PETA SMYTH
Transcription
PETA SMYTH
P ETA S MYTH ANTIQUE TEXTILES P ETA S MYTH ANTIQUE TEXTILES EXHIBITION OF TEXTILES MANY WITH A TREE OF LIFE DESIGN Wednes day 1 3th July t o Saturday 2 3 rd July 2 0 1 1 42 M oreton Stre et Pi m lic o L ondo n SW1V 2 PB 0 2 0 76 30 9 89 8 g aller y @petas my th. c o m w ww. petas my th. c o m Wi t h t h an ks t o th e fo llowi ng p eople for th eir help i n t h e pre pa rat ion of t his cat alo gue Ma r y Scho eser D r Ph ilip Sy ka s C lare Browne Fr an ces ca Ga lloway Ros ema r y Crill Sue Ker r y a nd Mari o Bet tella P r ic es of tex t iles avail able o n re que st THE TREE OF LIFE The Tree of Life is an ancient and worldwide symbol. Often associated now with India and Persia, genetic, linguistic and other evidence suggest the origin to have been in a tree worshipping culture existing prior to 10,000 BCE in Sundaland, an area of Southeast Asia that was exposed during the last ice age. When the sea rose between 8,000 and 7,000 BCE, submerging all save the Malay Peninsula, Borneo, Java, Sumatra and the smaller islands and forcing this culture to abandon its territory, the imagery seems to have reached China, later dispersing to India and Mesopotamia and, by northerly routes, Russian and Nordic lands1. Whether or not this was the source, Tree of Life images can certainly be seen on objects and buildings surviving from civilizations of the eighth century BCE in a region stretching across modern day northwestern Iran, Armenia and eastern Turkey, where a stylised Tree of Life has remained potent both in mythology and as a national emblem. Later cultures, from Celtic to Mesoamerican, also left visual evidence of the power of this image, which most often symbolises immortality or fertility. For Europeans however, it is the Indian and Chinese variants of Tree of Life imagery that were to become most familiar. From China, exports directly to Europe by the Portuguese and Spanish were well organised by around 1600, with the Dutch and English taking control of this trade before the century was out. Chinese kesi weavers interpreted Tree of Life motifs with great inventiveness, incorporating a wide range of flowering trees that were set on stylised rocks against a background of clouds to complete the allusion to a landscape. This imagery had a bearing on the European idea of how oriental textiles should appear and when Indian palampores began to be imported, at first in a trickle with the founding of the East India Companies by the English, Dutch and French, the designs that proved popular were those that adhered to this format. European designs were even sent to India to be copied, and by the later seventeenth century, when palampores had become widely available and fashionable as bed hangings, they seem to have been caught up with European design in a cycle of reciprocal influence. Indian palampores and the large crewelwork panels so characteristic of English embroidery of the period typically show a flowering tree standing on a hillock (cat. nos. 2, 3, 4, and 11, 12) and the variations on this basic design are in both cases often remarkably similar, as the Indian chintz adapted to European taste and the English embroiderer copied the new designs. Although often seen today merely as delightful decoration, the depiction of non-indigenous flora and fauna indicated a genuine and sometimes sophisticated interest in other cultures. Through prints and textiles such motifs, even the most highly stylised, became widely diffused. Arguably, many northern European pictorial embroideries and verdure tapestries of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries echo the ‘landscape’ of the palampore, with prominent foreground mounds and the inclusion of exotic animals. Eighteenth century European design was much indebted to Chinese exports; silk weavers in particular adopted chinoiserie, even repeating miniature Tree of Life scenes many times over a length of cloth. On many occasions the motif was reduced to a single flower or group of flowers with a much smaller vestigial ground. Embroiderers, able to more freely place their motifs, might incorporate such ‘trees’ into a complex overall pattern, and the influences of Indian and Chinese tastes in Tree of Life patterns were often combined in the same textile (cat. no. 16). A design of a delicate meandering blossoming vine (cat. no. 15), which would on occasion incorporate birds or butterflies, speaks strongly of Chinese influence. Others followed suit, and with the increase during the eighteenth century of block printing in Europe using the Indian techniques of fast dyeing both French and English printers developed patterns indebted to Indian designs and characterised by knarled or knotty branches adorned with a variety of exotic blooms. Certainly, the eighteenth and nineteenth century Genoese makers of mezzari copied closely the palampore design (cat. no. 30). After the 1851 Great Exhibition, and the establishment of what was to become the Victoria and Albert Museum, Indian textiles were once more widely seen and a fresh crop of patterns appeared and fed into later styles such as Art Nouveau (cat. no. 18). The symbolism had, by then, become subservient to European taste. Mary Schoeser 1 Oppenheimer, Stephen Eden in the East: The drowned continent of Southeast Asia, Phoenix, 1998 2 1. FRAGMENT OF AN EMBROIDERED PALAMPORE Gujarat, circa 1700-1720 68 x 32 in (172.5 x 81 cm) The design of this fragment, embroidered in silk thread in chain stitch, cut out, padded and re-applied at a later date, may be compared to a section of a complete embroidered palampore in the collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum, London (Museum No. IS.29-1889)2, and to another in the Musée des Arts Decoratifs, Paris (Inv. 16079 A)3. The design is worked in silk using a needle and an ari, the fine hooked awl used by the mochi community of cobblers and leather workers of the Kutch-Saurashtra region of Gujurat, and modified for use on textiles such as this. 2 Crill, Rosemary Indian Embroidery, V & A Publications, 1991, plate 5 3 Gasc, Nadine Broderie au passé et au present, Union Centrale des Arts Decoratifs, 1977, no. 94 3 2. PALAMPORE Coromandel Coast, circa 1750-1770 122 x 86 1/4 in (310 x 219 cm) The term palampore denotes usually the chintz hangings produced in the area of South East India known by the various European trading companies that established bases there as the Coromandel Coast. The complex methods of mordant and resist dyeing used to 4 create them are described by Rosemary Crill 4. This palampore, together with the following three hangings, was made using this time consuming technique. It has, as part of its design, a pair of charmingly stylised cranes attempting to catch fish in the pools at the base of the tree. 4 Crill, Rosemary Chintz- Indian Textiles for the West, V & A Publishing, 2008, pp. 10-13 3. PALAMPORE Coromandel Coast, circa 1760-1780 121 x 90 in (307 x 228.5 cm) Chintz was exported to South East Asia long before the trading companies of the European powers were established, but once the market seemed viable, the companies exercised a great deal of influence over the cottons that were made for export to Europe. In a ready illustration of the interdependence of European and eastern textile design, by the 1660’s the East India Trading Company was sending patterns for the Indians to copy that were of an English style infused with a western idea of Chinese taste 5. The presence of a type of bamboo in the border design of this palampore is an indication of the influence of Chinese decoration that had once again become prevalent during the period that this hanging was produced 6. 5 Edwards, Joan Crewelwork Embroidery in England, William Morrow & Co, 1975, pp. 89-112 6 Crill, Rosemary Chintz- Indian Textiles for the West, V & A Publishing, 2008, p. 21 5 4. PALAMPORE Coromandel Coast, circa 1775-1790 95 x 77 in (241.5 x 195.5 cm) A palampore with a tree of closely related design may be found in the collection of The Royal Ontario Museum (acc. No. 934.4.3) 7. The Victoria and Albert Museum has a palampore (Museum No. IS.44-1950)8 6 that shares elements of the border design, and on which the outline of the tree follows the same basic form with some variations. 7 Irwin, John & Brett, Katharine B. Origins of Chintz, HMSO, 1970, plates 38, 39 8 Crill, Rosemary Chintz- Indian Textiles for the West, V & A Publishing, 2008, plate 24 5. PALAMPORE Masulipatam, Coromandel Coast, circa 1800-1825 78 x 50 in (198 x 127 cm) John Irwin, in writing of a hanging of similar form in the collection of the Calico Museum, Ahmedabad (Acc. No. L.77), notes that the Masulipatam school ‘seems to have flourished entirely under Muslim craftsmen, some of whom may have been Persian immigrants’ 9. John Guy, referring to a more closely related palampore in the Victoria and Albert Museum (Museum No. IS.68-1950), writes that ‘cloths such as this evolved from the earlier palampores (..): the flowering tree has assumed a more subdued form as a cypress, and the overall treatment is more in keeping with Persian taste. Although produced primarily for the export trade to Iran, they also found a ready market in southern India and Southeast Asia’10. 9 Irwin, John & Hall, Margaret. Historic Textiles at the Calico Museum, Ahmedabad, Bastikar, 1971, HMSO, 1970, plate 20 10 Guy, John Woven Cargoes - Indian Textiles in the East, Thames and Hudson, 1998, plate 56 7 6. ORPHREY PANEL England, circa 1450 40 1/4 x 71/2 in (102 x 19 cm) Frame 45 x 13 in (114 x 33 cm) English ecclesiastical embroidery of the fifteenth century moved in style a little towards that of continental Europe, but retained a character of its own and was still highly prized for its quality. Indeed, the geometric decoration of the present chasuble cross recalls aspects of the Opus Anglicanum of the previous two centuries. Worked in silk and silver gilt thread and linen, the orphrey shows the Virgin and St. John at the foot of the Cross as angels with chalices catch the blood of Christ. Another figure, which appears to be a further representation of John the Evangelist, is seated within the panel above. 8 7. ORPHREY PANEL Probably Germany, circa 1450 32 x 71/2 in (81 x 19 cm) Frame 45 x 13 in (114 x 33 cm) Orphreys, together with other vestments of the mediaeval and later periods, developed via the apparel worn by both priests and laity in the primitive church from the ordinary clothing of classical antiquity, and derive the name from the Latin aurifrisium, a term referring to the gold work of the Phrygians11. Orphrey crosses and bands were embroidered throughout Europe for use on copes, chasubles and dalmatics, and it is probable that the present piece was made in Germany. The Virgin is shown holding the Child and standing on an anthropomorphised crescent moon, an allusion to her chastity. The iconography also has links with that of the ‘Woman of the Apocalypse’, a figure associated with the Virgin by Bonaventura in the 13th century and described in the Book of Revelation, 12:117 as ‘a woman clothed with the Sunne, and the Moone under her feete..’. The saint below, holding a staff and aspergillum, is possibly Emmeram of Regensburg, purported to have been the Bishop of Poitiers and martyred circa 652AD, having been tortured and gradually hacked to pieces while bound to a ladder. Another candidate, though less likely, is Benedict of Nursia, the ladder in this case an allusion to chapter 7 of his Rule, where reference is made to a ladder consisting of twelve steps of humility and reaching to heaven. 11 Mayer-Thurmann, Christa C., Raiment for the Lord’s Service – A Thousand Years of Western Vestments, The Art Institute of Chicago, 1975 9 8. TENT STITCH EMBROIDERY England, circa 1630-1660 11 1/2 x 171/2 in (29 x 44.5 cm) Frame 151/2 x 21 1/4 in (39.2 x 54 cm) This picture is extremely finely embroidered on canvas, using a variety of stitches in coloured wools with highlights of silk, and illustrates scenes from the encounter of the beautiful Hebrew widow Judith with 10 Holofernes, a general of the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar, as described in the deuterocanonical Book of Judith, 10:17-13:11. The story is depicted with a great verve, the compelling episodes, culminating in the demise of Holofernes and the triumphant return of Judith and her maid to the gates of Bethulia, utterly ignored by an array of animals, a kingfisher, a swan and a frog among them, in the vicinity of a very English church. 9. PAIR OF CREWELWORK HANGINGS England, circa 1670 103 x 54 in (262 x 137 cm) & 1021/2 x 54 in (260 x 137 cm) The term crewel refers to the loosely twisted worsted yarn used to embroider the plain or twill weave linen or cotton (or mixture of both) of which these textiles consist. The style of the earliest forms of English crewelwork such as this derive immediately from Elizabethan embroidery such as blackwork, the tendrils and other motifs worked up to a grand scale12, but the impact of continental and eastern decoration is also 12 strong. In the case of this pair of curtains the crewel embroidery has been reapplied at a later date onto a replacement linen ground, a common occurrence due to the handling to which the curtains would have been subjected and the relative weakness of the twill when compared to the robustness of the wool. The Victoria and Albert Museum, London has a crewelwork curtain of similar design and date (Museum No. T.29-1932)13 PROVENANCE: Alvar Gonzàlez-Palacios, Casa Estiva, Italy 12 Synge, Lanto Art of Embroidery-History of Style and Technique, Antique Collectors’ Club, 2001, pp. 146-147 13 King, Donald & Levey, Santina Embroidery in Britain from 1200 to 1750, V & A Publishing, 1993, plates 81-82 10. FRAGMENT OF A CREWELWORK HANGING England, circa 1680-1690 Mounted. 82 x 20 in (208.5 x 51 cm) The boldness, clarity and massive size of the design of this crewelwork fragment hint at the impression that the hangings would have made in their complete state. A. F. Kendrick observed that English ‘crewel-work designs seem to be the result of a complex interplay of influences, European, Indian and Chinese..’.14, and this panel is a strong expression of the English version of the Baroque style, combined with reminiscences of an earlier European reaction to the exotic as seen, for example, in the Flemish Giant Leaf tapestries of the previous century. 14 Kendrick, A. F. English Needlework, A. & C. Black, 1967, pp. 136-138 13 11. PAIR OF CREWELWORK HANGINGS England, circa 1700-1720 86 x 45 1/2 in (218 x 116 cm) & 861/2 x 431/2 in (220 x 110.5 cm) The early eighteenth century witnessed a development in the design of English crewelwork, with more pronounced exotic components introduced. Kendrick notes the downplay of the heavy baroque leaves and the introduction of bright flowers15, as in this pair of curtains where the foliage is reduced to allow space for colourful and obviously oriental flowers. The trees have become more elegant, lighter, and regular. Professional 14 workshops were responsible for some of the crewelwork that was produced in England in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but a large proportion was created by amateurs, leading to a view of such embroidery as as a domestic pursuit. It is worth remarking on the differences between the two curtains; they have been made to the same pattern, but the embroiderer has introduced variations between the two in outline and colour. It is a possibility that each was created by a different lady of the same house. The embroidery has since been reapplied. 15 Kendrick, A. F. English Needlework, A. & C. Black, 1967, pp. 149-150 12. CREWELWORK HANGING England, circa 1700-1720 98 3/4 x 46 1/2 in (251 x 118 cm) This hanging, an exceptional example of crewelwork with an exuberant array of exotic animals, flowers and oriental architecture in brilliant colour, is an enchanting illustration of the European fascination with the east, while the idiosyncratic interpretations of the various flora and fauna show the remove at which these subjects remained from everyday life. Another hanging of the set is illustrated in Lanto Synge’s Art of Embroidery16. Several of the animals embroidered on a pair of curtains in the collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, (Museum No. T.172-1923)17 and on a related curtain in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (Accession Number 08.186a), are copied from the same patterns. 16 Synge, Lanto Art of Embroidery-History of Style and Technique, Antique Collectors’ Club, 2001, plate 161 17 King, Donald & Levey, Santina Embroidery in Britain from 1200 to 1750, V & A Publishing, 1993, plate 88 15 13. BEDCOVER England, circa 1700 97 x 821/2 in (246 x 210 cm) The forms of the vegetation in this English bedcover have a close affinity with Indian textile designs, by which the maker has obviously been influenced. The latticed ground, flowering stems and fleur de lys at the centre are all worked in fine embroidery in gold coloured silk. A bedcover of closely related design is illustrated in Synge’s Art of Embroidery.18 This, the following textile and the English coverlet (cat. no. 17) are flat quilted, a form of embroidery in which no wadding or padding is inserted between the two layers of fabric. The upper layer was usually of silk 16 or, as here, of fine linen and the lower of coarser linen, a structure that served to add strength and weight to the textile. This bedcover appeared in the exhibition The Glamour of Silk at Spink and Son in 1996, the catalogue of which states that it was ‘Made by the relatives of Elizabeth Throckmorton of Coughton Court, Warwickshire’. PROVENANCE : The Throckmorton family, Coughton Court, Warwickshire Spink & Son EXHIBITED : Spink & Son The Glamour of Silk, 28th May28th June 1996 18 Synge, Lanto Art of Embroidery-History of Style and Technique, Antique Collectors’ Club, 2001, plate 138 14. CUSHION COVER England, circa 1710-1720 261/2 x 35 in (67.5 x 89 cm) The cushion cover has been flat quilted and embroidered in yellow, ivory and black silk thread using a variety of stitches, including stem, back, herringbone and long and short, with a background of vermicular design and scattered flowers. The central roundel has a basket of exotic flowers and each corner roundel a perched feng, or fenghuang, the Chinese mythical bird that served as an emblem of the empress and symbol of high virtue and grace. This bird, a combination of pheasant, peacock and crane, has often been referred to as a phoenix by Western writers, or called by its Japanese name of Ho-O. 17 15. EMBROIDERED SILK England, circa 1710-1720 23 1/2 x 201/2 in (59.5 x 52 cm) Frame 28 x 25 1/2 in (71 x 65 cm) The satin, embroidered in silk in various stitches, that makes up this joined panel would almost certainly have been professional work intended for a dress. The technique was used widely to decorate textiles intended for costume at the start of the century, with ‘dresses often made of plain silk material with embroidery in bright-coloured silks. The designs (..) chiefly floral’19. A dress of a silk such as this would have been a costly 18 item and highly prized, and when no longer in fashion might have been donated to the church to be remade as vestments; this particular silk appears to have been used as a chalice veil. A hanging embroidered in silk on a linen ground in the collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum, London (Museum no. T.402-1921) 20 appears to follow the same basic pattern. Bearing in mind the Acts of Union of 1706 and 1707 it is interesting to note the English Tudor rose and the Scottish thistle among the flowers. 19 Kendrick, A. F. English Needlework, A. & C. Black, 1967, pp. 154-156 20 King, Donald & Levey, Santina Embroidery in Britain from 1200 to 1750, V & A Publishing, 1993, plate 101 16. COVERLET England, circa 1710-1730 74 x 681/2 in (188 x 174 cm) This coverlet has a profusion of flowers embroidered in opulent coloured silks and metal thread, and owes much to Chinese, Indian and Persian textiles, both in its format and in the chinoiserie motifs used as decoration. The original drawing of the design is visible through the flat quilting, a technique which itself had originated in China and India. Coverlets such as this were often part of a set of bed furnishings also consisting of bolsters, cushions, etc, as may be seen in the case of a collection of embroideries at the Victoria and Albert Museum, London, (Museum No. T.48-1967). A coverlet similar to this, with identical flat quilting, is illustrated in Synge’s Art of Embroidery.21 21 Synge, Lanto Art of Embroidery-History of Style and Technique, Antique Collectors’ Club, 2001, pp. 183-187, plate 170 19 17. PAIR OF NEEDLEWORK HANGINGS England, circa 1740 933/4 x 213/4 in (238 x 55.5 cm) & 93 1/2 x 213/4 in (237 x 55.5 cm) The design of these needlework panels, which were 20 perhaps intended as bed hangings, echoes the motifs used on crewelwork. Entirely in coloured silk, the panels have been well restored in the 19th century, work proudly recorded in the label attached to the back of one of them that reads.. ‘Finished Putting New Black Silk Into This Curtain. May. 1850.’ 18. PRINTED SILK COVER England, circa 1895-1910 106 1/4 x 701/2 in (270 x 179 cm) Dr Philip Sykas, Research Associate at MIRIAD, Manchester Metropolitan University, has kindly supplied the following information. This is a pattern known from G.P. & J. Baker’s record sample P.212 hand-block printed on a linen/jute mixture fabric circa 1902-1905. However, the pattern dates from earlier, a small piece of paper proof identifying it as block B67 and its accompanying borders as B95, named “Haddon”. The border blocks were cut in July 1895 so providing an earliest possible date for use of the pattern as a table cover. The designer’s name is not recorded; one possibility would be Sidney Mawson. It was produced for Baker's client No.10, which may have been Liberty. 21 19. TAPESTRY FRAGMENT Southern Netherlands, circa 1550-1570 381/4 x 551/2 in (97 x 141 cm) The most famous representation of a boar hunt predates the present fragment by a quarter of a century; The Killing of the Wild Boar (Month of December) from the set of the Hunts of Maximilian, woven in Brussels after designs by Bernard van Orley, shows the boar attacked by several dogs while another lies wounded by the tusks of the boar. The treatment of the subject in the present fragment is far simpler, but remains bold and characterful. The tapestry from 22 which it came was probably woven in the town of Oudenaarde, though, as Guy Delmarcel notes, the interpenetration of tapestry designs and weavers between the three neighbouring towns of Oudenaarde, Grammont and Enghien ensured that the ‘production of the three towns can only be distinguished (…) by documentary evidence or by town and weavers marks’ 22. De Meûter & Vanwelden illustrate various Oudenaarde tapestries of similar style23. 22 Delmarcel, Guy Flemish Tapestry, Thames and Hudson, 1999, p. 174 23 De Meûter, Ingrid, & Vanwelden, Martine Oudenaardse Wandtapijten, Lannoo, 1999, pp. 131-141 20. TAPESTRY FRAGMENT Southern Netherlands, circa 1550-1570 18 x 61 in (45.5 x 155 cm) A section of a Giant Leaf tapestry, probably woven in Oudenaarde, although it may possibly be the work of an Enghien manufactory. As is noted by George Wingfield Digby and Wendy Hefford the vogue for large leaf ‘verdures’ began in the second and third decades of the sixteenth century and remained until supplanted by a more straightforward landscape design in the following centuries. In the catalogue of the Victoria and Albert Museum’s Medieval and Renaissance tapestry collection they write that the ‘new style, whatever its exact origins (…) undoubtedly reflected the new naturalism and study of botany. For this was the period when the great botanical gardens were first being developed and new plants were being introduced into Europe from Asia and the New World’24. This interest in the unfamiliar is also marked by the inclusion of exotic animals, such as the monkey depicted in this fragment with a captured bird. 24 Wingfield Digby, G. F. The Tapestry Collection – Medieval and Renaissance, HMSO, 1980, p. 54 23 24 21. TAPESTRY Brussels, circa 1650 22. NEEDLEWORK PICTURE France, circa 1610 1031/2 x 80 in (263 x 203 cm) 171/2 x 25 in (44.5 x 64 cm) Frame 22 3/4 x 301/4 in (57.5 x 77 cm) Depicting a pair of leopards rather incongruously situated in a northern European landscape, one of them lazily pawing at a bird far out of reach, this tapestry was woven in the workshops of Jan van Leefdael (1603-1668). Mentioned as a dean of the craft in 1644, van Leefdael was, to use the term employed by Thomas Campbell, one of the ‘moguls’ of Flemish tapestry manufacture in the middle of the seventeenth century, together with his son Willem, his close associate Gerard van der Strecken and van der Strecken’s son in law Gerard Peemans25. Based in Brussels, he also collaborated with Everaert Leyniers and Hendrik I Reydams26. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, has five tapestries of the set The Story of Anthony and Cleopatra from the workshop of van Leefdael (Accession nos. 92.1.7-11) 27. 25 Campbell, Thomas Tapestry in the Baroque – Threads of Splendour, MMA, 2007, p. 441 26 Delmarcel, Guy Flemish Tapestry, Thames and Hudson, 1999, p. 366 27 Standen, Edith European Post-Medieval Tapestries and Related Hangings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, MMA, 1985, no. 32, pp. 206-217 It is likely that this needlework, which has as its subject Amram and Jochebed entrusting Moses to the waters of the Nile, adapted from the Book of Exodus, 2:3, would have been one of a series of narrative scenes on a valance. Bed hangings consisting of episodic pictures finely worked in tent stitch were produced in several countries of Northern Europe in the last third of the sixteenth century and into the first years of the seventeenth century, most notably in France, Scotland, England and Flanders. The curtains from these sets tended to suffer from constant handling, and are consequently a rarer survival. The Musée National de la Renaissance, Château d’Écouen, has a set of three valances that show the Story of Moses 28 . The needlework has been restored. 28 Privat-Savigny, Maria-Anne Quand les Princesses d’Europe Brodaient, éditions de la Réunion des Musées Nationaux, 2003, cat. no. 5, pp. 77-83 25 23. WOOLLEN VELVET France or Netherlands, circa 1690 Mounted. 321/4 x 68 in (82 x 172.5 cm) Woollen velvet of this period, comparatively little of which survives, was referred to in various terms, such as mockado, caffoy, and Utrecht velvet. This last, as Peter Thornton writes, is misleading, ‘the term may derive from the fact that the figured versions were woven on a draw-loom and were thus velours de trek (i.e. 26 à la tire, drawn)’29. These joined widths have a repeated design of mounted figure, perhaps a French dragoon of the period, before the façade of a house. There is a width of velvet of the same design, bordered with two similarly striped widths showing repeating hunting motifs, in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (Accession no. 2006.561). 29 Thornton, Peter Seventeenth-Century Decoration in England, France and Holland, Yale University Press, 1978, pp. 111-112 24. COVERLET France or Italy, circa 1705-1710 77 x 851/2 in (195 x 217 cm) The cover consists of four joined widths of silk damask brocaded with Bizarre motifs in silk and metal thread and silk chenille. Thornton, in Baroque and Rococo Silks, writes that in the final years of the seventeenth century ‘a new and extraordinary phase in the history of silkdesign begins. It is usually known as the ‘Bizarre Phase’ because many of the patterns produced at this stage are so fantastic as to be virtually indescribable. The high point of the Bizarre Phase was reached about 1705, and lasted until 1710 or so..’. He also notes that one of the causes behind the new designs may have been exposure to oriental forms of decoration on textiles brought in by the East India Companies in the last third of the seventeenth century30. The term is derived from the title of the book by Dr Vilhelm Slomann, Bizarre Designs in Silks, in which attention was first drawn to the group of patterns. The Abegg Foundation has a chasuble made, in part, of a silk brocade of similar design (inv. no. 3991)31. 30 Thornton, Peter Baroque and Rococo Silks, Faber and Faber, 1965, pp. 95-101 31 Ackermann, H. C. Seidengewebe des 18. Jahrhunderts I - Bizarre Seiden, Abegg-Stiftung, 2000, cat. No. 144 27 25. NEEDLEWORK PICTURE French, circa 1720-1730 26. NEEDLEWORK PICTURE French, circa 1720-1730 35 x 223/4 in (89 x 58 cm) Mounted. 341/2 x 23 in (87.5 x 58.5 cm) 161/4 x 13 1/2 in (41 x 34 cm) Mounted. 16 3/4 x 131/4 in (42.5 x 33.5 cm) The design of this picture, on which little of the needlework has been completed, is an intriguing mixture of turquerie and chinoiserie. The Turkish elements may have their inspiration in the appearance at the French court in 1721 of Mehmet Effendi, the first ambassador from the Sublime Porte to be sent to reside in Europe. Prior to this mission the Ottomans had considered it beneath their dignity to send ambassadors and reserved their envoys for Islamic courts. A series of military and diplomatic reverses altered the situation and the eleven year old Louis XV received the ambassador, who created an understandably excited reaction from the Parisian crowds, and an enduring effect on the French taste for the exotic. The fact that both this and the previous panel were never finished, and never used, allows consideration not only of the boldness of the colours that were favoured, but also of the degree of elaboration of the drawn design that was expected of the needleworker. 28 27. SILK BROCADE France, circa 1730-1740 97 x 42 in (246.5 x 107 cm) The trend towards naturalism in silk design that developed slowly throughout the second half of the seventeenth century achieved its apogee in the 1730’s before retreating again in the 1740’s. In the words of Peter Thornton, ‘By far the most spectacular change that was to take place in silk-design during the whole of the eighteenth century occurred just after 1730 when an entirely new style was evolved consisting of great heavy flowers and fruit depicted in a completely naturalistic manner’32. The credit for this change is ascribed to the Lyonnais silk designer Jean Revel, and despite the fact that only one design can be securely attributed to him, Revel’s style permeates silk production of the decade and is evident in the large flowers of this silk, brocaded in coloured silks and silver thread. PROVENANCE : Collection of Mrs Ailsa Mellon Bruce, daughter of the renowned banker, politician and art collector Andrew W. Mellon 32 Thornton, Peter Baroque and Rococo Silks, Faber and Faber, 1965, pp. 116-124 29 28. COVERLET France, circa 1740-1750 98 1/2 x 87 in (250 x 221 cm) The four joined widths of silk damask of which this cover is made are of a wonderfully luminous blue. The design with its small repeat is typical of the period. PROVENANCE : 30 Spink & Son 29. TWO LENGTHS OF SILK VELVET Italy, circa 1680-1700 116 x 23 in (295 x 59 cm) This pair of lengths of velvet have a design of leaves and flowers that includes the Florentine giglio, or fleur de lys, in a cut pile enriched with a silver gilt bouclé weft on a ground of yellow silk with a further weft of silver gilt thread. Hangings of this type are often referred to as palio (a word which means, simply, cloth), and lend their name to the various horse races in Italian towns, most famously Siena, at which they were apparently offered as trophies for the contrada, or district, represented by the successful rider. A palio, or drappellone (banner), remains even now the prize awarded to the winning district. An identical velvet formed part of the Keir Collection33, and a hanging consisting of two joined widths with a version of the design is in the collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum, London (Museum No. 7792-1862). 33 King, Donald and King, Monique European Textiles in the Keir Collection, Faber & Faber, 1990, no. 153 31 30. MEZZARO ‘DELL’ALBERO CASTAGNO’ Genoa, circa 1850-1870 70 x 82 in (178 x 208 cm) The term mezzaro possibly derives from the Arabic mi’zar, meaning to cover, and references in 16th century Genoese inventories to a ‘mezaro turchino’ and to ‘meizari due Indiane’ indicate their origin via the thriving oriental commerce of the port. Production of the cotton block printed mezzari of the present type had commenced in and around Genoa by the late 18th century, and thrived in the first half of the following century. Although they must have served a variety of purposes, contemporary images show women wearing them as shawls, often attached at the crown of their heads with a silver clasp. They were made to set designs, the majority inspired by the Indian 32 palampores of the previous century and giving prominence to a central flowering tree. The name of each type of mezzaro is taken from a distinguishing feature of the design; mezzari ‘dell’ albero castagno’ derive their title from the chestnut tree that assumes the form of the ‘Tree of Life’ in this composition. Another mezzaro ‘dell’ albero castagno’, with slight variations, is in the collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum, London (Museum No. 622-1891). An identical mezzaro, marked with the stamp of one of the pre-eminent factories, that of Luigi Testori of Sampierdarena, and retaining the original borders that ours lacks, is illustrated in the book Cotoni Stampati e Mezzari34. 34 Rosina, Margharita Belleza, & Gallo, Marzia Cataldi Cotoni Stampati e Mezzari, Sagep Editrice, 1997, pp. 130-137