Supply Market Insight
Transcription
Supply Market Insight
Volume 1, February 2013 Supply Market Insight In this issue: Introduction - Richard Reynolds Market Analysis Market Trends Industry Outlook - In Focus - Global Metals & Materials Category Profile - Hot Topic - Mining & Aluminium Valves Modularization Keeping counterfeits out of the supply chain Introduction Welcome to your copy of the 2013 Volume 1 edition of WorleyParsons Supply Market Insight. This bi-annual newsletter provides a snapshot of current industry trends in pricing and delivery for some of the key products that directly affect our projects in the Engineering and Construction industry. The newsletter is built on various industry price indices (Sources: SSB, IHS, PMI-Markit) and suppliers who tell us what they see in the market place that’s affecting their price and delivery. 2 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Contributions/Feedback - [email protected] This edition contains the latest trends in pricing, demand and supply covering electrical equipment, pressure vessels, mining and oil equipment, industrial valves, heat exchangers, turbines, concrete, steel, wages, non-ferrous metals, stainless steel and ferro-alloys. The newsletter also provides news on market trends, industry outlook (Mining), Category Profile (China Valve Industry) Logistics, Modularization and a Hot Topic section on keeping counterfeits out of the project supply chain. Because of constantly changing market conditions, data is subject to change. Supply Market Insight is available from the Procurement SharePoint site portion of WorleyParsons intranet at: http://knowledge. worleyparsons.com/procurement/market/ Supply%20Markets/Forms/AllItems.aspx For more information, additional copies, or to be added to SharePoint alerts, please contact Nagesh Thiagarajan, +1 (403) 385 2082 email [email protected] or Rob Simmonds, +1 (403) 692 3640 email [email protected] We continue to work with the Procurement Network to share changing conditions in the market place throughout the year and issue market updates as events dictate via SharePoint alerts. Richard Reynolds Sincerely, Global Procurement Director Market Analysis The End of an Era Richard Reynolds – Global Director Procurement 3 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Five years on and counting from the onset of the global financial crisis, and the world continues to be embroiled in economic turmoil. While few – if any – markets seem immune from the continued uncertainty in the economy, all eyes are sharply focused on Europe. Indeed, the ongoing debt crisis that continues to grip many of the markets within the Eurozone has created unprecedented uncertainty for businesses across the globe. Against this backdrop, the pace of change in the business environment has continued to pick up speed; regulation is being introduced at an uncompromising rate; new technologies are being launched into the market on an almost weekly basis; and business models are rapidly evolving in almost every industry sector. Despite near-term narrowing of demand, the world remains at risk of long-term supply constraints. This danger will grow as customer’s slow production in the face of capital cost increases and growing shareholder demands for more immediate returns. Although customers are hesitant to invest aggressively, one thing is clear: failure to replace depleting assets will result in higher future commodity prices. Significant rewards will be available to the customers that invest today. Projects all over the world are feeling the heat associated with rising operational and capital costs at a time when the economics of projects are starting to look less attractive as commodity prices head south. This is forcing customers to put much greater focus on projects returns versus production volumes. Market Analysis Projects need to earn their keep and only the highest quality projects will get the green light. Yet the news isn’t all bad. For example China’s ongoing commitment to its current five-year plan has seen the country vow to spend an estimated CNY10 trillion (USD6.25 trillion) by 2015 in seven strategic industries. In the first four months of 2012, these initiatives translated into spending of CNY700 billion (USD4.4 billion) on selected infrastructure projects. Ongoing urbanization and industrialization around the globe also promises to spur heightened demand for commodities in the years to come. These conflicting global indicators leave customers in a quandary. On the one hand, making investments decisions without a clear understanding of future demand patterns can result in an ineffective allocation of capital resources – squeezing margins, threatening profitability and sparking shareholder ire. On the other hand, taking a wait-and-see approach will prevent customers from meeting future demand, potentially spurring a new commodity super-cycle that could push prices to unsustainable levels. Given shifting market realities, customers need the ability to develop accurate business cases, but the frequency of capital project overruns calls this competency into question. Around the world, we see projects exceeding budgets, alienating customers and shareholders in the process. Valid reasons for these overruns exist; more technically challenging projects; both skilled labor and specialized equipment are in short supply; compliance costs are rising; infrastructure bottlenecks are interfering with project delivery. Yet the external cost environment is not entirely to blame for cost overruns and schedule slippage. Other factors also contributing to poor performance include insufficient governance systems, poorly developed risk and control mechanisms, and inadequate project scoping processes. With customers under sustained pressure in the face of rapid change and economic uncertainty WorleyParsons is proving capable of seizing opportunities and thriving in this environment – work sharing and sourcing-led change is being used successfully to deliver a competitive advantage. This is forcing greater standardization and off shoring of work to drive the right cost bases for new revenue growth. Standardization of processes and tools is giving us more control and making performance more predictable. 4 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Another supply market trend is a consolidating supplier market. There have been some outstandingly sharp companies popping up in recent years offering an agile and adaptable service and frequently taking advantage of technology in ways that some of the larger companies rarely managed. The future presents another challenge – are the movements in the market taking away competition and tailor-made solutions and reducing their offering? Procurement will need to ask tough questions of their suppliers and watch the market closely for the opportunity to find the right fit despite the frequent acquisitions. In sourcing terms, much has been written about the shifts in China and its position as a low-cost provider of labor; in a sense, that trajectory has been followed as many said it would and businesses have been in a position to, if not anticipate, then at least prepare a reaction. Europe meanwhile has spluttering growth, political strife, a shaky unified currency and a still inflexible labor market. That’s not to write off the appeal of a whole continent for business, but it’s hard for industries that are looking to press on into the huge demand of faster growing economies to ignore the fact that Europe presents a problem. Supply chains will need to be more agile and, increasingly transparent. More simply said than done, one problem is that the pressure to redesign existing supply chains is coming from two directions. Internal customers who introduce demand volatility as they try to capture market share which entails the use of any number of techniques to make the supply and the price of a product more responsive to the needs of the customer. Meanwhile, there are still customers who do not understand the complexity inherent in supply chains and continue to grapple with the risks and immediate costs associated with sourcing from suppliers one level below the first tier. Speaking of risk – for all the focus that gets placed on everything from natural disasters, terrorism and currency collapse, the obvious risks are possibly the political ones. With the standout example of the Arab Spring, it’s not hard to think back to when political shifts changed the supply chain dynamics of a region. In short, the times … they have changed. For me, it is the end of an era. Market Trends Global Manufacturing and Services Purchasing Managers Index 5 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 The global economy continued to expand at the start of 2013, with output increasing in both the manufacturing and service sectors. At 53.3 in January, the Global All-Industry Output Index – produced by JPMorgan and Markit in association with ISM and IFPSM – signalled that global output has now risen throughout the past three-and-a half years, albeit the latest increase had weakened since December. The easing seen at the global level was almost entirely centred on the US, with the rate of expansion ticking slightly higher (on average) outside of the world’s largest national economy. The US nonetheless remained a strong performer overall, with its rate of growth comfortably above the global average. India continued to expand at a solid pace, growth accelerated in China, while conditions stabilized in Japan. The downturn in the euro area also eased further. Growth of economic activity was underpinned by improved inflows of new business, work on existing contracts and rising levels of employment. The level of new business rose for the forty second successive month in January, with the rate of growth ticking higher to its fastest since March last year. Manufacturers and service providers both reported modest increases in new business, while there were also signs that international trade flows – a key bellwether of global market strength – were close to stabilizing. Market Trends The level of outstanding business contracted for the ninth consecutive month in January, with the rate of reduction broadly in line with the average for that sequence of decrease. Manufacturers and service providers achieved broadly similar rates of contraction in work-inhand. Meanwhile, global employment rose for the fourth successive month, with the rate of jobs growth reaching a near two-year high. PMI™ data summary The US remained the strongest performing economy overall in January, followed closely by India. However, the rate of expansion slowed sharply in the US, accounting for much of the slowdown seen at the headline global level. Encouragingly, the rate of increase in output (on average) picked up outside of the US. There were signs of a further growth acceleration in China, while the downturn in the Eurozone eased further. Japan returned to (marginal) growth. 2013 A diverse picture was seen among the four largest euro members, with strong growth in Germany contrasting with ongoing downturns in France, Italy and Spain. Output in France fell at the steepest rate of these four countries, causing the gap between the headline indices for France and Germany to increase to the widest in the survey history. The US saw the most substantial increase in payroll numbers of the nations covered by the surveys, with the rate of expansion in workforce levels in the US hitting a near seven-and-a-half year peak. Employment also continued to rise in China, India, Brazil and Ireland. There was a return to jobs growth in the UK, while Japanese payroll numbers showed little change over the month. In contrast, the Eurozone saw further job losses, with reductions reported in each of the big-four euro area nations. 6 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Source: Markit Economics Ltd. Global Metals & Materials Global Metals PMI Production expands in Asia and the US, but falls in Europe 7 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Commodities PMI data from Markit signalled an expansion of output at copper, aluminium and steel users worldwide in January. Growth accelerated from December, with output rising at marked rates at copper and steel users, and modestly at aluminium users. Purchasing activity also increased at global metal users in January. Stocks of purchases fell modestly at steel and aluminium users, and slightly at copper users. moderate rates of growth. This was the second successive month where output increased at aluminium and copper users, with growth rates increasing for both metals from marginal rates in December. Steel users registered growth for the third month in a row, with the rate of expansion also quickening slightly from December. Across the monitored regions, output increased in Asia and the US but fell in Europe. at a modest pace. Aluminium users registered an increased amount of purchasing activity for the second month in a row, with growth quickening from December to a modest pace. The quantity of purchases at steel users also rose, and for the third successive month. Furthermore, the rate of growth accelerated from December. Across the monitored regions, input buying increased in Asia and the US, but fell solidly overall in Europe. Global metal users signalled an increased level of production in January. Copper-, aluminiumand steel-intensive firms all registered Purchasing activity increased at global metal users in January. Input buying at copper users increased for the first time in 16 months, and Stocks of purchases at global metal users fell in January, extending the current trend to 21 months. 30 Europe 25 World Decreasing purchases 20 PMI, Output, 50 = no change Global Metals & Materials The rates of reduction were modest at both aluminium and steel users, while copper users posted only a slight fall. Metal users in Europe signalled a sharp reduction in inventories, while stocks in Asia were either unchanged or fell marginally. Conversely, stocks of purchases increased in the US. Suppliers’ delivery times lengthened at metal users worldwide in January, albeit at a modest pace. Metal users in the US signalled some of the strongest rates of deterioration. The weakest rates of deterioration were at metal users in Asia, where times increased marginally. Total new orders increased in the US and Asia, with the US signalling the stronger rate of growth. However, new business continued to fall in Europe. Copper PMI Increasing output 70 70 65 65 60 60 Global copper users’ quantity of purchases 55 50 • Purchasing activity at global copper users increased for the 45 first time in 16 months in January, and at a modest pace. Asia 40 US • 35 Purchasing activity fell solidly in Europe, but strengthened Europe WorldUS. in Asia and the 30 Decreasing output • Copper users in the US signalled a marked rate of growth, Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 while input buying in Asia increased at the fastest rate since September 2011. 25 PMI, Quantity of Purchases, 50 = no change Increasing purchases 70 35 Increasing output 70 65 60 40 35 30 US Europe World Decreasing output 25 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Europe 45 World Decreasing purchases 2040 Jan-07 35 Asia Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 US Europe World US Europe 25 World Decreasing purchases 20 Jan-07 PMI, Stocks Jan-07of Purchases, Jan-08 50 = no Janchange -09 40 Asia 30 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 PMI, Stockscopper of Purchases, users’ 50 = no change Global stocks of purchases Increasing stocks 60 • Stocks of purchases at copper users worldwide fell in 55 January. Inventories have now declined in each of the past 21 50 months. 35 Asia 25 US Jan-10 Jan -11 Jan -12 Jan-13 Increasing stocks Shorter lead times 65 • Average lead times lengthened at copper intensive firms 45 60 worldwide for the fifth successive month in January. Asia 45 30 50 • However, the rate of stock depletion eased from December 40 and was only slight. 50 Asia 50 55 45 55 35 Global copper users’ supplier lead times PMI, Supplier Delivery Times, 50 = no change 40 PMI, Output, 50 = no change 4055 60 65 45 • Copper users in Asia and the US registered solid rates of expansion, whilst those in Europe signalled a reduction. 45 Increasing stocks 60 Decreasing stocks 50 • The rate of growth accelerated from December to a moderate pace, and the fastest since April 2011. 50 25 55 • Output at copper-intensive firms worldwide increased for the second successive month in January. Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Increasing purchases 55 PMI, Stocks of Purchases, 50 = no change 30 60 Global copper users’ output PMI, Quantity = no change Jan-10 Jan-07 of Purchases, Jan-08 50 Jan-09 US • Copper users Europeacross all three monitored regions signalled 30 World divergent trends, with stocks falling sharply in Europe, Decreasing stocks increasing solidly in the US, and remaining unchanged in 25 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan -09 Jan-10 Jan -11 Jan -12 Jan-13 Asia. 55 Asia • Times lengthened across all three monitored regions, US 35 50 with copper Europe users in Europe noting a marked rate of 30 45 World deterioration. Decreasing stocks 25 40 • In Asia, users registered deterioration Jan-07 copper Jan-08 Jan -09 Jan-10 the Janweakest -11 Jan -12 Jan-13 Asia 35 US in vendor performance, with times lengthening only Europe 30 marginally. World Longer lead times 25 PMI, Supplier Times, 50Jan-09 = no changeJan-10 Jan-07 Delivery Jan-08 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Shorter lead times 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 Asia US Europe World Longer lead times 25 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-13 PMI, Supplier Delivery Times, 50 = no change Shorter lead times 65 PMI, Quantity of Purchases, 50 = no change 70 Increasing purchases 65 60 55 8 60 50 55 45 50 40 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Source: Markit Economics Ltd. US Europe 30 PMI, Output, 50 = no change 25 65Jan-07 Global aluminium users’ output • Output expanded at global aluminium users for the second month in a row in January. • The rate of growth was modest overall. That said, it was the quickest since September 2011. • Output increased at aluminium users in Asia and the US. In contrast, output fell at aluminium users in Europe, albeit modestly. PMI, Output, 50 = no change Increasing output 65 Jan-11 25 45 Jan-07 40 45 Global aluminium users’ supplier lead times Increasing purchases Europe Decreasing output World Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 40 Jan-13 Europe World 25 Quantity of Purchases 50 = no change PMI, Decreasing Increasing purchases purchases 20 65 60 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 55 50 Global aluminium users’ stocks of purchases US 20 Asia US Europe Decreasing output World Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 • 40Aluminium users in the USJan-10 registered a marked increase in Asia stocks. 35 Increasing purchases Purchasing activity at global aluminium users increased for the second successive month in January, and at a modest pace. 25 55Jan-07 30 55 Decreasing purchases 20 Asia 60 US Europe 55 World 50 45 40 35 Longer lead times 30 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 US Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 PMI, Supplier Delivery Times, 50 = no change 40 40 25 Shorter lead times Decreasing stocks Increasing stocks Jan-12 Jan-13 45 65 35 60 Asia purchasing activity continued to fall sharply •35 Meanwhile, in Europe.USThat said, it was the weakest reduction in ten 30 Europe months. World 65 50 50 • Input buying increased in Asia and the US, with aluminium 45 users in Asia registering solid growth. PMI, Supplier Delivery Times, 50 = no change Europe World Jan-13 Global aluminium users’ quantity of purchases PMI, Quantity of Purchases 50 = no change World • 30 Suppliers’ delivery times lengthened at a modest pace overall, with vendor performance deteriorating across Decreasing stocksall 25 three monitored regions. Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 • Aluminium users in the US signalled a solid rate of deterioration while, in Asia, times lengthened at only a fractional pace. 30 PMI, Stocks of Purchases, 50 = no change 55 Jan-12 US Jan-07 40 • Average leadAsia times at aluminium-intensive firms worldwide US the fifth consecutive month in January. lengthened for 35 •30 The rate of depletion was modest overall, and the weakest Europe 50 World Stocks declined sharply at aluminium users in in 11 months. 25 Decreasing purchases 45Europe, but only marginally at those in Asia. 45 Jan-08 Increasing stocks 55 50 Asia 35 3555 50 60 Jan-13 Stocks of of Purchases, 50 = no change •PMI,Stocks purchases at global aluminium users decreased for 40 Increasing stocks the twenty-first successive month in January. Asia 55 •65 Jan-12 45 60 Jan-07 Jan-10 50 PMI, Quantity of Purchases 50 = no change 45 65 40 60 Asia 35 US 55 Europe 30 50 30 25 Jan-09 55 Aluminium PMI 30 Jan-08 PMI, Stocks of Purchases, 50 = no change 60 Global Metals & Materials 35 Decreasing output Increasing output World 25 50 Jan-07 Shorter lead times Asia Asia US USEurope Europe World World Decreasing stocks Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 45 40 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 9 35 PMI, Supplier Delivery Times, 50 = no change 30 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 65 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 PMI, Stocks of Purchases, 50 = no change Asia 60 US Europe Longer lead times Jan-11 Shorter lead times Jan-12 Jan-13 Source: Markit Economics Ltd. 65 30 PMI, Stocks of Purchases, 50 = no change Decreasing output 60 25 Jan-07 55 Global Metals & Materials Jan-12 Jan-13 45 • Output increased in Asia and the US while in Europe, it fell for the eleventh consecutive month (albeit fractionally). Increasing output PMI, Output, 50 = no change 65 Increasing purchases Europe 7035 65 30 60 25 55 Jan-07 50 World Decreasing output Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 45 40 35 Asia PMI, Quantity of Purchases, 50 = no change US 30 70 Europe 25 World 65 20 60 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 55 Increasing purchases Decreasing purchases Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 40 30 45 US Europe World Decreasing output 25 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 • Meanwhile, steel users in the US registered a marked 40 increase in stocks. 35 PMI, Stocks ofAsia Purchases, 50 = no change 60 30 Global steel users’ quantity of purchases PMI, Quantity of Purchases, 50 = no change Increasing purchases •70 Purchasing activity at global steel users increased for the 65 third successive month in January. 60 • Overall, growth was marked, with steel users in Asia 55 registering solid growth. In the US, purchasing activity 50 increased slightly. 45 •40 Steel users in Europe registered a further solid reduction in 35 input buying, Asia although it was the weakest in ten months. 30 US 25 World Europe 55 25 Jan-07 50 Increasing stocks US Europe Decreasing stocks World Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 45 40 PMI, Supplier Delivery Times, 50 = no change 6535 6030 55 25 Jan-07 50 Shorter lead times Asia US Europe Decreasing stocks World Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 45 Decreasing purchases 40 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Shorter lead times US Europe Longer lead times 10 60 25 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 PMI, Stocks of Purchases, 50 = no change Asia Times, 50 = no change PMI, 35 Supplier Delivery 65 30 Source: Markit Economics Ltd. Jan-07 55 Increasing stocks 65 60 45 40 35 Asia 30 Europe Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 US Longer lead times 25 Jan-07 45 30 Jan-08 Europe 55 The rate World •25 of depletion was modest, and the weakest since Decreasing purchases December 2011. Steel users in Europe signalled a solid 20 50 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10was Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 reduction while, in Asia, there only a marginal decline. Asia Shorter lead times 50 •PMI,Stocks purchases at steel-intensive firms worldwide Stocks of of Purchases, 50 = no change Increasing stocks 35 Asia the twenty-first consecutive month in January. 60 declined for US 50 There was a slightly stronger fourth quarter and sentiment is firmer for activity until Chinese New Year in mid-February. 55 Global steel users’ stocks of purchases 45 55 Economic indicators and Purchasing Managers’ Indices in 40 Europe continue to be generally below 50, anticipating lower activity. WSA’s latest prediction of 2.4% growth in apparent 35 Asia consumption US in EU-27 is also looking out-dated, though short30 sentiment term at the start of January is brighter. Most Asian Europe Decreasing stocksannual World economies are likely to achieve WSA’s predicted average 25 growth of 2.8% in 2013 and steel demand should rise slightly Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 year-on-year. PMI, Supplier Delivery Times, 50 = no change 50 60 55 50 Asia • Overall, production rose at a marked pace. Moreover, it was the quickest expansion since September 2011. 20 Jan-07 Jan-11 PMI,40 Quantity of Purchases, 50 = no change US • Output at steel-intensive firms worldwide increased for the third month in a row in January. Jan-07 Jan-10 45 Global steel users’ output 35 Jan-09 50 Steel PMI 40 Jan-08 Increasing stocks 60 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Global Metals & Materials Electrical Equipment Forecast Highlights: Buying Strategy Electrical Equipment Price Forecast Drivers (Percent change) Spare production capacity, slowing input cost escalation, and slowing demand for electrical equipment will lead to a favorable buying environment over the near term. Demand for electrical equipment from the manufacturing sector has slowed as capital expenditure cycles wind down. Also, demand from construction markets, although growing stronger, remains at low levels. Moreover, there will be minimal upward pressure from commodities and key intermediate good inputs. The softer global growth trajectory over the next 12 months will limit the upward risk to commodity prices. This, combined with increasing supply, as evidenced by a higher industrial production index and a higher capacity utilization rate for electrical equipment, will lead to continued weak pricing. 2013Q1 In 1 Year (2013Q4) Change in Conditions Prices Flat Flat No Change Supply Ample Ample No Change Demand Neutral Stronger No Change Forecast Highlights: Summary 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 2014F -1.1 -0.2 0.0 -0.2 0.0 0.2 -0.8 -0.6 Copper Costs 5.9 -2.3 -26.0 46.3 17.1 -9.9 2.2 -12.6 Lead Costs 100.1 -18.9 -17.8 25.0 11.8 -14.3 0.8 -6.9 Metal Stampings Costs 5.6 8.0 -1.9 0.8 5.4 -0.2 1.0 0.4 Real Investment, Equipment and Software 3.3 -4.3 -16.4 8.9 11.0 6.5 5.5 7.2 Electrical Machinery and Equipment Prices Forecast Drivers Electrical Equipment New Orders Recovering (Share of total) 4.0 3.7 Electrical equipment production growth decelerated over the second half of last year and is expected to post moderate gains going forward. US industrial production of electrical equipment is slated to increase 4.2% in 2013 and 3.1% on average over the next two years. Overall electrical equipment pricing is expected to remain subdued over the next several years as minimal escalation in key input costs tempers any upward pricing risk. The Producer Price Index for electrical equipment is expected at slip 0.7% each year on average during 2013 and 2014. Source: IHS Global Insight 11 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Energy 2% 3.4 3.1 Machinery and Parts 23% 2.8 2.5 2005 Demand for electrical equipment enjoyed strong growth in 2010 and 2011. Real nonresidential fixed investment for electrical transmission, distribution, and industrial apparatus jumped 5.5% on average annually over those two years. However, 2012 year-to-date through third-quarter growth has been negative, confirming that the resurgence is losing steam. Electrical Equipment Cost Structure (3-month moving average, billions of US dollars) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Other Metals 4% Iron and Steel Mills 1% Electrical Equipment New Industrial Production Still Well Off Peak level (Index, 2007=100) 105 98 91 84 77 70 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Other Materials 25% Steel 5% Labor 40% Global Metals & Materials US Shipments of Electrical Equipment Electrical Machinery and Equipment Price Forecast (Share of total) (1982=100) 117 116 Switch gears 24% Relays 29% 115 113 Transformers 14% 112 Motors and Generators 34% 111 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Near-term risks to the forecast Forecast Highlights: Risk The Pricing Risk is on the Downside for the Near Term Historical Volatility: PPI, Electrical Machinery and Equipment Average Annual Escalation (1990 to present) 3.6% Average Annual Range (1990 to present) 1.4 to 1.6% Pricing Risk - Medium/Downside There is medium risk that prices could escalate at a lower rate than our current forecast. Note: Price risk is defined by its historical price volatility (as measured by standard deviation): low (lowest quartile), medium (middle quartiles), and high (highest quartile). Source: IHS Global Insight 12 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Business investment for electrical equipment is slowing and input costs are seeing minimal escalation. Moreover, there remains some slack capacity for electrical equipment production. Consequently, price increases will be minimal. A greater risk stems from the economic recovery becoming more tumultuous and moving at an even slower pace than planned. Persistent economic headwinds (such as weak employment and global macroeconomic concerns) could constrain the recovery of key end markets (such as construction and infrastructure projects like utilities) to a greater degree than our current forecast. As a result, electrical equipment prices would also experience minimal, if any, gains. Global Metals & Materials Pressure Vessels Forecast Highlights: Buying Strategy Pressure Vessels Price Forecast Drivers (Percent change) The price outlook will be relatively favorable over the next three months. The correction in upstream commodities markets, which began in May 2012 and gave way to a general softness in pricing pressures over the second half of the year, has not been reflected in pressure vessel prices. While demand remains supportive of higher prices, the input pricing landscape does not. Advantageous buying opportunities will present themselves through the first half of 2013. The weakness in commodity markets that began in the middle part of 2012 is just now starting to pass downstream. The buying advantage will shift away from manufacturers over the near term. The recommendation is to seize the opportunity when it does. 2013Q1 In 1 Year (2013Q4) Change in Conditions Prices Lower Slightly Higher No Change Demand Stronger Stronger No Change Supply Slowly Tightening Slowly Tightening No Change Forecast Highlights: Summary As we enter 2013, buyers can expect softer price increases. The pricing profile in 2012 has been at times confounding. Prices strengthened 3.5% in the third quarter of this year, the highest rate of escalation since 2004. The fourth quarter of 2012 will mark a sixth consecutive quarterly price increase. This comes despite the softer global economic growth trajectory that has emerged in 2012, and it has completely diverged from fundamentals. The correction in upstream commodities markets that began in May 2012 and gave way to a general softness in pricing pressures over the second half of the year has not been reflected in pressure vessel prices. The supply outlook continues to tighten, but if new orders do not pick up, this tightness will not persist for long as unfilled orders continue to be worn down. Capacity continues to be brought online, breaking a streak of nearly three years of declining capacity. Source: IHS Global Insight 13 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 2014F 8.7 7.4 -1.3 1.0 2.3 7.1 3.1 1.2 Cold Rolled Steel Sheets and Strip Costs 17.3 -8.6 -28.2 36.3 19.1 -6.5 -3.7 0.4 Carbon Plate Costs -5.1 40.2 -40.4 4.3 52.7 -11.3 -11.9 12.0 Spot Price Merchant Bar Carbon Steel Costs 13.7 41.5 -16.1 2.5 11.8 -4.1 -14.5 7.0 Real Prive Investment, Industrial Facilities 18.2 24.8 4.6 -27.6 0.4 14.1 -1.1 16.5 Pressure Vessel Prices Forecast Drivers A Confounding Year for Prices... 20 (Percent change year ago) ...Only Partly Explained by Stronger Demand 150,000 PPI, Pressure Vessels 10 120,000 0 (Value of exports, thousands of dollars) 2010 2011 2012 90,000 -10 60,000 -20 Spot Price, Steel Plate -30 2012Q1 2013Q1 30,000 0 Jan Capacity utilization rates have been trending upward since the start of 2012, but remain steady just shy of the 85% prerecession levels. Shipments have begun to slow, mirroring the demand outlook in which unfilled orders remain elevated, but new orders are not keeping pace. The demand outlook is slightly downbeat as the pessimism surrounding the slower growth profile in the global economy has emerged. While unfilled orders of fabricated metal products have remained elevated (currently 8% higher than this point last year), new orders have slowed and were just 2.9% higher year over year in August. New orders of fabricated metal products began the year 11.6% higher than where they started 2011, but have softened through the third quarter. Mar May Jul Sept Nov Pressure Vessel Cost Struture (Share of total) Other 28% SteelOther All Other 33% 59.6% Materials 25% Labor 35.0% Nonferrous Metals 2% Energy 2% Global Metals & Materials Pressure Vessel End-Market Demand Pressure Vessels Price Forecast (2001: 12=100) (Share of total) 200 180 Basic Chemicals All OtherOther Manufacturing 59.6% Materials 45% 25% 160 240 120 Petroleum and Coal Producte Manufacturing 55.0% 100 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Near-term risks to the forecast Forecast Highlights: Risk The Pricing Risk is on the Downside for the Near Term Historical Volatility: PPI, Pressure Vessels Average Annual Escalation (2002 to present) 6.8% Average Annual Range (2003 to present) -1.2 to 13.8% Pricing Risk - Low/Downside There is low risk that prices could escalate at a slower rate than our current forecast. Note: Price risk is defined by its historical price volatility (as measured by standard deviation): low (lowest quartile), medium (middle quartiles), and high (highest quartile). Source: IHS Global Insight 14 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 The downside risks this quarter remain largely unchanged. Contagion risks from the European debt crisis cannot be discounted and continue to threaten global growth. Our outlook is now for an orderly Greek exit from the Eurozone in 2014. As we have seen this year, uncertainty prolonged by political paralysis in the United States is having an adverse impact on business capital expenditure plans. The biggest risk to the US economy remains an advertent or inadvertent fiscal tightening. This will continue to shadow markets into the coming year and will remain a downside risk. While growth in the developing world appears to have stabilized for the time being, there is no suggestion yet of a reacceleration. As we enter the middle of China’s 12th FiveYear Plan, it is possible that we will begin to see a number of infrastructure plans break ground. This could very well act as a form of stimulus to commodity markets and would pose an upside pricing risk in the coming year. Global Metals & Materials Mining & Oil Equipment Mining and Oilfield Equipment Price Forecast Drivers (Percent change) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 2014F 7.3 8.1 1.9 -0.6 2.6 2.9 3.1 2.5 Iron and Steel Costs 7.8 22.6 -25.3 21.5 13.3 -5.2 -5.8 7.7 Hot-Rolled Bars, Plates and Structural Shapes Cost 9.9 21.5 -25.1 13.0 15.6 -4.0 -7.3 7.8 Fabricated Pipe and Fittings Costs -1.3 7.6 5.5 10.8 6.5 4.1 0.1 2.1 Industrial Production, Oil and Gas Extraction & Drilling 1.5 1.4 -3.4 6.3 7.7 7.2 4.1 1.7 Electrical Machinery and Equipment Prices Forecast Highlights: Buying Strategy Equipment buyers have faced higher prices thus far in 2012. However, orders for new equipment have weakened and we expect escalation rates to remain tame in the near term. As we move through 2013 and into 2014, global economic activity should improve, resulting in a more favorable tilt to the energy and commodity supply/demand/price landscape, in turn leading to more robust increases in equipment prices. Forecast Drivers Mining and Oil & Gas Field Machinery and Equipment New Orders 2013Q1 In 1 Year (2013Q4) Change in Conditions Prices Higher Higher No Change Supply Higher Higher No Change Demand Ample Higher No Change (3-month moving average, millions of dollars) 4,000 3,000 Machinery All OtherOther and Parts 59.6% Materials 25% 23% 2,000 Forecast Highlights: Summary Production of mining and oil field and gas field machinery and equipment is slated to rise 13% in 2012 following a 21% jump in 2011. Industry output is likely to grind to a halt in 2013 before ramping up once again and expanding 5.9% in 2014, 7.0% in 2015, 6.2% in 2016, and 4.5% in 2017. Energy and commodity prices have softened as the supply/demand climate developed an unfavorable tilt. With adequate supply, low prices, and lackluster demand growth, there has been less incentive to drill for oil and gas. Efforts to expand existing mine productive capacity and open up new facilities have been tabled or cut back. Capital expenditure programs both here and offshore have been cut and will remain modest in 2013. The renaissance in North American oil and gas production has given equipment manufacturers a shot in the arm and will continue to do so following the lull in the action we are experiencing right now. The US coal industry has been under siege from cheap natural gas and stringent environmental regulations. Capital spending programs have been dramatically reduced and mines shuttered. Source: IHS Global Insight 15 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Mining and Oilfield Equipment Cost Structure (Share of total) 1,000 Energy 0.5% Labor 10.8% 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 Labor Materials 40% 29.0% 2012 A Worrying Trend (Percentage change y/y, fabricated metal products) 25 25 Unfilled Orders (LS) New Orders (RS) 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 0 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-11 Global Metals & Materials Mining and Oilfield Equipment End-Markets Oil and Gas Field Machinery Price Forecast (Share of total) (1980: 12=100) 280 258 North America 48% 236 Rest of World 18% Asia/Aus/NZ 13% Europe 29.0% 214 192 170 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Near-term risks to the forecast Forecast Highlights: Risk The Pricing Risk is on the Downside for the Near Term Historical Volatility: PPI, Electrical Machinery and Equipment Average Annual Escalation (1990 to present) 3.6% Average Annual Range (1990 to present) 0.9 to 9.0% Pricing Risk - Medium/Downside There is medium risk that prices could escalate at a slower rate than our current forecast. Note: Price risk is defined by its historical price volatility (as measured by standard deviation): low (lowest quartile), medium (middle quartiles), and high (highest quartile). There is clearly a risk that the always shaky Middle East could come unglued. The situations in Egypt and Syria remain problematic, the Israeli/Palestinian ceasefire may or may not hold, and the Iranian nuclear crisis remains. Should our worst fears come to pass, crude oil prices would surge and the fragile global economy would take a major hit. This being the case, energy and mining industry investment projects, which have already been scaled back, could be stopped dead in their tracks. Additionally, the Eurozone crisis is anything but behind us and a deterioration of the situation would negatively impact commodity markets and the demand for new equipment. Alternatively, the unlikely emergence of a stable Middle East would allow prices to be influenced largely by supply/demand considerations, which would benefit global economic activity and bolster energy and mining industry activity and capital spending. Even more stringent environmental regulations in the United States, such as anti-fracking rules, could spell trouble for domestic mining and energy industry capital expenditure programs. Source: IHS Global Insight 16 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Global Metals & Materials Industrial Valves Industrial Valves Price Forecast Drivers (Percent change) Forecast Highlights: Buying Strategy The buying environment for industrial valves remains unfavorable over the next three months. The buying advice through much of 2012 was to not delay purchases as moderate price increases would be spread evenly through the year, buoyed by a moderately strong demand outlook and elevated unfilled orders. Price increases in 2013 are poised to be softer as pressures from input costs will be virtually nonexistent through most of the year. Buyers should expect strong price increases entering 2014 and should plan accordingly. 2013Q1 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 2014F 9.3 5.8 2.4 1.5 5.3 4.7 2.3 1.6 Iron and Steel Mills Costs 6.5 17.7 -27.0 18.5 12.5 -4.2 -5.3 3.8 WTI Crude Oil Costs 9.3 37.8 -38.1 28.7 19.7 -0.7 -5.6 -2.2 Steel Foundries Costs 7.8 5.3 -1.0 3.5 3.5 3.9 1.5 2.2 Real Private Investment, Industrial Facilities 18.2 24.8 4.6 -27.6 0.4 14.1 -1.1 16.5 Industrial Valve Prices Forecast Drivers A Worrying Trend Relative Importance (Percentage change y/y, fabricated metal products) (Percentageof total capex in the chemcials industry) 25 25 In 1 Year (2013Q4) Change in Conditions 20 20 15 15 Prices Higher Higher No Change Demand Slightly Stronger Stronger No Change Tightening Tightening Supply 2007 No Change Forecast Highlights: Summary As has been the consistent message for a few quarters now, the catalyst behind stronger valve prices can be attributed more to supply and demand forces and less to input costs. Strong capital expenditures in the chemicals and refined petroleum industries are driving demand and sending prices higher despite a lack of pressure from input prices. Prices will increase 0.7% in the first quarter and 2.3% over 2013. The supply outlook continues to tighten, but if new orders do not pick up, this tightness will not persist for long as unfilled orders continue to be worn down. Capacity continues to be brought online, breaking a streak of nearly three years of declining capacity. Capacity utilization rates have been trending upward since the start of 2012, but remain steady just shy of the 85% prerecession levels. Source: IHS Global Insight 17 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Unfilled Orders (LS) New Orders (RS) 2012 2008 Africa Middle East Latin America 10 10 5 5 0 0 Eastern Europe Asia Pacific Western Europe Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-11 North America 0% 20% 40% 60% Industrial Valves Input Cost Structure There is little change on the demand front as the slightly pessimistic outlook that emerged over the second half of 2012 has not dissipated. New orders and unfilled orders of fabricated metal products kicked off 2012 approximately 11.6% and 8.9% higher year over year, respectively. However, as the year has unfolded, the softer global growth profile weighed on demand channels. New orders in November were down 0.9% from a year earlier, while backlogs were progressively worn down and currently sit just 5.2% higher than at this point last year. (Share of total) Steel 44% Other 12% Nonferrous Metals 11% Labor 33% 80% Global Metals & Materials Industrial Valves End-Market Demand Industrial Vavles Price Forecast (Share of total) (1991: 12=100) 230 210 Energy, Mining and Quarrying 40% Basic Industrial Chemicals 30% 190 170 150 Electricity, Gas and Water 130 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 30% Near-term risks to the forecast Forecast Highlights: Risk The Pricing Risk is on the Downside for the Near Term Historical Volatility: PPI, Industrial Valves Average Annual Escalation (1990 to present) 3.7% Average Annual Range (1990 to present) 1.3 to 9.3% Pricing Risk - Low/Downside Global economic headwinds pose a risk to growth in emerging markets that may in turn affect end market channels for industrial valves. Note: Price risk is defined by its historical price volatility (as measured by standard deviation): low (lowest quartile), medium (middle quartiles), and high (highest quartile). Source: IHS Global Insight 18 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 The downside risks this quarter remain largely unchanged. Contagion risks from the European debt crisis cannot be discounted and continue to threaten global growth. Our outlook is for an orderly Greek exit from the Eurozone in 2014. As we have seen this year, uncertainty prolonged by political paralysis in the United States is having an adverse impact on business capital expenditure plans. The biggest risk to the US economy remains an advertent or inadvertent fiscal tightening. This will continue to shadow markets into the coming year and will remain a downside risk. While growth in the developing world appears to have stabilized for the time being, there is no suggestion yet of a reacceleration. As we enter the middle of China’s 12th Five Year Plan, it is possible that we will begin to see a number of infrastructure plans break ground. This could very well act as a form of stimulus to commodity markets and would pose an upside pricing risk in the coming year. Global Metals & Materials Concrete Concrete Price Forecast Drivers (Percent change) Forecast Highlights: Buying Strategy Buying conditions for concrete will remain favorable over the next six months. Ready-mix prices advanced in 2012 on stronger energy prices in the first half of the year and rising demand from residential construction in the second half. Prices are expected to move sideways during 2013, before making strong gains in 2014–16 as demand from nonresidential construction strengthens. Spare production capacity remains ample. 2013Q1 Prices Flat 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 2014F 4.3 2.6 2.4 -2.5 -0.6 2.0 1.4 2.9 Labor Costs 2.6 2.0 1.5 0.0 5.6 0.0 1.8 1.8 Electricity Cost 3.3 5.0 2.5 2.4 2.5 0.7 3.5 3.5 Cement Price 5.4 -0.3 -1.7 -5.6 -3.5 0.8 1.5 4.5 US Investment in All Structures 14.1 6.4 -21.1 -15.6 2.7 9.2 -0.5 9.2 Ready-Mixed Concrete Price Forecast Drivers In 1 Year (2013Q4) Change in Conditions Slightly Higher No Change 15 Ready-Mix Concrete Cost Structure Concrete Prices Gradually Strengthen (Share of total) (Percent change from a year earlier) Demand Flat Rising No Change 10 Supply Ample Ample No Change 5 Ready-Mixed Concrete Products Pipe Cement 22% 0 Forecast Highlights: Summary Ready-mix concrete prices are expected to finish the fourth quarter on a flat note, with the producer price index up approximately 2.0% for the year as a whole. Given the subdued outlook for nonresidential construction next year, ready-mix prices are expected to rise a mere 1.4%. By the middle of 2014 we expect the recovery in nonresidential construction to begin exerting pressure on prices, which should rise 2.9% in 2014, 4.9% in 2015, and 4.0% in 2016. Subsequent years will see annual growth rates more in line with the historical average. Production in the US ready-mix concrete industry continues to be restrained by soft demand. Production of cement and concrete products is expected to move sideways during 2012, before falling 1.8% next year. As construction activity accelerates, annual production will see three years of strong growth, rising 7.4% in 2014, 11.1% in 2015, and 9.8% in 2016. Concrete demand benefited from a boost in housing activity that helped lift prices 2.0% in 2012. However, the majority of concrete is used in nonresidential projects, which are still suffering from a lack of business confidence and shrinking government . Until this segment of the construction market recovers, demand will not be a major force driving prices higher. Source: IHS Global Insight 19 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 -5 -10 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Labor 29% Non-residential lags Residential (Billions of chained 2005 dollars) 800 680 Residential Non-residential 500 440 320 200 2006 2008 2010 All Other 28% 2012 2014 2016 Sand and Gravel 19% Energy 2% Global Metals & Materials Ready-Mix Concrete End-Market Demand Ready-Mix Concrete Price Forecast (Share of total) (1981: 12=100) 250 234 218 Housing 25% Non-residential Construction 75% 202 186 170 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Near-term risks to the forecast Forecast Highlights: Risk The Pricing Risk is on the Downside for the Near Year Historical Volatility: PPI, Ready-Mix Concrete Average Annual Escalation (1990 to present) 3.1% Average Annual Range (1990 to present) -2.5 to 12.0% Pricing Risk - Medium/Downside There is low risk that prices could escalate at a slower rate than our current forecast. Note: Price risk is defined by its historical price volatility (as measured by standard deviation): low (lowest quartile), medium (middle quartiles), and high (highest quartile). Source: IHS Global Insight 20 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Pricing risk is weighted toward the downside over the next year. Lower escalation in concrete prices could occur if the recovery in US nonresidential construction markets falters. Broader deterioration in US economic conditions or a “lost decade” of weak growth and high unemployment would severely limit concrete demand, thereby keeping a tight lid on prices. Nevertheless, the upside risks cannot be ignored. On the geopolitical front, further instability in the Middle East could lead to a spike in energy prices, pushing input costs for concrete higher. Although the market remains well supplied and capacity utilization is well below historical averages, the increase in production over 2014–16 to meet rising demand could lead to stronger escalation rates than currently forecast if tightness develops anywhere in the supply chain. The risk of such an event occurring is quite small, though, given the current slack in the market. Global Metals & Materials WorleyParsons Supplier Survey Current Lead Time (Weeks) Category Sub Categories Current Lead Time (Weeks) Pump API610 Centrifugal - Horizontal 65 Pressure Vessel Average 64 API610 Centrifugal - Single-stage Overhung 47 Pipe Spool 12 API610 Centrifugal - Vertical 65 Above Ground Storage Tank (>100' Diameter) 48 Firewater 45 Switchgear 26 ANSI/ASME 32 Transformer 14 Pump - Other or category level only* 45 Motor 24 50 DCS and Instrumentation 18 API 618 Reciprocating 59 Motor Control Center (MCC LV & MV) 16 API 617 Centrifugal 59 Generator 32 Compressor - Other or category level only* 60 Variable Speed Drive 24 59 E-House Power Distribution Center 30 Light Industrial (< 34,000 hp) 52 10 Frame Units (> 34,000 hp) 58 Electrical Equipment - Other than listed above or category level only* Aero-Derivative 65 E&I Equipment Average 0 58 Industrial Control Systems 24 Dry Gas 10 Instrumentation 6 Mechanical API 682 12 Bulks 3 11 Automation Equipment Average 11 Exchangers - Shell & Tube 36 Pipe Exchangers - Air Cooler Pump Average Compressor Compressor Average Gas Turbine Gas Turbine Average Seals Seals Average Exchanger 20 52 Stainless Steel 24 Exchangers - Plate 51 Seamless Steel Pipe & Tube 20 Exchangers - Other or category level only* 55 Welded Steel Line Pipe & Tube (UOE) <16" (Sm. Diam.) 10 49 Welded Steel Line Pipe & Tube (UOE) >16" (Lg. Diam.) 28 Alloy/Chrome Steel Plate 14 Hot Rolled Plate (Carbon Steel) 10 Structural Shapes (Columns, Girders, Beams, etc) 8 Structural Steel Pipe (Seamless or Welded) 2 Structural Plate (Floor Plate checkered/smooth, Deck Plate, etc) 8 Fired Process Heaters Boilers 55 Plate 40 Structural Steel Furnace & Boiler - Other or category level only* 48 Furnace & Boiler Average Pressure Vessel Sub Categories Subsea Pipe & Tube Exchanger Average Furnace & Boiler Category Reactors - Forged Ring 80 Reactors - Rolled Ring 72 Pressure Vessels - <4" Carbon Steel 55 Pressure Vessels - <4" Alloy 63 Pressure Vessels - Other or category level only* 21 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 52 Steel Average 14 Valves - Alloy 44 Valves - Carbon Steel 42 Control Valves 20 Valves Average 35 Global Metals & Materials Logistics Emerging markets slowed along with the rest of the global economy in 2012. The impact of the European crisis, years of continuing stagnation in Japan, and fiscal uncertainty in the United States, weakened trade and financial flows, resulting in slower growth than was expected for many emerging economies. However, their economic performance was still generally stronger than that of developed markets. The US economy grew at a 2.2% pace; the EU contracted 0.2% (provisional estimates). Consequently, the developing world continues to remain at the forefront for investors. While the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) have played a significant role in global growth for a number of years, other emerging markets are now showing increased promise as potential investment alternatives. There are signs that increased labor costs and skill shortages are eroding China’s oncecommanding edge over other markets. That said, China continues to benefit from strong domestic growth and acts as a major driver of growth in the global economy. Separately, increasing transport costs are driving decisions about preferred production locations. ‘Near-sourcing’ – the effort to control costs by producing in countries adjacent or close to major destination markets - is again on the rise. Markets close to the United States and Europe, such as Mexico and Turkey, are attracting increased attention. Offsetting the nearsourcing trend is the growing attractiveness of more distant emerging economies as growth markets. Weakened demand in Europe, the United States and other developed economies means emerging markets have been less able to depend on these countries as export markets. 22 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 At the same time, several of the larger, more advanced emerging economies are fueling demand and have become attractive markets. That has powered increased trade between emerging markets and led to development of vibrant industry sectors, increasing opportunities for domestic-based logistics operations. In 2013, emerging markets growth will still depend heavily on demand from Europe and the United States and the overall health of the global economy. Despite or because of political change, the ‘Arab Spring’ countries face significant hurdles before they become attractive investment opportunities. Elsewhere, Sub-Saharan Africa continues to draw increased attention, despite uneven performance. Due to the region’s low-exposure to the European crisis (except for South Africa) growth rates in top performers have remained reasonably strong. Key Findings: • Emerging markets felt the slowdown in global economic growth in 2012 but generally continued to grow at a faster pace than traditional developed markets. • Logistics providers remain wary about prospects for global growth in 2013. Most believe there will be modest growth due to global GDP being flat. Prospects for the Eurozone continue to look bleak as the Eurozone will experience no growth or continue to contract in 2013. By contrast, many see a year of modest growth for the United States, and resumption of strong growth in the US. • China, India and Brazil – three of the so-called BRIC countries – remain the most dominant emerging markets for investors, exporters, producers of goods, and logistics providers. For the second consecutive year, logistics and trade providers ranked China, India, Brazil and Russia as the likely places to emerge as logistics hubs over the next five years. • Despite their size, growth and relatively sophisticated logistics networks, China, India, Brazil and Russia need to do more to address underlying weaknesses that could hurt performance and dim their attractiveness as an increasingly competitive group of secondtier markets (Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, UAE, Malaysia, Mexico and Turkey) becomes more alluring. China confronts rising labor costs, a skills shortage, and a growing gap in income disparity. India’s weak infrastructure and bureaucracy threaten its prospects. Brazil’s export sector is slowing. Russia remains overly dependent on energy exports. • Manufacturers face an increasing dilemma when it comes to locating production. The savings and efficiencies gained by ‘nearsourcing’ on the doorstep of large developed markets – for instance, producing in Mexico to be close to the United States or in Turkey for proximity to the European Union – must be balanced with their ability to tap into the emerging markets of Asia, the Middle East, Latin America and Africa. Logistics professionals see production going away from China to other emerging markets. • For logistics and trade providers, economic growth remains the leading driver of a country’s prospects as a logistics market, but cheap labor is no longer as important. They identified foreign investment and trade volumes as greater barometers of a country’s potential than labor costs. • Ongoing political unrest has done grave damage to the ‘Arab Spring’ countries of Egypt, Bahrain and Tunisia, leaving them less competitive and less attractive as markets and destinations for investment. Logistics providers agreed that the Arab Spring countries are ready to grow and absorb investment. Many felt those countries were too unstable for growth and investment; while others are uncertain. • The United Arab Emirates, Oman and Qatar are standouts among countries that are smaller markets with good economic prospects and easy market entry. Sri Lanka also was part of that group. • Qatar, Morocco, Oman, UAE and Cambodia experienced dramatic surges (20%+) in ocean freight exports to either the United States, Europe or, in the case of Oman, both. Ethiopia and Algeria showed large increases in air cargo to the United States and/or Europe. • Paraguay, Cambodia, Uruguay, Kazakhstan, Vietnam and Morocco experienced large year-over-year increases in ocean freight imports from the United States and/or Europe. On the air cargo side, Ukraine, Oman, Ethiopia, Bahrain and Qatar imported significantly more from the United States and Europe on a year-over-year basis. • The United States overtook the European Union as the leading destination for air freight from China. Air freight volume from China to the United States was relatively flat, but fell sharply (11.7%) to the EU. Iran, Syria and Iraq – were identified by logistics and trade professionals as having the least potential as emerging logistics markets. Trade and logistics providers see the greatest growth potential for Intra-Asia trade lanes. The Asia-Africa route is also attracting increased attention by logistics professionals. They are not as optimistic about trade between Asia and Europe and between Asia and Latin America as they were a year ago. Industry Outlook Mining Mining companies in 2012 faced external factors that prompted them to postpone a large number of capital projects at both the feasibility and pre-feasibility stages. The trends stemming from the highlighted global economic volatility and continuing delivery cost inflation are: • Uncertainty around the rate of growth in demand for metals and energy from the ‘growth engine’ economies • Uncertainty as to the price for key commodities, impacting economic hurdle rates for capital investments 23 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 • Uncertainty as the regulatory obligations impacting environmental, labor and taxation requirements • Increasing project delivery costs resulting in frequent and substantial cost variances on recent capital projects. Given the length of time it takes to bring a mine into production, the current slowdown could translate into supply constraints in the near term. Although global indicators are waning now, long term demand forecast remain bullish. According to UN estimates, the global population will exceed nine billion by 2050, with much of the growth occurring in large emerging economies. As per capita income rises in these countries, demand for housing, cars, electronics and other resource-intensive consumer goods will climb. While mining companies may plan to ramp up production from existing operations in the event of short-term spike in demand, production capacity constraints, stemming from a range of factors. Industry Outlook Obtaining permits, negotiating with local communities, attracting qualified labor and procuring sufficient equipment and materials are all activities that require years of advance planning. Against this backdrop, companies eager to grow require proven access to funds, a strong track record of delivery and solid local and regional relationships. Mining and metals companies are making the hard call to prioritize their capital expenditure. The assessment of strategic alignment requires mining and metal companies to determine how mega-projects investments align to the company’s long-term business plans. The projects that pass the test will typically be sound candidates to advance towards the front of the queue. Having put forward robust business cases, and effectively prioritized capital expenditure, project teams will need to embed the right project management disciplines to not only drive delivery against plan, but to do so in a standardized and consistent manner. In light of the rapid labor and equipment cost inflation facing delivery teams globally, the objective of these project controls is not necessary to reduce absolute cost – rather, project controls emphasize through planning, and controlled change and performance accountability to deliver predictable outcomes. As miners have sought to increase supply, they have been increasingly dependent on suppliers to provide goods and services in greater quantities than before. Many mining services and equipment companies have enjoyed higher profit margins in recent years due to scarcity of these required products and services, which range from freight-based services to equipment. Huge premiums have been paid for tyres, assays, acid and port access. Price increases were originally driven by shortages of such equipment, but now that supply has caught up with demand, this is no longer the case. 24 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 A trend we expect to continue is sourcing of goods and services from China. Customers have looked towards the Mining Equipment Manufacturing industry in China for excavation equipment, underground transportation equipment, mineral washing and screening equipment. The manufacturing industry for these products has expanded rapidly in recent years, due to high domestic demand from its coal and metal mining industries. Although China imports large volumes of coal, iron ore, bauxite and other resources, the government has authorized greater mining levels in recent years, which has contributed to growth in this industry sector. As China’s economy is heavily reliant on manufacturing and the energy sector, demand for natural resources drives the need for mining equipment. The industry’s total production volume output increased from 355,500 tons in 1998 to 5.06 mt in 2012. The industry’s exports are forecast to increase from $5.87 billion in 2011 to $13.62 billion in 2016, which is an annualized increase of 18.3%. China has become the second-largest manufacturer of mining equipment in the world, which means export volumes will continue to increase rapidly during these years. As the industry’s technology level improves, the quality of domestic products continues to increase. While pricing levels remain relatively competitive demand from foreign markets, especially emerging countries, will increase significantly during the next five years. The industry’s major export destinations include the United States (12.9% of total exports by value), Japan (11.4%), India (5.1%), South Korea (4.6%) and Indonesia (3.4%). Some major companies in the industry have developed foreign markets in developed countries such as Australia, Japan and South Korea. Medium and low-end products manufactured in China have competitive advantages in both good quality and lower prices. Exports are expected to increase strongly in future years at an annualized rate of 18.3% in the five years to 2016. The global resources boom is expected to continue in these years, which will greatly benefit China’s mining equipment manufacturers. Category Profile Valves China Valve Industry China’s output of valves hit 2.62mt, up 14.6% year-on-year, amid the severe economic downturn in China, ‘steady growth’ once again became the focus of national policy, and fixed asset investment in such sectors as steel, water, conservancy and hydropower, and railway. Value output maintained a stable growth in 2012 fueled by investment in these segments. This article provides the reader with an insight into the Chinese valve market with a special emphasis on petrochemical valves. 25 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 In 2002-2008, China’s valve output maintained an average annual growth rate of 24.8%. In 2009, the growth of China’s valve industry slowed down due to the financial crisis, and output increased by only 3.7% year on year to 4.584mt. Output snapped back with increase of around 15% between 2010 and 2011 against the backdrop of recovering downstream industries; and grew steadily and reached 5.959mt in 2011. Valve output showed steady growth with increase of 14.6% year-on-year for 2012. China over the last 10 years has become one of the most important valve production bases around the world due largely to transfer of technology from America and Europe and its low cost base. Valve producers in China today can now meet the various international standards due to major investments in their technologies. Nowadays, more and more multinational corporations regard China as one of the most important valve suppliers, which in turn brings opportunities to China’s valve producers and continues to drive the development of the whole industry. Category Profile Zhejiang Zhejiang is the largest valve producer in China. In 2011, output reached 2.093mt or 35.1% of the total, up 3% points over 2010. Zhejiang boasts the largest number of valve manufacturers and the largest production and sales of valve, and has approximately 3,000 valve companies. The valve industry in Zhejiang is characterized by a concentration of companies and closely related industry supply chain. The valve industry is mainly distributed in Yongjia, Longwan, Yuhuan, Qingtian and Fuyang regions which form the major manufacturing base in Zhejiang. Henan In 2011, valve production in Henan was 1.31mt, accounting for 22% of the total output. Valve manufacturers in Henan are mainly concentrated in Xinyang. Valves are a traditional industry of Xinyang, and product standards of Xinyang valve companies are adopted as the national standards for China’s butterfly valves. For instance, Xinyang valves are applied in national key projects such as Three Gorges and West-East natural gas transmission. Early in 1990, Xinyang valves were exported to Russia, Australia and Canada, etc. Now Xinyang is witnessing the development of its high-tech valve products. Jiangsu The valve output from Jiangsu made up 7.4% of the total in 2011. Jiangsu started early in the valve industry and has laid a solid foundation for its development. Currently, Jiangsu has stock companies, private enterprises and foreign-funded corporations engaging in the valve industry, and valve development in Northern and Southern regions keeps abreast of one another. The valve industry in Jiangsu is mainly located in Suzhou, Yancheng, Wuxi, Nantong, Changzhou and Nanjing. At present, large-scaled production base focusing on high and medium pressure valves and are supplemented by other types of valves including nuclear power valve and special valves developed in Suzhou. 26 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 The manufacturing base has a strong competitive edge both at home and abroad, and continues to develop in scale and professionalization. In Yancheng, the valve industry has seen large volumes of valves exported and manufacturers are developing related valve products such as castings, forgings, stainless steel, sealing element and standard parts in order to lay the basis for establishing a complete valve supply chain. Jiangsu 7.4% There are many famous valve companies in Jiangsu, CNNC SUFA is engaged in special valves and nuclear power valves, Neway specializing in manufacturing and exporting of generalpurpose valves including ball valves and Jiangsu Shentong Valve is involved in the production of valves for nuclear power and metallurgy valves. Henan 35.1% 22% Valve Output by China Region 2011 Zhejing Liaoning In 2011, valves from Liaoning reached 350,000t or 5.8% of the total output. Yingkou, Liaoning is one of the pipe fitting valve production bases in China. In 2009, the output value of Yingkou’s pipe fitting valve industry hit over RMB 2B. Yingkou is considered as a leader in the domestic industry for quality and technical contents of its valves and enjoys a good reputation in the international market, with its Beifang, Sifang and Yatai brands in the domestic and foreign market. Shandong In 2011, valves produced by Shandong Province increased by 0.4% over 2010 to 340,000t or 5.7% of the total output. The main companies in Shandong include Shandong Taifeng Valve Industry Limited and Shandong Yidu Valve Co., Ltd. Shanghai Compared with Zhejiang and Henan, valve output in Shanghai is smaller. The figure in 2011 was 270,000t, accounting for 4.6% of the total output. Shanghai valve industry is originally interconnected with Wenzhou valve, because many manufacturers first gained a foothold in the Wenzhou market, and then Shanghai. Shanghai valves feature good quality and high brand reputation. 4.6% Lianoning 5.8% 5.7% Shandong Shanghai Category Profile Valve export In 2011, China’s valve export maintained rapid growth, with export volume totaling USD7.501b, up 29.2% year-on-year. This increase was due to the robust demand for valves in the global market which pushed prices up, especially from Asian countries and regions where the recovery of the economy was much faster and their demand for valves larger. The export structure of valves made in China was further optimized and valves with higher added value occupied a larger market share, causing a surge of export price and export value. 2005 2006 1440 2002 3118 2007 4721 6126 2008 2009 2010 4514 5806 2011 Market Overview The petrochemical industry in China sees the widest application of valves. Valves purchases are valued at around RMB2.2b each year. Domestic valves are able to meet the demand for the industry. However, for special valves, China is forced to rely on imports from its foreign counterparts with their advanced technology. However, in recent years there has been a rise in domestic petrochemical valves. In particular, some companies such as SUFA Technology Industry Co., Ltd. and Lanzhou High Pressure Valve Co., Ltd. have established a foothold in the highend market. Export Value of Valves in China (USD million) 2004 As more and more new entrants tap into this market segment, competition becomes much fiercer, causing the profit of the low-end valve market to decline. In general, many domestic valve companies are small scale operations, lagging far behind foreign counterparts in terms of scale and capital strength. In the high-end valve application field the competitiveness of domestic companies will become very weak due largely to the small quantity of manufacturers. More than 10% of the valve market in China is occupied by foreign valve companies. 7501 Year Downstream clients of valves such as PetroChina, Sinopec and CNOOC have all established their own equipment purchase networks. International related certification systems include: IS09001 quality management system certification, IS014001 environment management system certification, API6D, API591, etc. and only companies that have gained these certifications are permitted to participate in bidding to these clients. Leading Petrochemical Valve Companies in China Revenue 2009 (RMB) Revenue 2010 (RMB) 1,528.3 1,104.5 SUFA Technology Industry Co., Ltd 563.1 594.2 Liangjing Group Valve Co., Ltd 467.2 506.9 Zhejiang Petrochemical Valve Co., Ltd 403.9 451.3 Zhejiang Chaoda Valve Co., Ltd 379.4 292.0 Lanzhou High Pressure Valve Co., Ltd 363.6 372.6 Hubei Hongcheng General Machinery Co., Ltd 222.0 237.1 Company Competition Pattern China has a total of 6,000+ valve companies, among which, more than 2,400 have annual revenue above RMB 5m. According to the statistics from the China General Machinery Industry Yearbook, the total industrial output value of the 2,400 valve enterprises reached RMB167.3b, with a total profit of RMB9.7b and exports approximating USD6b. Restricted by technology and research & development, the vast majority of domestic valve companies are in the mid-and lowend market where competition is fierce. 27 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Neway Valve (Suzhou) Co., Ltd In Focus Modularization a smarter approach 28 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 The sheer scale and convoluted nature of today’s mega projects plants are unprecedented. The fact that these plants often coexist with rich, fragile natural ecosystems adds a further layer of complexity for construction and production. It follows that environmental as well as safety constraints, are unyielding. And naturally, budgetary concerns are high on the agenda of customers seeking to commercialize the product. All in all, this is an intensely challenging scenario. It calls for meticulous project management strategies developed by the best and brightest minds in the industry. in the USA, Canada, Russia and the North Sea – is now being embraced around the world. An evolution in the approach of engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) managers has developed. Modular construction – a method historically favored by oil companies Benefits of a modular approach are many. It’s seen as delivering better quality, efficiency and cost-effectiveness and safety. The ‘plug and play’ concept brings all the advantages associated In a nutshell, modularization refers to a jigsaw-like mode of construction. Assets are manufactured and tested remotely, shipped to modular fabrication yards, then assembled onto preassembled skids with other assets, before being shipped to the end destination and pieced together in-situ. The advantages of this approach for the early generation of large North Sea Oil and Gas projects were immense. It greatly facilitated construction in this most hostile of environments. In Focus with shop fabrication as opposed to field construction. The manufacture can take place in controlled conditions with a highly experienced, permanent workforce. This reduces field construction costs in adverse environments, enhances startup schedules and overcomes workmanship limitations at the end destination. Moreover, construction is faster overall, so the revenue stream can be generated earlier. The long-term value of the equipment is improved, since it can easily be dismantled and moved to a future location. An additional factor that compelled some owners is that the impact of construction on the surrounding environment is significantly reduced. What is involved? While modularization addresses some of the challenges of mega projects, the approach does bring its own complexities. It requires disciplined methods and multi-level synchronization from the EPC/EPCM contractor. There are multiple, independent hubs of activity and each needs to work to the same rigorous layered timeframes. Equipment and materials are specified at the front end of the project. Once they are manufactured and tested, these are shipped to modular yards and incorporated into pre-assembled skid units before shipping to the end destination. Needless to say, accuracy and on-time delivery are absolutely vital. Typically, delivery requirements stagger over a set timescale. Establishing a priority list of onsite need dates is a core focus, as opposed to just shipping all the equipment and materials when their ready. This is especially critical with fabricators building modules, where completion has to occur in pre-determined phases. It is impossible to move to a new phase without satisfactory closure of the previous phase. All specification and design happens upfront. At a given point, all designs are “frozen” so manufacturing can begin. Each supplier needs to work actively with the module fabricator, planning a schedule of manufacture and supply that dovetails with their exacting requirements. Challenges of modularization The precise demands of modular projects have wider implications for companies supplying equipment and materials. For valve manufacturers, the challenges are rooted in the 29 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 severe nature of the applications. For instance, the long-lead times usually associated with complex materials and specialist valves aren’t simply acceptable with modular projects. It follows that many standard work processes are challenged, or turned on their head by modularization. The requirement to freeze designs at an early stage means that dimension and weight requirements need to be finalized sooner than with conventional projects. Critical analysis and decision making also needs to be fasttracked. All of these need to be achieved without compromising accuracy, quality or safety. Critical success factors The surest route to success is for all parties to work cohesively and supportively with the module fabricator. In many cases, it is necessary to re-write the rule book and evolve or reinvent traditional processes in order to meet the exacting demands. We have a five-pronged best practice approach that underpins modular projects. 1. Establish a tight roadmap - Concentric Project Management is the approach favored in modular projects. Manufacturers would do well to adopt this ethos, albeit on a smaller scale. This concept holds the project itself at the heart of operations and considers how it coexists within the bigger picture. It is inevitable that the journey from specification to delivery will involve problems such as resource bottlenecks and shifting priorities. Not to mention obstacles and complications resulting from inter-dependencies with other organizations involved. Taking a concentric view can help managers foresee and ease some of the difficulties that may be encountered. The ethos is rooted in integration, with role appropriate data and information shared at every level. This means resources can be planned more effectively and managers can quickly see what has been accomplished, and what needs to be done. It helps streamline management, control performance and enable real-time communication and decision-making. More importantly, it empowers individuals to take appropriate levels of responsibility from the front to the back end of the project. 2. Enhance efficiency - The sheer size and demanding specification of some of the equipment and materials destined for mega projects bring their own set of challenges. Any company serious about working on a modular basis needs to scrutinize internal processes and facilities and improve efficiencies. This may involve significant investment to boost capacity and proficiency. 3. Integrate and collaborate - Whilst many update meetings can be attended remotely, nothing beats having specialists on the ground. Getting face-to-face enhances relations as well as ensuring better understanding and a more cohesive approach overall. This is particularly true when requirements dictate for example that valves need to be highly engineered to operate beyond the normal realms of functionality. It is vital to identify upfront which valves are likely to require a higher level of attention in design and manufacture. 4. Facilitate breakthrough thinking - Some projects demand products with truly exceptional performance, eg. control valves in terms of speed of travel, range and response time. Employing and empowering top-class specialists, then encouraging them to work collaboratively and openly with third parties that are also at the top of their game, can make the seemingly impossible possible. 5. Cultivate knowledge and intelligence - Engineering should always be a discipline of continuous improvement. The emerging challenges posed by modular plants throw this into sharp focus. Establishing and harnessing a continuous loop of operational feedback drives and nurtures innovation for better performance, reliability and safety. This approach is set to become a key capability indicator as modularization becomes the norm for mega projects. Conclusion Modular mega projects are set to dominate methods of construction over the coming decades. The new generation of modular builds learns from processes initiated and refined during the North Sea boom. Performance can be further enhanced with recent technological advancements. Contractors, fabricators and suppliers need to look at their capability profile and take strategic measures to ensure they can meet the demanding requirements of modularization. Hot Topic Keeping counterfeits out of the project supply chain 30 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 We’ve all seen them for sale during our travels, displayed in markets or piled in shopping malls; replica DVDs, handbags, designer clothes and sports shoes. Many are happy to snap up so called bargains without sparing much thought for the copyright infringement they represent. But what if those items were pipes, fittings, valves, actuators or circuit breakers and they had infiltrated your project supply chain used to build your plant? Counterfeiting is a problem with global reach, and unrelenting vigilance, prevention and retribution are the best tools to fight it. Counterfeit and fraudulent goods cost US businesses more than USD200b a year according to the Federal Bureau of Investigations. Within the electrical components sector alone, the industry estimates losses at up to USD10b annually. But in addition to economic impact, counterfeit and suspect parts and components also pose a significant risk to health and safety. Consider that the US Federal Aviation Administration once estimated that 2%of the 26 million parts installed on aircraft annually a total of 520,000 parts may be ‘substandard,’ a category that includes counterfeit and fraudulent parts. Or consider this statement from a recent report by the Electric Power Research Institute: “In the US commercial nuclear industry, several CFSIs [counterfeit, fraudulent and substandard items] have been detected prior to being placed in active industry, and several others have been detected only after installation.” Or this from the Department of Defense (Dod): the DoD reported last year that it had documented incidents of counterfeits in its supply chain ranging from GPS oscillators to rotor retaining nuts used to hold the rotor to the mast of certain helicopters – and in many Hot Topic cases, failure of these parts could result in failure of a mission and/or loss of life. While the motive for producing CSFI is almost always profit, sabotage is also a concern. It’s a serious concern for the power industry when upgrading systems to include digital components and the type of electronics that are susceptible. Self assessment is vital The countries most impacted by CFSI are those currently involved in large scale construction. Typical cases are devices that are high volume, low cost commodities such as circuit breakers. If these are not correctly built, they can cause a fire or electrical failure, and those are the types of impacts developing countries are witnessing. A core piece of advice is to be cautious when dealing with sources not authorized by the original manufacturer (such as brokers) or when sourcing from regions known to be sources of counterfeits. A good place to start is a self-assessment to identify if your project is exposed to counterfeiting, to build awareness of the issues and examine anti-counterfeiting measures that may or may not be in place. Having a formal process to avoid and detect counterfeits should include: As new plants are designed and built around the world, CFSI will be a significant concern. The sheer number of suppliers and new suppliers, demand that EPC/M firms take special care to ensure counterfeit items don’t make their way into new plants it’s all about vigilance and prevention. What to do with fakes? If you should ever identify a counterfeit item, knowing what to do with it is also important. You must establish a process for handling a suspect item. Staff must know how to quarantine suspect items, to assess if it has had any impact on your project or organization, know who to notify (supplier, OEM, authorities) and when. It’s essential to know how to dispose of the item to ensure it isn’t salvaged and sold again. How much investigating should you do - is it sufficient to just remove the item from your inventory or should you investigate further? These are all important issues that need to be addressed by your organization. While there have been recent successful legal cases against counterfeiters, these represent a tiny majority of cases, but every victory helps. China is still the most notable country for counterfeiting, with 66% of seizures made in 2010 originating from there. Court cases certainly raise awareness in industry, exposing the problem and hopefully acting as a deterrent to counterfeiters. They also serve as an incentive for authorities in those jurisdictions to enhance their anticounterfeiting efforts. It’s a good thing that we’re seeing some legal successes. • Staff training and awareness • Identifying at-risk items • Making suppliers aware of expectations • Imposing contractual requirements on suppliers • Defining specific consequences if suppliers provide counterfeit items • Addressing CSFI prevention during the sourcing process • Choosing suppliers you know • Buying direct or from an authorized distributor • Implementing stringent measures when buying from a new supplier 31 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Image sourced from: ktcloset.blogspot.com Procurement Contacts London Calgary Shanghai Houston UAE Abu Dhabi Brisbane Rob Simmonds Janis Wilson, PMP Ron Porter, FCILTA Henry Hermanas, PhD Graeme Ormiston John Ritchie Peter Gilzean Tom Liao Brian Shoemaker Manager of Procurement, Global Manager, Global Manager, Global Director, Global Manager, Manager of Procurement, China Sourcing Hub Manager of Procurement, North America Procurement & Contracts Systems Logistics Contract Management Materials Management MENAI/SSA Based in Shanghai Based in Houston Based in Houston Based in London Based in Abu Dhabi Australia/Asia Pacific/ China Based in Calgary Based in Houston 32 WorleyParsons - Supply Market Insight - Volume 1, February 2013 Manager of Procurement, Europe Based in London Based in Brisbane