June 25, 2012 - City of Olathe
Transcription
June 25, 2012 - City of Olathe
W 87TH ST W 83RD ST CASE LOCATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION CASES FOR: W 87TH ST PKWY JUNE 25, 2012 CLARE RD De Soto CEDAR CREEK RD OLATHE PLANNING COMMISSION A NT SA A TR FE IL DR 10 435 De Soto 10 35 W 103RD ST 10 435 35 WARD WARD 2 2 COLLEGE BLVD RZ-12-006 W 119TH ST WARD WARD 4 4 7 LAKESHORE DR SU-12-007 W 135TH ST SANTA FE ST 35 P-12-010 WARD WARD 3 3 7 Overland Park W 143RD ST 7 W 151ST ST 56 WARD WARD 1 1 W 159TH ST Olathe Overland Park QUIVIRA RD 35 W 167TH ST 56 169 W 175TH ST W 191ST ST Lakes Stream WITZER RD Highway LACK BOB RD ACKMAN RD City of Olathe RIDGEVIEW RD Planning Cases WOODLAND RD W 183RD ST W 199TH ST Legend Arterial Street PFLUMM RD BLACK BOB RD MUR-LEN RD RIDGEVIEW RD Spring Hill WOODLAND RD LONE ELM RD HEDGE LN CLARE RD CEDAR NILES RD Gardner Date: 06/20/2012 Author: christopherc 69 W 127TH ST UIVIRA RD MOONLIGHT RD GARDNER RD WAVERLY RD Lenexa PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, JUNE 25, 2012 - 7:00 PM FINAL AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA 1. Minutes from the June 11, 2012 Planning Commission meeting - Cases: P-12-008, PR-12007, P-12-012, RZ-12-005, SU-12-006 2. P-12-010: Request for approval of a final plat for one lot, 0.996 ± acres, for United Office Products, Second Plat; located at 619 West Dennis Avenue. Owner/ Applicant:James R. Hutchinson/United Office Products Engineer: Jim Green/Green Engineering REGULAR AGENDA New Business 1. SU-12-007: Request for approval of a special use permit for a lodging place (Creative Cottage) on 0.16 ± acres; located at 221 South Walnut Street. PUBLIC HEARING Owner/ Applicant: Lori DeWitt and Kelly Skinner 2. RZ-12-006: Request for approval of an amendment to an existing RP-3 Planned Low Density Multi-family district on 5.32 ± acres, and revised preliminary development plan for The Homestead Townhomes at the Homestead Apartments; located in the vicinity of the 116th Street and Shannon Street, at the northern end of Homestead Apartments. PUBLIC HEARING Owner/ Applicant: Engineer: Todd Bleakley/Bleakley Development Co. LLC Jim Long/Allenbrand-Drews and Associates, Inc. MINUTES CITY OF OLATHE CITY PLANNING DIVISION CASE # P-12-008 The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Paul Ling, with the following members present: John Almeida, Mike Kohler, Greg Harrelson, Jeremy Fry and Mike Rinke. Absent was Jon Campbell. Vice Chairman Ling read the standard ex parte statement. No Commissioner reported having any ex parte communications. A motion to approve Consent Agenda items 1 and 2 was made by Commissioner Fry and seconded by Commissioner Kohler. Motion was approved 6-0. Planner: Dan Fernandez Request: Approval of a replat for eleven lots and one tract, 3.68± acres, for Red Hawk Run, Third Plat. Location: Vicinity of Woodland Avenue and 121st Terrace Owner/ Applicant: Dan Whitney Landmarketing, Inc. Engineer: Roger Norris, Allenbrand-Drews & Associates, Inc. Acres: 3.68± Current Zoning: R-1 Lots: 11 Streets and Right of way: Existing Required Proposed I. Planning Commission: June 11, 2012 Proposed Use: Single Family Residential Tracts: 1 S. Langley Road W. 121st Court 60’ 60’ (total) N/A 50’ 50’ (total) N/A COMMENTS This is a request for approval of a final plat of eleven lots and one tract for Red Hawk Run, Third Plat, located in the vicinity of Woodland Avenue and 121st Terrace. The rezoning from RUR to RP-1 (RZ-28-03) for this site was approved by the City Council on February 2, 2004. The preliminary plat for Red Hawk Run (P-73-03) for one hundred lots and four tracts was approved by the Planning Commission on February 23, 2004. Red Hawk Run, 1st Plat (P-04-049) which included thirty-three lots and one tract was approved P-12-008 June 11, 2012 Page 2 on April 12, 2004 and Red Hawk Run, 2nd Plat (P-04-151) for 43 lots and 2 tracts was approved on January 10, 2005. The reason for the replat is to reconfigure the lots and easement at this location. II. FINAL PLAT REVIEW A. Lots/Tracts: The final plat includes a total of eleven single family residential lots on 3.68 acres for a density of 2.99 units per acre. The average lot size is 10,150 square feet in area with an average lot width of 75 feet and an average lot depth of 125 feet. B. Utilities/Municipal Services: The property is located in the Water District #1 and Johnson County Wastewater service areas. The applicant will need to coordinate with the respective utility providers for required water and sewer connections. C. Streets/Right-of-Way: Lots 77 and 78 have access to W. 121st Street, Lots 79-83 have access to W. 121st Court and Lots 84-87 have access to W. 121st Place. The streets meet Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requirements for public right-of-way. A Limits of No Access (LNA) has been placed on the west side of Lots 77 and 78 along S. Langley Street. D. Drainage/Open Space: Tract B, which is approximately 1.2 acres, has been included in the plat as an open space and drainage easement. This area will be maintained by the home owners association. A fifteen foot (15’) tree preservation easement (TP/E) has also been placed along the eastern boundary of Tract B. E. Street and Signal Excise Taxes: Excise taxes were paid on the subject site with a previous plat so no fees are due with this application. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of P-12-008 with the following stipulations: a. Prior to and upon recording of the plat, a digital file of the final plat shall be submitted to the Development Services Department. The P-12-008 June 11, 2012 Page 3 submission of the digital plat file shall conform to the formatting standards, layering system, and text styles of the City of Olathe Planning Division Digital File Submittal Standards. b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, performance and maintenance bonds or a letter of credit in an amount to be determined by the City, shall be submitted in accordance with UDO § 18.68.390.B and 18.12.040.B to ensure that public improvements, certain easements and related improvements will be installed, approved, and maintained after completion of the development. c. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a performance and maintenance bond or letter of credit in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer, shall be submitted in accordance with UDO § 18.68.390 D. to ensure that all erosion control measures and water quality features are installed and maintained and that all of the development’s streets and sidewalks remain free of debris during all phases of construction. d. All above ground electrical and/or telephone cabinets shall be placed within the interior side or rear building setback yards. However, such utility cabinets may be permitted within front or corner side yards adjacent to street right-of-way if cabinets are screened with landscape materials. Motion by Comm. Fry, seconded by Comm. Kohler, to approve P-12-008, subject to the following stipulations: a. Prior to and upon recording of the plat, a digital file of the final plat shall be submitted to the Development Services Department. The submission of the digital plat file shall conform to the formatting standards, layering system, and text styles of the City of Olathe Planning Division Digital File Submittal Standards. b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, performance and maintenance bonds or a letter of credit in an amount to be determined by the City, shall be submitted in accordance with UDO § 18.68.390.B and 18.12.040.B to ensure that public improvements, certain easements and related improvements will be installed, approved, and maintained after completion of the development. c. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a performance and maintenance bond or letter of credit in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer, shall be submitted in accordance with UDO § 18.68.390 D. to ensure that all erosion control measures and water quality features are installed and maintained and that all of the development’s streets and sidewalks remain free of debris during all phases of construction. d. All above ground electrical and/or telephone cabinets shall be placed within the interior side or rear building setback yards. P-12-008 June 11, 2012 Page 4 However, such utility cabinets may be permitted within front or corner side yards adjacent to street right-of-way if cabinets are screened with landscape materials. Motion carries unanimously. MINUTES CITY OF OLATHE CITY PLANNING DIVISION CASE # RZ-12-005 Sean Pendley, Senior Planner, made the following staff presentation: Planner: Sean Pendley Planning Commission: June 11, 2012 Request: Rezoning from County RUR to RP-3 district, 7.31± acres, and preliminary development plan for Hospice House Center. Location: Vicinity of Lone Elm Road and OMC Parkway. Owner/ Olathe Medical Center, Inc., Frank Devocelle Applicant: Payne & Brockway, Mark Huggins Architect: ACI Boland, Bill Woodhouse Acres: 7.31± Proposed Use: Residential Care Current Zoning: RUR Proposed Zoning: RP-3 Building Area: Phase I Total 11,323 sq. ft. 39,051 sq. ft. Parking Spaces: Phase I Total Required 12 48 Proposed 17 52 Streets and Right of way: Existing Required Proposed Lone Elm Road OMC Parkway Marion Street 60’ (½ Street) 60’ (½ Street) 60’ (½ Street) 50’ (½ Street) 50’ (½ Street) 50’ (½ Street) 60’ (total) 60’ (total) 60’ (total) Land Use Zoning Comp. Plan Designation Site Undeveloped RUR Employment Area North Undeveloped/YMCA CP-1 Employment Area East Undeveloped RUR Employment Area South Assisted Care RP-4 Mixed Use Residential West Undeveloped RUR Employment Area Platted: No. A final plat shall be approved prior to development. RZ-12-005 June 11, 2012 Page 2 I. COMMENTS A. Proposed Development: The following is a request for a rezoning from County RUR to RP-3 district and a preliminary development plan for Hospice House Center. The first phase will include eight beds and the plan shows future expansions to accommodate a total of 32 beds. The Phase I building has an approximate area of 11,300 square feet. There is an existing farm pond on the subject property. This pond will be dredged and replaced with a new detention basin and water quality feature closer to Lone Elm Road. B. Public Notice: The applicant mailed the required public notification letters and posted signs on the property for the rezoning according to Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requirements. II. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN A. Utilities/Municipal Services: The property is located in the City of Olathe water and sewer service areas. The proposed development will require an existing sanitary sewer to be relocated to allow construction of the proposed detention basin. A two-feed looped water main extension is also required for the development. Fire hydrants shall be installed per Fire Department requirements. The property is subject to a sewer buy-in fee for Upper Cedar Creek of $3,459.85 per acre. Effective September 1, 2012, the buy-in fee will increase. B. Access/Traffic: A new public street, Marion Street, will be constructed to serve the Hospice House Center. The street will be phased and eventually future connections will extend north to 153rd Street and east to OMC Parkway. Marion Street will be constructed with a temporary turnaround for trash trucks and fire trucks for Phase I. The main driveway for Phase I will be one-way drive that loops around the front of the building. A traffic study was not required for the proposed development due to the low traffic volume for Hospice House. However, a traffic impact analysis will be required for future development proposals on adjacent properties. C. Drainage: RZ-12-005 June 11, 2012 Page 3 The preliminary site plan identifies a new wet bottom detention basin and water quality feature at the corner of Lone Elm Road and OMC Parkway. A stormwater study will be required with the final site development plan. D. Parking: The site plan indicates 17 parking spaces for Phase I. The requirement for medical and residential care buildings is one (1) space for each four (4) beds and one (1) space for each staff member. Based on the total of 8 beds and approximately 10 staff members in Phase I, the minimum required parking is 12 spaces. The total parking with future phases is 52 spaces which also exceeds minimum parking requirements. The preliminary site plan shows two (2) accessible parking spaces for Phase I which meets UDO requirements for disabled parking. One (1) additional accessible parking space is required for the proposed total of 52 parking spaces. Photometric plans for parking lot lighting shall be submitted with the final development plan. E. Pedestrian Access: There are existing sidewalks along OMC Parkway and the preliminary site plan identifies sidewalks on both sides of Marion Street. The final site development plan shall also show a pedestrian connection from the sidewalk to building entrance(s) per ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. The site plan identifies a walking trail around the detention pond that will serve as an amenity for family members and staff for Hospice House. F. Landscaping: There are existing trees at the southwest corner of the site where the proposed detention basin will be located. The preliminary site plan identifies a variety of new deciduous and evergreen trees around the detention area to replace the trees that will be removed. Additional shade trees and ornamental trees are also identified on the other property lines per UDO requirements. Screening (shrubs) is shown across 100 percent of all parking and vehicular areas facing streets. The landscape plan also identifies native plantings for Best Management Practices (BMPs) for water quality features. G. Architecture/Design: The proposed center is a one-story building with a prairie style design. The building materials include face brick and cast stone trim. The proposed roofing consists of Timberline asphalt shingles. The proposed building complies with the Guidelines for Multi-family Development Design. III. ANALYSIS RZ-12-005 June 11, 2012 Page 4 The following are criteria for considering applications as listed in Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Section 18.12.140 and staff findings for each item: A. The conformance of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted planning policies. The future land use map of the Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject property in an “Employment Area”. These areas are intended for the development of office buildings, medical facilities and light industrial uses. The proposed Hospice House is compatible with the Olathe Medical Center and is consistent with surrounding development. The proposed use follows the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. • Principle LUCC-8.1: “Mixture of Complementary Land Uses. Encourage and enable a mixture of complementary land uses in major new developments. Whenever land uses are mixed, careful design will be required in order of ensure compatibility, accessibility and appropriate transitions between land uses that vary in intensity and scale.” The proposed Hospice House is an appropriate land use in the Olathe Medical Center and it provides a good transition between the surrounding office buildings and existing residential developments, including Cedar Lake Village and Hoeger House. B. The character of the neighborhood including but not limited to: land use, zoning, density (residential), architectural style, building materials, height, structural mass, siting, open space and floor-toarea ratio (commercial and industrial). The surrounding area consists of the YMCA, office buildings, residential uses and undeveloped property. The proposed Hospice House Center has a similar design and appearance as the Hoeger House to the east of OMC Parkway. C. The zoning and uses of nearby properties, and the extent to which the proposed use would be in harmony with such zoning and uses. The surrounding properties are zoned RUR, CP-1 and RP-4. The proposed RP-3 zoning district is appropriate for this area and the use of a residential care facility is a good transition between the medical campus and the residential development for Cedar Lake Village. D. The extent to which approval of the application would detrimentally affect nearby properties. The proposed development should not detrimentally affect surrounding properties since the RP-3 zoning provide a good transition between commercial, office and residential uses. RZ-12-005 June 11, 2012 Page 5 E. The extent to which the proposed use would adversely affect the capacity or safety of that portion of the road network influenced by the use, or present parking problems in the vicinity of the property. The proposed development of a residential care facility with 8-32 beds will have minimal impact on traffic volume for the medical park and surrounding streets. The proposed development exceeds the minimum required parking for medical buildings. F. The extent to which the proposed use would create air pollution, water pollution, noise pollution or other environmental harm. Staff is not aware of any potential for unlawful levels of air, water or noise pollution with the proposed development. The site includes proper stormwater drainage and detention. The proposed modifications to the existing pond require approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. G. The economic impact of the proposed use on the community. The proposed facility will have minimal impact on economic development. The development provides additional employment opportunities for the community. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS A. Staff recommends approval of RZ-12-005 for the following reasons: (1) (2) (3) B. The proposed development complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The rezoning to RP-3 district meets the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) criteria for considering zoning applications. The proposed development complies with the Guidelines for Multi-family Development Design. Staff recommends approval of RZ-12-005 with the following stipulations to be included in the ordinance: (1) (2) Prior to publishing the zoning ordinance and within thirty (30) days following approval by the Governing Body, a statement that a preliminary development plan has been approved for the subject property shall be filed in accordance with the requirements of Section 18.12.230 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). A final plat shall be approved and excise taxes paid prior to issuance of a stormwater permit or building permit. RZ-12-005 June 11, 2012 Page 6 C. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary development plan with the following stipulations to be completed with the final site development plan: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) A stormwater study and drainage calculations shall be submitted and approved by Public Works with the final site development plan. A temporary construction easement and temporary turnaround is required at the north end of Marion Street for Phase I. The final site development plan shall include required vehicle turning templates for trash trucks and fire trucks. A parking lot lighting plan, in accordance with UDO requirements, shall be submitted and approved with the final site development plan. The proposed total of 52 parking spaces at full build out shall include a minimum of three (3) accessible parking spaces per UDO requirements. A pedestrian connection shall be provided from the sidewalk to building entrance(s) per ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated. All above ground electrical and/or telephone cabinets shall be placed within the interior side or rear building setback yards. However, such utility cabinets may be permitted within front or corner side yards adjacent to street right-ofway if such cabinets are screened with landscape materials. As required by the UDO, all exterior ground or building mounted equipment, including but not limited to mechanical equipment, utility meter banks and coolers, shall be screened from public view with landscaping or an architectural treatment compatible with the building architecture. All on-site wiring and cables shall be placed underground. Following staff presentation, the Vice Chairman opened the meeting up to questions from commissioners: Vice Chairman Ling: Are there any questions? Comm. Harrelson: I have one. Sean, looking at the landscape plan you showed us, can you roughly tell us what portion of the site is developed with Phase I? It looks like there’s a lot going on there that’s intermingled between Phase II and Phase I and I haven’t been able to determine what portion of that – For example, what percentage of those trees get planted Phase I? RZ-12-005 June 11, 2012 Page 7 Mr. Pendley: I will have to defer to the applicant, but I believe most of the perimeter landscaping will be installed with Phase I, for sure around the detention basin. All of this will have to be constructed with Phase I, all of the detention basin. The proposed public street will be constructed to this point. I’ll let the applicant talk about the details on the north end of the site in this location. But I believe all of the perimeter landscaping along OMC Parkway and to this north and west property line will be installed. There may be some additional details to talk about for the ultimate Phase III to the north in this location because I’m not sure how much grading for that future development would be potentially disturbed. I do believe, too, that all of this site will be graded with the Phase I development, if I understand it correctly. Comm. Harrelson: Is that something that we would want to document, that we would mandate being Phase I? Mr. Pendley: Yes, that is a good thing to get with the final development plan. A separate final site development plan and final plat will be required for this development. And I imagine that the final development plan will show the same thing. It will show the ultimate development so that they don’t have to keep coming back in for separate development plans. They’ll do one final development plan, show it in phases. And we can get that kind of detail with the final development plan, showing the extent of landscaping, especially with the street and the turnaround, because I know there were some specific requirements on the temporary turnaround, that will be needed in this location. Those are good items to note for the final development plan. Vice Chairman Ling: Any other questions? Thank you, Sean. This is a public hearing item, so we’ll give the applicant an opportunity to speak. Mike Jensen, Chief Operations and Development Officer, Olathe Health System, 10724 West 131st Street, Overland Park, appeared before the Planning Commission and made the following comment: Mr. Jensen: We appreciate this opportunity. We’re very proud with what we’re embarking upon here. We raised funds for this development through a capital campaign with tremendous support from our community. We’re looking forward to moving forward. The reason for this hospice house is that there is a need for inpatient hospice services on the Kansas side of the metropolitan area because we do not have that service at this time. Our patients in those last days/weeks of life who need inpatient care and are no longer able to stay at home, in a nursing home, or wherever they might be, at this time they are transferred over to the Missouri side, where they do a wonderful job at places like Kansas City Hospice. However, it’s just not as convenient for the family to be there. Hospice nurses almost become a member of the family in those very vulnerable times, so for that family then to have to start over, so to speak, with a new hospice nurse member RZ-12-005 June 11, 2012 Page 8 of the family is also not what’s ultimately best for them. So, we feel like it’s a real community need and we look forward to fulfilling that. Vice Chairman Ling: Would anybody else like to speak as a part of this application? Hearing none, would anybody opposed to this application like to speak? Thank you. This is a public hearing. Is there any other discussion on this item before we take a vote on closing the public hearing? Motion by Comm. Kohler, seconded by Comm. Almeida, to close the public hearing. Motion passes unanimously. Motion by Commissioner Rinke, seconded by Commissioner Almeida, to recommend approval of RZ-12-005, for the following reasons: (1) (2) (3) The proposed development complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The rezoning to RP-3 district meets the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) criteria for considering zoning applications. The proposed development complies with the Guidelines for Multi-family Development Design. Commissioner Rinke’s motion included recommending approval with the following stipulations to be included in the ordinance: (1) (2) Prior to publishing the zoning ordinance and within thirty (30) days following approval by the Governing Body, a statement that a preliminary development plan has been approved for the subject property shall be filed in accordance with the requirements of Section 18.12.230 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). A final plat shall be approved and excise taxes paid prior to issuance of a stormwater permit or building permit. Commissioner Rinke’s motion included recommending approval of the preliminary development plan, with the following stipulations to be completed with the final site development plan: (1) (2) (3) A stormwater study and drainage calculations shall be submitted and approved by Public Works with the final site development plan. A temporary construction easement and temporary turnaround is required at the north end of Marion Street for Phase I. The final site development plan shall include required vehicle turning templates for trash trucks and fire trucks. RZ-12-005 June 11, 2012 Page 9 (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) A parking lot lighting plan, in accordance with UDO requirements, shall be submitted and approved with the final site development plan. The proposed total of 52 parking spaces at full build out shall include a minimum of three (3) accessible parking spaces per UDO requirements. A pedestrian connection shall be provided from the sidewalk to building entrance(s) per ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated. All above ground electrical and/or telephone cabinets shall be placed within the interior side or rear building setback yards. However, such utility cabinets may be permitted within front or corner side yards adjacent to street right-ofway if such cabinets are screened with landscape materials. As required by the UDO, all exterior ground or building mounted equipment, including but not limited to mechanical equipment, utility meter banks and coolers, shall be screened from public view with landscaping or an architectural treatment compatible with the building architecture. All on-site wiring and cables shall be placed underground. Motion passes unanimously. MINUTES CITY OF OLATHE CITY PLANNING DIVISION CASE # SU-12-006 Planner: Sean Pendley Planning Commission: June 11, 2012 Request: Special use permit for a residential care facility for Hospice House Center. Location: Vicinity of Lone Elm Road and OMC Parkway. Owner/ Olathe Medical Center, Inc., Frank Devocelle Applicant: Payne & Brockway, Mark Huggins Architect: ACI Boland, Bill Woodhouse Acres: 7.31± Proposed Use: Residential Care Current Zoning: RUR Proposed Zoning: RP-3 Building Area: Phase I Total 11,323 sq. ft. 39,051 sq. ft. Parking Spaces: Phase I Total Required 12 48 Proposed 17 52 Streets and Right of way: Existing Required Proposed Platted: 1. Lone Elm Road OMC Parkway Marion Street 60’ (½ Street) 60’ (½ Street) 60’ (½ Street) 50’ (½ Street) 50’ (½ Street) 50’ (½ Street) 60’ (total) 60’ (total) 60’ (total) No. A final plat shall be approved prior to development. Proposed Use: The following is a request for a special use permit for a residential care facility for Hospice House Center. Residential care facilities are allowed in RP-3 districts with a special use permit. An associated rezoning to RP-3 district (RZ-12-005) and preliminary development plan for Hospice House is on this agenda. The first phase of the development will include eight beds and the plan shows future expansions to accommodate a total of 32 beds. The Phase I building has an approximate area of 11,300 square feet. SU-12-006 June 11, 2012 Page 2 2. Public Notice: The applicant mailed the required public notification letters and posted signs on the property for the special use permit according to Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requirements. 3. Conformance with Plans and Policies: The future land use map of the Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject property in an “Employment Area”. These areas are intended for office buildings, medical facilities and light industrial uses. The proposed Hospice House is compatible with the Olathe Medical Center and is consistent with surrounding development. The proposed use of a residential care facility is a good transition between the medical campus and residential development for Cedar Lake Village. The proposed use follows the adopted policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of SU-12-006 for the following reasons: a. b. c. The proposed development complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The special use permit for a residential care facility meets the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) criteria for considering zoning applications. The proposed development complies with the Guidelines for Multi-family Development Design. Please refer to RZ-12-005 for discussion of this item. Vice Chairman Ling: We need a motion to close the public hearing on the special use permit also. Comm. Harrelson: Before we do that, I have a question. Are we asking for a special use permit because of the planned nature of the district? In other words, are we not requiring a special use? David Clements, Planning Manager, appeared before the Planning Commission and made the following comment: Mr. Clements: It’s still a special use requirement, a residential care facility. Comm. Harrelson: So elderly care facilities always require one in Olathe? So for every one that we have in Olathe, we’ll continue to see special use renewals? Mr. Clements: No renewals. There’s no time limit because it’s specifically built for this planned use. Vice Chairman Ling: Any other questions on the special use permit? SU-12-006 June 11, 2012 Page 3 Motion by Comm. Kohler, seconded by Comm. Almeida, to close the public hearing. Motion passes unanimously. Motion by Comm. Harrelson, seconded by Comm. Rinke, to recommend approval of SU-12-006, for the following reasons: a. b. c. The proposed development complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The special use permit for a residential care facility meets the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) criteria for considering zoning applications. The proposed development complies with the Guidelines for Multi-family Development Design. Motion carries unanimously. MINUTES CITY OF OLATHE CITY PLANNING DIVISION CASE # PR-12-007 Sean Pendley, Senior Planner, made the following staff presentation: Case Planner: Sean Pendley Planning Commission: June 11, 2012 Request: Final site development plan for QuikTrip, Ridgeview Falls. Location: Northeast corner of 119th Street and Lennox Drive Owner: RMPL Development Company, Inc., Robert Morrissey Applicant: QuikTrip Corporation, Kristy Perdue Engineer: Darla Holman Engineering, Darla Holman Acres: 1.65± Proposed Use: Convenience Store/ Gasoline Station Current Zoning: CP-3 Building Area: 5,720 sq. ft. Parking Spaces: Required 23 Proposed 38 Streets and Right of way: Existing Required Proposed Platted: 1. 119th Street 75’ (½ Street) 75’ (½ Street) n/a Lennox Street 118th Terrace (Private) 45’ (total) 45’ (total) n/a 25’ (total) 25’ (total) n/a A final plat for QuikTrip Store No. 219 is on this agenda. Comments: The following is a request for a final site development plan for QuikTrip in the Ridgeview Falls shopping center. The proposed development consists of a 5,720 square foot convenience store and canopy with 16 fuel dispensers. A rezoning to CP-3 district and preliminary development plan (RZ-12-001) for QuikTrip was approved by City Council on April 3, 2012. At the meeting, the City Council removed some of the stipulations previously recommended for building design and materials. The details for the revised stipulations are addressed under the architecture/design section. PR-12-007 June 11, 2012 Page 2 2. Utilities: The property is located in the City of Olathe water service area and Johnson County Wastewater district. The proposed water main relocation shall be submitted as a separate Public Works plan set for review and approval. 3. Access/Streets: The proposed access to the site is generally the same as previously shown on the preliminary development plan. There is an existing shared drive on 119th Street. This drive will need to be widened from 30 feet to 40 feet to accommodate turning movements for the fuel tanker truck. The applicant has submitted truck templates showing ingress and egress for the tanker truck. The building permit plans shall show the complete truck route to the underground storage tanks. There will be a new right-in/right-out drive on Lennox Street and two access drives on the private street to the north. Lennox Street was recently widened in conjunction with development of the Jack-in-the-Box restaurant. The City is currently working on modifications to the existing traffic signal at 119th Street and Lennox Street. There is a delay for southbound traffic in the left-turn lane on Lennox Street. The Traffic Engineering Division is reviewing options for traffic signal phasing to provide protected movements for both north and southbound approaches. 4. Parking/Lighting: Based on the proposed building area, a minimum of 23 parking spaces is required for QuikTrip. The proposed plan shows a total of 38 stalls, including two (2) accessible parking spaces, which meets the parking requirements for commercial developments. A photometric plan was submitted for the parking lot lighting. The plan shows the required light levels for the site and the lighting does not exceed maximum foot-candles at the property lines. The plan indicates that the light fixtures are mounted at 22 feet. The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requires a maximum height of light fixtures at 20 feet when adjacent to residential development. Therefore, the lighting plan will need to be revised at the time of building permit. 5. Stormwater/ Drainage: There is an existing stormwater detention basin on the Aberdeen Village property to the north. This basin serves a portion of the Ridgeview Falls shopping center and it has been designed to accommodate stormwater for the subject property. A stormwater report was submitted with the final site development plan in accordance with the City’s stormwater management requirements. PR-12-007 June 11, 2012 Page 3 6. Landscaping: The proposed landscape plan identifies the required perimeter landscaping as identified on the preliminary development plan. The plan also shows foundation landscaping on the south side of the building. At the public hearing for the rezoning, the Planning Commission recommended changes to the landscaping around the proposed trash enclosure to avoid potential sight distance conflicts for the cross access drive with Jack-in-the-Box. The applicant has replaced three evergreen trees with two honey locust trees which will improve visibility for cross traffic. 7. Architecture/Design: The proposed building design for the convenience store and canopy is the same as shown with the rezoning. The City Council discussed the proposed architecture and they removed the following stipulations as previously recommended by staff and the Planning Commission: • The convenience store and fuel canopy shall not include illuminated banding. • The proposed awnings shall consist of tile or slate. Back lighting of window canopies and awnings shall not be permitted. • The windows shall not include interior graphics or signage. Although these stipulations were removed from the rezoning, there were other requirements, such as rooftop mechanical equipment screening, that needed to be addressed with the final site development plan. 8. Screening Materials: The proposed screening for rooftop mechanical equipment is a black material identified as “Poly Pro Mesh”. The applicant has provided a sample of the proposed mesh material and a picture of another QuikTrip store with this type of screening. The material does not appear to be durable and staff recommends an alternative metal screen wall to comply with the commercial design guidelines. The Guidelines for Screening of Rooftop Mechanical Equipment recommends “the use, design, and material of the screen should blend with the building architecture and create a massing hierarchy that projects the same high quality appearance as the building façade”. The proposed Poly Pro Mesh is not consistent with any other material on the building. The proposed gates on the trash enclosure also include Poly Pro Mesh. Staff recommends metal gates to provide a more durable material. The Guidelines for Trash Receptacle Screening states “screening doors on the enclosure should be finished with a high quality material and durable finish”. 9. Staff Recommendation: PR-12-007 June 11, 2012 Page 4 Staff recommends approval of PR-12-007 with the following stipulations: a. The building permit plans shall include truck templates for the fuel tanker with complete truck routes for ingress/egress to the underground storage tanks. b. A parking lot lighting plan, in accordance with UDO requirements, shall be submitted with the building permit. The maximum height for light fixtures is twenty (20) feet. c. The screening for rooftop mechanical equipment shall consist of a black metal panel or other material to be consistent with the building. d. The trash enclosure shall include black metal gates to provide a high quality durable material per the Guidelines for Trash Receptacle Screening. e. Sign permits shall be approved for all wall signs and monument sign in accordance with UDO 18.62.090. f. All above ground electrical and/or telephone cabinets shall be placed within the interior side or rear building setback yards. However, such utility cabinets may be permitted within front or corner side yards adjacent to street right-of-way if such cabinets are screened with landscape materials. g. All on-site wiring and cables shall be placed underground. Following staff presentation, the Vice Chairman opened the meeting up to questions from commissioners: Vice Chairman Ling: Any questions for Mr. Pendley? Thank you, Sean. Would the applicant like to step forward? This is not a public hearing. Kristy Perdue, Quik Trip Corporation, 4705 South 129th, Tulsa, OK, appeared before the Planning Commission and made the following comment: Ms. Perdue: I appreciate your time once again. Sean did a wonderful job as well, explaining what we are asking for tonight. We are asking for the approval of our final plan with the use of this material that was just passed around. We do like this new material. We have not used it on our old-style buildings but we are using it on our new-style buildings. The mechanical screening allows wind to go through it so everything can breathe a little nicer inside. It is the same color as the metal frame that we use, and also the metal canopy that is on top of the building. It also kind of acts as that dark brick screen, that dark brick road that’s around the building – they all at least are the same color. On the trash enclosure doors, it is a lighter material, it is easier for employees to open and close, and that’s why we have chosen to go with this. I’ll stand for any questions. PR-12-007 June 11, 2012 Page 5 Vice Chairman Ling: Any questions? Thank you. Is there any discussion? Comm. Fry: I think we should probably discuss this mesh material a little bit. I know we all are hearing that we don’t know a lot about it, never seen it, etc., and I don’t know if that’s necessarily a reason to automatically dismiss it. Perhaps we should have a little more information from the applicant as far as where this has been used in the past and what is the rationale for this material over other materials for other buildings? Ms. Perdue: Like I said, where it’s been used before, I personally don’t know the answer to that question. I know we always do research and development with any material that we choose to use in our buildings. We don’t like maintenance. We don’t like to go out and replace things every year. You guys see our building, they’re very well kept, and they are sturdy materials. So, I’m putting a lot of faith in our equipment coordinators and the people that choose these materials, that they do what’s best for Quik Trip in selecting these. It is 95 percent opaque. It is a metal material. I looked up the specs today, and if something hits it, that weight is dispersed, whereas, metal hits – hail damage, with dots and bumps all over it. But this, when something hits it, it is dispersed across the entire panel of the mesh, so it is a little more durable. If we have a huge storm it possibly could rip, but there’s not much material that’s going to withstand a massive storm, which we do get in the Midwest. Comm. Fry: How many QuikTrip buildings have used this material, up to this point? Ms. Perdue: All of our new stores, so about 20 in development or open today. I did talk to our coordinator in Tulsa, which was our first store that we opened, and it does not have a mechanical screen, but it has a trash enclosure door. It’s been opened three years and it has not been replaced. Comm. Fry: Are you familiar with other buildings that have used this type of material before? Ms. Perdue: I personally am not, no. Vice Chairman Ling: Any other questions for the applicant? Thank you. Any other discussion on this item? Personally, from my viewpoint, I certainly have a question about the durability of it, and I appreciate the applicant bringing up the point that it hasn’t been a problem at other sites. But I certainly see the durability of the trash enclosure, of somebody carrying a box or something and damaging t as they open the door, carrying a box, or something like that. So, I question whether it’s appropriate for the trash enclosure. As for the screening that would act as a parapet for the equipment, I think what staff read is that typically the screening would be of the same quality as the rest of the building façade. We’re not putting poly pro mesh over a plastic on the rest of the building. So, I think our expectation would be that the screening would be of the same quality as the rest of the building façade. Does anyone else have any other comments? Is there a motion on the final site development plan? PR-12-007 June 11, 2012 Page 6 Motion by Comm. Harrelson, seconded by Comm. Almeida, to approve PR-12-007, subject to the following stipulations: a. The building permit plans shall include truck templates for the fuel tanker with complete truck routes for ingress/egress to the underground storage tanks. b. A parking lot lighting plan, in accordance with UDO requirements, shall be submitted with the building permit. The maximum height for light fixtures is twenty (20) feet. c. The screening for rooftop mechanical equipment shall consist of a black metal panel or other material to be consistent with the building. d. The trash enclosure shall include black metal gates to provide a high quality durable material per the Guidelines for Trash Receptacle Screening. e. Sign permits shall be approved for all wall signs and monument sign in accordance with UDO 18.62.090. f. All above ground electrical and/or telephone cabinets shall be placed within the interior side or rear building setback yards. However, such utility cabinets may be permitted within front or corner side yards adjacent to street right-of-way if such cabinets are screened with landscape materials. g. All on-site wiring and cables shall be placed underground. Motion carries unanimously. MINUTES CITY OF OLATHE CITY PLANNING DIVISION CASE # P-12-012 Case Planner: Sean Pendley Planning Commission: June 11, 2012 Request: Final plat for one lot, 1.65± acres, for QuikTrip Store No. 219. Location: Northeast corner of 119th Street and Lennox Drive Owner: RMPL Development Company, Inc., Robert Morrissey Applicant: QuikTrip Corporation, Kristy Perdue Engineer: Darla Holman Engineering, Darla Holman Acres: 1.646± Proposed Use: Convenience Store/ Gasoline Station Lots: 1 Current Zoning: CP-3 Streets and Right of way: Existing Required Proposed 1. 119th Street 75’ (½ Street) 75’ (½ Street) n/a Lennox Street 118th Terrace (Private) 45’ (total) 45’ (total) n/a 25’ (total) 25’ (total) n/a Comments: The following is a request for a final plat for QuikTrip Store No. 219 in Ridgeview Falls. An associated final site development plan (PR-12-007) for QuikTrip convenience store and gas station is also on this agenda. 2. Utilities: The property is located in the City of Olathe water service area and Johnson County Wastewater district. The plat identifies a new waterline easement on the east side of the property. 3. Access/Streets: There is an existing shared drive on 119th Street. This drive will need to be widened from 30 feet to 40 feet to accommodate turning movements for the fuel tanker truck. The Limits of No Access (LNA) has been revised on the plat to show the change in access for 119th Street. P-12-012 June 11, 2012 Page 2 There will also be access along Lennox Street and the private street to the north. The final plat identifies the existing access easements. 4. Excise Taxes: The final plat is subject to a street excise tax of $0.215 per square foot of land area. Based on the plat area, 1.646± acres, the required street excise fee is $15,415.45. The final plat is also subject to a traffic signal excise tax of $0.0576 per square foot of land area. Based on the plat area, the required traffic signal excise fee is $4,129.91. The required excise fees shall be submitted to the City Planning Division prior to recording the final plat. 5. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of P-12-012 with the following stipulations: a. Prior to recording the final plat, the required street excise fee of $15,415.45 shall be submitted to the City Planning Division. b. Prior to recording the final plat, the required traffic signal excise fee of $4,129.91 shall be submitted to the City Planning Division. c. Prior to recording the plat, a digital file of the final plat (pdf format) shall be submitted to the City Planning Division. Please refer to PR-12-007 for discussion of this item. Motion by Comm. Harrelson, seconded by Comm. Rinke, to approve P12-012, subject to the following stipulations: a. Prior to recording the final plat, the required street excise fee of $15,415.45 shall be submitted to the City Planning Division. b. Prior to recording the final plat, the required traffic signal excise fee of $4,129.91 shall be submitted to the City Planning Division. c. Prior to recording the plat, a digital file of the final plat (pdf format) shall be submitted to the City Planning Division. Motion carries unanimously. Other Matters – Minutes from June 11, 2012 Mr. Clements: Our next meeting will be June 25th. There are several items on the Consent Agenda and we have two public hearings for the Planning Commission to consider. Vice Chairman Ling: Any discussion items by commissioners? Thank you. Have a good evening. Meeting adjourned. CITY OF OLATHE CITY PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT CASE # P-12-010 Planner: Dan Fernandez Request: Approval of a final plat for one lot, 0.996± acres, for United Office Products, Second Plat. Location: 619 West Dennis Avenue Owner/ Applicant: James R. Hutchinson United Office Products Engineer: Jim Green, Green Engineering Acres: 0.996± Current Zoning: C-3 Lots: 1 Streets and Right of way: Existing Required Proposed I. Planning Commission: Proposed Use: June 25, 2012 Commercial Dennis Ave 30’ (1/2 street) 30’ (1/2 street) N/A COMMENTS This is a request for approval of a final plat of one lot for United Office Products, Second Plat, located at 619 W. Dennis Ave. In order for future development to take place on the site, the lot must be platted. The applicant is proposing to rebuild an existing warehouse building. II. FINAL PLAT REVIEW A. Lots/Tracts: The final plat includes a total of one lot on 0.996 acres. There are three existing buildings on-site. B. Utilities/Municipal Services: The property is located in the City of Olathe water and sewer service area and the site has existing utilities. P-12-010 June 25, 2012 Page 2 C. Streets/Right-of-Way: The site has access to Dennis Avenue to the north. The street meets Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) requirements for public right-ofway. D. Landscaping/Open Space: The lot has green space along the north and west boundaries. There is also a forty foot (40’) detention easement and tree preservation area located along the south property line. E. Drainage/Detention Part of the lot is located in the 100-year floodplain. The property must meet all of the requirements of the City of Olathe Unified Development Ordinance chapter 18.50., Floodplain Zoning. F. Street and Signal Excise Taxes: The final plat is subject to a street excise tax of $0.215 per square foot of land area. Based on the plat area, 0.996± acres, the required street excise fee is $9,327.94. The final plat is also subject to a traffic signal excise tax of $0.0576 per square foot of land area. Based on the plat area, the required traffic signal excise fee is $2,499.02. The required excise fees shall be submitted to the City Planning Division prior to recording the final plat. III. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of P-12-008 with the following stipulations: a. Prior to and upon recording of the plat, a digital file of the final plat shall be submitted to the Development Services Department. The submission of the digital plat file shall conform to the formatting standards, layering system, and text styles of the City of Olathe Planning Division Digital File Submittal Standards. b. Prior to recording the final plat, the required street excise fee of $9,327.94 shall be submitted to the City Planning Division. c. Prior to recording the final plat, the required traffic signal excise fee of $2,499.02 shall be submitted to the City Planning Division. d. All above ground electrical and/or telephone cabinets shall be placed within the interior side or rear building setback yards. However, such utility cabinets may be permitted within front or corner side yards adjacent to street right-of-way if cabinets are screened with landscape materials. e This property must meet all requirements of the City of Olathe Unified Development Ordinance, Chapter 18.50, Floodplain Zoning. UNITED OFFICE PRODUCTS, 2ND PLAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 14, RANGE 23, CITY OF OLATHE, JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS LEGAL DESCRIPTION A part of the Northwest ¼ of Section 2, Township 14, Range 23, City of Olathe, Johnson County, Kansas, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 1, United Office Products, a subdivision in said Northwest ¼; thence S.00º-33'-00"E. along the west line of said Lot 1 a distance of 393.69 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1, which point is also on the North right-of-way line of Old 56 Highway; thence S.89º-01'-46"W. along said right-of-way line a distance of 110.00 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 3, Olathe Cloverleaf Addition, a subdivision in said Northwest ¼; thence N.00º33'-00"W. along the East line of said Olathe Cloverleaf Addition a distance of 395.55 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 3 of said Olathe Cloverleaf Addition, which point is also on the South right-of-way line of Dennis Avenue; thence N.90º-00'-00"E. along said right-of-way line a distance of 110.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.996 acres, more or less. The undersigned proprietor of the above described property has caused the same to be platted as shown hereon, which subdivision shall hereafter be known as “UNITED OFFICE PRODUCTS, 2ND PLAT”. DEDICATION Where prior easement rights have been granted to any person, utility or corporation on said parts of the land so dedicated, any pipes, lines, poles and wires, conduits, ducts or cables heretofore installed thereupon and therein are required to be relocated, in accordance with proposed improvements as now set forth, the undersigned proprietor hereby absolves and agrees to indemnify the City of Olathe, Kansas, from any expense incident to the relocation of any such existing utility installations within said prior easement. C L DENNIS AVENUE 1947.65' 110.00' N 90°00'00"E POINT OF BEGINNING 30' NW COR., NW 1/4 SEC 2-14-23 An easement or license to enter upon, locate, construct and maintain or authorize the location, construction or maintenance and use of conduits, gas, electrical, poles, wires, ducts and cables, and similar utility facilities, upon, over and under these areas outlined and designated on the plat as “Utility Easement” or “U/E” is hereby granted to the City of Olathe, Kansas, and other entities as may be authorized by state law to use such easement for said purposes. NW COR., NW 1/4 SEC 2-14-23 DENNIS AVE. / 143RD ST. 10' U/E 10' U/E 10' U/E An easement or license is hereby dedicated to the City of Olathe, Kansas, to enter upon, over and across those areas outlined and designated on the plat as “Tree Preservation Area”. Trees shall not be removed from a tree preservation area without the City of Olathe’s permission, unless such trees are dead, diseased or posed a threat to the public or adjacent property. The Developer shall not be responsible for the maintenance of the tree preservation area, including but not limited to the removal of dead or diseased trees, or trees posing a threat to the public or adjacent property. NORTH 1"=200' CONSENT TO LEVY The undersigned proprietor of the above described land hereby consents and agrees that the Governing body shall have to power to release such land proposed to be dedicated for streets and roads, or parts thereof, for public use, from the lien and effect of any special assessment and that the amount of unpaid assessments on such land dedicated shall become and remain a lien on the remainder of the land fronting or abutting on such dedicated road or street. S 00°33'00" E 393.69' 151ST STREET 395.55' N 00°33'00" W LONE ELM ROAD HARRISON STREET CENTER SEC 2-14-23 An easement or license to enter upon, locate, construct and maintain or authorize the location, construction or maintenance and use of conduits, water lines, storm pipes, sewer pipes, and related facilities and structures, and street trees upon, over and under these areas outlined and designated on the plat as “Public Utility Easement” or “Pub/E”, “Drainage Easement” or “D/E”, “Sewer Easement” or “S/E” is hereby granted to the City of Olathe, Kansas, Johnson County Water District, and/or Johnson County Wastewater District and other government entities as may be authorized by state law to use such easement for said purposes. LOCATION MAP EXECUTION IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned proprietor has caused this day of , 2012. instrument to be executed this HUTCHINSON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP (Owner of the East 10 feet of described property) Notes 1. The bearings shown hereon are based on the reference bearing of N.90ºE. on the North line of the Northwest ¼ of Section 2, Township 14, Range 23 as shown on the plat of United Office Products, recorded in Book 91, Page 35. 2. A portion of the property included in this plat is shown as Special Flood Hazard Area Zone AE, and Zone X (Future Base Flood) on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 20091C0093G dated August 3, 2009. JAMES R. HUTCHINSON, General Partner STATE OF KANSAS COUNTY OF JOHNSON, SS 40' D/E & TREE PRESERVATION AREA 110.00' S 89°01'46" W 40' D/E & TREE PRESERVATION AREA 1/2" x 24" rebar w/cap #932 set in concrete (Typical) OLD 56 HWY. RIGHT OF WAY day The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this of _______________, 2012, by JAMES R. HUTCHINSON, General Partner of HUTCHINSON FAMILY PARTNERSHIP. JAMES R. HUTCHINSON and MARGARET A. HUTCHINSON (Owners of the described property except the East 10 feet) ________________________________ JAMES R. HUTCHINSON _______________________________ MARGARET A. HUTCHINSON STATE OF KANSAS COUNTY OF JOHNSON, SS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this of 2012, by JAMES R. HUTCHINSON and MARGARET A. HUTCHINSON. day APPROVALS Approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Olathe, Kansas, this day of , 2012. Chairman - CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the property shown hereon and the legal description thereof is based on a true and accurate survey of the property completed on , and that the details of this plat are true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. Approved by the Governing Body of the City of Olathe, Kansas, this of , 2012 ______________________________ Mayor - MICHAEL COPELAND day ___________________________ City Clerk – TRACY HOWELL CHESTNUT ST WATER ST HARRISON ST RD De Soto Lenexa Lenexa K10 I35 Overland Park Olathe K7 TIER LN FRON Gardner FLAMING RD CI R FO UN TA IN T FRON IE DR Olathe Olathe I35 US169 Spring Hill Spring Hill UNITED OFFICE PRODUCTS, 2ND PLAT User: christopherc Date: 06/20/2012 CHESTNUT ST CHERRY ST KANSAS AVE PARKER ST LONE ELM RD L US DW Y 250 500 Feet ST OAK ST FL AM IN G R 0 AT E P-12-010 PITTMAN ST IP PAN R SOUTH ST Veterans Memorial Park FOUNTAIN DR PAYNE ST ST OTT MA RKET ST WEAVER ST ED G PROVENCE ST CT Grace United Methodist Church WATER ST GRANT ST POOR ST DENN IS DENNIS AVE CHERRY ST SHERMAN AVE R OLIVE ST OAK ST EM ER E CT St Pauls Catholic Church WEAVER ST EDGEMERE DR LARKSPUR PL Little Cedar Cre ek FERREL DR SHERIDAN ST GRANT TE VIRGIN IA LN Church Of God Holiness G H UT SO DAN ST SHERI TROOST ST HONEYSUCKLE DR ALTA LN D V ALLEY R HERSHEY ST First Presbyterian Church Little Ced ar Creek TER ASH B A W Westview Elementary P-12-010 Overland Park Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc UNITED OFFICE PRODUCTS 2ND PLAT 619 W DENNIS AVE P-12-010 FINAL PLAT CITY OF OLATHE CITY PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT CASE # SU-12-007 Planner: Dan Fernandez Date: Request: Approval of a special use permit for a lodging place (Creative Cottage). Location: 221 South Walnut Street Owners/ Applicants: Lori Dewitt and Kelly Skinner Acres: 0.16± Proposed Use: Building Area: 1301 square foot Number of Lots: 1 June 25, 2012 Lodging Place Zoning: Land Use Zoning R-5 Comprehensive Plan Designation Site Residential R-5 Urban Center/Downtown North Residential R-5 Urban Center/Downtown East Residential R-5 Urban Center/Downtown South Residential R-5 Urban Center/Downtown West Residential R-5 Mixed-use Residential Platted: OLATHE LOT 11 BLOCK 58 OLC 1395 I. COMMENTS This is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow a lodging place for the Creative Cottage. The proposal is to create a crafters retreat where customers could visit and work on their crafts or hobbies such as scrapbooking, quilting, beading and sewing. The subject site was platted in 1868 with the existing house being built in 1900. Per the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), the applicant notified all property owners within two hundred (200) feet of this property via certified mail. The applicant has provided staff with certified mail receipts and staff has verified all property owners have been properly notified. SU-12-007 Continued June 12, 2012 Page 2 II. DETAILS OF OPERATION The applicants are seeking a special use permit for miscellaneous lodging at 221 S. Walnut Street. The home has been vacant since December 2010 and was bought out of foreclosure. The house has three bedrooms and two baths and is handicap accessible by an existing ramp. The house would be available to rent during the day and early evenings on weekdays and there is an option for overnight retreats on Friday and Saturdays. The bedrooms will have twin beds for the guests and one of the applicants will stay overnight to supervise. The proposal states that the number of customers for the retreats would be between two and eight with an average of four to six. All activities would take place inside the house. Guests will be allowed to use the kitchen but the applicants will recommend using nearby restaurants and have discussed catering options with nearby businesses. III. PARKING The property has a parking area in the rear yard which includes a garage and carport and can accommodate four cars. The existing condition of this area is a combination of gravel and grass. Access to the parking is from a gravel alley south of the property. On-street parking is also available. An additional two cars can be parked directly in front of the house and two more across the street. Staff has stipulated that a parking area shall be paved in the rear yard adjacent to the alley for customer parking within a year of the special use approval. The Unified Development Ordinance requires paved parking for single-family homes. The applicants are proposing to put down gravel to keep in character with the neighboring houses which also have gravel driveways. IV. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The applicants held a neighborhood meeting on May 27, 2012. Six neighbors signed the sign-in sheet. In addition, they walked around the neighborhood, going door to door, explaining their proposal (see attached). The applicants have not talked to anyone in the surrounding area that is against the proposal. V. HOME IMPROVEMENTS/LANDSCAPING Since purchasing the home the applicants have installed a new roof, gutters and windows. They have also planted landscaping around the house and property as well as remove overgrown brush. VI. TIME LIMIT Staff recommends an approval period of five years for the subject property with expiration on July 17, 2017. SU-12-007 Continued June 12, 2012 Page 3 VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION a. Staff recommends approval of SU-12-007, for the following reasons: (1) The proposal conforms to the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (2) The proposal complies with the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) criteria for considering special use permit requests. b. Staff recommends approval of SU-12-007 subject to the following stipulations: (1) The Special Use Permit is valid for a period of five years following Governing Body approval, with a tentative expiration date of July 17, 2017. (2) A parking area must be paved on-site within one (1) year of approval of the special use permit. Special Use Plan for The Creative Cottage Retreat We would like to open a business called The Creative Cottage. It will be located in a house in downtown Olathe at 221 S. Walnut Street. We would like to use this house as a Miscellaneous Lodging Place/Short Term Dwelling Rental. The Creative Cottage would be a place to use as a crafters retreat. Women would come to the house and use it to craft throughout the week and/or use it as a retreat on the weekends. We will offer an option to stay over on Friday and Saturday nights. This is a three bedroom/two bath house and the accommodations will offer twin beds. We might offer classes during the week to learn new crafting techniques. Crafts such as scrapbooking, quilting, beading, stamping, sewing and drawing would be done there. The house would be available for 2-8 people, most of the time averaging 4-6 people. These activities are done in the house and do not consist of any activities outside of the house. These weekends will be supervised. There should never be more than 2-3 cars at the house on a given weekend and two of those cars will be parked in back of the house on the property. We are bringing in gravel to specify the parking area. We are doing this so that in the winter months the area will not be muddy. We have chosen gravel since that is what all of the surrounding properties and business have in place. We want to fit in with the area and not differentiate ourselves in any way. This house is handicap accessible with a ramp already attached. This will be a solitary business so people are not coming and going all weekend. Most of the clientele will be mothers or women needing space for a creative outlet/hobby. We will not be changing the structure of the existing house in any way, only making improvements. We have added a new roof, gutters, windows and new landscaping. The inside of the house and the attached screened porch have been freshly painted. The property has been in foreclosure and no one has resided there since December 2010. The house was in desperate need of some attention, which we have provided and it will be well cared for. We feel a new standard will be brought to the neighborhood. There have even been comments from the neighbors stating that we have inspired them to work on their own homes. I cannot perceive this being bothersome to any of the neighbors as we have met several of them and they are very excited about this endeavor. We have included a site plot plan showing where people would park and have also included the surrounding business locations that reside in this neighborhood. We currently know of three businesses within 1500 feet of this residence - one is an empty building that is for sale, one is a Pest Control business and one is a Landscaping business out of a neighboring house. This business will bring people both local and from out of town to Olathe to help bring revenue into the city. Crafters will also be shopping and using restaurants within the area. We have spoken to a few local businesses about catering for our guests. Doughy’s restaurant is in the process of putting together some information for us. We would also like to get involved with helping bring Arts and Crafts Festivals to downtown Olathe to help showcase the downtown area. We have spoken to local merchants and they have embraced having us here in Olathe. Kansas 4D Ultrasound/Peeps, Babies & Bears Boutique has even offered to let us use one of their street windows to advertise in. There are similar businesses like this one in Bonner Springs, McPherson, Topeka and Saint Louis. We have listed some website addresses for you to review below. www.wishesoftheheart.com www.maplememories.com www.craftcottagevm.com www.walnutplaceretreat.com www.memoriesonmarshall.com We look forward to a business partnership with the city of Olathe and helping bring recognition to the downtown Olathe area. WALNUT ST WATER ST WATER ST WATER ST De Soto CHESTNUT ST KANSAS AVE Lenexa Lenexa K10 Olathe K7 I35 Overland Park Gardner Overland Park I35 US169 Spring Hill GRACE TER Olathe Olathe ST Mill Creek ELM ST HARRISON ST GRANT ST SHERMAN AVE LEE AVE Central Elementary K ANS AS AVE TROOST ST PINE ST SU-12-007 Olathe ParkingFirst Christian Church Garage CEDAR ST THE CREATIVE COTTAGE RETREAT User: christopherc Date: 06/20/2012 Millcreek Center STE V E N SON ST 500 Feet Library (Main) Seven One One Club G RA CE Littl e Ce dar Creek 250 WALNUT ST ek Cre 0 Westview Elementary LITTLE ST German Baptist Church CEDAR ST PARK ST PARK ST Olathe Public CHERRY ST C WILLIE ST Pine & Elm Park CHESTNUT ST PINE ST PINE ST TROOST ST PA R K CI R Little WABASH TER General Baptist Christ Olathe Gospel Church Court SU-12-007 r CEDAR ST ELM ST Living Waters Fellowship Services ed a WABASH ST PARK ST Olathe Church Of Christ LOULA ST Post Office CHERRY ST PARK ST Mil re ek rC da k City Hall East City Hall West lC LOGAN ST Ce re e IOWA ST LINCOLN ST CLINTON ST TROOST ST MONROE ST tl e SANTA FE ST Y C H ERR ST L it Calamity Line Park WI S LLIE T MARION ST Park Spring Hill Grace United Methodist Church Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc THE CREATIVE COTTAGE RETREAT (MISCELLANEOUS LODGING PLACE) 221 S WALNUT ST SU-12-007 SITE PLAN CITY OF OLATHE CITY PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT CASE # RZ-12-006 Planner: Request: Dave Clements Planning Commission: June 25, 2012 Amendment to an existing RP-3 Planned Low Density Multi-family district on 5.32 ± acres, and revised preliminary development plan for The Homestead Townhomes at the Homestead Apartments. Location: The site is located in the vicinity of the 116th Street and Shannon Street, at the northern end of Homestead Apartments. Owner: Homestead Apartment Homes, LLC. Applicant: Bleakley Development Co. LLC./Todd Bleakley Engineer: Allenbrand-Drews & Associates, Inc. Acres: 5.32 acres of the 64 acre Homestead Apartments Proposed Use: Multi-Family Residential Current Zoning: RP-3 Units: Existing Revised Open Space Area: Required 15% Revised 21% 696 apartments 32 townhomes 728 total units Density 11.34 units/acre Permitted 15 units/acre Streets and Right of way: Private Street28’width/city standard Land Use Zoning Comp. Plan Designation Site North Undeveloped Single-Family RP-3 Mixed Use Residential R-1 (Lenexa) N/A East Vacant-future park RP-1 Parks/Greenway South Apartments West Industrial RP-3 M-1 Residential Industrial RZ-12-006 June 25, 2012 Page 2 I. COMMENTS A. Request and History: This request is for an amendment to an existing RP-3 Planned Low Density Multi-Family District and revised preliminary development plan for Homestead Townhomes. The application was filed to allow the construction of 32 townhome units on a 5.32 acre buffer/open space site on the northernmost part of the Homestead Apartment site. Please see the site location map in the upper left hand corner of Sheet 1. The planned district for Homestead Apartment Homes was approved in 1998 (RZ-35-98). The original application included 696 apartment units and 44 townhomes. The 44 townhomes were in the location of the 32 units proposed with this application. Planning Commission and City Council action on the original application is as follows: 1. July 27, 1998- Planning Commission reviews and recommends approval of original application with 696 apartments and 44 townhomes. 2. August 18, 1998- City Council reviews Planning Commission recommendation, and returns application for reconsideration and redesign with specific instructions to reduce the number of units and scope of project, traffic and traffic signals, and buffering. 3. September 14, 1998- Planning Commission reviews and recommends approval of a revised plan that deletes the 44 townhomes and provides a 230’ buffer along the north property line. 4. October 6, 1998- City Council approves revised plan by Ordinance #98-72 that includes stipulation “i” a 230’ open space buffer shall be provided along the north property line. At this time, the applicant would like to amend planned district Ordinance #98-72 to eliminate stipulation “i”, to allow the construction of 32 townhomes in the 230’ buffer/setback that was established by City Council with the final Ordinance. The proposed townhome development would have a 91’ setback from the single-family homes to the north. The minimum setback of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) in a RP-3 District is 15’, which can be achieved through “innovative and imaginative site design”. Bleakley Development believes that Homestead Apartments has been an asset to the City, have been nicely maintained and have not had any adverse impact on surrounding properties. The applicant believes that it RZ-12-006 June 25, 2012 Page 3 is appropriate to consider adding the townhomes to Homestead Apartments at this time, as was originally proposed, but with the number of units reduced from 44 to 32. B. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held the required neighborhood meeting for the proposed project on June 4, 2012. (Attachment 1) (Attachment 1A) At the neighborhood meeting, the applicant discussed a letter dated October 2, 1998 in which Bleakley Development stated that the no structures would be built in the buffer area. (Attachment 2) The applicant also conducted an informational meeting on February 8, 2012 with the Homestead Woods Association Board and an initial neighborhood meeting on February 28, 2012. C. Neighborhood Position: Residents of Homestead Woods subdivision north of Homestead Apartments are opposed to the proposed amendment to reduce the 230’ setback and allow the townhome development. Residents note that they were significantly involved with the approval of Homestead Apartments and that the 230’ buffer was a developer’s concession that was part of the original approval. The Board of Directors of Homestead Woods Subdivision submitted a letter representing their membership. This letter includes an exhibit discussing impact of the townhomes on property values. Please see letters of opposition. (Attachments 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) II. PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN A. Utilities/Municipal Services: The property is located in the City of Olathe water service area and Johnson County Wastewater service areas. A water man extension will be required. The proposed Townhomes will utilize the City's smart-cart system for solid waste collection per Title 6 of Olathe Municipal Code. The applicant will be responsible to provide and maintain access from 116th Terr. (a public street) through the Homestead Apartment development that is not a public street for solid waste collection to the proposed townhomes. Applicant will "hold harmless" the City of Olathe for any damage to the private drives that are not constructed to city standards. The final site development plan shall include truck templates for access route from 116th Terr. to the proposed Townhomes. The solid waste route will be from the Avignon Development east of the Homestead Apartments on 116th Terr. RZ-12-006 June 25, 2012 Page 4 B. Access/Streets: Access to the townhome site will be from private driveways north from 116th Street to the subject property. A private east/west street will be constructed north of existing garages and parking areas of the Homestead Apartments to serve the townhome units. Oakview Drive is a stub street north of the site in Lenexa. Residents in the adjoining single family homes have indicated a concern about Oakview Drive being connected to the Homestead Apartments. The physical layout of the proposed townhomes and the Homestead Apartments would make it difficult to connect public streets in this vicinity. The plan also makes no provision to connect private roads or driveways to Oakview Drive. The applicant will construct a fence at the south end of Oakview Drive; this fence is indicated on the landscape plan and will be part of any final plan approval. A traffic study was prepared with the application, and reviewed and approved by the Traffic/Engineering team. It was found that traffic from the 32 units would be easily absorbed by the existing street network. C. Building Setbacks: Front setback: Side yard: Rear yard: Building Separation: Proposed- 20’ Proposed-34’ Proposed-91’+ Proposed-15’+ Required Required Required Required 20’ 15’ 15’ 15’ D. Open Space: The RP-3 District requires a 15% common open space area. With the proposed townhome development, the open space provided is 20.7%. The active open space requirement is 50% of the common open space. The active open space in Homestead includes a walking trail in the area proposed for townhome development. This walking trail will have to be relocated if the townhomes are constructed. At the neighborhood meeting, residents were opposed to the walking trail being located closer to the single family homes to the north. It was suggested that the walking trail be routed through the new private street. Staff would recommend the walking trail be relocated in the 91’ setback north of the townhomes. The trail is also required as part of the open space amenities for Homestead Apartments. The applicant would like the walking trail to be considered an adequate substitute for a sidewalk along the private street. An existing waterline easement north of the townhomes would make it difficult to relocate the townhomes in a fashion to allow a sidewalk to constructed in front of the units. E. Landscaping/Screening: RZ-12-006 June 25, 2012 Page 5 There is an existing 30’ tree preservation easement along the north line of the property. This is a heavily treed area, but certain areas within the tree preservation easement have deteriorated. The applicant has submitted a preliminary landscape plan for the revised development area. The preliminary landscape plan complies with the requirements of the UDO. The landscape plan includes 61 evergreen trees as supplemental plantings for the tree preservation easement. A landscape plan will be submitted with the final development plan and it shall be sealed by a licensed landscape architect. F. Architecture/Design: The applicant has submitted colored perspectives and line drawings of the townhomes, along with an architect’s narrative of the design concept (attachment 8). The perspective generally indicates the scale of the buildings and the colors and materials proposed for the townhomes. Staff would note that use of decorative stone or masonry will have to be increased to meet the 75% requirement of the multi-family design guidelines, and this can be addressed with the final site development plan. Building material samples will also be required with the final site development plan. III. ANALYSIS The following criteria is used for considering rezoning applications as listed in Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Section 18.12.140 and staff findings for appropriate sections: A. The character of the neighborhood including but not limited to: land use, zoning, density (residential), architectural style, building materials, height, structural mass, siting, open space and floor-toarea ratio (commercial and industrial). The surrounding area consists of multi-family apartments to the south and an established single-family neighborhood to the north. The townhomes are introduced as a transition from the higher density apartments to the single family homes. The townhomes are designed so the mass and scale of the units is not significantly larger than the adjoining single family homes. B. The zoning and uses of nearby properties and the extent to which the proposed use would be in harmony with such zoning and uses. The townhomes are proposed to be developed in the existing RP-3 district, and are a permitted use. The townhome units are compatible and in harmony with the Homestead Apartments, and it is not unusual to find townhome units such as these used as a transition to single family homes. C. The suitability of the property for the uses to which it has been restricted under the applicable zoning district regulations. RZ-12-006 June 25, 2012 Page 6 The subject property is a suitable location for townhome development, but it is precluded by the open space stipulation of the original ordinance. D. The length of time the property has remained vacant as zoned. The Homestead Apartments were approved in 1998, and the subject site was designated as an open space buffer with the original plan. The property has been vacant as a result of the original stipulation of approval. It is reasonable to assume that the site would have been developed if the buffer had not been designated on the property. E. The extent to which approval of the application would detrimentally affect nearby properties. The townhome concept at this location provides a reduction or “step down” in density from the existing apartments and is less than the 44 units originally proposed. This density reduction is an attempt to reduce the impact on nearby properties. The applicant prepared an appraisal report that indicates no negative “final effect” from construction of the townhomes. (Attachment 7-Exhibit A) F. The extent to which the proposed use would substantially harm the values of nearby properties. The applicant’s appraisal report indicates that the townhome development will have no detrimental effect on the Homestead Woods subdivision. The report analyzes sales in Homestead Woods subdivision in Lenexa abutting the subject site, and Homestead Creek subdivision in Olathe, east of Homestead Woods. G. The extent to which the proposed use would adversely affect the capacity or safety of that portion of the road network influenced by the use or present parking problems in the vicinity of the property. The existing streets in Homestead Apartments and the proposed private road for the townhomes meet the traffic needs for the proposed development and surrounding uses. The private street is designed to city standards with a 28’ width. H. The economic impact of the proposed use on the community. The proposed amendment will allow new development in Homestead Apartments that will provide new housing opportunities and increased real estate taxes. IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION As previously discussed, the 230’ buffer was agreed to by the developer and stipulated as a development condition by the City Council. This stipulation was the major factor that allowed the construction of the 696 units of Homestead Apartments. As such, the applicant needs to bring RZ-12-006 June 25, 2012 Page 7 forward convincing information at this time in order to justify the request and meet the objections of residents in Homestead Woods subdivision. With the 1998 approval, the City Council, adjacent residents and developer arrived at a compromise that remains important to residents with this current request. Staff cannot recommend that the stipulation be changed only because of the passage of time. The Planning staff believes the preliminary development plan is appropriate for this in-fill site, and meets and exceeds the requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance, subject to a final development plan. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make findings as to the appropriateness of the preliminary plan, and offer their input or recommendation on the proposed amendment to the City Council as the appropriate decision makers for this request, based on City Council precedent with the original approval in 1998. A. Planning Commission approval of RZ-12-006 can be based on the following reasons: (1) The revised development meets the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) criteria for considering zoning applications (2) The proposed development, as stipulated, meets the development and performance standards of the RP-3 zoning classification. B. Planning Commission approval of RZ-12-006 can include the following stipulations to be included in the ordinance: (1) Prior to publishing the zoning ordinance and within thirty (30) days following approval by the Governing Body, a statement that a preliminary development plan has been approved for the subject property shall be filed in accordance with the requirements of Section 18.12.230 of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). (2) The revised development plan for The Homestead Townhomes and proposed building elevations shall comply with the development and performance standards for RP-3 developments as outlined in UDO Section 18.24.060, subject to exceptions granted by the Planning Commission. (3) The building design and materials for the townhomes shall comply with the Guidelines for Multi-Family Development Design as to materials. C. Staff recommends approval of the revised development plan with the following stipulations to be completed with the final site development plan: (1) Revised building elevations shall be submitted that meet the Guidelines for Multi-Family Development Design. (2) Building material samples for all materials shall be submitted prior to approval of the final site development plan. RZ-12-006 June 25, 2012 Page 8 (3) (4) (5) (6) The walking trail meets the requirement for active open space and shall be located north of the townhomes. A final landscape plan shall be submitted with the seal of a registered landscape architect. All elements of the final landscape plan shall be maintained in perpetuity. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated. All above ground electrical and/or telephone cabinets shall be placed within the interior side or rear building setback yards. However, such utility cabinets may be permitted within front or corner side yards adjacent to street right-of-way if such cabinets are screened with landscape materials. (7) As required by the UDO, all exterior ground or building mounted equipment, including but not limited to mechanical equipment, utility meter banks and coolers, shall be screened from public view with landscaping or an architectural treatment compatible with the building architecture. (8) All on-site wiring and cables shall be placed underground. HAGAN ST ALCAN ST CT Overland I35 Park Lenexa Overland Park Olathe K7 Walnut Grove Elementary Olathe Olathe I35 1 18TH ST US169 RENE ST BRENTWOOD DR SHANNAN ST 117TH ST PFLUMM RD SUM MI T ST ALDEN ST RD NE 118TH RZ-12-006 ST 1 16K10 T H T ER Lenexa Gardner 1 18TH TER HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES User: christopherc Date: 06/20/2012 PFLUMM RD MULLEN R D ACU FF LN OAKVIEW DR RD RO GE RS LI G 250 500 Feet BLACK BOB RD 0 118TH ST 8TH 11 De Soto 116T H ST INS HA SK ST 118TH ST 117TH CT IA RD GE S RD ES C AC 1 17TH TER 11 RR CA 117TH ST 116TH TER ST SUMM IT CT 11 6 TH TER 117TH ST R E NE S T 6 11 TH T HS 7T ST Unnamed 1 15TH TER 115TH ST RIAGE CAR D R 116TH ST ACK BL B BO RD 117TH R TE 114TH 115TH TE R 113TH ST 1 13TH TER NE ST ST 114TH ST 115TH ST RZ-12-006 116TH ST TH T E R 113 TH 115 ST H 4T 11 TER SUMMIT S T RD FE TR AI LD R SA NT A G AN R ST NE LI RE 35 AN R ST TH ST 113 ER DM WI Lenexa T ER RENE CT AVE TH OM PS O N H 2T 11 REN E ST ST OOD G R EE N W 112TH ST L DR AL ND RA 113 TH ST 111TH TE R Spring Hill Spring Hill Overland Park Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 SITE PLAN Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 LANDSCAPE PLAN Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 ELEVATION PLAN (DUPLEX) Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 ELEVATION PLAN (TRIPLEX) Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 COLOR RENDERING 1 (DUPLEX) Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 COLOR RENDERING 2 (DUPLEX) Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 COLOR RENDERIN 3 (DUPLEX) Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 COLOR RENDERING 4 (DUPLEX) Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 COLOR RENDERING 1 (TRIPLEX) Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 COLOR RENDERING 2 (TRIPLEX) Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 COLOR RENDERING 3 (TRIPLEX) Date: 06/20/2012 User: christopherc HOMESTEAD TOWNHOMES AMENDMENT TO RP-3 VIC OF 116TH ST & SHANNON ST RZ-12-006 COLOR RENDERING 4 (TRIPLEX)
Similar documents
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA
Rinke. Absent was John Almeida. Recited Pledge of Allegiance. Chairman Campbell read the standard ex parte statement. No Commissioner reported having any ex parte communications. A motion to approv...
More information