TRADE IN BANKING SERVICES IN ASEAN COUNTRIES
Transcription
TRADE IN BANKING SERVICES IN ASEAN COUNTRIES
TRADE IN BANKING SERVICES IN ASEAN COUNTRIES Mario B. Lamberte WORKING PAPER SERIES NO. 90-22 September 1990 Philippine Institute for Development Studies The study examines countries lateral that for a c o n t i n u o u s negotiations. around would paper ultimately analyzes, aspects which these of towards a more principles discussing the higher in t h e m u l t i l a t e r a l sector the possibility of for revolve services developing sector. trade first in The various of.the is t h e n of the increasing key on trade given banking It concepts and in services ends the competitiveness s h a r e of such measures and trade. The paper their in the benefits international It banking examining of the ASEAN countries. in t h e r e g i o n a n d s u b s e q u e n t l y multi- and sustainable growth negotiations in t h e A S E A N in and in t h e r e g i o n . E m p h a s i s implications of countries, of e x p a n d i n g regime ASEAN to t h e s e n e g o t i a t i o n s . by an e n u m e r a t i o n liberal discuss to t h e b a n k i n g the ASEAN of m a r k e t s and c o m p e t i t i o n is f o l l o w e d to to t r a d e This analysis begins by activities in negotiations developed relevant to a c h i e v i n g proceeds series focus, w a s g i v e n on the f i n a n c i a l as a means This the benefit both possibility to t h e s t r u c t u r e s system. in of b a r r i e r s the s c o p e of b a n k i n g banks issues in t h e c o n t e x t countries. in s e r v i c e s and more e f f e c t i v e are considered explores services costs The issues on trade the gradual dismantling countries. Primary also the by of international trade in cooperation services. banking and services the through Uruguay Round of trade as regional negotiations on TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. S c o p e of B a n k i n g A. B. C. D. E. III. IV. V. Region 9 * 12 16 18 23 28 . of M a r k e t s . and C o m p e t i t i o n S t r u c t u r e of O w n e r s h i p P o l i c y on Bank E n t r y and B r a n c h i n g D e g r e e of B a n k i n g C o n c e n t r a t i o n Pricing 37 37 39 40 40 . ..* 48 A. B. 48 49 Benefits Costs The A p p l i c a b i l i t y and I m p l i c a t i o n s of the U r u g u a y Key C o n c e p t s , Principles and Rules Transparency Progressive Liberalization Market Access National Treatment Most-Favored-Nation/Nondiscrimination I n c r e a s i n g P a r t i c i p a t i o n of D e v e l o p i n g Regulatory Situation Safeguards and Exceptions Round * Countries 50 51 52 53 54 56 ... 56 57 58 I n c r e a s i n g C o m p e t i t i v e n e s s o f B a n k s in A S E A N C o u n t r i e s and I n c r e a s i n g Their S h a r e of i n t e r n a t i o n a l T r a d e in B a n k i n g S e r v i c e s * A. B. Figure in t h e A S E A N B e n e f i t s a n d C o s t s of a M o r e L i b e r a l R e g i m e for I n t e r n a t i o n a l T r a d e in B a n k i n g S e r v i c e s in t h e ASEAN Region A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. VI. Activities Indonesia Malaysia The Philippines Singapore Thailand Structures A. B. C. D. 1 1 2 References Improving Competitiveness I n c r e a s i n g the S h a r e of I n t e r n a t i o n a l in B a n k i n g S e r v i c e s 58 58 Trade N e t F i n a n c i a l F l o w s to A S E A N , 1 9 7 5 - 1 9 8 7 Nominal Lending Rates, Deposit Rates and S p r e a d in A S E A N 59 . 5 Gross 42 61 LIST OF TABLES 1 Basic 2 Net F i n a n c i a l 3 Banking 4 Financial 5 The Financial 6 The 7 A u t h o r i z e d A c t i v i t i e s of V a r i o u s B a n k C a t e g o r i e s P h i l i p p i n e s B a s e d on the A m e n d e d B a n k i n g Laws 8 9 Indicator's: A S E A N Flows Density 2 to A S E A N , 1 9 7 0 , 1 9 7 5 - 1 9 8 7 8 in A S E A N C o u n t r i e s , 1 9 8 8 institutions System Philippine - 11 in I n d o n e s i a , S e p t e m b e r 1989 13 in M a l a y s i a , 1 9 8 8 Financial System 17 (as o f D e c e m b e r Philippine Offshore Banking System and L i a b i l i t i e s , September 1989 S t a t e m e n t of in 1988)..19 the 20 Assets 22 T r u s t a n d F u n d s M a n a g e m e n t A s s e t s of C o m m e r c i a l in t h e P h i l i p p i n e s 31, Banks * 10 Money Market 11 Assets 12 Singapore Commercial Banks: Assets and Liabilities, 1 9 8 8 . . 27 13 14 F i n a n c i a l S y s t e m in T h a i l a n d , 1 9 8 8 B r i e f P r o f i l e of A c t i v i t i e s of Six T y p e s of I n s t i t u t i o n s in T h a i l a n d (as o f 1 9 8 4 ) 29 15 16 Institutions 24 of M o n e y M a r k e t in S i n g a p o r e , 1 9 8 8 Institutions E s t a b l i s h m e n t T r a d e in F i n a n c i a l of t h e P a c i f i c R e g i o n in S i n g a p o r e , 1 9 8 8 Services in Financial 30 Countries in ASEAN * 17 ASEAN: 18 Cross-Border Interbank Claims and Liabilities and Border Bank C r e d i t and D e p o s i t s , 1983 and 1988 19 Concentration 20 Intermediation Operating . . . 26 33 N u m b e r of O v e r s e a s B r a n c h e s of T o p T e n B a n k s Countries Intra-ASEAN 25 Commercial B a n k s , 1981 in A S E A N C o m m e r c i a l M a r g i n , 1983 and Banking 1986 35 Cross36 S y s t e m s , 1988 (Philippines) 3 4 ., .. 41 46 TRADE IN B A N K I N G S E R V I C E S Mario B. I. IN A S E A N COUNTRIES* Lamberte** INTRODUCTION S i n c e its e s t a b l i s h m e n t in 1 9 6 7 , A S E A N h a s e n j o y e d regional peace and s t a b i l i t y . This has been translated into high e c o n o m i c growth most envied by other regional groupings. ASEAN is, however, c o m p o s e d of f a i r l y h £ t e r o g e n e o u s c o u n t r i e s in t e r m s of level of development and d e g r e e of sophistication of their economy. Singapore belongs to the so-called "newlyindustrializing economies" (NIEs). I t s p e r c a p i t a G N P in 1 9 8 8 is more t h a n 20 t i m e s h i g h e r t h a n t h a t of I n d o n e s i a , w h i c h h a s the lowest per c a p i t a G N P in t h e r e g i o n . It w a s a l s o the fastest growing ASEAN member country in the 1980s (see Table 1). T h a i l a n d ' s e c o n o m i c g r o w t h in t h e 1 9 8 0 s w a s p h e n o m e n a l . This is likely going to b e s u s t a i n e d in t h e e a r l y 1 9 9 0 s w h e n the huge f o r e i g n i n v e s t m e n t s it r e c e i v e d in t h e l a t e 1 9 8 0 s a r e translated into increased p r o d u c t i v e c a p a c i t y . In c o n t r a s t , t h e P h i l i p p i n e s has a l o t of c a t c h i n g u p to d o in t h e 1 9 9 0 s . The political and economic turbulence it e n c o u n t e r e d t h r o u g h m u c h of the 1980s p r a c t i c a l l y s e t b a c k i t s c l o c k o f d e v e l o p m e n t to t h e 1 9 7 0 s . Its huge d e b t o v e r h a n g w i l l c o n t i n u e to c o n s t r a i n i t s g r o w t h in the medium term. *Paper presented during the UNCTAD/ESCAP Regional S e r v i c e s in B a n g k o k , T h a i l a n d on 6 - 9 A u g u s t 1 9 9 0 . **Vice-President, Studies (PIDS). Philippine Institute for Seminar on Development Table 1 BASIC INDICATORS: ASEAN INDICATORS 1. Per capita 6NP: 1988 (USt) Indonesia 438 Malaysia Philippines 1,878 638 Singapore Thailand 9,188 1,888 2. Ave. growth rate per capita 6DP: 1981-89 (Z) 2.4 2.2 -8.9 4.7 4.6 3. Ave. 6DP growth rate: 1981-89 (X) 5.2 5.4 l.B 6.9 7.1 4.1 1988 13.2 69.8 19.8 94.4 37.3 4.2 1987 26.9 124.3 28.7 184.8 64.9 S.l Agriculture 28.5 21.2 26.9 8.4 15.9 5.2 Industry 48.3 41.8 33.1 36.6 33.9 5.3 Services 39.3 38.7 41.8 63.8 98.5 35.8 53.8 41.8 61.8 25.8 4. Broad aoney/GNP (Z) 5. Sectoral shares of GDP: 1989 (Z) 6. Share of services in Eaployient: 1986 (Z) Sources: Lines 4 and 6 froa the World Bank's World Developaent Report (1989) and Quibria (1989), respectively; and the rest froa Asian Oevelopteot Bank's Asian Developaent Outlook (1998). 3 Financial d e e p e n i n g h a s t a k e n p l a c e in A S E A N countries in 1980s. Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand experienced a doubling o f t h e r a t i o o f br,oad m o n e y t o G N P , w h i c h is u s e d h e r e a s a r o u g h measure of financial deepening. Singapore has continued its process of financial deepening. A g a i n , the only exception in this impressive performance of ASEAN countries is the Philippines. A l i q u i d i t y c r i s i s s t r u c k t h e P h i l i p p i n e e c o n o m y in 1981, followed by a severe b a l a n c e of p a y m e n t s p r o b l e m in the mid-1980s. T h e s e r e s u l t e d in t h e c o l l a p s e o f s e v e r a l financial institutions, which practically shook the people's confidence in t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m a n d l e d to c a p i t a l f l i g h t . Over the past three decades, ASEAN economies have undergone a p r o c e s s of s t r u c t u r a l t r a n s f o r m a t i o n , s h i f t i n g t h e i r d e p e n d e n c e from agriculture to n o n - a g r i c u l t u r a l a c t i v i t i e s . The service sector has i n c r e a s i n g l y become an important p r o d u c t i v e sector in their e c o n o m i e s . In 1 9 8 9 , t h e s h a r e o f t h e s e r v i c e s e c t o r in t h e GDP of A S E A N c o u n t r i e s r a n g e d f r o m 39 p e r c e n t to 63 percent. T h e i r c o n t r i b u t i o n to e m p l o y m e n t in A S E A N c o u n t r i e s h a s a l s o b e e n significant. Q u i b r i a (1989) u n d e r s c o r e s the i m p o r t a n c e of the s e r v i c e s e c t o r in e c o n o m i c d e v e l o p m e n t : "The r o l e o f s e r v i c e s in e c o n o m i c d e v e l o p m e n t is far f r o m u n i l i n e a r . In m a n y c a s e s , d e v e l o p m e n t o f services is not a consequence but a cause of growth. For example, an efficient financial sector, an extensive transportation and telecommunication network and welj.-run public administration: all are preconditions of gfcowth and development. So is a we11-developed infrastructure of health and education services. T r a d i t i o n a l l y , the service sector has not been the s u b j e c t of c o n s c i o u s c o m p r e h e n s i v e p l a n n i n g . As a c o n s e q u e n c e , a l a c k o f p l a n n i n g m a y r e s u l t in the i n i t i a l u n d e r d e v e l o p m e n t o f k e y s e r v i c e s . " ( p . 1) The experience of Singapore serves service sector itself can be a growth to demonstrate sector. that the The quantity a n d q u a l i t y of t h e p r o d u c t s p r o d u c e d by the service s e c t o r of A S E A N c o u n t r i e s , h o w e v e r , g r e a t l y vary among each other. Ip S i n g a p o r e , t e c h n o l o g y - i n t e n s i v e s e r v i c e s (e.g., banking and telematics) are quite significant, while in I n d o n e s i a , t h e P h i l i p p i n e s a n d T h a i l a n d , t h e r e is a predominance of traditional, labor-intensive services (e.g., restaurants, retailing, etc.). Such d i v e r s i t y reflects the varying levels of economic development among ASEAN countries. T r a d e in s e r v i c e s h a s n o w b e c o m e a s u b j e c t o f t h e n e w round of multilateral negotiations. The issue here is basically s i m i l a r to t h e o n e t h a t e m e r g e d in e a r l i e r r o u n d o f negotiations o n t r a d e in g o o d s , i . e . , g r a d u a l l y d i s m a n t l i n g b a r r i e r s t o trade in services in s u c h a w a y t h a t b o t h developed and developing 4 economies can benefit. This is not going to be an easy undertaking. Firstly, trade in services has already been d o m i n a t e d b y d e v e l o p e d e c o n o m i e s , and further o p e n i n g up of this sector will certainly be met with strong resistance by developing economies. S e c o n d l y , t h e s e r v i c e s e c t o r is so h e t e r o g e n e o u s a n d include areas that are considered politically Sensitive. Notwithstanding these, t h e r e is a n e e d to c l o s e l y examine the i s s u e s o n t r a d e in s e r v i c e s s o t h a t m o r e e n l i g h t e n e d m u l t i l a t e r a l negotiations can p r o c e e d . This p a p e r f o c u s e s on the f i n a n c i a l s e c t o r . Interestingly, the pattern of net financial flows to ASEAN countries has s i g n i f i c a n t l y changed over the last thirteen y e a r s . Net private f l o w s s h a r p l y fell a f t e r the e x p l o s i o n of the i n t e r n a t i o n a l debt c r i s i s in 1 9 8 2 (see F i g u r e 1 a n d T a b l e 2 f o r d e t a i l s ) . This has some implications on the operations of branches/agencies/ representative o f f i c e s o f f o r e i g n b a n k s in t h e s e c o u n t r i e s . It is to b e n o t e d t h a t t h e y f a c i l i t a t e d t h e f l o w o f d i r e c t foreign i n v e s t m e n t s into these c o u n t r i e s and p r o v i d e banking services to multinational corporations. T h e y w e r e a l s o i n v o l v e d in p a c k a g i n g sovereign loans for A S E A N c o u n t r i e s . After the international debt crisis, their a c t i v i t i e s in t h e s e two areas have been considerably reduced because of the slowdown in foreign i n v e s t m e n t f l o w s and t h e u n a t t r a c t i v e n e s s of s o v e r e i g n l o a n s . The b a n k i n g s e c t o r is o n e o f t h e s e c t o r s w h i c h w i l l likely b e i n c l u d e d in t h e o n g o i n g m u l t i l a t e r a l n e g o t i a t i o n s o n t r a d e in s e r v i c e s . 1/ I t is e n v i s a g e d t h a t p i v o t a l i m p o r t a n c e which is attributed to t h e s e c t o r a n d t h 6 e x i s t e n c e o f v a r i o u s different banking services would make the establishment of norms and regulations in the area a particularly complex matter. This paper a n a l y z e s , in t h e C o n t e x t o f t h e A S E A N countries, various aspects which a r e d e e m e d r e l e v a n t to these negotiations, and explores t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f e x p a n d i n g t r a d e in b a n k i n g services a s a m e a n s to a c h i e v i n g h i g h e r a n d s u s t a i n a b l e e c o n o m i c g r o w t h of these countries. M o r e s p e c i f i c a l l y , it e x a m i n e s : 1) t h e s c o p e of b a n k i n g activities 2) the structures 3) the benefits international 4) the implications of t h e key discussed in t h e m u l t i l a t e r a l of m a r k e t s and in t h e A S E A N region; competition; and c o s t s of a m o r e liberal regime for t r a d e in b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s in t h e r e g i o n ; concepts and principles n e g o t i a t i o n s on t r a d e in 1/ Banking s e r v i c e s a r e a p a r t of f i n a n c i a l services. The latter, apart from banking services, include insurance, brokerage and services facilitating commodity and other goods trading (Iwata 1 9 8 8 ) . 5 Figure 1 NET FINANCIAL FLOWS TO ASEAN, 1975-1987 <ln US$ M) 3.500 INDONESIA 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 TOTAL OFFICIAL NET 824 1083 837 941 907 1321 1258 1579 1520 1839 1346 1458 3278 NET PRIVATE FLOWS 1803 1615 71 504 -477 459 3310 1291 1597 1470 470 136 -155 -0.500 t r 1075 1676 1077 1078 1070 1060 1961 1083 1083 1084 1065 1086 1087 • offlotal not +• rwlpHy flow MALAYSIA 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 TOTAL OFFICIAL NET 164 155 194 163 213 217 258 265 359 454 380 210 137 NET PRIVATE FLOWS 151 152 47 41 505 472 733 569 1391 965 -147 -226 92 T 1 7 1077 107H 1879 • cffoialnsf 1997 + nst prrv flows 6 Figure 1 {cont'd.) PHILIPPINES 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1981 1985 1986 1987 TOTAL OFFICIAL NET 293 380 351 422 605 534 860 621 1283 784 882 1132 970 NET PRIVATE FLOWS 108 705 365 639 548 442 383 323 260 162 -248 -41 -285 i i i i 1 1 1 i ~T 1875 1076 1077 1S7H 1070 1960 10B1 10B2 1BH3 10B4 I K 0 official not + n oflioiai rwl +• rwl priv flow nst priv flows SINGAPORE 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 TOTAL OFFICIAL NET 50 35 8 103 95 43 11 23 -30 87 -56 -189 -220 NET PRIVATE FLOWS 73 136 207 262 433 709 1374 891 222 1227 -211 79 947 10BS 1687 7 Figure 1 {cont'd.) THAILAND TOTAL OFFICIAL NET 1975 158 1976 230 1977 254 1978 408 1979 638 1980 731 1981 782 1982 822 1983 1031 1984 870 1985 806 1986 583 1987 378 NET PRIVATE FLOWS 30 -23 31 236 308 382 781 416 246 602 73 -9 547 -0.100 1975 1070 ci Source: Table 2 i T 1077 187B official rwt 1 1079 r 1080 i 10S1 1—:—r 1882 1903 not prw 1084 1SSS 1SS7 8 Table 2 NET FINANCIAL FLOHS TO ASEAN, 1970, 1975-1987 (In US* N) 1978 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1988 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1. INDONESIA A. TOTAL OFFICIAL NET 413 824 1B83 837 a. ODA Grants 118 153 142 161 b. ODA Loans 355 539 527 354 c. Other Official F I O M S , Net -52 132 415 322 B. NET PRIVATE FLOWS 116 1883 1615 71 a. Direct Investments 145 12B9 747 -67 b. Portfolio Investaents 12 18 382 16 c. Export Credits -42 584 566 123 941 192 444 386 584 418 113 -26 987 1321 281 296 448 653 1B6 372 -477 459 -383 388 -183 57 9 182 1258 324 652 .283 3318 2584 386 348 1579 315 592 673 1291 537 423 331 1528 316 428 776 1597 303 692 682 1839 327 346 1166 1478 494 47 929 1346 338 265 743 478 -311 376 406 1458 3278 379 480 332 766 747 2833 136 -155 -539 -565 551 438 124 -28 2. MALAYSIA A. TOTAL OFFICIAL NET 44 164 155 194 163 213 217 258 265 359 454 380 218 137 a. ODA Brants 17 32 28 38 36 68 61 58 60 64 93 103 189 133 b. ODA Loans 9 66 34 42 44 65 75 86 75 113 234 127 3 230 c. Other Official F I O H S , Net 18 65 9 3 123 83 88 82 115 138 182 127 158 18 - 2 2 6 B . NET PRIVATE F L O N S a. Direct Investaents b. Portfolio Investments c. Export Credits 45 38 8 8 151 152 47 41 585 472 733 569 1391 965 -147 -226 92 73 133 134 -5 77 242 252 -429 234 227 148 -182 377 -3 18 -124 56 65 22 118 671 928 625 -263 -41 -278 82 1 36 -10 363 289 371 326 229 113 -23 -82 -7 3. PHILIPPINES ' A. TOTAL OFFICIAL NET 146 293 388 351 422 685 534 860 621 1283 7B4 882 1132 970 a. ODA Grants 32 185 98 104 93 112 123 146 163 259 256 245 516 461 b. ODA Lows 14 75 89 79 156 156 188 238 178 178 141 242 448 314 c. Other Official F I O M S , Net 188 113 193 168 173 338 230 484 2 8 8 854 3 8 8 396 176 195 B . NET PRIVATE FLONS a. Direct Investaents b. Portfolio Investaents c. Export Credits 172 188 705 365 639 54B 442 383 323 268 162 - 2 4 8 -41 -285 -1 117 1§4 116 144 330 128 115 126 -168 167 -250 60 85 33 18 375 48 230 246 32 -32 132 334 -142 154 189 -169 140 -181 176 201 266 -28 282 301 65 95 137 -152 -289 -201 4. SIN6AP0RE 8 183 95 43 11 23 A. TOTAL OFFICIAL NET 62 58 35 7 12 13 19 23 23 a. ODA 6rants 15 7 8 6 -5 -7 -5 -2 -2 b. ODA Loans 14 6 5 3 c. Other Official F I O M S , Net 33 37 23 -5 96 89 29 -11 B. NET PRIVATE F L O N S 53 73 136 287 262 433 789 1374 891 a. Direct Investaents 16 71 67 86 147 355 658 988 280 b. Portfolio Investaents 1 27 86 100 127 -11 18 154 288 c. Export Credits 36 -24 -17 21 -13 89 41 240 323 5. THAILAND A. TOTAL OFFICIAL NET 126 158 238 254 488 638 731 a. ODA Grants 55 53 126 64 184 147 178 b. ODA Loans 28 37 44 68 157 246 240 c. Other Official F I O M S , Net 52 78 61 121 147 245 313 B. NET PRIVATE FLOHS 73 38 -23 31 236 308 382 a. Direct Investaents 14 19 18 42 38 38 .218 b. Portfolio Investaents 10 8 -9 -9 125 205 35 c. Export Credits 49 12 -33 -3 72 65 130 782 198 217 375 781 219 159 404 -30 87 -56 -189 -220 21 28 28 37 32 -7 13 -4 -7 -8 -45 46 -80 -218 -244 222 1227 -211 79 947 418 865 252 682 781 -99 339 -402 -511 371 -97 23 -62 -12 -124 822 1031 185 218 284 222 433 599 416 246 128 200 79 112 209 -66 878 248 226 396 602 348 306 -52 Source: Lee, Jungsoo and I.P. David. 'Changing Pattern of Financial FIOMS to Asian and Pacific Developing Countries." ADB Statistical Report Series No. 11 (March 1989). 806 264 217 325 73 -98 240 -70 583 388 188 87 -9 -6 133 -136 378 322 184 -129 547 459 117 -29 9 services and 5) sector in t h e A S E A N countries; the p o s s i b i l i t y of i n c r e a s i n g c o m p e t i t i v e n e s s of banks in ASEAN countries and increasing their share of international trade in banking services including through regional c o o p e r a t i o n and the U r u g u a y Round of t r a d e n e g o t i a t i o n s on s e r v i c e s . A section objectives. II. to t h e b a n k i n g will SCOPE OF B A N K I N G be devoted ACTIVITIES to each IN T H E A S E A N of these specific REGION Although still underdeveloped relative to the financial systems of the OECD c o u n t r i e s , the financial systems of ASEAN countries have already achieved a certain degree of sophistication. This may be gathered from the great number and variety of financial institutions that have emerged in ASEAN countries in the last two d e c a d e s , the m u l t i t u d e of financial services being o f f e r e d , and the financial instruments that have been created. T h e s e d e v e l o p m e n t s c o u l d b e a t t r i b u t e d to several factors. One is t h a t A S E A N c o u n t r i e s s t a r t e d the process of liberalizing their financial s y s t e m in t h e 1970s, albeit at varying degree and s p e e d . T h a t p r o c e s s is s t i l l b e i n g p u r s u e d a t present. The response of the financial systems in ASEAN c o u n t r i e s to l i b e r a l i z a t i o n h a s g e n e r a l l y b e e n p o s i t i v e . Another is t h e t e c h n o l o g i c a l a d v a n c e m e n t in b a n k i n g t h a t f a c i l i t a t e d the i m p r o v e m e n t o f e x i s t i n g s e r v i c e s a n d r e s u l t e d in t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n of new services at a much reduced cost to both banks and customers. T h e i n t r o d u c t i o n o f a u t o m a t e d t e l l e r m a c h i n e s is one example. C o m p u t e r i z a t i o n h a s a l s o a l l o w e d b a n k s to o f f e r s a v i n g s deposit instruments whose interest is compounded daily. Interestingly, this is one area where banking technology developed in advanced economies can be easily copied by less developed countries at least cost, especially if certain i n f r a s t r u c t u r e s , such as electricity and t e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s , are readily available, a n d if t h e p o p u l a t i o n are generally welleducated. Still another f a c t o r is the generally impressive e c o n o m i c g r o w t h o f A S E A N e c o n o m i e s w h i c h r e s u l t e d in t h e c h a n g i n g demand for financial services by the corporate sector, individuals, and institutional investors. T h i s h a s led to the emergence of new t y p e s of financial institutions, like the merchant b a n k s in M a l a y s i a a n d S i n g a p o r e , t h e o f f s h o r e b a n k s in the Philippines and Singapore, among others. A wide range of instruments has also been introduced by existing andnewlycreatedfinancial institutions. E x a m p l e s of these instruments a r e b a n k e r s a c c e p t a n c e s , n e g o t i a b l e c e r t i f i c a t e of d e p o s i t s , and other deposit substitutes. Banks have recently expanded their f e e - b a s e d s e r v i c e s or o f f - b a l a n c e s h e e t a c t i v i t i e s . T h i s is m o s t e v i d e n t in S i n g a p o r e , M a l a y s i a , t h e P h i l i p p i n e s a n d T h a i l a n d . 10 It is to be noted that the monetary authorities and governments in ASEAN countries have played a great role in developing their respective financial infrastructure. In the main, they determine and regulate what kinds of activities a financial institution, whether owned by the g o v e r n m e n t or the private s e c t o r , c a n do,. E a c h t y p e o f f i n a n c i a l institution is t h e r e f o r e c o v e r e d b y s p e c i f i c s e t of r e g u l a t i o n s . For prudential reasons, t h e k i n d s of a c t i v i t i e s a l l o w e d f o r d i f f e r e n t t y p e s of financial institutions are associated with different minimum capital requirements. E x c e p t f o t S i n g a p o r e , g o v e r n m e n t s in A S E A N countries f o r c e t h e i r b a n k s to p e r f o r m d e v e l o p m e n t a l functions. Thus, loan p o r t f o l i o r e q u i r e m e n t s , t h a t is r e q u i r i n g banks to lend a c e r t a i n a m o u n t of t h e i r t o t a l l o a n a b l e f u n d s to specific s e c t o r , a r e n o t u n c o m m o n in t h e r e g i o n . In g e n e r a l , f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s in A S E A N c o u n t r i e s m a y b e distinguished by the t y p e s of l i a b i l i t i e s and a s s e t s they are legally allowed to h o l d . Banking institutions are allowed to mobilize t r a d i t i o n a l d e p o s i t s (such as d e m a n d , s a v i n g s and time d e p o s i t s ) , whereas nonbank financial institutions are n o t . Among banking institutions, some are restricted to mobilize only certain t y p e s of d e p o s i t s d i s t i n g u i s h e d b y d e g r e e o f liquidity, maturity, size, etc. The nonbanking institutions are fairly numerous and h e t e r o g e n e o u s even within the same ASEAN country. S t i l l , in t e r m s of a s s e t s , t h e y a r e s m a l l r e l a t i v e to t h e b a n k i n g institutions. H o w e v e r , t h e y h a v e s h o w n to b e i n n o v a t i v e a n d h a v e p u t up c o m p e t i t i o n w i t h b a n k s . . In the past, competition was encouraged, but this was limited only to f i n a n c i a l - i n s t i t u t i o n s b e l o n g i n g to the same category. This r e s u l t e d in t h e s e g m e n t a t i o n of the financial markets. A t p r e s e n t , t h e r e is a m o v e t o w a r d s u n i v e r s a l banking. This requires t h e r e d u c t i o n or b l u r r i n g of distinction among different types of f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s . Singapore is way ahead in this new approach, followed by Malaysia and the Philippines. The ongoing financial reforms in Indonesia and Thailand also suggest sucn trend. 2 / T a b l e 3 s h o w s b a n k i n g d e n s i t y r a t i o s in A S E A N c o u n t r i e s . It roughly i n d i c a t e s the e x t e n t of a c c e s s of the p o p u l a t i o n of the ASEAN c o u n t r i e s to t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e b a n k i n g s y s t e m s . The ratio tends to v a r y i n v e r s e l y w i t h the level of development of the c o u n t r i e s c o n c e r n e d ; t h a t i s , p o p u l a t i o n in m o r e d e v e l o p e d ASEAN c o u n t r i e s h a s b e t t e r a c c e s s to b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s c o m p a r e d to t h o s e 2/ In I n d o n e s i a , t h e d e r e g u l a t i o n p a c k a g e s w e r e incorporated in PACTO 27 ( O c t o b e r 1 9 8 8 ) , P A K O E S II ( D e c e m b e r 1988), PAKMAR (March 1989) and PAKJAN (January 1 9 9 0 ) . in m * in in in to * CM vo •sf m s CM « • <N ON CM VO VO in •h RO 53 00 • 00 in cs ON • vo rH «N vo m ro cs> in * vo rH • r- RH 30 in * rH CN (N ** r- C o •rl rH rH •H B C •H " — c o •H •P (0 iH aO cu (0 -rH TO (V c o TJ c M )H 0 6u • nj OQ ,fl ® -H Q Oi^ • Q < a —c o « s <0i •• VI O <3\ C m £ z -H rH f-l rH fcj "H M — c c <u <v £(0>f4O <0Q.TJ ® -Hc -4J a r a n • c — <o IT> rH 0 0 <H A IQ «H JC — • >o c ® N10<4-1 to Q iTl ' H l U H r l 00 r-tfljJ3 00 TO 4J •hW at-H gi .Q W a O i H rl ^ o c XI M o X o o « 3 <0 •H J* o to a s iH •p o111 go : • Oo a> c • 3 U C (0 OQ c o T> £QlS <0c O sa> to *> Ql I 4-) •u TO H >, O•n Z TO TO c <U - flj <9 •H rt C a> Ctffl)rH Cu TO e a <a £ UW -Ho Q o < s oo CU 4J 00 CP O •rH 3 c jj s c <n 41 C - P •l-l • a> > TO MC 00 00 5 " -p a> <o -U O E-H-U • g TO 10 <n O O 10 III 10 U U C /a >H Q 0) O O H c C M C MH <0 a> o (o -h jd a» ^ 0) J 3 £ 0 •H <P U TO C D S Q i C K Q 'rt C Q» (0 -H 10 MH £ o> ih >,-H <u m OQ i— in( Oc o M I C •«"• rH -H (0 MH Q« O J3 (0 0 C W O c <U (0 M C S 4J (0 Cu O TO o : 91 <1) C C •H (0 € • JS 01 -h KH 4-» • Q,i~t 4J U fcj • KH M B Q i O 91 S t3 • <U rH U-l •• C O -H S < H < U 4 J O < I I • «j >i to Ql-H > a> rH (0 rH 00 rH <D o s; <0 j* -h c -h on c u •HDJQCCC*H(0<H O -H a» a io « 6 s: <4H > - ^ X CQ E <2 E-« H TO l«H a) (0 (0 I — a) <u o Q^-H<l)rH UH •o <ou<U(os-Hoe •ri a> ^3U -Hc •Mc(0 3. C(0U M•p ai J3 MU CT C C C to (0 C (U C AS TO W -iH *H (U <0 a •H c y tu uj U W frn CQ — <0 TO jQ *rl (N m vo £ UH EH O TO <D • • u w •P 3 o O z w ON < r^ rH o\ TS rH CM CM M (U rQ e 3 C sz-p<D a <7\ <Ti TO <U O -(H KH «4H O c •rH c (0 MH o • o z m <s VO ro (N >1 •p •H TO c (U TJ cn C •H Cn CQ < 12 in l e s s d e v e l o p e d o n e s . 3 / O n l y S i n g a p o r e c a n comipare w i t h more developed e c o n o m i e s in t h i s a r e a . It is to b e no-ted that most b a n k s a n d t h e i r b r a n c h e s a r e c o n c e n t r a t e d in u r b a n ' a r e a s , l e a v i n g tne countryside with very little access to banking services. This problem is m o s t a c u t e in I n d o n e s i a , the Philippines and Thailand. Tne nunjerous and sitiall banks that have been e s t a b l i s h e d in t h e c o u n t r y s i d e h a v e m e r e l y s e r v e d a s c o n d u i t s of government funds. H e n c e , they do not truly provide banking s e r v i c e s to r u r a l p e o p l e . A f t e r g i v i n g an o v e r v i e w of t h e b a n k i n g a c t i v i t i e s of ASEAN countries, we now briefly describe the scope of banking activities in e a c h of t h e A S E A N m e m b e r c o u n t r i e s . Less emphasis w i l l b e g i v e n to a c t i v i t i e s o f n o n b a n k i n g i n s t i t u t i o n s . A. INDONESIA T h e f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m in I n d o n e s i a c o n s i s t s o f d e p o s i t money b a n k s , rural financial i n s t i t u t i o n s , savings b a n k s , and d i f f e r e n t types of nonbank f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s (see T a b l e 4 ) . 4 / In terms of assets, deposit money banks dominate the financial system. Deposit money fa&nks may be classified according to ownership. There are five banks that are wholly owned by the Indonesian government. A r n d t (1987) s u c c i n c t l y d e s c r i b e s their a c t i v i t i e s in t h e f o l l o w i n g m a n n e r : "Except in foreign exchange business where the foreign banks are i m p o r t a n t , the state commercial b a n k s , favoured by a w i d e variety of privileges, from tax exemptions, subsidies and rediscount f a c i l i t i e s to a v i r t u a l m o n o p o l y o f g o v e r n m e n t a n d other public sector banking business, provide the bulk o f b a n k i n g f a c i l i t i e s in t h e i r b r a n c h e s all over the country. They hold the major part of demand and time deposits, manage customers' a c c o u n t s , o r g a n i z e t r a n s f e r s of f u n d s d o m e s t i c a l l y and internationally, cooperate in clearing of inter-bank d e b t s , and conduct the w h o l e range of loan b u s i n e s s , from Short-term trade credit and p e r s o n a l l o a n s to m e d i u m a n d l o n g e r - t e r m l o a n s to t h e s t a t e and p r i v a t e c o r p o r a t e s e c t o r . " (p. 3 0 6 ) 3/ In 1 9 8 2 , the d e n s i t y r a t i o n for A u s t r a l i a , New Zealand, U n i t e d S t a t e s , a n d C a n a d a r a n g e d f r o m 3 , 0 0 0 to 6 , 0 0 0 a s compared with Singapore's 11,000. But this hides the fact that Singapore a l s o p l a y s a s a l e a d i n g f i n a n c i a l c e n t e r in t h e r e g i o n . 1/ US$1. A s of 14 A u g u s t 1990, the exchange rate was Rpl845.02 per Table 4 I N S T I T U T I O N S IN I N D O N E S I A SEPTEMBER 1989 FINANCIAL T y p e of F i n a n c i a l Deposit Money Banks Institution (DMBs): N u m b e r of Head Offices Total Assets (Rp.bil.) */. 141 83,740 8 6 .3 State Banks J o i n t V e n t u r e 1/ Foreign Bank Branches 5 12 10 51,450 5 1 .8 4,626 4 .7 Development Banks BAPINDO Regional Development Private 29 1 27 1 6,384 3,886 2,498 6 .4 3 .9 2 .5 — — 85 64 21 23,469 7,510 15,959 2 3 .6 7 .6 16 . 1 7,713 7,236 477 579 55 524 0 .6 0 .1 0 .5 Savings Banks: State Savings Bank (BTN) Private Savings Banks 1 4 2,531 2 .5 Pawnshops 2/ 1 152 0 .2 (DANAREKSA) 1 298 0 .3 Nonbank Financial Institutions: Development Finance Institutions Investment Finance Institutions Housing Finance (Papan Sejahtera) 13 3 9 1 3,564 837 2,413 314 3 0 2 0 .6 .8 .4 .3 130 30 77 5 4 14 3,906 799 844 1,930 333 3 0 0 1 0 .9 .8 .9 .9 .3 Banks Private Banks Nonforeign Exchange Foreign Exchange Rural Financial Institutions: Existing before PAKTO Established after PAKTO (State-owned) State Securities & Investment Fund Insurance s Life Loss Social Insurance Reinsurers Adjusters Co. 3/ - - - — - 14 Table 4 (cont'd.) T y p e of Financial Institution N u m b e r of Head Offices Total Assets (Rp.bil.) */. P e n s i o n F u n d s 4/ TASPEN Others Securities Companies Brokers/Dealers 130 1 129 7 129 1,329 1,105 224 — — Nondeposit Financial Institutions: Leasing Companies Factoring Venture Capital Credit Card Consumer Finance 154 101 14 7 11 21 — - T Notes: 1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ Source: 0 T A L 8,424 1.3 1.1 0.2 — — 1,195 1.2 — — — - — — — — 99,294 100.0 These banks are joint-ventures between Indonesian and foreign banks. T h e r e is o n e P a w n s h o p o f f i c e with 487 branch o f f i c e s . I n c l u d e s A S A B R I , t h e m i l i t a r y e m p l o y e e s s o c i a l insur— ance fund. E x c l u d e s u n k n o w n m e m b e r of p e n s i o n f u n d s t h a t a r e n o t r e g i s t e r e d w i t h the M i n i s t r y of F i n a n c e . C o l e , D a v i d C . and B e t t y F . S l a d e . " D e v e l o p m e n t of M o n e y M a r k e t s in I n d o n e s i a . " U n p u b l i s h e d (1990). 15 In a d d i t i o n to w h a t A r n d t had m e n t i o n e d / s t a t e c o m m e r c i a l banks are also allowed to issue three types of certificates of deposits: discount, monthly interest payment, and balloon interest and principal payment. In t h e a s s e t s i d e , they were s u p p o s e d to s p e c i a l i z e in l e n d i n g to a f e w s e c t o r s * b u t o v e r the y e a r s , they have progressively overlapped each other so that the d i s t i n c t i o n s b e t w e e n them h a v e b e e n r e d u c e d to a m i n i m u m . Like state banks, private national commercial banks raise funds by issuing demand and time d e p o s i t l i a b i l i t i e s . Although permitted to lend at a n y m a t u r i t y , they tend to concentrate in the provision of s h o r t - t e r m loans (usually 6 m o n t h s or less). This is not unusual among private commercial banks in ASEAN, countries. Private national commercial banks used to be classified into foreign exchange and nonforeign exchange banks. But under the October 1988 d e r e g u l a t i o n p a c k a g e (called PACTO 27), n o n f o r e i g n e x c h a n g e b a n k s m a y d e a l in f o r e i g n exchange if c l a s s i f i e d " s o u n d " in 20 of l a s t 24 m o n t h s a n d t h e i r t o t a l a s s e t s are greater than Rpl00 B . Foreign b a n k s h a v e a w i d e r a r r a y of s o u r c e s of f u n d s , such as d e m a n d , savings and time deposits as well as borrowing from the international markets. They may also engage in currency swaps with Bank Indonesia, the central bank of Indonesia, or b o r r o w in t h e i n t e r b a n k m a r k e t f o r r u p i a h f u n d s . Foreign banks' loans have b e e n c o n c e n t r a t e d in t h e o v e r d r a f t s and short-term facilities. A n y i n v e s t m e n t l o a n s t h e y w a n t to m a k e n e e d special permission from Bank Indonesia. Most of the multinational companies in I n d o n e s i a , p r e f e r t o b a n k w i t h ttiem. T o g e t h e r with more than 50 representative offices of foreign banks in I n d o n e s i a , f o r e i g n b a n k s h a d b e e n i n v o l v e d in o n e w a y or another in the negotiation of foreign loans and foreign direct investment. Development banks consist of one state-owned bank, 27 development banks which are either directly owned by local authorities or. j o i n t l y o w n e d b y l o c a l a u t h o r i t i e s and private s e c t o r , and one privately-owned b a n k . T h e s e b a n k s c o n c e n t r a t e in investment l o a n s , and m e d i u m - and long-term l o a n s . The stateowned development bank raises funds by accepting demand and time d e p o s i t s , and borrowing from Bank Indonesia, the government, and f o r e i g n l o n g - t e r m s o u r c e s of f u n d s . The local development banks are a l l o w e d to issue time and s a v i n g s d e p o s i t s . They may also have refinancing arrangement with the state-owned development bank. The savings banks include one state-owned bank and four privately owned banks. The state-owned savings bank mobilizes deposits through the post office network. These savings are used to m e e t t h e c r e d i t r e q u i r e m e n t s o f l o w - i n c o m e s e c t o r s . The Indonesian government has equity participation in several nonbank financial intermediaries. Interestingly, foreign 16 i n s t i t u t i o n s h a v e m i n o r i t y p a r t i c i p a t i o n in a l m o s t a l l o f t h e 12 nonbank financial intermediariesj C o l e and S l a d e (1990) d e s c r i b e the a c t i v i t i e s of n o n b a n k f i n a n c i a l i n t e r m e d i a r i e s as f o l l o w s : " t h e y d e a l in f o r e i g n e x c h a n g e , c o m m e r c i a l paper, long-term s t o c k s and b o n d s , SBIs and SBPUs, and C D s , a s w e l l a s in m a n y b a n k i n g o p e r a t i o n s . They serve a s ' a g e n t s ' for S t a t e - o w n e d b a n k purchases o f S B I s a n d a s " m a r k e t m a k e r s " in t h e S B I m a r k e t . " (p. 2 5 ) . 5 / B. MALAYSIA T a b l e 5 shows the f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m of M a l a y s i a . In t e r m s of assets, the banking institutions have dominated the s y s t e m . 6/ The banking system consists of commercial banks, finance companies, merchant banks, discount houses and a Specialized commercial bank that offers commercial banking servides based on Islamic principles. P a r t i c i p a t i o n o f b r a n c h e s of f o r e i g n banks in t h e M a l a y s i a n b a n k i n g s y s t e m is q u i t e s u b s t a n t i a l . Commercial banks in M a l a y s i a c a r r y the usual commercial banking functions in b o t h t h e l i a b i l i t y a n d the asset sides. They are the o n l y ones licensed as full trading and c h e q u e - p a y i n g banks (Lin et a l . 1990) . They are also allowed to deal in foreign e x c h a n g e and to o f f e r a v a r i e t y of fee-based services. They m a y i n v e s t in s h a r e s of p u b l i c a n d p r i v a t e c o m p a n i e s u p to 50 p e r c e n t of t h e i r c a p i t a l b a s e . The most important restriction in t h e i r l i a b i l i t y - s i d e is t h a t t h e y a r e n o t a l l o w e d to accept d e p o s i t s of less t h a n o n e - m o n t h m a t u r i t y . Finance companies cater to the mediumand long-term markets. T h e y a r e a l l o w e d to a c c e p t s a v i n g s a n d f i x e d deposits of t h r e e - m o n t h m a t u r i t y or m o r e b u t n o t d e m a n d deposits. They a r e n o t p e r m i t t e d to d e a l in f o r e i g n e x c h a n g e n o r g r a n t l o a n s in the form of o v e r d r a f t s . Their loans are mostly of long-term maturity. Merchant banks operate in both the: c a p i t a l and money markets. In the capital markets, they provide underwriting facilities, corporate financing, financial investment, management advice and portfolio investment management. In the money m a r k e t s , t h e y e n g a g e in t h e t r a d i n g o f m o n e y m a r k e t instruments. ~ SBI s t a n d s for S e r t i f i c a t B a n k I n d o n e s i a , a d i s c o u n t b i l l , which is a l i a b i l i t y o f B a n k I n d o n e s i a . SBPU stands for Surat B e r h a r g a P a s a r U a n g , w h i c h i s a n o t h e r i n s t r u m e n t u s e d in t h e o p e n m a r k e t o p e r a t i o n s of B a n k I n d o n e s i a . 6/ US$1. As of 14 A u g u s t 1990, the exchange rate was M$2.7tf per 17 THE Table 5 S Y S T E M IN M A L A Y S I A , FINANCIAL 1988 j. Type I. BANKINS of N u m b e r of Head Assets Offices <M« M) Institutions INSTITUTIONS Commercial Banks Domestic Foreign Islamic Bank Finance Merchant Banks Discount Houses TOTAL II. NQNBANK FINANCIAL 38 22 16 1 47 12 7 93,021 69,500 23,521 1,429 24,283 7,026 2,211 31.87 23.81 8.06 0.49 8.32 2.41 0.76 143 220,991 75.71 7 14 10 105 7 3,500 2,487 47,490 7,011 10,401 1.20 0.85 16.27 2.40 3.56 143 70,889 S3SSSSSS 24.29 INTERMEDIARIES Development Finance Institutions Savings Institutions P r o v i d e n t P e n s i o n F u n d s 1/ Insurance Companies O t h e r F i n a n c i a l I n t e r m e d i a r i e s 1/ TOTAL === G 1/ Sources R 7. A Only N D six T large O T ones A are L 286 291,880 — — — 100.00 included. Lin, See-Yan et al. "Regional Research Project: M o n e y M a r k e t s in A s i a . " U n p u b l i s h e d (1990). Study of 18 Merchant banks a r e a l l o w e d to a c c e p t o n l y l a r g e term deposits from financial institutions (not less than M$250,000 per deposit), corporations (not l e s s t h a n M $ 1 M p e r deposit), and foreign currency deposits from nonresidents (not less than M$250,000 per d e p o s i t ) . Discount h o u s e s o p e r a t e m a i n l y in t h e m o n e y m a r k e t s . They are p e r m i t t e d to a c c e p t f u n d s at c a l l or s h o r t - t e r m d e p o s i t s of up to t h r e e m o n t h s w i t h a m i n i m u m d e n o m i n a t i o n of M $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 from financial institutions, corporations, Federal, State, and local governments. Thus, they provide those with temporary surplus funds with an a l t e r n a t i v e investment o u t l e t . The funds they raised a r e m a i n l y i n v e s t e d in g o v e r n m e n t s e c u r i t i e s . They are n o t a l l o w e d to l e n d to t h e p u b l i c . C. THE PHILIPPINES The structure of the P h i l i p p i n e f i n a n c i a l system is not entirely different from the rest of ASEAN countries. The financial institutions may be g r o u p e d into banking and nonbanking financial institutions, with the former dominating the system in t e r m s of a s s e t s (see T a b l e 6 ) . 7 / The Government's presence in both categories is substantial. Foreign participation in t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m is a l s o significant. Like the r e s t o f t h e A S E A N c o u n t r i e s , t h e P h i l i p p i n e s is a l s o moving towards universal banking and the reduction in the d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n a m o n g d i f f e r e n t t y p e s of b a n k c a t e g o r i e s . Table 7 g i v e s a s u m m a r y of t h e a u t h o r i z e d a c t i v i t i e s o f various bank c a t e g o r i e s in t h e P h i l i p p i n e s . L e a s i n g is t h e o n l y a c t i v i t y t h a t is a b s o l u t e l y n o t a l l o w e d to u n i v e r s a l a n d ordinary commercial banks. O n t h e o t h e r h a n d , o t h e r t y p e s o f b a n k s ipay n o w obtain authority to p e r f o r m f u n c t i o n s t h a t used to be r e s e r v e d o n l y to commercial banks provided they meet certain criteria, like minimum capital requirement. The Philippines has an o f f s h o r e banking system which is patterned after Singapore's. There were 21 offshore banking units (OBUs) as of D e c e m b e r 1988 w i t h t o t a l a s s e t s of U S $ 2 . 7 B . T h i s d o e s n o t c o m p a r e w i t h t h o s e in S i n g a p o r e . OBUs may use any c u r r e n c y , e x c e p t d o m e s t i c c u r r e n c y , in t h e i r t r a n s a c t i o n s . Thus, they do not have swap facilities. They cannot accept deposits in foreign currency less than US$50,000. The purpose of establishing OBUs w a s to i n c r e a s e l o c a l residents' access to foreign currency funds. This may have been attained as suggested by the d a t a in T a b l e 8 , w h i c h s h o w s t h a t m o s t o f t h e funds of OBUs were lent o n s h o r e . Recently, the Philippine commercial banks have active in their off-balance sheet activities. V US$1. As of 14 A u g u s t 1990, the exchange rate was- been These P24.20 very are per 19 THE Table 6 PHILIPPINE FINANCIAL SYSTEM (As o f D e c e m b e r 3 1 , 1 9 8 8 ) N u m b e r of Head Offices BANKING SYSTEM Amount .(* B ) 982 29 24 1 4 299.3 224.6 38.8 35.9 72.0 === = 59.8 44.9 7.8 7.2 Thrift Banks -Savings & mortgaye banks -Private development banks -Stock savings & loan a s s o c i a t i o n s 110 8 41 61 24.9 14.2 6.7 4.0 5.0 2.8 1.3 0.8 Rural 840 10.7 2.1 3 25.2 5.0 2,766 140.2 28.0 Insurance Companies -Government -Private 135 4 131 98.3 68.6 29.7 19.6 13.7 5.9 Investment Institutions -Financing companies -Investment companies -Investment houses 233 143 75 15 21.4 7.4 5.6 8.4 4.3 1.5 1.1 1.7 12 2,386 1.8 18.7 0.4 3.7 3,758 500.3 100.0 = = = Commercial Banks -Private -Government -Foreign Banks Specialized NONBANK Government FINANCIAL Banks INTERMEDIARIES T r u s t O p e r a t i o n s (fund m a n a g e r s ) Other Financial Intermediaries T Sources: T A L Philippine Financial Fact Book I n s u r a n c e C o m m i s s i o n (for d a t a c o m p a n i e s in 1 9 8 8 ) ; a n d Government Corporate Monitoring C o m m i t t e e , f o r t h e a s s e t s of Government Service Insurance 360.1 % (1988); on i n s u r a n c e and Coordinating Social Security System S y s t e m in 1 9 8 8 . and Table 7 AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES OF VARIOUS BANK CATE60RIES IN THE PHILIPPINES BASED ON THE AMENDED BANKING LANS (1) Authorized Activities (2) (3) Thrift Banks Expanded Coaaercial Banks . Rural Coaaercial (KBs) Savings & Private Savings Banks Banks Mortgage Dev. and Loan (Unibank) Domestic Foreign Banks Banks Association A. Coaaercial Banking Services 1. Accept deposits 2. Issue LCs and accept drafts 3. Discounting of proaissory notes and coaaercial papers 4. Foreign exchange transactions S. Lend aoney against security 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a/ 1 a/ 1 a/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 B. Nationwide Branching Operations 1 1 1 1 1 1 C. Equity Investments in Allied Undertakings 11 11 11 11 11 11 1 * t * t * 11 11 11 F. Issue Real Estate and Chattel Mortgage, Bonds Buy and Sell These for its Otin Account, Accept/ Receive in Payaent or as Anortization of Loan 1 1 1 1 1 1 6. Direct Borrowing with Central Bank 1 1 1 1 1. 1 D. Equity Investments in Non-allied Undertakings E. Trust Operation U 11 U Table 7 (cont'd) (1) Authorized Activities (2) (3) Thrift Banks Expanded Commercial Banks Rural Couercial (KBs) Savings ft Private Savings Banks Banks Mortgage Dev. and Loan (Unibank) Domestic Foreign Banks Banks Association H. Activities of an Investaent House 1. Securities undemriting 2. Syndication activities 3. Business development and project implementation 4. Financial consultancy and Investment 5. Mergers and consolidation 6. Research and studies 7, Lease real and/or personal properties I. Money Market Operation 1 * t » « 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 » t t 1 ) « 1 1 b/ 1 b/ 1 b/ 1 1/ t b/ t b/ t b/ 1 t 1 I - Authorized activities II - Authorized but subjected to aonetary board approval t - Not authorized/prohibited a/ Liaited only to doaestic LCs and drafts, b/ The lending side aay be done by all banks Nithout The borrowing side (quasi-banking) aay be exercis CB approval for all banks. Source: Laaberte, Hario B. "The Financial Systea of the Unpublished (July 1998). iroval. prior Operations and Problems.' Table 8 PHILIPPINE OFFSHORE BANKING SYSTEM S T A T E M E N T OF A S S E T S AND L I A B I L I T I E S , S E P T E M B E R Items OS$ ASSETS N o t e s and C o i n s on H a n d Due from Banks - Outs'.de t h e P h i l i p p i n e s - In t h e P h i l i p p i n e s L o a n s a n d D i s c o u n t s to C u s t o m e r s Other than Banks - Nonresidents - Residents Public Sector Private Sector Bills Discounted/Purchased - Nonresidents - Residents I n v e s t m e n t in B o n d s a n d O t h e r S e c u r i t i e s - Nonresidents - Residents All Other Assets - Interest Receivable Nonresidents Residents - O t h e r A s s e t s in t h e P h i l i p p i n e s - other Assets Outside the Philippines Total Assets L e s s : A l l o w a n c e for P r o b a b l e Total Assets After Allowance LIABILITIES D e p o s i t of N o n r e s i d e n t s O t h e r D u e to B a n k s Outside the Philippines In t h e P h i l i p p i n e s Other Liabilities Interest Payable Nonresidents Residents In t h e P h i l i p p i n e s Outside the Philippines Total Source: Losses for L o s s e s than Banks Liabilities Foreign Central Exchange Regulations Department, B a n k of t h e P h i l i p p i n e s . 1989 (Million) 0 1,506 359 1,147 1,096 115 981 481 500 1 0 1 28 20 8 86 40 8 32 45 1 2,717 20 2,697 40 2,554 2,205 349 103 37 33 4 31 35 2,697 23 activities t h a t g e n e r a t e income for b a n k s w i t h o u t e x p a n d i n g a s s e t p o r t i o n of t h e i r s t a n d a r d b a l a n c e s h e e t . Table 9 shows phenomenal growth of these activities among universal commercial banks. D. the the and SINGAPORE Singapore has the largest and m o s t s o p h i s t i c a t e d financial system in the ASEAN region. It is considered as the fifth l a r g e s t f o r e i g n e x c h a n g e c e n t e r in t h e w o r l d t o d a y ( A r i f f e t al. 1990). Its financial system consists of commercial banks, merchant banks, finance companies, national savings bank, discount h o u s e s a n d i n t e r n a t i o n a l m o n e y b r o k e r s (see Tables 10 and 1 1 ) . 8/ Given its h i g h l y open p o l i c y and liberal exchange rate p o l i c y , the n u m b e r of f o r e i g n b a n k s i n c r e a s e d tremendously and has m a d e a v e r y s i g n i f i c a n t c o n t r i b u t i o n to its financial system. All commercial banks may obtain from the monetary a u t h o r i t i e s a n a u t h o r i t y to t r a n s a c t in t h e A s i a n D o l l a r Market. T h e y a r e , h o w e v e r , d i s t i n g u i s h e d b y the e x t e n t of t h e i r domestic banking business permitted by the m o n e t a r y authorities. Both f o r e i g n a n d l o c a l f u l l _ l i c e n s e b a n k s a r e a u t h o r i z e d to e n g a g e in the entice range of domestic banking business. Restricted license banks can perform domestic banking functions, but they are not p e r m i t t e d to a c c e p t s a v i n g s a n d fixed deposits below S$250,000 from the nonbank p u b l i c . The offshore license banks are a u t h o r i z e d to e n g a g e in a n y t r a n s a c t i o n s with nonresident^ e x c e p t t h a t t h e y c a n n o t a c c e p t d e p o s i t s in a n y c u r r e n c y or fixed deposits below S$250,000. A l s o , they a r e n o t a l l o w e d to accept any i n t e r e s t b e a r i n g d e p o s i t s from r e s i d e n t n o n b a n k c u s t o m e r s nor lend to t h e m in e x c e s s . o f S $ 5 0 M ( T y a b j i 1 9 8 9 ) . This has made offshore banks in Singapore regionally and internationally oriented. 9/ T h i s is s u p p o r t e d b y t h e d a t a in Table 12. The shares of the items "amount due to and from banks" are significantly high in t h e c a s e o f c o m m e r c i a l b a n k s with Asian Currency Units. Merchant banks in S i n g a p o r e a r e s i m i l a r in n a t u r e to the merchant b a n k s of M a l a y s i a . T h e y a r e a c t i v e in b o t h the money and capital markets. T h e y a r e n o t p e r m i t t e d to a c c e p t deposits from the p u b l i c . But they may source funds from the bank and m a y participate in t h e f o r e i g n e x c h a n g e m a r k e t w i t n t h e a p p r o v a l of the monetary authorities. T h e d a t a in T a b l e 11 suggest that merchant banks in Singapore are significantly active p a r t i c i p a n t s in t h e A s i a n D o l l a r M a r k e t , 8/ August Discount houses were d i s c o n t i n u e d in 1 9 8 6 . 1990, the exchange rate was S$1.80 per US$1. As of 14 y In c o n t r a s t , t h e P h i l i p p i n e domestically oriented. offshore banks have been made Table 9 TRUST AND FUNDS MANAGEMENT ASSETS O F C O M M E R C I A L B A N K S IN T H E P H I L I P P I N E l S (In * M ) Trust Assets Year Total 1984 11,260 6,837 18,097 1985 15,453 £,484 26,937 1986 22,457 11,395 33,852 1987 21,602 1-6,657 38,259 1988 27,575 23,624 51,199 26.7 36.7 30.4 Ave. Growth Source: Funds Management Assets Rate (%) Central Bank of the Philippines. MONEY MARKET T a b l e 10 I N S T I T U T I O N S IN S I N G A P O R E , 1988 N u m b e r of Head Offices Commercial Banks Local Full License Banks Foreign Full License Banks Restricted Banks Offshore Banks Asj,an C u r r e n c y Merchant Finance Units Banks Companies Saving Discount Houses International 187 63 National Source: (ACUs) I 13 121 22 14 85 , Bank Money 31 (POSB) 1 - Brokers 8 A r i f f , M . , B . K a p u r , and A . iTyabji. "Money Market Study: Singapore." Unpublished (1990). T a b l e 11 OF MONEY MARKET INSTITUTIONS IN S I N G A P O R E , 1 9 8 8 ASSETS BANK TYPE S* Commercial Banks Domestic Operations Domestic and Offshore 96,441 586,215 Merchant Banks D o m e s t i c O p e r a t i o n s 1/ Domestic and O f f s h o r e Finance Companies Discount Houses National Savings T 1/ 2/ 3/ O 8,274 36,942 8,479 2/ T M 2,458 Bank A L 3/ 12,262 646,338 Figures do not reflect corporate financial advisory services, underwriting a n d o p e r a t i o n s in t h e g o l d m a r k e t . D i s c o u n t h o u s e s M e r e d i s c o u n t i n u e d in 1986. Total depositors' balances. Source: A r i f f , M . , B . K . Kapur, and A . Tyabji. "Money Markets Study: Singapore." Unpublished (1990). Table 12 SINGAPORE CQHHERCIAL BANKS: ASSETS AND LIABILITIES, 1988 (In St H) Excluding ACUs Including ACUs I teas Aaount X 568 2,371 38,148 0.6 2.5 39.6 Aiiount I Assets Cash on Hand Balances with NAS fiiount Due froa Banks Honey at Call with Discount Houses St NCDS Held Investaents in Securities and Equities Loans and Advances (Including Bills) Other Assets J46 0.2 2,660 0.5 9,053 41,849 4,307 9.4 43.4 4.5 25,616 160,293 13,731 4.4 27.3 2.3 Total Assets 96,441 100.0 6,760 42,475 993 39,328 6,886 7.0 44.0 1.0 40.8 7.1 96,441 1M.0 - 590 2,371 380,953 - • - 0.1 0.4 65.0 - 586,215 100.0 Liabilities Capital and Reserves Deposits of Nonbank Custoaers St NCDs Issued 1/ Aeount Due to Banks Other Liabilities Total Liabilities 1/ Singapore dollar negotiable certificates of deposits (St NCDs) first issued by banks in Hay 1973, 8,058 125,469 5,106 427,544 20,037 1.4 21.4 0.9 72.9 3.4 586,215 100.0 Here Source: N. Ariff, B.K. Kapur, and A. Tyabji. 'Honey Harkets Study: Singapore.' Unpublished (1990) 28 Finance companies in Singapore have limited banking functions. Although they are p e r m i t t e d to a c c e p t savings and t i m e d e p o s i t s a n d g r a n t l o a n s to b a n k a n d n o n b a n k e n t i t i e s , they do not have current account facilities. Also, they cannot deal in g o l d a n d f o r e i g n c u r r e n c y . The Post Office Savings Bank (POSB), a government-owned savings i n s t i t u t i o n , is v e r y m u c h a c t i v e in t h e d e p o s i t market. It n a s 1 3 7 b r a n c h e s . It h a s c u r r e n t a c c o u n t s and s a v i n g s d e p o s i t facilities. It is n o t , h o w e v e r , p e r m i t t e d t o accept corporate deposits, f i n a n c e f o r e i g n t r a d e a n d e n g a g e in foreign exchange transactions. It may lend to banking and nonbanking institutions. L a t e l y , i t h a s b e c o m e a s i g n i f i c a n t p l a y e r in the m o n e y m a r k e t of S i n g a p o r e . E. THAILAND T a b l e 13 s h o w s t h e f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m in T h a i l a n d . L i k e other ASEAN c o u n t r i e s , the banking system has dominated the financial s y s t e m in t e r m s o f a s s e t s . 1 0 / I t s b a n k i n g s y s t e m is c o m p o s e d o f 3 0 c o m m e r c i a l b a n k s , of w h i c h 16 a r e d o m e s t i c a n d 14 a r e b r a n c h e s of foreign b a n k s , and three specialized government-owned banks. O f t n e 16 d o m e s t i c b a n k s , o n l y o n e b a n k (the s e c o n d l a r g e s t b a n k ) is o w n e d b y t h e T h a i g o v e r n m e n t . T h e a c t i v i t i e s o f t h e s i x t y p e s of f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s in Thailand a r e s u m m a r i z e d in T a b l e 1 4 . C o m m e r c i a l b a n k s mobilize funds by accepting d e m a n d , savings, and time d e p o s i t s , and by borrowing frdm domestic and foreign s o u r c e s . L e n d i n g in t h e f o r m of overdrafts used to b e .the m o s t popular activity among commercial b a n k s in T h a i l a n d . 1 1 / In t h e r e c e n t past, however, loans and bills discounted, have increasingly becbme important a c t i v i t i e s of c o m m e r c i a l b a n k s . Recently, commercial banks have been p e r m i t t e d t o d e a l in f o r e i g n e x c h a n g e a n d u n d e r t a k e s e v e r a l fee-based activities, such as loan syndication, consultancy s e r v i c e for m e r g e r a n d a c q u i s i t i o n , i s s u i n g c r e d i t c a r d s , i s s u i n g L/Cs, bill colLecting for government agencies, etc. Local corporate underwriting, stock broking, leasing, trust business, and m a n a g e m e n t o f p r o v i d e n t f u n d s a r e n o t a l l o w e d to t h e m . The share o f i n c o m e f r o m f e e - b a s e d s e r v i c e s in t h e t o t a l income of c o m m e r c i a l b a n k s h a s s i g n i f i c a n t l y i n c r e a s e d f r o m 5.6 p e r c e n t in 1 9 8 3 to 10 p e r c e n t in 1 9 8 7 . T h a i l a n d s t i l l m a i n t a i n s c e i l i n g s on i n t e r e s t r a t e on l o a n s a n d d e p o s i t s . We must underscore n a t i o n a l i z a t i o n of b a n k i n g at this point the increasing in t h e A S E A N r e g i o n . It c o m e s interin two 10/ A s of 14 A u g u s t 1990, the exchange rate was Baht25.57 per US$1. 11/ Note Philippines. that overdrafts are not allowed anymore in the FINANCIAL Type of I. B A N K I N G Financial Table SYSTEM 13 IN T H A I L A N D , Institutions TOTAL Financial V. TOTAL N D T 30 16 14 1 1 1,596,780 1,513,795 82,985 124,273 19,524 76.68 72.70 3.99 5.97 0.94 1 37,326 1.79 63 1,777,903 85.38 94 19 1,251 785 12 338 195,687 3,918 13,959 30,898 29,257 6,505 9.40 0.19 0.67 1.48 1.41 0.31 1 1 24,105 78 1.16 0.00 2,501 304,407 14.62 2,564 2,0B2,310 100.00 Intermediaries F i n a n c e and S e c u r i t i e s C o m p a n i e s Credit Foncier Companies Agricultural Cooperatives Savings Cooperatives Life Insurance Companies Pawnshops Industrial Finance Corporation of T h a i l a n d Small Industries Finance Office Source: N u m b e r of Head Assets Offices (Million Bahts) SYSTEM Commercial Banks Domestic Foreign Government Savings Bank Government Housing Bank Bank for A g r i c u l t u r e and A g r i c u l t u r a l , C o o p e r a t i v e s II. Nonbank 1988 O T A L B a n k of T h a i l a n d . "Financial Institutions M a r k e t in T h a i l a n d . " U n p u b l i s h e d ( D e c e m b e r and 1989). Table 12 BRIEF PROFILE OF ACTIVITIES OF SIX TYPES OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS IN THAILAND {As of 1984) INSTITUTIONS 1. (a) Coissercial Banks ACTIVITY SUPERVISES INSTITUTION (i) Mobilize funds by taking Bank of Thailand deposits froe the public (2) Lending in the forms of loan, overdraft and bill discounting (3) Investing in securities lb) 6ov't. Sayings Bank (1) Mobilize funds by taking deposits from the public (2) Investing in government securities (3) Lending to the public Eank of Thailand (c) Gov't. Housing Bank (1) Mobilize funds by taking deposits from the public (2) Lending to the public for housing purposes Ministry of. Finance (d) Bank for Agriculture (1) Taking deposits fro® the and Agricultural public Cooperatives (BAAC! (2) Lending to farmers and agricultural cooperatives Ministry of Finance 2. (a) Finance and Securities Companies (b) Credit roncier Co. 3. (a) Agricultural Coop. (1) Issuing promissory notes (2) Purchasing promissory notes (3) Investing in securities Bank of Thailand Ministry of Finance (1) Mobilize medium-tens funds (not less than 3 years) from the public by issuing promissory notes at minimum amount of Baht 1,000 per note (2) Lending for housing purpose? (1) Main sources of funds are borrowings from BAAC and ®e«bers' subscriptions to capital account (2! Lending directly to their members (b) Savings Cooperatives (1! Main sources of funds are paid-up share capita! and members' savings (2) Lending short-term and longterm funds to members Ministry of Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives Ministry of Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives Table 14 (cont'd.) INSTITUTIONS ACTIVITY •SUPERVISING INSTITUTION 4. Life Insurance Companies (ii Selling life insurance poll- Ministry of Commerce ties to the public (2) Lending and investing in securities 5. Pawnshops (1) Main sources of funds are Ministry of Interior their own savings and borrowings from financial institutions ( 2 ) Lending money against a variety of articles,'jewelry, gold, sachine, electrical appliance;, etc. 6.: (a) Industrial Finance Corporation of Thailand (IFCT) (1) Borrowing long-term funds from both domestic and foreign sources (2) Extending medius- and longterns credits to industries (b) Small Industries Finance Office Ministry of finance Receiving funds appropriated Ministry of Finance fro® the government budget and and Ministry of then depositing them with the Industry Krung Thai Bant, Krung Thai Bank also provides matching amounts to SIFO's account-at the ratio of 3 to 1 - for the purpose of lending to small industries Source: Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI). "1986 Year-End Conference on Financial Resources Management." Unpublished (December 1986!. 32 fo c m s . O n e is t h e e x t e n t o f p a r t i c i p a t i o n of f o r e i g n banks in the financial system of A S E A N c o u n t r i e s ; and the other, the e x t e n t o f p a r t i c i p a t i o n o f A S E A N b a n k s in i n t e r n a t i o n a l banking. T h e s u b s t a n t i a l p h y s i c a l p r e s e n c e of b r a n c h e s of f o r e i g n b a n k s in all ASEAN countries has "already been noted a b o v e . This does not include the n u m e r o u s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f f i c e s of f o r e i g n b a n k s in the ASEAN countries. There are more than 5ia o f them in Indonesia, 26 in Malaysia, 19 in the Philippines, 47 in Singapore, a n d 37 in T h a i l a n d . T o e c o m b i n e d a s s e t s of branches of f o r e i g n b a n k s r a n g e f r o m four p e r c e n t to e i g h t p e r c e n t of t h e total assets o f t h e f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m s in Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and the P h i l i p p i n e s . This obviously understates the e x t e n t of p a r t i c i p a t i o n o f f o r e i g n b a n k s in t h e f i n a n c i a l system of t h e s e c o u n t r i e s s i n c e a s i d e from d i r e c t l y m o b i l i z i n g deposits and lending to banks and nonbank enterprises, they also constitute important links between the ASEAN countries and international financial markets. In S i n g a p o r e , t h e t o t a l assets of foreign (full and restricted license) and offshore banks accounted for 92 p e r c e n t of t h e t o t a l a s s e t s of its commercial banking system in 1 9 8 8 . 1 2 / Although the Philippines has the lowest number of b r a n c h e s of f o r e i g n b a n k s , 10 o u t o f its 24 domestic universal/commercial banks have substantial foreign equity participation. A S E A N b a n k s h a v e a l s o p a r t i c i p a t e d in i n t e r n a t i o n a l b a n k i n g . As s h o w n in T a b l e 1 5 , A S E A N b a n k s h a v e a s i g n i f i c a n t number of b r a n c h e s a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s in t h e P a c i f i c r e g i o n . This has shown to b e i n c r e a s i n g b e t w e e n t h e m i d - 1 9 7 0 s a n d 1983 a t l e a s t for s o m e large banks (see Table 16). At present, the 13 local full license banks of Singapore have a lar^e network, of overseas off ices that include 96 branches, eight, agencies, and 16 representative offices. The Thai local banks have 22 branches overseas. T h e P h i l i p p i n e s h a v e 14 b r a n c h e s , t w o agencies, and eight representative offices overseas. T h e r e c o r d of intra-ASEAN exchange o f b a n k i n g f a c i l i t i e s is n o t t h a t i m p r e s s i v e , however.. T h e r e is m o r e i n t e r a c t i o n b e t w e e n M a l a y s i a a n d S i n g a p o r e t h a n t h e rest o f ASEAN c o u n t r i e s b e c a u s e o f t h e i r s t r o n g h i s t o r i c a l ties (see Table 17). O n e e n c o u r a g i n g n o t e t h o u g h is t h a t e x c e p t for Brunei, an ASEAN m e m b e r c o u n t r y has at least one b r a n c h bank in another member country. ASEAN banks appear to be active participants in the international Interbank market (see Table 18). Indonesia, Malaysia a n d T h a i l a n d w e r e n e t l e n d e r s in t h i s market, whereas the Philippines and Singapore were net borrowers. Their net p o s i t i o n s have improved b e t w e e n 1983 and 1 9 8 8 . As regards crossb o r d e r b a n k c r e d i t to n o n b a n k s b y r e s i d e n c e of l e n d i n g b a n k , o n l y Singapore showed significant a m o u n t of activity due to the presence o f i t s o f f s h o r e b a n k i n g s y s t e m t h a t is internationally 12/ See Taole 2.3 of A r i f f et a l . 1990. 33 ESTABLISHMENT T a b l e 15 T R A D E IN F I N A N C I A L S E R V I C E S OF THE P A C I F I C R E G I O N IN COUNTRIES T o t a l N u m b e r of Branches and Subs i d i a r i e s of A S E A N B a n k s in O t h e r C o u n t r i e s of the Pacific Region T o t a l N u m b e r of Branches and Subs i d i a r i e s of B a n k s of Other C o u n t r i e s in t h e P a c i f i c Region Established in A S E A N C o u n t r i e s INDONESIA 14 41 MALAYSIA 15 31 PHILIPPINES 33 33 SINGAPORE 52 113 THAILAND 22 30 Country Source: K a z u m a s a I w a t a . " L i b e r a l i s a t i o n o f T r a d e in Financial Services." Edited by Castle, Leslie V . and Christopher F i n d l a y . P a c i f i c T r a d e : in Services. Sydney: Allen and U n w i n , Inc., 1988. 34 NUMBER OF Rank Bank T a b l e 16 O V E R S E A S B R A N C H E S OF TOP TEN IN A S E A N C O U N T R I E S Name Mid-70s BANKS 1783 Change INDONESIA Bank Negara Indonesia TOTAL 3 3 3 3 121 na 26 9 6 26 9 +6 0 121 35 41 +6 4 3 +1 +3 MALAYSIA Bank B u m i p u t r a (M) Bhd Malayan Banking Bhd United Malayan Banking Corp. TOTAL PHILIPPINES Philippine National Bank Allied Banking Corporation TOTAL 3 na b/ 3 7 + 4 SINGAPORE D e v e l o p m e n t B a n k of S i n g a p o r e United Overseas Bank Overseas-Chinese Banking Corp. Overseas Union Bank Limited Chung Khiaw Bank Lee Wah Bank na 4 31 19 IS 9 4 32 31 18 18 9 TOTAL 81 112 15 12 +4 +28 0 -1 0 0 a/ +31 THAILAND Bangkok Bank Krung Thai Bank Thai Farmers Bank Siam Commercial Bank TOTAL Notes: Source: 0 1 -3 1 3 + + 1 2 0 2 +2 16 18 +2 B a n k s a r e r a n k e d b y t o t a l a s s e t s in t h e y e a r t o December 1982. Of t h o s e b a n k s w i t h o v e r s e a s b r a n c h e s a m o n g the ten, each country branches have been listed, a/ Two subsidiaries, b/ Including agencies. 31 top J o h n N e w s o n . " T h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l i s a t i o n of B a n k i n g . " A u g u s t i n e Tan and B a s a n t Kapur (eds.). P a c i f i c Growth and Financial Interdependence. M a s s a c h u s e t t s : Allen and U n w i n , Inc., 1986. ASEAN: T a b l e 17 OPERATING INTRA-ASEAN PARENT COUNTRY COMMERCIAL BANKS, HOST COUNTRY BANK Indonesia ( 1 ) Bank Malaysia (1) Malayan (2) United Negara 1981 Indonesia (1) Singapore (3) Ban H i n L e e B a n k (4) M a l a y a n U n i t e d Bank (5) B a n k B u m i p u t r a M a l a y s i a B e r h a d (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) Brunei Singapore Brunei Thailand Singapore Singapore Singapore (offshore) Philippines (1) P h i l i p p i n e (1) Singapore (offshore) Singapore (1) O v e r s e a s (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Thai land Source: Banking Malayan Berhad Banking National Union Carp. Bank Bank (1) B r u n e i (2) M a l a y s i a Chung Kiaw Bank (1) M a l a y s i a Lee Wah Bank (1) M a l a y s i a O v e r s e a s C h i n e s e B a n k i n g C o r p . (1) M a l a y s i a United Overseas Bank (1) M a l a y s i a Four Seasons Communication Bank (1) T h a i land I n t ' l . Bank of S i n g a p o r e (1) P h i l i p p i n e s (offshore) (1) B a n g k o k Bank Sutalaksana, Dahlan M. "Commercial ASEAN." Staff Paper No. 15, SEACEN Training Centre, 1986. (1) (2) (3) Indonesia Malaysia Singapore Banking Links Research and in T a b l e 18 CROSS-BORDER INTERBANK CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES AND CROSS-BORDER BANK CREDIT AND DEPOSITS, 1983 AND (In U 5 $ B ) I terns 1. Net Position (= 0.92 1.80 7.71 70.33 2.11 0.64 1.64 4.02 202.95 2.-65 6.57 2.23 -5.24 -11.06 -0.23 8.33 4.61 -0.22 -9.14 3.55 1.66 0.65 32.33 0.35 ty.85* 3.46 69.22 0.78 0.05 1.22 5.28 22.35 0.32 0.03 0.22 2.31 49.47 0.67 Cross-Border Bank Deposits of N o n b a n k s by R e s i d e n c e of B o r r o w i n g B a n k Indonesia Malaysia Phi 1ippines Singapore Thailand # 8.97 6.25 3.80 193.81 6.20 Cross-Border Bank Credit to N o n b a n k s by R e s i d e n c e of L e n d i n g Bank Indonesia Malaysia Philippines Singapore Thai land 5. 7.49 4.03 2.47 59.27 1.88 (1)-(2)) Indonesia Malaysia P h i 1i p p i n e s Singapore Thai land 4. 1988 Cross-Border Interbank L i a b i 1 i t i e s by R e s i d e n c e of B o r r o w i n g B a n k Indonesia Malaysia Philippines Singapore Thai land 3. 1983 Cross-Border Interbank C l a i m s by R e s i d e n c e of Lending Bank Indonesia Malaysia Phi 1ippines Singapore Thai 1 and 2. 1988 Only Source: third quarter International figures are Financial available. Statistics, October 1989. 37 oriented. On the deposit side, again Singapore figured prominently. P h i l i p p i n e s , which has an o f f s h o r e b a n k i n g system t h a t i s c o n c e n t r a t i n g o n r a i s i n g f u n d s , is a d i s t a n t s e c o n d . III. STRUCTURES OF M A R K E T S A N D COMPETITION This section examines the structures of markets and competition of the ASEAN banking systems. In t h i s regard, we look at c e r t a i n i n d i c a t o r s such as s t r u c t u r e of o w n e r s h i p , p o l i c y on bank entry and branching, degree of concentration, and pricing. A. Structure Owner ship In t h i s a s p e c t , w e f o c u s o n t h e r e l a t i v e s h a r e o f g o v e r n m e n t and the private sector in the ownership of financial institutions. It s h o u l d be p o i n t e d o u t at the outset that a government^run financial institution is not necessarily inefficient. it c o u l d b e e f f i c i e n t l y m a n a g e d a s the privately run financial institution. H o w e v e r , if i t i s being conferred w i t h s p e c i a l p r i v i l e g e s a n d s u b s i d i e s , t h e n it w o u l d b e v e r y h a r d for p r i v a t e f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s o p e r a t i n g in t h e s a m e market to c o m p e t e w i t h i t . A n e x a m p l e is t h a t a g o v e r n m e n t b a n k is m a d e the s o l e d e p o s i t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n of a l l g o v e r n m e n t - o w n e d corporations. A c c e s s to c h e a p f u n d s w i l l a l l o w i t s e l f to j&rice its loans at b e l o w m a r k e t r a t e s . E v e n in, t h e a b s e n c e o f special privileges and subsidies, being a government bank in itself already confers certain advantages. T h i s i s p a r t i c u l a r l y , t r u e in countries where t h e r e is n o d e p o s i t i n s u r a n c e scheme and the f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m is h i g h l y u n s t a b l e . Governments in ASEAN countries are not only involved in regulating financial institutions but also directly participate t h e m s e l v e s in t h e p r o v i s i o n of f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s t h r o u g h stateowned financial institutions. H o w e v e r , the degree of their involvement and their impact on the f i n a n c i a l markets greatly vary among each other. In Indonesia, the government has s u b s t a n t i a l e q u i t y p a r t i c i p a t i o n in p r a c t i c a l l y a l l k e y f i n a n c i a l institutions. It owns the five largest commercial banks with numerous branches n a t i o n w i d e , the largest development b a n k , the largest savings b a n k , the largest nonbank financial institution (NBFI) p l u s s u b s t a n t i a l e q u i t y p a r t i c i p a t i o n in p r a c t i c a l l y all N B F I , and the sole p a w n s h o p with more than-400 b r a n c h e s all over the c o u n t r y . A s C o l e and Slade (1990) p o i n t e d o u t : "State-owned banks have p a i d l o w e r i n t e r e s t r a t e s on d e p o s i t s than private b a n k s t h r o u g h o u t t h e p e r i o d , b u t a s t h e r e is n o d e p o s i t i n s u r a n c e in I n d o n e s i a , S t ^ t e - o w n e d b a n k s m a y h a v e a p p e a r e d ' s a f e r ' to m a n y depositors" (p. 43). It w a s o n l y after the October 1988 deregulation that state-owned banks ended their monopoly o£ d e p o s i t s of p u b l i c c o r p o r a t i o n s . E r q u i a g a (1987) o b s e r v e d that: "The state banks have come under increased scrutiny over the last 38 several years b e c a u s e of p e r c e i v e d operational inefficiencies c o m p a r e d to t h e f o r e i g n b a n k s a n d s o m e o f t h e n a t i o n a l c o m m e r c i a l b a n k s . " (p.55) The d i r e c t p a r t i c i p a t i o n o f g o v e r n m e n t in b a n k i n g is also visible in the financial landscape of Malaysia. Government ownership of f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s is p r o n o u n c e d in both the banking and nonbanking institutions. Lin e t a l . indicated that: "The commercial banking s y s t e m is dominated by two largely g o v e r n m e n t - o w n e d c o m m e r c i a l b a n k s , a c c o u n t i n g f o r 3 5 . 8 p e r c e n t of the t o t a l a s s e t s of a l l c o m m e r c i a l b a n k s a s a t the e n d of June 1989; t h e i r b r a n c h n e t w o r k of 327 o f f i c e s r e p r e s e n t e d m o r e than 35 p e r c e n t o f t h e t o t a l b a n k i n g n e t w o r k . " ( p . 1 1 ) However, these banks are considered to be efficiently managed. Both the privately owned domestic and foreign banks consider the financial m a r k e t in M a l a y s i a to b e c o m p e t i t i v e . T h i s is m a i n l y attributed to t h e o p e n n e s s o f i t s f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m . In the Philippines, the government owns the largest universal bank, which has the most extensive branching network, and the largest development bank. Both of them suffered financial difficulty in t h e m i d - 1 9 8 0 s a s a result of "behest loans" made by them during the previous regime. They were rehabilitated, but the government had to absorb their non^ performing assets worth over P100 B . The government-owned u n i v e r s a l b a n k i s n o w in t h e p r o c e s s o f b e i n g p r i v a t i z e d , w i t h 3 0 percent of its total outstanding shares already sold to the private sector. The g o v e r n m e n t has still maintained the policy of requiring all government agencies and government-owned corporations t o d e p o s i t t h e i r s u r p l u s f u n d s o n l y in governmentowned banks. Even Singapore which has a highly open financial system a l l o w s g o v e r n m e n t p a r t i c i p a t i o n in t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m . However, its savings bank (POSB) is shown to be innovative and competitive, while the semi-governmental commercial bank (DBS) serves a s a c o u n t e r w e i g h t to t h e " B i g F o u r " l o c a l b a n k s s o that its " p r e s e n c e h a s s e r v e d to e n h a n c e the c o m p e t i t i v e n e s s of the b a n k i n g s y s t e m , . . . . " (Ariff et a l . 1 9 9 0 ) . Perhaps, Thailand differs from the rest of the ASEAN countries in this area. Tan (1984) noted that the Thai "Government o w n e r s h i p and c o n t r o l of f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s and therefore the relative importance and number of specialized i n s t i t u t i o n s a r e very s m a l l . " (p. 45) A s r e g a r d s f o r e i g n o w n e r s h i p of b a n k s , S i n g a p o r e r a n k s f i r s t in terras of the number of foreign-owned banks operating domestically. I n d o n e s i a , M a l a y s i a a n d T h a i l a n d h a v e t e n or more branches of f o r e i g n b a n k s t h a t do d o m e s t i c b a n k i n g , w h e r e a s the Philippines has only four. B u t it s h o u l d b e n o t e d t h a t foreign banks h a v e m i n o r i t y p a r t i c i p a t i o n in t e n d o m e s t i c b a n k s in the Philippines. 39 B. P o l i c y on Bank Entrj£ ..and Branching This is one area where some ASEAN countries have made certain progress in the past few years to improve the c o m p e t i t i v e n e s s of t h e i r b a n k i n g s y s t e m . However .the d e g r e e of relaxation on bank entry significantly varies among ASEAN countries. In Indonesia, nationals may acquire a license to operate a b a n k a n y w h e r e in t h e c o u n t r y p r o v i d e d t h e y meet the minimum capital requirement. Foreign banks are encouraged to have joint ventures with Indonesian nationals. T h i s p r i v i l e g e is a v a i l a b l e o n l y to t h o s e t h a t c o m e f r o m c o u n t r i e s w i t h reciprocal agreement with Indonesia. T h e y m a y o w n up to 85 p e r c e n t o f the outstanding equity s h a r e s of j o i n t v e n t u r e . b a n k s . This is an improvement over minority share allowed them before the PAKTO 27 (October 1988) reforms. However, they are restricted to only s e v e n m a j o r c i t i e s a n d a r e r e q u i r e d t h a t w i t h i n 12 m o n t h s , their o u t s t a n d i n g e x p o r t c r e d i t s b e a t l e a s t 50 p e r c e n t o f t h e i r total outstanding credits. In t h e m e a n t i m e , n o n e w b r a n c h e s o f f o r e i g n b a n k s w i l l be a l l o w e d . As regards branching, banks wholly owned by Indonesian nationals may open branches anywhere in the country, whereas existing foreign bank branches may open one branch only in e a c h of t h e s e v e n m a j o r cities.. Branches of foreign banks do not have rediscounting privileges with the c e n t r a l b a n k of I n d o n e s i a . Malaysia's p o l i c y on b a n k e n t r y and b r a n c h i n g remains the same. In particular, no new b a n k s a r e a l l o w e d to enter the Malaysian f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m , and its p o l i c y t o w a r d foreign bank operation d o e s n o t e n c o u r a g e the e s t a b l i s h m e n t of m o r e branches in t h e c o u n t r y . O p e n i n g of n e w b r a n c h e s is a l L o w e d o n l y to local banks. Branches of foreign banks do not have • rediscounting p r i v i l e g e s w i t h t h e c e n t r a l b a n k of M a l a y s i a . The Philippines has r e c e n t l y relaxed its policy on bank entry and b r a n c h i n g . The Monetary Board has been processing some a p p l i c a t i o n s for b a n k e n t r y t h a t i n c l u d e e q u i t y p a r t i c i p a t i o n by foreign banks. T h e p r e s e n t l a w a l l o w s f o r e i g n i n v e s t o r s to own up to 30 p e r c e n t o f t h e o u t s t a n d i n g s h a r e s o f a domestic bank. E n t r y b y b r a n c h e s o f f o r e i g n b a n k s is s t i l l r e s t r i c t e d . Instead, f o r e i g n b a n k s a r e b e i n g e n c o u r a g e d to e s t a b l i s h off-shore b a n k s in t h e P h i l i p p i n e s or b u y e q u i t y s h a r e s of e x i s t i n g d o m e s t i c banks. It s e e m s t h a t o n l y I n d o n e s i a a n d t h e P h i l i p p i n e s e n c o u r a g e joint venture banks at p r e s e n t . E x i s t i n g b r a n c h e s of f o r e i g n b a n k s m a y open branches in o t h e r p a r t s o f t h e c o u n t r y b u t they are not a l l o w e d to a c c e p t d e m a n d d e p o s i t s . This restriction has the same e f f e c t a s t h e r e s t r i c t i o n o n b r a n c h i n g s i n c e d e m a n d d e p o s i t is a k e y s e r v i c e f a c i l i t y o f f e r e d b y b r a n c h e s of foreign;; b a n k s . Like domestic banks, b r a n c h e s of f o r e i g n banks have rediscounting p r i v i l e g e s w i t h the c e n t r a l b a n k of the P h i l i p p i n e s ^ Thailand has not allowed new entrants into its commercial b a n k i n g s y s t e m for q u i t e s o m e t i m e a l r e a d y . Instead, local banks have b e e n e n c o u r a g e d t o o p e n b r a n c h e s in r u r a l a r e a s . Branches 40 of foreign banks are still prohibited from establishing branch networks a n y w h e r e in t h e c o u n t r y . Like local banks, they have r e d i s c o u n t i n g p r i v i l e g e s w i t h t h e c e n t r a l b a n k of T h a i l a n d . C. D e g r e e of B a n k i n g Concentration We use h e r e two m e a s u r e s of b a n k i n g c o n c e n t r a t i o n , namely: the a s s e t s h a r e of the five b i g g e s t b a n k s to the t o t a l a s s e t s of banks in each country and the Herfindahl index. Only those domestic and branches of foreign banks belonging to the commercial banking system are included. T h e r e s u l t s a r e s h o w n in Table 19. In b o t h m e a s u r e s , i t a p p e a r s t h a t I n d o n e s i a h a s t h e highest degree of banking concentration. The first five banks, which h a p p e n to b e a l l s t a t e - o w n e d b a n k s , c o n s t i t u t e 8 1 p e r c e n t o f the total a s s e t s of the c o m m e r c i a l b a n k i n g s y s t e m . Thailand follows I n d o n e s i a , w i t h t h e f i v e l a r g e s t b a n k s a c c o u n t i n g for 68 percent of the total assets of c o m m e r c i a l bank assets. Note that T h a i l a n d h a s t h e b i g g e s t c o m m e r c i a l b a n k in t h e r e g i o n w i t h t o t a l assets a m o u n t i n g to a b o u t U S $ 1 7 B . P h i l i p p i n e s a p p e a r s to have the lowest concentration ratio. T h i s is b e c a u s e m o r e t h a n half of the a s s e t s of a g o v e r n m e n t - o w n e d c o m m e r c i a l b a n k that were deemed nonperforming had been recently transferred to the national government. In g e n e r a l , t h e f i n d i n g s s h o w n in T a b l e high degree of b a n k i n g c o n c e n t r a t i o n e x i s t s countries. D. 19 s u g g e s t that a in t h e four ASEAN Pricing T h e s t r u c t u r e o f t h e m a r k e t c o u l d b e r e f l e c t e d in t h e s p r e a d between the c o s t of funds and the l e n d i n g r a t e . An inefficient banking s y s t e m c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y g r e a t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n is likely to b e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h a l a r g e r b a n k s p r e a d . Figure 2 shows the b e h a v i o r of bank spread for ASEAN countries for the period 1982 to 1988. For purposes of comparison, the p a t t e r n s of bank s p r e a d for the U.S.A., Japan, and G e r m a n y a r e a l s o s h o w n in t h e s a m e t a b l e . A s expected, the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia have on the average larger b a n k " s p r e a d s than Malaysia and S i n g a p o r e . It i s , h o w e v e r , to be noted t h a t t h e b a n k s p r e a d s for t h e P h i l i p p i n e s , Indonesia and T h a i l a n d h a v e d e c l i n e d in t h e p a s t t w o y e a r s . The openness of the financial systems of Singapore and Malaysia c o u l d h a v e a c t e d as a strong p r e s s u r e on bank spread. M a l a y s i a and S i n g a p o r e a r e e v e n f o u n d to h a v e lower a v e r a g e bank Q 2 rt iJ t-H <X 00 00 a\ as CM rH <7l « r- r-l • • H • « O W 00 00 <T> >H w E w EH Qj a W C CQ tj i—i u OS w s s o u a W W C a M a o l-H =H s * » • • * rg • * II IN V0 ® ro •H « 31 * •H tO -P C <U (0 to J XJ (0 X 04 <0 ® M to X rt J rf rr— ® * • SI in O -H <o <1) 4J w O • 00 ^ rH E M £ — •4H O <hH U) w •5J" 1—t 00 * a o a a s 00 • M <OS X d) TJ EH a w C c ••H dp U a o u c rH a M U rin • u a M CO co . Ed a M cu cu M M 5H W in r-cs OJ CO > co •H C -P RA <D .6 to <4-1 W o •P (0 0) OJ <D <-) M CP (0 (0 u -p X ! (0 o w 1—1 -p • rH •H c o •IH .-( 4J •C ro <0 w TJ 4J c c -IH 0 4-1 u >H c <U o X o « CN -P X! to C 0 4J a> j * a> T> r-l w m CO c w ii to <o •Hg£ (0 a> u (0 II X (0 a) CO a) c o TJ C A W U O >4-1 <0 a> u D IJ> -I-I Co • • w D -P o a M s:(0 IH •a c •H 4-1 M 0) X II -H (U U s:0)3 to l-l •M JS J3 tP • ts Ot * ^—* 3 — (Tl O M S d> W 00 r-l JS 00 •u ON jz F-l EH -1 •n <w C d) o M 0 O <9 x: to e X3 •H d) € -p nJ • rH •u d) N o A CO O Z a d) r-l QtW Q — •H M C • J3 d) r-l o a • S (0 5 cu • c -A 10 •H c 0) -H O (0 rH m a «o >i • • •H O 4J <0 ^ to M 0 £ 0) - (0 o « CQ s CQ o •C e 4J •H o •H •H U -P s (0 CQ to Eu +J a) s - H d) K «J to CQ o w a <u M CD c ID C rH CP O S *iH (0 QJ*H C TJ •rt C >i a u •H )H > I-I (U o C r-l 0) w 1 o •iH P a, E..G S * CU o e M c u = a> • Q) 5 6 rH X! Qi (0 4J • • O • • <U iH-p c <0 D> d) 0) o <0 1—1 JJ !tj > •H -H <U c (0 D a a m CR O r-l X pa EH •HW in i to H flj r-l M-l (o o d) (S o DO'rt C w w JJ J* iH (0 m -h c c c c •H a> (0 0 Q< EnJ u CQ z> Mc «> as• as c a, JS CO a) U rH w ^ D O w CM ro ^ •—' 42 Figure 2 NOMINAL LENDING RATES, DEPOSIT RATES AND GROSS SPREAD IN ASEAN (In per annum) Lending 1982 1983 1984 1985 198S 1987 1988 AVERAGE STD.DEV 9.00 19.63 20.06 20.03 21.49 21.67 22.04 19.13 4.23 Deposit 6.00 6.00 16.00 18.00 15.43 16.78 17.72 13.70 4.94 Spread 3.00 13.63 4.06 203 6.06 4.89 4.32 5.43 3.56 Ldftdlng Lending 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 AVERAGE STD.DEV 8.79 11.08 11.35 11.54 10.80 8.19 7.25 9.86 1.61 Deposit 9.75 8.02 9.54 8.81 7.17 3.00 3.33 7.09 2.61 Spread -0.96 3.06 1.81 2.73 3.63 5.19 3.92 2.77 1.81 ^litl^aj^isc-i^-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-::-:-:-:::-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:Lending 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 AVERAGE STD.DEV 10.23 9.05 8.97 7.93 6.82 6.10 5.96 7.87 1.51 Deposit 7.22 6.31 6.98 4.99 3.91 2.89 2.74 5.01 1.74 Spread 3.01 2.74 1.99 2.94 2.91 3.21 3.22 2.86 0.39 • Undlnfl 43 Figure 2 (cont'd.) PHILIPPINES Lending 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 AVERAGE STD.DEV 16.12 19 24 28.20 28.61 17.53 13.34 15.92 20.14 5.51 Deposit 13.74 13.58 21.17 18.91 11.25 8.20 11.32 14.03 4.21 Spread 4.38 5.66 7.02 9 70 6.28 5.14 4.61 6.11 1.70 THAILAfdC Lending 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 AVERAGE STD.DEV 19.00 17.63 18.75 19.00 17.00 15.00 15.00 17.34 1.63 Deposit 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 9.75 9.50 9.50 11.54 1.69 Spread 6.00 4.63 5.75 6.00 7.25 5.50 5,50 5.80 0.73 Note: In the absence of data, WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMERCIAL BANK RATES were used for the 1983-85 Lending Rates in Indonesia. 44 Figure 2 (cont'd.) Lending 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 AVERAGE STD.DEV 14.86 10.79 12.04 9.93 8.35 8.21 9.32 10.50 2.17 Deposit 12,35 9.09 10.37 8.05 6.52 6.86 7.73 8.71 1.92 Spread 2.51 1.70 1.67 1.88 1.83 1.35 1.59 1.79 0.33 0 Imttifl Lending 7.23 I " 1?82 7.05 1983 6.66 1984 1985 5.52 1986 5.91 5.09 1987 4.93 1988 6.20 AVERAGE 0.85 ^STD.DEV Deposit 3.75 3.75 3.50 3.50 1.88 1.76 1.76 2.84 0.91 Spread 3.48 3,30 ! 3.16 3.02 4.03 3.33 3.17 3.36 0.31 Lending 13.50 10.05 9.82 9.53 8.75 8.36 8.33 9.76 1.65 Deposit 7.54 4.56 4.86 4.44 3.71 3.20 3.29 4.51 1.37 Spread 5.96 5.49 4.96 5.09 5.04 5.16 5.04 5.25 0.33 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 AVERAGE STD.DEV » Qvndt <• Gfrf* Sources of Basic Data: International Financial Statistics, October 1989. Erquiaqa, Philip. "Improving Domestic Resource Mobilization Through Financial Development: Indonesia." ADB Economic Staff Paper No. 40, November 1987. 45 spreads than Japan and G e r m a n y . The U . S . A . has the s p r e a d a m o n g t h e c o u n t r i e s i n c l u d e d in F i g u r e 2 . 1 3 / thinnest The larger bank spreads observed for the Philippines, T h a i l a n d a n d I n d o n e s i a c a n n o t b e w h o l l y a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e k i n d of market structures existing in these countries. Regulatory m e a s u r e s , s u c h a s t h o s e p e r t a i n i n g to i n t e r m e d i a t i o n t a x e s ( e . g . , high reserve requirements, mandatory credit allocations to c e r t a i n p r i o r i t y s e c t o r s , e t c . ) c o u l d a l s o b e c o n t r i b u t o r y to t h e large bank spread. 14/ T h e p i e c e s of e v i d e n c e a v a i l a b l e for the Philippines s e e m to s u p p o r t t h i s (see T a b l e 2 0 ) . F o r Thailand, the cost of said regulations comprises about 30 p e r c e n t of commercial banks' spread between lending and d e p o s i t r a t e s . 15/ T h u s , i n t e r m e d i a t i o n t a x e s a g g r a v a t e t h e p l i g h t o f b o r r o w e r s in a less competitive financial system. ±3/ Indeed, Ariff et a l . (1990) h a v e p o i n t e d out that the o p e n n e s s of t h e f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m of S i n g a p o r e " s e r v e s to p l a c e a l i m i t on the p e r m i s s i b l e w i d t h of s p r e a d s " (p. 2 6 ) . A l s o , it " i s generally b e l i e v e d t h a t t h e D B S ' p r e s e n c e h a s s e r v e d to enhance t h e c o m p e t i t i v e n e s s of t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m , in t e r m s o f a narrowing of the s p r e a d b e t w e e n lending and d e p o s i t r a t e s " . (p. 29) . DBS is a semi-government bank that intensely competes with private banks. 14/ In t h e P h i l i p p i n e s , a l l b a n k s a r e r e q u i r e d to a l l p c a t e a t l e a s t 2.5 p e r c e n t of t h e i r t o t a l l o a n a b l e f u n d s t b a g r i c u l t u r e a n d b e n e f i c i a r i e s of a g r a r i a n r e f o r m . In T h a i l a n d , c o m m e r c i a l banks must e x t e n d c r e d i t s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f r u r a l d e v e l o p m e n t in the amount o f a t l e a s t 20 p e r c e n t of d e p o s i t l i a b i l i t i e s a s of the end of the previous year. In I n d o n e s i a , national banks are r e q u i r e d to a l l o c a t e a m i n i m u m o f 20 p e r c e n t o f l o a n p o r t f o l i o to small business. T h e s e a r e e x a m p l e s of m a n d a t o r y c r e d i t allocations. M a n d a t o r y c r e d i t a l l o c a t i o n s c o u l d lead to the widening of bank spread. In t h e P h i l i p p i n e s , f o r e x a m p l e , b a n k s t h a t do not w i s h t o l e n d to t h e a g r i c u l t u r a l s e c t o r m a y buy government s e c u r i t i e s a s a s u b s t i t u t e for t h e i r c o m p l i a n c e of the r e g u l a t i o n that t h e y a l l o c a t e 25 p e r c e n t o f t h e i r t o t a l l o a n a b l e funds to the said sector. The interest rate on government securities e l i g i b l e f o r s u c h p u r p o s e is f i x e d a t a l e v e l s u b s t a n t i a l l y b e l o w the prevailing lending r a t e s (and a t times, even below the deposit rate). B a n k s r e c o u p t h e i r l o s s e s h e r e b y p a s s i n g t h e m on to b o r r o w e r s in t e r m s of h i g h e r l e n d i n g r a t e s . 15/ See T h a i l a n d D e v e l o p m e n t R e s e a r c h I n s t i t u t e (1987) . Table 20 INTERMEDIATION MARGIN, 1983 and 1986 PHILIPPINES 1983 1986 10,02 8.02 12.67 15.01 14.26 1.59 6.99 7.32 5.86 8.92 14.62 13.89 4,97 8,76 53.40 13.35 17.67 5.00 10.57 100.00 40.05 10.01 10.96 5.00 33.77 100.00 1984 1985 1936 5.04 1.06 1.48 0.83 3.37 1.67 6.02 1.23 1.50 1.08 3.81 2.21 5.07 1.38 1.57 0.86 3.8 1.9 0.90 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.20 0.70 1.40 1.40 1.00 A. Intermediation margin, as 2 of earning assets 1. Average cost of deposit 2. Net of 201 tax on interest incoae froa deposits 3. Cost of loanable funds 4. Average lending rate 5. (4) net of 5X gross receipts tax (GRT) 6. Bank aargin (5) - (3) 7. Total aargiti to clients (4) - (2) B. Composition of the total aargin (7) in I 1. Depositor 2. 281 tax on/interest incoae troa ueposits 3. Reserve cost 4. SRT 5. Bank aargin T O T A L C. Components of bank aargin (I of total assets) 1. Interaediation aargin 2. Staffing cost 3. Administrative cost 4. Depreciation 5. Total cost 6. Profits before taxes Staffing expenses as I bi total assets 1. All banks 2. Sound doaestic banks 3, Foreign banks Table 20 (cont'd.) £. Comparative bank margin Staffing Cost Phil. (1986) 1.4 Adm. Cost 1.6 Depr. 0.9 Total Cost 3.9 Profit before taxes 1.9 Selected countries ca. 1988 Belgium Denmark Finland Morocco Norway Pakistan Portugal Spain A V E R A 6 E Total Margin 5.8 • 2.2 2.0 1.6 2.2 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.8 2.1 0.5 8.9 1.6 8.8 1.4 8.8 8.7 0.8 0.9 B.3 8.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.1 1.5 8.6 0.6 3.1 3.6 3,9 3.7 4.0 2.6 4.2 4.2 3.7 0.3 0.7 8.4 1.9 0.3 0.7 0.3 1.5 0.7 3.4 4.3 4.4 4.8 4.5 3.3 4.5 5.7 4.4 Notes: The 20 percent tax on interest income from deposits is a final tax. Tfoe five percent gross receipts tax (6RT) is imposed on all receipts (including both interest and capital gains of a bank). It cannot be used as a credit against income tax. Cost of loanable funds includes average cost of deposits and reserve costs (including the cost attributable to;the requirement to lend 251 of a bank's total resources to agriculture and beneficiaries of agrarian reform program). Domestic banks were classified into sound and neak banks on the basis of their return on risk loans, return on total assets, past due loans and provisions therefore, potential loan losses, and adjusted capital/total assets. Source: World Bank. Philippines Financial Sector Study (August 1788). 48 IV. B E N E F I T S AND COSTS OF A MORE LIBERAL REGIME F O R I N T E R N A T I O N A L T R A D E IN B A N K I N G S E R V I C E S IN T H E A S E A N REGION This section discusses the benefits and costs of a more l i b e r a l r e g i m e f o r i n t e r n a t i o n a l t r a d e in b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s in t h e ASEAN region'. T h e r e a r e t w o a s p e c t s of i n t e r n a t i o n a l i z a t i o n of finance, n a m e l y cross-toorder and e s t a b l i s h m e n t - r e l a t e d t r a d e in financial services. This paper focuses on the latter. Establishment-related trade in banking services refers to "services produced by f a c t o r s of production whose ownership resides in o n e c o u n t r y a n d s o l d to r e s i d e n t s o f a n o t h e r through some form of d i r e c t p r e s e n c e of the s u p p l i e r in the client's country." (MTN.GNS/W/G8, 4 Sept. 1989; p.6) A. Benefits There are benefits to a more liberal regime for international t r a d e in b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s in t h e A S E A N r e g i o n . First, it improves access of t h e p o p u l a t i o n to banking services in general. It h a s b e e n s h o w n asbove t h a t except for Singapore, ASEAN countries are > still generally underbanked. Also, the distribution of b a n k s e r v i c e s is b a d l y s k e w e d in f a v o r of the c a p i t a l c i t y ( i . e . , M e t r o M a n i l a for t h e P h i l i p p i n e s , B a n g k o k for T h a i l a n d , and J a k a r t a for I n d o n e s i a ) . The recent liberalization on b a n k e n t r y a n d b r a n c h i n g in m o s t A S E A N c o u n t r i e s is i n d e e d a welcome development* I t c o u l d p e r h a p s b e e x t e n d e d to b r a n c h e s o f foreign banks. B u t t h e i r c o n t r i b u t i o n to b a n k i n g d e v e l o p m e n t in the country would l i k e l y toe l i m i t e d i f t h e y are confined to locate only in t h e c a p i t a l c i t y of the c o u n t r y concerned. As already pointed out above, all ASEAN countries have already several branches of foreign banks located and operating in capital cities. Thus> a l l o w i n g n e w b r a n c h e s of f o r e i g n b a n k s to b e e s t a b l i s h e d in o t h e r p l a c e s w i t h i n t h e c o u n t r y o t h e r t h a n the c a p i t a l c i t y w o u l d b e m o r e d e s i r a b l e t h a n h a v i n g ' t h e m s i t u a t e d in a capital city. I t is e q u a l l y d e s i r a b l e to a l l o w branches of foreign b a n k s t h a t a r e a l r e a d y o p e r a t i n g in A S E A N countries to h a v e b r a n c h n e t w o r k s in o t h e r p l a c e s w i t h i n t h e c o u n t r y c o h c e r n e d other than the capital c i t y . Indonesia has already started doing this. S e c o n d , it e n c o u r a g e s f o r e i g n i n v e s t o r s to l o c a t e t h e m s e l v e s in a r e a s o t h e r t h a n t h e c a p i t a l c i t i e s o f A S E A N c o u n t r i e s . This augurs well for a m o r e b a l a n c e d r e g i o n a l d e v e l o p m e n t within a c o u n t r y w h i c h h a s b e e n t h e o b s e s s i o n of p o l i c y m a k e r s for d e c a d e s . It is to b e n o t e d t h a t in t h e p a s t d e c a d e , A S E A N c o u n t r i e s have heavily invested in infrastructural development in certain regions w i t h i n their t e r r i t o r i e s to i n d u c e f o r e i g n i n v e s t o r s to l o c a t e t h e m s e l v e s in t h o s e a r e a s . The immediate availability of services from international banks with which they have long established relationship will further strengthen their decision to locate in t h o s e a r e a s b e c a u s e a s i d e from ordinary banking services, they may also require from their preferred banks 49 ancillary b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s , such as p a y r o l l s e r v i c e s , portfolio investment, etc. The d e l i v e r y of such services requires the p h y s i c a l p r e s e n c e o f t h e i r b a n k s in t h e a r e a . Third, i n c r e a s e d - c o m p e t i t i o n in t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m can be extended to other r e g i o n s or a r e a s o f the country with the p r e s e n c e o f f o r e i g n b a n k s in t h o s e a r e a s . Thus, more people will be exposed to a w i d e r s e t of f i n a n c i a l instruments with more a t t r a c t i v e r a t e s of r e t u r n s . So f a r , f o r e i g n b a n k s ' competition w i t h d o m e s t i c b a n k s h a s b e e n c o n f i n e d to. t h e c a p i t a l c i t y o f the country that benefited only wealthier residents. This is so because of t h e h o s t g o v e r n m e n t ' s p o l i c y of d i s a l l o w i n g branches pf f o r e i g n b a n k s to e s t a b l i s h b r a n c h n e t w o r k s in o t h e r p a r t s of the c o u n t r y . And lastly, improvements in intra-ASBAN trade and investment, which ASEAN countries have been diligently working on as may be observed from the various activities that have already b e e n d o n e and a r e b e i n g l i n e d up for t h i s p u r p o s e , w o u l d require better b a n k i n g i n f r a s t r u c t u r e . Such could be achieved through a more liberal regime for regional and international trade in banking services. T h e c o m p e t i t i v e n e s s of A S E A N b a n k s t h a t would result from a more liberal financial system at home will prepare them to participate in regional and international banking. Indeed, the experience of S i n g a p o r e in this area is worth considering. B. Costs Any undertaking always involves some qosts that must be weighed against the b e n e f i t s . The move t o w a r d s ^more liberal regime for international trade in.banking services has some costs. Deregulation might breed excessive r i s k - t a k i n g ^among competitors. This is worse in a c o u n t r y where there is a compulsory d e p o s i t i n s u r a n c e s c h e m e b e c a u s e of t h e m o r a l hazard problem that it may generate. T h e P h i l i p p i n e s is a case in point. However, even in those countries where no deposit insurance scheme e x i s t s , t h e p o l i c y o f bailirig p a t any ailing bank could be considered by market participants as a form of insurance. Thailand c o u l d s e r v e a s a n exartiple h e r e . In both cases, the g o v e r n m e n t c o n c e r n e d w i l l h a v e to b e a r the b u r d e n of those losses. O f c o u r s e , t h e o t h e r a l t e r n a t i v e is to a l l o w bank failures and let the p a r t i c i p a n t s absorb all the c o s t s . But it generates another cost, i.e., it undermines the people's c o n f i d e n c e in t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m , w h i c h m i g h t t u r n o u t t o b e m o r e costly in the long-run. This only setves to underscore the importance of having a strong and efficient supervisory o r g a n i z a t i o n a s w e l l a s e f f e c t i v e p r u d e n t i a l r e g u l a t i o n s in A S E A N countries. This, too, involves additional costs since superv i s o r y s t a f f h a v e to be t r a i n e d and p a i d y e l l . D u r i n g t h e h e y d a y of low i n t e r e s t r a t e in t h e international market, s e v e r a l c o u n t r i e s r e f u s e d to m a k e a d j u s t m e n t to correct 50 their worsening current account imbalances since cheap funds were readily a v a i l a b l e f r o m t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l m a r k e t to f i n a n c e : s u c h deficits. The P h i l i p p i n e s was one of t h e m . 16/ With a more liberal r e g i m e f o r i n t e r n a t i o n a l t r a d e in b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s , the inflow of foreign c a p i t a l that m i g h t be facilitated b y branches of fore ign banks could hide any imbalances in the current account. 17/ Finally, the present s u p e r i o r i t y of foreign banks over domestic banks in technology-based transactions, which most banking services are now, could r e s u l t in u n d u e c o m p e t i t i o n . 1 8 / Monetary authorities may end up supervising more foreign banks than d o m e s t ic banks. Apart from supervisory problem that may arise from t h i s , the e f f e c t i v e n e s s of m o n e t a r y p o l i c y could be undermined. T h i s c o u l d b e o n e o f t h e reasons" w h y A S E A N c o u n t r i e s prefer to promote joint ventures than allow new branches of f o r e i g n b a n k s to e n t e r the d o m e s t i c f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m . It is o u r v i e w t h a t t h e b e n e f i t s t h a t w i l l b e d e r i v e d f r o m a more l i b e r a l r e g i m e f o r i n t e r n a t i o n a l t r a d e in b a n k i n g services in ASEAN . countries outweigh the costs. However, the liberalization should be done g r a d u a l l y and should be in step with the development of the economy. The timing of the l i b e r a l i z a t i o n is a l s o i m p o r t a n t . V. THE APPLICABILITY AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE URUGUAY KEY C O N C E P T S , PRINCIPLES AND RULES ROUND This section d i s c u s s e s the a p p l i c a b i l i t y and i m p l i c a t i o n s of the key c o n c e p t s a n d p r i n c i p l e s d i s c u s s e d in the multilateral negotiations o n t r a d e in s e r v i c e s to t h e b a n k i n g s e c t o r in the ASEAN countries. Since MTN.GNS/35: "Draft: Multilateral F r a m e w o r k f o r T r a d e in S e r v i c e s " (23 J u l y 1 9 9 0 ) , M T N . G N S / F I N / W / 1 : "Proposal by tne European Community: Draft Financial Services A n n e x to t h e A g r e e m e n t o n T r a d e in S e r v i c e s " (10 J u l y 1 9 9 0 ) , and MTN.GNS/FIN/W/2: "Submission by the United States on Financial Services" (12 J u l y 1 9 9 0 ) a r e a l r e a d y a v a i l a b l e , t h i s p a p e r will also comment on some of the substantive contents of these W AZ/ ~ See Lamberte et a l . (1985). See Iwata (1988). The literature on the otder of e c o n o m i c l i b e r a l i z a t i o n p r o v i d e s a m p l e lessons on t h i s . S e e , for e x a m p l e , E d w a r d s (1985) and C o r b o and d e Melo (1987). ±1/ T h i s c o u l d a r i s e f r o m e c o n o m i e s of s c a l e . For instance, a m u l t i n a t i o n a l bank m a y d e v e l o p its own c o m p u t e r software for market analysis t h a t can be used b y its b r a n c h e s a l l over the world. 51 documents. In t h i s r e g a r d , C o r n f o r d ' s ( A u g u s t 1 9 9 0 ) c o m m e n t s on the proposals of the European Community and United States concerning an agreement regarding international trade in financial services are very relevant. Befgre w e p r o c e e d w i t h the a s s e s s m e n t of t h e applicability a n d i m p l i c a t i o n s of t h e c o n c e p t s , p r i n c i p l e s a n d r u l e s , it would b e w o r t h w n i l e to b r i e f l y c o m m e n t on t h e e m e r g i n g c o n s e n s u s on the need to have a s e c t o r a l a n n o t a t i o n to the general framework agreement for b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s . T h e s e r v i c e s s e c t o r in general is a f a i r l y h e t e r o g e n e o u s g r o u p of e c o n o m i c activities. Each sub-sector also consists of finer groupings of economic activities. But the banking sector clearly stands out among tne other s u b - s e c t o r s in t h e s e r v i c e s s e c t o r . Its function in tne economy is u n q u e s t i o n a b l y l a r g e . A significant portion of the trade in goods and services, both domestic awd international, p a s s e s through the banking s y s t e m . Thus, a dysfunctional banking system certainly impairs trade. Aside from this, the banking s y s t e m a l s o p r o v i d e s p o r t f o l i o i n v e s t m e n t s e r v i c e s to customers. In most of t h e s e t r a n s a c t i o n s , t h e p h y s i c a l p r e s e n c e of banks n§ar t h e i r c l i e n t s i s v e r y i m p o r t a n t . Monetary p o l i c y is t r a n s m i t t e d t o t h e r e s t o f the economy through the banking s y s t e m . T h u s , t h e r e is a s t r o n g motivation for m o n e t a r y a u t h o r i t i e s to m a i n t a i n a w e l l - f u n c t i o n i n g banking system. It is t h e n u n d e r s t a n d a b l e t h a t t h e b a n k i n g s e c t o r is o n e of the h i g h l y r e g u l a t e d s e c t o r s in t h e economy ostensibly to p r e s e r v e t h e p a y m e n t s s y s t e m a n d p r o t e c t c o n s u m e r s so t h a t their c o n f i d e n c e in t h e b a n k i n g s y s t e m w i l l b e m a i n t a i n e d . The banking sector has been experiencing a rapid innovation especially w i t h t h e a d v a n c e m e n t in c o m m u n i c a t i o n s a n d computer. This m a y b e g a t h e r e d f r o m the v a r i e t y of f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s and i n s t r u m e n t s t h a t a r e c u r r e n t l y a v a i l a b l e in t h e m a r k e t . With the further d e r e g u l a t i o n o f t h e f i n a n c i a l m a r k e t s in b o t h developed and developing economies, financial institutions will certainly b e b u s i e r in d e v e l o p i n g m o r e f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s a n d instruments. Thus, both the wholesale and retail markets for financial services will become more complex and sophisticated than what they are already now. A framework a g r e e m e n t t h a t is a p p l i c a b l e to all service sectors is h i g h l y d e s i r a b l e . H o w e v e r , if i t i s e x p r e s s e d in a v e r y g e n e r a l m a n n e r a n d d o e s not a d d r e s s t h e s p e c i f i c i t i e s of the b a n k i n g s e c t o r , i t w i l l l i k e l y l e a d t o m o r e d i s p u t e s t h a t in the end would only render the agreement useless. Thus, it is n e c e s s a r y to h a v e a s e c t o r a l a n n o t a t i o n to t h e g e n e r a l framework to a d d r e s s t h e s p e c i f i c i t i e s o f t h e b a n k i n g s e c t o r s o t h a t r e s o r t to d i s p u t e s e t t l e m e n t p r o c e d u r e s w i l l b e m i n i m i z e d . A. of Transparency I t is n o t u n c o m m o n t o s e e v a r i o u s b r a n c h e s o f t h e g o v e r n m e n t ASEAN countries involved in promoting, regulating and 52 supervising the same business entities. E a c h o n e of t n e m issues specific guidelines that are not usually well circulated. Neither are these activities well coordinated. Going through the exercise of knowing what guidelines apply and where to obtain them already entails too much effort and money for local residents. For foreigners, t h i s is a l m o s t impossible to do especially if t h o s e g u i d e l i n e s a r e w r i t t e n in local languages. Thus, for A S E A N c o u n t r i e s , t h e r e is a n e e d t o consolidate all those r e g u l a t i o n s and g u i d e l i n e s p e r t a i n i n g to b a n k i n g l a w s , in general, and to l a w s c o v e r i n g t r a d e in banking services, in particular. Each country may assign an office which can serve a s a " o n e - s t o p s h o p " for all t h o s e l a w s , regulations and guidelines affecting t r a d e in b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s . This may be patterned a f t e r t h e " o n e - s t o p s h o p " for t h e e x p o r t sector that all ASEAN c o u n t r i e s h a v e , a l t h o u g h in a l i m i t e d s c a l e . It is preferable that this o f f i c e be housed at the C e n t r a l B a n k . All government a g e n c i e s s h o u l d be r e q u i r e d to s u b m i t to t h i s office all l a w s , regulations and g u i d e l i n e s , and any amendments thereof, that have some e f f e c t s on banking operations. All inquiries p e r t a i n i n g t o s p e c i f i c l a w s o r g u i d e l i n e s in b a n k i n g , e i t h e r f r o m own citizens or foreigners, will be addressed to it. All branches of f o r e i g n b a n k s s h o u l d l i k e w i s e be r e q u i r e d to submit to t h i s o f f i c e a n y i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t h e i r o p e r a t i o n s . At the A S E A N l e v e l , the C o m m i t t e e on F i n a n c e and Banking (COFAB) m a y serve as a "one-stop shop" by c o n s o l i d a t i n g w h a t each member had already d o n e . Thus, any interested third party does n o t h a v e t o c o n t a c t e a c h i n d i v i d u a l c o u n t r y o f f i c e if h e w a n t s to make inquiries about banking laws, regulations and guidelines from all the ASEAN member c o u n t r i e s . B. Progressive Liberalization As already pointed out a b o v e , ASEAN countries are now in different s t a g e s of f i n a n c i a l l i b e r a l i z a t i o n . Leading the pack in t h i s e f f o r t is S i n g a p o r e . The remaining ASEAN countries have now gradually shifted their attention from credit allocation to t h e g e n e r a l s o u n d n e s s a n d s t a b i l i t y of t h e f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m . The need for s t r o n g and e f f i c i e n t s u p e r v i s i o n is clearly felt in these countries. S i n c e s u c h s u p e r v i s i o n t a k e s time to develop, ASEAN countries should opt for a gradual but progressive liberalization process. Singapore followed this track before. The c h a n g i n g r o l e of e x i s t i n g . b r a n c h e s of f o r e i g n b a n k s in the ASEAN region m u s t also be r e c o g n i z e d . In the p a s t , t h e y had been heavily involved in the financing of imports of multinational c o m p a n i e s , m o s t of w h i c h w e r e established during the import substitution regime of these countries, and in packaging sovereign loans. A s n o t e d in S e c t i o n I o f t h i s paper, their business for the latter had s u b s t a n t i a l l y d e c l i n e d as a r e s u l t of t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l d e b t c r i s i s . At the same t i m e , ASEAN countries* that used to b e i n w a r d looking have now switched towards export-orientation and more industrial dispersal of 53 industries. T h u s , t h e r e is i n c r e a s i n g a c t i v i t y in t h i s a r e a in which b r a n c h e s of f o r e i g n b a n k s a r e n o t a b l e to p a r t i c i p a t e due to existing r e g u l a t i o n s , s u c h ais p r o h i b i t i o n against opening branches outside the capital cities. This still exists today despite the fact that ASEAN countries, except Singapore, are generally "underbanked." T h u s , t h e r e s e e m s to b e s o m e s c o p e for allowing foreign b a n k s t o b e i n c l u d e d in A S E A N countries' ongoing financial liberalization. S i n c e . t h e p r e s e n c e o f b r a n c h e s o f f o r e i g n b a n k s o p e r a t i n g in the capital c i t i e s o f A S E A N c o u n t r i e s is already substantial, branch networks of f o r e i g n b a n k s m a y be established in areas outside the capital cities. This will extend the competition between f o r e i g n a n d l o c a l b a n k s in t h e c o u n t r y s i d e . , a n d at the same time, surplus units and foreign investors who locate themselves in the countryside will be offered a wider menu of banking services. This may be accompanied with.the promotion of joint ventures. Although most ASEAN countries have already maintained such p o l i c y , the e x t e n t of e q u i t y participation by f o r e i g n b a n k s in j o i n t v e n t u r e s m a y b e i n c r e a s e d . C. Market Access ASEAN countries have been exercising control over market access t o t h e i r f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m s to p u r s u e c e r t a i n objectives, such as m a i n t a i n i n g the s t a b i l i t y of the f i n a n c i a l system and effectiveness of m o n e t a r y p o l i c y , c o n f i g u r i n g t h e structure of their f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m s to m e e t c h a n g i n g n e e d s of the economy, developing banking skills of l o c a l professionals, etc. The framework agreement should allow ASEAN countries to exercise certain flexibility so t h a t they c a n c o n t i n u e to pursue those objectives while they. proceed witn their financial l i b e r a l i z a t i o n . In t h i s r e g a r d , c e r t a i n a s p e c t s o f t h e financial systems of ASEAN countries must be considered. One is the substantial p r e s e n c e o f f o r e i g n b a n k s in A S E A N c o u n t r i e s in the form of branches, joint ventures, agencies and representative offices. This serves as a testimony that they recognize the importance of the commercial presence of foreign financial institutions in various f o r m s for t h e delivery of financial services. H o w e v e r , g r a n t i n g m a r k e t a c c e s s a u t o m a t i c a l l y to all signatories at this time may not be advantageous to ASEAN c o u n t r i e s s i n c e , g i v e n the s u b s t a n t i a l p r e s e n c e of f o r e i g n banks in t h e s e c o u n t r i e s , i t c o u l d e a s i l y l e a d to a s i t u a t i o n wherein foreign banks would dominate their financial systems. A quota s y s t e m w h e r e i n A S E A N c o u n t r i e s d e t e r m i n e the n u m b e r of a d d i t i o n a l f o r e i g n b a n k s t h a t w o u l d b e p e r m i t t e d to h a v e c o m m e r c i a l p r e s e n c e in their m a r k e t s may be n e c e s s a r y . This may be applied to all f o r m s o f c o m m e r c i a l p r e s e n c e o f f o r e i g n b a n k s , e x c e p t in t h e c a s e of joint ventures, provided that nationals retain control over tne financial institations. The q u o t a s y s t e m should be applied in a n o n d i s c r i m i n a t o r y m a n n e r . A n o t h e r a s p e c t is t n e t r e n d t o w a r d s u n i v e r s a l b a n k i n g or t n e blurring of distinctions among different types of financial 54 institutions. it should be noted that ASEAN countries are gradually moving, though at different speeds, toward this direction. T h u s , in t h e l o n g - r u n , t h e u s e of m a r k e t access to develop or i m p r o v e t h e e f f i c i e n c y of p a r t i c u l a r s u b - m a r k e t s may not be relevant a n y m o r e . In t h e s h o r t - r u n , h o w e v e r , t n e u s e of m a r k e t a c c e s s f o r s u c h p u r p o s e s is s t i l l r e l e v a n t . O n e r e a s o n is that regulations that distinguish different types of financial institutions still exist. A n o t h e r r e a s o n is that some subm a r k e t s of t h e A S E A N f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m s a r e n o t y e t w e l l d e v e l o p e d and that there are no o p e r a t i v e p r u d e n t i a l r e g u l a t i o n s covering those markets. T h u s , universal market access at this stage of the development of the ASEAN financial systems may not be granted. D. National Treatment The Montreal document state that: "When . accorded in conformity with other p r o v i s i o n s of t h e m u l t i l a t e r a l framework, i t is u n d e r s t o o d t h a t n a t i o n a l t r e a t m e n t m e a n s t h a t t h e services exports and/or e x p o r t e r s of a n y s i g n a t o r y a r e a c c o r d e d in the m a r k e t of a n y o t h e r s i g n a t o r y , in r e s p e c t o f a l l l a w s r e g u l a t i o n s and a d m i n i s t r a t i v e p r a c t i c e s , t r e a t m e n t "no less f a v o u r a b l e ' than t h a t a c c o r d e d d o m e s t i c s e r v i c e s or s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e r s in t h e s a m e market." T h i s h a s s u b s t a n t i a l i m p a c t on the c u r r e n t policy of ASEAN c o u n t r i e s on b r a n c h e s of f o r e i g n b a n k s , b u t less on joint v e n t u r e s and o t h e r f o r m s of c o m m e r c i a l p r e s e n c e of f o r e i g n b a n k s . T h e t y p i c a l f o r m s of d i s c r i m i n a t i o n e x e r c i s e d b y A S E A N countries against foreign banks include, among others: ban on the e s t a b l i s h m e n t of b r a n c h e s ; l i m i t o n t h e r a n g e o f b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s t h e y c a n o f f e r , s u c h a s t r u s t _ b u s i n e s s ; n o a c c e s s to refinancing facilities; and prohibition against purchasing local properties for b u s i n e s s p u r p o s e s . 1 9 / O f c o u r s e , t h e d e g r e e o f restrictiveness varies across ASEAN countries. Given the situation that most areas o u t s i d e the c a p i t a l c i t i e s of ASEAN countries are still underbanked, the changing pattern of the business of branches of f o r e i g n b a n k s , and t h e e x p o r t - o r i e n t e d n e s s of ASEAN c o u n t r i e s , t h e r e s e e m s to b e a g o o d r e a s o n f o r i n c l u d i n g foreign b a n k s in t h e b r a n c h i n g d e r e g u l a t i o n c u r r e n t l y b e i n g u n d e r t a k e n b y ASEAL>I countries. A s r e g a r d s t h e r a n g e of s e r v i c e s t h a t may be offered by b r a n c h e s . of f o r e i g n b a n k s , t h i s may be gradually l i b e r a l i z e d in s t e p w i t h t h e m o v e t o w a r d s u n i v e r s a l b a n k i n g . It m i g h t be a p p r o p r i a t e at this p o i n t to c o m m e n t on the proposals of the EC,, and US on m a r k e t a c c e s s and national treatment s i n c e both p r o p o s a l s seem to very c l o s e l y link market access to n a t i o n a l t r e a t m e n t (Cornford 1 9 9 0 ) . C o r n f o r d ' s view of distinguishing the issues under m a r k e t a c c e s s from t h o s e under national t r e a t m e n t should be s u b s c r i b e d by ASEAN c o u n t r i e s . As These are mentioned in N a y a e t al. (1989) i n d i c a t e d in t h e d i s c u s s i o n in t h e p r e v i o u s s e c t i o n s . and also 55 regards m a r k e t a c c e s s , the US p r o p o s a l w h i c h also r e f l e c t s that of the EC p r o p o s a l s t a t e s that: "Each p a r t y (a) shall permit financial service p r o v i d e r s of a n o t h e r P a r t y to establish or expand an e n t e r p r i s e for the p r o v i s i o n of a financial service, and (b) shall permit such enterprises to provide financial s e r v i c e s a n d to c o n d u c t a c t i v i t i e s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e provision of financial services." T h i s is g o i n g f a r beyond what ASEAN countries can possibly offer. As regards (a), ASEAN countries will be o b l i g e d to o p e n t h e i r m a r k e t s t o . a l l signatories. As already mentioned above, foreign banks can easily overwhelm the market since t h e r e is a l r e a d y a s u b s t a n t i a l n u m b e r of foreign banks currently o p e r a t i n g in v a r i o u s f o r m s in ASEAN financial markets. I t m a y w e l l b e f o r A S E A N c o u n t r i e s t o r e s o r t to a q u o t a system if they think that additional foreign banks can be accommodated by the financial s y s t e m . What may be conceded by ASEAN countries is t h e r e l a x a t i o n o f the prohibition against foreign b a n k s to e x p a n d t h e i r b u s i n e s s t h r o u g h b r a n c h i n g within each A S E A N c o u n t r y ' s t e r r i t o r y for r e a s o n s a l r e a d y c i t e d above. As regards part (b) , it obliges ASEAN countries to grant u n i v e r s a l l i c e n s e to f o r e i g n s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r s w h i l e s u c h l i c e n s e is s e l e c t i v e l y g i v e n to d o m e s t i c f i n a n c i a l institutions. Even universal b a n k s in A S E A N c o u n t r i e s a r e n o t p e r m i t t e d to provide a l l t h e f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s m e n t i o n e d in t h e U S a n d E C proposals. F o r i n s t a n c e , f i n a n c i a l l e a s i n g is n o t a l l o w e d to e x i s t i n g ASEAN universal banks. A l s o , t h e r e a r e f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s m e n t i o n e d in both proposals that are not yet well-developed in ASEAN countries, hence there are virtually no regulations covering them. O n c e d e v e l o p e d or f u l l y a p p r e c i a t e d b y ASEAN countries, t h e r e m i g h t b e a n e e d to i n t r o d u c e n e w r e g u l a t i o n s f o r p r u d e n t i a l reasons that might include restricting the. benefits already e n j o y e d b y f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e r s of o t h e r p a r t i e s . Under A r t i c l e 1 , 2 o f t h e EC p r o p o s a l , t h i s c a n n o t b e d o n e a n y m o r e onca s i g n a t o r i e s a g r e e to t h e i r p r o p o s a l . A s r e g a r d s n a t i o n a l t r e a t m e n t , b o t h t h e EC a n d U S proposals are concerned m o r e a b o u t the r e s u l t s of having a competitive e n v i r o n m e n t t h a n o n t h e p o l i c y o f p r o m o t i n g c o m p e t i t i o n p e r s e in the m a r k e t s . C o r n f o r d is r i g h t in h i s o b s e r v a t i o n t n a t " e q u a l i t y of c o m p e t i t i v e o p p o r t u n i t y " s e e m s an u n t r i e d but p o t e n t i a l l y m o r e intrusive obligation than like treatment as regards taxation and regulation" (p.4). New entrants may be in a disadvantageous position c o m p a r e d w i t h t h o s e t h a t h a v e b e e n in t h e m a r k e t for a long t i m e , and s o m e of them m a y not s u r v i v e under an environment of stiff c o m p e t i t i o n . This s i t u a t i o n m a y be interpreted as not promoting "equality of competitive opportunity" since the results s a e m to b e u n f a v o r a b l e to c e r t a i n p a r t i e s , a l t h o u g h thfe policy environment promotes competition. Still, another example wherein the r e s u l t s of h a v i n g a c o m p e t i t i v e e n v i r o n m e n t can be d i s t i n g u i s h e d from the p o l i c y of p r o m o t i n g c o m p e t i t i o n per se in the markets could be c i t e d . As already mentioned above, ASEAN countries, except Singapore, still maintain loan portfolio allocation policy because they expect their banking system to perform developmental functions aside from commercial functions. 56 Thus, they r e q u i r e b a n k s to l e n d to p r i o r i t y s e c t o r s , such as agriculture and small and m e d i u m industries. E v e n if s u c h p o l i c y is applied e q u a l l y t o a l l b a n k s in t h e i r territories, foreign banks may b e p l a c e d in a d i s a d v a n t a g e o u s position because of their u n f a m i l i a r i t y w i t h the sectors and p r o b a b l y , the relatively n i g h e r t r a n s a c t i o n c o s t t h e y incur for g r a n t i n g s m a l l l o a n s when their o p e r a t i o n s a r e d e s i g n e d for the w h o l e s a l e m a r k e t . Again, this could be interpreted as not promoting "equality of competitive opportunity." To deal with this issue, the US p r o p o s a l r e c o m m e n d s the p r o v i s i o n t h a t "No p a r t y s h a l l establish or maintain any measure that requires that financial service be provided by f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r s of t h a t Party" (p.3). While m a n y a n a l y s t s w o u l d l i k e to s e e t h i s b e i n g d o n e , it might take ASEAN countries some time to dismantle their credit allocation p o l i c y given the c i r c u m s t a n c e s under which they were introduced and m a i n t a i n e d . E. Most-Favored-Nation/Nondiscrimjnation Under this concept, all signatories to the sectoral annotation on banking s e r v i c e s w i l l g u a r a n t e e that concessions m a d e b y o n e p a r t y w o u l d b e e q u a l l y a c c o r d e d to a l l . This concept in its purest form m a y lead to unlimited entry by foreign f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e r s into the ASEAN c o u n t r i e s ' financial markets. T h i s is m o r e p r o b l e m a t i c to t h o s e c o u n t r i e s t h a t d o n o t have yet well developed prudential regulations and efficient supervisory institution. M o r e s p e c i f i c a l l y , as regards opening the financial markets, ASEAN countries may suggest a phased l i b e r a l i z a t i o n c o n s i s t e n t w i t h the level of f i n a n c i a l d e v e l o p m e n t of e a c h c o u n t r y . T h u s , the speed of l i b e r a l i z a t i o n i n a l l or in some sub-sectors of t h e f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m m a y be d i f f e r e n t among parties — f a s t e r for c o u n t r i e s w i t h m o r e developed financial systems and slower for c o u n t r i e s w i t h less developed financial systems. A S E A N c o u n t r i e s s h o u l d s t r e s s t h i s so t h a t t h e y w i l l b e accorded greater flexibility in opening up their financial markets. The quota system mentioned earlier should be resorted to. Furthermore, the q u o t a s y s t e m to b e used in allocating a d d i t i o n a l s l o t s for f o r e i g n f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e r s and the rules for i m p l e m e n t i n g it s h o u l d a l s o b e a g r e e d upon in this sectoral annotation. A t t h i s p o i n t , it m i g h t b e important for ASEAN countries to stress on the need to spread the r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of t h e b a n k s a m o n g g e o g r a p h i c a l a r e a s for p u r p o s e s of p r o m o t i n g and d i v e r s i f y i n g t r a d e and i n v e s t m e n t . F. Increasing Participation of D e v e l o p i n g Countries As already mentioned above, ASEAN banking systems are a l r e a d y p a r t i c i p a t i n g in i n t e r n a t i o n a l b a n k i n g , a l t h o u g h s t i l l in a small way. T h i s c a n f u r t h e r b e i n c r e a s e d if A S E A N : c o u n t r i e s successfully hurdle at least two obstacles. One is the strengthening of t h e i r f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m s , in g e n e r a l , and the i n d i v i d u a l f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s , in p a r t i c u l a r . This h i n g e s on a number of f a c t o r s , such as i m p r o v e m e n t in their prudential 57 r e g u l a t i o n s , a v a i l a b i l i t y of s k i l l e d m a n p o w e r , a d e q u a t e computer and communication facilities, etc. Joint ventures with foreign banks and the requirement to hire local professionals in i m p o r t a n t p o s i t i o n s of f o r e i g n b a n k s c o u l d be o n e of the w a y s to deal with the p r o b l e m of lack of b a n k i n g expertise in ASEAN countries. More competitive banks at home managed by professional bankers can easily integrate themselves in the international banking community. This should be taken into c o n s i d e r a t i o n in t h e l i b e r a l i z a t i o n p r o c e s s b e c a u s e , p r e m a t u r e or i n d i s c r i m i n a t e l i b e r a l i z a t i o n c o u l d l e a d to g r e a t e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n of the A S E A N f i n a n c i a l m a r k e t s in f o r e i g n hands. Under this situation, there w i l l b e n o A S E A N , b a n k to s p e a k of that could p a r t i c i p a t e in i n t e r n a t i o n a l b a n k i n g . T h e s e c o n d o b s t a c l e t h a t A S E A N c o u n t r i e s m u s t h u r d l e is t h a t of increasing their trade and i n v e s t m e n t . ASEAN banks could follow t h e b u s i n e s s of t h e i r n a t i o n a l s in o t h e r c o u n t r i e s . The v o l u m e of b u s i n e s s s h o u l d r e a c h a c e r t a i n l e v e l t h a t c a n sustain the initial o p e r a t i o n s o f A S E A N b a n k s in t h o s e countries. As banking b u s i n e s s e x p a n d s , b r a n c h e s / s u b s i d i a r i e s of ASEAN banks c a n p e r h a p s s t a r t e x t e n d i n g b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s to n a t i o n a l s of h o s t countries. This is a long shot for A S E A N countries, and it greatly depends on h o w t h e i r e x p o r t of g o o d s and capital are t r e a t e d in h o s t c o u n t r i e s . G. Regulatory Situation The Montreal document is very much relevant to ASEAN countries in t h i s a s p e c t . It r e c o g n i z e s t h e r i g h t o f countries to i n t r o d u c e n e w r e g u l a t i o n s . R e g u l a t i o n s a r e n e e d e d e v e n in t h e process o f . l i b e r a l i z a t i o n to f i n e t u n e t h e f i n a n c i a l system so that the e f f e c t i v e n e s s of m o n e t a r y p o l i c i e s s h a l l be maintained. As already n o t e d a b o v e , s o m e of the banking institutions and b a n k i n g a c t i v i t i e s m a y b e n e w to t h e A S E A N b a n k i n g s y s t e m s , h e n c e prudential r e g u l a t i o n s a r e n e e d e d to m a i n t a i n t h e integrity of the f i n a n c i a l s y s t e m as w e l l as p r o t e c t d e p o s i t o r s and i n v e s t o r s . Some ASEAN c o u n t r i e s a r e in t h e p r o c e s s o f reorganizing their regulatory bodies. In t h e P h i l i p p i n e s , f o r e x a m p l e , t h e r e a r e a number o f b i l l s t h a t s e e k to r e f o r m t h e k e y regulatory bodies, such as the C e n t r a l B a n k , the S e c u r i t i e s and Exchange Commission to make it the l e a d a g e n c y in t h e capital market, and the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation. Thailand and Indonesia a r e n o t f a r b e h i n d in t h i s p r o c e s s . T h e E C a n d t h e US s e e m t o h a v e d i f f e r e n t v i e w s in t h i s a r e a . The EC proposal allows new regulations that may be introduced a f t e r t h e a g r e e m e n t o n l y t o " p r e v e n t or s o l v e a s e r i o u s economic crisis or f i n a n c i a l d i s t u r b a n c e " ( p . 8 ) . As already mentioned a b o v e , ASEAN countries may introduce new regulations especially in n e w l y d e v e l o p e d f i n a n c i a l s u b - m a r k e t s for p r u d e n t i a l reasons even if there is no i m m i n e n t c r i s i s . In contrast, the US proposal accommodates new regulations after the agreement for prudential reasons, b u t it a d d s t h a t " s u c h actions shall not 58 prevent the establishment by financial service provider of another Party of an e n t e r p r i s e for t h e p r o v i s i o n of financial services on c o n d i t i o n s w h i c h accord n a t i o n a l treatment" (p.9). It should be pointed out that the new regulations could include limiting t h e n u m b e r o f p l a y e r s in n e w l y e s t a b l i s h e d sub-markets in o r d e r t o c o n t r o l t h e l e v e l o f c o m p e t i t i o n in t h o s e particular sub-markets. H. Safeguards and Exceptions The f r a m e w o r k a g r e e m e n t s h o u l d i n c l u d e s a f e g u a r d s to allow A S E A N c o u n t r i e s t o o p e r a t e w i t h s o m e f l e x i b i l i t y . In t h e e v e n t o f severe balance-of-payments crisis, ASEAN countries may temporarily suspend the liberalization process committed under the framework a g r e e m e n t while they sort out the causes of the problem. T h e y m a y r e s o r t t o d i s c r i m i n a t o r y m e a s u r e s if t h e r e is sufficient e v i d e n c e to s h o w t h a t the i m b a l a n c e s w e t e caused by excessive a c t i v i t i e s of foreign f i n a n c i a l s e r v i c e s p r o v i d e r s in host countries. T h i s is in s h a r p c o n t r a s t to t h e U S ( A r t i c l e 8) and EC ( A r t i c l e 15) p r o p o s a l s . Safeguards are also necessary to prevent foreign financial services suppliers from practicing p r e d a t o r y p r i c i n g in h o s t c o u n t r i e s . VI. I N C R E A S I N G C O M P E T I T I V E N E S S O F B A N K S IN A S E A N C O U N T R I E S AND INCREASING THEIR SHARE OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN B A N K I N G S E R V I C E S This section examines some measures that can improve competitiveness of ASEAN banks and increase their share i n t e r n a t i o n a l t r a d e in b a n k i n g ' s e r v i c e s A. Improving the in Competitiveness ASEAN countries have already identified some barriers to competition among banks operating within their own territories. Indeed, t h e r e a r e s e r i o u s e f f o r t s to d i s m a n t l e these barriers. One o f t h e s e b a r r i e r s is t h e p r e s e n c e o f several large stateo w n e d f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s in t h e A S E A N f i n a n c i a l m a r k e t s . The special privileges they enjoy confer them undue advantage over private banks. A l t h o u g h o r i g i n a l l y d e s i g n e d to be development banks, state-owned banks have g r a d u a l l y moved into areas where private banks are operating. T h e r e is now a move towards privatizing most of t h e s e s t a t e - o w n e d b a n k s w h i l e the special privileges g i v e n to t h e r e m a i n i n g o n e s h a v e b e e n slowly phased out. This process could perhaps be a c c e l e r a t e d . The s e l e c t i v e c r e d i t c o n t r o l p o l i c y of A S E A N c o u n t r i e s has undermined t h e c o m p e t i t i v e n e s s of A S E A N b a n k s . It h a s weakened t h e i n i t i a t i v e o f b a n k m a n a g e r s to m a n a g e l o a n p o r t f o l i o s i n c e a big c h u n k o f i t is e a r m a r k e d t o s p e c i f i c p r i o r i t y s e c t o r s . The d i s m a n t l i n g of t h i s p o l i c y , w h i c h w a s a l r e a d y b e g u n b y s o m e A S E A N 59 countries, will hopefully develop more professional the r e g i o n . bankers in In the p a s t , policies that encouraged specialization have fragmented the f i n a n c i a l m a r k e t s of A S E A N c o u n t r i e s and reduced c o m p e t i t i o n a m o n g d i f f e r e n t t y p e s of f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s . The recent trend towards universal banking will hopefully increase competition among different types of financial institutions. Fee-based activities have been encouraged. This is important since t h e r e is a g r o w i n g m a r k e t f o r f e e - b a s e d s e r v i c e s f o r both domestic and foreign clients. E x p e r i e n c e o f A S E A N b a n k s in this area will be extremely useful when they compete in the international financial markets. Prudential regulations in A S E A N c o u n t r i e s h a v e also been revised to r e d u c e i n s t a b i l i t y in t h e i r f i n a n c i a l systems that might result from stiffer c o m p e t i t i o n . For instance, capital requirements for p r a c t i c a l l y a l l t y p e s of b a n k categories have been revised upwards. T h i s w i l l e n c o u r a g e s m a l l b a n k s to merge among t h e m s e l v e s or a c c e p t f o r e i g n e q u i t y p a r t i c i p a t i o n . Also, r u l e s on l o a n s to b a n k d i r e c t o r s , o f f i c e r s and r e l a t e d interests h a v e b e e n t i g h t e n e d to d i s c o u r a g e t h e m f r o m c o m m i t t i n g f r a u d . A strong bank that has a good track record at home will be in a b e t t e r p o s i t i o n to e n t e r t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l b a n k i n g c o m m u n i t y . Finally, a p o l i c y of a l l o w i n g b r a n c h e s of f o r e i g n b a n k s to expand their operations within the territories through branching and to d i v e r s i f y their b a n k i n g s e r v i c e s can further e n h a n c e the competitiveness of ASEAN banks. B r a n c h e s of foreign banks operating in ASEAN countries have served as an impetus for competition. Moreover, they are key sources of banking innovations. T h i s is i m p o r t a n t t o A S E A N c o u n t r i e s since there are no p a t e n t s to i n n o v a t i v e b a n k i n g i n s t r u m e n t s and services developed by foreign banks. B. Increasing in B a n k i n g the S h a r e of Services International Trade One of the ways by which ASEAN banks can increase their share of international t r a d e in b a n k i n g services is through integration of tneir financial markets. This, of course, requires h a r m o n i z a t i o n of their banking p o l i c i e s . It m i g h t be w o r t h w h i l e to c o n s i d e r t h i s a t t h i s m o m e n t s i n c e A S E A N countries are in the p r o c e s s of l i b e r a l i z i n g their financial markets. Joint venture banks could be easily encouraged among ASEAN countries if t h e i r b a n k i n g r e g u l a t i o n s (and tax systems) are harmonized. There are already some initiatives being done by ASEAN countries to e x p a n d i n t r a - A S E A N b a n k i n g a c t i v i t i e s that- n e e d to be encouraged further. O n e is t h e a g r e e m e n t on using ASEAN currencies in i n t r a - A S E A N t r a d e . It w i l l p r o m o t e the expansion of trade particularly with ASEAN countries which are confronted 60 with c h r o n i c b a l a n c e - o f - p a y m e n t s d e f i c i t s or w h o s e traders are covered by tight foreign exchange regulations. More importantly, it w i l l e x p a n d i n t r a - A S E A N b a n k i n g a c t i v i t y a r i s i n g f r o m greater intra-ASEAN financial flows. Another initiative, wnich unfortunately has not yet taken off the ground, is the development of the ASEAN bankers' acceptance (ABA). I t is s u p p o s e d to c a p t u r e t h e A S E A N m a r k e t s o n acceptances which have been largely serviced by American and British banks. T h e A B A s w o u l d b e e l i g i b l e o n l y to c o v e r imports of goods from other ASEAN countries. With harmonization of banking regulations and tax system as well as relaxation of foreign exchange regulations among ASEAN countries, prpgress in t h e d e v e l o p m e n t of A B A s c o u l d t a k e p l a c e . It m i g h t b e f e a s i b l e f o r A S E A N b a n k s to c r e a t e a n interbank market among themselves. I t w a s p o i n t e d o u t in S e c t i o n II that some A S E A N b a n k s a r e n e t l e n d e r s in t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l interbank m a r k e t , while others are net b o r r o w e r s . T h u s , the potential for developing this market already exists. Beyond the A S E A N r e g i o n , it m i g h t b e n e c e s s a r y for ASEAN banks to p a r t i c i p a t e in s o m e o f t h e a c t i v i t i e s of established international banks. T h e c o u n t r y f u n d s tfhat h a v e b e e n recently created for ASEAN countries could have been one of sucn opportunities. All of these funds are being managed by i n t e r n a t i o n a l b a n k s with p r a c t i c a l l y no p a r t i c i p a t i o n from ASEAN b a n k s w h e n in f a c t s o m e o f t h e a c t i v i t i e s , s u c h a s f o r m u l a t i o n o f p r o p o s a l s for c l i e n t f i r m s , c o u l d h a v e b e e n r e a d i l y d o n e by ASEAN banks. Finally, the framework agreement on trade in banking services w i l l h o p e f u l l y g i v e m o r e o p p o r t u n i t i e s for A S E A N banks to increase their physical presence in other countries, especially those that have been their important trading p a r t n e r s . There are strong indications that a multilateral framework agreement w i l l be m o r e b e n e f i c i a l to A S E A N c o u n t r i e s as w e l l as other developing countries than a bilateral agreement. 61 REFERENCES Ariff, M., B. Singapore," Kapur and June 1990. Arndt, H. W. Development " F i n a n c i a l S y s t e m of XI, No. 3 (1987). Asian Development Bank. ADB, 1990. A. Tyabji. Unpublished. Asian "Money Market Indonesia." Development Savings Outlook 1990. Key I n d i c a t o r s of D e v e l o p i n g M e m b e r ADB. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 1989. Bank of Thailand. "Financial Institutions Thailand." December 1989. Unpublished. . "Commercial Unpublished. Banks of Thailand." Bhatt, V. V. "On Participating in Markets." Services and Development Context. New York: U N C T A D , 1 9 8 9 . and Manila: Countries' of Market in and December International Potential: The Central Bank of t h e P h i l i p p i n e s ( C B P ) . Fact Book: S y s t e m of t h e P h i l i p p i n e s . Manila: CBP, 1988. C o l e , David C . and Betty F . S l a d e . "Development in I n d o n e s i a . " J u n e 1 9 9 0 . Unpublished. Study: 1989. Capital Indian Financial of M o n e y Markets C o r b o , V i t t o r i o and Jaime de M e l o . "Lessons from the Southern Cone Policy Reforms." The World Bank Research Observer 2, N o . 2 (July 1 9 8 7 ) . Cornford, Andrew J. " N o t e s on a P o s s i b l e M u l t i l a t e r a l Framework for International Trade in Banking Services." UNCTAD Discussion Papers No. 28. G e n e v a : U N C T A D , April- 1 9 9 0 . . " C o m m e n t s on the P r o p o s a l s of t h e E u r o p e a n C o m m u n i t y "and U n i t e d S t a t e s C o n c e r n i n g an A g r e e m e n t R e g a r d i n g International Trade in Financial Services," August 1990. Unpublished. Edwards, Sebastian. " T h e O r d e r o f L i b e r a l i z a t i o n of t h e E x t e r n a l S e c t o r : An A n a l y s i s B a s e d on the S o u t h e r n C o n e Experience." University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Economics, 1985. Mimeographed. Erquiaga, Philip. "Improving Domestic Resource Mobilization Through Financial Development - Indonesia." ADB Staff Paper No. 40. Manila: Asian Development Bank, November 1987. 62 International Monetary Fund. Washington: IMF, October International Financial 1987. Statistics. Iwata, Kazumasa. "Liberalisation of Trade in Financial Statistics." P a c i f i c T r a d e in S e r v i c e s . E d i t e d b y L e s l i e V . Castle and Christopher Findlay. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1988. Lamberte, Mario B., R o s a r i o G . Manasan, Roberto G. Mariano, E r l i n d a M . M e d a l l a , M a n u e l F . M o n t e s , and C e l i a M . R e y e s . "A R e y i e w and A p p r a i s a l o f t h e G o v e r n m e n t R e s p o n s e to the 19831984 Balance-of-Payments Crisis." "PIPS M o n o g r a p h Series No. 8. Makati: Philippine Institute for Development Studies, October 1985. Lee, Jungsoo and I. P. David. ''Changing P a t t e r n of Financial Flows to Asian and Pacific Developing Countries." ADB Statistical Report Series NO. 11. Manila: ADB, 1989.' Lin, See-Yan, Chung Tin Fiah, L i m C h e e S i n g , and Wan Hamdan. " M o n e y M a r k e t s in M a l a y s i a , " J u l y 1 9 9 0 . Unpublished. Macroeconomic Bangkok: 1986. Policy Program. Financial Resources Management. Thailand Development Research Institute (>TDRI), MTN.GNS/W/68. "Trade Mimeographed. in F i n a n c i a l Services." 4 September 1989. MTN.GNS/FIN/W/i. "Proposal by the European Community Draft Financial Services Annex to t h e Agreement on Trade in Services." 10 J u l y 199*0. M i m e o g r a p h e d . MTN.GNS/FIN/W/2. " S u b m i s s i o n by the United S t a t e s on Services." 12 J u l y 1 9 9 0 . M i m e b g r a p h e d . Financial MTN.GNS/w/105. "Proposal by the European Community Draft General A g r e e m e n t o n T r a d e in S e r v i c e s . " 18 J u n e 1 9 9 0 . m i m e o g r a p h e d . MTN.GNS/W/71. " T e s t of t h e A p p l i c a b i l i t y of C o n c e p t s , and R u l e s to t h e F i n a n c i a l S e r v i c e s S e c t o r . " 15 1989. Mimeographed. Principles September Naya, Seiji, Kernial S . S a n d h u , Michael Plummer and Narongchai Akrasanee. ASEAN-US Initiative: Assessment and Recommendat i o n s for I m p r o v e d E c o n o m i c R e l a t i o n s . Singapore: institute of S o u t h e a s t A s i a n S t u d i e s , 1 9 8 9 . Newson, John. "The Internati.onalisation of Banking."' Pacjfic Growth and Financial Interdependence. Edited by Augustine H . H. Tan and Basant Kapur. Massachusetts: Allen & Unwin Inc., 1986. 63 Nidhiprabha, B h a i ^ u p o h g a n d G o s a h Arya,. " E f f l a t e n c y in t h e Thai Financial Sector." Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI), 1987. Unpublished. QUibria, M. G. "Service Trade and Asian Developing. Economies." Asian Development Bank Economics and Development Resource Center Report Series No. 44. Manila: A D B , October 1989. Sheng, Andrew. "Bank Restructuring Planning and Research Working Washington: World Bank, 1989. in Malaysia." Paper Series Policy, No. 54. Sutalaksana, Dahlan M. "Commercial Banking Links in ASEAN." SEACEN Staff Paper N o . 15. Kuala Lumpur: Squth-'East Asian C e n t r a l B a n k s R e s e a r c h a n d T r a i n i n g C e n t r e , 19;86. T a n , Edita A. "Bank Concentration and Structure of Interest." S c h o o l of E c o n o m i c s D i s c u s s i o n Paper N o . 8 9 1 5 . Quezon City: U n i v e r s i t y of the P h i l i p p i n e s , 1 9 8 9 . ..... * " D e v e l o p m e n t "Finance a n d S t a t e B a n k i n g : A S u r v e y of Experience." PjDS Staff Paper Series No. 84-04. Makati: P h i l i p p i n e I n s t i t u t e for D e v e l o p m e n t S t u d i e s , 1 9 8 4 . Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI). "1987 Conference on E f f i c i e n c y and C o m p e t i t i v e n e s s of Economy," November 1987. Unpublished. ' Year-End the Thai . "1986 Year-End C o n f e r e n c e on Financial Management," December 1986. Unpublished. The Economics D e p a r t m e n t . Money and Banking Lumpur: Bank Negara Malaysia, 1984. in M a l a y s i a . Tyabji, Amina. " F i n a n c i a l R e f o r m in A S E A N . " N a t i o n a l of S i n g a p o r e , N o v e m b e r 1 9 8 9 . Unpublished. Whalley, John (Coordinator). The Uruguay London: McMillan Press Ltd., 1989. World Bank. Philippine Financial Industry and Energy Operations _ . World Development University Press, 1989. Resources Round Kuala University and Beyond. Sector Study. Washington: Division, world Bank, 1988. Report 1989. Washington; Oxford 64 PIDS WORKING PAPERS WP. No. 89-01 The Philippines: Recent Performance, Prospects for 1989-'90 and Policy and Development Issues. Josef T. Yap and Mario B. Lamberte (P28.00) W.P. No. 89-02 Linkages in Development A Philippine Case Study. Gustav Ranis, Frances Stewart and Edna A. Reyes (P48.00) WP. No. 89-03 Employment, Productivity and Wages in the Philippine Labor Market: An Analysis of Trends and Policies. Edna A. Reyes, Edwin MUan and Ma. Teresa C. Sanchez (P34.00) W.P. No. 89-04 Employment Effects of Selected Structural Adjustment Policies in the Philippines. Rosario G. Manasan (P22.00) W.P. No. 89-05 ASEAN-US Initiative: The Philippine Experience. Ertinda M. Medalla and Rosario G. Manasan (F48.00) W.P. No. 89-06 Financial Liberalization and Interest Rate Determination: The Case of the Philippines, 1981-1985. Ma. Socorro H. Gockoco (P27.00) W.P. No. 89-07 Japanese and US Development Assistance to the Philippines: A Philippine Perspective. Fitologo Pante, Jr. and Romeo A. Reyes (P15.00) W.P. No. 89-08 Employment Strategies for Accelerated Economic Growth: The Philippine Experience. Edna A. Reyes and Edwin Milan (P30.00) WP. No. 89-09 Philippine Trade Policy Options. Filologo Pante. Jr., Florian A. Alburo and Erlinda M. Medalla (P16.00) W.P. No. 89-10 Integrative Report on the Informal Credit Markets in the Philippines. Meliza H. Agabin, Mario B. Lamberte, Mahar K. Mangakas and Ma. Alcestis A. Mangahas (P35.00) WP. No. 89-11 Response to New Market Opportunities: The Case of the Overseas Employment Sector. Ma. Alcestis AbreraMangahas (P27.00) W.P. No. 89-12 A Study of the Export Financing System in the Philippines. Mario B. Lamberte, Rosario G. Manasan, Ertinda M. Medalla, Josef T. Yap and Teodoro S. Untalan (P73.00) WP. No. 89-13 Case Studies on the Monitoring of Informal Credit Markets. Aida Lava, Rosario de Guzman, Joselette de los Santos and Dennis Arroyo (P24.00) WP. No. 89-14 Hie Health Impact of Urban Poor Housing and Environmental Conditions. Orville Solon (PI 2.00) W.P. No. 89-15 Cost Comparisons of Selected Metro Manila Hospitals. Ruben Caragay (PI 1.00) W.P. No. 89-16 Towards Appropriating Economic Rent from the Philippine Logging Industry. Marian S. delos Angeles W.P. No. 89-17 Recent Policy-Oriented Research and Current Policy Issues: A Cursory Review. Filologo Pante, Jr. and Mario B. Lamberte (P24.00) 65 W.P. No. 90-01 The Philippines: Recent Performance, Prospects for 1990-1991, and Policy and Development Issues. Josef T. Yap (P16.00) WJ». No. 90-02 An Assessment of the Performance of the Aquino Government in Selected Policy Areas, 1986-1988: An Overview and Summary. Erlinda M. Medalla W.P. No. 90-03 An Assessment of Philippine Public Administration, 1986-1988. Ledivina V. Carina (P30.00) W.P. No. 90-04 An Assessment of the External Debt Management in the Philippines, 1986-1988. Josef T, Yap (P13.00) W.P. No. 90-05 An Assessment of Policies Affecting the Financial Sector, 1986-1988. Mario B. Lamberte and Julius P. Relampagos (P35.00) W.P. No. 90-06 An Assessment of Fiscal Policy in the Philippines, 1986-1988. Rosario G. Manasan (P34.00) W.P. No. 90-07 An AssessmentofTrade and Industrial Policy, 19861988. Erlinda M. Medalla (P27.00) W.P. No. 90-08 A Review of Natural Resource and Environmental Management, 1986-1988. Marian S. delos Angeles and Noela Lasmarias (P34.00) W.P. No. 90-09 An Assessmentof Labor and Employment Policies in the Philippines, 1986-1988. Edna A. Reyes and Ma. Teresa C. Sanchez fpmnm W.P. No. 90-10 An Assessment of Population, Health and Education Policies in the Philippines, 1986-1988. Alejandro N. Herrin (PI 5.00) W.P. No. 90-11 A Review of the 1986 Retain of the Individual Income Tax. Rosario G. Manasan W.P. No. 90-12 An Analysis of the Value Added Tax in the Philippines. Rosario G. Manasan W.P. No. 90-13 The PIDS-NEDA Annual Macroeconometric Model, Version 1989: A Summary. Winnie M. Constantino. Roberto S. Mariano and Josef T. Yap (P20.00) W.P. No. 90-14 A Review of Fiscal Policy Reform in ASEAN Countries in the 1980s. Rosario G. Manasan W.P. No. 90-15 Comparative Saving Behavior of Rural and Urban Households in the Philippines. Romeo M. Bautista and Mario B. Lamberte (P14.00) W.P. No. 90-16 Reestimation of Shadow Prices of the Philippines. ErlindaM. Medalla, Cecille M. del Rosario, Virginia S. Pineda, Rosario G. Querubin and Elizabeth S. Tan W.P. No. 90-17 Economics of Philippine Fisheries and Aquatic Resources: A Literature Survey. Marian S. delos Angeles, Ernesto P. Gonzales, Ramyleo Pelayo and Lota A. Ygrubay 66 W.P. No. 90-18 The Philippine Industrial Sector Policies, Programs and Performance. Filologo Pante Jr. and Erlinda MedaUa (P23.00) W.P. No. 90-19 Health, ManpowerEmploymentandProductivity inthe Philippines. Edna A. Reyes and Oscar Picazo W.P. No. 90-20 MCSME Promotion Policy and Legislative Agenda: Focus on Monetary Policy, Finance and Credit Programs. Mario B. Lamberte W.P. No. 90-21 Credit Unions: An Underrated Mode of Mobilizing and Allocating Resources in Rural Areas. Mario B. Lamberte Julius P. Relampagos and Douglas H. Graham W.P. No. 90-22 Trade in Banking Services in , ASEAN Countries. Mario B, Lamberte (P23.00) Copies may be obtained at the: RESEARCH INFORMATION STAFF (RIS) PHILIPPINE INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES ROOM 307, NEDA SA MAKATI BUILDING 106 AMORSOLO STREET, LEGASPI VILLAGE MAKATI 1200, METRO MANILA, PHILIPPINES TELS: 86-57-05; 88-40-59 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial - NoDerivs 3.0 License. To view a copy of the license please see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is a download from the BLDS Digital Library on OpenDocs http://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/