YATES PETROLEUM CORPORATION

Transcription

NEW WYPDES PERMIT APPLICATION
GREYBULL OIL FIELD PROJECT
BIGHORN RIVER BASIN,
OPTION 2
Bighorn County, Wyoming
SECTION 16, T52N, R93W
Prepared for:
ROCK WELL PETROLEUM (US), INC.
Prepared by:
P.O. Box 2775, Casper, WY 82602
Tel. 307-265-9199
December 27, 2007
1 1 1 West Second Street, Suite #400
P.O. Box 2775
Casper, WY 82602
Phone: 307-265-9199
Fax: 307-473-7138
www.gga-inc.com
December 27, 2007
Mr. Roland Peterson, Environmental Analyst
WYPDES Permits Section
Water Quality Division / Wyoming Dept. of Environmental Quality
122 West 25th Street, Herschler Building 4W
Cheyenne, WY 82002
RE:
Greybull Oil Field Project New WYPDES Permit Application (12/27/07)
Bighorn River Basin: Option 2
Rock Well Petroleum (US), Inc.
Dear Mr. Peterson:
On behalf of Rock Well Petroleum (US), Inc. (Rock Well), we are enclosing one (1)
paper copy and one CD with the electronic files of the Greybull Oil Field Project
WYPDES permit application for your review and approval. This application includes a
table of contents, the WYPDES Application for Permit to Surface Discharge Produced
Water…New Discharges form (4/25/07 version), and attached supporting map, tables,
and appendices.
Please contact me at the above address or telephone number, or at e-mail address
[email protected] if you have questions concerning this permit application.
Sincerely,
Gene R. George & Associates, Inc.
Jean F. Lawlor, PG
Hydrogeologist
Enclosures
cc:
S. Monninger / Rock Well
file
JFL;jfl
jean C:\GGA Projects\Rock Well\Greybull\WYPDES applics\xmt applic cover ltr.doc
OVER 35 YEARS OF PROFESSIONAL INTEGRITY
Greybull Oil Field New WYPDES Applic
Rock Well Petroleum, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
WYPDES APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO SURFACE DISCHARGE PRODUCED
WATER FROM COAL BED METHANE--NEW DISCHARGES, RENEWALS, OR
MAJOR MODIFICATIONS [4/25/07 vers]............................................................................. 1
MAPS (following application form)
MAP 1
Greybull Project Proposed WYPDES Discharge (scale 1” = 945 feet)
TABLES (following maps)
TABLE 1
Outfalls and Water Quality, Containment Unit, & Flow Monitoring Stations
TABLE 2
Producing Well Information
TABLE 3
Produced and Tunnel Water (Effluent) Quality
TABLE 4
Bighorn River Water Quality
TABLE 5
Estimated Resultant Water Quality Mixture: Effluent (Tunnel Water +
Produced Water) + River Water
APPENDICES (following tables)
APPENDIX A Effluent Water Analysis Laboratory Reports
APPENDIX B Bighorn River Water Analysis Laboratory Reports
i
vers: 12/27/07
Jean C:\GGA Projects\Rock Well\Greybull\WYPDES applics\Greybull oil field new WYPDES Tbl Contents.doc
For Agency Use Only
Application Number
SUBMIT ONE HARD COPY AND ONE ELECTRONIC COPY
WYOMING POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO SURFACE DISCHARGE PRODUCED
WATER FROM COAL BED METHANE NEW DISCHARGES, RENEWALS, OR
MAJOR MODIFICATIONS
WY00_______________
Date Received:
__________________
(mo/day/yr)
Revised: 06-22-06
Revised form last updated: 04-25-07
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE (Submission of illegible materials will result in return of the application to the applicant)
1. Check the box corresponding to the type of application being applied for:
New non-CBM permit
CBM permit renewal
Permit number ____________ Expiration Date: ________
CBM permit major modification
Permit number _____________ Expiration Date: ________________
2. Identify the river basin in which the discharge will occur:
Belle Fourche
Cheyenne
Powder
Little Powder
Tongue
Other (identify) __Bighorn River_______________________________________
3. Select permit option(s): if more than one option is selected, the applicant must describe which option applies
to which outfall.
Option 1A – Discharge is contained within a class 4 water body: Containment within an off-channel pit (class
4C) OR containment within a headwater reservoir situated within a class 4 channel and capable of containing all
effluent plus up to a 50-year / 24-hour storm event.
Option 1B – Discharge is contained within a class 3 water body: Containment within a natural closed basin
or playa lake (class 3A) OR containment within a headwater reservoir situated within a class 3 channel and
capable of containing all effluent plus up to a 50-year / 24-hour storm event.
Option 2 – This option includes any on-channel discharge (including discharge into an on-channel reservoir)
that does not meet the impoundment requirements specified in options 1A or 1B above.
If applying for outfalls under Option 2, will discharges from the facility proposed in this application
require the use of assimilative capacity credits for salt and sodium in the Powder River? Not applicable
□
Yes
□
No
4. General Facility Location: Township(s)__T52N_______________ Range(s) R93W_______________
Immediate Receiving Stream(s) Bighorn River___________
5. Name of the facility producing the discharge (this is the facility name that will appear on the WYPDES
permit)
Greybull Oil Field ______________________________________________________________
6. Company, Contact Name, mailing address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the individual or
company which owns the facility producing the discharge, and the person (consultant) responsible for permit
submission.
WYPDES Application for Permit to Discharge Produced Water: Application for Coal Bed Methane New Discharges, Renewals, or Major Modifications, revised
04-25-07
ROCK WELL PETROLEUM, INC: 2007-12-27 / 10080010 / NEW NON-CBM: GREYBULL OIL FIELD
Page 1 of 8
(06-554.DOC)
Company Contact Name
Stephen Monninger
Consultant Contact Name
Jean Lawlor
Company Name
Mailing Address
7000 W. Yellowstone Hwy.
City, State, and Zip Code
Casper, WY 82604
Telephone Number
307-266-1825
E-Mail Address
[email protected]
Company Name
Gene R. George & Assoc., Inc.
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 2775
Casper, WY 82602
Telephone Number
307-265-9199
E-Mail Address
[email protected]
7. If submitting a major modification or permit renewal, please describe all requested permit modifications
(i.e. add 2 outfalls, add 23 wells, move outfall 001 500 feet…):
1. __________________________________________________________________________________
2. __________________________________________________________________________________
3. ___________________________________________________________________________________
(add additional lines as necessary)
*NOTE: Major modification applications requesting to increase the permitted flow for a facility will be
processed as RENEWALS. Major modification applications for permits within six months of their expiration
date will also be processed as RENEWALS.
8. Name(s) and mailing address(es) of owner(s) of the surface rights on whose land the discharge occurs (in
cases where the land is owned by the state or federal government but surface rights are leased to a private
individual, provide lessee’s name and address)
Landowner #1 Name
Town of Greybull Public Works Dept., Randy
Rumpler, Tel. 307-765-2682
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 271
Greybull, WY 82426
(additional spaces may be added as necessary)
Landowner #2 Name
Mailing Address
9. For all facilities relying on reservoirs of any type as part of their water management plan, complete the
attached Table 5a (for option 1A or 1B facilities) and/or Table 5b (for option 2 facilities). The water budget
should demonstrate, considering total projected discharge inflows, natural precipitation, evaporation and
infiltration, the amount of the discharge that will be contained within the reservoirs, and the circumstances and
volume of effluent that could potentially be discharged. If applying for an Option 1A or 1B permit, the water
balance must demonstrate that the containment unit will be adequately sized to contain all projected discharge and
storm water runoff from a 50 year, 24 hour storm event. not applicable
10. For Option 2 facilities with planned reservoir releases to the Powder River, include analyses of expected
water quality within the reservoirs. Reservoir water quality analyses must include all constituents, with the
appropriate detection limits and units, listed in the table included with question #19 of this application. n/a
04-25-07
Page 2 of 8
(06-554.DOC)
11. Attach a description and a clear, legible, detailed topographic map of the discharging facility. Include the
following: see attached Map 1
a. A legend Map 1
b. Well locations Map 1: underground directional, access via portal tunnel
c. Ponds Map 1: storage / aeration / evaporation pond
d. Reservoirs n/a
e. Stock tanks n/a
f. Discharge points (outfalls) Map 1
g. Immediate receiving streams Map 1
h. Water quality monitoring stations n/a
i. Irrigation compliance points n/a
j. Location of nearest downstream irrigator. nearest downstream irrigation right sourced from Bighorn
River: Sect. 5-T52N-R93W (Rogers / Sherard canal)
k. Section, Township, and Range information
l. If proposing to use class 4C off-channel pits, include footprint outline of the proposed pits. To denote
setback distance, include a distance marker from closest side of pit to the nearest water feature, floodplain, or
stream alluvium. Identify latitude and longitude in decimal degrees (using a minimum of 6 decimal places)
for each end point of the setback distance marker. n/a
If any of the above are not applicable please indicate in the description and include a brief explanation as to
why the item is not applicable)
12. Describe the control measures that will be implemented to prevent significant damage to or erosion of the
receiving water channel at the point of discharge.
The effluent water will be piped from Rock Well’s production field east to the proposed outfall at the
Bighorn River (Map 1). The town of Greybull has given permission to Rock Well to tie their discharge
pipeline into the town’s storm sewer line. The effluent will flow to the river under low-flow gravity
drainage only (no pumps). This storm sewer is piped and discharges to the west side of the Bighorn
River; the last ~40 feet above the river outfall is a rock-lined open channel that reduces discharge flow
velocity and erosive energy.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
13. Describe the control measures that will be implemented to achieve water quality standards and effluent
limits. If proposing to utilize a treatment process, provide a description of the treatment process.
Oilfield produced water will be treated at the production field prior to discharge by passing it through
typical oil skim tanks or pits to which Champion “Cleartron ZB-216” de-emulsifier has been added to
reduce oil and grease concentrations to the 10 mg/L limit. After the skim tank treatment, water will be
stored in a 10,000-barrel storage tank and aeration/evaporation pond (Map 1) and to further reduce
volatile organic compound concentrations prior to discharge.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
14. Outfall locations must be established as part of a preliminary field reconnaissance survey using GPS or
conventional survey equipment and documented in Table 1. Please document the type of equipment used, the
expected accuracy of your measurements, and a brief rationale for locating the outfalls at the requested sites
below.
The outfall listed on Table 1 and shown on Map 1 was located in the field using a Trimble brand Geo
XH model GPS unit using a wide-angle augmentation system with an approximate accuracy of 50 feet.
The Town of Greybull has given permission to Rock Well to tie their pipeline into this storm sewer,
installed by the Town, to convey their discharge water the remaining distance to the river. This will
make use of an already existing pipeline, saving the disturbance, time, and expense of installing a new
04-25-07
Page 3 of 8
(06-554.DOC)
pipeline the entire distance to the river. Engineering estimates indicate that this 18” – 30” diameter
pipeline has sufficient capacity to convey both Rock Well’s effluent plus storm water.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
15. Complete the attached Table 1. Provide all the information requested in the table for each proposed discharge
point or monitoring point. If proposing changes (a major modification) to an existing facility, clearly indicate the
desired changes on the table. Additional tables may be attached. Use the format provided. Option 2 permits,
except those located in the Belle Fourche or Cheyenne River Basins, must include water quality monitoring
station locations. Option 1B headwater reservoir discharges (reservoirs other than playa lakes capable of 50 year,
24 hour stormwater runoff containment) must include flow monitoring station locations. Option 1A and 1B
permits must include containment unit monitoring station locations. Information related to reservoirs is only
required if the facility’s water management plan includes reservoir containment. See attached Table 1 –
“Outfalls and Water Quality , Containment Unit, and Flow Monitoring Stations”
16. Complete the attached Table 2. Provide all the information requested in the table for each well associated with
this proposed discharge authorization. If proposing changes (a major modification) to an existing facility, clearly
indicate the desired changes on the table. Additional tables may be attached. Use the format provided. See
attached Table 2 – “Well Information”
17. Complete the attached Table 3. Provide all the information requested in the table for each reservoir proposed
for containment of CBM produced water. Specified locations refer to the approximate center of the reservoir. If
proposing changes (a major modification) to an existing facility, clearly indicate the desired changes on the table.
Additional tables may be attached. Use the format provided. Information related to reservoirs is only required if
the facility’s water management plan includes reservoir containment. n/a
18. Complete the attached Table 4. Provide all information requested in the table related to reservoir bonding
requirements for each reservoir proposed for the containment of CBM produced water. If proposing any changes
(a major modification) to an existing facility, clearly indicate the desired changes on the table. Additional tables
may be attached. Use the format provided. Information related to reservoirs is only required if the facility’s
water management plan includes reservoir containment. n/a
19. Provide the results of water analyses for a sample collected from a location representative of the quality of
the water being proposed for discharge for all of the chemical parameters listed in the table below. The
sample must be collected from well(s) or outfall(s) within a twenty mile radius of the proposed facility’s location,
and from the same coal formation(s) and the same approximate depth(s) as proposed in this application. If filing
an application for a permit renewal or modification, the representative sample must be collected from the facility
being proposed for renewal or modification. Explain why this sample is representative of the produced water to
be discharged.
See attached summary Table 3 and corresponding detailed analytical laboratory reports in
Appendix A. The effluent water quality samples presented were collected from the Greybull Field
production water (from oil-producing formation) and tunnel water (shallow groundwater seeps into
portal access tunnel).
Samples from co-mingled coal seams are acceptable as long as the sample(s) meet the following criteria:
A. all of the coal seams being proposed for development are represented in the co-mingled sample, with no
contribution from coal seams not being proposed for development at the new facility.
B. the ratio of each coal seam’s contribution is approximately the same in the sample and the proposed
development,
C. documentation is provided to verify the criteria listed in A. and B.
The analyses must be conducted in accordance with approved EPA test procedures (40 CFR Part 136). Include
a signed copy of your lab report that includes the following: See Appendix A
04-25-07
Page 4 of 8
(06-554.DOC)
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
detection limits
results of each of the chemical parameters at the chemical state given below
quarter/quarter, section, township and range of the sample collection location
Time and date of sample collection
Time and date of analysis for each parameter
Analyst’s initials for each parameter
Detection limit for each parameter as achieved by the laboratory
WYPDES permit number and outfall number, where the sample was collected.
Origin of produced water (coal seam and legal location of sample collection location)
If more than one coal seam is being proposed for development, the permittee must submit a lab analysis and
complete information characterizing water quality from each coal seam being proposed for development. If the
permittee is proposing to include discharges from a coal seam not previously developed at this facility, the
permittee must submit a lab analysis and complete information characterizing water quality from the new coal
seam being proposed for development. A mixing analysis may be required if the representative water quality
analysis from the new coal seam indicates that the inclusion of the new effluent source may result in degradation
of existing effluent quality. Analyses must be provided in the units listed below.
See attached Table 3 and Appendix A.
Parameter* (See notes following
the table on chemical states)
Required Detection Limits and Required Units
Alkalinity, Total
Aluminum, Dissolved
Arsenic, Total Recoverable
Barium, Total Recoverable
Bicarbonate
Cadmium, Dissolved
Calcium, Dissolved
Chlorides
Copper, Dissolved
Dissolved Solids, Total
Fluoride, Dissolved
Hardness, Total
Iron, Dissolved
Lead, Dissolved
Magnesium, Dissolved
Manganese, Dissolved
Mercury, Dissolved
pH
Radium 226, Total Recoverable
1 mg/l as CaCO3
Radium 228, Total Recoverable**
Selenium, Total Recoverable
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
Sodium, Dissolved
Specific Conductance
Sulfates
50 μg/l
1 μg/l
100 μg/l
10 mg/l
5 μg/l
50 μg/l, report as mg/l
5 mg/l
10 μg/l
5 mg/l
100 µg/l
10 mg/l as CaCO3
50 μg/l
2 μg/l
50 μg/l
1 μg/l
to 0.1 pH unit
0.2 pCi/l
0.2 pCi/l
5 μg/l
Calculated as unadjusted ratio
5 micromhos/cm
10 mg/l
04-25-07
Page 5 of 8
(06-554.DOC)
Required Detection Limits and Required Units
Parameter* (See notes following
the table on chemical states)
Zinc, Dissolved
50 μg/l
*Discharges into drainages other than the Powder River geologic basin may require analysis of additional
parameters, please contact the WDEQ for a separate list.
**This parameter is only required for those discharges located within one stream mile of a class 2 water.
20. For new facilities, provide the expected (estimated) flow volume from each well in gallons per day, and
provide the rationale behind the flow volume estimate. For existing facilities, provide actual flow data from
all wells within the last six months.
Based on Rock Well’s site water production measurements, total (all wells) maximum daily flow is
estimated at 3500 barrels per day (= 102 gpm) produced water + 7 gpm tunnel water = 109 gpm total
effluent = 157,080 gallons per day = 0.157 MGD = 0.243 cubic feet per second.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
21. For applications for new facilities, are any of the required chemical constituents in the laboratory analysis
present in concentrations above Wyoming Water Quality Standards?
YES
NO
If the answer to question # 21 is yes, answer 21.a. – 21.b below. If no, proceed to question 23.
a. Which constituents? Oil & grease
b. Has this constituent been addressed in the response to question 13? Yes
Excepting oil & grease, several produced and tunnel water quality samples collected from the Greybull
Field (Table 3) indicate that the proposed discharge water quality can be expected to meet typical
permitted effluent water quality limits without treatment prior to discharge.
Rock Well has conducted Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) tests, both acute and chronic on Ceriodaphnia
and fathead minnow, using Greybull Field effluent (produced + tunnel water) in Bighorn River water.
Results are available upon request.
22. For applications for existing facilities, has the facility ever exceeded permit limits or water quality
standards? n/a
YES
NO
If the answer to question 22 is yes, answer 22.a. – 22.c. If no, proceed to question 23.
a. Which constituents?
b. Has the exceedance been addressed?
c. Describe how the exceedance was addressed.
23. Is there active irrigation in the drainage downstream of the discharge? (Please note that this response
includes both artificially and naturally irrigated bottomlands as defined in the Draft Agricultural Use
Protection Policy for the interpretation and implementation of Chapter 1, Section 20 of the Wyoming Water
Quality Rules and Regulations ).
YES
NO
04-25-07
Page 6 of 8
(06-554.DOC)
Irrigation rights to use Bighorn River water downstream of the proposed outfall have been identified
from a search of WSEO water rights database and are available upon request.
If yes, at a minimum, the WYPDES Program requires submission of the following information:
1.
Location(s) of irrigation diversions and/or sub-irrigated acreage;
2.
Type(s) of Crops grown under irrigation;
3.
Description of Irrigation Practices
4.
A topographic map showing irrigated acreage, any structures, ownership of irrigated acreage.
In addition to the minimum information described above, the WYPDES Program may require additional
information should the permittee request site-specific effluent limits protective of irrigation uses. Contact the
WYPDES Program for more information regarding requirements for site-specific SAR, TDS, and EC limits.
24. Provide name(s) and address(es) for all downstream irrigators between the outfalls and the mainstem.
Irrigator #1 Name
Irrigator #2 Name
Mailing Address
Mailing Address
(additional spaces may be added as necessary)
Only very limited historical river water quality data could be located for typical oil production water
constituents for comparison to Rock Well’s effluent. To date, Rock Well has collected 2 Bighorn River
water quality samples: 1 depth- and width-integrated composite sample collected from the Rt. #14
bridge downstream of the proposed discharge point, and 1 grab sample collected the same day at the
proposed discharge point at the west bank of the river for comparison to the composite (Table 4 and
Appendix B).
The predicted resultant water quality mixture of effluent plus Bighorn River water is nearly the same
quality as current Bighorn River water quality – see river water quality (Table 4) and mixing analysis
(Table 5). This mixing estimate conservatively assumes the maximum concentrations from the
produced water and tunnel water database (Table 3) and the minimum concentrations from the river
water database beginning with 2007 samples (Table 4). The river flow rate assumed (163,385 gpm) is
equivalent to the river low flow 7Q10 value (364 cfs) referenced from the Town of Greybull’s
WYPDES permit No. WY0020583 already discharging to the Bighorn River downstream (north) of Rock
Well’s proposed outfall.
25. Provide a listing of all active permits or construction approvals received or applied for by the applicant for
the site described in this permit application in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 5.T. of the Wyoming
Water Quality Rules and Regulations.
WDEQ Permit No. 06-659: land application of blended tunnel water
WOGCC Permit: on-lease lined aeration & evaporation pond
WOGCC Permit: on-lease road application of waste water
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate
the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those
persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting
04-25-07
Page 7 of 8
(06-554.DOC)
MAP
CEMETERY
MAP 1
Greybull Project
Proposed WYPDES Discharge
Greybull, Wyoming
Legend
er
Proposed WYPDES Pipeline
Portal
Big Ho
rn R iv
Aeration/Evaporation
Pond
Tie-In
Outfall
Aerated Treatment Pond
10,000 Barrel
Storage Tank
5th St.
RWP Property Boundary
PORTAL
Proposed WYPDES Pipelin
e
5th Ave
Storm Water
Tie-In
BALLPARK
WYPDES
Outfall
600
0
600
Feet
CONFIDENTIAL & PROPRIETARY PROPERTY
of Rock Well Petroleum (U.S.), Inc. © 2007
Unauthorized Copying Prohibited
Return to Rock Well Petroleum (U.S.), Inc.
File: Greybull-H2O-Treat.mxd Date: 19-Dec-2007
TABLES
TABLE 1
OUTFALLS and WATER QUALITY, CONTAINMENT UNIT, & FLOW MONITORING STATIONS
Greybull Oil Field New WYPDES Permit Application
LOCATION
Discharge
(Outfall) Point
#
001
Immediate
Receiving
Stream
Bighorn River
Mainstem
(closest
Dist. fr. Outfall
perennial
to Mainstem,
water)
Stream Miles
QQ
SECT
Bighorn River
0.0
NWNW 16
STATION DESCRIPTION
na
UWQMS
DWQMS
na
TRIB
na
CU1
na
FM1
na
IMP
na
vers: 12/18/2007
C:\GGA Projects\Rock Well\Greybull\WYPDES applics\
Greybull Field New WYPDES Data Tbls\1 -OUTFALL pts
TWNSP N
RNG W
52
93
LAT N,
LONG W,
degrees
degrees
(NAD27)
(NAD27)
44.483861 -108.048611
County
Big Horn
Receiving
Containment Unit
Name
n/a
NOTES
--
--
--
--
----
Gene R. George + Assoc., Inc.
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 2
PRODUCING WELL INFORMATION
WELL LOCATIONS
API No.
Producing Fm
Well I.D.
DRILL STATION
No. 1
321579 PEAY
SANDSTONE
DRILL STATION
No. 2
DRILL STATION
No. 3
DRILL STATION
No. 4
DRILL STATION
No. 5
321580 PEAY
SANDSTONE
321583 PEAY
SANDSTONE
321586 PEAY
SANDSTONE
321587 PEAY
SANDSTONE
QTY =
Well Depth
feet bgs
QQ
SECT
TWNSP N
RNG W
Discharges to
Outfall #
(see Table 1)
directional
NWNE
17
52
93
001
"
"
NWNE
17
52
93
001
"
"
NENW
17
52
93
001
"
"
NENW
17
52
93
001
"
"
NENW
17
52
93
001
5
vers: 12/20/2007
Greybull Field New WYPDES Data Tbls\2 - Wells
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 3
PRODUCED AND TUNNEL WATER (EFFLUENT) QUALITY
PARAMETERS
Alkalinity , total
UNITS
SURFACE
WATER
AQUATIC LIFE
EFFLUENT
CHRONIC
LIMITS1
VALUE2
AT E.O.P.,
May mix inNO MIXING
stream to
post discharge
achieve
PRODUCED WATER
10/27/05
mg/L as CaCO3
5/2/07
5/8/07
3,000
3,040
8/23/07
TUNNEL WATER
10/16/07
11/26/07
2/7/06
4/13/06
1310
1400
<0.002
<0.002
<0.1
<0.1
4/26/06
6/15/06
5/22/07
Aluminum, dissolved
Aluminum, total
mg/L
Arsenic , total
mg/L
arsenic, dissolved
mg/L
Barium , total
mg/L
Bicarbonate as HCO3
mg/L
cadmium, dissolved*
mg/L
Calcium
mg/L
Chlorides
mg/L
chromium III
mg/L
0.003
0.005
0.15
0.6
4,140
3,700
15.3
18.7
19
19
196
321
109
222
250
195
261
224
312
237
0.02
0.0022
2,000
230
0.0741
<0.05
<0.01
chromium VI (hexavalent)
mg/L
0.011
Copper, dissolved
mg/L
0.0090
Fluoride
0.3
0.087
mg/L
Hardness
1.1
87.2
mg/l as CaCO3
Iron , dissolved
mg/L
0.0025
Lead, dissolved*
mg/L
0.0025
0.1
0.8
84
79
0.29
1050
0.24
mg/L
manganese, dissolved*
mg/L
1.462
0.03
mercury, dissolved
mg/L
0.00077
<0.001
pH
9.7
Radium 226 , total
9.9
9
7
6.5 - 8.5
6.5-9
<0.03
145
296
165
<0.05
0.052
Standard Units
0.04
<0.05
Magnesium
nickel, dissolved
949
8.06
7.85
pCi/l
8.1
8.48
0.5
0.7
8.25
0.8
3.5
<0.004
<0.004
8.4
<0.2
Radium 228, total
Selenium , total
mg/L
Silver, dissolved
mg/L
Silver, total
mg/L
Sodium , dissolved
mg/L
Sodium Adsorption Ratio
unitless
Specific Conductance
umhos/cm
Sulfate
mg/L
sulfide (hydrogen sulfide)
mg/L
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
mg/L
ND
1,530
3000
3
<0.01
1,680
2,120
2,520
69.7
79.5
28.5
24.3
37.6
5,880
6,190
5,940
10,100
12,000
10,400
3
289
185
4,480
4,960
4,610
7,970
10,300
<10
<5
208
3,910
3,970
3,980
250
10
430
mg/L
9,800
8,680
<5.0
ug/L
1.2
2380
toluene3
ug/L
1,000
1650
ethylbenzene3
ug/L
700
216
xylenes3
ug/L
10,000
906
benzene
11,000
<0.02
0.1181
mg/L
2,660
4.22
4,000
5000
<0.01
1,500
0.002
Zinc, dissolved*
Oil & Grease
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(TPH)
0.006
0.005
[1] Wyoming Water Quality Rules & Regulations Chapter 7, Section 4: Effluent Limitations [for Surface Discharge of Water assoc. with the Production of Oil and Gas]
[2] WY Surface Water Quality Standards, Chap. 1: Water Quality Criteria, Appendix B, Aquatic Life Chronic Value
[3] -WY Surface Water Quality Standards, Chap. 1: Water Quality Criteria, Appendix B, Human Health Value, Fish & Drinking Water
* - hardness-dependent Aquatic Life Chronic Value concentration
EOP - end of discharge pipe
vers: 12/27/2007
C:\GGA Projects\Rock Well\Greybull\WYPDES applics\Dec07 Individ applic\applic files\
Greybull Field New WYPDES Data Tbls\3_produced&tunnel wq
Page 1 of 1
Rock Well GGA
TABLE 4
BIGHORN RIVER WATER QUALITY
SURFACE
WATER
AQUATIC
LIFE
CHRONIC
a
Parameters
Date Sampled
ALUMINUM, DISSOLVED
ARSENIC, DISSOLVED
CADMIUM, DISSOLVED*
CHLORIDE
CHROMIUM III
CHROMIUM VI (HEXAVALENT)
COPPER, DISSOLVED*
HARDNESS [Ca] + [Mg]
IRON, DISSOLVED
LEAD, DISSOLVED*
MANGANESE, DISSOLVED*
MERCURY, DISSOLVED
NICKEL, DISSOLVED*
OIL & GREASE
pH
RADIUM 226
SELENIUM, TOTAL
SILVER, DISSOLVED*
SULFATES
SULFIDE (HYDROGEN SULFIDE)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
ZINC, DISSOLVED*
b
Units
LIMIT
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
S.U.
pCi/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.087
0.15
0.0022
230
0.0741
0.011
0.009
n/e
1
0.0025
1.462
0.00077
52
n/e
6.5-9
n/e
0.005
n/e
n/e
0.002
n/e
0.1181
umhos/cm
deg C
n/e
n/e
n/e
n/e
n/e
cfs
n/e
Bighorn
River
Composite
at Rt#14
Bridge
Bighorn
River Grab
at Storm
Sewer
Outfall
10/16/07
10/16/07
0.2
<0.005
<0.001
19
<0.010
<0.010
<0.01
324
0.090
<0.1
<0.010
<0.001
<0.01
<1.0
8.2
<0.2
<0.005
<0.005
311
<0.04
679
<0.010
<0.1
<0.005
<0.001
19
<0.010
<0.010
<0.01
327
<0.03
<0.1
<0.010
<0.001
<0.01
<1.0
8.2
0.4
<0.005
<0.005
311
<0.04
682
<0.010
2/26/1973
0.0042
na
14.6
na
na
0
88
0.032
0.00063
0
0.696
na
na
7.89
na
0.0025
na
na
na
na
0.019
Bighorn River @ Greybull (WGF Stn #82100102: 44.48215187 N by 108.0404626 W)c
4/17/73 7/11/73 9/20/73 12/5/73 4/19/74 7/17/74 8/22/74 9/16/74 11/7/74 12/11/74
0.0042
0.0045 0.0042 <0.0042
na
na
na
na
14.5
14.0
9.0
7.5
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
0
0
0.004
0.002
106
96
78
133
0.0080
0 0.0080
0.012
0.00048 0.00032 0.00023 0.00048
0.024
0
0.006
0.012
0.00087
0.19 0.00090 0.00055
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
8.30
8.50
7.89
8.30
na
na
na
na
0.0025
0.0025 0.0025 <0.0025
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
0.0069
0.0021 0.0063
0.0040
na
na
11.6
na
na
na
102
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
11.5
na
na
na
92
na
na
na
na
na
na
8.30
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
11.5
na
na
na
92
na
na
na
na
na
na
8.30
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
8.40
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
16
na
na
na
102
na
na
na
na
na
na
8.40
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
19
na
na
na
110
na
na
na
na
na
na
8.40
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
FIELD MEASUREMENTS:
CONDUCTIVITY
D.O.
mg/L
Eh
pH
TEMPERATURE
FLOW (USGS Gauging Stn No. 06274300 @
Basin, WY), approx.
S.U.
861
nm
nm
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
nm
9.3
na
na
9.5
na
na
8.1
na
na
na
na
na
9.3
na
na
9.1
na
na
9.1
na
na
9.1
na
na
9.9
na
na
11.5
na
na
7.63
14.6
nm
9.4
na
na
nm
2
11
26
16
1
13
25
na
21
8
na
544
544
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
nm
nm
See Appendix C (attached) for 2007 corresponding laboratory reports
* - hardness-dependent Aquatic Life Chronic Value concentration
a - list received from B. DiRienzo/WDEQ (2003)
b - Chap. 1, Appendix B: WY Surface Water Quality Standards, Water Quality Criteria, Aquatic Life Chronic Value
c - source: archived Wyoming Game & Fish Dept. sample summary table, printed 7/23/07 from: http://charon.wrds.uwyo.edu
na - not available
nm -not measured
n/e - not established
vers: 12/27/2007
Greybull Field New WYPDES Data Tbls\ 4_hist BigHornR samples
Page 1 of 1
TABLE 5
ESTIMATED RESULTANT WATER QUALITY MIXTURE:
EFFLUENT (TUNNEL WATER + PRODUCED WATER) + RIVER WATER
BIGHORN
RIVER
(Table 4)
EFFLUENT (Table 3)
Produced
Tunnel
Water Max Water Max
Flow Rate (Q)
102
7
gpm
Effluent
[1a]
Mixture
109
River Water
Min
163,385
MIXTURE
[1b]
Mixture:
Effluent + River
Water
163,494
LIMITS
WDEQ Stock &
Wildlife Limits
chlorides
mg/L
261
312
264
8.2
oil & grease
mg/L
430
2.5
403
0.5
pH
8.06
8.48
8.1
8.20
6.5-8.5
sulfates
mg/L
289
4,960
589
311
3,000
TDS
mg/L
4,000
11,000
4,449
679
5,000
Conductivity
umhos/cm
6,190
12,000
5,694
861
864
Rd 226
pCi/L
0.7
3.5
0.88
0.10
0.10
Al
mg/L
As
mg/L
Cd
mg/L
Fe
mg/L
Mn
mb/L
0.30
na
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.005
0.0010
0.0047
0.0025
0.0025
0.020
na
0.020
0.00050
0.00051
0.29
0.040
0.27
0.015
0.015
0.04
3.60
0.27
0.0050
0.0052
Se
mg/L
0.0060
na
0.0060
0.0025
0.0025
Pb
mg/L
0.00
0.090
0.0058
0.0500
0.050
benzene,
ug/L
2,380
2.5
2,227
0
1.5
toluene,
ug/L
1,650
na
1,650
0
1.1
Effluent must meet
limits at End-ofPipe
[2]
2000
10
cfs - cubic feet per second
EC - electrical conductivity
gpm - gallons per minute
na - no data available; if no sample available for tunnel consituent, produced value assumed for effluent
[1] Mixture Estimation Method (USEPA, Dec. 1996: U.S. EPA NPDES Permit Writers' Manual,
EPA-833-96-003, Exhibit 6-2).
[1a] - (QpCp + QtCt) / Qe = Ce
[1b] - (QrCr + QeCe) / Qmix = Cmix
C = concentration, mg/L
Q = flow rate
e = effluent (produced + tunnel water)r = river water
mix = mixture (effluent + river)
t = tunnel water
p = produced water
If concentration was less than detection limit, 1/2 detection limit was used for calculation.
[2] - WY Water Quality Rules & Reg's Chapter 7, Sect 4: Effluent limits for Stock and wildlife limits
[3] - WY Water Quality Rules & Reg's Chapter 11, Section 55(c)(ii): Irrigation Water Quality, Numerical water quality
criteria for limited volumes.
vers: 12/27/2007
Greybull Field New WYPDES Data Tbls\5_Mix effluent+river
Page 1 of 1
APPENDIX A
Effluent Water Analysis Laboratory Reports
GREYBULL OIL FIELD PRODUCED WATER
ROCK WELL'S TUNNEL / MINE WATER
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
Client: Rock Well Petroleum
Project: Greybull
Lab ID: C06041147-001
Client Sample ID: GB 42606 001-007
Report Date: 05/16/06
Collection Date: 04/26/06 10:30
Date Received: 04/26/06
Matrix: Aqueous
Analyses
Result
Units
Qual
MCL/
RL QCL
Method
Analysis Date / By
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Solids, Total Dissolved TDS @ 180 C
Turbidity
11000
6.00
mg/L
NTU
10
0.10
A2540 C
A2130 B
04/27/06 11:11 / jdh
04/27/06 10:23 / th
ND
pCi/L
0.2
E903.0
05/05/06 08:30 / trs
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
102
115
104
100
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%REC
%REC
%REC
%REC
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
SW1311/8260B
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
05/01/06 23:19 / jlr
ND
mg/L
5.0
SW1664A
05/03/06 14:53 / dj
0.10
mg Cl/L
0.10
SW9020B
05/09/06 09:16 / cjs
RADIONUCLIDES - TOTAL
Radium 226
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS - TCLP
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
Methyl ethyl ketone
o-Xylene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Surr: 1,2-Dichlorobenzene-d4
Surr: Dibromofluoromethane
Surr: p-Bromofluorobenzene
Surr: Toluene-d8
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.10
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.7
0.5
7.5
0.5
0.5
100
6
200
0.7
0.5
0.2
80-120
65-125
80-120
80-120
ORGANIC CHARACTERISTICS
Non-polar Materials (SGT-HEM)
TOTAL ORGANIC HALOGENS - TCLP
Organic Halides, Total
Report
Definitions:
RL - Analyte reporting limit.
MCL - Maximum contaminant level.
QCL - Quality control limit.
ND - Not detected at the reporting limit.
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
APPENDIX B
Bighorn River Water Analysis Laboratory Reports
Bighorn River @ Hwy #14 Bridge,
Greybull, WY
Bighorn River @ storm water outfall (44.483861 N lat by
108.048611 W long), Greybull, WY

YATES PETROLEUM CORPORATION

Transcription

Similar documents

How Women ROCKED THE VOTE in Little Rock

Song List - Gator James Band

YTX14AHL-BS

social raquet - ALEXANDER PARK TENNIS CLUB

evolocity one sheet

ALABAMA

http://www.annsom.com http://www.myspace.com/annsommusic

Vadsö_kulturnaringslivseminarie 080605

PDF - Rock Science

BULLETIN

Code of Conduct - Jaguar Land Rover