Phase II ESA Rpt 071021b

Transcription

South Deerfield,
Massachusetts
Phase II Environmental
Site Assessment
Former Cains Pickle
Facility,
15 Jewett Avenue
South Deerfield, MA
October 2007
Weston & Sampson Engineers,
Inc.
Five Centennial Drive
Peabody, MA 01960-7985
www.westonandsampson.com
Tel: 978-532-1900
977-0100
Fax: 978-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................ES-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................. i
LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ ii
LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................... ii
LIST OF APPENDICES................................................................................................................. ii
1.0
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .................................................................... 1-1
1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Site Location .................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.3 Site Description and History............................................................................................ 1-1
1.4 Area Receptors................................................................................................................. 1-2
1.5 Soil and Groundwater Classification ............................................................................... 1-2
1.5.1
Soil ....................................................................................................................... 1-2
1.5.2
Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 1-2
1.6 Previous Studies............................................................................................................... 1-2
2.0
PHASE II FIELD INVESTIGATION ............................................................................. 2-4
2.1 Phase II ESA Project Approach and Conceptual Site Model .......................................... 2-4
2.2 Test Pits............................................................................................................................ 2-4
2.3 Soil Sampling and Analysis ............................................................................................. 2-5
3.0
PHASE II RESULTS....................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1 Geology............................................................................................................................ 3-1
3.1.1
Regional Geology ................................................................................................ 3-1
3.1.2
Site Geology......................................................................................................... 3-1
3.2 Hydrogeology .................................................................................................................. 3-1
3.2.1
Regional Hydrogeology ....................................................................................... 3-1
3.2.2
Groundwater Elevations....................................................................................... 3-1
3.3 Soil ................................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.3.1
Field Screening Results........................................................................................ 3-1
3.3.2
Analytical Results ................................................................................................ 3-1
3.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control.................................................................................. 3-2
3.4.1
Introduction.......................................................................................................... 3-2
3.4.2
Presumptive Certainty:......................................................................................... 3-2
3.4.3
PARCCS .............................................................................................................. 3-3
3.4.4
QA/QC Summary................................................................................................. 3-3
4.0
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................................... 4-1
4.1 Summary .......................................................................................................................... 4-1
i
Weston & Sampson
4.2 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................ 4-1
5.0
LIMITATIONS................................................................................................................ 5-1
6.0
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 6-1
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Locus Map
Site Plan
Area Receptors Map
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Soil Analytical Results
Appendix A
Appendix B
LIST OF APPENDICES
Test Pit Logs
R:\Deerfield MA\Cains Pickle Facility ESA\Report\Phase II ESA Rpt 071021.doc
ii
Weston & Sampson
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Weston & Sampson Engineers, Inc., on behalf of the Town of Deerfield, Massachusetts (the
Town) performed a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Phase II ESA) on a commercial
property located at 15 Jewett Avenue, South Deerfield, Massachusetts. The Phase II ESA was
conducted to support the Town’s efforts to evaluate the environmental conditions of the Site
prior to its redevelopment. Weston & Sampson was not acting as a Licensed Site Professional
during this investigation, however all fieldwork was performed in accordance with
Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) performance standards.
The scope of work included the excavation of eight test pits, sampling and analysis of soil; data
evaluation; comparison to regulatory criteria; and overall assessment of environmental
conditions at the Site. Sampling and analysis of groundwater at the Site was not performed as
part of this investigation. The major findings of the Phase II ESA are as follows:
Soil sampling analytical results detected several analytes above MCP Reportable Concentrations
(RCs) in one test pit sample. Specifically soil contamination was found in the vicinity of the
former maintenance building at the Coates Avenue entrance to the Site. The soil sample
analytical results are presented on Table 1 and the complete laboratory analytical report is
included as Appendix A. The lateral and vertical extent of soil contamination is unknown.
Weston & Sampson screened soil headspaces for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). None
were detected, other than adjacent to the Coates Avenue maintenance building.
Analytical results of soil samples collected from explorations performed within the storm water
retention basin, storm water drainage swale, the former gasoline underground storage tank (UST)
grave and adjacent to the former location of the Jewett Avenue maintenance building detected no
analytes above the laboratory detection limits.
The detection of MCP RCs in soil trigger a 120-day notification, per 310 CMR 40.0300.
However as the extent of contamination is currently unknown, Weston & Sampson recommends
additional characterization of the area to evaluate the aerial and vertical extent of contamination.
Potential outcomes include:
•
•
•
Conducting a Limited Removal Action (LRA) if the volume of petroleum-impacted soil is
less than 100 cubic yards and groundwater is not impacted. An LRA would be performed
within 120-days (i.e. prior to notification). Provided the requirements of an LRA are met and
all contamination was removed, no notification would then be required per the MCP.
If removal cannot be performed within 120 days, or volumes exceed 100 cubic yards, or
groundwater was impacted then removal actions could be conducted as Release Abatement
Measure (RAM).
If removal actions are not warranted (based on concentrations and aerial extent) then the
release could be closed out via a Method 3 Risk Characterization provided a condition of No
Significant Risk is demonstrated to exist at the Site.
ES-1
Weston & Sampson
1.0
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
1.1 Introduction
Weston & Sampson Engineers, Inc. was contracted by the Town of Deerfield, Massachusetts to
perform a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) on the former Cains pickle factory
property located at 15 Jewett Avenue, 25 Rear Jewett Avenue, South Main Street, Coates
Avenue and 34 Sugarloaf Street in South Deerfield, Massachusetts (the Site). No previous
environmental investigations have been conducted at the Site. However, the Massachusetts
Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) coordinated the cleanup of a heating fuel release
that occurred in 1983 and the operators of the pickle factory had been under an Administrative
Consent Order due to periodic releases of pickle brining solution. The Phase II ESA was part of
the Town’s efforts to evaluate the Site prior to redevelopment. This Phase II ESA report was
prepared in accordance with the Limitations included in Section 5.0 of this report. Please note
that fieldwork was performed in accordance with the performance standards in the MCP,
however this report is not supposed to meet the requirements of an MCP Phase II
Comprehensive Site Assessment in accordance with 310 CMR 40.0830. Weston & Sampson was
not acting as a Licensed Site Professional for this investigation. This Phase II ESA was prepared
for the Town to understand Site conditions and to support Site redevelopment.
1.2 Site Location
The Site is located at 15 Jewett Avenue, South Deerfield, Massachusetts 01373, in Franklin
County between Coates Avenue, South Main Street and Sugarloaf Street (Figure 1 – Locus
Map). The Site is listed as: Map 168, Parcels 20 and 21; Map 169, Parcels 2 and 3; Map 174,
Parcel 159; and, Map 175, Parcel 16 on Deerfield Assessor’s map. A Site Plan based on the
Deerfield Assessor’s map is included as Figure 2. The Site is located in a mixed residential and
commercial area of South Deerfield. The Site is abutted by the Town of Deerfield Highway
Department (Hwy Dept) Garage to the northeast, residential properties to the east, west and
south, and a mix of residential and commercial properties to the north (see Figure 2 – Site Plan).
The geographic coordinates for the approximate center of the Site are as follows:
Latitude/Longitude:
UTM Coordinates:
42° 28' 30" North / 72° 36' 29" West
696621.3 meters East / 4705069.3 meters North (Zone 18)
1.3 Site Description and History
The Site is approximately 16.03-acres in size and contains one approximately 1,500-square foot
building and an approximately 40,000-square foot paved parking area. The Phase I ESA
misidentified one of the Town of Deerfield Hwy Dept buildings on Jewett Avenue as one of two
former maintenance buildings belonging to the Site. The Site is owned by Sugarloaf Property
Development, LLC. The former pickle factory and several outbuildings have been demolished.
Site topography is generally flat and the land surface is unpaved to the east, south and west of the
former factory building and parking area, and the footprints of the former buildings were left
filled with crushed concrete following demolition. Valves, standpipes and other plumbing that
was used to distribute liquids to the pickle brining vats are visible throughout the site. The
former pickle factory operated at the Site from the early 1900’s and the majority of the site was
1-1
Weston & Sampson
occupied by the pickle factory and brining vats. The approximate footprints of the former
buildings are shown on Figure 2 and the locations of the brining vats are visible in the aerial
photograph used as the base layer of Figure 3 (Area Receptors Map).
1.4 Area Receptors
According to the Area Receptors Map (Figure 3) prepared using the Massachusetts Geographic
Information System (MassGIS) Environmental Receptors Database, the site is within a highly
productive aquifer and majority of the Site (approximately 15.41 acres) is located within a DEP
approved Zone IIs, the wellhead protection area for a public water supply well. There are two
portions of the site that are west of Sugarloaf Brook (totaling approximately 0.62 acres) that are
located outside of the Zone IIs. The Site is not located within, or adjacent to a National Heritage
and Endangered Species Program (NHESP) Priority and Estimated Habitat, or an area of
protected open space. There are no Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) or
protected open space present within 0.5 miles of the property. The closest institutions are the
Deerfield Elementary School, and the Frontier Regional School (a high school) located within
0.25 miles north of the Site.
1.5 Soil and Groundwater Classification
1.5.1 Soil
The Site is currently not listed with DEP, therefore contaminant concentrations at the Site were
compared to the MCP RCS-1 reportable concentrations as the Site is within 500 feet of
residential properties. Once reported, the release site would be compared to Method 1 S-1
standards (S-1/GW-1, S-1/GW-2 and S-1/GW-3) for unrestricted use and to S-2 standards S2/GW-1, S-2/GW-2 and S-2/GW-3) for site specific risk.
1.5.2 Groundwater
Site groundwater was not sampled as part of the Phase II ESA. If groundwater is encountered
then groundwater data would be compared to RCGW-1 standards for reporting. If groundwater
contaminants are detected at concentrations exceeding RCs then the following Method 1
standards would apply. According to information from the MassGIS Environmental Receptors
Database (graphically depicted on Figure 3), the Site overlies a current or potential drinking
water source area. Therefore, groundwater at the site is classified as GW-1. Although the
building is unoccupied, Site groundwater is within 30 feet of the structure therefore for future
Site use, Method 1 GW-2 Standards would also apply. In addition, all groundwater must be
compared to the Method 1 GW-3 Standards. Therefore for this Site, the Method 1 GW-1, GW-2
and GW-3 standards would apply.
1.6 Previous Studies
During the period from July to August 2007, Weston & Sampson conducted a Phase I ESA for
the Site. The Phase I ESA was performed in accordance with the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment Process (Standard Practice E 1527-05), as developed by the American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM), the Oil and Hazardous Material Release Prevention and
1-2
Weston & Sampson
Response Act - Massachusetts General Law Chapter 21E (MGL c. 21E), and in general
accordance with EPA’s All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) standard. The ESA included an
environmental database search, review of local, state, and federal regulatory agency files, a
limited reconnaissance of the Site and vicinity for potential off-site contamination sources,
interviews with Town officials and a limited chain of title review at the Franklin County Registry
of Deeds. The major findings of the Phase I ESA are as follows:
•
The Site was formerly under a DEP administrative consent order due to releases of pickle
brine. DEP files for the Site contain two release log forms for releases of pickle brine at
the Site: On 7/30/2000, Release Tracking Number (RTN) 1-13567 was assigned to the
Site and on 1/8/2003, RTN 1-14699 was assigned to the Site. Neither of the RTNs are
currently listed in the DEP database of disposal/cleanup sites. Therefore it appears that
both RTNs were retracted and the Site is not listed as a release site with DEP.
•
A release of #4 heating fuel occurred at the Site on 5/17/1983, and the subsequent
cleanup was supervised by DEP. No additional information was available.
•
The Site historically stored gasoline, #4 heating fuel and diesel fuel in underground
storage tanks (USTs) that have reportedly been removed from the Site. However, Weston
and Sampson was not able to locate details of the 6,000-gallon #4 heating fuel UST
removal or the 10,000-gallon diesel UST removal. Additionally, all of the available site
plans / site sketches indicating the locations of the tanks were “Not to Scale” drawings,
making it difficult to determine of the precise locations of the tanks from the drawings.
•
The Town Hwy Dept property abutting the Site, has been remediated for a gasoline
release stemming from USTs on the site. A Class-A2 Response Action Outcome (RAO),
was submitted to the DEP on June 22, 2000, indicating that a permanent solution has
been achieved, however contamination has not been reduced to background conditions.
•
The Cumberland Farms located at 2 Sugarloaf Street, approximately 500 feet north of the
Site, is currently being remediated for a gasoline release, and notified the DEP on
6/3/2004 of a condition of Substantial Release Migration (SRM).
•
The Site is located within a mixed commercial and residential area of South Deerfield.
The Site is currently vacant. Historical uses of the Site include a pickle making factory
that covered the majority of the Site, and a former residence at 34 Sugar Loaf Street. The
pickle factory and former residential structure were demolished prior to the real estate
transaction.
•
During Site reconnaissance on July 28, 2007, Weston & Sampson observed the presence
of remnants of the former pickle factory including; demolished concrete, an out of service
above ground storage tank, portable conveyor belts, numerous pipes and valves and one
intact plastic 55-gallon drum containing approximately 5-gallons of an unknown liquid.
1-3
Weston & Sampson
2.0
PHASE II FIELD INVESTIGATION
2.1 Phase II ESA Project Approach and Conceptual Site Model
Weston & Sampson conducted a Phase II ESA Limited Subsurface Investigation to evaluate
areas of concern identified during the Phase I ESA. Based on the findings of the Phase I ESA,
Weston & Sampson developed a Conceptual Site Model (CSM) for the Site. Based on site
history, impacted soil may exist in the vicinity of the following AOCs: the former tank locations
and maintenance buildings as well as within the stormwater-runoff collection system, possibly
extending below into the Site groundwater table. However, the exact location of the former tanks
cannot be determined from the “Not to Scale” Site plans and sketches found during the Phase I
ESA.
The depth to bedrock at the Site is not known. Based on a Water Pollution Control Plan prepared
for the Site that is on file at DEP, groundwater at the Site is approximately 5-7 feet below ground
surface (bgs). Groundwater in the Site vicinity flows in a southeasterly direction. Soil
contamination requiring remediation near the Site formerly existed adjacent to the Hwy Dept
building. Residual soil impacts below regulatory criteria were identified to the south of the Hwy
Dept building.
In order to determine the presence or absence of impact from the potential historical sources on
the Site the following was done as part of this investigation:
•
Excavation of eight test pits / trenches in the vicinity of the AOCs listed above;
•
Screening of soil headspace in test pits for total VOCs; and,
•
Sampling and laboratory analysis of soil for the presence of petroleum compounds.
Weston & Sampson observed the excavation of eight test pits designated TP-1 through TP-8.
The locations of the test pits, and soil sample locations are shown on Figure 2. Test pit logs and
photographs are included as Appendix B.
2.2 Test Pits
On September 28, 2007, Weston & Sampson documented the excavation of eight test pits by H. C.
Kocot and Sons, Inc, using a Caterpillar model 320 tracked excavator. Soils observed during the
explorations were classified by Weston & Sampson field personnel using the Modified Burmister
Soil Classification System. During the explorations, Weston & Sampson also screened the soil for
total VOCs using a MiniRAE 2000 PID fitted with a 10.6 electron volt (eV) lamp, and the results
exceeding the background concentration of 0.0 parts per million by volume (ppmv) were recorded
on the test pit logs. The PID screening does not identify or quantify individual compounds, but
provides an indication of relative levels of total VOCs present in a sample (referenced to a standard
of isobutylene in air) and reported in ppmv. Total VOC concentrations were measured using the
headspace test described in the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Waste Site
Cleanup Policy #WSC-94-400, Interim Remediation Waste Management Policy for Petroleum
Contaminated Soil.
2-4
Weston & Sampson
None of the soil headspace samples contained total VOCs above the background level of 0.0 ppmv
except for those collected from test pit TP-7 adjacent to the Coates Avenue maintenance building.
Soil samples from each sidewall and the bottom of test pit TP-7 contained elevated PID readings
ranging from 7.9 ppmv in the south wall sample to 34.5 ppmv in the bottom sample. Test pit logs
and photographs are included in Appendix B.
Extensive sampling adjacent to the Coates Avenue maintenance building could not be performed
due to the close proximity and uncertain location and depth of underground utilities. Extensive
sampling adjacent to the former location of the maintenance building along Jewett Avenue could
not be performed due to uncertain location of property lines between the Site, neighboring
residences and Town property.
2.3 Soil Sampling and Analysis
During the excavation of the test pits on September 28, 2007, Weston & Sampson collected soil
samples from the sidewalls and bottoms of the test pits. Soil headspace was screened for total
VOCs using a PID equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp. The PID was standardized to a 100 parts per
million (ppm) isobutylene reference gas. Selected soil samples were then sealed in laboratorysupplied jars and placed in a cooler on ice for transportation to the laboratory. Samples were
submitted for laboratory analysis based on PID results, visual indication of contamination and
the general location of the sample. Sampling equipment was decontaminated between each
sample collection by wiping or brushing off any excess water or soil from the equipment with a
paper towel or cleaning brush, spraying the equipment with Alconox soap solution and rinsing
with deionized water, spraying the equipment with the appropriate decontamination solutions
including dilute nitric acid and methanol, rinsing the equipment with deionized water, and
drying.
Eight selected soil samples from the test pits were submitted to Con-Test Laboratory, a
state-certified laboratory in East Longmeadow, Massachusetts. Soil samples were submitted for
analysis of volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH) and extractable petroleum hydrocarbons
(EPH) including target VOCs and target polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) according to
DEP Method 1.1. A summary of soil sample analytical data is presented as Table 1.
2-5
Weston & Sampson
3.0
PHASE II RESULTS
3.1 Geology
3.1.1 Regional Geology
According to the USGS Bedrock Geologic Map of Massachusetts (Zen et al., 1983) the Site is
underlain by reddish-brown to pale red arkose and siltstone, and gray sandstone, gray siltstone,
and black shale interpreted as lake beds as part of the sedimentary and volcanic rocks of the
Hartford Basin (Lower Jurassic and Mesozoic).
3.1.2 Site Geology
On September 28, 2007, Weston & Sampson documented the excavation of eight test pits (Figure
2). Two geologic units were identified at the Site. A loose to very dense unit composed of
granular fill material containing various amounts of sand, gravel, cobbles and boulders along
with demolition debris overlay a native silty fine sand unit. The fill unit ranged in thickness from
approximately 0.5 feet to 2.0 feet thick across the Site and was approximately 6.0 feet thick
within the former gasoline UST grave. Present directly below the fill unit, the native sand unit
varied in color from light tan to orange brown and persisted until the bottom of the test pits.
Weston & Sampson interprets this native sand as quaternary alluvium. Groundwater was
encountered in most test pits in the last foot of soil above the bottom of the test pit.
3.2 Hydrogeology
3.2.1 Regional Hydrogeology
Groundwater and surface water at the Site is presumed to flow towards the Connecticut River
located approximately 1.4 miles southeast of the Site. The Sugarloaf Brook flows towards the
southwest across the northernmost portion of the Site, then along the northwest border of the Site
until turning south and crossing over the westernmost portion of the Site. The Site is not located
within a 100-year floodplain according to MassGIS flood hazard data.
3.2.2 Groundwater Elevations
According to a soil evaluation form attached to the Site’s Water Pollution control Plan on file at
DEP, the estimated seasonal high groundwater table is approximately 4.5 feet below ground
surface. On September 28, 2007, the depth to groundwater across the Site ranged between 1.5
feet bgs at TP-5 to 6.0 feet at TP-1.
3.3 Soil
3.3.1 Field Screening Results
Elevated PID readings were only detected in samples collected from test pit TP-7 that was
excavated adjacent to the former maintenance building adjacent to the Coates Avenue entrance
to the Site. The field screening data exceeding the background concentration of 0.0 ppmv are
presented in Test Pit Log TP-7 included in Appendix B.
3.3.2 Analytical Results
The soil sample analytical results are summarized in Table 1. Several analytes were detected
above MCP RCS-1 in soil sample TP-7 collected at a depth of 2.5 to 3.0 feet bgs. Soil sample
3-1
Weston & Sampson
TP-7 contained EPH in the C19-C36 aliphatics range at a concentration of 5,300 milligrams per
kilogram (mg/kg), which exceeds the RCS-1 of 2,500 mg/kg. Soil sample TP-7 also contained
EPH in the C11-C22 aromatics range at a concentration of 946 mg/kg, which exceeds the RCS-1
of 200 mg/kg. Soil sample TP-7 also contained VPH in the C5-C8 aliphatics range and the C9-C10
aromatics range at concentrations of 113 mg/kg and 279 mg/kg, respectively, which exceed the
RCS-1 of 100 mg/kg. Additionally, soil sample TP-7 contained EPH in the C9-C18 aliphatics
range at a concentration of 407 mg/kg, 13 target PAHs at concentrations ranging from 0.2 mg/kg
to 2.1 mg/kg, VPH in the C9-C12 aliphatics range, and six target VOCs at concentrations ranging
from 0.165 mg/kg to 3.08 mg/kg all of which were below RCs.
Soil sample TP-2 contained EPH in the C19-C36 aliphatics range at a concentration of 38 mg/kg,
and two target PAHs, fluoranthene and pyrene at a concentration of 0.2 mg/kg, all of which were
below RCs.
Soil sample TP-4 contained three target PAHs, benzo(g,h,i)perylene, fluoranthene and pyrene at
concentrations ranging from 0.2 mg/kg to 0.4 mg/kg, all of which were below RCs.
None of the other soil samples analyzed contained detectable concentrations of EPH, VPH or
target analytes.
Groundwater sampling was not performed as part of this investigation
3.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
3.4.1 Introduction
Weston & Sampson submitted a blind duplicate soil sample and a VPH trip blank for QA/QC
purposes. One blind duplicate soil sample was submitted for each analysis. Two QA/QC
deviations were noted including the laboratory fortified blanks and duplicates for EPH in the
C9-C18 and C19-C36 aliphatic ranges with RPDs of 31.7% and 31.9%, respectively that were
outside of the control limit of 25%, and an overloaded fractionation cartridge resulting in
estimated concentrations for all results except for pyrene, the aromatic hydrocarbon range, and
the C19-C36 aliphatic range in sample TP-7. Based on a review of laboratory QA/QC, Weston &
Sampson has concluded that data usability has not been affected for the majority of analyses.
The usability of soil analytical laboratory data was evaluated in general accordance with DEP’s
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program outlined in guidance documents WSCCAM-VII (MADEP, May 2003) and WSC-02-320 (DEP, June 2003). The QA/QC program was
developed by DEP to provide minimum criteria and performance standards for the collection and
analyses of data to be used in MCP risk assessments, background determinations, and/or site
closure. Use of laboratory data for site evaluation under the MCP is acceptable if data meets
“presumptive certainty” and “PARRCS” criteria, both of which are discussed below.
3.4.2 Presumptive Certainty:
The criteria for presumptive certainty is achieved if sampling and laboratory procedures are
consistent with the following criteria:
3-2
Weston & Sampson
1. Field QC samples were collected in accordance with DEP’s Compendium of Analytical
Methods (CAM).
2. The laboratory provides the following certification:
• Chain-of-custody accurately describes condition of samples received.
• Compliance with all method QA/QC requirements and performance standards;
• MCP analytical methods were used in accordance with CAM; and,
• VPH/EPH analytical methods were run without significant modifications.
“Presumptive Certainty” was achieved for soil samples for criteria A-D and F. The laboratory
reports include a narrative for those data that received a negative rating for criteria E. (see
laboratory certification forms in Appendix B).
3.4.3 PARCCS
If presumptive certainty is met, the next step is to evaluate the usability of the data based on the
following parameters: Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness, Comparability, Completeness
and Sensitivity (PARCCS). A discussion of each parameter is presented below.
Precision: The Relative Percent Differences (RPDs) of The RPDs for the field duplicate soil
sample were less than 1% for EPH and ranged from 8.97% 10.25% for VPH, all below the
recommended 50% RPD for soil.
Accuracy: The laboratory fortified blanks and duplicates recoveries for EPH in the C9-C18 and
C19-C36 aliphatic ranges had RPDs of 31.7% and 31.9%, respectively that were outside of the
control limit of 25%.
Representativeness: The samples collected from the Site are considered representative based on
the known subsurface conditions.
Comparability: No compounds were detected above Method Detection Limits (MDLs) in the
soil sample or its blind duplicate and the RPDs of the MDLs indicate good comparability
Completeness: No sample holding times were exceeded for any of the soil or groundwater data,
and none of the concentrations were reported as qualified.
Sensitivity: The laboratory method detection limits for contaminants in soil were below
applicable Method 1 cleanup standards. The laboratory case narrative indicates that in EPH
analysis for sample 07B37695 (the soil sample collected from test pit TP-7), an overloaded
fractionation cartridge resulting in estimated concentrations for all results except for pyrene, the
aromatic hydrocarbon range, and the C19-C36 aliphatic range in sample.
3.4.4 QA/QC Summary
In summary, the results of the PARCCS evaluation indicate that data quality indicators are
acceptable, and the soil data obtained during this investigation is adequate for characterizing Site
3-3
Weston & Sampson
conditions, risk and RAO determination. Weston & Sampson considers the data to be of
sufficient level of sensitivity to support the conclusions in this report.
3-4
Weston & Sampson
4.0
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Summary
On September 28, 2007, Weston and Sampson performed a Phase II ESA at the former 15 Jewett
Avenue Cains pickle factory, in South Deerfield, Massachusetts. The Site, which is currently
vacant, has historically been used as a pickle factory.
The Phase II ESA included excavating eight test pits, screening soils for VOCs, and laboratory
analysis of soil. Nine soil samples, including one blind duplicate were submitted for laboratory
analysis of and EPH and VPH with target analytes. Soil sample TP-7 contained concentrations of
several analytes above RCS-1. No VOCs were detected in soil headspace except at test pit TP-7
that had PID results ranging from 7.9 to 34.5 ppmv. Extensive sampling adjacent to the Coates
Avenue maintenance building could not be performed due to the close proximity and unknown
exact location/depth of underground utilities. Extensive sampling adjacent to the former location
of the maintenance building along Jewett Avenue could not be performed due to uncertain
location of property lines between the Site, neighboring residences and Town property.
In summary, soil contamination exists at the Site, primarily in the area of the former maintenance
building at the Coates Avenue entrance to the Site. However, the nature and extent of soil impacts
are unknown and were beyond the scope of this investigation.
4.2 Conclusions and Recommendations
The following is our conclusions of the environmental issues at the Site and our
recommendations based on our investigations:
•
Soil sample TP-7 contained EPH in the C19-C36 aliphatics range at a concentration of
5,300 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), which exceeds the RCS-1 of 2,500 mg/kg. Soil
sample TP-7 also contained EPH in the C11-C22 aromatics range at a concentration of 946
mg/kg, which exceeds the MCP RCS-1 of 200 mg/kg.
•
Soil sample TP-7 also contained VPH in the C5-C8 aliphatics range and the C9-C10
aromatics range at concentrations of 113 mg/kg and 279 mg/kg, respectively, which
exceed the RCS-1 of 100 mg/kg. The extent of soil contamination at the Coates Avenue
maintenance building is unknown.
•
Because the detected concentrations of EPH and VPH exceed RCS-1, reporting of the
contamination to the DEP within 120 days of receipt of this knowledge is required unless
a LRA is completed within the 120 day period. A LRA can only be conducted on impacts
to soil with a total volume of less than 100 cubic yards and when groundwater is not
impacted.
•
If an LRA cannot be completed within 120 days, or the soil contamination detected in test
pit TP-7 extends into groundwater or volumes exceed 100 cubic yards, then notification
to DEP and the implementation of a Release Abatement Measure (RAM), which includes
assessment of Site groundwater quality, will be required.
4-1
Weston & Sampson
5.0
LIMITATIONS
This Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report was prepared for the use of the Town of
Deerfield, exclusively. The findings provided by Weston & Sampson in this report are based
solely on the information reported in this document. Future investigations, and/or information
that was not available to Weston & Sampson at the time of the investigation, may result in a
modification of the findings stated in this report.
Should additional information become available concerning this Site or neighboring properties
which could directly impact the Site in the future, that information should be made available to
Weston & Sampson for review so that, if necessary, conclusions presented in this report may be
modified. The conclusions of this report are based on Site conditions observed by Weston &
Sampson personnel at the time of the investigation, information provided by the Town of South
Deerfield, and samples collected and analyzed on the date shown or stated in this report. This
report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering and geological
practices. No other warranty, express or implied, is made.
5-1
Weston & Sampson
6.0
REFERENCES
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. Massachusetts Contingency Plan. 310
CMR 40.0000, Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup. Revised October 29, 1999.
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, DEP Waste Site Cleanup Policy
#WSC-94-400, Interim Remediation Waste Management Policy for Petroleum Contaminated Soil.
United States Geological Survey, Mount Toby Quadrangle Map, 1984.
Zen, E-an (Editor), 1983 United States Geological Survey Bedrock Geologic Map of
Massachusetts.
6-1
Weston & Sampson
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
Test Pit Logs and Photographs
T
NHESP Certified Vernal Pools
BRA
NHESP Estimated Habitats of Rare Wildlife
EBU
RN
ROAD
NHESP Priority Habitats of Rare Species
FEMA Q3 Flood Zones
NO
RT
H
RE
E
MA
IN
ST
ST
RE
ET
Sole Source Aquifers
RAIL RO
DEP Approved Zone IIs
GRAVES
T
ELM STREE
STREET
IWPAs
RK
PA
CROSS STREET
NORTH STR
EET
AD ST
RE E
T
ELM CIRCLE
CO
NW
AY
S
IEL D B
YPASS
AT
E
ET
RE
ST
CO
AV
E
NU
Surface Water Protection Areas
Zone A
Zone B
Zone C
Areas of Critical Environmental Concern
MassGIS Protected/Recreational OpenSpace
N
EASTER
Conservation Restriction
AVENUE
Agricultural Preservation Restriction
E
CR/APR Combination
OpenSpace: Chapter 61
AV
EN
U
E
61 - Forestry
61a - Agriculture
EW
E
RO
B'
S
G
SU
MA Towns (from Survey Points)
DEP Wetlands (1:12,000)
Shoreline
Hydrologic Connection
LO
H MA
I N ST
R
AR
EET
61b - Recreation
WAY
AY
W
VI
ST
E
CR
IV
DR
B 'S
RO
SOUTH
T
JEWET
AF
Wetland Limit
R
ST
ET
E
SOUT
Closure Line
Marsh/Bog
ET E
C EM
E ET
AD
RO
RY
R
ER ST
PORT
REET
ER ST
T HAY
MOUNTA
IN ROAD
Wooded marsh
Open Water
T REET
WEST S
400
0
400
Scale In Feet
IN R
O AD
DEERF
Other Legal Interest
NTA
MO
U
15 JEWETT AVENUE
SOUTH DEERFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS
OAF
SENSITIVE RECEPTORS MAP
PHASE I ESA
JULY 2007
SU G
ARL
OL
D
RO
UT
E
FIV
EA
ND
TE
N
FIGURE 3
SCALE: NOTED
Q:\DataStore\UnitedStates\NewEngland\MA\Franklin\Deerfield\2070453.A - Cains Pickle Facility Phase I ESA\Area Receptors Map - 11x17 Landscape.mxd 7/30/2007 12:15:34 PM caryj
Legend
Table 1
Soil Sample Analytical Results
Former Cain's Pickle Facility
15 Jewett Avenue, South Deerfield, MA.
TP-1
FD070928
SAMPLE DESIGNATION
Sample Depth (feet bgs)
6-7
Dup of TP-1
Sample Date 9/28/2007
9/28/2007
Laboratory Report LIMT-10027 LIMT-10027
PARAMETERS
UNITS
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
C9-C18 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
<37.0
<37.2
C19-C36 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
<37.0
<37.2
C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
<37.0
<37.2
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.2
<0.2
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
<23.2
<25.5
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
<15.5
<17.0
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
<15.5
<17.0
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.078
<0.085
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.078
<0.085
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
<0.078
<0.085
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.771
<0.850
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.078
<0.085
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.155
<0.170
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
<0.078
<0.085
%
81.2
80.7
Solids, total
Notes:
1. bgs = below ground surface.
6.
2. < = Not detected above the lab reporting limits.
7.
3. NA = Not Applicable/Tested.
8.
4. mg/kg dry wt = milligrams per kilogram dry weight
9.
5. Dup = Duplicate
10.
TP-2
TP-3
TP-4
TP-5
TP-6
TP-7
TP-8
TB070928
3-4
1-2
1.5-2
0-0.5
2-3
2.5-3
4-5
-9/28/2007
9/28/2007
9/28/2007
9/28/2007
9/28/2007
9/28/2007
9/28/2007
9/28/2007
LIMT-10027 LIMT-10027 LIMT-10027 LIMT-10027 LIMT-10027 LIMT-10027 LIMT-10027 LIMT-10027
MCP Reportable
Concentrations
(RCs)
RCS-1
RCS-2
<32.7
38
<32.7
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.2
<32.2
<32.2
<32.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<35.2
<35.2
<35.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.4
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.2
<35.8
<35.8
<35.8
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<38.5
<38.5
<38.5
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
407
5,300
946
<0.2
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.5
1
<0.2
<0.2
0.7
<0.2
1
0.2
0.4
0.9
0.8
0.2
2.1
<33.4
<33.4
<33.4
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,000
2,500
200
20.0
100
1,000
7.0
2.0
7.0
1,000
70.0
7.0
0.7
1,000
400
7.0
4.0
4.0
100
1,000
2,500
5,000
2,000
2,500
1,000
1,000
40.0
4.0
40.0
2,500
400
10.0
4.0
3,000
2,000
40.0
1,000
40.0
100
3,000
<13.8
<9.15
<9.15
<0.046
<0.046
<0.046
<0.458
<0.046
<0.092
<0.046
91.9
<16.5
<11.0
<11.0
<0.055
<0.055
<0.055
<0.548
<0.055
<0.110
<0.055
93.2
<20.3
<13.5
<13.5
<0.068
<0.068
<0.068
<0.674
<0.068
<0.135
<0.068
85.3
<21.8
<14.6
<14.6
<0.073
<0.073
<0.073
<0.727
<0.073
<0.146
<0.073
83.9
<25.0
<16.7
<16.7
<0.084
<0.084
<0.084
<0.834
<0.084
<0.167
<0.084
77.9
113
148
279
0.165
0.685
<0.049
1.68
0.189
1.82
3.08
95.5
<18.0
<12.0
<12.0
<0.060
<0.060
<0.060
<0.599
<0.060
<0.120
<0.060
89.9
<16.0
<10.7
<10.7
<0.054
<0.054
<0.054
<0.532
<0.054
<0.107
<0.054
NA
100
1,000
100
2.00
80.0
0.100
4.00
30.0
500
500
~
500
2,500
500
200
500
100
40.0
300
500
500
~
Bold = compound detected at that concentration.
MCP = Massachusetts Contingency Plan, 310 CMR 40.0000
113
Orange shaded values exceed MCP RCS-1.
5,300
Yellow shaded values exceed MCP RCS-1 and RCS-2.
~ = No standard available
APPENDIX A
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS
39 Spruce Street ° East Longmeadow, MA 01028 ° FAX 413/525-6405 ° TEL. 413/525-2332
REPORT DATE 10/13/2007
WESTON & SAMPSON
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
ROCKY HILL, CT 06067
ATTN: JOHN FIGURELLI
CONTRACT NUMBER:
PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
LIMS BAT #:
LIMT-10027
JOB NUMBER:
2070453
The results of analyses performed on the following samples submitted to the CON-TEST Analytical Laboratory are found in this report.
PROJECT LOCATION:
15 JEWETT AVENUE, SOUTH DEERFIELD, MA.
FIELD SAMPLE #
LAB ID
MATRIX
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
TEST
Text28:
FD070928
07B37697
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
eph - solid 04
FD070928
Text28:
07B37697
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
solids eph/vph
FD070928
Text28:
07B37697
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
vph - solid 04
TB070928
Text28:
07B37698
LIQUIDS
NOT SPECIFIED
vph - solid 04
TP-1 6-7
Text28:
07B37689
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
eph - solid 04
TP-1 6-7
Text28:
07B37689
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
solids eph/vph
TP-1 6-7
Text28:
07B37689
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
vph - solid 04
*TP-2 3-4
Text28:
07B37690
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
eph - solid 04
*TP-2 3-4
Text28:
07B37690
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
solids eph/vph
*TP-2 3-4
Text28:
07B37690
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
vph - solid 04
TP-3 1-2
Text28:
07B37691
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
eph - solid 04
TP-3 1-2
Text28:
07B37691
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
solids eph/vph
TP-3 1-2
Text28:
07B37691
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
vph - solid 04
TP-4 1.5-2
Text28:
07B37692
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
eph - solid 04
TP-4 1.5-2
Text28:
07B37692
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
solids eph/vph
TP-4 1.5-2
Text28:
07B37692
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
vph - solid 04
TP-5 0-0.5
Text28:
07B37693
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
eph - solid 04
TP-5 0-0.5
Text28:
07B37693
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
solids eph/vph
TP-5 0-0.5
Text28:
07B37693
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
vph - solid 04
TP-6 2-3
Text28:
07B37694
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
eph - solid 04
TP-6 2-3
Text28:
07B37694
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
solids eph/vph
TP-6 2-3
Text28:
07B37694
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
vph - solid 04
TP-7 2.5-3
Text28:
07B37695
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
eph - solid 04
TP-7 2.5-3
Text28:
07B37695
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
solids eph/vph
TP-7 2.5-3
Text28:
07B37695
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
vph - solid 04
TP-8 4-5
Text28:
07B37696
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
eph - solid 04
TP-8 4-5
Text28:
07B37696
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
solids eph/vph
TP-8 4-5
Text28:
07B37696
SOIL
NOT SPECIFIED
vph - solid 04
WESTON & SAMPSON
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
CONTRACT NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
LIMS BAT #:
LIMT-10027
JOB NUMBER:
2070453
Comments :
LIMS BATCH NO. : LIMT-10027
CASE NARRATIVE SUMMARY
IN THE EPH METHOD, REDUCED PRECISION IS ANTICIPATED FOR ANY REPORTED RESULT FOR THE C9-C18 AND
C19-C36 ALIPHATIC RANGES BASED ON LABORATORY FORTIFIED BLANK DUPLICATE RPDs THAT ARE
OUTSIDE OF CONTROL LIMITS.
IN THE EPH METHOD FOR SAMPLE 07B37695 ALL RESULTS EXCEPT FOR PYRENE, THE AROMATIC
HYDROCARBON RANGE, AND THE C19-C36 ALIPHATIC RANGE ARE ESTIMATED. FRACTIONATION CARTRIDGE
WAS OVERLOADED.
THERE ARE NO OTHER ANALYTICAL ISSUES THAT AFFECT THE USABILITY OF THE DATA
DETAILED CASE NARRATIVE
VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (VPH) MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
RECOMMENDED SAMPLE HOLDING TIMES WERE NOT EXCEEDED FOR ALL SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE VPH
METHOD UNLESS LISTED BELOW: NONE EXCEEDED
ALL VPH SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED PRESERVED PROPERLY (WATER SAMPLES pH <2; SOIL SAMPLES IN
METHANOL WITH A SOIL/METHANOL RATIO OF 1:1 +/- 25% COMPLETELY COVERED BY METHANOL) IN THE
PROPER CONTAINERS AT 4° C. +/- 2° AS SPECIFIED ON THE CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORM UNLESS SPECIFIED BELOW:
SOIL/METHANOL RATIO DOES NOT MEET METHOD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SAMPLE 07B37690 AT 1.41.
EXCESS AMOUNT OF SOIL.
THE VPH METHOD BLANK WAS FOUND NOT TO BE CONTAMINATED WITH TARGET ANALYTES AT LEVELS
ABOVE THE REPORTING LIMIT EXCEPT WHERE LISTED BELOW: NO CONTAMINATION NOTED
ALL VPH SAMPLES WERE ANALYZED UNDILUTED UNLESS SPECIFIED BELOW:
SAMPLE
DILUTION(S)
07B37695
X20 AND UNDILUTE
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS MET ALL REQUIRED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE VPH
METHOD EXCEPT AS LISTED BELOW: ALL STANDARDS MET
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE RECOVERIES, LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DUPLICATE RECOVERIES,
AND LCS DUPLICATE RPDs FOR ALL VPH COMPONENT STANDARD COMPOUNDS WERE WITHIN CONTROL
LIMITS SPECIFIED BY THE METHOD UNLESS LISTED BELOW: NONE OUTSIDE OF CONTROL LIMITS
ALL VPH SURROGATE STANDARD RECOVERIES WERE WITHIN CONTROL LIMITS SPECIFIED BY THE METHOD
UNLESS LISTED BELOW: NONE OUTSIDE OF CONTROL LIMITS
VPH MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERIES, SAMPLE DUPLICATE RPDs AND MSDRPD,
IF REQUESTED IN THIS BATCH WERE ALL WITHIN CONTROL LIMITS SPECIFIED BY THE METHOD UNLESS
LISTED BELOW: NONE REQUESTED
RESULTS FOR ALL ANALYTE-LIST COMPOUNDS WERE REPORTED FOR VPH UNLESS LISTED BELOW:
ALL REPORTED
WESTON & SAMPSON
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
CONTRACT NUMBER:
PROJECT NUMBER:
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
LIMS BAT #:
LIMT-10027
JOB NUMBER:
2070453
EXTRACTABLE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (EPH) MADEP-EPH-04-1.1
RECOMMENDED SAMPLE HOLDING TIMES WERE NOT EXCEEDED FOR ALL SAMPLES ANALYZED BY THE
EPH METHOD UNLESS LISTED BELOW: NONE EXCEEDED
ALL EPH SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED PRESERVED PROPERLY (WATER SAMPLES pH <2) IN THE PROPER
CONTAINERS AT 4° C. +/- 2° AS SPECIFIED ON THE CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY FORM UNLESS SPECIFIED BELOW:
ALL PROPERLY PRESERVED
SOLID SAMPLES, IF ANY, IN THE BATCH WERE EXTRACTED BY THE FOLLOWING METHOD:
MICROWAVE: SW846 3546
SPE CARTRIDGE CONTAMINATION WITH NON-PETROLEUM COMPOUNDS, IF PRESENT, IS VERIFIED BY GC/MS
IN EACH METHOD BLANK PER EXTRACTION BATCH AND EXCLUDED FROM C11-C22 AROMATIC RANGE
FRACTION IN ALL SAMPLES IN THE BATCH. THE EPH METHOD BLANK WAS FOUND NOT TO BE CONTAMINATED
WITH TARGET ANALYTES AT LEVELS ABOVE THE REPORTING LIMITS EXCEPT WHERE LISTED BELOW:
NO CONTAMINATION NOTED
ALL EPH SAMPLES WERE ANALYZED UNDILUTED UNLESS SPECIFIED BELOW:
SAMPLE 07B37695 WAS ANALYZED UNDILUTED AND AT 20X AND 40X DILUTIONS.
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS MET ALL REQUIRED PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR EPH METHOD
EXCEPT AS LISTED BELOW: ALL STANDARDS MET
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE RECOVERIES, LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DUPLICATE RECOVERIES,
AND LCS DUPLICATE RPDs FOR ALL EPH TARGET COMPOUNDS AND RANGES, INCLUDING NAPHTHALENE AND
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE BREAKTHROUGH INTO THE ALIPHATIC FRACTION WERE WITHIN CONTROL LIMITS
SPECIFIED BY THE METHOD UNLESS LISTED BELOW:
REDUCED PRECISION IS ANTICIPATED FOR ANY REPORTED RESULT FOR THE C9-C18 AND C19-C36
ALIPHATIC RANGES BASED ON LABORATORY FORTIFIED BLANK DUPLICATE RPDs THAT ARE
OUTSIDE OF CONTROL LIMITS.
ALL EPH SURROGATE STANDARD RECOVERIES WERE WITHIN CONTROL LIMITS SPECIFIED BY THE METHOD
UNLESS LISTED BELOW: NONE OUTSIDE OF CONTROL LIMITS
EPH MATRIX SPIKE AND MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERIES, SAMPLE DUPLICATE RPDs AND MSDRPD,
IF REQUESTED IN THIS BATCH WERE ALL WITHIN CONTROL LIMITS SPECIFIED BY THE METHOD UNLESS
LISTED BELOW: NONE REQUESTED
FOR SAMPLE 07B37695 ALL RESULTS EXCEPT FOR PYRENE, THE AROMATIC HYDROCARBON RANGE, AND THE
C19-C36 ALIPHATIC RANGE ARE ESTIMATED. FRACTIONATION CARTRIDGE WAS OVERLOADED.
The CON-TEST Environmental Laboratory operates under the following certifications and accreditations :
AIHA 100033
AIHA ELLAP (LEAD) 100033
MASSACHUSETTS MA0100
NEW HAMPSHIRE NELAP 2516
CONNECTICUT PH-0567
VERMONT DOH (LEAD) No. LL015036
NEW YORK ELAP/NELAP 10899
RHODE ISLAND (LIC. No. 112)
NEW JERSEY NELAP NJ MA007 (AIR)
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 1 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Field Sample # : FD070928
Sample ID :
07B37697
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Lo
C9-C18 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
37.2
C19-C36 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
37.2
Unadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
37.2
C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
37.2
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
10/5/2007
10/10/07
CJM
Date Extracted EPH Solid
RL = Reporting Limit
ND = Not Detected at or above the Reporting Limit
SPEC Limit
SPEC LIMIT = a client specified recommended or
regulatory level for comparison with data to
determine PASS (P) or FAIL (F) condition of results.
NM = Not Measured
* = See end of report for comments and notes applying to this sample
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 2 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Analytical Method:
MADEP-EPH-04-1
SAMPLES ARE EXTRACTED WITH METHYLENE CHLORIDE AND ACETONE BY PRESSURIZED FLUID
EXTRACTION (SW846 3545) OR MICROWAVE (SW846 3546), EXCHANGED INTO HEXANE AND CONCENTRATED.
ALIPHATIC AND AROMATIC FRACTIONS ARE SEPARATED. ANALYSIS IS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH
FLAME IONIZATION DETECTION. PAH AND C11-C22 AROMATICS ARE DETERMINED IN THE METHYLENE
CHLORIDE FRACTION. C9-C18 AND C19-C36 ALIPHATICS ARE DETERMINED IN THE HEXANE FRACTION.
TARGET COMPOUND CONTRIBUTIONS ARE SUBTRACTED FROM THE SUMMED AROMATIC RANGE, BUT NOT
FROM THE UNADJUSTED C11-C22 AROMATIC RANGE.
NM = Not Measured
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 3 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Field Sample # : TP-1 6-7
Sample ID :
07B37689
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Lo
C9-C18 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
37.0
C19-C36 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
37.0
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
37.0
C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
37.0
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
10/5/2007
10/10/07
CJM
SPEC Limit
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 4 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Analytical Method:
MADEP-EPH-04-1
NM = Not Measured
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 5 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37690
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Lo
C9-C18 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
32.7
C19-C36 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
38.0
10/10/07
CJM
32.6
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
32.7
C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
32.7
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
0.2
10/10/07
CJM
0.1
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
0.2
10/10/07
CJM
0.1
10/5/2007
10/10/07
CJM
SPEC Limit
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 6 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Analytical Method:
MADEP-EPH-04-1
NM = Not Measured
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 7 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37691
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Lo
C9-C18 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
32.2
C19-C36 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
32.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
32.2
C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
32.2
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
10/5/2007
10/10/07
CJM
SPEC Limit
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 8 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Analytical Method:
MADEP-EPH-04-1
NM = Not Measured
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 9 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Field Sample # : TP-4 1.5-2
Sample ID :
07B37692
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Lo
C9-C18 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
35.2
C19-C36 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
35.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
35.2
C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
35.2
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
0.4
10/10/07
CJM
0.1
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
0.2
10/10/07
CJM
0.1
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
0.2
10/10/07
CJM
0.1
10/5/2007
10/10/07
CJM
SPEC Limit
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 10 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Analytical Method:
MADEP-EPH-04-1
NM = Not Measured
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 11 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Field Sample # : TP-5 0-0.5
Sample ID :
07B37693
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Lo
C9-C18 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
35.8
C19-C36 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
35.8
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
35.8
C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
35.8
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
10/5/2007
10/10/07
CJM
SPEC Limit
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 12 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Analytical Method:
MADEP-EPH-04-1
NM = Not Measured
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 13 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37694
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Lo
C9-C18 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
38.5
C19-C36 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
38.5
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
38.5
C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
38.5
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
10/5/2007
10/10/07
CJM
SPEC Limit
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 14 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Analytical Method:
MADEP-EPH-04-1
NM = Not Measured
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 15 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
*07B37695
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Lo
C9-C18 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
407.
10/11/07
CJM
31.4
C19-C36 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
5300
10/11/07
CJM
31.4
mg/kg dry wt
955.
10/11/07
CJM
31.4
C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
946.
10/11/07
CJM
31.4
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/11/07
CJM
0.2
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
0.2
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
0.2
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
0.5
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
0.5
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
mg/kg dry wt
1.0
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/11/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/11/07
CJM
0.2
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
0.7
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/11/07
CJM
0.2
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
1.0
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
0.2
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
mg/kg dry wt
0.4
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
0.9
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
0.8
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
0.2
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
2.1
10/11/07
CJM
0.1
10/5/2007
10/11/07
CJM
SPEC Limit
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 16 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Analytical Method:
MADEP-EPH-04-1
NM = Not Measured
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 17 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37696
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Lo
C9-C18 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
33.4
C19-C36 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
33.4
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
33.4
C11-C22 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
33.4
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/10/07
CJM
0.2
10/5/2007
10/10/07
CJM
SPEC Limit
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 18 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Analytical Method:
MADEP-EPH-04-1
NM = Not Measured
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 19 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37697
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Results
Units
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Solids, total
%
80.7
SPEC Limit
Lo
10/02/07
LL
Date
Analyst
P/ F
Hi
Sample ID :
07B37689
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
RL
Analyzed
Solids, total
%
81.2
SPEC Limit
Lo
10/02/07
LL
Date
Analyst
P/ F
Hi
Sample ID :
07B37690
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
RL
Analyzed
Solids, total
%
91.9
SPEC Limit
Lo
10/02/07
LL
Date
Analyst
P/ F
Hi
Sample ID :
07B37691
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
RL
Analyzed
Solids, total
%
93.2
SPEC Limit
Lo
10/02/07
LL
P/ F
Hi
Sample ID :
07B37692
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Solids, total
Units
Results
Date
Analyzed
Analyst
%
85.3
10/02/07
LL
RL
SPEC Limit
Lo
Hi
NM = Not Measured
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 20 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37693
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Results
Units
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
Solids, total
%
83.9
SPEC Limit
Lo
10/02/07
LL
Date
Analyst
P/ F
Hi
Sample ID :
07B37694
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
RL
Analyzed
Solids, total
%
77.9
SPEC Limit
Lo
10/02/07
LL
Date
Analyst
P/ F
Hi
Sample ID :
07B37695
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
RL
Analyzed
Solids, total
%
95.5
SPEC Limit
Lo
10/02/07
LL
Date
Analyst
P/ F
Hi
Sample ID :
07B37696
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Analyzed
Solids, total
%
89.9
10/02/07
RL
SPEC Limit
Lo
LL
Analytical Method:
SM 2540G
PERCENT OF SAMPLE REMAINING AFTER DRYING OVERNIGHT AT 103-105 DEGREES
CENTIGRADE.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 21 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37697
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
SPEC Limit
Lo
Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
25.5
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
25.5
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
17.0
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
17.0
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
17.0
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.085
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.085
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.085
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.850
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.085
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.170
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.085
Analytical Method:
MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
SAMPLES ARE PRESERVED WITH METHANOL AND CONCENTRATED BY PURGE AND TRAP,
FOLLOWED BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS WITH PID/FID DETECTION. SUMMED
RANGES ARE REPORTED WITH TARGET COMPOUND CONTRIBUTIONS SUBTRACTED.
C9-C12 ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS EXCLUDE THE CONCENTRATION OF C9-C10 AROMATIC
HYDROCARBONS.
NO SIGNIFICANT MODIFICATIONS WERE MADE TO THE METHOD.
DETAILS OF ANY NON-CONFORMANCE WITH QA/QC REQUIREMENTS, PERFORMANCE, OR
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ARE LISTED IN THE NOTES SECTION OF THIS REPORT.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 22 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Field Sample # : TB070928
Sample ID :
07B37698
Sample Matrix:
LIQUIDS
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
SPEC Limit
Lo
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
16.0
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
16.0
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
10.7
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
10.7
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
10.7
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.054
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.054
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.054
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.532
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.054
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.107
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.054
Analytical Method:
MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
HYDROCARBONS.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 23 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37689
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
SPEC Limit
Lo
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
23.2
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
23.2
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
15.5
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
15.5
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
15.5
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.078
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.078
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.078
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.771
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.078
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.155
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.078
Analytical Method:
MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
HYDROCARBONS.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 24 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
*07B37690
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
SPEC Limit
Lo
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
13.8
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
13.8
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
9.15
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
9.15
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
9.15
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.046
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.046
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.046
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.458
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.046
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.092
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.046
Analytical Method:
MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
HYDROCARBONS.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 25 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37691
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
SPEC Limit
Lo
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
16.5
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
16.5
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
11.0
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
11.0
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
11.0
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.055
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.055
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.055
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.548
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.055
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.110
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.055
Analytical Method:
MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
HYDROCARBONS.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 26 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37692
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
SPEC Limit
Lo
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
20.3
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
20.3
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
13.5
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
13.5
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
13.5
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.068
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.068
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.068
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.674
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.068
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.135
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.068
Analytical Method:
MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
HYDROCARBONS.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 27 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37693
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
SPEC Limit
Lo
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
21.8
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
21.8
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
14.6
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
14.6
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
14.6
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.073
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.073
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.073
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.727
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.073
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.146
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.073
Analytical Method:
MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
HYDROCARBONS.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 28 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37694
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
SPEC Limit
Lo
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
25.0
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
25.0
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
16.7
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
16.7
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
16.7
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.084
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.084
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.084
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.834
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.084
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.167
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.084
Analytical Method:
MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
HYDROCARBONS.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 29 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37695
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
SPEC Limit
Lo
mg/kg dry wt
114.
10/02/07
EH
14.7
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
113.
10/02/07
EH
14.7
mg/kg dry wt
432.
10/02/07
EH
9.78
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
148.
10/02/07
EH
9.78
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
279.
10/02/07
EH
9.78
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
0.165
10/02/07
EH
0.049
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
0.685
10/02/07
EH
0.049
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.049
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
1.68
10/02/07
EH
0.489
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
0.189
10/02/07
EH
0.049
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
1.82
10/02/07
EH
0.098
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
3.08
10/02/07
EH
0.049
Analytical Method:
MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
HYDROCARBONS.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 30 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID :
07B37696
Sample Matrix:
SOIL
Sampled : 9/28/2007
NOT SPECIFIED
Units
Results
Date
Analyst
RL
Analyzed
SPEC Limit
Lo
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
18.0
C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
18.0
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
12.0
C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
12.0
C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
12.0
Benzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.060
Ethylbenzene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.060
MTBE
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.060
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.599
Toluene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.060
m/p-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.120
o-Xylene
mg/kg dry wt
ND
10/02/07
EH
0.060
Analytical Method:
MADEP-VPH-04-1.1
HYDROCARBONS.
NM = Not Measured
Hi
P/ F
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 31 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
The following notes were attached to the reported analysis :
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37690
vph - solid 04
SOIL/METHANOL RATIO DOES NOT MEET METHOD SPECIFICATIONS.
EXCESS AMOUNT OF SOIL.
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
C9-C18 Aliphatics
REPORTED RESULT IS ESTIMATED. FRACTIONATION CARTRIDGE IS OVERLOADED.
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Acenaphthylene
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Anthracene
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Benzo(a)anthracene
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Benzo(a)pyrene
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Chrysene
NM = Not Measured
JOHN FIGURELLI
WESTON & SAMPSON
10/13/2007
273 DIVIDEND ROAD
Page 32 of 32
Purchase Order No.:
Project Location:
LIMS-BAT #:
LIMT-10027
Date Received:
9/28/2007
Job Number:
2070453
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Fluoranthene
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Fluorene
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
2-Methylnaphthalene
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Naphthalene
Sample ID:
*
Analysis:
07B37695
Phenanthrene
** END OF REPORT **
NM = Not Measured
QC SUMMARY REPORT
SAMPLE QC: Sample Results with Duplicates
Sample Matrix Spikes and Matrix Spike Duplicates
BATCH QC: Lab fortified Blanks and Duplicates
Standard Reference Materials and Duplicates
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 1 of 14
GC/FID-19265
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
07B37689
2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)
Sur. Recovery FID/MS
122.9
%
70-130
117.8
%
70-130
116.9
%
70-130
100.2
%
70-130
115.8
%
70-130
125.2
%
70-130
106.1
%
70-130
114.5
%
70-130
118.1
%
70-130
114.0
%
70-130
C5-C8 Aliphatics
C9-C12 Aliphatics
Blank
Blank
<16.0
<10.7
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
Blank
<16.0
mg/kg dry wt
Blank
<10.7
mg/kg dry wt
Nonane
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.250
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. % Rec.
Dup Lab Fort Bl Amt.
93.220
6.704
%
mg/kg dry wt
5.534
mg/kg dry wt
07B37690
07B37691
07B37692
07B37693
07B37694
07B37695
07B37696
07B37697
07B37698
BLANK-108060
LFBLANK-69453
Dup Lab Fort Bl. Fnd
Pentane
Dup Lab Fort Bl %Rec
82.542
%
Lab Fort Blank Range
10.677
units
Lab Fort Bl. Av. Rec
87.881
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
12.150
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.704
5.096
76.016
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
5.017
mg/kg dry wt
74.830
1.186
LFB Duplicate RPD
75.423
1.573
30-130
30-130
0-25
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
%
%
70-130
70-130
units
%
%
0-25
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 2 of 14
GC/FID-19265
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
LFBLANK-69453
2-Methylpentane
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
5.426
mg/kg dry wt
80.932
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
4.875
mg/kg dry wt
2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
n-Decane
72.711
%
8.220
76.822
units
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
10.700
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.250
mg/kg dry wt
93.220
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
5.676
84.661
mg/kg dry wt
%
8.559
%
%
88.940
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
9.623
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.590
mg/kg dry wt
98.305
6.704
%
mg/kg dry wt
6.363
mg/kg dry wt
94.915
3.389
%
96.610
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
3.508
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.704
5.852
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
87.288
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
5.545
mg/kg dry wt
82.711
4.576
LFB Duplicate RPD
85.000
5.383
70-130
0-25
70-130
70-130
0-25
70-130
70-130
units
70-130
units
n-Butylcyclohexane
%
%
%
0-25
70-130
70-130
units
%
%
0-25
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 3 of 14
GC/FID-19292
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
07B37689
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate Recovery
103.1
%
40-140
2-Bromonaphthalene
Surrogate Recovery
76.2
%
40-140
Chlorooctadecane
Sur. Recovery
90.0
%
40-140
Terphenyl
Sur. Recovery
89.6
%
40-140
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate Recovery
104.0
%
40-140
2-Bromonaphthalene
Chlorooctadecane
Surrogate Recovery
Sur. Recovery
76.0
81.6
%
%
40-140
40-140
Terphenyl
Sur. Recovery
91.5
%
40-140
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate Recovery
99.4
%
40-140
2-Bromonaphthalene
Surrogate Recovery
74.4
%
40-140
Chlorooctadecane
Sur. Recovery
99.3
%
40-140
Terphenyl
Sur. Recovery
90.0
%
40-140
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate Recovery
98.8
%
40-140
2-Bromonaphthalene
Surrogate Recovery
72.3
%
40-140
Chlorooctadecane
Sur. Recovery
91.6
%
40-140
Terphenyl
Sur. Recovery
88.9
%
40-140
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2-Bromonaphthalene
Surrogate Recovery
Surrogate Recovery
108.8
101.6
%
%
40-140
40-140
Chlorooctadecane
Sur. Recovery
92.2
%
40-140
Terphenyl
Sur. Recovery
97.3
%
40-140
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate Recovery
109.6
%
40-140
2-Bromonaphthalene
Surrogate Recovery
102.4
%
40-140
Chlorooctadecane
Terphenyl
Sur. Recovery
Sur. Recovery
91.4
92.7
%
%
40-140
40-140
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate Recovery
115.1
%
40-140
2-Bromonaphthalene
Surrogate Recovery
96.6
%
40-140
Chlorooctadecane
Sur. Recovery
50.0
%
40-140
Terphenyl
Sur. Recovery
56.0
%
40-140
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate Recovery
110.3
%
40-140
2-Bromonaphthalene
Surrogate Recovery
104.0
%
40-140
Chlorooctadecane
Sur. Recovery
95.5
%
40-140
Terphenyl
Sur. Recovery
101.3
%
40-140
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate Recovery
119.2
%
40-140
2-Bromonaphthalene
Chlorooctadecane
Surrogate Recovery
Sur. Recovery
112.1
97.9
%
%
40-140
40-140
07B37690
07B37691
07B37692
07B37693
07B37694
07B37695
07B37696
07B37697
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 4 of 14
GC/FID-19292
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
%
40-140
07B37697
Terphenyl
Sur. Recovery
106.1
Naphthalene
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Acenaphthene
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Acenaphthylene
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Anthracene
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Blank
Blank
<0.1
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Chrysene
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Fluoranthene
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Fluorene
Blank
Blank
<0.1
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
2-Methylnaphthalene
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Phenanthrene
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Pyrene
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
n-Nonane
Blank
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
Naphthalene Aliphatic Fraction
2-Methylnaphthalene Aliphatic Fraction
Blank
Blank
<0.1
<0.1
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
Blank
<30.0
mg/kg dry wt
C9-C18 Aliphatics
Blank
<30.0
mg/kg dry wt
C19-C36 Aliphatics
Blank
<30.0
mg/kg dry wt
C11-C22 Aromatics
Blank
<30.0
mg/kg dry wt
Naphthalene
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
Lab Fort Blk. Found
5.0
3.9
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
78.1
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
4.4
mg/kg dry wt
BLANK-108211
LFBLANK-69615
Acenaphthene
%
88.3
%
10.2
units
LFB Duplicate RPD
83.2
12.3
%
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.3
mg/kg dry wt
86.3
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
5.1
mg/kg dry wt
102.8
16.4
%
%
units
40-140
40-140
0-25
40-140
40-140
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 5 of 14
GC/FID-19292
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
LFBLANK-69615
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
94.6
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
17.4
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.3
mg/kg dry wt
86.1
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
5.1
102.0
mg/kg dry wt
%
15.8
94.0
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
16.8
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.6
mg/kg dry wt
93.8
5.0
%
mg/kg dry wt
5.5
mg/kg dry wt
111.0
17.1
Benzo(a)pyrene
102.4
%
16.7
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
Lab Fort Blk. Found
5.0
4.6
93.7
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
5.4
mg/kg dry wt
109.6
15.9
40-140
0-25
40-140
40-140
units
LFB Duplicate RPD
0-25
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
%
%
40-140
40-140
units
LFB Duplicate RPD
101.7
15.6
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.6
mg/kg dry wt
92.1
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
5.3
mg/kg dry wt
%
40-140
units
Benzo(a)anthracene
%
0-25
%
%
%
107.9
15.8
%
units
100.0
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
15.8
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.5
mg/kg dry wt
91.6
5.0
5.4
%
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
0-25
40-140
40-140
0-25
40-140
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 6 of 14
GC/FID-19292
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
%
40-140
LFBLANK-69615
109.3
17.6
100.5
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
17.5
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.5
mg/kg dry wt
91.6
5.0
%
mg/kg dry wt
5.2
mg/kg dry wt
Chrysene
104.6
13.0
98.1
%
13.2
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
Lab Fort Blk. Found
5.0
4.9
98.6
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
5.5
mg/kg dry wt
111.9
13.3
Fluorene
%
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.6
mg/kg dry wt
93.7
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
5.2
mg/kg dry wt
%
%
%
%
units
99.2
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
11.0
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.6
mg/kg dry wt
92.7
5.0
5.4
109.7
16.9
40-140
0-25
40-140
40-140
units
105.2
12.6
104.7
10.9
40-140
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
LFB Duplicate RPD
0-25
units
LFB Duplicate RPD
Fluoranthene
%
units
%
0-25
40-140
40-140
0-25
40-140
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
%
40-140
units
101.2
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
16.7
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.3
87.7
mg/kg dry wt
%
0-25
40-140
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 7 of 14
GC/FID-19292
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
LFBLANK-69615
Fluorene
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
5.2
mg/kg dry wt
104.8
17.1
96.2
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
17.7
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
Lab Fort Blk. Found
5.0
4.3
86.3
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
15.4
units
LFB Duplicate RPD
94.1
16.4
%
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.1
mg/kg dry wt
83.6
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
4.8
mg/kg dry wt
97.8
14.1
%
%
%
units
90.7
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
15.6
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.5
mg/kg dry wt
90.0
5.0
5.3
106.8
16.8
%
%
98.4
%
17.1
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.7
95.8
mg/kg dry wt
%
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
5.6
mg/kg dry wt
113.4
17.6
104.6
LFB Duplicate RPD
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
16.8
5.0
40-140
0-25
40-140
40-140
0-25
40-140
40-140
units
LFB Duplicate RPD
40-140
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
%
101.8
0-25
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
40-140
units
2-Methylnaphthalene
%
%
0-25
40-140
40-140
units
%
%
mg/kg dry wt
0-25
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 8 of 14
GC/FID-19292
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
LFBLANK-69615
Lab Fort Blk. Found
4.7
94.6
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
5.4
mg/kg dry wt
n-Nonane
108.8
14.2
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
1.9
mg/kg dry wt
38.6
5.0
mg/kg dry wt
2.6
mg/kg dry wt
52.8
14.1
40-140
40-140
units
101.7
13.9
2-Methylnaphthalene Aliphatic Fraction
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
Naphthalene Aliphatic Fraction
mg/kg dry wt
%
%
%
%
units
45.7
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
30.9
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
3.9
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
0.0
mg/kg dry wt
0.0
%
4.4
0.0
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
0.0
%
0.0
units
0.0
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
4.1
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
0.0
mg/kg dry wt
0.0
4.9
%
mg/kg dry wt
0.1
mg/kg dry wt
2.0
%
2.0
units
1.0
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
200.0
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
Lab Fort Blk. Found
85.0
71.4
0-25
30-140
30-140
0-5
0-5
0-5
0-5
%
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
84.0
%
85.0
mg/kg dry wt
82.9
mg/kg dry wt
97.5
%
13.5
units
LFB Duplicate RPD
90.7
14.9
%
%
40-140
40-140
0-25
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 9 of 14
GC/FID-19292
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
LFBLANK-69615
C9-C18 Aliphatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
30.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
18.3
mg/kg dry wt
61.2
%
30.0
mg/kg dry wt
25.3
mg/kg dry wt
84.3
%
23.1
72.8
units
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
31.7
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
40.0
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
28.4
mg/kg dry wt
71.0
%
40.0
mg/kg dry wt
39.2
98.1
mg/kg dry wt
%
27.0
units
84.6
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
31.9
%
40-140
40-140
0-25
40-140
40-140
0-25
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 10 of 14
GC/PID-8306
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
07B37689
2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)
Sur. Recovery (PID)
116.3
%
70-130
Sur. Recovery (PID)
107.2
%
70-130
Sur. Recovery (PID)
105.8
%
70-130
Sur. Recovery (PID)
89.9
%
70-130
Sur. Recovery (PID)
105.9
%
70-130
Sur. Recovery (PID)
114.4
%
70-130
Sur. Recovery (PID)
110.3
%
70-130
Sur. Recovery (PID)
104.6
%
70-130
Sur. Recovery (PID)
110.1
%
70-130
Sur. Recovery (PID)
108.1
%
70-130
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Blank
Blank
<0.054
<0.054
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
Naphthalene
Blank
<0.532
mg/kg dry wt
Toluene
Blank
<0.054
mg/kg dry wt
o-Xylene
Blank
<0.054
mg/kg dry wt
m/p-Xylene
Blank
<0.107
mg/kg dry wt
C9-C10 Aromatics
Blank
<10.7
mg/kg dry wt
MTBE
Blank
<0.054
mg/kg dry wt
Benzene
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.136
mg/kg dry wt
91.525
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
6.193
mg/kg dry wt
07B37690
07B37691
07B37692
07B37693
07B37694
07B37695
07B37696
07B37697
07B37698
BLANK-108055
LFBLANK-69451
Ethylbenzene
%
92.372
0.847
%
units
91.949
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
0.921
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.477
mg/kg dry wt
96.610
6.704
6.079
%
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
70-130
70-130
0-25
70-130
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 11 of 14
GC/PID-8306
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
%
70-130
LFBLANK-69451
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene
90.677
5.932
93.644
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
6.334
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
5.965
mg/kg dry wt
88.983
6.704
%
mg/kg dry wt
5.323
mg/kg dry wt
Toluene
79.406
9.576
84.194
%
11.373
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.704
6.477
96.610
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
6.477
mg/kg dry wt
96.610
0.000
MTBE
0-25
70-130
70-130
units
LFB Duplicate RPD
0-25
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
%
%
70-130
70-130
units
LFB Duplicate RPD
96.610
0.000
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.590
mg/kg dry wt
98.305
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
6.363
mg/kg dry wt
m/p-Xylene
%
o-Xylene
units
%
%
%
94.915
3.389
%
units
96.610
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
3.508
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
13.409
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
12.613
mg/kg dry wt
94.067
%
13.409
12.045
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
89.830
%
4.237
0-25
70-130
70-130
0-25
70-130
70-130
units
91.949
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
4.608
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.193
92.372
mg/kg dry wt
%
0-25
70-130
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
QC Batch Number:
Sample Id
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 12 of 14
GC/PID-8306
Analysis
QC Analysis
Values
Units
Limits
LFBLANK-69451
MTBE
1,2,4-TrimethylBenzene
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
6.534
mg/kg dry wt
97.457
5.084
%
94.915
%
LFB Duplicate RPD
5.357
%
Lab Fort Blank Amt.
Lab Fort Blk. Found
6.704
6.193
mg/kg dry wt
mg/kg dry wt
92.372
6.704
mg/kg dry wt
5.852
mg/kg dry wt
87.288
5.084
LFB Duplicate RPD
89.830
5.660
70-130
units
%
%
0-25
70-130
70-130
units
%
%
0-25
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
NOTES:
QC Batch No. :
GC/FID-19292
Sample ID
Analysis
LFBLANK-69615
C19-C36 Aliphatics
:
:
LABORATORY FORTIFIED BLANK DUPLICATE RPD OUTSIDE OF CONTROL LIMITS. REDUCED
PRECISION ANTICIPATED FOR ANY REPORTED RESULTS FOR THIS COMPOUND.
QC Batch No. :
Sample ID
Analysis
:
:
GC/FID-19292
LFBLANK-69615
C9-C18 Aliphatics
LABORATORY FORTIFIED BLANK DUPLICATE RPD OUTSIDE OF CONTROL LIMITS. REDUCED
PRECISION ANTICIPATED FOR ANY REPORTED RESULTS FOR THIS COMPOUND.
Page 13 of 14
QC SUMMARY REPORT
Method Blanks
Report Date:
10/13/2007
Lims Bat # :
LIMT-10027
Page 14 of 14
QUALITY CONTROL DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS
QC BATCH NUMBER
This is the number assigned to all samples analyzed together that
would be subject to comparison with a particular set of Quality
Control Data.
LIMITS
Upper and Lower Control Limits for the QC ANALYSIS Reported. All
values normally would fall within these statistically determined
limits, unless there is an unusual circumstance that would be
documented in a NOTE appearing on the last page of the QC SUMMARY
REPORT. Not all QC results will have Limits defined.
Sample Amount
Amount of analyte found in a sample.
Blank
Method Blank that has been taken though all the steps of the
analysis.
LFBLANK
Laboratory Fortified Blank (a control sample)
STDADD
Standard Added (a laboratory control sample)
Matrix Spk Amt Added
MS Amt Measured
Matrix Spike % Rec.
Amount of analyte spiked into a sample
Amount of analyte found including amount that was spiked
% Recovery of spiked amount in sample.
Duplicate Value
Duplicate RPD
The result from the Duplicate analysis of the sample.
The Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate Analyses.
Surrogate Recovery
The % Recovery for non-environmental compounds (surrogates)
spiked into samples to determine the performance of the
analytical methods.
Sur. Recovery (ELCD)
Sur. Recovery (PID)
Surrogate Recovery on the Electrolytic Conductivity Detector.
Surrogate Recovery on the Photoionization Detector.
Standard Measured
Standard Amt Added
Standard % Recovery
Amount measured for a laboratory control sample
Known value for a laboratory control sample
% recovered for a laboratory control sample with a known value.
Lab
Lab
Lab
Dup
Dup
Dup
Lab
Laboratory Fortified Blank Amount Added
Laboratory Fortified Blank Amount Found
Laboratory Fortified Blank % Recovered
Duplicate Laboratory Fortified Blank Amount Added
Duplicate Laboratory Fortified Blank Amount Found
Duplicate Laboratory Fortified Blank % Recovery
Laboratory Fortified Blank Range (Absolute value of difference
between recoveries for Lab Fortified Blank and Lab Fortified
Blank Duplicate).
Laboratory Fortified Blank Average Recovery
Fort Blank Amt
Fort Blk. Found
Fort Blk % Rec
Lab Fort Bl Amt
Lab Fort Bl Fnd
Lab Fort Bl % Rec
Fort Blank Range
Lab Fort Bl. Av. Rec.
Duplicate Sample Amt
MSD Amount Added
MSD Amt Measured
MSD % Recovery
MSD Range
Sample Value for Duplicate used with Matrix Spike Duplicate
Matrix Spike Duplicate Amount Added (Spiked)
Matrix Spike Duplicate Amount Measured
Matrix Spike Duplicate % Recovery
Absolute difference between Matrix Spike and Matrix Spike
Duplicate Recoveries
APPENDIX B
TEST PIT LOGS
View from the south of Test Trench TP-1.
View from the east of the southern extent of former UST grave located in the north
end of Test Trench TP-1 (note change in soil color and texture from light tan fine
sand to brown sandy gravel in center of photograph).
View from the south of Test Trench TP-2.
View from the south of west end of Test Pit TP-3.
View from the east of Test Trench TP-4
View from the south of ash layer in the west end of Test Trench TP-4.
View from the east of Test Pit TP-5.
View of gleyed (light gray) soils in Test Pit TP-5.
View from the north of the south end of Test Pit TP-6.
View from the southeast of white-tipped stake marking the location of Test Pit TP-7
prior to excavation.
View of dark gray stained soil encountered while excavating Test Pit TP-7.
View of dark gray stained soil exposed in sidewall and bottom of Test Pit TP-7.
View from the south of the northwest end of Test Pit TP-8.
TEST PIT LOG
PROJECT NAME/NO. Former Cains Facility Phase II ESA
LOCATION 15 Jewett Ave, South Deerfield, MA
CLIENT
Town of Deerfield
CONTRACTOR H. C. Kocot & Sons, Inc.
FOREMAN G. Arel
OBSERVED BY
R. Prescott
DATE
9/28/2007
CHECKED BY
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-1
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION
DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER BELOW
GROUND SURFACE
6.0
DEPTH BELOW
TEST PIT DIAGRAM AND SOIL DESCRIPTION
GROUND
SURFACE (ft.)
0-1.5
1.5-2.5
2.5-5
5-6.5
6.5-7
Alternating minor layers of brown silty gravel and tan fine to medium sand, trace brick, concrete
-FILLOrange brown fine to medium sand, trace silt (except in UST grave backfill where soil was
graybrown silty fine to coarse sand with gravel)
Tan fine to medium sand, trace silt with orange brown mottles (except in UST grave backfill)
Light greyish tan fine to medium sand, trace silt (except in UST grave backfill)
Light greyish tan fine to medium sand, trace silt
BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION
TEST PIT DIAGRAM
SOUTH
0
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE
NORTH
40
60
80
DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (FT)
0
Miscellaneous FILL
1.5
2.5
Native fine to medium sand, trace silt
5
FORMER
UST GRAVE
7
*
APPROXIMATE
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
NOTES:
Screened soils for total VOCs with Mini-RAE 2000 PID at approximately 10-foot
intervals within each stratigraphic layer. No PID results above 0.0 background
readings observed in 48 samples screened
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-1
WESTON & SAMPSON
ENGINEERS, INC.
R:\Deerfield MA\Cains Pickle Facility ESA\Report\[Test Pit Logs.xls]TP-1
TEST PIT LOG
CLIENT
Town of Deerfield
FOREMAN G. Arel
OBSERVED BY
R. Prescott
DATE
9/28/2007
CHECKED BY
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-2
GROUND SURFACE
6.0
DEPTH BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE (ft.)
0-1.0
Crushed concrete,brick, little brown silty gravel and tan fine to medium sand
1.0-2.0
2.5" thick layer of buried pavement with approximate 8-10" layer of brown silty gravel sub-base
2.0-4.5
Brown silty fine to coarse sand with gravel
4.5-6.5
Tan fine to medium sand, trace silt
6.5-7
-FILL-
TEST PIT DIAGRAM
SOUTH
0
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE
NORTH
30
45
60
0
Demolition Debris
1.0
2.0
Miscellaneous FILL
*
4.5
5
7
=APPROXIMATE
*
NOTES:
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-2
WESTON & SAMPSON
ENGINEERS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
CLIENT
Town of Deerfield
FOREMAN G. Arel
OBSERVED BY
R. Prescott
DATE
9/28/2007
CHECKED BY
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-3
GROUND SURFACE
Not Encountered
DEPTH BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE (ft.)
0-1.0
1.0-2.5
-FILLOrange brown fine to medium sand, trace silt
2.5-5
Tan fine to medium sand, trace silt with orange brown mottles
5
TEST PIT DIAGRAM
EAST
0
0
1.0
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE
5
WEST
10
15
*
Miscellaneous FILL
2.5
5
=APPROXIMATE
*
NOTES:
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-3
WESTON & SAMPSON
ENGINEERS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
CLIENT
Town of Deerfield
FOREMAN G. Arel
OBSERVED BY
R. Prescott
DATE
9/28/2007
CHECKED BY
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-4
GROUND SURFACE
5.5
DEPTH BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE (ft.)
0-2.0
1.5-2.5
with a 1-foot thick layer of ash from 1-2 ft bgs in the western end of the trench
2.5-5.5
5.5-6
Light grey (gleyed) fine to medium sand, trace silt
TEST PIT DIAGRAM
EAST
0
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE
30
WEST
60
90
0
Miscellaneous FILL
ASH
1.5
*
2.5
6
=APPROXIMATE
*
NOTES:
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-4
WESTON & SAMPSON
ENGINEERS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
CLIENT
Town of Deerfield
FOREMAN G. Arel
OBSERVED BY
R. Prescott
DATE
9/28/2007
CHECKED BY
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-5
GROUND SURFACE
1.5
DEPTH BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE (ft.)
0-1.0
Dark brown organic silty fine sand (topsoil)
1.0-2.5
Brown gravelly fine to medium sand, little silt
2.5-3
-FILLLight grey (gleyed) fine to medium sand, trace silt
TEST PIT DIAGRAM
EAST
0
0
1.0
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE
5
WEST
10
15
*
Miscellaneous FILL
2.5
3.0
=APPROXIMATE
*
NOTES:
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-5
WESTON & SAMPSON
ENGINEERS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
CLIENT
Town of Deerfield
FOREMAN G. Arel
OBSERVED BY
R. Prescott
DATE
9/28/2007
CHECKED BY
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-6
GROUND SURFACE
4.5
DEPTH BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE (ft.)
0-1.0
Dark brown fine sandy organic silt (topsoil)
1.0-3.0
3.0-4.5
-FILLTan fine to medium sand, trace silt with orange brown mottles
4.5-5
Light grey (gleyed) fine to medium sand, trace silt
TEST PIT DIAGRAM
SOUTH
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE
0
5
0
1.0
NORTH
10
15
Miscellaneous FILL
*
3.0
5.0
=APPROXIMATE
*
NOTES:
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-6
WESTON & SAMPSON
ENGINEERS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
CLIENT
Town of Deerfield
FOREMAN G. Arel
OBSERVED BY
R. Prescott
DATE
9/28/2007
CHECKED BY
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-7
GROUND SURFACE
Not encountered
DEPTH BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE (ft.)
0-0.5
1.0-2.5
2.5-3
Dark grey stained with petroleum odor fine to medium sand, trace silt
'-FILL-
TEST PIT DIAGRAM
NORTHEAST
0
0
1.0
2.5
3.0
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE
SOUTHWEST
4
8
Miscellaneous FILL
Stained soil with petroleum odor (max PID=34.5ppm)
*
=APPROXIMATE
*
NOTES:
Screened soils for total VOCs with Mini-RAE 2000 PID in each sidewall and the
bottom of TP. Five samples from 2.5-3 ft bgs had results above 0.0 background:
from 2.5 ft bgs North wall- 15.2 ppm, South wall- 7.9 ppm, East wall- 11.3 ppm
and the test pit Bottom - 34.5 ppm from 2.5 to 3 ft bgs.
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-7
WESTON & SAMPSON
ENGINEERS, INC.
TEST PIT LOG
CLIENT
Town of Deerfield
FOREMAN G. Arel
OBSERVED BY
R. Prescott
DATE
9/28/2007
CHECKED BY
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-8
GROUND SURFACE
Not Encountered
DEPTH BELOW
GROUND
SURFACE (ft.)
0-0.5
0.5-1.5
1.5-2.5
2.5-5
5.5
6.0
TEST PIT DIAGRAM
SOUTHEAST
0
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE
4
NORTHWEST
8
12
0
*
Miscellaneous FILL
1.5
2.5
5.5
6.0
=APPROXIMATE
*
NOTES:
TEST PIT NUMBER
TP-8
WESTON & SAMPSON
ENGINEERS, INC.

Phase II ESA Rpt 071021b

Transcription

Similar documents

Neon Lights Map V7

here

Girlfriend Getaway Girlfriend Getaway

Inside the Times 2.indd

More than 100 exhibitors

Jefferson - Fort Community Credit Union

Notice of Workshop

Shownotes - consuleng.com.au

PDF Information about the Fall trip to Fort McKavett!!

Summer 2008 Quarterly Newsletter