S - Dr. Gary Jacob
Transcription
S - Dr. Gary Jacob
McKenzie Method Cervical & Thoracic Gary Jacob, DC, LAc, MPH, DipMDT garyjacob.com Back Black Box SL → S: L: R: M: S: → R M+ R S stimulus load (movement &/or positioning) response mechanical symptomatic Back Black Box: Observation vs. Explanation SL → → R M+ R S SL → R M + R S = phenomenology = what = mechanism = why The conceptual models… may eventually alter…effectiveness of the procedures will not change R McKenzie, Cervical Spine Intro p. xxiii SL → →RM+RS = chemical v. mechanical? Chemical (C) = Inflammation Better with rest, better upon awakening Lack of, or negative, response to movement Tends to be constant, intermittent if slight Mechanical (M) Worse/no response from rest, worse upon awakening Positive response to movement, manipulation Tends to be intermittent, constant if severe Intermittent vs. Constant Intermittent: “mechanical” more likely Constant mechanical chemical psychophysiological internal/systemic/organic SL → R M + R S Mechanical Patterns 3 (SL → → R M + R S) Patterns 3 Patterns Amenable To Mechanical (Movement & Positioning) Therapy = Posture stabilization = Dysfunction short tissue = Derangement subluxation stabilization Posture Syndrome Sitting Root of Most Postural Spinal Evil Cause, perpetuator, aggravator Upper cervical extension Cervico-thoraco-lumbar flexion Shoulder int. rotation & adduction Hip flexion Knee flexion McKenzie Slouch – Overcorrect - Back off 10% McKenzie Slouch – Overcorrect - Back off 10% McKenzie Slouch – Overcorrect - Back off 10% Jacob Sit Like you Stand Postural Syndrome Protocols Postural Syndrome Treatment Common for children Uncommon for adults Derangement Treatment Children Cervical Adults Cervical or Lumbar Masaccio Expulsion from the Garden of Eden c. 1424-28 St. Francis in the Desert Giovanni Bellini c. 1430 -1516 DYSFUNCTION The Myth of Muscle Spasm ODE to SPASM violent, involuntary, sustained contraction that prohibits joint motion in the direction opposite the afflicted muscle’s action Myth of Muscle Spasm Loss of Lordosis = paravertebral spasm? radiology’s greatest myth paravertebral muscle spasm would do the opposite! in other words it is impossible… Normal, Loss & Reversed Lordosis Normal lordosis Loss of lordosis Reversal of lordosis Loss of Lordosis due to Paravertebral Muscle Spasm? Normal lordosis Increased lordosis! Loss of Lordosis due to Paravertebral Muscle Spasm? Normal lordosis Loss of lordosis Reversal of lordosis Coming to Terms With Short Tissue Spasm Adaptive Shortening Hypertonic Hyperactive Tight ≠ Spastic Contracted Scar Dysfunction (McK) Myofascial? CNS disorder Short Muscle Expectations Motion loss and symptom provocation . . . Consistent with muscle claimed to be short In direction opposite action of culpable muscle Rx: muscle stretch to recover motion Motion loss and symptom provocation . . . Inconsistent with muscle claimed to be short Consider resistance to intra-articular compression Rx: intra-articular compression to recover motion Short Muscle Behavior Muscle Short Paravertebral Suboccipital Upper trapezius SCM Levator scapulae Motion loss & Symptoms Expected Flexion of the involved spinal area C flexion, lat flexion to opposite side Lat flexion to opposite, rot same side Cervical extension, rot to same side Cervical flexion, rot to opposite side Scalenes Upper Trap Myofascitis Upper Trapezius Myofascial Release with Movement Neural “Mobilization” dysfunction behavior and treatment rules McK: adherent nerve root Increasing root tension: spinal flexion &: Cervical Cervical flexion, Shoulder depression Cervical contra lateral flexion Decreasing root tension: opposite of above “Flossing”: backing tension off @ the last moment giving “slack,” “letting out the line” When Neural Mob May Be OK Dysfunction M & SR: Behaves like short tissue Intermittent ER only Does not remain worse after provocations Old & Cold vs. Young & Hot UE Neural Mobilization Median N. Above horizontal Below horizontal Radial nerve Waiter’s tip Ulnar nerve Hear no evil Median Nerve Mobilization above the horizontal Median Nerve Mobilization below the horizontal Cervico-Brachial Mobilization Establish UE Tension & Roll Lateral Ulnar Nerve Mobilization Radial Nerve Mobilization Short Adductors & Int Rotators Pect Stretch DERANGEMENT Derangement M & SRL features not present in other syndromes Quick changes persist after loading ceases ERL in one direction affects another Response during arc of motion Centralization <> Peripheralization Derangement M & SRL Response to loading in direction of detriment M&SR during motion arc & at ER Symptom Peripheralization Mechanics (ROM) obstructed in another direction i.e. mechanical impedance in other direction Derangement M & SRL Response to loading in direction of correction M&SR at ER only Symptom Centralization Mechanical obstruction diminishes Provocation diminished in direction of detriment Direction of Correction, an educational term here, is known in the literature as Directional Preference Derangement M & SRL “McKenzie Reflex” Promoting instability in one direction promotes obstruction in another Diminishing obstruction in one direction diminishes instability in another Kyphotic Antalgia Posterior Derangement Flexion: - possible - pain during motion - end range pain Sustained or dynamic flexion results in: - peripheralization - increased pain - further loss of extension Kyphotic Antalgia OBVIOUS posterior derangement Extension: - obstructed - no pain during motion - end range pain Sustained or dynamic extension results in: - centralization - diminished pain - recovery of extension - less pain with flexion Symptomatic Response a closer listen Monitor for symptomatic responses During motion (mid range) Peripheralization Centralization After ER AT End Range Cervical Kyphotic Antalgia OBVIOUS Posterior Derangement Monitor symptomatic response Traction: maintained throughout Retraction: flexes upper, extends lower C spine Retraction let go of retraction to extend Mini-rotations at ER to extend more Traction Traction- Retraction Traction-Retract (let go)-Extension Cervical Posterior Derangement self-treatment Correcting sitting posture Overcorrect - relax Stand - sit Cervical retraction Cervical retraction, extension Retraction, extension, mini-rotation Sitting vs. supine Towel, belt Extension from Protruded Position Extension From Neutral Position Extension From Retracted Position Extension from protruded Extension from neutral Extension from retracted McKenzie Prayer Posterior Derangement Mgmt. Two main factors for success or failure 1. Maintenance of Lordosis Sitting, ADLs & transitions, Sleeping Avoid flexion: “cut finger” Counteract flexion with extension ERL 2. Achieve Extension End Range Loading the 3-Rs Recap Posture syndrome RE-EDUCATE Dysfunction syndrome RE-MODEL Derangement Syndrome REDUCE Torticollic/Scoilotic Antalgia OBVIOUS posterolateral derangement Right Lateral Flex/Rot: - obstructed - end range pain Sustained or dynamic contra Lateral Flex/Rot: - centralization - decreased pain - recovery of contra LF/R Then proceed as for ”Fixed Kyphosis” Cervical Disc Horizontal Clefts Von Luschka 1858 Develop during childhood Level of uncinate, progress medially Regular physiologic findings Not degenerative Attempt to adapt to functional demands Weakens lateral containment of nucleus Cervical Disc Horizontal Clefts Von Luschka 1858 Torticollis: Supine Mob Monitor symptomatic response Traction – maintained throughout Step-wise recovery of lateral flexion Rotation in same direction if not tolerated To unlock lateral flexion Unilateral technique Self treatment strategies Therapist Progress to kyphotic protocols Retraction – Lateral Movements Torticollic/Scoliotic Mgmt. Avoid sagittal ERs; find lordotic “magic spot” Push nucleus to middle, then forward Sagittal extension ERL after coronal correction Checks for elimination of “relevant lateral component” i.e. need to avoid loading in sagittal plane Once extension benefits, treat as fixed kyphosis Flexion ER after period of preclusion evaluates for: Persisting derangement Adaptive shortening from avoiding flexion Lordotic Antalgia OBVIOUS anterior derangement Extension: - possible. - pain during motion. - end range pain Sustained or dynamic extension results in: - peripheralization - increased pain. - further loss of flexion. Lordotic Antalgia OBVIOUS anterior derangement Flexion: - obstructed. - no pain during motion. - end range pain. Sustained or dynamic flexion results in: - centralization - decreased pain - recovery of flexion - less pain with extension. Cervical Anterior Derangements not obvious Antalgia not visible – hidden Maybe associated with dysphagia retropharyngeal hemorrhage vs. ? Monitor symptomatic response Supine or sitting flexion maneuvers Spinal Lordotic Antalgia Mgmt. Avoid extension ER Lose lordosis Flexion ERL Later: introduce extension ER to eval for Elimination of anterior derangement Adaptive shortening Cervico-Cephalic Summary: Obvious Derangements Antalgias (obvious derangements) Easy to recognize Easy to fix Mechanics dictate reverse the mechanics Symptoms corroborate respect centralization No Obvious Derangement? What to do? Absent antalgia, detective work required search to find “hidden” derangement employ antalgia based criteria (“ABC”) recall simple antalgia M & SRL patterns choose antalgia M & SRL best fit as if recovering from, or headed to, which antalgia? apply tx protocols of best fit Jacob’s Postulate The utility of McKenzie derangement protocols is proportional to the degree that Mechanical & Symptomatic Responses to Loading resemble kyphotic, torticollic or lordotic antalgia patterns Mechanical Responses a closer look ROM loss? Maintain intended direction? Asymmetry vs. Curve reversal? Standardized McK C Spine Eval ERL history Order of motions tested Sitting: protrusion, retraction, retract extend Supine: retraction, retract extend “If needed”: Lateral flexion, rotation, flexion Tactics Single ROM – loss?, curve reversal? Dynamic loading: monitor symptoms If needed: sustained static loading Especially protrusion/retraction for HA factors sitting bending walking a.m. post-a.m. p.m. stationary moving < Ø >