for particulate matter and ozone1 [2] are exceeded. 2 Methodology The process of co-designing a Sustainable Mobility Strategy for the ZMT, integrated recommendations and concerns of organized civil society, academia, citizens and decision makers, in four phases: 1. Exploration and enquiry through forums, workshops, interviews with representatives of the three levels of government, NGO consultations, specialists in mobility and urban development. However, in the ZMT about 90% of the urban surface has density levels lower than 25 houses/ha, a situation that doesn’t favor a structured system of public transportation; on the contrary, it encourages individual and motorized transportation means. 2. Generation of field-gathered information through a mobility survey of over two thousand people, vehicular traffic density, occupancy study of public transportation and on-site analysis. While 76% of people travel using public transportation; 65% of users are dissatisfied with the 3. An assessment of mobility in the ZMT was elaborated which includes a description of the available infrastructure, public transportation corridors, the degree of public satisfaction with the 1 Since 2003, a significant increase in PM10 concentration levels began to be detected. In 2011 the indicator of acute exposure of 8 hours for ozone was exceeded in three of the seven monitoring stations. 1 Table 1: Current modal split and goals for 2025 service and problems identified by the authorities on mobility matter. 4. Generating a proposal portfolio under a structure of objective mobility for 2025, through a workshop with key players. 3 Results In the ZMT, we identified a trend towards expansive urban structure, increase in time and number of commutes, use of deficient modes of transportation, dispersion in public management of mobility and intensive use of private vehicles over other more sustainable transportation means. The motorization rate increases at a faster rate than its population and low capacity means of transportation are preferred. by 94% the units in circulation. As a result of the substantial decline in mileage, it’s possible to mitigate by more than 92% VOC, SO2 , NH3 , N2 O, CH4 and CO2 emissions and more than 90% CO, NOx, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions on structured corridors. Figure 2 shows the most important measures that overall drive inter-modality and sustainable mobility in the ZMT. In urban matter, what stands out is the strengthening of four alternative sub centers, containment of urban sprawl and identifying areas that need to elevate density parallel to the development of a structured public transportation system. In terms of mobility, the highlighted actions should be the reorganization of 162 transportation routes in four corridors that reduce circulation of 1332 existing units to 86 bi-articulated buses; the need to build four CETRAMs, a terminal and five bus stations; pedestrian walkways in the historic centers of five On the other hand, the public transportation municipalities and 116 km of a cycle path network. network is made up of 22 companies that provide Among policy and institutional proposals that stand public transportation services through 222 routes. out: the Law of Mobility (under development), the Paradoxically, more than half of the ZMT’s blocks Comprehensive Mobility Program and the creation have no public transportation in any of its roads. of a specialized Council in this matter (Figure 1), Although there is an oversupply of units and routes an Operating Agency for structured public transport throughout the city, these are mostly radial and and a Fund to supply continuously required investdiametrical to the city’s downtown [4]. This triggers ments. heavy congestion with an average speed of 38 km/hr during peak hours [5], thus increasing emissions. Finally, policy recommendations are made to discourage the use of private vehicles, such as the imThe most significant result from the discussions, diplementation of Low Emission Zones in downtown alogues and surveys around the ZTM’s mobility, was Toluca and Metepec, in order to restrict circulation of a consensual view of a modal split by 2025. which the most polluting vehicles according to the Required stabilizes the use of public transportation, drives nonVehicle Verification Program. motorized modes and reduces private car use (Table The dynamic of mobility is centralized around the center of Toluca’s municipality, which attracts more than 650,000 trips per day, representing two-thirds of metropolitan travel focusing on the municipalities of Toluca and Metepec [4]. On the one hand, the ZMT lacks Modal Transfer Centers (CETRAM, acronym in Spanish) to facilitate efficient management and the orderly and hierarchical confluence of two or more modes of transportation; there are only two central bus stations which merge urban, suburban and foreign transportation. 1). In order to make this vision of urban mobility a reality, the study raises proposals at working, regula- 4 Discussion Transforming the way people carry out their daily tory and institutional levels. For example, reordering routes on the four struc- travels in the ZMT requires root changes in a technituring corridors of the city would allow reducing cal, institutional, budgetary and political manner. 2 However, these changes are neither simple nor immediate. They take time, large public and private investment, determination and political leadership, institutional maturity and a great deal of debate. For this reason, and being aware of the changes required to achieve this transformation, the planning framework is 10 years, 2015 to 2025. A decade is reasonable time to achieve the proposed changes. It’s a term which allows citizens of the ZMT’s to first imagine the change and then see the progressive transformation so they join it. [5] Ayuntamiento de Toluca de Lerdo (2013). ”Estudio de Movilidad de Transporte Privado en la Zona Metropolitana de la Ciudad de Toluca.” 5 Conclusions and recommendations Briefly, the actions proposed by the MMC to reverse the vicious cycle of urban planning lacking a vision of sustainable mobility are: 1. Creating a polycentric urban structure through consolidating alternative sub-centers. 2. Ensuring availability, coverage, quality of service and financial balance of the transportation system. 3. Adapting and providing quality road infrastructure which prioritize communal transportation methods with low environmental impact. 4. Creating regulatory and institutional frameworks that transform and order mobility towards sustainability, supported by citizen participation. 5. Discouraging the use of private motorized meathods as the main form of transportation. References [1] SEDESOL (2012). La Expansión de las ciudades 1980-2010, Mexico. Resultados definitivos. [2] SMAGEM (2012). PROAIRE de la Zona Metropolitana del Valle de Toluca 2012-2017. [3] Based on the ZMT’s Survey of mobility: day to day and activities, conducted in Toluca’s Metropolitan Area during September 2014, with 2108 people surveyed. [4] ST-SIPATP (2007). Sistema Integral de Planeación Administrativa del Transporte Público, Secretarı́a de Transporte del Gobierno del Estado de México. 3 4 Planning Municipal Departments of Transportation Code for Biodiversity of the State of Mexico Metropolitan Coordination Agency(Art. 5.17) Councils Administrative Code (Books 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 y 11) of the State of Mexico Expenditure Law of the State of Mexico Ministry of Urban Development Ministry of Economic Development Civil society Private initiative Academia Metropolitan Convention Coordination (Art. 5.16) Municipal Planning Institutes Ministry of Communications Ministry of Environment Ministry of Labor Ministry of Finance Ministry of Health Ministry of Metropolitan Development Ministry of Mobility (prior Transportation) Ministry of Public Security Ministry of the Secretary-General Ministry of Education State Congress Governance Ministry of Finance Ministry of Agriculture, Land & Urban development Ministry of Comm & Transportation Housing Law Planning Law of the State of Mexico and its Municipalities Public Transportation and Related Services Regulation of the State of Mexico Mobility Law of the State of Mexico Legal Framework Source: Elaborated by the MMC Mobility and Urban Development Council Urban and Mobility Observatory Metropolitan Mobility Operator Agency Operation Sustainable Metropolitan Mobility Fund Metropolitan Fund FONADIN Financing Federal entities State entities Municipal entities Proposed entities Regulations and planning instruments Regulations and proposed planning instruments Municipal Urban Development Plans Partial plans for sub center's consolidation Regional Urban Development Plan Comprehensive Metropolitan Mobility Plan State Urban Development Plan Expenditure Budget 2014-2018 National Infrastructure Program 2013-2018 National Urban Development Program Instruments Figure 1: Policy and Institutional Proposals for the Sustainable Mobility Strategy for the Valley of Toluca 5 Source: Elaborated by the MMC Figure 2: Working proposals for a Sustainable Mobility Strategy for the Valley of Toluca