San Rafael - Walk Bike Marin!
Transcription
San Rafael - Walk Bike Marin!
City of San Rafael Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan Final Report August 2001 Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) Members Preston McCoy, Chair Christopher Goff Kristin Nute, Vice Chair Wil Matthews Noble A. “Rocky” Birdsey Richard Schneider Shawn Curtin Andy O’Neill Ashley Bettini Former BPAC Members Martin Peckins Jonathan J. Toste Dominique Goff Joel Segura Brian Walsh Paul Curfman Ralph Mihan Consulting Assistance Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Staff Acknowledgements Nader Mansourian Traffic Engineer Bill Voight GIS Technician BPAC Committee Staff Richard A. Landis Public Works Administrative Supervisor Lydia Romero Assistant to the City Manager Adopted by the San Rafael City Council February 2002 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction and Summary ............................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 Goals, Objectives and Policy Actions .............................. 2-1 Chapter 3 Existing Conditions ........................................................... 3-1 Chapter 4 Needs Analysis .................................................................. 4-1 Chapter 5 Proposed System and Improvements .............................. 5-1 Chapter 6 Implementation Cost Estimates........................................ 6-1 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Detailed Trail Descriptions Bicycle Parking & Restroom Facilities Educational Programs Bicycle Advocacy Groups Table of Figures Figure 1-1 Map of Existing and Proposed Bikeways ......................1-10 Figure 4-1 San Rafael Estimate of User Increases and Vehicle Trips and Miles Saved................................................................................4-3 Figure 4-2 Comparison of Mode Share ............................................4-4 Figure 4-3 Reduced Daily Vehicle Trips/Miles ..................................4-4 Figure 5-1 Short Term Bicycle Improvements ..................................5-4 Figure 5-2 Medium Term Bicycle Improvements ..............................5-5 Figure 5-3 Long Term Bicycle Improvements ...................................5-6 Figure 5-4 Existing Sections.............................................................5-7 Figure 5-5 Specific Pedestrian Improvements ................................5-13 Figure 5-6 Pedestrian Priorities ......................................................5-17 Figure 6-1 SHORT TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-5)..................6-1 Figure 6-2 MEDIUM TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-10) ..............6-1 Figure 6-3 LONG TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-20) ..................6-1 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL PREAMBLE The San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is the product of a collaborative effort of the San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC), Nelson Nygaard Transportation consultants, and City staff. Its purpose is to integrate proposed bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements and into San Rafael’s overall transportation plan. In terms of content and structure, the Plan meets the requirements set forth in the California Bicycle-Transportation Act, section 891.2 of the Streets and Highway Code. Upon adoption of the Plan by the San Rafael City Council, each of the policies, programs, and infrastructure improvement projects described herein will be fully reviewed by City staff. The San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is a conceptual document in that the Council will have ultimate discretion and authority to modify, reject, or implement any of the Plan’s elements. San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Chapter 1 Introduction and Summar y Background The San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) was established with the specific purpose of preparing a bicycle and pedestrian plan for the City of San Rafael. The Plan meets the requirements of the California Bicycle-Transportation Act. Those requirements are contained in the Streets and Highway Code, Section 891.2, which state that “A city or county may prepare a bicycle transportation plan, which shall include, but not be limited to, the following elements:” The 11 elements, (a) through (k), are treated in this section of the Plan. Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Process This plan was developed with input from San Rafael neighborhood groups, BPAC members’ expertise, and work done to create the Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2000). BPAC meetings are held monthly, are open to the public, and are properly agendized and noticed in compliance with the Brown Act. Previous Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans The following studies or planning efforts have been reviewed and consulted, studied for consistency, and where appropriate, folded into the San Rafael Plan. Marin County Bicycle Plan (1974 & 2000) In 1975, Marin County’s Board of Supervisors adopted “A Bikeway Policy for Marin County,” which emphasized the need for safe accommodation for bicycling in all public streets and roads. However, the City of San Rafael did not adopt this plan. The policies called for the County to design new road construction and repair projects to safely accommodate bicycles, integrate bicycle planning into transportation planning and construction, provide recreational bikeways, develop uniform standards for bikeway design, and support bicycle safety education and rules. The 1975 plan called for the delineation of over 400 miles of bike routes, the provision of bicycle parking at appropriate locations, the introduction of an educational and safety program in all elementary schools, and the introduction of a bicycle registration program to help recover stolen bicycles. In May, 2001 the County approved the Year 2000 update to the Plan. Page 1-1 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Marin County North-South Bikeway Feasibility Study (1994) The purpose of the Marin County North-South Bikeway Feasibility Study was to identify and develop safe and efficient north-south bikeways from the Golden Gate Bridge to the Sonoma County line. It generally followed the old Northwestern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, for commuters, but also recommended a short-term alignment that runs mostly along existing streets parallel to the right-of-way, with improvements in signing, striping, and pavement. The Study was never officially adopted. The Bay Trail Plan (1989) The Bay Trail Plan proposes the development of a regional hiking and bicycling trail around the perimeter of San Francisco and San Pablo Bays. Important sections pass through San Rafael. This effort is supported by the Association of Bay Area Governments. Contact ABAG at www.abag.org Summary Bicycle Section Definitions This plan refers to various classes of bikeways as defined by Caltrans in Chapter 1000 of the Highway Design Manual: Class I Bikeway: Referred to as a bike path or multi-use path. Provides for bicycle travel on a paved right of way completely separated from any street or highway. Class II Bikeway: Referred to as a bike lane. Provides a striped and stenciled lane for one-way travel on a street or highway. Class III Bikeway Referred to as a bike route. Provides for shared use with pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic and is identified only by signing and (sometimes) stenciling. Class III-b Bicycle Boulevard: is similar to Class III except that it is designed to favor bicycles. Pioneered in Palo Alto, the Bicycle Boulevard is designed to promote bicycle movement and to discourage through vehicle movement, except for local stops. The effect is achieved by partial closures and lack of coordinated traffic signals. Overview of Proposed System Improvements This plan proposes a continuous network of bikeways for travel within San Rafael and to surrounding communities. Routes are designated either “northsouth” or “east-west.” North-south routes have odd numbers, and east-west routes have even numbers. Two of the north-south routes connect San Rafael Page 1-2 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL with other cities, as does one of the east-west routes. The other routes are primarily for travel within the City. Proposed New North-South Bike Routes BPAC identified seventeen northsouth routes in San Rafael. Two connect San Rafael with cities to the north and south, and the rest provide connections within the city. BPAC identified seventeen north-south routes in San Rafael. Two connect San Rafael with cities to the north and south, and the rest provide connections within the city. North-south routes that connect with Novato and Larkspur are 01. From Novato to Bellam Blvd, via Las Gallinas, Northgate Dr, Los Ranchitos, Lincoln, Irwin, Woodland. 07. From Novato to Larkspur, via Northwestern Pacific Railway right-of-way through San Rafael. (Sections of both of these routes are in the County-wide bicycle plan.) Proposed new north-south routes primarily within San Rafael: 03. Los Gamos Dr from Lucas Valley Rd to Manual T Freitas Pkwy. 05. Redwood Hwy Frontage Rd and Civic Center Drive, from Smith Ranch Rd to North San Pedro Rd. 09. From North San Pedro Rd to the Richmond Bridge, via Hwy 101 shoulder, Villa Ave, Grand Ave & Francisco Blvd. East. (proposed alternative to Lincoln Ave. connection) 11. Recreational Shore Park Path and Bay Trail. 13. Baypoint Pathway from Spinnaker Point Dr to Andersen Drive 15. Kerner Blvd. from Bellam Blvd. to Grange Way. 17. Bay Trail spur from city line near Hamilton to McInnis Park. 19. Wolf Grade/ D Street from Fourth St to Larkspur. 21. Irwin and Tiburon from Woodland to Larkspur. 23. Nova Albion and Golden Hinde from Las Gallinas to Los Ranchitos. 25. Merrydale from Merrydale101 Overcrossing to Merrydale Pathway to Los Ranchitos/Lincoln Ave.. 27. Canal Neighborhood to Montecito connector from Third St to East Francisco Blvd. To West Francisco Blvd. (and/or Andersen Dr). Page 1-3 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL 31. C St from First St to Fifth Ave. 33. A St from Fifth Ave to First St. 35. Knight Dr and Castlewood from Point San Pedro Rd to 25 West Castlewood Drive. Proposed New East-West Bike Routes Twelve east-west routes the Committee identified in San Rafael. One connects San Rafael with San Anselmo to the west and with San Quentin and the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge to the east, and the rest are important connections within the city. East-west routes that connect with San Anselmo and San Quentin: 12. Greenfield Ave & Fourth St from City Limit to downtown. (see route 24 for alternative route) East-west routes primarily within San Rafael are: 02. Lucas Valley Road from the Lucas Valley area to Redwood Hwy Frontage Rd, and Smith Ranch to McInnis Park. 04. West end of Freitas Parkway from city limit to Las Gallinas Ave. 06. North San Pedro Rd, Point San Pedro Rd, Bay Trail Spur, Third. 08. Bay Trail Extension (Recreational & Park access). 10. West end of Fifth Ave from Mt Tamalpais Cemetery to H St. 14. Andersen Drive from Second St to Sir Francis Drake Blvd/Hwy 580. (Completed) 16. Taylor St and Woodland Ave from D Street to Irwin St. 18. Gallinas Creek Pathway from Redwood to Smith Ranch Rd. 22. Walter Place and Las Gallinas from Corillo Dr. to Merrydale 24. (Alt. to Route 12) Greenfield Ave, Second, and others from City Limit to Union St. 26. Francisco Blvd. West from Transit Center to new overcrossing near Medway and Andersen Dr. Page 1-4 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Pedestrian Section The Pedestrian Improvements section encompasses two elements: ¾ Sidewalk, intersection, and crossing improvements. ¾ Multi-use paths (Class I bikeways). See Chapter 5 for descriptions of proposed site-specific pedestrian improvements. School Commute This Plan calls for programs to educate all users of public rights of way and of each other’s respective rights and responsibilities in order to foster mutual respect and safety. The Plan prioritizes school commute safety, with many of the short to mid-term projects providing enhanced connections to schools, plus a separate School Commute Safety program. This program encourages more walking and biking to school through in-class activities, contests and events, and organized “school pools” of parents escorting children by foot, bike or carpool. Programs of this sort are known as “Safe Routes to School” and are being implemented throughout Marin County. Funding for such programs – especially capital elements – is limited and there are generally more applicants than awards given. Educational Programs This Plan calls for programs to educate all users of public rights of way and of each other’s respective rights and responsibilities in order to foster mutual respect and safety. More details are given in the Appendix. Caltrans Requirements The eleven standard bike plan elements mandated by Caltrans are presented in this section, but without complete detail. Full details appear later in the document as warranted. 1. “(a) The estimated number of existing bicycle commuters in the plan area and the estimated increase in the number of bicycle commuters resulting from implementation of the plan.” The Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan estimates that there are approximately 5,700 daily bicycle and pedestrian commuters in San Rafael and that they make 11,400 trips per day. (These figures are based on 1990 Census source data and adjusted and allocated based on San Rafael’s population.) Also according to the County plan, the potential increase in the number of bicycle and pedestrian commuters is estimated to be 5,165 for a daily total of Page 1-5 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL 10,904 commuters making a total of 21,808 trips. This assumes the current bicycle/pedestrian commute mode share can be increased from 3.7% to 7%. 2. “(b) A map and description of existing and proposed land use and settlement patterns which shall include, but not be limited to, locations of residential neighborhoods, schools, shopping centers, public buildings, and major employment centers.” The intent of this plan is to serve the entire city. San Rafael is a city of suburban character with a well developed downtown area, some light industrial areas, and several major shopping centers. This plan is integrated with General Plan provisions which may be referenced for further information. See Figure 1 – Existing & Proposed Bikeways Maps page 1-10. 3. “(c) A map and description of existing and proposed bikeways.” ¾ See Figure 1 – Existing & Proposed Bikeways Map. Page 1-10. ¾ See Chapter 5, Proposed System and Improvements. 4. “(d) A map and description of existing and proposed end-of-trip bicycle parking facilities. These shall include, but not be limited to, parking at schools, shopping centers, public buildings, and major employment centers.” ¾ See Figure 1 – Existing & Proposed Bikeways Map, which includes parking. The plan recognizes that bicycle-parking facilities are inadequate in some parts of San Rafael. A few locations, such as the Northgate Mall, currently have enough quality bicycle parking. Most schools, parks, and the downtown area have inadequate and/or substandard parking. ¾ See Bikeway Support Facilities in Chapter 3 for more about bicycle parking. 5. “(e) A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transport and parking facilities for connections with and use of other transportation modes. These shall include, but not be limited to, parking facilities at transit stops, rail and transit terminals, ferry docks and landings, park and ride lots, and provisions for transporting bicyclists and bicycles on transit or rail vehicles or ferry vessels.” Golden Gate Transit has installed bike racks at the Transportation Center and other locations, and has installed bike racks on nearly all of its buses. However, there is not enough bike parking at the Transportation Center and bike racks on buses are often filled. Two of the three park and ride lots lack Page 1-6 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL bicycle parking, and there is no “Bike Station” (secure, free parking with an attendant) in San Rafael as there is at other Bay Area locations such as Palo Alto and Berkeley. San Rafael has no active rail or ferry terminals. ¾ See Figure 1 –Existing & Proposed Bikeways Map page 1-10. It is recognized that changing and storage areas and locker, restroom, and shower facilities in major employment sites are a very important element in a complete and effective bicycle infrastructure. ¾ See Bikeway Support Facilities in Chapter 3 for more about multimodal connections. 6. “(f) A map and description of existing and proposed facilities for changing and storing clothes and equipment. These shall include, but not be limited to, locker, restroom, and shower facilities near bicycle parking facilities.” The Committee recognizes that changing and storage areas and locker, restroom, and shower facilities in major employment sites are a very important element in a complete and effective bicycle infrastructure. This type of facility is very limited at present but is addressed in the Plan. ¾ See Chapter 2 Goals Objectives and Policy Actions. 7. “(g) A description of bicycle safety and education programs conducted in the area included within the plan, efforts by the law enforcement agency having primary traffic law enforcement responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the Vehicle Code pertaining to bicycle operation, and the resulting effect on accidents involving bicyclists.” No formal bicycle safety education programs are offered by the City of San Rafael. However, the Bicycle Trails Council of Marin (BTCM) and Trips for Kids offer skill and other education programs for adults and youth as well as the “Safe Routes to School” Program, currently offered by the Marin County Bicycle Coalition (MCBC) in the selected schools. ¾ See the Appendix. 8. “(h) A description of the extent of citizen and community involvement in development of the plan, including, but not limited to, letters of support.” In developing this plan the BPAC used the input and data gathered for the recent Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan as a starting point. The BPAC also met with planners, bicycle advocates, neighborhood groups and interested citizens. Committee members attended workshops and participated in public hearings. In addition, members completed fieldwork surveys taking an inventory of existing conditions including safety concerns and identifying missing links to develop a coordinated citywide non-automotive Page 1-7 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL recreational/transportation system. Various neighborhood plans and documents were reviewed. Community involvement for the Marin County plan was managed by Marin County’s Congestion Management Agency (CMA) which hosted five public workshops and also met with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committees in most of the towns. This was done as part of the effort to create the Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. These workshops were attended by over 250 people and were advertised through the media, bicycle shops, schools, city halls, and other means. Copies of the surveys and all comments received are available through Marin County’s CMA. (Contact Public Works at 415/ 499-6570.) Surveys were targeted at individuals as well as elementary and middle schools. Bicycle and pedestrian counts were conducted in San Rafael by the Department of Public Works. 9. “(i) A description of how the bicycle transportation plan has been coordinated and is consistent with other local or regional transportation, air quality, or energy conservation plans, including, but not limited to, programs that provide incentives for bicycle commuting.” The San Rafael plan is consistent with the Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2000) prepared for the Marin County Congestion Management Agency. Specifically, it supports the goals of: ¾ Making the bicycle an integral part of daily life in Marin, ¾ Encouraging walking as a daily form of transportation, ¾ Making Marin a model community for alternative transportation. The San Rafael plan also supports the Bay Trail Plan (1989). 10. “(j) A description of the projects proposed in the plan and a listing of their priorities for implementation.” All items are prioritized as Short Term Priority (1 to 5 years), Medium Term priority (1 to 10 years), and Long Term priority (1 to 20 years). 11. “(k) A description of past expenditures for bicycle facilities and future financial needs for projects that improve safety and convenience for bicycle commuters in the plan area.” According to the BPAC’s measurements, there are now 2.7 miles of Class 1 pathways, 3.9 miles of Class 2 bike lanes, and no Class 3 bike routes. In addition to these routes, which can be used by recreational and commuter bicyclists, the City of San Rafael has a number of parks and open spaces that can be reached by bicycle. Four of San Rafael’s ten parks and all three recreation centers have bike racks but they are mostly sub-standard. Page 1-8 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Figure 1-1 Existing & Proposed Bikeway Map Page 1-9 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Chapter 2 Goals, Objectives and Policy Actions This chapter describes the Goals, Objectives and Policy guidelines that are recommended for the City of San Rafael. Relevant Legislation and Policies The following legislative goals and policies are relevant to the San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. • • • According to the California Bicycle Transportation Act (1994), all cities and counties should have an adopted bicycle master plan. The Caltrans Highway Design Manual contains specific, mandatory design requirements. The San Rafael Plan meets these requirements. Chapter 1000: Bikeway Planning and Design of the Highway Design Manual sets the basic design parameters for on-street and off-street bicycle facilities. As a matter of policy, the City of San Rafael follows the Caltrans Highway Design Manual in the development of its roadways, paths and sidewalks. As described in Chapter 300, Topic 308.1, of the Highway Design Manual, the city also uses the latest update of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards as described in “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,” as well as AASHTO’s “Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities,” for its local streets and roads. According to Liability Aspects of Bikeway Design, A Special Report (John English, Legal Consultant, Bicycle Federation of America, April, 1986.), a city can incur liability by being negligent in the designation or design of a bikeway, and by defects or hazardous conditions along the route. By conforming to the design standards listed above, the city significantly reduces exposure to liability. Goals, Objectives and Policy Actions The following goals, objectives, and policy actions will guide and facilitate the City in the implementation, maintenance, and upgrade of the bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure in San Rafael: • Goals set a long-term vision and serve as a foundation to this plan. • Objectives identify specific areas where effort is required. • Policy Actions guide day-to-day decision-making toward reaching the goals. Page 2-1 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Goals The following Goals, Objectives and Policies are similar to those in the Marin County Pedestrian Bicycle Master Plan but are tailored for San Rafael. There are three major goals: Goal 1 Bicycle Transportation Encourage walking as a daily form of transportation in San Rafael, by completing a pedestrian network that accommodates short trips and transit, improves the quality of the pedestrian environment, and increases pedestrian safety and convenience. Make the bicycle an integral part of daily life in San Rafael, particularly for trips of less than five miles, by implementing and maintaining a bikeway network, providing end-of-trip facilities, improving bicycle/transit integration, encouraging bicycle use, and making bicycling safer. Goal 2 Pedestrian Transportation Encourage walking as a daily form of transportation in San Rafael by completing a pedestrian network that accommodates short trips and transit, improves the quality of the pedestrian environment, and increases pedestrian safety and convenience. Goal 3 Model Community Make San Rafael a model community for alternative transportation. Aim for a 20 percent mode share of all utilitarian trips to be made by bicycling and walking by the year 2020. Objectives and Policy Actions Objective A - Facilitation Facilitate the implementation of this San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, which identifies existing and future needs, and provides specific recommendations for facilities and programs over the next 20 years. Proposed Policy Actions for Objective A What: 1. Approve this Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. 2. Maximize coordination between the City and community to facilitate citizen review and comment on issues of mutual concern. Who1: City Council Staff 1 Key to Abbreviations: Staff = City Staff (various departments as appropriate), BPAC = Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee, DPW = Department of Public Works Page 2-2 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Objective B - Bikeways Complete a network of bikeways that provide bicycle-friendly connections through travel corridors and to important destinations, especially for travel to employment centers, schools, commercial districts, transit stations, parks, and institutions. Policy Actions for Objective B What: 1. Where feasible, include planning and design of bikeway and pedestrian facilities as an integral part of the process for all transportation improvements. 2. Seek funding for bikeway projects through regional, state, and federal funding programs. 3. Coordinate with multi-jurisdictional funding applications when appropriate. Who: Staff Staff Staff Objective C - Walkways Complete a network of walkways that serves pedestrian needs, especially for short trips to employment centers, schools, commercial districts, transit stations, and institutions. Policy Actions for Objective C What: 1. Complete missing connections to establish direct routes for walking. 2. Identify and mitigate impediments and obstacles to walking to school, such as through a Safe Routes to Schools program. 3. Ensure accessibility of pedestrian facilities to the elderly and disabled. 4. Support the installation of appropriate pedestrian facilities as part of all new transportation improvements, development projects and transit facilities. 5. Identify funding for construction of ADA curb cuts. 6. Identify funding for ongoing maintenance of sidewalks and pathways. Who: Staff Staff Staff Staff Staff Staff Page 2-3 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Objective D – Maintenance Maintain and improve the quality, operation, and integrity of bikeway and walkway network facilities. What: 1. Undertake routine maintenance of bikeway and walkway network facilities, such as sweeping bicycle lanes and trimming bushes next to bike lanes and sidewalks. 2. Consider bicycle and walking facilities in the repair and construction of roadways. 3. Provide an easy method (such as a hotline or email) for the public to report road/walkway hazards, and create an effective and appropriate response mechanism to correct reported hazards. Who: Staff Staff Staff Objective E – Bicycle Parking Provide bicycle parking in employment and commercial areas, in multifamily housing, at schools and colleges, and at transit facilities. Policy Actions for Objective E What: 1. Review existing zoning code ordinances that require bicycle parking spaces are built as part of development projects. 2. Encourage the installation of bicycle parking in the public right-of-way as appropriate. 3. Coordinate with local businesses and schools to offer improved bicycle parking. 4. Explore the adoption of zoning requirements for lockers and showers to be added to new commercial buildings. 5. Upgrade bike parking at City recreation facilities. 6. Consider that parking for bicycles is as essential as parking for cars. Who: Staff Staff City Council; staff City Council City Council, staff City Council, staff Page 2-4 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Objective F – Bike/Transit Coordination Increase the number of bicycle-transit trips. Policy Actions for Objective F What: 1. Support and promote improved bicycle access to all local transit facilities. Who: Staff Objective G - Education Increase public awareness of the benefits of bicycling and walking and of available resources and facilities. Develop and implement plans for bicycle and pedestrian education aimed at youth, adult cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists. Increase public awareness of the benefits of bicycling and walking and of available resources and facilities. Policy Actions for Objective G What: 1. Add a San Rafael Transportation page to the San Rafael website. The page should include a bike route map, plans, and a list of bike organizations and events. 2. Develop adult and youth bicycle and pedestrian education, encouragement and safety programs with the help of available bicycle and pedestrian facility programs such as: >Safe Routes to Schools >Public Service Announcements 3. If feasible, require major City sponsored community events to include convenient bicycle parking and publicize such accommodations. Who: Staff, BPAC Staff City Council, Staff Objective H - Standards Continue to use the latest versions of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) “Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,” and the AASHTO “Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities,” as applicable, for streets, roads, highway and pathways in San Rafael. Page 2-5 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Chapter 3 Existing Conditions Bicycle Facilities San Rafael’s existing bikeway system consists of approximately 2.7 miles of multi-use pathways and 3.9 miles of bicycle lanes. While bicyclists are generally prohibited from using freeways, they are allowed on the northbound shoulder of U.S. 101 between and including the Villa Avenue and North San Pedro off-ramps, and a short section of I-580 near San Quentin. Bicycles are not allowed on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge; bicyclists must use a bus to make this crossing. Existing Bikeways The following are the known existing bikeways that have been identified by the BPAC, with approximate measurements made by BPAC members: 1. Pacheco Hill Pathway: This paved path links Miller Creek Road in Marinwood to Alameda del Prado in Ignacio, just north of the San Rafael city limits. 2. Merrydale Hill Pathway: This paved pathway connects North San Pedro Road to Lincoln Avenue by way of Merrydale Road to Merrydale Hill pathway. This pathway is in the jurisdiction of Caltrans. In the near future, this pathway will be relocated approximately 100 feet west of its present location. This new class I pathway will be a 12 foot wide paved path with a 2 foot dirt shoulder on either side. However, the steepness of both the pathway and Merrydale Road connecting to the pathway will present an impediment to use by southbound cyclists. 3. Baypoint Pathway: This pathway starts at the intersection of Bellam Boulevard and Playa Del Rey and continues to Spinnaker Point Drive. The length is approximately 0.4 miles and the width is 9 - 10 feet. The primary use of this trail is recreational. 4. The Shoreline Park Path and Bay Trail: This recreational trail follows the shoreline from Pickleweed park south to Francisco Blvd near Grange Way. The length is about 1.9 miles of which one mile is paved. The width varies. For a complete section-by-section description of this pathway, see the Appendix. 5. The Redwood Hwy. Frontage Rd to McInnis Park Pathway: This pathway begins at Redwood Highway Frontage Road and continues east to McInnis Park. The trail length is about 0.5 miles and width is 8 feet with a dirt shoulder on either side. Page 3-1 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL 6. The Old Lucas Valley Road Pathway: This pathway starts at the intersection of Lucas Valley Road and Mount Lassen Drive continuing to the intersection with Upper Oak and Canyon Oak Drive. The length of this trail is 0.6 miles. The city of San Rafael and Marin County Open Space District have jurisdiction of this pathway. 7. Walter Place Pathway: This pathway starts at the “T” intersection of Los Ranchitos Road and Walter Place, just south of Mt. Olivet Cemetery. This pathway is 180 feet long with a five to six foot width, and it crosses the Northwestern Pacific Railway right-of-way. Total length of Bikeways (Multi-Use Paths): approximately 2.7 miles Existing Bike Lanes The following street segments in San Rafael currently have bike lanes: 1. Andersen Dr: 2.0 miles. This bike lane follows Andersen Drive from Lindaro St to Hwy. 580 at Sir Francis Drake. 2. Las Gallinas Ave: 1.0 miles. This bike lane follows Las Gallinas Ave. from Lucas Valley Rd. to Las Colindas. 3. Bellam Boulevard: 0.1 miles. This bike lane follows Bellam Blvd. from 24 Bellam Blvd to Andersen Dr. both northern and southern routes. 4. Lincoln Avenue: 0.2 miles. This bike lane follows Lincoln Avenue from where Lincoln Avenue and Los Ranchitos Road merge at the top of the hill and runs south to Prospect Ave. 5. Civic Center Drive and McInnis Parkway: Length 0.2 miles. This bike lane follows Civic Center Drive from 400 Civic Center Drive to 330 feet north of McInnis Parkway. 6. Merrydale Overcrossing: Length 0.2 miles. This bike lane follows the Merrydale Overcrossing (U.S. 101) from Civic Center Drive to Las Gallinas Avenue. 7. Redwood Highway Frontage Road: Length 0.1 miles. Page 3-2 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL This bike lane follows Redwood Highway frontage road from Professional Center Drive to Marin Center Drive. 8. Bellam/Playa Del Rey: Length 0.1 miles. This bike lane follows Baypoint Village Drive from Playa Del Rey to Baypoint Drive. 9. Mahon Creek Path: Length 0.22 miles This bike and pedestrian path way connects Lindaro to Francisco Blvd. West Total length of Bike Lanes: approximately 4.12 miles Bike stations are attended biketransit centers that offer secure valet bicycle parking and other transit amenities such as rental bikes, repairs, and snacks. Bikeway Support Facilities Classification of Bicycle Parking Facilities Class I: Class I bicycle parking facilities are provided in a secure, weatherprotected manner and location such as a bicycle locker, or a secure area like a ‘bike corral’ that may be accessed only by bicyclists. Class II: Bicycle racks provide support for the bicycle and usually do not have a locking mechanism. The cyclist provides his/her own lock(s). Appropriate Class II racks should meet the following standards: • • • allow bicyclists to securely lock their frames and wheels, secured to the ground, located in highly visible areas. Typically, variations on the “upside-down ‘U’” or “wave” racks meet these standards. Racks that only support the front wheel of a bicycle do not. Bike Stations According to the 1990 Census Journey to Work data, approximately 11% of San Rafael residents take transit to work on an average day. “Bike Stations” can provide Class I bike parking. Bike stations are attended bike-transit centers that offer secure valet bicycle parking and other transit amenities such as rental bikes, repairs, and snacks. Such facilities are currently in place at the Palo Alto Caltrain Station and Berkeley BART Station and are currently under development at other major transfer centers in the Bay Area. Bicycle Parking – Existing Conditions A field review found several locations in San Rafael with bike racks. Excluding schools and parks, there is Class I parking at two locations, Class II at 11 locations, and sub-standard racks at three locations. Most of the schools surveyed had sub-standard Class II racks (See the Appendix for details.) Page 3-3 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Multi-Modal Connections According to the 1990 Census Journey to Work data, approximately 11% of San Rafael residents take transit to work on an average day. In San Rafael, Golden Gate Transit (GGT) provides local bus service, regional bus service to San Francisco, Santa Rosa and Richmond, and a shuttle to Larkspur to connect with Golden Gate Ferry service to San Francisco. According to Golden Gate Transit, approximately 88% of their buses had bike racks as of mid-1999. They can be used day and night and at the same fare as a regular passenger. Each rack holds two bicycles. The buses that do not have bike racks are 45 feet long and state law forbids bike racks on them. The #40 bus that links the San Rafael Transit Center with the City of Richmond also allows bicycles inside the bus, as long as there is rear door wheelchair access and room for the bicycles (passengers and wheelchairs take precedence). The district runs a taxi shuttle for cyclist’s who are bumped from buses that are filled with the maximum. The Golden Gate Transit ferries from Larkspur Landing also accommodate bicycles: 25 bicycles are permitted on the regular ferry, and 15 are permitted on the high-speed ferry. Golden Gate Transit hopes to increase this number to about 20 bikes on both the existing and future high-speed ferries. While most of San Rafael has a continuous sidewalk network, there are some locations in the city where pedestrian facilities could be improved. According to BPAC field surveys, Class II parking for about 16 bicycles exists at the San Rafael Transit Center, but more than 16 bikes are typically found at the center, many of them chained to posts or trees. Since almost the entire population of San Rafael is within a five-mile bicycle ride of the Transit Center – the upper limit of the distance that a typical cyclist will ride, according to Bicycle Federation of America measurements – meeting bicycle parking demand there should be a high priority. Pedestrian Facilities This section briefly describes the general conditions that exist in San Rafael with regard to pedestrian facilities. Sidewalks While most of San Rafael has a continuous sidewalk network, there are some locations in the city where pedestrian facilities could be improved. There are places were sidewalks do not exist or end abruptly in some areas of San Rafael. Examples are Sidewalks on Redwood Highway Frontage Road and East Francisco Blvd. Also, there is no sidewalk on Mission St. from the Library/City Hall area to Boyd Park. In some locations such as East Francisco Boulevard, from Bellam Boulevard north, sidewalks are impacted by both northbound and southbound bicyclists. Page 3-4 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL There are places where wheelchair ramps do not exist or are in conflict with sidewalk obstacles. Sidewalks are discontinuous in some places or are in need of repair. Pedestrians may conflict with vehicle movements at certain freeway on-ramps and off-ramps. Page 3-5 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Chapter 4 Needs Analysis This section presents material that provides the basis for the recommendations made in Chapter 5. As a community, we need to expand our transportation infrastructure in the most economical; environmentally responsible and lowest impact method available. Bicyclists in San Rafael include employees who ride to work, children and adults who ride to school, and people running errands and shopping. As a community, we need to expand our transportation infrastructure in the most economical, environmentally responsible and lowest impact method available. As individuals, we need to commute to work, school and to businesses in our neighborhoods while engaging in more exercise for health and well-being. This plan attempts to address these needs through sound transportation planning practice. Commuter Bicycle Needs According to a May 1991 Lou Harris Poll, it was reported that “...nearly three million adults – about one in 60 – already commute by bike. This number could rise to 35 million if more bicycle friendly transportation systems existed.” The parts of this plan that deal with bicycling focus primarily on the use of bicycles for commuting – utilitarian trips made for the purpose of getting to work or school, or for shopping, or other errands. It is therefore important to understand the specific needs of bicycle commuters. Bicyclists in San Rafael include employees who ride to work, children and adults who ride to school, and people running errands and shopping. While recreational cyclists often ride long distances and are not concerned with the time it takes, commuting bicyclists are more interested in shorter trips. Typically, they expect to ride less than three miles. Access to transit helps extend the commute range of cyclists. Bicycle commuters usually seek the most direct and fastest route available, with regular adult commuters often preferring to ride on arterials rather than on side streets or off-street facilities. Commute periods for bicyclists frequently coincide with peak auto traffic periods, increasing exposure to potential conflicts. Rather than be directed to side streets, most commuting adult cyclists would prefer to use bike lanes or wider curb lanes on direct routes. Commuters generally prefer routes where they are required to stop as few times as possible, thereby minimizing delay and conflict with other vehicles. Besides traffic congestion, major concerns for bicycle commuters include rain, riding in darkness, personal safety and security, and secure storage of their bicycle at the end of the trip. Page 4-1 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Traffic Congestion and Air Quality Benefits A key goal of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is to maximize the number of local bicycle and pedestrian commuters in order to help reduce traffic congestion and air pollution. In order to set the framework for these benefits, national statistics and policies are used as a basis for determining the benefits to Marin County. The policy goal of this plan is for a combined bicycle and pedestrian mode share of 20% of all local trips, including work, shopping and recreational trips. While significantly higher than current rates, this goal is achievable over the 20-year time frame of this plan if a comprehensive network of bicycle and pedestrian facilities is completed as called for by project lists herein. The goal is also supported by the following points: The mild climate of San Rafael and the residents’ health-oriented lifestyle are conducive to walking and biking. • According to the 1990 Census, 3.9% of San Rafael residents walk or bike to work, and according to the Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, 4.1% of Marin County workers walk or bike to work. • In the Bay Area, Stanford and the City of Berkeley already significantly exceed the 20%goal (not including student trips), and the City of Calistoga comes close. • This is a 20-year plan. • The mild climate of San Rafael and the residents’ health-oriented lifestyle are conducive to walking and biking. • Increased fuel costs and increased congestion over the next 20 years will make walking and biking even more attractive. Using figures from the Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, the BPAC estimated the impact of meeting various mode share goals. Figure 4-1 below shows the effect on numbers of bicyclists and walkers, daily vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled if San Rafael can meet the 10.31% bike/walk mode split goal described in the County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, and what happens if the city meets the 20% goal described in this plan. To calculate the impact on San Rafael at 10.31%, the BPAC simply took the countywide numbers and multiplied them by the city’s share of the overall county population, 24.2%. For the 20% mode share goals, the BPAC simply rounded up. Page 4-2 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Figure 4-1 San Rafael Estimate of User Increases and Vehicle Trips and Miles Saved Scenario 1- Impact with 10.31% Bike/Walk Mode Share When System is Current Completed Increase Mode Share 3.75% 10.31% 275% Total Daily Bicycle/Walk 5,739 15,996 10,257 Commuters Total Daily Bicycle/Walk Trips 11,479 31,992 20,514 Reduced Daily Vehicle Trips 7,820 22,134 14,192 Reduced Daily Vehicle Miles 13,996 39,011 25,014 Scenario 2 - Impact with 20% Bike/Walk Mode Share When System is Current Completed Increase Mode Share 3.75% 20.00% 533% Total Daily Bicycle/Walk 5,739 30,608 24,869 Commuters Total Daily Bicycle/Walk Trips 11,479 61,221 49,742 Reduced Daily Vehicle Trips 7,820 41,707 33,887 Reduced Daily Vehicle Miles 13,996 74,645 60,649 Page 4-3 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Figure 4-2 Comparison of Mode Share 100.00% 96.25% 89.70% 90.00% 80% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% Walk/Bike mode share 50.00% Automobile/Transit Share 40.00% 30.00% 20% 20.00% 10.00% 10.30% 3.75% 0.00% Current Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Figure 4-3 Reduced Daily Vehicle Trips/Miles 80,000 74,645 70,000 60,000 50,000 39,011 40,000 10,000 Reduced daily vehicle trip Reduced Daily Vehicle Miles 30,000 20,000 41,707 22,134 13,996 7,820 0 Current Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Page 4-4 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Chapter 5 Proposed System and Improvements This chapter begins with the overall priorities of San Rafael residents, and then describes the proposed infrastructure improvements that would meet these priorities. The most frequently requested improvements were for a continuous network of high quality northsouth and eastwest bikeways through the County. A. Community Priorities The BPAC developed the following priorities list based on input to the Marin County Bicycle Plan as well as additional comments from residents, cyclists and pedestrians in San Rafael. The most frequently requested improvements were for a continuous network of high quality north-south and east-west bikeways through the County. This includes San Rafael where a number of routes are needed within the City. Other community priorities include the following: • The 1994 North-South Bikeway Feasibility Study provides the framework for this ‘bicycle freeway’ envisioned as an unbroken path following a combination of the railroad right-of-way and Highway 101. The long-term alignment of this north-south bikeway would be along the Northwestern Pacific Railroad right-of-way from Novato to Larkspur, then along the existing path through Larkspur, then again using the undeveloped right-of-way through Corte Madera, through the partially collapsed Mill Valley Tunnel, and finally connect to the existing Mill Valley-Sausalito path. For certain segments, alternative alignments may be more feasible in the short-term. One key segment is from Central San Rafael south to Larkspur. It is desirable to connect the new bike lanes on Andersen Dr. with the rail right-of-way near Bellam to form a Class I path to Larkspur. • An equally high quality east-west bikeway is needed from San Quentin through San Rafael to San Anselmo and Fairfax using existing roads. East-West routes are also needed within San Rafael, where several are necessary to serve the local population. The routes would be mostly on street with limited off-street near West End and perhaps Court Street. (See Chapter 5). • Requests for shoulder widening on many streets and roads. In San Rafael these include Ranchitos Rd., Lucas Valley Road, and Lincoln Ave. Page 5-1 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL • Requests for new Class II bicycle lanes on many existing roads, such as Andersen Drive, Second and Third Streets, and Francisco Blvd. East. • Improvements to existing bicycle lanes on Old Redwood Hwy., Civic Center Dr. and Bellam Blvd. • Improved pedestrian and bicycle crossings. • Allow bicycling over the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge. • Alternatives to sub-standard sidewalk/path along streets like East Francisco Blvd., Mission near San Rafael High School, Grand Ave, near the transit center, and along Redwood Highway in north San Rafael. • Improve pedestrian access/safety and continuity on the main arteries feeding the town center. • A bridge over the canal would make a much better connection between the Canal Neighborhood and Downtown, San Rafael High, and major employment and shopping centers. A freeway crossover at Medway would greatly improve connectivity between the canal area and the Woodland/Davidson school area. • • Addition of curb cuts to meet ADA guidelines for pedestrians. • Improve pedestrian crossings through traffic calming, better signage, enforcement, lighting and visibility, especially at crossings to bus stops, libraries, schools, and other frequent destinations. • Create transit hubs in downtown areas that include bicycle parking and storage, access to a park and ride lot, and a pedestrian plaza. • Two-way bicycle and pedestrian access to the Hammondale freeway undercrossing at the top of Lincoln Ave. • A focus to encourage of safe and more frequent bicycling and walking amongst school-age children. • The addition of a comprehensive destination–based bikeway and walkway signing and/or marking system for Marin County. • The addition of high quality bicycle parking. B. Bicycle Improvements in San Rafael – Specific Route Projects Proposed and existing bicycle routes are described in this section and illustrated on the Bike Route Map. Each route is given a number and a short general description is provided below as a supplement to the map. Eighteen north-south routes are assigned odd numbers. Page 5-2 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Thirteen east-west routes are assigned even numbers. The Committee expects that a simplified system of route numbers may be needed for signage, but the numbers shown here are useful during planning and development. Bicycle improvements have been categorized as short term, medium term and long term priority based on the following considerations: Short Term: Bike route segments that are relatively low cost and require only signage and striping/stenciling. Medium Term: bike route segments that will require more work or require further study. For example, in some cases parking may need to be moved, or a median strip altered, or they may depend on the completion of some other segment in order to be useful. For some Medium Term segments, another jurisdiction may be involved, such as the County or the GGBHTD. Long Term Bike Route segments all have some characteristic that makes them difficult to complete. Reasons can include high cost, lack of space, location outside of the city limits, uncertainty about plans by other agencies or the need to build community support. Short-term projects require only signage and striping, and, if feasible, be done without extensive planning, design work, construction, or high-level decision-making. Projects categorized as long term or medium term are no less important than short term projects. In some cases, preliminary work needs to start right away on medium and long term projects in order to assure completion within the 10 or 20 year timetable. Therefore, the strategy is to do most or all of the short-term priority improvements during the first five years and to start planning and preliminary work soon on the top priority projects in the medium and long categories. Projects are listed in priority order in Table 5.4.1, Pedestrian Priorities. Within each category, the most important segments are listed first. Individual Segments of each Route are listed below. The segments are organized by priority as explained in the boxes below. Short Term priority Segments (1 to 5 years) • These projects require only signage and striping, and, if feasible, be done without extensive planning, design work, construction, or highlevel decision-making. • Projects with a priority “A” are recommended for completion in the 1st year, “B” in the 2nd year, and so on. • The main north-south and main east-west routes are priority “A”. Routes that are centrally located, and/or heavily used are priority “B”, and the rest are “C”. Page 5-3 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Figure 5-1 Priority A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A B B B B Short Term Bicycle Improvements (refer to Chap. 1 for a list of routes) Route – segment 01-01 01-03 01-11 01-13 01-21 01-23 06-07 09-02 09-03 09-04 09-05 12-01 12-03 12-05 14-01 32-01 05-01 05-05 05-07 05-09 B B B B B B 06-05 06-09 13-05 13-07 13-09 19-03 B B B B B C C 24-05 24-06 24-07 24-09 24-11 01-15 01-17 02-07 C C C C C 02-09 03-01 04-03 04-501 SHORT Term Priority Segment: (1-5 years) Miller Creek Rd. from Marinwood Ave. to Las Gallinas Ave. (County route) Las Gallinas Ave. from Miller Creek Rd. to Lucas Valley Rd. (County route) Northgate Dr. from Las Gallinas Ave. to Los Ranchitos Rd. Los Ranchitos Rd. from Northgate Dr. to Lincoln Ave. Irwin Ave. from Lincoln Ave. to Woodland Ave. Woodland Ave. from Irwin Ave. to Bellam Blvd. Point San Pedro Rd. from North San Pedro Rd. to Third St. Villa Ave from the Hammondale Under-Crossing to Linden Ln. Grand Ave. from Linden Ln. to Mission Ave. Grand Ave. from Mission Ave. to Francisco Blvd East. Grand Ave. from Villa to Mission Greenfield Ave. from City Limit to Dunand Ave. West End Ave. from Dunand Ave. to Marquard/Fourth St. Fourth St from West End Ave. to Union St. [For an alternate, see Route 24] Andersen Dr. from Second St. to Lindaro St (south side only) Harbor Dr. along Canal St. to the Bay Trail Redwood Highway Frontage Rd. from Smith Ranch Rd. to Professional Center Dr. Redwood Highway Frontage Rd. and Civic Center Drive from Marin Center Dr. Civic Center Drive from Number 400 Civic Center Drive from 330 Feet north of McInnis Pkwy to North San Pedro Rd. North San Pedro Rd. from La Pasada to Point San Pedro Rd. Third St. from Point San Pedro Rd. to Grand Ave. Bellam Blvd. from Playa Del Rey to Kerner Blvd. Bellam Blvd. from Kerner to Hwy. 580 interchange. Bellam Blvd. from Hwy. 580 interchange to Andersen Dr. Wolfe Grade from Antonette to Larkspur [Route 24 is an alternate to Route 12, Segment 5]: Second St. from West End Ave. to Miramar Ave. Miramar Ave. and First St. from Second St. to E St. First St. from E St. to D St. First St. from D St. to B St. First St. from B St. to A St. Lincoln Ave. from Los Ranchitos Rd. to Prospect Ave. Lincoln Ave. from Prospect Ave. to Fourth St. Canyon Oaks Dr. from Old Lucas Valley Road to (new) Lucas Valley Road. Lucas Valley Rd. and Smith Ranch Rd. from Canyon Oaks Dr. to Redwood Hwy. Los Gamos Dr. from Lucas Valley Rd to Manual T. Freitas Pkwy. Manual T. Freitas Parkway from Marin Open Space to Las Pavadas Ave. Del Ganado from Terra Linda Open Space to Freitas Parkway Class 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 3 3 3 2-3 3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 3 3 2-3 2-3 2-3 3 3 3 2-3 3 2-3 2-3 Page 5-4 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Priority C C C C C C C C C C Route – segment 10-01 10-03 16-01 16-03 21-01 23-01 23-03 23-05 35-01 35-03 Class SHORT Term Priority Segment: (1-5 years) Racquet Club Dr. from City limit to Fifth Ave. Fifth Ave. from Racquet Club Dr. to K St. Taylor St. from D Street to B St. Woodland Ave. from B St. to Irwin St. Irwin Ave. from Woodland Ave. to Tiburon Ave (at SR city limit). Nova Albion Way from Las Gallinas Ave to Golden Hinde Blvd. Golden Hinde Blvd from Nova Albion Way to Los Ranchitos Rd. Nova Albion Way from Golden Hinde Blvd. to Northgate Dr. Castlewood Drive form 25 Castlewood to Knight Drive Knight Drive from Castlewood to Pt. San Pedro Rd. 3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 3 3 Medium Term Priority Segments (1 – 10 years) • These projects require moderate to extensive planning and design work, minor to moderate construction and high-level approval. Most do not involve other agencies or have an unusually high cost, but may involve redesign of the median or intersections, the relocation of parking, and other issues. • The “A” projects are probably easier to implement and should be started right away, if feasible. “B” and “C” should be implemented later during the 10-year Medium Term period, if feasible. • The main north-south and east-west routes are priority “A”. Routes that are centrally located, and/or heavily used are priority of “B”, and the rest are “C”. Figure 5-2 Medium Term Bicycle Improvements Priorit y A Route – segment 01-09 A 01-07 A 04-07 A 04-05 A A 19-01 25-02 A A 25-03 26-01 A 26-03 A A A 27-03 27-05 27-07 MEDIUM Term Priority Segment: 1-10 Years Las Gallinas Ave. from Manual T. Freitas Pkwy. to Northgate Dr. Las Gallinas Ave. from Las Colindas Rd. to Manual T. Freitas Pkwy. Manual T. Freitas Parkway from Las Gallinas Ave. to Northgate Dr. Manual T. Freitas Parkway from Las Pavadas to Las Gallinas Ave. D St. from Fourth St. to Antoinette Ave. Merrydale Rd. across the NWP right of way and across a small creek to reach the continuation of Merrydale Rd. A culvert or small bridge (bike/ped. access only) will be needed. Merrydale Rd. from NWP right of way to Las Gallinas Ave. Francisco Blvd. West from Second Street to Medway Overcrossing Francisco Blvd. West from Medway Overcrossing to Andersen Dr. Canal from the Bridge to Harbor Drive Harbor Drive from Canal St to Front St Front St and Harbor Drive to Medway and Front St. Class 3 2-3 2-3 2-3 3 1 2-3 1 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 Page 5-5 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Priorit y A B B B Route – segment 27-09 06-01 06-03 09-01 B B B B B B 10-07 10-09 10-11 10-12 10-13 15-01 B 15-03 B B B 15-05 15-07 25-01 B 25-05 B C C C 22-03 02-01 02-03 02-11 C 04-09 C C C 04-11 09-07 09-09 C C C 10-05 31-01 33-01 MEDIUM Term Priority Segment: 1-10 Years Mill St and Harbor Drive to Medway Rd N. San Pedro Rd. from Los Ranchitos Rd. to Civic Ctr. Dr. North San Pedro Rd from Civic Center Dr to La Pasada. Hwy 101 east shoulder and off-ramp (northbound) from N San Pedro Rd to Hammondale. H St from Fifth Ave to Fourth St. Fifth Ave from H St to Court St. Fifth Ave from Court St to Grand Ave. Court St from Fifth St to Mission Ave. Mission Ave from Court St. to Grand Ave. Kerner Blvd. from Bellam to the start of the Kerner Blvd. gap. Kerner Blvd. gap. This segment will close the gap north of Shoreline Kerner Blvd from Shoreline Pkwy to Grange Way. Grange Way from Kerner Blvd from Francisco Blvd. Merrydale Rd from Merrydale Overcrossing to NWP Rightof-way. Merrydale Rd from Las Gallinas Ave to the existing Merrydale Hill pathway. Las Gallinas Ave from Corrillo Dr to Merrydale Rd. Lucas Valley Rd. from Westgate Dr. to Mt. Lassen Dr. Lucas Valley Rd. from Mt. Lassen Dr. to Canyon Oaks Dr. Smith Ranch Rd. and Main Drive from Redwood Hwy. Frontage to McInnis Park Manual T. Freitas Pkwy. From Northgate Dr. to Las Gallinas Ave. Manual T. Freitas Parkway freeway overpass (Hwy. 101) Francisco Blvd. East from Grand Ave. to Medway Francisco Blvd. East from Medway to Main St. (Richmond Bridge) Fifth Ave from K St to H St. A St from Fifth Ave to First St. C St from Fifth Ave to First St. Class 2-3 3 2-3 1-2 3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 2-3 Long Term Priority Segments (1 – 20 years) • These projects are very important but may be complicated, involve other agencies, require community input, or need substantial funding, extensive planning, and design and engineering work. They involve major construction, road realignment, or other issues. • Priority “A” projects should be planned right away, and completed first. “B” and “C” should be planned and implemented within 20 years. Page 5-6 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL • The main north-south and main east-west routes are priority “A”. Other routes that are centrally located, and/or heavily used are priority of “B”, and the rest are “C”. Figure 5-3 Long Term Bicycle Improvements Priority A A Route – segment 01-19 07-01 A A 07-03 07-05 A 07-07 A A 27-01 27-13 A B 27-11 17-01 C C C 08-01 08-03 11-01 C 11-02 LONG Term Priority Segment: 1-20 Years Lincoln Ave from Fourth Street to Irwin Ave. NWP Right of Way from the San Rafael northern city limit to Smith Ranch Rd. NWP Right of Way from Smith Ranch Rd to the Transit Center NWP Right of Way from the Transit Center to the San Rafael southern city limit NWP Right of Way from San Rafael southern city limit through the Larkspur Tunnel. Bridge over the San Rafael Creek from Third St to Canal St Freeway Overcrossing from Francisco Blvd East to Francisco Blvd West. Medway Rd to Francisco Blvd. East. Bay Trail spur from Hamilton to McInnis Park. The path from the sewer plant to McInnis Park is paved. Cantera Way from Point San Pedro Rd to the bay. Bay Trail Spur from Cantera Way (end) to Point San Pedro Rd. Bay Trail from Kerner Blvd to Shoreline Park (near Grange Way). Grange Way from Bay Trail to Francisco Blvd Class 2-3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2-3 1 2-3 1 1 2-3 The following table lists the segments already completed or in the process of being completed. Figure 5-4 Existing Sections 01-0 01-05 02-05 04-01 05-03 13-01 13-03 14-03 14-05 18-01 18-03 22-01 24-15 Name of Existing Routes and Segments: “Pacheco Hill Pathway” parallel to Hwy 101 from Novato to Miller Creek. Las Gallinas Ave from Lucas Valley Rd to Las Colindas Rd. Old Lucas Valley Road from Mt. Lassen Dr to Canyon Oaks Dr. Marin Open Space District pathway from City limit to Manual T Freitas Parkway Redwood Highway Frontage Rd from Professional Center Dr to Marin Center Baypoint Pathway from Spinnaker Point Dr to Baypoint Village Dr. Baypoint Village Dr from Playa Del Rey to Baypoint Dr. Andersen Dr from Lindaro St to Bellam Blvd segment (Existing). Andersen Dr from Bellam Blvd to Sir Francis Drake Blvd/Hwy 580. Gallinas Creek Pathway from Paul Drive to Yosemite Rd. Gallinas Creek Path from Yosemite Rd to Smith Ranch Rd Walter Place pathway from Los Ranchitos Rd to Corrillo Dr. Mahon Creek Path from Lindaro St. to Francisco Blvd. West Class 1 2 1 1 2 (partly done) 1 2 2 2 Path 1 1 1 Page 5-7 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL 25-07 37-01 37-03 Merrydale Hill pathway from the south end of Merrydale Rd to Los Ranchitos Rd. Hwy 580 off ramp (westbound) from East Francisco Blvd to Sir Francis Drake Blvd Hwy 580 on ramp and Hwy 580 shoulder (eastbound) from Sir Francis Drake Blvd to Main Street 1 2 2 C. Proposed County-Wide Gap Closure and Safety Projects The following section is a list of San Rafael projects from the Marin County plan that are consistent with community priorities. 1. County Signing and Stenciling Program (A potential countywide project) Jurisdiction(s): County and local public works agencies This project addresses one of the most common concerns expressed in surveys and workshops: the lack of directional signage for bicyclists, and signs warning and advising motorists of bicycles on the roadway. All approved routes should be signed. This project could be implemented in the following three phases: a. Phase I: primary north-south and east-west routes b. Phase II: rural recreational routes Capital funding for the projects identified in this Plan is available through Federal and State sources, but maintenance funds are not included. c. Phase III: secondary routes 2. Bicycle and Pedestrian Maintenance & Development Project Jurisdiction(s): County and local agencies Capital funding for the projects identified in this Plan is available through Federal and State sources, but maintenance funds are not included. This project would seek to establish a regular source of maintenance funds for roadways and multi-use pathways in Marin County similar to the streetlight agreement already in place. In many cases, it would be more cost-effective to maintain and re-construct facilities on a larger multi-jurisdictional level rather than have each local city or town act independently. It should be noted that participation in such a program, however, would be optional for the local jurisdictions. Page 5-8 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Recommended minimum maintenance practices to be funded under this project are presented below. The annual maintenance cost of the bike path system is estimated to be $90,000 countywide when it is fully implemented. Class I bike path and sidewalk maintenance costs are based on $8,500 per mile, which covers weekly trash removal, monthly sweeping, and bi-annual resurfacing and repairs. Other maintenance costs include bike lane line and crosswalk restriping, sweeping debris, and tuning signals for bicycle and pedestrian sensitivity. 3. Interchange Projects (Safety Projects) Jurisdiction(s): Caltrans, local agencies The City of San Rafael should continue to work with Caltrans to eliminate barriers to walking and bicycling from one side of the freeway corridor to another. U.S. 101 in Marin County acts as a major barrier for bicyclists and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. This project recognizes both the complexity and the similar nature of the issue from interchange to interchange. Many interchanges share the same characteristics, meaning that prototype solutions probably have wide applicability. Caltrans itself has modified interchanges in Marin, notably the southbound East Blithedale off-ramp, partially to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety. The City of San Rafael should continue to work with Caltrans to eliminate barriers to walking and bicycling from one side of the freeway corridor to another, and to ensure that on- and off-ramps are as safe as possible for all users. 4. Bellam-Francisco Bicycle/Pedestrian Project (Safety Projects) Jurisdiction(s): City of San Rafael, Caltrans Staff, the public, and others consistently identified these two corridors in San Rafael. Specifically, it was noted that this area has a high number of people who are dependent on walking or bicycling as a primary mode of transportation, plus numerous people riding bikes on sidewalks, and a combination of heavy traffic volumes, numerous driveways, and constrained roadway. Some surveys indicated specific problems with school children in the Canal Neighborhood reaching Davidson Middle School because of the traffic on Bellam at the I-580 ramps. People walking or riding on East Francisco Blvd. towards the Montecito Shopping Center was also identified as a high priority area. Page 5-9 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL The corridor between San Anselmo and San Rafael was identified as a major bicycling route in public workshops and surveys. Several potential solutions for this area are being explored, on of which to explore the feasibility of a bicycle/pedestrian bridge connecting the east side of US 101 to the west side. Solutions on East Francisco Blvd. are more problematic due to the constrained roadway. A drawbridge connection leading directly from the Canal Neighborhood to San Pedro Rd. near San Rafael High School has been proposed. While this project would help provide people walking/bicycling on East Francisco Blvd. with a viable option, additional feasibility work is required. 5. San Rafael – San Anselmo Connector (Safety Projects) Jurisdiction(s): City of San Rafael/City of San Anselmo The corridor between San Anselmo and San Rafael was identified as a major bicycling route in public workshops and surveys. Bicyclists typically use Greenfield as an alternative to the busy Red Hill/4th St. (Miracle Mile) corridor. Specific problem areas include the crossing from West End to 4th Street, and 2nd Street between West End and 1st Street. A feasibility study is needed to identify the best and most effective improvements. 6. Safe Routes to Schools Projects (Safety Projects) Jurisdiction(s): Local agencies, school districts, community groups School commute improvements were a major focus of public and staff comments, partially out of concerns about current safety and impacts of school-related traffic, and partially because of new State funding opportunities. 7. San Rafael - Larkspur Gap Closure Project (Gap Assure Project) Jurisdiction(s): San Rafael, Larkspur, Marin County, GGBHTD, Caltrans Along with the two previous gap closure projects, this is a key project that helps overcome one of the largest barriers in Marin County. Bicycle and pedestrian movement between San Rafael and southern Marin is limited to steep routes on Wolfe Grade or Via Cumbre, or very heavy traffic and an unprotected crossing on East Sir Francis Drake (ESFD) and Andersen Drive. This project would open up connections to the Larkspur Ferry Terminal, and numerous schools, employment and shopping areas, and virtually all movement in the north-south direction. There are several approaches to this multi-jurisdictional project. Page 5-10 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Option #1: construct shoulders or bike lanes on ESFD from the ferry terminal to Andersen Drive. Signalize and improve this intersection, if feasible, and provide new bike lanes on Andersen. Option #2: construct a new Class I bike path on the north side of ESFD from the Larkspur Landing Circle signalized intersection to Andersen Drive. Provide new bike lanes on Andersen. Option #3: construct a Class I pathway on the NWP right-of-way from ESFD up to the tunnel portal, ramp up and around the portal to the U.S. 101 cut, connect through the cut, and then ramp back down to the NWP right-of-way. Option #4: construct a Class I path on the NWP right-of-way through the tunnel and on to a connection with Andersen in San Rafael. 8. Puerto Suello Gap Closure Project (Gap Closure Project) Jurisdiction(s): San Rafael, Marin County, GGBHTD, Caltrans Unlike other gap closure projects in Southern or Central Marin, there are existing direct, local streets (Lincoln Avenue and Ranchitos Rd) available to bicyclists and pedestrians over Puerto Suello Hill. While these routes do carry moderate to heavy traffic volumes, neither corridor was identified as a major constraint by experienced bicyclists in surveys or workshops other than the lack of bike lanes or shoulders. Marin County currently has plans to provide bike lanes on a portion of Ranchitos Road. However, Class II bike lanes cannot be accommodated on the full length of Lincoln because of its constrained roadway width. It is recommended that the feasibility of a contra-flow bike connection be explored to transition northbound cyclists on Grand Avenue under US 101 (Hammondale undercrossing) at Villa Ave. to connect to the West Side 101 Bike Path. Use of the NWP right-of-way from Central San Rafael northward as a bikeway is directly linked to future rail use. Due to the expansion of U.S. 101 through this area, the railroad corridor will be reduced to 30 feet total, leaving no possibility of shared use. Expanding the right-of-way further would require the removal of numerous additional homes in this corridor, which is neither likely nor desirable. Should rail service not prove practical, a bike path could use this corridor and possibly the existing Puerto Suello tunnel. Other related components of this project could include: Use of the NWP right-of-way from Central San Rafael northward as a bikeway is directly linked to future rail use. • re-construction of the Merrydale path as part of the U.S. 101 project • improvements to the North San Pedro Road/US 101 undercrossing pathway • potential extension of Merrydale for bicycles and pedestrians only, across the railroad tracks and over a small creek. The feasibility of this option is dependent on approval by the California PUC and NWP owners/operators. Page 5-11 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL 9. Regional Connection Projects (Gap Closure Project) Jurisdiction(s): Marin County, Caltrans, Novato, San Rafael North-South Bikeway (Shared Rail-with-Trail) Should rail service be implemented, then a bike path would need to be located so that it meets the latest Federal Railway Administration and California Public Utility Commission requirements. Much of the proposed North-South Bikeway in central and southern Marin is proposed to be located on the old Northwestern Pacific Railroad right-ofway. This right-of-way runs through San Rafael from the city line on the north, through a tunnel at Puerto Suello Hill, through the center of town (where it bisects the Transit Center), and continues south to the city line where it enters the short Larkspur Tunnel. The corridor is held in trust by the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District (GGBHTD). Width of this right-of-way varies from 37 ft to 100 ft throughout its length. The San Rafael General Plan currently calls for this corridor to be developed as a Class I multi-use path. North of San Rafael, from Terra Linda through Novato and on to Petaluma and Black point, the short- to mid-term recommendations are mostly located on existing streets. As discussed earlier, the feasibility of sharing the railroad right of way north of San Rafael is largely dependent on the future of rail service in this corridor. Should rail service not prove practical, then a bike path could be constructed on the right of way to Ignacio. Should rail service be implemented, then a bike path would need to be located so that it meets the latest Federal Railway Administration and California Public Utility Commission requirements. Additional research being conducted by the Federal Highways Administration and Federal Railroad Administration points to a recommended setback of 25 feet, with 15 feet being a minimum setback when combined with fencing. For most of the NWP right of way north of San Rafael, this would place a bike path in the adjacent wetlands, or force it to climb the embankments through cut sections. While both of these options are physically possible, they would be expensive and politically challenging. The boardwalk option through the wetlands requires extensive environmental analysis to determine potential impacts. 10. Signals and Lighting Improvements and Upgrades. Recommendation: Create a program to install and mark signal loop detectors that are responsive to bicycles at existing and new intersections. Such markings should show cyclists where to stand to trip lights. One suggested site for bicycle-sensitive traffic signals is North San Pedro Road at Merrydale Road. Page 5-12 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL D. Pedestrian Improvements in San Rafael Accessibility, continuity, and connectedness of pedestrian facilities are key features of this element. Listed below are recommendations for pedestrian improvements identified in field surveys conducted by BPAC members. More improvements will be identified later by the Safe Routes to Schools program and by neighborhood associations. Safe Routes to School Accessibility, continuity, and connectedness of pedestrian facilities are key features of this plan. It is recommended that San Rafael embrace and encourage the Safe Routes to Schools program. Among other things, it can provide valuable suggestions for improved pedestrian facilities. During the first months and years of this plan, we propose to take advantage of the Safe Routes to Schools program to help identify additional specific pedestrian improvements. Neighborhood associations will be invited to identify problem areas for pedestrians and school children, and that input will also be incorporated. Articles should be placed in the neighborhood newspapers to stimulate more community involvement. Safe Routes to Schools addresses the daily gridlock of school traffic through a combination of education, activities, and engineering solutions. It encourages more walking and biking to school through in-class activities, contests and events, and organized “school pools” of parents escorting children by foot, bike or carpool. It also identifies problem areas that need to be improved. The following table (Figure 5-5) is a listing of pedestrian improvements in priority order. Figure 5-5 Specific Pedestrian Improvements Location Villa/Highway 101 Underpass Issue One way underpass. Puerto Suello Hill to North San Pedro Road, on East side of US 101 Narrow path next to busy freeway lane. Merrydale Road to Civic Center Drive (under US 101) [see segment 025002 in figure 5.2] Gap in Merrydale Rd Project Change travel under freeway from one way to both directions for better pedestrian and bicycle access to west side of 101 and Lincoln Avenue, by eliminating one automobile travel lane. Improve and construct pedestrian (and bicycle) sidewalk Pave over railroad tracks that split Merrydale South of the Merrydale Overpasses, and add a bridge over the creek to make Merrydale Road continuous for pedestrian and bicycle access. Page 5-13 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Location D Street (Wolf Grade): Los Gamos and Northgate at Freitas Parkway East Francisco Boulevard US101 Overcrossing at Medway St Canal Bridge Francisco Boulevard West. Vallecito School: Lucas Valley Rd at Miller Creek. Mission from Tamalpais Ave to San Rafael High School. Old Redwood Hwy frontage road from Smith Ranch Road to Freitas Parkway Grand & Elm Issue Busy road; lots of pedestrians including children; and no sidewalk Offset intersection; pedestrians crossing divided parkway; poor visibility; and no crosswalks. Narrow, incomplete, broken, and heavily used sidewalk situated next to a busy street with no parking. The freeway is a barrier to pedestrians who sometimes run across 6 lanes of traffic to cross the freeway. The canal separates bikes and pedestrians from San Rafael High School, Montecito Shopping Center, and down town, and forces them to use busy Francisco Blvd East. Sidewalks are missing in many places and there are no bike lanes. This is a major route to Davidson Middle School. Inadequate sidewalks on Nova Albion Way. Falling hazard. The bridge railings are sub-standard, only about 18” high, and the creek is deep. Narrow street and heavy traffic during school hours. Bike and pedestrian facilities are poor. Irregular sidewalk made of asphalt on sections. Sidewalk from Mitchell Drive to Professional Center Parkway is broken, disjointed, narrow, and missing altogether at some locations. There is only 1 curb cut and bushes and dirt block the sidewalk and impede access on the northeast corner. Project Provide sidewalks or shoulders, as feasible. Redesign the offset intersection to provide continuous north-south pedestrian and bicycle movements. Improve/construct (widen sidewalks) Construct a Pedestrian & Bicycle over-crossing across the freeway at the location of East Francisco and Medway Street/Louise Street connecting to West Francisco Boulevard (and/or to Andersen Dr). Construct a bridge over or under the canal for easier pedestrian/bicycle movement. Improve and construct sidewalk going from San Rafael Transit Center out Francisco Boulevard West to Andersen Drive. Note: As part of the US 101 freeway widening HOV project, Caltrans will put in a new 4 ft. sidewalk along West Francisco Boulevard. Construct new sidewalk to reduce pedestrian car conflicts. Raise the height of the railing on both sides of the Miller Creek Bridge on Lucas Valley Road near Canyon Oaks Drive. Consider legal use of sidewalk for bikes on Mission from Tamalpais Ave to San Rafael High School. Improve sidewalks. Add curb cuts needed at Grand & Mission. Add pedestrian and bike signage in this section of Mission. Repair broken sidewalk. Complete all of the gaps on east side of street to make continuous. Widen sidewalk where the Fairchild property is being redeveloped. Add curb cuts, cut bushes, and clean up dirt at north east corner. Page 5-14 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Location Los Ranchitos from North San Pedro to Hammondale & Lincoln. Civic Center Drive from MT Freitas Parkway Overpass To North San Pedro Road. Merrydale Road at the NWP tracks. Larkspur Street from Kerner To Canal. Mission and Grand intersection Canal from Harbor to Medway Hammondale & Lincoln intersection. Los Ranchitos Rd from Northgate to North San Pedro Rd. Francisco Boulevard from Grange Way to Highway 580. (At approximately 2165 E. Francisco Bld). Issue There is no place to walk along this stretch. The fog lane pinches out in places, and there is only a ditch and embankment, but no path or sidewalk. (This is also a very bad stretch for bikes.) No sidewalk south of Gable Court. Project Widen the northbound shoulder to create a dirt path, and trim branches. Create a wide fog lane on the southbound direction. Reduce vehicle lane width to create a wider paved shoulder. Finish connecting missing gaps in the sidewalk. The railroad tracks and creek form a barrier to pedestrians (and bicycles). There is no sidewalk on Merrydale between the Merrydale OC and the NWP RR tracks. This street would be a great pedestrian & bike route if it were continuous. There are many pedestrians; uncut bushes obstruct the sidewalk; and only a few cross walks exist. Add a sidewalk or dirt/gravel path on the west side of Merrydale (next to the cemetery). Add a crossing for the railroad right of way. Add a bike and pedestrian bridge over the small creek. No traffic light, no cross walk signs on Mission. This is a very busy street. No sidewalk on one side of street. Pedestrian facilities are missing on southeast corner. Need cross walk on Lincoln and on Hammondale, east side of intersection. Sidewalk is broken or missing on southwest corner and blocked by bushes. The Hammondale under-crossing has a very narrow sidewalk and is difficult to access. Install traffic calming devices (roundabout & speed bumps) along Larkspur at Larkspur & Canal. Cut brush obstructing the sidewalk. Add a few cross walks. Add a traffic light and pedestrian crosswalk signs. Add sidewalk where missing. Add a sidewalk to east side of Lincoln approaching the intersection. Add crosswalks with lights and pushbuttons on east side of intersection. Repair and complete sidewalk on the southwest corner of the intersection & trim bushes. Improve pedestrian access to the underpass and widen the sidewalk. No sidewalk (but has generous fog line area.) Add a sidewalk, or at least a dirt or gravel path to the east side of the road through here. There is a bus stop sign, but no shelter or bus pad here. There is a small business center here and this stop is a link to the Richmond Bridge & Sir Francis Drake Blvd. Sidewalk ends at Bay Park. Complete sidewalk on the east side of the street. Improve the bus stop at 2165 E. Francisco Blvd. Page 5-15 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Location Grand and 5th Ave intersection Grand from Elm to Villa. Grand and 2nd Street intersection Grand from Locust to Newhall Grand from Jewel to Locust North San Pedro Road from city limit to Lincoln East Francisco from Pelican Way to the end. Davidson Middle School access via Woodland Medway and Canal from E Francisco Blvd to Novato St. Belvedere at Alto and Tiburon streets intersection Tamalpais Ave at Mission Bellam and Andersen Drive intersection. Mission Street from the Library/City Hall area to Boyd Park. • Issue Curb cuts lacking on the west side. Gravel sidewalk on the east side, paved sidewalk on the west side. No sidewalk on the east side of Grand, from Grand & Elm part way to Grand Court to Grand. On the Northeast. corner at Chevron station, the signal light pole is in the sidewalk, and a curb is needed. Mountain View & Grand has no curb cuts on east side. Area varies from no sidewalk to dirt or gravel sidewalks. Newhall & Grand, no curb cuts. Sidewalk is gravel and dirt. No sidewalks in some parts. No curb cuts at Grand & Watt, Grand & Locust. Sidewalks missing in many areas. Pedestrians have problems crossing the onramps at the freeway. No sidewalk. Project Install curb cuts on the northwest and southwest corners. Add a sidewalk to the east side of Grand. Move stop light and install curb cut on northeast corner. Add sidewalks where missing Add curb cuts at Newhall & Grand. Add sidewalks where missing, Add curb cuts at the Grand & Watt, and Grand & Locust intersections Add sidewalks on at least one side of North San Pedro Road. Improve pedestrian crossings of the freeway on and off ramps. Add a sidewalk on the east (nonfreeway) side of East Francisco. Children walk along Woodland, which is fast, narrow, and has many parked cars, business & driveways. Narrow street, fast traffic, parked cars, no crosswalks. Educate kids on traffic safety & safe routes. Slow Woodland traffic with signs and speed humps. No crosswalk. This is an oddly shaped intersection with lots of cars, bikes, and pedestrians. Curb cut on east side of Tamalpais. Very busy intersection with no pedestrian signal or curb cuts. Add crosswalks. There is no sidewalk. Add crosswalks and more stop signs along Canal and Medway. Add a curb cut on the east side of Tamalpais at Mission. Add pedestrian signals with push buttons. Add curb cuts on all 4 corners. Conduct a study to find the best solution is this area. A standard concrete sidewalk may not fit in well at this location. Pedestrian improvements are not grouped by time period, but are designated as either “A”, “B”, or “C” with “A” the most important. Note that the bridge projects Page 5-16 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL are included with the bike route segments because they serve both bicycles and pedestrians. Figure 5-6 Pedestrian Priorities Priority: A A A A A A A A A A A A B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B C C C C C C Pedestrian Projects: 1. Villa/Highway 101 Underpass. 2. Puerto Suello Hill to North San Pedro Road, on East side of Hwy 101. 4. D Street (Wolf Grade) 6. East Francisco Boulevard. 10. Francisco Boulevard West. 14. Old Redwood Highway Frontage Road from Smith Ranch Road to Freitas Parkway. 16. Los Ranchitos from North San Pedro to Hammondale & Lincoln. 18. Merrydale Road from Merrydale Overcrossing to end at NWP tracks. 22. Hammondale & Lincoln intersection. 27. Grand and 2nd Street intersection. 34. Belvedere at Alto/Tiburon streets intersection. 36. Bellam at Andersen Drive intersection. 3. Merrydale Road to Civic Center Drive (under highway 101) 8. Hwy 101 Overcrossing at Medway 9. Canal Bridge (or tube or ferry) 11. Vallicito School sidewalk improvement 13. Mission from Tamalpais Ave to SR High School. 15. Grand & Elm 17. Civic Center Dr. from MT Freitas Parkway Overpass To N. San Pedro Road. 19. Larkspur Street from Kerner To Canal. 20. Mission and Grand intersection. 21. Canal from Harbor To Medway. 23. Los Ranchitos Rd from Northgate to N San Pedro Rd. 26. Grand from Elm to Villa. 28. Grand from Locust to Newhall 29. Grand from Jewel to Locust. 30. N San Pedro Rd from city limit to Los Ranchitos Rd. 32. Davidson Middle School access via Woodland. 33. Medway and Canal from E Francisco Blvd to Novato Street 37. Mission Street from the Library/City Hall area to Boyd Park. 5. Los Gamos and Northgate at Freitas Parkway 12. Lucas Valley Rd at Miller Creek, railings. 24. Francisco Blvd from Grange Way to Hwy 580. (At approx. 2165 E. Francisco Blvd). 25. Grand and 5th Ave intersection. 31. East Francisco from Pelican Way to the end. 35. Tamalpais Page 5-17 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Chapter 6 Implementation Cost Estimates Figures 6-1, 6-2, and 6-3 show estimated costs for program elements. Most improvements are eligible for funding through a variety of State and Federal sources. Figure 6-1 SHORT TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-5) Expense of Item Signs Striping Stencils Curb Cuts Year(s) 2001-2004 2001-2004 2001-2004 2001-2004 Feet or #. of Signs 590 195,450 Ft. 521 100 Type Signs Striping Stencils Curb cut Cost $55,500 $306,000 $130,000 $150,000 Figure 6-2 MEDIUM TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-10) Expense of Item Signs Striping Stencils Bridges Curb Cuts Class 1 Year(s) 2001-2010 2001-2010 2001-2010 2001-2010 2001-2010 Feet or #. of Signs 359 116,000 Ft. 311 2 100 2001-2010 3,662 Ft. Type Signs Striping Stencils Curb cut Multiuse Cost $34,000 $183,000 $78,000 $2,000,000 $150,000 $13,500 Figure 6-3 LONG TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-20) Expense of Item Signs Striping Stencils Bridges Curb Cuts Rail Trail Year(s) 2001-2020 2001-2020 2001-2020 2001-2010 2001-2010 2001-2010 Feet or # of Signs 125 15,369 Ft. 41 2 50 45,137 Ft. Type Signs Striping Stencils Curb cut Multiuse Cost $12,000 $24,000 $10,000 $2,000,000 $75,000 $000,000 Page 6-1 APPENDIX A Detailed Trail Descriptions San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Appendix A Detailed Trail Descriptions The Shoreline Park Path and Bay Trail - Recreational: (Note: this description runs from south to north.) This trail starts in San Rafael at Shoreline Park and continues east for 982 feet before ending at H. and H. Storage at 2167 East Francisco Boulevard. Then the Trail becomes a small dirt path for1238 feet, then is paved again for 165 feet to a T-junction trailhead intersection at Pelican Way and Glacier Point. The width is just over 9 feet. Benches are distributed throughout this section of the pathway. Continuing east, the paved path stops at 700 feet and becomes a dirt path and continues for 980 feet to a T-junction. The pathway continues 1420 feet onto a breakwater levy multi-use dirt pathway, which varies in width from 18 to 22 feet. This section ends at the Baypoint housing complex. The next section measures 3300 feet in length, and is 11 feet wide with a 2-foot shoulder on the inland side and one-foot shoulder bayside. Benches are provided alongside the trail. The total length of all paved sections of this pathway is one mile. Page A-1 APPENDIX B Bicycle Parking & Restroom Facilities San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Appendix B Bicycle Parking & Restroom Facilities • San Rafael Transit Center - high quality racks exist that can accommodate about 16 bicycles. Observations indicate that this is inadequate to serve the existing and projected demand. • San Rafael City Hall - a Class 2 bike rack was recently installed. • Dominican College in San Rafael - there is a mixture of Class 2 and sub-standard bike racks. • Guide Dogs for the Blind - has Class 2 bike racks. Showers and lockers are also part of their facility. • Fair Isaac - showers, lockers and Class 2 bike racks are provided • AutoDesk - Class 2 bike racks exist outside most of the buildings. Showers and lockers are available through a gym membership, which the AutoDesk Company subsidizes. • United Market - employees are allowed to bring their bikes into a storage area. • Montecito Shopping Center - there are two separate substandard bike racks each holding one bicycle. • Northgate Mall - Five or six Class 2 bike racks exist. • Northgate I - One Class 2 bike rack but none near the Safeway store or Starbucks. • San Rafael Public Library - bike racks exist but are substandard. • Jackson’s Hardware - One Class 2 rack. • Albert Park and Mary B Freitas Park - have Class 2 racks. • The Shamrock Center - Class 2 bike racks exist. • Whole Foods - has Class 2 bike racks Page B-1 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Bicycle Parking Note: To be effective, bicycle parking must be located in secure, visible, and convenient locations. • Install adequate bike parking on busy commercial roads such as Fourth St. • Expand and improve bike parking at the Transit Center. • Encourage operators of shopping centers, large businesses, and employment centers, hospitals, schools, and public buildings to install secure bike parking. • Install adequate amount of secure parking at all public parks and recreation centers. Bike Stations Another approach to providing Class I bike parking is the creation of a Bike Station. Bike stations are attended bike transit centers that offer secure valet bicycle parking and other transit amenities to encourage the use of a bicycle as a transportation mode. Three facilities are currently operating in California cities including Long Beach, Palo Alto and Berkeley. The Palo Alto Bike station is funded by the City of Palo Alto and a grant from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Operating in an old baggage building, it works like a coat check: People leave their bikes while they commute on the train or bus, or while visiting Palo Alto. There is no charge for bicycle storage. The facility is open weekdays from 6:00 AM to 8:00 PM, and on weekends from 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM. In addition to bike storage there is a mechanic on duty to perform repairs and adjustments. The bike station also offers a coffee bar and patio seating, a changing area, and education programs including bicycle safety and maintenance workshops. There is a corporate commute program where companies can reserve bicycles for their employees to travel to and from the transportation center. Page B-2 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Restrooms & Bike Racks in City of San Rafael Parks and Recreation Centers Albert Park Portable Restroom 1- Bike Rack Boyd Park Portable Restroom 0 - Bike Rack Freitas Park 1- Bike Rack Gerstle Park 0 - Bike Rack Peacock Gap Park 0 - Bike Rack Santa Margarita Park 1- Bike Rack Sun Valley Park Bike Rack 0- Victor Jones Park Bret Harte Park Bike Rack 0 - Bike Rack Portable Restroom (Seasonal) 1- Pickleweed Recreation Center: Building Restroom 2 - Portable Restrooms 1 - Bike Rack San Rafael Recreation Center Building Restroom 1 - Bike Rack Terra Linda Recreation Center Building Restroom, 1 - Portable Restroom (Seasonal) 1 - Bike Rack Page B-3 APPENDIX C Educational Programs San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Appendix C Educational Programs Skills Development Programs This plan recommends that San Rafael develop safety programs for cyclists and pedestrians such as Safe Routes to School and Trips for Kids. For seniors, the plan describes "Walking Through The Years," a program provided through the American Association of Retired Persons, American Automobile Association, and the National Safety Council. A National Safety Council pedestrian safety program for elementary (K- 6) school bus riders is also available. The program contains materials for teachers, parents, and bus drivers. Five videos, K-6 curricula, and information pamphlets make up the program materials which are available as the "Walk-Ride-Walk: Getting to School Safely" program. (Call 708-7752307.) Administrators and Advocates Programs also exist for administrators, bike and pedestrian advocates and program administrators, and for the police. The National Highway Institute provides a 3-day training program for government representatives and public interest groups in the latest findings and foundations of the pedestrian and bicyclist areas relative to safety and accommodations. The course presents safety problems and provides countermeasure and design information. The course number is 38061. (Call 703-235-0528.) Police can get training on how to classify police crash reports into the NHTSA/FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) pedestrian and bike crash types. It is recommended that the SRPD obtain this training. The same program then will serve to create an operational database that identifies pedestrian and bicyclist safety problems at the local level. Existing Bicycle Safety Education Programs Local nonprofit organizations offer a variety of safety education programs in San Rafael. Safe Routes Marin, Safe Routes to Schools, the Bicycle Trails Council of Marin (BTCM), and Trips for Kids offer skill and other education programs for adults and youth. Safe Routes to Schools also organizes walk and bike pools and special events that promote walking and biking to school. Page C-1 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Safe Routes to Schools Successful in Australia, Europe, and British Columbia, Safe Routes to Schools increases the health and safety of children, reduces traffic around schools, and fosters a stronger sense of community. The program operates through a team building process, bringing together parents, children, neighbors, teachers, police, public and school officials to study the problem and create innovative solutions. The team begins with identifying the road networks leading to the schools, recognizing the hazardous areas, and recommending possible solutions. The local jurisdiction works to find funding sources to implement feasible solutions. Trips for Kids Marin A Bay Area non-profit with facilities in San Rafael provides mountain bike outings and environmental education for kids who would not otherwise be exposed to these types of activities. Their goal is to combine lessons in personal responsibility, achievement and environmental awareness through development of practical skills and the simple act of having fun (including riding bicycles). The Trips for Kids Re-Cyclery program focuses on recycling used bikes and bike parts through its thrift store, and provides job-training programs for youth. These recycled bikes provide safe, environmentally friendly and affordable transportation for both children and adults. Page C-2 APPENDIX D Bicycle Advocacy Groups San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Appendix D Bike Advocacy Groups that are active in San Rafael and seem relevant to this Plan are included here. • San Rafael BPAC was created to develop a bicycle and pedestrian master plan for the City of San Rafael and pursue grant funding. The BPAC also promotes public involvement and support for biking and walking as a viable alternative to driving. Contact: City Managers office, (415) 485-3070 • Safe Route to Schools offers bicycle and pedestrian safety and educational programs in selected schools in San Rafael and plans to expand to all interested schools. It establishes safe routes “teams” of parents, neighbors, and other stakeholders. These teams organize "walking school buses," bike pools, and special events that promote walking and biking to school. They also work with local jurisdictions to improve safety conditions on the streets surrounding the school sites. Contact (415) 488-4101 or [email protected]. Bicycle Trails Council of Marin (BTCM), an informational and educational non-profit founded in 1987 that sponsors free monthly skill classes and other education programs. BTCM also helps maintain and build trails. They can be reached at: www.btcmarin.org or 488-1665. • • Transportation Alternatives of Marin (TAM) a non-profit organization that works to promote bicycling in Marin. • Trips for Kids is an organization based in San Rafael that 1) takes inner city kids on mountain bike rides, 2) offers bicycle riding classes, 3) recycles bikes, and 4) runs 2 shops with used cycles and gear. Trips for Kids can be reached at 458-2986 or [email protected]. Bike the Bridge! Coalition was founded in 1996 and is working to secure bicycle access on all Bay Area bridges, including the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge. They can be reached at: www.bikethebridge.org. • • Marin County Bikeways Committee provides recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on bicycle policies and practices in Marin County. • Cal Park Connection A citizens group that seeks to close the gap for pedestrians and bicycles between San Rafael and Larkspur. Cal Page D-1 San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan CITY OF SAN RAFAEL Park Connection favors opening the Larkspur tunnel as a Class I bike path or install a Class I path parallel to Hwy 101. CPC can be reached at [email protected] • Marin County Bicycle Coalition (MCBC), a non-profit organization founded by cyclists in 1998 to unify bicyclists in Marin. The MCBC has produced a countywide bicycle map, available at bike shops. The MCBC can be reached at: www.marinbike.org or (415) 4563469. • Share The Road program, which includes signs, posters, and educational programs, has the goal of making it safer to bicycle and drive in Marin County. Contact: [email protected] or visit: www.sharetheroad.com . Page D-2 ONE DR D MT DR A TE OP E O O D E W L E AC I ETTA CT. 01003 E AV IN AS LL GA S DE RIV D LL EY RD. TH NO IVE DR DR DE AY W IV E W AY DR AY W AY W W AY E BR YC IT A AL ER G DR IV E SAN W AY DR . A H H SID NE Y AVEN LEON RT NO RIAN AD AN LV SY CT . DR. CH C C T AR . M DST CT. OCK CT. Y ILL AD W LS YH IL BA OA KC RE ST 06 -00 3 NO LNRTH . VIE CIRCLE W OO PIC V ILLA GE TU CTDO . R O BL PA RE FI UE AV EN FIRE LN . RO AD W M O E IV DR DO MIN IC AN AN G EL IC CT A . AN IC TU CK IN M AQUINAS DO NE LA D TO N ME RI G I N IA N IRONWOOD DR. DR. CIE N DA E MAN LE CO U NT AIN VIE COURT R ED DR IV AV EN UE ALD A ND PI PER CT SA . EL AY W GLENSIDE ET ST RE V E NETIA MEADO W E D R IV SH CT OR ES . LAGOON CT. CT. EDGEWATER E AV E NU E GLEN SID Y RD. BA D AR R DA VA NE AY PALMERA RO AD AV EN UE Y WA LA NE LA NE SI HA PP Y W AY VENDOLA Y A W GLAC IE R NE LA IA AD AC YO SE MITE WAY PA RK IV E DR ARMORY N SA NO R TH AD O W GE AY MA YW OO D EL W MW CT OOD . AN SH RA Y W AY D VIST AW LA NE NO N UR T CO E NCO N RI RO AD . CT ISL E ROA D JU DG E D R O PE N SA NO R TH ROAD R O CIR CLE W RAI N BO RD W AY BL BL ES NUE AVE S LO BL C O FR AN C IS SAN T R E C I R EL OO AV A R RB A BA SA N G EL AN E DR AY CK SI DO P TA I CA T cI N NIS M RT CO U BLE GA OF EN UE AV CAN CT. ADA RO AD PASO POCO DR . S TO AL LO S PASADENA AV E AL IC SAN TA C O R ID G ST ON E CO UR TETO N YO SEMI TE WAY CH AN NIN G TA VIS DRIVE CORRILLO 07-003 WAY KN O LL TOM Y W FR AN C IS I C CT RD ON GL EN AW K R D E A OW DR CIR NS IV E DR RL OS CA DR IVE AY R KW PA BLV D. AY W O H AR L DE AV IN DIA N C ed i s k r a P CO . CT TH OR IE S A NN BR AD CL IFF L WIL W MILL WO OD AVE. D OO BIN M OU NTA IN D RO M W DRIVE E DR IV RRI LL O NO VA E DR IV E CO E DR IV ALB IO N 23 -0 05 NO DO N CO TIM UR OT EO T LA NE NE LO MA 07 -0 03 35 -0 01 30-003 CT. CT. CO ND OR EL NG NNI DE THE ALAMEDA H BR A CT SIL VEIRA 101 AY PAUL AT E NO RT HG DR FA ISA N DEVON CO RT PA E CH EC O CE RM CO EN UR HO T AV E. HIGHW E DR IV 01 -01 1 THORNDALE TAMA 05-00 1 RO AD FRONTAGE HWY REDWOOD DE AY W AL BI ON NO VA R ACK DR IVE LOS G AM OS 23 -0 01 COU RT TRELLIS CARROLL DRIVE DRIVE ELDA L PR E SI BL DIO VD . CT. LO S LUIS A CT . DR LA S IV E TA M DRIVE DR IVE A ELDA ELD IV E DR LE A FOX LN O A K C R E S R O O H WAY CT . GRAND NE LA VE . E. AV DRI AVE RO AD LANE OOD FIRE NN MA DR . AVE. GLENW RO GE R IVE DR CT LA S PE HILL D VI DA DR T LE YR M VIL PR O T T UR E. AV ARD EY DRI VE PARK ON VIN GOLD . CT GLEN OA KM LW ZE A E H AN L LIN D E NW CT. CO E. A W Y AV E GOLD NV ENT DRIVE NT UE O EN UE R IA FR CO A MES . CT ON ON MILT HA . CT HILL LE CO U RT A H LN ILS DA AV ROAD N K PAR E. LIA LIL # LI N C O CO NV EN T E FIR # ALE W DR IV OAK S ## D ON. MM CT HA 00-502 03 -0 09 03 -0 07 AV CASCAD E DR. NI PR OSPECT DR. EDGE WO OD ET TR IN I UA . DRIVE E . UE M LL S L L WY EN OA K VI BA Y AV IZA . CORTE BROA DMOO IVE AQ BROO KME AD CRESTA DR M OS AVE GALLINAS LAS E W AY A R AC K IVE DR LEA MATEO SAN N DR THE GA LOS RK PA DA S VA PA TR IN ITY ANA LE R FO W CL CIR CO U RT TRINIT Y NE LA W AY R HE D O O AVE . DRIVE N E LA SU RR EY COURT AC E RR AN UE L M 04-0 01 CT EY LL VA PAVADAS IV E DR U T TTE RN BU T. SL EE P Y FAW T BUTTER FIELD RD DR DR. RD ILLS FIE LD BAYH DOAKS ROAD TT ER AD RO E IV DR AY W T. L EL I BU AY AY W ELEN A CI ZA LU DRIVE LA W DR. E # DR FAIR C WILD SO S BAYHILL HI H GE ED TI WAY W IN D I EW C D AVE . EN AV S U R WC AS TL . LN WOOD H AS M RIA ME E. AV E. A O R ID T E ILLS LE Y AVE. S AV T DR. NU WA Y A LL VI FAIRH EL MAY W IN DS O R ST REE EY E U EN AV PINE NO CAR E E AV EY VAL AY AK O LA V 06-00 AD Y WA AN LE E LT V AL SO HU MB OX O E RD FO N VALL WAY RO AD ROAD GR 09-001 E IV OO PE CT. D R DR IV LE G E W ER W AY YW H M M IT EY CAR IVE 01-015 DR MA EC H PL O . W SU DRIVE # AVENUE FIFT H RIV D O N CIR. ER DR IV A OL SC IR Y O N TIL DE ALD D O RID D D AR E E DR IVE E. RA C E # ROCK AVENUE W IE V AV RT PO TE R W OD MO Y RE TE B LE V A MO N IM W AV EY T UR CO PT ON DR IV DR. TH BE ER NT MO RR TE RD HA M W U H DRIVE Av OAKWOOD T EN D AR G A FA z D UR EL N SA AN W Y NC N RO AD MONT OAK RT COU LY OO OO D RT WOO E AV W AY TREE RA D CT UR M LE CO Cru Y NE BL ta ER ALD AKE San A ER RIVI ST DR VE R TW CO EST CR LO VE A LIN NE LA CT . VISTA AV BE DG EW VE DRI UE RI CR ES U E AV EN U E LA CT GE . ULA AV E FR AN CIS PILGRIM RO AD IV E NA S EN CT. N SA LI AV E STA N O VIL CH D AN KL OA D IV R DR UE N MU E AV Ct DUR CT R VIEW SI N D HA M DR DR AV IS AD M N OO E SID T OK C O BR IVE M EN TO . NO DR IV TO G W W INGS IDE SACRA SC HM E IN O IDE PEDRO OAK S H AS BROO KS DR DRI VE EW I V WY NY SUN W LE OB OFT MO RN N IVE R OR ELKH AD RO LF G E NU D EN MEAD OAKS OW DR. 1 -00 007 09 25 RID # 101 E DR E AVE RD E AV OD WO GE R CR OA K DR RID D RANCHITO S RO AD CT E REN VU EL ID 01 06-0 25 -0 05 RD. AD RM CA DR OKS CT A OK BRO UE GA R # RD AV N AD O R O R ED P AY AL YD RR ME O LL INDIAN MIW SUNVIEW N VE AY W E LL AV E TH NOR E O G W L IA R O IL LO DRIVE HW HIG E IV DR RRI CO N O EM M W E. Y D M E PL WILL AV OW LE W RO AD O O R LO UPP ER GALL I NAS AY W DR IVE E AV AV E R . DR ó _ Æ AY OK TE AC RR CLE STE SO R IVE E. AV O AD PR EL 5 -00 25 O D POINT WAY ESTANCIA E FF JE DR AV RO AD RO DR PE SA N C IR AY SE O RO BEHR E. A E CL IR C BR O M AD O CT OR E BRO OK MEA BE R KE IT TIE EY AL H W AD IS AD M MARIN COUNTY HIGH IR M 05-009 OOD AV ER CIVIC CENTER AVE. A H AV E ES MED K AR M W E. S FA RM CIRCLE RIAN DR E TH OR FL THE ALA AD O O R R AV E FL DW RE S AD OAKRIDGE ARROYO FIR A WAY RIAN AD # E VA LA NE PETER AV RO LINA VAN CT L AE ME AD OW LE UE N VE A E LA GAL VIA CK RS CIRC S AG CE NT AL YD RR ME # 003 22S S LA TA ER . HU CT LA COURT E IN AR TER WA GE ID BR WATERSIDE CIVIC 003 25- S Y WA WAY AY A LA ANGE L VE CO CT. ANZA CH E CL AD DA W AY ED AD RO C 01-013 DE AR IR W TVIEW CRES ES LM E AN WALTER PL. DR A S KE E EX SUSS HIND PA SA AY W W AT ER SID E HO AL YD RR ME EN E AG OR CH . AN CT 3 23-00 C E # # LD RD VENDOLA CT . G IN SH CU E HILL SUMMER T COUR E TRE PINE CT. CON ST # AY W O G WAY IN TE LS HO CH R IV DR D SUMMERHILL O R TE AY ES W DIAS q DRIVE DEVON HA W TH OR NE BI TER CEN W AY ROA S C AI WAY VI WA Y 007 05- AY W LE AV # AUG U CIRC A V CK RA MA ON IVE WA Y N TW AIN NI DR. SCE TTRI OVERCROSSING 3 01-01 AL RE NO TA ALBI E SAO RT DR DRIV THGATE NOR CI AN ADRIAN A OL ND VE CIVIC # AN IS FA L SA RO AY EST AF R IN MAR 01 25-0 RA ND RDE ZIO RIV D MERRYDALE TOS RANCHI LO A VE M # 28-00#1 # URT O LA W DRIVE # # _ Æ CO PAV COU OR MIN DEER HOLLOW RD ALAMEDA CALETA # DIZ PER EL EL E IV BR EA N YO ME SA CA RL SB CO AD UR T CEN TER 05-003 04-00 9 LA DRIVE R D CAN WAY 05 -0 05 DAIR AS CT. CT DR D R HACIE NDA LA LE YA O R MARIN CE NT DRIVE ER ó LEC LA CT. IRE ES ME YE R AL ION ESS PROF # 30-0 01 NUE E EN G # EL _ Æ a ó November 21, 2001 N # E R IV D S LO CIL VE DRI AD RD L Route Points # End Point Bicycle & pedestrian related features PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY TRANSIT CENTER RACK LOCKERS Bicycle Routes Status & Class EXISTING I EXISTING II PROPOSED I PROPOSED I-II PROPOSED II PROPOSED II-III PROPOSED III No Data LLOW W E IVE # _ Æ # CK LBRO S WEL IG HT HE W AY HO LANE CIRCLE AC DR M LA MO NT E WALLACE FA E E R SO AVE E IV ONE IVE DR # PARKW AY OS CT . AL WN FA LIN DA D 04 -00 7 ELE NA JOSEPH CT. RR TE EL DA A ST Y R BL S TAHO PLA CE OL YM PI C DRIVE WAY HYACINTH FAWN DR NORTH OW LL AN DO AH PL. MARK WAY FR EITA RO TERR YE SHEN AB M LANE 5 GALLIN AS DR IVE F T UR CO NING AN T. ESMEYER D R W H AR 18-001 CH UEL STRE ET AVE . . CR A LA TE W KE R AY E IV DR SANTA CLARA CT. GINA RE CH OR MAN Y N 04 -00 D TE WA W HICKO RY ARIAS AC E VD ID 009 01- FORD NE N EE FA WAY ROA DRIVE LEN GLE N GR HIBISC US ORANGE TE RR DE DRIVE NE T # HO LLY E AY W TANBARK ILLO TEC MON T N LA NE LA DRIVE TERRACE Y HO LLY E TL IS TH T. C IC H R KO ó PL AC E D E N # ME O O LE AR ES ES RR FO IVE DR # LN AY LA RR FO WAY VA LLEY LA RKW . AY W IR IS PA LEA VIA EN D OO AS L SY DR LLE DA NIE HOLLO W DR HIDD EIT THY W N R O TH RT OU C . 01-007 NE . FR AG MAIN SAILMAK ER COURT . DR CT 03 -0 04 R R TA IVE SAN W AY DR IVE N O DR DOLA VEN 04003 _ Æ# O VE A IA BL BLOS SOM D OO BO AM B AD ST ER S E HW RO W AL ND SA PE C DR AN AT DR IV E WI LA N LA RC BI MO NT EC ILL O RD E RY UR T E IV DR TLI NG DR IV NE AD M WAY TA UE RQ HO VIA HE LA HIT EW O VEJAS S LA O ROAD DRIVE # 3 -01 02 # CIR. OVE C MITC HEL L AL CORTE H LIN DA S INE RD BARB ER UT AD WOO DB N AD GAN ER OBI RO WAK DEL CO HEAT HER CO LAS RACE W TER AD IRVING DR IVE LA S AVEN UE SERR A RO AD BA MB OO BEEC HN WINT ER GR TER EE RA CE N DR RA NC DR RD RO AD LAS W AY WOOD BINE 02-0 11 SMITH CT. LANE LANE # óq KEE L E RT TO CO NI N BE SA PIN E GA NA DO RO Bike Routes North San Rafael E RT Z CO PA LA Y NORTH GATE WA L MONTECILL O M AR RK SA C RA OR TO TE G A KNAB OU L ROA D CT WAY OR EN DA S RO YAL DE LVAD SA 01-005 DR DR PA S CA LU AVE KNOC CO LIN WA Y EO ID NTEV MO AD Y S NU E LA PENNY OVEJAS O DR. DIEG WA BOLA NOS VAN TASSEL CT RO CORTE CAPISTRANO RT TRA LEE RIDGE DU RAN AY W WA Y CO 03-001 BRI C T. LLO AY CA PATR ICIA 04501 E LN. W DR IV CHERRY HILL DR. CE N EO O EJ CALAFI A NG VI IR E MIGUEL S LA MAPLE WA Y N LL RAPOSAS LAS RA RA DO IA RA PO PAS PATR IC CT . GALWAY DU LL GA NA TE R CO RT ES GA RO AD CO VA DR IVE L DE RA CT. PI E AC AD RO ER GU LA DE W RT H UE GA CT . R AVE NUE LL IN AS L VA NO AV EN L HIL HIL H LA PLA YA DR IV E OAK E IV DR PIN E C AN R E OO D PA S CA # LU OAK RK CL OV HILL ER CT . N TA ER DR VALLEY CLE CIR 02 -0 09 DR SO L DE SC AN Y WA VE DRI HIL E W AY TWELVEOAK D TH NOR PARK CAS WE LC OM TR EE CT . LU SMITH AR D CE NT I AV E. K AV E. AVE. SA PARKW AY NYO N CA UP PE R DO GA NA NORTH E TE COR ANO VER DEL DR IV E OA K O AG OA CANYON RD N E # ROAD LE # RO AD DR IV L HIL BLVD. DRIVE IVE DRIVE 02-007 AK O T AS CO LEY VAL 02-005 LU CA S DR OAK LU CA S D OL OLD EL RRY DRIVE BE N DEL REY LE APP IV DR # FIRE APPLEBERRY DRIVE 02-003 LE CORTE ELDERBERRY RY LEBER HUCK RD RD EY EL COURT ELV A DR . CT. LL A CT VALLEY IN REE A LIS S VA RA UIE RD. CA ## LUCAS SEQ LU AJ C ELLEN E DRIV FLAXBERRY LANE DRIVE NE CT. UR T ER T. C LA LANE GREENBERRY LANE LA IN RY LANE DR T. M W CO RB ER RY ER KB AC BL DAR MU IR DA MILL ER CE APPLE BER RY ROAD ROAD MT MT LASSEN SU RY ER NB DA PA LO M AR LANE IDYLBERRY MT . SITN CT A . MT. ROAD ROAD Y RR BE DI ID YL K ABL O LE JUNIPERBERRY M IVE CIRC . MT MT. SHAS CT. CREE T. TE NA YA MT DANA DRIVE DR . PIK ES PEAK DRIVE DRIV E DR EN SS LA MT. TA AC R TER LL ROU NDTRE E CT ROU NDT A CT CT. MT . TA DRIVE BERR Y KERN RC RO AD BERRY MUL IDYLBERRY D WOO ET QUI MA JO WI T T E NBURG . MT DR DR LOGANBERRY DR DR O SE PA MT HOOD CT LO PUEB DR DE T C LE CT AN GR R ZEPHYR E RD TON OD O T FLA GS VIL SE D M I P D R W L T C N DR RE DW RY IE L NN E T LI R S H R ROAD NE KSTO AC BL 01 01-0 # A C D R K E E R RO A R NE TO YS ER EM RIN MA BE N R 01 -0 02 RA D ONE ST AG n CL UB S EY ID YL M OU N T A T BE 07-003 L DR N IT H T M LYEL O CRESTA MT TE CT ROAD AD E DR R ER W DR DR MCKINLEY RA K FL RR QUAIL CT PEAC HSTONE NLIN CT FO one Dr Queenst MOUNT RD SHEL DR CT AK E TONE LS EL CAPITAN DR RAN IE R CT CT DR CT LUC AS VAL LEY K OA N MT MOUNT BURN E Y EN LD GO MT TO NE M Z CT LIL Y PL OAK MTN CT LUT PL MT LILY WIN DS NINESTONE CT DE EP ST ON TERR CT DU CT GA TIO VOGELSANG DR SE ER LV CT CE LA AD AL PI NE KS TO NE E DR RE BL UE OS SO M CT CK RO BL RO JASMINE LN SI RUBICON T E RO AC BB LE ST ON CIRCLE E UE BL K OA CT BL CO STONE CT N YNE HO CK LE SU CT RD I VALLEY LUCAS LAS GALLINAS AV R P CT HE AT HE RS TO NE DR E BRID GEGATE S I LV CT DAR CE RED DR CT DR E CR EE KS IDE VE RBE NA MI LL LANE DRIVE BAY EL LAUR GO LD HILL E NU AV E IV E DR PHEASANT CT. FIRE P OOD DRIVE ROAD BISCAYNE PEDRO IV E DR RIVIERA OD BRIA RWO TWOOD BREN MAP LEW OOD SAN PT . FAI RW DRIVE D O W O CK LO BEEC HW O E DR IV OD CT. C T. DRIVE SILK COURT . LN TU CK W AY CT . DG E RI AN DO RI DRIVE SU LL DE LE YV IE W DR. BA DRIVE E IN AR M ND LOMO SAN PEDRO COVE MA R IN E LY MAND ER E 11-0 01 WA Y BE AC H DRIVE TO SO RR EN BAHI A AY M XB UR Y CO VE VE D CO BEDF OR GA M VE HIN CO AG AN SE CO TT DU VE LE VE SA CO CK PO RT VE WA Y RT PO W NE W AY LINA PLAYA TA CA ARD VIEW EGRET WA Y NARR REY VISTA 13001 IA BAH DEL L OMAVIS PL. TA ER KE RN AVE. RO W INDW CAST BLVD . LAN E BAHIA RO CO W AC E PL AY W NE EL AI 02 11-0 CENTRAL MARIN SANITATION ST . PLANT ID E BL VD . DRIVE _ Æ E. DRAKE BLVD. PIO SIR MB O PL. O SE DR 15 -0 07 IS FRANC AY LA CIRC DR IV E ROA D E. LUNA DA BLV D. DR . AR LO TT E CH T ST REE ON LAN NT A CE CR ES LA EET STR AL TO ST RE ET LO UIS E TIB UR VE RD I E PL AC VI VIA N STREET BLVD. RF WOO D RNE SS INVE CASAS RA SER AVE. BALBOA JUNIPERO LAS DR IVE ITA GAR MAR CT . E AV SE AV IEW AD RO AY ME DW ES T W . BL VD CIS CO EE T STR GIL BERT 07 -00 5 MARON CU M BR E _ Æ G W IO EL IS LA ND IN GR AN G E SA DE RTE CO CAY UG A CO RTE AY MO RP HE W BL A ORA DA M IRONWOOD DR. AR IT A M AR G RD. N UE PIDGEON WEST INT CR OW CT N . PO ST RE ET 27 -0 3211 00 3 HO AG FR STRE ET RN AU BU VIA A VIA LERID VIA CORTE GRAC ITAS LA LA S R PU N CA ER RN KE S RK LA AK O November 21, 2001 Y K WA 05 -0 15 AS IT A PAR 0 58 BE LA RD O # E LI PE N SE VIA HOLLOW AVEN UE ELL IA JEW VA LENC E LL BE ST. ALICE 27 -0 01 ST . -0 05 R EXT. IVE DR EB ER NE W LA LANE WAY LA QU ES TA Y W A NA D IN AV E LA N EU CA LY PTUS BR OA D CT VI . EW CT. AVEN UE UNI ON PAR K 27 HA RBO ST . AN 14 -0 05 TE E R DE C RO E AD GR AV EN UE PARK DEER FR AN C IS LL HU BBE AVEN UE RIDGE R LV E BLO DU PAZ EJO E AL CO RT DR IV AN VIA AD W EN UE AV LM PA AVE NUE RE ET ST UNION STR EET BAY CU STREET IS BO M BALBOA CORTE E W V IE TA IN MO UN 09005 YACHT CLUB DR. RE D D IN G Y WA G DIN D RE Y W A AL TU R N E AN ITA CO RT TIOGA RD DA M O CO WAY UE AV EN AV DR. L TER RAD I STR EET MAR Y ND GRA . DR CE RI W DR ALMADO CO RT E R D R A NO M CO RT E WE LC OM EN UE NE LA D AVENUE 09-007 IRWIN STREET BAYWOOD SS O CO RDO VA A RT E C O CIELO DR R E LE G W AV # # N O TE TA RS TE AV E 03 -0 15 R DRIV E E IV DR q IN S E . VD BL BE REN DRIV ET RE ST EN IR CO CIS AN FR LA NC AS TE R U NT AIN VIE M O E IV DR AQUINAS NE LA D A R F I EL LN . HE EN U E AV BE LLE AN WAY GRE EN STRE ET TON HETHER IRWIN ROAD AY VISTA GRADE E CO RT GRA DE OL FE CT VIL LA GR STRE ET STEVENS STREET AVE NUE TAMALP AIS 01-021 RD. IN B AL DW N TWAI V A O N TS ST E AV E AC R R TE ASH AV DO MIN IC AN AN G EL IC CT A . AN IC IN M DO D LA NE AVE NUE LINCO LN ST. CIJOS 01-019 LL LO VE ST. R D C AN YO N E GR AD W O LF E O LF E CYP RES ME RI TO N STR EET DRIV E HILLCR EST NYE ET STRE NYE G ARDE N LN. PLACE STRE ET LINDA RO T. S SPRI NG RO AD WO OD 21 -0 01 R AD E G LF E O W H AR TE AV LE AP M W AV WOODROSE CT. RE COURT DA CIE N EL CA MINO E. A AV EV Y LK WA PE RR M D R AR O PL P S AV AV FLY R TTE EL M AV IA OL # E RIV D 1 11-00 GN E O IN T . VD BL MA DRI VE W OO EN IC SC ST. WILKINS RD. MARIP OSA EN GL W ALK DY RO AD HAN R EY E ARROYO DR HIL L AV W DO MEA 24-513 LAND CT. PL. WARNER W OOD C D GROVE DR HOTA LING CT COURT ST. B C A BROOKS D STREET WILLOW ST. STREET 19-001 MARIN STREE T CLAR K AV NE M AD RO D R LOOTENS STREET 33-001 E STREET STREET 31-001 STREET STREE T STREET ST. HA YE S SH AV ER . ST H TERRACE WE LC STREE T 24-505 STRE ET SS RO OO D DW RE GR AD E N MA KI HA NK EN CIRCLE V ILLA GE DR. DR R CE EL FO RB COTTAGE AVE. STREET F AVE. MIRAMAR ST. W OODS ROAD ST. MADRONA DR. ES G H STREET ST. G ST. EAS T RESERVOI R E IV DR ES RS T LE CT. GE OBL STRE ET U E AV EN . C IR ER RA SI DRIVE QUA RRY EN OD E AVENU STRE ET ST. CU LL STRE ET LN. 10-007 IDA EET STR ST ST. WE HA RT E AN ST DET TN ER . RO AD ROAD DRIVE HILLS FAIR STRE ET PIN E EYE AY W AV E. RQ UA RD MA E GROV SPRING N RD GL EN E DR IV MAN LE AVENU E AL L C T EN . ST K . WOOD CIR LEA F CT . KIN EL BE LLOR EI AV D E. AVE NUE GROVE SPRING LANE DR. D OO STW TE RR EN CA NYO V A DST CT. OCK CT. Y ILL AD PIC R ED CO AY W T BE R LN YL . AV EN UE A CA LIFO RNI RE E ELIZA B ETH R DRIVE VALLEY ROSS L HIL E FA LL IN SS AV A IR AL TA M U B AV L EL VIL UR NT TO U TUR NST WAY ONE BA YP 09 -0 09 D IV E _ Æ a ó INT ITCHER 01 -0 15 . VD BL A O R DRIVE W Route Points # End Point Bicycle & pedestrian related features PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY TRANSIT CENTER RACK LOCKERS Bicycle Routes Status & Class EXISTING I EXISTING II PROPOSED I PROPOSED I-II PROPOSED II PROPOSED II-III PROPOSED III No Data T EE STR LA GR AN D AY W GLENSIDE W AY AY W OO D MA YW ET ST RE DA VA W EST RB FO C C T AR . M EL Y WA E GLEN SID Y RD. BA TU CT DOR . AV EN UE AD R O O W GE MW CT OO . D EL LA NE LA NE AR D HA PP Y SI NE RAQU ET TAMA L AV ES AV CA RO LIN A MADERA AV FI D R O PE N SA NO R TH ROAD CIR CLE W AY D OO VIST AW AN SH LN HILL TERR AV LON GVIEW TT AG E CO 08-003 D E AV CT. OO W IV OD D DR O O O D O . A CO IS _ Æ T _ Æ BRET E W W RN FE NORTH DR ER AD M C AN LI AD RO OCK AC NE PE LA UTH SO S NK BA 007 06CH LO # DOW AG ER RN IE ALTENA AD HERMOSA WAY # ON GO LA D OO IE LAN BAY OA K N SA NO R TH CAN CT. ADA RO AD PASO POCO O CORRILLO ARMORY JU DG E DRIVE 07-003 WAY KN O LL W RAI N BO RD BL E DR IV E BLV D. AY W O H AR L DE DR . S TO AL LA NE NO N UR T CO RA Y AL TO . O AVE PL W SE KNOLL S LAGOON PL. D DR LEITH COVE BAY PO OI 07 13-0 INT AVO CET CT. HER ON CT # 13-005 PO PLY MO UTH CO VE FALM OU TH CO VE TERN CT MAR DRIVE M AN D ER SE N CIR VIA VD OO HW . CT HT IG JORD AN AV LE GA TIN NE NIGH LA RO NE R NANT UC KE T FR O AS KN AMBE R URT NG AL OW CO ST D BU O BELLO VIA MONTE O O S LL INO MAR PL. W DRIVE E DRIV T IF 7 06-00 GE FLA MIN GO LANE E IV DR LA AV T R U CO BE SAN TA MA IN ALLENSBY IV AN T PAR K NTE MO PL. CT. K OC AC PE RIVIER A KEN D OO DR T KNIGH OOD RI NE LA ST URD BAY VIA AC BR W NW HE AD RO D TERR ACE K N A SPIN L BLVD. KE MS STR EE GLOU CEST CO ER VE 3 -00 13 OO D LN IN R MA RY B ER OW CT. . DR Bike Routes (South San Rafael) LN YP BA OO KW ROAD SN RN FE COTTO PL. LN. O IN BR RI I VE RT DRIVE # N SA N DU WAY LIDO OF RT PO RD. DO D HYAN NI CO S VE W AY S SITA CA S ITA CAS N AY DRA KE S Y WA PL. # H UT O E DE ET STRE SIM T V IA LO E Y 1 -00 08 I PR . CT E IV NE UE BELL EV BAY WAY AVE . AVEN UE CT. CED AR SM RT PO ST RE ET ON BELLA NN D ROA . DR AMA LFI PL. CA LI SB # _ Æ . DR STREET LANE PE DR O O . L CT ST AT E TE GA 21-003 LO CH E IV CI T O YA RO TE R EN LD GO RKS O OA K AY AD RO ST RE ET T A W ST RE ET CL E EE STR PA O W LY DR TE ON M _ Æ EET . ST RE ET M 03 BR ET AN BL RR BA A ER D EST WAY 0 LA # JACOBY AN GE STR SIR W O NT PICKLEWEED PARK CIR MA RIA N CT ST. D. LV B -0 07 RR AN CA DR E CORTE REAL CA CA NA L 58 101 N A IN AR M W BA WOO DR IV E ER MARGARITA DRIVE AG ST RE ET 09 -0 13 E # D TERRACE LO CKS LY # LL SO NO MA ST RE ET MA RKE T IN PLAC T O . FA IR FAX T CE RY GA AL BIO ER A HO O DR ISE DR BE VIEW BOR CT. HAR EE TR S BEL EE TR S MA ND Y T DR IV E E. RTE DR AK R VIA PE UP VI S S EL OR Y CO TA VIS UR ER E 09 -00 9 AV RS CT. A UR CO HIGHW AY VIA CA BARRAN W LO O RT EG A FED RTE CO W EA U M AR CO DR IV E ES BO DA ON T LE AS C ITA BAY VIE RO AD SAN LIN RE O SH VIA TO CAN EN C OR TE E NZ AN DR IV E POINT SE A BAHIA Y AR G H A RTE RT WAY A BE LV ED CI BR ET AN O O O RT PO DA ST RE ET EAST E C LIN NO VA TO LA RK SP LA P AUBURN OR AR GUE LL O D OA R AD RO 007 06- 001 32- _ Æ BO ULE VA RD U TIB O A UA LA Y DR AR DRIVE L W IN AR M P W FR AN CI S L DR TE COR O LG HIDA RTA RR IR PL. AVE. I ON MA LO # DE RS EN FR I WAY AD T # E SS INV AR OAK DRIVE # EST ND LA D NO CHAT E IN AD RO SS CIRCLE BAY RIN MA ST RE ET O HU LO CH KIN D. G ST REE RO RLY DE AN M BA Y ST RE ET COR NA VA FA WAY STRE ET ON T O W GO AL O RT E LA PO EL PA NE Mc . CT UE EN RK JEWELL STREET C SO VIA ETA NO DRIVE AV PA EW ET BU RO N . LN HID CORTE TE DEL NOR VIA BR MILL WOOD NN MA RK NE PA LA D VI JEWELL BRO A RE ST OAK RT ADA TWE R D. . VIA DR MAR DR IV E DR IV CT . UE EN COURT 27 -0 07 27 -0 09 NGE HA Y WA RTE CO O IN MAR CT. SA N DRIV E MA I VE DR N LN SUM MIT SC H IR AD O LV B DR. RO A TI S IS 'L M ESTA QU OS RR CORTE LAS SOMBRAS VIA CASITAS TAMALPAIS RD WAY VISTA MO OR IN R O ST. IN R G A MADELINE LANE ORANGE CT. T EE TR S ROAD MONC IT EC NT O M W MIL L AN C IS CO RO HARTE IE AV # VD. BL CO RT E LE NO SA CORTE ORIENTAL RD AV T. RO SE C M O E IVE SUMMIT N MARINA M # DRIVE S CE SIR BAY VIE W SO IV BAL BOA CORTE LOYOLA AV RD LANE UE IN IR W ALTURA WY CT AIR BON EET STR S LO B R NA ME DR BIN T UR LIAMS WIL E. ET BR MEN AR RO CO AV T. IR W O CORTE LODAT AL TW OO D N BA YV IEW AVENUE AVE NUE # DRIVE C RA U LT A LO SHER WOOD CT. AV E. LL VI EW L T UE EN AV ALTA AN AY MMI UE # CIS CO BRET NA ELE AN SU AV E. RK PA MISS M HI W FAIRW AY AV EN 26-003 E CORTE AV AV ST ER R SOLA HA ZE T PASEO WY GRAD E A IVE DRIVE HAV EN ITA AR WAY WAY RE ET IR AL D CH W AY E NU EM BAR CA DE RO ST O ST RE ET AV E. ND DEER DRIV E BO ULE VA RD NA GLE VISTA AC LIL LI RE ET W HA RTE RRO ACAC IA AL FR FR 01 -0 23 CORTE DR AV EN U E D DR R DEE BR OD EA 27 -0 0 # 3 00 3 CE STREET ENC IO OO MA H L AN HIG SE SS CO UR MEA DO HLA HIG VE A MIS SIO FR ET STRE RA TER HA R TE CHEPA LN M C EN AV ST COURT VIA SEBA NK ET BLO N LYN STRE ET A L E LN CER ROS ND BOIS T BRE GW KW T. TEA C ER AV EN U E _ Æ EST DU TE AR H IRWIN BROADWAY OAK DR E RT O C O EN R SE LO S UE _ Æó AV EN UE OU BILL ET STRE BL D EDN A CT RO VE OLI Y. S ORE DOL W T TE PAT COR LA H T EE W OAD R WY E AK R D NT FAY DR AV EE T 14 - D GL EN AV SIR FRA NCIS DRA KE BL SEBA NK IVE STR IV E A RO WO L F KE RO W AVENUE E DR McNEAR W RT IG H EA ST BLV D. IRWIN N UR CO N IA D IN E. AV DR CA NA L D CIS CO BRET DO RA DO S AV INMAN AV STADIUM WY DR DR LOMA LA LL DRIVE UE WOOD LAND A VE. RES E AV CIS AN FR AV E AC RR TE NT S IR KE OAK E AC RR _ Æ N DR MAN CYP T AN ER SE N E C FR EN 06009 BO IS HART L TE AN D OW McCOY DR BO ULE VA R # E. AV NA SA E N # AVENUE cC M ET ISI QU AVEN # 26 -0 01 UE BR SS E SIO N . ST RD. BLV D. LN VE AV U MIS BU NG GRO AV R U CO EL L BELLE 03 -0 AV EN DRIVE MAR INO TLE AS C ST. RE ST STRE ET ST RE ET DL AN D NE LA AVEN UE DE ED W C T. A R D 07 W O O T BRE LA D AN GR UE FFY PL ACE 16 -00 3 AV EN U E HT COURTRIG REL LAU DAR CE R ROAD _ Æ A L OW H RO AD BRUSH OD WO REL LAU E FIR DU IER LE RC MIL AN # E EET EN UE 12-005 # # STRE ET AV EN PI CN IC HE IG E IV DR TS STR STREET TH IR D OY ME YE R IA A INIT MAR # FOUR TH SECOND AN RO HILL GN OL IA AVE. AVE. LO AVE . . HO OD ST AVE NUE ION AVEN UE AL NG HERN YO N CT MISS E. NUE ROAD TO AVE 03 ST RE ET UPP ER CI T UR LUPINE CT. O JE W AV FIFTH THIRD ST RO AD U E AVEN STREET L 10-011 # AV SOUT W AY # FOUR TH BU RD. E. EL VE DRI RA FAEL PLACE E RC HT NUE AV LANE E 19-0 LF O N YO TO KNIGHT DR. S EL IB SE GLEN W DR AVEN UE DE LUCA G A PE AVENUE ST. D AN GL AN E. AV RTS BE RI AVE AD ANTONETTE CO UR T PLEASANT # ST RO LN . BELLE WALTE R LN. ENS DRIV E RIV CT. RUSH SA CIRCLE E R IV D D OO MANOR AVENUE STR LN FO STE JEW DU AVE. ALVINA MA O C T MAR E AV EN UE BLVD. GE AR Y AV RD DRIVE NUNAN 5 24-01 JO RD LOCU AV RAFAEL IS C AN FR COURT WO ODLAN D STREET ST CU AVE. AVE . AVE . FIFTH PL. 24-509 16-001 LO AC AC PLUM LN. PLAC E LANE IVY LANE MART ENS OAK NI PALOM A EE T 101 PARK NE LA STR ION _ Æ FIRE RIVIERA OAK . R D MAGNOLIA NU E _ Æ ó HIGHWAY OCTAVIA AVENUE SAGEB WAY HILL GR AD AVENUE WA TT CLINTON CT. 24-507 E SID GOLD AV E. E ALBERT LD AVENUE YD E V Y L D DR LOCUST AV AVE. E. W B OO GE CL STREET 24-511 # # STREET EL . VD G IN D IN KE RA D E CT MA PL E BL W CIS AN FR PIN PARK AV # TAYLOR STREET GO ALL NE WH AV E AVE NUE LAUR HILL N D DRIVE MISS DR IV E LIN DE VISTA RIT TE R ELFORD ST. # SIR AV GRAN ST. 24-009 STREET 24-007 PALM AV AV DW RE PLAR PO BR ID E AL # TREANOR D DR GLEN KD OO # STREET ST. STREET SAN VISTA E PLAC E AN DE RS EN W G I N ST RE ET _ Æ20-001 ó a ST. PER E AD BR FRANCES # 24 # -011 # A OAK AV MAK IN ER ALT W GR E. AV # ST. GR KIN MA LA 6 GOLD BR AD CL IFF WA Y AR COMMERCIA L STREET _ Æ SECOND OOD D LW E D WAY A NN LINDEN LINCOLN BAYVIE THIRD N RAFAEL TO YO N SKYLAND WY VIL # # AVENUE TA TES SP AN EM CLAY TO AVENU E ES UP 017 AV E. ROSS GREENWOO D GR AD E 01- DR. 2400 ST. LIN D E NW CT. DRIVE UE RE ET # # ó JULIA STREET 01 -0 14 DA R IN CLO R ST FIR ST AVE. . WY WINDING TO YO N GR O VE EN AV ES DR AD # 1 20-00 JONE S PL. TH OR PALO MA T EE TR S O O HE AR IE S ELM 12 10 -013 -0 10 # NV ENT A MES LN OR FL V I STA N O L L RO E STREET 24-502 CA LA LOS RE L CO T DA AVENU # RIA _ Æ 10-009 FOUR TH AD MIRA MAR K FIFTH KN OL DRIVE RG MA CURTIS LAUREL LW ZE E A H AN L D VI DA N # 09-0 05 DR I BERT AVE. LATHAM MIRA RO LL O D RO MISSION 12-005 DR GL O CLORINDA AV EXT DR LA U LIN BO N ND E D RI V PO PLA R E. ON F ESPALDA CT. RIN AV DRIV E CO RD L Y UE VE SE OIR ERV RES O IA EN ND LI DR. RT LUNNY ST. Y AN D PAC HE CO TROS T ER FREMON T SKYVIEW RD YW RR EN AV DRI UE VI O X W GR PA M DRIVE LANE 24005 P UE EW A ER EN MAKIN BE 03 -0 09 03 -0 07 SU WA UPP POPLAR AV UE JES FR CLO VE RO E LAND AC CT. E RD M R . NT RD E MO UP PE R AV DRIVE ó # AV AV PR . DR UE E LA O IT R DRI VE . CT CO L MAW R AVEN CLORINDA AV EXT LG URE LA FOST AVE. GRAND . AE END L BAYWOOD AV A AV RT # CAM INO EL WE ST EN ON GT OU AVE AND RK BR A ST AV LIN R G TA PA YN BR # ACE GLENW N NIE VI AV W EL VE STRE ET DR IVE 12003 DUNAND AVE. W CT E IV R D STRE ET AVE. e AV EN UE UE YO BA TERR ACE AV AV UE EN AV EN T EET SEN A TI N Av AF LE S AK O ST AV EN Y UE AV D E HARC WA EN CREST O O IN TR R TE CEN 5 -00 10 T. C RT PO RA AV STR E UFF W AY B EH A WAY TA AVE NUE AVENUE ve G ro AV SID IELD E . AS OM EN AV D VIS CR ES C DR OOD LS O OD T EE RO GE R DR . T LE YR M S PE GR BE S ET YO TI ER EAST e in g AC HIL E C PLA RE VIS TA 12-0 01 v Spr BA ALE XAND ER GRE ENF RR LE W J SCENIC ENT ESC W. CR . DR AVE . TE PR O DRIV CT FOU RTH AV TERRACE AV HTS. GREENFIELD CT N R U AVE . g Gr rin o ID TW FO R ST PB HE ALEX AND ER GREENFIELD AV IVE CRE SC ENT ARD EY DRIVE E. CT AVE. VIN T WAY R PEP PE TE R TH DR NEAM E DRIVE PARK WY p CE N RT DR MARGARITA ND ISLA AV ON W AY AV ET STRE SANTA E DR AL LD HIL DR DRIVE WAY CLE AV SUNS ET CIR JORD AN OA KM Y . FAIR FIF TH MA RG ARITA EN AV E E SA NTA E IA B A W SO R STR DRIV DR SE QUO CT. HAAF LN SC D EDGE WO OD E. GOLD . CT AV W IN D # AY W RO E O EN IV E TA VIS AL O LD W DR HIL W H UT SO D OO DR. AV EN UE R IA FR E. AV DRIVE E WAY E. T 10 -0 03 E MAN LE CO O E E IV AV ENU R DR RI VE JE NS OA K DR O AV ST REE AN 01 -0 10 A KS JORDAN AV O CR M LE CO NO LD T B CT. D E OK IR LA WOOD T DR IV E HU MBO MAY W IN DS O R EE STR FRANCIS LN VI NT ON ON MILT HA . CT AVENUE CLU IZA O DRIVE SO # DRIVE D OO EL M ILS AV CO U RT CO LN . CT W DR IV WILD WO OD SEQUOIA DR PINE UT ESTN W NG LO WAY AL CH ED ON D # LI N C O AVE. S RO AD W AY WIM BL OO C OA K AY AK O CIR. LN YW TI S U R ILLS LE Y WAY EC H PL O . ER D N FAIRH VAL W RIV B LE TIL DE MA EY VALL MONT OAK RT COU IM W T UR CO FIFT H O N E ON . MM CT HA W Y DR IV D O RID DR IVE PR OSPECT HILL LE A H FA E AVENUE W IE V LE DA 00-502 DA CO NV EN T CORTE DR IV DR. N K PAR OAKWOOD TH BE OD MO ## LIA LIL # # # DRIVE Y WA OO U RT O C UA . O CT . BISC AYN E OD WO ALDERW AQ # PE DR CT. E ID GR EEN S CO CASCAD E DR. 09-001 # DR FAIR E OCK SILK VISTA OO D ET TR IN I 01-015 WA Y DG SU LGRAV E LN. ROAD SC . LN TW . RA C E # N RI DGE L L WY PI NEC CT. ON A LL VI D LL S EL TE R SA RT I UR N SA ROCK H GE ED LA CT . ULA CR ES OO HI WC AS TL E CT H 06-0 05 PA DRIVE NE BIS CAY N LO S E. AV NE CH DG EW AVE . LE G RI A OL RT BA Y D EN PA E DR IV N NO IO ALB NO VA DO N CO TIM UR OT EO T 23 -0 05 CO RT PA E CH EC O CE RM CO EN UR HO T LA NE UE NE N LO E E U EN AV MA NU N E AV E IV E E AV TO G U NC IN N OA K OD WO GE RA E AV E CL IR C RID DR TREE H E. RT PO MEAD OAKS OW DR. 1 -00 007 09 25 RO AD RO AD RO AD DRI VE LF AD O W AY RD EW H AS N # INDIAN I V AV . EN D AR G A LA CT GE . 101 R PILGRIM RO AD AD GA R D VIL AY E OAKRIDGE REN VU RANCHITO S LIN O R ED P 01 06-0 25 -0 05 RD. FA RM CIRCLE VE A AD O R # DRIVE HW HIG AL YD RR ME O LL VAN E RO SO R 5 -00 25 E IV DR VIA FIR IVE AY E. W L IA R O W EL IL LO DR EM M HIGH AVE. W NO O G OOD AD AV E. AV A RRI CO E FF JE IVE RO E. O AD PR . DR ó _ Æ ES AD N O EY AL H S IR M IS AD M DR CIVIC CENTER E. DW RE AV S OR FL S S LA TA ER . HU CT LA COURT LINA ER MARIN COUNTY E S Y WA AY A CT. ANZA WAY VE CO LA GAL AV 01-013 DE ANGE L S KE E EX SUSS HIND CH LA EN WAY AR DR A # 003 22- WALTER PL. LD DIAS 3 23-00 AL YD RR ME AY W O G E AG OR CH . AN CT DRIVE DEVON CE NT 05-009 BEHR D C AN CON ST # CIVIC W DEVON # 003 25- ROA HILL SUMMER T COUR SUMMERHILL O R TE AY ES W E TRE PINE CT. WA Y WAY LE IVE SC E LT V A V DR ON PETER CIRC NO ALBI SE O RO AUG U 3 01-01 AL RE SAO AY W W AY AI RRI LL O THGATE NOR AN IS FA EL VI CO LA IV TOS RANCHI R D RT FRANCISCO