The subject property (8134 South 1300 West) is
Transcription
The subject property (8134 South 1300 West) is
WEST JORDAN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: December 9, 2014 ITEM 4 2 PROJECT#: V20140005 SIDWELL #: 21- 34- 278- 025; 21- 34- 277- 026, 028 1. APPLICATION/REQUEST: S& K Machine Expansion Variance Request; 8134 South 1300 West; Variance request to waive undergrounding of utility lines along the frontage the subject property; M- l; Dave Mortensen, Bush & Gudgell ( applicant) [ Larry of Gardner# V20140005; parcels 21- 34- 278- 025; 21- 34- 277- 026, 028] II. A. APPLICANT: Dave Mortensen, Bush and Gudgell B. LOCATION: 8134 South 1300 West C. ZONING: M- 1 D. ACREAGE: 1. 45 Acres BACKGROUND: The subject property ( 8134 South 1300 West) is located within the Greenwood Industrial Park Master Plan approved in 1980. The subject parcel is 1. 22 acres in area and the applicant will be adding . 23 acres to the site as part of the subdivision and site plan approval process. The site 8134 South 1300 West) has been zoned M- 1 for over 30 years. The S& K Machine building was originally constructed in 1989 with an addition approved in 2006. The applicant is proposing to expand the business with a 7000 square foot addition to the existing building. III. GENERAL INFORMATION & ANALYSIS The subject property' s surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: Existing Use Zoning North Manufacturing M- 1 South Construction Storage Yard M- 1 East Farm Ground BR-P West Manufacturing R- 1- 81) City Code, Section 8- 2- 4. A. requires as part of subdivision approval, all utility lines, including power lines less than 69kV are buried underground. Section 8- 2- 4.G. allows property owners to seek a variance from this requirement where the applicant can demonstrate that the findings contained in Section 13- 7G- 3 are met. 8- 2- 4.A. Utilities To Be Underground: All electrical, communications, television service cables, and similar distribution service wires andlor cables to serve properties in connection with new subdivision developments shall be placed underground at the expense of the developer, builder or property owner, regardless of whether the utilities are initially installed with the development or are in place prior to development. The developer, builder or property owner shall be responsible for complying with the requirements of this section, and shall make necessary arrangements with each of the servicing utilities for installation of such facilities. Efforts will be made by responsible persons to encourage and accommodate collocation within underground utility conduits. " Section 8- 24G. Variance: The requirements of this section applied to any particular development application may be the subject of a pre-application variance appeal to the board of adjustment, which variance appeal must address and provide substantial evidence of compliance with the existing variance criteria provided in this code. (2001 Code § 89- 6- 405; amd 2009 Code; Ord. 12- 30, 12- 12- 2012)". With the building addition of 7000 square feet to S& K Machine, a subdivision is also required with the site plan approval. The reason a subdivision is required is to dedicate a small 3' X 33' piece of property extending into 1300 West to the City and to consolidate the parcels. It is worthy to note that the utilities fronting the subject site were not required to be undergrounded at the time of original construction in 1989 or with the first addition in 2006. Section 10. 9a. 702 of the State Code requires the Board of Adjustment to review a variance request based on five findings. These findings are also contained in City Code, Section 13- 7G- 1 and are addressed in the following section. IV. FINDINGS OF FACT Prior to approving any Variance, the Board of Adjustments shall make findings on the following criteria and shall have the duty and power to approve, disapprove, and/ or require modifications as deemed necessary to carry out the purposes of the Municipal Code. Criteria 1: Literal enforcement of this title would cause an unreasonable hardship for the applicant that is not necessary to carry out the general purpose of this title. The board of adjustment shall not find an unreasonable hardship if the hardship is self-imposed or economic. To determine whether or not enforcement of this title would cause unreasonable hardship, the board of adjustment shall not find unreasonable hardship unless the alleged hardship: 1. Is located on or associated with the property for which the variance is sought; and 2. Comes from circumstances peculiar to the property, notfrom conditions that are general to the neighborhood, 2 t:lplanning& zoning\' users sub-folders\- projects-\ board of adjustment\variance\s& k machine powerline burial variance requests& k boa staff report. docx Discussion: The proposed S& K Machine Expansion subdivision will create one 1. 45 acre lot with a lot width of 311 feet along 1300 West. The subdivision will dedicate approximately 99 square feet of right of way to the City. The only place thetpower lines are buried is between 8518 South and 8633 South for 717 feet adjacent to the residential subdivisions, Arbor Meadow Cove and Killey Lane. There are two utility poles in the landscaped area along the frontage of the S& K lot and one in an undeveloped portion to the South of the lot. Because of the pole placement, only one middle pole will be actually removed. The poles at both ends would remain to provide support for the existing overhead lines. The City cannot require the applicant to bury the lines beyond their property lines. As the poles are existing the hardship is not self-imposed nor is it a result of economic circumstances. It is associated with the property to which the variance is being sought, and is associated with a circumstance peculiar to the property. The S& K expansion is not a new subdivision development but rather an expansion and consolidation of properties with the dedication of a small piece of property to the City. If S& K had only been required to apply fora site plan review they would not be required to underground the utility lines. In site plan review only, sites with less than 400 feet of frontage are not required to underground utility lines. The S& K site has 311 feet of frontage. The undergrounding of the utilities will require the removal and replacement of existing established landscaping, existing drive approaches and disturbance of all other existing utilities in the park strip. Finding: Literal enforcement of this title would cause an unreasonable hardship for the applicant that is not necessary to carry out the general purpose of this title. Criteria 2: There are special circumstances attached to the property that do not generally apply to other properties in the same district and relate directly to the hardship complained of.• Discussion: Utah State Code states that the Board of Adjustment may determine if special circumstances exist if the special circumstance is: 1. Related to the hardship complained of-,and 2. Deprives the property of privileges granted to other properties in the same zone. All new subdivisions require that all electrical lines under 69kV be placed underground, regardless of the width of the proposed subdivision. The proposed combined lot will be 311' in width and the dedicated portion is only 3' X 33'. The site improvements will include a 7000 square foot addition and associated landscaping and off-street parking. 3 t9planning& zomngP users sub-folders\- projects Aboard of adjustmentWariaocels& k machine powerfine burial variance requests& k boa staff report. docx The Greenwood Industrial Park Master Plan subdivision was recorded in 1980 and at that time was not required to underground the utilities along 1300 West but the utilities were buried underground in the industrial park. The underground utilities in the* industrial park are serviced by the overhead power lime on 1300 West, including S& K Machine. In essence S& K Machine is being required to burry the power lines that service the entire industrial park, not just the machine shop. S& K Machine will not be adding more power or other utility drops based on the expansion but will use the existing lines running to the site. If a new subdivision development was to occur in the M- 1 zone the justification could be made to underground the utilities, but an addition to an industrial building is not a new subdivision development but a site specific upgrade. The applicant is meeting all other parking and landscaping requirements of the M- 1 zone and to require the applicant to underground utilities that was not required at the time of the original development is depriving them of a privilege that neighboring properties are not required participate in, but still benefit from. The only difference is that the overhead power lines happen to be along S& K' s frontage. Finding: There are special circumstances attached to the property that do not generally apply to other properties in the same district and relate directly to the hardship complained of. Criteria 3: Granting the variance is essential to the enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same district: Discussion: The Ordinance allows for an exemption from the undergrounding requirement if the petition was for a site plan without a subdivision, with less than 400' in width. As such, the requirement, as only applied to subdivisions, appears to deprive the property of privileges others in the same zone enjoy. Finding: Granting the variance is essential to the enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same district. Criteria 4: The variance will not substantially affect the general plan and will not be contrary to the public interest: Discussion: The General Plan seems to dictate undergrounding of utilities in commercial areas and residential areas but does not have the same disposition for industrial areas. The General Plan addresses the placement of utilities underground for new commercial projects and existing commercial projects in the Commercial Land Use section. The applicable Goals and Policies state the following: Goal 3: Provide well-designed, aesthetically pleasing, commercial areas within the City of West Jordan and efficient 4 t:\planning& zoning\' users sub-folders\- projects Aboard of adjustment\variance\s& k machine powerline burial variance requesf,s& k: hoa staff report. docx Policy 1. Improve the visual appearance of all commercial areas. Implementation Measure: 8. Encourage the underground placement of all utility line throughout commercial-areas. Develop practical and consistent standards for undergrounding utilities in redevelopment and infill areas. The General Plan calls for industrial development to be attractive, clean, landscaped and buffered from less intense uses. However, the Plan is silent on undergrounding of utilities in industrial zones. In Staff' s opinion, the proposed variance is consistent with the goals of the General Plan. The proposed subdivision will only assemble parcels around an existing development and be dedicating property to the City. Finding: The variance will not substantially affect the general plan and will not be contrary to the public interest. Criteria 5: The spirit ofthis title is observed and substantial justice done. Discussion: The purpose of the development ordinances are: Segregate uses to reduce incompatibility issues; Reduce and mitigate negative impacts; Provide areas where similar uses can flourish, Regulate development standards to provide an attractive, clean, safe environment; Protect the health, safety and welfare. It is Staffs opinion that the City will not be negatively impacted by granting a variance waiving the requirement to underground the utilities along the frontage S& K Machine. The applicant is not undertaking a new subdivision of development but is merely improving their building with an addition and dedicating property for public use. Finding: The spirit of Title 13 is observed and substantial justice done. V. CONCLUSION: The proposed request meets the requirements for granting a variance as contained in City Code, Section 13- 7G- 3: Variance Criteria. 5 tAplanning& zoning\' users sub-folders\- projects-\ board of adjustment\ variance\s& k machine powerfine burial variance requests& k boa staff report. docx VI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the positive findings set forth in this staff report, Staff recommends that the Board of Adjustment approve the variance request for S& K Machine Expansion located at 8134 South Westin the M- 1 zoning district. VII. MOTION RECOMMENDED: r..................................................................................................................... Based on the positive findings set forth in this staff report, I move that the Board of Adjustment approve the variance for S& K Machine Expansion located at 8134 South 1300 West in the M- 1 c zoning district to waive the requirement to underground the utility lines along the frontage of the S& K Machine property. If the moving member disagrees with the staff's findings and conclusions and finds substantial evidence supporting a different result, thefollowing motion may be given: Based on my reading of the staff report and/ or the new evidence and further explanations and discussions received in this meeting today, I move that the Board of Adjustment denv the variance to waive the requirement to underground the utility lines along the S& K Machine property located at 8134 South 1300 West in the M- 1 zoning district. Specifically, I disagree E with the Staff and find that the following required criteria for a variance has not been met: 1. Literal enforcement of this title would cause an unreasonable hardship for the applicant that is not necessary to carry out the general purpose of this title. The board of adjustment shall not find an unreasonable hardship if the hardship is selfimposed or economic. To determine whether or not enforcement of this title would cause unreasonable hardship, the Board of Adjustment shall not find unreasonable hardship unless the alleged hardship: a. Is located on or associated with the property for which the variance is sought; and b. Comes from circumstances peculiar to the property, not from conditions that are general to the neighborhood; 2. There are special circumstances attached to the property that do not generally apply to other properties in the same district and relate directly to the hardship complained of; 3. Granting the variance is essential to the enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same district; 4. The variance will not substantially affect the general plan and will not be contrary to the public interest; and 5. The spirit of this title is observed and substantial justice done. 6 C\ planning& zoning\' users sub-folders\- projects-\ board of adjustment\variance\s& k machine powerline burial variance request\s& k boa staff report. docx Which criteria has been met or not met? Why? a Note. All applicable criteria must be met to support a positive action by the Board of Adjustment. VIII. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A- Vicinity and Aerial Map Exhibit B - Zoning and Land Use Map Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D- Preliminary Subdivision Plat Exhibit E- Power Line Placement Options Exhibit F - Application Questions Exhibit G- IX. Application CLEARANCE Planner: arry do r P anne Reviewed by: Greg Mikolash, AICP City Plant= Reviewed by: Robert Thorup Deputy City Attorney 7 tiphuming& zoning\bsers sub-folders\- projects Aboard of adjustment\ vanance\s& k machine powerline burial variance requests& k boa staff report. docx i air Ir r r CO d N Z3 JCco Cco 0) C w N m Q 9 Nwvnd@mnm6\'wm au66tlmb pvfmrtY min(aafnuxn Wamoo NtnwNrc WweGw NNInAm>u9um\ takM n9 naa. 9 rA I S I I fil 1 0' 0215" W I 52. 06' N 0' 0215 I m 1- h I J A n{ k' u o to Him o c s CD o Vp{ 1` ti! i• 3 x o 1V P l f F m CO NYRQ M& i liax 1. 51 r— vim•_ •---_._._... s°' 1_ __ V sOCYtW CURD Y GUMVI t C 4 gg x e V. inf Wrttqq' rRv€ 10 t\planning& zoning\' users sub- folders\- projects-\ board of adjustment\ variances& k machine powerline bunat variance request\ s& k boa staff report. docx v tier i 9, i e$ r3" i! i lid r.y li l zya NZ 7. tiY 6 j wog o Al w 4 i e B0p t x a1 . p'" ii n doe 1 ca n I jFI I" I4 B I t= O d m . Z 4 44 [ j 8949 6n 4kt q 4 " 493^ .9t{ f gq dtCEE a Q VlOC n Pole to O remain N E 8 f6 UL c J Pole to be removed 3 Pole to remain aiM to be d relocatetl a few feet to the north. W low e 2 ebu• q an. nJSv A' n+M MM' WM.. p. oiWM. w or. ei n. M. nuwx n h.. p Mire nett r 0Enc CL O c a E U c0 d dC J N O a W Q 13 aa. 1. The owner of an existing building at 8120 South 1300 West wishes to expand their facility by 7, 000+/- SF. The planned expansion requires the purchase of additional property and merger of the joint parcel, ordinarily, a minor development activity such as this would only require a lot consolidation filing. However, the acquired property includes a strip of land 3. 4' wide, which extends about 33' into 1300 West. This small strip was not previously dedicated as a public right- of-way( ROW). Because of the unusual shape ofthe parcel and the associated requirement of a ROW dedication, a new subdivision filing is necessary. 2. § 8. 2-4: Underground Utilities Required. 3. A The ordinance requires underground utilities " to serve properties in connection with new subdivision developments." The unusual 3. 4' strip extending into 1300 West is itself unrelated O to the connection of utilities to the property and, while the proposal is for a new subdivision filing to resolve the ROW issue, the development of the site is not itself" Ca new." 4. Arguably, the strip In question is already part of the ROW through 10 years of continuous public use. It would seem that requiring the overhead powerline to be buried as part of the process of removing any doubt S. about the ROW would bean unreasonable Cy burden. The 3. 4' strip of land extending into 1300 West is an unusual feature of the parcel and uncommon if not entirely unique among similarly situated properties. highly But for this feature, no roadway dedication would be necessary and the goals of the owner would be possible through a Yes. Virtually all property owners with property fronting 1300 West O 4- simple lot consolidation rather than through a subdivision filing. 6. a would be able to undertake 0 Cu V the modest development activity proposed here without being required to bury 300' of overhead powerline. Granting this variance would allow this property owner enjoy the same opportunity. 7. Q The segment In question is roughly 300' out of aline over 60,000' ( 11.4 miles) in total length. Since about 95% of the 11. A miles is presently above ground, granting this variance is plainly not contrary to, nor will it undermine, either the general plan or the public interest. 8. Granting the variance will achieve substantial justice by resolving the existing problem of the 3. 4' strip of property not previously dedicated as right-of-way without creating anew and highly unusual burden on this property. The proposed development activity does not itself create the atypical circumstance nor impose any new burden on the existing utility infrastructure. MAR Nft- 14 t\planning& zoning\' users sub-folders\- projects Aboard of adjustment\ variancels& k machine powerline burial variance requests& k boa staff report. doex BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION CITY OF WEST JORDAN 5000 SOUTIIREDWOOD ROAD WWT JORDAN, UT 84088 801) 569- 5060 Date r^ar• fnty- Email J crnnerfv A R ire Sol- sss- DZ 4 0 Zone r" t Usting land Use Sordrwfll , c{ mnt)• Owner fif difi- S o© , ,' lj, Je 1W L)+ State: blgy Ceti : O iqq ) p ? 41110 4i 8aI - @bµ shr ZIA: daell. ndpgu_ CU ( vDm 5 i Lews As 1ctr+Iy•s Phone: as a modification, granted by the l3omd ofAtus6neat of a zone's width, setback, separation or other numerical or quantitative requirement bulk, area, 61681a L-> for+ensc/) Y + Mor4en5en is dc5ned variance ozs a77- 13OC 5 E a. S il- Sa Telephone: 5 S1 z Z au3h # Gudell 6 Address' 34 - Sidwelltt 81- AddresxofSublectprorrerty: ` NomaofEl^^„ 4_ zl- a- l! la- for ent for height, req*= a Q building or struoaue or other site improvements which are set fourth in Section 13- 7G- 1 of the West Jordan City Zoning Ordinance and Section 10.9a-702 ofihe Utah State Municipal Coda. The Board of Adjustment may grant a varance only i£ 1. Literal enforcement ofthe Zoning Ordinance would cause an unreasonable hardship ofthe Applimut that is not necessary to carry out the g® oral ptz4tgosc ofthe Zoning Ordinance, 2. There are special circumstances attached to the property that do not generally apply to otlur properties in the same district; 3. Granting the variance is essential to the enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same district 4. The variance will not substantially affectthe general plan and will not be contrary to the public interce, and 5. The spirit of the Zoning Otdiaanee is observed and substantial justice done. The Board of Adjustmemniects on the last Wednesday of the month as needed, Please submit an application. required piaterials and a the public hearing date. Signalise of Applicaut 0( non-refimdable) filing fee at least 30 days prior to Meill'? -I lid. Or A. dwdwdAWt m[ Signature ofProperty Owner Udle. mrtawn Awimt 7r u. •...........•... aortG OYAtlliabnen. aearMaertt_.............................................«.• r..... ....•°- L its App. eUO= aaceWea B... . oaL f aaulat numEa .._.,.._, 15 t:\planning& zoningYusers sub-folders\- projects-\ board of adjustment\ variance\ s& k machine powerline burial variance requests& k boa staff report. docx