March 2008 - California Aiseki Kai
Transcription
March 2008 - California Aiseki Kai
C ALIFORNIA A ISEKI K AI Volume 26, Issue 3 March Program Bonnie McGinnis made a short CD from Bruce’s photographs of our show at the Huntington and it is set to music! This is a must see. Come on March 26th and enjoy! We can discuss the show, the stones and our displays and talk about ways to improve for next year. We are always on the lookout for new program ideas and presenters. Please let us hear from you! Note to our long distance members: we would love to hear from you as well. Participation is just an email away. Stone of the Month Yuha Mania: This is a given….Bring in your finds from our March 22-23 collecting trip to the Yuha. Those of you who missed the trip can bring in your Yuha stones from a previous time. Larry found this stone on his first club trip several years ago. It is nearly flat on the bottom and the right side is only 1/2” thick. Thank you, Al Nelson, for researching and taking orders for the rockhounders treasure scoop. They arrived quickly and most have been delivered. We are all set for our trip with a lot less bending. You saved our backs. Thank you all for renewing your membership. Aiseki Kai wishes to thank the following donors who, in addition to their dues, generously contributed $50 or more: Kay Komai, Leila Kusumi, May McNey and Ralph Johnson. Aiseki Kai thrives because of you! March 2008 The Lost Ei Chart I have to admit I was surprised when I read Tom Elias and Hiromi Nakaoji’s last article in Vol. 26-1, on the translation of Murata - Ei’s classifications from a later book by Ei on viewing stones where monyo seki (pattern stones) were positioned as a suiseki group. That was quickly corrected in Vol.26-2 and now compares with their first chart seen in Vol. 25-7. This inspired me to congratulate Tom and Hiromi and salute Horace Hinds, a bonsai and stone collector from the San Francisco Bay who passed away several years ago. I received the chart seen on page 11 of this newsletter in 1981 from Hinds who had heard we were planning a club and offered help. The notation on the left, dated 1973, and signed H.H.H, admits the translation may be “clumsy” and it ends with a request for corrections and input. Since Hinds also indicated (in a letter) that it might not be accurate, I put both in a file and forgot about them. If you take the time to compare the photo to the first chart (Vol. 25-7) translated 35 years later, you will note that the content is basically identical down to the dotted lines. [Note that Hinds even identified the second author as Naga (Ei). In earlier programs I had referred to it as the Murata- Naga Chart]. The Hinds chart was lost in my files for years. When Aiseki Kai was formed in 1983, Toy Sato, whom I consider a pioneer in introducing America to the proper definition of suiseki, was first to let us know, under no uncertain terms, that all those rocks we were offering up as suiseki, were not. In the same year, Hideko Metaxas and Nancy Eaton published, Introducing Suiseki, in Golden Statements, Oct.1983. These authors used the same definitions as Ei and Sato for classifications and shapes of suiseki and added, “In addition to stones resembling landscapes features, there are several other divisions of interesting stones that one may see at suiseki exhibitions. Such stones are usually displayed in a separate area”. They described these other stones in many of the same Japanese terms as Ei. This sounds too simple. [see chart on page 11] Next Month- Trouble looms ahead. Larry Ragle PAGE 2 February Meeting Notes VOLUME 26, ISSUE 3 CALIFORNIA AISEKI KAI by Linda Gill ANNOUNCEMENTS: The Guide to Suiseki and Other Viewing Stones pamphlet is still available for $2. The Melba Tucker Educational Fund paid for the printing. Members attending for the first time were Harry Trieu and Hedy Merganthaler. Hedy is Jon Reuschel's stepmother. Welcome and please come again! STONE OF THE MONTH Jean Horton Barry Josephson Janet Shimizu Hanne Povlsen Linda Gill Hanne Povlsen back Don Mullaly Hanne Povlsen front Larry Ragle The 1 inch wide inner margins are designed for use with a 3 hole punch. - Color Stones Alice Greaves brought a jasper with a pattern of dancing Aztecs or Chinese characters (longevity & plum) from the Eel River. Jim had a red figure stone and a black jasper with red & blue in it. Don Mullally had a 'sorta' mountain from the Eel with yellow, gray, brown & red. Joe Gaytan's blanket stone had yellow & red stripes. Cliff's pinkish-gray stone was wall rubble from China. Don Kruger's dry waterfall was a split in a cliff. Bruce McGinnis had a dark red 'frog' that he received as a gift. Joe James had 3 stones- one red, one maroon and one purple. Harry Trieu's Chinese stone from Guilin was a monk with the top and bottom of different stone. Hanne's Eel River stone was red and round and her dark red near mountain came from 'out there'. Sharon Sommerfeld brought an Eel River stone that had dark red and green in it. Linda found her yellow & red Chicken Blood Stone near a road in China and she had a dark red distant mountain from the Yuha. Jean's Yellow wax stone from China was translucent and his $5 stone, Chinese, was a warped gourd in greens, golds, reds & yellows. Barry's 'heart' came from N. CA. Manny Martinez showed a green dry waterfall. Al Nelson's 4 stones were from the Yuha: a shelter stone, a water pool, a mesa and a cave stone. He also gave Barry a red 'potato'. Janet obtained her malachite in China and had pink stones from the Eel. Phil Chang had a 5 color stone with green, red, brown, white and tan. Jack showed several Yuha stones: an armadillo, a mountain range, an island, a cliff, a slope stone and a bridge or a boat stone. VOLUME 26, ISSUE 3 February Program Notes PAGE 3 CALIFORNIA AISEKI KAI by Linda Gill Jack Dennis talked about the field trip to the Yuha Desert that he will lead on March 22-23. [Details in the last newsletter]. You must call /email Barry Josephson if you plan to come and especially if you plan to meet the group at any location other than Alpine. 714-544-8399 or [email protected]. Safety in the Desert 1. Stay oriented to the vehicles by checking their location regularly. Leaving a marker or noting a landscape feature to mark the top of a ridge that hides the cars is also a good idea. 2. Animal pests can include the rare snake. Rattlers have triangular heads that are wider than their body and usually have rattles. Ants are to be stepped over and only the fire ants can bite you painfully. If you don't know the difference avoid them all. Scorpions are usually only out at night and can be in a hole in the sand or under a stone that is in a pile. Turn over piled stones carefully. Ground squirrels can trip you up - Really! Where you see holes in the sand - walk carefully. Desert iguanas (lizards) are harmless. 3. Take plenty of water. 4. Equipment, recommended but not required: 'the claw' and/or a crowbar to dig a large stone, or both; flags for your pile, bucket or the top of a ridge. PLEASE pick them up when you leave! 2 way radios or even your cell phone which will often work in the Yuha; hat and sunscreen; newspaper to wrap stones and a container for them; toilet paper for.... you know. 5. Develop a visual propensity. Know the categories of stones or the characteristics of the type of stones you seek. Think about what it may look like in the desert. Don't hesitate to turn over ANY interesting/promising stone. a. Don't reject a 'good' stone because it isn't perfect. b. If the stone interests you, take it home for further consideration. It should have good shape, appropriate hardness, color &/or texture, good balance and/or scale, (the golden ratio is 8/3/5) and lastly it must evoke an emotional response. c. Cracks are a flaw, even the appearance of a crack is a flaw! The scholarship of suiseki Learn what makes a good, bad or indifferent stone. Quality counts; size doesn't. 1. Read everything you can find. 2. Attend exhibitions and conferences. 3. Prepare stones to enter shows. You will learn even if they are rejected. 4. It's all about display even with a good stone. 5. Participate in the club. For each stone answer these questions: 1.What do you see in it? 2.Why do you like it? 1&2 are almost the same question. 3.What story does the stone tell you? The value of understanding how the stones are described in a classification system cannot be overstated. A classification system is: > merely a way of describing the suggestion that the stone speaks to you, > a method of organizing & cataloging a collection of stones, > a method of defining the mental image that the stone speaks to a collector. Stones can be catalogued by: geology; origin; shape, surface pattern or color; title - the poetic name or emotion; provenance and any combination/all of the above. Colored or textured stones should exhibit another feature to be collectible. Jack said that all the classification systems we have studied have similarities and differences-especially in the Japanese terms used- and are incomplete. There is no universally recognized, standard system. Jack and Sachiko's guide is designed as an educational tool that will help increase a collector's knowledge of what to look for and will assist him/her to recognize a good stone when he/she sees it in the field and will tend to smooth the progress of attaining a methodical understanding of the art as their collection grows and matures. A working knowledge of a classification system will spark a collector's imagination and will assist that person to see what they seek. Jack's hunting strategies: Walk a line, mark what you like and collect on the way back. Circle an area or wobble side to side in a rectangular area. Visual awareness is 60% effort, 30% attention and 10% luck. The watch words are shibui, yugen, wabi-sabi, wabi and sabi. Shibui is elegance beyond beauty. Commonly found stones in the Yuha dankyu-seki - tableland toyama-ishi - distant mountain doha-ishi - slope stone chusho katachi-ishi - abstract stone chusho mo'yo-ishi - abstract pattern stone shimagata-ishi - island stone continued on page 11 PAGE 4 CALIFORNIA AISEKI KAI VOLUME 26, ISSUE 3 Ask GuyJim Dear GuyJim, In the club’s new brochure (A Guide to Suiseki and Other Viewing Stones), Stone #8, labeled as an Isogataishi, is displayed with figurines of waterfowl. On the page dedicated to “Displaying Stones,” the stone at the bottom of the page is displayed with the figurine of a boat. In the August 2004 issue of the Aiseki Kai Newsletter you were quoted as saying “… even though you may find them in magazines and pictures of stones, the traditional Japanese do not use props such as small boats … pagodas, bridges, animal or human figures that may be found in a scene to enhance a stone’s suggestiveness.” John Naka, bless his soul, would be having us all for lunch if he learned that we may be advocating this. Are we now going to include props with our table top displays during exhibitions? Jack, Alpine Dear Jack, As my disclaimer states, I am not an official spokesperson for California Aiseki Kai, but I will give you my thoughts on accessory figures. My earlier statement that accessory figures do not seem to be commonly encountered in the more formal practice of Japanese stone display would still seem to hold true. However, such usage is not unknown as evidenced by examples seen in large exhibitions and even by Uhaku Sudo in his Keido displays. Students of Mr. Sudo refer to what I have long called accessory figures or figurines as tenkei, the word being translated as “small scenic things”. This usage seemingly derives from tenkei as it more commonly refers to the little items of human interest that are to be found in most landscape painting: small huts, boats, etc. that indicate man’s humble presence in nature. Tenkei are very small, often under an inch. We have seen Keido examples of tenkei being intimately placed directly on the stone, in suiban, on jiita (a thin board of any shape or material, i.e. what we have been calling a jiban), and on shoku (display tables). We also see figurines displayed apart from the stone as distinct complementary, subordinate elements in a manner comparable to the use of an accent plant. In such cases, the figurines are usually a bit larger and may more accurately be called okimono. Okimono were originally ornamental items that were shown, even featured, in an alcove or tokonoma. Often today, the term simply indicates figurines of a wide subject range in contrast to the very limited subject matter of tenkei. As your question is phrased, I will assume your present concern is over the smallest figurines -– those that I have often referred to as accessory figures as distinguished from accent figures – that are placed directly upon a stone or within a suiban. The examples you cite of Nina and Larry Ragles’ use of the two birds and the boat as seen in A Guide… are based directly upon Sudo’s own published examples. In the display of the shore stone (see below) the presence of the birds is particularly successful in explaining what might otherwise be an ambiguous stone. It is to make such connections for the public that I have occasionally used figurines at the Huntington Show and elsewhere during the years. Publicly, I first addressed the issue of accessory figures in the audiovisual lecture I created for the Huntington Show in 1991. In that series of slides I illustrated how the introduction of accessory figures, in that case a series of boats of increasingly larger size and crabs, can affect, even control, how a viewer sees a stone – and in so doing, explained why we normally do not include them in our displays. Without doubt and pretty much without exception, figurines do affect scale and do limit the viewer’s freedom of interpretation … and they do connect with the first time visitor! At the Huntington VOLUME 26, ISSUE 3 CALIFORNIA AISEKI KAI show there has always been an unwritten policy that the use of accessory figures be restricted, but occasionally tolerated for their magical effect. Without question, I have been most culpable for their use, most often when placing the small fisherman under my coastal shelter stone [page 4, figure 2]. That said, I have not personally employed an accessory figure at the Huntington for several years and, off hand, cannot remember any being used recently. I suspect the future will hold more of the same, a general prohibition with occasional exceptions for didactic purposes. If figures are to be considered, the quality of the figurine is important. The ubiquitous mud men figures would seldom be acceptable because, quite frankly, their mass- produced ‘cheapness’ is far too evident – their presence demeans a stone. Metal figurines vary from crude pot metal castings to elegant miniature works of craftsmanship in bronze or precious metals. As with suiseki, the most appropriate figurines are usually those most subtle. In Keido, only the highest quality antiques are deemed acceptable. Finely cast bronze miniatures with natural finishes or patinas (see below) are the closest equivalent. Note that silver and inlaid figurines are sometimes encountered, but I find them ‘wanting to have it both ways’ – they are too eyecatching to be subtle and too abstract and arty to be simply accepted as a natural part of a composition. Subdued is subtle, while bright has an inherently obvious, decorative component. But, being nominally restrained, yet invitingly obvious, is disconcerting! Even the finest figurines should be carefully subordinated to the stone. With experience you will see that this is easily said, yet nearly impossible to achieve. Even in Keido displays, a simple figure usually dominates one’s first impression of the stone. The shore stone (pg 4, figure 1) presents a well balanced natural setting. However, to the casual viewer, the fine figurine could easily become the focal point. I find that a similar problem almost inevitably occurs when a pagoda figurine is added. Although the stone is physically much larger, I defy anyone to look at the next figure and tell me they did not ‘see’ the pagoda before looking at the stone itself! Regardless of stone PAGE 5 quality or symbolic significance, the figure is a visual magnet. Among the few subjects where a figure can complement a stone without overwhelming it is with island and coastal stones. Here, we can consider the use of the boat in the lower example of tabletop display under the topic of Displaying Stones in A Guide … (see below). While our first impression is that of the balanced display, this is an instance where the choice of a figurine of a given scale may be lending confusion as to the intended image of the stone, rather than clarifying the classification. Observe that the form of this stone is somewhat ambiguous: such a smooth contour would normally suggest a distant island, while the pronounced verticality and the apparent deep indentation in the stone are more suggestive of a nearby coastal rock or sea stack. If an island image is intended, to me, the size of the boat feels a bit incongruous. If a coastal rock or islet was intended, then the choice of a larger boat could have removed any doubt by definitely establishing the scale for a closer ‘rocky’ vision. As is, the chosen boat seems to be a bit too small – although those of you familiar with Morro Rock may beg to differ! Regardless of how you or I perceive this display, one must remember that stone appreciation is not entirely about naturalness; there is room for ambiguity, a bit of romantic imagination, and mystery! Painted figurines are not used in Keido display of stones (page 6, figure 1). However, for our purposes subtly colored figurines that are placed so as not to be PAGE 6 CALIFORNIA AISEKI KAI seen at first glance in the photo below may serve to invite closer scrutiny by the public while, at the same time, not disrupting the traditional restrained nature of our overall show. The red crab is obvious, but do you see the other two? As noted an occasional bright spot of “impossible” color, such as with a small fisherman figure (page 4, figure 2) may encourage the visitor to better comprehend the “correctly” presented stones throughout the exhibit. Here, I must confess to a proclivity for torii-gates. At home, I often delight in adding a bright vermilion gate near a coastal rock – the boldness just brings on a smile! I have yet to test the torii – and the tolerance of others – in show waters! However, within the context of an overall exhibition design, I have observed that one such minute spot of color can serve as accent and visual relief for a table or even an entire row of subdued stones. Touching on another somewhat related subject, note that objects, including tenkei or okimono, that are used as independent, complementary accents must be of a scale appropriate to the overall composition and in proportion to the mass of the entire stone display unit (prepared stone plus shoku or jiita). Such accent figures need not be of the same scale as the stone, itself. Similarly, when using a multi-level stand, one tries to maintain a proportional relationship between all elements. Remember when using multi-level stands, that while a tenkei may be perceived as a legitimate thematic accent, it may also be as readily seen as an VOLUME 26, ISSUE 3 Tenkei on a jiita used as an accent interesting, even dominant, objet d’art in its own right, such as occurs with a display of mame bonsai pots. Miniature tokonoma presentations may create a further challenge. Tenkei are by definition ‘small things,’ therefore, an actual tenkei cannot represent a tenkei when used in a miniature display. However, a carefully chosen tenkei might be used to represent a larger, discrete okimono or even a sculpture in the biwa doko (the side niche with raised platform that is adjacent to the main part of the tokonoma, the hon doko). [see pg 9] Remember that a tenkei of less than an inch may represent several inches within the scale of your miniature display – so be cautious. In conclusion, no matter the quality of the figure or the concern with placement, the mere presence of the figure moves one a step away from suiseki – you are moving in the direction of bonkei, penjing, and diorama. Keep that in mind and use them sparingly and judiciously. GuyJim More of GuyJim ’s suibanics... Shimagata-ishi - An island stone Shigottadi-ishi - The woman has some good stones. Shigatada-gawa - She has a lot of good stones and may be worth a marriage proposal. Shigottami-ishi - My ex-wife left me the kids and car, but she took my best stones! The views expressed in this column are personal, perhaps irreverent, irrelevant or just plain wrong and do not reflect the consensual view of California Aiseki Kai. Send your viewing stone questions (or comments) for GuyJim to [email protected] or 1018 Pacific Street, Unit D, Santa Monica, CA 90405 (310) 452-3680 VOLUME 26, ISSUE 3 CALIFORNIA AISEKI KAI PAGE 7 Bonsai-a-thon 2008 There was a mini-exhibit of viewing stones found at the Kern River between the late 1950’s and early 1980’s by four early Los Angeles area collectors: Shiro Iwahashi, Kazuo Handa, Elmer Uchida and Hiroshi Miyazono. The stones selected were necessarily of larger size because of the experimental use of the individual pedestals in an insecure area. It is believed that Mr. Iwahashi made his own daiza and you might note their distinctive design using a beaded lip. Neither Mr. Iwahashi nor Mr. Handa owned Japanese suiban for the display of suiseki. All three suiban used in the Huntington display are examples of wooden “suiban” that Bruce Hisayasu believes were made by Mr. Iwahashi. One example was shown without sand so that visitors could appreciate the workmanship and beautiful grain of the wood. continued next page Elmer Uchida, 1970’s Shiro Iwahashi, 1950 -60’s Shiro Iwahashi: 1950-60’s (cut) Elmer Uchida: 1970 - early 1980’s (cut), daiza by Cliff Johnson PAGE 8 CALIFORNIA AISEKI KAI VOLUME 26, ISSUE 3 Shiro Iwahashi: 1950 - 60’s (cut) Kazuo Handa:1960’s (Korean doban was not used in exhibit) Hiroshi Miyazono: 1973, wooden 'suiban' made by Shiro Iwahashi Elmer Uchida Collection: 1980’s, found by Cliff Johnson (cut) This historical exhibit was prepared by Jim and Alice Greaves within the context of their proposed concept for an American Viewing Stone Resource Center (AVSRC). They continue to seek stones to compliment and augment this window into the birth of stone appreciation in America. More Bonsai-a-thon 2008 The mini tokonoma displays were securely set inside a glass case. Each tokonoma, expertly built by Marge Blasingame, is just 40” across! Nina Ragle created each display. The scrolls were made by Susanne Barrymore. Al Nelson represented Aiseki Kai at the show with a display that included a moss accent piece. Close up of mountain stone seen in tokonoma on page 9 Al Nelson’s coastal stone has a cavity in front that held water. VOLUME 26, ISSUE 3 CALIFORNIA AISEKI KAI PAGE 9 Each biwa doko contains a tenkei used as an okimono. Using precious high quality pieces honors the viewer. PAGE 10 VOLUME 26, ISSUE 3 CALIFORNIA AISEKI KAI Photo Gallery from the Collection of Chiara Padrini Chiara’s viewing stones are from the Ligurian Alps except #3 [Nebrodi mountains] and #12 [south coast of Italy near the sea side]. Daiza were made by Chiara except #2 and #4. 2 3 4 12 CALIFORNIA AISEKI KAI VOLUME 26, ISSUE 3 PAGE 11 continued from page 1 February Program notes continued from pg 3 At the Mingei Museum in San Diego, Jack met Mrs. Audrey Gessel (Mrs. Dr. Seuss) while at the stone exhibition. She enjoyed the show but did not grasp the 'classification' or meaning of each of the stones. After Jack explained some of the concepts of suiseki to her she understood the exhibit better. Even Jack felt more enlightened by Jim Greaves' title for one of his stones. An atypical boat stone that was wider and had higher prows; it was puzzling until you realized that it was a treasure boat and needed the greater bulk. This chart was translated 35 years ago. Note that it includes as a biseki, ikko no ishi or piece of stone. Does a piece of stone refer to a cut stone? Refreshments Thank you Linda Gill, Harry Hirao, Kyra Haussler, Jim & Alice Greaves and Hanne Povlsen for the fabulous food in February. March munchies will be hosted by Akio Okumoto, Bill & Lois Hutchinson, Joe James and Emma Janza. California Aiseki Kai meets on the 4th Wednesday of each month at 7:30 pm at the Nakaoka Community Center located at 1700 162nd St, Gardena, CA. Second floor. We do not meet in Nov-Dec. Contact People Programs: Larry Ragle Treasury/Membership: Nina Ragle Annual Exhibit: Jim Greaves Exhibit Set Up: Marge Blasingame Refreshments: Lois Hutchinson Historian: Ray Yeager Webmaster: Bill Hutchinson Newsletter: Larry and Nina Ragle Newsletter Committee 949.497.5626 [email protected] 949.497.5626 [email protected] 310.452.3680 [email protected] 626.579.0420 [email protected] 714.964.6973 [email protected] 760.365.7897 [email protected] 714.964.6973 [email protected] 949.497.5626 [email protected] March Contributors: Linda Gill, Jim Greaves and Larry Ragle. Mailing: Flash Partch Editor: Nina Ragle We hope you will participate. Please send any submissions to [email protected] no more than 10 days following our monthly meeting. Thank you! Ragle P.O. Box 4975 Laguna Beach CA 92652 ADDRESS CORRECTION REQUESTED Leaves no stone unturned aisekikai.com Coming Events AMERICAN VIEWING STONE RESOURCE CENTER Exhibition: American Viewing Stones – Natural Art in an Asian Tradition (Selections from the Jim & Alice Greaves Collection), Mingei International Museum, Balboa Park, San Diego. Tues - Sun, Hours: 10 - 4; Go to: mingei.org. The site says “continuing”…. Please check with the museum before your visit to confirm the status of the exhibit. 619-239-0003 Sept 24-28 Saint Vincent, Italy ~ Bonsai and Suiseki Exhibition. For more info see the event web site: bci-ibs2008.it/home-en.asp SAN DIEGO BONSAI CLUB 43rd Annual Spring Show, April 26-27, Balboa Park, Casa Del Prado Room 101, San Diego. 10-5. Sales. Demos 11 and 2. Free. For more info: Joanie Berkwitz 760-431-1014 BONSAI CLUB OF SANTA BARBARA Annual Bonsai Exhibition, May 17-18, Santa Barbara Botanic Garden, 1212 Mission Canyon Road. Sat 11-4, Sun 10-4. Demos at 1:00 both days. Sales. More info: Ann Erb 905-929-4972 or [email protected] or see website: santabarbarabonsai.org INTERNATIONAL STONE APPRECIATION SYMPOSIUM October 2-5 at the Harrisburg-Hershey Holiday Inn, Grantville, PA. Exhibits, workshops, critiques, vendors, auction. For more info: Glenn Reusch at 540.672.5699 or email [email protected] Happy Birthday, Harry Hirao. 91 years on March 12 and still hunting !