1 - Treasure Island

CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
CITY HALL AUDITORIUM - 120 108th AVENUE, TREASURE ISLAND, FLORIDA
THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 2015 AT 2:00 PM
1.
2.
3.
4.
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER BY PRESIDING OFFICER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CELL PHONE ANNOUNCEMENT
ROLL CALL
TIM BUTLER
KEVIN JOHNSON
LARRY LUNN
SALEENE PARTRIDGE
STEVE YOST
5.
6.
7.
8.
DENNIS FAGAN (CHAIRPERSON)
JOHN LAYNE
FRANK MCCONNELL
GUY PETIX
DAN YOUNKMAN
RICHARD HARRIS
JIM LORENZ (VICE-CHAIR)
DARRELL MEACHUM
MITCHELL SHENKMAN
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 16, 2015 and May 21, 2015
EX PARTE COMMUNICATION DISCLOSURE
ADMINISTRATION OF WITNESS OATH
PRESENTATION OF ITEMS:
A. Case No. PZ 2015-23V A variance to encroach into the front yard setback two
nd
and a half (2.5) feet for two 2 living level cantilevered shallow porches. Lot 31
th
on 80 Avenue (currently vacant) (RM-15).
B. Case No. PZ 2015-24SR Site Plan Review for a new 7 unit motel with restaurant.
9650 Gulf Blvd. (CG) THIS CASE HAS BEEN POSTPONED TO JULY 16, 2015 BY
THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT.
C. Case No. PZ 2015-V A marine variance to increase the combined maximum
width of a marine structure from 35 feet to 38 feet – 10 inches for a residential
th
dock with 2 boat lifts. 12175 5 Street, East (RU-75)
9.
10.
11.
REPORTS AND COMMENTS OF CITY ATTORNEY, STAFF, AND BOARD MEMBERS
NEXT PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEETING – THURSDAY, JULY 16, 2015 AT 2 P.M.
ADJOURNMENT
Ex parte communication - The substance of any ex parte communication with a board member which relates to quasi-judicial
action pending before the Board is not presumed prejudicial to the action if the subject of the communication and the identity of
the person, group, or entity with whom the communication took place is disclosed and part of the record before final action on
the matter. The board member may read a written communication from any person. However, a written communication that
relates to quasi-judicial action pending before a board member shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action, and such
written communication shall be made a part of the record before final action on the matter. Board members may conduct
investigations and site visits and may receive expert opinions regarding quasi-judicial action pending before them. Such
activities shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action if the existence of the investigation, site visit or expert opinion is made
a part of the record before final action on the matter. Disclosure must be made before or during the public meeting at which a
vote is taken on such matters, so that persons who have opinions contrary to those expressed in the ex parte communication
are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond to the communication. (For more information see Florida Statutes
286.0115)
Any person desiring to file an appeal to any action taken by the Board at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings
and for such purpose may be required to insure that a verbatim transcript is made. Said transcript shall be made by the
appellant at his or her expense. The City maintains a tape recording of all public hearings. In the event that you wish to appeal
a decision, the tape may or may not adequately insure a verbatim record of the proceedings. Therefore, you may wish to
provide a court reporter at your expense.
Any person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding is entitled to assistance at
no cost. Please contact the office of the City Clerk in writing at 120 108th Avenue, Treasure Island, Florida 33706, or by phone
at 727-547-4575, at least two working days prior to the meeting to advise what assistance is needed.
CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MINUTES
Thursday, April 16, 2015
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
Tim Butler
Dennis Fagan (Chairperson)
Richard Harris
Kevin Johnson
John Layne
Jim Lorenz (Vice-Chair)
Larry Lunn
Frank McConnell
Darrell Meachum
Saleene Partridge
Guy Petix
Mitchell Shenkman
Steve Yost
Dan Younkman
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Present
Present
Present
Present
The Chairperson called the meeting to order at 2:00 pm. Present were the City
Attorney, Maura Kiefer and the CI Director, Paula Cohen.
It was noted that Ms. Partridge reported her absence.
New member, Larry Lunn, offered a brief introduction listing his past experiences
and qualifications.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
There were no minutes for approval.
4. EX PARTE COMMUNICATION:
There was no Ex Parte communication reported.
5. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH:
All applicants, witnesses, members of staff and other persons wishing to address
any item before the Board of quasi-judicial nature were duly sworn.
1
P & Z minutes 04/16/2015
6. PRESENTATION OF ITEMS:
A. [PZ-2015-13-V - Variance ]- Tim Ramsberger, 12112 Lagoon Lane is
requesting a variance to reduce the north setback along 122nd Avenue
from 10 feet to 4 feet to install the staircase for a new single family
home. Residential Medium (RM-15)
The CI Director offered a verbal presentation of the staff report and answered
questions of the Board.
The applicant, Tim Ramsberger, 12112 Lagoon La. and his agents Jill
Colledge and Dan Karcher of Dan Karcher Construction addressed the
Board. Mr. Ramsberger offered an explanation of the variance request and
answered questions of the Board.
Public Comments:
Ms. Mel Lenehan 8251 Bayshore Dr. addressed the Board stating that she
supports the variance request.
Board discussion ensued regarding the variance request.
Upon a request from the CI Director, the applicant’s agent, Jill Colledge,
addressed the Board and explained that there would be a reduction in the
stair width from 6 feet to 5 feet in order to reduce the variance to a 5 foot
setback.
ACTION:
Motion was made by Mr. Butler and seconded by Mr. Meachum to approve
the variance request to reduce the setback on 122 nd Ave. from 10 feet to 5
feet to install the staircase based on staff findings and conditions.
Mr. Yost requested to modify the motion to include the words to complete the
structure that has been presented because the structure will also be in the 10
foot setback.
Mr. Butler wished to amend his motion to include the portion of the house and
the porch that also encroach into the setback as per the site plan provided
Mr. Meahum agreed to amend his second.
Upon roll call the vote to approve the amended motion was unanimous.
2
P & Z minutes 04/16/2015
B. [PZ-2015-14-V - Variance ]- Anas and Staci Iqbal, 12416 Sunshine Lane
are requesting a variance to increase the length of an existing
encroachment that is 12 feet 6 inches in length to 17 feet 4 inches for a
proposed landing to the stairs. There is an existing encroachment of 3
feet 10 inches into the 10 foot setback of Sunshine Lane. Resort
Facilities High (RFH-50)
The CI Director offered a verbal presentation of the staff report and answered
questions of the Board.
The applicant, Mr. Anas Iqbal addressed the Board and offered an
explanation of the purpose of the variance request. Mr. Iqbal offered a video
presentation of the proposed structures.
Public Comments:
Ms. Mel Lenehan, 8251 Bayshore Dr. addressed the Board and stated that
she supports the variances.
Board discussion ensued with concerns and opinions regarding the variance
requests.
ACTION:
Motion was made by Mr. Harris and seconded by Mr. Yost to approve the
variance request in accordance with staff supporting facts that there is
already an encroachment, does not increase the habitable area of the home
and subject property is substandard in width and area.
Board discussion ensued regarding the need to have a condition that the
variance if approved will attach to the structure and not the land. Opinions
were offered by the City Attorney and it was suggested by the Chair to
reconsider going down that road.
Mr. Meachum wished to amend the motion to include the condition that the
variance remain with the structure and not the land.
Mr. Harris agreed to amend his motion and Mr. Yost agreed to amend his
second to include the condition that the variance remain with the structure
and not the land.
3
P & Z minutes 04/16/2015
Upon roll call the vote to grant the variance with the condition as stated in the
amended motion was 8 ayes and 5 nays (Mr. Butler, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Lunn,
Mr. Meachum and Mr. Younkman the dissenting votes).
C. [PZ-2015-15-V - Variance ]- Anas and Staci Iqbal, 12416 Sunshine Lane
are requesting a variance to increase the length of an existing
encroachment that is 56 feet in length to 76 feet for a proposed 1st floor
terrace and 2nd floor deck/lanai. There is an existing encroachment of at
least 6 feet 11 inches into the 10 foot setback of 125 th Avenue. Resort
Facilities High (RFH-50)
ACTION:
Motion was made by Mr. Harris and seconded by Mr. Meachum to deny the
variance request as presented.
Upon roll call the vote to deny the variance was 8 ayes and 5 nays (Mr.
Layne, Mr. Petix, Mr. Shenkman, Mr. Yost and Mr. Younkman the dissenting
votes).
7. REPORTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY, STAFF AND BOARD
MEMBERS:
The City Attorney offered a review of House Bill 383 which she indicated
seems to be moving through the process. Ms. Kiefer noted that House Bill
383 addresses Chapter 70, the Private Property Act and then read the
definition of Prohibitive Exaction which is the subject of the bill.
8. NEXT MEETING:
The next regularly scheduled P & Z meeting will be Thursday, May 21, 2015
at 2:00 pm.
9. ADJOURNMENT:
Motion was made to adjourn the meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:20 pm.
A. J. Sarko
Recording Secretary
Dennis Fagan
Chairperson
4
P & Z minutes 04/16/2015
CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
MINUTES
Thursday, May 21, 2015
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
Tim Butler
Dennis Fagan (Chairperson)
Richard Harris
Kevin Johnson
John Layne
Jim Lorenz (Vice-Chair)
Larry Lunn
Frank McConnell
Darrell Meachum
Saleene Partridge
Guy Petix
Mitchell Shenkman
Steve Yost
Dan Younkman
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Absent
Absent
Present
Present
Present
The Chairperson called the meeting to order at 2: 00 pm. Present were the City
Attorney, Maura Kiefer, the CI Director, Paula Cohen and the City Planner,
Michelle Orton.
It was noted that Mr. Petix and Ms. Partridge have reported their absence.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Motion was made by Mr. Harris and seconded by Mr. Butler to approve the
minutes of the meeting of March 19, 2015 as printed. Upon a voice vote the
motion to approve the minutes was unanimous.
4. EX PARTE COMMUNICATION:
Mr. Yost reported that he was a noticed neighbor in case PZ-2015-19V and Mr.
Butler reported that he received several e-mails and noted that he did not
respond to any and also that they will be forwarded to staff.
1
P & Z minutes 05/21/2015
5. ADMINISTRATION OF OATH:
All applicants, witnesses, members of staff and other persons wishing to address
any item before the Board of quasi-judicial nature were duly sworn.
6. PRESENTATION OF ITEMS:
A. [PZ-2015-16-V-Variance ]- Beach Haven Condo Association, 9750 Gulf
Blvd is requesting a variance to encroach an additional 5 feet into the
north side yard setback to install one exterior aluminum spiral staircase.
Commercial General (CG)
Postponed to July 16, 2015 meeting at the request of the applicant.
B. [PZ-2015-16-V-Variance ]- Beach Haven Condo Association, 9750 Gulf
Blvd is requesting a variance to encroach an additional 5 feet into the
south side yard setback to install one exterior aluminum spiral staircase.
Commercial General (CG)
Postponed to July 16, 2015 meeting at the request of the applicant
C. [PZ-2015-18-SM- Site Plan Modification]- Beach Haven Condo Association,
9750 Gulf Blvd is requesting a site plan modification to incorporate six
new powder-coated exterior aluminum staircases on the Beach Haven
Condo property. Commercial General (CG)
Postponed to July 16, 2015 meeting at the request of the applicant
D. [PZ-2015-19-V - Variance ]- Tom and Melanie Lair, 8715 East Bay Drive are
requesting a variance to permit the overall length of the dock to increase
from a maximum of 50 feet to 67 feet 6 inches due to the extent of sea
grass in the Bay behind their home. Residential Medium (RM-15)
The CI Director offered a verbal presentation of the staff report and answered
questions of the Board.
Mr. Speeler of Speeler Foundations, Inc., the applicant’s agent addressed the
Board outlining the proposed dock structure and noted the aerial photo he has
distributed to the Board. Mr. Speeler answered questions of the Board.
Public Comments:
Ms. Mel Lenehan, 8251 Bayshore Dr., addressed the Board and stated that she
supports the variance request.
2
P & Z minutes 05/21/2015
Ms. Melinda Lair, 8715 East Bay Dr., the owner and applicant addressed the
Board and noted that she has received several e-mails supporting the dock. The
e-mails were read into the record by the Chair. E-mails were from Mr. Tom
Fitzgerald, 8685 East Bay Dr. supporting the dock, Jim and Linette Zink, 8665
East Bay Dr. supporting the dock and Pam ???? no address also supporting the
dock.
ACTION:
Motion was made by Mr. Harris and seconded by Mr. Shenkman to approve in
accordance with staff report and recommendations. Upon roll call the vote to
approve the motion was unanimous.
E. [PZ-2015-20-V – Variance A and B ]- Justin and Rennie Mace, 715 119th
Avenue are requesting A – a variance to reduce the required 5 foot marine
structure setback on the east side lot line to 2 feet and B – a variance to
reduce the required 5 foot marine structure setback on the west side lot
line to 3 feet. Residential Urban (RU-75)
It was noted by the CI Director that two handouts were distributed to the Board,
a document from Dolphin Marine indicating the proposed dock and a letter from
T. C. and Tracy Dettenwanger offering an outline of their proposed public
comments.
The CI Director offered a verbal presentation of the staff report and answered
questions of the Board
The applicant, Justine Mace, 715 119th Ave., addressed the Board explaining
his situation and reasons for the variance request and answered questions of
the Board.
Public Comments:
Mr. Ron Schmidt, 11775 7th St E, addressed the Board and explained his
objection to the variance.
Mr.Tom Dettenwanger, 725 119th Ave., addressed the Board by reading from a
handout that was previously distributed to the Board.
Mr. Ron Schmidt, 11775 7th St E, again addressed the Board stating another
objection to the variance.
3
P & Z minutes 05/21/2015
Ms. Mel Lehehan, 8251 Bayshore Dr., addressed the Board noting the lack of
an overhead to allow for public viewing.
Mr. Pete Zitter, 685 Capri Blvd., addressed the Board and stated that knowing
the applicant to be a man of his word he would like to see the variance granted.
The applicant, Justin Mace, again addressed the Board offering a rebuttal to
some earlier comments.
Board discussion ensued regarding dock regulations and measurements.
ACTION:
Motion was made by Mr. Butler and seconded by Mr. Shenkman to approve
both variance A & B as recommended by staff and in accordance with details in
staff report and based on the drawing from Dolphin Marine with no mooring of
boats.
The City Attorney suggested that the motion be amended to add no mooring of
registered boats. Mr. Butler and Mr. Shenkman agreed to amend the motion.
Upon roll call the vote to approve the amended motion was 9 ayes and 3 nays
(Mr. Johnson, Mr. Lorenz and Mr. Meachum the dissenting votes).
Board recessed at 3:45 pm
Board reconvened at 3:55pm
Mr. Yost left meeting at 3:55 pm
F. [PZ-2015-21-SR – Site Plan Review ]- T I Beach 9900 LLC, 9900 Gulf
Boulevard is requesting a site plan review for a new single family structure
along the Gulf of Mexico located at 9900 Gulf Blvd. Resorts Facilities High
(RFH-50)
The CI Director offered a verbal presentation of the staff report and answered
questions of the Board
Mr. Jack Bodziak, the applicant’s architect and agent, addressed the Board and
answered questions of the Board.
Ms. Noel Johnson, 9920 Gulf Blvd., addressed the Board and expressed some
concerns with the construction site.
4
P & Z minutes 05/21/2015
Ms. Mel Lenehan, 8251 Bayshore Dr., addressed the Board and expressed a
concern with the loss of commercially zoned properties.
Upon a question from Mr. Butler regarding undergrounding utilities and the
easement necessary, the CI Director noted that a condition was missing from
the staff report and the 10 foot easement along the entire width of the property
on Gulf Blvd. is to be included as a condition.
ACTION:
Motion was made by Mr. Harris and seconded by Mr. Johnson to approve the
site plan in accordance with staff recommendations and staff report and an
added condition that an FDOT driveway connection and drainage connection
permit or exemption be provided to the City prior to the issuance of a building
permit and that a recorded easement be provided.
Mr. Jack Bodziak, the applicant’s agent addressed the Board to explain that
prior to granting a certificate of occupancy the driveway and drainage
connection permits are granted.
The City Attorney suggested adding the words to pay in the first condition of
approval after the word responsible.
An amended motion was made by Mr. Harris and seconded by Mr. Johnson to
approve the site plan in accordance with staff recommendations and staff report
and an added condition that an FDOT driveway connection and drainage
connection permit or exemption be provided to the City prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy and that a recorded easement be provided.
Upon roll call the vote to approve was unanimous.
G. [PZ-2015-22-SR – Site Plan Review ]- T I Beach 9900 LLC, 9900 Gulf
Boulevard is requesting a site plan review for a new single family structure
along the Gulf of Mexico located at 9908 Gulf Blvd. Resorts Facilities High
(RFH-50)
*The CI Director offered a verbal presentation of the staff report noting the
change made by the City Attorney in the condition of approval to be responsible
to pay for the removal and/or relocation of any and all public utilities, etc. and to
include the recorded 10 foot easement along with FDOT driveway and drainage
connection permits if required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Mr. Jack Bodziak , the applicant’s architect and agent, addressed the Board.
5
P & Z minutes 05/21/2015
Ms. Mel Lenehan, 8251 Bayshore Dr. addressed the Board and questioned the
easement and the sidewalk footage.
ACTION:
Motion was made by Mr. Harris and seconded by Mr. Butler to approve the site
plan in accordance with the staff report including additional conditions as *noted
above.
Upon roll call the vote to approve was unanimous.
7. REPORTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY, STAFF AND BOARD
MEMBERS:
There were no reports
8. NEXT MEETING:
The next regularly scheduled P & Z meeting will be Thursday, June 18, 2015
at 2:00 pm.
9. ADJOURNMENT:
Motion was made to adjourn the meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 pm.
A. J. Sarko
Recording Secretary
Dennis Fagan
Chairperson
6
P & Z minutes 05/21/2015
A. Case No. PZ 2015-23V A
variance to encroach into the front
yard setback two and a half (2.5)
nd
feet for two 2
living level
cantilevered shallow porches. Lot
th
31 on 80
Avenue (currently
vacant) (RM-15).
CITY OF
TREASURE ISLAND
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
120 - 108th Avenue, Treasure Island, Florida 33706
Telephone (727) 547-4575; Fax (727) 547-4584
CASE NO. PZ-2015-23-VARIANCE
STAFF REPORT
JUNE 18, 2015; 2:00 P.M. - PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
PROPERTY
OWNERS:
Sherri Wiggins
Hassan Salami
200 South 57th West
Suite 103
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
DESCRIPTION:
A variance to encroach into the front yard setback two and a half (2.5)
feet for two 2nd living level cantilevered shallow porches.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Location:
Lot 31 on 80th Avenue (vacant)
Land Use:
Residential Medium
Zoning:
RM-15
Adjacent Property (Use):
North:
Lot 24 (24 80th Ave) - Single Family Dwelling Unit
South:
Part of lot 38, all of lots 39, 40 and 41 (26 79th Terrace)
8 Dwelling Units
East:
Lot 30 is vacant
Lots 28-29 (28 80th Ave) Single Family Dwelling Unit
West:
Lot 32 is vacant
Lot 33 (33 80th Ave) - Single Family Dwelling Unit
Site Area:
35 feet x 40 feet = 1400 square feet
Flood Zone:
AE 12, Flood Insurance Rate Map
Community Panel No. 12103C0257G, September 3, 2003.
Site Legal:
PENGUIN CABANA SUBDIVISION, LOT 31
1
Parcel #:
36-31-15-68283-000-0310
BACKGROUND:
The subject site is a vacant lot lying south of 80th Avenue and east of West Gulf Boulevard. The
applicants purchased this lot in 2011.
STAFF ANALYSIS
1.
The variance is in fact a variance as set forth within the Land Development Regulations
and within the province of the Planning and Zoning Board based upon the opinion of the
City Manager or his designee.
The variance being requested is set forth within the Land Development Regulations and
under the purview of the Planning and Zoning Board.
2.
Special conditions or circumstances exist which are peculiar to the building, structure, or
land for which the variance is sought and do not apply generally to buildings, structures,
or lands in the same district.
This lot is rectangular in shape and measures approximately 35 feet by 40 feet for 1400
square feet of area. The minimum lot dimensions for an RM-15 lot are 40 feet by 90 feet
and a minimum of 4,500 square feet of area. Land Development Regulations, Sec. 68-451
Non-Conforming Lots, permits a single-family structure to be constructed on a nonconforming lot. The subdivision was platted in 1939, prior to the adoption of Ordinance
78-18 which prescribed minimum lot sizes.
3.
Strict application of the provisions of the land development regulations would not permit
the applicant reasonable use of the building; structure, or land.
The Land Development Regulations permit the development of a single family home on a
non-conforming lot as identified in the above response. The setback requirements are 10
feet for the front yard, 5 feet at the rear and side yards leaving a shallow depth for the
building.
4.
The peculiar conditions and circumstances existing are not the result of the actions of
the applicant, the applicant’s agents, or the applicant’s predecessors in title.
The size of the lot was platted in 1939 prior to the adoption of prescribed minimum lot
sizes and not the result of the petitioner.
5.
The variance proposed to be granted is the minimum variance that will make possible
the reasonable use of the building, structure, or land.
The variance proposed is the minimum required to develop the architectural features to
the front yard of the proposed residence without imposing any sight restrictions to
neighboring properties. The building footprint of the single family structure is within the
required setbacks and the minimum variance requested is for two cantilevered shallow
porches on the second floor living area.
2
6.
Owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement would result in unnecessary hardship.
Special conditions to be considered pursuant to this section of the land development
regulations shall include, but not be limited to, the following circumstances:





Redevelopment. If the proposed project involves the redevelopment or utilization
of an existing developed or partially developed site.
Substandard Lot(s). If the proposed project involves the utilization of an existing
legal nonconforming lot(s).
Neighborhood Character. If the proposed project promotes the established
development pattern of a block face, including setbacks, building height, and
other dimensional requirements.
Public Facilities. If the proposed project involves the development of public parks,
public facilities or public utilities.
Architectural and/or engineering considerations. If the proposed project utilizes
architectural and/or engineering features that would render the project more
disaster-resistant.
Comments:





7.
Redevelopment – Not applicable. There is no record of a dwelling ever existing
on this lot.
Substandard Lot(s) - This is a substandard lot in the RM-15 zoning district.
The minimum lot size is 40 feet x 90 feet with an area of 4,500 square feet. The
petitioner’s lot measures approximately 35 feet wide x 40 feet with an area of
1400 square feet.
Neighborhood Character – The neighborhood consists of non-conforming lots;
that are both built upon with single family homes and a few vacant lots. The
establishment of a single family home on this site is consistent with the
neighborhood. The fact that the proposed improvement will be cantilevered
allows the architectural feature to exist with the least impact on the
neighborhood.
Public Facilities – Not applicable
Architectural and/or engineering considerations – The proposed project will
abide by required state building and City flood control ordinances to provide for a
more disaster-resistant dwelling unit. The variance provides for a 2.5 deep
architectural feature on the front of the new home.
The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of
this chapter.
The general purpose and intent of this chapter is to provide a variance where a hardship
has been determined. The lot is substandard in size. The footprint of the new home will
meet the zoning regulations. The owners are trying to establish an architectural feature
on a very small house.
8.
The granting of the variance will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare.
3
The granting of this variance will not be injurious to the neighboring property owners.
Granting the variance may enhance the character of the neighborhood by providing an
architectural feature on the front of the house.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends APPROVAL of the request; based upon the following:

This rectangular shaped lot is substandard to the minimum lot requirements for a single
family home in the RM-15 zoning district;

This request is a minor variance to the front yard setback;

The proposed encroachment will not block anyone's view and will not be injurious to the
neighborhood. The proposed encroachment will be on the 2nd living level of the new
home and it will be cantilevered from the building.
Should the Planning and Zoning Board wish to DENY the variance, it would be based on the
following finding:

The variance request to reduce the required front yard setback from 10 feet to 7.5 feet is
a self-imposed hardship to create two second living level cantilevered shallow porch. It
is an architectural feature which is not necessary to provide for reasonable use of the lot.
As described in Section 70-221, subsection (g) “The granted variance shall be valid for one
year”. To remain in effect after one year, one of the following must have occurred:
(1) An extension of time has been approved by the approving body;
(2) Building permits relating to the requested variance have either been applied for or
granted; or
(3) A site plan review relating to the requested variance has been applied for or approved
by the planning and zoning board.
Any requests for an extension of time relating to a variance(s) must be in writing and received
by the city manager or specified designee at least three weeks prior to its expiration date in
order for the request to be placed on the approving body's agenda.”
4
A variance to encroach into the front yard setback 2.5 feet to reduce the required front
yard setback from 10 feet to 7.5 feet for two cantilevered shallow porches on the 2nd
living level of a new home.
Planning and Zoning Board Action:
[ ] Approved
[ ] Denied
[ ] Deferred
5
[ ] Approved with Conditions
. J1015-2.-? v
Case Number:
City of Treasure Island
Development Review Application
Please use blue or black ink only. Failure to complete this form in its entirety will result in this application
being returned without review. Note: A separate application is required for each request.
Property
Owners
Address
SHERRI
WIGGINS / HASSAN SALAMI
Agent
200 SOUTH 57 WEST SUITE103
Address
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
Phone
801-864-3894
Phone
Fax
Email
Fax
[email protected]
List all Legal Owner(s) of Property:
Email
SHERRI WIGGINS AND HASSAN SALAMI
SHERRI WIGGINS AND HASSAN SALAMI
Complete legal description (may be placed on attached separate page):
LOT#31, PEQUIN CABANA SUBDIVISION
AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23. PAGE 38 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY , FLORIDA
Development Name:
SHERRI AND HASSAN RESIDENCE
Site Location/Address:
LOT # 31 80TH AVENUE TREASURE ISLAND FL 33706
Area of Development (Acreage or Square Feet)
Parcel Identification Number (list all):
Application Request
1400 SQUARE FEET
36-31-15-68283-000-0310
Variance of 2.5' on the front setback for a third level
cantilevered shallow porche.
^
SINGLE HOME RESIDENCE
SINGLE HOME RESIDENCE
Future Land Use Designation
Proposed Future Land Use
Current Zoning
^^
Proposed Zoning
RM15
I certify that I have reviewed the Land Development Regulations and that my submission meets all requirements. The only exceptions are those
items to which I am requesting variances to or waivers from certain sections of the code and understand that they must be listed on the plans
individually and on the attached transmittal. I understand that if an item does need a variance, it will be necessary to file through the appropriate
review entity.
Signature must be original (No copies, scans, faxes or e-mails)
Owner/Agent
os loCi (JM S
Date
VARIANCE APPLICATION
FOR A
NEW RESIDENCE
FOR
Sherri Wiggins and Hassan salami
PENGUIN CABANA SUB LOTS 31
80ih AVENUE
TREASURE ISLAND, FLORIDA
NARRATIVE STATEMENT
The Owner of this property is requesting a minor front yard setback variance in order to construct a new
residence.
The existing site is currently a vacant parcel. The lot size is 35' by 40' lot sandwiched between two
vacant lots of the same size.
Narrative:
1) The Owners are requesting a 2.5' variance to the front yard setback in order to construct an
architectural feature ( Mediterranean looking cantilevered porches) 8'6"wide to the front of the proposed
new residence. This structure will only encroach on the 3rd level with no supports extending down to the
ground level. All other aspects of the proposed new home have been designed to meet all other setback
and flood elevation requirements.
2) The existing site lot of 1400 square feet is sub-standard to the minimum lot size required by the RM-15
zoning for single family homes of 4,500 square feet and lot dimensions of 35' wide x 40' deep, thereby
making development difficult to construct a sizable home for today's real estate market. The extremely
shallow depth of the property at 40' feet with the required 5' rear setback and 10' front setback leaves a
very small 25' remaining depth to design a residence.
3) The existing lot dimensions which are making construction challenging, are not the result of the
applicant.
4) We believe this variance is the minimum required to help develop architectural features to the front of
the proposed residence, without imposing any sight restrictions to neighboring properties.
5) Special conditions:
a.) This property is an existing vacant lot. Past development may have occurred on this site, but is
unknown to the applicant.
b.) This is a substandard lot as mentions above in item #2.
c.) The existing neighborhood has many non-conforming structures to this zoning district, ie: fronts of
buildings not meeting the required 10' front yard setback.
d.) This is not a public project.
e.)This project has been designed to exceed the energy efficiency code as well as the requirements for
hurricane resistant homes as it will integrate building with metal insulated panels so as to reduce the
impact on the environment.
6) The granting of this variance will be in harmony with the intent of the code in order to provide relief to
structures with hardships, while at the same time develop an attractive architecturally designed home.
7) The granting of this variance will enhance the character of the neighborhood as mentioned above
We believe this is a minor encroachment to the 10' front setback. The encroachment totals only 42.5
square feet of area at the 3rd level.
We feel that this variance would rather enhance the look of the structure embellish the look of 80th
avenue and relieve the occupants from the rather very small 25' by 25' allowable building space .
We ask for your thoughtful consideration of this variance request, as we feel that it will have little or no
adverse effect to the neighboring properties or the city.
Thanks for your consideration.
Sherri Wiggins and Hassan Salami.
801-864-3894
[email protected]
(80TH AVENUE A-PER PLAT)
,6*
80TH AVENUE (30' R/W)
(24' PAVED)
N.A.V.D. BM.
EL.~2.81' ON
,BACK OF CURB
B.C.
5/8" F.I.R.
(LB65J9)
ADJ. J'W.F*
"•O
N.A.V.D. BM.
EL =2.72' ON
BACK OF CUR,
/L
JJ66' 70 '4Q"EL
35' (P&M)
5/8" F.I.R.
(LB6539) -
(BASIS OF BEARINGS)
3/4"
F./.P.
105 (PAM)
ADJ. 3' & 6'W.F.
CLEAR 0.13'
I
I
"sf-
LOT
30
(VACANT LOT)
LOT
32
«9
A?
ki kj
Q>
N
c\J
Ch N
LOT
31
O)
£
§ §
0.9'x1.2'x2' HIGH
ELECTRIC BOX
0.9'Nx0.35'\
ADJ. 6'W.F.
CLEAR 0.09 v
OVERHEAD_ ELECTRIC UNES
ADJ. 6'W.F,,X
5/8" SIR
S66'10'40"W
35' (PScM)
£ £
Co (/•)
I;1P.P.
5/8" FIR
(LB6539)
VERHEAD ELECTRIC
LINES 0.3' N
5/8' FJ.R.
(0.13'SxO.OItf)
LOT
40
LOT
39
LOT
41
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT 31, PENQUIN CABANA SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE 38, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.
JOB NUMBER: MMXIV157
TELEPHONE:
(727) 360-0636
DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: 4/17/14
SCALE:
1 INCH = 10 FEET
DRAWN BY: DCH
CERTIFIED TO:
DAVID C. HARNER
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
9925 GULF BOULEVARD
TREASURE ISLAND, FL 33706
SECTION 36 TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH RANGE 16 EAST
SHERRI WIGGINS AND HASSAN SALAMI
FLOOD ZONE: "AE" (B.F.E.= 12)
FLOOD MAP DATE: 8/18/09
COMMUNITY NUMBER: 125153
PANEL NUMBER: 0257 G
CHECKED BY: DCH
•• r
PANEL'SQfl§o®[ra
Stair
Storage
8'-8" * 7'-0*
9'-0" Ceiling
Bicycles
6070
Driveway
Plants
Ground Floor Plan
3/16" = r-o'
Driveway
!•••
PDDD
3036CSMT
3036CSMT
3036AWNG
I*
ro
3
CL
T]
O
O
"V
0)
3
3068
3036AWNG
3036AWNG
3036CSMT
3036CSM
••
••
••
PANEUkmftm
3024AWNG
3024AWNG
Bath
12"-0" * 8'—10"
8'-0" Ceiling
Arch
Walk-In
Closet
8'-0" Celling
Walk-In 1
Closet Ii
8'-0" Ceiling
Bedroom 1
Bedroom 2
11'—8" * 10"-98'-0' Celling
8'—0" Ceiling
3060CSMT
3060CSMT
3060CSMT
1st Floor Plan
3/16" = r-o"
3060CSMT
••
PANEL
3024AWNG
3024AWNG
Mezzanine
16-2" x t2'-6
Vaulted Celling
Open to Below
6036HFXD
6036HFXD
3rd Floor Plan
3/16" = r-0
••
••
••
PANEL
Roof Plan
3/16" = r-0"
••
••
••
PANEL
North Elevation
3/16" = r-0'
••
••
••
PANEL
East Elevation
3/16" = r-0"
!•••
Pooo
CD
CO
r+
•
CD
<
05
PANELMo©0®m
South Elevation
3/16" = r-0"
PANELtftta©S®Bi)
+35'-0" (49-0' NAVD)
HEIGHT UMIT (BFE +2)+35
+34'—4" (48-4' NAVD)
TOP OF ROOF
/
4
+27'—1* (41'-r NAVD)
TOP OF WALL
+19'—0' 1/2" (33'-0 1/2" NAVD)
TOP OF 3RD FLR
+9'—6' (23'—6" NAVD)
TOP OF 2ND FUR
+9'—2" (23'-2" NAVD)
TOP OF BALCONY
4
O'-O' (14'—0' NAVD)
TOP OF 1ST FUR
—1'—5" (12*—7' NAVD)
TOP OF COLUMNS
—2'—0" (12'—0" NAVD)
— 10'—5" (3'-7" NAVD)
TOP OF GROUND FLR
— 10'—9" (3'—3' NAVD)
TOP OF CARPORT SLAB
-11'-4" (2'-8* NAVD)
EXISTING GRADE
I -14'-0" (Q'-Q- NAVD)
T MEAN SEA LEVEL
Cross Section
1/8" = T-0"
REPORT OF THE
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 31-80™ AVENUE
TREASURE ISLAND, FLORIDA
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
1
"S1 SSL
D R 1 G G E R S
•
SERVICES
INCORPORATED
Geatechnical Engineering & Construction Materials Tasting
Ms. Sherri Wiggins
510 W. Murray Boulevard
Murray, Utah 84123
RE:
i
E N G 1 NEERING
June 4, 2014
Report of the Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Residence
Lot 31 - 80<h Avenue
Treasure Island, Florida
Our File: DES 147412
Dear Ms. Wiggins:
In accordance with your request and authorization, DRIGGERS ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INC. has completed the subsurface soil investigation for the planned residence. The
following pages of this report present the results of our Held and laboratory studies, plus provide
preliminary recommendations for structure subgrade preparation, foundation design and slab
support.
FIELD GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
To identify foundation subgrade conditions on the subject lot, a single Standard Penetration
Test (SPT) boring was performed and advanced to a nominal depth of 45 feet below existing grade.
The Standard Penetration method of sampling and testing was utilized to provide soil samples for
visual classification and laboratory testing, plus to develop Standard Penetration resistance data
reflective of the strength and bearing capability of the soils penetrated. Representative samples
were returned to the laboratory for examination by the project engineer and assignment of
laboratory classification tests.
Plate I in the report Appendix provides an illustration of the approximate boring location.
The results of the exploratory borings are also appended in the form of a boring log providing
visual soil descriptions and estimated Unified Soil Classifications with depth, plus groundwater
information. Also attached is a brief description of the Standard Penetration method of sampling
and testing.
Sarasota
Phone: 941.371.3949
Fax: 941.371.8962
[email protected]
Cloarwater
P.O. Box 17839 • Clearwater, Florida 33762
Phone: 727.571.1313 • Fax: 727.572.4090
[email protected]
Tampa
Phone: 813.948.6027
Fax: 727.572.4090
[email protected]
2
LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION TESTING
To aid in further characterizing the engineering properties of the subsoils encountered at
the boring location, a limited laboratory classification test program was implemented. The
classification tests consisted of a grainsize analysis and Atterberg liquid limit and plastic limit
determinations. Results of the laboratory tests are presented in the report attachments.
INDICATED SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The exploratory boring has identified an upper unit of fine and sometimes shelly sands
with variable silt and organic fmes content which comprise the SP Unified Soil Classification.
Note, however, that a thin seam of high plasticity clay was evidenced between about 1.4 and 1.8
feet. Thus, some of these upper soils likely represent fill placed to develop current grades. The
line sands were evidenced to a depth of about 18 feet where the fmes content increased, resulting
in silty sands with an SM classification. The silty to slightly silty fine sands with shell continued
to the completion depth of the boring.
At the time of our field investigation, which was conducted in May of 2014, groundwater
was measured at depth of 2.7 feet below existing gTade. It is anticipated that normal seasonal high
groundwater levels would be tidally controlled and may occur relatively close to the measured
level.
GEOTECIINICAL EVALUATION
STRUCTURE TYPE AND LOADING CONDITIONS - It is our understanding that your
proposed residence will include two column supported elevated living levels above an open ground
level. Steel stud framing would be utilized to construct the residence. We also anticipate that
negligible fill would be placed to develop the final grade. Based upon experience with similar
construction we anticipate individual column supports would be subjected to total axial
compressive loads of 50 kips, or less. We also understand that the lot is within an "A" zone and
therefore, deep foundations would not be mandated by building code. When your plans are
complete, should final structural loads or fill thicknesses significantly exceed these levels, this
office should be contacted to review recommendations herein.
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
3
SHALLOW FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS - If deep foundations are not mandated
by the Building Code, shallow foundations may be utilized for structure support. With proper
subgrade preparation, foundations may be designed based upon an allowable soil bearing pressure
of up to 2,000 pounds per square foot. Foundations proportioned in accordance with this
allowable soil bearing pressure should experience maximum total settlement of 1.0 inch or less
considered excessive, we suggest incorporation of liberal steel reinforcement in the foundations
and within grout-filled masonry cells in the columns. Such stiffening of the structure should help
minimize cosmetic cracking due to minor settlement.
Note that the exploratory boring has identified an upper fill unit which locally contains
seams of clay. Such fill soils can also locally contain organic seams. Accordingly, subgrade
preparation should include probing of foundation and slab areas for the presence of any moderate
to highly organic soils, root zones, layers of high plasticity clay or other deleterious materials
which would warrant undercutting and replacement with compacted, structural backfill. We
recommend that these operations be conducted under the observation of a representative of the
geotechnical engineer to help identify any highly organic or otherwise unsuitable materials which
would warrant removal. Appended are specific recommendations for structure subgrade
preparation and foundation design.
DEEP FOUNDATION ALTERNATIVE - If mandated by the Building Code, or should you
desire the added resistance to potential storm scour, pile foundations may also be considered.
Typically, where modest pile capacities and design involve a relatively small number of piles,
driven piles would be an economical alternative. Augered cast-in-place and augered
displacement piling may also be considered as essentially vibration free alternatives. We can
provide recommendations for these piling types upon request.
Driven Piling - Treated timber piling having a minimum tip diameter of 8 inches and a
butt diameter of not less than 10 inches should be capable of developing an axial
compressive resistance of up to 15 tons when driven into the underlying medium dense
sands. Based upon results of the single SPT boring, pile penetration depths on the order of
35 feet should be anticipated. However, experience suggests that there can be
considerable differences in pile penetration depths within relatively short distances.
Therefore, the contractor should plan for additional pile lengths. We would recommend
limiting uplift resistance to 3 tons when penetrating to a minimum depth of 35 feet. It is
recommended that dynamic pile driving formulae such as the Hiley formula or wave
equation analyses be utilized for control of pile penetration.
•riggers Engineering Services Incorporated
4
It must be recognized that the installation of timber piles will impart some noise and
vibration. This vibration can cause minor settlements of adjacent structures if supported
on shallow foundations. Accordingly, the pile driving contractor should certainly be
cautioned with respect to special care that he must exercise in order to avoid potential
damage to-neighboring structures. Pre-drilling through the upper soils can help reduce
these vibrations. We suggest conducting a crack survey of adjacent structures prior to
initiating the pile driving operations in order to document any existing distress.
Quality assurance will also be warranted to confirm the required design capacity and the
capability of the contractor's installation equipment. This testing usually involves
installation of the piles under the continuous inspection of a qualified geotechnical engineer
or geotechnician. The purpose of this inspection will be to monitor the penetration
resistance during pile driving. Based upon the relatively conservative capacities provided
we would not anticipate the need for load testing.
SLAB-ON-GRADE CONSTRUCTION - Slab-on-gradc construction may be utilized for a
ground level parking area beneath the structure with proper subgrade preparation and fill
placement as discussed above. Fill required to establish design grades should be placed and
compacted in lifts. Of importance is the subsequent compaction of backfill around foundations,
adjacent to stem walls and within utility trenches in order to provide uniform slab subgrade
support.
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING.SERVICES, INC. appreciates the opportunity to assist
you on this project. Should you have any questions concerning the results of our geotechnical
studies, please do not hesitate to contact this office at your convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERYICE^ENG
/Nicholas T. Korecki, P.E.
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
FL Registration No. 45529
NTK-REP\147412
Copies submitted:
(3)
•riggers Engineering Services Incorporated
No. 45529
V*
OK#
APPENDIX
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUBGRADE PREPARATION
AND FOUNDATION DESIGN
PLATE I - BORING LOCATION PLAN
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING LOG
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
GRAINSIZE ANALYSIS
METHOD OF TESTING
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUBGRADE PREPARATION
AND FOUNDATION DESIGN
•riggers Engineering Services Incorporated
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUBGRADE PREPARATION
AND FOUNDATION DESIGN
SUBGRADE PREPARATION
h
The entire-building area"and for a distance of at least 5 feet beyond the outside foundation
perimeters should be stripped of all surface vegetation, topsoil, existing buried structures and
foundations and other objectionable material. Exact depth of stripping should be determined
by a representative of the soil engineer in the field. All previous underground pipes, conduits,
tanks or other structures should be located that may require removal. Soils used to backfill
excavations should consist of suitable structural fill backfilled in compacted lifts as specified
hereinafter.
2.
The structure area and especially foundation areas should be hand probed for the presence of
soils with excessive organic content, root concentrations or other unsuitable material which
will require overexcavation and replacement with compacted structural fill. Removal of
unsuitable material should extend beyond the footing or structure perimeter at least 3 feet.
Backfilling should follow the recommendations listed below.
3.
A hand-guided, vibratory compactor (minimum drum width of 36 inches) should be employed
on the stripped grade and the soil compacted to at least 95% Modified Proctor (ASTM D1557) density. A qualified engineer or technician should be present during initial compaction
operations to check proper compactor performance and compaction procedures.
4.
Subgrade compaction should consist of no less than eight (8) to ten (10) complete coverages
in a criss-crossed pattern. In addition, compaction should achieve a minimum density of no
less than 95% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density established in ASTM D-1557.
5.
The bottom of footing excavations should be compacted using a vibratory sled or impact
compactor. A density of at least 95% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density should
be obtained at the bottom of footing elevation.
6.
Density tests should be used to control subgrade compaction. At least one (1) density test
should be performed for every 2,000 ft.2 at a depth of 6 inches below the compacted, stripped
subgrade elevations. No fewer than two (2) tests should be planned. Density tests should
also be performed in the bottom of the footings.
FILL AND BACKFILL PLACEMENT
1.
Fill and backfill required to develop proposed grade should be inorganic, clean to slightly silty
fine sand, free of unsuitable debris. For example, soils with a Unified Soil Classification of
SP to SP-SM would certainly be considered suitable.
2.
The fill should be placed in lift thicknesses not exceeding 9 inches with each lift compacted
to a density of not less than 95% of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. Thinner lifts
may be required depending upon compactor size and performance. Moisture content within
the fill soil should be controlled to within ±2% of optimum as established in ASTM D-1557
to help ensure development of both density and stability during compaction operations. No
fewer than six (6) to eight (8) coverages should be performed on each lift using the above
specified hand-guided vibratory roller.
3.
Density tests should also be used to control fill placement. At least one (1) density test should
be performed for each 2,000 ft.2 per fill lift. No fewer than two (2) tests should be planned
per fill lift.
FOUNDATION DESIGN
1.
Shallow foundations may be designed based on an allowable bearing pressure of up to 2,000
pounds per square foot based upon dead plus live plus wind load requirements.
2.
We recommend a footing embedment of no less than 16 inches below finished grade, but
excessive embedment should be avoided to take advantage of the compaction process and
maintain the footing as high as possible within the compacted structural fill.
3.
Slab-on-grade construction may be utilized. To maintain slab support, care should be taken
so that all excavations made for foundations and utilities are backfilled with suitable fill
compacted in thin lifts with a small compactor. Before backfill is placed, all water and loose
debris should be removed from these excavations.
4.
Wall foundations should be no less than 16 inches wide and individual column foundations
should be no less than 3 feet wide.
PLATE I - BORING LOCATION PLAN
•riggers Engineering Services Incorporated
0
I EGEND:
®
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING LOCATION
CAD RLE NAME:
A:\PIATE1\147412.DWG
SHEET TITLE
BORING LOCATION PLAN
PROJECT NAME
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 31 - 80th AVENUE NE
TREASURE ISLAND. FLORIDA
5
10
20
SCALE IN FEET
DRAWN BY:
R.D.B.
DATE:
5/19/14
PREPARED BY
•^i=o=-Hi
DRIGGERS ENGINEERING
SERVICES, INCORPORATED
SHEET NO.
PLATE
I
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST BORING LOG
•riggers Engineering Services Incorporated
•RIGGERS
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
INCORPORATED
Project No. PES 147412
BORING NO. B-1
Project Proposed Residence, Lot 31 - 80th Avenue NE, Treasure Island, Florida
Location See Plate I
Foreman
Completion
Depth To
DePth
46.5'
Date
5/9/14
Water
2.7'
Time
B.D.
Date
5/9/14
STANDARD
PENETRATION TEST
BLOWS/FT. ON 2" O.D.
SAMPLER-140 LB.
HAMMER, 30" DROP
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SURF^EL:
Light brown Fine SAND with shell (SP)
Dark gray CLAY (CH)
Light brown Fine SAND with trace of shell (SP)
Medium dense light brown Fine SAND with shell
VIE)
•
Medium dense light grayish-brown Fine SAND (SP)
5/9/15
6/8/8
5/11/12
8/10/14
5/6/7
Medium dense light grayish-brown Fine SAND
with abundant shell (SP)
4/7/7
7/8/8
Loose dark gray silty Fine SAND with shell (SM)
3>•*!?»>
WTsW
J????:
itfKKrt
ffc?*.
Very loose dark gray slightly silty,
slightly clayey Fine SAND with trace of shell
(SP-SM)
WH/WH/2
Loose to medium dense light gray
slightly silty Fine SAND with shell (SP-SM)
KB?#
3/3/2
ft'sTO
Remarks Borehole Grouted
WH = Weight of Hammer
Casing Length
40.0'
DRIGGERS
ENGINEERING
SERVICES
INCORPORATED
BORING NO. B-1
Project No. PES 147412
Project Proposed Residence, Lot 31 - 80th Avenue NE, Treasure Island, Florida
Location See Plate I
Foreman
Completion
Depth
46.5'
Date
5/9/14
%ater
2.7'
x
CL
UJ
a
Time
Date
a: cc
.J
H
B.D.
ora
SOIL DESCRIPTION
S
>to
5/9/14
STANDARD
PENETRATION TEST
BLOWS/FT. ON 2" O.D.
SAMPLER-140 LB.
HAMMER, 30'LDROP
gSg
> -J Q.
o CL r:
-J 5 £
m<o
SURF. EL:
Loose to medium dense light gray
slightly silty Fine SAND with shell (SP-SM)
35 -
uu
s.
4/16/11
IMWI
40
/
Very loose dark brownish-gray silty Fine SAND
with shell (SM)
/
/
1/1/2
/
\
45 -
\
Loose dark grayish-brown silty, slightly clayey
Fine SAND with trace of shell (SM)
\
\
8/3/5
1
50 H
55 -
60
65 -
Remarks Borehole Grouted
WH = Weight of Hammer
Casing Length
40.0'
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
•riggers Engineering Services Incorporated
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
BORING
NO.
B-l
DEPTH
(«)
1.4-1.7
WV.
DESCRIPTION
58.1
Dark gray CLAY
Yd
(pcf)
G,
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
LL
PL
S3
27
P.P.
(tsf)
U.C
CON.
W%
25.0-26.5
=
Con.
CI
(ppm)
SO 4
(ppm)
RES.
(ohm-cm)
Consolidation Test
Ydfpcf) =
Gs
=
LL
=
Dry Density
Specific Gravity
Liquid Limit
G.'S. (+1)
ORG. (%)
CI. (ppm)
Grainsize Analysis (Hydrometer)
Organic Content
Total Chloride
PL
PI
P.P. (tsf)
U.C.
Plastic Limit
Plasticity Index
Pockct Penetrometer
Unconfmed Compression
SOJ (ppm)
RES. (ohm-cm)
Totn! Sulfate
Lab Resistivity
See Test Curves
Percent Passing No. 200 Sieve
—
=
=
=
pH
•
with trace of shell
Water Content
ORG.
(V.)
PI
Dark gray slightly silty, slightly claycy Fine SAND
B-l
G.S.
CLIENT:
Sherri Wiggins
PROJECT:
Proposed Residence,
Lot 31- 80ft Avenue NE, Treasure Island, Florida
DES 147412
FILE:
GRAINSIZE ANALYSIS
•riggers Engineering Services Incorporated
PRIGGERS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
u. S Sta«KU«J Siava Numben
\
100
l
10
50
GRAVEL
Number
B-l
Depth
25.0' - 26.5'
Natural
Moisture
Coarse
LL
P. L
P. 1.
1
0.5
0.1
0.05
Grain Size in Millimeters
SAND
Medium
1
Fine
Classification
Dark gray s ngrit ly si Ity,
slightly clayey Fine SAND
with trace of shell
Q.01
0.005
SILT or CLAY
CLIENT:
Sherri Wiggins
PROJECT:
Propos 2d Residence,
Lot 31 - 80th Avenue NE,
Treasu *e Island, Florida
FILE:
DES 14}'412
0.001
METHOD OF TESTING
Driggers Engineering Services Incorporated
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
AND
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
STANDAMD PENETRATION TEST (ASTM P-15861
_ In.the. Staidard Penetration Test boriDgs, a rotary drilling rig is used to advance the borehole to the desiired test depth.
A viscous drilling fluid is circulated through the drill rods and hit to stabilize the borehole and'to assist in removal of'
soil and rock cuttings up and out of the borehole.
. •
Upon reaching the desired test depth, the 2 inch O.D, split-barrel sampler or "split-spoon", as it is sometimes called
is attached to an N-size drill rod and lowered to the bottom of the borehole. A 140 pound hammer, attached to the
drill string at the ground surface, is then used to drive the sampler into the formation. The hammer is successively
raised and dropped for a distance of 30 inches using a rope and "cathead" assembly. The number of blows is recorded
for each 6 inch interval of penetration or until virtual refusal is achieved. In the above manner, the samples are ideally
advanced a total of 18 inches. The sum of the blows required to effect the final 12 inches of penetration is called the
blo.wcount, penetration resistance or "N1.1. value of the particular material at the sample depth.
•
After penetration, the rods and sampler are retracted to the ground surface -where the core sample is removed, sealed
in a glass jar and transported to the laboratory for verification of .field classification and storage. •
.
. SOIL SYMBOLS AND CLASSIFICATION
.
..
Soil and rock samples secured in the field sampling operation were visually classified as to texture, color arid
.consistency. The Unified Soil Classification"was assigned to each soil stratum per ASTM D-2<187. Soil classifications
are presented descriptively and symbolically for ease of interpretation. The stratum identification lines represent the
approximate boundary between soil types. In many cases, this transition may be gradual.
'
Consistency of the soil as to relative density or undrained shear strength, unless otherwise noted, is based upon
Standard Penetration resistance values of "N" values and industry-accepted standards. "N" values, or blowcounts,
are presented in both tabular and graphical form on each respective boring log at each sample interval. The graphical
plot of blowcount versus depth is for illustration purposes only and does not warrant continuity in soil consistency
or linear variation between sample intervals.
The borings represent subsurface conditions at respective boring locations and sample intervals only. V ariations in
subsurface conditions may occur between boring locations. Groundwater depths shown represent water depths at the
dates and time shown only. The absence of water table information does not necessarily imply that groundwater was
not encountered.
Rev. 9/20]]
1
VVDD
BBLL
VEE
H AA
800TT
22
21
28
29
20
43
30
W
W
19
42
VVDD
BBLL
LLFF
GGUU
31
32
33
41
40
37
44
45
R
R
EER
H
H TT
7799TT
36
W
W
46
VVD
BBLL
LFF
GGUU
47
48
W
W
VVDD
BBLL
LLF
GGU
51
59
58
57
56
VVEE
H
H AA
7799TT
55
54
53
61
62
52
63
PZ 2015-23V
Lot 31 – 80th Avenue
NORTH
RR
EE D
O
ORR
YYSSH
BBAA
49
50
RR
EE DD
ORR
HHO
YYSS
BBAA
39
38
35
2
RR
EE DD
ORR
HHO
YYSS
BBAA
LLFF
GGUU
W
W
23
34
3
25
24
15
17
26
13
14
16
18
27
12
R
EERR
HH TT
8800TT
DDRR
RREE
HHO
YYSS
BAA
11
2
60
8
Site
1
VVDD
BBLL
VEE
H AA
800TT
22
21
28
29
20
43
30
W
W
19
42
VVDD
BBLL
LLFF
GGUU
31
32
33
41
40
37
44
45
R
R
EER
H
H TT
779TT
36
W
W
46
VVD
BBLL
LFF
GGUU
47
48
W
W
VVDD
BBLL
LLFF
GGUU
51
59
58
57
56
VEE
H
H AA
7799TT
55
54
53
61
62
52
63
RR
EE D
O
OR
YYSSH
BBAA
49
50
RR
EE DD
O
ORR
YYSSH
BBAA
39
38
35
2
RR
EE DD
ORR
HHO
YYS
BBAA
LLFF
GGUU
W
W
23
34
3
25
24
15
17
26
13
14
16
18
27
12
R
EERR
HH TT
8800TT
R
E DD
ORR
HHO
YYSS
BAA
11
2
60
8
PZ 2015-23V
Lot 31 – 80th Avenue
NORTH
Site
PZ 2015-23V
Lot 31 – 80th Avenue (vacant lot)
Looking Southwesterly on 80th Avenue
Google Map
CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, FLORIDA
PUBLIC NOTICE
TREASURE ISLAND PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING
CASE NO. PZ 2015-23 VARIANCE
DATE: THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 2015 at 2:00 P.M.
TREASURE ISLAND CITY HALL AUDITORIUM LOCATED AT 120 108TH AVENUE
PROPERTY
OWNERS:
SHERRI WIGGINS
HASSAN SALAMI
200 SOUTH 57 WEST SUITE 103
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101
PROPERTY LOCATION: LOT 31
80TH AVENUE (VACANT LOT)
The Planning and Zoning Board will consider a variance to reduce the front yard setback from
10 feet to 7.5 feet to construct a 3rd level cantilevered architectural feature (two Mediterraneanlooking porches) on a newly proposed single family house.
th
PLANS FOR THE APPLICATION MAY BE REVIEWED AT THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DEPARTMENT, 120 108
AVENUE, TREASURE ISLAND, FLORIDA, BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8:00 AM AND 4:30 PM, MONDAY TO FRIDAY.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DEPARTMENT AT 547-4575 EXT. 239.
Ex parte communication - The substance of any ex parte communication with a board member which relates to quasijudicial action pending before the Board is not presumed prejudicial to the action if the subject of the communication and the
identity of the person, group, or entity with whom the communication took place is disclosed and part of the record before
final action on the matter. The board member may read a written communication from any person. However, a written
communication that relates to quasi-judicial action pending before a board member shall not be presumed prejudicial to the
action, and such written communication shall be made a part of the record before final action on the matter. Board members
may conduct investigations and site visits and may receive expert opinions regarding quasi-judicial action pending before
them. Such activities shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action if the existence of the investigation, site visit or expert
opinion is made a part of the record before final action on the matter. Disclosure must be made before or during the public
meeting at which a vote is taken on such matters, so that persons who have opinions contrary to those expressed in the ex
parte communication are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond to the communication. (For more information
see Florida Statutes 286.0115)
Any person desiring to file an appeal to any action taken by the Board at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings
and for such purpose may be required to insure that a verbatim transcript is made. Said transcript shall be made by the
appellant at his or her expense. The City maintains a tape recording of all public hearings. In the event that you wish to
appeal a decision, the tape may or may not adequately insure a verbatim record of the proceedings. Therefore, you may
wish to provide a court reporter at your expense.
Any person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding is entitled to assistance
th
at no cost. Please contact the office of the City Clerk in writing at 120 108 Avenue, Treasure Island, Florida 33706, or by
phone at 727-547-4575, at least two working days prior to the meeting to advise what assistance is needed.
NOTE: THE STAFF COMMENTS AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE MAY ALSO BE VIEWED AT THE COMMUNITY
IMPROVEMENT DEPARTMENT OFFICE.
_________________________________________
Paulette E. Cohen
Community Improvement Director
B. Case No. PZ 2015-24SR Site
Plan Review for a new 7 unit motel
with restaurant. 9650 Gulf Blvd.
(CG)
THIS CASE HAS BEEN
POSTPONED TO JULY 16, 2015 BY
THE
REQUEST
OF
THE
APPLICANT.
C. Case No. PZ 2015-V A marine
variance to increase the combined
maximum width of a marine
structure from 35 feet to 38 feet –
10 inches for a residential dock
th
with 2 boat lifts. 12175 5 Street,
East (RU-75)
CITY OF
TREASURE ISLAND
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
120 - 108th Avenue, Treasure Island, Florida 33706
Telephone (727) 547-4575; Fax (727) 547-4584
CASE NO. PZ-2015-25-V
STAFF REPORT
Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
Planning and Zoning Board
PROPERTY
OWNER:
Anita Ford
12175 5th Street, East
Treasure Island, FL 33706
AGENT:
James (Jay) A. Pruitt
12175 5th Street, East
Treasure Island, FL 33706
DESCRIPTION:
A marine variance to increase the combined maximum width of a
marine structure from 35 feet to 38 feet – 10 inches for a residential
dock with 2 boat lifts.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Location:
12175 5th Street, East
Land Use:
Residential Urban
Zoning:
RU-75
Adjacent Property (Use):
North:
12205 5th St – single family house
South:
12155 5th St. – single family house
East:
Boca Ciega Bay
West:
5th St. right-of-way
12170 5th St. single family house
Lot Area:
70 feet x 120 feet
Waterfront Width:
70 feet
1
Flood Zone:
AE 11, Flood Insurance Rate Map
Community Panel No. 12103C0192G, September 3, 2003.
Site Legal:
CAPRI ISLE SUBDIVISION, BLOCK M, LOT 33
and RIPARIAN RIGHTS
Parcel #:
14-31-15-13284-013-0330
BACKGROUND:
The property owner purchased this property in 1986. On the subject lot is a non-FEMA
compliant single family home that was built in 1962. The current waterfront structures include a
30 foot long dock and a 13 feet – 2 inch wide boat lift on the left side of the dock and a large wet
slip on the right side of the dock.
The applicant intends to install a 16,000 lb. boat lift on the right side of the dock and build a 3foot wide catwalk 15 feet in length with a 2 feet - 6 inch lower landing. The catwalk meets code
and does not require the review and approval of the Planning and Zoning Board.
Pertinent regulations pertaining to Marine Structures
Chapter 69 - MARINE STRUCTURES AND COMMERCIAL FISHING
DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY
Excerpt from Sec. 69-32. - Definitions
Private dock dwelling, single-family means any dock which will be used by an individual owner,
his family and friends, or means any single structure dock facility which provides dockage for a
duplex type residential unit. This definition is not to include docks servicing zero lot line attached
units. A private dock shall not be used for the production of income.
Catwalk means a narrow dock with a minimum width of 24 inches and a maximum width of 36
inches.
Dock means any structure, otherwise known as a pier, wharf or loading platform which is
constructed on piling over open water or which is supported by floatation on the water.
Service catwalk means a structure on pilings over open water similar to a dock. The service
catwalk shall be a minimum of two feet wide, a maximum of three feet wide and used solely in
conjunction with a boat lift for servicing the boat and lift. This structure shall the considered part
of the boat lift.
ARTICLE II. - MARINE STRUCTURES
DIVISION 3. - CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
Excerpt from Sec. 69-71. - Docks, davits, boat lifts and boats.
(a) Maximum width, length and position of docks, davits, boat lifts and tiepoles.
(1) All docks to be constructed on waterfront property of less than 60-foot frontage must be
located so that no portion of the proposed dock is closer to either extended property line than
2
one-third of the waterfront measurement. All docks to be constructed on waterfront property of
more than 60-foot frontage must be located so that no portion of the proposed dock is less than
20 feet from either adjacent extended property line. Docks located on waterfront property on the
inside corner of a canal may be located not closer than five feet from either adjacent extended
property line.
(2) All docks, not to include boatlifts and davits, shall be constructed so that the width of
same shall not exceed 25 percent of the width of the property involved at the waterfront.
Residential docks and boat lifts shall be limited to a combined maximum width of 35 feet.
The length of docks shall not exceed a maximum length of 50 feet, including tie poles.
Catwalks shall have a minimum width of 24 inches and a maximum width of 36 inches.
(3) All davits and lifts shall comply with all setback and locational requirements of docks.
(4) All tiepoles shall be located within the extension of the side property lines, project not farther
above the surface of the water than is reasonably necessary for their use, and in no case higher
than ten feet above mean high water. Tiepoles shall be located no more than 50 feet from the
seawall.
(5) Docks shall be constructed so that no portion of the deck projects above the level of the
seawall cap more than 12 inches.
(6) The location of all docks, including the measurements, limitations and restricted area in
which docks are not permitted, shall be in accordance with the requirements of Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein, which, along with its locations, measurements,
limitations and restricted area is incorporated in this Code.
(7) All docks, davits, lifts or tiepoles, as permitted, shall be located so as not to interfere with the
riparian rights of adjacent properties.
(8) All boats and personal watercrafts moored at a private dock shall be located so as not to
interfere with the riparian rights of adjacent properties.
(d) Number of docks.
Private docks. A private dock shall not be used to accommodate more than two boats for
permanent mooring. No more than one dock structure shall be located at any dwelling, singlefamily, with the exception of service catwalks. Catwalks and service catwalks will be considered
part of the private dock and shall be included in the width calculations for the total dock
structure.
DIVISION 4. - VARIANCES
Sec. 69-91. - Procedure.
(a) Requests for variances from the requirements of this chapter shall be heard by the planning
and zoning board. No variance may be granted unless the applicant establishes, by substantial
competent evidence, that:
3
(1) A literal enforcement of the provisions of this article would result in extreme hardship due to
the unique nature of the project and the applicant's property;
(2) The variance being sought to be granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the applicant's property; and
(3) The granting of the requested variance will be in harmony with the general intent and
purpose of the chapter and will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental or
of adverse effect to the public interest and welfare.
(b) In granting any variance, the planning and zoning board may prescribe appropriate
conditions and safeguards.
(c) The planning and zoning board shall prescribe a reasonable time limit not to exceed one
year within which the action for which the variance is granted shall be initiated.
(d) Variances shall not be deemed to set precedence for other applications should they be
either standard applications or those requiring variances.
(e) In no event shall the planning and zoning board grant variances permitting construction of
structures which interfere with or violate the riparian rights of adjacent properties.
STAFF ANALYSIS:
(1)
A literal enforcement of the provisions of this article would result in extreme hardship due
to the unique nature of the project and the applicant's property.
Applying the regulation to this location does not diminish the applicant’s opportunity to
use the waterfront. The applicant currently has the maximum number of permanent
mooring locations on the lot.
(2)
The variance being sought to be granted is the minimum variance that will make possible
the reasonable use of the applicant's property.
The applicant has reasonable use of the lot and the waterfront of the property. The
maximum number of permanent mooring spaces for a private residential home is two.
The applicant currently has 2 permanent mooring spaces, a boatlift and a wet slip.
(3)
The granting of the requested variance will be in harmony with the general intent and
purpose of the chapter and will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise
detrimental or of adverse effect to the public interest and welfare.
The property owner at 12155 5th St East has already provided a notarized signature on
the Pinellas County Dock Application to permit the placement of the new boat lift 15 feet
4 inches from the lot line. That is the neighbor who would be most impacted by this
marine improvement.
4
The subject lot is rectangular in shape. The neighboring lots on each side of the subject
property are also rectangular in shape. It is unlikely that there will be a navigational
concern that will result from the installation of the new boat lift.
The variance request does not appear to be similar with the pattern of marine structure
sizes in Treasure Island. As one looks at an aerial of the City (especially at the end of the
“fingers”), it does not appear that this variance request for the waterfront structure to be
greater than 35 feet to be in harmony with lots in the city with a much greater waterfront
width.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL of the request for a marine variance to increase the combined
maximum width for a residential dock and boat lift from 35 feet to 38 feet-10 inches.

There are two permanent mooring spaces on this site. Therefore, the maximum number
of permanent mooring spaces is already available at this single family home.

The maximum width for a marine structure is the same for all private single family
residential properties in the City, without regard to the waterfront width. The maximum
width regulation is applied equally to all lots bordering Boca Ciega Bay, Johns’ Pass and
Blind’s Pass.

This is not in harmony with other marine structures in the City.
If the Planning and Zoning Board members wish TO APPROVE the request for a marine
variance to increase the combined maximum width for a residential dock and boat lift from 35
feet to 38 feet – 10 inches, the findings would be:

The property owner already has a wet slip is this location and no additional permanent
mooring locations will be created by this request.

The property owners to the right (most impacted by the installation of the new boat lift)
located at 12155 5th Street, have signed the Pinellas County dock application for the
applicants not objecting to the placement of the new boat lift.
Pursuant to Sec. 10-221 (g) The granted variance shall be valid for one year. To remain in effect
after one year, one of the following must have occurred:
(1) An extension of time has been approved by the approving body;
(2) Building permits relating to the requested variance have either been applied for or
granted; or
5
(3) A site plan review relating to the requested variance has been applied for or approved by
the planning and zoning board.
Any requests for an extension of time relating to a variance(s) must be in writing and received
by the city manager or specified designee at least three weeks prior to its expiration date in
order for the request to be placed on the approving body's agenda.
CASE PZ 2015-25V A variance request to increase the combined maximum width for a
residential dock and boat lift from 35 feet to 38 feet-10 inches.
Planning and Zoning Board Action:
[ ] Approved
[ ] Denied
[ ] Deferred
6
[ ] Approved with Conditions
. yz 9c\^ ~£5 V
Case Number:
City of Treasure Island
Development Review Application
Please use blue or black ink only. Failure to complete this form in its entirety will result in this application
being returned without review. Note: A separate application is required for each request.
Owners'
f-Q&b^ flfJtTft
Agent
Address
/ 7-1 HS" fitA St• £-
Address
7
(t& Xs/an^t h 3396k
1
1 7-b ~~~
'
3^'lCX^
Phone
7Z7- ^7-l^o/l'ZA hM'Oltoti Phone
fl2J]
Fax
727- 3(P1~ 12W0
12^1
Email
II
Fax
'1?Ji M7,-S <4
(JbrA d\ 7aMMCiJLf WM-gjU-tL. Email
.<^>W
List all Legal Owner(s) of Property: f fXZQ{ tk^\ rt>\
Complete legal description (may be placed on attached separate page):
. ioi & iDevelopment Name:"
(X
PTS,
Cc:pv
Site Location/Address: 1'2-1*73- 5-K
)
^ Vnf.^u-v^g-
Area of Development (Acreage or Square Feet)
Parcel Identification Number (list all):
Application Request
Future Land Use Designation
Current Zoning.
gf ef(Lo/frfeij A^l/1lficn/i 1 br^4 C ifr
*J/n
tllA
Proposed Future Land Use _
Proposed Zoning _
tj/i
A)/#
I certify that I have reviewed the Land Development Regulations and that my submission meets all requirements. The only exceptions are those
items to which I am requesting variances to or waivers from certain sections of the code and understand that they must be listed on the plans
individually and on the attached transmittal. I understand that if an item does need a variance, it will be necessary to file through the appropriate
review entity.
Signature must be original (No copies, scans, faxes or e-mails)
Shslzoi^
owner Owp£r/AgenK
Date
O
(/tnita (fold.
72/75 S" Stjl
(jT^eabWce ^Ibland (fjf*- 33706
727-644-0768 (p/ione) 727-344-3267 (fax)
afo,Ld@uitiae?Lcuic.efJ^hQ^
To: City of Treasure Island Board/Commission
120 108"' Ave
Treasure Island, FL 33706
REF: Requesting Marine Variance
To whom it may concern:
I am requesting a variance of the width requirement so that I can install a boatlift
to the right side of my dock. I have an existing wet slip which will accommodate
up to a 50 foot boat in this area, where a 40 foot boat was recently moored.
I am no longer able to maintain the large vessel, so I am requesting the variance
so that I can safely moor and board a smaller boat from a boatlift, rather than the
existing wet slip.
Tearing down the existing dock to construct a conforming structure would
create an undue financial hardship.
Thank you for your consideration.
Anita Ford
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS
CHECKED BY:
EDM
PH. (727) 347-8740
576011TH AVENUE NORTH
ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIOA 33710
OF FIELD VNORK:
11/26/12
FAX (727) 344-4640
WWW.MURPHySLANOSURVEYiN6.COM
;ERTIFIED TO: Patricia S. Keener
Sun/ey not valid for more than one (1) year from date of field work.
SCALE: 1" = 20'
WO.
S
—nay—14
•
.or
YACHT
BASIN
BOAT
LIFT
4" VIWIFE
226' OVER-
5 27° 34' 00'
SEC. 14 TOP. 31 S. RGE. 15 E.
2R-
fi
Ft>.
15.6'
J.7' CONC. SEAWALL
-ADJ. 4" VINYL FE
OJO'OR.
o
o
Cvl
4'VlKM.fe. - 2
0.23' aft.—
ADT.6'VIN/LFE.
- *
O-23'OVR
mo?
12.24!
LOT
7.66*
LOT
1 STY. MAS. <5t FRM.
#12205
-ADJ. 6" VINYLFe.
0.13' OVER
2.70'
ac
. LOT
UJ
LU
LU
O
vO
CVJ
1/2*
FIR
S27°.34'.00;; E
70.00WM)
(BASIS OFBESOMS)
o
oo
CD
t-f
CL
5/8"
FIR
fl.C
A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF: Lot
32, Block M, CAPRI ISLE BLOCKS
L-M-N-O, as recorded in Plat Book
39. Paae 6 of thfi Puhlir. Rftnords nf
Application #
/ATE POCK,
^ AMIf: Ford, Anita
2175 5th St. E. Treasure Island, PL. 3370G
*P ^
"" 1J
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
REVI?'*-,?;;V. r-osc
COMPLIANCE
MHW
MLW
BOTTOM
Profile View
ENG. SCALE:
201
-2SSL
TOTAL SQUARE FEET
NEW SQUARE FEET
WATERWAY WIDTH
WATERFRONT WIDTH
\ I/
— M-
2GO
70'
This p**ct qut»#«6 tef U.S. AWH/ tisffts
of Engineers permi! SAJ-96. Approval
from the Fl Ospi ot Environmental
Protection (813-632-/600) may also be
required
Plan View
(applicant and adjacent docks)
z/|\
O
P/L
P/L
c8
8>
o
EXISTING
WETSLIP
UfT
I
1
1 r
1
\
EXISTING c
:DOCK=
/
32'
2'-GH—^A'^-{ O-G'-^
2G'-G"
SHOREUNE
The undersigned does not object to the proposed dock and requested variances as drawn in the space provided above.
Left Owner: John E. 4/or Patricia 5. Keener
Right Owner: N/A
Signature
Municipality Approval
Water and Navigation Approval
5;
EYASTIU\Q>
MAY l 8 20!)
Date
lONl
APPROVED
PINELLAS COUNTY
PRIVATE DOCK
Application #
NAME: Ford, Anita
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
I 2 I 75 5th St. E. Treasure bland, PL. 337OG
MHW
MLW
BOTTOM
Profile View
ENG. SCALE: I" = 20'
TOTAL SQUARE FEET
NEW SQUARE FEET
WATERWAY WIDTH
WATERFRONT WIDTH
M/
—M—
3071
52.5'
2GO'
70'
Plan View
(applicant and adjacent docks)
/1 \
REMOVE PART OF
EXISTING DOCK
CONSTRUCT
EXTENSION
e - PtoPOSED PIUNS
© - If-SET PIUNG
P/L
3&-10"
V-
47-G
40'
EXISTING
BOAturr
EXISTING
=DOCK.3
42 "e"
PROPOSED
16.000#
NCPTUNC eoATurr
50'
30'
I G-&
2'-£"<NTS>
15'-1 a
5-i-l 4'_ 10"—J—I 5-4'
5'-1 0"
22-6"
<NTS>"
The undersigned does not object to the proposed dock and requested variances as drawn in the space provided above.
Left Owner: N/A
Right Owner: N/A
Signature
Date
Signature
Municipality Approval
Date
Water and Navigation Approval
Vkoposed
PRIVATE POCK
Application #
'
NAME: ford, Anita
(OFFICIAL USE ONLY)
I 2 I 75 5th St. E. Treasure Island, EL. 33706
MHW
MLW
BOTTOM
Profile View
3Q7-5'
TOTAL SQUARE FEET
NEW SQUARE FEET
WATERWAY WIDTH
WATERFRONT WIDTH
ENG. SCALE: I" = 20'
M/
52.5'
2 GO1
70"
Plan View
(applicant and adjacent docks)
REMOVE PART OF
EXISTING DOCK,
CONSTRUCT
EXTENSION
• - PROPOSED PILING
O - RE-5CT PILING
F/L
t-
EXISTING
BOATLIFT
4
,
40' 42 -6"
P/L
3&-1 0"
47-6"
:EXISTING
=DOCK.
PROPOSED
G.OOO#
NEPTUNE BOATLIFT
50'
30'
k.,V
M 0'-
20'
G'-G"2'-6"<NTS>
M
lla^:(Vf.R^
- ^ !=4;•<w*Iv.v.*>cn-:£*
:• * " -•'ti.f
5'-10"—J—I 3'-2"-
^1 • I Is
• V a 'I!1 .•.Vrfl."-'
fi.
/
I ??' C"
•UL.
cs'-J-—I 4'-1D"——I ^"-4"—*—
" ——I ?'—
5'-10"
<NTS>
The undersigned does not object to the frofosed dock and requested variances as drawn in.the space provided above.
Left Owner: N/A
Signature
Right Owner: Suzanne $/or Jeffrey Wrtght
Date
*6
Municipality Approval
PateA-^-^
Water and Navigation Approval
"p«opo^
Uu/
hbeSR
Application #
VARIANCE REQUEST FORM
Left Lot Owners Name: N/A
Mailing Address:
Zip:
I Certify that I am the owner of Lot which adjoins the property owned by the applicant who proposes
to construct a Commercial | | Multi-use | | Private x ! dock at the following address:
I have seen the plans of the proposed structures) with any requested variances (see Section IVB of
Application) and therefore: DO OBJECT! | DO NOT OBJECT X to the construction.
OWNERS SIGNATURE:
X
Date:
NOTARY: STATE OF FLORIDA, PINELLAS COUNTY, BEFORE ME the undersigned authority, personally appeared
, well known to me, or who provided a valid Florida Driver's license to be the person
who executed the foregoing instrument and that he/she acknowledged to me, under oath, that he/she signed the same freely
and voluntarily for the purposes expressed therein.
Witness my hand and official seal this
day of
.,20.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
Right Lot Owners Name: Suzanne P. &/or Jeffrey K. Wright
Mailing Address: 12155 5m St. E. Treasure Island~FLT
Zip: 33706
I Certify that I am the owner of Lot 34 which adjoins the property owned by the applicant who proposes
to construct a: Commercial
Multi-use I
Private
dock at the following address:
12175 5th St. E. Treasure Island. FL. 33706
I have seen the plans of the proposed structure(s) with any requested variances (see Section IVB of
Application) and therefore: Dp-pBJECT| | DO NOT OBJECT |"Y"| to the construction.
QWNE
SIGNATU
Date:
"
NOTARY: STATE OF FLORIDA, PINELLAS COUNTY, BEFORE ME the undersigned authority, flSrsonally appeare3~D
.
, well known to me, or who provided a valid Florida Driver's License to be the person
who executed the foregoing instrument and that he/she acknowledged to me, under oath, that he/she signed the same freely
and voluntarily for the purposes expressed therein.
Witness my hand and official seal this*7 day of
^
Notary Public
My commission expires:
£ "/ ^
^ TINA MARIE KELLESTINE
COMMISSION # FF 26717
EXPIRES June 12, 2017
— NOTARY
* PUBLIC
STATE OF
JLORIPA
BONDED THROUGH
Rll INSURANCE COMPANY
20
^
^
_
/
0
70
12
12300
12255
12150
70
90
12205
12250
70
TT EE
HH SS
55T
70
12175
83
12
70
(S)
12
540
83
0
83
70
12
0
0
75
14
12125
12150
80
SITE
PZ 2015-25V
12175 5th Street, E
NORTH
560
0
70
12155
12170
(S)
140
70
12200
520
84
DD
LLVV
II BB
PPRR
CCAA
0
70
12
12300
12255
12150
70
90
12205
12250
70
TT EE
HH SS
55TT
70
12175
83
12
70
(S)
12
540
83
0
83
70
SITE
12175 5th Street – aerial
NORTH
12
0
0
75
PZ 2015-25V
14
12125
12150
560
0
70
12155
12170
(S)
140
70
12200
520
84
PZ 2015-25V
SITE
12175 5th Street
Google aerial
NORTH
CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, FLORIDA
PUBLIC NOTICE
TREASURE ISLAND PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
PUBLIC HEARING
CASE NO. PZ 2015-25 VARIANCE
DATE: THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 2015 at 2:00 P.M.
TREASURE ISLAND CITY HALL AUDITORIUM LOCATED AT 120 108TH AVENUE
PROPERTY
OWNER:
ANITA FORD
12175 5TH STREET, E
TREASURE ISLAND, FL 33706
AGENT:
JAMES (JAY) A. PRUITT
12175 5TH STREET, EAST
TREASURE ISLAND, FL 33706
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
12175 5TH STREET, EAST
The Planning and Zoning Board will consider a marine variance to increase the combined
maximum width of a marine structure from 35 feet to 38 feet – 10 inches for a residential dock
with 2 boat lifts.
th
PLANS FOR THE APPLICATION MAY BE REVIEWED AT THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DEPARTMENT, 120 108
AVENUE, TREASURE ISLAND, FLORIDA, BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8:00 AM AND 4:30 PM, MONDAY TO FRIDAY.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DEPARTMENT AT 547-4575 EXT. 239.
Ex parte communication - The substance of any ex parte communication with a board member which relates to quasijudicial action pending before the Board is not presumed prejudicial to the action if the subject of the communication and the
identity of the person, group, or entity with whom the communication took place is disclosed and part of the record before
final action on the matter. The board member may read a written communication from any person. However, a written
communication that relates to quasi-judicial action pending before a board member shall not be presumed prejudicial to the
action, and such written communication shall be made a part of the record before final action on the matter. Board members
may conduct investigations and site visits and may receive expert opinions regarding quasi-judicial action pending before
them. Such activities shall not be presumed prejudicial to the action if the existence of the investigation, site visit or expert
opinion is made a part of the record before final action on the matter. Disclosure must be made before or during the public
meeting at which a vote is taken on such matters, so that persons who have opinions contrary to those expressed in the ex
parte communication are given a reasonable opportunity to refute or respond to the communication. (For more information
see Florida Statutes 286.0115)
Any person desiring to file an appeal to any action taken by the Board at this meeting will need a record of the proceedings
and for such purpose may be required to insure that a verbatim transcript is made. Said transcript shall be made by the
appellant at his or her expense. The City maintains a tape recording of all public hearings. In the event that you wish to
appeal a decision, the tape may or may not adequately insure a verbatim record of the proceedings. Therefore, you may
wish to provide a court reporter at your expense.
Any person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding is entitled to assistance
th
at no cost. Please contact the office of the City Clerk in writing at 120 108 Avenue, Treasure Island, Florida 33706, or by
phone at 727-547-4575, at least two working days prior to the meeting to advise what assistance is needed.
NOTE: THE STAFF COMMENTS AND OTHER CORRESPONDENCE MAY ALSO BE VIEWED AT THE COMMUNITY
IMPROVEMENT DEPARTMENT OFFICE.
_________________________________________
Paulette E. Cohen
Community Improvement Director