We are here. The TransCanada Journey 1998
Transcription
We are here. The TransCanada Journey 1998
We are here. We are here. The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 in the responsible development and reliable and safe operation of North American energy infrastructure. Our network of wholly owned and affiliated pipelines taps March 2007 TransCanada leads the North American pipeline industry and the world in system integrity. And we’ve demonstrated an exceptional record of system reliability and safety. We are proud that millions of North Americans can depend on us for the energy they need. With increasing production from oil sands in Alberta, and growing demand for secure, reliable sources of energy, TransCanada has developed a major oil pipeline, complementing our natural gas transmission business, drawing on our extensive pipelines experience and offering an efficient way to maximize the value of our current pipeline assets. TransCanada is one of the continent’s largest providers of gas storage and related services. “Hal Kvisle is one of the unsung superstars of Canadian business ... . Having taken over a company reeling from a wrenching merger in the late 1990s, he completed its turnaround and guided expansion in other capital-intensive businesses, from nuclear (a major interest in Ontario’s Bruce Power) and LNG to wind power and gas storage.” — Gordon Pitts, THE Globe and Mail, April 2007 A growing independent power producer, TransCanada owns, controls or is developing more than 11,700 megawatts of power generation. TransCanada 450 – 1st Street SW, Calgary Alberta, Canada T2P 5H1 www.transcanada.com “...TransCanada has gone from being a boring regulated utility to a company that’s one of the biggest infra- structure players on the continent. Today, TransCanada is all about two “P’s”—pipelines and power—with assets spread throughout the continent.” — Deborah Yedlin, Calgary Herald, April 2010 Printed in Canada Since TransCanada began operations in 1958, the company has built a rich history. Its stories have been told over the years through various books and other publications. This book focuses on the twelve years from 1998 to 2010, a transformative era for the company that has left it well-positioned for the future. The Trans canada Journey 1998–2010 into virtually all major natural gas supply basins in North America. “TransCanada and NOVA are corporate Siamese twins joined at the hip in Alberta’s post-war energy boom.” — Dick Haskayne, Northern Tigers: Building Ethical Canadian Corporate Champions, The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 We are here. With more than 50 years experience, TransCanada is a leader We are here. The book chronicles some of the defining moments in the emergence of a major independent energy infrastructure powerhouse, starting with the TransCanada-NOVA merger in 1998, through the years of post-merger restructuring and refocusing, the first steps of expansion and growth, to the mega-projects and success of recent years. The story in these pages is based on interviews with the people who were directly involved in the events of the last twelve years. In many cases, you’ll hear their recollections and experiences told in their own words. The book is dedicated to those who are or have been part of the TransCanada family and who have helped draw the map of where we’ve been, where we are, and where we are going. The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 We are here. We are here. The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 in the responsible development and reliable and safe operation of North American energy infrastructure. Our network of wholly owned and affiliated pipelines taps March 2007 TransCanada leads the North American pipeline industry and the world in system integrity. And we’ve demonstrated an exceptional record of system reliability and safety. We are proud that millions of North Americans can depend on us for the energy they need. With increasing production from oil sands in Alberta, and growing demand for secure, reliable sources of energy, TransCanada has developed a major oil pipeline, complementing our natural gas transmission business, drawing on our extensive pipelines experience and offering an efficient way to maximize the value of our current pipeline assets. TransCanada is one of the continent’s largest providers of gas storage and related services. “Hal Kvisle is one of the unsung superstars of Canadian business ... . Having taken over a company reeling from a wrenching merger in the late 1990s, he completed its turnaround and guided expansion in other capital-intensive businesses, from nuclear (a major interest in Ontario’s Bruce Power) and LNG to wind power and gas storage.” — Gordon Pitts, THE Globe and Mail, April 2007 A growing independent power producer, TransCanada owns, controls or is developing more than 11,700 megawatts of power generation. TransCanada 450 – 1st Street SW, Calgary Alberta, Canada T2P 5H1 www.transcanada.com “...TransCanada has gone from being a boring regulated utility to a company that’s one of the biggest infra- structure players on the continent. Today, TransCanada is all about two “P’s”—pipelines and power—with assets spread throughout the continent.” — Deborah Yedlin, Calgary Herald, April 2010 Printed in Canada Since TransCanada began operations in 1958, the company has built a rich history. Its stories have been told over the years through various books and other publications. This book focuses on the twelve years from 1998 to 2010, a transformative era for the company that has left it well-positioned for the future. The Trans canada Journey 1998–2010 into virtually all major natural gas supply basins in North America. “TransCanada and NOVA are corporate Siamese twins joined at the hip in Alberta’s post-war energy boom.” — Dick Haskayne, Northern Tigers: Building Ethical Canadian Corporate Champions, The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 We are here. With more than 50 years experience, TransCanada is a leader We are here. The book chronicles some of the defining moments in the emergence of a major independent energy infrastructure powerhouse, starting with the TransCanada-NOVA merger in 1998, through the years of post-merger restructuring and refocusing, the first steps of expansion and growth, to the mega-projects and success of recent years. The story in these pages is based on interviews with the people who were directly involved in the events of the last twelve years. In many cases, you’ll hear their recollections and experiences told in their own words. The book is dedicated to those who are or have been part of the TransCanada family and who have helped draw the map of where we’ve been, where we are, and where we are going. The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 We are here. We are here. The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 in the responsible development and reliable and safe operation of North American energy infrastructure. Our network of wholly owned and affiliated pipelines taps March 2007 TransCanada leads the North American pipeline industry and the world in system integrity. And we’ve demonstrated an exceptional record of system reliability and safety. We are proud that millions of North Americans can depend on us for the energy they need. With increasing production from oil sands in Alberta, and growing demand for secure, reliable sources of energy, TransCanada has developed a major oil pipeline, complementing our natural gas transmission business, drawing on our extensive pipelines experience and offering an efficient way to maximize the value of our current pipeline assets. TransCanada is one of the continent’s largest providers of gas storage and related services. “Hal Kvisle is one of the unsung superstars of Canadian business ... . Having taken over a company reeling from a wrenching merger in the late 1990s, he completed its turnaround and guided expansion in other capital-intensive businesses, from nuclear (a major interest in Ontario’s Bruce Power) and LNG to wind power and gas storage.” — Gordon Pitts, THE Globe and Mail, April 2007 A growing independent power producer, TransCanada owns, controls or is developing more than 11,700 megawatts of power generation. TransCanada 450 – 1st Street SW, Calgary Alberta, Canada T2P 5H1 www.transcanada.com “...TransCanada has gone from being a boring regulated utility to a company that’s one of the biggest infra- structure players on the continent. Today, TransCanada is all about two “P’s”—pipelines and power—with assets spread throughout the continent.” — Deborah Yedlin, Calgary Herald, April 2010 Printed in Canada Since TransCanada began operations in 1958, the company has built a rich history. Its stories have been told over the years through various books and other publications. This book focuses on the twelve years from 1998 to 2010, a transformative era for the company that has left it well-positioned for the future. The Trans canada Journey 1998–2010 into virtually all major natural gas supply basins in North America. “TransCanada and NOVA are corporate Siamese twins joined at the hip in Alberta’s post-war energy boom.” — Dick Haskayne, Northern Tigers: Building Ethical Canadian Corporate Champions, The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 We are here. With more than 50 years experience, TransCanada is a leader We are here. The book chronicles some of the defining moments in the emergence of a major independent energy infrastructure powerhouse, starting with the TransCanada-NOVA merger in 1998, through the years of post-merger restructuring and refocusing, the first steps of expansion and growth, to the mega-projects and success of recent years. The story in these pages is based on interviews with the people who were directly involved in the events of the last twelve years. In many cases, you’ll hear their recollections and experiences told in their own words. The book is dedicated to those who are or have been part of the TransCanada family and who have helped draw the map of where we’ve been, where we are, and where we are going. The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 We are here. We are here. The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 in the responsible development and reliable and safe operation of North American energy infrastructure. Our network of wholly owned and affiliated pipelines taps March 2007 TransCanada leads the North American pipeline industry and the world in system integrity. And we’ve demonstrated an exceptional record of system reliability and safety. We are proud that millions of North Americans can depend on us for the energy they need. With increasing production from oil sands in Alberta, and growing demand for secure, reliable sources of energy, TransCanada has developed a major oil pipeline, complementing our natural gas transmission business, drawing on our extensive pipelines experience and offering an efficient way to maximize the value of our current pipeline assets. TransCanada is one of the continent’s largest providers of gas storage and related services. “Hal Kvisle is one of the unsung superstars of Canadian business ... . Having taken over a company reeling from a wrenching merger in the late 1990s, he completed its turnaround and guided expansion in other capital-intensive businesses, from nuclear (a major interest in Ontario’s Bruce Power) and LNG to wind power and gas storage.” — Gordon Pitts, THE Globe and Mail, April 2007 A growing independent power producer, TransCanada owns, controls or is developing more than 11,700 megawatts of power generation. TransCanada 450 – 1st Street SW, Calgary Alberta, Canada T2P 5H1 www.transcanada.com “...TransCanada has gone from being a boring regulated utility to a company that’s one of the biggest infra- structure players on the continent. Today, TransCanada is all about two “P’s”—pipelines and power—with assets spread throughout the continent.” — Deborah Yedlin, Calgary Herald, April 2010 Printed in Canada Since TransCanada began operations in 1958, the company has built a rich history. Its stories have been told over the years through various books and other publications. This book focuses on the twelve years from 1998 to 2010, a transformative era for the company that has left it well-positioned for the future. The Trans canada Journey 1998–2010 into virtually all major natural gas supply basins in North America. “TransCanada and NOVA are corporate Siamese twins joined at the hip in Alberta’s post-war energy boom.” — Dick Haskayne, Northern Tigers: Building Ethical Canadian Corporate Champions, The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 We are here. With more than 50 years experience, TransCanada is a leader We are here. The book chronicles some of the defining moments in the emergence of a major independent energy infrastructure powerhouse, starting with the TransCanada-NOVA merger in 1998, through the years of post-merger restructuring and refocusing, the first steps of expansion and growth, to the mega-projects and success of recent years. The story in these pages is based on interviews with the people who were directly involved in the events of the last twelve years. In many cases, you’ll hear their recollections and experiences told in their own words. The book is dedicated to those who are or have been part of the TransCanada family and who have helped draw the map of where we’ve been, where we are, and where we are going. The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 We are here. T h e T r a nsCanada Journey 1998–2010 We are here. T h e T r a nsCanada Journey 1998–2010 Published in Canada by Produced by TransCanada’s Internal Communications Department and TransCanada Photos on opening pages are of a wind TransCanada Corporation Mapping, in collaboration with Forwords Communication Inc. turbine and a ‘through-the-pipeline’ Dedicated to those who are or have been part of the TransCanada a welding spark on Gas Transmission family and who have helped draw the map of where we’ve been, Northwest. image of Keystone. Photo above is of 450 – 1st Street SW, Calgary Alberta, Canada T2P 5H1 Copyright ©2010 by: TransCanada Corporation where we are, and where we are going. First edition 2010 All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced Disclaimer: This book includes thoughts, ideas, views and opinions of various individuals. The views in any form, or by any electronic, and opinions contained in this book do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of TransCanada mechanical or other means, without permission from the publisher. Corporation. Any figures, numbers, charts, strategies, or data included is for illustrative purposes only and should not be relied on for any analysis or other purposes. While efforts were made to be accurate, TransCanada Corporation does not make any representation as to accuracy, or completeness of any such information and will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its use. ISBN 978-0-9866892-0-8 Printed and bound in Canada We are here. 1 The start of something new. 2 Fix and focus. Keystone Pipeline captures new opportunity 9 The call of the north. Building the power business 8 Crude awakening. The essential role of gas storage 7 Earth, wind, water, fire. Pipeline expansion in the U.S. and Mexico 6 On tap. The evolving Canadian pipeline business 5 Grow with the flow. Leaders and leadership 4 Roots and branches. Birth of a new strategy 3 At the helm. 1998 merger transforms business Partnerships, promise, potential 10 Making it all happen. The people who are TransCanada Here we are. Lat 50ºN, Long 113ºW An emergency response from nearby Vulcan, exercise in the town of Alberta, and Jim Hudson, Champion, Alberta, in TransCanada’s emergency 2005. (left to right) site manager. Dwayne Hill, fire chief We are here. Almost anywhere you go at TransCanada, you will find maps of North America on the walls. For our people, these maps often tell fascinating stories, create passion, and generate ideas for building something new. Every colour-coded pipeline route, and every power plant marked by a lightning bolt, was at one time “something new.” Together they make up an infrastructure suite that has been built weld by weld, mile-by-mile, year-by-year, by thousands of people, over a span of six decades. In his office in Calgary, Hal Kvisle is pointing out the huge scope and reach of the Keystone Pipeline System, North America’s newest piece of critical oil energy infrastructure and the company’s most recent feat of engineering. “Every single one of these lines represents people,” says the now-retired CEO, who steered the company through one of the biggest turnarounds in Canadian business history. He points to an under-construction area he flew over just a few weeks earlier. “And each one connects to another …” Today, we are here … and here … and here … on three different coasts and hundreds of points in between, across a continent that houses 529 million people. And our work is vital to millions of those people, though they themselves may not know it. Yet just a dozen years ago, our map looked very different and we could not have contemplated a project on the grand scale of Keystone. Looking back at what the people of TransCanada have accomplished over the past 12 years, there’s no question it’s been a dramatic transformation in a very short time. “The map is a diagram that shows where our influence is,” continues Hal. “The company is so big, and the spread of our influence is so large.” We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 1 1998 With the TransCanada-NOVA merger in July 1998, TransCanada became the major transporter of Canadian natural gas both within the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) and across the continent. “For the first time in history, the NOVA (Alberta) system would “I spent probably 40 weeks straight traveling to Boston trying to become owned and operated and managed by the same group that convince our partners to let us manage this plant,” says Alex Pourbaix, was owning and operating the Mainline,” says Dennis McConaghy, President, Energy and Oil Pipelines. “At that point going forward, Executive Vice-President, Corporate Development. we could say we were the operator of a state-of-the art power As Dick Haskayne, TransCanada Board Chair from 1998 to 2005, says: “It’s one big pipeline system, and, in the final analysis, you had to plant. It gave us instant credibility and allowed us to go after other opportunities. It was that deal that kick-started the power business.” hammer them together.” In the deregulated New England power market, the Ocean State Power plant, which TransCanada had only recently begun managing, was a key asset. Natural Gas Pipelines Power Generation Natural Gas Storage 1 Canadian Mainline (1958) 1 Ocean State Power 1 2 Great Lakes (1968–partially owned) (1990–partially owned) 3 TQM (1980–partially owned) 4 Northern Border (1982–partially owned) 5 Iroquois (1992–partially owned) 6 Tuscarora (1993–partially owned) 7 Alberta System (1998) 8 Foothills (1998–partially owned) 9 Alaska Pipeline Project (proposed) 10 Mackenzie Gas Pipeline Project (proposed by producers) Some of the partially-owned entities are not operated by TransCanada. 2 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 CrossAlta (1994–partially owned) 10 9 7 1 8 1 3 2 1 5 1 4 6 Core assets that remain part of the business today: 37,780 km (23,475 mi.) of wholly-owned natural gas pipelines 7,598 km (4,721 mi.) of partially owned natural gas pipelines 400 MW of power generation owned, controlled or in development 68 Bcf of underground natural gas storage We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 3 2004 The company saw its niche in large-scale “blue chip” infrastructure. By 2004 the power business had grown significantly through a combination of acquisitions and greenfield construction projects. “We decided that we should commit ourselves and go after the power business in a big way. And there were lots of sceptics,” says Hal Kvisle, CEO from 2001 to 2010. “So we said it shouldn’t be determined by where our pipe goes, rather it should be determined by markets that we know and that we understand really well. So the first run was Alberta, and the second one was Ontario.” In 2003 the company acquired partial ownership of Bruce Power, Canada’s first privately owned nuclear plant. “Bruce is one of the deals that really made the company,” says Alex Pourbaix, President, Energy and Oil Pipelines. “It’s a challenging business, but it’s been a very good business for us.” With few opportunities to invest capital in Canadian gas transmission, TransCanada turned its attention to connecting pipelines south of the border. The acquisition of Gas Transmission Northwest (GTN) and the North Baja system in 2004 were the first steps. Natural Gas Pipelines Power Generation Natural Gas Storage 1 Canadian Mainline (1958) 11 Portland (1999–partially owned) 1 Ocean State Power (1990) 1 2 Great Lakes (1968–partially owned) 12 GTN (2004) 2 Sundance A PPA (2000) 3 TQM (1980–partially owned) 13 North Baja (2004) 3 Redwater (2001) 4 Northern Border (1982–partially owned) + 4 Carseland (2001) 5 Iroquois (1992–partially owned) 5 Cancarb (2001) 6 Tuscarora (1993–partially owned) + 6 Sundance B PPA (2001) 7 Alberta System (1998) 7 Bruce Power (2003–partially owned) 8 Foothills (1998) 8 Bear Creek (2003) 9 Alaska Pipeline Project (proposed) 9 MacKay River (2004) 10 Mackenzie Gas Pipeline project (proposed by producers) PPA: Power Purchase Arrangement + Held in whole or in part through TC PipeLines, LP. Some of the partially-owned entities are not operated by TransCanada. 4 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 10 Grandview (2004) CrossAlta (1994–partially owned) 10 9 7 9 8 2 6 3 1 8 4 5 10 1 3 12 1 2 11 7 5 1 4 6 Core assets that remain part of the business today: 41,000 km (25,476 mi.) of wholly-owned natural gas pipelines 13 7,489 km (4,653 mi.) of partially owned natural gas pipelines 5,700 MW of power generation owned, controlled, or in development 68 Bcf of underground natural gas storage We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 5 2007 After the acquisition of the ANR pipeline system in 2007, TransCanada was no longer a “one-basin” company. Overnight, the acquisition added close to 17,000 km (10,500 mi.) of pipeline to the system. This encompassed two large-diameter, highcapacity natural gas pipelines from the south to the Detroit-Chicago area and a web of delivery lines serving Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Illinois, and Indiana. At the same time, the addition of ANR’s gas storage capacity made “Cartier was our stepping stone into wind power,” says Corey Goulet, TransCanada one of the largest gas storage providers on the continent. who led the technical development and implementation. “And Storage is an essential element associated with natural gas transportation. It provides a means to put gas into a temporary “warehouse” during periods of low demand when it’s not needed, Bécancour was an important stepping stone for building large gas fired power plants. It was the first two-on-one combined cycle plant we built, and it was important that we did it well.” and then pull it out during periods of high demand when it is. By 2007, TransCanada’s power business had also diversified through the acquisition of a run-of-river hydro system in New England, the construction of its first large gas-fired power plant at Bécancour, and the construction of its first wind farm in Québec. Natural Gas Pipelines Power Generation Natural Gas Storage 1 Canadian Mainline (1958) 11 Portland (1999–partially owned) 1 Ocean State Power (1990) 1 CrossAlta (1994–partially owned) 2 Great Lakes (1968) + 12 GTN (2004) 2 Sundance A PPA (2000) 2 Edson (2007) 3 TQM (1980–partially owned) 13 North Baja (2004) 3 Redwater (2001) 3 ANR Gas Storage (2007) 4 Northern Border (1982–partially owned) + 14 Tamazunchale (2006) 4 Carseland (2001) 5 Iroquois (1992–partially owned) 15 ANR (2007) 5 Cancarb (2001) 6 Tuscarora (1993) + 6 Sundance B PPA (2001) 7 Alberta System (1998) 7 Bruce Power (2003–partially owned) 8 Foothills (1998) 8 Bear Creek (2003) 9 Alaska Pipeline Project (proposed) 9 MacKay River (2004) 10 Mackenzie Gas Pipeline project (proposed by producers) 10 Grandview (2004) 11 TC Hydro (2005) 12 Sheerness PPA (2005) PPA: Power Purchase Arrangement + Held in whole or in part through TC PipeLines, LP. Some of the partially-owned entities are not operated by TransCanada. 6 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 13 Bécancour (2006) 14 Cartier Wind (2006–partially owned) 10 9 7 9 8 2 6 3 14 2 1 12 8 4 5 10 1 13 3 12 1 2 11 7 4 5 11 1 3 6 15 Core assets that remain part of the business today: 59,000 km (36,661 mi.) of 15 wholly owned natural gas pipelines 13 7,857 km (4,882 mi.) of partially owned natural gas pipelines 7,700 MW of power generation owned, controlled or in development 360 Bcf of underground natural gas storage 14 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 7 2010 With the construction of Keystone Pipeline, TransCanada has built one of the largest oil delivery systems in North America. Oil from Alberta first reached refineries in Wood River and Patoka, Illinois, via Keystone Pipeline in June 2010. “If you look at the Midwest, they can’t get oil from supertankers— Another example, Portlands Energy Centre (PEC), was one of there’s no tidewater port in Nebraska,” says Robert Jones, Vice- Canada’s biggest infrastructure projects of 2008–09. “On the Toronto President, Keystone Pipelines. “So when you look at the refiners waterfront, there’s an old coal-fired power plant that was the R.L. that we’re supplying in the U.S. Midwest at Wood River and Patoka, Hearn generating station built in the 50s, and shut down in the early and the growing Western Canadian production of crude oil, mainly 80s. We thought it would be an ideal site to build a new gas-fired from the oil sands, it’s a natural marriage.” power plant, because of the centralized location, the fact that the Growth in the power business has continued in a stepwise fashion through both new construction and acquisition. electrical infrastructure was there, combined with access to cooling water and supply,” says Finn Greflund, Vice-President, Power Generation and Development. “Several attempts were made to launch “We’ve almost followed the recipe book for that perfectly,” says a generation project at the Hearn site. I worked on it for probably Hal Kvisle, retired CEO. “It’s a perfect example of organic growth. 20 years before PEC came to fruition.” We started out building $40 million projects, then $100 million projects, then $500 million projects, and now the Bruce re-build is a $2 billion project.” Natural Gas Pipelines Power Generation 1 Canadian Mainline (1958) 11 Portland (1999–partially owned) 1 Ocean State Power (1990) 2 Great Lakes (1968) + 12 GTN (2004) 2 Sundance A PPA (2000) 15 Portlands Energy Centre (2008–partially owned) 3 TQM (1980–partially owned) 13 North Baja (2004) + 3 Redwater (2001) 16 Ravenswood (2008) 4 Northern Border (1982–partially owned) Carseland (2001) 17 Kibby Wind (2009) Cancarb (2001) 18 Halton Hills (under construction) Sundance B PPA (2001) 19 Coolidge (under construction) Oakville (in development) 5 Iroquois (1992–partially owned) 6 Tuscarora (1993) + + 14 Tamazunchale (2006) 15 ANR (2007) 16 Guadalajara (under construction) 4 5 6 7 Alberta System (1998) 17 Bison (under construction) 7 Bruce Power (2003–partially owned) 20 8 Foothills (1998) Bear Creek (2003) Natural Gas Storage Alaska Pipeline Project (proposed) 18 Groundbirch (under construction) 19 Horn River (in development) 8 9 9 MacKay River (2004) 10 Mackenzie Gas Pipeline project (proposed by producers) Keystone Pipeline Project (2010) PPA: Power Purchase Arrangement A B + C Keystone Expansion (proposed project) Held in whole or in part through TC PipeLines, LP. Some of the partially-owned entities are not operated by TransCanada. 8 Oil Pipelines Keystone Extension (under construction) We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 1 CrossAlta (1994–partially owned) 10 Grandview (2004) 2 Edson (2007) 11 TC Hydro (2005) 3 ANR Gas Storage (2007) 12 Sheerness PPA (2005) 13 Bécancour (2006) 14 Cartier Wind (2006–partially owned) 10 9 19 7 18 9 8 2 6 3 14 2 1 12 8 4 5 10 1 12 17 1 2 A 11 7 18 20 17 C 13 3 4 3 15 5 11 1 16 6 15 A Assets today: B More than 60,000 km (37,500 C mi.) of wholly owned natural gas 15 pipelines 8,800 km (5,468 mi.) of partially 13 19 owned natural gas pipelines 3,500 km (2,174 mi.) of crude oil pipeline in operation and a proposed expansion of 2,700 km (1678 mi.) 11,700 MW of power generation owned, controlled or in development 380 Bcf of underground natural gas storage 14 16 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 9 finding our way The first decade of the 21st century transformed TransCanada from a “one-basin” pipeline company to a major energy infrastructure provider on the continent. Today, millions of North Americans rely on us for the energy that fuels their homes and businesses. The build-out of our assets looks clean, logical and obvious when laid out in a series of maps. But real life is never that neat and the story could have gone a different way. “There were people who thought we should just be a gas pipeline company,” recalls retired CEO Hal Kvisle. “And if we didn’t have gas pipeline projects to invest in, we should just pay all the money to shareholders. Notably, the people that are here on the executive team today did not agree with that and we had greater ambition.” The leadership team envisioned a company that would play a major role in delivering energy to North America, not only in gas pipelines, but in other critical ways too. They also envisioned sustainability, both in the environmental sense and in the economic sense. By investing wisely, they saw that the company, its assets, and its people could grow and thrive in the short term, and also survive for the long haul, leaving a legacy for future generations. “Our vision was essentially unchanged for ten years,” says Hal. “We had a vision, and we’ve stuck to it.” In the pages of this book, you’ll find the story of that vision and the people who made it real. You’ll experience some of the defining moments of the journey and the pivotal milestones along the way. But we’re not standing still. Our journey continues to unfold. This is only the beginning. 10 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 The start of something new. 1998 merger transforms the business 1 Chapter 1 1998 merger transforms the business 11 chapter 1 1998 merger transforms the business Corporate marriage of the century? By 1998, after 40 years in business, TransCanada PipeLines (known commonly as “TCPL”) had grown into a company with assets, people and operations around the world. Across town in Calgary, NOVA Corporation, a business with an equally steeped history, had just announced plans to separate its petrochemical and natural gas lines of business. This opened the doors for the two pipeline giants to start talking. Described by the media of the day as somewhere between a marriage made in heaven and a shotgun wedding, the merger of TransCanada and NOVA created the fourth-largest gas pipeline company in North America and a stand-alone spin-off, NOVA Chemicals. Although, on paper, the arranged marriage was full of promise, each company’s way of doing things was quite different from the other, the result being a challenging time for the employees who formed “MergeCo.” January 26, 1998 George Watson (far right) then-CEO of TransCanada, and Ted Newall, then NOVA’s Vice Chairman and CEO, announced the merger agreement and answered questions at a joint press conference. The March/April issue of TransCanada’s Along the Line magazine explained the proposal for employees. George Watson, who became CEO of the merged company, called it the “deal of a lifetime.” 12 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Lat 51°N, Long 114°W: June 29, 2010 When Marilyn Carpenter sometimes along is not at work with Calgary’s scenic Bow “some of the smartest River. She’s training for and hardest working a marathon now— people I know,” she can her first. often be found running, 14 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 remembering the merger In 1998, Marilyn Carpenter was working in community and Aboriginal relations for NOVA Corporation in Calgary, a job she’d held for three years. She remembers how she felt when it was announced that her company would merge with TransCanada PipeLines: “It was an opportunity to bring together two world-class companies and make something better. The business strategy made sense.” Following the merger, Marilyn joined TransCanada’s new community and Aboriginal relations group. “We were creating something new, it was exciting,” she recalls. But it quickly became obvious that the two companies brought very different cultures through the new front door. One reporter described the two groups as “Care Bears” vs. “G.I. Joes,” a characterization that stuck, whether you agreed with it or not. The tags referred to the “softer,” people-focused culture of NOVA, and its contrast to a more business-focused, hierarchical approach from within the “old” TransCanada. “I don’t think as a worker, I truly appreciated how difficult it is to merge two companies,” remembers Marilyn. “For years, people asked ‘Which side did you come from?’” Many factors contributed to the eventual integration of the two cultures, and Marilyn recalls one example, a line rupture near the community of Brookdale, Manitoba in 2002. “It was a negative situation, but it pulled people together,” she says. “Who we were as a new company really came through. It made us focus on what’s important and move forward.” Today, no one would dispute that the merger was the right thing for both companies. Now a manager in TransCanada’s environment group in Calgary, Marilyn says, “We really did end up better.” Chapter 1 1998 merger transforms the business 15 Merger is big news When the deal became final in July 1998, it was the largest energy merger in Canadian history, and created the fourth-largest gas pipeline company in North America. On paper, the companies were equals. Both headquartered in Calgary, NOVA had a virtual monopoly on natural gas transmission in Alberta, while TransCanada’s Canadian Mainline reached from the David Lazarowych, Calgary Herald provincial boundaries across the country to Québec and southeast to the Great Lakes region. The new company married the Canadian Mainline with the NOVA Gas Transmission System (now known as the Alberta System). Projections were for $16.8 billion in annual revenue, and $100 million in savings on operating costs. The Financial Post called it a “hot stock” with the headline “Analysts like new-look TransCanada.” The reality was a little different. Both companies had embarked on 1 growth strategies, and invested heavily in international opportunities and commodity businesses, under the assumption that traditional pipeline opportunities were declining. The combined debt that the company was carrying, and the difficulties of managing smaller, far-flung assets around the world, were concerns to the still-emerging leadership team. Add to this the blending and restructuring of the workforce from the two merged companies, and almost anyone who went through that time remembers it as tumultuous and uncertain. 16 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 “RED LETTER DAY” in downtown Calgary shareholders, in keeping On June 30, 1998, are George Watson, with the spartan fashion shareholders of then CEO (top left), for which the company both companies and Gerald Maier, is known, were treated overwhelmingly outgoing Board Chair to coffee, pastries and approved the (1), who later received ceremonial pens.” TransCanada-NOVA a standing ovation merger. Addressing in acknowledgment 400 TransCanada of his leadership. The shareholders at the Calgary Herald reported Westin Hotel ballroom that “TransCanada “In the realm of possible partners, NOVA was like beachfront property to TransCanada. How often does beachfront property like that come up for sale? So it certainly looked to be a very good fit for TransCanada, and a great opportunity.” David Lazarowych, Calgary Herald —Bob Reid, then-president of TransCanada Gas pipelines, now head of the Aboriginal Pipeline Group At the Calgary counterparts that same reported that “After Convention Centre, day. Before the vote, the meeting, NOVA 500 NOVA shareholders Calgarians Wendy shareholders—some with gathered to cast their Walker (left) and Peggy tears in their eyes—filed ballots—just a few Ward sang O Canada out of the meeting hall blocks away from to the beat of a native to the calming strains of their TransCanada drum. The Calgary Herald a Bach concerto.” By the numbers – At December 31, 1998 Book value of combined assets: CAD$25.5 billion Revenues (1998): CAD$17.2 billion Debt: CAD$14.6 billion Employees: 4,700 Number of countries with TransCanada offices and assets: 15 Continents: 5 Net Income: CAD$575 million 18 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 1998 TransCanada at a glance With assets from Bogotá to Bangkok, and business consulting toeholds from Moscow to Montreal, this map of the combined TransCanada-NOVA ventures from the company’s first postmerger annual report is a busy one. Both organizations had pursued aggressive growth as global “energy services” companies. Chapter 1 1998 merger transforms the business 19 “There is still a great deal of work ahead of us to make this merger the success it has every potential to be. For the moment, though, I invite you to savour the accomplishment of merging these great companies.” —THen-CEO GEORGE WATSON in a memo to all employees July 6, 1998, the first business day after the merger Stock exchange Each TransCanada common TransCanada shares Each NOVA share was share yielded one “new” outstanding in July 1998: exchanged for 0.52 of a TransCanada share + 0.2 of 459.1 million. (At end of “new” TransCanada share a NOVA Chemicals Corp. Q1 2010:687.1 million.) valued at C$26.95. common share valued at C$27.85. 20 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 1 2 3 “It was a lot of change, people worrying about their jobs, will they have a job, or will the job they have be a good one, new co-workers, new bosses. That puts stress on people.” Memories of NOVA: Husband and wife employees John McIntyre and Rhonda Trundle (1) outside the former Calgary head office. Kelvin —Steve Emond, then-co-director, sales and service Davies (2) on the site “My own memory was coming out of the NOVA building, and there was a big sign in the front, ‘NOVA Corporation,’ and it was kind of ironic, because the day I was walking out with my last armful of things, and feeling kind of sad, they were taking the sign down, and it was very emotional, there were a couple of tears… People just loved that company, but what is a company? It’s the people.” —Wendy Hanrahan, then-Director, Transmission Accounting of a compressor station construction project in Turner Valley, Alberta. Marj Johnson and Sue Pruliere (3) outside the former NOVA building in downtown Sarnia, Ontario. All photos from NOVA’s 40th anniversary “The immediate post-merger period was—for me—a time when I was very cautious as a leader. I felt like I was walking on eggshells a lot of the time, trying to do my job while being sensitive to the cultural differences, one of which was the differences in people’s expectations for leadership.” commemorative publication, 1993. —Max Feldman, then-vice-president, business operations and transportation marketing “I was a member of the so-called “culture club.” Through a defined process, we held focus groups where we explored the culture of the two organizations, and through that, we were able to really delve into the differences between the two organizations.” —Corey Goulet, then-leader of the Songo Songo project Chapter 1 1998 merger transforms the business 21 CHAPTER 1 Where we’ve been 1998 merger transforms the business July 1957 June 1998 April 1999 First gas flowed on Alberta system Merger approved by shareholders First AGM of the new TransCanada With about 190 km (120 mi.) of Shareholders of TransCanada PipeLines Company reported disappointing pipeline, the system was built and and NOVA Corporation overwhelmingly post-merger results. operated by The Alberta Gas Trunk approved the $14-billion deal; NOVA Line Company, which later became Chemicals spun off as separate entity. NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. April 1999 New brand and logo July 1998 TransCanada retired its old OctOBER 1958 New shares start trading “hamburger” logo and introduced Last weld on TransCanada’s Common shares of the new its new “one-company” brand. Canadian Mainline TransCanada began trading under 3,500 km (2,190 mi.) of pipe, stretching the symbol TRP. Vision was to be July 1999 from the Alberta-Saskatchewan border “the pre-eminent provider of high Doug Baldwin appointed to Toronto and Montreal. value-added integrated energy interim CEO solutions, worldwide.” One year after merger, share price JanUARY 1998 was down almost 40%; CEO George Merger announced Watson departed and the Board TransCanada-NOVA union tagged appointed Doug Baldwin to lead as “marriage made in heaven”; the floundering company. it’s the largest non-financial merger in Canadian history. “This was a huge integration, there were merger teams set up to try to figure out how to do it. It was structured as a merger of equals, and that’s got its own unique challenges, because there’s confusion about who’s really the boss.” —Garnet Scaman, Canadian pipeline operations 22 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Fix and focus. Birth of a new strategy 2 Chapter 2 Birth of a new strategy 23 chapter 2 Birth of a new strategy New leaders, new plan, tough choices, good timing. A year after the TransCanada–NOVA merger, the company was not performing as expected and was faltering on many fronts. A new direction was clearly needed. In July 1999, retired Imperial Oil executive Doug Baldwin was appointed Chief Executive Officer, with a mandate to “fix and focus.” He and his leadership team saw no option but to divest the company’s international, gas marketing, and non-core assets. They made the difficult decision to reduce TransCanada’s dividend payments as an additional austerity measure. With these steps, the company slowly emerged from troubled waters. In 2001, Doug retired (again) and passed the reins to Hal Kvisle, who held the post of CEO for nine years. Doug Baldwin, CEO 1999–2001 Doug recalls the company had “an awful lot of moving parts and we really didn’t understand the pieces very well. We had investments in Argentina, in Chile, in the North Sea; we had a liquids extraction plant in Louisiana; we had the midstream extraction facilities in Alberta. We needed to understand what all these assets were contributing to the bottom line.” 24 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Chapter 2 Birth of a new strategy 25 April 5, 2000 Russ Girling (left) and Doug Baldwin, explain the new strategy to shareholders at the company’s annual general meeting. 26 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Taking the hard road “We were in pretty dire trouble,” recalls Russ Girling, who, in 1999, was TransCanada’s newly appointed Chief Financial Officer. Earnings were down, the stock price was falling, growth areas of the business were heavily funded with debt. “We needed to do something.” After several months of analysis and debate among the leadership team, Doug Baldwin, interim CEO, announced the company’s new “fix and focus” strategy. Many employees were disappointed, but not surprised, by the plan. The company would scale back, sell non-core assets, and focus on its strongest North American businesses. “Given our core business was pipelines, we kept that, and we kept our fledgling power business, because it was very profitable at the time,” explains Russ. “That was the core, which we thought we could build around.” At the same time, Doug announced the news that the company’s prized dividend would be reduced almost 30% from $1.12 to $0.80 per share. A month or so later, Doug and Russ took a winter road trip to meet with the company’s biggest investors, explain the new strategy, and defend the unpopular dividend cut. “We were actually escorted out of one office,” remembers Doug more than a decade later. “It was tough going, but we explained we felt it was our last resort,” says Russ. “We took heat from the rating agencies, and were called names on blogs and websites. We needed to build their confidence back that we were doing the right thing, and that this was for the betterment of the company in the long run.” Looking back, Dick Haskayne, who was Board Chair at the time, offers perspective: “I’ve never taken so much personal flack over anything in my career,” he says. “But it was absolutely the right thing to do.” Dick Haskayne Chapter 2 Birth of a new strategy 27 “I remember meeting as a management team, and debating what we were going to recommend to the Board: Are we going to sell international or are we going to sell midstream? It was actually Sarah [Raiss] who said, ‘I think we’d better sell them all.’” —Doug Baldwin, CEO, 1999-2001 DIVESTITURE PLAN “I was hired in 1999 to run TransCanada’s non-regulated businesses,” As for the timing, TransCanada recalls Hal Kvisle. “Within three months we knew that most of what “hit the wall” about 18 months I was hired to run had to be sold.” before the giant American energy “There really were no options,” recalls Russ Girling. “It’s the same as anybody who gets themselves into too much debt. You cut up your credit cards and you stop going out for dinner every night. Hopefully you still have a job. In our case, we still had our regulated businesses—which were throwing off cash—so we could keep the lights on and pay the bills. But we had to sell off all the extra houses and cars and pay down our credit cards. company Enron filed for bankruptcy in December 2001, causing crisis and financial hardship both inside the industry and out. In fact, Russ recalls the terms of the sale of TransCanada’s gas trading and marketing business being finalized in the wee hours of a Sunday night, just days before the “It was rough, but we had to decide what businesses we were going Enron accounting fraud scandal became to keep, and which ones we were going to sell. I think we sold some public on a now-infamous Thursday things that we didn’t want to sell, but we had no choice, because in October. it was imperative that we get our financial flexibility back. We never want to be in that position ever, ever again.” “We were in the marketplace selling assets when everybody else was still in the euphoria,” says Russ. “It was a heady time—you could Before succeeding Doug as CEO, Hal helped manage the asset sale borrow more money than the company was worth. But we stayed process throughout 2000 and 2001. “It was actually something that away from that, which allowed us to get through this last global I’d done a lot of in my career. There were people around me saying financial crisis unscathed.” ‘that’s the wrong way to do it,’ but I knew, because I’d done it before. And we got it done. So that was a defining moment for me. That’s where we saved the company in many ways from getting taken over by somebody else.” “When you hit the wall, there is only one way to turn.” —Russ Girling, then-CFO 28 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Hal Kvisle 1 2 “From an employee’s perspective it was very emotional,” remembers “We were in a bunch of businesses that we thought could carry Jill Gilhuly of Human Resources (1). “We had all these people in a lot of debt, but it became clear that was not the case,” says Don the assets we were selling off. How do you decide who stays and Marchand (2), who was Treasurer in 1999 and is Chief Financial who goes? Nobody’s job was guaranteed and we wanted it to be Officer today. “Though we felt vulnerable to a takeover at that time, fair—why should somebody who works in corporate be chosen over the value was there if we could just get our financial house back in somebody who works in international? We had three weeks to put order. The financing plan that was put together was credible and together a plan. We called it ‘resourcing during divestiture.’ Those supported by rating agencies. Even through the turbulence, we didn’t of us on the design team had to stand up and explain this to groups lose our ‘A’ grade credit. Our plan was well-crafted, well-executed, of employees—you could feel the anger and the emotion.” and we were very fortunate on timing.” “You’ve already got a merger that hasn’t gelled, you’re now having to divest, and you’re having to downsize. So you can imagine the pain of all these people—they don’t know what’s happening, they see all the politics going on, it’s a scary time for them.” —Sarah Raiss, Executive Vice-President, Corporate Services Chapter 2 Birth of a new strategy 29 “For a man without a map, any path will do, because he really doesn’t have a destination in mind. Operational Excellence gave us a map.” —Steve Schock, VICE-PRESIDENT, PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMPETITION DRIVES EFFICIENCY “At the time you had two large utility-type companies, with limited “It became a way of rallying and improving just about every aspect of competition, and efficiency maybe wasn’t their forte,” says Jim Baggs, what we do,” says Jim. “We would be more efficient, more effective, who was then-Manager of Maintenance Practices and Procedures. and improve safety.” “When the merger was announced, we said we would save a hundred million dollars in operating costs. That was one of the reasons why shippers would actually approve it.” To cite but a few examples: gas control was centralized from eight locations down to one; a new approach to field maintenance enabled the company to work through a single contractor rather than dealing By 2000, the leadership team realized that gas volume and workload directly with 1,500 different subcontractors; new emissions-tracking reductions required downsizing of at least 50% of the field workforce technology was introduced; and online electronic billing was made across Canada, recalls Jim, now Vice-President, Operations and available for pipeline customers. Engineering. “And that was probably the most stressful thing that I had to go through. My emotions were in rough shape because I knew a lot of these people.” It was Doug Baldwin who began the mantra of “operational The drive for operational excellence brought a new level of discipline and helped the company grow revenues faster than expenses. By the end of 2003, the company had annual cash flow of $1.8 billion and was poised for new growth opportunities. excellence” that same year. Customers had increasing choices and TransCanada could not afford to deliver anything but “low-cost, reliable, hassle-free, and responsive service.” 1 (1) The 2000 annual report was symbolically pared down. The “Better, faster, cheaper” tagline proved memorable and remains part of TransCanada’s lexicon today. (2) 2004 saw the launch of “OE2”—the Operational Excellence in Operations and Engineering Project. This OE2 cube puzzle promoted the project’s goals to employees. 30 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 2 Chapter 2 Birth of a new strategy 31 CHAPTER 2 Where We’ve Been Birth of a new strategy April 2001 July 1999 July 2000 Doug Baldwin New vision Better, faster, cheaper Appointed interim CEO. TransCanada stated its vision to be 2000 annual report featured the tagline “the most extraordinary turnaround “better, faster, cheaper” and significantly DecEMBER 1999 story in Canadian history” by 2005. Quarterly dividend was raised by 12.5%. New strategy approved, dividend cut restored and strengthened financials. AugUST 2000 Strategy of refocusing on core Power asset acquisition June 2001 Financial performance recognized pipeline and power businesses Sundance A Power Purchase approved by the Board. TransCanada Arrangement (PPA) acquired Barron’s Top 25 Financial Rankings cut its dividend by almost 30% and (560 MW). included TransCanada at No. 21 out of 500 companies based on financial announced plans to sell non-core assets including international and DecEMBER 2000 midstream businesses. Divestiture program well underway FebRUARY 2000 more than $2 billion of assets, Final exit from gas marketing Share price declines including $1 billion in midstream, and Natural gas marketing and trading international assets in Tanzania, the business sold. By year-end, the company had sold Share price reached low of $9.80. performance. OctOBER 2001 Netherlands, Mexico and Venezuela. March 2000 New focus on operational excellence Total projected sales for all divestitures estimated at $3.45 billion. NovEMBER 2001 Roadshow promotes strategies Hal Kvisle embarked on first media “Operational Excellence” first explained in the Source employee magazine. March 2001 and investor relations tour to share the For some, it was a painful cost-reduction Hal Kvisle company’s key strategies for growth. and restructuring exercise. Named President and CEO. “TransCanada is a company that always has some big challenges and big opportunities in front of it. There’s never been a dull moment.” —Steve Pohlod, Commercial East, Canadian pipelines 32 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 At the helm. Leaders and leadership 3 Chapter 3 Leaders and leadership 33 chapter 3 Leaders and leadership Setting direction. Staying the course. Doing the right thing. When Russ Girling took the post of Chief Executive Officer in July TransCanada’s extended leadership team now numbers more 2010, he became the third in a line of TransCanada CEOs working than 600 people. They guide a workforce of over 4,200 (plus towards a single vision. hundreds of contractors), many dispersed in remote locations across Russ will further the work Hal Kvisle started in 2001. Hal, in turn, continued the work that Doug Baldwin began in 1999. Together the three men have presided over a remarkable turnaround that the Calgary Herald has called “an era of rebirth, redirection and growth.” the continent. “The company is so big and we do it all with so few people,” reflects Hal. “I don’t know any other company that has $45 billion of assets and only 4,200 people. So the people that you have need to be really good; they’re each responsible for a very large asset value. They tend to be very resilient, self-sufficient and capable people.” But leadership is not just about the top job. TransCanada’s success story would not have been possible without the commitment of leaders at all levels of the company—from the Board of Directors, to the executive team, to those on the front lines. LAT 51°N, LONG 114°W: April 30, 2010 Russ Girling and Hal Kvisle have worked closely with each other for more than a decade. Here, they share the stage at the final annual general meeting of Hal’s tenure as CEO. 34 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 LAT 52°N, LONG 113°W: Hal Kvisle, 2008 “I did not grow up in a hard, and get the best wealthy family, but my job experience you can. parents were committed That advice came from to higher education for an older friend, an all their children. I was engineer in the oil fortunate to get some refining business, and it’s good advice—go to perhaps the best advice engineering school, work I’ve ever received.” 36 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 REFLECTIONS OF A CEO He’s fascinated by maps of all kinds, and keeps many pipeline schematics of North America handy. He’s covered almost every inch of Alberta in a car, and knows the TransCanada system like the back of his hand. He’s criss-crossed the continent countless times visiting TransCanada’s construction sites and facilities, and talking with the people on the ground. In his office, he’s got a sample piece of 42-inch pipe with an experimental half-inch fibreglass wrap on the outside. Once an engineer, always an engineer. His ability to understand, explain, and discuss the technical details is renowned; as is his remarkable talent for communicating and relating to people of all walks of life. Hal Kvisle has said he hopes to be remembered for just two things: the right strategy and good decision-making. “The really pivotal moments that I would reflect back on are where we made very conscious, thorough, and high-quality decisions,” he said, shortly before his retirement from the CEO post at the end of June 2010. “I’m a bit obsessive about doing what it takes to make sure that the organization makes the right decision on very difficult, complicated matters. One wrong decision made at three o’clock on a Thursday afternoon can cost the company billions of dollars.” On the strategy point, he says he’s proud of the “resolve, tenacity, and courage” TransCanada’s leadership has shown over the past ten years. “We went from a company where a big investment program was $600 million a year to a company that’s capable of investing $6 billion a year, and doing it wisely and getting a good result. This is tough, tough stuff.” What have been the hardest decisions he’s faced? He cites the decision to get out of gas marketing in 2001, several reorganizations and “people” decisions, and staying the course in the face of external criticism. “When you’ve run the numbers and figured it out, but the stock market doesn’t believe you, the credit agencies want to downgrade your debt, or the people in the newspapers are writing stories saying that TransCanada has gone crazy…that’s when it’s tough being the CEO. Over the past three years, we’ve been criticized externally, we’ve been questioned by our Board. We’ve agonized over whether we are doing the right thing by going after the full Keystone project. If this had been a $12 billion oil sands development project, I would have said no, we can’t manage this. But this is $12 billion of putting pipe in the ground— and the people in this company know how to do that better than anyone in the world. So we did it.” Chapter 3 Leaders and leadership 37 REFLECTIONS ON HAL AS CEO “If you walked into a diner in small-town Alberta, you would think he was a local. You would never guess that he was the CEO of a major corporation, because he’s so unassuming and low-key.” —JANNA LABERGE, Hal’s executive assistant of eleven years “A great role model for a young engineer like me.” —JESSE BAJNOK, Keystone Pipeline, Houston “He is the best communicator I have ever known.” —SARAH RAISS, EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT, Corporate Services Janna Laberge 2010 “He has an unbelievable ability to listen and talk to and reach agreements with other people. He’s a superb dealmaker, strategist. That’s what I admire. And he’s a very nice man.” —DOUG BALDWIN, Hal’s predecessor as CEO “He has made this a company I am truly proud to be a part of every day.” —CHARLEEN PARCHEWSKY, Treasury, Calgary “He focused on the health and safety of all our staff without hesitation. The ability to assure the public on our environmental commitment was never compromised.” —THOMAS McLEAN, Energy Project Implementation, Arizona 38 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 HAL KVISLE – BY THE NUMBERS Born: October 20, 1952, Innisfail, Alberta University degrees: 2 (B.Eng and MBA) Years in the energy business: 35 On retirement: Hal says he is looking forward Years with TransCanada: 11 to fixing fences on his ranch, and “changing Years as CEO: 9 (starting in 2001) tracks,” to quote Company’s net income in his first year as CEO: one of his favourite $670 million artists, Canadian country bluesman In 2009: $1.374 billion Fred Eaglesmith. Increase in TRP share price during years as CEO: 94% (from $18.40 to $35.61) Personal leadership and management awards: 6 (including Canada’s CEO of the Year in 2008) Board positions held as of July 2010: 4 (3 corporate and 1 not-for-profit) Retired: June 30, 2010 “He is as comfortable pounding fence posts and dealing with the guy driving the tractor as he is dealing with the Prime Minister of Canada.” —BARRY JACKSON, chairman of the board “Hal was a leader from the start because of the way he acts. A lot of leaders lose track of their base, but Hal really hasn’t changed.” —DICK HASKAYNE, past board CHAIR Corey Goulet explains to Hal how the industrial gas turbines work at Bécancour, 2005. Chapter 3 Leaders and leadership 39 Back in the day... July 1998: Energy Transmission Leadership Team Upon its formation, the They envisioned an Back row (left to right): Front row: Bruce Transmission Leadership efficient organization John Walker, Brian McNaught, Janet Love, Team declared that they that would “blend the McNulty, Greg Fisher, Shelagh Ricketts, Eric would meet the market best from our corporate Ron Turner, Paul Jeffrey, Shelton, Max Feldman. realities of continental legacies and styles.” Bob Reid, Barbara Tate, competition and con tinuous change in the industry “head on.” John Carruthers. 2001: Executive leadership team •Al Bellstedt (1), Executive Vice-President (EVP), Law and General Counsel. Al retired in 2007. •Alex Pourbaix (2), then-EVP, Power Development—one of the initial proponents of developing a substantial power business, Alex 3 2 continues to play a key role on today’s Executive Leadership Team (ELT), as President, Energy and Oil Pipelines. •Sarah Raiss (3), EVP, Corporate Services—recruited in 1999 as a merger integration specialist, Sarah’s role was expanded in 2001. 1 •Russ Girling (4), then-EVP and Chief Financial Officer—after 16 years with the company, Russ was named CEO in 2010. •Hal Kvisle (5)—shown here shortly after he became CEO in May 2001. •Ron Turner (6), then-EVP, Operations and Engineering—known for his work in the international pipeline business at TransCanada prior to its divestiture, Ron retired in 2006. •Dennis McConaghy (7), then-EVP, Gas Development—part of the original team who determined how to refocus the company in 1999, Dennis remains on the ELT, leading the development of major pipe and power infrastructure initiatives. 4 5 6 7 June 1998: Merger Transition Working Team Their task: to help and then to communicate develop the transition that across the organiza- process for the pipeline tion,” recalls Russ Hantho, business, as its various who led the team. components were integrated into a single new energy transmission business unit post-merger. The team was composed of a cross-section of people from both NOVA and TransCanada. “On the part of the whole team, there was open- Back row (left to right): Fred Jacques, Bill Ediger, Russ Hantho, Lynn Sveinson, Doug Goodwin, Shelagh Ricketts, Terry Clarke, Charles Vermeeren, Allan Amey, Steve Emond and Dave McClenaghan. mindedness, a willingness Front row: Alex Wile, to listen and learn from Marie Robinson, Rick each other, and really Schmidt, Gerry Gibson, take the best forward, Carolyn Craig and Art Smith. Chapter 3 Leaders and leadership 41 A seat at the table Hal Kvisle, former CEO, on leadership “We’ve given our leaders permission to be visionary, but we also insist that we be respectful of diligent, detailed work, hard, factual knowledge, and expertise. How do you know all these things that your competitors don’t know? You do it by people doing a lot of detailed work and having conversations within TransCanada, that I think generally are at a higher and more sophisticated level than what goes on industry-wide.” LAT 44°N, LONG 97°W: June 22, 2010 Some of TransCanada’s extended Back table (left to right): leadership team gathered for an offsite Wendy Hanrahan, Vice-President, session in downtown Calgary. Human Resources; Paul Miller, Vice- Left table (left to right): Karl Johannson, Senior Vice-President, Canadian Power; Lee Hobbs, Senior Vice-President and General Manager, U.S. Pipelines; Steve Schock, VicePresident, Project Management; Max Feldman, Senior Vice-President, President, Oil Pipelines; David Moneta, Vice-President, Investor Relations and Communications; Steve Clark, Vice-President, Commercial West, Canadian and Eastern U.S. Pipelines; Gary Charette, Vice-President, U.S. Pipelines Commercial Operations. Canadian and Eastern U.S. Pipelines; Right table (left to right): Kristine Delkus, Deputy General Terry Bennett, Vice-President, Power Counsel, Pipelines and Regulatory Development; Vern Meier, Vice- Affairs; Jim Baggs, Vice-President, President, U.S. Pipelines Field Operations and Engineering. Operations; Rick Coutts, Vice-President, Information Services; Brandon Anderson, Vice-President, Gas Storage; Rick Gateman, Vice-President, Northern Development; Steve Pohlod, Vice-President, Commercial East, Canadian Pipelines. 42 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 “I think it’s one of the best leadership teams around; certainly at the top end of the spectrum of talent and capability. And it goes quite deep in the organization—the knowledge base and capability is just outstanding… . When you have a management team with this kind of capability, it makes it very easy for the Board.” —Barry Jackson, board chair Chapter 3 Leaders and leadership 43 LIVING OUR VALUES Dick Haskayne, past Board Chair, on integrity “When you leave this planet, the only thing you leave behind, or take with you, depending on how you measure it, is your reputation, and if you mess that up, it’s awfully hard to get back. So therefore, if your objective is to make a lot of money, that’s fine, but do it in some ethical way.” Max Feldman, Senior Vice-President, Canadian and Eastern U.S. Pipelines, on integrity “We need buy-in from many of our customers to be successful in achieving our own goals. We’ve got to recognize that for them to understand and support us they need a lot of information, they need to hear the straight goods from us, and they need to understand it.” Dick Haskayne and Rhondda Grant, Vice-President and Corporate Secretary, at the AGM 2000. “The people who live and breathe these values, they will rise to the top, they will be the leaders of this organization.” —Russ Girling, CEO 44 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 “The people at the top of the company inspire other leaders to model the same kind of behaviour.” —KIM McGILLIVRAY, Human Resources, leadership program developer and facilitator Don Wishart (1), Executive Vice-President, Operations and Major Projects, on responsibility “We serve millions of people in terms of providing them with the electricity and with the natural gas they need to live a comfortable and safe life. We take the responsibility very seriously. It’s our job.” 1 2 Lee Hobbs, Senior Vice-President and General Manager, U.S. Pipelines, on responsibility “When you’re in something for the long-term you act in a way that says ‘I’m here for a long time and I have to live in this community, I have to live with what I say, I have to live with what I do.’” Sean McMaster (2), Executive Vice-President, Corporate and General Counsel, on collaboration “I’m continuously amazed at when there’s an issue or a problem, all you have to do is ask a few people and there’s such a great depth of knowledge and talent in the company that somebody’s got an answer to just about anything.” Hal Kvisle, former CEO, on innovation “We lead the industry in terms of buying steel pipe, we lead the industry in terms of the welding technology. How do you weld pipes together out in the field using automatic computer-controlled welding? TransCanada and the welding machine companies and the pipe suppliers jointly developed all that stuff over the past 25 years. The only constant you find in leading-edge pipeline technology is TransCanada.” Sarah Raiss (3), Executive Vice-President, Corporate Services, on collaboration “I’ve worked with, and for, a lot of companies in my career, and the level of collaboration you get here is unique. It’s what sets us apart.” 3 CHAPTER 3 Where we’ve been Leaders and leadership July 2009 July 1999 November 2003 Doug Baldwin Sarah Raiss Russ Girling Appointed interim CEO. Named to Canada’s most powerful Appointed Chief Operating Officer. March 2001 Network and the Richard Ivey School of December 2009 Hal Kvisle Business; she was subsequently named to Sean McMaster Named as new President and CEO. the list four more times. Sarah received Received appointment to Alberta this recognition during her tenure as Queens Counsel. The award recognizes women list by Women’s Executive September 2001 EVP Corporate Services. Board of Directors members of the Alberta bar for outstanding expertise, work and Named one of the top 25 boards in February 2005 Canada by Canadian Business Magazine Barry Jackson (2001–2003) under leadership of Announced as TransCanada Board Chair. contributions in public life. May 2010 Hal Kvisle Dick Haskayne. September 2008 Received Distinguished Business Leader Hal Kvisle Award from Haskayne School of Business Alex Pourbaix Received Canada’s Outstanding CEO and Calgary Chamber of Commerce. Named one of Canada’s Top 40 Under 40 of the Year award. April 2002 July 2010 by the Globe and Mail (Alex was then in the role of Executive Vice-President November 2008 Hal Kvisle retires (EVP), Power Development. Russ Girling Russ Girling appointed President Received Management Alumni and CEO; also appointed to the Board Excellence Award from the University of Directors. of Calgary’s Haskayne School of Business. “It’s a company that has a can-do attitude, looks at challenges and works together and pulls together to meet those challenges.” —Brian Blair, Mackenzie development 46 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Roots and branches. The evolving Canadian pipeline business 4 CHAPTER 4 The evolving Canadian pipeline business 47 chapter 4 The evolving Canadian pipeline business Celebrating 50 years. Expanding the Alberta System. Tapping into shale gas. It was once dubbed a “sleepy pipeline business” by local and national media. But today, it’s far from that. More than 50 years since it started operating, TransCanada’s Canadian natural gas pipeline business continues to evolve and remains a critical part of the North American pipeline network. In the 90s, a large amount of capital was spent on both the Canadian Mainline and the Alberta System, as expansions to both systems occurred to meet market demand. More recently, TransCanada expanded the Alberta System with its North Central Corridor project. As well, recent changes in both jurisdiction and technology make shale gas supplies in British Columbia and Alberta very promising. TransCanada will be right there with two new pipeline projects in the works. Lat 49°N, Long 82°W: October 10, 1958 The building of the original Canadian Mainline changed the face of Canada in many ways, bringing gas to the East and providing economic and other benefits to hundreds of communities across the country. Pictured here is the “last weld” that marked the completion of the original pipeline at Kapuskasing, Ontario, in 1958. 48 We Are Here The Transcanada Journey 1998–2010 CHAPTER 4 The evolving Canadian pipeline business 49 Lat 51°N, Long 114°W: June 18, 2010 Thirty years ago, Kay later that man had a Coad left her job as a new job at TransCanada. small-town lifeguard, Three decades on, Kay and was working in works in the customer TransCanada’s Calgary call centre in Calgary, a Human Resources central hub for pipeline department, when a customer calls 15 hours a man wandered in on a day, seven days a week. hot summer’s afternoon That man, Steve Emond, wondering about job is now a vice president opportunities. Kay got with the company, and his resumé into the right Kay’s senior leader. hands, and two hours 50 We Are Here The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 Listening to customers “At the end of the day, it’s about the customer, and it doesn’t hurt to remind ourselves that we would not be here if we did not have customers. It’s as simple as that.” —Kay Coad, Canadian and Eastern U.S. Pipelines, Commercial Operations “Another key thing for me, with customers and in life, is, don’t be afraid to say if you’ve messed up. Like this guy called me, and I told him I would search something out for him. The next day came, but somehow I got busy, and I completely forgot. So he calls me to find out what’s up? And I could have made an excuse, but instead, I just admitted I’d forgotten, and that I’d be on it as soon as I hung up the phone. And then he laughed, and I had an answer for him within a couple hours, and I know that builds trust. Don’t try to snow somebody. Don’t make up excuses. Take ownership, and be honest. That’s huge. Don’t be afraid to say you don’t know something either. I’d like to be a lot smarter, but a lot of times, I just don’t know, and I’m comfortable with that. My experience is that you’re not the only one that doesn’t know. But always take the time to find out and get the answers. I guess it’s the good old golden rule: What would you want if it was you on the other end of the meeting or the phone call?” What we hear An annual survey is conducted by lpsos-Reid to assess the quality of our customer relationships in our Canadian gas pipelines business. Over the past five years, results have indicated continued high performance particularly in the areas of transactional systems, call centre, and our overall customer service. Satisfaction percentages ranked between 80–98% across the three categories. These results are extraordinary and are unsurpassed within the lpsos-Reid customer base. “It’s important for us to be able to measure how well we’re meeting customers’ expectations. The survey is an excellent tool for gauging how well we’re doing,” says Steve Emond, Vice-President, System Design and Commercial Operations. “We really dig into the survey results and wherever we see areas where we may be falling short, we’ll build specific objectives into our business plans to make improvements in those areas.” CHAPTER 4 The evolving Canadian pipeline business 51 celebrating 50 years When it was completed in October 1958, it was the longest pipeline in the world. With good care and maintenance, TransCanada’s Canadian Mainline is still going strong more than 50 years later. The 50th anniversary of its completion, in 2008, was a chance to celebrate, and look back at the incredible achievement in technology and engineering. That expertise combined with human perseverance is still at work today on many TransCanada projects. The Canadian Mainline, of course, connected to the original Alberta System, which brought gas from the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin as far as the Alberta border. It started operating in 1957 with 190 km (118 mi.) of pipe in southeastern Alberta, built by the Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited. To commemorate the 50th anniversary of the completion of the Canadian Mainline, Canada Post issued a special stamp. Designed by Banff, Alberta, artist Tim Nokes, the stamp depicts a welder joining pieces of the pipeline, to represent the more than 5,000 people who worked on the historic project. The confetti-like sparks coming off the pipeline evoke another aspect of the celebration. The stamp was unveiled to almost 1,800 employees by then-CEO Hal Kvisle and second generation TransCanada employee Roger Lemieux at the Employee Forum in May 2008. The Last Weld Construction on the Canadian Mainline’s western leg began on June 17, 1956, at Burstall, Saskatchewan. Up to 5,000 men at a time persevered through rain, mud, snow and ice, to complete the project just over two years later. 52 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 “My father, Guy Lemieux, was an inspector on the site of the final weld [of the Canadian Mainline], but rain forced cancellation of a planned celebration. One of the welders had a vintage American 1881 silver coin and Dad asked him to solder it to the final weld to commemorate the event. Eventually the coin was removed and donated to the company. It now sits on display at the TransCanada Tower in Calgary.” —Roger Lemieux, Construction Services East Canadian Mainline – By the Numbers Original length of pipeline: 3,680 km (2,290 mi.) Current length: 14,101 km (8,762 mi.), longest pipeline in North America Length of Canada, from the Pacific to the Atlantic: About 5,000 km (3,100 mi.) Tons of pipe used: 655,000, carried by 25,000 railway cars Lakes and rivers crossed: Almost 200 Amount spent to build: $245 million by TransCanada and $113.5 Hal Kvisle and Roger Lemieux million by the Northern Ontario Pipe Line Crown Corporation Gas shipped on Mainline in 1959: 300 million cubic feet per day by the end of that year Year Russian pipeline surpassed Canadian Mainline as the longest in the world: 1980 Gas shipped on Mainline in 2009: 5.6 billion cubic feet per day—about the same volume of water that flows over Niagara Falls each day CHAPTER 4 The evolving Canadian pipeline business 53 1 2 3 An ounce of prevention By 2010, TransCanada had a 20% market share of all natural gas shipped in North America, and a system that linked virtually all major gas supply basins on the continent. Hundreds of workers, across vast distances in North America, ensure those complex systems operate efficiently and safely. Ongoing pipeline integrity programs and maintenance across the network have combined with significant in-house repair capabilities for big-ticket items such as TransCanada’s compressors and gas turbines, specialized welding and non-destructive testing. The safe operation of the pipelines is a credit to the professionalism, care and concern of those who watch over this system. Consider that in 2009 alone, about 1,800 Operations and Engineering employees recorded zero lost-time injuries for the second time in four years. No easy feat considering almost 3.5 million hours were worked that year. TransCanada remains among the top safety performers within its industry peer group. 4 Pipeline Maintenance is Key A “pig run” conducted is going smoothly as the in the Hearst area of pig starts its run. Many Ontario, northeast of hours later, (4) employees where corrosion may have occurred. “Smart pigs” travel through Lake Superior, in 2009. Michel Blier and Richard the pipeline collecting and analyzing data to determine if there Don Bezeau (1) sets Tessier (in white suits) are areas of concern. up for the pig launch prepare to receive the in Mattice. A team of pig out of the line in contractors (2) loads the Kapuskasing, 60 km (38 pig into the launcher. The mi.) away from where it team listens attentively started that morning. TransCanada has an extensive Pipeline Maintenance Program. In-line inspection, also called “pigging,” looks for any locations (3) to ensure everything 54 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Lat 51°N, Long 114° W: June 2010 TransCanada’s new 24/7/365, and is one control centre in Calgary of the largest pipeline monitors 43,000 kilo- control centres in metres of combined North America. gas and oil pipeline, “When you look at a field organization or a maintenance organization, it’s no different than if you took your car to get serviced at a garage. You know you have to get it serviced and you know there’s money going out the door when you’re done. And so you see it as nothing more than an expense. What we wanted to do is take that attitude and change it from being viewed as an expense to a value creation centre. Getting people to understand the business, what drives the business, and getting them to tell us where we’ll become more efficient, where we can become more productive—and rewarding them for that—has pushed us a little ahead of the competition … . And that’s the kind of organization I think anybody wants to be a part of.” —Jim Baggs, Vice-President, Operations and Engineering CHAPTER 4 The evolving Canadian pipeline business 55 North Central Corridor 1 The project experience gained in northern climates and terrains during capabilities to the Alberta-Saskatchewan border, and reduce TransCanada’s North Central Corridor project (NCC) was invaluable. fuel consumption on the entire Alberta System. The expansion has So were the results of the project, which saw a 300-kilometre (185- also positioned the company for transporting shale gas from the mile) pipeline expansion of the Alberta System in its northern section. Horn River area in a cost-effective manner. Built by TransCanada’s contractor over two winter construction seasons—2009 and 2010—the NCC is expected to meet the anticipated increase in demand from the Alberta oil sands, address growing receipt requirements in Alberta, improve delivery Along the way, TransCanada participated in a comprehensive and meaningful Aboriginal engagement effort with 14 Aboriginal communities located in the area. It led to over $36 million in Aboriginal contracting and employment over the course of the project, a significant result. Cold case It was so cold one day The project included late January 2010, there in January, 2009 that a impressive technological were over 900 people at truck thermostat at an advancements to deal two work camps, using NCC construction site with the harsh climate, more than 700 pieces of stopped working when like the use of high- equipment on-site. the temperature dipped strength pipe, advanced below -45ºC (-49ºF). welding techniques TransCanada’s NCC project required winter construction because some of the terrain was 2 in wet muskeg or in unstable soil conditions, and couldn’t have handled the weight of machinery in summer. 56 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 and low-temperature valves. Additionally, the company completed three major Horizontal (1) directional drill river crossing where pipe is strung up with cranes and then pulled through the river Directional Drills— (2) preparing the pipe including the 1,110 for welding metre (3,462 foot) crossing of the Peace River in spring 2009. At peak construction in (3) pipe stringing operation 3 CHAPTER 4 The evolving Canadian pipeline business 57 B.C. shale plays Beneath the SURFACE Shale gas formations are the result of ancient seas in North America that dried up millions of years ago, behind muddy sea beds. Heat and pressure “baked” the mud into shale rock, while decomposed aquatic life trapped underneath the rock layers turned into natural gas. Buried inside the earth’s shale rock formations, shale gas was once considered too expensive to extract in North America. Improvements in technology, including horizontal drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing, have been big breakthroughs. The potential for increased production has some analysts predicting shale and other unconventional gas sources accounting for more than half of North America’s gas supply by 2020. From a geologic perspective, the Montney and Horn River shale plays in northeast British Columbia (B.C.) stack up very favourably with their U.S. counterparts. With the emergence of shale plays, the remaining productive potential of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) has more than doubled—and potentially tripled— putting to rest the belief that the WCSB will remain in decline. In the summer of 2010, TransCanada began construction on Groundbirch, a 77 km (48 mi.) pipeline carrying gas from the Montney formation, near Dawson Creek, B.C. to a tie-in point on the Alberta System. Similarly, the Horn River project will add another 72 kilometres (45 miles) of pipeline to transport shale gas from an area north of Fort Nelson, B.C. These projects are significant capital investments that may be in play for 25 to 50 years to come. Aerial view of the Horn 40–100 trillion cubic feet River region in B.C. of recoverable shale gas Beneath the surface reserves. lies an estimated Beyond borders Technological advancements, economic incentives and royalty Groundbirch and Horn River pipelines followed soon after the changes are “changing the game” within the WCSB. TransCanada jurisdictional change. Through these pipelines, B.C.’s shale gas will and the industry will also benefit from a favourable ruling by the have direct access to the Alberta Hub, one of the most significant National Energy Board that moved the Alberta System to federal gas trading points on the continent. jurisdiction in 2009. This reduces regulatory hurdles, enabling TransCanada to cross provincial boundaries and extend pipelines into the shale plays in northeast B.C. Applications to build the 58 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Greenland North Slope Prudhoe Bay Nunavut Tapping new supplies Northwest Territories Mackenzie Pipeline network poised for the future Northwest Territories Alaska Nunavut Nunavut Anchorage Yukon Iqaluit Nunavut Northwest Territories Whitehorse Liard Juneau Labrador Yellowknife Muskwa-Besa Horn River Alberta Newfoundland Alberta British Columbia Newfoundland Saskatchewan Montney Gr Edmonton Saskatoon Victoria Tacoma Washington Bakken Oregon Boise Green River Carson City Nevada Salt Lake City Unita Mancos San Jose Wyoming Powder River Mancos Colorado San Joaquin Bakersfield Ventura Los Angeles San Diego Nebraska Permian Oklahoma City Hermosillo Shale gas basins Altar Barnett-Woodford BarnettWoodford Chihuahua Chihuahua Baja California Sur Pipelines under construction / in development La Paz 250 500 500 Bossier City Louisiana Houston Tennessee Black Warrior Culiacan 1,000 Miles 1,000 1,500 Kilometers Norfolk Columbia South Carolina Huntsville Atlanta Chattanooga Consauga Birmingham Georgia Alabama Mississippi Floyd-Neal Montgomery Jackson Mobile Tallahassee N.E. Gulf Salt Dome New Orleans Pearsall-Eagle San Antonio Ford Gulf Coast Eagle Ford Saltillo Virginia Raleigh North Carolina Charlotte Nashville Baton Rouge Austin Jacksonville Florida Orlando Tampa Miami Florida-Bahama Platform Monterrey Nuevo Leon Durango Tampico Durango Zacatecas Zacatecas 0 Barnett New York City Greensboro Sabinas Sinaloa 250 Texas Haynesville New Albany Coahuila De Zaragoza Existing pipelines 0 Dallas Fort Worth West Virginia Kentucky Arkansas Woodford Woodford-Caney Bend Lubbock Frankfort Louisville Saint Louis FayettevilleMemphis Little Rock Halifax Richmond Indiana Illinois Missouri Excello-Mulky Arkoma Tulsa Oklahoma Fort Worth El Paso Sonora Jefferson City Wichita Tucson Baja California Norte Traditional natural gas basins Excello-Mulky Horton Bluff DevonianWashington Marcellus-Utica Maryland Indianapolis Springfield Kansas City Nova Scotia Philadelphia Pennsylvania New Jersey Baltimore Illinois Lincoln Kansas Cleveland Scotia Shelf Hartford Appalachian Chicago Des Moines Omaha Denver New Mexico Mexicali Detroit Niobrara Albany Buffalo Sarnia South Dakota Piceance Colorado Springs Hermosa Paradox Pierre Lewis Santa Fe San Juan Albuquerque Arizona Anadarko Phoenix Los Angeles Antrim Iowa Denver New York Toronto Michigan Nova Scotia Charlottetown Augusta New Hampshire Concord Massachusetts Boston Providence Montpelier Vermont Michigan Wisconsin Minneapolis -Saint Paul Pierre Utah CaliforniaMcClure Las Vegas Minnesota Gammon Hilliard-Baxter Mancos Cheyenne Sacramento Monterey Bismarck Cody Big Horn Wind River Idaho Horton Bluff Ottawa North Dakota Montana Helena Fredericton Québec Maine Spokane Cordilleran Overthrust Belt Salem Utica Ontario Winnipeg Williston Lethbridge Portland Santa Maria New Brunswick Regina Seattle Sacramento San Francisco Prince Edward Island Colorado Calgary Vancouver Québec Manitoba Rocky Mountains St. John’s Ciudad Victoria Tamaulipas San Luis Potosi Campeche Aguascalientes San Luis Potosi Merida Nayarit Queretaro de Arteaga Tepic Yucatan Guanajuato Guadalajara Queretaro Guanajuato Hidalgo Campeche Jalisco Pachuca Quintana Roo Morelia Mexico City CHAPTER 4 The Jalapa Salinas Colima Toluca Chetumal Campeche Tlaxcala Colima Michoacan Mexico Cuernavaca Veracruz-Llave Villahermosa de Ocampo Morelos Puebla Tabasco Chilpancingo De Los Bravo Veracruz Oaxaca Peten-Chiapas Chiapas evolving Canadian pipeline business 59 CHAPTER 4 Where We’ve Been The evolving Canadian pipeline business July 1998 SEPTEMBER 2008 FEBRUARY 2010 TransCanada-NOVA merger ATCO agreement proposed Horn River Alberta System (23,905 km / 14,854 mi.) TransCanada and ATCO Pipelines Filed NEB application for natural gas joined with Canadian Mainline (14,101 proposed combining of physical assets pipeline 72 km (45 mi.) to connect new km / 8,762 mi.), creating one of the under a single rates and services shale gas supply in the Horn River basin largest systems in North America. structure to provide seamless Alberta in B.C. to the Alberta System. It gathers 66% of the natural gas natural gas transmission service. The National Energy Board (NEB) approved MARCH 2010 the agreement in August 2010. Groundbirch Foothills OCTOBER 2008 gas pipeline project that will extend Merger included 50% ownership of Construction began on Alberta’s the Alberta System to connect to Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd.; the remainder North Central Corridor the Montney shale gas formation in was acquired in 2003. Foothills owned The project included 300 km (186 mi.) northeast B.C. (anticipated completion certificates to build the Canadian of natural gas pipeline and 26 MW of in 2010). portion of the Alaska Pipeline Project additional compression. The expansion making it key to TransCanada’s was completed in April 2010. produced in Western Canada. JULY 1998 NEB approved 77 km (48 mi.) natural ambitions to move northern gas to North American markets. APRIL 2009 Alberta System under federal JULY 2002 jurisdiction New high-strength steel The jurisdictional change provided TransCanada partnered with a Japanese greater flexibility to transport natural company to develop and test “X100” gas to North American markets and high-strength steel pipe. TransCanada attract new gas supplies to the was the first company to use it to Alberta System. transport natural gas. “I’m convinced the steps that got us here are focus and tenacity.” —Steve Clark, CommerCIal West, Canadian and Eastern U.S. Pipelines 60 We Are Here The TransCanada Journey 1998–2010 Grow with the flow. Pipeline expansion in the U.S. and Mexico 5 Chapter 5 Pipeline expansion in the U.S. and Mexico 61 chapter 5 Pipeline expansion in the U.S. and Mexico West Coast, Gulf Coast. TransCanada’s pipeline expansion in the U.S. began in 2004 with the acquisition of GTN (Gas Transmission Northwest), TransCanada’s first wholly owned U.S. pipeline asset. Then, in mid December 2006, TransCanada announced its purchase of ANR Pipeline, including its gas storage assets, and the remaining interest in Great Lakes Gas Transmission (through TC PipeLines, LP). For the next two months, TransCanada worked diligently to finalize the acquisition, and by February 2007 the deal was closed. The purchase gave TransCanada access to key supply basins and markets in the U.S., made it the second-largest provider of natural gas storage in North America, and added almost 1,000 people to the company. Further south, TransCanada has two projects in Mexico— Tamazunchale, constructed in 2006, and Guadalajara, currently under construction. LAT 45°N, LONG 119°W GTN’s Station No. 9 in Oregon’s High Desert has two compressors, each capable of 14,100 horsepower of compression. 62 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Chapter 5 Pipeline expansion in the U.S. and Mexico 63 LAT 29°N, LONG 95°W: June 18, 2010 The Houston office is the In June 2010, about hub of our U.S. Pipelines 200 Houston employees businesss—TransCanada gathered in front of the has more than 1,600 Alley Theatre for this U.S. employees, over half commemorative photo. of whom came to the company through the ANR Pipeline/Great Lakes acquisition in 2007. 64 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 HUMAN ENERGY Michael Barnes had worked in public affairs for ANR in Houston for several years when TransCanada acquired the company from its parent, El Paso. He had other career opportunities before him, but chose TransCanada, and has never looked back. “I thought TransCanada to be an excellent fit for me, so I made the jump on my own as opposed to being part of the acquisition,” he says. “My story’s a little bit unusual.” Over the next few years, much of Michael’s work focused on communications with the hundreds of people who joined TransCanada with ANR. There were many uncertainties and anxieties for those who made the switch—TransCanada was an almost-unknown name to many, and the new employees Michael Barnes had questions about everything from how the company would run its maintenance programs to the terms of its pay and benefits. “Communications were integral to our success and building employee confidence,” says Michael. “It’s easy to say that, but it’s another thing to live it. When you have leaders who are really dedicated to helping employees understand what the business is about so that they can do their job, to understand where they fit in the business, to understand all the processes and changes that have occurred, and to build a team, it speaks volumes about the company. “In Houston, we’re approximately 1,700 miles from Calgary, but I feel very connected to my department and the home office. I don’t really see any border issues because no one has treated me like that. In terms of blending the cultures, I find them very similar. In the U.S. and Canada we have people who come to work every day trying to do the best they can and who bring a lot of integrity to the job. I believe that’s the common foundation. On both sides of the border, we have people with high energy, who are very good at planning and who get results.” Chapter 5 Pipeline expansion in the U.S. and Mexico 65 Integration “Through it all, our teams have proven they get the job done. The level of work and commitment that our employees demonstrated on both sides of the border is nothing short of remarkable and exemplifies collaboration.” —Lee Hobbs, senior vice-president and general manAger, U.S. Pipelines The integration of ANR into TransCanada was characterized by tight processes for getting the job done. Towards the end of 2008, the timelines, rapid decision-making, and complex technical issues. process began again—this time for Great Lakes, which had up to that “In the transition agreement [with El Paso], there were some things time been operated as a separate entity. that were very, very hard deadlines, and the commercial system in In three years, TransCanada has unquestionably solidified its particular was one of them,” recalls Rick Coutts, who was the ANR presence in Houston and across the U.S. “We’re here for the long integration team lead during 2007 and 2008. “We had to meet that haul,” says Lee. “This is what we do. We’ve done it for decades. deadline, because they were not going to continue to give us access We do pipelines.” beyond the agreed deadline, and they had some solid commercial reasons for that. That’s just the ground rules we had to work with.” ANR Integration – By the Numbers The commercial system was one of the most technically challenging Date of acquisition: February 22, 2007 aspects of integration—along with the pipeline SCADA (Supervisory Number of people who joined TransCanada with ANR: 900+ Control and Data Acquisition) systems. “These were the two systems that were most core to the operation of the business,” says Rick. And that was just the beginning... In the year following the acquisition, U.S. and Canadian employees teamed up to build new gas control, data center and backup facilities for U.S. Pipelines. They also had to learn dozens of new systems and Miles of pipeline: 10,500 (17,000 km) Compressor stations: 59 Storage fields acquired: 15, with 236 Bcf of storage Offshore platforms: 5 States within ANR’s market area: 5 (Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio) Number of people involved in integration efforts: at the peak, about 250 on any given day Time to set up new gas control and commercial operations: 154 days (from February 22 to July 26, 2007) Size of new data center in downtown Houston (pictured here): 7,500 square feet, 180 servers Number of pieces of equipment (“entities”) set up in the Avantis maintenance system: 130,000 (twice as many as expected) Number of unique “services” transferred from previous owner, El Paso: 350 (from pipeline integrity services, to engineering project The ANR integration Services, and Lee Hobbs, effort was led by Rick Senior Vice-President management services, to financial services…) Coutts (left), now Vice- and General Manager, President, Information U.S. Pipelines. Timeline to integrate all systems and processes: 2 years 66 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Customer satisfaction rating through integration: 87% “We came to realize that for the most part, we were all pipeliners at heart. I would say we found more commonalities than dissimilarities, and that allowed us to begin getting to know each other.” —Rick Coutts, ANR integration team lead Chapter 5 Pipeline expansion in the U.S. and Mexico 67 Lat 30°N, Long 96°W: September 15, 2008 When Hurricane Ike here a few days after made landfall in the storm discussing how southeast Texas, Joe TransCanada’s offshore Pollard and Steve assets were affected. The Jaskolski had already efforts of the commercial relocated—along with services and system members of their teams operations teams meant —to the disaster recovery gas kept flowing to site. The two are shown customers. 68 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration IN THE EYE OF THE STORM 1 “...The company came to my rescue [after Hurricane Ike]. They came, they aided me, they brought me some drinking water, and because we were out of power, there was no way of preserving the baby’s food, the refrigerator was out. They brought me a generator, and when it didn’t work, they brought me another one.” —Joseph Fomukong, U.S. Pipelines Commercial Operations Many of ANR’s employees live and work in parts of the country that are commonly threatened by severe conditions. ANR’s Southwest Mainline traverses what’s known as Tornado Alley, Hurricane Ike (1) made 2 landfall just southeast of Houston on September 13, 2008, with winds of 110 mph (175 km/h). As it approached is where many destructive hurricanes gather their deadly strength. In May 2007, a tornado leveled Greenburg, Kansas, the site of one ANR compressor station. TransCanada helped rebuild the town’s the Texas coast it became livestock pavilion, an act one town official said symbolized the the largest Atlantic tropical “rebirth of the community.” cyclone in recorded history —measuring 900 miles (1,450 km) in diameter. Houston’s gas control (2) was moved inland and Steve Mize, Gas Control Manager for U.S. Pipelines 3 and the Southeast Mainline gets its start in the Gulf of Mexico, which In September 2008, Hurricane Ike, the third-most-costly hurricane in U.S. history, slammed Southeast Texas causing tremendous damage to the Houston area, which is home to several hundred employees. Thanks to TransCanada’s well-rehearsed hurricane preparedness plan, pipeline operations were safely moved to an emergency control Central, coordinated gas center outside Houston. Employees, many with damaged homes and control activities during no electricity or water, stayed on the job, ensuring gas continued the storm. ANR’s offshore to reach customers. Other employees tracked down colleagues with assets, such as Eugene Island whom they had lost contact and distributed generators and fresh 188 (3) were shut in. In the aftermath, TransCanada water to those in need. donated $50,000 to the American Red Cross’s relief efforts (4). Chapter 5 Pipeline expansion in the U.S. and Mexico 4 69 TC Pipelines, LP 1 2 3 Some of the LP assets: sites. This equipment (1) Great Lakes Gas reduces the temperature Transmission, Crystal of the gas following Falls compressor station compression, helping it (No. 8) in Michigan, an move down the line more interconnection point efficiently. (3) Tuscarora with the ANR system. yard piping at the Radar its 30% interest in Northern Border. This transaction yielded US$228 (2) Northern Border gas compressor station in million to TransCanada, as the company worked to enhance its balance after cooler fans at one of Northern California. sheet post-merger. TransCanada maintained about a 33% ownership in the pipeline’s compressor The U.S. pipelines story wouldn’t be complete without TC PipeLines, LP. TransCanada set up the LP in 1999 as a financing vehicle to hold certain mature U.S. pipeline assets. TransCanada’s first asset sale to the LP was the LP, allowing it to retain some ownership and control of the asset. Throughout the life of the LP, several assets have been acquired from TransCanada with proceeds of the sales used to finance the growth of TransCanada’s business. Today, the LP’s assets total approximately 3,700 miles (5,920 km) of federally regulated U.S. interstate natural gas pipelines. The LP owns or has partial ownership in Northern Border (since 1999), Tuscarora (since 2000), Great Lakes (since 2007), and North Baja (since 2009). Over time, TransCanada has assumed the operation of all of the LP’s pipelines. Greg Lohnes, President, Natural Gas Pipelines and Board Chair of TC PipeLines, LP. 70 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Lat 40°N, LONG 74°W: June 9, 2009 In 2009, the LP the opening NASDAQ representative, Mark celebrated its 10-year bell in honour of the Zimmerman, Amy Leong, anniversary. Members occasion. (left to right) NASDAQ representative, of the management and Diane Karst, Rhonda Donald DeGrandis. investor relations team Amundson, Terry Hook, had the chance to ring Annie Belecki, NASDAQ Building and growing Under a unified command Just as things began to “We knew we would be settle from the ANR and much stronger and more Great Lakes integration, effective as a unified TransCanada made the entity with an aligned decision in 2009 that it leadership team in a would consolidate single location,” says Lee. its U.S. natural gas “What a difference it pipelines business with makes having teams the commercial and in one place. We are able administrative functions to make better decisions in Houston. “It was in a more timely manner another major change,” when we can walk down says Lee Hobbs, Senior the hall and consult Vice-President and directly on a project or General Manager for U.S. initiative.” Pipelines. By June 2010, consolidation was completed. Lat 29°N, LONG 95°W: June 18, 2010 Marx Talley (foreground) and Doug Conner monitor the pipes from Houston’s Gas Dispatch. Six systems—ANR, Great Lakes, Northern Border, GTN, Tuscarora and North Baja—are now all controlled from the Houston office. 72 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Old pipeline learns new trick 1 TransCanada’s longest- opportunities, but successful. It was a win- serving pipeline recently also some operational win for our customers went in a new direction. challenges. and staff. Now we’re ANR’s Southwest Main- “From a collaboration line was completed in standpoint, it required 1949 (1) and began every group in our U.S. moving gas from the offices to come together midcontinent to the to make that service U.S. Midwest. But just work—extra hours from two years ago, the line everyone,” says Dean was modified so that Ferguson, currently gas could flow in both Vice-President, U.S. directions. The non- Pipelines West. “Through traditional flow pattern innovation and hard created commercial work our team was looking at bidirectional flows for the Southeast Mainline and Great Lakes, and GTN.” Nice to meet you The ANR name was well- station in Indiana says, In just one example, known in communities “ANR has been doing the Newcastle Courier- along the pipeline. charitable work around Times ran this photo But to local residents, here for years. publicizing TransCanada’s “TransCanada” was TransCanada has enabled donation to the Sulphur pretty much unheard of. us to continue that Springs, Indiana, To help introduce the legacy and people are volunteer fire depart- company, TransCanada starting to learn the ment (left to right): undertook a significant TransCanada name. The Dwight Henry and community investment positive word-of-mouth Ronnie Cross of program in the American that these donations TransCanada; Fire Midwest in 2009. Dwight generate goes a lot Department members Henry, a technician further in building your Kip Jones, Wes Jones, at our Sulphur Springs reputation than any John Province and compressor sticker on the side of Curtis Parker (2). your truck.” 2 Guadalajara under construction The Guadalajara regasification terminal pipeline supports a major in Manzanillo to infrastructure project Guadalajara, 310 km (193 undertaken by Mexico’s mi.) inland. Shown here state-owned energy (3) is the Tamazunchale company to meet the Pipeline in east central country’s growing Mexico. Construction was demand for electricity completed in late 2006. and natural gas. The pipeline will ship from a liquefied natural gas Chapter 5 Pipeline expansion in the U.S. and Mexico 3 73 Chapter 5 Where we’ve been Pipeline expansion in the U.S. and Mexico NOVEMBER 1949 DecEMBER 1998 FebRUARY 2007 Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline TC PipeLines, LP formed ANR Pipeline acquired begins service As of June 2010, TransCanada owned A 10,500 mi. (17,000 km) system Now known as the southwest leg of ANR, approximately 38% of the LP. transporting natural gas from Texas, Oklahoma, the Gulf of Mexico and the Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline began service in late 1949. Sixty years later, MarCH 1999 Louisiana to markets in Wisconsin, TransCanada’s longest-serving pipeline Portland Natural Gas Transmission Michigan, Illinois, Ohio and Indiana. still carries gas from the Texas and system went into service in New Included 236 Bcf of natural gas storage. Oklahoma panhandles to the England U.S. Midwest. OctOBER 1961 Serving Maine, New Hampshire May 2009 and Massachusetts (295 mi./ 474 km). Guadalajara natural gas TransCanada owns 21.4%. Gas Transmission Northwest (GTN) Construction completed. pipeline project awarded The Comisión Federal de Electricidad NovEMBER 2004 (CFE) confirmed that a TransCanada Gas Transmission Northwest (GTN) affiliate will build, own and operate the pipeline from near Manzanillo on DECEMBER 1967 Acquired with more than 1,351 mi. Great Lakes Gas Transmission in (2,174 km) of pipe in the Western U.S. Mexico’s Pacific Coast to Guadalajara service Acquisition also included the North Baja (190 mi./305 km). TransCanada has 50% ownership. In Pipeline system (80 mi./129 km). April 2010 February 2007 remaining 50% acquired by TC PipeLines, LP and TransCanada FebRUARY 2006 Bison assumed operatorship. Northern Border Natural gas pipeline project received In 2006, TC PipeLines, LP increased its Federal Energy Regulatory Commission January 1992 ownership in Northern Border to 50%. In (FERC) certificate of public convenience Iroquois Gas Transmission System addition, pipeline operations transferred and necessity. Once completed, the Began full operations designed to to TransCanada (1,398 mi./2,250 km) pipeline will extend 303 mi. (487 km) from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming link Canadian supplies with Northeast markets. Since then, Iroquois has DECEMBER 2006 to TransCanada’s Northern Border operationally doubled the amount of Tamazunchale pipeline. gas transported on its system. Natural gas pipeline went into service in east-central Mexico (80 mi./129 km). “It has been the incredible growth that has been most remarkable.” —John Roscher, Law and Regulatory Affairs 74 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 On tap. The essential role of gas storage 6 Chapter 6 The essential role of gas storage 75 chapter 6 The essential role of gas storage Going underground. Let’s say you are a company that transports natural gas: what should you do when your customers don’t need quite as much as last month, or a cold snap hits, and more is needed to heat homes and businesses? TransCanada’s decision to invest in the gas storage business positions the company to address these fluctuations in market demand. Starting from one storage facility in Alberta (CrossAlta, partially owned since 1994), TransCanada has expanded its gas storage business dramatically in recent years. The company became one of the largest storage providers in North America almost overnight. First came the decision to build a 50-billion cubic foot (Bcf) facility in Edson, Alberta. Then, in early 2007, TransCanada acquired ANR’s storage assets from El Paso, adding 230 Bcf to the portfolio. Cold Springs 1, the newest facility in Michigan, tacked on another 14 Bcf in 2008. Lat 53°N, Long 116°W: June 24, 2010 At the end of 2006, TransCanada completed construction on its Edson gas storage facility, with a capacity of 50 Bcf and a daily maximum deliverability of 750 mmcf. This, combined with the CrossAlta facility and other Alberta storage leases give TransCanada control of about 140 Bcf of storage capacity in Alberta—about one-third of the province’s total. Shaun Chalmers, (shown on right), one of the employees who operates the Edson facility, performs a plant check for regular maintenance. 76 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Chapter 6 The essential role of gas storage 77 Lat 44°N, Long 85°W 78 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Andy Radtke, of the a few months after Reservoir Services Group, construction of the second from right, facility was finished. explains the scope of CS1 has six wells the storage operations and a compressor to state regulators who station that provides visited Cold Springs 1 7,000 horsepower of in the spring of 2009, compression. Reservoir Services Group “We have a very powerful asset at work; it’s very reliable and well positioned in its geographic market.” —Steve Nowaczewski, Reservoir Services Group Niche group for a niche market, TransCanada’s Reservoir Services Group is a unique crew. Comprised of engineers, geologists, well-drilling specialists and administrative associates, the Troy, Michigan-based team’s focus was the ANR Gas Storage assets located right in their backyard. There, they work closely with the field technicians to maintain and enhance the company’s storage fields, and to investigate and develop new storage projects. More recently, their recognized expertise is being applied to TransCanada’s Alberta-based storage assets and to new growth opportunities and acquisitions across the continent. “While we’re a relatively small group, we have a lot of years of experience,” says Steve Nowaczewski, who’s been working with ANR storage assets for Steve Nowaczewski 29 years. “Because we’re a niche group in our company—we have people with highly specialized expertise—we have to train and develop our people ourselves. We take that obligation very seriously.” That makes the group very tight-knit and also helps keep TransCanada ahead in the very competitive natural gas storage market. In Michigan, it also helps to have the capacity and flexibility that comes with 16 fields situated along two major interstate pipelines. It gives customers peace of mind to know that their gas will be available when they need it most. “When we say that our portfolio can deliver rates and volumes reliably over the course of time, we can do it,” says Steve. “That’s not to say we don’t have operating troubles along the way, but one of the strengths of the ANR system is that total portfolio of 16 fields. If we do have operating issues in one particular field, we have other fields to back that up.” Those strengths will position TransCanada well as it looks to grow the storage business. Chapter 6 The essential role of gas storage 79 Filling the gap ONE BUSINESS, TWO MODELS HOW IT WORKS “Not by accident, but through a series of somewhat unrelated Gas is injected into storage reservoirs when demand is low in summer transactions, we became a very large storage company,” says Brandon months and withdrawn during the higher-demand winter season, Anderson, Vice-President, Gas Storage. “We’ve got a storage business ensuring a reliable supply of gas for TransCanada’s gas transmission that spans two business models—the unregulated or merchant customers. operation that we have in Alberta, and the rate-regulated storage TransCanada’s Michigan assets operate in a regulated environment, in Michigan. On the risk profile, I think it [gas storage] kind of with regulated storage and published gas transmission tariffs. In sits in between the regulated Canadian and U.S. pipelines and the Alberta, gas storage is non-regulated, meaning the company sets merchant power business. So it fills an interesting gap in the rates for storage services based on market conditions, as well as portfolio of the company.” buying and selling gas in our inventory. While there remains some room for growth, TransCanada retains a dominant competitive position with its current gas storage assets. 2 1 Cold Springs 1’s first- and CS1 is the latest natural second-stage recycle gas underground compressors (1) are storage facility to shown here shortly be commissioned by before installation. TransCanada. (2) Edson facility. 80 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Lat 53ºN, Long 116ºW Bird’s-eye view of the Edson gas storage facility, about 200 km (125 mi.) from Jasper, Alberta. Chapter 6 The essential role of gas storage 81 Chapter 6 Where we’ve been The essential role of gas storage DECEMBER 2006 1941 First storage field Edson Gas Storage facility in-service The Austin gas field in central Michigan Gas storage capacity expanded, was converted to storage; ANR’s original positioning TransCanada to become storage field is still in operation. one of the largest natural gas storage 1940s THROUGH 1970s The Edson storage facility is wholly providers in Western Canada (50 Bcf). More fields converted owned by the company and was ANR Pipeline Company’s predecessor, TransCanada’s first venture in Alberta Michigan Wisconsin PipeLine Company, as a storage operator. acquired depleted oil and gas fields in central and southeast Michigan and FEBRUARY 2007 converted them to gas storage. ANR acquisition closes AUGUST 1991 gas storage capacity in Michigan. Includes more than 230 Bcf of natural Blue Lake Gas Storage Company was formed A partnership between ANR and an DECEMBER 2007 “STEP 2007” Storage Enhancement outside partner, Blue Lake is the largest Project Completed storage field in terms of volume and Project added 3 Bcf of storage capacity deliverability that ANR operates. in four ANR storage fields. APril 1994 DECEMBER 2008 CrossAlta Gas Storage in-service Cold Springs 1 facility opens in The facility, of which TransCanada owns Michigan 60%, expanded over the years and now Operated by ANR, the facility added has a total working natural gas capacity 14 Bcf of gas storage to TransCanada’s of 68 Bcf. TransCanada’s partners portfolio. operate the field. “We have a very entrepreneurial leadership, and also the ability to go and try different things and see what works. We were given lots of trust and support.” —Brandon Anderson, Gas Storage 82 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Earth, wind, fire, water. Building the power business 7 CHAPTER 7 Building the power business 83 chapter 7 Building the power business Starting out. Growing up. Going strong. Like many energy companies in the 1990s, TransCanada’s first the region by acquiring hydro assets, developing a major wind power steps in the power business were on the marketing and trading project, and establishing a successful retail power business. front. But around 1998, the company decided to shift its focus to owning and managing power generation assets. Other major milestones included a significant investment in Bruce Power, the second-largest nuclear power facility in the world, The early years were defined by initial forays into greenfield and the acquisition of Ravenswood, which is capable of supplying development. In Alberta, TransCanada was one of the most successful more than 20% of the power to New York City. new entrants into the newly deregulated power market, building five cogeneration plants in the space of as many years, and ultimately winning the rights to three Alberta Power Purchase Arrangements. In Ontario the company built four plants and purchased a fifth— all of which were ultimately rolled into the TransCanada Power LP and later sold. However, development in Eastern Canada continued, with greenfield projects of increasing scale, including TransCanada’s first wind farm. Today, TransCanada is Canada’s largest independent power producer and stepping into new regions of the U.S. “If there’s anything that surprised me, it’s probably how quickly we did it,” says Karl Johannson, Senior Vice-President, Canadian Power. “When I look around at the industry in Canada I see some companies that have been around for over 100 years and we were able to exceed both their capacity installed and their profitability in less than 12 years. That speaks highly of our ability to plan and execute strategies.” The U.S. Northeast was another area the company knew well due to the pipelines already in TransCanada’s portfolio. Beginning with a single New England power plant in 1996, TransCanada grew in LAT 40° N, LONG 73° W “We definitely had a strategy that was defined as being opportunistic, and that has served us well. We diversified our fuel mix and that was deliberate and I think we achieved that. We focused on areas we know; we’ve done that.” —Bill Taylor, Senior Vice-President and General Manager, Northeast Region. Ravenswood Generating Station (shown at right) in Queens, New York. 84 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 CHAPTER 7 Building the power business 85 Lat 51ºN, Long 114ºW: October 16, 2009 The way TransCanada built the power business fits the recipe book for organic growth, starting with building $40 million projects, then $100 million projects, then $500 million projects, and then a $2 billion project. The power portfolio has expanded to include natural gas, nuclear, coal, hydro and wind generation. ALBERTA PPAs It’s 1999. TransCanada is refocusing in the wake of its merger with NOVA the year before. Though the prevailing mood is to sell rather than buy assets, a not-to-be-missed opportunity presents itself. Based on an investment thesis that power demand and prices would increase following deregulation and restructuring in Alberta, Alex Pourbaix, then-Senior Vice-President, Power Ventures (at left), convinces the TransCanada Board that the company should enter an auction to purchase up to two leases on the output of coal-fired power plants (the Alberta Power Purchase Arrangements, or PPAs). “[The bidding] was actually done on the Internet, which was very novel for the time. There were progressive rounds where you would bid on a PPA, then other people could top your bid, then you would have a chance to top it again in successive rounds. At the start, we saw about one bid a day; by day seven, there was a bid every hour. They had consulted experts on game and auction theory to drive the highest price, so you could actually watch what your competitors were bidding. It was fascinating. The Board had authorized us to bid on two PPAs, and we could go up to something like $300 million total, but as we started bidding, the price went up over $200 million on just one of the PPAs; the Board gave us a little more money if I recall, to keep bidding, but in the end, we just acquired one, Sundance A, for $215 million.” Ironically, just over a year later, Enron Canada began to unravel, and was looking to offload assets, including the second PPA TransCanada had bid on, Sundance B. Terry Bennett, Vice-President, Power Development, recalls the purchase: “I think it was December 14th when the opportunity became real, and we had to get it done by the end of the year because of a complex court and bankruptcy process with Enron Canada and its parent. So we were literally here every day, and closed it on December 30th. It was very cool to see a big company like TransCanada react and mobilize that quickly. I’ll admit, it was sort of a fun time.” Four years after that came a third PPA purchase. “Sheerness was notable in that, at the time, it was our largest single power acquisition outside of Bruce,” says Karl Johannson, Senior Vice-President, Canadian Power. “Most other potential buyers could not accept the size of the transaction and tried to buy only parts of it. This acquisition gave us a unique opportunity to achieve large scale quickly in a growing market. We had the confidence that we could take this large block of power and effectively market it.” CHAPTER 7 Building the power business 87 LAT 43°N, LONG 79°W: August 27, 2009 Still under construction during peak demand and due online in late and generate enough 2010, Halton Hills power for about Generating Station in 600,000 homes. Ontario will operate Natural Gas “Every time you win a bid, it’s a team effort and there’s always a feeling of great satisfaction. That certainly is one of the highlights of the job. If you lose, there’s the other side of that. But at the end of the day, we learn something from it, and there’s always a lesson to be had that you use as you move forward to the next project.” —Finn Greflund, VICE-PRESIDENT, POWER GENERATION AND DEVELOPMENT GREENFIELD DEVELOPMENT TransCanada’s greenfield power development business goes back to the late 1990s, when the company began building projects in Alberta and Ontario, starting with plants of less than 100 MW each. “TransCanada had money to invest and it was a big competitive advantage in those days, because the typical independent power producer was a very small company that had all sorts of difficulty trying to arrange financing,” recalls Karl Johannson, Senior VicePresident, Canadian Power. By June 2010, the company had 15 greenfield power projects under its belt (some of them sold as part of the Power LP in 2005). Most of these have been natural gas-fired plants. Today, TransCanada is capable of building some of the largest gas-fired power projects in North America. Some of the latest projects use high-efficiency, low-emissions technology to minimize their environmental impact. Combined-cycle natural gas generating stations, such as Halton Hills Generating Station (HHGS), use 30 to 40% less fuel energy than traditional generation alternatives. In addition to being amongst the most energy-efficient generators, HHGS also uses low-emissions technology to further minimize air pollution. How it works: • Natural gas is used to fuel twin gas turbine generators, which generate electricity and hot exhaust gas • The hot exhaust gas from the turbines is used to make steam which Finn Greflund led Left to right: John a number of our very Mikkelsen, Finn successful greenfield Greflund, Terry Bennett, power development Nick Di Domenico, and projects. Pictured here Christine Cinnamon. are Finn and some of his team at Portlands Energy Centre, in Toronto. generates additional electricity via a steam turbine • After passing through the turbine, the steam is condensed to water, and the water is reused in the steam generator CHAPTER 7 Building the power business 89 by the numbers Date of initial TransCanada investment: February 2003 LAT 51°N, LONG 85°W Year investment first proposed to TransCanada Board (declined): 2001 Rank among world’s nuclear power plants: 2nd, behind the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant in Japan Land area: 932 hectares (2,303 acres) TransCanada ownership: 48.8% of Bruce A, 31.6% of Bruce B Roads on site: 56 km (35 mi.) TransCanada employees onsite: 5 Bonazzo, all of TransCanada’s Bruce A: 4 CANDU reactors (2 online, 2 in refurbishment) Operations and Engineering Bruce B: 4 reactors (all online) Bruce restart project team (left to right) Brett Schoneck, John Soini, Gary Juenke, Larry project management group. Wildlife living on site: 200+ species Bruce Power employees who operate the plant: About 3,700 (2) Power output: 4,700 MW (6,200 MW after restarts) Turbine hall length: 1,460 metres (4,790 feet) (more than 14 CFL football fields) 1 2 3 4 Nuclear TransCanada’s Corey Goulet, Vice-President, Technical Development (3, left), recently transferred to the Bruce Power nuclear facility near 5 Kincardine, Ontario, on the shore of Lake Huron (4). He talks about how working at a nuclear power plant is different from working at a conventional plant. “The first thing you notice is a lot more security. The whole process of getting into the facility as a visitor or as a new employee takes a lot longer,” describes Corey. “The second thing that struck me was the enormity of the facility. Bruce produces more than 6,000 MW, the equivalent to about ten of our Portlands facility. It takes 25 people to operate Portlands, so for 10 Portlands, we have 250 people, right? This facility has almost 4,000.” One reason for the large staff is self-sufficiency; in a rural environment, Containment structure line Bruce must supply almost all ofSteam its own services, including electricity, Turbine heavy equipment operations, food services, medical care, fire services Steam generator generator and security. “Because of the nature of the work, you have to control everything Pump Core from a radiological safety perspective. You have to control what Condenser comes in and out much more carefully than you do at a different type cooling water” of power plant; you really need a more self-contained site. Lake Pump How it works The Bruce Nuclear Pressurized water moderator and coolant Steam Lake water Unpressurized water Generating Station, the second-largest nuclear power facility in Containment structure the world, uses CANDU Steam line Turbine generator Steam generator (CANada Deuterium Uranium) reactors to generate electricity. Here’s how they work: Core Pump Condenser cooling water In the primary loop, pressurized heavy water is passed through Lake Pump the reactor core. Pressurized water Steam Unpressurized water After Lake water Here, the fission of The pipes of the primary moderator and coolant The steam produced is passing through uranium or other nuclear loop are passed through forced through a steam the turbine, the steam fuels heats the water. a steam generator filled turbine, which in turn is piped across a tertiary Because it is under with low pressure light powers the generators loop containing cold high pressure, it can be water in the secondary that produce electricity. water, which is returned superheated without loop. Because the water boiling. in the secondary loop is to the steam generator. at low pressure, it boils. CHAPTER 7 Building the power business 91 Hydro Vernon Station: 100 years of hydroelectric power generation Vernon Station, a hydroelectric facility on the Connecticut River TransCanada opted to refurbish Vernon Station by installing four between Vermont and New Hampshire, was built in 1909, and was modern turbines to replace the obsolete units and making other designed to produce 16 MW of power from eight turbine generator improvements to the powerhouse. After the $55 million upgrade was units. It was the first plant in the Northeastern U.S. to transmit completed in May 2008, Vernon Station returned to full power, with electricity across state lines. a capacity of 32 MW. In April 2005, TransCanada acquired Vernon and 12 other hydro- At Vernon’s 100th birthday party last year, hundreds of New electric plants from USGen New England. By then, Vernon was Englanders celebrated the facility’s past and present. showing its age. Two units had been decommissioned because of mechanical failures, while two units were on “emergency run only” status because of equipment problems. Vernon Station (left) is electricity and are a key The vintage postcards one of 13 TransCanada part of the U.S. Northeast (above, from the top), hydroelectric power business. Many depict “The New Dam” generating stations are historic landmarks. at Bellows Falls, Vermont on the Connecticut Deerfield No. 2 Station in (in service 1928), Vernon and Deerfield Rivers. Conway, Massachusetts, Station (1929), and Combined, these facilities began operating in 1913. Comerford Station, near produce 567 MW of Monroe, New Hampshire (1930). LAT 42°N, LONG 72°W Robert Burrington and David Fain inside the 15 MW Harriman Station in Vermont. “In the case of the hydro facilities, there were some really excellent, dedicated staff who joined us with the assets. They had continued to operate the hydro facilities through some very rough years and so when they saw us come on board they were relieved, I think a little bit, that we were financially sound and we were committed to the assets and staff for the long run. Vernon is an example where the employees were really thrilled that the company was very committed to taking what was a 100-year-old facility and giving it a new lease on life.” —Bill Taylor, Senior Vice-President and General Manager, U.S. noRtheast Region CHAPTER 7 Building the power business 93 Greenland powering North America Nunavut 11,700 MW and growing Northwest Territories Northwest Territories Nunavut Alaska Nunavut Anchorage Yukon Iqaluit Nunavut Northwest Territories Whitehorse Juneau Yellowknife Newfoundland Mackay River Cogeneration Plant 165 MW – Gas British Columbia Bear Creek Cogeneration Plant 80 MW – Gas Alberta Sundance ‘A’ PPA 560 MW – Coal Redwater Cogeneration Plant 40 MW – Gas Edmonton Sundance ‘B’ PPA 353 MW – Coal* Vancouver Prince Edward Island Ontario Regina Cancarb Waste Heat Recovery Power Plant 27 MW Spokane Portland Winnipeg Helena Montana Toronto – Power Marketing Office Minnesota Bismarck Oregon Boise Minneapolis -Saint Paul Pierre Idaho South Dakota Sarnia Sacramento San Francisco Carson City Nevada Salt Lake City Saint Louis Frankfort Lincoln Colorado Utah Kansas City Denver San Jose California Colorado Springs Kansas Las Vegas Santa Fe Phoenix San Diego Missouri Albuquerque Arizona Mexicali Arkansas Oklahoma City New Mexico Coolidge Generating Station (Under Construction) 575 MW – Gas Lubbock Hermosillo Bossier City Louisiana Texas Sonora Houston Hartford New York City Norfolk Raleigh North Carolina Charlotte Tennessee Bellows Falls Comerford McIndoes Moore Sherman Vernon Wilder Atlanta Birmingham Alabama Georgia Montgomery Jackson Mobile Tallahassee New Orleans San Antonio Jacksonville 49 MW 164 MW 13 MW 192 MW 7 MW 22 MW 42 MW Deerfield River System Florida Orlando Tampa Chihuahua Miami Coahuila De Zaragoza TC HYDRO Connecticut River System Columbia South Carolina Huntsville Baton Rouge Austin Chihuahua Memphis Mississippi Fort Worth El Paso Virginia Nashville Little Rock Dallas Tucson Baja California Norte New Hampshire Concord Massachusetts Ocean State Power Plant Boston Providence 560 MW – Gas – Combined Cycle Greensboro Kentucky Tulsa Oklahoma Albany Buffalo Louisville Jefferson City Wichita Bakersfield Los Angeles Des Moines Omaha Vermont Nova Scotia Halifax Grandview Cogeneration Plant Maine 90 MW – Gas Kibby Wind Power 132 MW – Wind Augusta Westborough – Power Marketing Office Portlands Energy Centre Detroit Cleveland 275 MW – Gas – Philadelphia Combined Cycle* Chicago New Jersey Oakville Generating Centre Baltimore (In Development) Indianapolis 900 MW – Gas – Washington Ravenswood Illinois Maryland Combined Cycle Generating Station Richmond 2480 MW – Gas & Indiana Springfield Fuel Oil – Combined Cycle West Virginia Iowa Nebraska Montpelier New York Toronto Halton Hills Generating Station (Under Construction) 683 MW – Gas – Michigan Combined Cycle, Wyoming Cheyenne Ottawa Bruce Power LP 2474 MW – Nuclear* Wisconsin Fredericton Québec Bécancour Cogeneration Plant 550 MW – Gas North Dakota Salem Nova Scotia Charlottetown New Brunswick Calgary – Power Marketing Office Deerfield No.2 Deerfield No.3 Deerfield No.4 Deerfield No.5 Harriman Searsburg 6 MW 7 MW 6 MW 14 MW 39 MW 5 MW Baja California Sur Sinaloa La Paz Culiacan Saltillo Zacatecas 0 0 250 250 500 500 1,000 Miles 1,000 1,500 Kilometers Monterrey Nuevo Leon Durango Durango Zacatecas Ciudad Victoria Tamaulipas San Luis Potosi Aguascalientes San Luis Potosi Merida Nayarit Queretaro de Arteaga Tepic Guanajuato Yucatan Guadalajara Queretaro Guanajuato Hidalgo Campeche Jalisco Pachuca Quintana Roo Morelia Mexico City Jalapa Colima Chetumal Toluca Campeche Tlaxcala Colima Michoacan Mexico Cuernavaca Veracruz-Llave Villahermosa de Ocampo Morelos Puebla Chilpancingo De Los Bravo Oaxaca Tabasco Chiapas St. John’s Cartier Wind Energy 365 MW – Wind* Saskatoon Lethbridge Seattle Tacoma Washington Québec Manitoba Sheerness PPA 756 MW – Coal Calgary Carseland Cogeneration Plant 80 MW – Gas Victoria Newfoundland Saskatchewan * Partially Owned – MW Stated as TransCanada’s proportionate share Ravenswood Ravenswood Generating Station, a 2,480 MW gas- and oil-fired plant, is capable of supplying more than 20% of New York City’s power. TransCanada acquired it on August 26, 2008. Just three days later, technicians discovered a vibrational anomaly in ”Big Allis,” a 1,000 MW turbine that is the plant’s biggest, and that was the biggest in the world when it was commissioned in 1965. Technicians investigated, and found a fracture in the unit’s highpressure generator rotor. This was bad news. The obvious solution—forging a new rotor— would take up to five years. But New York summers can be brutally hot, making the demand for electricity surge. Going offline for four summers was not an option. The Ravenswood team found an innovative solution. The entire rotor was shipped to a foundry in North Carolina, where the damaged part was replaced and welded on to a 9,000 kg ”stub shaft.” Shipped David Callender (above, back in early 2009, the rotor was reinstalled in time for the 2009 left) and Gordon Bristol, summer peak. prepping a boiler feed Big Allis was back in play. so it can be overhauled. 1 pump volute for shipment 2 (1) Aleksandr Kazakov of the Ravenswood Maintenance Department. (2) A view of Ravenswood from across the East River in Queens, New York. (3) Clement Amanor (left) and Ekow Oppon of the Operations Department. (4) Gregory Heinen, 4 3 Operations Department, in the control room. CHAPTER 7 Building the power business 95 “It filters down, I mean, TransCanada always tries to settle things fairly by its stakeholders. We’ve always dealt with people properly, and you know, in Maine, at Kibby, we told them we’d be good corporate citizens, we did that, and they appreciate it. There were doubters initially, and now they’re no longer doubters. They’re thrilled to have a company of this quality as a neighbour.” —Nick Di Domenico, Project Manager 96 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Wind 1 2 3 Cartier HOW TO BUILD A WIND FARM In 2004, Cartier Wind Energy, then a partnership of TransCanada, “I’ve always said that wind projects are actually more like pipeline Innergex and RES Canada, bid on six Québec wind projects. The projects than gas-fired power plant projects, because of the repetitive bids were TransCanada’s first forays into wind power generation. construction activities,” says Corey Goulet, who was responsible “TransCanada ended up winning 740 of the 1,000 MW that were for the construction of both Cartier and Kibby. “When you build a awarded, which shocked everybody! We thought maybe one project, pipeline, you have a group that clears the land, another group two projects, we got ultimately six projects out of it, and realized that puts a trench in, another one that lays the pipe, another that how big wind could be for us,” says Terry Bennett, Vice-President, welds it together, and so forth. Building a wind farm is no different. Power Development. When you have 73 turbines, you have the crew that goes in and clears the land, another crew behind it builds the roads, another Kibby The Kibby Wind Power Project in Maine, built on the experience installs the turbines, et cetera, et cetera. So, experience-wise, we were well equipped to build a wind farm.” gained through Cartier, added to TransCanada’s growing presence in the northeast U.S. In building Kibby (shown at left, and 1 and 3, above), TransCanada helped make a difference for ten local young people by co-sponsoring ”Kibby Boot Camp” with the State of Maine and TransCanada’s partners and contractors on the Kibby project. Kibby Boot Camp (2) was part of Maine’s WorkReady program, aimed at preparing young people for the job market. During the six-week program, the participants received occupational safety and health training, courses in first aid and CPR, and jobseeking guidance. They also spent much of their time on the Kibby project site, learning about environmental research, surveying, road construction, wind turbine assembly and management, and renewable energy. TransCanada managers Wolfgang Neuhoff and Matthew Nazarko acted as mentors, as did managers and technicians from TransCanada’s partners and vendors at Kibby. All ten participants earned Maine’s WorkReady Certificate. CHAPTER 7 Building the power business 97 Chapter 7 Where we’ve been Building the power business September 2009 August 2000 October 2004 November 2005 Sundance A—PPA Cartier Wind Sheerness—PPA Kibby Wind First power purchase arrangement (PPA) Six wind energy projects awarded by Third PPA acquired in Alberta. Phase 1 construction completed on wind acquired through Alberta government Hydro-Québec. online auction. farm in Maine. September 2006 April 2005 Bécancour September 2009 June 2000 Hydro acquisition closes Construction completed on gas-fired Oakville Ocean State Power—full ownership 13 hydroelectric facilities acquired cogeneration plant in Québec. Positioned TransCanada to compete in on Connecticut and Deerfield Rivers in the New England power market. New England. Contract awarded by Ontario Power Authority to build gas-fired May 2008 combined cycle plant. Portlands Energy Centre October 2009 Fall 2001 September 2005 Phase 1 construction completed Carseland and Redwater TransCanada Power, LP sold in Toronto; in April 2009 phase 2 was Zephyr and Chinook Construction completed on two gas-fired Originally formed in 1997, by the time completed and plant began full Proposals announced for two high- it was sold, the Power LP encompassed high-efficiency, combined-cycle voltage direct current (HVDC) power 11 power plants in Canada and the operations. transmission projects originating in cogeneration plants in Alberta. December 2001 U.S., totalling 744 MW. The Power LP Sundance B—PPA included both natural gas/waste Second PPA acquired in Alberta. heat and hydro assets. February 2003 October 2005 Wyoming and Montana. August 2008 Ravenswood June 2010 Power generating station acquired Halton Hills in New York. Construction continued on gas-fired Bruce Power deal closes Bruce Power restart 31.6% interest acquired in the world’s TransCanada invested in multi-billion second-largest nuclear power facility. dollar restart and refurbishment Coolidge program of the Bruce A nuclear facilities Construction began on gas-fired peaking at Bruce Power. power plant in Arizona. plant in Ontario. August 2009 “The big question is, are people willing to pay for green power, because it’s going to cost a lot more. So at the end of the day, it’s about the consumer.” —Russ Hantho, Power Growth 98 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Crude awakening. Keystone Pipeline captures new opportunity 8 Chapter 8 Keystone pipeline captures new opportunity 99 chapter 8 Keystone pipeline captures new opportunity Convert an old pipeline. Build a new one. Turn the tap on. What might have seemed like a lucky, right-time, right-place They began considering crude oil as a business development opportunity was, in fact, the result of thorough preparation and opportunity, in particular looking at carrying Alberta’s oil sands good planning. production out of the province to U.S. Midwest markets and beyond. In the fall of 2003, TransCanada’s restructuring was complete, Over seven years, thousands of workers brought to life, across the balance sheet was restored, and the company was ready to borders, and against the odds, the Keystone Pipeline. build more aggressively on its core businesses. Steve Becker, a vice-president in the Pipeline Development Group, and Robert Jones, now Vice-President, Keystone Pipelines, joined forces to look at new project possibilities for the company. “Our mandate was to develop new commercially-viable pipeline projects that built on our traditional strengths and expertise,” says Steve, now Vice-President, Business Development and President, TC PipeLines, LP. “We also had to come up with something new that TransCanada and our competitors had not already tried.” Lat 52ºN, Long 111ºW Billed as the largest construction project in North America in 2009 and 2010, Keystone will provide TransCanada with an almost one-third share of Canada’s oil pipeline business. It epitomizes the company’s disciplined, low-risk, yet innovative approach to growth. 100 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Chapter 8 Keystone pipeline captures new opportunity 101 Lat 38ºN, Long 90ºW: June 30, 2010 Nicole Aitken at our relationships with Keystone’s Hartford communities have only Pump Station in Wood just begun,” says Nicole. River, Illinois. She was “We’re here for many, on-site to celebrate the many years to come.” official opening of the pipeline. “With phase 1 now operational, 102 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS “In Yankton, South Dakota, the Chamber of Commerce had a local pipeline welcoming committee.” Nicole Aitken, Keystone stakeholder relations, Calgary — Keystone traverses three provinces and nine states—a vast area—much of which was new territory for TransCanada. So the company began consulting with community leaders across the proposed route in 2004, before the project was announced. “At that time, the war in Iraq was on people’s minds,” says Nicole Aitken, who leads the stakeholder relations team for Keystone. “The overwhelming majority of feedback was that America needs a new source of oil, and if we can get it from our friends north of the border instead of overseas, then we’re all for it.” In the U.S. Midwest, they were also interested in the potential impact on farming and the environment—they naturally questioned how it would be constructed, how it could impact the soil, the groundwater, the crops, and the river crossings. Keystone used a variety of tactics to share information. “We proactively sent invitations to media to come to our open houses. Literally hundreds of people came to TransCanada’s open houses to learn about the pipeline, and company representatives became local celebrities overnight. We were the news, not just in the local community, but in the entire state,” recalls Nicole. “We also used TV and radio campaigns to help deliver information about the project when we encountered very vocal localized opposition, and that was very successful.” In the end, the 15,000 landowners and other key stakeholders along the U.S. route were largely supportive. “There were a handful of landowners opposed in the state of North Dakota and a handful in South Dakota. Ten to twenty people out of 15,000. That’s a small percentage,” reflects Nicole. Many communities welcomed the economic benefits of the project. “There’s one particular individual in North Dakota I will probably remember forever and that’s Senator Curtis Olafson. He had enthusiasm for projects that would make his community better and had foresight in understanding how these types of projects play into the local community. He also helped ensure we did the job right, including restoring the land.” Now the spotlight is on the next phases of the project and times have evolved. “You can see how social media has started to play into things and the shift in the political agenda. The news coverage is less focused on war and Iraq and more focused on environment, looking at green energy,” says Nicole. “It’s difficult to be talking about issues that are much bigger than just a project. So we’re working with other organizations and key stakeholders to try to raise awareness about facts versus fiction, particularly as it relates to energy security and supply. We try to continue to raise awareness, correct misinformation and keep the dialogue going.” Chapter 8 Keystone pipeline captures new opportunity 103 What’s in a name? “The keystone is a critical component in an arch bridge; it’s what holds the bridge together from bank to bank.” —ROBERT JONES, Vice-President, Keystone Pipelines “So in our case, if you think about the producers being one side of the bank and the refiners being the other side of the bank on a river, the Keystone Pipeline really represents the bridge to connect the producers to the market, and the most critical part of that bridge is the keystone, and that’s how Keystone got its name,” says Robert. “In order to make a project like Keystone viable, we had to be competitive in new markets, and early on it looked like the original pipeline was going through Iowa. If you Google Iowa, you get pictures of a lot of nice bridges, like in the movie The Bridges of Madison County, which had beautiful covered arch bridges from that area. The ironic part today, of course, is that Keystone doesn’t go through Iowa, because in order to serve all the markets we needed to, we had to move the pipeline into North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska.” Robert Jones 104 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Approx. lat 47°N, Long 97°W: Summer 2009 The Keystone Pipeline right-of-way and nearby farmlands in North Dakota. Chapter 8 Keystone pipeline captures new opportunity 105 A MEGA-PROJECT IS BORN Our business development team had already begun exploring the idea when a fortuitous phone call kick-started the Keystone Pipeline. “A gentleman from the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) subcommittee phoned our 1-800 number and left a message asking if we would be interested in getting into the oil pipeline business,” remembers Robert Jones, now Vice-President, Keystone Pipelines.“ He represented a number of CAPP members [oil companies]. It trickled through the organization to me, because I was the only person in business development who had any crude oil experience. I called him back and we discussed the concept of using pipelines already built to move crude oil being developed in the oil sands. That’s how it all began.” There was a clear demand from the marketplace. The company could make the project viable by converting some of its existing natural gas pipeline to oil operations, making use of related facilities and landowner agreements on the Canadian portion of the route. “Somebody way back in 1957 had the vision to have the easement agreement say we can move all hydrocarbons—not just natural gas, not just oil,” says Robert. “That was really very fortunate, because it would have been very challenging to renegotiate a lease agreement with every single landowner.” Next began the job of selling the idea both internally and externally. “We had a hearing in Canada—it was called a Section 74 hearing, and there were people lined up on both sides of the fence, both supporting and opposing the project,” says Robert. Keystone was cham- Vice-President, Keystone pioned by a leadership Pipelines; Paul Miller, team including (left Vice-President, Oil to right) Don Wishart, Pipelines; and Hal Kvisle, Executive Vice-President, former CEO. Operations and Major Projects; Robert Jones, In the end, shippers were enticed by an innovative bullet line design that brought the crude oil non-stop from storage to refining hubs in the U.S. Midwest as well as novel long-term contracts with fixed tolls—previously uncommon in the oil industry. Feat of engineering Hundreds of engineers, world-class engineering 2nd Row: Ken Murchie, Back Row: Maxime both internal and team. Left to right: Brando Barreto, Sandra Beaulieu, Victor Cabrejo, Front Row: Mauricio Gigovic. Peter Staszelis, Brian Beltran, Yin Qu, Susan 3rd Row: Bill Joerissen, Spackman, Doug Parker, Suman Basak, Harold Yarn, Brian Rene Baillargeon. Richter, Bob Lewis, Ron external, contributed to the design of the Keystone Pipeline System. Here are just a few representatives of the 106 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Knopp, Jordan Nicholson. Brunning, Randy Wight, Tim Johnson. Chapter 8 Keystone oil pipeline captures new opportunity 107 Construction began in May 2008. The company’s industry-renowned expertise in large-scale project management brought the Keystone Pipeline home years earlier than many thought possible, with first oil flowing through the line by June 2010. 108 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 KEYSTONE – by the numbers Number of workers at peak construction of phase 1: Approximately Pump stations: 39 pump stations built in phase 1, 29 of which were 8,000 workers in the summer of 2009. used in the initial start-up in June 2010. Hours worked: 23 million. That’s equivalent to one person working Pipeline length: 6,134 km (3,812 mi.) for all phases when complete— for 12,777 years. about the same distance as from Calgary, Alberta to Reykjavik, Iceland, Distance driven (by construction workers): 147 million km (more than 91 million mi.), the equivalent to driving 3,668 times around the earth. Weight of pipe: More than 1.2 million metric tonnes (2.65 billion or about half-way to Antarctica from Houston, Texas. Speed of oil: About 8 km/h (5 mph)—about the same as a brisk walking pace. pounds, about 1.32 million tons US). That weight is equal to the steel Commodities shipped on the line: 45 different and distinct grades of required to build 266 Eiffel Towers in Paris, France. crude oil can be shipped, moving in carefully separated batches along Expected volume of oil filling the Keystone Pipeline (phase 1): 9.1 million barrels. That’s enough oil in the pipeline to theoretically fill 580 Olympic size swimming pools. After completing all Keystone the line. Each commodity has specific yields and specific properties for creating various oil-based products—ranging from gasoline, to polyethylene, to roofing tar, and everything in between. phases, there’ll be enough oil to theoretically fill 790 Olympic size Average batch: 100,000 barrels, or 30 km (18 mi.) long; 1.1 million swimming pools. barrels per day upon completion. Crude oil storage tanks at Hardisty, Alberta: 3 storage tanks, each 65 metres (215 feet) in diameter and 18 metres (60 feet) high. Total capacity: Over 1 million barrels per day. 2 1 3 Collaborating with Aboriginal Communities Aboriginal relations to corral buffalo. A with Aboriginal stone,” used by buffalo have been integral to reroute was planned, community members, and other animals more our operations for more however additional one of the sites was than 1,400 years ago. than 30 years. In the archaeological sites were excavated and artefacts Excavation in progress case of Keystone, the discovered along the preserved. Appropriate (2, 3) and arrowheads (4) original proposed route reroute. TransCanada ceremonial practices recovered from site. for the Hardisty West worked closely with were incorporated interconnection crossed Aboriginal communities into the excavation an important Aboriginal to better understand the process. (above, left archaeological site, impacts of the project to right) Aboriginal and an area that on their traditional environmental workers traditionally was used lands. Collaborating (1) beside a “rubbing 4 Chapter 8 Keystone pipeline captures new opportunity 109 1 2 Keystone commercial operations Start-up: Commissioning that are commissioning Matthew Ulmer (1) and a line from scratch is pump stations, valves, Mark Malinowski (2) Building a business from a “clean sheet of paper” was a once- “not a trivial task” says electronics, and that all monitor the flow of oil in-a-lifetime opportunity for the people who developed Erik Tatarchuk. “There has to be synchronized in the pipeline from the TransCanada’s new crude oil pipeline project in record-setting are literally hundreds as oil moves down new control centre in fashion. While it could have taken anywhere from three to of people in the field the pipe.” Calgary. four years to establish commercial processes and business systems for Keystone, TransCanada’s motivated employees did it in an unprecedented 12 months, developing business processes while simultaneously building commercial and control room software from scratch. In Calgary, oil control centre operators rely on sophisticated systems to monitor the pipeline and pump stations along 3 the route. With an advanced leak detection system, operators are alerted electronically to even the smallest of leaks in remote locations and ready to respond instantly to any emergency. “From both a physical and commercial operations perspective, execution of the daily business of an oil pipeline is significantly different than gas,” explains Erik Tatarchuk, who is responsible for all aspects of daily Keystone commercial operations. “Oil moves in batches, which is analogous to a rail car system. In each rail car, there’ll be a different commodity, and each commodity has to be kept separate and distinct from each other via the hydraulic operation of the pipe. Then you have to deliver it to the right refinery at the right time when the customers expect Hartford Pump Station in Illinois (3). From it, because there is very little storage at the tail end—refineries here, oil is directed to usually have about two to three days of storage given their run refineries in Illinois, rate. We have to take oil in at a specific time to deliver it Indiana and Michigan. out plus or minus two days for that specific batch.” In addition, oil is non-compressible, unlike gas, which poses different physical operating challenges. 110 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Linking secure crude oil supply with refining markets in the U.S. Athabasca Oilsands Alberta Other Oil Pipelines Edmonton Manitoba Saskatchewan ST EA ND SE KE TY A S L I B R RD TY TO NI HA DIS R ND MO SE HA N KE E A H L OY UT SO S R OS TO DL TH NI U IN O B M SO I Calgary N BR E CA OY H UT SO SS LO EY ND LL BI VA X FO Lethbridge OT AP PI K EE CR SY AS S GR IP ILL PH Hardisty British Columbia Vancouver Victoria Tacoma Olympia Spokane Washington Saskatoon Converted Gas Pipeline 860 km (534 mi) T ER RB HE N RO CA NA GI RE AL ND KE LL FE EN GR Ontario IN OM OS MO D I AP TY CI R Regina PO IN Y RA AG NI CK RC Montana CI FO E RI Keystone Expansion (In Development Proposed Completion in 2013) G FE Michigan BU TH I FA E RP Pierre Wyoming E RE R NE IN ME O OL Nebraska Salt Lake City Nevada D L RA NT CE Denver Utah Steele City E rsfield S R VE RD RI A K FO OD RT WO ATO P HA Patoka Saint Louis Kentucky No Charlotte A T CI Tulsa L NG HI DE Cushing ON Y ER Nashville Tennessee Chattanooga Arkansas TI TA L Birmingham Little Rock O EL P TU Keystone Expansion (In Development Proposed Construction Completion in 2012) Dallas Alabama Mississippi TA EL D O OR Fort Worth NSB Texas KE LA R LE TY 500 Miles 500 Austin Houston Houston 1,000 Kilometers San Antonio Y ER LIV N GA I RR 250 Georgia Montgomery Jackson Louisiana N KI F LU CO Atlanta Jackson IN W South Ca Huntsville Oklahoma EL W OM CR Co Memphis S Oklahoma City IV Chihuahua Frankfort West Virginia Charleston Louisville Wood River N YA BR Sonora Cincinnati CK Y S CU El Paso Indianapolis L RO NC Tucson 250 N AI AU TP S Lubbock 0 MI Springfield Dayton RN Phoenix 0 N OW ET L DD Indiana Missouri BU Ontario Baja California Norte IA AL TR N CE PE PO New Mexico RY BU LIS SA Jefferson City Kansas City Wichita Santa Fe Albuquerque NA TI HO Keystone Cushing Extension (Under Construction Expected In-service in 2011) Las Vegas EY RN TU Topeka Y LE RI Kansas Colorado Springs ornia Mexicali Y E NC RA VE SE B T CI E EL ST o San Diego ER ET EX Colorado Arizona TY CI Lincoln LE EE CA ST NE SE Ohio Columbus Illinois ILB W Penns Toledo Fort Wayne Omaha ER TY CI Cleveland Des Moines Y T CI VI DA N SO IC ER Detroit Chicago AN ST ON NS KI AT Sarnia Lansing Madison N TO C Grand Rapids Milwaukee Keystone Pipeline F N TO (Construction Completed NG I RT HA in 2010) Iowa O RD MU Cheyenne Flint Wisconsin N MA W Reno Carson City o L RO Roch Buffalo Minneapolis -Saint Paul EL SW Toronto Green Bay CA O AK HA ER NT South Dakota O AL FF N Idaho Minnesota Y NE R IN RD HA EN DD LU N LO L FA M SO AN R RT Bismarck AI E RN VE LU North Dakota LE PR Boise G R BU ED P RT Oregon T H FO Helena Winnipeg ET K AS E tro Area m AN RM CA LE L VA E RI AI PR LA E AG RT TY ER LIB D N LA DE ON Mobile I AT ST Tallahassee Baton Rouge ER D NE O New Orleans Nederland We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Port Arthur Beaumont Flo 111 Tampa Clearwater Saint Petersbur CHAPTER 8 Where we’ve been Keystone Pipeline captures new opportunity February 2005 September 2007 March 2008 Project first proposed NEB provided approval to construct U.S. Presidential Permit received To link Canadian crude oil with U.S. and operate demand (3,461 km/2,151 mi.). The NEB also approved the toll May 2008 methodology and tariff. Construction began July 2008 November 2005 MOU signed with ConocoPhillips October 2007 Commits ConocoPhillips to ship crude Contracts worth US$3.0 billion Expansion announced oil on the proposed pipeline and awarded To serve the U.S. Gulf Coast—additional gives them the right to acquire up to For major materials and pipeline capacity of 500,000 barrels per day 50% ownership. construction contractors. Work (2,673 km / 1.661 mi.). continued to secure land access January 2006 agreements. June 2009 January 2008 TransCanada purchased ConocoPhillips’ Firm, long-term contracts of 340,000 Final Environmental Impact share in the project. barrels per day (18-year average Statement Long-term commitments secured from shippers duration). Sole ownership announced From the U.S. Department of State. After nearly two years of detailed FebrUary 2007 analysis of the project proposal by June 2010 Oil starts flowing “Tap turning” ceremony marked arrival National Energy Board (NEB) more than a dozen U.S. federal agencies of first crude oil at Wood River and approved gas pipeline conversion and other interested stakeholders, Patoka, Illinois. to oil the impact statement indicated the Involved conversion of approximately pipeline would result in limited adverse 860 km (530 mi.) of existing Canadian environmental impacts. Mainline pipeline facilities from natural gas to crude oil transmission service and January 2008 construction of approximately 370 km ConocoPhillips (230 mi.) of new oil pipeline, terminal Acquired 50% ownership interest in facilities at Hardisty, Alberta, and the project. pump stations. “People wanted to work for TransCanada because we have a tremendous reputation attracting and retaining highly qualified people and providing a very enriching workplace.” —Paul Miller, Keystone Pipelines 112 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 The call of the north. Partnerships, promise, potential 9 Chapter 9 Partnerships, promise, potential 113 chapter 9 Partnerships, promise, potential Mackenzie Valley and Alaska. For more than 30 years, TransCanada has had its sights set on two Further north, 2008 saw TransCanada named the license-holder northern lights. by the State of Alaska under the Alaska Gas Inducement Act (AGIA). The company’s role in the formation of the Aboriginal Pipeline Group in 2000 represented a unique business development investment opportunity in the yet-to-be-approved pipeline from the Mackenzie River delta in the Northwest Territories. This unique communitybuilding and investment coalition continues today, and represents An open season was held between April and July 2010, with partner ExxonMobil. The goal is to build and operate a pipeline system that will make possible the development of Alaska’s vast North Slope natural gas resources, and provide a reliable, clean supply of domestic energy for North American or international markets. the first time that Aboriginal groups in Canada would participate in an industrial project of this scope. North of 60º: February 2009 Yukon Quest (opposite Alaska. As a key player “We have never wavered page), a 1,000-mile in the Alaska Pipeline in the conviction to dogsledding race held Project, TransCanada is persevere with annually between proud to sponsor this Mackenzie and Alaska, Whitehorse and event and showcase even through all the ups Fairbanks, is a unique northern culture, and downs of the last 10 event highlighting the tradition and character years on both.” cooperation, friendship across North America. —Dennis McConaghy, and shared values of Executive Vice- residents in Yukon and President, Corporate Development 114 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 LAT 68°N, LONG 135°W “Hurry hard!” An unofficial TransCanada curling team stops along a northern ice road. Left to right, Bill Arthur, Rick Gateman, Kristine Delkus, David Kohlenberg, Hal Kvisle. 116 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 a sweeping tour of the north I n Inuvik, every February there is an oilman’s curling bonspiel. Given the never-ending nature of the Mackenzie pipeline project, it is valuable to reinforce our continued interest in the north by touching base from time to time with our northern partners at such events. A few years back, Hal, an avid curler and accomplished skip, suggested that I put a team together for the bonspiel. On the Saturday of the tournament we had most of the day off, so Hal says why don’t we drive to Aklavik? The way you get there is you drive on the frozen Mackenzie River delta, 112 kilometres along an ice road, which I am nominated to do, in our rented Chevy Blazer, with a badly cracked windshield and bald tires. You’re mostly above the tree line, and with the wind howling in off the Beaufort Sea there are times when your entire world is completely white. At first I tried to keep up with the ‘local’ driving in front of us, but when we started to slide a bit I had visions of being upside down in a snowdrift with the CEO dangling from his seat belt—so we just took our time! By total coincidence, in Aklavik it turns out that a new curling rink Rick Gateman had just been opened the day before and many of the locals were busy with their own bonspiel. As we seemed to be the only nonaboriginal folks in the entire community we were a bit of a curiosity to them! We watched as they raced dogsleds up and down the frozen delta tributaries. It was far from being a touristy thing, it was just part of their culture. This was late February, and they were just coming out of a period of winter darkness when the sun never gets above the horizon at all—towards March you start to see the sun a bit more. We drove past the school there, and all the school kids had put little posters in the windows: “Welcome Back Mr. Sun!” A recollection of an interesting journey by Rick Gateman, Vice-president, northern development Chapter 9 Partnerships, promise, potential 117 ALASKA “We brought to the table a tremendous amount of credibility from our past history on this project and our history as the largest pipeline company in North America. TransCanada provides equal access to the original customers as well as more recent customers—big and small—and that was very appealing to Alaska.” —Tony Palmer, Vice-President, major projects Development In 2010, the Alaska Pipeline Project conducted the first natural gas pipeline open season in the history of the North Slope—resulting in a number of industry players bidding for significant volume on the pipeline. This represents a major milestone in the development of Alaska’s vast natural gas reserves. Alaska – By the Numbers Length of proposed pipeline, from a new gas treatment plant in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska to the Alberta border: 1,700 mi. (2,737 km) Number of Alaskans already employed on early stages of the project: 110 Projected capacity of the new pipeline: Up to 5.9 billion cubic feet Diameter of pipeline: 48 inches (left to right) Carla Birthwright, both of Dozens of people have obtained in the summer Kudrenecky-Nagy, ExxonMobil, are also contributed to the of 2008 were (left to Ignacio Monterrubio, part of the Alaska Alaska Pipeline Project right) Joyce Donnelly, Christina Mockridge. Pipeline Engineering over the past several Vincent Lee, Tony Palmer, Dan Lillig and Rhys team. years. Among those Donna Friesen, Jack gathered to celebrate Beattie, Tom Babuk. state legislative approval 118 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Mackenzie “In my first interview, Fred [Carmichael, of the APG] said: ‘My vision is to create the opportunity for Aboriginal youth to complete their education… to create a self-sufficient Aboriginal population.’ It probably won’t be accomplished in my lifetime, but APG is a first step.” Proposed PipeLine Routes North Slope Basin Arctic Ocean Prudhoe Bay Gas Treatment Plant Beaufort Sea Proposed Alaska Pipeline Project Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Ivvavik Yukon Flats National National Wildlife Park Refuge Vuntut National Park MacKenzie Basin Banks Island Tuktoyaktuk Fairbanks Inuvik Anchorage Victoria Island Valdez —Bob Reid, President, A boriginal Pipeline Group (Formerly with TransCanada). Norman Wells Great Bear Lake ie River Mackenz Whitehorse Watson Lake Juneau Through our support for the Aboriginal Pipeline Group (APG), Proposed Mackenzie Pipeline Project Northern limit of wooded country TransCanada is invested in the Mackenzie Gas Project, a pro- Fort Simpson posed 1,196 km (748 mi.) natural Yellowknife gas pipeline system along the Great Slave Lake Mackenzie Valley of Canada’s Northwest Territories to connect northern onshore gas fields with North American markets. Lake Athabasca Pacific Ocean Fort St.John The APG was formed in 2000 to represent the ownership interest Boundary Lake Dawson Creek Grande Prairie Southern reach of continuous permafrost of the Aboriginal peoples of the Northwest Territories in the proposed Mackenzie Valley pipeline. The APG’s involvement in the Mackenzie Gas Project represents the first time that Aboriginal Edmonton groups in Canada will participate as an owner in a major, multi-billion Southern reach of discontinous permafrost dollar industrial project. In exchange for providing funding to the project definition phase, TransCanada earns a number of acquisition Caroline Vancouver and expansion rights together with a financial return if the project Calgary Victoria goes ahead. The project is currently awaiting regulatory approvals, Regina but if development of this pipeline goes forward, it would connect Monchy would be converted 100W 110W 115 W 120 W Kingsgate 125 W 30 W Gulf of Alaska The Alaska Pipeline The gas would then be Project open season in delivered on existing to liquefied natural gas 2010 offered two options pipeline systems serving in a facility to be built to potential shippers. major North American by others and then The first (dark green markets. The second delivered by ship dotted line) is a pipeline (light green dotted line) to North American and through Alaska, Yukon would transport natural international markets. Territory and B.C. to gas to Valdez, Alaska, Alberta, about 1,700 about 800 miles miles (2,737 km). (1,287 km), where it with TransCanada’s system in Northern Alberta. Chapter 9 Partnerships, promise, potential 119 CHAPTER 9 Where we’ve been Partnerships, promise, potential APRIL 2010 MAY 2003 OCTOBER 2004 Full ownership of Foothills Imperial Oil filed application Open Season begins on Pipe Lines Ltd. Application filed to National Energy Alaska project Integral addition to move future Board (NEB) to construct and operate The Open Season Plan, the first to northern gas to North American markets; the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline. be filed in the history of the North Slope, was filed in January 2010. In April Foothills holds certificates to build the Canadian portion of the Alaska Highway NOVEMBER 2007 information was provided to potential Pipeline Project. AGIA application filed shippers in Alaska and Canada on TransCanada files an application under anticipated engineering design, JUNE 2003 the state’s AGIA. Four other parties file commercial terms, estimated project Funding announced for competing applications. costs and timelines. TransCanada agreed to anticipated AUGUST 2008 JULY 2010 funding of approximately $80 million Alaska Legislature approves Initial Alaska Open Season concludes for APG to participate in the project TransCanada license for Alaska Received multiple bids from major Aboriginal Pipeline Group definition phase of the Mackenzie Pipeline Project industry players and others for Gas Pipeline. TransCanada is given License facilitated continuing commercial significant volumes. an option to obtain an interest in the negotiations with potential shippers. pipeline at the decision to construct. JUNE 2009 MARCH 2004 Agreement reached to team with Alaska pipeline leadership ExxonMobil on Alaska project position suggested Agreement on initial project terms TransCanada announced intentions to helped to progress the project under assume a leadership position on AGIA. the development of an independently owned pipeline project in Alaska, in addition to their long-standing leadership of the Canadian portion of the project. “Now, we’re better at doing than just dreaming and planning of what we might be.” —Steve Becker, Pipeline Business Development 120 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Making it all happen. The people who are TransCanada 10 ChaPTER 10 It’s the People Who are Transcanada 121 chapter 10 the people who are TransCanada Doing big things that matter. The people of TransCanada clearly have a track record of dreaming big, thinking big, and doing big things. “We have one of the best workforces,” says Russ Girling, CEO. “They’re capable, professional people who know how to get their jobs done. They’re collaborative. Honest. They have incredible dedication, and commitment. And they’re just great people to work with. I can’t say enough about how amazed I am at the things that they accomplish, and the magnitude of the tasks and the challenges they take on. Even when we have our rough times, we pull together, dust ourselves off, and go back and do it again.” At TransCanada, every person makes a difference, and every person matters. In the following pages, you’ll meet just a few of our people, and hear just a few of their stories. But it’s a tribute to all of the people who are TransCanada. Lat 40ºN, long 73ºW “Having integrity in everything you do and having trust in the people that work alongside you is important. In a high-energy environment with lots of its own dangers, we have to protect not only ourselves but the people that work at the station. We need to trust each other and help each other out.” —Jawad Masud, Ravenswood maintenance, New York 122 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 LAT 51°N, LONG 114°W Willie Weich (left) and Jim Thompson at Winchell Lake Compressor Station, near Cremona, Alberta. 124 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 SAFEty 24/7 ustin Enright, a safety specialist for Northern Border D pipeline, is a volunteer firefighter in his hometown of Port Byron, Illinois. In 2008, he received a hero’s award from the state for saving a man’s life using an automated external defibrillator (AED), which he learned to use through TransCanada’s safety training. PREPARED FOR EMERGENCY Dustin was working in his garage one night in 2007 when he heard the rescue call. He hurried to the scene, not far from his home. “The victim was unconscious and not breathing when I arrived,” says Dustin. “I did a patient assessment as trained in the class and radioed for an AED to be brought to the scene right away.” Dustin began to administer CPR and continued until the AED arrived. “I grabbed the unit, ripped off his shirt, and applied the shock pads,” says Dustin. “The shock worked.” Dustin Enright An ambulance took the patient to hospital. “I was very happy to learn that he made it and was in stable condition later that night,” says Dustin. Several months later, Dustin was one of about 40 Illinois citizens to receive the state’s ‘Heartsaver Hero’ award. “This award makes me feel proud to work for a company that has such a strong focus and commitment to safety,” says Dustin. “Many companies might say they have a good safety program, but TransCanada backs it up. It’s nice to know that at TransCanada you are surrounded by people who have everyone’s safety, including the public, on the forefront of their mind.” ChaPTER 10 the People Who are Transcanada 125 Integrity “Our customers have told us time and again through surveys and conversations that reliability is the most important thing, which is all tied up in responsibility and integrity. So at the end of the day the most important thing to me is to be able to tell them that TransCanada will do what we say we’re going to do. The customers trust our word.” —Hang Nguyen-Xuan, transportation services accounting, Houston Gary Charette “Whether I’m working with my team in Brooks or on project teams, the people are just excellent, and I think the biggest reason for that is they all have a high degree of personal integrity. Collaboration comes, I think, if you have integrity.” “I don’t want to work in an environment where my values don’t match company expectations, and I feel very comfortable with TransCanada that integrity isn’t just words on a piece of paper, it’s actually the way we do business.” —Gary Charette, U.S. pipelines commercial operations, Houston —Duane Hauer, field operations, Brooks, Alberta “On a personal note, integrity is about holding myself to high ethical standards and also committing and delivering on the promises that I’ve made.” —Joe Williment, facilities maintenance, MAPLE / Niagara, Ontario “In my line of work we have to deal a lot with customers in fairly contentious situations—in rate cases for example. Being honest and being open about your position is important. Having that integrity to be honest in situations where it’s tough, it’s important.” —Ben Johnson, law and regulatory affairs (rates), Houston 126 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Joe Williment LAT 51°N, LONG 114°W: MAY 2009 Bob Semeniuk, who was with the Airdrie office, shares information about the Alberta System jurisdictional change with locals at an open house in Cochrane, Alberta. ChaPTER 10 the People Who are Transcanada 127 Engaged “I spend more time with my TransCanada family than my home family, and so you have to like where you are. I like the people I work with—they are motivated and intelligent, they are fun to work with, they are respectful, they are collegial. We have issues from time to time, as you would expect anywhere, but it is a very comfortable place to work. I don’t go into Sunday night with trepidation that Monday morning’s coming.” —Kristine Delkus, pipelines and regulatory affairs, Calgary “I think it’s what you do every day that makes up the culture of an organization. It’s more in your actions than what you put on paper.” —Wendy Hanrahan, human resources, Calgary “We challenge our people to come up with new “Regarding corporate culture, I think there are a ideas, and to bring them forward. We can’t rest on lot of sharp people. I think TransCanada has done our laurels or just let the asset do what it’s going a good job of putting the right people in the right to do—we have to try to add value, given what we places. I think it’s well thought out.” —John Roscher, law and regulatory affairs see in the market every day. That’s an engaging environment for people. People are happy to be here (rates and tariffs), Houston and learning.” —Brandon Anderson, gas storage, Calgary 128 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 PASSIONATE As an Official Supplier of the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games, TransCanada offered opportunities for employees to “share in the experience” every step of the way. During the year-long countdown, employees from all areas participated in activities such as weekly trivia competitions, torch relay celebrations and a contest to win a trip to the games. Local celebrations were also held across North America during the actual 16-day event. Ten employees shared the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to represent TransCanada in the 2010 Olympic Torch Relay. “When I saw the torch approaching me, it was a surreal moment,” recalls John Coutts of our Ile des Chênes, Manitoba compressor station, one of the torchbearers selected from among hundreds of employees nominated across North America. “It was just a wonderful experience, very emotional.” Joan Muzzey of Tinley Park, Illinois agrees. On one of two special LAT 41°N, LONG 88°W: FEBRUARY 2010 legs of the Torch Relay—one TransCanada employee literally passed the flame to another—Joan passed the torch to David Haag of In Sandwich, Illinois, the Joan Muzzey (centre), Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Both U.S. based employees traveled to Lake Michigan Region one of TransCanada’s held a Hawaiian beach employee torchbearers. Mont-Joli, Québec to complete their portion of the Relay. “To be able to hand it off to a fellow employee was just, to me, party with special guest the best!” Joan says. 1 2 17 employees and their Pictured here is winner and Lisa Ma (2), from guests won a trip to Dana Hatch (1), Calgary, with husband, the Games courtesy of from Westborough, also at women’s hockey. TransCanada. Massachussetts, at women’s hockey, ChaPTER 10 the People Who are Transcanada 129 Connected It’s the largest gathering of TransCanada people you’ll find and it The first-ever U.S. Pipelines employee meeting was held after happens twice a year. During employee forums people across North the consolidation of the company’s U.S. natural gas pipelines. America connect with each other and hear about the business from The meeting was held in Houston and webcast to employees and the CEO and other executives. More than 1,000 people typically contractors across U.S. Pipelines. attend the events in Calgary with hundreds more participating in Houston and other locations via webcast. 1 3 2 (clockwise) Employees Ryan McGrath, Blair ensure the live streaming technology to bring Kim Groves and Alenda mingling at the Telus Purvis, and Gisele webcast goes smoothly— people closer together Hanson (3) hand out Convention Centre in Aparicio-Hull (2) work on just one example of despite the great physical travel mugs featuring Calgary (1). the technical set-up to how TransCanada uses distances between us. TransCanada’s four values. 130 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 4 5 6 (top left to right) Mike Karen Leal and Bobi Jackson, Yasin Vohra and Jones (5) share a laugh Michael Barnes (4) man prior to the event (6). the technical table. ChaPTER 10 the People Who are Transcanada 131 CARING LEADING THE WAY In 1999, employees shouted their $1.25 million United Way campaign success from the half-built rooftop of the company’s new tower in downtown Calgary (1). Ten years later, after more than 50 years of commitment to the United Way, TransCanada and its employees were awarded the ‘Embracing United Way’ award. The award, from United Way of Calgary and Area, recognizes ongoing support for a decade or more and is given each year to an organization that has embedded the spirit of United Way into its culture. TransCanada may have earned extra points for its support of almost 100 United Way offices across North America. “I like the fact that we help others in our community, in our own backyard,” says Angelique Bentivoglio, who works at the Maple compressor station in Ontario. “I can actually go out in the community 1 and see how we help others. My family has been involved as well.” 2 3 4 5 Employees, including United Way parade in tradition in Calgary for (4) came out in support Way in Houston. The more than $2.5 million campaign chair Holly September 2009 (2). many years. In 2009, the of the event. Liz Palacios 2009 campaign kickoff company-wide. Yaschuk (second from Johanna Peters and campaign kick-off had and Lena Treviño (5) event drew thousands left in front), carry the Judy White participate a change of scene and represent TransCanada at to the Toyota Center TransCanada banner in the United Way fun moved indoors. Special a gathering of corporate downtown. TransCanada’s at Calgary’s city-wide run (3), a TransCanada guest ‘Harvey the Hound’ sponsors of the United 2009 campaign raised 132 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 hammer time About 10 days every year, TransCanada employees can be found with hammers and hardhats on Habitat for Humanity construction sites. “You know your efforts are going into something that’s going to be around for many years to come and those efforts change someone’s life for the better,” says Steve Elliott, former Calgary build coordinator. “It seems an excellent way for TransCanada to have a long-lasting impact in the community.” In fact, a Habitat for Humanity build project was the first community activity undertaken by Houston employees following the ANR pipeline acquisition in 2007. In November, 2007, more than two 1 dozen Houston employees helped with the construction. The keys were turned over to the new homeowner on May 15, 2008. “We believe this is one way that we can have a real impact in a community where we have strong ties,” says Catharine Davis, U.S. Pipelines. “Our employees rolled up their sleeves and showed that they are generous and caring people by their actions.” 2 3 4 6 5 Framing “TransCanada Jay Lewis (3); Lena House” in Calgary in 2003 Treviño, Margaret Kidd, (1, 5, 6). Construction in Amy Sowa, and Carol Houston in 2007 (2, 3, 4): Wehlmann (4). Tom Janish (2), ChaPTER 10 It’s the People Who are Transcanada 133 Lat 51ºN, Long 114ºW Emily Zhang is pictured here outside the TransCanada building in Calgary. Achieving As a child, TransCanada engineer Emily Zhang was taught that the only limits are those you place on yourself. Selected by the Women’s Executive Network as one of Canada’s Most Powerful Women in 2008, at the age of only 26, Emily has become a national role model for what can be achieved with talent, foresight and determination. FUTURE LEADER Emily joined Engineers Without Borders in 2000, when she was studying for her Mechanical Engineering degree at the University of Calgary. She now serves as co-president of the Calgary chapter of the organization, where she helps lead a team of 42 executives and directors and engages hundreds more in the Calgary community through awareness activities. The Network honoured Emily in the ‘Future Leader’ category for her role. The Calgary chapter’s activities have focused on the African countries of Malawi, Burkina Faso, Ghana and Zambia, as well as on promoting global citizenship in Canada. Her advice for others is simple: aim high, be true to yourself, and surround yourselves with mentors who can help guide you. “I’ve been taught that there are no limitations, that the only limits are those you place inside yourself,” she says. “Don’t be afraid to jump at new opportunities and see where they may lead you.” ChaPTER 10 It’s the People Who are Transcanada 135 Committed “It’s very easy to destroy a good reputation. One of the pieces of advice I typically give my clients is ‘do the right thing.’ If it feels right then that’s what you should be doing.” —Lauri Newton, law and regulatory affairs– U.S. pipelines land and environment, Houston “It’s a commitment to high ethical standards, it’s a commitment to safety, it’s a commitment to stewardship of environmental resources. In an engineering role, there are plenty of opportunities for shortcuts and by and large it’s maintaining high ethical standards that keeps you from taking undesirable shortcuts. Obviously we’re in the business to move gas, but it’s not worth it if you can’t do it safely.” —Garrett Word, U.S. pipelines system & capacity management, Houston Garrett Word 136 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 LAT 45°N, LONG 70°W Kibby Wind Farm is surrounded by scenic hills in Maine; it will be the largest wind power development in New England. “The thing that really excites me about the company is that we’re right in the middle of what is the most important political and social debate in the world, which is how do we continue to provide affordable, reliable energy to our citizens in a way that heals the planet? We do that in everything we do—our natural gas is cleaner than coal, we’re doing electric transmission projects that will carry clean energy to large markets that need it. So we’re looking for practical solutions to one of the most intractable problems facing humanity.” —Scott Farris, public sector relations, Portland ChaPTER 10 the People Who are Transcanada 137 CHAPTER 10 Where we’ve been The people who are TransCanada As of August 2010, TransCanada had about 4,200 employees in 3 countries, 7 provinces, 31 states, and almost Gen Y 13% 250 locations. GENERAtions In the last five years, the number of Baby Boomers in our workforce has Baby Boomers 54% Gen X 33% CANADA 2,525 people Calgary 1,800 people declined by 11 percentage points. Gen Y has increased by 6 percentage points. Commitment to diversity thinking long term In 2010, TransCanada was named one About 60% of our people are in of Canada’s Best Diversity Employers in a Operations and Major Projects—their national awards program sponsored by work is largely devoted to ensuring Maclean’s magazine. In particular, the the long term reliability, safety, award recognized the company’s efforts and sustainability of our pipelines, to support women in the workplace, power plants, and other facilities. UNITED STATES 1,630 people and hire and train Aboriginal workers. in the field Experience and dedication About 40% of our people work in the On average, our employees have about field. Outside of Calgary, Houston, and 13 years of service and only about 3% Ravenswood (New York), the average leave or retire annually. Slightly more location has 7 people. MEXICO 9 people Houston 420 people than 25% of our current employees were part of the TransCanada-NOVA merger. doing big things In 2009, we had $9.5 million in assets per person and generated $333,300 in net income per person. A NEW ERA OF GROWTH: EMPLOYEE POPULATION FROM 2003−2010 4500 4000 4000 3375 3500 3000 2500 4200 2200 2400 2440 NOVEMBER 2004 GTN acquisition APRIL 2005 U.S. hydro facilities acquisition 2000 1500 1000 500 0 DECEMBER 2003 Restructuring complete 138 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 FEBRUARY 2007 ANR / Great Lakes acquisition AUGUST 2008 Ravenswood acquisition and continued growth JUNE 2010 Here we are. Here WE ARE The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 1 Lat 51ºN, Long 114ºW Close-up of gas control screen. 2 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 Here we are. Twelve years ago, TransCanada was a very different company than it is today. And yet, many things have not changed. This book tells the story of a group of people with steadfast vision, discipline and commitment who built a business that customers choose to partner with, shareholders value, communities welcome as a good neighbour, and those who work here are proud of. This company has changed the energy map in North America. Millions of people benefit from our role in providing energy across the continent. This role is often largely invisible, and yet, we have only to look at still-developing parts of the globe to appreciate how essential reliable and safe natural gas, oil, and electricity supplies are to our well-being. We could not have reached this point without the spirit and resilience of the people who persevered when times were tough—and have stayed focused during our current era of rapid growth. Looking back, the challenging times have helped define the “personality” of the company and the values we espouse. We will remember and learn from our history and remain on course—our map will evolve and our vision will continue to guide us. In the words of CEO Russ Girling, “We understand who we are and what we are. And that’s not about to change.” Here WE ARE The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 141 TURNAROUND STORY – by the numbers TransCanada (TRP) TSX Debt and equity issues (CAD$) 45 July 1998: TransCanada-NOVA merger closes 40 35 30 1 December 1999: Divestiture program and dividend cut announced 25 December 2000: More than $2B of assets divested by year-end February 2003: Bruce Nuclear Power investment 5 20 4 15 3 2 10 December 2001: Enron files for banruptcy 5 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 We define success in many ways—safety, efficiency, reliability, and Between 2008 and 2010, during the height of global financial crisis, reputation, to name a few. TransCanada issued more than $20 billion in debt and equity to But the ultimate measure, of course, is how the company is valued in the marketplace. Our share price tells the story of TransCanada’s turnaround. From its post-merger low in 2000, TransCanada’s share price has recovered and grown steadily. Sticking to the strategy mapped out in 1999, TransCanada focused on its core pipeline, power, and gas storage businesses within North America. finance the expansion and growth of its core businesses. (Green dots on graph indicate debt and equity issues; see details on facing page.) “Probably the toughest period in the entire time that I’ve been on the Board was through the latter part of 2008, when we had a pretty significant financial meltdown,” says Barry Jackson, current Board Chair. “But the support for TransCanada in the marketplace was phenomenal. I’d say there weren’t more than a handful of companies in North America who could have done what TransCanada did. That’s a market endorsement of the caliber of the individuals, the caliber of the strategy, and the caliber of the execution under that strategy.” 142 We Are Here The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 2004 TSX 16,000 April 2005: TC Hydro facilities acquired in New England June 2010: First crude oil delivered from Alberta to Illinois via Keystone Pipeline August 2008: Ravenswood New York power acquisition closes 14,000 8 9 10 11 10,000 7 6 12,000 8,000 September–October 2008: World financial crisis reaches peak; Lehman Brothers files for bankruptcy 6,000 4,000 December 2006: ANR Pipeline/ Great Lakes Gas Transmission acquisition announced November 2004: GTN pipeline acquired in Western US 2005 2006 2007 2,000 2008 2009 2010 Financing for growth Barry Jackson Debt and equity issues shown as green March 2006 – US$500M senior notes August 2008 – US$1.25B senior notes dots on the graph above: September 2006 – $400M medium term November 2008 – $1.2B common shares June 2003 – US$350M senior notes notes November 2003 – $450M medium term October 2006 – $400M medium term notes notes February 2004 – $200M medium term February 2007 – $1.7B common shares notes May 2007 – US$1.0B junior subordinated March 2004 – US$350M senior notes notes October 2004 – US$300M senior notes October 2007 – US$1.0B senior notes January 2005 – $300M medium term May 2008 – $1.3B common shares notes August 2008 – $500M medium term January 2006 – $300M medium term notes notes January 2009 – US$2.0B senior notes February 2009 – $700M medium term notes June 2009 – $1.8B common shares September 2009 – $550M preferred shares March 2010 – $350M preferred shares June 2010 – US$1.25B senior notes June 2010 – $350M preferred shares Here WE ARE The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 143 Lat 51ºN, Long 114ºW As he looks forward in his new role as CEO, Russ Girling has history on his side as he continues in the footsteps of those leaders before him. The next chapter “It’s a great thing to be part of a team that’s winning, enjoying it, and getting better all the time.” —Russ Girling, CEO It’s rewarding to know that the business strategy TransCanada committed to just over a decade ago remains essentially unchanged today. Our work to build a first-class North American energy infra structure company is on the right track. “Our primary objective is to build long-term value for our shareholders, many of whom are also our employees,” says Russ. “So it’s in all our best interests to succeed. Ten years ago, we decided to focus only on businesses we know and understand; developing them, operating them, and building them. TransCanada today is large and diversified, but equally focused on operation and management. “We are able to conceptualize, negotiate, design, construct, operate, and maintain this large-scale infrastructure like nobody else can. And that’s what it takes. It takes the ability to do all those things exceedingly well. We will only be successful going forward if we never forget what got us to where we are today: hard work, skill and disciplined execution.” Russ also emphasizes another critical ingredient: “The more fun you have at your job, the more success you have. And that to me is important,” he says. “If everybody performs at their best, they’re going to be the happiest, and the most satisfied, and that will drive the performance of the company.” Here WE ARE The Transcanada JOurney 1998–2010 145 just the beginning… There could have been and which represents no better last act for TransCanada’s vision Hal Kvisle on the day of and ability to seize his retirement as CEO opportunity. Keystone on June 30, 2010, than symbolizes both how to turn on the tap for far we’ve come, and the the Keystone Pipeline, promising future that lies a project he believed before us. The journey in from the beginning, continues… Special thanks. Thank you to the innumerable people who participated in interviews, donated memorabilia, contributed photos, helped research and provide historical details, and otherwise supported this project. It is your contributions that have made the stories within these pages come to life. acknowledgements TransCanada Project Team Forwords Communication Inc. Photography Editor Project and Creative Lead Marnie Burkhart, Jazhart Studios Heather Opseth Jennifer Wah, abc, mc Managing Editor Writer/Editorial Consultant Shela Shapiro Allan Jenkins Contributors Production Manager Gisele Aparicio-Hull, writer and Spencer MacGillivray reviewer Creative Director Michael Barnes, writer and reviewer Matt Warburton fgdc David Dodson, reviewer Art Director Reina Fonseca, associate Linda French, legal counsel Dawn Jenkinson, photography Dan Bannister, One Word Photography the Calgary Herald, photographer Photography David Lazarowych Paul Connor, Rocky Point Productions Bruce Forster, Bruce Forster Photography Winter Ghostkeeper Todd Korol, Todd Korol Photography Graphic Designers Jim Larime Deana De Ciccio Rob Liddle Kat McCulloch coordination Dennis Lanthier, interviewer and writer Printing Jeff McIntosh Joseph Lohan, writer and reviewer Rhino Print Solutions Shannon Oatway Kimberly Molnar, editorial assistant Eric Willis, mapping Executive Sponsor Patrick O’Connor, Patrick O’Connor Hurricane Ike satellite image, page 69, courtesy of NOAA Satellite and Information Service Disaster relief photo, page 69, courtesy of the American Red Cross NASDAQ opening bell photo, page 71 © 2009, The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., printed with permission Keystone photos, pages 104/105, courtesy of Bechtel Corporation APG mug, page 119, used with permission of the Aboriginal Pipelines Group Photography Salvo Photography Sarah Raiss Kathleen Scott Project Advisor Jay Stevens Wendy Hanrahan shareholder meeting photos, pages 16-17, used with permission of Brian Buchsdruecker, Bookstrucker Brandon Brind Leanne Romak TransCanada PipeLines and NOVA Media acknowledgements Page 12, reference ‘marriage made in heaven and shotgun wedding’ – Maclean’s, February 9, 1998 Daniel Vaillancourt, Patrick O’Connor Page 16, reference Financial Post, Photography June 27-29, 1998 Daniel Wood TransCanada Archives Page 16, reference the Calgary Herald, June 30, 1998 Page 17, reference the Calgary Herald, June 30, 1998