Department of Environmental Protection Southeast Regional Office

Transcription

r
providing environmentaol
M1
-
consulting and
S
engineering services
500 West Curnrnings Park
Suite 1050
Woburn, MA 01801
781/937 0500
Foax 781/937 0578
G
McCulley
Frick &
Gilman,
October 22, 1998
MFG Project No. 5539 (11)
,.
Department of Environmental Protection
Southeast Regional Office
20 Riverside Drive
Lakeville, MA 02347
RE:
f 27
Response Action Outcome Statement
Property:
44 Warren Avenue
Osterville, Massachusetts
RTN# 4-14017
D.E.P
SOUTHEAST REGION
Dear Sir/Madam:
In accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (310 CMR 40.0000)
(MCP), McCulley, Frick & Gilman, Inc. (MFG), has prepared a Response Action Outcome (RAO)
Statement for the property located at 44 Warren Avenue in Osterville, Massachusetts (Site) on behalf of
LIS Corporation. The Release Tracking Number assigned by the Department of Environmental
Protection (DEP) is RTN# 4-14017. This RAO and supporting documentation contains information
regarding site activities conducted by other consulting firms including a Limited Removal Action (LRA)
and additional soil and groundwater testing. A Method 1 Risk Characterization is provided in support of
the RAO.
The results of the site assessment activities presented in this report indicate the concentrations of
oil contamination in the soil and groundwater at the site do not pose a significant risk of harm to human
health, public safety and/or the environment.
General Site Information
The Site is located at 44 Warren Street in Osterville, Massachusetts, approximately ' mile from
Nantucket Sound. The Site is approximately 18,000 square feet in area, as shown on Figure 2. The Site
is located at approximate UTM coordinates 4607864 N and 385351 E. The Site is surrounded by
residential properties. The Site Location is shown on the attached Massachusetts GIS Map (Figure 1).
The Site building is currently used as a wood working shop with a residential apartment in the
back (north) portion of the building. The one-story building is constructed of wood. A partial-basement
Client/silvia/Osterville/Rao/553".wpd
Albuquerque, NM * Austin. TX * Boston
MA * Boulder (CO* Missoula MT * Port Lovocou, IX * Sun
I rjrncis
o,
C:A
*
eAttl
WA * Walla(ce
I)
S
500 West Cummings Park
providing environmental
Suite 1050
consulting and
F
J
-
Woburn, MA 01801
781/937-0500
Fax. 781/937-0578
.
Mc.ule
SCANN
Frick
Gilrnan,.n
November 3, 1998
MFG Project No. 5539(11)
Board of Selectman
Town of Barnstable
367 Main Street
Hyannis, MA 02601
RE:
44 Warren Avenue
RTN 4 - 14017
Attention: Board of Selectman
m.
On behalf of our client, LIS Corporation, McCulley, Frick, & Gilman, Inc. (MFG) is
providing this notice that a Class A2 Response Action Outcome Statement has been filed with
the Southeast Regional Office of the Massachusetts Department of Environment Protection.
As per 310 CMR 40.1403(3)(f) we are providing this notice to you. If you would like to
receive a copy of the Response Action Outcome Statement, you may contact us at the letterhead
address.
If you have any questions please do not hestitate to call us at 781-937-0500.
Very truly yours.
McCulley, Frick, & Gilman, Inc.
e
LS.P.
Senior Geologist
cc.MADEP/SE
LIS Corp.
Barnstable BOH
Lovoca. TX * So n Francisco, CA * Seattle, WA * WlIc,
Albuquerque, NV * Austin. TX * Boston, MA , Boulder. CO * Missoula, MT * Port
I,
IFM
Ml
L
.4
W
providing environmental
consulting and
500) West Cummings Pork
Suite 1050
Woburn, MA 01801
781/937-0500
Fox 781/937-0578
vIMcCulley
Frick &
GCilrman,n
November 3, 1998
MFG Project No. 5539(11)
Board of Health
Town of Barnstable
PO Box 534
Hyannis, MA 02601
RE:
44 Warren Avenue
RTN 4 - 14017
Attention: Board of Health
On behalf of our client, LIS Corporation, McCulley, Frick, & Gilman, Inc. (MFG) is
providing this notice that a Class A2 Response Action Outcome Statement has been filed with
the Southeast Regional Office of the Massachusetts Department of Environment Protection.
As per 310 CMR 40.1403(3)(f) we are providing this notice to you. If you would like to
receive a copy of the Response Action Outcome Statement, you may contact us at the letterhead
address.
If you have any questions please do not hestitate to call us at 781-937-0500.
Very truly yours,
Senior Geologist
cc.MADEP/SE
LIS Corp.
Barnstable BOH
Albuquerque, NM * Austin. TX * Boston. MA * Boulder. CO * Missoula. MT * Port Lavoca, TX * San Francisco. CA * Seattle, WA * Woallr
r
October 22, 1998
Page 2
is located in the north section of the building, a 250 gallon above ground storage tank is located in the
basement. The Site was developed in 1925. The former 500-gallon fuel oil UST was located adjacent to
northeast corner of the building.
The Site is served by municipal water and electric utilities. There is a on-site septic system. The
Site is generally flat, sloping gently to the south toward Warren Street. Parking for vehicles is provided
on asphalt pavement east of the building. The remainder of the Site is landscaped.
Background Information
A 500-gallon underground storage tank (UST) for No. 2 fuel oil was removed from the Site in
the Fall of 1997 under the direction of Advanced Environmental Services (AES). Upon removal of the
tank, petroleum contaminated soil was observed. Headspace screening results of the soil reportedly did
not exceed 100 parts per million (ppm). A LRA was undertaken by AES. Approximately 45 tons of
petroleum contaminated soil were excavated for off-site recycling at Bardon Trimount, Inc. in South
Dennis, Massachusetts. A copy of the Bills of Lading and laboratory analytical test results of the
contaminated soil stockpile are provided in Appendix A.
AES excavated soil to a depth of 15 feet below ground surface (bgs). Composite soil samples
were collected from the four sidewalls and bottom of the excavation. Additional hand-auger samples
were collected to a depth of 20 feet bgs.
The laboratory analytical test results by AES reported total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) by
EPA Method SW846 80158 at the following concentrations: sidewalls: 12 milligrams per kilogram
(mg/kg) to 884 mg/kg, bottom: 3,020 mg/kg at 15 feet bgs, 2,050 mg/kg at 18 feet bgs, and 106 mg/kg at
20 feet bgs. The MCP S-1 Reportable Concentration (RC) for TPH is 200 mg/kg. Based on the results of
the TPH testing conducted by AES a 120-day reportable condition existed at the Site.
According to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (310 CMR 40.0360 (2), parties involved with
situations where TPH exceeds the MCPRC have 120 days to obtain Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbon
(EPH) fractional data and demonstrate that none of the fractions exceed an applicable EPH RC.
Therefore, Cushing, Goins & Kirschner, Inc. (CGK) was retained by the site owner to evaluate this
criteria..
CGK excavated a test pit in February 1998 at the location of the former UST in order to collect
soil samples for EPH analysis by the MADEP method. A soil sample was collected at 15 feet bgs and 19
feet bgs. The results of the testing indicated a reportable condition. The Site situation was reported to
the Southeast Regional Office of the DEP on June 24, 1998 and issued Release Tracking Number RTN #
4-14017. The following report details the CGK work and risk assessment supporting this RAO.
October 22, 1998
Page 3
Subsurface Investigations
A test pit was excavated by CGK on February 27, 1998 and was observed by Geoffrey May,
formerly employed by CGK. Location of the test pit was in the area of former underground storage tank
location. The test pit was excavated to a depth of 19 feet bgs. The test pit encountered a brown to
yellow, medium to coarse sand with a trace of fine gravel. No visual petroleum contamination was
observed in the subsurface. Groundwater was not encountered in the test pit. Test pit activities were
stopped when a test pit side-wall cave-in threatened the building foundation. Because of Site constraints
the test pit activity did not reach groundwater and the installation of monitoring wells was recommended.
Three borings were performed at the Site on May 20, 1998 and were completed as monitoring
wells. Drilling was performed by All Cape Well Drilling of Brewster, Massachusetts under the
supervision of CGK geologist. The wells were installed in order to evaluate the potential impact of the
petroleum release to the groundwater.
The borings were advanced using 4 inch I.D. hollow-stem augers to a depth of 22 to 25 feet
bgs. A soil sample was collected from the bottom of each boring in order to confirm the subsurface
conditions at each boring location. In general, a brown to yellow coarse, medium to fine sand with a
trace of fine gravel was encountered in each boring. The water table was encountered between 14.1 to
17.7 feet bgs. No visual or olfactory evidence of petroleum contamination was observed in any boring.
All the soil borings were completed as monitoring wells. The wells were constructed with 2-inch
I.D. PVC riser and a five foot length of 0.010-inch machine slotted PVC screen. Processed sand was
placed around the well screens to a depth of one foot above the screen. A bentonite seal was placed
above the sand. The wells were then backfilled with native sand and finished with flush-mounted
locking roadway boxes set in the ground with a surface collar of cement. Copies of the boring logs and
groundwater reports prepared by CGK detailing subsurface conditions encountered during advancement
of the wells are provided in Appendix B.
The locations of the three monitoring wells at the Site are shown on Figure 2. The newly
installed wells were developed on the day of installation (May 20, 1998) by removing 10 volumes of
water.
The monitoring wells were sampled on May 26, 1998 by CGK personnel. Prior to sampling,
depth to groundwater measurements were taken and three well volumes were removed using dedicated
tubing. Groundwater samples were placed in laboratory supplied containers for Volatile Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (VPH) and EPH and their respective target analyte compounds by the MADEP method.
The relative elevations of the three wells were surveyed at the time of the well sampling. The
well elevations (relative to one another) and depths to groundwater measurements were used to construct
a potentiometric groundwater surface map for the Site. Surface elevations, well elevations and
MFG Project No. 5539 (1 1)
October 22, 1998
Page 4
groundwater elevations are provided on Figure 2.
The groundwater flow direction beneath the Site was estimated using depth to groundwater
measurements obtained on May 26, 1998. Groundwater elevations were calculated by assuming an
elevation of 100 feet for the road box of well MW-1. Based on this assumption, elevations ranged from
83.54 feet in MW-1 to 84.31 feet in MW-2. The groundwater flows in a southwesterly direction, from
wells MW-2 and MW-3 towards MW-1.
Summary of Analytical Testing - Soil
AES collected a total of seven confirmatory soil samples at the completion of the LRA in
October of 1997. The soil samples were submitted to the laboratory for TPH analysis by EPA Method
SW846 8015B. This method provides results in the following carbon ranges: C6 - C9, C9 - C24, and
C24 - C36. The analytical test results for the excavation by AES are listed below and complete copies of
the analytical test results are provided in Appendix C.
Sides of excavation:
West side wall
East side wall
South side wall
North side wall
Bottom of excavation
15 feet
18.5 feet
20 feet
884 mg/kg (C9 - C24)
257 mg/kg (C9 - C24)
12 mg/kg (C9- C24)
(
25 mg/kg (C9- C24)
. 3,020 mg/kg (C9 - C24)
--- ,
kg (C9 - C24)
10
1g (C9 - C24)
CGK collected a total of two soil samples from the area surrounding the former tank grave. The
soil samples were submitted for EPH and targeted PAH analytes by the MADEP method. The laboratory
reports of the testing are provided in Appendix C and the data are summarized below:
EPH Range (mg/kg)
Sample S-101 (15' bgs)
Sample S-104 (19' bgs)
C9 - C18 Aliphatics
2,190
ND
C19 - C36 Aliphatics
416
ND
C11I - C22 Aromatics
685
ND
Targeted PAH Analytes (ug/kg)
ND
ND
October 22, 1998
Page 5
At the time of the assessment by CGK, soil samples were screened in the field using an OVM128 photoionization detector with a 10.2 eV lamp. No headspace readings above background were noted
from the samples collected by CGK, therefore no samples were submitted for VPH analysis. The
analytical results indicate that the petroleum contamination is associated with weathered # 2 fuel oil and
VPH testing is not warranted.
Summary of Analytical Testing - Groundwater
Water samples collected from the on-site monitoring wells were analyzed for EPH and VPH
including their respective target analyte compounds.
No compound was detected above minimum detection limits in the groundwater samples
collected at the Site. A copy of the laboratory report of groundwater test results is provided in Appendix
C.
Risk Characterization
A Method I Risk Assessment was conducted on the soil and groundwater data collected at the
Site. Based on the current and foreseeable use of the property, the exposure point concentration (EPC)
for the soil was calculated for a residential use scenario, where children and adults are present and their
frequency and intensity are high. The petroleum contaminated soil maybe considered to be accessible to
potentially accessible, therefore the soil category for the Site is S1.
The groundwater category was determined to be GW-1 due to the Site's location within the Cape
Cod Sole Source Aquifer. The surrounding properties are serviced by Town water and according to the
Massachusetts GIS Map, the Site is not located within the Zone II of a public water supply. In addition,
the groundwater beneath the Site is also classified as GW-3, as is all groundwater within the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
In order determine the EPC for the soil, data obtained by AES and CGK was used. The results of
the soil analyses were provided as either TPH or EPH data. Therefore, the EPH soil data were converted
to TPH concentrations. A total of eight soil samples representing the residual TPH levels of soil
contamination at the Site were used. The individual converted concentrations for the eight soil samples
is as follows:
Side Walls:
25, 12, 257, and 884 mg/kg
Bottom:
15' -24 mg/kg
18.5' - 2,050 mg/kg
19'- 150 mg/kg (V detection limit)
20'- 106 mg/kg
MFG Project No. 5539 (1 1)
October 22, 1998
Page 6
Based of the above results an average concentration of 847 mg/kg was calculated, providing a soil EPC
for the Site of 847 mg/kg.
Based on the soil EPC, a compositional template was developed using Site specific EPH data.
The soil sample collected fifteen feet below the ground surface (worst case, i.e. highest concentration)
was used to develop the Site specific compositional template for the petroleum contaminated soil
remaining at the limits of the excavation in order to close out the Site in accordance with MCP
provisions using the VPH/EPH approach.
A compositional template was developed by estimating the percentage of each EPH fraction in
the total EPH concentration of 3,291 mg/kg measured in the sample from 15' bgs. The reported EPH
results for the soil sample were 2,190 mg/kg for C9 - C 18; 685 mg/kg for C 1I- C22; and 416 mg/kg for
C19 - C36. Based on these data the following percentages for each compositional range were calculated:
C9-C18=66%,CIlI - C22 = 21%,and C19-C36 = 13%.
Based on these EPH percentages, the fractions of the total average TPH concentration (847
mg/kg) representing the EPC for each of the EPH compositional ranges are:
C9 - Cl8
Cl1I - C22
C19- C36
559 mg/kg
178 mg/kg
111 mg/kg
The EPC concentration for each EPH compositional range was compared to the Method 1
GW1/SI soil standard. The Method I GW1/SI standards for the three EPH compositional range are as
follows:
C9 - C18
Cl I - C22
C9 - C36
1,000 mg/kg
200 mg/kg
2,500 mg/kg
The Method I GW I/SI standards for the three EPH compositional ranges were not exceeded
when compared to the Site specific EPH compositional template EPC concentrations.
Three monitoring wells were sampled for VPH/ EPH and their target analyte compounds. No
contaminate of concern was detected above minimum laboratory detection limits indicating that
groundwater was not impacted by the petroleum release and that no significant exposure to the
groundwater has occurred.
Client silvia/Osterville/Rao/5 53".wpd
October 22, 1998
Page 7
Based on the risk assessment findings a condition of"No Significant Risk" has been achieved at the Site
with no limitation on the current or future use of the Site.
Feasibility of Achieving Background
The contamination at the Site was not reduced to background. It is assumed that "background"
for the Site is considered to be "non-detect" for petroleum contamination. However, a review of the
levels of residual petroleum contamination in the soil after the LRA indicates the removal action was
successful in "approaching background."
The remedial actions performed at the Site included the removal and recycling of approximately
30 cubic yards of petroleum contaminated soil. Additional soils could not be removed due to the
proximity of the building foundation to the excavation. The soil removed consisted of a fine to coarse
sand typical of this area of Cape Cod. This material lacks significant cohesiveness and stability and was
a threat to cave-in. A cave-in situation had the potential to damage the building unless extraordinary
measures including the shoring and bracing of the building was performed in order to remove additional
soils. The estimated cost to shore and brace the building is estimated to be $20,000. Based on an
assessment of the shoring requirement to perform additional excavation and the levels of residual soil
contamination, it is MFG's opinion that the removal of additional soils is infeasible compared to the
benefits that may be realized.
Uncontrolled Sources
The release associated with this Site was associated with an underground storage tank. The tank
was removed and disposed of off site. Approximately 30 yards of soil were also removed from the UST
grave for off-site recycling. Based on the work conducted to date, all substantial uncontrolled sources
associated with this release have been eliminated.
Conclusions
This supporting documentation is provided in support of a Class A2 Response Action Outcome
Statement. The residual levels of contamination in the soil exceed the applicable Method 1 Standards.
An Activity and Use Limitation is not required at the Site because the residual levels of soil
contamination are below the S1 standard. It is MFG's opinion that according to 310 CMR 40.0000 no
significant risk remains at the Site. The removal of the underground storage tank and impacted soil has
October 22, 1998
Page 8
mitigated effectively all substantial uncontrolled sources associated with this release.
A Response Action Outcome Statement Form (BWSC - 104) has been completed and attached to
this letter report.
Limitations
The assumptions and conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions based on
our scope of services, observations, testing and reporting by others. Opinions expressed herein apply to
site conditions existing at the time of our review and those reasonably foreseeable in the future. The
opinions cannot necessarily apply to Site changes of which McCulley, Frick & Gilman, Inc. is not aware
of and has not had the opportunity to evaluate.
If you have any questions regarding this letter report, please contact this office at 781-937-0500.
Very truly yours,
McCulley, Frick & Gilman, Inc.
Seni
rGe6fM ,.G.,
Geologist
L.S.P.
b-rret
W. Gra kikmp, P.G.
Senior Geologist
Office Manager
Massachusetts Department of Envi'.ment
1Prt
r rtinn
Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
P f W
RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME (RAO)
t
PROPERTY STATU!
_DOWNGRADIENT
Pursuant to 310"CMR 40.0180 (Subpart B), 40.0580 (Sub -artE
TRelease
uL
BWSC-104
Tracking Number
J
-
.40 l(Subpart J
A. SITE OR DOWNGRADIENT PROPERTY LOCATION:
4
i
14017
SOUTHETRECION
Site Name: (optional)
44 Warren Avwnue
Street
Cityf/own:
Ostervill p
SCheck here
LocationAid:
off
ZIPCode:
n?655
Westr
Strpeet
if this Site location is Tier Classified. If a Tier I Permit has been issued, state the Permit Number:
Related Release Tracking Numbers that this Form Addresses:
If submitting an RAO Statement, you must document the location of the Site or the location and boundaries of the Disposal Site subject to this
Statement. If submitting an RAO Statement for a PORTION of a Disposal Site, you must document the location and boundaries for both the
portion subject to this submittal and,'to the extent defined, the entire Disposal Site. If submitting a Downgradient Property Status Submittal,
you must provide a site plan of the property subject to the submittal and, to the extent defined, the Disposal Site.
B. THIS FORM IS BEING USED TO:
(check all that apply)
Submit a Response Action Outcome (RAO) Statement (complete Sections A, B,C. D. E, F, H. I.J and L).
D
D
Check here if this is a revised RAO Statement.
Date of Prior Submittal:
Check here if any Response Actions remain to be taken to address conditions associated with any of the Releases whose Release Tracking
Numbers are listed above. This RAO Statement will record only an RAO-Partial Statement for those Release Tracking Numbers.
Specify Affected Release Tracking Numbers:
SSubmit an optional Phase
I Completion Statement supporting an RAO Statement or Downgradient Property Status Submittal
(complete Sections A, B, H, I,J. and L).
SSubmit a Downgradient Property Status Submittal (complete Sections A, B
]
Check here if this is a revised Downgradient Property Status Submittal.
,G H, I,J and K).
Date of Prior Submittal:
Submit a Termination of a Downgradient Property Status Submittal (complete Sections A. B, I.J and L).
Submit a Periodic Review Opinion evaluating the status of a Temporary Solution (complete Sections A, B, H, I, J and L).
Specify one:
For a Class C RAO
For a Waiver Completion Statement indicating a Temporary Solution
Provide Submittal Date of RAO Statement or Waiver Completion Statement:
You must attach all supporting documentation required for each use of form indicated, including copies of
any Legal Notices and Notices to Public Officials required by 310 CMR 40.1400.
C. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE ACTIONS:
xI
(check all that apply)
Assessment and/or Monitoring Only
Deployment of Absorbant or Contaminent Materials
SRemoval of Contaminated Soils
Temporary Covers or Caps
Re-use, Recycling or Treatment
Q
On Site
C()Off Site
Bioremediation
Est. Vol.:
30
cubic yards
Describe: LRA Recycling @ Asphalt Batching
P
Landfill
Q
Cover
Q
Disposal Est. Vol.:
Removal of Drums,Tanks or Containers
Describe: Removed
500 gal.
_
cubic yards
Soil Vapor Extraction
Structure Venting System
Product or NAPL Recovery
Groundwater Treatment Systems
UST
Air Sparging
Removal of Other Contaminated Media
Temporary Water Supplies
Specify Type and Volume:
Temporary Evacuation or Relocation of Residents
Other Response Actions
Fencing and Sign Posting
Describe
SECTION C IS CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE.
Revsed 4/7/95
Supersedes Forms BWSC-004 and 010 (in part)
Do Not Alter This Form
Page 1 of 4
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
BWSC-104
RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME (RAO) STATEMENT &
DOWNGRADIENT PROPERTY STATUS TRANSMITTAL FORM
7-
Pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0180 (Subpart B), 40.0580 (Subpart E) & 40.1056 (Subpart J)
4
C. DESCRIPTION OF RESPONSE ACTIONS:
Release Tracking Number
-
14017
(continued)
SCheck here if any Response Action(s) that serve as the basis for this RAO Statement involve the use of Innovative
interested in using this information to create an Innovative Technologies Clearinghouse.)
Technologies. (DEP is
Describe Technologies:
D. TRANSPORT OF REMEDIATION WASTE: (if Remediation Waste was sent to an off-site facility, answer the following questions)
NameofFacility: Bardon Trimount,
Inc.,
Townandstate:
South Dennis, Massachusetts
Quantity of Remediation Waste Transported to Date:
30 enhi r
yards
E. RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME CLASS:
Specify the Class of Response Action Outcome that applies to the Site or Disposal Site. Select ONLY one Class:
S Class A-1 RAO:
Specify one of the following:
Q
Contamination has been reduced to background levels.
Q
A Threat of Release has been eliminated.
Class A-2 RAO: You MUST provide justification that reducing contamination to background levels is infeasible.
SClass A-3 RAO:
You MUST provide both an implemented Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) and justification that reducing contamination
to background levels is infeasible.
If applicable, provide the earlier of the AUL expiration date or date the design life of the remedy will end:
SClass B-1 RAO:
Specify one of the following:
Q
SClass B-2 RAO:
Contamination is consistent with background levels
O
Contamination is NOT consistent with background leves.
You MUST provide an implemented AUL.
If applicable, provide the AUL expiration date :
Class C RAO:
]
Check here if you will conduct post-RAO Operation, Maintenance and Monitoring at the Site.
Specify One:
Q
0
Peassive Operation and Maintenance
Q
Active Operation and Maintenance (defined at 310 CMR 40.0006)
Monitoring Only
F. RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME INFORMATION:
SIf an
H
RAO Compliance Fee is required, check here to certify that the fee has been submitted. You MUST attach a photocopy of the payment
Check here if submitting one or more AULs. You must attach an AUL Transmittal Form (BWSC-113) and a copy of each implemented AUL
related to this RAO Statement. Specify the type of AUL(s) below: (required for all Class A-3 RAOs and Class B-2 RAOs)
(
Notice of Activity and Use Limitation
O
Number of AULs attached:
Grant of Environmental Restriction
Specify the Risk Characterization Method(s) used to achieve the RAO described above and all Soil and Groundwater Categories applicable to the Ste.
More than one Soil Category and more than one Groundwater Category may apply at a Site.
Be sure to check off all APPULICABLE categories, even if more stringent soil and groundwater standards were met.
Risk Characterization Method(s) Used:
Method 1
]
Method 2
Soil Category(ies) Applicable:
S-1
]
S-2
S-3
Groundwater Category(ies) Applicable:
GW-1
GW-2
GW-3
;
]
Method 3
> When submitting any Class A-1 RAO or a Class B-1 RAO where contamination is consistent with background levels, do NOT specify a
Risk Characterization Method.
> When submitting any Class A.2 RAO or a Class B-1 RAO where contamination is NOT consistent with background levels, you cannot
use an AUL to maintain a level of no significant risk. Therefore, you must meet S-1 Soil Standards, if using Risk Characterization
Method 1.
Revised 4/7/95
Page 2 of 4
QMassachuse
SPursuant
Department of Enviro
n I reti
iB
RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME (RAO) S
DOWNGRADIENT PROPERTY STATUS T
ME T &
BWSC-104
-
3J
I
ase Tracking Number
sT--R
to 310 CMR 40.0180 (Subpart B), 40.0580 (Subpart )
.1
14017
G. DOWNGRADIENT PROPERTY STATUS SUBMITTAL:
SIf a Downgradient Property Status Submittal Compliance Fee is required, check here to certify that the fee has been submitted. You MUST
attach a photocopy of the payment.
SCheck
here if a Release(s) of Oil or Hazardous Material(s), other than that which is the subject of this submittal has occurred at this property.
Release Tracking Number(s):
Q
Check here if the Releases identified above require further Response Actions pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0oo000.
Required documentation for a Downgradient Property Status Submittal includes, but is not limited to, copies of notices provided
to owners and operators of both upgradient and downgradient abutting properties and of any known or suspected source properties.
H. LSP OPINION:
I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have personally examined and am familiar with this transmittal form, including any and all
documents accompanying this submittal. In my professional opinion and judgment based upon application of (i) the standard of care in 309 CMR
4.02(1). (ii) the applicable provisions of 309 CMR 4.02(2) and (3), and (lii) the provisions of 309 CMR 4.03(5), to the best of my knowledge, information
and belief,
> if Section B indicates that a Downgradlent Properly Status Submittal is being provided, the response action(s) that is (are) the subject of this
submittal (i) has (have) been developed and implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000, (ii)
is (are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish
the purposes of such response action(s) as set forth in 310 CMR 40.0183(2)(b), and (iii) complies(y)
with the identified provisions of all orders, permits, and approvals identified in this submittal;
> if Section 8 indicatesthat either an RAO Statement Phase I Completion Statement and/or PeriodicReview Opinion is being provided, the
response action(s) that is (are) the subject of this submittal (i) has (have) been developed and implemented in accordance with the applicable provisions
of M.G.L. c. 21 E and 310 CMR 40.0000, (ii) is (are) appropriate and reasonable to accomplish the purposes of such response action(s) as set forth in
the applicable provisions of M.G.L. c. 21E and 310 CMR 40.0000, and (iiI) complies(y) with the identified provisions of all orders, permits, and approvals
identified in this submittal.
I am aware that significant penalties may result, including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment, if I submit information which I know to be
false, inaccurate or materially incomplete.
SCheck here if the Response Action(s) on which this opinion is based, Ifany, are (were) subject to any order(s). permit(s) and/or approval(s)
issued by DEP or EPA. If the box is checked, you MUST attach a statement identifying the applicabtl
LSP Name:
Telephone:
R
nffry
781- 937-c00
Ext.:
"AOF
Stamp:
LSP#:5755
MAy
thereof.
1&2
GEOFFREY
FAX (optional)
ip
R.
MAY
o
0
No. 5755
Signature
//S
22<t
/
Date.
1. PERSON MAKING SUBMITTAL:
Name of Organization: 1Tq
on
Cnrpnrati
t
R i 1 Vi
Name of Contact
F I.ny
Street:
619
city/Town:
Centerville
Telephone:
508-775-1442
Title:
Main StrPpt
Ext.':
FAX:(optional)
J. RELATIONSHIP TO SITE OF PERSON MAKING SUBMITTAL:
SRP or PRP
Specify.
Owner
ZIPCode: 02632
State: MA
Q
Operator
O
Generator
O
508-775-2753
(check one)
Transporter
Other RP or PRP:
Fiduciary. Secured Lender or Municipality with Exempt Status (as defined by M.G L c. 21 E, s 2)
Agency or Public Utility on a Right of Way (as defined by M.G.L c 21E. s. 5())
Any Other Person Submitting This Form
Revised 4/7/95
Specify Relationship:
Page 3 of 4
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
RESPONSE ACTION OUTCOME (RAO) STATEMENT &
DOWNGRADIENT PROPERTY STATUS TRANSMITTAL FORM
Pursuarntto 310 CMR 40.0180 (Subpart B), 40.0580 (Subpart E)& 40.1056 (Subpart J)
BWSC-104
Release Tracking Number
--- LJ i 14(1I7
i
K. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON SUBMITTING DOWNGRADIENT PROPERTY STATUS SUBMITTAL:
I.
, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury (1)that I have personally examined and am
familiar with the information contained in this submittal, including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form; (ii)that, based on my inquiry
of the/those individual(s) immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material information contained herein is, to the best of my knowledge,
information and belief, true. accurate and complete; (iiI) that, to the best of my knowledge, Information and belief, I/the person(s) or entity(ies) on whose
behalf this submittal is made satisfyKes) the criteria in 310 CMR 40.0183(2); (iv)that l/the person(s) or entity(ies) on whose behalf this submittal is made
have provided notice in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0183(5); and (v) that I am fully authortzed to make this attestation on behalf of the person(s) or
entity(ies) legally responsible for this submittal. lithe person(s) or entity(ies) on whose behalf this submittal is made is/are aware that there are significant
penalties, including, but not limited to. possible fines and imprisonment, for willfully submitting false, inaccurate, or incomplete information.
(signature)
Date:
(print name of person or entity recorded in Section I)
Enter address of the person providing certification, if different from address recorded in Section 1:
Street:
City/Town:
State:
Telephone:
FAX: (optional)
ZIP Code:
L. CERTIFICATION OF PERSON MAKING SUBMITTAL:
If you are completing only a Downgradient Property Status Submittal, you do not need to complete this section of the form.
I. n)
r
si
,
V1
/1(
, attest under the pains and penalties of pejury (i)that I have personally examined and am
familiar wl
information contained n this submittal, including any and all documents accompanying this transmittal form, (ii)that, based on my inquiry
of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material information contained in this submittal is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete, and (ii) that I am fully authorized to make this attestation on behalf of the entity legally responsible for
this submittal. 1the person or entity on whose behalf this submittal is made amis aware that there are significant penalties, including, but not limited to,
possible fines and imp* nmefnt, f willfullySubmitting false, inaccurate, or incomplete Information.
Title:
*
Rv
/ I
(sign ure)
Date:
(print name of pifson or entity
"
in Stction
1)
S/
Enter address of the person providing certification, if different from address recorded in Section I:
Street:
City/Town:
State:
Telephone:
FAX: (optional)
ZIP Code:
YOU MUST COMPLETE ALL RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THIS FORM OR DEP MAY RETURN THE DOCUMENT AS
INCOMPLETE. IF YOU SUBMIT AN INCOMPLETE FORM, YOU MAY BE PENALIZED FOR MISSING
A REQUIRED DEADLINE, AND YOU MAY INCUR ADDITIONAL COMPLIANCE FEES.
Revised 4/7/95
Page 4 of 4
Attachments:
Figure 1
Figure 2
GIS Map - Project Locus
Site Map
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Bill of Lading
CGK Boring logs and Monitoring Well Report
AES Soil Data
CGK Soil and Groundwater Data
Figures
MA DEP - Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup
Site Scoring Map: 500 feet & 0.5 Mile Radii
SITE NAME:
stwnwon
PrOpiemamn
44 Wmrren Ave
Osv
MA
4607864n 385351gw
e map
mai
It t11 e
Ii
or
e remw
atI
bemat
Su
itoalneors
.
.s4.p.o
u...
..
"
IM
AILL
rt----
(N
'N.
/
I.&. knaSstas,a.d
-*i-
Rnurare:
cnwaymrIftEP PAtakn ..........* - IrP fr ; Pipan
s........................
Q
DrrapRains: M,.a.b ........................
educt ..........
Strea mFAratterrattertkA
m:
Pobw I&v P, dutiv A*A: Mack.r V-id.:Ho,€ Y,,d
Pn-Rtanot.od
- - --
-
-
~d Sol. s
&sp1.S o
ApAr ...............................
,s.Sufce.,Noncarmay
Q Q
Appund aintm;
.rtae Wittr &svgv
Z. A
H
YVi FassRk Stae al Stpw Y ...
htil
FreeBet.hHEGP Wilexis Hmiit ..........-
m
-&agrph
-
-
Ck~
,e Spm
3a.w ACEC.......................
r.* ,g Ar Sour. A..: badmn.HWgh w
SCALE 1:15000
=
*
EPA Do
Pcwa
I
'"
DEP Parrvated Sold wAste FoCti
1U
K....am.
crried Vrn Pom.
..
is,
0
cc)
CN
00
a-
LiJ
o'
nr.N'
0
<
<)
<
<f
C
1<0
<o <
u
<o
<<n/
°
oo- Ox>2"
u
afu
e0J
/,
/a
/j//I
/
/
/E/
0
IL
/
/<-<"
"
/4
z
0
n
)
/
o
_
-J\
CD
\o~
L
<<
\o
(\
0
,Li
-0 (>
\
(00
\\\\
\\\\\\\\\\m
KU)
5
LiL
-j0z
zo
cvo
.t
Appendix A
MassachusettsDepartmentof
SIL.. OF L.ADING
(pursuant n 31s
44 Warren Avtiu
c,,,irew;
vironmrental Protection
"
cAR 4o-
A. LOCATION OF SITE oR oDISPOSAL SITE WuER
ese Namaeson: Woqdvri
Shop
stes
7752753
TO
A.M. WILSON ASSOC.
FROM
8:34AM
08-07-1998 01
P.04
BWSC-O 12A
L..
-
REM DIArON WASTE WAS -CIRMATED'
Locaon
.
er:
Zone..
0-aterville
0265.5
-
ot Genersonn: 10 /
/
o
/0-ate/Peroo
/
ACaaIconaI Rese Tradting NUmbees Assocaed Wr thi $11 O LadSg:
t
*Nte*
it tale inI of ladrn I the nt
.off/astlen, a Releas
a.
of a LiMn e Remove Action (LRA
raTkin Ntbe,
Is not neaSte.
- WITH BILL OF LADINOe
PERsoN CONDUCTING RESPONSE ACTION ASSOCIA
LM
oran~xato
aWe
Corporation
Narneer Conlact:
Sient
Silva
. Flayd
Tie
street
619 Main
fO..
50 NH-71T
Tal
Staw
o - 1442
C. RELATIONI&HIP TO RELEASE OR THREAT OF RELEAS
ASSOCIATD WITH BILL OF LAOING:
(Cneca 0netsps
$oUwcy oes oc..;:
owner 00eae
PA seeiy (cfrct. one):
) COoeraor
FPo.u.ersecurea Lancer
Agency/Puoric UVlty on a RgkW a Way
It an owme a4r appeer
Genaeete
Tanspoor
ey
cthon asoaae
onep.,ao: Robert Devilanqra
-
41/
-
a Owner
S
Sate
h
-
ng
..
seet; 152 Kiahs Way
c~ty/ro,,,: Sandwich
508
s e.-ne:
398 - 8865&
SO,.-.
8 - Dennis
ana: -: South
r
Eawscrvo
Asael
91 A6se saterWoV
ast
LAnCoona
WashlassA Perr~
ActuwAntucqpae
Div
s-95-042seeent
Perme
d Period OtTervorary Strage (setedy oates
Reason tar Temporary S&oaae (Irsan
bl).
.
hveetW
,gj
-_
Tis
im
epA
-
....
MAD985286394
aenalticaIe -**
t
/
/
0
yndiia
n,
6 V899880ST
"0
Oma:
s
appetcablet-
08/07/98
rOd
,ncwatr
O ?oory Storage
AN
--
0
ma come:02
D
cover
02553
Manager
.2660
Lawbauitsircumri
Th.fma Prccashg
Wssnot rsertetaaeWas'e
5-95-042
sm
eiaosanmsoea
C
m.
e
c
""e
L- RECRIVING FrAcarYraPORARY STORAGE LOCATION
oetae/FackhNane
Bron
Troun
nc.
Powers
Bar
CantacrPrs
aes ern Road
reat
290
sw
acdno
OWRP'
PRP
the u at Lacing provide on anacmen me name.
ers.otr seen. loow..
. ndwcing any ares cod. an
0. TRANSPORTERICOMMON CARRIER INFORMATION.
reanponwormen CmaerNanse Robert
evi'lnanua Trackt
T
yOe o
(Onat
____
OF PERnSON CONOfleTrNG R9SP120= ACTION
Gent
s not eonhousing mn 'epo
contact pesn. addss an tetehone me
Teleonane*
02632
at)
OP
O
Coe:
3o Code:
A
Stae:
Centerville
cy/row,:
aken pi.or to
2
I
ect
08:37
TX/RX NO.
8?9t- TLt-80
WodA
1046
Pace iot 2
P04
wtub:80 866T-t0-o
,. wILSON ASSOC.
?752753
viranmental Protection
Maasachusetts Deparatent of
HrX Jureau <t
ThM!
4
ILL .*
L..fDING 4.....*a-sa
I
to swqcar*
ooanu______
.auseIwned
"asd
see
e
.
.
.
.....
a
-*--
---
---
(t-
'tedle
bI
C7eans
fn
l
Soit
y)
1* Mat 1-"i
C1u6w
.. '.,'.*t*f
*
ea
.
0CEIo
Water
ve.vaa.
o
.
---
-
.cp.
doJ l.~
JAnlts
---
-
othear-.lspty:.
('1C!k;asin
Gasoare
.M..sn
*<'vsja.
St.co
*
ap.>yr
l**n:. a.tat
&Zee
k upo.a.~CJs
tstftS
& ot*****e
*
IfgassSQtth.NtMSaShlS
;~SfE
1r..-
loW ",amn..su4p,
OF REItantATIEM WAsrs
P. DacaraPnO
enek as ra 4-rk
$
.
-
...-
or
SWSC-0 I 2A
Sic Cerus
Was;t
t sdCEVEG D&&s~jrTnz2caEAltY StguIA&E Lsat.
a
P.06
-
, *-..messSasc:4:ttackione/WTEY.;
40
^.-,aa"
..
....
'
-.-
-
.
0o ''ans-x..u-
-
-
alc
Oa'er (sec.vt.
4-<*:*<**wus
nteojr.'Jocumn~t.on
2WIaCSerMaStie
m*a...
a. unsaSD SITa PROsswget.LSPI OPOItoN
oa
*~~~~
Pt:-imi-6.
-tie.oInAnO.
\,"
400.j
-
rMIL Lstuart
v .aasist
I
nc.
.cT,
Vrg
r-
omspoga
tat
*.
** enr
±'
bnwlat*,gat
1.44
tnnrm
Mas 4 .
eelpi
the :tse.
w.
*9.
tnct.
r4sen
-c.-Y
i
I"v
smatw-r
Weme 5f wtw
&W "" o
.">www...... ne.n
U.
L ev-see
.s
Zemba
I"
n
aang;z
L
I- itrt14000
.j--
# '0
,teflj(t
T .. ","
f
a-
.
V1 :
;-.Jm.*
T
e
-.-
*
*
zte
s..
-st~'::"tt*.
w..
.r
*. *r
-
-'431:-,?.-
owre
08:37
-4.M
?!T
"
7M9S
1:*(tt*
t
,'y
*L**.5j
Seht
fal .t4Ad &e* a9JC - pole @*.I
4 .L islIa .thCC.;rt4.
..
Mr7-vr * NM
W-*
.,*4 <
"aunf.eSmass .rwhe0r.
.
Uas 'rtn '1SL~aseWC Cfl
08/07/98
FTRqq
v
hy.
CSARTfICATbOQ CF PERSON CONVUCTINC RE5Pomi t ACT:014 Assoo0ATD
*iLu. or Lunlese3
4*ffaaw
-Vc
qrnH
**=ae:~n -l :flv..diu.
****so3 .
o'ear
r*ra
2955
IM.
ececI...,fIn::1 r.s
cs
.co
*-
r1 ;ctt'Jla:. 0
rfr"
tra
-
,e-
ar
*
*--ar--'c-e"
cr
.4/
*y****r
-
z
T1/RI NO. 1046
P6OS
8?St-1Tt-80S
WOaJ
WdJbE:80 9661-t,0-90
,LLSON
P. 02
7752753
TC
kSSUC.
ae
ac
NO
TIE
T
M
11cl2
ANo:
I
ACsAom. AN
5E89ICE
ADUANCkrD £NvZRONMCN'A .
15 ATLANTIC
5~Q0TE~.vS4.~R
UENUE
SQOUTH DENNIS. MA e266
me..
..
,
._.
.
n,
TON
PONOS
.
Roes
RfPY SCIL. 0TL
ann
de
a
,
Ntt
TfAXTCTALouse
i
-, .
•
I
.
RZeoed by:
/
J
1 "DEPAFINOB
r,
YKI
-
current prians
CUSTOMER
- - - - - - - - - -
08/07/98
?o0d
6vT899988o0
I wernGHsA'
e1/4
our w, be echrgec
e Wai~rImn
ew
1
-
CoNTo.
vO'Y
916) 87-25
-- -- -- - -
WAi'iG TIMe
2598287
- =-
-
08:37
TX/RI NO.
9F?9-Tt/L-80S
1046
WO4-
WOS:80 8661-t0-80
FROM
08-07-1S998 OS 34AM
U
*
A.M.
7752733
TO
WILSCON ASSOC.
a
Ba~mIHnnut
out
tO.9T3Ue
a-mc
e wNou anN.
Is.".
IT C aQ
sOUTm DENNIS,
m.e.
an
uE
tu
/ o
so
U-ANCD EN'JXtIW-ENTAL MVICE
15 AT
P.03
_
(
Db
A
-
Wm N
,t
I_
_,
660@
MA
m wso
r-
.--........
TOI
U D
.rrP
GAQSS
1,
REPY SOIL OIL
u
TA
TRuCMKING RA
>;
+
IYiiitqnfnm
Reaeve
by:
+ .
-..
-
..
MINOR+,
.
...
.
raimou
T'x
*
e
.
.4, 1
+,
...
p
T
O
:ech.
.in
is w"nay vwtind
*..J
,~a.r
3'-
I e-"ar2
I--
t,..
I
-
--.
I
-
I
CUSTOMER
-
-
cus-
08/07/98
-
2596288NO
foPY
-
po-
u-
08:37
TX/RX NO.
,----nnnnr.T9?R-Ty-SPI
L40HH
t JbTS:82 8%l-t0-80
08-07-1998 08:36AM
FROM
A.M.
W[LSON ASSOC.
I'
(D4
(D.)
Masachusaltts Department of I nvironmental Protection
~
BWSC-C
BILL OF LADING (purnuant to
G SHE
is
OF
Tp"
ese?.nr
a
Dat& at SrhJert:
icfo w)a,m.-
-
:
'o C: Recert
Date at Aeceor:
rthe of Stupnent
-/
-
RecewinQ FacityfrmOcraly Storage Regrese taNe:
eoeswentativ:
Silpiralre ol Traesperer
Im
Tr te Reg4svGt.won (i
TrvC lTraCI0f Reguiraon:
N**
CMR 4C.0o=o)
I. LOAD INFORMATION.
LOAD
12B
(CvCl one) aCmc
ay)
LoaC Size (cu. y,.Aon$)
*cang Faciivtyramporary Storaqe Recresemtwoe
LOAD 2t Sgnature of Transoarter Reoresentade!
Tme of S tt intO
Date of Stuament
/
/
.
(crae on&) awr..n
*
Traser Registration
rtstckTractor RAgtaznon
Tme vs ReCt
Roceov
Dg at
/-.
(crcIe one) anvmf
(it any);
Loe Size (Cu. ydtAnS;
(cirleoelm
Tr Regstration (it any):
-
/
/
rucKtrfacnf Reistrtion:
/
Win
F*e*e
~~("ciree
Tra
(orCe oMe) arpm
snune at Tr4nwsparmW Reprmeswmtav
SDene
LOADl C
agr.'as
Dse ad Sniomner:
m at
(circleer
/
m
/
TruSwTractrC Re
Sze
(cu. yd__
Oat
One ot Aceot:
" + ,R....
Shipmetnu
. '
_ -tn of ,.-ec-
LOC SHURN
*
(Ccle Coe)
Trole Regisrage (u any)
atlian:
V OLUat
INFORMATION:
~
101I/93
~Total
yas.At)
Carrie Fotware (ou.y.cs:
Trs teer a anwo o tyed
08/07/98
arnlam
rtal Volume This Pag* (cadto
TOW C+
Th*sea
Time at Reawi E
f/(Circle one) adam
/
Lead Size (cu.
J.
_):
Repeernts
stRewg PacifliryfrmoraryStorace
Ropfe"'At
Iswg
Oaeur of Tenporter Represetnta:
De&e omfhourret
.
-
(ircle oe.) eime
Load
LOAD 7e
Rerse~u
al Recetm
/,
Regirador (if 4ny))
egirao.Trale
runkTacr
____
ce ofRecoo
ipet
/-/
-
Reeei~FciwyTemporury Sworage
Aeearadvt
of Trrp
ecaut
-
.--
Size (cu. ydOsIito
__1411s
_-O-
Tieeof
1 Recei t
/
m
J.
(Cu. yAd.cds:
f
n FacnyrmwMoway Srae Reenta
ae
(cil/.)
/i/.
/-
Size
=msc
m
o
Tn
Time of Rocept:
/
/
arnpm
y
i any.
Ae egim or(ion
glad
Date
arrverr
raeutreVmoorary Siorage Roresnwemoc
eofAceipt-
of Shipenea
/
Tuat, ,actor Regitratw;
LOAD
-
ne
Size (cu- ydiAonsk
LOAD 4:s Sinane o4 TanWeter Rmveon adve2
/
-
/-
(were*
_________
_Lo__e__ad
Qate at Shupment:
Thme of Pemcpe,:
Date of Aeverog:
ort Shipment
T
at Shtwfen:t
Da
Recewvvg Faceiy/Temporary Storage Resresetatwo
of Tra soarter Aepresernacve*
LOAD W Sga"
08:37
d
erw.d
r
This Pt
Cu.Oydtert):
Waper.
TX/RX NO.
1046
P07
Utbv:8e LeS-t-O8
qfl-Ttt-809 W4-0
Page
Boi dIwa±l
nlreeaAw1.
J.no
- -
*
AAMm"M.V
E
CSDINGlNC RRf A
o
U
*frsouinetn mieerageark
37AM
SUWAAUY
DATE Of
*4,p
FROM
Aa
fotat
A.M.
OF
SI4IflEIITW1
OF Rs
Wri THrIS
e.Bsepe
rrs
aAToN
ILL O
WASTR
LAflCl a
-a
godwe
WILSON ASSOC.
..
eay
mV
PERSON
sucmdarl
F**m,
r'.4ee.nee.
0'
7752753
TO
of E
BWSC-01 2C
Protecton
ironnental
P.08
RA
CUP..O=f-n
I
t
S 1I-P1fCUa(C U. YO SJTC N S)
O:S:I:V
:;
OAr E vFmgCliPT:
3N T:
Date_
waAUs1PT
AssesATwb
tts Dpartment
MAaiachus
Bureau of Waste Site Cleanwp
SILA. OF L-ADIN
tP .*.=It
.....
SUMMARY SHNE
~
K.
IM
Mr
aeemni
0
08-07-19
-a..-.-.
-/
na
atS
-74-------- ----------------------
---------
.---------.....
I
-----------
-------- --------
-
---------
------------
-------------
------------------------- -
I
------
-------
---------------
---------
----------------------------------
--------------
----------------------------
-------------------
------
....
I-I
-------------
~~OJ
7,
-----------------
s.4LPPS.C10:
08/0708
I -------------
1046---------------
---------------8/07/O
----------------------------------
-----------
--------------------
---------
-----------
0
3OTAL
------
*O------------
P0
o
Toq
i~tud .
rj
mu
.
--
'.
.
SMasesnchuetts
1
kLn-wag
rt,...., . *
P. 09
7?527?53
Depalment of Envira imentu .Protection BWSC-o01 2C
ot Waste SlW Cleanup
,WUau
DILL OF LADING
w..
SUMMAy Swar..
to s o cum
[
asoat
NT OF RECEPTOF aEMMDIATON WAn AT RECOSIVING FACSIInY aR
L.ACOWLAW4W
WI LOCAT €Ct
TIAPOllAKY SMrm
mewrerar
nece..
*
Is. ACIVOWLEDaMm
C
I CeWy
.tCa0
DU iTI
r
thewre ar
anmon
SNIPMENTr AND
T
w...w =
gta
h
RECRIPT OF REM
ACTION ASSOCATED WaT
RB
wfadw oM uM Ian
g isa
flleW
eoc..
In. wamaso,
/.../
. .m
Ipae pg eey mgne aM
Saw SulhUail. and fel. amnt on
n"M
=s,
wtlt
fflanon
um:"
(*Ords
A@.
nan 4. I* me set
M id ho. poal
ilvta
__
Canes"
O
ArON WASTE BY PERaON
TMIS
.L Or LAtIME
fr
t
nsme
05y muaryoft
a mJantedq
e aInes aMS ,rt.
oraksr
S
Qssinwt Un ltas Sjrth,8
eacWsit
nriANm
ervy
.rwnrteiaory (eDonabe for cmannag
as.. luC. aeeflee oe
wro'te.
r.
ns. -a milway ubmasar Tansi efl.att.
e,
I
TOTAL P.09
08/07/98
t1'd
6t1899880ST
08:37
TX/RX NO.
1046
W0aJ
99.-Tt-80S
QQ) T)) flq
P09
W9S:80 8661-0-80
-
advanced
01 :44P
Dec-17-97
any iroranllnLt.a
I
1.
ba*dsaboez
R.I. Analytical
ein
SvAc
EneraAwltwwO
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Date Received:
Daft Reported:
P.O. I:
Work Order #:
Advuned Euvoemtal Service
AML Mr. Terry Becr
P.O. Box 472
One Alantic Aven
Souh Demi, MA 02660
DEISCRPTION:
11/11/97
11/14/97
9711-05387
ONE SOL SAMPLE
Subject samplc(s) Isbave bee mnlyznd by our laboratory with the aached rekts.
Referocu:
ee sanalyzed by U.S. EPA approved
mct logies. The specific methodologies are lia d in the
mabods cohun of the Certificale Of Analysis
AU
If you havcL qucs
/i
this work, or if we maybe of further assistance, please comaet us.
of Catody
PLM
ASa
Lawariekao
41 Unois AmtWbnidc
ma
a
4400 7P-BsO
Far WMfl&r
Dec-17-
9 7
01:44P
advanced
P.03
5083856622
ervironmenta1
I
Pa
2 of
3
R.L Analytica Laboratories, Inc.
g
I
Advamnced Enviromni Service.
ed:
DlRe I
Wok Order #
11/11/97
9711-05387
sample :
1
SAMPiL DESCRMOrN: SILVIA STOCKPILE 10/18/97
PARAMETR
SAMPLR
RESULTS/UNIT
METHOD
ANALYZED
DA'TFTrME
BAlDON TRIMOUNT
PCs
Amchlor-1016
Magthr dry
eAg dry
mg/kg dry
agfkg dry
Amdulkw-Ifl
Azohlr-im1
ArOCHo-122
ArCalor-1248
at
dry
Azellor-1254
Asoclar-120
Instdry
wg/ dry
SW-B46
3W446 M0M1
SW-846 8080
SW446 S
SW.846 80M0
SW-44 M
SW-4dd60S
11/13/97
11/1.n
11/13/97
12/13/97
11/13"
1113/97
VoladL kgnc Campos
MG/KG
MORG
Mrmo
MGMG
drasemma
MaM
MG/K0
ametylm doid
MGKIRO
LriMbodomb
chlorarnedisasm
W
m
MGKG
MG/KG
MO/EG
MG/KG
MOIKG
MGOKG
MG/EG
MO/KG
auade
1,01-Tddftortse
tamc-I.Maqykub
i.1.2-fl M
g
c1,o2-rTolnaoze
u
Tiriblnefta
1.1.,2.Ticinedisned
sw-w am
SW4846 8240
SW.46 :240
SW4A6 8240
SW4146 240
Sw-i46 40
sW-446 240
SW-546 3240
5W-46 240
SW4AC
*240
SW446 3240
SW.846 240
SW-846 W240
sw-ia
5W-846 3240
040
SW-Wt 8280
MO/EG
M/KG
MG/KG
MG/EG
MO/KG
MO/KG
SW-46 C0
SW-846 MAD0
SW.84
1240
SW46 OZ40
SW-046 820
SW-M4 8240
I IJ3/97 16-21
11/13/97 16:21
11/13/97 16-21
21/13/97
L
16:21
11/13/9716-21
11/13/97 16:21
11/13/97 16:21
S12/1397 16:21
11/13/97 16:21
aULdus Id!2[
113/97 16:11
11/13/97 16:21
li/st 16:21
11113/97 1621
11/1391 16:21
11)/13M 16:21
11/13/97 16:21
11/1T97 16:21
11/13/97 1421
11/13/97 16:21
11/1397 16:.21
11/13/97 16:21
11/1397 16:21
11/13/97 16:21
1113197 16*21
ANALYST
Dec-17-97
01:44P
advanced
P.04
5083856622
environmental
3 of
3
R.IL Analytical laboratories, Inc.
CERTIFrCATE OF ANALYSIS
Advncd Environeal Service
11/11/97
Dae Received:
9711-05387
Work Order #
Saupi #-
SILVIA STOCKPILE 10/18/97
SAMPULS
PARAM TR
Chloabeasee
yl riyl lcgt
2-ldil
abns
aceme
tons -m
4-oum
m
lSULTS/UNITs
CADUM
LEAD
MERCUIRY
PLASilPOarr
PH
CYA DE REACTIVTY
Sum RRACTIVITY
PAINT FILTER
ANALYZED
DATE/TFIME
Most
<0.4
MU/IK
SW-446 8240
SW-46 2AO
11/137 16:21
11/13 7 16-21
<0.2
cO.2
<0.2
<a.2
0.6
<1
MO/lw
MGlKO
MO/KG
5W-44 8240
11/1319716:21
IlliLk97 16:21
<0.21
<0.5
<1
<5
2-ammon
Styram
ARWIC
METHOD
M0/KG
MGIEG
MO/K
MOKG
MO/KG
MO/KO
SW.446 8240
SW-42J240
SW446 8240M
SW-46 8240
SW-84 820
SW446 1240
MG/KG
SW446
W240
MOKG
SW-46 20A
<5
<0.2
MG/KG
mG/MG
MO/KG
SW 46 8240
<5.39
MG/KG DRY
MO/EO DRY SW-p4
SW-846 6010
2200
<0.27
1.61
7J3
SW-14 K0
MOEKO DRY SW446 WI1
SW-846 670
70.0
MGiKG DRY SW-46
<0.2S
MG/KG DRY 5W-Wd 7471A
>200
5.2
< 0.20
<O.Z
F
NO FtE
Sil
uMGtWG
MG/IEG
LuQUID
W3xd 1010
5W*44 9045C
SW-46 733
SW-4 73.4
SW446 90
12/13L7 16:21
11113/9716-21
21/ 3 15:21
16:21
11/13
11/13M 16:21
11/13/97 16:21
11/139 16:21
16:21
11/13t
11/13/9716:21
1113M9 1W21
11/1397 16:21
11/1497 13:38
11/1417 13:35
1111407 13:38
11/1487l 13:38
11/1197 23:16
1/12197 1254
11/11/97 20-30
11i137 3:30
11/13)9"7 &-30
11/13M7 16-2
"K C
C6-CS
C9-C24
C24-C06
<12
4150
<21
aght dry
agg dry
Metod VA0 Volsale oqmc
operaint gdctas of
alys
20.
perftoed udera
SW846 31511
SWS46 80153
SWd6 80ISB
10/24/97 13:36
1024/97 13:36
10f24 7 13-
ANALYST
Dec-17-97
01:44P advanced environmental
5083856622
I
P.05
So>
I
.
I- -
I
A
.us
g
ii
,
,
x,'
L
I
cool~
TMIlLUI rif
o1
ic
rot Iv
c:er tuI
s/atin
Appendix B
Boring Log
Cushing, Goins & Kirschner, Inc.
422 West Grove Street
Middleborough, MA 02346
Boring Number: B-1 (MW-1)
TEL (508) 923-0879 FAX (508) 923-0894
Project Number: 98108
PROJECT: 44 Warren Street, Osterville, Massachusetts
CLIENT: Silvia & Silvia Associates
CONTRACTOR: All Cape Well Drilling, Brewster, MA
OPERATOR: Shawn Harrington
Date end:
Date Start: 5/20/98
Depth ISAMPLE
No.
Depth
(Ft)
Pen/Rtne
I
of
I
EQUIPMENT: B-52
INSPECTOR: Geoffrey May
Surface Elevation:
5/20/98
Equipment
Installed
Stratum
Description
Sample
Description
Blows/6"
Sheet
PID
(
cement
Augered to 23 feet
native backfill
bentonite
10
sand
-
20
SI
23-25
24/22
10-13
-
O.
Brownlyellow medium to coarse SAND.
25-50
Bottom of Exploration = 25 feet
30
40
REMARKS:. Installed flush mounted roadway box, with locking PVC cap. Water at 15.7 feet below ground surface at 1430.
Installed 2" diameter, 0.010" machine slotted PVC well.
Proportions Used
trace 0 - 10%
little 10- 20%
some 20 - 35%
and 35 - 50%
Cohesionless Density
0 - 4 Very Loose
4 - 10 Loose
10 - 30 Med. Dense
30 - 50 Dense
>50 Very Dense
Cohesive Density
0 -4 Soft
4 - 8 Med. Stiff
8 - 15 Stiff
15 - 30 Very Stiff
>30 Hard
Summary
Soil Boring: 20'
Rock Boring: 0'
Soil Samples: I
Rock Samples: 0
Well Screen: 10'
Boring Log
TEL. (508) 923-0879
FAX (508) 923-0894
Date end:
SAMPLE
th
Pen/Rec
Blows/6"
of
EQUIPMENT: B-52
Date Start: 5/20/98
I
Sheet
Surface Elevation:
5/20/98
Sample
Stratum
Description
Description
Equipment
Installed
M cement
Augered to 20 feet
native backfill
bentonite
sand
2" fluff
Brown/yellow medium to coarse SAND trace
fine gravel.
face at 1450.
REMARKS:. Installed flush mounted roadway box, with I
Proportions Used
Cohesive Density
Summary
trace 0 - 10%
little 10- 20%
some 20 - 35%
and 35 - 50%
0 - 4 Very Loose
4 - 10 Loose
10 - 30 Med. Dense
30 - 50 Dense
>50 Very Dense
0 -4 Soft
4 - 8 Med. Stiff
8 - 15 Stiff
15 - 30 Very Stiff
>30 Hard
Soil Boring: 24'
Rock Boring: 0'
Soil Samples: 2
Rock Samples: 0
Well Screen: 10'
1
Boring Log
TEL. (508) 923-0879 FAX (508) 923-0894
Sheet
1
of
EQUIPMENT: B-52
Date end:
Date Start: 5/20/98
SAMPLE
Depth
(Ft)
No.
Depth
Pen/Rec
Blows/6"
Surface Elevation:
5/20/98
Sample
Stratum
Equipment
Description
Description
Installed
PID
cement
Augered to 20 feet
native backfill
10
_
,
•
bentonite
sand
20
-SI
20-22
24/24
13-3
6-69
0
Brown coarse SAND little fine gravel.
30
40
REMARKS: Installed flush mounted roadway box, with locking PVC cap. Water at 17.66 feet below ground surface at 1450.
Proportions Used
trace 0 - 10%
little 10- 20%
some 20- 35%
and 35 - 50%
0 - 4 Very Loose
4 - 10 Loose
10 - 30 Med. Dense
30 - 50 Dense
>50 Very Dense
Cohesive Density
0 -4 Soft
4 - 8 Med. Stiff
8 - 15 Stiff
15 - 30 Very Stiff
>30 Hard
Summary
Soil Boring 22'
Rock Boring. 0'
Soil Samples: I
Rock Samples: 0
Well Screen: 10'
WELL DEVELOPMENT/SAMPLING DATA SHEET
Project:
nWIM
Well Number:
YW
6Te r v
Location:
Sampler: K
:e.
Date: 5
-e
t 96
Time:
/ go
'%
5nV
Weather:
/
Protective Casing Present
Protective Casing Locked
Cap on Well Riser
Physical Damage
N
N
N
Y
Y
Cement Pad Present
Standing Water
Visible Heaving
Visible Subsidence
)
Comments:
Well Identification: it)1
Purging Device: "A0L(-
Depth of Well: _
'
15- b
Depth to Water:
Standing Water Depth:
4-70
Volume to Purge (Vx3):
Time
Time
Time
Time
:
:
:
:
T
T
T
T
Volume Purged: _
Comments:
4
(PVC
: SC.
: SC
: SC
: SC
0t
)-
TPC
Ground
)
TPC
Ground
)
Time Start:
pmhos/cm:
mhos/cm:
pmhos/cm:
mhos/cm:
Gals
:P
Clarity:
i'
Time:
Gals
Time End:
DO
DO
DO
DO
Dry:
NE
.6
coy
mg/l:
mg/l:
mg/l:
mg/l:
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
Y
Sheen:
JCi/vL
Ir-
Sample Collection Date:
Signature:
Feet
Gals
pH
pH__
pH
pH
Odor:
(PVC$
Feet (x 0.163 =) Volume (V):
j
oC:
*C:
*C:
*C:
Color:jfC'}
'
Feet
W/)ljj
5
- Lt
t.L
(-t i'
,
0.163 for 2" dia wells; 0.092 for 1.5" dia wells; 0.064 for 1.25" dia wells; 0.041 for 1.0" wells
Project:
L6Te(lVL-
Location:
Sampler:
Well Number:
l
\
V
1 <-
.
Time:
Date: 5)/36/
/( c
84
tt gy
Weather:
(r"
Protective Casing Preset
Protective Casing Locked
Cap on Well Riser
Physical Damage
Cement Pad Present
Standing Water
Visible Heaving
Visible Subsidence
1j
I
I
d
Y
Comments:
Well Identification:/2)t
2
Purging Device:
Depth of Well:
Depth to Water:
I 7.7
4.3
:T
: T
: T
:T
°C:
*C:
°C:
0 C:
Feet
(PVC
WC
TPC
Ground
)
Feet
(PVC__k
TPC
Ground
)
Feet (x 0.163 =) Volume (V):
Time
Time
Time
Time
IctQc
pH
pH
pH
pH
:
:
:
:
Gals
Time Start:
SC j
SC
SC
SC
pmhos/cm:
pmhos/cm:
pmhos/cm:
pImhos/cm:
Volume Purged:
Comments:
F'
Gals
Time End:
DO
DO
DO.
DO
Dry:
Odor: NMe ktt
Color: -rflr
.
Clarity: (" 'Ue
_mg/l:
mg/1:
mg/l:
mg/l:
Y
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
)
Sheen: NotUA&
-1, IT
1/
Signature:
h7 a
J
[q6
Time:
. 0.163 for 2" dia wells; 0.092 for 1.5" dia wells; 0.064 for 1.25" dia wells; 0.041 for 1.0" wells
%/
Project:
Well Number:
tlcv LL
0
Location:
,,
Sampler:
, fl
"
Date: '_
Time:
/i/3g
Weather:
e Casing Present
Protectiv
Protectiv e Casing Locked
Veil Riser
Cap on W
Physical Damage
Y
N
Cement Pad Present
N
N
Standing Water
Visible Heaving
Visible Subsidence
)
Y
Y
Y
Commen ts:
Well Identification:
IiA'-3 Purging Device: 93_
S(
Depth of Well:
J-1.I
Depth to Water:
S-
Time
Time
Time
Time
:
:
:
:
T
T
T
T
Feet
(PVC.Q
TPC
Ground
)
Feet
(PVC
TPC
Ground
)
pH
pH
pH
pH _
Gals
:
:
:
:
Time Start:
SC
tmhos/cm:
SC
mhos/cm:
SC
ptmhos/cm:
SC.mhos/cm:
Volume Purged:
Od or:
'
Gals
DO
DO
DO
DO
mg/l: TDS
mg/l: TDS
mg/l: TDS
mg/l: TDS
Clarity: CAC
Y
.
y
Sheen:
- vw
Signature:
cl L.
-qV
Time End:
Dry:
Color: '1 'r\
Comments:
K
Feet (x 0.163 =)' Volume (V):
3~
*C:
*C:
°C:
*C:
rC
),4
5,Af
i-f
/
) ct
Time:
ji :4
I
. 0.163 for 2" dia wells; 0.092 for 1.5" dia wells; 0.064 for 1.25" dia wells; 0.041 for 1.0" wells
m
17 -97 01:45P
advanced
e
bUM4SbbbZ
enviranmenta
R.I. Analytical
Spna
ia
mwuvm
Advanred Environmenal Service
Ano: Mr. Twny Baner
PO. Box 472
One Atfltic Avec=
Soun Deans, M1A 02660
mCON
10/21/97
10/24/97
Work Order #:
9710-04776
P.O. I.
SILVIA PROJECT (EIGHT SOIL SAMPLES)
Subjet sampe(s) has/bave be
Reference:
Date Received:
Date Reported:
All
meods
analyzed by our laboratory with the atached results.
wre salyzed by 1I.S. EPA apprved
.The specific maodologies are lb in the
of t Ccniflcate Of Analysis
l
regading ts wor, or if we Uybe of frther ssance, please contact us.
If ye he'
ot Csmody
R-4 Aartica Lanwis.lnc
In Sanh'wrwickafa02sfe. (4
zso
Faxxoo7e-3
o
.u
10'24/97
FRI 16:35 FAX 401 738 1970
R l ANALYTICAL
003
252
mrit
uN
.
6
-
a
sr
.=1
/LO'e
ZZ99SSRO9
*-
a
C o
L2UaWUOLAuU
It
F
I
paDUPApr
dgq:TO
L6 -LtI - D
10/24/97
FRI 16:3S FAX A01 738 1970
RI ANALYTICAL
-4 -J .I
coo
0
U
sa
,
its
Hof
vt
gag
a;-
vav
'El
Tof
%
<U
og
80"d
zzgggs
809
9U
WuoJLOAIUa
PaDUApr
d
T
t6 -Lt
-:IO
-- o
.L'Z4/v7
FRI 19'35 FAX 401 734 1970
RI ANALTICAL
loos
att=
jE-4
N 2i
6; 6I 6%NaiI4
31o
.
n *,n
a'V'
r-
4v
6
;r
16
60ld
ZZ9998ESDS
60d
[equWU~UD.A
Z~99S8ESO9 I
Ue
panue^pv
d81V
TOL6-LL6-LzI -DOO
-
1024,S7
FRI 10:36 FAI 401 738 1970
R I AJALYrICAL
0o6
- a ..
9300
00
U'
.
Z
0c
C
-
re9
V7V
0[ "d
ZZ99sass05
01d
I EqU3UiUO.
ZZ9998t209
UO
PeDurApU
dgk10Lb-LI-of
L6-L
T-
C
Dec-17-97 01:46P
advanced environmental
5083856622
I fi
I IiT
1 J
!I-
I
\\
I
,
I
I
S;
a
Lt
Ii'
-
j
l-
-
uir
Ua -A'"
-
1- --
e
r-'
-t
r
+co
a.
P.11
GeoLabs, Inc.
Environmental Laboratories
PREPARED FOR:
CGK, Inc.
Middleboro, MA 02346
Attn: Geoffrey May
PROJECT ID:
98108
Silva & Silva
Warren Street
Osterville, MA
GEOLABS CLIENT #:
1448-96
SAMPLE NUMBER:
64441-64442
DATE PREPARED:
March 6, 1998
PREPARED BY:
Christine Johnson
APPROVED BY:
Location:
,nt ////-r5
3Ldaboratory D
Director/Date
JA Oh
10 Plain Street
Braintree, MA 02184
Phone: (781) 848-7844
Fax: (781) 848-7811
1 of 7
GeoLabs, Inc.
I
CLIENT NAME:
SAMPLE TYPE:
COLLECTION DATE:
REC'D BY LAB:
COLLECTED BY:
PROJECT ID:
REPORT DATE:
ANALYZED BY:
EXTRACTION DATE:
DIGESTION DATE:
CGK, INC.
SOIL
02/27/98
02/27/98
CLIENT
98108 SILVA & SILVA
03/06/98
EA/SRW 03/05/98
03/02/98
N/A
EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON (EPH)
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE LOCATION:
64441
S-101 (15' BGS)
RESULTS
(mglKg)
DETECTION LIMIT
(mglKg)
C9-C18 ALIPHATICS
2190
100
C19-C36 ALIPHATICS
416
100
*C11-C22 AROMATICS
685
100
EPH RANGES:
*C1 1-C22 IS ALL AROMATICS EXCLUDING PAH TARGET COMPOUNDS
ND = NOT DETECTED
Method Reference:
MADEP EPH
2 of 7
GeoLabs, Inc.
CLIENT NAME:
SAMPLE TYPE:
COLLECTION DATE:
REC'D BY LAB:
COLLECTED BY:
PROJECT ID:
REPORT DATE:
ANALYZED BY:
EXTRACTION DATE:
DIGESTION DATE:
CGK, INC.
SOIL
02/27/98
02/27/98
CLIENT
98108 SILVA & SILVA
03/06/98
NER 03/04/98
03/02/98
N/A
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE LOCATION:
64441
S-101 (15' BGS)
RESULTS
(pglKg)
DETECTION LIMIT
(pglKg)
Acenaphthene
ND
22.3
Acenaphthylene
ND
22.3
Anthracene
ND
55.8
Benz[a]Anthracene
ND
55.8
Benzo[b]Fluoranthene
ND
55.8
Benzo[k]Fluoranthene
ND
22.3
Benzo[g,hi]Perylene
ND
89.1
Benzo[a]Pyrene
ND
33.5
Chrysene
ND
55.8
Dibenzo[a,h]Anthracene
ND
44.7
Fluoranthene
ND
44.7
Fluorene
ND
55.8
Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]Pyrene
ND
67.0
2-Methylnaphthalene
ND
55.8
Naphthatene
ND
55.8
Phenanthrene
ND
33.5
Pyrene
ND
67.0
TARGETED PAH ANAL YTES
ND = NOT DETECTED
Method Reference:
MADEP EPH
3 of 7
GeoLabs, Inc.
CLIENT NAME:
SAMPLE TYPE:
COLLECTION DATE:
REC'D BY LAB:
COLLECTED BY:
CGK, INC.
SOIL
PROJECT ID:
REPORT DATE:
ANALYZED BY:
EXTRACTION DATE:
DIGESTION DATE:
02/27/98
02/27/98
CLIENT
98108 SILVA & SILVA
03/06/98
EA/SRW 03/05/98
03/02/98
N/A
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE LOCATION:
64442
S-104 (19' BGS)
RESULTS
(mglKg)
DETECTION LIMIT
(mglKg)
C9-C18 ALIPHATICS
ND
10.0
C19-C36 ALIPHATICS
ND
10.0
*C11-C22 AROMATICS
ND
10.0
EPH RANGES:
*C11-C22 IS ALL AROMATICS EXCLUDING PAH TARGET COMPOUNDS
ND = NOT DETECTED
Method Reference:
MADEP EPH
4 of 7
GeoLabs, Inc.
CLIENT NAME:
SAMPLE TYPE:
COLLECTION DATE:
REC'D BY LAB:
COLLECTED BY:
CGK, INC.
SOIL
02/27/98
02/27/98
CLIENT
PROJECT ID:
REPORT DATE:
ANALYZED BY:
EXTRACTION DATE:
DIGESTION DATE:
98108 SILVA & SILVA
03/06/98
NER 03/05/98
03/02/98
N/A
SAMPLE NUMBER:
SAMPLE LOCATION:
TARGETED PAH ANALYTES
64442
S-104 (19' BGS)
RESULTS
(pglKg)
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benz[a]Anthracene
Benzo[g,h,i]Perylene
Benzo[a]Pyrene
Chrysene
Dibenzo[a,h]Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno[1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
ND = NOT DETECTED
Method Reference:
MADEP EPH
5 of 7
DETECTION LIMIT
(pglKg)
GEOLABS, INC.
10 PLAIN STREET
BRAINTREE, MA 02184
LIMITATIONS & EXCLUSIONS
All the professional opinions presented in this report are based solely on the scope of
work conducted and sources referred to in our report. The data presented by GeoLabs
in this report was collected and analyzed using generally accepted industry methods
and practices at the time the report was generated. This report represents the conditions,
locations and materials that were observed at the time the work was conducted. No
inferences regarding other conditions, locations or materials, at a later or earlier time
may be made based on the contents of the report. No other warranty, express or
implied is made.
This report was prepared for the sole use of our client.
be used independent of the entire report.
Portions of the report may not
All analyses were performed within required holding times, in accordance with EPA
protocols and using accepted QA/QC procedures. The information contained in this
report is, to the best of my knowledge, accurate and complete.
6 of 7
U11
>12
Anm
)L
E'0
ca3
LU
o
a
z
.c
z
Cc
01.
zzzzz
VI
L
=.:c
*M00 .
2z
..-
.
0w
0
LU
z
z
Oa
<
r-
- Cus
c
o
K
0
_______0
M__
f0
U)
aV
o
C)
22 .
L00 co
'00Ir_
MN<L
E
Q)
0U
.
_co
A
L
0
GeoLabs, Inc.
PREPARED FOR:
CGK, Inc.
Middleboro, MA 02346
Attn: Geoff May
PROJECT ID:
44 Warren Street
Osterville, MA
GEOLABS CLIENT #:
1448-96
SAMPLE NUMBER:
67569-67571
DATE PREPARED:
June 5, 1998
PREPARED BY:
Christine Johnson
APPROVED BY:
Jim Chen, Laboratory Director/Date
Location:
10 Plain Street
Braintree, MA 02184
1 of 5
Phone: (781) 848-7844
Fax: (781) 848-7811
t- 3~-S-
$~
GeoLabs, Inc.
I
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Aqueous 0
9
Matrix
9 Satisfactory
Containers
Aqueous
0
Soil or
Sample
Preservative Sediment
Temperaturt H
O
O
0
Received
Soil o Sediment 0 Other
O Broken O Leaking
pH <2 O pH >2 Comment:
N/A
ml MeOH
01:1+25%
0 Other
N/A 0 Samples NOT preserved in MeOH or air-tight containers
Samples received in MeOH [ Covering soil? 0 Not
Received in air tight container
O Received at 4' C 0 Other
on ice
MW-1
Client ID:
67569
Lab ID:
Date Collected: 05/26/98
Date Received: 05/27/98
Date Analyzed: 06/04/98
1
Dilution Factor:
N/A
Total solids (%):
VPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Method for Ranges: MADEP VPH 97-12 GC/MS
Method for Target Analytes: MA VPH - GC/MS
VPH Surrogate Standards 2,5-Dibromotoluene
1,2-DCE
Toluene-d8
BFB
MW-2
67570
05/26/98
05/27/98
06/04/98
1
N/A
MW-3
67571
05/26/98
05/27/98
06/04/98
1
N/A
RL
Units
Benzene
5
ug/L
ND
ND
ND
Ethylbenzene
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
5
5
ug/L
ug/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Naphthalene
Toluene
m-,p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Cs-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons'
C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons2
C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons
50
5
5
5
40
15
55
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11_
::::125,
114
92.7
903
91,2
113
93.8
70-130%
Elut. Range
Range/Target Analyte
N/A
N/A
N/A
2,5-Dibromotoluene Surrogate Recovery
1,2-DCE Surrogate Recovery
Toluene-d8 Surrogate % Recovery
BFB Surrogate% Recovery
Surrogate Acceptance Range
158.
98.115
116
70-130%
94.1
70-130%
'CsCa Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target Analytes eluting in that range
2
Cg.C2, Aliphatic HCs exclude concentrations of Target Anatytes AND C-Clo Aromatic Hydrocarbons eluting inthat range
CERTIFICATION
Yes 0 No - Details attached
Were all QA/QC procedures REQUIRED by the VPH Method followed? I
Were all QA/QC performance /acceptance standards achieved? 0 Yes 0 No - Details attached
Were any significant modifications made to the VPH method?? 0 No 0 Yes- Details below
Aromatic and aliphatic ranges quantitated by GC/MS Total Ion Chromatogram and all targets were
quantitated by GC/MS Selected Ion Measurements.
I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals
immedately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to
the best of my knowledge, accurate and complete.
SIGNATURE: -J
(ct
POSITION: Lab Director
DATE:
PRINTED NAME: Jim Chen
2 of 5
IGeoLabs,
Inc.
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Matrix
Containers
Aqueous Preservative
Temperature
Extraction Method
9
Other
0 Soil O Sediment 0
Aqueous
0 Broken 0 Leaking
1 Satisfactory
9 pH <2 O pH > 2 Comment:
0 N/A
O
Received at 4° C [ Other
9
Received on ice
Water: Separatory Funnel
Soil:
FULL EPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Method for Ranges: MADEP EPH 98-1
Method for Target Analyte 8270 GC/MS
EPH Surrogate Standards
Client ID:
Lab ID:
Date Collected:
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
67569
67570
05/26/98
67571
05/26/98
05/27/98
05/28/98
06/01/98
1.0
N/A
05/27/98
05/28/98
06/01/98
1.0
N/A
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
55%
75%
40-140%
51%
41%
40-140%
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
42%
81%
40-140%
63%
45%
40-140%
05/26/98
Date Received: 05/27/98
Aliphatic COD
Date Extracted: 05/28/98
Aromatic OTP
Date Analyzed: 06/01/98
EPH Fractionation Surrogates:
Dilution Factor
1.0
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Tota solids (%):
N/A
2-Bromonaphthalene
Units
RL
Range/Trarget Analyte
ND
Unadjusted C1i-C22 Aromatics'
50.0
(Pg/L)
ND
Acenaphthalene
0.500
(pg/L)
0.500
(Fg/L)
ND
Diesel PAH 2-Methyinaphthalene
ND
0.500
(pg/L)
Analytes Naphthalene
0.500
(gg/L)
ND
Phenanthrene
ND
0.750
(p./L)
Acenaphthene
0.500
(g/L)
ND
Anthracene
0.500
(pg/L)
ND
Benz[alAnthracene
ND
0.500
(g/L)
(g/L)
ND
0.750
Other
Target PAl- Benzo[g,h,I]Perylene
0.500
(g/4L)
ND
Analytes Benzo[a]Pyrene
0.200
(g/L)
ND
ND
Chrysene
0.500
(Ig/L)
ND
0.500
(g/L)
Dibenzo[a,hlAnthracene
(Ig/L)
ND
0.500
Fluoranthene
ND
0.500
(g/L)
Fluorene
0.500
(g/L)
ND
Indeno[1,2,3-c,d]Pyren
ND
(fg/L)
0.500
Pyrene
C-Cls Aliphatic Hydrocarbons'
50.0
(fg/L)
ND
CI-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons'
50.0
(g/L)
ND
ND
50.0
(g/L)
C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons'
50%
Aliphatic Surrogate % Recovery (COD)
75%
Aromatic Surrogate % Recovery (OTP)
40-140%
Sample Surrogate Acceptance Ran e
64%
2-Fluorobiphen 1%Recovery
42%
2-Bromonaphthalene % Recovery
Fractionation Surrogate Acceptance Range
40-140%
1
'Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range
2
CI.C22,Aromrnatic Hydrocarbons exclude concentrations of Target PAH Analytes.
CERTIFICATION
Were all QA/QC procedures REQUIRED by the EPH Method followed? 9 Yes 0 No - Details attached
Were all performance/acceptance standards acheived? 0 Yes O No- Details attached
E No 0 Yes - Details attached
Were any significant modifications made to the EPH method??
I attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately
responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, accurate and complete.
SIGNATURE:
POSITION: Lab Director
PRINTED NAME: Jim Chen
DATE:
3 of 5
GEOLABS, INC.
10 PLAIN STREET
BRAINTREE, MA 02184
LIMITATIONS & EXCLUSIONS
All the professional opinions presented in this report are based solely on the scope of
work conducted and sources referred to in our report. The data presented by GeoLabs
in this report was collected and analyzed using generally accepted industry methods
and practices at the time the report was generated. This report represents the conditions,
locations and materials that were observed at the time the work was conducted. No
inferences regarding other conditions, locations or materials, at a later or earlier time
may be made based on the contents of the report. No other warranty, express or
implied is made.
This report was prepared for the sole use of our client. Portions of the report may not
be used independent of the entire report.
All analyses were performed within required holding times, in accordance with EPA
protocols and using accepted QA/QC procedures. The information contained in this
report is, to the best of my knowledge, accurate and complete.
4 of 5
1
1i
I
II
d
-
mIxn
Is I C C
-
I
II
;r -
-
.IL
6 .1
*iiE
sa
Ez
.
0
C
C
=
al
nS
zzzzz
o
<
e
(5ff
SD < z -
a <
-
--
-
-
&
-
II
-
I- >- I-wU
-
2
mo
3.
~
=
~l
oo
II
LLJ
<m
!
~I
I
>'t I
,L
IId~SIIIIJ~LI
-.

Department of Environmental Protection Southeast Regional Office

Transcription

Similar documents

EROSION CONTROL is for planting

Calla Lilies

“Mark Ricciuto”

Preface to Secrets Of Shastiamsa

Awesome Aquifers - Groundwater Foundation

Toward Location-based Services using GPS-based Devices

Monthly Newsletter - MU Extension

The Great Garden Dilemma

Laboratory tests and applied geophysical investigations in

The contribution of Portuguese agriculture to the climate

Got Milk (weed)? Get Monarchs!

101 Easy Garden Tips - Better Homes and Gardens

Untitled

Vodafone Mobile Broadband ReadMe

a critical review of the hindu empire of maharashtra