Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse
Transcription
Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse
Hyatt Regency Walkway Collapse Group 1: Mehad Saïd Abdel Kader Messaoudi July 17th, 1981 Background • The Hyatt Regency Hotel was built in Kansas City, Missouri in 1978. • This hotel consisted of a 40-story hotel tower and conference facilities, which were connected by an open concept atrium. • Inside the atrium, there were three walkways that connected the hotel to the conference facilities on the second, third, and fourth floors. The atrium was 145 feet long, 117 feet wide and 50 feet high. People Involved Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. Jack D. Gillum & Associates, Ltd. (G.C.E.) Patty Berkebile Nelson Duncan Monroe Lefebvre (PBNDML) Eldridge Construction & Havens Steel Co. H&R Inspection, Jack D. Gillum Daniel M. Duncan Event " A party was held in the lobby " Over 2,000 people were in attendance " People crowded the walkways and the lobby below to watch the dance competition " The excess weight caused the fourth floor walkway to fall onto the second floor walkway and both walkways collapsed onto the crowded first floor " The collapse left 114 dead and more than 200 injured " This was the United States’ most devastating structural failure of the time Original Design Modified Design Main Causes • Crown Center Redevelopment Corp: Owner Interested in lowest cost No on-site inspection • Jack Gillum, Principal of G.C.E. Design and build the Hyatt Regency Hotel Too much responsibility to junior engineer Insufficient supervision • Daniel Duncan: Junior engineer at G.C.E. Flawed Design Overconfidence in his Design How it could have been avoided? Ethics Violations of Principles of Professionalism Ethics ASCE Code • “Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the pubic in the performance of their professional duties.” • “Engineers shall issue public statements only in an objective and truthful manner.” • “Engineers shall not complete, sign, or seal plans and/or specifications that are not of a design safe to the public health and welfare and in conformity with accepted engineering standards.” Conclusion • Good Communication between the different parties • Not Interpreting Preliminary Drawings as Finalized Drawing • Review of the Final Design Sufficiently References " “ASCE code of ethics amended.” (1976) Civil Engineering American Society " Hyatt-Regency Walkway Collapse Web site: http:// www.rose- hulman.edu/Class/ce/HTML/publications/ momentold/winter96-97/hyatt.html. " "The Hyatt horror": Failure and responsibility in American engineering.