Breathe in, Breathe out, How to Pick `em Out: Selecting Inhalers for
Transcription
Breathe in, Breathe out, How to Pick `em Out: Selecting Inhalers for
Breathe in, Breathe out, How to Pick ’em Out: Selecting Inhalers for Patients and Institutions Nune Zadikian, PharmD Jeff Endicott, PharmD University of Vermont Medical Center April 14, 2016 Objectives • Differentiate between the mechanisms of action of common inhaled medications • Compare and contrast the characteristics of available inhaled products for prescribing • Identify key elements involved in selecting medications for formulary addition Asthma • Affects ~7% of Americans • ~300 million worldwide • Improved outcomes in recent decades – More widespread preventive use of ICS – Introduction of other effective medications • Airway obstruction caused by airway smoothmuscle constriction and inflammation of the bronchi – Cough, SOB, chest tightness, wheezing New Engl J Med 2009;360:1002-14 http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/asthma Pathophysiology of Asthma Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2004;3:831-44 Classifying Asthma Severity Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007 Components of Asthma Management • Measures of assessment and monitoring • Education • Control of environmental and comorbid conditions • Pharmacologic therapy Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007 Stepped-Care Approach to Asthma Treatment New Engl J Med 2009;360:1002-14 Medications For Asthma • Categorized into two general classes – Quick-relief PRN • Anticholinergics • SABAs • Systemic corticosteroids – Long-term control Taken daily • Inhaled corticosteroids • Cromolyn sodium and nedocromil • Immunomodulators – Omalizumab • Leukotriene modifiers • LABAs • Methylxanthines Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007 Inhaled Medications Drug Class Medications Short Acting Beta-2 agonists Albuterol, levalbuterol Long Acting Beta-2 agonists Formoterol, salmeterol, indacaterol, vilanterol (combination) Inhaled Corticosteroids Ciclesonide, flunisolide, mometasone, fluticasone, beclomethasone, budesonide Anticholinergic Ipratropium Long-Acting Anticholinergics tiotropium, aclidinium, umeclidinium (combination) INHALED CORTICOSTEROIDS (ICS) Cellular Effects of Corticosteroids Annals of Internal Medicine 2003;139:359-70 Inhaled Corticosteroids • Most effective long-term therapy in asthma • Preventative therapy – Multiplicity of anti-inflammatory activities • Suppress generation of cytokines, recruit airway eosinophils and other inflammatory mediators • Clinical outcomes – – – – Fewer asthmatic symptoms Increased lung function Improved asthma specific QOL Fewer asthmatic exacerbations • Suppress but do not cure asthmatic inflammation – Airway inflammation returns to baseline 2 weeks after stopping Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007 Safety of ICS • Well tolerated and safe – Only small amount available for systemic absorption • <20% of delivered dose deposited onto airways – Undergo extensive first-pass metabolic inactivation – HPA function affected with doses of 88 mcg/day of fluticasone, • Not clinically important, long term adverse systemic effects observed with low to medium doses – At high doses (>1000 mcg/day of beclomethasone or equivalent), risk of skin bruising, cataracts, elevated intraocular pressure and accelerated loss of bone mass increase • Growth retardation in children? • Pharyngeal and laryngeal side effects – Sore throat, coughing, weak/horse voice, candidiasis • High-dose ICS effective for severe persistent asthma – However, dose-response curve for treatment begins to flatten at low to medium doses, whereas dose-systemic absorption curve is linear New Engl J Med 2009;360:1002-14 BRONCHODILATORS: BETA-AGONISTS Molecular Mechanism of Action of Bronchodilators Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2004;3:831-44 Inhaled Long Acting Beta-Agonists • Sustained relaxation of airway smooth muscles – Stimulating β2-receptors increase cAMP and antagonize bronchoconstriction • Lipophilic molecules – Prolonged retention in lung tissue – Duration of bronchodilation ~12 h after a dose • BID administration • No anti-inflammatory activity Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007 New Engl J Med 2009;360:1002-14 Inhaled Long Acting Beta-Agonists • Used as adjunct to ICS for providing long-term control of symptoms • Reduce daytime and night-time symptoms, improve lung function, reduce risk of exacerbations, minimize required dose of ICS • Not recommended as monotherapy for long-term control of persistent asthma – Discontinuation of ICS following LABA initiation results in an increase in asthma exacerbation • Use not recommended for acute symptoms or exacerbations Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007 New Engl J Med 2009;360:1002-14 Chemical Structures Albuterol Indacaterol Salmeterol Formoterol Inhaled B2-Agonists Salmeterol vs Formoterol • Salmeterol – Partial agonist – Onset: 15 min – Peak effect: 3 h – Duration: 12 h • Formoterol – Full agonist – More rapid onset • 3-5 minutes • Similar to albuterol – Peak effect: 15 min – Duration: 12 h – Less lipophilic Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007. LABA Adverse Effects • Cardiovascular effects seen at doses 4-5 times those recommended – Tachycardia – QTc prolongation – Hypokalemia • Tremor • Hyperglycemia Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007. Safety of LABAs in Asthma • FDA Black Box Warning – CT comparing salmeterol vs placebo added to usual asthma therapy • Increased risk of asthma-related deaths in patients treated with salmeterol – 13/13176 vs 3/13179 treated for 28 weeks • LABA should not be used as monotherapy as long-term control in persistent asthma – Daily use should not exceed 100 mcg salmeterol or 24 mcg formoterol Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007 SABA • Relax airway smooth muscle – Onset of action ≤ 5 min – Peak effect in 30-60 min – Duration of action of 4-5 hrs • With regular use ≥ 4 X per day, potency not affected, duration of action slightly shortened • Drug of choice – Acute asthma symptoms and exacerbations – Exercise induced asthma • Exist chemically as racemic mixtures – Therapeutic activity resides in the (R)-enantiomer Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007 SABA • In mild to moderate asthma, regularly scheduled albuterol vs PRN albuterol – No difference in level of asthma control – No difference in efficacy or side effects • Regularly scheduled, daily, long-term use not recommended • Administering SABA before ICS to improve delivery to lower airways is unnecessary • Use not contraindicated in patients on beta-blockers – Effectiveness may be somewhat diminished Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007 New Engl J Med 2009;360:1002-14 SABA • Albuterol (salbutamol), levalbuterol • Decision largely based on cost and patient’s or physician’s preference – Levalbuterol • Only active enantiomer • When delivered by MDI, has efficacy and side-effect profile indistinguishable from racemic albuterol New Engl J Med 2009;360:1002-14 BRONCHODILATORS: ANTICHOLINERGICS Mechanism of Action of Anticholinergics Anticholinergics Anticholinergics • Mechanism of Action – Block the action of acetylcholine at parasympathetic sites in bronchial smooth muscle causing bronchodilation • Ipratropium bromide – Short acting – Not FDA approved for asthma – Has not demonstrated to be effective in long-term management of asthma • Tiotropium bromide – Long acting, once daily for COPD – Tiotropium Respimat: Has approval for asthma Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, Aug 2007 Ipratropium • Not recommended routinely for quick relief of asthmatic symptoms • Takes longer to start working (15-20 min) and causes less bronchodilation than SABA • May be used in patients with SABA intolerance • May be used in treatment of severe asthma attacks or attacks induced by beta-blockers New Engl J Med 2009;360:1002-14 CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (COPD) COPD • Preventable and treatable disease • Characterized by progressive airflow limitation caused by chronic inflammation in the airways and lung parenchyma – Main cause: smoking • ~25% of adults > 40 years have mild airflow obstruction • Fourth leading cause of death • 60-85% with mild to moderate disease remain undiagnosed Lancet 2012;379:1341-51 Pathophysiology of COPD NEJM 2010;362:1407-16 Lancet 2012;379:1341-51 Algorithm for Treatment of COPD NEJM 2004; 350:2689-97 COPD Assessments • Symptoms – Modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) Questionnaire • Measure of breathlessness – COPD Assessment Test (CAT) • 8-item unidimensional measure of health status impairment Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2016. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.org/. mMRC Questionnaire Grade Degree of breathlessness related to activities 1 Not troubled by breathlessness except on strenuous exercise 2 Short of breath when hurrying on the level or walking up a slight hill 3 Walks slower than most people on the level, stops after a mile or so, or stops after 15 minutes walking at own pace 4 Stops for breath after walking about 100 yards or after a few minutes on level ground 5 Too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when undressing Stenton C. Occup Med. 2008; 58:226-227 COPD Assessment Test http://www.catestonline.org/images/pdfs/CATest.pdf. Accessed 2/12/2016. COPD Assessments • Spirometric assessment – Classification of Severity of Airflow Limitation in COPD Classification Spirometric Assessment GOLD 1: Mild FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted GOLD 2: Moderate 50% ≤ FEV1 < 80% predicted GOLD 3: Severe 30% ≤ FEV1 < 50% predicted GOLD 4: Very severe FEV1 < 30% predicted Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2016. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.org/. 4 (C) (D) 3 2 (A) (B) CAT < 10 CAT ≥ 10 ≥2 Or ≥ 1 leading to hospital admission Risk (Exacerbation History) Risk (GOLD Classification of Airflow Limitation) Combined COPD Assessment 1 not leading to hospital admission 1 Symptoms mMRC 0-1 mMRC ≥ 2 Breathlessness Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2016. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.org/. GOLD Initial Pharmacologic Treatment Patient Group Recommended First Choice Alternative Choice A • • Short-acting anticholinergic prn or Short-acting beta 2-agonist prn • • • Long-acting anticholinergic or Long-acting beta 2-agonist or Short-acting beta 2-agonist and short-acting anticholinergic B • • Long-acting anticholinergic or Long-acting beta 2-agonist • Long-acting anticholinergic and long-acting beta 2agonist C • Inhaled corticosteroid + long-acting beta 2-agonist or Long-acting anticholinergic • Long-acting anticholinergic and long-acting beta 2agonist or Long-acting anticholinergic and phosphodiesterase4 inhibitor or Long-acting beta 2-agonist and phosphodiesterase4 inhibitor • • • D • • Inhaled corticosteroid + long-acting beta 2-agonist and/or Long-acting anticholinergic • • • • Inhaled corticosteroid + long-acting beta 2-agonist and long-acting anticholinergic or Inhaled corticosteroid + long-acting beta 2-agonist and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor or Long-acting anticholinergic and long-acting beta 2agonist or Long-acting anticholinergic and phosphodiesterase4 inhibitor Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2016. Available from: http://www.goldcopd.org/. Fluticasone (Flovent, Arunity) Albuterol (ProAir, Ventolin, Proventil) Fluticasone/Salmeterol (Advair) Beclomethasone (QVAR) Levalbuterol (Xopenex) Mometasone/Formoterol (Dulera) Budesonide (Pulmicort) Budesonide/Formoterol (Symbicort) Fluticasone/Vilanterol (Breo) Mometasone (Asmanex) Olodaterol (Striverdi) Salmeterol (Serevent) Formoterol (Foradil) Indacaterol (Arcapta) Ipratropium/Albuterol (Combivent) Tiotropium/Olodaterol (Stiolto) Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (Anoro) Glycopyrolate/Indacaterol (Ubitron) Ipratropium (Atrovent) Umeclidinium (Incruse) Tiotropium (Spiriva) Aclidinium bromide (Turdoza) Glycopyrolate (Seebri) Anticholinergics Which drug is best? Trials • Olodaterol vs placebo vs formoterol Koch A. Int J Chron Obstruc Pulm Dis. 2014;9:697-714 Trials • Olodaterol improved lung function (FEV1) over placebo – Formoterol also improved lung function over placebo • Olodaterol improved health-related quality of life scores compared to placebo(Transitional Dyspnea Index and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire) – No significant difference seen when comparing formoterol versus placebo – No comparison given for olodaterol versus formoterol • Safety similar between formoterol and olodaterol Koch A. Int J Chron Obstruc Pulm Dis. 2014;9:697-714 Trials • “The 24 Hour Lung Function Time Profile of Olodaterol Once Daily Versus Placebo and Tiotropium in Patients with Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease” • Outcomes examined change in FEV1 – Tiotropium vs placebo (statistically significant) – Olodaterol vs placebo (statistically significant) – Improvements in FEV1 appeared similar between tiotropium and olodaterol Lange P, et al. J Pulm Respir Med. 2014; 4: 196 Trials • Umeclidinium/vilanterol (Anoro Ellipta) – Improvement in FEV1 compared with vilanterol alone or tiotropium alone – Improvement in Transition Dyspnea Index compared to placebo, not to monotherapy • Aclidinium – Improvement in FEV1 over placebo – Improvement in TDI over placebo Decramer M, et al. Lancet Resp Med. 2014; 2: 472−86 Donohue JF, et al. Resp Res. 2014; 15:78 Kerwin EM, et al. J Chronic Obstruct Pulm Dis. 2012; 9: 90–101 Jones PW, et al. Eur Resp J. 2012; 40: 830–6 Drug Selection • Randomized, controlled trials are typically placebo controlled – No indicators one more efficacious than another – FDA approval does not require a drug to be more efficacious than another • Combination therapies typically compare to monotherapy –2>1 FDA Approved Indications • ICS/LABA – COPD/Asthma • Fluticasone/Salmeterol (Advair) • Budesonide/Formoterol (Symbicort) • Fluticasone/Vilanterol (Breo) – Asthma • Mometasone/formoterol (Dulera) • Long-acting anticholinergics – COPD/Asthma • Tiotropium (Spiriva) – Different doses – COPD • Aclidinium bromide (Turdoza) • Umeclidinium (Incruse) • Glycopyrolate (Seebri) Frequency • LABA – Twice daily • Salmeterol • Formoterol – Once daily • Indacaterol • Olodaterol • Vilanterol/Fluticasone • Long acting anticholinergics – Twice daily • Glycopyrrolate • Aclidinium – Once daily • Tiotropium • Umeclidinium Fluticasone (Flovent, Arunity) Albuterol (ProAir, Ventolin, Proventil) Fluticasone/Salmeterol (Advair) Beclomethasone (QVAR) Levalbuterol (Xopenex) Mometasone/Formoterol (Dulera) Budesonide (Pulmicort) Budesonide/Formoterol (Symbicort) Fluticasone/Vilanterol (Breo) Mometasone (Asmanex) Olodaterol (Striverdi) Salmeterol (Serevent) Formoterol (Foradil) Indacaterol (Arcapta) Ipratropium/Albuterol (Combivent) Tiotropium/Olodaterol (Stiolto) Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (Anoro) Glycopyrolate/Indacaterol (Ubitron) Ipratropium (Atrovent) Umeclidinium (Incruse) Tiotropium (Spiriva) Aclidinium bromide (Turdoza) Glycopyrolate (Seebri) Anticholinergics Types of Inhalers • Metered-Dose Inhalers (MDI) • Soft-Mist Inhalers (Respimat) • Dry-Powder Inhalers (DPI) – Single-Dose • Aerolizer • HandiHaler • Neohaler – Multidose • • • • • • Diskus Ellipta Flexhaler Pressair RespiClick Twisthaler Device Considerations Device Advantages Disadvantages Pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI’s) • Portable and compact • Independent of inspiratory flow • Reproducible dosing • Low cost • Coordination between actuation and inspiration • High oropharyngeal deposition Dry powder inhalers (DPI’s) • Portable and compact • Do not require coordination (no spacer needed) Soft-mist inhalers • Slow velocity aerosol • Do not require coordination (no spacer needed) • Inspiratory flow dependent (less in new devices) • Poor dose reproducibility • Affected by environmental factors • Dose loading into device Survey • Recent survey of healthcare providers and patients examined what influences their preferences for inhaler devices • 245 patients with COPD from USA, UK, France, and Germany • 504 HCPs from US, UK, France, Italy, and Japan Molimard M. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015;28:219-28 Survey Ease of use Size of inhaler Dose recording Disposable or recyclable Doses carried Dose confirmation Once vs twice daily dosing Molimard M. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015;28:219-28 Survey Molimard M. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015;28:219-28 Patient Preference Molimard M. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015;28:219-28 Provider Preference Molimard M. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2015;28:219-28 Inhalational flow Drug deposition Aerosol velocity Inhaled drug particle size Bonini M, et al.COPD Res and Prac. 2015; 1:9 Deposition • Inhalation flow – Failure to inhale slow and deep leads to failure with pMDI • Greater impaction of drug – DPI’s require greater inhalation flows • Flows > 60 L/min may be necessary for de-aggregation and dispersion • Particle size – 2-5 micron have greatest deposition in bronchial tree • Aerosol velocity – Slow-moving velocity achieves greater deposition Deposition Before training After training Respimat pMDI Brand P, et al. Int J of COPD. 2008; 3:763-70 Deposition • Device selection impacts drug deposition – All devices (when used appropriately) should be effective and achieve appropriate clinical response Drug formulation Degree of airway obstruction Inspiratory flow Lung Deposition Device usability Particle size Patient ability Scichilone N, et al. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 31:63-7 Feedback Seebri Prescribing Information. InspiraChamber prescribing Information. Turdoza Prescribing Information. Patient Considerations • Age, physical, and cognitive ability – – – – Coordination of breath and actuation (pMDI) Dose loading into device (Respimat) Once vs twice daily dosing Inspiratory flow dependent (DPI) • Convenience – Single vs multi dose – Need for a spacer • Cost • Adherence – Dose counters Patient Preference Formulary • Continually updated list of medications and related information • Includes – List of medications – Medication-associated products and devices – Medication-use policies – Decision support tools – Organizational guidelines American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines on the pharmacy and therapeutics committee and the formulary system. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2008; 65:1272–83 Formulary System • Ongoing process through which an organization establishes policies – Use of drug therapies – Drug-related products – Identify most medically appropriate and costeffective • Overseen by Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee (P&T) American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines on the pharmacy and therapeutics committee and the formulary system. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2008; 65:1272–83 Formulary System • Evaluating medications for inclusion on formulary – Using evidence-based decision making • Review, evaluate, and apply the relevant biomedical literature – Create a Drug-Evaluation Document or P&T Drug Monograph American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines on the pharmacy and therapeutics committee and the formulary system. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2008; 65:1272–83 Monograph • Brand/generic • FDA approval info • FDA approved indications • Potential non-FDA approved indications • Pharmacology/MOA • Recommended dosage • PK/PD • Special populations • Pregnancy category • Evidence – Compare vs alternatives – Clinical trials (critique) • Medication safety assessment • Pharmacoeconomic assessment American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines on the pharmacy and therapeutics committee and the formulary system. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2008; 65:1272–83 Need for the drug? • Prevalence and importance of condition to be treated • Does this drug overcome problems with existing therapies? • FDA approved indications? Schiff GD, Galanter WL, Duhig J, et al. PLoS Med. 2012; 9:1-7 Efficacy • Quality and strength of evidence • Design of studies • Patient population • Conflicting evidence Schiff GD, Galanter WL, Duhig J, et al. PLoS Med. 2012; 9:1-7 Safety • Look-alike, sound-alike drugs • Administration or preparation requirements • Long term experience with the drug • Patient monitoring or special precautions Schiff GD, Galanter WL, Duhig J, et al. PLoS Med. 2012; 9:1-7 Misuse potential • Existing marketing to consumers/prescribers for off-label indications • Difficulty in accurately diagnosing conditions which the drug is indicated for • Experience with similar drugs that may be misused Schiff GD, Galanter WL, Duhig J, et al. PLoS Med. 2012; 9:1-7 Cost • Product cost • Preparation, storage, administration, monitoring • Comparative costs/generics available • Insurance coverage Schiff GD, Galanter WL, Duhig J, et al. PLoS Med. 2012; 9:1-7 Therapeutic interchange Safety • Safe to change between products Efficacy • Equally efficacious Cost • Save some money for the patient Therapeutic interchange • Several ICS/LABA combinations available – Some have different approvals by the FDA • Safety – No major concerns switching between ICS/LABAs • Efficacy – One combination product has not been shown to be superior when inhaler used correctly • Cost – Inhaler A = $65.70/15 days – Inhaler B = $91.40/15 days – Inhaler C = $59.52/15 days > $140,000/year Conclusion • Inhaled therapies utilize various mechanisms of action to help control asthma and COPD – Minor differences between agents exist that afford them their unique characteristics • Despite these differences, no drug in the same class has proven to be more efficacious than another in clinical trials • Patient and inhaler characteristics need to be considered to appropriately select products for patients • Formulary system is in place to ensure the safest, most efficacious and cost effective treatments for our patients in the health care system