Freehold Regional High School District

Transcription

Steven Winter Associates, Inc.
Building Systems Consultants
www.swinter.com
293 Route 18, Suite 330
East Brunswick, NJ 08816
Telephone
Facsimile
(866) 676-1972
(203) 852-0741
September 18, 2010
Local Government Energy Program
Energy Audit Final Report
Freehold Regional High School District
Howell High School
405 Squankum-Yellowbrook Road
Farmingdale, NJ 07727
Project Number: LGEA65
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 3
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 6
HISTORICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION........................................................................................ 7
EXISTING FACILITY AND SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION.................................................................. 13
RENEWABLE AND DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES .......................................................... 28
PROPOSED ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ................................................................ 30
APPENDIX A: EQUIPMENT LIST ................................................................................................. 67
APPENDIX B: LIGHTING STUDY ................................................................................................. 91
APPENDIX C: THIRD PARTY ENERGY SUPPLIERS .................................................................. 98
APPENDIX D: GLOSSARY AND METHOD OF CALCULATIONS ............................................. 100
APPENDIX E: STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE FROM ENERGY STAR® ............. 104
APPENDIX F: INCENTIVE PROGRAMS..................................................................................... 105
APPENDIX G: ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ........................................................... 107
APPENDIX H: METHOD OF ANALYSIS ..................................................................................... 111
Steven Winter Associates, Inc. - LGEA Final Report
Freehold RHSD-Howell High School
Page 2/111
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Freehold RHSD (Regional High School District) Howell High School is a partial two-story
building slab on grade comprising a total conditioned floor area of 249,000 square feet. The original
structure was built in the 1963, with additions/alternations completed in 1992 and 2002. The
following chart provides an overview of current energy usage in the building based on the analysis
period of March 2009 through February 2010:
Table 1: State of Building-Energy Usage
Electric
Other
Gas Usage,
Usage,
fuel
therms/yr
kWh/yr
usage
Current
2,637,200
142,441
N/A
Proposed
2,194,708
108,904
N/A
Savings
442,492
33,537
N/A
% Savings
17
24
N/A
Proposed Renewable
245,908
Includes SRECs
* Includes operation and maintenance savings
Current
Annual Cost
of Energy, $
637,332
499,531
137,801*
22
8,920
Site Energy
Use Intensity,
kBtu/sq ft yr
89.0
69.8
19.2
21
3.4
Joint Energy
Consumption,
MMBtu/yr
23,243
18,380
4,863
21
839
There may be energy procurement opportunities for the Freehold RHSD Howell High School to
reduce annual utility costs, which are $20,968 higher, when compared to the average estimated NJ
commercial utility rates.
SWA has also entered energy information about the Howell High School in the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency’s (EPA) ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager Energy benchmarking system. This
high school is comprised of K-12 School space type. The resulting score is 45, which is slightly
more than the average comparable school building by 3.5%.
Based on the current state of the building and its energy use, SWA recommends implementing
various energy conservation measures from the savings detailed in Table 1. The measures are
categorized by payback period in Table 2 below:
Table 2: Energy Conservation Measure Recommendations
First Year
Savings ($)
Simple Payback Period
(years)
0-5 Year
58,458
5-10 Year
79,934
> 10 Year
Total
Renewable PV
ECMs
Initial Investment, $
CO2 Savings, lbs/yr
1.6
95,402
214,478
6.2
496,832
586,691
8,601
137,801
22.1
5.6
189,934
782,168
66,556
867,725
185,608
8.2
1,526,550
336,894
SWA estimates that implementing the recommended ECMs is equivalent to removing
approximately 53 cars from the roads each year or avoiding the need of 1,542 trees to absorb the
annual CO2 generated.
Further Recommendations: Other recommendations to increase building efficiency pertaining to
capital improvements and operations and maintenance are (with additional information in the
Proposed Further Recommendations section):
Capital Improvements
o Replace all original, single-glazed windows with a low-E, double glazed type.
Page 3/111
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Replace common area heating equipment
Replace and recommission the Automatic Temperature Controls (ATC) system
Replace unit ventilators
Replace packaged RTU serving Media Center
Replace/provide (4) H&V units to serve the Main Gym B100 and Auxiliary Gym B101
Replace (2) hot water heating air handling units serving the Auditorium
Replace three (3) horizontal pad-mounted end suction pumps in the Original Boiler Room
Consider replacement of the 1964 walk-in cooler and freezer with newer models
Operations and Maintenance
o Apply appropriate air-sealing strategies around all exterior wall penetrations Repair and
maintain all gutter to downspout connections
o Repair and patch roof leakage areas and remove sharp edged objects from roof surface
o Thoroughly and evenly insulate space above the ceiling tiles and plug all ceiling penetration
o Provide weather-stripping/air-sealing
o Create an energy educational program
o Install boilers and building piping insulation
o Change filters in rooftop units and air handling units monthly Tighten belts on exhaust fans
and air handling units supply fans every three to six months
o Inspect RTU and air handling unit coils for dirt buildup or coil freeze-up regularly
o Inspect condensate pan and drain line on all RTUs and air handling units.
o Inspect and replace gasketing around door into walk-in refrigeration boxes.
The recommended ECMs and the list above are cost-effective energy efficiency measures and
building upgrades that will reduce operating expenses for the Freehold RHSD. Based on the
requirements of the LGEA program, the Freehold RHSD must commit to implementing some of
these measures, and must submit paperwork to the LGEA program within one year of this report’s
approval to demonstrate that they have spent, net of other NJCEP incentives, at least 25% of the
cost of the audit (per building). The Howell High School should spend a minimum of $4,923 (or 25%
of $19,692) worth of ECMs, net of other NJCEP incentives, to fulfill the obligations.
Financial Incentives and Other Program Opportunities
The table below summarizes the recommended next steps that the Freehold RHSD can take to
achieve greater energy efficiency and reduce operating expenses.
Table 3: Next Steps for the Howell High School
Recommended ECMs
Install 14 new CFL light fixtures
Install 14 new LED exit sign light fixtures
Retrofit 10 drink and 3 snack machines with Drink/Vending Miser
Install a minimum of 7 motion sensors on light fixtures
TM
Incentive Program (Please
refer to Appendix F)
Smart Start
Smart Start, Direct Install
There are various incentive programs that the Freehold RHSD could apply to lower the installed
ECM costs. SWA recommends the following programs, contingent upon available funding:
x
1.
2.
3.
New Jersey Clean Energy Pay for Performance - Three phase incentive plan:
Develop plan to reduce current energy use by 15%: receive up to 50% of annual energy costs
Install measures per plan: receive up to $0.13 per kWh saved and $1.45 per therm saved
Benchmark energy savings for a year: receive up to $0.09 per kWh saved and $1.05 per therm.
Page 4/111
x
x
x
x
x
Direct Install 2010 Program: Commercial buildings with peak electric demand below 200kW
can receive up to 60% of installed cost of energy saving upgrades.
Smart Start: Majority of energy saving equipment and design measures have moderate
incentives under this program.
Renewable Energy Incentive Program: Receive up to $0.75/Watt toward installation cost for
PV panels upon available funding. For each 1,000 kWh generated by renewable energy,
receive a credit between $475 and $600.
Utility Sponsored Programs: Look for available programs with JCP&L https://www.firstenergycorp.com/JCP_L/index.html and NJNG - http://www.njng.com/
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Rebate Program: Provides up to $20,000
per local government toward energy saving measures.
Please refer to Appendix F for further details.
Page 5/111
INTRODUCTION
Launched in 2008, the Local Government Energy Audit (LGEA) Program provides subsidized
energy audits for municipal and local government-owned facilities, including offices, courtrooms,
town halls, police and fire stations, sanitation buildings, transportation structures, schools and
community centers. The Program will subsidize up to 100% of the cost of the audit. The Board of
Public Utilities (BPUs) Office of Clean Energy has assigned TRC Energy Services to administer the
Program.
Steven Winter Associates, Inc. (SWA) is a 38-year-old architectural/engineering research and
consulting firm, with specialized expertise in green technologies and procedures that improve the
safety, performance, and cost effectiveness of buildings. SWA has a long-standing commitment to
creating energy-efficient, cost-saving and resource-conserving buildings. As consultants on the built
environment, SWA works closely with architects, developers, builders, and local, state, and federal
agencies to develop and apply sustainable, ‘whole building’ strategies in a wide variety of building
types: commercial, residential, educational and institutional.
SWA performed an energy audit and assessment for the Howell High School at 405 SquankumYellowbrook Road, Farmingdale, NJ 07727. The process of the audit included facility visits on May
6 and June 28, 2010, benchmarking and energy bills analysis, assessment of existing conditions,
energy modeling, energy conservation measures and other recommendations for improvements.
The scope of work includes providing a summary of current building conditions, current operating
costs, potential savings, and investment costs to achieve these savings. The facility description
includes energy usage, occupancy profiles and current building systems along with a detailed
inventory of building energy systems, recommendations for improvement and recommendations for
energy purchasing and procurement strategies.
The goal of this Local Government Energy Audit is to provide sufficient information to the Freehold
RHSD to make decisions regarding the implementation of the most appropriate and most costeffective energy conservation measures for the Howell High School.
Page 6/111
HISTORICAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION
Energy usage, load profile and cost analysis
SWA reviewed utility bills from February 2008 through February 2010 that were received from
the utility companies supplying the Howell High School with electric and natural gas. A 12 month
period of analysis from March 2009 through February 2010 was used for all calculations and for
purposes of benchmarking the building.
Electricity - The Howell High School is currently served by one electric meter. The Howell High
School currently buys electricity from JCP&L at an average aggregated rate of $0.157/kWh.
The Howell High School purchased approximately 2,637,200 kWh, or $414,416 worth of
electricity, in the previous year. The average monthly demand was 635.0 kW and the annual
peak demand was 718.0 kW.
The chart below shows the monthly electric usage and costs. The dashed green line represents
the approximate baseload or minimum electric usage required to operate the Howell High
School.
Natural gas - The Howell High School is currently served by one meter for natural gas. The
Howell High School currently buys natural gas from NJ Natural Gas at an average aggregated
rate of $1.565/therm. The Howell High School purchased approximately 138,274 therms, or
$216,394 worth of natural gas, in the previous year.
Page 7/111
The chart below shows the monthly natural gas usage and costs. The green line represents the
approximate baseload or minimum natural gas usage required to operate the Howell High
School.
The chart above shows the monthly natural gas usage along with the heating degree days or
HDD. Heating degree days is the difference of the average daily temperature and a base
Page 8/111
temperature, on a particular day. The heating degree days are zero for the days when the
average temperature exceeds the base temperature. SWA’s analysis used a base temperature
of 65 degrees Fahrenheit.
The following graphs, pie charts, and table show energy use for Howell High School based on
utility bills for the 12 month period. Note: electrical cost at $46/MMBtu of energy is 2.8 times as
expensive as natural gas at $16/MMBtu
Annual Energy Consumption / Costs
MMBtu
% MMBtu
$
Electric Miscellaneous
5,701
25% $262,552
Electric For Cooling
147
1%
$6,759
Electric For Heating
688
3%
$31,707
Lighting
2,341
10% $107,799
Domestic Hot Water (Gas)
Building Space Heating
(Gas)
Totals
Total Electric Usage
Total Gas Usage
Totals
%$
$/MMBtu
42%
46
1%
46
5%
46
17%
46
1,887
8%
$29,532
5%
16
11,940
53%
$186,862
30%
16
22,705
100%
$625,210
100%
8,877
13,827
22,705
39%
61%
100%
$408,816
$216,394
$625,210
65%
35%
100%
Page 9/111
46
16
Energy benchmarking
SWA has entered energy information about the Howell High School in the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency’s (EPA) ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager Energy benchmarking system.
This high school is categorized as a K-12 School space type. The Howell High School received
a national energy performance rating of 45. The Site Energy Use Intensity is 89.0 kBtu/ft2-yr
compared to the national average of a school building consuming 86.0 kBtu/ft2-yr. See ECM
section for guidance on how to improve the building’s rating.
Per the LGEA program requirements, SWA has assisted the Freehold RHSD to create an
ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager account and share the Howell High School facilities
information to allow future data to be added and tracked using the benchmarking tool. SWA has
shared this Portfolio Manager account information with the Freehold RHSD (user name of
“frhsd8579” with a password of “frhsd8579”) and TRC Energy Services (user name of “TRCLGEA”).
Tariff analysis
As part of the utility bill analysis, SWA evaluated the current utility rates and tariffs. Tariffs are
typically assigned to buildings based on size and building type.
Tariff analysis is performed to determine if the rate that Freehold RHSD is contracted to pay
with each utility provider is the best rate possible resulting in the lowest costs for electric and
gas provision. Typically, the natural gas prices increase during the heating months when
natural gas is used by the hot water boiler units. Some high gas price per therm fluctuations in
the summer may be due to high energy costs that recently occurred and low use caps for the
non-heating months. Typically, electricity prices also increase during the cooling months when
electricity is used by the HVAC condensing units and air handlers.
Page 10/111
The supplier charges a market-rate price based on use, and the billing does not break down
demand costs for all periods because usage and demand are included in the rate. Currently, the
Freehold RHSD is paying a general service rate for natural gas. Demand is not broken out in
the bill. Thus the building pays for fixed costs such as meter reading charges during the summer
months. The building is direct metered and currently purchases electricity at a general service
rate for usage with an additional charge for electrical demand factored into each monthly bill.
The general service rate for electric charges is market-rate based on usage and demand.
Demand prices are reflected in the utility bills and can be verified by observing the price
fluctuations throughout the year.
Energy Procurement strategies
Billing analysis is conducted using an average aggregated rate that is estimated based on the
total cost divided by the total energy usage per utility per 12 month period. Average aggregated
rates do not separate demand charges from usage, and instead provide a metric of inclusive
cost per unit of energy. Average aggregated rates are used in order to equitably compare
building utility rates to average utility rates throughout the state of New Jersey.
The average estimated NJ commercial utility rates for electric are $0.150/kWh, while Howell
High School pays a rate of $0.157/kWh. The Howell High School annual electric utility costs are
$18,836 higher, when compared to the average estimated NJ commercial utility rates. Electric
bill analysis shows fluctuations up to 4% over the most recent 12 month period.
Page 11/111
The average estimated NJ commercial utility rates for gas are $1.550/therm, while Howell High
School pays a rate of $1.565/therm. The Howell High School annual natural gas utility costs are
$2,131 higher, when compared to the average estimated NJ commercial utility rates. Natural
gas bill analysis shows fluctuations up to 80% over the most recent 12 month period.
Utility rate fluctuations may have been caused by adjustments between estimated and actual
meter readings; others may be due to unusual high and recent escalating energy costs and
constant meter charges combined with low usage.
SWA recommends that the Howell High School further explore opportunities of purchasing both
natural gas and electricity from third-party suppliers in order to reduce rate fluctuation and
ultimately reduce the annual cost of energy for the Howell High School. Appendix C contains a
complete list of third-party energy suppliers for the Freehold RHSD service area.
Page 12/111
EXISTING FACILITY AND SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION
This section gives an overview of the current state of the facility and systems. Please refer to the
Proposed Further Recommendations section for recommendations for improvement.
Based on visits from SWA on May 6, and June 28, 2010, the following data was collected and
analyzed.
Building Characteristics
The partial two-story, slab on grade, 249,000 square feet Howell High School building was
originally constructed in 1963, with additions/alternations completed in 1992 and 2002. It houses
administrative offices, gymnasiums, a cafeteria, an auditorium, classrooms and laboratories.
Partial Front Façade (typ.)
Partial Left Side Façade (typ.)
Partial Side Façade (typ.)
Rear and Side Façade
Building Occupancy Profiles
Its occupancy is approximately 2,300 students and 198 faculty and staff from 6:15am until
2:30pm, extra-curricular activities continuing to 4:30pm and cleaning activities completed by
midnight Monday through Friday. Saturday activities are 7:00am until 2:30pm and Sunday
activities are sporadic and driven by sport events. Currently there are no summer school
activities scheduled.
Building Envelope
Due to unfavorable weather conditions (min. 18 deg. F delta-T in/outside and no/low wind), no
exterior envelope infrared (IR) images were taken during the field audit.
Page 13/111
Exterior Walls
The exterior wall envelope is mostly constructed of brick veneer and some limestone type
accents over concrete block with 2 inches of fiberglass batt cavity insulation. Other more
recent additions are insulated with 1 inch of foam board insulation. The interior is mostly
painted gypsum wallboard or painted concrete block.
Note: Wall insulation levels could not be verified in the field and are based on available
construction plans.
Exterior and interior wall surfaces were inspected during the field audit. They were found to
be in overall acceptable, age-appropriate condition with only a few signs of uncontrolled
moisture, air-leakage or other energy-compromising issues.
The following specific exterior wall problem spots and areas were identified:
Signs of water
Un-caulked/un-sealed exterior wall penetrations
damage at perimeter
walls due to defective
gutter or downspout.
Roof
The building’s roof is predominantly a flat and parapet type over steel decking with a built-up
asphalt finish and reflective stone coating. It is original to the building. Two and a half inches
of foam board roof insulation were recorded. Also about two and a half inches of under roof
deck applied spray cellulose ceiling insulation were added to some parts of the original
building a few years ago. Other parts of the building are also covered by a recently updated
dark colored EPDM single membrane finish.
Note: Roof insulation levels could not be verified in the field, and are based on available
construction plans.
Roofs, related flashing, gutters and downspouts were inspected during the field audit. They
were reported to be in overall acceptable, age-appropriate condition, with only a few signs of
uncontrolled moisture, air-leakage or other energy-compromising issues.
The following specific roof problem spots were identified:
Page 14/111
Rocks/nails or other sharp objects on roof surface were detected.
Small roof leaks in most parts of the building were reported.
Base
The building’s base is composed of a slab-on-grade floor with a perimeter foundation and no
detectable slab edge/perimeter insulation.
Slab/perimeter insulation levels could not be verified in the field and are based on available
construction plans.
The building’s base and its perimeter were inspected for signs of uncontrolled moisture or
water presence and other energy-compromising issues. Overall the base was reported to be
in acceptable condition with no signs of uncontrolled moisture, air-leakage and/or other
energy-compromising issues except for reports of condensation on ground floor finishes
during hot and humid outside conditions.
Windows
The building contains basically two different types of windows.
1. Casement type windows with a non-insulated aluminum frame, clear single glazing and
some interior shading devices. The windows are located throughout the building and are
original.
2. Casement type windows with a non-insulated aluminum frame, clear double glazing and
interior roller blinds. The windows are located throughout the building. Window updates
started about 10 years ago but have been on hold for a while now due to lack of funding.
Windows, shading devices, sills, related flashing and caulking were inspected as far as
accessibility allowed for signs of moisture, air-leakage and other energy compromising
issues. Overall, the windows were found to be in acceptable condition with only a few signs
of uncontrolled moisture, air-leakage and/ or other energy-compromising issues.
The following specific window problem spots were identified:
Page 15/111
Single-glazed window with Window sealant is
ineffective frame
ineffective
Exterior doors
The building contains only one type of exterior door.
1. Aluminum/steel frame with safety glass type exterior doors. They are located throughout the
building and are original.
All exterior doors, thresholds, related flashing, caulking and weather-stripping were
inspected for signs of moisture, air-leakage and other energy-compromising issues. Overall,
the doors were found to be in acceptable, age appropriate condition with no signs of
uncontrolled moisture, air-leakage and/ or other energy-compromising issues.
Building air-tightness
Overall the field auditors found the building to be reasonably air-tight with only a few areas
of suggested improvements, as described in more detail earlier in this chapter.
The air tightness of buildings helps maximize all other implemented energy measures and
investments, and minimizes potentially costly long-term maintenance, repair and
replacement expenses.
Mechanical Systems
Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning
The building is heated by two boiler plants, with cooling and/or ventilation provided by a
combination of rooftop units, heating and ventilating units and exhaust fans for the common
and office areas, and unit ventilators for many of the classrooms. Some of the unit
ventilators contain a split system DX cooling component but most are heating and ventilating
only. The original boiler plant in the 1963 building provides heating to the original building
and the 1979 additions. These portions of the building include A, B and C Wings and the
Auditorium, Gymnasium B100, Gymnasium B101, Cafeteria, Media Center, Guidance
Offices and Main Offices. The D Wing was added in 2001 and contains its own boiler plant.
It should be noted that a good portion of the school HVAC systems are still controlled by the
Barber Coleman Automatic Temperature Controls (ATC) systems. The D Wing Addition and
partial renovations to A Wing and B Wing, and a few second floor C Wing Rooms contain a
Johnson Metasys digital ATC system in those portions of the building. There are also some
Honeywell and Powers thermostats scattered throughout the school. It was reported that the
Barber Coleman/Andover system provides poor temperature control.
Page 16/111
Equipment
Howell High School has undergone several renovations and one addition since the original
building was constructed in 1964. With each renovation or addition, there has been
equipment added to condition the affected portion of the building. The following paragraphs
contain a summary of the systems in the various portions of the building. A comprehensive
Equipment List can be found in Appendix A.
The Auditorium contains two (2) air handling units suspended from the roof deck above the
stage that provide heating and ventilation. Heating is provided by hot water coils in the units
that are fed by the building’s original boiler plant. There are also two (2) 15-ton cooling only
packaged RTUs providing cooling to the space. The air handling units appear to be original
to the building and replacement should be considered. The RTUs were installed in 2006 and
are in very good condition. There are also rooftop exhaust fans above the Auditorium to
exhaust rooms A111-115, the toilet rooms in Auditorium lobby and the SECA Office.
One of Two American Standard Rooftop Units Serving the Auditorium
Rooms A104-A117 are heated and ventilated only via Nesbitt unit ventilators that are
original to the building. These units are in fair to poor condition, are well beyond their
expected service life and should be replaced. Rooms A100-A103 were renovated with the
addition of the D Wing in 2001. These Rooms and the classrooms in D Wing, except D112
and D114, are conditioned by cooling only packaged rooftop units with hot water heating
coils located in the supply air ductwork below the roof deck. Rooms D112 and D114 contain
through wall, floor-mounted unit ventilators with DX cooling. All equipment and ductwork is
in good condition.
The Main Gymnasium is heated and ventilated by finned tube radiation and four exhaust
fans, two located high on each of the long walls. The Auxiliary Gymnasium B101 is heated
and ventilated via one (1) large H&V unit located above the adjacent locker rooms. This
gymnasium is exhausted by multiple rooftop exhaust fans. The Auxiliary Gym D100 is
heated and ventilated by two large rooftop H&V units with hot water heating coils located in
the supply air ductwork below the roof deck. The locker rooms that are adjacent to these
gyms are heated and ventilated by air handling units with hot water coils. These units are
located in the ceiling above the rooms, or in adjacent Storage rooms. The H&V unit in B101
and air handling units in the locker rooms are original to the building and have exceeded
Page 17/111
their expected service lives. This equipment should be replaced as part of a capital
improvement plan in the district.
The Gym Offices and Wrestling Room and are conditioned by rooftop DX cooling, heating
and ventilating RTUs added in 2002. The Dance Studio is heated, cooled and ventilated by
a built up rooftop H&V unit with split condensing unit added in 2002. Music Room B104 and
adjacent offices and storage rooms are conditioned by packaged RTUs added in 2006.
Music Room B105 is heated and ventilated only but contains a wall-mounted ductless split
system to provide some cooling. Based on the size of this equipment, it is likely to be
inadequate for the room and should be replaced with another RTU similar to that in Room
B104.
The Cafeteria is heated and ventilated by rooftop H&V units and exhaust fans. This
equipment was added in 2002 and is in good condition. The Faculty Dining Area behind the
Kitchen was added in 2002 and is heated, cooled and ventilated by a packaged rooftop unit
that is in good condition. The Kitchen hood receives dedicated makeup air from rooftop H&V
units located above the Cafeteria.
The Media Center and its ancillary offices are heated, cooled and ventilated by one large
35-ton RTU manufactured in 1981. This unit is in poor condition and is operating well
beyond its expected service life. Based on the odor experienced in the Media Center, there
is a possibility that the unit is not adequately dehumidifying the space. This unit should be
replaced with multiple units to offer redundancy and reliability, as well as an increase in
operating efficiency.
The Main Office is heated, ventilated and cooled by a packaged, constant volume rooftop
unit located above the Media Center. The unit utilizes hot water heating and DX cooling.
This equipment was added in 1981, is operating well beyond its expected service life and
should be replaced. Replacement should provide an increase in cooling efficiency. The
Guidance Office and adjacent Media Center Rooms are heated, ventilated and cooled by
two (2) Trane rooftop units that were installed in 2002. There is a hot water coil in the
ductwork below, and DX cooling in the unit. The units are in good condition and can be
retained for another 6-7 years.
Rooftop Units Serving Media Center (left) and Main Office
Page 18/111
Classrooms B106-B112 are heated, cooled and ventilated by multiple RTUs that were
added in 2000. This equipment is in good condition and can be retained for another 4-5
years.
The Nurse’s Office, Attendance Office and adjacent rooms are heated, cooled and
ventilated by original finned-tube radiation and window air conditioning units. This equipment
is in fair condition and should be replaced.
Classrooms A207-A217 contain 1964 (Nesbitt) unit ventilators for heating and ventilation,
and are cooled by wall-mounted ductless split system air conditioning units. The unit
ventilators are operating beyond their expected service lives, and should be replaced. The
ductless split systems can be retained for another 3-5 years, but replacement would bring
energy savings.
The remainder of the classrooms in the A and C Wings are heated and ventilated by floor
mounted or ceiling mounted unit ventilators installed in either 1964 (Nesbitt) or 1979
(Trane), with the exception of Rooms A202 and C203, 205, 213, 214, 216. These
classrooms contain newer unit ventilators with split system DX cooling.
Original 1964 Nesbitt (Left) and 1979 Trane Unit Ventilators
In general, the rooftop units in this building contain a direct expansion (DX) system for
cooling, made up of an evaporator, condenser and refrigerant loop. The heating section
consists of a hydronic (hot water) coil located in the supply ductwork below the roof deck. In
cooling mode, the refrigerant absorbs heat from the passing air in the evaporator coil and
transfers the heat to the atmosphere in the condenser. Much of the equipment contains
refrigerant R-22, which contains CFCs and is being phased out of production for
environmental reasons. Newer equipment will contain refrigerant R-410A, which is more
environmentally-friendly than R-22.
The rooftop units draw in outside air directly, providing a means of ventilation without an
additional building penetration above that required for the distribution ductwork.
The H&V unit and RTU heating coils, unit ventilators, hydronic unit heaters and finned-tube
radiation located in the A, B and C Wings of the building are provided with heating hot water
by two (2) Superior packaged fire-tube boilers located in the original boiler room. These
boilers were installed in 1963 and are in fair to poor condition. This equipment is operating
Page 19/111
well beyond its expected life of 30 years per the 2007 ASHRAE Applications Handbook. The
thermal efficiency of this equipment can be expected to be approximately 65%.
The Superior boilers produce heating hot water that is pumped by one of three floormounted to the A, B, and C Wings. One of the three original pumps is run at a time and is
usually sufficient to handle the heating load. On days with particularly cold outside air
temperatures, a second pump will be run as well. These pump motors are recommended to
be replaced with premium efficiency motors in the ECM section of this report. In addition, it
is recommended that the operation of the three-way valve at each boiler is checked since it
failure of this valve can cause the existing outside temperature hot water reset controls to
not function effectively.
The Original 1964 Superior Boilers
The hydronic unit heaters, duct-mounted heating coils and finned-tube radiation located in
the D Wing (2001 addition) and a small adjacent portion of the A Wing are provided with
heating hot water by two (2) Aerco Benchmark 2.0 condensing boilers located in a boiler
room adjacent to Room D104. The boilers were installed in 2002 and are in very good
condition. This equipment is almost one third of its way through its expected service life of
30 years. The efficiency of this equipment can range from about 80-93%. In general,
condensing boilers are most efficient when operating at temperatures that are lower than
non-condensing or cast iron boilers.
The Aerco boilers produce heating hot water that is pumped by a pair of floor-mounted
pumps in the D Wing Boiler Room. These pumps are in very good condition. The pump
motors are standard efficiency and are recommended to be replaced with premium
efficiency motors in the ECM section of this report.
There are several exhaust fans located on the roof, which serve the bathrooms, kitchen
hood and general exhaust. The fans vary in age and condition, but were all operating at the
time of the field visit. In general, most of the building exhaust fans have an estimated 0-50%
useful operating life left.
Page 20/111
Some of the classrooms and the offices in the Nurse’s Office area contain window air
conditioners, most of which are not ENERGY STAR° rated. SWA recommends that this
equipment is replaced with equipment that is ENERGY STAR° rated.
The Two Aerco Condensing Boilers in the 2002 Boiler Room
Distribution Systems
The heating hot water produced in both boiler rooms is distributed via pumps and copper
piping to the H&V unit coils, unit ventilators, finned-tube radiators, unit heaters and cabinet
unit heaters scattered throughout the building. The Superior boilers are piped in a primary
pumping arrangement. The floor-mounted pumps in the boiler room operate in a lead-lag
fashion to distribute the water to various heating zones throughout the A, B and C Wings of
the building. The Aerco boilers are piped in a primary pumping arrangement, with two (2)
floor-mounted pumps delivering the water to the terminal equipment in the D Wing of the
building. These pumps operate in lead-lag fashion, and usually one pump can satisfy the
heating load in this area of the building.
Page 21/111
Examples of Pumps in the Original Boiler Room (Left) and in the 2002 Boiler Room
A typical rooftop unit arrangement draws in fresh air and brings it into a mixing box, where it
is combined with return air from the building. A small portion of the return air is purged and
vented outside prior to entering the mixing box. The mixed air inside the air handler is sent
through a filter before passing through the evaporator or direct expansion (DX) coil. The air
handler fan then pushes the air through the duct-mounted hot water coil before the
conditioned air is distributed into the building spaces. The hot water coil is only active in the
heating season and the DX system is only active in the cooling season. In between these
seasons neither system may operate and only the blower will be active to provide fresh air
to the building. In a few cases in this building, the rooftop equipment did not contain the DX
cooling coil mentioned above.
Example of Hot Water Piping Leading to Duct-Mounted Hot Water Coil in D Wing
Howell High School has constant air volume systems as described above. Typically, with
this type of arrangement, the outside air damper is opened and the supply fan runs
constantly during occupied hours, and the outside air damper is closed and the supply fan
cycles when heating or cooling is required during unoccupied hours. The heating coils
contain a control valve that opens to let heating water into the hot water coil upon a heating
call from the thermostat. Upon a call for cooling, the DX compressor in the RTU is operated
to provide cooling.
There is one (1) large commercial kitchen exhaust hood over the ovens and range in the
kitchen. The makeup air for this hood is provided by H&V units located on the roof above the
Cafeteria and transferred via grilles that are located high on the wall between the Kitchen
Page 22/111
and the Cafeteria. The H&V units are provided with heating hot water and are in relatively
good condition.
Controls
There are two different Automatic Temperature Controls (ATC) systems within the building.
A good portion of the school HVAC systems are still controlled by the Barber
Coleman/Andover Automatic Temperature Controls (ATC) systems that were installed in
1964 and modified over the years. It was reported that the Barber Coleman/Andover
controls provide poor overall temperature control. The system is monitored by Jersey State
Controls, and limited control of the equipment on this system is provided via desktop
computer in the Maintenance Office. The D Wing Addition and partial renovations to A Wing
and B Wing and a few second floor C Wing Rooms contain a Johnson Controls Metasys
digital ATC system. These thermostats are connected to small Johnson Controls Metasys
direct digital control (DDC) ATC panels located in the maintenance office, D Wing Boiler
Room, and a few other strategic locations.
There are also some Honeywell and Powers thermostats scattered throughout the school
but it was not determined if these thermostats are standalone or connected to the Barber
Coleman/Andover ATC system.
The D Wing boilers are provided with an Aerco boiler control panel.
Original ATC Contactor Cabinet (Left) and 2002 Johnson Metasys Controller
The original Barber Coleman ATC equipment is beyond its expected service life, and
modifications have been made to the system to allow for outside monitoring.
Some Examples of the Various Thermostats Encountered in the Building
Page 23/111
Some Examples of the Various Thermostats Encountered in the Building
The different controls listed above do not provide one consistent control scheme throughout
the school.
SWA recommends that one uniform ATC system is provided for the school. A logical
approach for the district would be to combine and build on the existing Johnson Controls
Metasys ATC systems to provide one comprehensive ATC system. This would allow
salvaging of the controls equipment in a significant portion of the school.
Domestic Hot Water
The domestic hot water (DHW) for the school is provided by one (1) Cleaver Brooks
packaged fire-tube boiler and adjacent storage tank located in the Original Boiler Room. The
boiler was installed in 1981, and is at the end of its expected service life. This system is
provided with re-circulating pumps to provide a constant supply of domestic hot water
throughout the building. This reduces water consumption by eliminating the need to wait for
hot water.
Domestic Water Heater and External Storage Tank in Original Boiler Room
There is also a 45 KW electric booster heater at the dishwasher in the kitchen. This
equipment is in fair condition and should be considered for replacement. Replacement
would not provide energy savings, but if gas-fired equipment is used, it is likely that
operating costs would be reduced.
Commercial Refrigeration
The school also has an approximately 8’ x 10’ walk-in cooler inside the kitchen. This cooler
was manufactured by Bally and appears to be original to the building (1964). The equipment
Page 24/111
is in fair condition. Although the unit was locked and nameplate data was not accessible, it is
assumed that there is a savings opportunity from changing the evaporator fan section to a
more modern model.
The school also has an approximately 8’ x 8’ walk-in cooler inside the kitchen. This cooler
was manufactured by Bally and based on its condition; it is estimated to have been added in
the 1980s. The equipment is in fair to good condition, and appears to have been partially
refurbished within the last few years. Although the unit was locked and nameplate data was
not accessible, the evaporator fans appeared to be a more modern model than what was
witnessed through the window of the door of the original cooler mentioned above.
Accessible via the cooler is a walk-in freezer of similar size to the cooler. This freezer is also
estimated to have been added in the 1980s and is in similar condition to the cooler. It is
assumed that the evaporator fans are of a similar model to those in the cooler and that they
are fairly efficient.
Several of the rooms adjacent to the newer walk-in box were locked and inaccessible during
the survey. Therefore, it is not known if any of the adjacent rooms also contained an
evaporator section to provide cold storage, as witnessed in some of the other schools in this
district. If so, this area could be studied separately to identify other potential savings
opportunities.
Original Walk-In Cooler Box (Left) and 1980s Walk-In Cooler/Freezer
The kitchen contains four (4) stainless steel refrigerators, two (2) chest freezers, one (1)
chest cooler and several glass door merchandisers. All equipment appears to be in relatively
good condition.
Electrical systems
Lighting
See attached lighting schedule in Appendix B for a complete inventory of lighting throughout
the building including estimated power consumption and proposed lighting
recommendations.
Page 25/111
As of July 1, 2010 magnetic ballasts most commonly used for the operation of T12 lamps
will no longer be produced for commercial and industrial applications. Also, many T12 lamps
will be phased out of production starting July 2012.
Interior Lighting - The Howell High School currently contains a mixture of T12 fixtures, T8
fixtures, and self-ballast bulbs including incandescent bulbs and CFLs. There were some
observed high pressure sodium and metal halide fixtures found in the wrestling room and
the media center. Based on measurements of lighting levels for each space, there are no
vastly over-illuminated areas.
Exit Lights - Exit signs were found to contain both fluorescent and LED lamps.
Exterior Lighting - The exterior lighting surveyed during the building audit was found to be a
mix of Metal Halide lamp and CFL fixtures. Exterior lighting is controlled by timers.
Appliances and process
SWA has conducted a general survey of larger, installed equipment. Appliances and other
miscellaneous equipment account for a significant portion of electrical usage within the
building. Typically, appliances are referred to as “plug-load” equipment, since they are not
inherent to the building’s systems, but rather plug into an electrical outlet. Equipment such
as process motors, computers, computer servers, radio and dispatch equipment,
refrigerators, vending machines, printers, etc. all create an electrical load on the building
that is hard to separate out from the rest of the building’s energy usage based on utility
analysis.
Elevators
Howell High School contains one (1) hydraulic elevator in C Wing. The hydraulic machine
was manufactured by Dover in 1981 and is 20 horsepower. It is recommended that further
study is undertaken to confirm that the elevator meets current code, and that the required
upgrades are performed to bring the elevator into compliance.
Generator
There is one (1) Onan 100 KW natural gas emergency generator located just outside the
original boiler room. This generator was installed in 1994. This generator is in fair condition
overall and has been well maintained considering its age.
Page 26/111
Emergency Generator
Other electrical systems
There are not currently any other significant energy-impacting electrical systems installed at
the Howell High School other than five electrical transformers ranging from 30.0 kVa to 75.0
kVa. The transformers range in appearance from good to satisfactory operating condition.
Page 27/111
RENEWABLE AND DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES
Renewable energy is defined as any power source generated from sources which are naturally
replenished, such as sunlight, wind and geothermal. Technology for renewable energy is improving,
and the cost of installation is decreasing, due to both demand and the availability of
state and federal government-sponsored funding. Renewable energy reduces the need for using
either electricity or fossil fuel, therefore lowering costs by reducing the amount of energy purchased
from the utility company. Technology such as photovoltaic panels or wind turbines, use natural
resources to generate electricity on the site. Geothermal systems offset the thermal loads in a
building by using water stored in the ground as either a heat sink or heat source. Solar thermal
collectors heat a specified volume of water, reducing the amount of energy required to heat water
using building equipment. Cogeneration or CHP allows you to generate electricity locally, while also
taking advantage of heat wasted during the generation process.
Existing systems
Currently there are no renewable energy systems installed in the building.
Evaluated Systems
Solar Photovoltaic
Photovoltaic panels convert light energy received from the sun into a usable form of electricity.
Panels can be connected into arrays and mounted directly onto building roofs, as well as
installed onto built canopies over areas such as parking lots, building roofs or other open areas.
Electricity generated from photovoltaic panels is generally sold back to the utility company
through a net meter. Net-metering allows the utility to record the amount of electricity generated
in order to pay credits to the consumer that can offset usage and demand costs on the electric
bill. In addition to generation credits, there are incentives available called Solar Renewable
Energy Credits (SRECs) that are subsidized by the state government. Specifically, the New
Jersey State government pays a market-rate SREC to facilities that generate electricity in an
effort to meet state-wide renewable energy requirements.
Based on utility analysis and a study of roof conditions, Howell High School is a good candidate
for a 48.07 kW or 158.47 kW Solar Panel installation. See ECM# 17 and 18 for details.
Solar Thermal Collectors
Solar thermal collectors are not cost-effective for this building and would not be recommended
due to the insufficient and intermittent use of domestic hot water throughout the building to
justify the expenditure.
Wind
The Howell High School is not a good candidate for wind power generation due to insufficient
wind conditions in this area of New Jersey.
Page 28/111
Geothermal
Howell High School is not a good candidate for geothermal installation since it would require
replacement of the entire existing HVAC system, of which major components still have between
50% and 95% remaining useful life.
Combined Heat and Power
Howell High School is not a good candidate for CHP installation and would not be cost-effective
due to the size and operations of the building. Typically, CHP is best suited for buildings with a
high electrical baseload to accommodate the electricity generated, as well as a means for using
waste heat generated. Typical applications include buildings with an absorption chiller, where
waste heat would be used efficiently.
Page 29/111
PROPOSED ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES
Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) are recommendations determined for the building based on
improvements over current building conditions. ECMs have been determined for the building based
on installed cost, as well as energy and cost-savings opportunities.
Recommendations: Energy Conservation Measures
ECM#
Description of Recommended 0-5 Year Payback ECMs
1
Install 10 Drinks and 3 Snack Misers on Vending Machines
2
Install 124 New T5 Light Fixtures
3
4
Install 14 New CFL Light Fixtures
Install 14 New LED Exit Sign Light Fixtures
5
Install 35 New Motion Sensors
6
Replace 3 Old Refrigerators with ENERGY STAR® Models
7
8
Install 193 New Occupancy Sensors
Replace (2) 5 HP Superior Boiler Burner Motors with (2) Premium Efficiency Motors
9
ECM#
10
11
12
13
14
Install 51 New Pulse Start Metal Halide Light Fixtures
Description of Recommended 5-10 Year Payback ECMs
Replace (3) 10HP Hot Water Circulation Pump Motors with Premium Efficiency Motors
Replace 2092 MBH Input HW Heater with (3) 400 MBH Input, 96% Efficient, Direct Vent
Unit
Install Variable Frequency Drives on (5) 10HP Motors of Hot Water Circulators
Install 33 New Bi-level Light Fixtures in Stairwells
16
Retro-commissioning
Replace (2) 8369 MBH Input Boilers with (4) 2000 MBH Input 96% Efficient,
Condensing Boilers
Install 403 New T8 Light Fixtures
17
18
Install a 48.07 kW PV System with Incentives
Install a 158.47 kW PV System without Incentives
19
Install Premium Efficiency Motors on Walk-In Box Evaporator Fans
15
ECM#
Description of Recommended >10 Year Payback (End of Life Cycle)
20
24
Replace (3) DX cooling condensing units with 14 SEER high efficiency units
Replace Trane 7.5-ton packaged DX Cooling Only Rooftop HVAC Unit with a 13 EER
High Efficiency Unit
Replace Trane 35-ton Packaged DX Cooling Only Rooftop HVAC Unit with (3) 12.5-ton,
13 EER High Efficiency Unit
Replace Trane 1.5-ton Packaged DX Cooling Only Rooftop HVAC Unit with 14 SEER
Replace (5) DX Cooling Condensing Units with 14 SEER High Efficiency Units
25
Replace (2) DX Cooling Condensing Units with 14 SEER High Efficiency Units
21
22
23
Page 30/111
Note: In order to clearly present the overall energy opportunities for the building and ease the
decision and choice of which ECM to implement, SWA calculated each ECM independently and did
not incorporate slight/potential interactions between some of the listed ECM retrofits (i.e. lighting
change influence on heating/cooling).
Page 31/111
ECM#1: Install 10 Drinks and 3 Snack Misers on Vending Machines
Description:
The Howell High School building has ten drink vending machines and three snack vending
machines. Energy vending miser devices are now available for conserving energy with these
machines. There is no need to purchase new machines to reduce operating costs and greenhouse
gas emissions. When equipped with the vending miser devices, refrigerated beverage vending
machines or coolers use less energy and are comparable in daily energy performance to new
ENERGY STAR® qualified machines. Vending miser devices incorporate innovative energy-saving
technology into small plug-and-play devices that install in minutes, either on the wall or on the
vending machine. Vending miser devices use a Passive Infrared Sensor (PIR) to: power down the
machine when the surrounding area is vacant; monitor the room's temperature; automatically
repower the cooling system at one to three hour intervals, independent of sales; ensure the product
stays cold.
Vending machines found throughout Howell High School
Snacks vending miser devices can be used on snacks vending machines to achieve maximum
energy savings that result in reduced operating costs and decreased greenhouse gas emissions
with existing machines. Snacks vending miser devices also use a Passive Infrared Sensor (PIR) to
determine if there is anyone within 25 feet of the machine. It waits for 15 minutes of vacancy, then
powers down the machine. If a customer approaches the machine while powered down, the snacks
vending miser will sense the presence and immediately power up.
Installation cost:
Estimated installed cost: $2,287 (includes $260 labor)
Source of cost estimate: www.usatech.com and established costs
Page 32/111
est. installed cost, $
est. incentives, $
Net ECM cost with incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
kW, demand reduction/mo
therms, 1st yr savings
kBtu/sq ft, 1st yr savings
est. operating cost, 1st yr
savings, $
Annual Energy Cost Savings, $
Projected Measure Life, yrs
est. lifetime cost savings, $
simple payback, yrs
lifetime return on investment, %
annual return on investment, %
internal rate of return, %
net present value, $
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
2,287
0
2,287
34,933
10.6
0
0.5
2,530
8,014
10
80,145
0.3
3,404
340
350
63,358
25,152
Assumptions: SWA assumes energy savings based on 75 operating hours/week. The modeling
calculator is found at www.usatech.com or
http://www.usatech.com/energy_management/energy_calculator.php
Rebates/incentives:
There are no incentives at this time offered by NJ Clean Energy for this energy conservation
measure.
Please see Appendix F for more information on Incentive Programs.
Page 33/111
ECM#2: Install 124 New T5 Light Fixtures
On the day of the site visit, SWA completed a lighting inventory of the Howell High School (see
Appendix B). The existing lighting inventory contained Metal Halide and High Pressure Sodium
fixtures. SWA recommends replacing each existing fixture with more efficient, T5 fluorescent
fixtures with electronic ballasts. T5 fixtures with electronic ballasts provide equivalent or better light
output while reducing energy consumption by 20% when compared to a Metal Halide or High
Pressure Sodium fixture.
Installation cost:
Estimated installed cost: $15,850 (includes $6,906 of labor)
Source of cost estimate: RS Means; Published and established costs, NJ Clean Energy Program
est. incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
17,710
1,860
15,850
82,518
17.2
0
1.1
7,324
20,279
15
304,190
0.8
1,819
121
128
215,870
59,413
Assumptions: SWA calculated the savings for this measure using measurements taken the days
of the field visits and using the billing analysis. SWA also assumed an aggregated 183 hrs/yr to
replace aging burnt out lamps vs. newly installed.
Rebates/financial incentives:
x NJ Clean Energy – Smart Start – T5 fixtures with electronic ballasts ($15 per fixture). Maximum
incentive amount is $1,860.
ECM#3: Install 14 New CFL Light Fixtures
Appendix B). The existing lighting inventory contained a total of 14 inefficient incandescent and
halogen lamps. SWA recommends that each incandescent lamp is replaced with a more efficient,
Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL). CFLs are capable of providing equivalent or better light output
while using less power.
Installation cost:
Estimated installed cost: $623 (includes $187 of labor)
est. incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
623
0
623
1,558
0.3
0
0.0
468
713
8
5,701
0.9
815
102
114
4,203
1,122
x None
Page 35/111
ECM#4: Install 14 New LED Exit Sign Light Fixtures
Appendix B). The existing lighting inventory contained 14 inefficient incandescent or fluorescent exit
signs. SWA recommends that these exit signs be replaced with a new, more efficient LED exit sign.
LED exit signs can provide significant energy savings since they operate 24 hours per day.
Installation cost:
Estimated installed cost: $612 (includes $267 of labor)
est. incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
892
280
612
3,189
0.7
0
0.0
66
567
15
8,500
1.1
1,289
86
93
5,868
2,296
x NJ Clean Energy – Smart Start – LED Exit Signs ($20 per fixture). Maximum incentive amount
is $280.
Page 36/111
ECM#5: Install 35 New Motion Sensors
SWA recommends installing motion sensors in areas that are occupied only part of the day, and
where payback on savings is justified. Typically, motion sensors have an adjustable time delay that
shuts down the lights automatically if no motion is detected within a set time period. Advance microphonic lighting sensors include sound detection as a means to control lighting operation. Please
see Appendix B for a detailed lighting inventory.
Installation cost:
Source of cost estimate: RS Means; Published and established costs, NJ Clean Energy Program,
ENERGY STAR®
est. incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
7,700
700
7,000
32,004
6.7
0
0.4
0
5,025
10
50,246
1.4
618
62
71
34,328
23,043
of the field visits and using the billing analysis.
x NJ Clean Energy – Smart Start – Ceiling-mounted motion sensors ($20 per sensor). Maximum
incentive amount is $700.
Page 37/111
ECM#6: Replace 3 Old Refrigerators with ENERGY STAR® Models
On the days of the site visit, SWA observed older refrigerators in the foods classroom, custodial
break room, and in the kitchen that are not ENERGY STAR® rated (using as much as 840 kWh/yr).
SWA auditors could not confirm the energy usage of many of the smaller refrigerators located
throughout the building. SWA high recommends the Regional High School District consider
replacement of all refrigerators over 10-12 years of age with more modern, ENERGY STAR®,
energy efficient appliances. In addition to saving energy, the replacements will also keep the
refrigerator locations cooler. Furthermore, the older model refrigerators may utilize R-12 refrigerant,
which is not an ozone-friendly refrigerant. Newer systems should be specified with R-134A or R404A refrigerant. When compared to the average electrical consumption of older equipment,
ENERGY STAR® equipment results in large savings. Look for the ENERGY STAR® label when
replacing appliances and equipment, including window air conditioners, refrigerators, printers,
computers, copy machines, etc. More information can be found in the “Products” section of the
ENERGY STAR® website at: http://www.energystar.gov.
Installation cost:
Estimated installed cost: $2,250 (includes $150 of labor)
Source of cost estimate: Energy Star purchasing and procurement site, similar projects,
manufacturer and store established costs.
est. incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
2,250
0
2,250
3,600
1.1
0
0.0
582
1,147
12
13,766
2.0
512
43
51
8,754
2,592
Assumptions: RAMA-SWA calculated the savings for this measure using measurements taken
the day of the field visit and using the billing analysis. SWA assumed one annual call to a
refrigeration contractor to perform minor repairs on old refrigerators.
Rebates/incentives:
There are no incentives at this time offered by NJ Clean Energy for this energy conservation
measure.
Page 38/111
ECM#7: Install 193 New Occupancy Sensors
On the day of the site visit, SWA observed that the Howell High School contained few locations of
lighting installations that were operated via occupancy sensors. SWA recommends installing
occupancy sensors in bathrooms, closets, offices and areas that are occupied only part of the day,
and where payback on savings is justified. Typically, occupancy sensors have an adjustable time
delay that shuts down the lights automatically if no motion is detected within a set time period.
Advance micro-phonic lighting sensors include sound detection as a means to control lighting
operation. Please see Appendix B for a detailed lighting inventory.
Installation cost:
Source of cost estimate: RS Means; Published and established costs, NJ Clean Energy Program,
ENERGY STAR®
est. incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
42,460
3,860
38,600
102,969
21.5
0
1.4
0
16,166
10
161,661
2.4
319
32
40
94,868
74,138
of the field visits and using the billing analysis.
x NJ Clean Energy – Smart Start – Wall-mounted occupancy sensors ($20 per sensor). Maximum
Page 39/111
ECM#8: Replace (2) 5 HP Superior Boiler Burner Motors with (2) Premium Efficiency Motors
The Original Boiler Room houses a pair Superior Boilers with a single boiler burner each. These
burner motors are in fair to poor condition and are suggested for replacement as part of a capital
improvement project. The motors are both beyond their expected service lives of 20 years. The
burners are each rated at 5 Hp. Each burner operates dependently on the other burner. As more
heating hot water is required, another boiler fires up and energizes its associated burner. All burner
motors are standard efficiency. The Howell High School will realize energy savings by utilizing
premium efficiency motors for either the existing or new pumps.
Installation cost:
Estimated installed cost (5 Hp motors): $700 (includes $200 labor)
Source of cost estimate: Similar projects and DOE Motor Master International selection & savings
analysis
est. incentives, $
net est. ECM cost with
incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
total 1st yr savings, $
life of measure, yrs
est. lifetime energy cost
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
lifetime return on investment,
%
annual return on investment,
%
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics (with incentives):
808
108
700
1,127
0.2
0
0.0
0
177
20
3,539
4.0
406
20
25
1,932
1,544
Assumptions: SWA calculated the savings for this measure using nameplate data taken and using
the billing analysis. The DOE Motor Master International selection and calculator was used with the
assumption that one of each of the burners operates for the heating season. According to weather
bin data for McGuire AFB, Trenton, NJ, each burners considered should operate for approximately
2,000 hours per year.
NJ Clean Energy – Premium motors ($45-$700 per motor)
Maximum incentive amount: $108
Page 40/111
ECM#9: Install 51 New Pulse Start Metal Halide Fixtures
Appendix B). The existing lighting inventory contained 51 inefficient metal halide fixtures. SWA
recommends replacing them with more efficient, Pulse Start Metal Halide fixtures with electronic
ballasts. Pulse Start Metal Halide fixtures with electronic ballasts provide equivalent or better light
output while reducing energy consumption by 30% when compared to metal halide or high pressure
sodium fixtures. .
Installation cost:
est. incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
28,755
1,275
27,480
34,970
7.3
0
0.5
880
6,370
15
95,554
4.3
248
17
22
46,007
25,178
x NJ Clean Energy – Smart Start – Pulse Start Metal Halide Fixtures ($25 per fixture). Maximum
Page 41/111
ECM#10: Replace (3) 10HP Hot Water Circulation Pump Motors with Premium Efficiency
Motors
The Original Boiler Room houses (3) floor-mounted, hot water circulation pump pumps as part of
the hot water heating system to serve the hot water coils and other hot water terminal units in the A,
B, and C wings of the building. These pumps are in fair condition and have passed their expected
service lives of 20 years. The pumps are rated at 10 HP each. The pumps operate in lead/lag
fashion. All pump motors are standard efficiency. The Howell High School will realize energy
savings by utilizing premium efficiency motors for the pumps.
Installation cost:
Estimated installed cost: $1,758 (includes $600 labor)
Source of cost estimate: Similar projects and DOE Motor Master International selection & savings
analysis
est. incentives, $
incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
%
%
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
2,028
270
1,758
2,177
0.5
0
0.0
0
342
20
6,836
5.1
289
14
19
3,327
2,982
the billing analysis. The DOE Motor Master International selection and calculator was used with the
assumption that that all four (3) pumps operate for the heating season with an average operation of
(1) at one time. According to weather bin data for McGuire AFB, Trenton, NJ, each of the pumps
considered should operate for approximately 2,000 hours each per year.
NJ Clean Energy – Premium motors ($45-$700 per motor).
Maximum incentive amount: $270
Page 42/111
ECM#11: Replace 2,092 MBH Input HW Heater with (3) 400 MBH Input, 96% Efficient,
Direct Vent Unit
There is one natural gas floor-mounted domestic water heater/boiler with an adjacent storage tank
located in the original boiler room. The boiler produces the domestic hot water for the building’s
toilet rooms as well as any sinks in the associated classrooms. The boiler was installed in 1981 and
is in fair condition. Based on the age and expected service life of 20-25 years, the Howell High
School should consider replacing this boiler with (3) more efficient (condensing type) gas-fired tank
heaters and retaining the existing storage tank as part of a capital improvement plan.
Installation cost:
Source of cost estimate: Manufacturer’s data and similar projects
est. incentives, $
incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
%
%
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
50,000
2,100
47,900
0
0.0
5,980
2.4
0
9,359
13
121,663
5.1
154
12
17
51,629
69,966
the billing analysis. The new high efficiency gas fired water heater would operate with an efficiency
of approximately 96%.
NJ Clean Energy - Gas Water Heaters ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH ($1.75 per MBH) - Maximum incentive
amount is $2,100.
Page 43/111
ECM#12: Install Variable Frequency Drives on (5) 10HP Motors of Hot Water Circulators
The original boiler room houses one set of (3) floor-mounted circulator supply pumps and the D
Wing boiler room has one set of (2) floor-mounted circulator supply pumps as part of the hot water
heating system to serve the hot water coils in the air handling units, and other hot water terminal
units listed in this report. Adding variable frequency drives (VFDs) to these pumps will vary the flow
according to the required heating capacity to better meet the load of the building. This
recommendation will ensure that the retro-commissioning estimated savings (per ECM#14) are
maintained and reproducible. The pumps in both the original and D wing boiler rooms are rated at
10 Hp. The motors are on-off operation. Howell High School will realize energy savings by utilizing
variable frequency drives for the pump motors, and incorporating this new motor control method
into the BMS programming.
Installation cost:
Estimated installed cost: $26,250 (includes $12,750 labor)
Source of cost estimate: RS Means Cost Data and Honeywell VFD Quick Savings Estimator
est. incentives, $
incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
%
%
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics (with no incentives):
26,250
0
26,250
31,000
6.5
0
0.4
0
4,867
20
97,340
5.4
271
14
18
46,159
42,470
the billing analysis. The Honeywell VFD Quick Savings Estimator was used with the assumption
that one of each set of heating water pumps operates for the heating season. According to weather
bin data for McGuire AFB, Trenton, NJ, each set of pumps considered should operate for
approximately 4,000 hours per year.
NJ Clean Energy – There are no incentives at this time for hot water pump applications, only for
chilled water pumps and centrifugal fans.
Page 44/111
ECM#13: Install 33 New Bi-level T8 Fixtures in Stairwells
On the day of the site visit, SWA completed a lighting inventory of Howell High School (see
Appendix B). The school currently contains T12 and T8 fluorescent lighting fixtures that are
operated 16 hours per day in stairwells. New technology called bi-level lighting, combines
fluorescent lighting fixtures with an occupancy sensor. These efficient light fixtures operate at a
minimal light level in order to meet code and safety requirements and power up to a higher level
when any motion is detected in the stairwells. Howell High School would be an appropriate
application for these fixtures since there are large periods of time when the stairwells should be
unoccupied.
Installation cost:
est. incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
5,745
825
4,920
5,362
1.1
0
0.1
0
842
10
8,418
5.8
71
7
11
2,120
3,861
x NJ Clean Energy – SmartStart – bi-level T8 fluorescent fixtures ($25 per fixture). Maximum
incentive amount is $825.
Please see Appendix F for more information on Incentive Programs
Page 45/111
ECM#14: Retro-commissioning
Retro-commissioning is a process that seeks to improve how building equipment and systems
function together. Depending on the age of the building, retro-commissioning can often resolve
problems that occurred during design or construction and/or address problems that have developed
throughout the building’s life. Owners often undertake retro-commissioning to optimize building
systems, reduce operating costs, and address comfort complaints from building occupants.
Since the systems in the building have undergone some renovations in recent years, and the
occupants continue to have concerns with thermal comfort control, SWA recommends undertaking
retro-commissioning to optimize system operation as a follow-up to completion of the upgrades.
The retro-commissioning process should include a review of existing operational parameters for
both newer and older installed equipment. During retro-commissioning, the individual loop
temperatures and (setback) schedules should also be reviewed to identify opportunities for
optimizing system performance, besides air balancing and damper proper operation. New controls
as well as any HVAC ECM measures should be implemented before retro-commissioning.
Installation cost:
est. incentives, $
net est. ECM cost with incentives,
$
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
186,750
0
186,750
68,038
14.2
11,247
5.4
1,820
31,510
12
378,124
5.9
102
9
13
119,372
245,797
Assumptions: SWA calculated the savings for this measure using measurements taken during the
field audit and using the billing analysis. Since the utility bills have some accounting fluctuations, it
is difficult to determine the amount of energy used for building heating and cooling . Based on
experience with similar buildings, SWA estimated the heating and cooling energy consumption.
Typical savings for retro-commissioning range from 5-20%, as a percentage of the total space
conditioning consumption. SWA assumed 10% savings. Estimated costs for retro-commissioning
range from $0.50-$2.00 per square foot. SWA assumed $(1.00 or 1.25 or 0.75) per square foot of a
total building square footage. SWA also assumed on the average 1 hr/wk operational savings when
systems are operating per design vs. the need to make more frequent adjustments.
There are currently no incentives for this measure at this time.
Page 46/111
ECM#15: Replace (2) 8,369 MBH Input Boilers with (4) 2000 MBH Input 96% Efficient,
Condensing Boilers
The existing (2) fire-tube Superior boilers in the Original Boiler room were installed in 1963 and are
in fair condition. The boilers are relatively inefficient as compared to modern boilers. No outdoor
temperature reset controls were observed. The boilers should be considered for replacement to
achieve energy savings as well as operating and maintenance savings. The initial efficiency of the
existing boilers are approximately 80%, but it can be assumed that in the time since installation, it
has degraded to an efficiency of about 65%. An upgrade to (4) higher efficiency, condensing boilers
of minimum 85% combustion efficiency each should be considered by the Howell High School as a
means of energy conservation.
The new high efficiency condensing boilers should have a guaranteed minimum thermal efficiency
of 85% at the worst case boiler operating conditions, such as mid-fire or high-fire conditions with a
return water temperature in the range of 140-160 degrees Fahrenheit, and efficiencies of up to 95%
achievable with lower return water temperatures. The boiler should be Low NOx certified with a 5:1
turndown burner, PVC direct venting and direct exhaust, hydronic safety controls and interface
systems. The boiler shall have compact design for easy retrofit installation, with sectional aluminum
block, ASME relief valve, stainless steel burner as a minimum. The air blower should be variable
speed combustion with easily removable access panels. Model shall be similar to Patterson-Kelley
C-2000condensing boiler.
Installation cost:
est. incentives, $
incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
%
%
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
182,000
8,000
174,000
0
0.0
16,310
6.6
0
25,525
25
638,129
6.8
267
11
14
270,473
190,827
Assumptions: SWA calculated the savings for this measure using nameplate data taken on the
day of the field visit and using the billing analysis and that the boiler will be replaced with (4) 2000
MBH input capacity boilers.
NJ Clean Energy - Gas-fired boilers > 1500 MBH - ≤4000 MBH ($1.00 per MBH)
Maximum incentive amount is $8,000.
Page 47/111
ECM#16: Install 403 New T8 Light Fixtures
Appendix B). The existing lighting inventory contained inefficient T12 fluorescent fixtures with
magnetic ballasts. SWA recommends replacing each existing fixture with more efficient, T8
fluorescent fixtures with electronic ballasts. T8 fixtures with electronic ballasts provide equivalent or
better light output while reducing energy consumption by 30% when compared to a T12 fixture with
magnetic ballast.
Installation cost:
est. incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
Economics:
49,299
6,045
43,254
21,974
4.6
0
0.3
2,324
5,774
15
86,609
7.5
100
7
10
23,923
15,821
x NJ Clean Energy – Smart Start – T8 fixtures with electronic ballasts ($15 per fixture). Maximum
Page 48/111
ECM#17: Install 48.07 kW PV Rooftop System with Incentives
Currently, the building does not use any renewable energy systems. Renewable energy systems
such as photovoltaic (PV) panels can be mounted on the building roof facing south which can offset
a portion of the purchased electricity for the building. Power stations generally have two separate
electrical charges: usage and demand. Usage is the amount of electricity in kilowatt-hours that a
building uses from month to month. Demand is the amount of electrical power that a building uses
at any given instance in a month period. During the summer periods, electric demand at a power
station is high, due to the amount of air conditioners, lights, and other equipment being used within
the region. Demand charges increase to offset the utility’s cost to provide enough electricity at that
given time. Photovoltaic systems offset the amount of electricity used by a building and help to
reduce the building’s electric demand, resulting in a higher cost savings. Installing a PV system will
offset electric demand and reduce annual electric consumption, while utilizing available state
incentives. PV systems are modular and readily allow for future expansions.
The size of the system was determined considering the available roof surface area, without
compromising service space for roof equipment and safety, as well as the facilities’ annual base
load and mode of operation. A PV system could be installed on a portion of the roof with panels
facing south. A commercial multi-crystalline 230 watt panel has 17.5 square feet of surface area
(providing 13.1 watts per square foot). A 48.07 kW system needs approximately 209 panels which
would take up 3,666 square feet. The larger 158.47 kW system would require approximately 689
panels which would take up 12,086 square feet.
A PV system would reduce the building's electric load and allow more capacity for surrounding
buildings as well as serve as an example of energy efficiency for the community. The building is
not eligible for a residential 30% federal tax credit. The Howell High School may want to consider
applying for a grant and / or engage a PV generator / leaser who would install the PV system and
then sell the power at a reduced rate. Typically, a major utility provides the ability to buy SREC’s at
$600/MWh or best market offer.
Two different system sizes were proposed due to installation incentives only being offered for
systems less than 50kW in size. The first option takes advantage of these incentives by staying
below the 50kW system threshold, and the second option takes advantage of the total usable space
on the school’s roof to install a PV system. SWA recommends installing the larger system;
however, if sufficient funding is not available, the Howell High School should at least install the
48.07 kW system. As mentioned above, these systems are modular and can be expanded in the
future.
Please note that this analysis did not consider the structural capability of the existing building to
support the above recommended system. SWA recommends that the Howell High School contract
with a structural engineer to determine if additional building structure is required to support the
recommended system and what costs would be associated with incorporating the additional
supports prior to system installation. Should additional costs be identified, the Howell High School
should include these costs in the financial analysis of the project.
Installation cost:
Estimated installed cost – $360,525 (includes $144,210 of labor)
Source of cost estimate: Similar projects.
Page 49/111
9.9
cash flow yr 12
42,521
cash flow yr 25
cash flow yr 11
42,521
cash flow yr 24
42,521
cash flow yr 23
cash flow yr 10
77,845
218,431
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
%
4.6
%
cash flow yr 9
42,521
cash flow yr 22
42,521
cash flow yr 21
42,521
cash flow yr 20
cash flow yr 8
7.9
115.1
simple payback, yrs
savings, $
223,022
25
cash flow yr 7
42,521
cash flow yr 19
cash flow yr 6
42,521
savings, $
42,521
cash flow yr 18
cash flow yr 5
0
cash flow yr 4
42,521
cash flow yr 17
42,521
cash flow yr 16
cash flow yr 3
0
0.8
48
kWh, 1st yr savings
42,521
cash flow yr 15
cash flow yr 2
56,821
incentives, $
338,025
42,521
cash flow yr 14
cash flow yr 1
22,500
-338,025
cash flow yr 13
cash flow yr 0
360,525
est. incentives, $
Install a 48.07 kW PV System with Incentives
42,521
42,521
42,521
8,921
8,921
8,921
8,921
8,921
8,921
8,921
8,921
8,921
8,921
Assumptions: SWA estimated the cost and savings of the system based on past PV projects.
SWA projected physical dimensions based on a typical Polycrystalline Solar Panel (230 Watts,
model #ND-U230C1). PV systems are sized based on Watts and physical dimensions for an array
will differ with the efficiency of a given solar panel (W/sq ft).
NJ Clean Energy - Renewable Energy Incentive Program, Incentive based on $0.75 / watt Solar PV
application for the first 30 kW of systems 50 kW or less. Incentive amount for this application is
$22,500 for the 48.07 kW proposed option. There are no associated incentives for the larger
158.47 kW system due to the NJ Clean Energy - Renewable Energy Incentive Program’s cap on
the size of the PV system.
http://www.njcleanenergy.com/renewable-energy/programs/renewable-energy-incentive-program
NJ Clean Energy - Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Program. Each time a solar electric system
generates 1,000kWh (1MWh) of electricity, a SREC is issued which can then be sold or traded
separately from the power. The buildings must also become net-metered in order to earn SRECs as
well as sell power back to the electric grid. A total annual SREC credit of $33,600 has been
incorporated in the above costs for the 48.07 kW system and an annual SREC credit of $113,400
Page 50/111
for the 158.47 kW system; however, it requires proof of performance, application approval and
negotiations with the utility.
Options for funding ECM:
This project may benefit from enrolling in NJ SmartStart program with Technical Assistance to offset
a portion of the cost of implementation.
http://www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/nj-smartstart-buildings/nj-smartstartbuildings
Page 51/111
ECM#18: Install 158.47 kW PV Rooftop System without Incentives
Currently, the building does not use any renewable energy systems. Renewable energy systems
such as photovoltaic (PV) panels can be mounted on the building roof facing south which can offset
a portion of the purchased electricity for the building. Power stations generally have two separate
electrical charges: usage and demand. Usage is the amount of electricity in kilowatt-hours that a
building uses from month to month. Demand is the amount of electrical power that a building uses
at any given instance in a month period. During the summer periods, electric demand at a power
station is high, due to the amount of air conditioners, lights, and other equipment being used within
the region. Demand charges increase to offset the utility’s cost to provide enough electricity at that
given time. Photovoltaic systems offset the amount of electricity used by a building and help to
reduce the building’s electric demand, resulting in a higher cost savings. Installing a PV system will
offset electric demand and reduce annual electric consumption, while utilizing available state
incentives. PV systems are modular and readily allow for future expansions.
The size of the system was determined considering the available roof surface area, without
compromising service space for roof equipment and safety, as well as the facilities’ annual base
load and mode of operation. A PV system could be installed on a portion of the roof with panels
facing south. A commercial multi-crystalline 230 watt panel has 17.5 square feet of surface area
(providing 13.1 watts per square foot). A 48.07 kW system needs approximately 209 panels which
would take up 3,666 square feet. The larger 158.47 kW system would require approximately 689
panels which would take up 12,086 square feet.
A PV system would reduce the building's electric load and allow more capacity for surrounding
buildings as well as serve as an example of energy efficiency for the community. The building is
not eligible for a residential 30% federal tax credit. The Howell High School may want to consider
applying for a grant and / or engage a PV generator / leaser who would install the PV system and
then sell the power at a reduced rate. Typically, a major utility provides the ability to buy SREC’s at
$600/MWh or best market offer.
Two different system sizes were proposed due to installation incentives only being offered for
systems less than 50kW in size. The first option takes advantage of these incentives by staying
below the 50kW system threshold, and the second option takes advantage of the total usable space
on the school’s roof to install a PV system. SWA recommends installing the larger system;
however, if sufficient funding is not available, the Howell High School should at least install the
48.07 kW system. As mentioned above, these systems are modular and can be expanded in the
future.
Please note that this analysis did not consider the structural capability of the existing building to
support the above recommended system. SWA recommends that the Howell High School contract
with a structural engineer to determine if additional building structure is required to support the
recommended system and what costs would be associated with incorporating the additional
supports prior to system installation. Should additional costs be identified, the Howell High School
should include these costs in the financial analysis of the project.
Installation cost:
Estimated installed cost –$1,188,525 (includes $475,410 of labor)
Source of cost estimate: Similar projects.
Page 52/111
Economics (without incentives):
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
cash flow yr 23
143,087
143,087
143,087
143,087
29,687
29,687
29,687
29,687
29,687
29,687
29,687
29,687
cash flow yr 25
143,087
cash flow yr 24
cash flow yr 22
cash flow yr 10
259,049
682,175
9.2
143,087
cash flow yr 21
cash flow yr 9
annual return on
investment, %
4.2
lifetime return on
investment, %
105.6
143,087
cash flow yr 20
cash flow yr 8
simple payback, yrs
143,087
cash flow yr 19
143,087
cash flow yr 18
cash flow yr 7
8.3
savings, $
742,166
25
143,087
cash flow yr 17
cash flow yr 6
143,087
savings, $
0
143,087
cash flow yr 16
cash flow yr 5
2.6
0
143,087
cash flow yr 15
cash flow yr 4
143,087
cash flow yr 14
cash flow yr 3
189,087
143,087
cash flow yr 13
cash flow yr 2
158
kWh, 1st yr savings
incentives, $
1,188,525
est. incentives, $
0
143,087
cash flow yr 12
cash flow yr 1
-1,188,525
cash flow yr 11
cash flow yr 0
1,188,525
Install a 158.47 kW PV System without Incentives
29,687
29,687
Assumptions: SWA estimated the cost and savings of the system based on past PV projects.
SWA projected physical dimensions based on a typical Polycrystalline Solar Panel (230 Watts,
model #ND-U230C1). PV systems are sized based on Watts and physical dimensions for an array
will differ with the efficiency of a given solar panel (W/sq ft).
NJ Clean Energy - Renewable Energy Incentive Program, Incentive based on $0.75 / watt Solar PV
application for the first 30 kW of systems 50 kW or less. Incentive amount for this application is
$22,500 for the 48.07 kW proposed option. There are no associated incentives for the larger
Page 53/111
158.47 kW system due to the NJ Clean Energy - Renewable Energy Incentive Program’s cap on
the size of the PV system.
http://www.njcleanenergy.com/renewable-energy/programs/renewable-energy-incentive-program
NJ Clean Energy - Solar Renewable Energy Certificate Program. Each time a solar electric system
generates 1,000kWh (1MWh) of electricity, a SREC is issued which can then be sold or traded
separately from the power. The buildings must also become net-metered in order to earn SRECs as
well as sell power back to the electric grid. A total annual SREC credit of $33,600 has been
incorporated in the above costs for the 48.07 kW system and an annual SREC credit of $113,400
for the 158.47 kW system; however, it requires proof of performance, application approval and
negotiations with the utility.
Options for funding ECM:
This project may benefit from enrolling in NJ SmartStart program with Technical Assistance to offset
a portion of the cost of implementation.
http://www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/nj-smartstart-buildings/nj-smartstartbuildings
Page 54/111
ECM#19: Install Premium Efficiency Motors on Walk-In Box Evaporator Fans
There are (2) walk-in cooler boxes and (1) walk-in freezer box in the Kitchen of Howell High School.
Typically, the evaporator and condenser fans of walk-in coolers will run 24 hours per day, 7 days
per week for a cooler and 18 hours per day, 7 days per week. The motors on these fans are
standard efficiency, shaded pole motors. The freezer fans could not be observed at the time of the
survey since the cooler door was locked, but it is assumed that on average for this size box, there
will be approximately (3) evaporator motors. It is assumed the motors are fractional horsepower.
Howell High High School will realize energy savings by utilizing premium efficiency motors for these
fans.
Installation cost:
Source of cost estimate: Similar projects and manufacturer’s data
est. incentives, $
incentives, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
savings, $
savings, $
simple payback, yrs
%
%
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
5,250
0
5,250
3,425
0.7
0
0.0
0
538
20
10,755
9.8
105
5
237
578,616
4,692
the billing analysis. Calculations were completed with the assumption that all of the cooler fans
operate for 8,760 hours per year and all of the freezer fans operate for 6,570 hours per year.
NJ Clean Energy – There are no incentives available since these are single phase, fractional
horsepower motors.
Page 55/111
ECM#20: Replace (3) DX cooling condensing units with 14 SEER high efficiency units
A110, A215, C203, C205, C214, C215, and C216 are cooled by split system DX cooling
condensing units, varying from 1-ton to 4-ton models, located on the roof above the associated
building zone. These pieces of equipment were installed in either 1985 or 1992 and are beyond, or
nearing, their expected service lives of 15 years. SWA recommends replacement of the (10)
condensing units to gain increase in operating efficiency. This measure cannot be justified by
energy savings alone, but should be considered as an end-of-life-cycle energy savings opportunity.
The current equipment is operating with a cooling Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) of approximately
8.0. The new equipment should have a minimum 14.0 EER rating. The higher EER will involve
increased cost for the equipment over units with lower EER. The equipment shall be Energy Star
certified and ASHRAE 90.1 compliant. The equipment shall utilize R-410A refrigerant.
Installation cost:
annual return on
investment, %
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
lifetime return on
investment, %
simple payback, yrs
savings, $
est. operating cost, 1st
yr savings, $
kW, demand
reduction/mo
kWh, 1st yr savings
incentives, $
est. incentives, $
(3) 4-ton Units
-3
-8
-15,004
6,576
Replace (3) 4-ton split system condensing units with 12-SEER units
24,000
0
24,000
4,800
1.0
0
1.5
0
754
15
11,448
31.8
-52
Incremental cost to replace (3) 4-ton condensing units with 14-SEER units vs. 12-SEER units
6,000
1,104
4,896
2,058
0.4
0
0.0
0
615
15
9,230
8.0
89
6
9
2,450
2,819
0
1
-4,417
9,395
30,000
1,104
28,896
6,858
1.4
0
0.1
0
2,051
15
30,758
14.1
6
days of the field visits and using the billing analysis, and by estimating the total of 1,200 cooling
hours for one year using weather bin data for McGuire AFB, Trenton, NJ.
NJ Clean Energy - Electric Unitary HVAC <5.4 tons and Min. 14.0 EER ($92/ton)
Page 56/111
ECM#21: Replace Trane 7.5-ton packaged DX cooling only rooftop HVAC unit with a 13 EER
high efficiency unit
The Main Offices are cooled by a packaged DX cooling rooftop unit located on the roof above the
associated building zone. This piece of equipment was installed in 1981 and is beyond the end of
its expected service lives of 15 years. SWA recommends replacement of the packaged rooftop unit
to gain increase in operating efficiency. This measure cannot be justified by energy savings alone,
but should be considered as an end-of-life-cycle energy savings opportunity.
8.0. The new equipment should have a minimum 11.0 EER rating, but preferably 13.0 EER. The
higher EER will involve increased cost for the equipment over units with lower EER. The equipment
shall be Energy Star certified and ASHRAE 90.1 compliant. The equipment shall utilize R-410A
refrigerant.
Installation cost:
%
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
lifetime return on
investment, %
simple payback, yrs
savings, $
savings, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
incentives, $
est. incentives, $
-3
-6
-8,099
5,044
Replace Trane 7.5-ton cooling only rooftop unit with 11 EER unit
15,000
0
15,000
3,682
0.8
0
1.2
0
578
15
8,782
25.9
-41
Incremental cost to replace Trane 7.5-ton cooling only rooftop unit with 13 EER unit vs. 11 EER unit
3,750
547.50
3,203
1,510
0.3
0
0.5
0
237
15
3,601
13.5
12
1
1
-372
2,069
-2
-5
-8,471
7,113
Replace Trane 7.5-ton cooling only rooftop unit with 13 EER unit
18,750
547.50
18,203
5,192
1.1
0
1.7
0
815
15
12,383
22.3
-32
NJ Clean Energy - Electric Unitary HVAC ≥5.4 tons to <11.25 tons and Min. 11.5 EER ($73/ton)
Maximum incentive amount is $547.50.
Page 57/111
ECM#22: Replace Trane 35-ton Packaged DX Cooling Only Rooftop HVAC unit with (3) 12.5ton, 13 EER High Efficiency Unit
The Media Center is cooled by a packaged DX cooling only rooftop unit located on the roof above
the associated building zone. This piece of equipment was installed in 1981 and is beyond the
expected service life of 15 years. SWA recommends replacement of the packaged rooftop unit to
gain increase in operating efficiency. This measure cannot be justified by energy savings alone, but
should be considered as an end-of-life-cycle energy savings opportunity.
8.0. The new equipment should have a minimum 11.0 EER rating per the energy code, but
preferably 13 EER. The higher EER will involve increased cost for the equipment over units with
lower EER. The equipment shall be ENERGY STAR® certified and ASHRAE 90.1 compliant. The
equipment shall utilize R-410A refrigerant.
Installation cost:
annual return on
investment, %
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
lifetime return on
investment, %
simple payback, yrs
savings, $
savings, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
incentives, $
est. incentives, $
-3
-7
-47,997
25,220
Replace 35-ton cooling only rooftop unit with (3) 12.5 Ton, 11 EER units
82,500
0
82,500
18,409
3.8
0
5.9
0
2,890
15
43,905
28.5
-47
Incremental cost to replace 35-ton cooling only rooftop unit with (3) 12.5 ton, 13 EER units vs. 11 EER units
18,750
0
18,750
7,553
1.6
0
2.4
0
1,186
15
18,014
15.8
-4
0
-1
-4,594
10,348
-2
-5
-49,628
35,568
Replace 35-ton cooling only rooftop unit with (3) 12.5 ton, 13 EER units
101,250
2,963
98,288
25,962
5.4
0
8.3
0
4,076
15
61,919
24.1
-37
NJ Clean Energy - Electric Unitary HVAC ≥11.25 tons and <20 tons and Min. 11.5 EER ($79/ton)
Page 58/111
ECM#23: Replace Trane 1.5-ton Packaged DX Cooling Only Rooftop HVAC unit with 14 SEER
The Boy’s Locker Room Offices are cooled by a packaged DX cooling only rooftop unit located on
the roof above the associated building zone. This piece of equipment was installed in 1991 and is
beyond the expected service life of 15 years. SWA recommends replacement of the packaged
rooftop unit to gain increase in operating efficiency. This measure cannot be justified by energy
savings alone, but should be considered as an end-of-life-cycle energy savings opportunity.
The current equipment is operating with a cooling Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) of
approximately 9.0. The new equipment should have a minimum 12.0 SEER rating per the energy
code, but preferably 14 SEER. The higher SEER will involve increased cost for the equipment over
units with lower SEER. The equipment shall be Energy Star certified and ASHRAE 90.1 compliant.
The equipment shall utilize R-410A refrigerant.
Installation cost:
%
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
%
simple payback, yrs
savings, $
savings, $
kWh, 1st yr savings
incentives, $
est. incentives, $
-3
-8
-1,875
822
Replace Trane 1.5-ton cooling only rooftop unit with 12 SEER unit
3,000
0
3,000
600
0.1
0
0.2
0
94
15
1,431
31.8
-52
Incremental cost to replace Trane 1.5-ton cooling only rooftop unit with 14 SEER unit vs. 12 SEER unit
750
0
750
257
0.1
0
0.1
0
40
15
613
18.6
-18
-1
-3
-268
352
-3
-7
-2,006
1,174
Replace Trane 1.5-ton cooling only rooftop unit with 14 SEER unit
3,750
138
3,612
857
0.2
0
0.3
0
135
15
2,044
26.8
-43
NJ Clean Energy - Electric Unitary HVAC ≥11.25 tons and <20 tons and Min. 11.5 EER ($79/ton)
Page 59/111
ECM#24: Replace (5) DX Cooling Condensing Units with 14 SEER High Efficiency Units
Installation cost:
annual return on
investment, %
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
lifetime return on
investment, %
simple payback, yrs
savings, $
savings, $
kW, demand
reduction/mo
kWh, 1st yr savings
incentives, $
est. incentives, $
(5) 3-ton Units
-3
-8
-18,754
8,220
30,000
0
30,000
6,000
1.3
0
1.9
0
942
15
14,310
31.8
-52
7,500
0
7,500
2,570
0.5
0
0.8
0
403
15
6,129
18.6
-18
-1
-3
-2,683
3,521
-3
-7
-20,058
11,741
37,500
1,380
36,120
8,570
1.8
0
2.8
0
1,345
15
20,439
26.8
-43
Page 60/111
ECM#25: Replace (2) DX Cooling Condensing Units with 14 SEER High Efficiency Units
Installation cost:
annual return on
investment, %
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
lifetime return on
investment, %
simple payback, yrs
savings, $
est. operating cost, 1st
yr savings, $
kW, demand
reduction/mo
kWh, 1st yr savings
incentives, $
est. incentives, $
(2) 1-ton Units
-3
-8
-2,501
1,096
4,000
0
4,000
800
0.2
0
0.3
0
126
15
1,908
31.8
-52
1,000
0
1,000
342
0.1
0
0.1
0
54
15
816
18.6
-18
-1
-3
-359
469
-3
-7
-2,676
1,565
5,000
184
4,816
1,142
0.2
0
0.4
0
179
15
2,724
26.9
-43
Page 61/111
PROPOSED FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS
Capital Improvements
Capital Improvements are recommendations for the building that may not be cost-effective at the
current time, but that could yield a significant long-term payback. These recommendations should
typically be considered as part of a long-term capital improvement plan. Capital improvements
should be considered if additional funds are made available, or if the installed costs can be shared
with other improvements, such as major building renovations. SWA recommends the following
capital improvements for the Howell High School:
x
Install premium motors when replacements are required - Select NEMA Premium motors when
replacing motors that have reached the end of their useful operating lives.
x
Replace all original, single-glazed windows with a low-E, double glazed type.
x
Replace common area heating equipment - such as finned tube radiation and cabinet unit
heaters in the toilet rooms, vestibules and corridors. This equipment is in fair condition, but age
and wear have reduced the heat transfer capacity. This equipment should be replaced with
more modern equipment suited for the intended use. These changes cannot be justified based
on energy savings alone. However, replacement is strongly recommended along with upgrades
to other portions of the heating system. This is a replacement in kind recommendation which
offers negligible energy savings.
x
Replace and re-commission the Automatic Temperature Controls (ATC) system - There are a
few different systems within Howell High School, as detailed in Section 2.1 Mechanical
Systems, Controls above. In general, the building has fair temperature control, but there are
areas where the ATC system does not function well. SWA recommends that one uniform ATC
system is provided for the school. Since the school has a few separate areas with a Johnson
Controls Metasys system that appears to be in good condition, SWA recommends that the
School removes the ATC systems in the remainder of the school and upgrades and enhances
the existing Johnson systems to provide one, comprehensive ATC system. The three-way
valves at each of the boilers in the original boiler room should be checked and repaired or
replaced to allow the existing water temperature reset control to function properly. In addition,
any equipment not currently interfaced with a current ATC system shall be incorporated into the
new ATC system. The Johnson system is open BACnet protocol. The cost to provide one
Johnson ATC system utilizing as much of the existing system as possible is $1,600,000.
x
Replace unit ventilators - The (39) Nesbitt unit ventilators installed in 1964 and (33) A and C
Wing Trane units were installed in 1979. These units are beyond their expected service life.
Considering the increased maintenance repair costs and that replacement parts are difficult to
find, SWA recommends replacement of this equipment. There is better control offered by the
newer, electronically controlled units, although energy savings are negligible.
o The unit ventilators are operating beyond their useful operating lives. SWA evaluated
replacement of all (72) units with new. The updated fan coils should be double inlet,
forward curved of centrifugal variety; have a maximum speed of 1,000 rpm with
permanent split capacitor motors. The fan housing should be constructed of heavy
gauge metal to help reduce air noise during operation. Wheel motors are to be
premium efficiency, single speed, and permanent split capacitor with overload
protection. Each fan should be equipped with a three speed switch for air balancing.
Page 62/111
o
An ultra-low leak, blade type outside air damper will ensure low leakage of the
outside air when the equipment is not operating. The unit shall have a solid-state
defrost control system and two separate filters. The provided air-to-air heat
exchanger should be designed to support two air streams in a counter-flow direction.
The heat exchanger matrix shall permit less than one percent of cross contamination
between the air streams. The heat exchanger shall have an effectiveness of
approximately 80% with equal airflow. The proposed unit will not be that much more
energy efficient than the existing unit. The estimated budget installed cost of a 72
new fan coil ventilators is $700,000. The recommended enhancements over the
replacement in kind will offer negligible energy savings.
Howell High School may wish to consider adding DX cooling as part of the
equipment replacement. In this case, it should be recognized that cooling will result
in an increase in energy usage versus providing heating and ventilation only. The
estimated budget installed cost for DX coil and air cooled condensing units for the
unit ventilators is an additional $265,000. Note that the addition of air
conditioning may require an upgrade to the existing electric service. The cost
of the electric service upgrade is broken out separately below but should be
included if the cooling option above is incorporated.
x
Replace packaged RTU serving Media Center - The packaged RTU serving the Media Center is
operating beyond its expected service life. SWA recommends that this equipment is replaced
with three units in the 12.5-15 ton range as part of a capital improvement project, and that it is
designed to provide code minimum ventilation rates. It is strongly recommended that systems
are provided that utilize a heat recovery wheel for pretreatment of the outside air and CO2
sensors for demand control ventilation. This is a replacement in kind recommendation that
cannot be justified by energy savings alone. The estimated budget installed cost for (3) rooftop
units with DX cooling and heat recovery wheel, including new ductwork, is $170,000.
x
Replace/provide (4) H&V units to serve the Main Gym B100 and Auxiliary Gym B101 - The hot
water heating only ventilation system for the Main Gym and Auxiliary Gym is beyond its
expected service life. SWA recommends that this equipment is replaced as part of a capital
improvement project, and that it is designed to provide code minimum ventilation rates. The
estimated budget installed cost for (4) hot water H&V units for the Main Gym and Auxiliary Gym
is $195,000. Howell High School may wish to consider providing DX cooling as part of this
system to make the room more functional in warm weather, but should recognize that this will
increase energy usage versus providing a heating and ventilation system only. If cooling is
desired, it is strongly recommended that a system is provided that utilizes a heat recovery wheel
for pretreatment of the outside air and CO2 sensors for demand control ventilation. This is a
replacement in kind recommendation which offers negligible energy savings. The estimated
budget installed cost for (4) rooftop H&V units with DX cooling and heat recovery wheel is
$280,000. Note that the addition of air conditioning may require an upgrade to the
existing electric service. The cost of the electric service upgrade is broken out separately
below but should be included if the cooling option above is incorporated.
x
Replace (2) hot water heating air handling units serving the Auditorium - The hot water air
handling units in the Auditorium are beyond its expected service life. SWA recommends that this
equipment is replaced as part of a capital improvement project, and that it is designed to provide
code minimum ventilation rates. The estimated budget installed cost for (2) hot water air
handling units for the Auditorium is $95,000.
Page 63/111
x
Replace three (3) horizontal pad-mounted end suction pumps in the Original Boiler Room – The
three (3) original hot water heating system pumps are in fair condition. SWA recommends that
this equipment is replaced to minimize future maintenance costs and provide more efficient
operation. This upgrade will provide negligible energy savings. The estimated cost for
demolition and replacement of the three pumps is approximately $65,000.
x
Replace existing elevator in C Wing. This elevator is 40+ years old and is at the end of its
expected service life. Replacement will yield negligible energy savings. The estimated
replacement cost is $60,000.
x
Replace window air conditioners – Several of the existing window air conditioners still have
some useful life remaining (on the average 0-5 years left) but replacement should be considered
with more modern, energy efficient systems. The window air conditioners should be replaced
with split systems to allow for closing up of the existing window or wall penetrations. These
upgrades cannot be justified by energy savings alone but will result in a decrease in energy
usage versus the existing equipment. In addition, some of the existing systems utilize R-22
refrigerant, which is not an ozone-friendly refrigerant. Newer systems should be specified with
R-410A refrigerant.
x
Consider replacement of the 1964 walk-in cooler and freezer with newer models. The wall and
roof panels of the box itself are likely not insulated to the levels of current walk-in coolers. This
is a replacement in kind recommendation which cannot be recommended based on energy
savings alone.
Operations and Maintenance
Operations and Maintenance measures consist of low/no cost measures that are within the
capability of the current building staff to handle. These measures typically require little investment,
and they yield a short payback period. These measures may address equipment settings or staff
operations that, when addressed will reduce energy consumption or costs.
x
Apply appropriate air-sealing strategies around all exterior wall penetrations (including electrical,
plumbing and HVAC).
x
Repair and maintain all gutter to downspout connections.
x
Repair and patch roof leakage areas and remove sharp edged objects from roof surface.
x
Install/replace and maintain sealants at all windows for airtight performance.
x
Air balance distributed conditioned air - for uniform and steady temperature control. This activity
is also included in Retro-commissioning, ECM#14.
x
Thoroughly and evenly insulate space above the ceiling tiles and plug all ceiling penetration. All
missing ceiling tiles should be put back in place.
x
Maintain roofs - SWA recommends regular maintenance to verify water is draining correctly.
Page 64/111
x
Maintain downspouts and cap flashing - Repair/install missing downspouts and cap flashing as
needed to prevent water/moisture infiltration and insulation damage. SWA recommends round
downspout elbows to minimize clogging.
x
Provide weather-stripping/air-sealing - SWA observed that exterior door weather-stripping was
beginning to deteriorate in places. Doors and vestibules should be observed annually for
deficient weather-stripping and replaced as needed. The perimeter of all window frames should
also be regularly inspected, and any missing or deteriorated caulking should be re-caulked to
provide an unbroken seal around the window frames. Any other accessible gaps or penetrations
in the thermal envelope penetrations should also be sealed with caulk or spray foam.
x
Repair/seal wall cracks and penetrations - SWA recommends as part of the maintenance
program installing weep holes, installing proper flashing and correct masonry efflorescence, and
sealing wall cracks and penetrations wherever necessary in order to keep insulation dry and
effective.
x
Provide water-efficient fixtures and controls - Adding controlled on/off timers on all lavatory
faucets is a cost-effective way to reduce domestic hot water demand and save water. Building
staff can also easily install faucet aerators and/or low-flow fixtures to reduce water consumption.
There are many retrofit options, which can be installed now or incorporated as equipment is
replaced. Routine maintenance practices that identify and quickly address water leaks are a
low-cost way to save water and energy. Retrofitting with more efficient water-consumption
fixtures/appliances will reduce energy consumption for water heating, while also decreasing
water/sewer bills.
Older water faucets, no aerators
x
SWA recommends that the building considers purchasing the most energy-efficient equipment,
including ENERGY STAR® labeled appliances, when equipment is installed or replaced. More
information can be found in the “Products” section of the ENERGY STAR® website at:
http://www.energystar.gov.
x
Use smart power electric strips - in conjunction with occupancy sensors to power down
computer equipment when left unattended for extended periods of time.
Page 65/111
Computers left on in Media Center back room after school hours
x
Create an energy educational program - that teaches how to minimize energy use. The U.S.
Department of Energy offers free information for hosting energy efficiency educational programs
and plans. For more information please visit: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/education/.
x
Boilers and building piping insulation - Insulate un-insulated heating piping throughout the
building to efficiently deliver heat where required and provide personnel protection.
x
Water levels in the expansion tanks and the integrity of the tank bladder should be checked on a
regular basis to confirm proper operation.
x
For Aerco condensing boilers, inspect the igniter and flame sensor and calibrate combustion
every six months per manufacturer’s recommendations.
x
Change filters in rooftop units and air handling units monthly to ensure efficient operation of the
fan, ensure adequate air delivery to the space.
x
Tighten belts on exhaust fans and air handling units supply fans every three to six months –
tightening belts on belt-driven fans can maximize overall efficiency of the equipment.
x
Inspect RTU and air handling unit coils for dirt buildup or coil freezeup every three to six
months. These conditions should be rectified if found and they will cause inefficient operation
and possibly damage to the equipment.
x
Inspect condensate pan and drain line on all RTUs and air handling units. Remove sludge or
foreign materials that might obstruct proper drainage.
x
Inspect and replace gasketing around door into walk-in refrigeration boxes. Ineffective gasketing
allows infiltration of warm air into the walk-in box, which increases the run-time of the
compressors.
The recommended ECMs and the list above are cost-effective energy efficiency measures and
building upgrades that will reduce operating expenses for the Freehold RHSD. Based on the
requirements of the LGEA program, the Freehold RHSD must commit to implementing some of
these measures, and must submit paperwork to the Local Government Energy Audit program within
one year of this report’s approval to demonstrate that they have spent, net of other NJCEP
incentives, at least 25% of the cost of the audit (per building). The Howell High School should
spend a minimum of $4,923 (or 25% of $19,692) worth of ECMs, net of other NJCEP incentives, to
fulfill the obligations.
Page 66/111
APPENDIX A: EQUIPMENT LIST
Inventory
Building
System
Description
Model #
Fuel
Location
Space
Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn Ventilation
(no nameplate)
Electric
Roof above
Auditorium
Auditorium
Est. 1970
0%
Cooling
(2) Rooftop Units:
American
Standard
(RTU#37 & #38)
Est. 11 EER
M# TCD180
B400HB
S#633100263D
S#633100285D
460V 3ø
39 MCA
50 MOCP
27 lbs. R-22
Electric
Roof above
Auditorium
Auditorium
2006
2006
75%
75%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn Ventilation
(no nameplate)
Electric
Roof above
Auditorium
Auditorium
Est. 1970
0%
Rooftop Unit:
Trane (RTU#19)
Est. 10 EER
M# THC036A4
R0A0EH200
A1000300 A
S#216100012L
460V 3ø
9.7 MCA
15 MOCP
5.3 lbs. R-22
Electric
Roof above
room A115
A115
2002
45%
Electric
Roof above
hallway
adjacent to
Auditorium
2000
50%
Electric
Roof above
hallway
adjacent to
Auditorium
entrance
Est. 1970
0%
Rooms
behind
Auditorium
Est. 1970
0%
Rooms
behind
Auditorium
2003
65%
Rooms
behind
Auditorium
Est. 1970
0%
A116
A117
1999
45%
Cooling
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Greenheck
Ventilation
(2) Exhaust Fans:
Penn Ventilation
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
(EF#24)
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Dayton
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn-Air (EF#64)
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Greenheck
M# GB-130LMDX
S#00F11093
(no nameplate)
Roof above
rooms
(no nameplate)
Electric
behind
Auditorium
Roof above
M# 4YC88
rooms
Electric
115V 1/4 HP
behind
2.3A
Auditorium
Roof above
M# 18 BCRA
rooms
Electric
115V 1ø 4.2A
behind
Auditorium
Roof above
M# GB-90-4Xhallway
OD
Electric
adjacent to
S#99L00681
rear of
Auditorium
Continued on next page
A111
A112
A113
A114
A115
Toilet
adjacent to
Auditorium
entrance &
SECA
office
Page 67/111
Continued from previous page
Building
System
Ventilation
Description
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#20)
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#20)
Est. 10 EEr
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#13)
Est. 10 EER
Model #
M# 100C10DH
115V 1ø
1/25 HP
M# TCC024F1
00BG
S#2191JMD2H
208V 1ø
17.7 MCA
25 MOCP
4 lbs. 2 oz.
R-22
M# THC048A4
R0A0GH200A1
000300
S#216100285L
460V 3ø
11.8 MCA
15 MOCP
7.7 lbs. R-22
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Electric
Roof
above
hallway
adjacent to
rear of
Auditorium
Janitor’s
Closet
adjacent to
A115
2001
50%
Electric
Roof
above
room A115
Rooms
adjacent
to A115
2002
45%
Electric
Roof
above
room A113
A116
2002
45%
A Wing Corridor
2001
50%
Stair Near Media
Center
Est.
1980s
0%
A100
A101
A102
A103
2002
2002
2002
2002
45%
45%
45%
45%
D108
D110
2002
45%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#24)
M# 100C10DH
115V 1ø
1/25 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
(EF#27)
(no nameplate)
Electric
Cooling
(4) Rooftop
Units: Trane
(RTU#9, #10,
#11, #12)
Est. 10 EER
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane (RTU#3)
Est. 10 EER
Roof
above
hallway
connecting
the ‘A’ &
‘D’ wings
Roof
Above
Stair Near
Media
Center
M# THC048A4
R0A0GH200A1
000300
Roof
S#212100182L
above
S#212100048L
rooms
A100
S#212100270L Electric
A101
S#212100239L
460V 3ø
A102
11.8 MCA
A103
15 MOCP
7.7 lbs. R-22
M# THC120A4
R0A0DG000A1
000300
Roof
S#21610094L
Electric
above
460V 3ø
room D110
25.5 MCA
30 MOCP
18.7 lbs. R-22
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Date
Installed
Page 68/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Date
Installed
Electric
Roof
above
rooms
D112 &
D114
D112
D114
2002
2002
60%
60%
D Wing
Classrooms
2002
60%
Cooling
(2) Air-cooled
Condensing
Units: Trane
Est. 10 EEr
XE1200
M# TTP042D4
00A0
S#20333AH2F
S#20333GN2F
460V 3ø
9 MCA
15 MOCP
8 lbs. 11 oz.
R-22
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#14)
M# 245C8B
460V 3ø
1/2 HP
Electric
Roof
above
hallway
adjacent to
room D110
M# THC072A4
R0A06G000A1
000300
S#216100347L
460V 3ø
17.5 MCA
25 MOCP
10.7 lbs. R-22
Electric
Roof
above
room D115
D115
2002
45%
Electric
Roof
above
toilet
rooms
adjacent to
room D115
Toilet rooms
adjacent to room
D115
2002
60%
D113
2002
60%
D Wing Corridor
2002
50%
Cooling
Ventilation
Rooftop Unit:
Trane (RTU#7)
Est. 10 EER
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#15)
Cooling
Air-cooled
Condensing
Unit: Trane
Est. 10 EER
Heating
Built-up Air
Handling Unit:
Trane (HV#3)
M# 120 C3B
115V 1ø
1/4 HP
XE1200
M# TTP042D4
00A0
S#20333DU2F
Roof
460V 3ø
Electric
above
9 MCA
room D113
15 MOCP
8 lbs. 11 oz.
R-22
T-series
Climate
Roof
Changer:
above
3 sections
Electric
hallway
M# TSCA006
U0A
adjacent to
S#K02B32288
room D111
460V 3ø
3 HP 4.5 FLA
Page 69/111
Building
System
Description
Heating/
Cooling
(2) Built-up Air
Handling Units:
Trane (AHU#3
& #4)
Cooling
(2) Air-cooled
Condensing
Units: Trane
Est. 10 EER
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane (RTU#6)
Est. 10 EER
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#13)
Cooling
Air-cooled
Condensing
Unit: Trane
Est. 10 EER
Heating/
Cooling
Built-Up Air
Handling Unit:
Trane (AHU#2)
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#2)
Est. 10 EER
Model #
Fuel
Location
T-series
Climate
Roof
Changer:
above
6 sections
Electric
rooms
M# TSCA003
D111
U0A
D109
460V 3ø
3 HP 4.5 FLA
M# TTP060E4
00A0
S#2095S5N1F
Roof
S#2093KXP1F
above
rooms
460V 3ø
Electric
12 MCA
D111
20 MOCP
D109
10 lbs. 14 oz.
R-22
M# TCC018F1
00BG
S#2184K02H
Roof
208V 1ø
Electric
above
15 MCA
room D107
20 MOCP
3 lbs. 4 oz.
R-22
M# 100R3B
Roof
115V 1ø
Electric
above
1/4 HP
room D107
XE1200
M# TTP060E4
00A0
S#2093K2A1F
Roof
460V 3ø
Electric
above
12 MCA
room D107
20 MOCP
10 lbs 14 oz.
R-22
(5 sections)
M# TSCA003
Roof
U0A
Electric
above
S#K02B32131
room D107
460V 3ø
M# THC120A4
R0A
S#216100358L
Roof
460V 3ø
Electric
above
25.2 MCA
room D107
30 MOCP
18.7 lbs. R-22
Space Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
D109
D111
2002
50%
D109
D111
2002
2002
60%
60%
Room between
D107 and D109
2002
45%
Kiln Room
between D107
and D109
2002
60%
D107
2002
60%
D107
2002
45%
D104
D106
2002
45%
Page 70/111
Building
System
Description
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#31)
M# 135C4B
115V 1ø
1/3 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#12)
M# 165C4B
115V 1ø
1/3 HP
Electric
Cooling
(2) Air-cooled
Condensing
Units: Trane
Est. 10 EER
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane (RTU#1)
Est. 10 EER
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#11)
Heating/
Cooling
Built-up Air
Handling Unit:
Trane (AHU#1)
Cooling
Air-cooled
Condensing
Unit: Trane
Est. 10 EER
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#6)
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane (RTU#4)
Est. 10 EER
Model #
M# TTP042D4
00A0
S#20333B32F
S#20333H32F
460V 3ø
9 MCA
15 MOCP
8lbs 11oz.
R-22 ea.
M# THC048A4
R0A
S#216100029L
460V 3ø
11.8 MCA
15 MOCP
7.7 lbs R-22
M# 100C3B
115v 1ø
1/4 HP
(5 sections)
M# TSCA008
U0A
S#K02B32090
460V 3ø
M# TTA120B
400DA
S#21842A7AD
460V 3ø
22.7 MCA
30 MOCP
M# 100C10DH
115V 1ø
1/25 HP
Fuel
Location
Roof
above
room
hallway
adjacent to
room D105
Roof
above
room
hallway
adjacent to
room D105
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
D105
D107
Boiler Rm
2002
60%
D Wing Corridor
2002
60%
Electric
Roof
above
room D103
D103
D105
2002
2002
60%
60%
Electric
Roof
above
room D103
D102
2002
45%
Electric
Roof
above
room D103
D103
2002
60%
Electric
Roof
above
Dance
Dance Studio/
Storage
2002
45%
Dance Studio
2002
60%
Aux Gym D100
Storage
2002
60%
Aux Gym D100
Storage & Offices
2002
45%
Electric
Electric
Roof
above
hallway
adjacent to
Gym and
Dance
Roof
above
Gym
entrance
M# TCC024F
100BG
S#21555M52H
Roof
above
208V 1ø
Electric
17.7 MCA
Gym
25 MOCP
entrance
4 lbs. 2 oz.
R-22
Space Served
Date
Installed
Page 71/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Fuel
Heating
Built-up Air
Handling Unit:
Trane (HV#3)
M# TSCA008
U0A
S#K02B32280
460V 3ø
Electric
Ventilation
(2) Exhaust
Fans: Loren
Cook (EF#7,
#10)
M# 135C3B
115 V 1ø
1/4 HP ea.
Electric
Ventilation
(2) Exhaust
Fans: Loren
Cook (EF#8,
#9)
M# 165C5B
460V 3ø
1/2 Hp ea.
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#30)
M# 100C3B
115 V 1ø
1/4 HP
Electric
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane (RTU#5)
Est. 10 EER
Ventilation
(2) Exhaust
Fans: Loren
Cook (EF#4,
#5)
Heating
(2) Built-up Air
Handling Units:
Trane (HV#1,
#2)
Ventilation
(2) Exhaust
Fans: Loren
Cook (EF#2,
#3)
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#25)
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Location
Roof
above
Gym
hallway
Roof
above
areas
around
Gym &
Dance
Roof
above
areas
around
Gym &
Dance
Roof
above
Restroom
adjacent to
room
Dance
Space Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
D Wing Corridor
2002
45%
D Wing Storage &
Toilets
2002
60%
D Wing Storage &
Corridor
2002
60%
D102
2002
60%
Hub Room
Adjacent to D102
2002
45%
M# TCC024
F100BG
S#255N4J2H
208V 1ø
17.7 MCA
25 MOCP
4 lbs. 2 oz.
R-22
Electric
Roof
above
Restroom
adjacent to
room D102
M# 270C6B
460V 3ø
3/4 HP ea.
Electric
Roof
above
Gym
Gym
2002
60%
(3 sections)
M# TSCA012
U0A
S#K02B32272
S#K02B32276
460V 3ø
Electric
Roof
above
Gym
Gym
2002
2002
45%
45%
M# 135C3B
115V 1ø
1/4 HP ea.
Electric
Roof
above
Gym
Gym
2002
60%
Corridor Between
A100 & Wrestling
Room
2002
60%
Wrestling Room
1970s
0%
Roof
above
M# 70C15DH
room
115V 1ø
Electric
adjacent to
1/20 HP
new boiler
room
Roof
above
(no nameplate) Electric
Wrestling
Room
Page 72/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Fuel
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 214 BCRA
115V 1ø 4.4A
Electric
Heating
Built-up Air
Handling Unit:
Trane (HV#7)
(4 sections)
M# TSCA008
U0A
S#K00G18970
460V 3ø
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Greenheck
M# GB-130LMDX-QD
S#00E25302
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 111RA EJ
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 118CA EJ
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 182BCRA
115V 1ø 4.2A
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Greenheck
M# GB-130LMDX-QD
S#00F11090
Electric
Cooling
Rooftop unit:
Trane
(RTU#36)
Est. 9 SEER
Location
Roof
above
Boys
Locker
Room/
Offices
Roof
above
Boys
Locker
Room/
Offices
Roof
above
Boys
Locker
Room/
Offices
Roof
above
Boys
Locker
Room/
Offices
Roof
above
Boys
Locker
Room/
Offices
Roof
above
Boys
Locker
Room/
Offices
Roof
above
rooms
between
two gyms
M# TCC018
F100AA
Roof
S#F38151039
above
208V 1ø
Boys
Electric
15 MCA
Locker
20 MOCP
Room/
3lbs. 16oz.
Offices
R-22
Space Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Locker Room/
Offices
1970s
0%
Boys Locker
Room/ Offices
2000
35%
Boys Locker
Room/ Offices
2000
50%
Boys Locker
Room/ Offices
1970s
0%
Boys Locker
Room/ Offices
1970s
0%
Boys Locker
Room/ Offices
1970s
0%
Boys Locker
Room/ Offices
2000
50%
Boys Locker
Room/ Offices
1991
0%
Page 73/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Fuel
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 108CRAEJ
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
M# CB18
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
ventilation
M# AT24
Electric
Ventilation
(4) Exhaust
Fans: Penn
Ventilation
M# RB30
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 301BCD
115V 1ø 6A
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 181 BCRA
115V 1ø 4.2A
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#22)
Est. 10 EER
M# TSC090
A3E0A
S#226101521L
208V 3ø
42.7 MCA
60 MOCP
11.9 lbs. R-22
Ventilation
(3) Exhaust
Fans: Jenn Air
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Electric
Electric
Location
Roof
above
Boys
Locker
Room/
Offices
Roof
above
rooms
adjacent to
B101
Roof
above
rooms
adjacent to
B101
Roof
above
room B101
Roof
above
hallway
between
Gym &
Wrestling
Room
Roof
above
Wrestling
Room
Roof
above
Wrestling
Room
Roof
above
M# 2HRVEJ
Electric
Wrestling
Room
Roof
above
M# 301 BCRA
Electric
Wrestling
Room
Roof
M# 18 BCRA
above
Electric
115V 1ø 4.2A
Wrestling
Room
Space Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Boys Locker
Room/ Offices
1970s
0%
Rooms adjacent
to B101
1970s
0%
Rooms adjacent
to B101
1970s
0%
Room B101
1970s
0%
Hallway between
Gym & Wrestling
Room
1970s
0%
1970s
0%
2002
45%
1970s
0%
1970s
0%
1970s
0%
Wrestling Room
Wrestling Room
Wrestling Room
Wrestling Room
Wrestling Room
Page 74/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Date
Installed
Electric
Roof
above
Wrestling
Room
Wrestling Room
2002
45%
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#23)
Est. 10 EER
M# TSC090
A3E0A
S#221101246L
208V 3ø
42.7 MCA
60 MOCP
11.9 lbs. R-22
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 301 BCRE
480V 3ø 1.3A
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 241 BCRA
115V 1ø 4.4A
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 42 BCRA
115V 1ø 4.2A
Electric
M# YSC048AE
LA2MD
S#630100690L
S#630100774L
460V 3ø
12.8 MCA
20 MOCP
3.8 lbs. R-22
60 MBH input
48 MBH output
Roof
above
Wrestling
Room
Roof
above
hallway
between
Gym &
Wrestling
Room
Roof
above
Wrestling
Room
Wrestling Room
1970s
0%
Hallway between
Gym & Wrestling
Room
1970s
0%
Wrestling Room
1970s
0%
Natural
Gas /
Electric
Roof
above
room B104
B104
2006
2006
75%
75%
Heating /
Cooling
(2) Rooftop
Units: Trane
(RTU#24, #25)
Est. 11 EER
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 98 BCRA
Electric
Roof
above
room B104
B104
1970s
0%
Cooling
Air-cooled
Condensing
unit: Friedrich
Est. 9 EER
M# MR30C3E
S#LDDT00990
230V 1ø
20 MCA
30 MOCP
4.19 lbs. R-22
Electric
Roof
above
room B105
B105
1999
25%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
B105
1970s
0%
Ventilation
(2) Exhaust
Fans: Jenn Air
Girls Locker
Room/ Offices
1970s
0%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Girls Locker
Room/ Offices
1970s
0%
Roof
above
room B105
Roof
above Girls
Locker
Room/
Offices
Roof
above Girls
M# 301 BCRE
Electric
Locker
480V 3ø 1.3A
Room/
Offices
M# 142 BRCA
115V 1ø 4.2A
Electric
Page 75/111
Building
System
Description
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 10 BCRA
Heating
(2) Built-up Air
Handling Units:
Trane (HV#5,
#6)
T-Series
Climate
Changer
M# TSCA008
U0A
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#29)
Refrigeration
Model #
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Electric
Roof
above Girls
Locker
Room/
Offices
Girls Locker
Room/ Offices
1970s
0%
Electric
Roof
above
Cafeteria
area
Cafeteria
2002
2002
45%
45%
Cafeteria
2002
60%
Cafeteria Walk-in
Box
1970s
0%
Kitchen
2002
45%
Kitchen
2002
60%
Kitchen Bathroom
1970s
0%
Kitchen
2002
60%
Kitchen
1970s
0%
Kitchen Office/
Storage
1970s
0%
Kitchen Office/
Storage
1990’s
0%
Kitchen Office/
Storage
1970s
0%
Hallway adjacent
to Guidance
1973
0%
M# 245C7B
1 HP
Electric
Condenser for
Walk-in Cooler
Box: Bally
Est. 8 EER
M# PL-150A-1
S#24958-M3
5.4 A
Electric
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#21)
Est. 10 EER
M# THC102A4
R0A
S#216100349L
460V 3ø
22.9 MCA
25 MOCP
14.5 lbs. R-22
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#21)
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#28)
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Roof
above
Cafeteria
area
Roof
above
Cafeteria
Kitchen
area
Roof
above
Kitchen
Roof
above
Kitchen
Roof
(no nameplate)
above
Electric
Est. 1/6 HP
Kitchen
Bathroom
M# 165C5B
Roof
460V 3ø
Electric
above
1/2 HP
Kitchen
Roof
M# 483 BCRE
Electric
above
440V 3ø 2.9A
Kitchen
Roof
M# 121 RVE
Electric
above
Est. 1/8 HP
Kitchen
Roof
(no nameplate)
Electric
above
Est. 1/6 HP
Kitchen
Roof
M# 301 BCR
Electric
above
115V 1ø 6.0A
Kitchen
Roof
above
M# 301BCP
Electric
hallway
115V 1ø 6.0A
adjacent to
Guidance
M# 120C3B
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Date
Installed
Electric
Page 76/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Date
Installed
Electric
Roof
above
hallway
adjacent to
Cafeteria &
Gym/B100
Hallway adjacent
to Cafeteria &
Gym/B100
1970s
0%
Toilet Rooms
adjacent to B106
Est.
1990
Est.
1990
0%
0%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 181BCRA
115V 1ø 4.2A
Ventilation
(2) Exhaust
Fans
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/4 HP ea.
Electric
Roof
above
room B106
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#16)
Est. 10 EER
M# THC092A4
R0A
460V 3ø
19.4 MCA
25 MOCP
12.6 lbs. R-22
Electric
Roof
above
room B106
B106
2002
45%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. +/- 1/3 HP
Electric
Roof
above
room B106
B106
1970s
0%
Cooling
Rooftop unit:
Trane
(RTU#14)
Est. 10 EER
Electric
Roof
above
Guidance
Media Center
Offices
2002
45%
Cooling
Rooftop unit:
Trane
(RTU#26)
Est. 11 EER
Electric
Roof
above
Guidance
CST
2005
65%
Cooling
Rooftop unit:
Trane
(RTU#15)
Est. 10 EER
Electric
Roof
above
MC1
Guidance
2002
45%
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane (RTU#8)
Est. EER 8
Electric
Roof
above
Media
Center
Main Office
1981
0%
Media Center
1970s
0%
Media Center
1970s
0%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
M# THC036A4
R0A
S#216100373L
460V 3ø
9.7 MCA
15 MOCP
M# TSC060A4
E0A
S#523101761L
460V 3ø
16 MCA
25 MOCP
4.9 lbs. R-22
M# THC036A4
R0A
S#216100361L
460V 3ø
8.3 MCA
15 MOCP
5.3 lbs. R-22
M# SACCB754-A
S#C81E-14590
480V 3ø
25 MCA
12.4 lbs. R-22
Roof
above
Electric
Media
center
Roof
(no nameplate)
above
Electric
Est. 1/3 HP
Media
center
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/8 HP
Page 77/111
Building
System
Model #
Fuel
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/6 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/3 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/6 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
M# 100 C3B
1/4 HP
Ventilation
Description
Cooling
(3) Ductless
Splits: Sanyo
Est. 10 EER
Heating /
Cooling
Ductless Split:
Sanyo
Est. 10 EER
Cooling
Ductless Split:
Goodman
Est. 10 EER
Cooling
Ductless Split:
Sanyo
Est. 10 EER
Cooling
(2) Rooftop
units: Trane
(RTU#27, #28)
Est. 11 EER
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
M# SAP121C
S#0008151
S#0137651
S#0051251
115v 1ø 10.6A
12000 BTUH
2.51 lbs. R-22
M# SAP122CH
S#0029944
208V 1ø 20A
2.95 lbs. R-22
M# HDC121AT
S#0005409639
208V 1ø
7.9 MCA
15 MOCP
36 oz. R-22
M# C1211
S# 0089034
115V 1ø
15 MCA
20 MOCP
12000 BTUH
M# TSC048E3
E0A0
S#830100491L
S#830100495L
208V 3ø
25.2 MCA
30 MOCP
7.4 lbs. R-410A
Electric
Location
Space Served
Roof
above
Media
center
Roof
above
Media
center
Roof
above
Media
center
Roof
above
Media
Center
Media Center
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
1970s
0%
1970s
0%
1970s
0%
2002
60%
Media Center
Media Center
Media Center
Electric
Exterior of
rooms
A207
A209
A211
A207
A209
A211
2000
2001
2000
30%
Electric
Exterior of
room A213
A213
2000
30%
Electric
Exterior of
room A215
A215
2000
30%
Electric
Exterior of
room A217
A217
2000
30%
Electric
Roof
above
Media
Center
Media Center
2008
2008
85%
85%
B106/B107
1970s
0%
Roof
above
(no nameplate)
Electric
rooms
Est. 1/8 HP
B106,
B107
Date
Installed
Page 78/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Space Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
B106/B107
1970s
0%
Electric Closet
B106/B107
2002
60%
B106/B107
1970s
0%
Prep Room
B106/B107
2002
60%
B107
1970s
0%
Media Center
1970s
0%
Electric
Roof
above
Media
Center
Media Center
1981
0%
Electric
Roof
above
room B107
B107
2002
45%
B108
1970s
0%
B108
2002
60%
Hallway adjacent
to room B108
1970s
0%
Fuel
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/3 HP
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#17)
M# 135C4B
1/3 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/8 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
M# 120C4B
115V 1ø
1/3 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/2 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. 3/4 HP
Electric
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#29)
Est. 8 EER
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#17)
Est. 10 EER
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# SAHA40D4
0KSSA43DC0
S#B81B00503
460V 3ø
121 MCA
175 MOCP
65 lbs. R-22
M# THC092A4
R0A
S#216100491L
460V 3ø
19.4 MCA
25 MOCP
12.6 lbs. R-22
Electric
Location
Roof
above
rooms
B106,
B107
Roof
above
rooms
B106,
B107
Roof
above
rooms
B106,
B107
Roof
above
rooms
B106,
B107
Roof
above
room B107
Roof
above
Media
Center
Roof
above
room B108
M# 100C15DH
Roof
115V 1ø
Electric
above
1/8 HP
room B108
Roof
above
(no nameplate)
Electric
hallway
Est. 1/6 HP
adjacent to
room B108
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/3 HP
Electric
Page 79/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Date
Installed
Electric
Roof
above
hallway
adjacent to
room B108
B108
2002
45%
Custodian/
Electrical
1990s
0%
Custodian/
Electrical
1990s
0%
B110
1970s
0%
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#18)
Est. 10 EER
M# THC048A4
R0A
S#216100211L
460V 3ø
11.8 MCA
15 MOCP
7.7 lbs. R-22
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/6 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/4 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 70CRAEC
Electric
Not Used
Trane (HV#8)
M# PCAA07040-1CAADAIA
0A0A0
S#B81B00514
Not
Used
Roof
above
Cafeteria /
Kitchen
Not Used
1981
0%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/2 HP
Electric
Roof
above
Cafeteria
Cafeteria
1970s
0%
Rooftop Unit:
Trane (RT#35)
Est. 10 EER
M# TCD090C4
DCBC
S#R3010
1883D
460 V 3ø
22.1 MCA
30 MOCP
10.6 lbs. R-22
Electric
Roof
above
room B109
B109
2000
35%
Offices between
rooms B109 and
B111
1970s
0%
Offices between
rooms B109 and
B111
1970s
0%
Cooling
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Roof
above
Custodian/
Electrical
Roof
above
Custodian/
Electrical
Roof
above
room B110
Roof
above
areas
(no nameplate)
Electric
between
Est. 1/2 HP
rooms
B109 and
B111
Roof
above
areas
M# 121 RVEJ
Electric
between
rooms
B109 and
B111
Page 80/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Fuel
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/4 HP
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 181 BCRA
115V 1ø 4.2A
Electric
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#30)
Est. 10 EER
Heating /
Cooling
Rooftop unit:
Trane
(RTU#34)
Est. 11 EER
M# TCD0900C
40CBC
S#R30101
964D
460 V 3ø
22.1 MCA
30 MOCP
10.6 lbs. R-22
M# YSC060A4
EHA21
S#532100821L
460V 3ø
16 MCA
25 MOCP
4.9 lbs. R-22
130 MBH in
108 MBH out
Location
Roof
above
areas
between
rooms
B109 and
B111
Roof
above
hallway
adjacent to
room B110
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Offices between
rooms B109 and
B111
1970s
0%
Hallway
1970s
0%
Electric
Roof
above
room B110
Room B110
2000
35%
Electric
/ Nat.
Gas
Roof
above
room B111
B111
2005
65%
Boiler Room
1970s
0%
2006
80%
1990s
0%
Room B113
2000
35%
B113
1970s
0%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/6 HP
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Dayton
M# 4YC7 36
S#06B15561
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(no nameplate)
Est. 3/4 HP
Electric
Cooling
Rooftop unit:
Trane
(RTU#33)
Est. 10 EER
M# TCD102C4
0CAB
S#R30101
898D
$60V 3ø
31 MCA
40 MOCP
14.2 lbs. R-22
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 301 BCR
115V 1ø 6A
Electric
Electric
Roof
above
Boiler
Room
Roof
above
Boiler
Room
Roof
above
Boiler
Room
Roof
above
room B113
Roof
above
room B113
Space Served
Date
Installed
Electric
Boiler Room
Boiler Room
Page 81/111
Building
System
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Model #
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Date
Installed
(2) Exhaust
Fans
(no nameplate)
Electric
Roof
above
room B113
B113
1970s
0%
Cooling
Rooftop unit:
Trane
(RTU#32)
Est. 10 EER
M# TCD102C4
0CAB
S#R30101
976D
$60V 3ø
31 MCA
40 MOCP
14.2 lbs. R-22
Electric
Roof
above
room B115
Room B115
2000
35%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 142 BCRA
115V 1ø 4.4A
Electric
Roof
above
room B112
B112
1970s
0%
Cooling
Rooftop Unit:
Trane
(RTU#31)
Est. 10 EER
M# TCD090C4
0CBC
S#R3010
1940D
460V 3ø
22.1 MCA
30 MOCP
10.6 lbs. R-22
Electric
Roof
above
room B112
Room B112
2000
35%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 181 BCRA
Electric
A201
1970s
0%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 98 CRA
Electric
A200
1970s
0%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
(EF#26)
A Wing Corridor
2002
60%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Loren Cook
A203
2002
60%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
(no nameplate)
Electric
A205
1979
0%
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 241BCRA
115V 1ø 4.4A
Electric
A Wing Corridor
1970s
0%
(2) Air-cooled
Condensing
Units: Trane
Est. 10 EER
M# TTA042
D400B0
460V 3ø
10 MCA
15 MOCP
5 lbs. 1 oz.
R-22
A202
A204
2000
2000
50%
50%
1970s
0%
Ventilation
Description
nd
Cooling
M# 100C10DH
115V 1ø
1/25 HP
M# 135C2B
120V 1ø
1/6 HP
Electric
Electric
2 Floor
roof above
room A201
nd
2 Floor
roof above
room A200
nd
2 Floor
roof above
hallway
nd
2 Floor
roof above
room A203
nd
2 Floor
roof above
A205
nd
2 Floor
roof above
hallway
nd
Electric
2 Floor
roof above
rooms
A202,
A204
nd
Ventilation
(2) Exhaust
Fans: Jenn Air
2 Floor
M# 241BCRA
roof above
115V 1ø
Electric Restrooms
4.4A ea.
adjacent to
room A205
nd
2 Floor
Restrooms
adjacent to room
A205
Page 82/111
Building
System
Description
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
M# CB-18
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 71CRA
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
M# AT-24
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 301BCRE
440V 3ø 1.3A
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 301BCRA
115V 1ø 6A
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 98CRA
Electric
Cooling
(2) Air-cooled
Condensing
Units: Trane
Est. 9 SEER
M# BTA048
0300A0
(rest of
nameplates
behind
disconnects)
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room A215
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 80CRA
Electric
2 floor
roof above
hallway
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
(EF#1)
M# DX9B
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room A212
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 183BCRA
115V 1ø 5.4A
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Electric
Ventilation
(2) Exhaust
Fans: Jenn Air
M# 214BCRA
115V 1ø 4.4A
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M# 182BCRA
115V 1ø4.4A
Electric
Model #
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
A Wing Corridor
1979
0%
A Wing Corridor
1970s
0%
A Wing Corridor
1979
0%
A Wing Corridor
1970s
0%
A Wing Corridor
1970s
0%
A Wing Corridor
1970s
0%
A215
1985
0%
A Wing Corridor
1970s
0%
A212
1979
0%
A214
1970s
0%
A217
1979
0%
Restrooms
adjacent to room
C217
1970s
0%
C217
1970s
0%
C215
1992
10%
C216
1979
0%
nd
2 floor
roof above
hallway
nd
2 floor
roof above
hallway
nd
2 floor
roof above
hallway
nd
2 floor
roof above
hallway
nd
2 floor
roof above
hallway
nd
2 floor
roof above
hallway
nd
nd
nd
nd
Cooling
Ventilation
Air-cooled
Condensing
Unit: Trane
Est. 9 SEER
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
(nameplate
hidden behind
disconnect)
2 floor
roof above
room A214
nd
2 floor
roof above
room A217
nd
2 floor
roof above
Restrooms
adjacent to
room C217
nd
2 floor
roof above
C217
nd
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room C215
nd
2 floor
(no nameplate) Electric roof above
room C216
Page 83/111
Building
System
Ventilation
Ventilation
Description
(2) Exhaust
Fans: Penn
Ventilation
(RF#1, #2)
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
Model #
Fuel
Location
M# XR-82
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room C216
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room C216
Space Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
C216
1979
0%
C216
1979
0%
C216
2008
85%
C216
1992
1992
10%
10%
C214
1992
10%
C214
1992
10%
C213
1979
0%
Storage/ Prep
1970s
0%
Storage/ Prep
1979
0%
Storage/ Prep
1979
0%
nd
nd
(no nameplate)
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Greenheck
M# CUE-101AX-QD
S#11467880
0808
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room C216
Cooling
(2) Air-cooled
Condensing
Units: Trane
Est. 9 SEER
(nameplate
behind
disconnect)
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room C216
Cooling
Air-cooled
Condensing
Unit: Trane
Est. 9 SEER
M# TTR012
C100A0
S#G36293862
208V 1ø
11 MCA
15 MOCP
2lbs. 12 oz.
R-22
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room C216
Cooling
Air-cooled
Condensing
Unit: Trane
Est. 9 SEER
(nameplate
behind
disconnect)
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room C216
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
Ventilation
(4) Exhaust
Fans
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
(RF#5)
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
(RF#12)
2 floor
roof above
rooms
C213
C214
nd
2 floor
roof above
M# 181BCRA
room
Electric
115V 1ø 4.2A
between
C213 &
C214
nd
2 floor
roof above
room
M# MX-9T
Electric
between
C213 &
C214
nd
2 floor
roof above
room
Electric
M# FMX-12
between
C213 &
C214
Page 84/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Storage/ Prep
1979
0%
C214
1970s
0%
C214
1979
0%
C213
1979
0%
C213
1970s
0%
Utility Room
1979
0%
Room between
rooms C209
C210
1979
0%
Room between
rooms C209
C210
1979
0%
Hallway
1979
0%
Hallway
1979
0%
C203
C205
1985
1985
0%
0%
nd
Ventilation
(4) Exhaust
Fans: Penn
Ventilation
(RF#&, #8, #9,
#10)
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
Ventilation
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
(RF#3)
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
(RF#4)
M# FMX-11Q
Electric
M3# 241BCRA
115v 1ø 4.2A
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room
between
C213 &
C214
nd
2 floor
roof above
room C214
nd
M# XQ-82
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room C214
M# XQ-82
Electric
2 floor
roof above
room C213
nd
nd
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Jenn Air
M3# 241BCRA
115v 1ø 4.2A
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan
(no nameplate)
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
M# BB-30
Electric
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
M# LB-24
Electric
M# CB-36
Electric
M# LB-24
Electric
Ventilation
Ventilation
Cooling
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
(2) Air-cooled
Condensing
Units: Trane
Est. 9 SEER
2 floor
roof above
room C213
nd
2 floor
roof above
utility room
nd
2 floor
roof above
room
between
rooms
C209
C210
nd
2 floor
roof above
room
between
rooms
C209
C210
nd
2 floor
roof above
hallway
nd
2 floor
roof above
hallway
M# BTA036
D300A0
nd
2 floor
S#Y39295447
roof above
S#Y39295451
208V 1ø
Electric
rooms
18 MCA
C203
30 MOCP
C205
5 lbs. 8 oz.
R-22
Page 85/111
Building
System
Description
Model #
Space Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Fuel
Location
Electric
2 floor
roof above
rooms
adjacent to
C201
Rooms adjacent
to C201
1979
0%
Natural
Gas /
Electric
Main Boiler
Room
Building
1981
0%
Electric
Main Boiler
Room
Main Boiler Room
Est.
2000
50%
Est. 1/2 HP
Electric
Main Boiler
Room
Domestic Hot
Water Storage
Tank
Est.
2000
50%
Est. 1/3 HP
Electric
Main Boiler
Room
Domestic Hot
Water Storage
Tank
Est.
2000
50%
M# GCR4RB
250A
S#4570-10224
S#4570-10223
8,369 MBH
Input ea.
Natural
Gas
Main Boiler
Room
A, B & C Wings
1963
1963
0%
0%
5 HP ea.
Electric
Main Boiler
Room
(2) Fire-tube
boilers
1963
0%
10 HP ea.
Standard
efficiency
Electric
Main Boiler
Room
A, B & C Wings
1963
0%
10 HP
Super
efficiency
Electric
Main Boiler
Room
A, B & C Wings
1963
0%
No nameplates
Electric
C Wing
1 Floor
classrooms
1964
0%
No nameplates
Electric
C Wing
1 Floor
classrooms
1979
0%
No nameplates
Electric
C Wing
2 Floor
classrooms
1979
0%
No nameplates
Electric
C Wing
2 Floor
classrooms
1964
0%
nd
Ventilation
Exhaust Fan:
Penn
Ventilation
Domestic
Hot Water
Water heater:
Cleaver brooks
Est. 65% eff.
Misc.
Domestic
Hot Water
Domestic
Hot Water
Heating
Heating
Heating
Heating
Heating
Heating
Heating
Heating
Sump pump
Est. 85% eff.
Circulation
Pump: Bell &
Gossett
Est. 85% eff.
Circulation
Pump: Bell &
Gossett
Est. 85% eff.
(2) Fire-tube
Boilers:
Superior
Est. 65% eff.
(2) Boiler
Burner Motors
Est. 75% eff.
(2) Circulation
Pumps:
Armstrong
Est. 75% eff.
Circulation
Pump:
Armstrong
Est. 75% eff.
(9) Floor
Mounted Unit
Ventilators
Nesbitt
(12) Floor
Mounted Unit
Ventilators
Trane
(14) Floor
Mounted Unit
Ventilators
Trane
(2) Floor
Mounted Unit
Ventilators
Nesbitt
M# CB-18
M# CB900-50
S#L-70616
2092 MBH in
2 HP blower
motor
(no nameplate)
Est. 1/2 HP
st
st
nd
nd
Page 86/111
Building
System
Description
Cooling
(5) Window
A/C units
Cooling
(6) Ceiling Unit
Ventilators
Trane
Cooling
(3) Window
A/C units
Heating
Heating
Cooling
Cooling
Heating
Heating
Heating
Cooling
Cooling
Cooling
Cooling
(13) Floor
Mounted Unit
Ventilators
Nesbitt
Ceiling
Mounted
Cabinet Unit
Heaters
Nesbitt
Ceiling Air
Handler
Window A/C
Unit
(15) Floor
Mounted Unit
Ventilators
Nesbitt
(2) Floor
Mounted Unit
Ventilators
Trane
Ceiling
Mounted
Cabinet Unit
Heaters
Nesbitt
(2) Ceiling Unit
Ventilators
Trane
(5) Window
mounted split
systems
Est. 8-10 EER
Window
mounted split
system
Est. 9 EER
(2) Window
mounted split
systems
Est. 8 EER
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Varies
0%-50%
Varies
0%
Varies
0-50%
Model #
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Sharp
Whirlpool
Airtemp
Electric
C Wing
1 and 2 floor
classrooms/offices
No nameplates
Electric
C Wing
Whirlpool
Frigidaire
Goldstar
Electric
Faculty
Nurse
Attendance
No nameplates
Electric
A Wing
1 floor
classrooms
1964
0%
No nameplates
Electric
A wing
corridors
1 floor corridors
1964
0%
No nameplate
Electric
Prop Room
Prop room behind
Auditorium
1979
0%
No nameplate
Electric
Prop Room
Prop room office
behind Auditorium
1979
0%
No nameplate
Electric
A Wing
2 floor
classrooms
1964
0%
No nameplate
Electric
A Wing
A202 & A204
1979
0%
No nameplate
Electric
A Wing
corridors
1964
0%
No nameplate
Electric
A Wing
A215 & A217
1979
0%
Sanyo
(3) SAP121K
(1) SAP122K
(1) KS1211W
Electric
A Wing 2
floor
A207, A209,
A211, A213
Varies
0-50%
Goodman
WWC12-1A
Electric
A213
A213
1999
20%
Sanyo
SAP121K
Electric
A110
A110
1979
0%
st
nd
C216 (2), C214,
C213, C205,
C203
Faculty
Nurse
Attendance
st
st
nd
nd
2
nd
floor corridors
Page 87/111
Building
System
Cooling/
Heating
Description
(5) Floor
mounted unit
ventilators
Trane
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Model #
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Date
Installed
Trane
VUVB150
Electric
D wing
D103, D105,
D113, D114,
D112
2001
50%
Electric
D107/D109
D107/D109
2001
50%
Electric
D Wing
Boiler
Room
D Wing
2001
55%
Natural
Gas
D Wing
Boiler
Room
D Wing
2002
70%
Gas
Outside
Boiler
Room
Serves boiler,
emergency
circuits and phone
1994
50%
Ventilation
Kiln
Olympic
Electric
#FL12A
S#W090043
240V-3Ph,
16.3KW
Heating
(2) Circulation
Pumps: Taco
Est. 85% eff.
Standard Eff.
10 HP ea.
Heating
(2) Condensing
Boilers: Aerco
Est. 90% eff.
Emergency
Power
Generator
Cooling
Wall mounted
split system
AHU: Friedrich
Est. 9 EER
Nameplate
inaccessible
Electric
Wall in
B105
B105
1999
25%
Cooling/
Heating
(2) H&V Units
Nameplate
inaccessible
Electric
Auditorium
Above
Stage
Auditorium
1979
0%
Cooling
Ductless Split
System: Sanyo
Est. 10 EER
SECA Office
2000
30%
Refrigeration
Glass Door
Merchandiser:
True
Kitchen
2009
95%
Refrigeration
Glass Door
Merchandiser:
True
Kitchen
2005
70%
Refrigeration
Glass Door
Merchandiser:
True
Kitchen
2003
60%
Refrigeration
Milk Cooler:
Powers
Kitchen
2007
80%
Misc.
Industrial
Mixer: Hobart
Kitchen
1970
0%
Benchmark 2.0
S#36899
S#36900
2000 MBH in
ea.
Onan
#100ENBA
S#C940J38873
100KW
125KVA
Model:
SAP91K
SECA
Electric
Serial:
Office
0084351
M#GDM-49EM
S#1-5213650
Electric
Kitchen
115V ½ HP
R134A
M#GDM-37
S#1-3652806
Electric
Kitchen
115V ½ HP
R134A
M#GDM-37
S#1-3459751
Electric
Kitchen
115V ½ HP
R134A
M# 780
S# B072603
Electric
Kitchen
115V; 4 A
M#H-600
S#1846870
Electric
Kitchen
208V 3ø 1HP
Page 88/111
Space Served
Date
Installed
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Kitchen
Kitchen
2005
70%
Electric
Kitchen
Cafeteria
2000
50%
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
2008
90%
Electric
Kitchen
Cafeteria
2008
90%
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
1998
40%
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
2002
60%
(Locked)
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
2005
85%
No Nameplate
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
2000
50%
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
2000
50%
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
2005
50%
(locked)
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
1980
0%
(locked)
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
1980
0%
(locked)
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
1980
0%
No Nameplate
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
2005
75%
M#C199-H(1)N
1990W
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
2007
70%
No Nameplate
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
1964
0%
Building
System
Description
Model #
Fuel
Location
Refrigeration
Glass Door
Merchandiser:
True
M#GDM-07
S#1-4122518
115V 1/5 HP
R134A
Electric
Refrigeration
Glass Door
Merchandiser:
Beverage Air
M#UR30G
R134A
Refrigeration
Glass Door
Merchandiser:
True
Refrigeration
Glass Door
Merchandiser:
Beverage Air
Refrigeration
Glass Door
Merchandiser:
True
Refrigeration
Glass Door
Merchandiser:
True
Refrigeration
Dishwasher
Domestic
Hot Water
(Dishwasher)
Cooking
Refrigeration
Refrigeration
Refrigeration
Refrigeration
Cooking
Refrigeration
Stainless Steel
Cooler:
Continental
Dishwasher:
Jackson
Booster Water
Heater: Hatco
(2) Heated
Cabinet:
Metro
(2) Stainless
Steel Coolers:
Traulsen
Walk-in 8x8
Refrigerator
Evap Fans
Walk-in 8x4
Freezer Evap
Fans
Ice Cream
Chest Freezer
(2) Heated
Cabinet:
Metro
Chest Freezer:
Nelson
M#GDM-35
S#1-5077375
115V ½ HP
R134A
M#MT27
115V 1ø 8.5A
R134A
M#GDM-23HL
S#1-1713658
115V 1/3 HP
R134A
M#GDM-05PT-S
S#1-3094232
115V 1/5 HP
R134A
Model #CC45
Serial# Not
Legible
45 KW
M#C199-H(1)N
1990W
Page 89/111
Building
System
Refrigeration
Refrigeration
Cooking
Cooking
Cooking
Cooking
Lighting
Description
Walk-in 8x10
Refrigerator
Evap Fans
3-Door Cooler:
Koch
Electric Range:
Toastmaster
Top/bottom
Oven:
Hussman
Top/bottom
Oven: Blodgett
Steam
Generator:
Market
Cleveland
See details Appendix B
Estimated
Remaining
Useful Life
%
Model #
Fuel
Location
Space Served
Date
Installed
(locked)
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
1964
0%
(locked)
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
1964
0%
No Nameplate
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
2005
75%
No Nameplate
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
1980
0%
No Nameplate
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
1964
0%
No Nameplate
Electric
Kitchen
Kitchen
Circa
2005
75%
-
Electric
See details
- Appendix
B
Note: The remaining useful life of a system (in %) is an estimate based on the system date of built
and existing conditions derived from visual inspection.
Page 90/111
Appendix B: Lighting Study
Page 91/111
Page 92/111
Page 93/111
Page 94/111
Page 95/111
Page 96/111
Page 97/111
APPENDIX C: THIRD PARTY ENERGY SUPPLIERS
http://www.state.nj.us/bpu/commercial/shopping.html
Page 98/111
Third Party Gas Suppliers for NJNG
Service Territory
Cooperative Industries
412-420 Washington Avenue
Belleville, NJ 07109
Direct Energy Services, LLC
120 Wood Avenue, Suite 611
Iselin, NJ 08830
Gateway Energy Services Corp.
44 Whispering Pines Lane
Lakewood, NJ 08701
UGI Energy Services, Inc.
704 East Main Street, Suite 1
Moorestown, NJ 08057
Hess Corporation
1 Hess Plaza
Woodbridge, NJ 07095
Intelligent Energy
2050 Center Avenue, Suite 500
Fort Lee, NJ 07024
Metromedia Energy, Inc.
6 Industrial Way
Eatontown, NJ 07724
MxEnergy, Inc.
510 Thornall Street, Suite 270
Edison, NJ 08837
NATGASCO (Mitchell Supreme)
532 Freeman Street
Orange, NJ 07050
NJ Gas & Electric
1 Bridge Plaza, Fl. 2
Fort Lee, NJ 07024
Pepco Energy Services, Inc.
112 Main Street
Lebanon, NJ 08833
PPL EnergyPlus, LLC
811 Church Road
Cherry Hill, NJ 08002
South Jersey Energy Company
One South Jersey Plaza, Route 54
Folsom, NJ 08037
Sprague Energy Corp.
12 Ridge Road
Chatham Township, NJ 07928
Woodruff Energy
73 Water Street
Bridgeton, NJ 08302
Telephone & Web Site
(800) 628-9427
www.cooperativenet.com
(866) 547-2722
www.directenergy.com
(800) 805-8586
www.gesc.com
(856) 273-9995
www.ugienergyservices.com
(800) 437-7872
www.hess.com
(800) 724-1880
www.intelligentenergy.org
(877) 750-7046
www.metromediaenergy.com
(800) 375-1277
www.mxenergy.com
(800) 840-4427
www.natgasco.com
(866) 568-0290
www.NewJerseyGasElectric.com
(800) 363-7499
www.pepco-services.com
(800) 281-2000
www.pplenergyplus.com
(800) 756-3749
www.southjerseyenergy.com
(800) 225-1560
www.spragueenergy.com
(800) 557-1121
www.woodruffenergy.com
Page 99/111
APPENDIX D: GLOSSARY AND METHOD OF CALCULATIONS
Net ECM Cost: The net ECM cost is the cost experienced by the customer, which is typically
the total cost (materials + labor) of installing the measure minus any available incentives. Both
the total cost and the incentive amounts are expressed in the summary for each ECM.
Annual Energy Cost Savings (AECS): This value is determined by the audit firm based on the
calculated energy savings (kWh or Therm) of each ECM and the calculated energy costs of the
building.
Lifetime Energy Cost Savings (LECS): This measure estimates the energy cost savings over
the lifetime of the ECM. It can be a simple estimation based on fixed energy costs. If desired,
this value can factor in an annual increase in energy costs as long as the source is provided.
Simple Payback: This is a simple measure that displays how long the ECM will take to breakeven based on the annual energy and maintenance savings of the measure.
ECM Lifetime: This is included with each ECM so that the owner can see how long the ECM
will be in place and whether or not it will exceed the simple payback period. Additional guidance
for calculating ECM lifetimes can be found below. This value can come from manufacturer’s
rated lifetime or warranty, the ASHRAE rated lifetime, or any other valid source.
Operating Cost Savings (OCS): This calculation is an annual operating savings for the ECM. It
is the difference in the operating, maintenance, and / or equipment replacement costs of the
existing case versus the ECM. In the case where an ECM lifetime will be longer than the
existing measure (such as LED lighting versus fluorescent) the operating savings will factor in
the cost of replacing the units to match the lifetime of the ECM. In this case or in one where
one-time repairs are made, the total replacement / repair sum is averaged over the lifetime of
the ECM.
Return on Investment (ROI): The ROI is expresses the percentage return of the investment
based on the lifetime cost savings of the ECM. This value can be included as an annual or
lifetime value, or both.
Net Present Value (NPV): The NPV calculates the present value of an investment’s future cash
flows based on the time value of money, which is accounted for by a discount rate (assumes
bond rate of 3.2%).
Internal Rate of Return (IRR): The IRR expresses an annual rate that results in a break-even
point for the investment. If the owner is currently experiencing a lower return on their capital
than the IRR, the project is financially advantageous. This measure also allows the owner to
compare ECMs against each other to determine the most appealing choices.
Gas Rate and Electric Rate ($/therm and $/kWh): The gas rate and electric rate used in the
financial analysis is the total annual energy cost divided by the total annual energy usage for the
12 month billing period studied. The graphs of the monthly gas and electric rates reflect the
total monthly energy costs divided by the monthly usage, and display how the average rate
fluctuates throughout the year. The average annual rate is the only rate used in energy savings
calculations.
Page 100/111
Calculation References
Term
ECM
AOCS
AECS
LOCS*
LECS
LCS
NPV
IRR
DR
Net ECM Cost
LECS
AOCS
LCS
Simple Payback
Lifetime ROI
Annual ROI
Definition
Energy Conservation Measure
Annual Operating Cost Savings
Annual Energy Cost Savings
Lifetime Operating Cost Savings
Lifetime Energy Cost Savings
Lifetime Cost Savings
Net Present Value
Internal Rate of Return
Discount Rate
Total ECM Cost – Incentive
AECS X ECM Lifetime
LOCS / ECM Lifetime
LOCS+LECS
Net ECM Cost / (AECS + AOCS)
(LECS + LOCS – Net ECM Cost) / Net ECM Cost
(Lifetime ROI / Lifetime) = [(AECS + OCS) / Net ECM Cost – (1 / Lifetime)]
* The lifetime operating cost savings are all avoided operating, maintenance, and/or component
replacement costs over the lifetime of the ECM. This can be the sum of any annual operating savings,
recurring or bulk (i.e. one-time repairs) maintenance savings, or the savings that comes from avoiding
equipment replacement needed for the existing measure to meet the lifetime of the ECM (e.g. lighting
change outs).
Excel NPV and IRR Calculation
In Excel, function =IRR (values) and =NPV(rate, values) are used to quickly calculate the IRR
and NPV of a series of annual cash flows. The investment cost will typically be a negative cash
flow at year 0 (total cost - incentive) with years 1 through the lifetime receiving a positive cash
flow from the annual energy cost savings and annual maintenance savings. The calculations in
the example below are for an ECM that saves $850 annually in energy and maintenance costs
(over a 10 year lifetime) and takes $5,000 to purchase and install after incentives:
Page 101/111
Solar PV ECM Calculation
There are several components to the calculation:
Costs:
Energy Savings:
Incentive 1:
Incentive 2:
Assumptions:
Material of PV system including panels, mounting and net-metering +
Labor
Reduction of kWh electric cost for life of panel, 25 years
NJ Renewable Energy Incentive Program (REIP), for systems of size
50kW or less, $1/Watt incentive subtracted from installation cost
Solar Renewable Energy Credits (SRECs) - Market-rate incentive.
Calculations assume $600/Megawatt hour consumed per year for a
maximum of 15 years; added to annual energy cost savings for a period
of 15 years. (Megawatt hour used is rounded to nearest 1,000 kWh)
A Solar Pathfinder device is used to analyze site shading for the building
and determine maximum amount of full load operation based on available
sunlight. When the Solar Pathfinder device is not implemented, amount
of full load operation based on available sunlight is assumed to be 1,180
hours in New Jersey.
Total lifetime PV energy cost savings =
kWh produced by panel * [$/kWh cost * 25 years + $600/Megawatt hour /1000 * 15 years]
ECM and Equipment Lifetimes
Determining a lifetime for equipment and ECM’s can sometimes be difficult. The following table
contains a list of lifetimes that the NJCEP uses in its commercial and industrial programs. Other
valid sources are also used to determine lifetimes, such as the DOE, ASHRAE, or the
manufacturer’s warranty.
Lighting is typically the most difficult lifetime to calculate because the fixture, ballast, and bulb
can all have different lifetimes. Essentially the ECM analysis will have different operating cost
savings (avoided equipment replacement) depending on which lifetime is used.
When the bulb lifetime is used (rated burn hours / annual burn hours), the operating cost
savings is just reflecting the theoretical cost of replacing the existing case bulb and ballast over
the life of the recommended bulb. Dividing by the bulb lifetime will give an annual operating cost
savings.
When a fixture lifetime is used (e.g. 15 years) the operating cost savings reflects the avoided
bulb and ballast replacement cost of the existing case over 15 years minus the projected bulb
and ballast replacement cost of the proposed case over 15 years. This will give the difference of
the equipment replacement costs between the proposed and existing cases and when divided
by 15 years will give the annual operating cost savings.
Page 102/111
New Jersey Clean Energy Program Commercial & Industrial Lifetimes
Measure
Commercial Lighting — New
Commercial Lighting — Remodel/Replacement
Commercial Custom — New
Commercial Chiller Optimization
Commercial Unitary HVAC — New - Tier 1
Commercial Unitary HVAC — Replacement - Tier 1
Commercial Unitary HVAC — New - Tier 2
Commercial Unitary HVAC — Replacement Tier 2
Commercial Chillers — New
Commercial Chillers — Replacement
Commercial Small Motors (1-10 HP) — New or Replacement
Commercial Medium Motors (11-75 HP) — New or Replacement
Commercial Large Motors (76-200 HP) — New or Replacement
Commercial VSDs — New
Commercial VSDs — Retrofit
Commercial Comprehensive New Construction Design
Commercial Custom — Replacement
Industrial Lighting — New
Industrial Lighting — Remodel/Replacement
Industrial Unitary HVAC — New - Tier 1
Industrial Unitary HVAC — Replacement - Tier 1
Industrial Unitary HVAC — New - Tier 2
Industrial Unitary HVAC — Replacement Tier 2
Industrial Chillers — New
Industrial Chillers — Replacement
Industrial Small Motors (1-10 HP) — New or Replacement
Industrial Medium Motors (11-75 HP) — New or Replacement
Industrial Large Motors (76-200 HP) — New or Replacement
Industrial VSDs — New
Industrial VSDs — Retrofit
Industrial Custom — Non-Process
Industrial Custom — Process
Small Commercial Gas Furnace — New or Replacement
Small Commercial Gas Boiler — New or Replacement
Small Commercial Gas DHW — New or Replacement
C&I Gas Absorption Chiller — New or Replacement
C&I Gas Custom — New or Replacement (Engine Driven Chiller)
C&I Gas Custom — New or Replacement (Gas Efficiency Measures)
O&M savings
Compressed Air (GWh participant)
Life Span
15
15
18
18
15
15
15
15
25
25
20
20
20
15
15
18
18
15
15
15
15
15
15
25
25
20
20
20
15
15
18
10
20
20
10
25
25
18
3
8
Page 103/111
APPENDIX E: STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE FROM ENERGY STAR®
Page 104/111
APPENDIX F: INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
New Jersey Clean Energy Pay for Performance
The NJ Clean Energy Pay for Performance (P4P) Program relies on a network of Partners who
provide technical services to clients. LGEA participating clients who are not receiving Direct
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants are eligible for P4P. SWA is an eligible
Partner and can develop an Energy Reduction Plan for each project with a whole-building
traditional energy audit, a financial plan for funding the energy measures and an installation
construction schedule.
The Energy Reduction Plan must define a comprehensive package of measures capable of
reducing a building’s energy consumption by 15+%. P4P incentives are awarded upon the
satisfactory completion of three program milestones: submittal of an Energy Reduction Plan
prepared by an approved Program Partner, installation of the recommended measures and
completion of a Post-Construction Benchmarking Report. Theincentives for electricity and
natural gas savings will be paid based on actual savings, provided that the minimum
15%performance threshold savings has been achieved.
For further information, please see: http://www.njcleanenergy.com/commercialindustrial/programs/pay-performance/existing-buildings .
Direct Install 2010 Program*
Direct Install is a division of the New Jersey Clean Energy Programs’ Smart Start Buildings. It is
a turn-key program for small to mid-sized facilities to aid in upgrading equipment to more
efficient types. It is designed to cut overall energy costs by upgrading lighting, HVAC and other
equipment with energy efficient alternatives. The program pays up to 60% of the retrofit costs,
including equipment cost and installation costs.
Eligibility:
x Existing small and mid-sized commercial and industrial facilities with peak electrical
demand below 200 kW within 12 months of applying
x Must be located in New Jersey
x Must be served by one of the state’s public, regulated or natural gas companies
x Electric: Atlantic City Electric, Jersey Central Power & Light, Orange Rockland
Electric, PSE&G
x Natural Gas: Elizabethtown Gas, New Jersey Natural Gas, PSE&G, South
Jersey Gas
For the most up to date information on contractors in New Jersey who participate in this
program, go to: http://www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/direct-install
Smart Start
New Jersey’s SmartStart Building Program is administered by New Jersey’s Office of Clean
Energy. The program also offers design support for larger projects and technical assistance for
smaller projects. If your project specifications do not fit into anything defined by the program,
there are even incentives available for custom projects.
Page 105/111
There are a number of improvement options for commercial, industrial, institutional,
government, and agricultural projects throughout New Jersey. Alternatives are designed to
enhance quality while building in energy efficiency to save money. Project categories included
in this program are New Construction and Additions, Renovations, Remodeling and Equipment
Replacement.
For the most up to date information on how to participate in this program, go to:
http://www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/nj-smartstart-buildings/njsmartstart-buildings.
Renewable Energy Incentive Program*
The Renewable Energy Incentive Program (REIP) provides incentives that reduce the upfront
cost of installing renewable energy systems, including solar, wind, and sustainable biomass.
Incentives vary depending upon technology, system size, and building type. Current incentive
levels, participation information, and application forms can be found at the website listed below.
Solar Renewable Energy Credits (SRECs) represent all the clean energy benefits of electricity
generated from a solar energy system. SRECs can be sold or traded separately from the power,
providing owners a source of revenue to help offset the cost of installation. All solar project
owners in New Jersey with electric distribution grid-connected systems are eligible to generate
SRECs. Each time a system generates 1,000 kWh of electricity an SREC is earned and placed
in the customer's account on the web-based SREC tracking system.
http://www.njcleanenergy.com/renewable-energy/home/home.
Utility Sponsored Programs
Check with your local utility companies for further opportunities that may be available.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Rebate Program
The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) Rebate Program provides
supplemental funding up to $20,000 for eligible New Jersey local government entities to lower
the cost of installing energy conservation measures. Funding for the EECBG Rebate Program is
provided through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).
http://njcleanenergy.com/EECBG
Other Federal and State Sponsored Programs
Other federal and state sponsored funding opportunities may be available, including BLOCK
and R&D grant funding. For more information, please check http://www.dsireusa.org/.
*Subject to availability. Incentive program timelines might not be sufficient to meet the 25% in 12 months
spending requirement outlined in the LGEA program.
Page 106/111
ECM #
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
42,460
2,250
7,700
892
623
17,710
2,287
est. incentives, $
3,860
0
700
280
0
1,860
0
38,600
2,250
7,000
612
623
15,850
2,287
Net ECM cost with
incentives, $
102,969
3,600
32,004
3,189
1,558
82,518
34,933
10 Drinks & 3
snack vending
misers
installed
124 T5 fixtures
to be installed
with incentives
14 CFL
fixtures to be
installed with
incentives
14 LED
fixtures to be
installed with
incentives
35 Motion
sensors to be
installed with
incentives
3 NEW
ENERGY
STAR® 18 cu
ft Refrigerator
193
Occupancy
sensors to be
installed with
incentives
ECM
description
kWh, 1st yr savings
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.5
21.5
1.1
6.7
0.7
0.3
17.2
10.6
savings, $
0
582
0
66
468
7,324
2,530
10
12
10
15
8
15
10
Page 107/111
16,166
1,147
5,025
567
713
20,279
8,014
Annual Energy Cost Savings,
$
Recommended Improvements
APPENDIX G: ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES
161,661
13,766
50,246
8,500
5,701
304,190
80,145
simple payback, yrs
2.4
2.0
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.3
%
319
512
618
1,289
815
1,819
3,404
%
32
43
62
86
102
121
340
40
51
71
93
114
128
350
94,868
8,754
34,328
5,868
4,203
215,870
63,358
74,138
2,592
23,043
2,296
1,122
59,413
25,152
CO2 reduced, lbs/yr
ECM #
5,745
33 Bi-level
fixtures to be
installed with
incentives
13
est. incentives, $
825
0
2,100
270
1,275
108
Net ECM cost with
incentives, $
4,920
26,250
47,900
1,758
27,480
700
5,362
31,000
0
2,177
34,970
1,127
kWh, 1st yr
savings
26,250
Install VFDs
on (5) 10HP
motors
50,000
2,028
28,755
808
est. installed cost,
$
12
11
10
9
8
Replace (2)
5HP Superior
boiler burner
motors with (2)
premium
efficiency
motors
51 Pulse start
metal halide
fixtures to be
installed with
incentives
Replace (3)
10HP hot
water
circulation
pump motors
with premium
efficiency
motors
Replace 2092
MBH input HW
Heater with (3)
400 MBH
input, 96%
efficient, direct
vent unit
ECM
description
kW, demand
reduction/mo
therms, 1st yr
savings
0
0
5,980
0
0
0
kBtu/sq ft, 1st yr
savings
0.1
0.4
2.4
0.0
0.5
0.0
0
0
0
0
880
0
est. operating
cost, 1st yr
savings, $
1.1
6.5
0.0
0.5
7.3
0.2
Annual Energy
Cost Savings, $
10
20
13
20
15
20
Projected Measure
Life, yrs
Page 108/111
842
4,867
9,359
342
6,370
177
est. lifetime cost
savings, $
8,418
97,340
121,663
6,836
95,554
3,539
simple payback,
yrs
5.8
5.4
5.1
5.1
4.3
4.0
lifetime return on
investment, %
71
271
154
289
248
406
annual return on
investment, %
7
14
12
14
17
20
internal rate of
return, %
11
18
17
19
22
25
net present value,
$
2,120
46,159
51,629
3,327
46,007
1,932
3,861
42,470
69,966
2,982
25,178
1,544
CO2 reduced,
lbs/yr
ECM #
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
est. installed
cost, $
18,750
30,000
5,250
1,188,525
360,525
49,299
182,000
186,750
est. incentives, $
548
1,104
0
0
22,500
6,045
8,000
0
Net ECM cost
with incentives, $
18,203
28,896
5,250
1,188,525
338,025
43,254
174,000
186,750
5,192
6,858
3,425
189,087
56,821
21,974
0
68,038
kWh, 1st yr
savings
Retrocommissioning
Replace (2)
8369 MBH
input Boilers
with (4) 2000
MBH input
96% efficient,
condensing
boilers
403 T8 fixtures
to be installed
with incentives
Install a 48.07
kW PV
System with
Incentives
Install a
158.47 kW PV
System
without
Incentives
Evap Fans on
walk in freezer
and cooler
Replace (3) 4ton split
system
condensing
units with 14SEER units
Replace Trane
7.5-ton cooling
only rooftop
unit with 13
EER unit
ECM
description
kW, demand
reduction/mo
therms, 1st yr
savings
0
0
0
0
0
0
16,310
11,247
kBtu/sq ft, 1st yr
savings
1.7
0.1
0.0
2.6
0.8
0.3
6.6
5.4
0
0
0
0
0
2,324
0
1,820
est. operating
cost, 1st yr
savings, $
1.1
1.4
0.7
158.0
48.0
4.6
0.0
14.2
Annual Energy
Cost Savings, $
15
15
20
25
25
15
25
12
Projected
Measure Life, yrs
Page 109/111
815
2,051
538
143,087
42,521
5,774
25,525
31,510
est. lifetime cost
savings, $
12,383
30,758
10,755
742,166
223,022
86,609
638,129
378,124
simple payback,
yrs
22.3
14.1
9.8
8.3
7.9
7.5
6.8
5.9
lifetime return on
investment, %
-32
6
105
106
115
100
267
102
annual return on
investment, %
-2
0
5
4
5
7
11
9
internal rate of
return, %
-5
1
237
9
10
10
14
13
net present
value, $
-8,471
-4,417
578,616
682,175
218,431
23,923
270,473
119,372
7,113
9,395
4,692
259,049
77,845
15,821
190,827
245,797
CO2 reduced,
lbs/yr
ECM #
25
24
23
22
5,000
37,500
3,750
101,250
est. installed
cost, $
est. incentives, $
Net ECM cost
with incentives, $
4,816
36,120
3,612
98,288
1,142
8,570
857
25,962
kW, demand
reduction/mo
0.2
1.8
0.2
5.4
therms, 1st yr
savings
0
0
0
0
kBtu/sq ft, 1st yr
savings
0.4
2.8
0.3
8.3
est. operating
cost, 1st yr
savings, $
0
0
0
0
Annual Energy
Cost Savings, $
179
1,345
135
4,076
Projected
Measure Life, yrs
15
15
15
15
est. lifetime cost
savings, $
2,724
20,439
2,044
61,919
simple payback,
yrs
26.9
26.8
26.8
24.1
lifetime return on
investment, %
-43
-43
-43
-37
annual return on
investment, %
-3
-3
-3
-2
-7
-7
-7
-5
internal rate of
return, %
Page 110/111
Discount Rate: 3.2% per DOE FEMP; Energy Price Escalation Rate: 0% per DOE FEMP Guidelines
A 0.0 electrical demand reduction/month indicates that it is very low/negligible
184
1,380
138
2,963
kWh, 1st yr
savings
Assumptions:
Note:
Replace 35ton cooling
only rooftop
unit with (3)
12.5 ton, 13
EER units
Replace Trane
1.5-ton cooling
only rooftop
unit with 14
EER unit
system
condensing
system
condensing
ECM
description
net present
value, $
-2,676
-20,058
-2,006
-49,628
1,565
11,741
1,174
35,568
CO2 reduced,
lbs/yr
APPENDIX H: METHOD OF ANALYSIS
Assumptions and tools
Energy modeling tool:
Cost estimates:
Established/standard industry assumptions, E-Quest
RS Means 2009 (Facilities Maintenance & Repair Cost Data)
RS Means 2009 (Building Construction Cost Data)
RS Means 2009 (Mechanical Cost Data)
Published and established specialized equipment material and
labor costs
Cost estimates also based on utility bill analysis and prior
experience with similar projects
Disclaimer
This engineering audit was prepared using the most current and accurate fuel consumption
data available for the site. The estimates that it projects are intended to help guide the
owner toward best energy choices. The costs and savings are subject to fluctuations in
weather, variations in quality of maintenance, changes in prices of fuel, materials, and labor,
and other factors. Although we cannot guarantee savings or costs, we suggest that you use
this report for economic analysis of the building and as a means to estimate future cash
flow.
THE RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED IN THIS REPORT ARE BASED ON THE
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS, INSPECTION, AND PERFORMANCE TESTING OF A SAMPLE
OF COMPONENTS OF THE BUILDING SITE. ALTHOUGH CODE-RELATED ISSUES
MAY BE NOTED, SWA STAFF HAVE NOT COMPLETED A COMPREHENSIVE
EVALUATION FOR CODE-COMPLIANCE OR HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES. THE
OWNER(S) AND MANAGER(S) OF THE BUILDING(S) CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT
ARE REMINDED THAT ANY IMPROVEMENTS SUGGESTED IN THIS SCOPE OF WORK
MUST BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL
LAWS AND REGULATIONS THAT APPLY TO SAID WORK. PARTICULAR ATTENTION
MUST BE PAID TO ANY WORK WHICH INVOLVES HEATING AND AIR MOVEMENT
SYSTEMS, AND ANY WORK WHICH WILL INVOLVE THE DISTURBANCE OF
PRODUCTS CONTAINING MOLD, ASBESTOS, OR LEAD.
Page 111/111

Freehold Regional High School District

Transcription

Similar documents

7 More London Riverside

100K Vermont House

Bully Boy Bullmastiffs, Reg. - Puppies and Breeders Worldwide

AirCycler®g2-k brochure here. - Green South Energy Solutions

flat/skillion roof buildings

High Line map

Untitled - Tin Roof

MISE YOU? - Totalspan Steel Buildings

MISE YOU? - Totalspan Steel Buildings

Atlantis Energy