Buddhist Symbolism in Akira Kurosawa`s Ran: A Counterpoint to
Transcription
Buddhist Symbolism in Akira Kurosawa`s Ran: A Counterpoint to
243 Buddhist Symbolism in Akira Kurosawa's Ran: A Counterpoint to Human Chaos Kenneth D. Nordin Consider the Buddhist symbolism embedded in Akira Kurosawa's jidaigeki, or medieval samurai, filmi^an (1985): Scroll images ofAmitabha, the oldest and most important of the five celestial Buddhas. Another scroll featuring Japanese calligraphy depicting the Buddhist path of enlightenment. A bow and arrow. The Bodhi Tree. A sun and quarter moon ensign. A wreath of flames. Lotus flowers. Grass. A white horse. These symbols — which Kurosawa subtly wove into major scenes throughout the movie — all point to the Buddhist path of enlightenment. At the same time, they stand as powerful counterpoints to the chaos and destruction upon which the movie is built, a film inspired by William Shakespeare's play King Lear. While some scholars have noted the presence of Buddhist imagery in Ran. no critic has paid close attention to the complete inventory of the Buddhist symbols embedded in the film, or what they imply.1 The purpose of this paper is to provide such an analysis and to suggest that Buddhist themes form important subtexts in the film. These Buddhist symbols can be viewed as serving two purposes: First, they provide signposts pointing toward the spiritual path of enlightenment the Lord Ichimonji Hidetora seeks to gain when he gives up his lifetime of savage warfare. These symbols appear so frequently that they underscore Hidetora's spiritual intent. In the course of the film, the warlord experiences intense psychological suffering for his sins; a traumatic shock makes hirn insane; then, shortly before his death, he regains his sanity and undergoes a transformation of character. Stephen Prince has pointed out that Kurosawa viewed enlightenment and spiritual development as "necessarily dependent upon shock" and notes this feature is present in many of his films, including SanshirM, Drunken Angel, Seven Samuari, Red Beard, and Dersu Uzala (1991:120-121). Secondly, the film's Buddhist icons suggest that when humans ignore enlightened spirituality, when they heap violence and warfare upon each other, their lives will descend into chaos and self-destruction. Kurosawa hiniseu stated this was a major concern ofRan. "[S]ome of the essential scenes of tins film," he observed, "are based on my wondering how God and Buddha, if the}' actually exist, perceive this human life, this mankind stuck in the same absurd behavior patterns" (Prince, 1991: 285-286). Ran features several visual and audio elements to suggest a divine presence. Clouds, for example, frequency appear in myth and art as indicating the presence of God (Tressider, 1997:4bJKurosawa inserts cloud shots throughout the film, and they grow darker and Asian Cinema. Fall/Winter 2005 more turbulent as the story unfolds. Other signs in the film suggesting that the gods are watching include blowing winds and the shrill tones of a wooden flute. The visual imagery of Buddhist symbols, however, often placed in the background of scenes and bearing double meanings are the most pervasive signs of a divine presence in the film. Kurosawa weaves these Buddhist icons throughout the fabric of his cinematic story. Before we explore this Buddhist symbolism, here is a brief synopsis of the film's plot. Lord Hidetora Ichimonji, age 70, decides to retire and leave his castles and lands to his three sons. He chooses his eldest son, Taro, as his successor and expects his two younger sons, Jiro and Saburo, to support him. Saburo objects to his father's plans, and the warlord banishes him. Greed, rivalry, and revenge fueled by Lady Kaede, Taro's wife, set in. The two older sons drive Hidetora from their respective castles and then attempt to kill him in a third castle. During a combined attack by Taro and Jiro upon Hidetaro and his retainers, Jiro's top general kills Taro. All of Hidetaro's followers are slaughtered in the attack. The horrified warlord fails in his attempt to commit suicide and wanders in a deranged state of mind into a mountain wilderness. Sabaru, the only son who loved him, returns from exile to rescue him. The pair reconcile and Hidetaro becomes sane again. Then, Saburo is shot and killed by Jiro's assassin. Heartbroken, Hidetora collapses over his dead son's body and dies. All of this action occurs within the presence of the Buddhist symbolism, making the drama even more poignant. Let's now explore these signs in the order and within the context in which they app ear in the film. Hidetaro meets Lady Sue. who expresses Buddhist consciousness. Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 245 244 Bow and Arrow: Two Sacred Weapons In the film's opening hunt scene, the great warlord Ichimonji Hidetora (TatsuyaNakadai) shoots an old, wildboar with abow and arrow while mounted on horseback. Hidetora's fierce, focused eye behind his drawn arrow presents one of the most powerful images in the film. The hunt scene takes place just before the old warlord abdicates his position in favor of his three sons. The shooting of the old boar becomes a metaphor, foreshadowing the hunting down of Hidetora by his two eldest sons Taro (Akira Terao) and Jiro (Jinpachi Nezu). OnRan's visual surface a bow and arrow are emblems ofwar and hunting. They define Hidetora's life. Their Buddhist significance, however, should not be overlooked. Hidetora's drawn bow and arrow mark the beginning of his search for spiritual enlightenment. Hidetora's fierce look—Kurosawa describes the warlord's eyes as "hawkish" in his script (1) — as he releases the arrow underscores his determination to follow a new path. In the Mahayana tradition, the dominant form of Buddhism in medieval Japan, the bow and the arrow are central symbols. Together, they represent knowledge, a signpost to absolute emptiness or sunyata, the highest form of enlightenment. The bow and arrow also reflect accuracy of the intellect driven by determination and will power (Blau, 2003: 195). In Mahayana Buddhism, an enlightened being, or bodhisattva, postpones his or her own spiritual liberation in order save other humans first. The fierce look Hidetora displays as he shoots his arrow in the opening scene, therefore, marks the end of his warrior life and beginning of his search for spiritual enlightenment. Grass The opening scenes of Ran, as well as a later scene in which Hidetora has gone mad, are set in fields of tall, windblown, dark green grass. Dark green grass is a Buddhist symbol for a long life. It is used in life-enriching ceremonies. In Buddhist thought, grass is considered to be immortal and represents the end of samsara, the successive death and rebirth of all things (Blau, 200y 147). Samsara is a Sanskrit word meaning "journeying," An individual continues on this j ourney through various mo des of existence until lib eration is attained. An individual becomes imprisoned in samara or the journey by three "unwholesome roots" -hatred, craving, and delusion (Bercholz, 1993: 323). Kurosawa places two major scenes in the film in wind-blown grass fields. The film's opening springtime scenes are set in lush, green, pampas grass. These scenes feature the boar hunt followed by the hunters' feast during which Hidetora hands over his power to his sons. The second grass scene is set in the Fall, when life is dying out in nature. It provides the setting i01 Kurosawa's descent into apparent madness. It occurs after the military force ofTaro and Jiro, his two oldest sons, attack and kill his household and retainers in the Third Castle. Kyomi, the fool, who is the most clear-sighted character n Asian Cinema. Fall/Winter 2005 thefilm,sees in withered, autumn grass a metaphor representing the destruction of Hidetora's entire clan. "How strange!" the fool sings, describing Hidetora's state of mind, "On withered fields I see an entire clan destroyed by my hands, each of them floating up before me" (Script, 120). Thus, the film's two grassy scenes symbolize Hidetora's struggle to free himself from his sins as he continues on with his spiritual quest, a journey, as the grass implies, that could stretch over many life cycles. ■:tQgm &s*~, o* \^- v ^ —; iP* mlm Bfr- ^MM^^^i^^K^^s^ Hidetaro and Kyomi lost in the grass, a Buddhist symbol of infinity. The Buddha Under the BodM Tree One of the mo st important images in Buddhist iconography is that of the Buddha sitting cross-legged under a banyan tree, the place where he first achieved his state of enlightenment. The tree became known as the Bodhi tree, meaning to be enlightened. In the Buddhist Mahayana tradition, bodhi is equated to one's own buddha-nature, insight to the essential emptiness {slmnyata) of the world (Bercholz, 1993: 314-315). Buddhist tradition holds that while meditating under a banyan tree growing near the Nairajana River, the king's son Siddhartha became the Buddha when he.discovered the four noble truths and the eightfold path, the basic principles of Buddhism. The Tour noble truths include the nature of suffering, the origin of suffering, the cessation of suffering, and the path that leads to the cessation of suffering. The "eightfold path" requires a right view, right resolve, right speech, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration (Bercholz, 1993:317). Kurosawa alludes to the icon of the Buddha under the Bodhi tree in an ttnportant developing scene in Ran. Midway through the hunting party's feast, Hidetora suddenly—and uncharacteristically — falls into a deep sleep Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 246 or trance. To shelter his father from the glaring, western sun, his youngest son Saburo (Daisuke Ryu) cuts off a small tree branch and places it next to him. The image of the sleeping or meditating Hidetora, dressed in a white robe and sitting cross- legged under a tree branch, replicates the Buddha's own act of enlightenment. The scene is another signpost of Hidetora's spiritual journey. Hidetora suddenly awakens, alarmed by a dream. It's a dream of vast emptiness, the ideal state of mind in Mahayana Buddhism. Hidetora tells the hunting party, his look now wild-eyed, "I had a dream...a dream of wilderness. A wilderness.. .no matter how far I went I saw no one. I shouted and screamed, but no one answered...." (Script, 6). The dream has a double meaning. It foreshadows the wilderness Hidetora eventually finds himself in when he becomes mad. It also suggests that Hidetora's search for the enlightened path has begun. The end of that search is nirvana, complete emptiness of the self, the extinction of passion, illusion, and desire. The warlord encounters in his dream, therefore, his spiritual destiny. Sun and Quarter Moon Another prominent Buddhist symbol that Kurosawa placed in the hunting party scene is black bunting running across the background. On it is painted Lord Hidetora's ensign composed of a sun and quarter moon. The sun is the symbol of Japan, the land of the rising sun. As such, it symbolizes Hidetora's military and political power. At the same time, the ensign depicts important symbols in Buddhism. The sun, or surya in Sanskrit, represents masculinity. The quarter moon, or chandra, represents the feminine principle. Paired together, as they are in Hidetoro's ensign, the symbols represent the removal of polarities. The sun and moon together symbolize perfect enlightenment, with the sun or the masculine representing compassion and skillful means and the moon or the female representing wisdom. The male also signifies the noumenal world while the female represents the noumenal world (Blau, 2003: 88-89). Thus Hidetora's ensign as a symbol of his power is highly ironic when seen in the context of Buddhist symbolism. It's early andhighly visible presence in Ran further underscores Hidetora's toning away from his lifetime of warfare to find spiritual peace. The Calligraphy Scroll Kurosawa maintains the irony associated with Hidetora's sun and quarter moon ensign when the film's action shifts to an interior scene inside the First Castle. Taro, Hidetora's oldest son, and Lady Kaede, Taro's wife, have taken over control of the castle. The couple is sitting in the donjon on the castle's top floor. The room is barren of decoration except for a scroll hanging behind them. The scroll contains calligraphy representing the Buddhist path of enlightenment. The scroll is hanging on the wall heretofore occupied by Lord Hidetora's ensign. Lady Kaede, a personification of evil, notices that the ensign is missing and demands that Taro retrieve it from his father. "That standard is supposed to be with the head of the House of Ichimonji," she declares (Script, 17) Taro never retrieves the ensign, and the scroll continues to hang prominently in subsequent scenes in the same room, scenes featuring seduction, betrayal, and plots of murder. The scroll becomes a counterpoint to the sinful behavior of Taro, Jiro, and Lady Kaede in the room. It also is a sign that the gods are watching, Kurosawa's underlying theme in the film. Jiro, and Hidetora. Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 249 248 Axnitabha: One of the Five Celestial Buddhas After Taro and Lady Kaede drive Lord Hidetora from the First Castle, his former home, he travels with his retainers to the Second Castle, now the residence of second son Jiro and his wife Lady Sue. Hidetora's first act upon entering the castle is to seek out Lady Sue (Yoshiko Miyazaki). The sun is setting in the west, the domain of the Amitabha, the Buddha who rules over the western paradise. Hidetora finds his daughter-in-law in a garden praying with her rosary beads. Before the warlord reaches her3 he opens a cabinet containing a scroll painted with a golden image ofAmitabha. Buddhist images serve as aids in meditation. They represent purity and spiritual enlightenment. An image of the Amitabha Buddha. Amitabha, or Amida, as he is known in Japanese culture, is the Buddha of Infinite Light. His skin color is red, reflecting his point on the compass — west. His symbol is the lotus flower. His element is fire. Amitabha represents the transformation from greed to enlightened wisdom. He is also the steward of the Sukhavati Paradise, where beings reside before they reach redemption and perfect enlightenment (Blau, 2003:41). Hidetora and the Buddha appear to be looking at each other face to face. Then, in the last light of day, the warlord approaches Lady Sue. His daughterin-law serves as the Buddhist conscience in the film. Many years earlier. Hidetora had killed Sue's parents, gouged out the eyes of her brother Tsurumaru, and burned down her family's castle. She was forced into a marriage with Jiro. Her compassion toward Hidetora and her forgiveness of his sins toward her astonish the old warlord. Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 "Go on, hate me!" he tells her. She replies, "I do not hate you. Everything has been preordained in our previous lives.. .All things are the heart of the Buddha." A pessimistic Hidetora then argues that Buddha has no effect in the world. "The Buddha again? There are no Buddha's in today's world. This is a degraded age, when the Buddha's guardians, Bonten and Taishaku, have been routed by raging Asuras. It is not-a world where we can rely on the Buddha's compassion" (Script, 33). His comment reflects Kurosawa's own doubt about a divine presence in the world and whether the gods are watching. Lady Sue looks sadly at her father-in-law at the end of their exchange. She has become a Buddhist teacher to him, but he still understands little about the path of enlightenment. He has more lessons to learn and more of his past sins to confront. Hidetora's conversation with Sue" is an important component in Kurosawa's concept of individual spiritual development. In many of his films, as Stephen Prince has pointed out, verbal instruction by a teacher is less important as a guide than is personal experience (1991: 121). Hidetora is to face other, highly traumatic events in his spiritual journey. And, another scroll image of the Amitabha Buddha appears later in the film. A Wreath of Flames In many of Kurosawa's films, as noted earlier, his protagonists are forced to go through a shocking experience as a necessary step towards their spiritual enlightenment (Prince, 1991:120-121). Perhaps the most memorable scene in Ran is the burning of Castle Three, an experience so shocking to Hidetora that he becomes insane. The forces of his two elder sons attacked the warlord there, and his household and retainers all die. Kurogane (Hisashi Igawa), counselor to Jiro, kills Taro during the attack, an act that puts Jiro at the head of the clan. With flames, featuring the yellow and red colors of the flags carried by Taro's and Jiro's soldiers — and underscoring their treacherous and destructive behavior—licking around him, Lord Hidetora, now mentally deranged, descends slowly from the ruined castle and disappears, alone, into the wilderness. The fire, like other symbols in the film, evokes a double meaning. On the one hand, it represents the destructive nature of lust, greed, and warfare. The burning castle symbolizes Hidetora's hell on earth. On the other hand, fire as a purifying element in Buddhist thought is not to be overlooked. A fire wreath in a Buddhist mandala represents the burning away of ignorance. Its light drives out the darkness and opens the path to transcendental, spiritual wisdom (Blau, 2003:79) Confronted by the darkest forms of evilHidetaro himself gave birth to, he becomes insane. His slow descent through the burning castle and then out into a wilderness of decaying grass symbolizes the beginning of his Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 250 spiritual purification. The warlord's descent into madness and psychological emptiness is a necessary step toward his spiritual transformation 251 The Lotus Flower Here and there in Ran, Kurosawa embeds images of the lotus flower. It is a symbol closely associated with the Amitabha Buddha, the dominant Buddha image in the film. The lotus represents the path that leads from ignorance to enlightenment. While its roots grow in muck-symbolizing human desires — its leaves and flowers rise up to the sun, to enlightenment. In Buddhism the lotus is also the most important symbol of purity. It represents the feminine principle (the womb of the mother), the throne of the Buddha, and the centers ofenergyinthebody(Blau,2003:171) warlords defeated in battle by Lord Hidetora who then killed his vanquished foes. Both daughters were forced to marry Hidetora's two oldest sons. As Taro's wife, Lady Kaede lived in the castle that had once belonged to her family. Her own mother had committed suicide in the castle. Lady Sue chose to follow the Buddhist path of enlightenment to find healing for her sufferings. Through her Buddhist faith she was able to forgive Hidetora's cruelties. Lady Kaede, by contrast, followed a path of revenge and sought to destroy Lord Hidetora and his clan. To achieve her goal, she used treachery, sexual seduction, assassination, and warfare. During her final counsel with Jiro, she ignores the powerful Buddhist symbol of the lotus flower she sits in front of. Her rejection of that symbol of feminine wisdom, purity and spiritual enlightenment ultimately leads to her own beheading, as if she were a snake, by General Kurogane, Jiro's counselor. Thus Lady Kaede becomes the antithesis of the Buddhist ideal of femininity, an ideal expressed by the lotus flower she ignores. Taro and Lady Kaede plot murder in front of lotus flowers, a Buddhist symbol of purity. A White Horse Saburo, Hidetora's youngest son, whom the warlord disinherits at the beginning of Ran and with whom he reconciliates at the end of the film, rides a white horse. Saburo is the noblest samurai in the film, and, characteristic of a hero, he treats his white steed with kindness. A white horse evokes a multitude of symbolic meanings in Buddhist myth and legend. It is the hero's companion. It is also a symbol of death. Both meanings come into play when Saburo and Hidetora reconcile at the film's tragic end. "While father and son joyfully ride together on the white horse, Saburo is shot and killed by Jiro's assassins lying in ambush. A distraught Hidetora flings himself over his son's fallen body and dies, heartbroken. The white horse is more than a symbol of companionship and death in Buddhist tradition. It can represent Buddha himself. Before Prince Siddhrtha becomes the Buddha, he rode a white horse named Kanthaka. In fact, when the prince renounced his royal inheritance to seek the path of enlightenment, he abandoned his family's royal palace riding Kanthaka. Further, the precious white horse in Buddhism is one of the treasures of the Chakravartin Buddha, a Buddha whose all-encompassing teachings are universally true (Blau, 2003: 163). Chakravartin's precious white horse symbolizes mobility and speed. According to Buddhist myth, it is able to circle the world three times a day. Buddhist legends abound in which the Buddha takes the form of a white horse to serve as a savior and spiritual guide for humans.2 Can it be that Hidetora's ride on a white horse at the end of his life, when he has regained his mental senses and for the first time in his life experiences love and joy, symbolizes that he is finally on the path toward spiritual enlightenment? The white horse, as a sign of Buddha, suggests the spiritual The lotus image becomes most visible just before the climactic battle in Ran. As Jiro leaves for battle to fight the combined forces of Saburo and the warlords Fujimaki and Ayabe, Lady Kaede, now his lover, calls him to her room. She sits, ironically in front of a dark screen painted with lotus flower blossoms. She challenges her lover to assassinate Saburo. She has alreadysent out assassins to kill Lady Sue, Tiro's wife. The flowers are another subtle sign Kurosawa has embedded in the film to suggest that the gods might be watching with sorrow the human folly unfolding before their eyes. Moreover, these are humans who are oblivious to their need for spiritual enlightenment. Lady Kaede's character is the exact opposite of Lady Sue's character, although their lives parallel each other. Both women were the daughters of Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 252 ! journey of the two dead samurai is not over. In reincarnated forms, they will continue to seek nirvana. An Image of the Amitabha Buddha Once Again In Ran's final scene, Tsurumaru, the blind brother of Lady Sue, stands on an edge of the ruins of his family's castle clutching a scroll bearing a golden image of Amitabha, the western sky Buddha. His sister had given it to him for his protection when she left him to fetch his flute, only to meet her assassins. Behind him the sun is setting in the West. Tsurumaru drops the Buddhist scroll over the cliff where it falls into a crevice. Then he steps back, forlorn and alone. A subsequent panning shot of a barren wilderness brings the film to an end. Thus Kurosawa leaves open the question, "can humankind ever save themselves from desire, hatred and delusion?" Tsurumaru's blindness now becomes a metaphor for the blindness of all humanity. After Hidetora dies, Kurosawa has Kyoami, the fool, pose the question whether there is ever a divine presence in the world. "Is there no God or Buddha in the world?" he yells. "Damnation! God and the Buddha are nothing but mischievous urchins! Are they so bored hi Heaven that they enjoy watching men die like worms? Damn God! Is it so amusing to see and hear human beings cry and scream?" (Script, 183). • ■ 2 5 3 I not slander god or the Buddha!" Tango replies. "They are the ones who are 1 crying. The evil of human beings.. .the stupidity of the sinful creatures, who I'.. believe their survival depends on killing others, repeated again and again f throughout all time...Even God or the Buddha cannot save us from if' (Script, I , 183). ||; Tango's answer to Kyoami's question reflected Kurosawa's own view of !>' the problem of evil in human nature. In an interview in 1986 with Kyoko I Hirano, a year after Ran began its theater run, the filmmaker said " [T]he world • j will not change unless we steadily change human nature itself and our very I.; way of thinking. We have to exorcise the essential evil in human nature, rather 1 than presenting concrete solutions to problems or directly depicting social j , : problems"(23). I:-: The final image of the Amitabha Buddha in Ran, a golden figure painted I ; on a scroll lying in barren rock, poses a question: will humans ever free j themselves from desire, hatred, and delusion? Or, like Tsurumaru , the film j ' asks, "will they remain blind to their spiritual potential?" I "1 Endnotes J 1. Most commentators on Ran view Lord Hidetora's Ichimonji's mental state I as a decline into madness from which he recovers only briefly before his I death, paralleling the mental deterioration of King Lear in Shakespeare's i'. play. But Kip Jones, an authority on aging and diversity, argues that I ;.■ ' Hidetora'psychological transformation can be regarded as a mental process 1 ':■ that older people often go through as they take stock of their entire life and |,::: seek some spiritual meaning out of it. "The film's intensely felt humanist I -' message, its encompassing hallucinatory effects, the obscuring of characters I': in a landscape of time and space, its insistence upon Buddhist principles of §/" redemption, forgiveness and lack of hatred and its overall description of a f:: - decent from power and a confrontation with past deeds," Jones observes II "—all present evidence for the consideration for the character through the 1 ■■'. lens of gerotranscendence" (2002: 5). 1 ' 2. For a fuller discussion of Kurosawa's utilization of Buddhist horse symbolism I.' in his samuari films, see my article (Nordin, 2003). ■§ ■■ Hidetaro confronts the Buddha. Tango (Masayuki Yui), Hidetora's chief retainer and bodyguard, offers an answer to Kyoami's metaphysical question. The problem lies not with the gods but with humans themselves who behave ungodlike, he suggests. "Do Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 I I ■ 1 j \l/ r f' I References Bercholz, Samuel and Sherab ChodzinKohn, eds. 1993. Entering the Stream: An Introduction to The Buddha and His Teachings. B oston: Shambhala. Blau, Tatjana and Mirabai. 2003. Buddhist Symbols. New York: Sterling Publishing Co. Goodwin, James. 1994. Akira Kurosawa andIntertextaal Cinema. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 254 Gunapayuta. 1977. A Pictorial Biography of Skyamimi Buddha. ChineseEnglish. Translated by Bhiku Jan Hai and Z. A. Lu. Taipei: The Corporate Body of the Buddha Educational Foundation. Hirano, Kyoko. 1986. "Making Films for All the People: An Interview with Akira Kurosawa." Cineaste. 14:4. Jones, Kip. 2002. "The Spiritual Dimension: A GerotranscentalTake On Akira Kurosawa's Film 'Ran'." Paper presented at International Association of Gerontology. 34thEBSSRS Symposium onAging and Diversity. Bergen, Norway. Kurosawa, Akira. 1982. Something Like ait Autobiography. Translated by Audie E. Bock. New York: Vintage Books. Kurosawa, Akia, dir. 1985. DVD. Ran. Perf. TatsuyaNakadai, MiekoHarada, and Peitah. Maguire, Jack. 2001. Essential Buddhism: A Complete Guide to Beliefs and Practices. New York: Pocket Books. Morgan, Diane. 2001. The Best Guide to Eastern Philosophy and Religion. Los Angeles: Renaissance Books. Nordin, Kenneth D. 2003. "Images ofUma (Horses) in the Samurai Films of Akira Kurosawa." Asian Cinema. 14:2 (Fall/Winter). Prince, Stephen. 1991. The Warrior's Camera: The Cinema ojAkira Kurosawa. Revised and Expanded Edition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Richie, Donald. 1998. The Films of Akira Kurosawa. Third edition expandedand updated with anew epilogue. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press. Tressider, Jack. 1997. Dictionary of Symbols: An Illustrated Gidde to Traditional Images, Icons, and Emblems. SanFrancisco: Chronicle Books. Yoshimoto, Mitsuhiro. 2000. Kurosawa: Film Studies and Japanese Cinema. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. Kenneth D. Nordin, Ph.D. is a professor of communication arts atBenedictine University, Lisle, Illinois. He teaches one film course each semester in addition to his courses in journalism, mass communication theory, and cultural historyHe has delivered and published many papers on film. 255 Tjhansmodern Space in Tsai Ming-Liang's The Hole \ / \ Jasmine Nadua Trice / / InTsaiMingrLiang's 1998 film, TheHole, the barrier between two urban dwellers opens in the form of a small, round break in/the man's floor and the woman's ceiling; this hole challenges the divides between bodies and buildings, dreaming and waking. It becomes more than a simple puncture between floors, a flaw to be patched up. Itds a litemlpunctum, drawing the characters towards its revolutionary potential.\The film offers images of that Utopian potential in its juxtaposition of apocalyptic urban decay with the euphoric extravagance of the movie musical, a parallel world that sends the Man Upstairs, the Woman Downstairs and several dancers into joyous song and dance sequences across the barren hallways and derelict\stairwells. This complex mixture of elation and desolation is fitting for the film's cultural context, aperiod of millennialirepidation marked by ambivalent feelings towards issues significant to many of Tsai's works: modernity, urbanism, and everyday life. Tsai presented The Bole as part of the "2000 as seen by..." series, an international group of cinematic mediations on millennium anxiety. His filmic commemoration of this temporal transition creates a vision of a city reeling from its own rapid conversion to modernity. Taipei at the turn of the century is a dystopia overtaken by both physical and psychic disease. In its depiction of a viral, infectious modernization, The Hole offers a picture of Taiwanese "transmodernity," a term Enrique Dussel suggests as an alternative to modernity or postmodernity. Transmodernity opposes Euro-centrism through its emphasis on cross-cultural exchanges, rather than one-way changes imposed by the center upon its periphery (Lu, 2002:19). Through the weaving of dystopian and Utopian universes, The Hole suggests transmodernity's dual nature, offering viewers a two-sided coin containing both alienating despair and liberating promise. The film's connection to millennial modernity emerges in its depiction of the preparious border between bodies and buildings, between consumption, excretion*, and penetration, and between generic conventions. An overview of Tsai's place within Taiwanese film, the relationship between the body and the city's boundaries, and Taipei's ^easymodernization will contextualize the film's image of aTaiwanese millennium. Visions ,6f Transition Viewing The Hole as an emblem of Taiwan's late 20th Century transition to a glbbal city, Tsai Ming-Liang is perhaps the most fitting narrator of this evolutionary, internationalizing period. Tsai was bom in Kuching, Malaysia in 1957, where his grandparents introduced him to films from China, Taiwan, Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 2005 Asian Cinema, Fall/Winter 20'05