Linking fossil reefs with earthquakes: Geologic insight to where
Transcription
Linking fossil reefs with earthquakes: Geologic insight to where
Linking fossil reefs with earthquakes: Geologic insight to where induced seismicity occurs in Alberta Ryan Schultz, Hilary Corlett, Kristine Haug, Kelsey MacCormack, Virginia Stern, Todd Shipman Seismicity in the WCSB Seismicity in the WCSB is sparse and relatively quiescent. Long-lasting clusters have been recognized. Three clusters account for the majority of Albertan seismicity: RMHSZ, BrC, CLS. After Stern et. al., 2013 2 Induced Clusters Majority of earthquake clusters have been linked with petroleum resource development activities. RMHSZ associated with conventional gas production [Baranova et al., 1999]. Brazeau cluster (Cordel Field) link to waste-water disposal [Schultz et al., 2014]. Cardston swarm associated with hydraulic fracturing [Schultz et al., 2015a]. Crooked Lake (Fox Creek) region has multiple distinct clusters associated with hydraulic fracturing wells [Schultz et al., 2015b]. 3 Few earthquakes? Despite ubiquitous oil & gas development there are only a few locations where EQs are reported as induced. Associations of wells & EQs estimates < 2% of disposal and < 0.5% of HF wells [Atkinson et al., 2016]. What are the controlling operational, geological, and tectonic variables? 4 Double-Difference & Waveform Modelling Use double difference location algorithm to determine event geometry. Epicentral errors: 10s km -> 1s km. Beam average stacks of repeated earthquakes. Fit waveforms to constrain earthquake depth. 5 Induced EQ Depths Similar findings are reported from DD, Induced EQs are at or deeper than active formation. Suggests reactivation of basal sedimentary or waveform modelling, & other studies in the WCSB [e.g., Zhang et al., 2016]. basement controlled faults? 6 Spatial Association Robust epicentral locations coincide with the margins of the Swan Hills Formation. Geospatial correlation is decent: R2 0.85, and EQs are no further than 20 km from margin. Coincidence? 7 Coincidence? Correlation =/=> Causation. Spurious correlations are possible, what is the statistical confidence of this spatial association? Causal relationships require a physical rationale to relate cause and effect via a correlation. R2 0.80 8 Monte Carlo Randomly guess 19 EQ locations, build distribution from 106 trials, compare to observation. << 10-6 odds of occurring randomly i.e., similar to flipping 20+ heads in a row. 9 Physical Rationale? Highly confident Swan Hills & Induced EQs are related. Obvious first guess: wells target nearby this formation. Repeat Monte Carlo tests with skewed “dart throwing.” Still recover significance. Same for deeper wells? Rogers, 2014 10 Monte Carlo w/ Depth Bias 11 Monte Carlo w/ Depth Bias All EQ data >5σ ~All EQ data >3σ Most EQ data 90% ~No EQ data 2σ 12 Monte Carlo w/ Depth Bias >3σ All EQ data >5σ ~All EQ data ~3σ Most EQ data • • • 17 Duvernay MS-HF 1 Disposal 1 Production 90% 6,1,1 ~No EQ data 2σ 13 Reason for Association? Swan Hills is the first/deepest carbonate unit in study area, a reef which grew in warm epeiric sea of the Devonian Period. 14 Reason for Association? Swan Hills is the first/deepest carbonate unit in study area, a Berger & Davies, 1999 reef which grew in warm epeiric sea of the Devonian Period. Reefs prefer to grow on bathymetric highs. Spatial correspondence may be the result of reef nucleation preference for faulting related paleobathymetric highs. Purdy et al., 2003 15 Geological Rationale: Reef Nucleation Swan Hills Formation is the first/deepest carbonate unit in study area, a reef which grew in warm epeiric sea of the Devonian Period. Spatial correspondence may be the result of reef nucleation preference for faulting related paleobathymetric highs. Purdy et al. 2003 Eaton et al., 1995 16 Geological Rationale: Communication After Green & Mountjoy, 2005 Pervasive dolomite at Swan Hills build up margin decreases significantly towards build up interiors. Regional dolomitizing fluids could have flowed up vertical faults and fracture systems, enhancing porosity (2-5x) and permeability (2-63x). Plausible hydraulic communication w/ basement, or increased hydraulic diffusivity laterally. After Eccles & Berhane, 2011 17 Implications* Geographically biased activation potential observed for induced seismicity. Swan Hills Formation reef margin settings may provide a geological proxy for geological features which have a propensity for the initiation of induced seismicity. Detailed study of the geological, geomechanical, and hydraulic conditions along the margins of this fossil reef may provide criteria to prioritize regions with increased seismogenic potential. 18 *Caveats Two rationales conjectured, likely more, reasons for association would need verification. Despite correspondence, induced EQs have been detected only in a few margin locations: Geomechanical considerations have not been included, other faults may be poorly oriented. Reef nucleation is a complex process with many controlling factors. Other faults likely exist outside of reef-building conditions i.e., induced EQs may still be observed away from the reef margin. 19 Summary Only a small number of wells actually induce EQs in the central WCSB. EQs tend to occur at, or deeper than the active formation and into the shallow basement. Induced EQs in the central WCSB are spatially associated with Devonian fossil reefs Unlikely to simply be the result of (deep) wells targeting nearby the Swan Hills Formation. The Swan Hills Formation reef margin settings may provide a geological proxy for geological features which have a increased seismogenic potential. Correspondence interpreted as reef nucleation preference to regions of paleobathymetric highs (faults?), or enhanced hydraulic diffusivity. 20 Schultz, R., Corlett, H., Haug, K., MacCormack, K., Stern, V., Shipman, T., (2016). Linking fossil reefs with earthquakes: Geologic insight to where induced seismicity occurs in Alberta, Geophysical Research Letters 43, doi: 10.1002/2015GL067514.