15-17 - VdP EFi.qxd
Transcription
15-17 - VdP EFi.qxd
When ‘S’ was best Was the manual-transmission 3500S really the most desirable P6 of them all? James Taylor – who owned one back in the 1980s – assesses the case for and against R ight from the start the Buick V8 engine was seen as the means of injecting some much-needed performance into the Rover range. The initial impetus for its purchase had come from North America, where Bruce McWilliams, who ran the US and Canadian import business, had recognised early on that the Rovers of the early 1960s were just too slow and staid to attract many US customers. Once he had persuaded managing director William Martin-Hurst of his case, and once Martin-Hurst had found the engine and done the deal with General Motors, the next thing was to integrate the new engine into Rover’s future product plans. It wasn’t quite as simple as it might have seemed. For a start, the engine delivered rather more torque than any existing Rover gearbox could handle. This meant that the engineering resources would have to be found to develop one, unless a suitable unit could be bought in from outside the company. The next big issue was that it was The first P6 models to have the V8 engine were put on the market in 1968, and were available only with Borg Warner automatic transmission. Styling was much plainer than on the later 3500S cars more important for Rover to use the engine to stop its ageing P5 3.0-litre luxury saloon losing sales on the home market rather than to go after incremental sales in the still developing North American market. All of this led to a compromise that turned out to be a happy one for the P5. Since this was a luxury car, and because most of the people who bought it chose automatic transmission – and not least because the latest Borg Warner Type 35 automatic was just about capable of handling the torque of the V8 – the solution was to mate V8 with Borg Warner automatic and get the re-engined car out into the showrooms as quickly as they possibly could. Inevitably the rush to do this diverted some resources from developing the high-performance V8-engined P6 that McWilliams so badly wanted for North America, and which Martin-Hurst recognised would do Rover a power of good almost everywhere else. The fact that the solution worked so well also meant that only a few people complained when the same powertrain was fitted to the P6 to deliver the P6B 3500 in April 1968 – making this the first Rover, incidentally, to be introduced after the creation of the ill-fated British Leyland. There were three transmission-development cars among the batch of 25 V8-powered P6 prototypes built in 1966, and former engine-test engineer Brian Terry remembered them being registered JXC 801D, JXC 810D, and JXC 817D. JXC 801D may have been used for development with the automatic gearbox, so the other two would have been the first manual-gearbox P6s with the V8 engine. Probably neither was ever tried with the 2000’s four-speed gearbox, because on-paper calculations alone would have made fairly clear what the result would be. Instead both were fitted with a five-speed manual gearbox made by ZF in Germany. This had already been tried out in the sixcylinder P7 prototypes, and was probably the same gearbox that BMW had just begun to use in its high-performance 1800TI/SA sports saloons, and would go on to use in other models later. For Rover the main attraction of this transmission was probably its torque capacity rather than its five forward speeds. Its gear ratios were arranged to give smaller between-the-gears steps than a four-speed gearbox, and with a direct-drive fifth gear rather than an overdrive type. But it had been designed as a sports gearbox – five-speed types were extremely rare in the mid-1960s, and invariably associated with sporting machinery such as the Porsche 911 – and Rover decided that it was just too unrefined for the typical Rover owner. So there was a change of plan. The problem was handed back to Frank Shaw’s transmission engineers at Solihull, who found themselves under some pressure to come up with the goods. They were already working on a new four-speed gearbox to go behind the V8 engine, but this had been The P6’s ‘Series II’ styling was accompanied (on the 3500S) by distinctive spoked wheel trims and a vinyl roof. It was all very much of the 1970s! specifically conceived as a Land Rover gearbox (it would eventually go into the Range Rover and the 101 Forward Control) with an integral two-speed transfer gearbox. Clearly it would not suit the V8-powered P6, but resources were limited, and there could be no question of designing another new manual gearbox in the timescale that management wanted. The solution was simply to uprate the existing fourspeed gearbox from the Rover 2000 in order to withstand the torque of the V8. In fact, the gearbox was heavily redesigned, even though it was equally heavily based on the existing four-speeder. A new and stronger outer casing allowed for more than twice the oil capacity of the 2000’s gearbox, and fins on the outside provided a modest degree of additional cooling. The rear of the layshaft was modified to drive an oil pump so that the gears and bearings were always under positive lubrication (rather than by splash alone) when the car was moving. Characteristic of the early 3500S was the box-pleated upholstery. The black interior and yellow exterior were again entirely typical of 1970s’ tastes The visual balance of power and sophistication seemed to work exceptionally well on the 3500S The layshaft was given taperroller bearings in place of the original needle-roller type, and the gears were shot-peened. By about 1970 the new gearbox was ready to do the job. That it could only just do that job was something that – to the transmission team’s credit – would not become apparent until many years later. The manual-transmission V8-engined P6 was launched in October 1971 as the 3500S – a name which would forever cause confusion with the by then extinct North American 3500S automatic – and immediately caused a sensation. Here was a car which embodied all the expected Rover qualities (give or take things like leather upholstery and the traditional Rover discretion), and to them added (for the time, and especially for a Rover) high performance. And it really was high performance: 0–60mph in 9.1 seconds was strong stuff for a four-door saloon in those now far-off days, knocking about 1.5 seconds off the time of the automatic car, and completely transforming its character. That transformation was reflected in the car’s trim and equipment. Rover reasoned that buyers would be attracted to the 3500S by its sporting character, and probably wouldn’t be very interested in leather upholstery. So the seats of the 3500S were covered with Ambla – a type of vinyl that bore a passing resemblance to leather – and they also had a distinctive box-pleated design which had been used in the North American 3500S, but which hadn’t been seen before outside the USA and Canada. Externally a vinyl roof and rear quarter pillars made the car look more sporty, and were a nod to one of the latest automotive fashions, while the five-spoke stainless-steel wheel trims developed for the North American V8 car added yet another sporty touch. Sills were painted to match the vinyl roof, which meant that while most were Satin Black, some were in a very attractive colour called Huntsman Brown. In my book on the P6 range, Rover P6, 1963–1977, I called the manual-transmission 3500S ‘the masterpiece of the P6 range’, which was a view that the press took as soon as the car was released. In its issue dated 16th October 1971, Motor magazine said it all in one somewhat unwieldy sentence. Its testers thought that the car had an ‘unrivalled combination of high performance and reasonable economy, good handling and roadholding, an excellent ride, refinement with much luxury and, perhaps most important of all, quality’. No matter that the performance gains over the automatic 3500 were ‘rather academic and only apparent in the upper speed ranges’. They liked it. Britain’s other weekly motoring magazine of the time, Autocar, was equally enthusiastic. Although it was no fan of the new gearbox, complaining of gear whine in the indirect ratios, and a slow change action, it was none the less delighted by the car’s ‘excellent mid-range performance’. The 3500S was ‘more than a match for its Rear badging made very clear what the car was when it passed you... competitors, both British and foreign’, it said, and added that its features combined to ‘surpass all expectations’. The 3500S certainly was some car. It quickly became a favourite with police forces in Britain, who from March 1973 were offered a special heavyduty version of the four-speed gearbox. This had a stronger layshaft cluster and stronger intermediate gears, which made it rather tougher than the standard production type, but also rather noisier. The police used the 3500S especially for motorway-patrol duties, where its high performance could be an important factor in getting a patrol team to the scene of an incident before it turned into a crisis with several miles of tailback. The popular image of the 3500S ‘jam sandwich’ is of the car being used for highspeed pursuits on the motorways, but such chases were always relatively rare. Sales were strong, too, although the 3500S was never as popular as the automatictransmission 3500. Rover owners seem to have liked their luxuries, and voted in the main for the Borg Warner-equipped car. They liked the extra acceleration of the V8, but not if they had to change gear themselves to achieve it! That same conservative attitude even affected the further development of the 3500S. It quickly became clear that Rover’s marketing people had been wrong to assume that the buyers of sporting saloons wouldn’t be interested in leather upholstery, and so from January 1972 leather upholstery became available. In order to keep the base price of the 3500S competitive, however, it was offered as an extra-cost option. Many took the bait. By the time the car went out of production in 1976 to make way for the new SD1 3500, it was still widely respected as a high-performance saloon, and was still a hot property on the second-hand market. It was only after the superior performance and interior space of the SD1 had made their mark that prices began to drop. Then, as the cars became affordable to less wealthy buyers, it suffered the same fate as had the Jaguar Mark 2 some years earlier. Many examples of the 3500S fell into the hands of people who wanted the high performance but weren’t prepared to pay for the maintenance. A lot of cars were driven into the ground in the late 1970s and early 1980s – and that was when the gearbox troubles began to show up. The problems tended to come about either because of oil leaks that went unattended (Rover recommended that the level was checked every 6000 miles) and/or because the wrong oil had been used (the company recommended a 20W engine oil rather than conventional gearbox oil, which is usually thinner). Hard use by drivers with no mechanical sympathy did the rest. Gearboxes became noisy, teeth became chipped, third gear would jump out of mesh on the over-run, and things went from bad to worse. The best solution, some owners thought, was to replace an ailing gearbox with the latest Key 3500S production changes Suffix ‘A’ models were built from the start of production in summer 1971 until September 1972. In approximately January 1972 inertia-reel seat-belts became standard, ‘teardrop’ headrests replaced the so-called ‘ET’ type (although headrests were still optional at this stage), and leather upholstery to the 3500 pattern (ie not box-pleated) became an option Suffix ‘B’ models were built between October 1972 and January 1973. The engines also became suffix ‘B’ types, now with lip-type crankshaft rear oil seals, and the engine number next to the dipstick. A revised steering-column lock lost the second inhibition feature. Through-flow ventilation was deleted from the rear body pillars (although it had gone from the final suffix ‘A’ models, as well) Suffix ‘C’ models were built between February 1973 and September 1973. The original machinesensed 11ACR alternator was replaced by a battery-sensed 18ACR type. The hazard lights lost their separate fuse, and the fuse for the HRW was now in the main fuse box. The original hooked, hardplastic knobs for the choke and petrol reserve were replaced by round knobs in a softer material. From April 1973 Champion L92Y spark plugs replaced the original L87Y type to reduce misfiring. In July 1973 Dunlop Denovo run-flat tyres became optional for cars with power-assisted steering Suffix ‘D’ models were built between October 1974 and December 1976. These had a lowercompression engine (9.25:1 instead of 10.5:1) to cope with the phasing-out of 100-octane petrol. A driver’s door mirror became standard, and a passenger’s door mirror was optional. Sundym glass and headrests became standard for the home market, and the heated rear window was fitted for most markets. The five-spoke wheel trims were replaced by the push-fit type used on other P6s. The front-seat backrests were reshaped to give more rear legroom, and Ambla upholstery was deleted, while box-pleated and ventilated leather became optional. A tufted carpet material and a lightercoloured ‘wood’ trim were used. A longer gear lever was fitted, together with a safety-stem rear-view mirror, and a mirror on the passenger’s sunvisor. The parking-light position was deleted to meet new legislation. Lucas Square 8 fog-lights replaced the earlier Cibié option, and black rubber floor mats replaced the earlier link and charcoal-grey types. In approximately October 1974 the push-pull switch for the heated rear window was replaced by a rocker type LT77 five-speed type from the Rover SD1 – and as SD1s began to succumb to their own many problems during the early 1980s, so such transmissions became more plentiful on the second-hand market. It was a reasonably straightforward conversion, but inevitably many owners neglected to tidy up the console area around the relocated gear lever, leaving the conversion looking somewhat makeshift. The five-speed How many were made? Some 17,721 3500S models were built, mostly for the UK market Fast and stylish, 3500S was very much a car to be seen in during the 1970s Home-market cars 48100001A to 48111747D (June 1971–December 1974) Between January 1975 and December 1976 cars were numbered within a combined sequence (see below) conversion also delivered a 3500S with very strong acceleration, much more refined high-speed cruising, and better fuel consumption. I had a 3500S in the 1980s, and I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find HOV 310N still around today. It should be, after all the rebuilding I had done on the underbody! It was a superb car to drive, with shove-in-the-back acceleration in every gear, and its own endearing transmission whine in the intermediates. Fuel economy wasn’t too bad, either, and it would usually achieve at least 20mpg even when I was trying hard. It eventually went in favour of an SD1 2600S manual RHD export cars 48200001A to 48201097D (November 1971–December 1974) One car was not built, making a total of 1096. The combined sequence was used from January 1975 to December 1976 LHD cars 48400001A to 48402275D (August 1971–December 1974) The combined sequence was used from January 1975 to December 1976 In the combined sequence serial numbers ran from 13000 to 15002, with prefixes 481-, 482-, or 484- as appropriate. Within that range, 106 cars were not built, making the total 1897 (which was an exceptionally good car, but that’s another story), and it was a real wrench eventually to part with it. Would I have another? Yes, I would, but circumstances these days are very different. Back then the 3500S was a wholly practical everyday car for me. These days, with young children to cart around everywhere, it’s not a very sensible proposition for that kind of use, and I’d have to think of it as a weekend warrior. Then there’s the issue of where on earth I’d put it… But then we all face that kind of problem from time to time, and we usually manage to get around it somehow, don’t we? ■