view this paper - ICADTS International Council on Alcohol, Drugs
Transcription
view this paper - ICADTS International Council on Alcohol, Drugs
BLOOD ALCOHOL IN HOSPITALIZED TRAFFIC CRASH VICTIMS R. A. Rockerbie, G. R. Martin, H.E. Parkin Drinking Driving CounterAttack, Ministry of the AttorneyGeneral, Policy Planning & Research, 4th Floor (Bridge), 800 Hornby Street, VANCOUVER, B.C. V6Z 2C5, Canada. Research on the effect of alcoholic influence on severity of injury in traffic crashes is hampered by the necessity to give priority to medical care over research and police investigations. Consequently, such studies are few in num ber. Blood alcohol was determined in 1S2 consecutive adult crash victims at a hospital in Finland in 1974. In 30 per cent of them, alcohol was found in the blood. In a study in South Africa in 1976, 36 per cent of a group of 115 traffic crash victims exceeded the legal limit of .05 2 per cent. In a roadside survey in B.C. in 1974, 1,157 drivers were breath-tested between the hours of 10 p.m. and 3 a.m. Evidence of drinking was found in 23.7 per cent, and 6.6 per cent exceeded the legal limit of .08 per cent 3 in the blood. The B.C. Medical Association, in June, 1978, endorsed a proposal by the M i n i s t r y of Attorney-General to study blood alcohol in traffic crash victims admitted to the Royal Columbian Hospital in New Westminster. The purpose of the study was to determine the proportion of injuries which were alcohol-related; to explore the relationship between blood alcohol concentrations and severity of in jury; and to assess the feasibility of routine blood al cohol testing in all hospitalized traffic crash victims. The study has been completed and this report summarizes 165 soae of the findings. Data collection covered a six month period from I-Jovember 20, 1978 to liay 12, 1979. All patients admitted to the emergency ward of the Royal Columbian Hospital, as the re sult of a motor vehicle accident, were included in the study. Ilinors were omitted. Basic information concerning the accident was collected including: age, sex, time and date, patient crash role, seatbelt usage, duration of stay, and police action. The degree of injury was assessed using the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) of the American Association for Automotive Medicine. Venous blood speci mens, upon signed consent, were collected for quantitation of alcohol. Patients were guaranteed individual confiden tiality of information. In total, 776 crash victims were examined. Of these, 422 (54 per cent) were drivers, 270 (35 per cent) were passen gers, 43 (6 per cent) were pedestrians, and 41 (5 per cent) were cyclists. Hales comprised 58 per cent and females com prised 42 per cent of the group. The incidence and degree of alcohol usage is shown in Table 1. Forty-eight patients were not tested due to lack of informed consent, communication barriers, patient's critical condition, inadequate specimen, or other techni calities. Of those tested, 30 per cent of the drivers, 38 per cent of the passengers, 26 per cent of the cyclists, and 3 3 per cent of the total had been drinking. Of the 410 drivers tested, 25.8 per cent exceeded the legal limit of .00 per cent blood alcohol and an additional 3.9 per cent had been drinking but were below the limit. Forty-one per cent of tested male patients and 21.1 per cent of the fe male patients had been drinking. Female passengers and female drivers did not differ significantly in blood alco hol concentration. Of the male patients, 57.3 per cent of the passengers had been drinking as contrasted to 35.2 per 166 cent of the drivers. In an age vs alcohol correlation, a number of peculiarities became apparent (Table 2). Wher eas those over age 40 made up 24 per cent of non-drinking male patients, this age group made up only 32 per cent of the female casualty victims. Similarly, of those who had been drinking, the over 40 group made up only 9 per cent of the males as compared to 17 per cent of the females. Other correlations are shown in Table 2 with the under 25 age group conforming to the expected pattern. Consistent with established social and drinking habits which follow cyclic weekly patterns, 50 per cent of the injuries occurred between 4 p.m. Friday and 4 a.m. Sunday. This period accounted for a disproportionate 64 per cent of the blood alcohol findings over .08 per cent. The time of day at which accidents occurred was found to be age-re lated. Persons under 16 and those aged 16-19 were found to have 62.5 and 52.7 per cent of their accidents respective ly between 3 p.m. and 4 a.m. Accidents involving the 20-40 age group occurred between 4 p.m. and 4 a.m. in 6 5 per cent of the instances. Sixty-one per cent of the injury accidents involving persons over 40 occurred between 12 noon and 8 p.m. 2 A weak correlation (R =0.40) was found between the severi ty of injury and BAC (Table 3). however, A significant difference, (P<.01), was found in the degree of injury sus tained by drinking crash victims as compared to the sober group. Only 2 9 per cent of the sober persons had an AIS greater than one, as contrasted to 40 per cent of those who had been drinking. No significant difference in AIS between drivers and passengers was found. The duration of hospital stay was not related to the BAC at admission, but quite expectedly correlated well with the AIS (R“=0.7S). Seventy-eight per cent of the patients were discharged from Emergency. Thirteen per cent remained 167 in hospital for more than 7 days. Compliance with the seat-belt law was 58 per cent. This corroborates a previous finding of 60 per cent by Parkin and Constance (5). Of the non-drinking persons 68 per cent wore seatbelts as contrasted to 33 per cent of those drink ing. A marked relationship was found between age and seat belt usage. Compliance increased gradually from 12.5 per cent at age 16 and under to 73.1 per cent in subjects over 40. Sixty-eight per cent of the drivers complied as com pared to 44.4 per cent of passengers. The degree of injury was significantly less (PC.01) in the belted vehicle occu pants as compared to those that were not. The difference in AIS appeared to be about 23 per cent, thus making a clear case for seatbelt usage without even taking into ac count vehicle occupants who may have completely escaped injury wearing seatbelts. Police recognition of alcoholic influence and possible pro secution was hampered and complicated by the presence of injury, shock, and the need to bring the injured person to medical aid prior to collection of evidence and breath testing. A search of police files revealed that of 106 drivers exceeding the legal limit of .08, only 18 were charged for drinking driving. Legal provision for mandato ry blood testing for alcohol in hospital, as compatible with medical care, can provide the evidence needed for law enforcement, and is recommended as a result of this study. A question may arise as to whether all crash victims should be tested, or only drivers and on the basis of clinical ob servations which suggest the presence of alcohol. Selective blood sampling has a shortcoming in that clinical observ ations for impairment are unreliable. Secondly, testing of drivers alone wouldplace an onus on medical staff to identify patient crash role, the legal implications of which are unattractive. 168 Blood testing for alcohol in an injured person oresents ad vantages to patient management. Patients with alcohol in their blood have their senses dulled to the extent that se rious injuries are obscured. Knowledge of the patient's level of impairment significantly reminds the physician to place less reliability on the patient's self-assessment. Testing for alcohol may also minimize confusion between effects of trauma and the effects' of alcohol on level of consciousness. Similarly the hazard of synergism between alcohol and anesthetics, sedatives, tranquilizers and anal gesics is decreased. The 196 9 amendments to the Criminal Code of Canada, which make breath-testing mandatory and of which blood testing may be an extension for those injured, precludes most of the arguments related to infringement of civil rights and liberties. The legal ramifications as they affect the prac tice of medicine, however, will need to be carefully stu died and resolved for such a lav/ to be workable. ■tt 0) -p w <D E-i dP O O r— o o T~ O O r- o T— LO ^5* CN ro LO cK> in r— <D x— '— ' — ' CN •w> O O 00 o o r— • -- —o o r— -- o> ro CO CN P- ro T~* VO t— m ro T— r— • A| KO V~~ .— . • O in df> T~~ o> X~~ o H Eh V ro ro CN CD • *** in r'— ' ' — *— V£> ro CN O x— 3 ►-1 H U• ► o u t-q O O U < Q O O J w Q < M i4 O o *— dP • • o • T— • o f4 o O T— ro m o o 00 CN iK ,— V •— <* V • • c\ o r'— ' ro *•>■» o V LO o> o o • LO • „— . o T— —' CO m o o\o dP V cn —' rT— o 1 — ' VD VO r— o "—' o • r” fi CN • rro P< u o Eh [7 m M [H < Oi r— m CQ C Eh 170 o| dP CO CN VO *w CN 00 IT) CM r— U CD ->H m O y (U Cn c <D cn W (0 CL. >—* CN VO V0 CN CN CO £ (0 •H -P CO <U Ti (1) Hi -P CO ■H rH o o i-q < 5H o Ph p* in cr> TABLE 2 INCIDENCE OF DRINKING AS RELATED TO SEX AND AGE Hale Patients Female Patients Age (years) Drinking % 124 109 (62) 118 (47) 36 (56) 97 (41) 25 - 40 50 (29) 73 (29) 17 (27) 66 (27) >40 16 (9) 59 (24) 11 (17) 76 (32) TOTAL 175 (100) Not Drinking Q. O 250 (100) Drinking Not Drinking 9* 1 5 64 (100) 9 t> 239 (100) 171 CM '— LO LO LO O r^* T— O r— CO ' LO CM o o rtf -P O Eh a £ o c D LO «— t— Ip r-* c\j lo m (N ro LO 00 CM rr- CM o o LO I g L f) fO 00 ^ ro D •^r Q W Eh fO CN < H ' in (N cm t— co ro o o — > W ro CP cr» lo ro co r- 2 < LO CO vd r- LO CM — ' — m H LO Eh O O ro c- cm ro ro CJ < CQ ro O lo U V < CQ I I I I I I 3 { lo O H oo h o 3 o o oo ro I I I I ro r- O'! cm I — I I I I I I 1 I O O r-~ Eh *3 M oo o a o u ro r- vc o cm <N ro LO <Ti ro U1 ^ o o ro LT) O J o O cn U H 1-1 < CN CN < —' Q M O O « w O ps5 t3 U ro w co H < 172 (N <T\ S\ CO 61 ro ro r" -sr *— O ' —• W> ^ O O <Ti oo 'SJ* i-l < [H o Eh REFERENCES 1. Honkanen, R . , Ottelin, J., 31ood Alcohol Levels in Injury Victims at the Emergency Station of a Rural Central Hospital, Ann. chir. Gynne. Fenn., 65 (1976) 232-236. 2. livers, R.A.il. et al, Alcohol and Road Traffic Injury, S.A. lied. J., Aug. 13 (1977) 328-330. 3. Smith, G.A. et al, A National Roadside Survey of the Blood Alcohol Concentrations in llighttime Canadian Drivers, Road and Motor Vehicle Traffic Safety Branch, Transport Canada, Ottawa, 1976. 4. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, American Association for Automotive Iledicine, liorton Grove, 111., U.S.A., 1976 . 5. Parkin, H., Constance, P. I1V injuries reduced since seatbelt law. B.C. lied. J. 21 :5 186-187, 1979. 173