13-26064
Transcription
13-26064
I - ()RI GINIA-1- PP3 IBEABuCH),IKEMEFLAA,c. \19017 NiO, 70761/65376 ELY STATE FRistrAl -0-B0X t clg9 E13 NV 930.1 rr„rr, se:44Ln_ - CLEUNOEMAN leitelmtrus ea PI.' A.(212 • AMILA"..-41 rAigard DEP CLERK- 419 1/1-1-VITELLANT IN FROfS PETSON THE SuPREivIE COT. OF THE St4TE OF , NFVADA lb 12 13 • 14 IK.7.1vIEFLIGA CHARLE5 113EABUCI-1/ API7ELLA .51FRENIE CIA/Kr NO- G20 G7 OM Cl/ORLI) WIDE- VIEBI DI5TR1 Li CiauKT NOA59g230 E1 Cirrn-LTUDi CiAL. IDl5ICTCbJT 18 - 19 20 21 22 23 25 27 2i OF TRE STATE OF NEVADA) IN AO NEVNt9PAY) TANuAgY • FCF TFiE COLINI-Y OF CLARK 69,ZDf3 fp:54Am RE5P6NDENT5 IFKIRTEv OPPOSIii bN TO' THE RECEIVE() JAN bg 013"TKADE K , UNIVektAN CLERK (OF SLIPKEME a-. u7T : , ...,.t, :-Pki lit:I.:EkK)__Fff-: GA gPiNG DOCKET ENTRY I/17112 e lat3G7., 7).)_AND Fig5'0ANT TO 714E Et- 1- _ r'prEarNEK TO PRoC2 1 N -,: RM4 P741_5_,_ _1 1:ETCLERK Fr LE 61 A Nia_g,f7-:auESTI__ECiK ( 1 (Lb ■ ••■•• EAL FO-011-3-d4900 COME5 NOv■LAFLL.,1,\&iT RE--MEP-LILA CHARpRopER FE•Rsoi\l, A All7 ENT TLE-p ile)FT,05_ iLE5 ,2 3 1 42E-7 ciFu fly 11 • i,11•110,W. f . i51 pw,p ,Tuo& Ai a-NT: OF A 1317a--AL 4pOCK1 - NO 62067,, P.Rt/Trap oF yyç-PA147:5D/V; - RECEIPT gy in/A44Am .i1 7NLIARY 0.9 ) 2013 ( #7/97? 6F ELy STA ' 1E . 1 1[364\8244_if It PRISON, (A1DOC) Ot '6(/l03 DO C-3626,4 CREV.. 1,7/0i) AND AmiT A- cHop,_ A5 pRob -5‘1 - 9 to. OrPOsITC0-7■/ T6 iffE IIRECEIVET3\ OF TRE' CLRK, ..(9F AN • v.. RECE(PT Fo-g ECW4ENTS tdoeizoi2i_FILEP 011 CEw AL PkoPEg PawsoN Pr1-07- PRo6 1G . la Cl 20 21 22 23 .24 • 25 „ 2) 27 • iLED Da E 0 ?; OTT CE N b. 2t36`.7 CASE F AF PEA 1' 2 e\ - ANP,..THErzE71N ) dER THE PE517.645a-.. TO 1THE Tif-V\I, n2 2013,, _RE-c.E79.vgp_ • 10---AN (vs' 2.013 T.F40.g 14,LiNpAN ) cLERK,OF:71 . • .47, CoaRr DEPI4TycLERKIISLuEsTAMP'', AND Pkial ) •AND AI-TAD-NEP AS PRooF, lia-KEN-- -FRE /0-DAy Loc t_IR_StJANT RE-HEARIN OF MATTER OF C1ARI-15 PerciSteg Arl MI5 508M) 5318 NN'ETZ-E7 Also TTAlatY, . 7-14ÄT 7r-iE FiLE7 DEC. Oa) 2011, CLERK oF KT, _?el PPlA CA LflDf ROCE-1, IN-FORMA p41417E:Roi ND ORD-a-IR) id&-R SLISmirm-E, oF ENEaRC.EmE-Arr or "Ji4DailIEN7 1/ CASE- NO- A5 -- 982,31) Tera-K e9 F T-1-1.15 CcsuRT SC.- NO 47261 REmi -1.ftTED `7-0 71-iE P' z1c1T CoLig-r/(EIcyfITH)i'pivisto-Ni OF CAW_ MATTY- R5 MARcH9 , 20,o7 AND WERE RECEiVED ATLAIA1 OF THE MAR i2 2,6C7, ANC) 8)/ TI-IE GIs THE pigt-Ricr- Co “R-r-, FbR THE 'EACTITLE-'D LiE7-1 THERe(Nr ISPosiTtbN jaELE_P_LSCfnaay2_. STATEMENT OF THE' CASE ) PURSLIANIT it) THE CciveLAINT DFNE--CIAFNCE DtsTR1CT CouRT C,ASa- NO. A 5-96230 OF RECENED .9.4gm ssi ON) , NOV 2S 201( aLEKK oF , ECouRT; reriz NV. i 1TH2Q (I, REQuEST; FNFoRC,A1ENT OF 3-1_10GmENT, CoArRAcT/ACCAtfi 44D ATT4D-4e", NE-REINI As EV41, 3173 Fo-R RE-viEw OF THE 03-uRT1 FoR FUN/GI Su1mod5/M7ER Si TO PRocEEP IN-RYRA174 PALipos, THE OF PR 0 ce-ss Ar MCP s CO; 5(6) A /VP 4r, LI witerer) Tb APRcP. 4 . EKE issumx THE APPL CATI t54 WE'RE FLED big DE'C C')) 01i AND .13Y nia Co-aRyi fr1mcAL5p i /S5LiED VER ,$'HEET"17‘' OF 66-ot\ITY, NEVADA ,Fagm viL 17A 201 _REV 2- 5 Si GnIFD il)(_EGAL 2EPARWIa-A/774IVP t)AT'D DEc.„6 zoiLi i E'R f CAL. As g erf. NG, ENFoRcEfriEALT nF Ti-rPGAIA(r,` iff3u.4 E- r ArrAcHEO /45 EXHJBIT5 fREVIEIAl i ay 77+13 uRT, it-e aMPIANT _RAP 0-EGFP THE - 1\11:7 1-1 4EdCE OF LACk. OE RL-aF OFSLRRe-Mff Cotm-r /\/6 - 472(.i) FE/sill -7ED .SIA/cE ivIM'CH 7 2007, TO DisTRtc.-T CouRT, 44.17,- ,LAIA/ 1 M-604 61-54 frk/ERE A FiNAL 0 -14.DGAIFNT; NANP/Imwsi rerR cir-roR CL4/m5 OF 17/5Poscn IN) ll_ORPFR ARI5e- PURIN& THE CALISE oF THE CaLiRT OF F"'I3 oo2C61-7 IN- PART Pr e- VEgs(NC IN - 04 ANp REM/VI-DIN LINPffg NRcF' )2(17)5. _ )ivtiniC 7 HAT LiFoN TR-E _RDA's-510 N 6F 7.415 f41 G1-1- ' CN1RT 1N1 MARCH 200 171 MP TILL t7ATE- op - Co,MPLAINT .45F FiLaD APP40A-770--Al PEc C cl THAT NEGCJGENCE OCcoz,i!..,e.P) WHILE THE RGY_77 jERSAL OF 6KPER WO. 4726( 14/0 E-'- /N--FFa- .1_ IAND pis ros(TioN) INR-RE NOT' RE1-C -1\/-"rP. Fl...__ IFELIF5 ""INIT11-1_Ep Trt-4gETO • ! iHE /MA1TE F Rm_LEF AS Ci-ArmEP Fois 0,45/4/›LiC ER E, _1T4E 1- RS. III N"F•RAIAt_. A u gel-f LFF FLAmIrriFF (KEMERAA (seAsucw fro 719. 761 IA( - Ci-L51-0/7X 1 OF /VW, AND /9/4/A/537 TT763 OF 13ANK OF/WE-Ric/VT NEW Mgkr PHopAld( 14-Rizo/vAi CECe3; ELI-5 FA RGo 1314NK) pizic KLISi-fAIER) OF NEIAI )1g.k.) AND CEPRic KusfiN PMM, 4F AtFliv)*x i /4W7 eril MAY i 3 2.06 4, JN PAL-AS -1- (-4s, Hob CommcgcE STRa•-a-- (1-{Ai THE ALITR,RITy AT- LAW c'D'F SA-ID A-1-1Coulz-rIT 1A/ERE GNERNED B)", THE Si4pRE-/yiE R. 14E_ Ko S' 6 )C2)C), REPEALEP Fb-R ADA/WS-I-RATNG' RuLEO AND UR- DATEP Fo-R. OPeRATkiff DCFDaRE 0(3) 11\1770,17 OF 2007 ,APCP THAT) 11-fg APMIMSTRATIVE AND /NVE5TIGATIVE FuNcTioA/3 jfrI5LER V- PA cHTmAN, 424 Li-s 1449 ) /4-750-31r S-cT ciSq- ) ,q91-1--% Z.N.33 j 1-1-7 1,-E13-217 12g6i75 PiSCLISSiNG LiNla• THAT .3 -71;3AP.NT,5 ADMIN151k4 F\IR AND INVEsTiGtATIVE Ft4NCTI0-N5 FiKopet 7405 E OF AN ADVOCATE ) , (ACA ,3-4-035*; 3-4036; ETC---. APPLIE7 t-tizEIN AND e -F-- ThE (1A5E No. Ci6lzG , THAT 1.-IERIN ) RIMKtNa A5 ADVacATE ) WERE 11-1E RETAINFD OFNER4 Co2JN5Et ) Acwowl.E-12 13)/ -Ttf CbuFT- or FiLE77 /4-PR AL 409 rm)D3 Cia 1gEMERILA 1E64 : 17.144iNTIFF/1-7671770Fo-KT eLiaff 1/VERE DAVID z. CifFESNOFfr, ESQ. NOVADA .BAK )\10, 2272 6F RADMAN g- CI-ESN6F-F, 52o SO114744 Fem-cgm STRT 1-1As VEGA 5 9 NEVADA 89101 7iLF1-1-014E;(702)384-5563 M-tO WERE -n-+E gas T rmIPENT TD5L-IF7RalviE CeruRT CASE NO- 4726 t) AN p 6P/15i T,/ o-N1 N Po 7 Pf,TH/N THERE! N E 1A15gF ALSo THE. SLIFREmE CfroRT OFAiSt 2602 '/A171>`./CC5i>a, r-s) DA `vbgPel T17-4E \tgiFirop ASsNil Fcriz 5L:4133)-TTLITE Cti-NALSL suPRG-ma° AMP 7PENCEFQ-17-rti_, fiA UT CAse No frkk. (NITAINFE) WE lpri-te-N4L FuNCTio-a5 AS CtruN SEL 'Tb PLAINTIFF tNHi5 CRimiNbot-t- 1K0-ce --7/1\/G 5 AND A1-50 ACTEV NAIPE:g COL.07, OF sTATe LAvVil iN /41>1inliSTRATIO-ig OF 'PC-ZCEIPT5 6F THE (- RiNf RAIAtOF Mk'/ L3 2064 ) AND IN SCR,l6c, 14 1-fiCH 71746-1\1 LJE R6PEALFD Fb -g AR- 1. 13) IN 24564 1.4ANIT -719 SCR. 42 Antp &RAN-FLP AND -THE TkAAISR_ eF PRI)-PffR-17, RSQ1-11REP SETTL-c--,D AT-LAWI V'L VJRIE NEVER Di si;365.5p, SEE 'i7A'Y V. zusal 922 F22 5v3 1i2 N 972 _ /VEY. (1%) , FRE Ce3MPARFD ScNAa, -TD IIDAy' l ThAT APPELLANT 114E4IFF4LA CIIARLEs affNCE OF LACK oFp6::_t_L, HAD St-IFFFRED oF THE Cort4gT.15 Og:DER[DF CASE No.4747 „2_007, RE4)0(gil4& ' al-tasN6FF"') TO 1.7-A41(?I ) F'13 FER ACCOON7 LA/HfC,H WERE IN 1-113 possEss'og AND Fag -ME' AppELLAnn- PaR5U4Afr TOIf fE HI. CS, AND 4 -P-1(3, ANp umAwF-1_41Ly °DAY' CA-Liso_ THE" FALSE- /1■47K1SoAIMEN'Ti oF 1607a7L-L-A-NTI iEYAE51-iCi-fi" I N "Th-fE NEVADA DEFART: PRISON I SINCE 2007 1 OF 'PIE RE4'1171?mag-T_ r..ET T$1E C0LAT,OF AIEVA2A 7 t5SUEO, gFspb-wpwroig5/vofF, ANp PT ACT LiNPR Col-crg OF .577-17 tAlAi 74:01zFf3,1 Ni o-LATTN6 ,APPOIANT5 CZN5ITTLIT10/441_ f-fT5 AT-L4 . C5FE 47H AvV/2 114TH 41v1EAOMEAn3 CDN5Tri-Ltifo-NO;AND 14AP NoT REMITTED MYR 1RAIAL5FRRE4-.D PRop-FrrY) F uNiTm7 sirr AMILAgT i TELL TH15 DAy RGuMENT TOE CoN5717LiTto1JALITY OF ME SiNG-E-51.133-ECT (NCTIATNe REOuiREmeNT OF NFAI -REv- STAT: ss2515. 609 MUST (3E EVALLiAT6D LINPFR 7FIE Fli2c(5 LE ALANC(N'e TEST, NOT 5TRtc1- SCRLJTIN PE SIN. aLE -5 La.TE-c-r REQL.wElYSENT OF IRE CAGE NO‘ .o(7, REet..11RINIC. A FILING Fe 6 FUR • - . t715Fb5MoN1,1 5TffM.5 FM SUPREME 0.9rtjg-T12CYCAZET NO . .3265-1 1NvoLv(Ne APPEtimT 1i3E4BLIct-ft, AND THE STATE OF N5VADA 1 14 2002, AN7 1_1170:4 M ESTAI3LotiMENIT o'r A NE13-silE RPRis-a. vt.1 2, Fog APPotIANT) pURNC, I1\-PLANTczt.I.Dutt AL-ElYT FF-15. /APM_LANT'5 BEHALF, AND PARol_k'tivaR- EME-17 FOR THE- RE-FtrizT- P. Na7 1- vvc.wili 'OF .5-'06 MtLitO-Ki At4DIT ‘THERI-13 Ai7VOCATE GI4ESNOFT- WERE t5R--R.T) To TR TFfE DiSTRicy NSFER ReCo-RD.5 AND FiLas ) DIN len-fiRT) clUD 3"%&.F>f-i 7 BoNAVUntit-Rc', ANP 113 TREApp 4i\i)/FCLED oF ,TL4L 7 2 aLLANTilEgErN,As t it3,_E/ABuCI-1-t t AND 6F 1-W HAD NibT LL -ME CbMP/A-thir biz WRIT' (Z4EP /3')/ DtSTRicT iN CASEIWRITA/6-A5172 612 1b1 CASE No- C16( 26 12, AT-I-At ,SEF RANT OF FE 5 13 It:(5-Am 2,066p fro-ficH CI4LI5F3 OFACTwN /ro-R, RE/4 1-ir SEvEN S REVE-R5E7 AAlp REM EP Fug 1'EL40- F 13Y IS C6ft-OZT IN Pa-cger NO. 47264 ,AirWci-I 72ô117 PE5 - 1417( cATA 61\AI LINPEK "TFtg- FlgigeLe BALANCING 7 - 5-7,0 AN_Pgi 1 'S'iR ci SLRuiLaYi -1t7-1-E A-Pw-cAr C-HF5A/DFF: /WE) TriE STA:MI AND AS R-ILFP OF TWi COU7 ScMi. 4726/ I- Alifir7E - SuPposzo Tv •TR4A/5FP 015171,517-7DN - NAIPo7-grtz)-1-41N5 , 70 AFF7F4LANT`fE4 BUCtie ANP AT- .4-AiAl E 1100 131-IFFINGMN SGs P- 2D THE STATE 6NEVADA 1-V3 1994- NEV.' LE705 HFKE 1HE _TuDGE LAcKEp 7LigisD.raTteitv OF tsetATT5K t4NTrLttT ii/VETE-- RECE--IVF2 FRE Pisi-RicT- CznAr (MAR 12 2007). I t-fAT jA/RE VES1Z-D 5eLaty (1■17He 51.4PREME. CMRTI LINDER 7-+E RataVANT 5TAM-It7:53 -THE 94CottRI-- HAD eNriRta .04/4DI-ipvis_toA/ AN! ApparAt F71./A/6 OF -Pia": friATTER FRom NOTiCE &FA-pPEAL_ UNTIL THE- IS5LIAA/cE OF RTIF(cAT 0r- 3-I/PGA-a-NT% ArPFUANTJ/E3EA6uci-e AS An/ fivfrIATE. Na0C), FF-KE /Ar-RE2grP7 - or CEgriFiciri OF 31JDG(4FAITc-A10-472(1„ oN MAK. (Fc 2,6(f. Rs177.155' Mp *5177 - 305 "NTANS THAT 714E CERTIFic4T OFT0,0mENT/iA/P VAR(er05 inkg PO- CLIMEWT5 COWSPTI-ITE 770-1-F gEmiThThigi _ tkrVIEVF,tc AIRAP 41Cci) DE7A/F5 THE R TO 5E 4 cER1Fia-9 CoPY OF THEL-Tioo - , Of,M0N OF TfiE CoaRT; F111 01, NA Cu-PI 6- F eau7 To Costs 04E55 p 4Ny PlE.C.110A1 A.5 DREcf, THAT A Fc3FAIAL REMITTITUR (.4111 11. is• THE ReGIVE17 CeiRT1 CANt O• 7c LiP■ Olvtar TD NO '4 7261 . oF MAK 13 2,011, P THE Aff2E-Al_ NO- $7774, AO ierrAcei evio--eveE; tAERE wi71-1.6-07 etTT/R4 4 709A1 MD MUST 13E Fo-RGD,A7---miAil , CiTirVC iv . g.s 239-330. ziAlEIFEL V , STATE ) 1 6 73 510 17-2P S72, '39 NFV.242 FRA-up la-77 6s- WHERE TliE TEgM 8 FALse IA/L--;7RE /\10T5YrVoNYMOu e j (Allift ilFt7RGEI- 17'1. So THAT pf.:711-7\12AAtil (NO AcLE --, .1.-(MNT.5 ()-1 7FfE -TRUE _ ap Tf+Ar 7-IE (NST"R -: AA/p -rt-tRE-70-pE bt/c-'-: SIGAlkirM.-,-- OF TF-t. frtivaTHE---- OVNOT FogGp, Cc3 LILP a E-- co N V I Cr&Y, 14/11-6 4 FiTKViA77 (Y.-ig EWT,AtNE-p 1N THE cE-g-RT---1&47E5 MERE FALS 'R , (SEE ISIGNIED T- R c.d1-4.ART)51 Ci-fiEFDFp.clE TI4E'KE- R-F-7, THE siNGiz---sUBD-E---cr AT AIR. 295009, W C t -i i?ff01-irRE7 THAT T1 -fa ie ff5FbAIDEA/75 6A/ AFFEA -1- TkoAA/5F EE NOT 54-Fspo-D ) RiRSLIANT Tb THE 1.4N Egi-TFLE-1,› Reerr--1-- /OF A4A-f (3 20 j oF 744PGAIN7- 1 gFcwisiTE oF pEr5p651-rtNNR7 - RFLT1-(W5., AND Tf-ft,5 &NAT - INE-Rff A-Lao ) Pg5/7 6N5f8t..F AND NO atey / 4pt/Ks/47-F _ C.t4EsNoPF II IN -Tr-fE Co i4oKT ) lAlfritCH RPF5L1LT3 17\/ ATE LLANIT FALsE I 1\1117r< ISO AIMENT Cti NG I I DAY ° .1-Fiz A AT 54/0 Ca). IHEREFeg i AFPFAL Pocke= T WO- 6.2o 67 mug; CCD Sp AS ) To SEAL AN,p C ---R-riF-Y POCKET AID - 4726 ) 6 F TwDOmEATT- OF E2F Ar-1A L. ei NRicF6o 4 PAAP2P NP 4o2 FE y-K ToE 5477 AL OF IRE SLIFgENE C.MRTATAig 4P45/1,5 -.__ a NOTICE OF POTU-KnAL 1715MISS4L FeY-R L-Lig:E_TO f24Y_S_LIPKE/467 CouR T F7LiNc FEE 922 P.2d 536, 112 Nev. 972, Day v. Zubel, (Nev. 1996) Page 5 case like this, Day must satisfy two elements. First, Day "must prove that the conviction or sentence has been reversed on direct appeal, expunged by executive order, declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or called into question by a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus." Heck, 512 U.S. at ----, 114 S.Ct. at 2372. This element was satisfied when the district judge dismissed with prejudice all criminal charges pending against Day. concluded that a delay in filing an appeal was not an action under color of state law. In further support, Zubel states that a public defender's decision not to file a frivolous suit is within the scope of traditional lawyer functions. See Polk, 454 U.S. at 312, 102 S.Ct. at 446-47. Zubel argued that Polk is directly on point because the allegation raised in that case--that the public defender injured the appellant while acting pursuant to administrative rules and procedures for handling criminal appeals--is identical to the allegation raised in Day's underlying claim. We conclude that these cases cited by Zubel are not dispositive because in both cases the individual attorney made a unilateral decision either to delay or to not file an appeal on behalf of his/her client after the case had been assigned to the attorney, whereas in the instant case, no attorney was apparently even assigned to the habeas corpus proceedings. *540 [8] Second, Day must prove that the defendants' representation of him during his unlawful imprisonment violated Day's constitutional rights and that defendants were acting under color of state law. The determination of whether a public defender acts under [112 Nev. 9791 color of state law depends on the nature and context of the function he is performing. Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U.S. 42, 54, 112 S.C. 2348, 2356, 120 L.Ed.2d 33 (1992). "[A] public defender does not act under color of state law when performing a lawyer's traditional functions as counsel to a defendant in a criminal proceeding." Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 453, 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981). However, "a public defender may act under color of state law while performing certain administrative, and possibly investigative, functions." McCollum, 505 U.S. at 54, 112 S.Ct. at 2356 (citing Polk, 454 U.S. at 325, 102 S.Ct. at 453-54); see also mbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 430-31 & n. 33, 96 S.Ct. 984, 994-96 & n. 33, 47 L.Ed2d 128 (1975) (discussing line that separates administrative and investigative functions from those of an advocate); see, e.g., Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507, 100 S.Ct. 1287, 63 L.Ed.2d 574 (1980) (public defender acted "under color of state law" when making hiring and firing decision on behalf of the state). , f - [9] Zubel does not dispute that the state and county public defenders' offices violated Day's constitutional rights; however, he argues that the state and county public defenders' offices were not acting under color of state law when the violations occurred and therefore no viable cause of action under § 1983 existed. Our analysis is therefore restricted to determining whether a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding whether the state and county public defenders' offices acted under color of state law when the alleged violations occurred. The district judge said that there was "no question in his mind" that the actions of the public defender, and any actions of a prosecutor, were traditional lawyer functions. We disagree. We [112 Nev. 9801 conclude that a genuine issue of material fact exists regarding whether the state and county public defenders' actions of (1) failing to assign personnel to handle Day's writ petition and (2) losing the writ petition were administrative functions or traditional lawyer functions. Therefore, summary judgment was improperly granted on this issue, and we remand this cast; to the district court for further proceedings. CONCLUSION We conclude, as a matter of law, that the statute of limitations commenced on May 17, 1991, the date the district judge dismissed all criminal charges against Day. We further conclude that genuine issues of material fact remain regarding whether Day had a viable underlying claim against the state and county public defenders' offices. Therefore, the grant of summary judgment is reversed, and this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. STEFFEN, C.J., and YOUNG and SHEARING, JJ., concur. SPRINGER, J., dissents. In support of his contention that the state and county public defenders' actions were traditional lawyer functions and therefore not conducted under color of state law, Zubel cites Franklin v. Oregon, State Welfare Division, 662 F.2d 1337, 1345 (9th Cir.1981), a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision that *541. SPRINGER, Justice, dissenting: The majority notes the trial judge's comment that there was "no question in his mind" that the actions of the public defender and the prosecutor were traditional © 2006 Thomson/West. No claim to original U.S. Govt. works. PATT, NOVEMSER 05) 20(2 "-TA ciG- LiNer)/Yit\f, C_LEKis P CouR -r i SLIPREmE Gerai- NO,C2o6 7 1HF OLIESTIeN As To tAlt-i-ETH-EzR_ OR NoT/F THE A1742E-Li-ANT PrEP THE' FILING FEe OF,S250 A 7 NR52. 25'o COC60 lAltruLL? 1-f4c) PlzervEN F-F(CtE-NC7 6&1( THE FART OF 7T-E API:717,71/14757 71-1F1E- Fo-RE Thist5 C.6-L4R7 WE-RE: RFsERVED› TO AN5vvaR HEREN AN)? Skitn_iLp sGAL CCA-)2/4 RTIRcATE ,TLIDGAIT N6-14726/ t.So 77-64rAPPELIANT MA'y ZECEIVE jr_iDGA4-EArr OFREttEE, CcoC-A5 Nto - A 5/ 7 292 oF Pi sik( C7 ectiRT; NRAP240)C3),ANP IN-PFg-77NERDANCF NT- PART) TO T (NIT) i( pg7tyR APpRoVA-e I/4 FART -ii vitt° NEKE ,PEgmi -Trov TO PRoci-PP _clot Go.LiRT-Ael Fo-RMA PAuFFRIs nON MAY 19goCEL7 ow APPEAL IN FORMA P4LI- 17?Ri5 WIFicyz_ir FoRMOR A LITI-OR i zATI NO_ SEE, ATTACHED ExIll3t75 OF FKlaR APPRoVAL OF sTR CryuRT o F CASE, NO A5, 7252) CS. 'CA/ 05 472(, /, 515176i 5r7r794). ONE CAsE ANP 11AFFFA-L /7tYcKET1-5; F-0-R LAci< oF CFRTIRED ME-14T *DUE TO No 4726i , AS RECEIVE)? itihR IS 2011 ) Sy APPELLANT HERF/Al, AS ii\liatE 16E- Ast_tb4t, Npop N 7(97'?. . IN Colvausta4 _ g5 uANT Tb THE: Ft NANCIAL LER Ti lycVp 11M5ANO2NOV 29 Fo-R CASF5i N ciefTG-5 sa-R51 11,2067) ar7opj Li(g),5777cN AA/74726/ 1 14AD SiCA/4---pl AALLTAITT-tOgizep efl9 e oF IAL5727-17-0A0/01/4- ACC&LiAlTA-AITICND0C) ,% EACANLE OF -.73et AND 42ot?.o0 1mS'AvaV65,"1 IAND Lit3/417-M.ID 14811■1 A5 Extlierr FO-R, RE -vow _ OF TT-1(s CouRT, ,:litRi5Dicercod vti6RE AN' 17 WE-f -R ESTP.2 LIPM 7Th$ n0-7AT RiRsi../ANT 773 THE dM.:1171 GATE. 0F JZIDOME/VT _No- 4 -726ii_/Uf1I A/co WIE 2067_,40_, TIRED ebP>711 0-4T. 74,4-klAnip 1 110 7 PE miTTABLE hi-AT 7T-115 it5PPO."1.77oN‘ BE CA/S!2L?7?EV FTIf 1 47/FFi1fOTDA(1 11) TT/EOF7,$ :„.17-1E fEr'-577-Fori OA/ Fai7 _ ILY/A/6 _ , • OF ,7-0Z(sDICP0A( HWI-ItCH l?ErDLIIREp sTR4N5 liaP6N REM rip ThI To_77pg Pi .,.51R/C,TCPURT/4AV bT, ANyTT4/N& 8E-f-TygE -MAT As 113:Y Mg RECOPT C)1 ,7, MAR_ 10- 26/ RRO;EP I .A1E14-17 Ff 0-1 4/0<s, • . }ESPL-r -zeaVE 9-43040717 b. m H • PAY ()F so/m-11[R 167-, 2of , 113EA13LICHI, IkEMEFULA Fko VFR I Fi CAT 3 ic 12 3 4/ 14_ I(' INMATE1 IN 13),OPE/Z PEwtoi\I I P6, /KEWFFLILA CHN<LE5 Ii3EABLIctil,No.`7197% AND Ag APPE:LIANT TO THE 51(19RE -AiE Coak=rr6F NEVADA ) IN( PoreKE-75 MO- /-1726 ANP 6'2067 po HERESY. VEPIFY THE FogE . G0-TwO ibPPo511713N 11 E:Arrin.F.p.) 1-21-0;4c)/N ) 76 HAD E -0-iv 0--RRifc -r- AN't30 CONCA5F- ArThrs-T-A4E-WT &F MY TRuE MingLEP&E ) M f3E5-7-' 1-E/distiNtia At\sp Flii5o/4Af7 . TbThE LeAliv5 OF jorz7 mAIP __)14EARtA-TR-LAIAl i AT i52,41-o31 3( • „DAT-Lp TH15 1< t7A) / OF - etr1 ' S _6:NA-fit RE 17 -E:teE31.4Ci-f1).1)<E/14E-FLgil, INMATE #7/97q 1`40 20 1 1 R,Ly I h N -VA PA ATo, /:/)/D BETo 7-1E p4sEic. ) AT-4,41Ai 23 24 Zq PA/ &f 1 g AATLIRE NO774 Pasb (5si-L) HERE IN NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIoNs ELY STATE PRISON LEGAL MAIL J NAME: e- Doc#: UNIT: 4' '1:32 REPORT TO CONTROL AT ADM1N FOR THE FOLLOWING: LEGAL MAIL: Supreme Court, Clerk 201 N. Carson St. Suite 201 Carson City, Negada 89701 CERTIFIED MAJL: s REGISTERED MAIL: _ DATE: 01I INMATE SIGNATURE: i OFFICER: FP6^5-3 DOC#TIT 9 -7 9 DOC - 3020A (REV. 7/01) 1-1 -1ANI . . „. • /0/4 ID I'L.J17REME-r Ca1,11- oNVAPA ii„OFTICE OF TRE.CL,ERk:,,, 11. TRACIE. IZ- LINDEMAN! CLEgg. I..Z • 13 • 14 .• 15 ill■ t I1 I i li 11 17._ 1c6 illi.ti li,! I1 if !1 , 22 23 25'_ 26 27 2g KE' (Lep NN/ 19 Zolz, RPL`LFOR. RECel- FOR DOCWNIENT5 /I/0Z /201_2 ) FiLe] 1\iciicg bEAPpEAL/PIRDFER Its°5ai RLDT bGRAM- FitFP LL-FT-IF-16D CuPy_bF_Pgi FER m-R561\) NrilCE OF APPAL ) CASE NO. 62b67) D-C, CASE ND. A598230 L1iVi2EmAN/ 1 11 11 V\i1W:y.6744SFM? M 1-)-4-É?: FD P .1rEK5bi\I LuT_,PFoOlAm_ R,17 TF-1E7 AOtNE -- /-) 11 k 113EABL)c-Hf) PENEFT4LA. c APPELLANT' )N1 PgbPER., A-L77 Nevada Supreme Court Docket Sheet Page 1 Docket: 62067 IN RE: PETITION OF FORMA PAUPERIS (IBEABUCHI) Supreme Court No. 62067 IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FORMA PAUPERIS REQUEST, Consolidated with: IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI, Appellant, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent. Counsel lkemefula Charles lbeabuchi, Ely, NV, Appellant, in proper person Attorney General/Carson City, Carson City, NV \ Catherine Cortez Masto, as counsel for Respondent, The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark Case Information Panel: Panel Panel Members: Unassigned Disqualifications: Case Status: Appeal Docketed/Awaiting Filing Fee Category: Civil Appeal Type: General Submitted: Subtype: Proper Person Date Submitted: Oral Argument: Sett. Notice Issued: Sett. Status: Sett. Judge: Related Supreme Court Cases: 58848, 60260 District Court Case Information Case Number: A598230 Case Title: IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF FORMA PAUPER'S REQUEST (APPLT: IKEMEFULA IBEABUCHI) Judicial District: Eighth County: Division: , Clark Co. Sitting Judge: Replaced By: Notice of Appeal Filed: Judgment Appealed From Filed: 11/05/12 Appeal Docket Entries Date Docket Entries 11/08/12 Filing Fee due for Appeal. 11/08/12 Filed Notice of Appeal/Proper Person Pilot Program. Filed certified copy of proper person notice of appeal. 12-35329 11/08/12 Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. No action will be taken on this matter until Pap up5(12 filing fee is paid. Due Date: 10 days. 12-35336 11/19/12 Filed Proper Person Document (Reply Notice of Potential Dismissal for Failure to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee), Order Denying Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis without Prejudice Filed in District Court 3/1/12 attached. 12-36727 01/09/13 Filed District Court Order. Certified copy of order filed in district court on December 12, 2012. (Order Denying Application to Proceed lnforma Pauperis without Prejudice.) 13-00826 Wednesday, January 09, 2013 10:54 AM CIVIL COVER SHEET CLARK County, Nevada Case No. I. Defendants..NCIRL0 Plaintiffs ..... kvivE WEB jiv .‘BUCtil iVEz 4 Attorney i(rAllarin/rffdrEgAne)..1. ILA C. ii _7Lil 1:6e C9‘ SOX f (icsti ,.pLy Alv, cm 30 ( FC) F1/4-14 .. Attorney (name/address/phone) (13 1;E:xievs NATURE OF CONTROVERSY (Place An X in One Box Only) TORTS DOMESTIC O 1. Divorce O 2. Annulment O 3. Adoption 0 4. Name Change O 5. Paternity O 6. Termination of Parental Rights O 7. Other (Specify)__________- REAL PROPERTY Negligence: O I. Vehicle, Airplane, Marine, etc. Negligence-Professional: O 2. Medical O 3. Dental 0 4. Legal O 5. Accounting 0 6. Architectural 0 7. Other (Specify).-------------.---- Intentional Misconduct: O I. Assault O 2. Battery O 3. Interference With Contractual Rights O 4. Defamation (Libel or Slander) O 5. Wrongful Termination of Employment O 6. Other (Specify) Product Liability: O I. Motor Vehicle 0 2. Other (Specify) Business/Commercial Tort: O 1. Anti-Trust 0 2. Unfair Competition O 3. Fraud and Misrepresentation O 4. Negligence-Slip and Fall O 5. Other (Specify).-- -.-------- O I. Landlord and Tenant O O O O O O O O O 2. Quiet Title 3. Unlawful Deiainer 4. Partition 5. Specific Performance 6. Foreclosure 7. Liens 8. Condemnation 9. Planning and Zoning 10. Other (Specify).. Bad Faith: O I. Insurance Carrier 0 2. Other (Specify).- PROBATE AND GUARDIANSHIP O I. Guardianship O 2. Conservatorship and Trusts O 3. Special Administration 0 7. Other (Specify)._ 0 4. Summary Administration 0 5. Full Administration 0 6. Set-Aside Estates CONTRACT/ACCOUNTS/JUDGMENTS PERSONAL PROPERTY 0 I. Damage to Property (Specify)._____--..... 0 2. Recovery of Property 0 I. Insurance 0 2. Commercial Instrument 0 7. Guarantee 0 8. Collection of Actions 0 .3. Uniform Commercial Code 0 9. Sale Contract 0 3. Conversion of Property X 4. Enforcement of Judgment 0 4. Other (Specify). 0 5. Building and Construction 0 6. Stockholder Suits 0 10. Employment Contract 0 II. Other (Speci(y). ------------- - - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 0 I. Gaming 0 5. Other (Specify)._...- 0 2. Dept. of Motor Vehicles 0 3. Public Service Commission 0 4. S.I.I.S. -_----__ ...- SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS 0 I. Habeas Corpus 0 4. Other (Specify) JUSTICE/MUNICIPAL COURT APPEALS Municipal Court: 0 I. DUI 0 2. Other (Specify) Justice Court: 0 I. DUI 0 2. Other (Specify). ..____. ...... .. ALL OTIIER Briefly Specify Nature of Action. 0 2. Mandamus or Prohibition 0 3. Certiorari 877t,ZOIl 165 MI Po Po CIVIL COVER SHEET County, Nevada Case No. (Assigned by Clerk's Office) I. Party Information ILlaintif1(s1 (name/address/phone): ' Ke co.8/uat, < "Tc,c. tres, 1K Defendant(s), (name/address/phone): LOC9(1 a C...0 ;c1.e. d 6t gt-i C. IA Attorney (name/address/phone):0 a. coc We-6 (3 s s Attorney (name/address/phone): FkAIA 0 4/1/iitr,Sol 0 Arbitration Requested II. Nature of Controversy (Please check applicable bold category and applicable subcategory, if appropriate) Civil Cases Real Property Torts Negligence 0 Landlord/Tenant 0 Product Liability 0 Negligence—Auto O Unlawful Detainer O Product Liability/Motor Vehicle O Other Torts/Product Liability 0 Negligence — Medical/Dental 0 Title to Property 0 Negligence—Premises Liability O Foreclosure O Liens O Quiet Title El Specific Performance 0 Intentional Misconduct O Torts/Defamation (Libel/Slander) O Interfere with Contract Rights 0 Employment Torts (Wrongful termination) (Slip/Fall) 0 Negligence — Other 0 Other Torts 0 Condemnation/Eminent Domain O O O O O 0 Other Real Property O Partition O Planning/Zoning Anti-trust Fraud/Misrepresentation Insurance Legal Tort Unfair Competition Other Civil Filing Types Probate 0 Appeal from Lower Court 0 Construction Defect Estimated Estate Value: O O 0 Summary Administration Chapter 40 General O Transfer from Justice Court O Justice Court Civil Appeal 0 Breach of Contract 0 General Administration O O O O O O O O O 0 Special Administration 0 Set Aside Estates 0 Trust/Conservatorships O Individual Trustee O Corporate Trustee 0 Other Probate Building & Construction Insurance Carrier Commercial Instrument Other Contracts/Acct/Judgment Collection of Actions Employment Contract Guarantee Sale Contract Uniform Commercial Code 0 Civil Petition for Judicial Review O Foreclosure Mediation O Other Administrative Law O Department of Motor Vehicles O Worker's Compensation Appeal III. Business Court Requested o NRS Chapters 78-88 O Commodities (NRS 90) O Securities (NRS 90) (also check applicable civil case box) 0 Civil Writ O Other Special Proceeding ti`Other Civil Filing O Compromise of Minor's Claim O Conversion of Property O Damage to Property O Employment Security LULEnforcement of Judgment 1113 Foreign Judgment — Civil O Other Personal Property O Recovery of Property O Stockholder Suit O Other Civil Matters (Please check applicable category; for Clark or Washoe Counties only.) o Investments (NRS 104 Art. 8) 0 Deceptive Trade Practices (NRS 598) O Trademarks (NRS 600A) O Enhanced Case Mgmt/Business O Other Business Court Matters k Date ignature of initiati g party or representative See other side for family-related case filings. Nevada AOC Research and Statistics Unit Res Forte ( 2250 11 I N IT-E.GI-iTi-i :TA> &AL 17) 51R 1 CT CC51-11_77IN A-ND FOR THE STATE oF NVA-177At, CoLiNT5/ CIVIL ACT(01\t, FILE , IKEISEABLICHI. Ot1(\ AN17 kE 'LIRE 17 1E51 .1), ENT- Co frc rt-ANTIEE5 V 0 LP KliT?•E. 1N55 NUMER*. DEPAgimENT - .4726f DOCKE1pi 0 HEARING 17"r( ? I iME 14 :I AMENDED • II 1 •r AL ENS':.DFCEMENT OF -3 I-DOME/4115 "-- 04E2, A Nip __PrTr-tii.A SLiFranetE Coltzr NO. 1-r126i . _OKES NOV\LI PLANTIEF I N PElz150.NL,_10_7_51,1C+414_11<eviEFlu LA. C . OF Tr-1E 1\TEV/Art: PE: PAri r-7vtEATTCo_FEcriws iNivf,4 it: 71779 AT Tiff - ELY _ TAT,L7. _FRISaN 0_4 g'_FENTI:Yi_AN7 F/ I-55 THL5 _ CIVI L. _ Arc m O N ON/ rtw-rizAc-7--)A CcouATT5 /31/00vVAirs w F." R -Erki OW? NAfrtt,--. y AN_17 AQAP\i5T i LiCX"%wri\rr IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI, Appellant, vs. DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, AND LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, AN ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS D/B/A GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, Respondents. Supreme Court No. 47261 District Court Case No. A517292 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF NEVADA, ss. I, Janette M. Bloom, the duly appointed and qualified Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada, do hereby certify that the following is a full, true and correct copy of the Judgment in this matter. JUDGMENT The court being fully advised in the premises and the law, it Is now ordered, adjudged and decreed, as follows: "We affirm the district court's order to the extent that it dismissed Schonfeld as a defendant, we reverse the order in all other respects, and we remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this order." Judgment, as quoted above, entered this 8th day of February, 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the Supreme Court at my Office in Carson City, Nevada, this 7th day of March, 2007. Janette M. Bloom, Supreme Court Clerk By: Chief Deputy Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI, Appellant, Supreme Court No. 47261 VS. DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, AND LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, AN ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS D/B/A GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, Respondents. District Court Case No. A517292 FILED 'MAR 2 0 2007 REMITTITUR ,ANfTTE M. BLOOM maw vF $UPREME COURT BY TO: Charles J. Short, Clark District Court Clerk OtPUTY CLERK Pursuant to the rules of this court, enclosed are the following: Certified copy of Judgment and Opinion/Order. Receipt for Remittitur. DATE: March 7, 2007 Janette M. Bloom, Clerk of Court BY: Chief Dieputy Clerk cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Goodman & Chesnoff lkemefula Charles lbeabuchi RECEIPT FOR REMITIITUR Received of Janette M. Bloom, Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada, the REMITTITUR issued in the above-entitled cause, on INAck DOPUtiDi4trict Court Clerk CE RECEIVED MAR 1 2 2007 ijIv 40 • MAR 1 9 2007 JANErrE N. koc., Eft OF SUPREME COURT .."....._DEP LITY CLERK 70°7 • IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI NDOC #71979 Lovelock Correctional Center 1200 Prison Road - POB 359 Lovelock, Nevada 89419-0359 FILED 105 FEB I 3 A II: I 1 PLAINTIFF, In Proper Person ,0 u DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA --00000-IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI, Plaintiff, 100° CP‘Case NcRi 5 1 Vs. 7 29 2 Dept No. X" DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, and LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, An Association of Professional Corporations, dba GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, ORDER Defendants. Plaintiff, IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI (hereinafter "Ibeabuchi") has filed an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, on his civil action, in the above-entitled action, together with a sworn affidavit, and an Inmate Financial Statement. The Court has reviewed Application and the file herein. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, pursuant to NRS 12.015, it is hereby Ordered that Ibeabuchi's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis along with process of services is GRANTED. DATED THIS ,cY1DAY OF " CO .... cifira I/ a,o fr g RECEIVED JAW 2 3 7nrri Muff, crr.r.x JvD5-zi J (?) L dJa/ 3s 11 'cO M OHS .1a.ci)JO CIL A-14.34 1 W\7/ 0 4.14\ivONaa---a 1 • t S'CN S TsliVOrivbNs_INI Air U. —18T - L! '7 71.J314-3 NIERMEI V aVMN 'AIN)/ QT X1V33. 'TA 11()DJJ~.LL$ i cJ AMU d - 006069 - 60 - V 0I - ) • 6-S6TM"gi"mO7 ...d -3 -- 4 i-fcc t • 59g2. 1. . :‘, , . I - • O.__ . f 1 _. ...14 t3 15 142 ,. • --11-- • 22_ ' 2 261 27 2S ke. 11, AP . iv 7 L I Pt-it/A/RE t\tb NOT TEt.Ef-toalc. CL LEVI REPUE5 ktiffictf HAD, Nor S___L\LAPPL4L--t). CoR MEI< ER5KMPPLKAAti- HE-R5IN T-t-E S 2 Aet6INT4tA/5 a F TFFE S' J.Z. ' 1 A 1 0 wk.! LA BEAeuct-fr 1 5485cR(ser) b 1 a K. a _a.LT__T/D Al 4 ir. _ff 2-012 + ASEE1 6 .a k/ CALIEE oRcrEK 4 MP Art-Act4e5 CAmE A EV LPFMCL , 70 -n-u's R E Y ssca- c.RD(NL6 To The THOu at..A ND triEgEN.je_Ei 0 TTEK Wsiza- "The AM(ArriAINE7 ORDE-icsIV- r> . _V ••.B (D _ - ii-tE- Fi rEnT-TE2, NOW 5EALEP ANiu5Lit3mITTE-v THAT, ijw 60 MeAL6.415_4_A- R-ELtEF S'UFW .FRo Nek Suck{ '314Gilei,E141..,EN 46 sr; PAk -rtcizAR5 Ric---RS(413Mt-r-ri> 1 N -ri-fE 1-2.:EGILt 6- -s-r 65F AFR(1 (2. i 261Z As ' PRO() F :e..uggst_tykArr TO Au NR5 12-1'315 PrscLosuR,G•2 FeyR FIN4140' STAILIS OF- APPLecivr -rrs_t_: . •3 32 4 011/2AW2. 7 14ERE7N/ 1? A FRE Mil Z1-405 O F R'g-Liq- OF 5 C-NO- 4726/ Pf5POSCTION WI Po7 - R (7/TiVA/5 1 Tf-JE- 1-<-Eni reTic17. As ILIK OF FINAL ji./DeAelE,VT NIA-ci-1, 7i _ 23 t k. a 0 60 AIN 4 E. TT F _L Pa - 14AT --TIE ' Ft-tRrt4ER A% ai - 0 . IN- FoEttlA PALIP - R15 AM) AT . t . 0 • lp 6 CE-7 Ti4ff 71--IDGE GOA/z4L&-.2._ CDF I T • A 2.• 2 1/ORpER ,0. - (A/6 ApPL c CATAI TO PRnCE-7) IN PPMA PALITRIS_ WIT 5RL4 A lc . I Hour vLp_ :,_Gsz-: PRE3-1471cE) FicED jvk4E_o_L2gjza , 6.0 lA/ 7g• A - 6 A p: DvP T1 F Oka& N ta PE - La f/VroGAliORDFR S DEFacTS CL1rE0 1, 6- I/ APPEICATIoN 12 tW A 4' Am t • • (.I ELizttn D -T-tr 5 , szD DA • - 11_ -E1d4XLAILL77 FE C EP ?RD 142 _13 23 2 2(4 zs 30 _V32 ER4 At:ERG:TE - kE g U 4 p _Nc (4b/14L- E a- NI _ EX j-ttO1T3) FcriZ 12.6---0vU • _ •11_ 2D A 1-161- I Sr , 201 2 er Fp KE.4 E 610 E- g.. bu'i: d IA7 P4UPFKt5 NE 4/ARRA - '_R'S A Ta •- . rifolPIARANICESigFkoPni? AS Al-ErE KAWT-6-7) --rb FlAtAmFF-PcppEIW 200; (2ea5) 14T-Th4Fp A5 t Xi-403115 a- PAGE, - N.515k, CocasFL (WA Sui.rrEaciAIG AP74L " n"EP CoaRT ED 0 Gk-4, AA E:R f 5-5 /OW —(9 a tvr&-6175 PKOM-R Pg-RSoN ' ,24-sboVGLY) CLE 6F 7T-TE Cazik — IVEK° PtkEr - f> 6 0 E' tI tiAl it ED a- A "trrED A NC EK aP Eo 05- =7 , a. ispc)E . ALL MATTE K5 As tAlFgE NoW ,C6A/CoLl- S P_A ct41_ OiscLosuRe r :73 THe NR5 12.015 , lAltbookAiG 7T-IE REC. 0- A 17212 NHICE "rimiilAL, AN, CjekilL bZE Ro PER PEI?So-tq [AiR4,i7 aA 5-EkL) As STIOnittri - D. /6rPR IL (2, 20(z Q IL SO , Ti- 4T 7T4 - 3 15 _ Disr Lic3 (19s72 N AAI ORN c • 374 ORO . A Tio-At -To _t=1) e - -Gm RBAL 0-7R- P Flto Fiotvi 4- lleto-RTG, 20 - APPaIVASL,E. PLR I\IF74-1. PART Fir-R ac C(Ta:C) I i l.cauisall 6- 5LJA 1T _ F1 _ LL _ RrzekSo Ai EYTH _CP -WKILLA_IYaga - E5 I lEr )CI4 T( ts-u k UL AL 21_ 23 77-fer 2 Pp\ I1 4 FD-R AC):87Q/J4T g OM 0(4R2 14 jAmri&- ERK., cpg'cu=-/ sc4u- ' 2$ -74- — a I 41; EIT-Lrbt Ca- • gr3f -rA_elLX A_Atz). Ina / Pos-E- Fcrg-n-fp\trn-f, .51 aNyok: F6-1E C E iN-17--A-VaZ cApk( or: E "r- L I kC c A ME Tt-t-oz.G. , IwAL 'DC EtzE -Cow sts -rEnrr Jirt4 5E E ARRITR Pc-TuR, WtA51--cg) iiu FHANK5 g'FSFE- CTEgaZ siligkurrp MAK las-zo cirg s-'7ro pi? 1, 1-10EAfuct4(i)ilvt) id- FRO V--/-Py VERIFY Ti-f-E- Fo-e-ac?-fr46 ITR_PLY`i 7-0 6 121O Sf-to (Ai CAu 5 E. /VI RiCe 7 G AL16.______TR14T[4 1 ANC:, AG/ST PE,?-(4RX; HVEm_E_F-141Acti .r :.. r:1-1-,T, _ 2_:___i_ 3 4 5 • , , cat___ HD i5270`15 CLARK Colon)/ 11_3.gAi3t4c1-1-LIKEfrreFutii-cDor. 1\1065:376 C7/979) EL -I STATE PRI5bN IIP-6- aox (q451 Ff-"/ NV Vi30 I 7 ID _ .e■ . . PLANTiFF i 114 PRoPER _ K 13 _ Cou --000 R NeVADA boo-- Re7vtEFaLUBFA(3.1.1CRI 60(14-36,---5617 'VI -F-11247;C )CASE o.Agz3o pEArNTIT-T '5 _KIEMAThistAL134.614_5ss MACfliN ND Xf 1_0_4EazIHNoRT14. W-0.-4■11)ANT: _ 23 FRDAVI zsET 114EME-FLitAiaEABoa_.:, 114E Sr4Tt OF NEVADA) CouNTy - OF //WM PINE 30 31 3z 1,4 igENEFLAA tapewigAiL, 331 frNiDiz,Af ACcRtuIcro LAtAii OF LEGAL AC, - 0.5-a• A5 FoLLows 2. J.1 it4A-T- Livag'E- Ti-fE AFF/ArAir fiq 111-1E "FoREGa- NC? 51A1eKNI,AfFIDAVII_ Coo 2 11:1AT Tt4i5 FppidwiT tAIERV gi4 Atip_g01 - LINDR DLIRass ) OR F0 - -ASONS.' Art4"/ IMPROP6R rz a 3. -THAT IT-fis AFT-- pAvir Nff'RE sb ,- /■/ t4AJ.fJ. St412Fbizr oF My APPLIeATioN Tb iJ FoRMA PzUPRt OF THE" Af3ow ENTLT --D CdituSg. oF AcTION teViiIIENRRcE,, MENT OF '1/4TLIDGMNIT SC No-4726 ( 4- ITIAT I BELIEVE" 7iT-4/41 TO -71-1 R6-1)5.s StNafri- 7F4 i1E:i ,J 5. iT FoR TRE PAST ILA/et-VP' MONTHS, I RAD, NOT' RcE-k\IED ENANCIAL j7)VILE'--- 1\11)51 FROTHMA/15 .1.Y1-B-1E ___EQUX_MNI-C_SouRCE-5 E'MPI-70\lavi&147,. REAL "OJAI IT) FDR645 01% --R-TY, RENTAL I NI OWE, INTL-REST; DiviDEN 4 Lf C iL_ PR)R RE iRFMuN"-- CO -N.LAsitY _ 25_ . Li2tia.5j7roALSNaz) 2S Zcf _ 3( 32 ..33J Tui R5,540 RENUTTY'ag. 8.12A7 266 2yRE:A44--o coLIR OF NE-vADA, FwArL atD6A/tArT/ORDER. A - a 7 ) 2.7. _ .6 . 0-3AT_ WERE ONOviPLIVED., AND BEFN 1 1131,-Y .INCArkcERA -rap g jAiimike E NEvAipA MFARTMENIT PE CoRRcrt biv5_ 'cli4AT I Do OWN A Ci4ECWkiG e9R SAtarvcs Or? D-1.315irgAFE- E3Dx, AcCeLpvT5 writ/ ht'VEF116c0.13M/K i P/1-4o5E 4ccoota;)-07-4TEMa-NT F0R CjiecKiNQ REF-1.6c-r5 A 557 // 454 LANCE IN 7-44Ly 2011, Accerz_INT Nwr1BaR; 412461(0 148155- 2. Srj—THAT PuRsuANT 7D 7Fic-- 11-c.CoaniT Et411A1 MRilizeD.) NE-11-5 F;4RCe OR NO V74 E I Tt4RouGH VF&3LPI 2& 07 _ MIc 771RoLIGI-1 AliCus -r 77-iktz-iGil- AuGLIST, 2(9toS Fog) SAbiff A CLeSt-INT N4MI3 ; 67 It) 7 - _ ID _ (3 . 1T4E. /30 WD Mr-MizEsT Rowe-Nue PL/4R c 101,93 To ibtoi F27 Co 38) SEZIATFicifFD FAIN317-5; _ ILL 140 _ tiL 2b__ 21 23 A heloTORI, .• Th4LL o NOT bkvN ANY RtAL Vm+tatzs, ExCEPT -IRE° SECti_0! ■11.1 10- DL1E 112 MY NT Acs TRE SANKINO AcCe5UNTINC PRoC 1-14va- ANY Pareso,Vc Np_ENIT 1-IPON ME. roR 4.5'uPPoRTI 1D(CEPT MY IFE. 25 12. 114A1- I Do ExPerT A 54/4/F-ie./itTr CHANG IN MY FiNANCE CvER "THE fRi OD 6F "ii-tE 2(0 27 _ moNTH5; AP-Tr-1:z ME- 3 1"riL,F/y{2$ a-NT OF Sc -N0. 1-1726 I/ El%/FoRcE--MArr 6 F. tr 39 • ,cm_ArT 3vt L CASE NA5i72?Z4WNilhelamus -Trie Nr)lhc DEFAULT 7IIIZAIENT5 3( SAW OF AMERICA, W4-7.1-s Fri-RCO, a-0RK Kus 31 PRN\40770N5; DIREOVR CoMF 33 „_INDoc i ETC4 Cli4S.E5 s, A-1(-6tiggo9-c_ivrt. _ oi (S , • - (1-6417402-c PLED _ _AFFt ANT s'ilYallf A/ALIGHT- 1- ugmeR `-ituR _4 1 7 g 9 • IQ . 1_ _ _ 7, _ T-t-fiS t>ATE i BY ME Lit■IM-RksiGnio yiivt) 8 EFOR'g _/ A.j_--,._.1 e ....__,_____ 74. __:.__aL. .5T7iTe-- ExE-c4TED Ar--- /ANIT t FRI5Oki NTT:ARV FLIBLI C , LIN L) L:TiS al R THE Ft9 RES PE(.11-utl_ IDA7M IT-HS 1531 _L4 'TT 7) ARC. AiM) 12,..1 ...du eti varR t6e-454cHI, IN - PR° iiurr pEeR SE 17 LL t-fasnoKtJ3i /4-15 — • swo R cr ND sip FP. 0.■ ' • 2012 44 23 • dwf -;-, ,„ KAY ELLEN WEISS . /111. • _ 2,5 27 _ 2i 30 1• _ - N 3 /il 32 0_5: " "I I FAL) 1-4L, -r-G>A1. ,• 1 FILED MA g o 1 2012 ORD 2 DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 3 4 5 6 IKEMEFULA C. IBEABUCHI for anda IBEABUCHLCOM and IICE "THE PRESIDENT.COM , 7 ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, 11 591,23 0 Case No. Unassigned Dept No. Xi ) 8 ) vs. ) 9 ) 10 IBM (WORLD WIDE WEB) ) ) 11 Defendant. ) ) 12 13 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 14 WITHOUT PREJUDICE 5 16 This application has been assigned for handling to the Presiding Judge of the Civi 17 Division by the Chief Judge pursuant to EDCR 1.30 and heard pursuant to EDCR 2.23. Upot 18 consideration of 1KEMEFULA C. IBEABUCHI's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis: 19 20 21 22 23 iti r100 3H1 JO Ae1313 24 25 26: 2egi IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to the application being incognizable. DATED this day of February, 2012. 1 2 Certificate of Service 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about the date filed, I mailed a copy of this order to th 4 5 6 7 following party: Ikemefula C. lbeabuchi/80689 NDOC #71979 PO Box 1989 Ely, NV 89301 9 10 II Maximilieil 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 , -2- 1 OrFP IKEMEFULA I EEA FUG' I FILED #71979 2 Lovelock Correctional Center P.O. Box 359 3 Lovelock, Nevada 89419 • 4 DEFENDANT In Pro Se Auc ' 1 2 CLERK 6 DISTRICT COURT 7 CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA * 8 IKEI■IFFULA IEEAEUCHI 9 DEFENDANT 10 11 * * ) ) ' ) Case No. C161262 -vs- Dept. No. VI STATE OF NEVADA 12 PLAINTIFF 13 ) , ) 1 15 16 rtrIS • 5 14 25 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAOPERIS Upon consideration of DEFENDANT'S 's Application to Proceed in 17 Forma Pauperis and it appearing that there is not sufficient income, property 18 or resources with which to maintain the action and good cause appearing 19 therefore: 20 1 , IKEMEFULA IEFAEUCNI IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that DEFENDANT 21 shall be permitted to proceed In Forma Pauperis with this action as permitted 22 by NRS 12.015, with no fees, costs or securities being necessary towards the 23 filing or issuance or any necessary writ, process, pleading or other paper. 24 ,5 26 Dated this day of AUG 0 1 2005 JOSER , 200 . 210,VERMICON DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 (F-1 IKEMEFULA CHARLES /BEABUCHI NDOC #71979 Lovelock Correctional Center 1200 Prison Road - POE 359 Lovelock, Nevada 89419-0359 PLAINTIFF, In Proper Person DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA --00000-IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI, Plaintiff, 1. V Case No. 5 72 9 V s. Dept No. DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, and LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, An Association of Professional Corporations, dba GOODMAN & CHESNOPF, ; t ORDER Defendants. Plaintiff, IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI (hereinafter "Ibeabuchi") has filed an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, on his civil action, in the above-entitled action, together with a sworn affidavit, and an Inmate Financial Statement. The Court has reviewed Application and the file herein. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, pursuant to NRS 12.015, it is hereby Ordered that Ibeabuchi's Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis along with process of services is GRANTED. DATED THIS / DAY OF , .j( , 2006. /// /// DISTRICT COURT JUDGE • • et Nevada Supreme Court Docket Sheet Page 1 Docket: 47261 IBEABUCHI VS. CHESNOFF Supreme Court No. 47261 IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI, Appellant, vs. DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, AND LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, AN ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS D/I3/A GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, Respondents. Consolidated with: Counsel Ikemefula Charles lbeabuchi #71979, Ely, NV, Appellant, in proper person Goodman & Chesnoff, Las Vegas, NV David Z. Chesnoff, Richard A. Schonfeld, as counsel for Respondents Case Information Panel: NNP07 Disqualifications: Panel Members: Parraguirre/Hardesty/Saitta Type: Proper Person Category: Civil Appeal Case Status: Closed Date Submitted: 12/01/06 Submitted: On Record Oral Argument: Sett. Status: Exempt\ Sett. Notice Issued: Sett. Judge: Related Supreme Court Cases: 51596 District Court Case information Case Number A517292 . . • • Case Title: IBEASUCHI VS. CHESNOFF Judicial District: Eighth County: Clark Co. Division: Sifting Judge: Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez Replaced By: Notice of Appeal Filed: 65/04/06 Judgment Appealed From Filed: 05/09/06 Appeal Docket Entries Date Docket Entries 05/10/06 Filing Fee Waived: In Forma Pauperis. 05/10/06 Filed Certified Copy of proper person Notice of Appeal. (Pilot program civil appeals order and documents mailed to proper person appellant.) 06-09808 05/17/06 Filed Civil Proper Person Transcript Request Form. 06-10422 05/30/06 Filed Certified Copy of Transcript. Proceedings: April 17, 2006. Court Reporter Jill Hawkins. 06 - 11322 06/01/06 Issued Notice to Transmit Required Document. Order filed May 9, 2006 and Notice of Entry filed May 9, 2006. Due Date: 10 days. 06/09/06 Filed District Court Order/Judgment Certified copy Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed in district court on May 9, 2006. 06-12151 06/09/06 Filed certified copy of Notice of Entry of Judgment or Order. Filed in district court on: May 9, 2006. 06-12152 Friday, October 16, 2009 01:39 PM I. , tit} Nevada Supreme Court Docket Sheet Page 2 Docket: 47261 IBEABUCHI VS. CHESNOFF 06/16/06 Filed Proper Person Motion. Appellant's Motion for Leave to file Longer than Normal Appeal Statement. 06-12608 06/16/06 Filed Proper Person Document. Sworn Affidavit of lkemefula Charles lbeabuchi in Support of Proper Person Case Appeal Statement. 06-12609 06/16/06 Filed Proper Person Document. Appellant's Notice of Pending Motion (Motion for Reconsideration of Judgment.) 06-12610 06/16/06 Filed Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement. 06-12607 Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. and Denying as Moot Motion to 06-16424 08/08/06 file an extended Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement. Record due in District Court Case No. A517292: 120 days. As appellant's civil appeal statement has already been filed, we deny as moot his motion to file an extended civil appeal statement. 12/01/06Filed _ Record on Appeal (Copy). 12/01/06 Processing status update: Submitted for decision on record. 06-24666 01/11/07 Filed Order Directing Response. Due: 30 days. No extensions of time to file the response will be granted absent extreme and unforeseeable circumstances. 07-00781 01/25/07 Filed Response to Proper Person Appeal Statement. Respondent's Answering Brief to Appellant's Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement. 07-01939 01/25/07 Filed Appendix. Respondent's Appendix on Appeal. (Appendix to Respondent's Answering Brief to Appellant's Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement.) 07-01941 01/25/07 Issued Notice to Provide Proof of Service. Due date: 10 days. Respondent's Answering 07-01944 Brief to Appellant's Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement. 01/31/07 Filed Proof of Service - (Response) Answering Brief to Appellant's Civil Proper Person Appeal Statement and Appendix. 07-02470 02/08/07 Filed Dispositional Order. Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding. "We affirm the district court's order to the extent that it dismissed Schonfeld as a defendant, we reverse the order in all other respects, and we remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this order." NNP07-RP/JH/NS 07-03262 02/13/07 Received Proper Person Letter. Letter in response to Notice to Provide Proof of Service 07-03552 issued on January 25, 2007. 02/28/07 Filed Order Regarding Service. In light of our February 8, 2006 disposition, no further action is necessary concerning appellant's letter, and we deny as moot any relief requested therein.. 07-04836 03/07/07 Issued Remittitur. 07-04892 03/07/07 Processing status update: Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. 03/20/07 Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 12, 2007. 10/18/07 Returned Unfiled Proper Person Document. Original document entitled, "Affidavit and Request to Enter Default Judament." 07-04892 Friday, October 16, 2009 01:39 PM 1 • ORD 2 DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 IKE1BEABUCHLCOM and IKE "THE ) PRF-SIDENT.COM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) WORLD WIDE WEB ) INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ) MACHINE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 75t Case No. Vss1gne Dept No. IX 3r) 13 14 ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPER'S 15 WITHOUT PREJUDICg 16 This application has been assigned for handling to the Presiding Judge of the Civi 18 Division by the Chief Judge pursuant to EDCR 1.30 and heard pursuant to EDCR 2.23. Upo 19 consideration of IKEIBEABUCHI.COM and IKE "THE PRESIDENT.COM's Application t 20 Proceed in Forma Pauperis: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 21 1. The Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE du 22 to the application being incognizable. 1 6 23 • DATED this 14 day of January. 2012. 24 23 26 27 II Cal . Cse44,6z 4vezx 240245 ELI 1.4TH G a TialaiISTRICT JUDGE 23 ji 1 The Application may also be denied on other grounds (1) due to the application lacking a Financial Certificate an Inmate Account Statement and (2) pursuant to EDCR 7.42, which states that a corporation or entity may no represent itself in proper person. il -I- 1 2 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that on or about the date filed, I mailed a copy of this order to th 3 following party: 4 5 6 Ikemefula C. Ibeabuchi Inmate #71979, Esp. PO Box 189 Ely, NV 89301 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ii Maximilieli 0IW 4P3 DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA (7'e 10 11 12 IKEMEFULA IBEABUCHI, an individual, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS ) MACHINE IBM, FORTWORTH, ) ) Defendant. ) ) A5q3Z50 Case No.: Linessigiiie&Department No.: XI Efectronical Filed 08/24/2012 04: 5:07 PM CLERK OF THE'COURT 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 15 TO: Ikemefula lbeabuchi: 16 17 38 19 WHEREAS NRS 12.015 permits indigent persons to proceed in forma pauperis withou the payment of court costs and fees.. Such rules and statutes are designed to ensure that even person in Nevada is afforded meaningful access to the courts, regardless of that person'; financial status.' 20 WHEREAS an indigent has a right of reasonable access to the courts, this right is noi 21 unrestricted. 2 Typically, monetary sanctions and/or professional discipline deter the filing of 22 frivolous, malicious, or repetitive lawsuits; however, pro se litigants render such deterrents 23 ineffective because the public assumes their filing fees and court costs. 24 25 tu. 1.* . 28 Jordan v, State. Deo't of Motor Vehicles, 121 Nev. 44, 55-56, 110 P.3d 30, 39 (2005) (rev'd on other grounds b. Buzz Stew. LLC. v. City of N. Lis_ Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 181 P.3d 670 (2008) (Jordan v. State, Dep't of Moto Vehicles may also be referred to as Luckett v. Doumani). 2 Jordan, 121 Nev. at 56, 110 P.3d at 40 (noting that "a litigant's right to access the courts in proper person and wit in forma pauperis status is not without limits"); Baffles v. Dist. Court, 103 Nev. 679, 682-83, 748 P.2d 483, 48 (1987). 1 WHEREAS the Chief Judge of the Eighth Judicial District Court, or designee pursuant I 2 1.31(b)(26) 3, may hold a preliminary evidentiary hearing — referred to as a "Luckett Hearing" 3 to examine a complaint for frivolity and to determine whether the complaint lacks "an arguabl 4 basis . in law or in fact."' 5 6 WHEREAS if the Court, after conducting a Luckett Hearing, deems the petitione indigent and determines that the action or claim is not frivolous, then the Court will allow the petitioner to file his complaint (or petition) and to proceed in forma pauperis. However, if the 7 Court finds the complaint (or petition) to be without merit and/or deems the litigant to be vexatious, then the present suit is dismissed. 9 THEREFORE, YOU ARE HEREBY ORDERED TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY ip 10 District Court, Department XI at 200 Lewis Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89155 on the 25th da)) 11 of September, 2012, at 8:30 a.m. to address the request made in your complaint to proceed i 12 forma pauperis, show cause why you should not be deemed a vexatious litigant and why you 13 complaint should not be dismissed under N.R.C.P. 11. The hearing will consider the factor' 14 enumerated by the Nevada Supreme Court in Jordan v. State ex rel. Dept. of Motor Vehicles, 121 15 Nev. 44 (2005) (attached hereto as Exhibit 1). 16 17 DATED this—day of 2012. 18 19 20 ELIZ DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 EDCR 1.31(b)(26) states that the presiding judges of the criminal, civil, and family division Iciomplete an assignment received from the chief judge of the Eighth Judicial District . . . to assist in the smooth and efficien work of the district court on behalf of the public." 4 ,lordart, 121 Nev. at 56, 110 P.3d at 41 (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.C1. 1827, 1831-3: (1989)). 2 1 Certificate of Service 2 I hereby certify that, on or about the date filed, I faxed and or mailed a copy of this orcle 3 4 5 6 to: Ely State Prison Attn: Skye Fax No.: 775-289-1205 7 8 9 10 lkemefula lbeabuchi, NDOC No. 65376 Ely State Prison PO Box 1989 Ely, NV 89301 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 ZiOZ z, CP cOS 08 614 E l 0 00 • mi 20 1.0E69 da 006-deg ...06 .4.1g3wiso dsn AN kr-12)cot 4.1..V.1,S Kr-12, 6r1 ,L.2/ kL1 L. QN iiin-w-.a>1 C Case No eszoG7 Dept. No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE IN THE MATTER OF, L kE.m ne.441_z_Aaut : Got j #71979' On a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Prison Number L3n,d.A. # Signature 653 Prison Number I hereby certify that the Petitioner/Applicant herein has the sum of 10 on account to his credit at the institution (Ely State Prison) where he is confined. I further certify that the Petitioner/Applicant likewise has the following securities to his credit according to the records of said institution (Ely State Prison): 43i Dated this (`)—C1 day of -3 ' tv\.)F)s-- Kf. C J atO tt Nevada Department of Corrections Inmate Services Accountant Authorized Officer of Institution 5 AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO: N.R.S. 239B.0/10 I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE UNDERSIGNED INDIVIDUAL AND THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT THAT IS ENTITLED: FWAN(C/4L CEkTi ACATR T5 THE 5t_1Pg-EmF cLAIRT,FoR,eAs - --- f. 62o67 , DOES NOT CONTAIN THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANY PERSON, UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY, THIS, DAY OF, NOV, 20 ,2012. . SIGNATURE: INMATE NAME PRINTED: 548Llaff ikE/XEF4LA CHA INMATE NUMBER: q71 ADDRESS: ELY STATE PRISON, P.O. BOX 1989, ELY, NV 89301 SC . Case No. 6(700 Dept. No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE IN THE MATTER OF, ikrm Name T ,c4f3E451.4ai # On a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 7 iti79 Prison Number # 6 53 7 Signature Prison Number I hereby certify that the Petitioner/Applicant herein has the sum of t 0 on account to his credit at the institution (El y State Prison) where he is confined. I further certif y that the Petitioner/Applicant likewise has the followin g securities to his credit accordin g to the records of said institution (El y State Prison): 4 GT • 0-1) ;---61 day of 4( , 9- \ Dated this 14 (1 6 f _ t fV5S' , 200 I '- Nevada Department of Corrections Inmate Services Accountant Authorized Officer of Institution 5 AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO: N.R.S. 239B.010 I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE UNDERSIGNED INDIVIDUAL AND THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT THAT IS ENTITLED: FliV A WCIA L CERT id c_AIL" : n-Lp7-7k.-1,/cF 6)(70:'\, DOES NOT CONTAIN THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANY PERSON, UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY, THIS„DAY OF, IVO-V, 26 SIGNATURE: INMATE NAME PRINTED: i)/. INMATE NUMBER: / .L1 ADDRESS: ELY STATE PRISON, P.O. BOX 1989, ELY, NV 89301 Ole S C , Case No.61A1 Dept. No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF, FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE Wei4at_smiA CtiA)16EAFLICti I certify that 7/9749 On a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Prison Number # Signature I hereby # 675376 Prison Number the Petitioner/Applicant herein has the sum of t on account to his credit at the institution (Ely State Prison) where he is confined. I further certify that the Petitioner/Applicant likewise has the following securities to his credit according to the records of said institution (Ely State Prison): Dated thisd" day of ' , 200 / T Nevada Department of Corrections Inmate Services Accountant Authorized Officer of Institution 5, AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO: N.R.S. 239B.0,1 0 I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE UNDERSIGNED INDIVIDUAL AND THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT THAT IS ENTITLED: <ii - ME A i\IANCiA L C efeiTI Fi CATE To "Rig 11. M o15l , DOES NOT CONTAIN THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANY PERSON, UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY, THIS„DAY OF, SIGNATURE: /1/0-11, 70 ,20k. . > INMATE NAME PRINTED: I FEA13LICi4( likizAAFFI-11A) CH 41INMATE NUMBER: 7/977 ADDRESS: ELY STATE PRISON, P.O. BOX 1989, ELY, NV 89301 SC - case No. 5 77 Dept. No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE IN THE MATTER OF, tiZMEMCHit,16E-A6u0-1( C?E?A_Ja Signature # On a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 7/ 497 (i Prison Number # 6537 Prison Number I hereby certify that the Petitioner/Applicant herein has the sum of on account to his credit at the institution (Ely State Prison) where he is confined. I further certify that the Petitioner/Applicant likewise has the following securities to his credit according to the records of said institution (Ely State Prison): i-\/5S"' Dated this 02-9 day of N.1 6 vi , Nevada Department of Corrections Inmate Services Accountant Authorized Officer of Institution 5 3. AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO: N.R.S. 239B.010 I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE UNDERSIGNED INDIVIDUAL AND THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT THAT IS ENTITLED: Fit\cAN Li A L Ct Ri Fi C4 Tk. 7' ThE DOES NOT SLPReLVIF CbtiRT, FTR_ CASE No. 57791-1 , CONTAIN THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANY PERSON, UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY, THIS„DAY OF, WM/ 2t:), ,2012. SIGNATURE: INMATE NAME PRINTED:k5E4NIN1 IklYMER4A CHA INMATE NUMBER: 7/ 977 ADDRESS: ELY STATE PRISON, P.O. BOX 1989, ELY, NV 89301 21-72. 1 , Case No. Dept. No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FINANCIAL CERTIFICATE IN THE MATTER OF, Name IKEMEFuLA 1.:44.0EABLiCii) # 7/97/ # hereby * Prison Number Signature I On a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (1;53 Prison Number certify that the Petitioner/Applicant herein has the sum of on account to his credit at the institution (Ely State f Prison) where he is confined. I fluffier certify that the Petitioner/Applicant likewise has the following securities to his credit according to the records of said institution (Ely State Prison): clfleq c Dated this.*;1 o, orv) day of tN tkV IV IN( 0 ( , 200.1_72_— Nevada Department of Corrections Inmate Services Accountant Authorized Officer of Institution F;ECE-tvE-p• T. ififr_ :PREME:: Cfror.T. litet.E7 1‹,141?1,P4,41\I ..Aktaltrer) (4 'S 2 12, cieRK cEKTIpicAm INrtilki441111-71 i VEF cAnc KT.7 TO RET/A FLRSLJA-- CoNMENT5 (No. 47261) THE NRAF KEcsNED NOV_ 13 20(Z TRAccE k_-LNDOWN/ CLERK !IF .9-FREME COURT DGRAT1/74. cLEKK `!. 13LuE 51-Am te. A5 SIGNED Foiz„A.K_p_ By 0.4E,15E45u041; T.,_ _ .r.4 AA/p_O.F_.„ , _ IF. ,, ____ _. _Le- PDC- 3°2 0A CREv.7/01) FRortv• S LI PRE/vita"_aTuR .._... __I_ CLEgK 2O1 N. CAR56-N ..ST_Swir: 20_1 CAK5o&I CLTY4E- - - Way 13 . BPA ?c/76(_, Fog _ Mkt.__OF 115/ CAKSONf svi-kEil‘k ,h______ A 10 MAILE17 E___ z.Alket_Z(P_____. __ __12_______ c6i)E. se376/4._ _ __________ i 5, WFgE FRIAP AfgECE_WED Aim/ (3 2017. T_TA_C,7_, .____,,, UN %/MN CLERK 0 Fgu PKE-ME CCURT_PERITY • (5 f/ _114P S-1,-Ampl Ot.1114E CWRK15 coz-ciFicivi-a- noamal 1 , IVO- 47261_, a 1767:- RP1.71415321, 5Pb5liltrAl AL ergot IT n"FMARci-f 7 26o7_ KEM(Ticrul Ntto5E 113LuE STA A41.7‘1 C-KIGiNAL_Wa_Er NOT_TI-fE_AT.Ta'57T2 suppeyi _ IS ■6*, 1„,OA1_734: E 1 ' FACE OF Mca Ai_ _ Cb-ug-r5 /qA-F .20 AfiP 74FFEFoR.g-_„„MAY Altr REPLACE" 5,4ME: DATEp Mr 5 .NoVEM,6FK gOV) 2012. . . __21 _ 22 .23 Z4 25 . Zc 27 ZS A . l RE ...... . .. . ... t, r, 9e t -d .. . . ........... .. .. .. .... . ............... ....... UIVDER THE Ely .,STATE;, NDTARY pwal sicA/ATuRE, NoTAKVF145Lt C. „1 . . C5E-A L) 44EREW . • f- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI, Appellant, vs. DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, AND LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, AN ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS D/B/A GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, Respondents. Supreme Court No. 47261 District Court Case No. A517292 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF NEVADA, ss. I, Janette M. Bloom, the duly appointed and qualified Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada, do hereby certify that the following is a full, true and correct copy of the Judgment in this matter. JUDGMENT The court being fully advised in the premises and the law, it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed, as follows: "We affirm the district court's order to the extent that it dismissed Schonfeld as a defendant, we reverse the order in all other respects, and we remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with this order." Tudgment, as quoted above, entered this 8th day of February, 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the Supreme Court at my Office in Carson City, Nevada, this 7th day of March, 2007. Janette M. Bloom, Supreme Court Clerk By: Chief Deputy Clerk c1/4 ""."CEItleo NOV 13 2012 TRACE. K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DEPUTY CLERK • 4 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IKEMEFULA CHARLES IBEABUCHI, Appellant, Supreme Court No. 47261 VS. DAVID Z. CHESNOFF, RICHARD A. SCHONFELD, AND LAW OFFICES OF GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, AN ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS D/B/A GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, Respondents. District Court Case No. A517292 FILED MAR 20 2007 REMITTITUR TTE M. BLOOM PREME COURT CL K BY TO: Charles J Short, Clark District Court Clerk PUTY CLERK Pursuant to the rules of this court, enclosed are the following: Certified copy of Judgment and Opinion/Order. Receipt for Remittitur. DATE . . March 7, 2007 Janette M. Bloom, Clerk of Court Z.1_1-Natj._ .. ( BY: Chief Deputy Clerk cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Goodman & Chesnoff lkemefula Charles lbeabuchi RECEIPT FOR REMITTITUR Received of Janette M. Bloom, Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada, the REMITTITUR issued in the above-entitled cause, on 'ftek /2 / 7C01 • DeputiDi4trict Court Clerk ØtEIV RECEIVED MAR 1 2 2007 • ri sr. nr%i ICIT MAR 1 9 2007 JAKErFE M. SLOok CLERK OF SUPREME Cam DEPUTY CLERK NOV 1 3 2012 TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT IY- PUTY CLERK FV ■ a /4E1 AFFIRMATION PURSUANT TO: N.R.S. 239B.010 I, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE UNDERSIGNED INDIVIDUAL AND THAT THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT THAT IS ENTITLED: LiPRITAAF 0.71-4rCr, L CET<TiFi CAW 773 71-117 DOES NOT CAsivz), 47z6/ , CONTAIN THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF ANY PERSON, UNDER TIIE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY, THIS„DAY OF, MTV. 2 0 ,20/2_ SIGNATURE: INMATE NAME PRINTEDI6E-A5iiC1-6,/*ALA-, INMATE NUMBER: 7/9 7q ADDRESS: ELY TATE PRISON, P.O. BOX 1989, ELY, NV 89301 CH4. 4- * N.. * * * * N * LI,(C. * 7 7c, ^ram:IVT.7777 ,: , — MxAs 7. -;74 t.hrt BAK' K - V- " • t 4e -7?-7 tyt. -4 4 4 .4 * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4. HZ NS-20 s-lcgAT4KE Z57it ?E-R-7E:REive452520) Et/ 5TAT4 OAN/ t?RisdNI oiTL t Iroki\EFI-4LA) C. IFF-A51--/Ci-fi ."?7 BLuE.. VE- Ri Fie-2 1-INDLik KEVAD4) &RI-AR:7 P & L ,6 71-ft5 Nevada t ;wt. ''''' ''' Notary Public. State of White Pine County APPOintment Recorded in 208 17 - EgifeSlinilary 9, 411 ' Form A240 LIMITE6 POWER OF ATTORNEY (With Durable Provision) or R-4LA C. stAcru,Nt,op NO. 71'179 TO ALL PERSONS, be it known, that 1, li3aA1N-lcal,t1cama ay .STATe- FRI 50-N t Mite PINE Cout4Ty, NENOkt:›Ar , as Grantor, do hereby make and grant a limited and specific power of attorney to of and appoint and constitute said individual as my attorney-in-fact. My named attorney - in - fact shall have full power and authority to undertake, commit and perform only the following acts on my behalf to the same extent as if I had done so personally: all with full power of substitution and revocation in the presence: (Describe specific authority) DEC-L AATioki OF- TRI-is-r ti REF 2_520 NIA IKE C I BEABL4041 Vs. NELL 5 F4RG0 1 1494 PAT (APgf L 2.C ; ZC12.) CenIRT 6F- /\:—VADA (2602) — 711451-ci-,14 C2-012) , i,7 12.b 13 1-1-4E- Fi(S7 The authority granted shall include such incidental acts as are reasonably required or necessary to carry out and perform the specific authorities and duties stated or contemplated herein. My attorney-in,faet agrees to accept this appointment subject to itrterms, and agrees to act and perform in said fiduciary capacity consistent with my best interests as my attorney-in-fact deems advisable, and I thereupon ratify all acts so carried out. I agree to reimburse my attorney-in-fact all reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities enumerated herein. Special durable provisions: be affected by disability of the Grantor. This power of attorney may be This power of attorney shall revoked by the Grantor giving notice of revocation to the attorney-in-fact, provided that any party relying in good faith upon this power of attorney shall be protected unless and until said party has either a) actual or constructive notice of revoCation, or hi upon recording of said revocation in the public records where the Grantor resides. Other terms: REA5 0 NPTBLE Co9m ' A5 To t)F A6L-ve Rec..tpTs To IT-fe ArtitnEy-fr-t- FAc-r PGRceNT(76) OF 1-t-fE GRArtio-K 824,1Are- RG To THE Z4170 day of Signed under seal this Signed in thspresynce of: c Witness Grantor Witness Att C5f4A1A. (As 20g-I6 YINIINMIIMNPO1lVNO•OPIHIIPMIO.MM•WONWVo“.t KAY ELLEN WEISS 1 Notary Public- State of Nevada Appobtasat Recorded la Mb 1119W:sly No: 04-R059-17 • ExplibaJessarya, 2015 State of County of On .3 before me, appearer -ei2.1r) be the person(s) whose name(s) lice personallftWown to me (or of satfsfa o me on is/are subscribed to the within instrument and nowledged to me thar er eithey executed the same in er/their signature(s) on e instrument the person(s), or the his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that b entity upon behalf of which the Rerson(s) acted, )(-ECuted the instrument. . WITNESS my hand a off,a1 Sionahire Signature r•-y Affiant coduced ID