Fowl River and D`Olive - Mobile Bay National Estuary Program

Transcription

Fowl River and D`Olive - Mobile Bay National Estuary Program
Research Elements
Water
Quality
Land Sediment
Use
Study
Coastal
Research
Status of
Watershed
Project/Restoration
Opportunities
FOWL RIVER FOREVER
www.fowlriverforever.org
WATERSHED INFORMATION
HAS BEEN DIGITIZED
• Data inventory and
creation of GIS database
• Delineation of eight
subwatersheds
• Analysis of land
use/land cover
• Population trend
analysis (planning for
future conditions)
SAMPLE NETWORK
• A sampling network has
been established
• Samples are being collected
during representative flow
conditions
• Sample locations represent
specific parts of the basin
• Sample analyses should
correlate to land use/land
cover effects
FOWL RIVER FOREVER
www.fowlriverforever.org
Sampling Parameters Include:
Alkalinity
Ammonia as N
Anionic surfactants as MBAS
Bacteria Genetic Mapping
Carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand
Chloride
Dissolved Reactive Phosphorous
FOWL RIVER FOREVER
CO2-Free
Flow
Land Use
Dissolved Oxygen
Depth
Chlorophyll – a
www.fowlriverforever.org
Sampling Parameters Include:
Fluoride
Salinity
Total residual chlorine
Specific Conductance
Nitrate as NO2
Nitrite as NO2
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Nitrate as N
FOWL RIVER FOREVER
Total nitrate-nitrite as N
Total Phosphorous as P
Light Attenuation
Sulfate
Temperature
Particulate Organic Matter
Total nitrate-nitrite as NO3
www.fowlriverforever.org
Sampling Parameters Include:
Iron
Recoverable Phenols
Selenium
Silica
Magnesium
Molybdenum
Nickel
Zinc
Lead
Lithium
Manganese
FOWL RIVER FOREVER
Potassium
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Total residual chlorine
Total suspended solids
Sodium
Vanadium
Strontium
Total Dissolved Solids
Turbidity
Thallium
www.fowlriverforever.org
LANDUSE PERCENTAGES
FOWL RIVER FOREVER
www.fowlriverforever.org
LAND USE PERCENTAGES
BY SUBWATERSHED
PROJECT GOALS


determine cause and effect (correlate
water quality to land use/land cover)
identify restoration/preservation
opportunities

prioritize projects

implement projects

monitor results and modify if necessary
FOWL RIVER FOREVER
www.fowlriverforever.org
Coastal Research:
Preliminary Findings
FOWL RIVER FOREVER
www.fowlriverforever.org
Fowl River Shorelines
1. Problem Identification
2. Shoreline Assessments
3. Conceptual Strategies
4. Long-Term Planning
Problem Identification
1. Flow Volume and Speed
• Breaching and Erosion of Spits & Islands
2. Boat Wakes
• Shoreline & Marsh Erosion
• Wave Reflection
3. Sea Level Rise
• Conversion to Open Water
Shoreline Assessments
1. Types
• Marsh (60%) & Veg. Banks (37%)
2. Armoring Extent
• About 25% (Bulkhead, Riprap)
3. Zone Classification
• Marine (Zone I)
• Transition (Zone II)
• Fresh (Zone III)
47 Miles
of Tidal
Shoreline
Conceptual Strategies
1. Watershed Strategies
• Off-line detention (land acquisition)
• Attenuation of peak flows
2. Spits & Islands
• Armoring – riprap, sand, vegetation
3. Marshes
• Low sills with gaps
• Sand and vegetation
Long-Term Planning
1. Existing Armoring
• Compensatory programs
2. Adaptive Management
• Wake zones or buffers
3. Holding the Line
4. Periodic Reassessment
Public Outreach:
FOWL RIVER FOREVER
www.fowlriverforever.org
Fowl River Steering Committee
Ray Mayhall (Co-chair)
Belinda Lott (Co-chair)
Johnnie Adams
Richard Becker
Jack Boatman
Casi Callaway
Jerry Carl
Richard Craig
David Evans
Elizabeth Evans
Julius Foster
Frank Gardner
Ken Granger
Gene Grantham
Rose Grantham
Rob Harris
Ted Henken
Brian Hewes
Sen. Bill Hightower
Jeremiah Kolb
Bill Klutz
Greg Landry
Lamar Lott
Cindy McLendon
Bill Melton
Coy Morgan
Joyce Nicholas
Barbara Nolan
Stan Nolan
Matt Orrell
Bruce Pfeiffer
Jon Porthouse
Ray Richardson
Rep. David Sessions
Sam St. John
Randy Shaneyfelt
Sam St. John
Judy Stout
Bonnie Tulley
Oliver Washington
Harold White
Jenny Zimlich
Outreach / Publicity
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Business cards
Rack cards
Website
Video Commercial
Water bills
Billboard
Digital Billboard (Fire
Dept.)
Banners at marinas
•
•
•
•
•
Social Media / Emails
(FRACA, Mobile
Baykeeper, Bellingrath
Gardens, etc.)
Schools – robocalls
Church bulletins
Online Media (AL.com,
Next Door.com)
TV (WKRG TV5 and
Fox10)
Public Input is Critical
• Public Involvement Meetings
• Website
What did they tell us?
• Ideas and concerns to date
• Integration of comments into research
PROJECT PARTNERS
FOWL RIVER FOREVER
www.fowlriverforever.org
D’Olive Creek Restoration Project
Segments D4-D6
Baldwin County, Alabama
Galen Thackston
Goodwyn, Mills and Cawood
April 21, 2015
PROJECT AREA
•
•
•
•
2,100 ± Linear Feet of Stream
Daphne, AL
Between I-10 and US 90
Restoration and maintenance
attempted in the past
EXISTING CONDITIONS
•
On April 29-30, 2014, during a 24-hour, 13.3-inch rain event D’Olive Creek was subjected to a peak
discharge of 3,750 cubic feet per second. As a result of this substantial flow, the stream experienced
extreme erosion, as the channel headcut and banks widened, depositing, per Dr. Jennings’
assessment, approximately 4,000 tons of sediment downstream and threatening to compromise the
interstate crossing upstream.
Typical Condition of Stream Banks
View of Existing Channel Downstream of I-10
View of Existing Channel
PROJECT DESIGN GOALS
Objective #1: Reduce the sediment supply within reach
Objective #2: Design a stable stream and floodplain capable of handling
a discharge of 3,750 cfs (2014 Storm Event)
Objective #3: Design a self-sustaining, stable stream
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1-10 Culverts
Hwy 90 Culverts
ALDOT Stabilization
Telecommunication Lines
Soil Conditions
Natural Topography of Valley
Hydrology Upstream and
Downstream
Floodplain Expansion and
Contraction
Net Cut of Materials
DESIGN APPROACH
•
•
•
Design Flows
– Bankfull Discharge
– Historical Maximum
Allowable Shear Stresses
– Floodplain
• Short-term
• Long-term
– Channel
Bankfull Dimensions
– Area, Width, Depth
WATERSHED APPROACH FOR REFERENCE
D'Olive Mini-Regional bankfull width, depth, and area curves
WATERSHED ANALYSIS
• Bankfull Parameters
Identified (Area, Width,
Depth)
• Curve established for
Design Morphology
Table
100
100
10
Bankfull Area = 21.998x0.61
Coefficient of determination = 0.85
10
Width = 12.72x0.27
Coefficient of determination = 0.54
Depth = 1.74x0.34
Coefficient of determination = 0.70
1
0.1
1
0.1
1
Drainage Area (sqmi)
10
Cross-Sectional Area (ft2)
Bankfull Width and Depth (ft)
EXPLANATION
Bankfull area geometry curve
Bankfull width geometry curve
Bankfull depth geometry curve
Bankfull area survey data
Bankfull width survey data
Bankfull depth survey data
DESIGN MORPHOLOGY
• Table Populated by
Watershed Analysis
• Confirmed by Reference
Reaches
• Parameters from Watershed
Analysis
DESIGN MORPHOLOGY
IN-STREAM STRUCTURES
WOOD TOE
ROCK CROSS VANE
THRESHOLD RIFFLE
LOG DROP WITH BOULDERS
J-HOOK
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
30% DESIGN PLANS
30% DESIGN PLANS
DESIGN COMPARISON
Design Parameters
Channel Sizing
Floodplain Slope
Sheer stress @ 3,750 cfs
Previous design (2009)
18
2
ft
1.8%
5
2
lb/ft
Current Design 30%
33
2
ft
0.8%
1.5
2
lb/ft
TIMELINE
D'Olive Watershed Timeline
Responsible Party
Objective
Estimated
Completion Date
Actual
Completion
Date
Project Team
Preliminary design workshop
March 10-12
March 10-12
GMC
Pick up reference reach
March 16-20
March 10-13
Project Team
Design workshop
30% submittal to NEP, NFWF, John
Curry & DOT
NEP Project Implementation
Meeting 1:00-3:00 p.m.
March 23-27
March 23-27
4/6
4/6
4/21
4/21
Field verify & model verify
60% submittal to NEP, NFWF, John
Curry & Dot
4/27
Submittal to CORPS
Add preliminary opinion of cost for
NFWF to use @ NFWF board
meeting
5/11
GMC
GMC
Project Team
GMC
GMC
GMC
NFWF Board Meeting
5/4
7/6
1st week of
August
GMC
Final plans/specs
9/7
GMC
Bid Project
9/7
NEP
Select Contractor
12/31
D’OLIVE CREEK RESTORATION
QUESTIONS?