Revisão Bibliográfica - Universidade Federal do Ceará
Transcription
Revisão Bibliográfica - Universidade Federal do Ceará
RENORBIO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOTECNOLOGIA EMPREGO DE TECNOLOGIAS EMERGENTES NO PROCESSAMENTO DE SUCO DE LARANJA ADICIONADO DE FRUTO-OLIGOSSACARÍDEOS E SUCO PREBIÓTICO DE LARANJA PRODUZIDO VIA SÍNTESE ENZIMÁTICA FRANCISCA DIVA LIMA ALMEIDA Fortaleza-Ce 2015 FRANCISCA DIVA LIMA ALMEIDA EMPREGO DE TECNOLOGIAS EMERGENTES NO PROCESSAMENTO DE SUCO DE LARANJA ADICIONADO DE FRUTO-OLIGOSSACARÍDEOS E SUCO PREBIÓTICO DE LARANJA PRODUZIDO VIA SÍNTESE ENZIMÁTICA Tese submetida à Coordenação do Curso de Pós-graduação em Biotecnologia - Renorbio, da Universidade Federal do Ceará, como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Doutor em Biotecnologia. Área de concentração: Biotecnologia Industrial Ponto focal: Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) Orientadora: Profª Drª Sueli Rodrigues. Fortaleza-Ce 2015 Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação Universidade Federal do Ceará Biblioteca de Ciências e Tecnologia A446e Almeida, Francisca Diva Lima. Emprego de tecnologias emergentes no processamento de suco de laranja adicionado de fruto-oligossacarídeos e suco prebiótico de laranja produzido via síntese enzimática. / Francisca Diva Lima Almeida. – 2015. 108 f. : il. color. Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia (Rede Nordeste de Biotecnologia), Fortaleza, 2015. Área de Concentração: Biotecnologia Industrial. Orientação: Profa. Dra. Sueli Rodrigues. 1. Suco de laranja. 2. Oligossacarídeos. 3. Bioteconologia. I. Título. CDD 660.6 FRANCISCA DIVA LIMA ALMEIDA EMPREGO DE TECNOLOGIAS EMERGENTES NO PROCESSAMENTO DE SUCO DE LARANJA ADICIONADO DE FRUTO-OLIGOSSACARÍDEOS E SUCO PREBIÓTICO DE LARANJA PRODUZIDO VIA SÍNTESE ENZIMÁTICA Tese submetida à Coordenação do Curso de Pós-graduação em Biotecnologia - Renorbio, da Universidade Federal do Ceará, como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Doutor em Biotecnologia. Aprovada em: 30/10/2015 BANCA EXAMINADORA ______________________________ Profa. Dr. Sueli Rodrigues (Orientadora) Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) ______________________________ Profa. Dr. Ana Lúcia Fernandes Pereira Universidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA) - Membro ______________________________ Profa. Dr. Luciana Rocha Barros Gonçalves Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Membro ______________________________ Dr. Edy Sousa de Brito Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) ______________________________ Dr. Elenilson de Godoy Alves Filho Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) - Membro Dedico este trabalho, ao meu anjinho particular, Heitor (in memoriam), que intercede por mim junto a Deus. AGRADECIMENTOS Primeiramente a Deus por sempre ter me dado forças para continuar nessa caminhada. Por me conduzir sempre nos melhores caminhos, por colocar pessoas tão bondosas e cheias de luz em meu caminho. Aos meus pais, José Eudes de Almeida e Maria de Fátima Lima Almeida, por todo amor e carinho de sempre. Por confiarem e acreditarem nas minhas escolhas. Por sempre me darem forças, pelas inúmeras vezes que me ligaram perguntando: “Como está o doutorado? E o artigo?”. Pelas orações da minha mãe, por todo cuidado e zelo. Amo vocês e, é por vocês todo o meu esforço. À minha orientadora, Profa. Dra. Sueli Rodrigues, que me acolheu de braços abertos desde o mestrado. Obrigada pelos inúmeros ensinamentos, por todas as oportunidades, por estar sempre à disposição, por acreditar em mim, por cada ajuda e puxão de orelha. Obrigada por ser esse exemplo de profissional. Ao Leonardo Primo, presente de Deus na minha vida. Obrigada por toda paciência durante esses anos que me acompanhou durante o doutorado. Obrigada por toda ajuda, toda torcida, por todo amor, por me fazer confiar que no final tudo daria certo. Obrigada pelo companheirismo, mesmo durante o período em que estávamos afastados fisicamente. À Rosane, minha dupla inseparável do doutorado e da vida. Obrigada pelos agradáveis momentos que compartilhamos juntas, sorrimos juntas, choramos juntas. Ao meu querido “Sexteto” do coração: Ana Lúcia, Virgínia Kelly, Gleison, Adalva e Erbênia. Pelas conversas e alegrias compartilhadas, pela amizade sincera, pelos conselhos e por tornar meus dias mais alegres. Ao Dublin Institute of Technology (DIT), nas pessoas do Jesus Frias, Patrick Cullen (PJ) e Paula Bourke, por terem aceitado a parceria e terem me acolhido e orientado tão bem durante o período de doutorado sanduiche em Dublin-Irlanda. Aos amigos queridos e companheiros de laboratório e sala do DIT: Richam, Lubna, Sonal, Lu, Carmem, Shashi, NN, por toda ajuda, ensinamentos, momentos de alegrias, por me acolherem tão bem na “Ilha de Esmeralda”. Aos amigos do LABIOTEC: Niédila, Cristiane, Cláudia, Jonas, Elenylson, Imilena, Soraya, Simone, Mariana, Nair, Lívia, às Thatis Nunes, Vidal e Cavalcante, por todo carinho, em especial ao Wesley, por todo carinho e amizade e, também, por toda ajuda na finalização deste trabalho. Às minhas queridas irmãs, Virgínia, Clarissa e Cristiane por todo carinho e força, por sempre torcerem por mim. Aos meus queridos “Bioamigos”, em especial, Karine Pires, André Leandro, Milena Esmeraldo, Eduardo Neves, Luís Neto, Anderson Weyne, Camila Salviano, pelos momentos prazerosos que compartilhamos durante o período de doutorado. Aos doutores Edy Brito e Elenilson Godoy e às professoras doutoras Ana Lúcia Fernandes e Luciana Gonçalves por, gentilmente, aceitarem o convite para participar da banca examinadora. Aos meus tios Regina e Alfredo por me acolherem durante quase todo o período do doutorado. Obrigada por todo carinho. À CAPES peça concessão da bolsa de estudos e ao CNPQ pelo financiamento do meu projeto de pesquisa. Muito obrigada a todos, de coração! RESUMO ALMEIDA, Francisca Diva Lima Almeida. Emprego de tecnologias emergentes no processamento de suco de laranja adicionado de fruto-oligossacarídeos e suco prebiótico de laranja produzido via síntese enzimática. 2015. Tese – Programa de Pós-graduação em Biotecnologia - Renorbio. Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi empregar tecnologias emergentes no processamento de suco prebiótico de laranja adicionado de fruto-oligossacarídeos (FOS) e em suco prebiótico de laranja produzido via síntese enzimática. A primeira etapa da pesquisa consistiu em avaliar o efeito da aplicação das tecnologias de plasma e de alta pressão, como métodos de conservação, em suco de laranja adicionado de 7% de FOS comercial. O suco foi exposto direta e indiretamente ao processamento por plasma em diferentes tempos: 15 30, 45 e 60 s. Para o processamento com alta pressão, o suco foi tratado a uma pressão de 450 bars por 5 minutos. Após os tratamentos, a concentração de fruto-oligossacarídeos foi quantificada pela técnica de cromatografia em camada delgada (CCD), utilizando o equipamento densitômetro. Determinações de cor, pH e concentração de ácidos orgânicos foram também realizadas. Ambos os processos não degradaram os FOS presentes no suco. Ácidos orgânicos e a cor das amostras tratadas também foram preservados. Na segunda etapa da pesquisa, foi avaliado o efeito da aplicação dos tratamentos de plasma e ozônio em suco prebiótico de laranja produzido via síntese enzimática. O suco foi exposto direta e indiretamente ao processamento por plasma, a 70 kV, em diferentes tempos: 15 30, 45 e 60 s. Para o processamento com ozônio, diferentes cargas (0,057, 0,128 e 0,230 mg/ O3.mL de suco) foram avaliadas. Após os tratamentos, a concentração de oligossacarídeos foi determinada pela técnica de HPLC. Os valores de pH, cor, conteúdo de fenólicos totais e atividade antioxidante total também foram determinados. Ambos os processos promoveram uma degradação parcial dos oligossacarídeos no suco. Contudo, o suco manteve uma quantidade suficiente de oligossacarídeos para ser classificado como um alimento prebiótico. Os demais parâmetros analisados foram preservados. Diante disso, sugere-se que os tratamentos de plasma, alta pressão e ozônio são alternativas não térmicas adequadas para o tratamento de suco de laranja prebiótico. Palavras-chave: Tecnologia de plasma. Alta Oligossacarídeos. Fenólicos. Capacidade antioxidante pressão. Ozônio. Laranja. ABSTRACT ALMEIDA, Francisca Diva Lima Almeida. Emprego de tecnologias emergentes no processamento de suco de laranja adicionado de fruto-oligossacarídeos e suco prebiótico de laranja produzido via síntese enzimática. 2015. Tese – Programa de Pós-graduação em Biotecnologia - Renorbio. Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza. The aim of this research was to use emerging technologies on the processing of the prebiotic orange juice added of fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) and in prebiotic orange juice produced by enzymatic synthesis. The first stage of the study was evaluated the effect of atmospheric pressure cold plasma (ACP) and high pressure processing (HPP) on the prebiotic orange juice added 7% commercial FOS. The orange juice was directly and indirectly exposed to plasma discharge at 70 kV with processing times of 15, 30, 45 and 60 seconds. For high pressure processing, the juice containing the same concentration of FOS was treated at 450 bars for 5 minutes. After the treatments, the fructo-oligosaccharides were qualified and quantified by Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC), using densitometer. The organic acids, color analysis and pH values were also evaluated. Both processes did not degrade the FOS. The organic acids and the color of the treated samples were also preserved. On the second stage of the study, the effect of plasma and ozone treatments on prebiotic orange juice produced by enzymatic synthesis were evaluated. The orange juice was directly and indirectly exposed to plasma discharge at 70 kV with processing times of 15, 30, 45 and 60 seconds. For ozone processing, different loads (0.057, 0.128 and 0.230 mg/ O 3.mL of juice) were evaluated. After the treatments, the oligosaccharides were quantified by HPLC. The juice pH, color, total phenolic content and total antioxidant activity were also determined. Both processes promoted a partial degradation of the oligosaccharides in the juice. However, the juice maintained an enough amount of oligosaccharides to be classified as a prebiotic food. The other parameters analyzed were preserved. Thus, atmospheric cold plasma and ozone are suitable non-thermal alternatives for prebiotic orange juice treatment. Keywords: Emerging technologies. Prebiotic. Orange. Oligosaccharides. Phenolics. Antioxidant capacity LISTA DE FIGURAS CAPÍTULO 1 Figura 1 - Representação da reação do aceptor .......................................................... 27 Figura 2 - Esquema de montagem experimental para sistema de plasma frio. ............ 36 Figura 3 - Sistema esquemático de tratamento de ozônio. .......................................... 38 CAPÍTULO 2 Figure 1 - Degree of polymerization of the fructo-oligosaccharides in water (A) and orange juice (B) after direct exposure of plasma treatment ........................................... 59 Figure 2 - Relative concentration from fructo-oligosaccharides in water (a) and in orange juice (b) after direct plasma exposure (in).. ....................................................... 60 Figure 3 - Relative concentration from fructo-oligosaccharides in water (a) and in orange juice (b) after indirect plasma exposure (out).. .................................................. 61 Figure 4 - Relative concentration from fructo-oligosaccharides in water and orange juice after high pressure processing .............................................................................. 63 Figure 5 - Concentration (g/L and g/100mL) of organic acids in orange juice after high pressure processing .............................................................................................. 68 Figure 6 - Concentration (g/L and g/100mL) of organic acids in orange juice after direct and indirect plasma exposure... ........................................................................... 70 CAPÍTULO 3 Figure 1 – Experimental setup for plasma treatment. ................................................... 81 Figure 2 – Experimental setup for of ozone treatment .................................................. 82 Figure 3 – Degree of polymerization of the oligosaccharides in prebiotic orange juice before (control) and after ozone treatment. ................................................................... 90 Figure 4 – Oligosaccharides quantification after direct exposure (A) and indirect exposure (B) of the plasma treatment. The control sample (without plasma treatment) corresponds to the time zero.. ....................................................................................... 92 Figure 5 – Oligosaccharides quantification after ozone processing. The control sample (without ozone treatment) corresponds to the load zero ................................... 93 Figure 6 – Sugars concentration after plasma direct exposure (A) and indirect exposure (B) and after ozone treatment ........................................................................ 95 Figure 7 – Total phenolic content after plasma (A) and ozone treatment (B) ............... 99 LISTA DE TABELAS CAPÍTULO 2 Table 1 - Color parameters of the orange juice after direct exposure by plasma .......... 64 Table 2 - Color parameters of the orange juice after indirect exposure by plasma.. ..... 65 Table 3 - Color parameters of the orange juice treated by HPP.................................... 66 Table 4 - pH values in prebiotic orange juice after high pressure processing ............... 67 Table 5 - pH values in prebiotic orange juice after plasma treatment. .......................... 67 CAPÍTULO 3 Table 1 – pH values in prebiotic orange juice after ozone processing. ......................... 88 Table 2 – pH values in prebiotic orange juice after plasma treatment ........................... 89 Table 3 – Oligosaccharide concentration and loss after non-thermal treatment ........... 94 Table 4 – Color parameters of the prebiotic orange juice after ozone processing.. ...... 96 Table 5 – Color parameters of the prebiotic orange juice after plasma treatment ......... 97 Table 6 – ABTS antioxidant activity in prebiotic orange juice after plasma treatment . 101 Table 7 – ABTS Antioxidant activity in prebiotic orange juice after ozone treatment .. 102 LISTA DE ABREVIATURAS E SIGLAS ABTS 2,2 – azinobis (ácido 3-etilbenzotiazolina- 6 – sulfônico) DPPH 2,2 – difenil1 – picrilhidrazil FOS Fruto-oligossacarídeos TLC Thin Layer Chromatography HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography DP Degree of Polymerization ACP Atmospheric Cold Plasma DBD Descarga de barreira dielétrica LAB Lactic acid bacteria GS Glucansucrases FS Fructansucrases HMF 5- Hidroximetil-2-furaldeído SUMÁRIO INTRODUÇÃO .............................................................................................................. 17 CAPÍTULO 1: REVISÃO BIBLIOGRÁFICA ................................................................. 20 1.1 Alimentos funcionais: uma visão geral .................................................................... 20 1.2 Oligossacarídeos prebióticos .................................................................................. 22 1.2.1 Oligossacarídeos prebióticos produzidos via síntese enzimática ......................... 25 1.3 Sucos de frutas como veículo de ingredientes funcionais. ...................................... 27 1.3.1 Suco de laranja como um alimento funcional ....................................................... 28 1.4 Métodos de processamentos de alimentos: convencionais X tecnologias emergentes ................................................................................................................... 31 1.4.1 Tecnologia de plasma na conservação de alimentos ........................................... 34 1.4.2 Emprego do ozônio .............................................................................................. 37 1.4.3 Altas Pressões ..................................................................................................... 39 REFERÊNCIAS ............................................................................................................. 41 CHAPTER 2 - EFFECT OF ATMOSPHERIC COLD PLASMA AND HIGH PRESSURE PROCESSING ON FRUCTO-OLIGOSACCHARIDES, ORGANIC ACIDS AND ORANGE JUICE COLOR ............................................................................................. 50 2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. 51 2.2 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................ 53 2.2.1 Prebiotic orange juice preparation ........................................................................ 53 2.2.2 Plasma Treatment ................................................................................................ 53 2.2.3 High pressure processing ..................................................................................... 54 2.2.4 Carbohydrate analysis .......................................................................................... 55 2.2.4.1 Fructo-oligosaccharides degree of polymerization characterization .................. 55 2.2.5 Color measurement .............................................................................................. 56 2.2.6 Organic acid quantification ................................................................................... 57 2.2.7 Statistical analysis ................................................................................................ 57 2.3. Results and Discussion .......................................................................................... 58 2.3.1 Fructo-oligosaccharides quantification by TLC ..................................................... 58 2.3.2 Color parameters .................................................................................................. 64 2.3.3 Effect of ACP and HPP on the juice pH ................................................................ 67 2.3.4 Organic acids quantification by HPLC .................................................................. 68 2.4. Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 71 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 72 CAPÍTULO 3: EFFECTS OF ATMOSPHERIC COLD PLASMA AND OZONE ON PREBIOTIC ORANGE JUICE....................................................................................... 75 3.1. Introduction............................................................................................................. 76 3.2. Materials and methods ........................................................................................... 78 3.2.1 Orange juice ......................................................................................................... 78 3.2.2 Dextransucrase production and enzyme activity determination ............................ 78 3.2.3 Prebiotic oligosaccharides synthesis in orange juice ............................................ 79 3.2.4 Plasma treatment on prebiotic orange juice ......................................................... 79 3.2.5 Ozone treatment on prebiotic orange juice ........................................................... 81 3.2.6 Carbohydrate analysis .......................................................................................... 82 3.2.6.1 Oligosaccharides degree of polymerization ....................................................... 82 3.2.6.2 Sugars and oligosaccharides quantification ...................................................... 83 3.2.7 Color analysis ....................................................................................................... 84 3.2.8 Total phenolic content .......................................................................................... 85 3.2.9 Antioxidant activity determination ......................................................................... 85 3.2.9.1 DPPH method ................................................................................................... 86 3.2.9.2 ABTS method .................................................................................................... 86 3.2.10 Statistical analysis .............................................................................................. 87 3.3 Results and discussions .......................................................................................... 87 3.3.1 Orange juice characterization ............................................................................... 87 3.3.2 Effect of plasma and ozone on the juice pH ......................................................... 88 3.3.3 Oligosaccharides characterization after plasma and ozone treatments................ 89 3.3.4 Oligosaccharides quantification by HPLC after plasma and ozone treatments. ... 91 3.3.5 Color analysis ....................................................................................................... 96 3.3.6 Total phenolic content .......................................................................................... 99 3.3.7 Total antioxidant activity ..................................................................................... 100 3.4. Conclusion............................................................................................................ 103 CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS ........................................................................................ 104 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 105 Introdução 17 INTRODUÇÃO Um número crescente de consumidores está, cada vez mais, consciente da importância dos alimentos funcionais devido aos benefícios adicionais de saúde que estes oferecem. Diante disso, os alimentos funcionais, sendo uma das principais categorias de alimentos do mercado de saúde e bem-estar global, estão se tornando um grande foco de desenvolvimento de novos produtos na indústria de alimentos. Dentro da categoria de alimentos funcionais, os prebióticos vêm ganhando um destaque especial. Eles são ingredientes alimentares seletivamente fermentados que permitem mudanças específicas, tanto na composição quanto na atividade da microbiota gastrintestinal, conferindo benefícios de saúde e bem-estar ao hospedeiro. Atualmente, a grande maioria dos alimentos contendo oligossacarídeos são produtos à base de leite. Contudo, a produção de alimentos prebióticos não lácteos é uma opção interessante e bastante promissora para a produção desse tipo de alimento a baixo custo e em escala industrial. Nesse contexto, sucos de frutas são considerados substratos adequados para veicular esses ingredientes funcionais, uma vez que são importantes fontes de compostos bioativos, como fenólicos, vitamina C e carotenóides. No entanto, as tecnologias utilizadas para seu processamento e armazenamento podem causar alterações no conteúdo nutritivo dos mesmos. Tratamentos térmicos são os métodos comumente aplicados para prolongar a vida útil dos alimentos líquidos através da inativação de micro-organismos e enzimas. Contudo, o calor transferido ao produto pode provocar alterações bioquímicas e nutritivas irreversíveis, que afetam a qualidade do suco e, muitas vezes, a aceitação do produto. Introdução 18 Dessa forma, o desenvolvimento de alimentos funcionais vem estimulando a inovação e o desenvolvimento de novos produtos na indústria de alimentos. Entretanto a estabilização microbiológica do mesmo sem o uso de conservantes e processamento térmico representa um desafio. Os desenvolvimentos na área de processamento de alimentos são, geralmente, conduzidos de forma a combinar a inovação tecnológica com os hábitos sociais e culturais, a fim de produzir alimentos que satisfaçam as necessidades nutricionais, pessoais e sociais de todas as comunidades. Diante disso, a tecnologia de plasma representa uma alternativa potencial aos métodos tradicionais de processamento não térmico de alimentos. Enquadra-se, ainda, entre as tecnologias avançadas não térmicas como uma abordagem alternativa para a eliminação de micro-organismos deteriorantes e patógenos. Este processo apresenta numerosas vantagens sobre os métodos convencionais, como: processo operacional de baixo custo, tempo de tratamento curto a baixas temperaturas, natureza não tóxica e aplicação para uma grande variedade de produtos (Ziuzina et al. 2013). A aplicação da tecnologia de alta pressão (HPP), em alimentos, resulta em produtos com qualidade sensorial superior quando comparados com produtos submetidos a processamento térmico (Patras et al. 2009). O processamento utilizando altas pressões é capaz, ainda, de ativar e inibir micro-organismos, ativar e inativar enzimas a baixas temperaturas, enquanto que os compostos de baixo peso molecular, tais como vitaminas e compostos relacionado com a pigmentação e aroma, permanecem inalterados (Carnonell-Capella et al. 2013). O uso do ozônio, por sua vez, tem se destacado como um método alternativo aos processos térmicos, e é empregado na conservação de sucos de frutas e outros Introdução 19 alimentos, com o intuito de atender a demanda dos consumidores por produtos prontos para o consumo, que sejam frescos e seguros. O ozônio é um alótropo triatômico de oxigênio e é caracterizado por um elevado potencial de oxidação, transmitindo propriedades bactericidas e viricidas. O ozônio inativa os micro-organismos através de oxidação e o residual de ozônio decompõe-se a produtos não tóxicos (isto é, oxigênio), tornando-o um agente antimicrobiano ambientalmente amigável para utilização na indústria de alimentos (Patil et al. 2009b). Diante disso, o presente trabalho de tese teve por objetivo a aplicação, como método de conservação, das tecnologias emergentes de plasma e alta pressão no processamento não térmico de suco de laranja adicionado de fruto-oligossacarídeos (FOS) e aplicação de plasma e ozônio em suco prebiótico de laranja produzido via síntese enzimática. Após a aplicação dessas tecnologias, os sucos foram analisados para avaliar o efeito da aplicação dessas tecnologias sob os compostos nutritivos e seus ingredientes funcionais. Capítulo 1 20 CAPÍTULO 1: REVISÃO BIBLIOGRÁFICA 1.1 Alimentos funcionais: uma visão geral Os alimentos funcionais, sendo uma das principais categorias de alimentos do mercado de saúde e bem-estar global, estão se tornando um grande foco de desenvolvimento de novos produtos na indústria de alimentos (Khan et al. 2013). Esta por sua vez, tem um papel central no sentido de facilitar as práticas alimentares mais saudáveis através da prestação e promoção de alimentos que sejam saborosos, visualmente atrativos e saudáveis (Nagpal, Kumar, and Kumar 2012; Saad et al. 2013). Nesse contexto, grandes avanços vêm ocorrendo no desenvolvimento dos alimentos funcionais. Alimentos funcionais são definidos como alimentos que afetam beneficamente a saúde de quem os consomem, além dos efeitos nutricionais adequados. Essa classe de alimentos é similar aos alimentos convencionais com relação à aparência, contudo eles vão além do papel tradicional de alimentos como provedor de nutrição. Eles fornecem função específica, proporcionando efeitos adicionais de saúde sobre o consumo sustentável (Lamsal 2012; Silva, Rabelo e Rodrigues 2012). Ingredientes alimentares funcionais estão inclusos, principalmente, os probióticos, prebióticos, vitaminas e minerais e são comumente aplicados em leites fermentados, iogurtes, bebidas esportivas, alimentos para bebês, etc (Lamsal 2012). Uma das estratégias para a produção de alimentos funcionais é a adição de um composto bioativo em um alimento convencional, levando-se em conta diferentes Capítulo 1 21 variáveis, tais como: a interação desse composto com a matriz alimentar, a estabilidade ao processamento e a sua biodisponibilidade (Amigo-Benavent et al. 2013). A principal motivação dos consumidores para a compra de alimentos funcionais é o crescente desejo em prevenir doenças crônicas, como doença cardiovascular, Alzheimer e osteoporose, ou para aperfeiçoar a saúde, por exemplo, aumentando a energia, estimulando o sistema imunológico e geração de bem-estar (Bigliardi and Galati 2013; Khan et al. 2013; Nobre, Suvarov e De Weireld 2014). No desenvolvimento de alimentos funcionais é necessário compreender os impactos sensoriais de seus componentes e determinar como a sua adição aos produtos pode influenciar a preferência e aceitabilidade dos consumidores em termos de aparência, aroma, sabor e textura, a fim do desenvolvimento e formulação direta dos produtos (Pimentel, Madrona e Prudencio 2014). Atualmente, existe um grande interesse na melhoria da saúde e função intestinal, uma vez que a microbiota intestinal desempenha um papel fundamental na saúde humana. Qualquer estresse sobre a microbiota intestinal devido a fatores bióticos e abióticos pode levar a distúrbios microbiológicos resultando em um aumento do risco de doenças (Sangwan et al. 2014). Esta melhoria da microbiota intestinal é comumente conseguida pelo consumo de alimentos probióticos, os quais são suplementos alimentares que contém micro-organismos vivos. Contudo, uma alternativa bastante eficaz e que vêm ganhando destaque nos últimos tempos, é o consumo de ingredientes alimentares denominados prebióticos (Tako et al. 2014). Capítulo 1 22 1.2 Oligossacarídeos prebióticos O termo “Prebiótico” foi definido pela primeira vez em 1995 por Gibson e Roberfroid, como “ingredientes alimentares não digeríveis que afetam beneficamente o hospedeiro por estimularem seletivamente o crescimento e/ou atividade de um ou de um número limitado de espécies bacterianas já residentes no cólon” (Gibson and Roberfroid, 1995). No entanto, a literatura recente não restringe o cólon como único local de ação e, o termo prebiótico é atualmente definido como “um ingrediente alimentar seletivamente fermentado que permite mudanças específicas, tanto na composição quanto na atividade da microbiota gastrintestinal, conferindo benefícios de saúde e bem-estar ao hospedeiro” (Figueroa-González et al. 2011; Roberfroid, 2010; Saad et al. 2013). Com exceção da inulina, que é uma mistura de fruto-oligossacarídeos e polissacarídeos, os prebióticos são misturas de oligossacarídeos não digeríveis, que consistem de 3-10 monômeros de carboidratos (Saad et al. 2013). Dentre estes, podem ser citados os fruto-oligossacarídeos, glico-oligossacarídeos, isomalto-oligossacarídeos (IMOS), galacto-oligossacarídeos, oligossacarídeos de soja, etc (Patel e Goyal 2010). Estes oligossacarídeos são encontrados em diferentes fontes alimentares, tais como: leite, mel, cana de açúcar, soja, alho, beterraba (Mussatto e Mancilha 2007). Atualmente, existe um grande interesse no uso de prebióticos como ingredientes de alimentos funcionais, pois eles têm a capacidade de modular a composição da microbiota intestinal, uma vez que o consumo regular dos prebióticos estimula, de forma seletiva, o crescimento e atividade das bactérias probióticas, as Capítulo 1 23 quais atuam na melhoria da saúde, além de minimizar o crescimento de bactérias patogênicas (Srinivasjois, Rao e Patole 2013). As mudanças entre as colônias de espécies microbianas no intestino humano produz uma ampla gama de efeitos positivos, incluindo o aumento da saciedade e da absorção de cálcio da dieta, regulação da motilidade intestinal, produção de ácidos graxos de cadeia curta, prevenção de diarreia e constipação (Johnson et al. 2013; Pimentel et al. 2014). Além disso, o consumo regular de prebióticos alivia os sintomas de constipação, estimula o sistema imunológico (Lee and Mazmanian 2010), pode diminuir o risco de câncer de cólon e os fatores de risco associados à obesidade e síndrome metabólica (Johnson et al. 2013). Contudo, para que os prebióticos possam atuar como ingredientes funcionais, eles devem ser quimicamente estáveis às etapas de processamento de alimentos, como calor, baixo pH e condições da reação de Maillard (Huebner et al. 2008). Esses ingredientes devem, ainda, apresentar alguns critérios importantes: serem resistentes à ação de enzimas salivares e intestinais e estimular o crescimento de bactérias benéficas no intestino (Lamsal 2012). A ingestão excessiva de ingredientes prebióticos pode causar desconforto intestinal (Yang et al. 2011). Diante disso, a Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA) define o valor de referência dietética para fibras alimentares e frutooligossacarídeos (FOS) de no mínimo 3 g/dia de fibras ou FOS se o alimento for sólido ou 1,5 g se o alimento for líquido, para que o mesmo apresente alegações com propriedades funcionais, de acordo com o item 3.3 da Resolução nº 18/1999. É recomendada, ainda, uma ingestão máxima de 30 g/ dia de fibras ou FOS (BRASIL, Capítulo 1 24 2014). O consume de 200 mL de suco prebiótico de laranja corresponde a uma ingestão de 14 g de FOS. A European Food Standard Agency define os valores de referência para fibra dietética a 25 g por dia para adultos de 18 anos de idade ou mais, para sustentar a função normal do intestino (European Food Safety Authority, 2010). No entanto, não existem recomendações oficiais com relação ao consumo de prebióticos. Enquanto isso, muitos investigadores têm oferecido algumas sugestões: 10 g por dia de FOS (Bouhnik et al. 1999) e 7 g por dia de galato-oligosacarídeos (Silk et al. 2009). Diversos estudos envolvendo a adição de ingredientes prebióticos em alimentos têm relatado efeitos positivos, uma vez que esses ingredientes apresentam a capacidade de favorecer o crescimento de micro-organismos probióticos (Tako et al. 2014), bem como melhorias nos atributos físico-químicos, reológicos e sensoriais dos produtos (Cruz et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2014; Freitas, Amancio e Morais 2012; Tako et al. 2014). Os efeitos positivos das diversas pesquisas envolvendo a aplicação de ingredientes prebióticos e os efeitos benéficos causados pelos mesmos, têm despertado o interesse por parte de muitos grupos de pesquisas e, até mesmo, da indústria alimentícia, de realizar novos estudos nessa área com o intuito de buscar o desenvolvimento de produtos e expandir a oferta de alimentos com propriedades funcionais. Capítulo 1 25 1.2.1 Oligossacarídeos prebióticos produzidos via síntese enzimática Nas últimas décadas, muitos estudos têm investigado a produção de prebióticos como ingredientes alimentares capazes de promover um estado de bem-estar e saúde aos consumidores. A maioria dos ingredientes prebióticos identificados atualmente são obtidos por extração direta a partir de fontes naturais, ou produzidos por meio de processos químicos que hidrolisam polissacarídeos, ou ainda, pela síntese química através de reações de transglicosilação de carboidratos de baixo grau de polimerização e síntese enzimática de dissacarídeos (Charalampopoulos e Rastall 2012; FigueroaGonzález et al. 2011; Saad et al. 2013). Diversos trabalhos têm demonstrado a obtenção de ingredientes prebióticos por diferentes vias. Sangwan et al. (2014) estudaram a produção de galactooligossacarídeos (GOS) a partir da síntese de β-galactosidase, produzida pelo Streptococcus thermophilus. Silva et al. (2013b) investigaram a produção de frutooligossacarídeos (FOS), em meio aquoso, a partir da atividade enzimática da inulase imobilizada. Praznik et al. (2013) avaliaram a estrutura de fruto-oligossacarídeos obtidos de folhas e caules da cultivar Agave tequilana. Silva, Rabelo and Rodrigues (2012) produziram oligossacarídeos prebióticos por processo enzimático, através da adição da enzima dextranasacarase em suco de caju clarificado. Oligossacarídeos prebióticos podem ser produzidos por processo de fermentação, contudo, a síntese enzimática apresenta uma maior produtividade e fácil controle de processo (Rabelo et al. 2006). Enzimas da família glicosiltransferases (EC 2.4.x.y) são comumente usadas como ferramentas biotecnológicas para a síntese de Capítulo 1 26 oligossacarídeos. Elas são responsáveis em catalisar a transferência de unidades de glicose, a partir de uma molécula doadora, para um receptor específico (Rabelo, Fontes, and Rodrigues 2009a; Rodrigues, Lona, and Franco 2005, 2006; Saad et al. 2013). Bactérias ácido-lácticas apresentam a capacidade de produzir uma ampla variedade de um grupo particular de glicosiltransferases, as quais são utilizadas para a produção de oligossacarídeos (Rabelo, Honorato, e Rodrigues 2009b). Lactobacillus spp. e Leuconostoc spp. estão envolvidos na síntese de importantes produtos para a saúde humana, devido suas propriedades prebióticas e atividade imunomoduladora (Bivolarski et al. 2013). Quando a estirpe Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B512 é cultivado em meio contendo sacarose como fonte de carbono, uma fonte de nitrogênio e minerais, ele fermenta os açúcares do meio produzindo a enzima dextranasacarase (Rodrigues, Lona, and Franco 2003). Dextranasacarase é uma enzima bacteriana extracelular que catalisa a formação de dextrana quando o meio contém sacarose como único substrato. Contudo, em um meio contendo um aceptor como substrato (frutose, glicose, maltose, etc.), além da sacarose como segundo substrato, a enzima apresenta a capacidade de produzir oligossacarídeos prebióticos. Esta reação é conhecida como reação do aceptor e a proporção sacarose: aceptor está diretamente relacionado com o rendimento e grau de polimerização da dextrana e oligossacarídeos formados (Rodrigues, Lona and Franco 2006). A reação do aceptor acontece devido à adição de unidades de glicose (a partir da quebra da sacarose) na molécula aceptora, ou seja, essas unidades de glicose são Capítulo 1 27 desviadas da cadeia de dextrana para a formação do produto do aceptor (Rabelo et al. 2006). Como as unidades de glicose são incorporadas na cadeia de oligossacarídeos, o grau de polimerização dos mesmos tende a aumentar. Graus de polimerização com até 10 unidades de glicose, com as mesmas sendo incorporadas por síntese enzimática, através de ligações do tipo α-1,6, são conhecidos como oligossacarídeos prebióticos (Silva, and Rodrigues 2012). A figura a seguir representa um esquema da reação do aceptor: Dextranasacarase Sacarose Dextrana + Frutose Dextranasacarase Sacarose + Aceptor Oligossacarídeos prebióticos + Frutose Figura 1 – Representação da reação do aceptor. Fonte: Silva (2013a) 1.3 Sucos de frutas como veículo de ingredientes funcionais. Atualmente, a grande maioria dos alimentos contendo oligossacarídeos prebióticos são produtos à base de leite (Cruz et al. 2013). Entretanto, alguns consumidores evitam o consumo destes produtos devido a problemas de alergia ao leite, intolerância a lactose ou vegetarianismos (Araújo et al. 2014). Dessa forma, a produção de alimentos prebióticos em escala industrial vem enfrentando grandes desafios. A produção de oligossacarídeos não lácteos é uma opção interessante e Capítulo 1 28 bastante promissora para a produção de alimentos prebióticos a baixo custo e em escala industrial (Figueroa-González et al. 2011). Nesse contexto, sucos de frutas são considerados substratos adequados para veicular esses ingredientes funcionais, uma vez que são alimentos ricos em nutrientes, como vitaminas, fibras, minerais e antioxidantes. Além disso, eles possuem perfis de sabor agradável e são alimentos consumidos com regularidade por todas as faixas etárias, devido seu sabor refrescante e seu status de alimento saudável (Pereira 2013; Pimentel et al. 2014). Vários trabalhos têm reportado o uso de suco de frutas como substrato para a incorporação de ingredientes prebióticos. Araújo et al. (2014) e Coelho (2013) desenvolveram um novo produto funcional a partir da desidratação, em leito de jorro, de suco de acerola e limão, respectivamente contendo oligossacarídeos prebióticos, produzidos a partir da reação de aceptor da dextranasacarase. Silva (2013a) utilizou diferentes tipos de sucos de frutas: cajá, jambo e siriguela para sintetizar oligossacarídeos prebióticos como forma de elaboração de novos produtos funcionais. Silva, Rabelo and Rodrigues (2012) produziram oligossacarídeos prebióticos por processo enzimático, adicionando a enzima dextranasacarase em suco de caju clarificado. 1.3.1 Suco de laranja como um alimento funcional Em todo o mundo, cerca de 55 milhões de toneladas de laranjas doces são produzidas, com destaque para o Brasil como maior produtor (Okino-Delgado e Fleuri Capítulo 1 29 2014). O suco de laranja fresco é um dos sucos mais consumidos mundialmente, com uma participação de 35% do mercado de bebidas de frutas e, isso é devido ao seu rico conteúdo em vitamina C e valor nutritivo (Agcam, Akyıldız, e Evrendilek 2014; Ferreira et al. 2013), além da perfeita combinação dos seus atributos sensoriais, tais como a cor, sabor e aroma (Vervoort et al. 2011). Ele é uma importante fonte de compostos bioativos, como ácidos orgânicos, compostos fenólicos, carotenoides, os quais têm mostrado serem bons contribuidores para a capacidade antioxidante total (CarbonellCapella et al. 2013; Zulueta et al. 2013). Devido à riqueza nutricional que o suco de laranja apresenta, ele tem sido considerado um substrato promissor para a elaboração de novos produtos com propriedades funcionais. Diante disso, diversos estudos têm demonstrado a potencialidade do suco de laranja e de seus subprodutos como veículo para a entrega de ingredientes funcionais. Nesse contexto, Manderson et al. (2005) avaliaram as propriedades prebióticas de oligossacarídeos extraídos da casca de subprodutos da fabricação de suco de laranja, bem como estudaram uma forma mais eficaz em termos de custos para a produção desses oligossacarídeos. Fontes (2012) avaliou a produção de oligossacarídeos prebióticos em sucos de frutas, incluindo, dentre estes, o suco de laranja, seguido da secagem desses produtos pela técnica de spray-drying. De acordo com os resultados obtidos para o suco de laranja, a autora concluiu que o mesmo apresentou-se como um excelente substrato para a síntese de oligossacarídeos prebióticos com elevados graus de polimerização. Capítulo 1 30 Com relação à aceitação sensorial dos sucos contendo ingredientes funcionais, diferentes estudos têm sido realizados com essa finalidade e os resultados ainda apresentam algumas contradições. Luckow e Delahunty (2004) estudaram o impacto sensorial de ingredientes funcionais probióticos no sabor e aroma de suco de laranja. Os resultados desse estudo mostraram que sucos de laranja contendo propriedades funcionais são associados a um sabor não característico do suco. Os consumidores preferiram as características sensoriais do suco de laranja convencional ao suco funcional. Por outro lado, Coelho (2009) realizou um estudo envolvendo a aceitação sensorial de suco de laranja probiótico e adoçado. Os resultados mostraram uma aceitação global de 84% dos consumidores. A autora relata que a adição de açúcar pode ser uma estratégia utilizada para melhorar a aceitação do suco de laranja fermentado. Contudo, a informação ao consumidor acerca dos benefícios que esses alimentos promovem à saúde, leva a uma melhoria da aceitação do produto. Apesar do seu baixo pH, a estabilidade do suco de laranja é bastante limitada durante a estocagem, devido um importante número de reações de deterioração, como por exemplo, a degradação do ácido ascórbico, deterioração microbiana, ação de enzimas, desenvolvimento de off-flavour, alterações na cor, textura e aparência (Zulueta et al. 2013). Tratamentos térmicos são os métodos comumente aplicados para prolongar a vida útil dos alimentos líquidos através da inativação de micro-organismos e enzimas. Contudo, o calor transferido ao produto pode provocar alterações bioquímicas e Capítulo 1 31 nutritivas irreversíveis, que afeta a qualidade do suco e, muitas vezes, a aceitação do produto (Demirdöven and Baysal 2014; Vervoort et al. 2011). 1.4 Métodos de processamentos de alimentos: convencionais X tecnologias emergentes Sob o ponto de vista tecnológico, os principais objetivos dos processos de preservação e conservação consistem em prolongar a vida útil dos produtos alimentícios, oferecendo aos consumidores produtos que não somente apresentem boa qualidade nutritiva e sensorial, mas também, alimentos seguros, isentos de microorganismos e suas toxinas. A escolha do método de conservação adequado irá depender da origem do alimento, seu estado físico (sólido, líquido, emulsionante), o tempo de conservação necessário e o destino final do produto (Fellows 2006). Dentre os inúmeros métodos de conservação disponíveis, o tratamento térmico continua sendo um dos métodos mais importantes empregados no processamento e conservação dos alimentos, principalmente pelos efeitos de conservação através da inativação de enzimas e micro-organismos. Contudo, a aplicação do calor pode resultar em alterações dos componentes dos alimentos, responsáveis por suas características sensoriais, bem como em alterações do conteúdo nutritivos dos mesmos (Demirdöven e Baysal 2014). Em sucos de frutas, o tratamento térmico é utilizado na preservação e no processo de fabricação dos mesmos. Porém, as reações de escurecimento não enzimático, resultante do aquecimento, causam alteração de cor, perdas de açúcar e vitamina C e formação de 5- Hidroximetil-2-furaldeído (HMF), afetando assim, a Capítulo 1 32 qualidade dos sucos de frutas. No entanto, conseguir a estabilização microbiológica desses alimentos sem o uso de conservantes e aplicação de um processamento térmico ainda é um grande desafio (Damasceno et al. 2008). Vários trabalhos têm avaliado os efeitos do tratamento térmico convencional na qualidade de sucos de frutas e alguns autores comparam seus impactos com a de um processamento não térmico. Nesse contexto, Vervoort et al. (2011) compararam o impacto do processamento térmico, tecnologia de altas pressões e o processo de campo elétrico pulsado nos parâmetros de qualidade químico e bioquímico do suco de laranja. Com relação aos parâmetros de qualidade investigados (açúcares, ácidos orgânicos, vitamina C, furfural, carotenoides e HMF), não houve impacto significativamente diferente das três técnicas utilizadas. Cortés, Esteve e Frígola (2008) estudando o efeito da estocagem refrigerada no conteúdo de ácido ascórbico de suco de laranja submetido aos tratamentos de pasteurização térmica e campo elétrico pulsado, relataram que, em temperatura de estocagem a 2 ºC, a qualidade nutricional do suco de laranja (ácido ascórbico) foi mantida por mais tempo no suco tratado por campo elétrico pulsado (277 dias de vida de prateleira), enquanto que no suco tratado por pasteurização térmica convencional a vida de prateleira só chegou até 90 dias. Patil et al. (2009a) e Tarazona-Díaz e Aguayo (2013) avaliaram o efeito da pasteurização térmica em sucos de frutas e concluíram que esse processo ocasionou degradação da cor dos produtos e redução dos compostos bioativos, resultando na redução da qualidade sensorial e nutricional do suco. Com relação à estabilidade química dos prebióticos às condições de processamento de alimentos, inúmeros estudos têm reportado sobre isso. Matusek et Capítulo 1 33 al. (2009), Klewicki (2007) e Huebner et al. (2008) estudaram a estabilidade de ingredientes funcionais durante a pasteurização a baixos valores de pH, e concluíram que os FOS são altamente susceptíveis à hidrólise nas condições de pasteurização de sucos de frutas, dentre outras bebidas. A quantidade hidrolisada desses ingredientes é maior quanto menor for o pH e mais longo for o tempo de pasteurização. Diante disso, os prebióticos serão funcionalmente estáveis se a sua atividade prebiótica, antes e após as condições de processamento de alimentos, aumentar ou permanecer inalterada (Huebner et al. 2008). Dessa forma, um cuidado especial deve ser observado durante a aplicação de um processo para a conservação e aumento da vida útil de um produto com propriedades funcionais, visto que, o tratamento e suas condições podem afetar as características do produto em questão. Atualmente, as exigências dos consumidores por alimentos de melhor qualidade aliado às deficiências das tecnologias existentes, estão estimulando, cada vez mais, o desenvolvimento de novas abordagens na realização de novos estudos nessa área com o intuito de buscar o desenvolvimento de novas tecnologias e produtos e, assim, expandir a oferta de alimentos com propriedades funcionais (Misra et al. 2014b). Portanto, tecnologias não térmicas têm sido reportadas como excelente opção para a obtenção de produtos com bons atributos de qualidade, seguros e preservando seu conteúdo nutricional (Zulueta et al. 2013). Capítulo 1 34 1.4.1 Tecnologia de plasma na conservação de alimentos Plasma é um gás ionizado que pode ser produzido a partir da aplicação de uma descarga elétrica a um gás inicialmente neutro. O processo pode ocorrer à temperatura ambiente e pressão atmosférica, com um fluxo brilhoso composto de espécies químicas com características antimicrobianas e bastante reativas: fótons UV, partículas carregadas, superóxido, radicais hidroxila, óxido nítrico e ozônio (Bermúdez-Aguirre et al. 2013; Rød et al. 2012). Nesse contexto, quando o plasma é produzido sob as condições acima citadas, é frequentemente chamado de “descargas luminescentes à pressão atmosférica” ou ainda, “plasma de atmosfera fria (Atmosferic Cold Plasma – ACP)” para enfatizar o fato de que as temperaturas dos gases estão próximas à temperatura ambiente (30- 60 °C) (Fernández and Thompson 2012). Contudo, dependendo dos níveis relativos de energia dos elétrons e espécies constituintes, os plasmas são classificados em plasmas térmicos e não térmicos (Jiang et al. 2014). Plasmas frios, à pressão atmosférica, caracterizam-se pelo desequilíbrio de temperatura entre elétrons e íons, que podem ser gerados através de várias técnicas (Pankaj et al. 2014b). Descarga de barreira dielétrica (DBD) é um método que oferece versatilidade no seu modo de operação e configurações do sistema. Em DBD, o plasma é gerado entre dois eletrodos, com uma grande diferença de potencial entre eles, e são separados por uma ou mais barreiras dielétricas (Misra et al. 2015; Pankaj et al. 2013). Particularmente, a técnica de plasma por descarga de barreira dielétrica oferece uma grande vantagem, pois permite o tratamento de produtos dentro de embalagens Capítulo 1 35 seladas, o que elimina o risco de contaminação pós-processamento (Misra et al. 2014a). O uso da tecnologia de plasma para a conservação de alimentos embalados tem sido bem documentado (Pankaj et al. 2014a). Misra et al. (2014a) demonstraram, recentemente, a aplicação de plasma frio na conservação de morangos embalados, sem comprometer a qualidade dos mesmos. Pankaj et al. (2013), por sua vez, avaliaram a cinética de inativação da enzima peroxidase na conservação de tomates embalados. A temperatura do plasma frio varia em torno de 30–60 ºC, e esta temperatura é desejada pela indústria de alimentos, uma vez que baixa energia é requerida para a formação do plasma, além de não afetar os compostos sensíveis a altas temperaturas (Bermúdez-Aguirre et al. 2013). Esta tecnologia apresenta numerosas vantagens sobre os métodos convencionais, uma vez que apresenta custos operacionais de processo reduzido, utiliza tempo de tratamento reduzido a baixas temperaturas, apresenta natureza não tóxica e é aplicado a uma grande variedade de produtos (Ziuzina et al. 2013). A aplicação do tratamento por plasma envolve duas abordagens distintas quanto ao tipo de exposição aos quais os produtos são submetidos, sendo estas denominadas de exposição direta e indireta. Em tratamento direto, a amostra fica entre os dois eletrodos, em contato direto com o plasma, enquanto que, por outro lado, na exposição indireta, a amostra é colocada a uma distância adjacente da descarga de plasma e só é exposta às espécies reativas formadas (Fernández and Thompson 2012). A figura 2 apresenta um esquema do sistema de plasma Capítulo 1 36 Figura 2 – Esquema de montagem experimental para sistema de plasma frio. Adaptação de Pankaj et al. (2013) Diversos estudos têm reportado sobre a aplicação da tecnologia de plasma frio na conservação de alimentos, por meio da inativação de micro-organismos e, estes estudos têm mostrado resultados efetivos de inativação (Fernández et al. 2013; Misra et al. 2015; Patil et al. 2014; Ziuzina et al. 2014). As condições de tratamento aplicadas no presente estudo foram baseadas nesses trabalhos. Contudo, até o presente momento, esta tecnologia vem sendo aplicada na conservação de alimentos sólidos e em nível de superfície, não existindo estudos voltados sobre a aplicação do plasma frio na conservação das características nutricionais e de qualidade de alimentos líquidos com propriedades funcionais. Capítulo 1 37 1.4.2 Emprego do ozônio O uso do ozônio tem se destacado como um método alternativo aos processos térmicos, e é empregado na conservação de sucos de frutas e outros alimentos, com o intuito de atender a demanda dos consumidores por produtos prontos para o consumo, que sejam frescos e seguros (Patil et al. 2009a). O ozônio é um alótropo tri-atômico do oxigênio e é um agente antimicrobiano capaz de inativar micro-organismos em geral, como fungos, vírus, protozoários, esporos fúngicos e bactérias. Isso é possível graças ao potencial altamente oxidante que o ozônio apresenta, resultando nessas propriedades bactericidas e viricidas que ele transmite. Os resíduos de ozônio se decompõem em produtos não tóxicos, sendo considerado, dessa forma, um agente antimicrobiano ambientalmente adequado para o uso na indústria de alimentos (Patil et al. 2009b). As reações de oxidação são causadas pelo ozônio molecular dissolvido ou pelas espécies de radicais livres formados durante a decomposição do ozônio (Patil et al. 2010a). A figura 3 apresenta uma representação do sistema de tratamento com ozônio. Em 1997, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dos EUA, declarou o ozônio como um ingrediente “Geralmente Reconhecido como Seguro” (GRAS) para o uso no processamento de alimentos (Tiwari et al. 2008b). Subsequentemente, o ozônio ganhou aprovação como um aditivo de uso direto em alimentos, o que têm provocado o interesse na aplicação de ozônio, tanto por parte de pesquisadores acadêmicos, quanto por parte da indústria processadora de alimentos (Tiwari et al. 2008a; Tiwari et al. 2009; Torres et al. 2011). Capítulo 1 38 Figura 3: Sistema esquemático de tratamento de ozônio. Fonte: Tiwari et al. (2008a) Tradicionalmente, o processamento por ozônio dentro da indústria de alimentos tem se concentrado em alimentos sólidos, pela aplicação de qualquer tratamento gasoso, ou ainda, pela lavagem de frutas e vegetais com água ozonizada. No entanto, com a aprovação do ozônio como um aditivo direto à alimentação, surgiu a possibilidade de aplicação do mesmo em alimentos líquidos (Patil et al. 2010a). Diante disso, trabalhos recentes têm reportado a utilização do ozônio como um método de conservação de alimentos, por meio da inativação de micro-organismos e, estes estudos têm demonstrado resultados efetivos (Patil et al. 2009a; Patil et al. 2009b; Patil et al. 2010b; Patil et al. 2010c). Contudo, apesar dos resultados efetivos, poucos trabalhos têm sido realizados abordando os parâmetros sensoriais e nutritivos dos sucos tratados. Até o momento, não existem estudos voltados à aplicação do ozônio na Capítulo 1 39 conservação de sucos de frutas com propriedades prebióticas. Portanto, um dos objetivos do atual trabalho de tese foi avaliar os efeitos do tratamento de ozônio nas características funcionais de suco de laranja, além de avaliar as características sensoriais e de qualidade do produto tratado. 1.4.3 Altas Pressões O processamento de alta pressão (HPP) pode ser uma ferramenta útil para a obtenção de produtos alimentícios mais saudáveis e seguros (Carnonell-Capella et al. 2013). Diante disso, esta tecnologia foi adaptada às necessidades específicas da indústria de alimentos e, atualmente, uma gama de produtos tratados por pressão, incluindo sucos de frutas e vegetais, molho de abacate, cozidos de presunto embalado, arroz cozido e carne de frango marinado, já foram introduzidos na União Europeia e no mercado americano (Patras et al. 2009). No que diz respeito à qualidade de ingestão do produto acabado, a aplicação da tecnologia de altas pressões pode apresentar vantagens sobre os processamentos térmicos. Isso ocorre porque as moléculas pequenas, tais como compostos voláteis de aroma e pigmentos relacionados com a qualidade sensorial dos alimentos não são afetados pelo processamento de alta pressão (Patras et al. 2009). Com esse tipo de processamento não-térmico é possível, ainda, ativar e inibir micro-organismos, ativar e inativar enzimas a baixas temperaturas, enquanto que os compostos de baixo peso molecular, tais como vitaminas e compostos relacionado com a pigmentação e aroma, permanecem inalterados. Em alimentos fluidos, a pressão é Capítulo 1 40 transmitida uniformemente e instantaneamente, isto é, não há gradientes. Ao contrário do que acontece com os processos que envolve calor, a HPP é independente do tamanho e geometria do produto, o que reduz o tempo necessário para processar grande quantidade de alimentos (Carnonell-Capella et al. 2013). Capítulo 1 41 REFERÊNCIAS BRASIL. Disponível em: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/content/Anvisa+Portal/Anvisa/Inicio/Alimentos/Assuntos+ de+Interesse/Alimentos+Com+Alegacoes+de+Propriedades+Funcionais+e+ou+de+Sau de/Alegacoes+de+propriedade+funcional+aprovadas Acesso: 14/10/2014 Agcam, E., Akyıldız, A. and Evrendilek, G.A. 2014. “Effects of PEF and Heat Pasteurization on PME Activity in Orange Juice with Regard to a New Inactivation Kinetic Model.” Food chemistry 165:70–76. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25038650). Amigo-Benavent, M., Nitride, C., Bravo, L., Ferranti, P. and Del Castillo, M.D. 2013. “Stability and Bioactivity of a Bowman-Birk Inhibitor in Orange Juice during Processing and Storage.” Food & function 4(7):1051–60. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23536125). Araújo, A.D.A. et al. 2014. “Production and Spouted Bed Drying of Acerola Juice Containing Oligosaccharides.” Food and Bioproducts Processing 1–7. Retrieved September 23, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S096030851400090X). Bermúdez-Aguirre, D., Erik, W., Patrick, P., Barbosa-Cánovas, G. and Garcia-Perez, M. 2013. “Effect of Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma (APCP) on the Inactivation of Escherichia Coli in Fresh Produce.” Food Control 34(1):149–57. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0956713513002065). Bigliardi, B. and Galati, F. 2013. “Innovation Trends in the Food Industry: The Case of Functional Foods.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 31(2):118–29. Retrieved July 24, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0924224413000678). Bivolarski, Veselin et al. 2013. “Characterization of Glucansucrases and Fructansucrases Produced by Wild Strains Leuconostoc Mesenteroides URE13 and Leuconostoc Mesenteroides LM17 Grown on Glucose or Fructose Medium as a Sole Carbon Source.” 68. Bouhnik, Yoram et al. 1999. “Short-Chain Fructo-Oligosaccharide Administration DoseDependently Increases Fecal Bifidobacteria in Healthy Humans.” Journal of Nutrition 129(1):113–16. Retrieved (http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.00032901238&partnerID=tZOtx3y1). Capítulo 1 42 Carbonell-Capella, J. M., Barba, F.J., Esteve, M.J., and Frígola, A. 2013. “High Pressure Processing of Fruit Juice Mixture Sweetened with Stevia Rebaudiana Bertoni: Optimal Retention of Physical and Nutritional Quality.” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 18:48–56. Retrieved November 22, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1466856413000295). Charalampopoulos, D. and Rastall, R.A. 2012. “Prebiotics in Foods.” Current opinion in biotechnology 23(2):187–91. Retrieved November 04, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22244693). Coelho, J.C. 2009. “Elaboração de Bebida Probiótica a Partir Do Suco de Laranja Fermentado com Lactobacillus Casei.” Coelho, R. M. D. 2013. “Elaboração de Pó Do Suco de Limão Prebiótico Desidratado Em Secador Em Leito de Jorro.” Cortés, C., Esteve, M.J., and Frígola, A. 2008. “Effect of Refrigerated Storage on Ascorbic Acid Content of Orange Juice Treated by Pulsed Electric Fields and Thermal Pasteurization.” European Food Research and Technology 227(2):629–35. Retrieved December 12, 2014 (http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00217-007-0766x). Cruz, A. G. et al. 2013. “Developing a Prebiotic Yogurt: Rheological, Physico-Chemical and Microbiological Aspects and Adequacy of Survival Analysis Methodology.” Journal of Food Engineering 114(3):323–30. Retrieved August 24, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260877412004013). Damasceno, L. F., Fernandes, F.A.N., Magalhães, M.M.A., and Brito, E.S. 2008. “NonEnzymatic Browning in Clarified Cashew Apple Juice during Thermal Treatment: Kinetics and Process Control.” Food Chemistry 106(1):172–79. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308814607005237). Demirdöven, A. and Baysal, T. 2014. “Optimization of Ohmic Heating Applications for Pectin Methylesterase Inactivation in Orange Juice.” Journal of food science and technology 51(9):1817–26. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190836). European Food Safety Authority Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) (2010). Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for carbohydrates and dietary fibre. EFSA Journal, 8(3), 1462–1538. Fellows, P.J. 2006. Tecnologia do Processamento de Alimentos - Princípios e Práticas. 2ª ed.; Editora. Artmed. 602p. Capítulo 1 43 Fernández, A, Noriega, E. and Thompson, A. 2013. “Inactivation of Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium on Fresh Produce by Cold Atmospheric Gas Plasma Technology.” Food microbiology 33(1):24–29. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23122497). Fernández, A. and Thompson, A. 2012. “The Inactivation of Salmonella by Cold Atmospheric Plasma Treatment.” Food Research International 45(2):678–84. Retrieved July 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0963996911002390). Ferreira, L. R., Macedo, J.A., Ribeiro, M.L. and Macedo, G.A. 2013. “Improving the Chemopreventive Potential of Orange Juice by Enzymatic Biotransformation.” Food Research International 51(2):526–35. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0963996913000379). Figueroa-González, I., Quijano, G., Ramírez, G. and Cruz-Guerrero, A. 2011. “Probiotics and Prebiotics--Perspectives and Challenges.” Journal of the science of food and agriculture 91(8):1341–48. Retrieved November 06, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21445871). Fontes, C. P. M. L. 2012. “Produção de Oligossacarídeos Pré-Bióticos Em Sucos de Frutas Cláudia Patrícia Mourão Lima Fontes Fortaleza - Ce Produção de Oligossacarídeos Pré-Bióticos Em Sucos de Frutas.” Freitas, K. C., Amancio, O. M. S. and Morais, M. B. 2012. “High-Performance Inulin and Oligofructose Prebiotics Increase the Intestinal Absorption of Iron in Rats with Iron Deficiency Anaemia during the Growth Phase.” The British journal of nutrition 108(6):1008–16. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22172251). Gibson, G. R. and Roberfroid, M. B. 1995. “Critical Review Dietary Modulation of the Human Colonie Microbiota : Introducing the Concept of Prebiotics.” (August 1994). Huebner, J., Wehling, R. L., Parkhurst, A. and Hutkins, R. W. 2008. “Effect of Processing Conditions on the Prebiotic Activity of Commercial Prebiotics.” International Dairy Journal 18(3):287–93. Retrieved November 21, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0958694607001756). Jiang, B. et al. 2014. “Review on Electrical Discharge Plasma Technology for Wastewater Remediation.” Chemical Engineering Journal 236:348–68. Retrieved August 19, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1385894713012941). Johnson, C.R., Thavarajah, D., Combs, G. F. and Thavarajah, P. 2013. “Lentil (Lens Culinaris L.): A Prebiotic-Rich Whole Food Legume.” Food Research International Capítulo 1 44 51(1):107–13. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0963996912004942). Khan, R. S., Grigor, J., Winger, R. and Win, A. 2013. “Functional Food Product Development – Opportunities and Challenges for Food Manufacturers.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 30(1):27–37. Retrieved July 31, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0924224412002592). Klewicki, R. 2007. “The Stability of Gal-Polyols and Oligosaccharides during Pasteurization at a Low pH.” LWT - Food Science and Technology 40(7):1259–65. Retrieved December 11, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0023643806002283). Lamsal, B. P. 2012. “Production, Health Aspects and Potential Food Uses of Dairy Prebiotic Galactooligosaccharides.” Journal of the science of food and agriculture 92(10):2020–28. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22538800). Lee, Y. K. and Mazmanian, S.K. 2010. “Has the Microbiota Played a Critical Role in the Evolution of the Adaptive Immune System?” Science (New York, N.Y.) 330(6012):1768–73. Retrieved July 10, 2014 (http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3159383&tool=pmcentre z&rendertype=abstract). Liu, Z. et al. 2014. “Prebiotic Effects of Almonds and Almond Skins on Intestinal Microbiota in Healthy Adult Humans.” Anaerobe 26:1–6. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24315808). Luckow, T. and Delahunty, C. 2004. “Consumer Acceptance of Orange Juice Containing Functional Ingredients.” Food Research International 37(8):805–14. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0963996904000924). Manderson, K. et al. 2005. “In Vitro Determination of Prebiotic Properties of Oligosaccharides Derived from an Orange Juice Manufacturing By-Product Stream In Vitro Determination of Prebiotic Properties of Oligosaccharides Derived from an Orange Juice Manufacturing By-Product Stream.” Matusek, A., Merész, P., Le, T. K. D. and Örsi, F. 2009. “Effect of Temperature and pH on the Degradation of Fructo-Oligosaccharides.” European Food Research and Technology 228(3):355–65. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00217-008-0941-8). Capítulo 1 45 Misra, N. N. et al. 2014a. “In-Package Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma Treatment of Strawberries.” Journal of Food Engineering 125:131–38. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260877413005384). Misra, N., Keener, K.M., Bourke, P., Mosnier, J.P. and Cullen, P.J. 2014b. “In-Package Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma Treatment of Cherry Tomatoes.” Journal of bioscience and bioengineering 118(2):177–82. Retrieved December 11, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24650730). Misra, N. N. et al. 2015. “Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma (ACP) Treatment of Wheat Flour.” Food Hydrocolloids 44:115–21. Retrieved December 11, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0268005X14002951). Mussatto, S. I. and Mancilha, I.M. 2007. “Non-Digestible Oligosaccharides: A Review.” Carbohydrate Polymers 68(3):587–97. Retrieved December 11, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0144861706006151). Nagpal, R., Kumar, A. and Kumar, M. 2012. “Fortification and Fermentation of Fruit Juices with Probiotic Lactobacilli.” Annals of Microbiology 62(4):1573–78. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13213-011-0412-5). Nobre, C., Suvarov, P. and Weireld, G. 2014. “Evaluation of Commercial Resins for Fructo-Oligosaccharide Separation.” New Biotechnology 31(1):55–63. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23806732). Okino-Delgado, C. H. and Fleuri, L. F. 2014. “Obtaining Lipases from Byproducts of Orange Juice Processing.” Food Chemistry 163:103–7. Retrieved July 28, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24912703). Pankaj, S. K., Bueno-Ferrer, C., Misra, N. N., Milosavljević, V. et al. 2014a. “Applications of Cold Plasma Technology in Food Packaging.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 35(1):5–17. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S092422441300229X). Pankaj, S. K., Bueno-Ferrer, C., Misra, N. N., O’Neill, L. et al. 2014b. “Characterization of Polylactic Acid Films for Food Packaging as Affected by Dielectric Barrier Discharge Atmospheric Plasma.” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 21:107–13. Retrieved July 21, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1466856413001604). Pankaj, S. K., Misra, N. N. and Cullen, P. J. 2013. “Kinetics of Tomato Peroxidase Inactivation by Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasma Based on Dielectric Barrier Discharge.” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 19:153–57. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1466856413000416). Capítulo 1 46 Patel, S. and Goyal, A. 2010. “Functional Oligosaccharides: Production, Properties and Applications.” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 27(5):1119–28. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11274-010-05585). Patil, S., Torres, B. et al. 2010a. “Safety and Quality Assessment during the Ozonation of Cloudy Apple Juice.” Journal of food science 75(7):M437–43. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21535553). Patil, S. et al. 2014. “Influence of High Voltage Atmospheric Cold Plasma Process Parameters and Role of Relative Humidity on Inactivation of Bacillus Atrophaeus Spores inside a Sealed Package.” The Journal of hospital infection 88(3):162–69. Retrieved December 11, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25308932). Patil, S., Bourke, P., Frias, J. M., Tiwari, B. K. and Cullen, P. J. 2009a. “Inactivation of Escherichia Coli in Orange Juice Using Ozone.” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 10(4):551–57. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1466856409000629). Patil, S., Cullen, P. J., Bridget K., Frias, J. M. and Bourke, P. 2009b. “Extrinsic Control Parameters for Ozone Inactivation of Escherichia Coli Using a Bubble Column.” 107(2007):830–37. Patil, S., Valdramidis, V. P., Cullen, P. J., Frias, J.M., and Bourke, P. 2010b. “Inactivation of Escherichia Coli by Ozone Treatment of Apple Juice at Different pH Levels.” Food microbiology 27(6):835–40. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20630327). Patil, S., Valdramidis, V. P., Cullen, P. J., Frias, J. M. and Bourke, P. 2010c. “Ozone Inactivation of Acid Stressed Listeria Monocytogenes and Listeria Innocua in Orange Juice Using a Bubble Column.” Food Control 21(12):1723–30. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0956713510002185). Patras, A., Brunton, N., Pieve da S., Butler, S., and Downey, G. 2009. “Effect of Thermal and high pressure processing on antioxidant activity and instrumental colour of tomato and carrot purées.” 10:16–22. Pereira, A. L. F. 2013. “Elaboração E Secagem Em Spray Dryer de Bebida Probiótica Formulada a Partir Da Fermentação Do Suco de Caju.” Tese. Universidade Federal do Ceará. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos. 115p. Pimentel, T. C., Madrona, G.S. and Prudencio, S.H. 2014. “Probiotic Clarified Apple Juice with Oligofructose or Sucralose as Sugar Substitutes: Sensory Profile and Capítulo 1 47 Acceptability.” LWT - Food Science and Technology 1–9. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0023643814004897). Praznik, W., Löppert, R., Rubio, J. M., Zangger, K., and Huber, A. 2013. “Structure of Fructo-Oligosaccharides from Leaves and Stem of Agave Tequilana Weber, Var. Azul.” Carbohydrate Research 381:64–73. Retrieved August 07, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24071527). Rabelo, M. C., Fontes, C. P. M. L. and Rodrigues, S. 2009a. “Enzyme Synthesis of Oligosaccharides Using Cashew Apple Juice as Substrate.” Bioresource Technology 100(23):5574–80. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19608414). Rabelo, M. C., Honorato, T. L., and Rodrigues, S. 2009b. “Optimization of Enzymatic Synthesis of Isomalto-Oligosaccharides Production.” 33(2009):342–54. Rabelo, M. C., Honorato, T. L., Gonçalves, L.R.B, Pinto, G.A.S., and Rodrigues, S. 2006. “Enzymatic Synthesis of Prebiotic Oligosaccharides.” 133:31–40. Roberfroid, M., et al. 2010. “British Journal of Nutrition.” (November). Rød, S. K., Hansen, F., Leipold, F., and Knøchel, S. 2012. “Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment of Ready-to-Eat Meat: Inactivation of Listeria Innocua and Changes in Product Quality.” Food microbiology 30(1):233–38. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22265306). Rodrigues, S., Lona, L. M. F., and Franco, T. T. 2003. “Effect of Phosphate Concentration on the Production of Dextransucrase by Leuconostoc Mesenteroides NRRL B512F.” Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 26(1):57–62. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14505164). Rodrigues, S., Lona, L. M. F., and Franco, T.T. 2005. “The Effect of Maltose on Dextran Yield and Molecular Weight Distribution.” Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 28(1):9–14. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16163491). Rodrigues, S., Lona, L. M. F., and Franco, T.T. 2006. “Optimizing Panose Production by Modeling and Simulation Using Factorial Design and Surface Response Analysis.” Journal of Food Engineering 75(3):433–40. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260877405002852). Saad, N., Delattre, C., Urdaci, M., Schmitter, J. M. and Bressollier, P.. 2013. “An Overview of the Last Advances in Probiotic and Prebiotic Field.” LWT - Food Science and Technology 50(1):1–16. Retrieved July 15, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0023643812002319). Capítulo 1 48 Sangwan, V., Tomar, S.K., Ali, B., Singh, R.R. B., and Singh, A.K. 2014. “Production of Β-Galactosidase from Streptococcus Thermophilus for Galactooligosaccharides Synthesis.” Journal of Food Science and Technology. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13197-014-1486-4). Silk, D. B. A., Davis, A., Vulevic, J., Tzortzis, G., and Gibson, G. R. 2009. “Clinical Trial: The Effects of a Trans-Galactooligosaccharide Prebiotic on Faecal Microbiota and Symptoms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.” Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 29(5):508–18. Retrieved January 12, 2015 (http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.059149093199&partnerID=tZOtx3y1). Silva, I. M., Rabelo, M.C., and Rodrigues, S. 2012. “Cashew Juice Containing Prebiotic Oligosaccharides.” Journal of Food Science and Technology. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13197-012-0689-9). Silva, J. L. A. da. 2013a. “Síntese e Secagem de Sucos de Frutas Tropicais e Exóticas contendo Oligossacarídeos: estudo do cajá, siriguela e jambo.” Silva, M.F. et al. 2013b. “Fructooligosacharides Production in Aqueous Medium with Inulinase from Aspergillus Niger and Kluyveromyces Marxianus NRRL Y-7571 Immobilized and Treated in Pressurized CO2.” Food and Bioproducts Processing 91(4):647–55. Retrieved August 26, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960308513000424). Srinivasjois, R., Rao, S., and Patole, S. 2013. “Prebiotic Supplementation in Preterm Neonates: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.” Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) 32(6):958–65. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23786897). Tako, E., Glahn, R., Knez, M., and Stangoulis, J. 2014. “The Effect of Wheat Prebiotics on the Gut Bacterial Population and Iron Status of Iron Deficient Broiler Chickens.” Nutrition Journal 13(1):58. Retrieved August 20, 2014 (http://www.nutritionj.com/content/13/1/58). Tarazona-Díaz, M. P. and Aguayo, E. 2013. “Influence of Acidification, Pasteurization, Centrifugation and Storage Time and Temperature on Watermelon Juice Quality.” Journal of the science of food and agriculture 93(15):3863–69. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23907928). Tiwari, B. K., Muthukumarappan, K., O’ Donnell, C. P., and Cullen, P. J. 2008a. “Modelling Colour Degradation of Orange Juice by Ozone Treatment Using Response Surface Methodology.” Journal of Food Engineering 88(4):553–60. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260877408001453). Capítulo 1 49 Tiwari, B. K., O’Donnell, C. P., Patras, A., Brunton, N., and Cullen, P. J. 2009. “Effect of Ozone Processing on Anthocyanins and Ascorbic Acid Degradation of Strawberry Juice.” Food Chemistry 113(4):1119–26. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308814608010637). Tiwari, B. K., Muthukumarappan, K., O’Donnell, C. P., and Cullen, P. J. 2008b. “Kinetics of Freshly Squeezed Orange Juice Quality Changes during Ozone Processing.” 6416–22. Torres, B. et al. 2011. “Effect of Ozone Processing on the Colour, Rheological Properties and Phenolic Content of Apple Juice.” Food Chemistry 124(3):721–26. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308814610007600). Vervoort, L. et al. 2011. “Comparing Equivalent Thermal, High Pressure and Pulsed Electric Field Processes for Mild Pasteurization of Orange Juice.” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 12(4):466–77. Retrieved November 28, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1466856411000762). Yang, B., Prasad, K.N., Xie, H., Lin, S., and Jiang, Y. 2011. “Structural Characteristics of Oligosaccharides from Soy Sauce Lees and Their Potential Prebiotic Effect on Lactic Acid Bacteria.” Food Chemistry 126(2):590–94. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0308814610014664). Ziuzina, D., Patil, S., Cullen, P. J., Keener, K. M., and Bourke, P. 2013. “Atmospheric Cold Plasma Inactivation of Escherichia Coli in Liquid Media inside a Sealed Package.” Journal of applied microbiology 114(3):778–87. Retrieved November 18, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23190122). Ziuzina, D., Patil, S., Cullen, P. J., Keener, K. M., and Bourke, P. 2014. “Atmospheric Cold Plasma Inactivation of Escherichia Coli, Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Listeria Monocytogenes Inoculated on Fresh Produce.” Food microbiology 42:109–16. Retrieved November 27, 2014 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24929725). Zulueta, A., Barba, F.J., Esteve, M.J., and Frígola, A. 2013. “Changes in Quality and Nutritional Parameters During Refrigerated Storage of an Orange Juice–Milk Beverage Treated by Equivalent Thermal and Non-Thermal Processes for Mild Pasteurization.” Food and Bioprocess Technology 6(8):2018–30. Retrieved December 15, 2014 (http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11947-012-0858-x). Capítulo 2 50 CHAPTER 2 - EFFECT OF ATMOSPHERIC COLD PLASMA AND HIGH PRESSURE PROCESSING ON FRUCTO-OLIGOSACCHARIDES, ORGANIC ACIDS AND ORANGE JUICE COLOR Abstract In this study, the effect of atmospheric pressure cold plasma (ACP) and high pressure processing on the prebiotic orange juice processing were evaluated. Orange juice containing 7% (w/v) of commercial fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) was directly and indirectly exposed to plasma discharge at 70 kV for 15, 30, 45 and 60 seconds. For high pressure processing, the juice containing the same concentration of FOS was treated at 450 bars for 5 minutes. After the treatments, the fructo-oligosaccharides were qualified and quantified by Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC). The organic acids, color and pH values were also evaluated. Both processes did not degrade the FOS, making them suitable for the processing of functional foods containing FOS. The organic acids and the color of the treated samples were also well preserved. Therefore, ACP and high pressure processing can be used as non-thermal alternatives for the production of prebiotic orange juice. Keywords: Non-thermal technologies, chromatography orange juice, organic acids, thin layer Capítulo 2 51 2.1 Introduction A growing number of consumers are aware of the importance of functional foods due to their health benefits. Prebiotic oligosaccharides are among the functional compounds that added to foods grant to them the desired functionality. Prebiotics are defined as “non-digestible food ingredients that beneficially affects host by selectively stimulating the growth and the activity of one or a limited number of bacteria in the colon” (Hernandez-Hernandez et al. 2012). The beneficial health effects attributed to the intake of prebiotic have been previously reported as well (Hess et al. 2011; Wichienchot et al. 2010; Vergara et al. 2010). Prebiotic compounds have been used in several food products. Fruits and fruit juices can be used as vehicles for these compounds. Renuka et al. (2009) studied the fortification of selected fruit juice beverages with fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), a low caloric prebiotic. According to ANVISA (National Health Surveillance Agency, Brazil), the recommended daily intake (RDI) for foods containing prebiotic compounds should provide at least 3 g of FOS in solid foods or 1.5 g in liquid foods. Besides, the FOS consumption should not exceed 30 g per day in products ready for consumption. The consumption of 200 mL of the prebiotic orange juice corresponds to the intake of 14 g of FOS. Thermal technologies are still the golden standard processing for fruit juices preservation. However, thermal processing may cause changes in functional molecules, vitamins and other nutrients (Vervoort et al. 2011). Thermal pasteurization of orange Capítulo 2 52 juice can cause off-flavors and the degradation of the product's quality due to nonenzymatic browning (Patil et al. 2009). Nowadays, the consumers are looking for safe food products with high quality retention. The preservation of the nutraceutical properties of functional foods, of nonthermal innovative technologies to produce foods with a minimum of nutritional, physicochemical, and organoleptic changes and without degradation of the prebiotic compounds (Esteve and Frígola 2007). Among these technologies, atmospheric cold plasma (ACP) and high pressure technologies have been reported as a good non-thermal food processing that guarantees food preservation at safe standards maintaining, as much as possible, the fresh-like characteristics of foods (Ramos et al. 2013). Studies involving the application of atmospheric cold plasma and high pressure on fruits and vegetables reported a positive effect on pathogens and enzyme inactivation (Misra et al. 2014; Ziuzina et al. 2013; Patterson et al. 2005). However, there is no published data showing the advantages and limitations of these technologies, when applied to fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), the most studied and used functional carbohydrate in food industry. The evaluation of a non-thermal treatment for fruit juice processing containing FOS is important because a previous study showed thermal degradation of FOS due to thermal treatment (Matusek et al. 2009; Klewicki 2007). Orange juice is largely consumed due to its vitamin C content. In this context, this study evaluated the effect of atmospheric cold plasma (ACP) and high pressure processing on the integrity of functional fructo-oligosaccharides in Capítulo 2 53 orange juice. The influence of ACP and HPP processing on the organic acid profile and on the juice color was also evaluated. 2.2 Materials and Methods 2.2.1 Prebiotic orange juice preparation Orange juice (Squeez©, Fruit Juices Ltd, Ireland) was purchased from a local supermarket (Dunnes, Dublin - Ireland). Orange juice containing prebiotic ingredients was prepared by adding of 7% (w/v) of commercial fructo-oligosaccharide (ORAFTI© P95, Beneo GmbH, Mann, Germany) in a liter of the juice. The pH of the juice was determined by direct measurement in a 420A pHmeter, (Orion research Inc, Beverly, MA. US). The pHmeter was calibrated before use with buffer solutions of pH 4.0, 7.0 and 10.0. 2.2.2 Plasma Treatment The plasma treatment was carried out using a plasma generator system (DBDACP), model: 6CP120/60-7.5 (Phenix Technologies). The system consists of a variable high voltage transformer with an input voltage of 230 V at 50 Hz and a maximum high voltage output of 70 kV at 50 Hz. The two 15-cm-diameter aluminum disc electrodes were separated by a polypropylene container, which served as a sample holder and as a dielectric barrier with wall thickness of 1.2 mm. The distance between the two electrodes Capítulo 2 54 was 22 mm and equal to the height of the container. Voltage was monitored using an InfiniVision 2000 X-Series Oscilloscope (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). All experiments were performed at 70 kV peak to peak at ambient air and atmospheric pressure conditions. A volume of 20 mL of orange juice samples containing 7% (w/v) of fructooligosaccharide was transferred to an open Petri dish, which was placed in a polypropylene box, sealed with a polymeric film of 50 µm thickness (Cryovac BB3050). This film served as an additional layer of dielectric barrier (Pankaj et al. 2014). Then, samples were treated with atmospheric cold plasma (ACP) with processing times of 15, 30, 45 and 60 seconds and different exposure kinds: direct plasma field (in) and indirect plasma field (out). These treatment times were selected based on a previous study carried for pathogens inactivation in orange juice (Ziuzina et al. 2013). These authors achieved a complete bacterial inactivation after 20 s of direct and 45 s of indirect plasma treatment. Treated samples of prebiotic orange juice were stored at room temperature (25 ºC) for 24 h before opening the container. A control sample, containing the same concentration of FOS dissolved in water was prepared and packed and treated in the same way that the prebiotic orange juice 2.2.3 High pressure processing High pressure processing (HPP) was carried out using an industrial equipment (Hiberbaric), model: 300. Prebiotic orange juice was packed at 250 mL polyethylene bottles, which were placed in polyethylene plastic bags, and vacuum sealed for the high Capítulo 2 55 pressure processing. A control sample, containing the same concentration of FOS dissolved in water was prepared and packed and treated in the same way that the prebiotic orange juice. The processing was done at the industrial conditions: 5 minutes at 450 bars as recommended by HPP Toolings Business (Dublin, Ireland) for fruit juices. The juice processing in industrial equipment is a differential of this study because almost all published studies on fruit juice processing by HPP are done in small equipment with small volumes. After the treatment, quality analyses were carried out on the final product. 2.2.4 Carbohydrate analysis 2.2.4.1 Fructo-oligosaccharides degree of polymerization characterization Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) analysis was used to qualify and quantify the FOS. The prebiotic orange juice samples were diluted (1:2), filtered, using glass fiber prefilters AP25 13 mm diameter (Merck Millipore Ltd.) and cleaned on a C-18 SPE cartridge, followed by filtration, using a syringe (2.0 mL) and a support comprising a membrane (HA membrane cellulose ester 0,45 uM, 13 mm of diameter). The samples were analyzed by TLC, using a silica gel on TLC plates SIGMA-ALDRICH (20x20 cm, 60 Å medium pore diameter; product number: 99570-25EA). Samples of 1 μL were applied on the plate at 1 cm from the bottom and at a separation distance of 1.0 cm from each other. The plates were disposed into the TLC chamber pre-conditioned at room temperature (25 ºC). The solvent system used to separate the carbohydrate mixture was Capítulo 2 56 composed of n-butanol/2-propanol/H2O (10:5:4 [vol/vol/vol]) mixture (Shiomi, Onodera and Sakai 1997). The TLC plate was irrigated by the solvent systems three times. To visualize the separated carbohydrates in the plates, a fine spray containing 1butanol/water (80% w/w) as solvent, phosphoric acid (6.78 mL), urea (3 g) and ethanol (8 mL) in 100 mL was used. The plates were oven heated at 120 °C for 10 min. For the quantification of the oligosaccharides, a TLC scanner CAMAG 4 20x20 cm densitometer was used, using the Planar winCATS Chromatografy Manager software. The wavelength used was 450 nm. The analyses were performed in triplicate. 2.2.5 Color measurement The color of the samples was measured using a colorimeter (Color Quest XE Hunter Lab, Northants, UK). The instrument operates on CIELAB (L*, a* and b*) and it was calibrated using white (L*= 93.97, a*= 0.88 and b*= 1.21) standard. The L, a, b parameters were used to calculate the chromaticity, the hue angle and the ∆E according to equations 1, 2 and 3, respectively: Chroma = (1) Hue = tan-1 (2) ∆E= {(∆L2) + (∆a2) + (∆b2)}1/2 (3) Where, Lo, ao and bo are the color values of the non-processed juice. Capítulo 2 57 2.2.6 Organic acid quantification High Performance Liquid Chromatographic (HPLC) analysis was used to quantify the organic acids. The prebiotic orange juice samples were diluted (1:4), filtered, using glass fiber pre-filters AP25 13 mm diameter (Merck Millipore Ltd.) and cleaned on a C-18 SPE cartridge, followed by filtration, using a syringe (2.0 mL) and a support comprising a membrane (HA membrane cellulose ester 0.45 uM, 13 mm of diameter). A HPLC system (Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity) equipped with a pump system and a UV-DAD detector. Organic acids were detected at 210 nm. Organic acids were separated in an Aminex HPX-87H column (300 × 7.8 mm) (Bio-Rad) at 50 °C. The isocratic elution was performed with 0.01M sulfuric acid in deionized water as mobile phase for 30 min at 0.6 mL/min. The analyses were performed in triplicate. 2.2.7 Statistical analysis Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software Statistica (Statsoft) version 10.0. The results were compared by Tukey test at a 95.0% confidence level. Capítulo 2 58 2.3. Results and Discussion 2.3.1 Fructo-oligosaccharides quantification by TLC The thin layer chromatography (TLC) allowed the evaluation of the prebiotic fructo-oligosaccharides concentration along with their degree of polymerization (DP). The results were expressed as the relative concentration obtained by densitometry (Robyt 2000). In the mixture of fructo-oligosaccharides some, mono- and disaccharides such as glucose, fructose and sucrose, were observed and quantified besides the target oligosaccharides such as kestose (DP3), nystose (DP4), 1-fructofuranosyl-nystose (DP5), and FOS with higher with DP6 and DP7. Fig 1 shows the TLC results of the fructo-oligosaccharides in water (A) and orange juice (B) after direct exposure of plasma treatment. Capítulo 2 59 Fig 1 – Degree of polymerization of the fructo-oligosaccharides in water (A) and orange juice (B) after direct exposure of plasma treatment According to the manufacturer (ORAFT), the commercial FOS, used in this study (P95) presents about 6% of mono and di-saccharides, which corresponds to the upper clear spots in the first plate on Fig 1. These spots are darker in orange juice due to the higher amount of sugars present in fruit juices. Fig 2 and Fig 3 shows the relative amounts of FOS in water (a) and in orange juice (b), after direct and indirect plasma exposure, respectively. Capítulo 2 60 Fig 2 – Relative concentration of fructo-oligosaccharides in water (a) and in orange juice (b) after direct plasma exposure (IN). DP means degree of polymerization. It was compared the effect of each process time on the FOS concentration. * Average ± standard deviation of triplicate. Averages with different letters, the samples are statistically different (p≤0.05) Capítulo 2 61 Fig 3 – Relative concentration of fructo-oligosaccharides in water (a) and in orange juice (b) after indirect plasma exposure (OUT). DP means degree of polymerization. It was compared the effect of each process time on the FOS concentration *Average ± standard deviation of three replicates. Averages with different letters, the samples are statistically different (p≤0.05) The FOS profile regarding the time (15, 30, 45 and 60 s) and kind of exposure to ACP (direct or indirect exposure) did not present a high variation in the percentage of each degree of polymerization. The high similarity in the relative amount of the FOS in water after direct and in indirect ACP treatment indicates that the kind of exposure had no substantial effect on the FOS DP distribution. The Fig 2 and Fig 3 show that the percentage of DP-7, DP-6, 1-FFN, nystose and kestose in water are similar to the percentages of these fructo-oligosaccharides in orange juice, proving that there were no degradation of FOS. Unlike some reported Capítulo 2 62 studies in which it was shown that the plasma can degrade active compounds, and some carbohydrates, FOS were not degraded after plasma treatment (Park et al. 2007; Benoit et al. 2011). For the analysis of the samples obtained from high pressure treatment, it was also used a FOS solution in water for comparison purposes. On the orange juice analysis, it was also observed a high amount of sucrose, glucose and fructose compared to the samples of FOS in water, due to the presence of these sugars in the juice. Then, quantification was based only on the fructo-oligosaccharide, as done for the plasma treatment. It was observed that the oligosaccharides percentage of each degrees of polymerization in water were similar to ones found. Fig 4 shows the fructooligosaccharides in water and orange juice after the high pressure processing (HPP). Capítulo 2 63 Fig 4 – Relative concentration from fructo-oligosaccharides in water (W HPP) and orange juice (OJ HPP) after high pressure processing. DP means degree of polymerization. It was compared the effect of each treatment on the FOS concentration *Average ± standard deviation of three replicates. Averages with different letters, the samples are statically different (p≤0.05) Previous studies demonstrated the efficiency of HPP on the preservation of interesting compounds as anthocyanins, phenolic compounds and ascorbic acid in strawberry and blackberry purees (Patras et al. 2009). Other studies reported a considerable retention of bioactive compounds and its physical-chemical properties in fruit juices after high pressure processing (Ferrari, Maresca and Ciccarone 2010; Chen et al. 2015; Cao et al. 2012). Capítulo 2 64 On the other hand, several studies have reported regarding the chemical stability of the prebiotics to food process conditions. Matusek et al. (2009) and Klewicki (2007) studied the stability of functional ingredients during pasteurization at lower pH values. These authors concluded the FOS is highly susceptible to hydrolysis in pasteurization conditions of fruit juices and drinks. 2.3.2 Color parameters The Tables 1 and 2 shows the color analysis of the ACP treated orange juice. The control sample (reference) was the non-treated juice containing FOS. The L* parameter, that indicates the luminosity of the product, presented values from 55.96 ± 0.01 (non-treated juice) to 56.12 ± 0.01. The results showed statistical differences due to low standard deviation. However, the highest difference between the samples was lower than 0.5% (Lmax = 0.16). Table 1 – Color parameters of the orange juice after direct exposure by plasma Chroma ho ∆E Orange juice (control) 55.96 ± 0.01d 30.58 ± 0.02a 95.29 ± 0.02a -- 15s 56.02 ± 0.01c 30.27 ± 0.01b 94.68 ± 0.02b 0.46 ± 0.00c 30s 56.00 ± 0.01c 29.92 ± 0.03c 94.01 ± 0.01c 0.95 ± 0.01b 45s 56.05 ± 0.01b 29.82 ± 0.01d 93.83 ± 0.02d 1.08 ± 0.01a 60s 56.10 ± 0.01a 29.85 ± 0.02d 93.77 ± 0.01e 1.09 ± 0.01 a Samples L* *Average ± standard deviation of three replicates. Averages with different letters, the samples are statically different (p≤0.05). Capítulo 2 65 According to Tiwari et al. (2008) perceptible differences in color parameters can be analytically classified as follows: very different (ΔE> 3); distinct (1.5 <ΔE <3) and slightly different (ΔE <1.5). Thus, the results of ΔE of the samples after direct exposure (table 2) and indirect exposure (table 3) to plasma treatment show that they were all slightly different when compared with control juice. Table 2 – Color parameters of the orange juice after indirect exposure by plasma Samples Orange juice (control) L* ho Chroma 55.96 ± 0.01d 30.58 ± 0.02a c 30.21 ± 0.01 b ∆E 95.29 ± 0.02a 94.56 ± 0.01 -- b 0.54 ± 0.01d 15s 56.03 ± 0.01 30s 56.07 ± 0.01b 30.10 ± 0.02c 94.36 ± 0.02c 0.70 ± 0.02c 45s 56.12 ± 0.01a 30.00 ± 0.01d 94.07 ± 0.03d 0.88 ± 0.01b 60s 56.11 ± 0.01a 29.83 ± 0.01e 93.92 ± 0.01e 1.05 ± 0.01 a *Average ± standard deviation of three replicates. Averages with different letters, the samples are statically different (p≤0.05). A small change in the Chroma and Hue values of ACP treated samples was also observed. Again, the results were statistically different due to the small standard deviation with maximum differences less than 3% for Chroma value (Cmax =0.75) and less than 2% for hue value and hmax= 1.92). Thus, despite the instrumental statistical difference the small change in the L*, Chroma and Hue value does not compromise the product acceptance. The Table 3 shows the color results of the samples treated by HPP. Capítulo 2 66 Table 3 – Color parameters of the orange juice treated by HPP Samples L* Chroma ho Orange juice (control) 55.96 ± 0.01b 30.58 ± 0.02b 95.29 ± 0.02a Prebiotic orange juice 58.49 ± 0.19a 41.71 ± 0.17a 86.17 ± 0.02b *Average ± standard deviation of three replicates. Averages with different letters, the samples are statically different (p≤0.05). The changes observed in the color parameters are higher than the observed for ACP treatment. However, the changes due to HPP were positive and improved the color of the final product. The L*-value in HPP treated sample increased from 55.96 ± 0.01 to 58.49 ± 0.19, which means that the sample became lighter. The Chroma value increased from 30.58 ± 0.02 to 41.71 ± 0.17 indicating that the treated sample is more vivid than the non-treated sample. The hue value decreased from 95.29 ± 0.02 to 86.17 ± 0.02. The hue value represents the characteristic color of the juice. According to the color wheel, the pure yellow corresponds to 90o. Orange juice characteristic color ranges from orange to yellow depending on the fruit variety. Despite the small variations in the instrumental color of the treated sample, the changes did not compromise the characteristic color of the juice. After HPP treatment, the color was enhanced becoming more vivid and clearer due to the increased Chroma and L-value. Capítulo 2 67 2.3.3 Effect of ACP and HPP on the juice pH The pH values of the juice samples submitted to non-thermal treatment are presented in Tables 4 and 5. Table 4 – pH values in prebiotic orange juice (OJ) after high pressure processing Samples pH values Control 4.43±0.01a OJ without FOS 3.90±0.00b OJ with FOS 3.90±0.00b *Average ± standard deviation of three replicates. Averages with different letters, the samples are statically different (p≤0.05). Table 5 - pH values in prebiotic orange juice after plasma treatment Treatment (time) pH values Direct exposure Indirect exposure Control 4.43±0.01a 4.43±0.01a 15s 3.90±0.10b 3.90±0.20b 30s 3.90±0.10b 4.00±0.10b 45s 4.00±0.10b 4.00±0.10b 60s 3.90±0.01b 3.90±0.10b *Average ± standard deviation of three replicates. Averages with different letters, the samples are statically different (p≤0.05). The non-thermal treatments (ACP and HPP) decreased the juice pH values. The mean pH value obtained for the control was 4.43 and the pH values for treated orange juice samples ranged from 3.9 to 4.0 (Table 5). Despite, the statistical differences, the Capítulo 2 68 plasma treated samples presented pH values in the expected range for orange juice. This small decrease the pH value is associated with the increase in the concentration of the main organic acids present in orange juice after the non-thermal processing. 2.3.4 Organic acids quantification by HPLC Fig 5 shows the concentration of organic acids in orange juice after high pressure processing. Fig 5 – Concentration (g/ L and g/100 mL) of organic acids in orange juice after high pressure processing. The control sample (without treatment) corresponds to the time zero. It was compared the concentration of each acid on the different treatments Capítulo 2 69 In HPP treatment, it was possible to observe a significant increase in the concentration of citric acid after HPP in the juice without FOS (10.60±0.04 g/ L) and for the juice with FOS (10.42±0.02 g/ L), compared to the control (6.70±0.06 g/ L). Similarly, the ascorbic acid (vitamin C) concentration in the juice with FOS (5.00±0.00 g/100 mL) and without FOS (5.80±0.00 g/100 mL) increased after HPP, compared to the control (from 3.5±0.00 g/100 mL). The control sample is the non-processed juice containing FOS. The organic acids in orange juice after ACP presented a similar behavior compared to HPP, with an increased concentration of citric acid (from 6.70±0.06 g/ L to 8.18±0.02 – 9.00±0.08 g/ L). This increase was lower compared to the results obtained after HPP. It was also observed a small increase in the concentration of ascorbic acid (from 3.50±0.00 g/100 mL to 3.80±0.00 – 4.90±0.02 g/100 mL). Regarding the kind and time of exposure some small and statistically significant differences were found (Fig 6). Capítulo 2 70 Fig 6 – Concentration (g/ L and g/100 mL) of organic acids in orange juice after direct and indirect plasma exposure. It was compared the concentration of each acid on the different process times and kinds of exposure. The control sample (without plasma treatment) corresponds to the time zero *Average ± standard deviation of triplicates. Averages with different letters, the samples are statically different (p≤0.05) This increase in concentration of organic acids may be related to disruption of membranes after the processes as the orange juice contains pulp. Igual et al. (2010) reported that thermal treatments, such as conventional pasteurization, degraded organic acids in grape fruit. Their results showed that thermal treatment led to a significant decrease in citric acid (from 1.538 to 1.478 mg/100 g) and ascorbic acid (from 36.0 to 34.3 mg/100 g). Cserhalmi et al. (2004) also reported a decrease of 11% on the vitamin Capítulo 2 71 C (ascorbic acid) content in raspeberry juice after pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment. Estrada et al. (2013) evaluated the effect of the non-thermal process of ultra-high pressure on bioactive compounds of orange juice. Their results showed that the remaining content of L-ascorbic acid in the UHPH treated samples at any pressure was significantly higher than in the thermal pasteurized one. 2.4. Conclusions The application of plasma and high pressure processing showed to be particularly interesting for orange juice containing prebiotic fructo-oligosaccharides. Both processes do not degrade the FOS, making them suitable for the functional foods processing containing FOS. The treated samples presented a slight variation on the color parameters analyzed, in both treatments. However, human eyes are not able to detect differences in the samples treated by plasma and HPP when compared with a control sample. These processes also proved to be viable by the fact that not degrades main organic acids in orange juice. Acknowledgments Authors thanks National Council of Technological and Scientific Development CNPq through the National Institute of Tropical Fruits (INCT-FT-CNPq) for the financial support, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) for the scholarship and Beneo-Orafiti for the FOS sample. Capítulo 2 72 REFERENCES Benoit, M., Rodrigues, A., Zhang, Q., Fourré, E., Vigier, K. D. O., Tatibouët, J.-M., & Jérôme, F. (2011). Depolymerization of cellulose assisted by a non-thermal atmospheric plasma. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English), 50(38): 8964–7. doi:10.1002/anie.201104123 Cao, X., Bi, X., Huang, W., Wu, J., Hu, X., Liao, X. (2012). Changes of quality of high hydrostatic pressure processed cloudy and clear strawberry juices during storage. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 16:181–190. Chen, X., Qin, W., Ma, L., Xu, F., Jin, P., Zheng, Y. (2015). Effect of high pressure processing and thermal treatment on physicochemical parameters, antioxidant activity and volatile compounds of green asparagus juice. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 62:927-933. Cserhalmi, Z., Meszaros, L., Sass-Kiss, A., Toth-Markus, M. (2004). Study of fruit juices treated by new preservation techniques. International Congress on Engineering and Food, 180 - 186. Esteve, M. J., Frígola, A. (2007). Refrigerated Fruit Juices: Quality and Safety Issues. Advances in food and nutrition research 52:103–39. Ferrari, G., Maresca, P., Ciccarone, R. (2010). The application of high hydrostatic pressure for the stabilization of functional foods: Pomegranate juice. Journal of Food Engineering, 100, 245–253. Hernandez-Hernandez, O. et al. (2012). Effect of Prebiotic Carbohydrates on the Growth and Tolerance of Lactobacillus. Food microbiology 30(2):355–61. Hess, Jennifer R., Anne M. Birkett, William Thomas, and Joanne L. Slavin. (2011). Effects of Short-Chain Fructooligosaccharides on Satiety Responses in Healthy Men and Women. Appetite 56(1):128–34. Igual, M., García-Martínez, E., Camacho, M. M., Martínez-Navarrete, N. (2010). Effect of thermal treatment and storage on the stability of organic acids and the functional value of grapefruit juice. Food Chemistry 118: 291-299. Klewicki, Robert. (2007). The Stability of Gal-Polyols and Oligosaccharides during Pasteurization at a Low pH. LWT - Food Science and Technology 40(7):1259–65. Capítulo 2 73 Matusek, A., Merész, P., Le, T. K. D. and Örsi, F. (2009). Effect of Temperature and pH on the Degradation of Fructooligosaccharides. European Food Research and Technology 228(3):355–65. Misra, N. N., Sullivan, C., Pankaj, S. K., Alvarez-Jubete, L., Cama, R., Jacoby, F., & Cullen, P. J. (2014). Enhancement of oil spreadability of biscuit surface by non-thermal barrier discharge plasma. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 26, 456– 461. doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2014.10.001 Pankaj, S. K. et al. (2014). Applications of Cold Plasma Technology in Food Packaging. Trends in Food Science & Technology 35(1):5–17. Retrieved December 15, 2014 Park, B. J., Takatori, K., Sugita-Konishi, Y., Kim, I, Lee, M., Han, D., Chung, K, Hyun, S. O., & Park, J. (2007). Degradation of mycotoxins using microwave-induced argon plasma at atmospheric pressure. Surface & Coatings Technology, 201, 5733–5737. Patil, S., Bourke, P., Frias, J. M., Tiwari, B. K., & Cullen, P. J. (2009). Inactivation of Escherichia coli in orange juice using ozone. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 10(4), 551–557. doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2009.05.011 Patras, A., Brunton, N. P., Da Pieve, S., Butler, F. (2009). Impact of high pressure processing on total antioxidant activity, phenolic, ascorbic acid, anthocyanin content and color of strawberry and blackberry purées. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 10, 308–313. Patterson, M.F., (2005). A review microbiology of pressure-treated foods. Journal of Applied Microbiology 98, 1400–1409. Ramos, B., Miller, F.A., Brandão, T.R.S., Teixeira, P., Silva, C.L.M., (2013). Fresh fruits and vegetables - An overview on applied methodologies to improve its quality and safety. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. Renuka, B., S. G. Kulkarni, P. Vijayanand, and S. G. Prapulla. (2009). “Fructooligosaccharide Fortification of Selected Fruit Juice Beverages: Effect on the Quality Characteristics.” LWT - Food Science and Technology 42(5):1031–33. Robyt, J. F. (2000). Thin-layer chromatography. Encyclopedia of Separation Science, 5, 2235–2244. Shiomi, N., Onodera, S., Sakai, H. (1997). Fructooligosaccharide content and fructosyltransferase activity during growth of onion bulbs. New Phytologist, 136, 105113. Capítulo 2 74 Tiwari, B. K., Muthukumarappan, K., O’ Donnell, C. P., and Cullen, P. J. 2008a. “Modelling Colour Degradation of Orange Juice by Ozone Treatment Using Response Surface Methodology.” Journal of Food Engineering 88(4):553–60. Retrieved August 27, 2014 (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260877408001453). Vergara, C. M. A. C., Honorato, T. L., Maia, G. A. and Rodrigues, S. (2010). Prebiotic Effect of Fermented Cashew Apple (Anacardium Occidentale L) Juice. LWT - Food Science and Technology 43(1):141–45. Velázquez-Estrada, R. M., Hernández-Herrero, M. M., Rüfer, C. E., Guamis-López, B., Roig-Sagués, A. X. (2013). Influence of ultra high pressure homogenization processing on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of orange juice. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 18: 89-94. Vervoort, L. et al. (2011). Comparing Equivalent Thermal, High Pressure and Pulsed Electric Field Processes for Mild Pasteurization of Orange Juice. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 12(4):466–77. Wichienchot, S., Jatupornpipat, M. and Rastall, R. A. (2010). Oligosaccharides of Pitaya (dragon Fruit) Flesh and Their Prebiotic Properties. Food Chemistry 120(3):850–57. Ziuzina, D., Patil, S., Cullen, P. J., Keener, K. M. and Bourke, P. (2013). Atmospheric Cold Plasma Inactivation of Escherichia Coli in Liquid Media inside a Sealed Package. Journal of applied microbiology 114(3):778–87. National Health Surveillance Agency – ANVISA - Available in: http://portal.anvisa.gov.br/wps/content/Anvisa+Portal/Anvisa/Inicio/Alimentos/Assuntos+ de+Interesse/Alimentos+Com+Alegacoes+de+Propriedades+Funcionais+e+ou+de+Sau de/Alegacoes+de+propriedade+funcional+aprovadas Acessed: 14/10/2014 Capítulo 3 75 CAPÍTULO 3: EFFECTS OF ATMOSPHERIC COLD PLASMA AND OZONE ON PREBIOTIC ORANGE JUICE Abstract In this study, the effect of plasma and ozone treatments on the quality of orange juice was evaluated. The juice was directly and indirectly exposed to a plasma field at 70 kV for different treatment times: 15, 30, 45 and 60 seconds. For ozone processing, different loads (0.057, 0.128 and 0.230 mg/ O3.mL of juice) were evaluated. The oligosaccharides were quantified, in the juices, by HPLC. The juice pH, color, total phenolic content and total antioxidant activity were also determined. Both processes promoted a partial degradation of the oligosaccharides in the juice. However, the juice maintained an enough amount of oligosaccharides to be classified as a prebiotic food. The phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of the treated samples were also well preserved as the pH and color. Thus, atmospheric cold plasma and ozone are suitable non-thermal alternatives for prebiotic orange juice treatment. Keywords: Emerging technologies, orange juice, phenolic, antioxidant activity Capítulo 3 76 3.1. Introduction Nowadays, there is a great interest in the use of prebiotics as functional food ingredients to improve the human health (Liu et al. 2014). The beneficial health effects attributed to the intake of prebiotics have been reported in several studies (Moreno-Vilet et al. 2014; Tako et al. 2014). Prebiotic oligosaccharides are usually obtained by polysaccharide hydrolysis or enzyme synthesis. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are able to produce a wide variety of glucansucrases (GS) and fructansucrases (FS), which synthesize glucans and fructans, respectively, from sucrose with food and nutritional applications (Bivolarski et al. 2013). Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B512F produces the enzyme dextransucrase when cultivated in a medium containing sucrose as substrate, a nitrogen source and minerals (Rodrigues et al. 2003). Dextransucrase (EC 2.4.1.5) is a bacterial extra cellular enzyme, which uses sucrose as a substrate to promote the synthesis of dextran releasing the fructose moieties from sucrose (Rodrigues, 2005). When another substrate (acceptor) is also present, besides sucrose, dextransucrase produces prebiotic oligosaccharides in a reaction called acceptor reaction due to the addition of glucose units from sucrose to the acceptor molecule (maltose, glucose, fructose) instead of into the dextran chain (Rabelo et al. 2006). Oligosaccharides are well documented as effective prebiotic ingredients that modulate the intestinal microbiota and provide other beneficial health effects such as stool improvement, weight management, allergy alleviation (Johnson et al. 2013; Sangwan et al. 2014) and mineral absorption (Tako et al. 2014). Capítulo 3 77 Our group has successfully studied the oligosaccharides synthesis in fruit juices thought the dextransucrase acceptor reaction. The oligosaccharides synthesized by L. mesenteriodes B-512F dextransucrase present α-1,6 glycosidic bonds, which are not digested in the stomach (Araújo et al. 2014; Rabelo et al. 2009; Silva et al. 2012). Orange juice is one of the most worldwide consumed juice due to its high nutritional value and pleasant taste (Agcam et al. 2014). Commonly, thermal treatments are used in the preservation of fruit juices in order to extend their shelf life. However, oligosaccharides are liable to hydrolysis in the pasteurization temperatures of fruit juices and drinks (Matusek et al. 2009). Nowadays, the consumer’s demand and the shortcomings of the existing technologies are stimulating the development of alternative non-thermal approaches in food processing (Misra et al. 2014a). In this context, atmosphere cold plasma (ACP) and ozone processing are emerging technologies that offer many potential applications. Recently, these technologies emerged as powerful tools for surface decontamination of both foodstuffs and food packaging materials (Pankaj et al. 2014a). Several studies have been focused on the application of ozone and plasma such as good alternative processing technologies for decontamination of foods (Misra et al. 2014b; Ziuzina et al. 2013). However, there are no available data and studies concerning the effects of ozone and cold plasma on the quality characteristics of functional foods. In this context, this paper aims to evaluate the effect of the atmospheric cold plasma and ozone processing on the quality of orange juice containing prebiotic oligosaccharides. Capítulo 3 78 3.2. Materials and methods 3.2.1 Orange juice Orange juice (Squeez©, Fruit Juices Ltd, Ireland) was purchased from a local supermarket (Dunnes, Dublin 1- Ireland). The pH of the juice was determined by direct measurement in a 420A pHmeter, (Orion research Inc, Beverly, MA. US). The pHmeter was calibrated before use with buffer solutions of pH 4.0, 7.0 and 10.0. Reducing sugars were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis using an Agilent Technologies System. Separation was achieved in a Supelcogel-Ca column at 80 °C. Ultrapure water (MilliQ System, Millipore, Bilberica, MA, USA) at 0.5 mL/ min was used as eluent and the detector temperature was 35 °C. All samples were analyzed in duplicate. 3.2.2 Dextransucrase production and enzyme activity determination The dextransucrase production was carried out according to Rodrigues et al. (2003). The enzyme produced was stocked frozen at -20 ºC prior to use. The enzymatic activity of the dextransucrase was determined by quantifying the released fructose by the DNS (3.5 dinitrosalicylic acid) method (Miller, 1959) using as substrate a 10% (w/v) sucrose solution in sodium acetate (20mM, pH 5.2) at 30 oC (Rabelo et al. 2009; Rodrigues et al. 2005). Dextransucrase activity was expressed in IU/ mL. One Capítulo 3 79 international unit (IU) is the amount of enzyme that releases 1 mol of fructose per minute under the assay condition. 3.2.3 Prebiotic oligosaccharides synthesis in orange juice Oligosaccharides synthesis was carried out using the partially purified enzyme and the optimum synthesis conditions (30 °C and pH 5.2). Synthesis was carried out in 1000 mL Erlenmeyer flask at 30 °C for 24 h (Rabelo et al. 2006) containing 800 mL of the orange juice and using enzyme with 0.05 IU/ mL. The amount of enzyme was modulated to avoid the oligosaccharides overproduction, which can cause intestinal discomfort and or diarrhea. 3.2.4 Plasma treatment on prebiotic orange juice The plasma treatment was carried out using a plasma generation (DBD-ACP), model: 6CP120/60-7.5 - Phenix Technologies (Fig. 1). The system consisted of a variable high voltage transformer with an input voltage of 230 V at 50 Hz and a maximum high voltage output of 70 kV at 50 Hz. The two 15 cm diameter aluminum disc electrodes were separated by a polypropylene container, which served both as a sample holder and as a dielectric barrier with wall thickness of 1.2 mm. The distance between the two electrodes was 22 mm, equal to the height of the container. Voltage was monitored using an InfiniVision 2000 X-Series Oscilloscope (Agilent Technologies Inc., Capítulo 3 80 Santa Clara, CA, USA). All experiments were performed at 70 kV peak to peak at ambient air and atmospheric pressure conditions. An aliquot of 20 mL of the prebiotic orange juice was transferred to an open Petri dish, which was placed in a polypropylene box, sealed with a polymeric film with 50 µm of thicknesses (Cryovac BB3050). This film served as an additional layer of dielectric barrier (Pankaj et al. 2014). Then, the samples were treated with atmospheric cold plasma (ACP) with processing times of 15, 30, 45 and 60 seconds and different exposure kinds: direct plasma field (in) and indirect plasma field (out). These treatment times were selected based on previously study carried for pathogens inactivation (Ziuzina et al. 2013), where a complete bacterial inactivation was achieved after 20 seconds of direct exposure and 45 seconds of indirect plasma treatment. In the present work, lower and higher exposure times to ACP were evaluated. Treated samples of prebiotic orange juice were stored at room temperature (25 °C) for 24 h, after that, the samples were analyzed. Treatments were done in duplicates and analyzes were performed in triplicate. Capítulo 3 81 Fig.1- Experimental setup for plasma treatment. (Adapted from Pankaj, Misra, & Cullen, 2013) 3.2.5 Ozone treatment on prebiotic orange juice The prebiotic orange juice was also submitted to ozone treatment. Ozone was generated using an ozone generator (Model OL80F, Ozone services, Burton, B.C., Canada – Fig. 2) and produced by a corona discharge generator. Pure oxygen was supplied via an oxygen cylinder (Air Products Ltd., Dublin, Ireland) and the flow rate was controlled using a gas flow regulator. The excess of ozone was destroyed by an ozone destroyer unit. To prevent excess foaming, 3 drops of sterile anti-foaming agent (Antifoam B emulsion, Sigma Aldrich, Ireland Ltd.) was added before the ozone treatment. The treatment of the prebiotic orange juice samples was carried out using different ozone loads: 0.057, 0.128 and 0.230 mg O 3/ mL of juice. These ozone loads Capítulo 3 82 were based on the minimum load applied (0.075 mg O3/ mL) for 5 log CFU/mL of E. coli inactivation in orange juice (Patil et al. 2009). Higher values were applied considering the existence of more resistant microorganisms. Treatments were conducted in duplicates and analyzes were performed in triplicate. Fig.2- Experimental setup for of ozone treatment. (Adapted from Patil et al. 2009b) 3.2.6 Carbohydrate analysis 3.2.6.1 Oligosaccharides degree of polymerization The prebiotic oligosaccharides produced in the orange juice were characterized according to their degree of polymerization by Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) on Capítulo 3 83 Whatman K6 silica plates, 250-µm thickness (Whatman, Kent, UK). Diluted samples of 10 µL were absorbed onto the TLC plate by injection with a micropipette on a line at 1.5 cm above the lower plate edge and, at least 1.5 cm from each other. Then, the plate was irrigated for two ascents in a solvent mixture composed of acetonitrile: ethy-1-acetate: 1propanol: H2O (85:20:50:90). To make sugars visible, the plates were revealed with a solution containing 0.3% (w/v) of 1-naphthyl ethylenediamine dihydrochloride in methanol with sulphuric acid 3% (v/v). The plates were then heated in an oven at 120 ºC for 10 minutes. 3.2.6.2 Sugars and oligosaccharides quantification After removing the dextran by ethanol precipitation, the supernatant containing the oligosaccharides and the residual sugars was cleaned by SPE using the STRATA C18 (SUPELCO) cartridge and filtered through a Nylon membrane (SUPELCO Acrodisc, 25 mm x 0.45 µm) to be analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A Varian ProStar System (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with two high pressure pumps (Model 210), refractive index detector (Model 355) and a Timberline column heating oven was used to carry out the assay. Oligosaccharides separation was achieved in a Phenomenex Resex RSO column (10 x 300 mm) at 80 °C. Ultrapure water (MilliQ System, Millipore, Bilberica, MA, USA) at 0.3 mL/min was used as eluent and the detector temperature was 35 °C. All samples were analyzed in duplicate. The software ProStar WS 6.0 was used to acquire and handle the data. The chromatographic condition allowed the separation and quantification of simple sugars (sucrose, glucose Capítulo 3 84 and fructose) and the oligosaccharides. The oligosaccharides were quantified using maltotriose (DP3), maltotetraose (DP4), maltopentaose (DP5), maltohexaose (DP6) and maltoheptaose (DP7) purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, :St. Louis, MO, USA). 3.2.7 Color analysis The color of the samples was measured using a colorimeter (Colour Quest XE Hunter Lab, Northants, UK). The instrument operates on CIELAB (L*, a* and b*) and it was calibrated using white (L*= 93.97, a*= 0.88 and b*= 1.21) standard. The L, a, b parameters were used to calculate the chromaticity, the hue angle and ∆E values according to equations 1, 2 and 3, respectively: Chroma = (1) Hue = tan-1 (2) ∆E= {(∆L2) + (∆a2) + (∆b2)}1/2 (3) Where, Lo, ao and bo are colour values of control juice. Capítulo 3 85 3.2.8 Total phenolic content Total phenolic content was assayed by Folin-Ciocalteu method, developed by Folin and Ciocalteu (1927). The method is based on the ability of phenolic compounds to reduce a mixture of phosphomolybdic/phosphotungstic acid complexes (Folin reagent) in alkaline medium. The analysis was carried out in a 96 well microtiter plate where 10 µL of the sample (or water for blank) was mixed with 200 µL of Folin-Ciocalteu solution (diluted in water 1:10). After 3 minutes of reaction and the development of the blue colour, 10 µL of 20% (w/v) sodium carbonate solution was added. The reading was taken at 765 nm using an Elisa reader spectrophotometer (Biotek Epoch, Winooski VT – USA) using the software Gen 5 1.10 to handle the data. Gallic acid was the reference standard and total phenolic was expressed as equivalents of gallic acid. 3.2.9 Antioxidant activity determination The antioxidant activity of the prebiotic orange juice before and after ACP and ozone treatment was assayed according to DPPH and ABTS methods, as further described. DPPH and ABTS methods are recommended as easy and accurate assays for measuring the antioxidant activity of orange juice (Kelebek et al. 2009) Capítulo 3 86 3.2.9.1 DPPH method The antioxidant activity of the prebiotic orange juice was determined spectrophotometrically using DPPH• free radical method reported (Brand-Williams et al. 1995) with modifications. An aliquot of 30 µL of the orange juice (or water for blank) diluted in methanol (1:10) was added to 1200 µL of DPPH• solution in methanol (0.06 mM). The absorbency was taken at 515 nm at 2 minutes intervals during 30 minutes. The assays were carried out in a Thermo Fisher Scientific Spectrophotometer (model Evolution 201 – USA). The antioxidant efficiency was expressed as EC50 determined as the time when the concentration of substrate causes 50% loss in absorbance (DPPH • activity). 3.2.9.2 ABTS method The ABTS free radical capture reported by Re et al. (1999) was also used to measure the antioxidant capacity of the prebiotic orange juice treated by ozone and plasma. ABTS was dissolved in water to 7 mM concentration. ABTS radical (ABTS•+) was produced by reacting 10 mL of the ABTS stock solution (7mM) with 176 µL of potassium persulfate (140 mM) and the mixture was allowed to stand in the dark at room temperature for 16 h before use. The ABTS•+ radical was diluted in ethanol to an absorbance of 0.700 (±0.05) at 734 nm. An aliquot of 1.5 µL of the orange juice diluted in methanol (1:7) was mixed to 1500 µL of ABTS •+ radical and the absorbance was measured after 6 minutes against the blank using Thermo Fisher Scientific Capítulo 3 87 Spectrophotometer (model Evolution 201 – USA). Trolox was the antioxidant standard. Results were expressed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant activity per mL. 3.2.10 Statistical analysis Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software Statistica (Statsoft) version 10.0. The results were compared by Tukey test at 95.0% confidence level. 3.3 Results and discussions 3.3.1 Orange juice characterization The concentration of sugar in the orange juice used as raw material was: 20.80 ± 0.03 of sucrose; 15.41 ± 0.17 of fructose and 15.30 ± 0.36 of glucose. According to Rabelo et al. (2009) and Rodrigues et al. (2006), the acceptor mechanisms requires high concentration of reducing sugars since they are the acceptor of the reaction, which promotes the deviation of glucosyl moieties to the acceptor molecule producing the desired oligosaccharides. Thus, the level of sugars were adjusted to 75 g/ L of sucrose and 75 g /L of reducing sugars (equimolar proportions) by adding external sucrose, glucose and fructose. The enzyme synthesis resulted in 11.55 ± 0.25 g/ L of oligosaccharides in the juice. This concentration is enough to consider the juice a Capítulo 3 88 functional food. After the production of prebiotic oligosaccharides, the orange juice was submitted to plasma and ozone treatments. 3.3.2 Effect of plasma and ozone on the juice pH The pH values of the prebiotic orange juice after ozone processing ranged from 4.41 to 4.43. The pH of ozone treated samples (Table 1) was not statistically different from the non-treated sample (control). Ozone processing did not affect the pH of prebiotic orange juice after application of different ozone loads. Table 1 – pH values in prebiotic orange juice after ozone processing Charge of ozone (mg O3/ mL) pH values Control 4.43 ± 0.01a 0.057 4.41± 0.01a 0.128 4.42± 0.01a 0.230 4.43 ± 0.01a Mean ± SD (n = 6). Means with the same letter are not significantly different by the Tukey test (p < 0.05). This result agrees to the reported for other non-thermal processing of orange juice such as sonication and pulsed electric field. (Tiwari et al. 2008a; Cortés, Esteve, & Frígola, 2008). On the other hand, when prebiotic orange juice was plasma treated, the pH of the treated samples was statistically different from the control (non-treated sample). The mean pH value obtained for the control was 4.43 and the pH values for treated orange juice samples ranged from 3.9 to 4.0 (Table 2). Capítulo 3 89 Table 2 – pH values in prebiotic orange juice after plasma treatment pH values Treatment (time) Direct exposure Indirect exposure Control 4.43 ± 0.0 a 4.43 ± 0.01a 15s 3.90 ± 0.10b 3.90 ± 0.20b 30s 3.90 ± 0.10b 4.00 ± 0.10b 45s 4.00 ± 0.10b 4.00 ± 0.10b 60s 3.90 ± 0.01b 3.90 ± 0.10b Mean ± SD (n = 6). Means with the same letter are not significantly different by the Tukey test (p < 0.05) The orange juice pH depends on the harvest period (Sinclair & Ramsey, 1944). As a citric fruit juice, the orange pH can reach values as low as 2.8 as reported by Sinclair, Bartholomew & Ramsey (1945). Despite, the statistical differences, the plasma treated samples presented pH values in the expected range for orange juice. 3.3.3 Oligosaccharides characterization after plasma and ozone treatments. The prebiotic oligosaccharides produced in orange juice were characterized according to degree of polymerization (DP). The DP of the treated samples were similar to the non-treated sample (control). Figure 3 shows the Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) analysis of the produced oligosaccharides after ozone treatment, against the control (non-treated sample). Capítulo 3 90 Fig 3 – Degree of polymerization (DP) of the oligosaccharides in prebiotic orange juice before (control) and after ozone treatment. Oligosaccharides with DP up to 8 were obtained in all samples. Similar results were obtained for ACP treatment. Regarding the oligosaccharides DP, the ACP and ozone treatments did not affect the degree of polymerization of the oligosaccharides in orange juice since the degree of polymerization of the treated samples was the same as the untreated sample in both cases. Capítulo 3 91 The oligosaccharides DP obtained in this study are in agreement to those reported in previous studies on oligosaccharides synthesis in fruit juices. Rabelo et al. (2009) and Vergara et al. (2010) evaluated the oligosaccharides production in fruit juices by fermentation. These authors obtained oligosaccharides with degree of polymerization up to 7 (DP7). Araújo et al. (2014) and Coelho et al. (2014) evaluated the enzyme synthesis of oligosaccharides in acerola and lemon juice, respectively, and reported DP up to 6 in both fruit juices. Regarding to plasma and ozone treatments, it is not possible to compare our results with other groups because so far, these treatments in juices containing functional ingredients was never did before to our knowledge. 3.3.4 Oligosaccharides quantification by HPLC after plasma and ozone treatments. Despite oligosaccharides with DP up to 8 were visualized on the TLC plates, oligosaccharides with DP higher than 7 were below the quantification limit of the HPLC method. The HPLC analysis showed the oligosaccharides concentration in prebiotic orange juice before and after plasma and ozone treatments. The degradation of oligosaccharides with higher degree of polymerization resulted in oligosaccharides with lower degree of polymerization as presented in Figures 4 and 5. The results for direct (A) and indirect plasma exposure (B) are presented in Figure 4. Capítulo 3 92 Fig.4- Oligosaccharides quantification after direct exposure (A) and indirect exposure (B) of the plasma treatment. The control sample (without plasma treatment) corresponds to the time zero. DP means degree of polymerization. Analyzing the concentration of oligosaccharides according to their degree of polymerization (Figure 4A and 4B), it is clear that oligosaccharides with higher degree of polymerization (DP4, DP5, and DP6) decreased when the treatment time was increased on both kinds of exposure. On the other hand, the oligosaccharides with DP 3 (panose) increased at the end of the plasma treatment. Before ACP treatment, the DP3 concentration was 2.50 ± 0.07 g /L and after 60 seconds of treatment, this concentration was 3.17 ± 0.06 g /L and 3.09 ± 0.01 g/L for direct and indirect exposures, respectively. The increase of panose (DP3) is due the degradation of higher DP oligosaccharides. Capítulo 3 93 Figure 5 shows the oligosaccharides concentration according to degree of polymerization obtained after ozone processing. Oligosaccharides with DP from 4 to 7 decreased with the increase of the ozone loads. On the other hand, panose (DP3) increased after mild ozone loads and decreased after higher loads application. Fig.5 - Oligosaccharides quantification after ozone processing. The control sample (without ozone treatment) corresponds to the load zero. DP means degree of polymerization. Table 3 presents the total oligosaccharide loss for each non-thermal treatment. The higher loss was observed for plasma treatment with indirect exposure and the highest ozone load. Capítulo 3 94 Table 3 – Oligosaccharide concentration and loss after non-thermal treatment. Non-thermal Oligosaccharide (g/ L) Oligosaccharide (g/ L) Oligosaccharide treatment Before treatment After treatment Loss (%) Plasma IN (60s) 11.55 ± 0.25a 10.15 + 0.05b 12% Plasma Out (60s) 11.55 ± 0.25a 9.07 ± 0.07b 22% 11.55 ± 0.25a 9.18 ± 0.04b 21% Ozone (0.230 mg O3/min.mL) Mean ± SD (n = 6). Means with the same letter are not significantly different by the Tukey test (p < 0.05) In ACP plasma ozone gas is formed in the head space. According to Wang et al. (1999), ozone can cause polysaccharides depolymerization producing other polysaccharides with shorter chains as observed in the present study. Prebiotic oligosaccharides synthesized by L. mesenteriodes B-512F dextransucrase present α-1,6 glycosidic bonds. Wang et al. (1999) also demonstrated that ozone process can degrade polysaccharides with 1,6-linked α-D-glucose bonds. Ben’ko, Manisova & Lunin (2013) reported that the main route of carbohydrate ozonolysis is the cleavage of glycoside bonds, leading to depolymerization of the macromolecule, and the oxidation of functional groups to form carbonyl and carboxyl compounds, lactones, hydroperoxides and CO2. However, the mechanism of oligosaccharides degradation due to the plasma and ozone application still needs to be elucidated as this is an emerging field of investigation. The amount of prebiotic oligosaccharides intake is a controversial issue as their effect strongly depends on the oligosaccharide structure and the consumer itself (adults, children or babies). The Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA, 2014) suggests a prebiotic daily ingestion of about 1.5 g in liquid foods. Although some degradation of Capítulo 3 95 oligosaccharides has occurred due to the non-thermal treatments, the minimum required amount of oligosaccharides to be considered as a prebiotic food was maintained in both plasma and ozone treated juice samples since a portion of 200 mL provides 1.8 g of oligosaccharides. Figure 6 shows the concentration of simple sugars after the direct (A) and indirect (B) exposures of plasma processing and simple sugars after ozone (C) processing. Fig.6 - Sugars concentration after plasma direct exposure (A) and indirect exposure (B) and after ozone treatment (C) In both kinds of plasma exposure (Figure 6A and 6B) there was a decrease on the fructose concentration and an increase on the sucrose along the treatment time. For ozone processing (Figure 6C), the same behavior was observed with these sugars, after the lowest ozone load. Capítulo 3 96 Thus, the increase in sucrose concentration explains the decrease of the oligosaccharides with a high degree of polymerization in prebiotic orange juice since the degradation of oligosaccharides with higher degree of polymerization may also result on the release of the simple sugar. Sucrose might have also been formed by the combination of fructose and the glucose moiety released from the oligosaccharides. 3.3.5 Color analysis Regarding the color parameters after ozone processing, the values of L* and Chroma were not statistically different from the control (Table 4). Table 4 – Color parameters of the prebiotic orange juice after ozone processing Load (mg O3/ mL) L* Chroma ho ∆E Control 52.93 ± 0.02a 28.74 ± 0.07a 95.47 ± 0.02a -- 0.057 53.03 ± 0.02a 28.56 ± 0.03a 94.75 ± 0.05a,b 1.97 ± 0.01a 0.128 53.06 ± 0.01a 28.50 ± 0.02a 94.48 ± 0.02b 0.87 ± 0.01c 0.230 53.15 ± 0.02a 28.40 ± 0.02a 94.19 ± 0.02b 1.90 ± 0.01b Mean ± SD (n = 6). Means with the same letter are not significantly different by the Tukey test (p < 0.05) The Hue angle, in treated samples, presented a slightly, and statistically significant reduction compared to the control sample. According to Tiwari et al. (2008) perceptible differences in color parameters can be analytically classified as follows: very different (ΔE> 3); distinct (1.5 <ΔE <3) and slightly different (ΔE <1.5). Thus, the ΔE results of the samples after ozone treatment, show that only the sample submitted to Capítulo 3 97 second charge, it was slightly different when compared with control juice. The other samples were distinct whn compared to the control sample. Table 5 presents the results obtained for plasma treated samples. Table 5 – Color parameters of the prebiotic orange juice after plasma treatment Direct exposure (in) Treatment (time) L* Chroma ho ∆E Control 52.93 ± 0.02d 28.74 ± 0.07d 95.47 ± 0.02a -- 15 56.02 ± 0.01b,c 30.27 ± 0.01a 94.68 ± 0.02b 0.46 ± 0.00c 30 56.00 ± 0.01c 29.92 ± 0.03b 94.01 ± 0.01c 0.95 ± 0.01b 45 56.05 ± 0.01b 29.82 ± 0.01c 93.83 ± 0.02d 1.08 ± 0.01a 60 56.10 ± 0.01a 29.85 ± 0.02b,c 93.77 ± 0.01e 1.09 ± 0.01 a Treatment Indirect exposure (out) (time) L* Chroma ho ∆E Control 52.93 ± 0.02d 28.74 ± 0.07e 95.47 ± 0.02a -- 15 56.03 ± 0.01c 30.21 ± 0.01a 94.56 ± 0.01b 0.54 ± 0.01d 30 56.07 ± 0.01b 30.10 ± 0.02b 94.36 ± 0.02c 0.70 ± 0.02c 45 56.12 ± 0.01a 30.00 ± 0.01c 94.07 ± 0.03d 0.88 ± 0.01b 60 56.11 ± 0.01a 29.83 ± 0.01d 93.92 ± 0.01e 1.05 ± 0.01 a Mean ± SD (n = 6). Means with the same letter are not significantly different by the Tukey test (p < 0.05). The L* (lightness) values were in the range of 56.02 - 56.10 and 56.03 - 56.11 for direct and indirect plasma exposure, respectively, while the control sample (nontreated juice) was 52.93 ± 0.02. In all plasma treated samples the L* value was statistically different from the control. Misra et al. (2014b) also observed a change in the L* color parameter in plasma treated strawberries. Regarding the Chroma and the Hue angle, a slight reduction in these values were observed in both kind of plasma exposure. Capítulo 3 98 The L* is the luminous intensity of a color and reflects if the color is dark or light. This parameter ranges from 0 (black) to 100 (white). The plasma treatment slightly increased the juice L* parameter by about 3 units. The Chroma reflects the vividness or the color saturation, which means how close the color is either the gray or the pure hue. An increase in Chroma means that the color gets closer to the pure hue, becoming more vivid. The Chroma values in plasma treated samples increased slightly, which means that the treatment resulted in a more vivid instrumental color. The same behavior was observed for pasteurized orange juice (Lee & Coates, 2003). The Hue angle is the characteristic color of the sample. According to the color wheel, the pure yellow corresponds to 90º. Orange juice characteristic color ranges from orange to yellow depending on the fruit variety. The control sample Hue angle was 95.47º, which is close to the pure yellow (90º) and is in agreement to the reported by Lee & Coates (2003) for fresh orange juice (95.66º). The maximal decrease of the Hue angle observed in plasma treated sample corresponds to less than 2º, which is very low and approximates the juice color to pure yellow color. In pasteurized orange juice the Hue angle increased by about 1.2 units compared to the control (Lee & Coates, 2003). Despite some color parameters presented statistical difference, the characteristic color of the juice was kept in the expected ranger for orange juice with a slightly increase in Chroma and lightness indicating that the juice became lighter and more vivid. Thus, the ozone and plasma treatment did not compromise the product color. Regarding to the ΔE results, the samples after direct and indirect exposure to plasma treatment, show that they were all slightly different when compared with control juice. Capítulo 3 99 3.3.6 Total phenolic content Figure 7A show the concentration of phenolic compounds after plasma exposure. The values decreased from 2.52 ± 0.20 to 2.37 ± 0.10 g /L and 1.93 ± 0.12 g /L for direct and indirect exposure, respectively. When the prebiotic orange juice was processed under plasma indirect exposure, the total phenolic content was affected (p<0.05) only after 60 seconds of treatment. Figure 7B shows the total phenolic compounds concentration in prebiotic orange juice after ozone treatment. Before ozone processing, the phenolic concentration in the juice was 2.52 ± 0.20 g /L and at the end of processing this value decreased to 2.33 ± 0.07 g /L. After ozone treatment, the phenolic concentration was statistically the same of the control sample. 3,5 3,0 3,0 2,5 a a a a a a a a a a 2,0 a a 1,5 1,0 in out 0,5 Phenolics (mg/L) Phenolics (mg/ L) 2,5 a a 2,0 1,5 1,0 0,5 0,0 0,0 0 10 20 30 Time (s) 40 50 60 0,00 0,05 0,10 0,15 Ozone load (mg O3/mL) Fig.7 - Total phenolic content after plasma (A) and ozone (B) treatment. 0,20 0,25 Capítulo 3 100 The plasma discharge generates energetic electrons that dissociate oxygen molecules by direct impact. The single oxygen atom from the dissociation combines with oxygen molecule (O2) to form ozone gas (Misra et al. 2014a). Phenolics compounds are particularly susceptible to ozone attack (Stalter et al. 2011). According to Perez et al. (2002), ozone reacts very efficiently on degradation of aromatic compounds of the phenolic compounds. The molecular ozone action on the aromatic compound favors the formation of hydroxylated and quinone compounds, because the formation of aliphatic compounds is originated from rupture of the aromatic ring. Despite the phenolics compounds are susceptible to ozone attack, only the indirect plasma exposure by 60 s caused a significant change on the phenolics contents. However, after plasma indirect exposure, 76% of the initial phenolic content was preserved in the treated juice. In addition, our results showed higher concentration of phenolic compounds when compared with the Kelebek et al. (2009) and Gil-izquierdo et al. (2001) results, which presented the phenolic concentrations of 0.317 and 0.839 g /L, respectively to different variety of oranges. 3.3.7 Total antioxidant activity Total antioxidant capacity of prebiotic orange juice was evaluated using DPPH • and ABTS• free radical methods. DPPH did not show any significant changes among the treated samples and the control (results not shown). On the other hand, when antioxidant activity was measured by the ABTS• free radical method, a reduction in the antioxidant capacity of the prebiotic orange juice was observed after plasma and ozone Capítulo 3 101 processing. The results obtained suggest that the ABTS• method is more sensitive since there was a reaction between the ABTS radical and the antioxidants compounds of the prebiotic orange juice not observed with the DPPH. The antioxidant capacity results according to ABTS method of the prebiotic orange juice treated with plasma are showed in Table 6. Table 6 – ABTS antioxidant activity in prebiotic orange juice after plasma treatment Treatment ABTS (µM de trolox / mL) (times) Direct exposure Indirect exposure Control 4.97 ± 0.30a 4.97 ± 0.30a 15 3.11 ± 0.28b 3.61 ± 0.69a 30 3.18 ± 0.21b 4.61 ± 1.82a 45 3.31 ± 1.02b 4.35 ± 1.16a 60 2.63 ± 0.23b 4.40 ± 1.02a Mean ± SD (n = 6). Means with the same letter are not significantly different by the Tukey test (p < 0.05) When prebiotic orange juice was directly exposed to plasma there was a slight reduction on the antioxidant capacity of the juice, however the reduction was significantly different when compared to the control sample. After 60 s of direct exposure to plasma field, the juice lost about 50% of the antioxidant capacity measured by ABTS. On the other hand, when prebiotic orange juice was submitted indirectly to the plasma field, the antioxidant compounds of all samples were statistically equal. According to Ziuzina et al. (2014), 20 s of ACP treatment is enough to inactivate 5 log of E.coli in orange juice. This processing time would not affect the antioxidant capacity of the product according to the ABTS methodology. Capítulo 3 102 The results related to the antioxidant capacity of the prebiotic orange juice after ozone processing are showed in Table 7. Table 7 – ABTS Antioxidant activity in prebiotic orange juice after ozone treatment. Load (mg O3/mL) ABTS (µM de trolox / mL) 0 4.97 ± 0.3a 0.057 5.46 ± 0.13a 0.128 5.17 ± 0.25a 0.230 4.08 ± 0.26b Mean ± SD (n = 6). Means with the same letter are not significantly different by the Tukey test (p < 0.05). After the application of the first and second loads, there was no change on the antioxidant activity of the juice when compared to the control sample. These loads were applied based on the minimum load applied (0.075 mg O 3/ mL) for 5 log CFU/mL inactivation of E. coli in orange juice (Patil et al. 2009a). On the other hand, when 0.230 mg O3/mL was applied, a statistical significant reduction in the antioxidant capacity of the juice was observed. However, this value corresponds to a loss of about 18% of the antioxidant capacity compared to the control sample. In addition, this load is much higher than necessary to the pathogens inactivation. The results obtained for antioxidant capacity by ABTS method showed that the ACP and ozone treatment of orange juice at the same conditions previously studied for pathogens inactivation (Ziuzina et al. 2014; Patil et al. 2009a) does not affect the product antioxidant capacity. Capítulo 3 103 3.4. Conclusion This work has shown that plasma and ozone treatments can be used as emerging technologies for prebiotic orange juice processing without affecting the quality of the juice regarding the phenolic content, antioxidant capacity and the product color. Ozone treatment resulted in a higher reduction in the juice oligosaccharides content compared to plasma processing. Nevertheless, at the end of both treatments, the juice maintains the minimum required amount of the oligosaccharides to be classified as a prebiotic food since a portion of 200 mL provides at least 1.5 g of oligosaccharides. The elucidation of the oligosaccharides degradation mechanism by atmosphere cold plasma and ozone processing is subject of further studies. Acknowledgments Authors thanks CNPq through the National Institute of Tropical Fruits (INCT-FT-CNPq) for the financial support, CAPES for the scholarship. Capítulo 3 104 CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS As tecnologias de plasma e alta pressão foram efetivas no tratamento de suco de laranja contendo fruto-oligossacarídeos (FOS) comerciais, uma vez que as mesmas não ocasionam degradação dos FOS. Esses mesmos processamentos promovem uma ligeira alteração nos parâmetros de cor. Contudo, essa mudança não afeta a qualidade do produto, uma vez que não é possível detectar alterações visuais quando se compara o suco tratado com uma amostra controle. A aplicação do tratamento de ozônio no suco prebiótico de laranja proporciona uma redução na concentração de oligossacarídeos em comparação com o processamento de plasma. Contudo, as tecnologias não térmicas estudadas nesse trabalho apresentam-se como alternativas adequadas para o processamento de suco de laranja prebiótico, uma vez que, o suco tratado manteve a quantidade mínima estabelecida de oligossacarídeos para ser designado como alimento funcional prebiótico, além de não afetar os demais compostos bioativos presentes no produto. Estudos posteriores devem ser conduzidos no intuito de elucidar os mecanismos de degradação dos oligossacarídeos submetidos ao tratamento com plasma e ozônio. Capítulo 3 105 REFERENCES Agcam, E., Akyıldız, A, and Evrendilek, G. A. (2014). Effects of PEF and heat pasteurization on PME activity in orange juice with regard to a new inactivation kinetic model. Food Chemistry, 165, 70–6. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.097 Araújo, A. D. A., Coelho, R. M. D., Fontes, C. P. M. L., Silva, A. R. A., Costa, J. M. C., and Rodrigues, S. (2014). Production and spouted bed drying of acerola juice containing oligosaccharides. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2014.08.005 Ben’ko, E. M., Manisova, O. R., and Lunin, V. V. (2013). Effect of ozonation on the reactivity of lignocellulose substrates in enzymatic hydrolyses to sugars. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 87(7), 1108–1113. doi:10.1134/S0036024413070091 Bivolarski, V., Vasileva, T., Dzhambazov, B., Momchilova, A., Chobert, J., Ivanova, I., and Iliev, I. (2013). Characterization of glucansucrases and fructansucrases produced by wild strains Leuconostoc mesenteroides URE13 and Leuconostoc mesenteroides LM17 grown on glucose or fructose medium as a sole carbon source. Biotechnol & Biot, 68. Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., and Berset, C. (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 28(1), 25–30. doi:10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5 Coelho, R. M. D., Araújo, A. D. A., Fontes, C. P. M. L., Silva, A. R. A., Costa, J. M. C., and Rodrigues, S. (2014). Powder lemon juice containing oligosaccharides obtained by dextransucrase acceptor reaction synthesis and dehydrated in sprouted bed. Journal of Food Science and Technology. doi:10.1007/s13197-014-1635-9 Cortés, C., Esteve, M. J., and Frígola, A. (2008). Effect of refrigerated storage on ascorbic acid content of orange juice treated by pulsed electric fields and thermal pasteurization. European Food Research and Technology, 227(2), 629–635. doi:10.1007/s00217-007-0766-x Folin, O., Ciocalteu, V. (1927). On tyrosine and tryptophane determinations in proteins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 73:627–650 Gil-izquierdo, A., Gil, I., Ferreres, F., and Tomás-Barberán, F. A. (2001). In Vitro Availability of Flavonoids and Other Phenolics in Orange Juice, 1035–1041. Capítulo 3 106 Johnson, C. R., Thavarajah, D., Combs, G. F., and Thavarajah, P. (2013). Lentil (Lens culinaris L.): A prebiotic-rich whole food legume. Food Research International, 51(1), 107–113. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2012.11.025 Kelebek, H., Selli, S., Canbas, A., and Cabaroglu, T. (2009). HPLC determination of organic acids, sugars, phenolic compositions and antioxidant capacity of orange juice and orange wine made from a Turkish cv. Kozan. Microchemical Journal, 91(2), 187–192. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2008.10.008 Lee, H. S., and Coates, G. A. (2003). Effect of thermal pasteurization on Valencia orange juice color and pigments. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 36(1), 153– 156. doi:10.1016/S0023-6438(02)00087-7 Liu, Z., Lin, X., Huang, G., Zhang, W., Rao, P., and Ni, L. (2014). Prebiotic effects of almonds and almond skins on intestinal microbiota in healthy adult humans. Anaerobe, 26, 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.11.007 Matusek, A., Merész, P., Le, T. K. D., and Örsi, F. (2009). Effect of temperature and pH on the degradation of fructo-oligosaccharides. European Food Research and Technology, 228(3), 355–365. doi:10.1007/s00217-008-0941-8 Miller, G. L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3), 426–428. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.033747333106&partnerID=tZOtx3y1 Misra, N. N., Keener, K. M., Bourke, P., Mosnier, J.-P., and Cullen, P. J. (2014a). Inpackage atmospheric pressure cold plasma treatment of cherry tomatoes. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 118(2), 177–82. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.02.005 Misra, N. N., Patil, S., Moiseev, T., Bourke, P., Mosnier, J. P., Keener, K. M., and Cullen, P. J. (2014b). In-package atmospheric pressure cold plasma treatment of strawberries. Journal of Food Engineering, 125, 131–138. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.10.023 Moreno-Vilet, L., Garcia-Hernandez, M. H., Delgado-Portales, R. E., Corral-Fernandez, N. E., Cortez-Espinosa, N., Ruiz-Cabrera, M. A, and Portales-Perez, D. P. (2014). In vitro assessment of agave fructans (Agave salmiana) as prebiotics and immune system activators. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 63, 181–7. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.10.039 Pankaj, S. K., Bueno-Ferrer, C., Misra, N. N., Milosavljević, V., O’Donnell, C. P., Bourke, P., … Cullen, P. J. (2014). Applications of cold plasma technology in food packaging. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 35(1), 5–17. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2013.10.009 Capítulo 3 107 Pankaj, S. K., Bueno-Ferrer, C., Misra, N. N., O’Neill, L., Jiménez, A., Bourke, P., and Cullen, P. J. (2014ba). Characterization of polylactic acid films for food packaging as affected by dielectric barrier discharge atmospheric plasma. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 21, 107–113. doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2013.10.007 Pankaj, S. K., Misra, N. N., and Cullen, P. J. (2013). Kinetics of tomato peroxidase inactivation by atmospheric pressure cold plasma based on dielectric barrier discharge. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 19, 153–157. doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2013.03.001 Patil, S., Bourke, P., Frias, J. M., Tiwari, B. K., and Cullen, P. J. (2009a). Inactivation of Escherichia coli in orange juice using ozone. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 10(4), 551–557. doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2009.05.011 Patil, S., Cullen, P. J., Kelly, B., Frias, J. M., and Bourke, P. (2009b). Extrinsic control parameters for ozone inactivation of Escherichia coli using a bubble column, 107(2007), 830–837. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04255.x Perez, M., Torrades, F., Domenech, X., and Peral, J. (2002). Treatment of bleaching Kraft mill effluents and polychlorinated phenolic compounds with ozonation. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 77(8), 891–897. doi:10.1002/jctb.651 Rabelo, M. C., Fontes, C. P. M. L., and Rodrigues, S. (2009). Enzyme synthesis of oligosaccharides using cashew apple juice as substrate. Bioresource Technology, 100(23), 5574–5580. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.060 Rabelo, M. C., Honorato, T. L., Gonçalves, L.R.B., Pinto, G. A. S., and Rodrigues, S. (2006). Enzymatic Synthesis of Prebiotic Oligosaccharides, 133, 31–40. Re, R., Pellegrini, N., Proteggente, A., Pannala, A., Min Yang, A., and Catherine, R.-E. (1999). Antioxidant Activity Appliying an improved ABTS radical, 26(98), 1231– 1237. Rodrigues, S., Lona, L. M. F., and Franco, T. T. (2003). Effect of phosphate concentration on the production of dextransucrase by Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRRL B512F. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 26(1), 57–62. doi:10.1007/s00449-003-0330-4 Rodrigues, S., Lona, L. M. F., and Franco, T. T. (2005). The effect of maltose on dextran yield and molecular weight distribution. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 28(1), 9–14. doi:10.1007/s00449-005-0002-7 Rodrigues, S., Lona, L. M. F., and Franco, T. T. (2006). Optimizing panose production by modeling and simulation using factorial design and surface response analysis. Journal of Food Engineering, 75(3), 433–440. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.04.028 Capítulo 3 108 Sangwan, V., Tomar, S. K., Ali, B., Singh, R. R. B., and Singh, A. K. (2014). Production of β-galactosidase from streptococcus thermophilus for galactooligosaccharides synthesis. Journal of Food Science and Technology. doi:10.1007/s13197-014-14864 Sinclair, W. B., and Ramsey, R. C. (1944). Changes in the Organic-Acid Content of Valencia Oranges During Development. Botanical Gazette, 106(2), 140-148. Sinclair, W.B., Bartholomew, E.T. and Ramsey, R. C. (1945). Analysis of organic acids of orange juice. Plant Physiology (518), 3-18. Silva, I. M., Rabelo, M. C., and Rodrigues, S. (2012). Cashew juice containing prebiotic oligosaccharides. Journal of Food Science and Technology. doi:10.1007/s13197012-0689-9 Stalter, D., Magdeburg, A., Wagner, M., and Oehlmann, J. (2011). Ozonation and activated carbon treatment of sewage effluents: removal of endocrine activity and cytotoxicity. Water Research, 45(3), 1015–24. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.008 Tako, E., Glahn, R. P., Knez, M., and Stangoulis, J. C. (2014). The effect of wheat prebiotics on the gut bacterial population and iron status of iron deficient broiler chickens. Nutrition Journal, 13(1), 58. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-13-58 Tiwari, B. K., Muthukumarappan, K., O’Donnell, C. P., and Cullen, P. J. (2008). Colour degradation and quality parameters of sonicated orange juice using response surface methodology. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 41(10), 1876–1883. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2007.11.016 Vergara, C. M. A. C., Honorato, T. L., Maia, G. A., and Rodrigues, S. (2010). Prebiotic effect of fermented cashew apple (Anacardium occidentale L) juice. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 43(1), 141–145. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2009.06.009 Wang, Y., Hollingsworth, R. I., and Kasper, D. L. (1999). Ozonolytic depolymerization of polysaccharides in aqueous solution. Carbohydrate Research, 319(1-4), 141–7. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10520262 Ziuzina, D., Patil, S., Cullen, P. J., Keener, K. M., and Bourke, P. (2013). Atmospheric cold plasma inactivation of Escherichia coli in liquid media inside a sealed package. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 114(3), 778–87. doi:10.1111/jam.12087 Ziuzina, D., Patil, S., Cullen, P. J., Keener, K. M., and Bourke, P. (2014). Atmospheric cold plasma inactivation of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes inoculated on fresh produce. Food Microbiology, 42, 109–16. doi:10.1016/j.fm.2014.02.007