DABDAGANG UB MICRO WATERSHED

Transcription

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
WEST TRIPURA – III
IWMP 2009-14
PIA: SA, MANDWI
DABDAGANG UB MICRO WATERSHED
MANDWI AGRI SUB-DIVISION
WEST TRIPURA
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF
IWMP
(2009 – 2014)
Micro Watershed
: DABDAGANG UB
Micro Watershed Code No
: 3C3A1C1A
IWMP project
: WEST TRIPURA - III
Block
: MANDWI & JIRANIA
District
: WEST TRIPURA
Name of the PIA
: SUPERINTENDENT OF AGRICULTURE,
MANDWI
Page 2 of 161
Acknowledgements
We wish to express our gratitude to the people of DABDAGANG UB watershed
whichcovers
D.B.Nagar.East.D.B.Nagar,SouthSibnagar,EastNoabadi,,Laxmipur,S.R.C.Nagar,W.Barjala,Ko
brakhamar,
Durganagar,BriddhanagarGram
Pinheads for their priceless
cooperation, support
and
participation
especially
women, farmers and labourers
in the preparation of DPR by
providing
authentic
information
covering
all
aspects of information and
baseline data.
We are sincerely thankful to the Gram panchayat representatives, Watershed Committee
members, SHG members for their valuable support in preparation of DPR.
We wish to express our heartful thanks to the planning team members – Volunteers:
KishoreDebbarmaJamesDebbarma, SajalDebbarma, BishuDebbarma, Tapas Debbarma,
MalindraDebbarma,
NarayanDas,
JagadishDebbarma,
RameshDebbarma,
AbhiramDebbarma, Nabakumar Sil, who put all their efforts in preparing micro plan by
facilitating all discussions and exercises at field level.. This team includes Computer
Operator
Mr.Mintu
Saha,&Miss
Dipannita
Bhattacharjee. Secretary Mr.Shyamal
Debbarma,WDT members Mr Wakhirai Debbarma,A.A, Satyandra Debnath A.A Sri
DEBASISH DEB, A.O &Core WDT member Mr. Siddhartha Debbarma A.O .
We express our deep thanks to Sri HirendraDebbarma Dy.PO, WestTripura district. We
also sincerely thank Sri Saradindu Das, CEO, and SLNA for his timely instructions,
constructive suggestions, encouragement and necessary action during preparation of
DPR.
I cannot leave the opportunity to thank team of WASSAN, Hyderabad especially M.
Bhaktha Valli Sab for his time to time support and guidance..
(Mr.DEBAJYOTI BANIK)
S.A MANDWI PIA DABDAGANG UB
Page 3 of 161
Contents
Acknowledgements................................................................................................................................................. 3
E X E C U T I V E
1.
S U M M A R Y
................................................................................... 10
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .............................................................................................. 11
1.1
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 11
1.2
Profile of the Watershed Project: .................................................................................................................. 11
1.2.1
Project at a Glance................................................................................................................................. 11
Need and Scope for Watershed Development ....................................................................................................... 13
1.3
Watershed information ................................................................................................................................. 15
1.4
Status of other development project in the area ........................................................................................... 15
1.5
Status of previous watershed program: ......................................................................................................... 16
2.
CHAPTER 2: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA ..................................................................................... 17
2.1
Location ........................................................................................................................................................ 17
2.2
Location maps ............................................................................................................................................... 18
2.3
Land Details .................................................................................................................................................. 25
2.4
Details of the types of beneficiaries covered under the project ..................................................................... 26
2.5
Details of Agro-climatic condition .................................................................................................................. 26
2.6
Details of flood and drought in the project area ............................................................................................ 27
2.6 Details of soil erosion in the project area ............................................................................................................ 28
2.7
Details of the Soil pH ..................................................................................................................................... 28
2.8
Climatic Condition ......................................................................................................................................... 29
2.9
Physiographic Features ................................................................................................................................. 29
2.10
Watershed characteristics ............................................................................................................................. 30
3.
CHAPTER – 3: BASE LINE INFORMATION OF WATERSHED .................................................................................. 31
3.1
Demographic features: .................................................................................................................................. 31
3.2
Livestock details: ........................................................................................................................................... 32
3.3
AVAILABILITY VS SCARCITY ANALYSIS............................................................................................................. 33
Page 4 of 161
3.4
Socio- economic status (Based on land class):................................................................................................ 34
3.5
Socio- economic status (Based on Income): ................................................................................................... 35
3.6
Migration Details:.......................................................................................................................................... 36
3.7
Details of Community Based Organizations existing in the watershed village: ................................................ 37
3.8
Infrastructure Facilities: ........................................................................................................................... 39
3.8
Land use pattern (in Hectares)....................................................................................................................... 41
3.9
Details of Common Property Resources:........................................................................................................ 43
3.10
Agriculture implements: ................................................................................................................................ 44
3.11
Crop Classification ......................................................................................................................................... 45
3.12
Crops & Cropping pattern:............................................................................................................................. 46
3.13
Land capability Classification ......................................................................................................................... 49
3.14
Irrigation facilities: ........................................................................................................................................ 50
3.15
Status of water table: .................................................................................................................................... 50
3.16
Assessment of drinking water facility*:.......................................................................................................... 50
3.17
Ground Water Structures to be repaired. ...................................................................................................... 52
3.18
Existing Water Saving Practices: .................................................................................................................... 52
3.19
Details of existing livelihoods ........................................................................................................................ 53
3.20
Existing functional assets ............................................................................................................................... 54
3.21
PROBLEM TYPOLOGY OF THE WATERSHED .................................................................................................... 55
3.22
AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS .............................................................................. 57
3.22.1
Production Systems Analysis - Agriculture crops .................................................................................... 59
3.22.1.1
Name of the crop: PADDY .......................................................................................................... 59
3.22.1.2
Name of the crop: SRI PADDY ..................................................................................................... 61
3.22.2
Production Systems Analysis - Vegetable crops ...................................................................................... 63
3.22.2.1
Name of the crop: POTATO ........................................................................................................ 63
3.22.2.2
Name of the crop: BRINJAL ........................................................................................................ 65
3.22.2.3
Name of the crop: BRINJAL(2) .................................................................................................... 67
3.22.2.4
Name of the crop: TOMATO ....................................................................................................... 69
3.22.2.5
Name of the crop: CAULIFLOWER............................................................................................... 72
3.22.2.6
Name of the crop: LADY’S FINGER .............................................................................................. 76
Page 5 of 161
3.22.3
Production Systems Analysis - Horticulture ................................................................................................ 78
3.22.3.1
Name of the Fruit: PINEAPPLE .................................................................................................... 78
Production System Analysis - PLANTATION ........................................................................................................... 80
3.22.3.2
Name of the crop: BAMBOO CULTIVATION ................................................................................ 80
3.22.3.3
Name of the crop: ARIKANUT ..................................................................................................... 82
Name of the crop:
3.22.4
RUBBER PLANTATION.................................................................................................... 83
Production Systems Analysis – Livestock, Poultry, Fisheries ................................................................... 87
3.22.4.1
Large Ruminants ........................................................................................................................ 87
3.22.4.2
BACK YARD POULTRY ................................................................................................................. 89
3.22.4.3
INLAND FISHERIES ...................................................................................................................... 91
3.22.5
Livelihood Analysis................................................................................................................................. 94
3.22.5.1
3.22.6
INCENSE STICK MAKING ............................................................................................................. 94
Best Practices, Constraints, Programme Actions ........................................................................................ 96
3.22.6.1
Paddy......................................................................................................................................... 96
3.22.6.2
Vegetable .................................................................................................................................. 97
3.22.6.3
Livestock .................................................................................................................................... 99
3.22.6.4
Goat Rearing ............................................................................................................................ 102
3.23
MANANGEMENT ACTION PLAN ................................................................................................................... 103
3.23.1
AGRICULTURE, VEGETABLES .................................................................................................................... 103
3.23.2
HORTICULTURE and PLANTATION ............................................................................................................ 105
3.23.3
LIVESTOCK AND FISHERIES ....................................................................................................................... 106
3.23.4
LIVELIHOODS ........................................................................................................................................... 107
4
CHAPTER – 4 Institutional Building and Project Managemen t .......................................................................... 108
4.1
Details of SHGs & UGs newly formed under IWMP: ............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
4.2
Details of Watershed Committee (WC) ........................................................................................................ 108
4.3
WDT Particulars: ......................................................................................................................................... 109
4.4
PIA particulars ............................................................................................................................................. 110
4.5
Bank Account Details ................................................................................................................................... 111
4.6
Institutional Mechanisms, Records and Registers ........................................................................................ 113
4.6.1
Flow Chart of Institutional Arrangement from District to watershed level ............................................ 113
4.6.2
Fund Flow mechanisms – flow chart .................................................................................................... 114
Page 6 of 161
4.6.3
4.7
List of Watershed Records to be maintained ........................................................................................ 114
Documents of Agreements: ......................................................................................................................... 115
4.7.1
Watershed Committee Registration certificate (Annexure-1) ............................................................... 115
4.7.2
MoU – PIA – DWDU, PIA – WC (Annexure-2) ........................................................................................ 115
4.7.3
Resolution of Gram Sabha, Aam Sabha, WC approving action plan# (Annexure-3) ............................... 115
4.8
5
Project Implementation .............................................................................................................................. 115
CHAPTER – 5 Management/Action Plan .......................................................................................................... 116
5.1
Description on methodology of plan adopted .............................................................................................. 116
5.1.1
Awareness generation interventions.................................................................................................... 116
5.1.2
Initial Orientation program .................................................................................................................. 117
5.1.3
Formation process UGs & Watershed Committee ................................................................................ 117
5.2
DPR preparation process: ............................................................................................................................ 118
5.3
Planning Process: ........................................................................................................................................ 119
5.3.1
PNP: .................................................................................................................................................... 119
5.3.2
FGDs: ................................................................................................................................................... 119
5.3.3
IB and CB plans: ................................................................................................................................... 120
5.3.4
Mapping: ............................................................................................................................................. 120
5.3.5
Hydro-geological Survey: ..................................................................................................................... 120
5.3.6
Data entry: .......................................................................................................................................... 120
5.3.7
Consolidation & preparation of DPR document: ................................................................................... 120
5.3.8
Approval by Aam Sabha/Gram Sabha................................................................................................... 120
5.4
6
Details of User Groups with code numbers .................................................................................................. 121
Communication and Capacity Building Plan ..................................................................................................... 123
6.1
Details of Capacity Building...................................................................................................................... 123
6.2
Details of Material Development ............................................................................................................. 125
6.3
Details of Modules Development ............................................................................................................. 125
6.4
List of Training Institutes/ Resource Organisations identified ................................................................... 125
6.5
Funding available for Capacity Building activities at different phases and levels ....................................... 126
Page 7 of 161
6.6
7
Details of Capacity Building activities ....................................................................................................... 127
PROPOSED WORKS AND BUDGET DETAILS ...................................................................................................... 128
7.1
UG wise list of beneficiaries and proposed works (INDIVIDUAL) ANNEXURE- 10 .......................................... 128
7.2
List of proposed works (community/common) ANNEXURE - 11 ................................................................... 128
7.3
Year wise list of works to be taken up including list of beneficiaries ANNEXURE – 12 ................................... 128
7.4
SUMMARY OF WORKS SHOWING CONVERGENCE DETAILS (INDIVIDUAL) ANNEXURE – 13 .......................... 128
7.5
Abstract of Phasing of works (year wise) ..................................................................................................... 128
7.6
SUMMARY OF WORKS SHOWING CONVERGENCE DETAILS (COMMUNITY) ANNEXURE - 14 ......................... 134
8
CHAPTER – 8: ABSTRACT OF WORKS................................................................................................................ 135
9
CHAPTER – 9: Convergence Plan...................................................................................................................... 136
9.1
CONVERGENCE PLAN .................................................................................................................................. 136
9.1.1
INDIVIDUAL WORKS ............................................................................................................................. 136
9.1.2
COMMON WORKS ............................................................................................................................... 138
9.2
Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio ....................................................................................................................... 139
10
CHAPTER – 10: EXPECTED OUTCOMES ......................................................................................................... 140
10.1
Good Practices in the village........................................................................................................................ 140
10.2
Lessons Learnt............................................................................................................................................. 140
10.3
“Expected Outcomes” in details .................................................................................................................. 140
10.4
“Expected Outcomes” Summary (Quantifiable indicators) ........................................................................... 140
10.5
Backward and Forward Linkages.................................................................................................................. 143
10.1
Annexure – 8: List of Beneficiaries for Kitchen Garden ............................................................................. 146
10.2
Annexure – 9: UG wise list of Beneficiaries with proposed Works (Individual) .......................................... 146
10.3
Annexure – 10: UG wise list of Beneficiaries with proposed Works (Community) ..................................... 146
10.4
Annexure – 11: Year wise list of works and list of Beneficiaries ................................................................ 146
10.5
Annexure – 12: Summary of works (Individual) – convergence details ..................................................... 146
10.6
Annexure – 13: Summary of works (Community) – convergence details .................................................. 146
10.7
Annexure – 14: Model Estimates ............................................................................................................. 146
10.8
Annexure – 15: Detailed Estimates for Community Works ....................................................................... 146
Page 8 of 161
Page 9 of 161
E X E C U T I V E
a)
S U M M A R Y
Brief about area: Dabdagang UB Micro watershed is located between 91°21’55.8"E to
91° 26'10.6"E longitude and 23°50'39"N to 23°52'55.1"N latitude. This area falls under
Mandwi R.D. Block and Jirania R.D Block. The Gram Panchayats covered are D.B. Nagar,
East.D.B.Nagar,South
Sibnagar,South
R.C.
Nagar,East
Noabadi,Laxmipur,West
Barjala,Kobrakhamar,Durganagar,Briddhanagar part. (The details are mentioned in the
following tables). The watershed area is located at 20 KM away from the District HQ
AGARTALA SADAR The villages are well connected by road. There is no bus facility in the
entire area. Share autos is the only transportation facility for the watershed villages.
b)
Total watershed area is 1588 Ha and the number of households is 1862. The total
population is 6077. 80% of the population belongs to Schedule Tribe. Total cultivable
area is 833 Ha and cultivation is done under rainfed condition.
c)
The major source of income to the community is from agriculture. Predominant crops are
paddy and winter vegetables. Pisciculture is the livelihood of 15% households. Poultry,
duckery are more in numbers followed by local breed of cows and bullocks.
Page 10 of 161
1. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
1.1 Introduction

Name of the State
:
TRIPURA

Name of the District
:
WEST TRIPURA

Names of the Blocks
:
MANDWI AND JIRANIA

Name of the project
:
WEST TRIPURA -III

Financial Year of sanction
:
2009-10

Project duration
:
From April 2009 to March 2014

Map of the project area showing village boundaries, contours and drainage.
1.2 Profile of the Watershed Project:
1.2.1
Project at a Glance
1
Name of the State
TRIPURA
2
Name of the project
WEST TRIPURA –III
3
Name of the District
WEST TRIPURA
4
Names of the Blocks
MANDWI AND JIRANIA
5
Names of Gram Panchayats
1) D.B.NAGAR 2)EAST D.B NAGAR 3)SOUTH
SIBNAGAR4)SOUTH R.C.NAGAR
5)LAXMIPUR 6)WEST BARJALA
7)KOBRAKHAMAR 8)DURGANAGAR 9)EAST
NOABADI 10)BRIDDHANAGAR
Page 11 of 161
6
7
Names & Census Code of
Villages covered
Four major reasons for
selection of watershed
1. Dinabandhunagar (P)-00012100
2.Briddhanagar (P)-00013600
1) Poverty 50 -80%
2) % of ST/SC population is above 40%
3) Productivity is less
4) Employment opportunities are low
5) Assured irrigation less then 10%
8
Name, Address , Phone No
and Reg.No.. of the PIA(s)
Superintendent of Agriculture,
Mandwi Agri. Sub division,
West Tripura Dist.
Ph: 0381 2347 292
9
Date of approval of
Watershed Development
Plan by the DPC
10
Area of the Project (ha.)
1667.40 ha
11
Area proposed to be
treated
1588 ha
12
Financial Year of sanction
2009-10
13
Project duration
From April 2009 to March 2014
14
Project Cost (Rs. in Lakhs)
Rs.238.20 lakhs
15
Date of Sanction by State
authority
Page 12 of 161
16
Date of Release of 1 st
Installment of Central
Assistance (To be filled by
DoLR)
17
Any other, please specify
Need and Scope for Watershed Development
A write up elaborating the weightage table for selection of the watershed. (Weightage for
selection of Watershed (as per DoLR’s instructions already issued)
Project Name
Project
Type
West Tripura –III Hilly areas
Weightage
i
ii
Iii
iv
v
Vi vii
7.5 10
0
10 10 0
ix
x
xi Xii Xiii Total
15 15 10 5
0
5
100
*As per PPR
Slno. Criteria
Max Score Ranges and Scores
I
Poverty index(%of
poor to population)
10
Above 80% (10)
80 to 50 % (7.5)
50 to 20 % (5)
Ii
% of SC/ST population
10
More than 40%
(10)
20 to 40 % (5)
Less than 20%
(3)
Iii
Actual wages
5
Actual wages
are significantly
lower than
minimum wages
(5)
Actual wages
are equal to or
higher than
minimum wages
(0)
Iv
% of small and
marginal farmers
10
More than 80%
(10)
50 to 80% (5)
Less than 50 (3)
V
Ground water status
15
Over exploited
(15)
Critical (10)
Sub critical (5)
Vi
Moisture index/
DPAP/DDP Block
10
-66.7 & below
(10) DDP Block
-33.3 to -66.6
(5) DPAP Block
0 to -33.2 (0)
Non DPAP/DDP
Block
Below
20%
(2.5)
Safe (0)
Page 13 of 161
Vii
Area under assured
irrigation
15
Less than 10%
(15)
10 to 20% (10)
20 to 30% (5)
Above
30%
(Reject)
Viii
Drinking water
10
No source (10)
Problematic
village (7.5)
Partially covered
(5)
Fully
covered
(0)
Ix
Degraded land
15
High – above
20% (15)
Medium – 10 to
20 % (10)
Low – less than
10 % of TGA (5)
X
Productivity potential
of the land
10
Lands with low
production &
where
productivity can
be significantly
enhanced with
reasonable
efforts (10)
Land with
moderate
production &
where
productivity can
be enhanced
with reasonable
efforts (5)
Lands with high
production &
where
productivity can
be marginally
enhanced with
reasonable
efforts (0)
Xi
Contiguity to another
watershed that has
already been
developed/treated
10
Contiguous to
previously
treated
watershed &
contiguity
within the micro
watersheds in
the project (10)
Contiguity
within the micro
watersheds in
the project but
non contiguous
to previously
treated
watershed (5)
Neither
contiguous to
previously
treated
watershed nor
contiguity within
the micro
watersheds in
the project (0)
Xii
Cluster approach in
the plains (more than
one contiguous
micro-watersheds in
the project)
15
Above 6 microwatersheds in
cluster (15)
4 to 6 micro
watersheds in
cluster (10)
2 to 4 micro
watersheds in
cluster (5)
xiii
Cluster approach in
the hills (More than
one contiguous
microwatersheds in
the project)
15
Above 5 microwatersheds in
cluster (15)
3 to 5 micro
watersheds in
cluster (10)
2 to 3 micro
watersheds in
cluster (5)
Total
150
150
90
41
2.5
Page 14 of 161
1.3 Watershed information
Sl
no
Name of
Project
Watershed
Code
Villages to be Treated
Geographical
Area(Ha)
Treatable
Area(Ha)
Approval
Year
1667.4
1588
2009-10
D.B.Nagar,E.D,B.Nagar,E.Noabadi,South
Sibnagar
Laxmipur, South R.C..Nagar,West
Barjala
1
WestTripuraIII
3C3A1
Kobrakhamar,Durganagar,Briddhanagar
1.4 Status of other development project in the area
S
Name of the Sponsoring Objectives of
no programme/ agency
the
scheme
programme/
scheme
Year of
Villages Estimated
commencement covered number of
beneficiaries
1
MGNREGA
DoRD
Wage
employment
creation
NA
ALL
Regular
programme in
legal framework
2
Regular
ARDD,
Dept of
Agrl,
Animal
NA
resource
development,
agriculture
development,
etc.
ALL
Info Not
Available
department
programmes
3
SRI
Dept of
Agrl
Promote SRI
method in
Paddy
For the last 4
years
6
Unlimited
4
Technology
Do
Promote
horticulture
NA
ALL
As per approved
target
Mission
Page 15 of 161
1.5 Status of previous watershed program:
S
.
N
o
Proj
ect
nam
e
Year
start
ed
Nam
e of
villa
ges
No. Of
micro
waters
hed
Water
shed
codes
Area
under
treat
ment
Fund
ing
sour
ce
Nod
al
age
ncy
PI
A
To
tal
co
st
Expend
iture
incurre
d up to
start of
IWMP
%
financi
al
compl
etion
%
physic
al
compl
etion
Nil
Page 16 of 161
2. CHAPTER 2: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA
2.1 Location
Longitude
91°21'55.8"E to 91° 26'10.6"E
Latitude
23°50'39"N to 23°52'55.1"N
State
TRIPURA
District
WEST TRIPURA
Subdivision
MANDWI & JIRANIA
Block
MANDWI & JIRANIA
Panchayat
D.B.NAGAR 2)EAST D.B NAGAR 3)SOUTH
SIBNAGAR4)SOUTH R.C.NAGAR 5)LAXMIPUR 6)WEST
BARJALA 7)KOBRAKHAMAR 8)DURGANAGAR 9)EAST
NOABADI 10)BRIDDHANAGAR
Villages
1.D.B.Nagar- Ward-1,2,3,4,5,6
2.E.D.B.Nagar- Ward-1,2,3
3.South Sibnagar- Ward-1,4
4.East Noabadi – Ward-1,2,3,4
5.South R.C.Nagar- Ward-2,3
6.Laxmipur- Ward-4,5,6
7.West Barjala –Ward-1
8.Kobrakhamar –Ward-1,4,5,6
9.Durganagar –Ward-1,2,3
10.Briddhanagar –Ward-1,2,4,9,10
Approach Road
From RanirBajar A.A. Road To South Sibnagar via Lalit Bajar
pucka road is laid.
Page 17 of 161
2.2 Location maps
Watershed maps
Page 19 of 161
Page 20 of 161
Page 21 of 161
Page 22 of 161
Page 23 of 161
Page 24 of 161
2.3 Land Details
S. Names of
No villages
.
Geographi
cal Area of
the village
(ha)
1.
D.B.Nagar
2.
Fore
st
Area
(ha)
Land under
agricultural use (ha)
Wasteland
Rain-fed
area (ha)
Permane
nt
pastures
Irrigate
(ha)
d Area
Cultivab Nonle (ha)
cultivable
(ha)
380
190
14
15
8
E.D.B.Nagar
200
103
12
16
4
3.
S.Sibnagar
I8O
90
12
11
9
4
E. Noabadi
230
120
13
19
3
5
S.R.C.Nagar
50
25
4
4
6
Laxmipur
170
90
13
14
7
7
W.Barjala
25
12
4
2
3
8
Kobrakhamar
53
20
2
1
1
9
Durganagar
180
99
3
18
2
10
Briddhanagar
120
61
2
17
5
TOTAL
1588
810
79
117
42
Status of land use
Sl.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Land Use
Agricultural land
Horti/Plantation land
Forest land
Fallow land
Barren land
Others
Total
Area in Ha
% of Total WS area
626 39%
207 13%
NIL
662 42%
13 1%
80 5%
1588 100%
2.4 Details of the types of beneficiaries covered under the project
No. of beneficiaries covered
S. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Name of the Gram Panchayat
DBN
SSN
PB
EDBN
PNB
SRCN
LP
BDN
DN
KK
Total
MARGINAL SMALL
LARGE LANDLESS
341
18
27
41
182
65
63
57
290
30
60
27
2
11
8
47
12
3
7
6
11
15
1
0
3
5
0
0
1
1
119
0
11
42
57
42
84
108
36
29
1114
183
37
528
Total
531
60
41
94
250
159
159
168
334
66
1862
2.5 Details of Agro-climatic condition
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name
Major soil types
of the
Agroclimatic
zone
Name of covers
the
project Area in Names of
b) Area
Sl. No. Project
area
ha
the villages a)Type in Kani
1 WEST
Tropical 1588
DBN
CLAY
1280
TRIPURA Plain
–1
zone
Ssn
PB
EDBN
PNB
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
630.8
154
214.25
646
7
Major crops
b) Area
a) Name
in Kani
BAMBOO,
513
CHILLI,
FRUIT,
PADDY,
RUBBER,,
SEGUN
174.5
67
94
203
Page 26 of 161
Kk
SRC
LP
DN
BDN
Total
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
CLAY
351.14
763.8
283
280.53 PADDY
45 PADDY
4320.52
190.25
239.6
112.5
158.96
27.5
1640.31
2.6 Details of flood and drought in the project area
1
2
3
4
5
Periodicity
Sl. No.
Particulars
Villages
Annual
1
2
Flood
Drought
Any other
(please specify)
Not
affected
No. of villages
Nil
Nil
Nil
Name(s) of villages
Nil
Nil
Nil
No. of villages
Nil
Nil
Nil
Name(s) of villages
Nil
Nil
Nil
Page 27 of 161
2.6 Details of soil erosion in the project area
Run off
Cause
Area affected
(ha)
Type of erosion
(mm/
year)
Average soil loss
(Tonnes/ ha/ year)
Water erosion
a Sheet
705
b Rill
317
c Gully
248
Sub-Total
1325
12
1270
Wind erosion
0
Total
1270
2.7 Details of the Soil pH
Name of the Villages
Sample no
Soil Ph
Soil Type
D.B.NAGAR
25
5.5 - 5.8
Clay to Clay loam
LAXMIPUR
18
5.2 - 5.4
Clay to Clay loam
BRIDDHANAGAR
51
4.92 – 5.4 Clay to Clay ioam
Page 28 of 161
2.8 Climatic Condition
Average
Sl
No
1
Year
2009
Monthly Rain
fall(in mm)
173.625
Average
Annual
rainfall(in
mm)prece
ding 5
years
0
Temp( C)
Max
Wind
Velocity
Open
pan
evaporat
ion (mm
per day)
NA
Info not
available
77%
Info not
available
Min
2083.5
42
Relative
Humidity(
RH)
Average
Annual
run
off(mm/y
ear)
06
2.9 Physiographic Features
Elevation(MSL)
Slope Range(%)
Nal, Lunga, Bastu and water
bodies are a t 0% slope.
Slope of Tilla land i.e upland
ranges between 8% to 20%.
There are multi slopes.
Order
of
Waters
hed
Major Stream
Info
not
availab
le
Dabdagangcherra is the
major stream. It join
Hawrah River which
flows through
Bangladesh to Bay of
Bengal
Topo
sequenc
e
(Soil
series)
Average
annual
soil
loss(Ton
/
hectare/year)
Page 29 of 161
2.10 Watershed characteristics
Shape index
of the
watershed
Length of
main stream
Drainage
density
Average slope
About 12-15
km)
Multiple
slopes and
the elevation
at north side
causing the
formation of
drainages.
The density of
such
drainages is
low
Explained
above
Watershed
relief
Perimeter of the
watershed
Page 30 of 161
3. CHAPTER – 3: BASE LINE INFORMATION OF WATERSHED
3.1 Demographic features:
S.No
Feature
1 Population
SC
ST
OBC
GEN
Total
2 Children(0-14 years)
3 Sex Ratio
4 Literacy
Literates
Illiterates
5 Work Force
LABOUR
AGRICULTURE
INDUSTRY
BUSINESS
SERVICE
ARTISAN
6 Birth Rate
7 Death Rate
MALE
FEMALE
Total
Source
of Info
SE Data
209
2159
297
490
3155
519
173
2073
283
393
2922
516
382
4232
580
883
6077
1035 SE Data
926 SE Data
SE Data
0
0
0
SE Data
1373
522
0
68
351
0
1117
404
0
3
83
0
2490
926
0
71
434
0
PHC
PHC
Page 31 of 161
3.2 Livestock details:
S.No
Feature
No./ quantity)
1 Milch Animals
Cows
Buffaloes
Goat, sheep
1534
534
2240
2 Draft Animals
Ox
112
3 Others
Poultry
5321
Duckery
54
Piggery
448
4 Total Milk production from milch
animals (ltrs/day)
5 Availability
Page 32 of 161
3.3 AVAILABILITY VS SCARCITY ANALYSIS
S.No
Feature
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
No./ quantity)
Percentage
Food grains
Enough
876
49%
Less
816
45%
Normal
108
6%
Nil
0
0%
Enough
0
0%
Less
1798
100%
Normal
2
0%
Nil
0
0%
Enough
0
0%
Less
1786
99%
Normal
14
1%
Nil
0
0%
Enough
51
3%
Less
1733
96%
Normal
16
1%
Nil
0
0%
Enough
0
0%
Less
1790
99%
Normal
10
1%
Nil
0
0%
Enough
0
0%
Less
1785
99%
Normal
15
1%
Nil
0
0%
Enough
0
0%
Less
0
0%
Normal
0
0%
Nil
1800
100%
Enough
0
0%
Less
1646
91%
Normal
154
9%
Nil
0
0%
Grams
Vegetables
Fruits
Fodder
Fuelwood
Green Manure
Money
Page 33 of 161
3.4 Socio- economic status (Based on land class):
1
S.
No
2
Type
3
4
5
Total
HHs
No.
of
BPL
HHs
Land Holding (KANI)
Rain fed
SC
ST
IRRIGATED
OBC
GEN
SC
ST
FALLOW
OBC
GEN
SC
ST
VEGETABLE
OBC
GEN
SC
ST
ORCHARDS, FRUITS
OBC
GEN
SC
ST
TOTAL
OBC
GEN
SC
ST
OBC
GEN
1
Marginal
1114
873
54.1
756
41.1
48
32
166
57
87
90
987
102
191
1.8
74
6.7
4.5
0.6
55
2
0
178
2039
209
331
2
Small
Farmers
183
78
6
583
21
0
5
177
3
16
6.5
570
15
8
3
88
3
2
0
73
3.5
0
21
1491
45
26
3
Large
farmers
37
0
8
273
0
15
4
42.5
0
0
3
275
0
0
0
24
0
2
0
24
0
3.6
15
637.8
0
21
4
Landless
528
403
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1862
1354
68.1
1612
62.1
63
41
385
60
103
99
1832
117
199
4.8
186
9.7
8.5
0.6
153
5.5
3.6
213
4167
254
377
Total
3.5 Socio- economic status (Based on Income):
1
S. No
2
Type
1 Marginal
3
4
Total HHs
6
No. of BPL
HHs
Annual Average Income (Rs.)
SC
ST
OBC
OC
VILLAGE
AVERAGE
1114
873
45119
64245
49081
0
52815
2 Small Farmers
183
78
66667
65029
49000
0
60232
3 Large farmers
37
0
60000
66143
0
0
63071
4 Landless
528
403
43556
52005
43558
0
46373
Total
1862
1354
53835
61856
47213
0
55622
Page 35 of 161
3.6 Migration Details:
1
Sl. No.
2
No. of
persons
migrating
M
F
67
3
4
5
No. of days
per year of
migration
Major
reason(s)
for
migrating
Distance of
destination of
migration
from the
village (km)
6
7
Occupation
during
migration
Average
Income from
such
occupation
(Rs.)
Total
12
79
3534
Page 36 of 161
1
S.
o.
1
3.7 Details of Community Based Organizations existing in the watershed village:
2
3
Total no. of CBOs
Type of
Group
SHG
With
only
Men
With
only
Women
With
both
4
5
5
6
7
8
No. of members
No. of SC in
each category
No. of ST in
each category
No. of OBC in
each
category
No. of
GENERAL in
each category
No. of BPL in
each category
Total
M
F
Total
M
F
Total
M
F
Total
M
F
Total
M
F
Total
M
F
Total
LANDLESS
37
172
209
6
37
43
8
17
25
9
#
58
14
69
83
37
172
209
MARGINAL
73
22
95
11
2
13
37
9
46
13
4
17
12
7
19
73
22
95
SMALL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LARGE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
110
194
304
17
39
56
45
26
71
22
#
75
26
76
102
110
194
304
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(ii) MF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(iii) SF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(iv) LF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
(i)
Landless
UGs
2
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
JFM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
FIG
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
Other
related
Groups
(Specify)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 37 of 161
1
S.
No
.
1
2
Type
of
Group
3
Total no. of CBOs
Wit
With
Wit
h
only
h
only Wome
bot Tota
Men
n
h
l
SHG
0
0
0
0
Total
0
0
0
0
4
5
No. of members
No. of SC in
each
category
5
6
7
8
No. of ST in
each category
No. of OBC
in each
category
No. of
GENERAL in
each
category
No. of BPL in
each category
M
F
Tota
l
M
F
Tota
l
M
F
Tota
l
M
F
Tota
l
M
F
Tota
l
M
F
Tota
l
(i)
Landles
s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(ii) MF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(iii) SF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(iv) LF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
65
1
17
3
0
5
3
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
480
0
41
0
76
0
65
1
0
5
3
0
0
0
7
6
0
54
0
4
1
0
0
704
186
3
0
3
0
48
0
16
4
0
704
0
5
4
0
164
2
0
2
4
0
4
0
0
0
40
86
4
1
6
7
41
0
1
39
0
0
683
0
43
0
80
0
65
1
0
5
3
0
0
0
8
0
0
58
0
4
3
0
0
39
68
3
0
931
1
5
8
704
(i)
Landles
s
(ii) MF
(iii) SF
UGs
0
0
41
41
2
Total
0
0
41
41
3
JFM
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
FIG
Other
related
Groups
(Specify
)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
(iv) LF
Page 38 of 161
3.8
Infrastructure Facilities:
1
2
3
4
5
S.No
Infrastructure type
No./Quantity
Distance (km)
Status (description)
1
Educational Institutions
Anganwadi
10
Within watershed villages
Primary School (1-5)
03
Do
Senior Basic school (1-8)
01
High school (6-10)
01
Do
Higher Secondary school (+2
1
Kobrakhamar
Stage)
2
Govt. College
--
Vocational Institutions
--
Service Institutions
Bank
--
Page 39 of 161
Post office
2
Primary Health Care Center
2
Veterinary Center
1
Markets/ Village Haat
2
3
No. of bore wells/pump sets
(Functional)
5
4
No. of Milk collection centers
1
Kobrakhamar
.
( Union/ Society/ Pvt.
Agency/Others)
Total Quantity of surplus milk
5
Road Connectivity (to main road by
an all-weather road) (Yes/No)
Yes
6
Bus facility (Yes/No)
No
7
No. of HHs provided electricity
1015
8
No. of HHs with access to drinking
water
All
9
Access to Agro Industries (Yes/No)
No
10
Any other facilities (specify------------ No
-)
.
Page 40 of 161
3.8 Land use pattern (in Hectares)
S. No
Village
Net Sown Area
Net Area sown more
than once
Gross Cropped Area
DBN
1
68
11.12
79.12
30.48
20
50.48
10.72
0.48
11.2
15.36
17.36
21.696
37.536
6.8
1.36
4.68
201.152
0
17.92
8.904
11.84
13.6
24.0736
8.048
70.264
15.36
35.28
30.6
49.376
20.4
25.4336
12.728
271.416
ssn
2
PB
3
EDBN
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
PNB
kk
SRC
LP
DN
BDN
Total
Page 41 of 161
1
S.
N
o
2
Village
D.B.Nagar
3
4
Geogra
phical
Area#
3
4
6
Commun
ity Land
Land
under
Non
Agricult
ure Use
7
Perman
ent
Pastures
380
1
2
Fore
st
Area
5
6
E.D.B.Nag
ar
S.Sibnagar
200
E.Noabadi
230
S.R.C.Nag
ar
Laxmipur
50
W.Barjala
9
1
0
Kobrakha
mar
Durganaga
r
Briddhana
gar
53
7
42
7
49
7 23
54
6
47
6
53
15 43
49
13
34
13
47
16
1
14
1
15
43
13
33
13
44
9
1
9
1
10
16
2
13
2
15
56
10
44
10
54
26
12
24
Perman
ent
Fallow
85
31
12
78
120
7
3
3
180
34
10 27
25
53
Gross
Cropp
ed
Area
81
14
12
8
13*
81
2
170
Cultivated area
12
Net
Area
sown
more
than
once
14
Cultivat
ed
Rainfed
Tempor
ary
fallow
95
90
11
Net
Sown
Area
67
11
180
10
Cultivat
ed
Irrigate
d
14
77
7
Land
Under
miscellane
ous use
9
Uncultivated
Private land
186
110
5
8
1
24
13
12
25
13
12
316
79
57
403
87
Total
1588
755
79
395
259
#geographical area here is the area covered under the watershed.
Page 42 of 161
* Coloumn 13 is
3.9 Details of Common Property Resources:
1
2
CPR
Particulars
S.No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Total
Wasteland/
degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Forest
Forest
Village Ponds/
Tanks
Community
Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent
markets
Temples/ Places
of worship
Others (Pl.
specify)
3
Total Area (ha)
Area owned/ In possession of
Govt.
Pvt.
(specify
persons
dept.)
PRI
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
Any other
(Pl. Specify)
0
Area available for treatment (ha)
Govt.
Pvt.
(specify
persons
deptt.)
PRI
0
0
0
Any other
(Pl. Specify)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 43 of 161
3.10 Agriculture implements:
1
2
S. No
Implements
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Plough
Push cart
Sprayers
Weeders
Power Trillers
Pump Sets
Threshers
Other
3
Nos.
101
9
44
22
33
55
0
11
Page 44 of 161
3.11 Crop Classification
1
S. No
2
Crop classification
3
Area (kani)
1 Single crop
1337
2 Double crop
725
3 Triple Crop
4 Perinnial Crop
5 Fallow
2
136
2520
Page 45 of 161
3.12 Crops & Cropping pattern:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Crop
sown
Rain fed
Irrigated
Total
S.
N
o
Season
1
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
BAMBO
O
BANANA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
BRINJAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CHILLI
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FRUIT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
JACK
FRUIT
LADIES
FINGER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
1ST
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
MIXED
FRUIT
PINE
APPLE
PADDY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
POTATO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RUBBER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SEGUN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOMATO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
BAMBO
O
BANANA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9.5
1.48
155.78947
4
0
0
0
9.5
1.48
77.89474
52631.58
2
Area
(kani)
Productio
n (Ton/yr)
Productivit
y (Kgs/kani)
Average
Cost of
cultivatio
n (Rs.
/kani)
Area
(kani)
Productio
n (Ton/yr)
Productivit
y (Kgs/kani)
Average
Cost of
cultivatio
n (Rs.
/kani)
Area
(ha)
Productio
n (Ton/yr)
Average
Productivit
y (Kgs/ha)
Average
Cost of
cultivatio
n (Rs.
/kani)
Page 46 of 161
3
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
BRINJAL
1.5
0.3
200
0
0
0
1.5
0.3
100
333333.3
CHILLI
27
3.606
1.5
0.335
223.3333
28.5
3.941
178.4444
45278.98
FRUIT
0
0
133.55555
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
JACK
FRUIT
LADIES
FINGER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
2ND
KHARIF
RABI
MIXED
FRUIT
PINE
APPLE
PADDY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
232.225
2.63
150.2857
141.4697
602.3706
2
0.8
400
1768.1
1
4
234.855
0.9
132.65376
1
450
17.5
POTATO
1750.6
1
2
1.7
425
250000
RUBBER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SEGUN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOMATO
0.5
0.2
400
0
0
0
0.5
0.2
200
1000000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RABI
BAMBO
O
BANANA
0
0
0
2
0.7
350
2
0.7
175
250000
RABI
BRINJAL
0
0
0
4
0.42
105
4
0.42
52.5
125000
RABI
CHILLI
0
0
0
1.5
0.1
66.66667
1.5
0.1
33.33333
333333.3
RABI
FRUIT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RABI
JACK
FRUIT
LADIES
FINGER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0.25
125
2
0.25
62.5
250000
RABI
MIXED
FRUIT
PINE
APPLE
PADDY
21.3
3.3
137.8985
643.91
89.157
146.4141
1642.205
POTATO
0
0
622.6
1
5.5
85.857
RABI
154.92957
7
0
0.604
109.8182
5.5
0.604
54.90909
90909.09
RABI
RABI
RABI
Page 47 of 161
4
RABI
RUBBER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RABI
SEGUN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RABI
TOMATO
0
0
0
12.5
3.235
258.8
12.5
3.235
129.4
40000
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
BAMBO
O
BANANA
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
BRINJAL
0
0
0
2
2.4
1200
2
2.4
600
250000
CHILLI
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FRUIT
0.5
1
2000
0
0
0
0.5
1
1000
1000000
JACK
FRUIT
LADIES
FINGER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.6
1600
1
1.6
800
500000
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
SUMME
R
Total
MIXED
FRUIT
PINE
APPLE
PADDY
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
POTATO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RUBBER
58
2.2
29.5
3.2
108.4746
87.5
5.4
73.20281
13556.08
SEGUN
0
0
37.931034
5
0
7.5
0.85
113.3333
7.5
0.85
56.66667
66666.67
TOMATO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 48 of 161
3.13 Land capability Classification
1
S.N
o
2
Land
type
3
Total
Area
(KANI
)
Soil
Texture
*
5
6
Based on Depth (cms)-
Based on Slope (%) (mention area
in ha)
Erosion
(mention area in ha)
V.
Shallo
w
(0.75)
4649
0
0
SILT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SILT
LOA
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CLAY
2
3
Shallo
w (7.522.5)
Lan
d
clas
s
(mention area in ha)
Moderat
e deep
(22.545.00)
0
1
4
4
Deep
(45.0
90.0)
0
Very.
Deep
(>90
)
4649
Nearl
y
Level
(0-2)
3015
Moderat
e slope
(2-6)
Steep
(>15
)
640
Stron
g
slope
(6-15)
497
497
Water
LOW
MEDIU
M
Win
d
HIG
H
1981
68
0
0
259
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
* Soil texture (sandy-clay, clayey, loamy-clay, gravel)
Page 49 of 161
3.14 Irrigation facilities:
1
S.No
2
Type of water resource
1
3
Nos
4
Area irrigated (Ha)
130
Pond
5
Storage capacity
(Cu.m)
124
3.15 Status of water table:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
S.No
Source
Plot No
of the
source
Name of the
Owner*
Date of
recording
Depth of water
table from
ground level (in
fts)
Source located at
(ridge/middle/valley)
Remarks
(open well)**
1
Ridge
2
Middle
3
Middle
4
Valley
5
Valley
** Identify at least five representative open wells in the ridge/middle/valley portion. Collect the data at the time of DPR and maintain a register every Quarter
3.16 Assessment of drinking water facility*:
Page 50 of 161
1
2
3
4
5
S.No
Item
Units
Quantity
Source
1 Drinking water requirement
Ltrs/day
142000
2 Present availability of drinking water
Ltrs/day
70000
3 No. of drinking water sources available
Nos
a) Functional
Nos
130 Open ponds
10 Mini deep tube wells
b) Need Repairing
Nos
50 Do
c)
Nos
20 Do
Defunct
4 Short fall if any
Ltrs/day
5 No. of families getting drinking water
Nos
from outside the Micro watershed area
6 Requirement of new drinking water
Nos.
sources (if any)
No safe drinking water
52
78 Tube Well
* based on the observation from the field
Page 51 of 161
3.17 Ground Water Structures to be repaired.
No. available
S.No
Type of structure
No. to be
Repaired
No. to be
rejuvenated
No. with no
interventions required
Total
Nil
Total
3.18 Existing Water Saving Practices:
Name of the Major Crop
Area (KANI)
$
Under water saving devices
SRI PADDY
POTATO
2422.02
Under water
conserving agronomic
practices#
Any other (Pl.
Specify)
Current water Saving
status as against flood
irrigation. (Cu.m)
1767.81
7.5
$: Sprinklers, Drip, PVC Pipe, etc.,
#: Vermi compost, organic manuring, check basin, alternate furrow, Ridges and furrow & specific practices
Page 52 of 161
3.19 Details of existing livelihoods
1
2
3
No. of beneficiaries
SC
ST
OBC
GEN
TOTAL
WOMEN
4
Preproject
average
income
per HH
(Rs.)
S. No.
Name of activity
1
AGRICULTURE
3
398
9
6
416
24
51363
2
BUSINESS
3
17
12
19
51
2
50490
3
SERVICE
8
234
15
20
277
14
119422
4
LABOUR
115
542
145
261
1063
108
41370
5
DRIVER
0
2
0
1
3
0
40000
6
PENSIONER
0
12
0
0
12
2
108333
7
WORKER
0
3
0
0
3
0
120000
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
75854
Page 53 of 161
3.20 Existing functional assets
(Works already completed under different schemes including works undertaken by farmers independently)
1
2
3
4
5
6
S.lNo
Name of the work
Plot No.
Quantity
(No./RMTs)
Amount spent
(Rs. In lakh)
Programme
1
Fishery
MGNREGA,
individual
2
DRAIN
MGNREGA
3
ROAD
MGNREGA
Page 54 of 161
3.21 PROBLEM TYPOLOGY OF THE WATERSHED
1
2
3
4
S.No
Problem area
Problem analysis
Loss of productivity due to soil
loss by heavy rainfall
Proposed interventions to overcome
problems
 Planting of fruit crops & other Parannial
crops.
Scarcity of water in lean period

Excavation of WHS, Farm Ponds,
percolation tanks, community tanks et.
No irrigation facility during Rabi
season. Inundation problem in
kharif
Explained below

Cultivation of forest species such as rubber,
bamboo etc. Promotion of horticulture etc.

Explained below
Explained below

Explained below
Daily labour, Auto Driver,
Goatery,Piggary,Dairy,Shop
keeper etc.







Wage employment,
Incense stick making
Back yard poultry
Vegetable cultivation
Cattle rearing
Fishiculture
promotion of artisan skills etc,





Input linkages
Support services
Credit support
Organising into SHGs/CIGs
Facilitation will be strengthened by which
the SHGs could be revived and functional
with all processes


Reviving defunct groups
Formation of new groups
1 Soil Conservation (slope,
erosion, soil loss, rainfall,
productivity, etc)
2 Water conservation (Water
budget, Ground water norms,
productivity)
3 Crop coverage – {80% of w/s
area should be with canopy}
4 Agriculture productivity (crop
wise compare with dist. average)
5 Livestock productivity (Milk
Yield, Meat yield, Eggs, Wool Yield,
Kidding etc.)
6 Existing Livelihood activities
for Asset less persons
7 Community Based
Organizations & Social capital
base
All SHGs are not in function. No
proper facilitation
Page 55 of 161
1
2
3
S.No
Problem area
Problem analysis
8 Capacity Building (participation,
training,awareness of watershed
community
9 Others (specify)
Awareness levels are very low
4
Proposed interventions to overcome
problems
 Strengthening the groups

Communication and capacity building
activities would be organised
Page 56 of 161
3.22 AGRICULTURE AND LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
Sl.No.
Name of the crop/
produce
Production in
watershed
area
(kg/kani)/
(ltr/animal)/
(no/bird)
District
average
(kg/kani)
/(ltr/animal)/
(no/bird)
Interventions
1
1st Kharif – Paddy
2400
3200

Soil fertility enhancement – composting methods
2
2nd Kharif – Rabi
2700
3500

Soil moisture retention practices,
3
Wheat

Adaption of proper agronomy practices

Water saving practices
Package of practices. Usage of pesticide and chemical
fertilizers is high. Bio mass is abundant, but there is no
proper awareness among the farmers to use the bio
mass effectively. Soil fertility improvement through
composting methods is required
4
Potato
5000
7000

Mixed Vegetable is in practice.
5
Winter vegetable
4000
6000

Soil fertility improvement

Promotion of bio fertilizers,

Non chemical pesticide management practices
6
Milk
60
150
Milk productivity is very low. Need to improve the breed
Page 57 of 161
Sl.No.
Name of the crop/
produce
Production in
watershed
area
(kg/kani)/
(ltr/animal)/
(no/bird)
District
average
(kg/kani)
/(ltr/animal)/
(no/bird)
Interventions
and credit support for owning the cattle
100
140

Credit support

Feed and fodder support, Promoting new
varieties

Strengthening Health management

Strengthening AI services

Marketing milk
7
Eggs
Market for eggs is very attractive. Need to promote
back yard poultry through knowledge inputs and credit
support
8
Other livestock
Goat is predominant activity. Providing credit input and
other services will enhance income from this activity
9
Fisheries
Fishiculture practices
Nursery raising
Feed management
Netting practices
Page 58 of 161
3.22.1
Production Systems Analysis - Agriculture crops
3.22.1.1 Name of the crop:
Sl. No.
PADDY
Particulars
Best farmer Sambhuram
Debbarma D.B.Nagar
Not so good farmer: Jaharlal Ghosh
Kobrakhamar
1.
PRODUCTION
400 kg/Kani
280-300 kg/Kani
2.
Fertilising soil
50 basket of Composted Farm yard
manure with bio mass
40 basket of cow dung
Farm yard manure
3.
Land preparation
process







4.
Seed
5.
Plantation

6.
Weeding



Application of compost
Power tiller – 2 hour
After 2 days gap – 1 time with
power tiller
Water the land
Plough again
8-10 kg of seed
Seed is purchased from
Agriculture office.
General method with line
sowing
6’’ gap
Manual weeding
The weed is mixed into soil




Bullock ploughing
Then application of cow dung
Watering the land
Ploughing again





10 kg of seed
Own seed
No seed treatment
General method with line sowing
6’’ gap


Weeder is used
Weed is mixed into soil
Sl. No.
Particulars
Best farmer Sambhuram
Debbarma D.B.Nagar
Not so good farmer: Jaharlal Ghosh
Kobrakhamar


2 times
Water way is arranged to allow
excess of water


3 times
Water way is arranged to allow
excess of water
Fertiliser
application


Total quantity 20 kg of Urea
3 times


Total quantity is 10-15 kg of Urea
2 times
Pest control


Regular watching the pest
Dose: Endosulphon – 5 ml with
16 ltr water
No. of times – 2




Regular watching the pest
Dose: From Agriculture store.
Agriculture officer suggests based
on the symptoms explained
Extension officer (BLW) visits
rarely
No. of times – 2
As prescribed by the Agriculture
extension officer
2 times
3 months
7.
Water
management
8.
9.




10.
Application of
micro nutrients
11.
Duration


As prescribed by the
Agriculture extension officer
1 time
3 months
12.
Livestock owned

3

5
13.
Any other

Farmer has limited area and
concentration is high.

Labour is the constraint. He is not
able to give much time to
observe the paddy field

Page 60 of 161
3.22.1.2 Name of the crop: SRI PADDY
Sl. No.
Particulars
Best farmer: Chandramoni Debbarma Kobrakhamar
1.
PRODUCTION
450 kg/Kani
2.
Area
9 kani
3.
Government
support
4.
Seed
5.
Preparation of
bed














Previous year, for labour Rs 500/- per kani and 24 kg
fertilizer (SP – 6 kg, Urea – 13 kg and MoP – 5 kg)
Present year only fertilizer support.
4 kg from shop and 4 kg own seed.
Seed is purchased from the Agricultural stores. This is
treated seed and is good. But adequate quantity of seed is
not available. Hence using own seed also.
The seed is tied in a cloth and dip for 3 days in the water.
The germinated seed is sown on the bed prepared
The bed prepared is 20’ * 5’
After loosing the soil for bed following FYM and fertilizer is
applied
SP – 2 kg
Urea - 1 kg
MoP – 0.5 kg
Cow dung - 20 kg
The process: Plough the land, apply cow dung and
fertilizers, sprinkle the germinated seed and then sprinkle
water.
10-15 days
6” – 8” saplings
Page 61 of 161
Sl. No.
6.
Particulars
Best farmer: Chandramoni Debbarma Kobrakhamar
Land preparation
process



Plough with bullocks
Till the land with power tiller
Application of FYM and fertilizers
Cow dung– 500 kg/kani
SSP – 16 kg
MoP – 1.5 kg
Urea -6-7 kg
8.
Soil Fertility
improvement

After adding the above fertilizers and cow dung
After sufficient rain water is stored and the land becomes mud
plough the land with buffalos
Marking: No marker is used. Approximately maintained the
distance of 9”
The bed between two drains is 2 mtr width. Water way is
provided to allow excess of water
8 kg of Urea per Kani is provided – 2 times (Total 8 kg per kani)
9.
Weeding
10.
Water
management




Manual weeding
The weed is mixed into soil
2 times
Water way is arranged to allow excess of water
11.
Fertiliser
application


Total quantity 20 kg of Urea
3 times
12.
Pest control


Incidence of pest is high
Khatra, a grass cutter and Manjara a grass horper are the
major insects
Change of color of paddy leaves into red. (micro nutrient
deficiency)
Treatment: For all diseases , Endryn only
Dose: 200 ml with 16 ltr water/ kani
No. of times – 3
As prescribed by the Agriculture extension officer
1 time


7.
Transplantation



13.
Application of
micro nutrients





14.
Duration

3 – 3 ½ months
15.
Yield

450 kg
Page 62 of 161
3.22.2
Production Systems Analysis - Vegetable crops
3.22.2.1 Name of the crop: POTATO
Sl.No. Particulars
Best farmer: Sambhuram
Debbarma
Not so good farmer Surjya D/B
600 kg/Kani
1.
PRODUCTION
1200 kg/Kani
2.
Duration

3 months

3 months
3.
Land preparation
process


Tilling with tractor
After 4-5 days application of
Compost


4.
Seed

Agriculture storage godown,
Kumarghat
Quantity – 50 kg/ Kani
Cost – Rs.40/kg
Compost manure
200 baskets/ kani
2nd tillage by tractor
Give gap for 7 days
Application of lime powder @
25-30 kg per kani
Then Bullock ploughing
Soil should become dust
1.5’*6’’
Loosen the soil in furrows with
pick axe
Non TPS. Medium size good
quality potato is preserved for



Tilling with Plough
Direct application - Every day the
cow dung is collected and applied
to the filed directly
Own stored seed
Quantity: 40-42 kg/ Kani
5.


Fertilising soil


Farm yard manure 


6.
Preparation of
basins




7.
Seedling


Super Phospate (25 kg) +Urea (15
kg) +Potash (4-5 kg)
Application before land
preparation
Then tilling with bullock plough

Same process



Page 63 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
8.
Pest Management
Best farmer: Sambhuram
Debbarma



9.
Irrigation
management


10.
Micro nutrients




next season in the home itself
The main disease is route
necrosis.
This normally attacks when the
height of the plant is 6’
A type of dust is sprayed – 30 gr
of dust mix with 16 ltr water 1
time
It is winter vegetable. Usually it
depends on rains/fog.
Critical irrigation support is
required one time after 1
month and at the time of
harvesting.
1 kg of micronutrients mix with
48 ltr of water was sprayed per
time.
Application of micronutrients is
done twice per crop.
The micronutrient is brought
from Agriculture stores.
The method is as prescribed by
BLW.
Not so good farmer Surjya D/B

The main disease observed is
‘dosa’ (a Bengali term). It changes
leaf color to red. This attacks in
the extreme cold climate only.
The medicine is brought from
Agriculture stores as prescribed
by the BLW
Same

Nil


Steps to improve the productivity in potato

Watching the pest is important

Need 4-5 hours of work daily in the field. (Labour is a problem)

Loosening the soil in the furrows with pick axe gives good nutrients to the plant and hence the yield

Soil dressing once in 15 days

Irrigation support once in 15-20 days

Preparation of land – the soil should become dust and very loose
Issues to be addressed:

Water problem is high. The present practice is manual lifting. Required peddle pump/generator.

Soil fertility improvement measures - Compost pit
Page 64 of 161

Disease control, use of non-pesticide methods.
3.22.2.2 Name of the crop: BRINJAL
Sl.No. Particulars
Best farmer: Chandramoni D/B
Not so good farmer: Surja D/B
4 satak
1.
Area
20 satak
2.
PRODUCTION




3.
Appropriate time
for better profit

First 2 weeks – 20-25 kg
Next 2 weeks – 30-40 kg
Next 1 week on wards – 150 kg
Total harvesting takes place in
4 months
Average yield per kani is 36
quintal per season
Bhadra month (August)
4.
Duration

5 months

5 months
5.
Land preparation
process



Clean the jungle
Plough with buffalos
Application of cattle dung – 20
baskets
2nd ploughing
Preparation of furrows
Big lines to allow excess water
After 1 week loosen the soil



Clean the jungle
Application of cattle dung 20
baskets
2nd ploughing
Loosening the soil in furrows with
pick axe. This farmer applies






1 quintal per month upto 3
months

Average yield per kani is 30
qunital per season

Same



Page 65 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
6.
Seed
7.
Nursery
preparation
8.
Transplantation
9.
Irrigation
management
Best farmer: Chandramoni D/B










10.
Pest Management



11.
Soil Fertility





12.
with pick axe
After 1 week prepare basins.
20 gr seed
Own seed
Duration of nursery 15-20 days
6’ height plants
Distance is 1” * 2”
For first 3 days – daily twice
This is a rainy crop
If there is no rain critical
irrigation is required
Little irrigation is required once
in a week
Major disease: Stem
Borer/Nematodes
Keep Furadan granules 500 gr
per 20 satak of land (i.e. 1 kg
per kani) in the basins near the
plant
Mix 5-10 gr of Endosulphan
with 16 ltr water and spray 4-5
times.
Make the dry cow dung into
powder
Mix with Urea
Application of this dust @ 25 gr
per plant.
Apply in the basins directly to
the plant at 1 month age
Do soil work in the basins every
week
Micro nutrients
Not so good farmer: Surja D/B

more focus to loosen the soil with
pick axe.
Same

Same

Same

Same

Major disease is Stem
borer/nematodes
Bud necrosis is also noticed
For all diseases Spray of
Endosulphan




Nil
Steps to improve the productivity in potato

Watching the pest is important

Loosening the soil in the furrows with pick axe gives good nutrients to the plant and hence the yield

Soil dressing once in a week

Preparation of land – the soil should become dust and very loose
Page 66 of 161
Issues to be addressed:

Soil fertility improvement measures - Compost pit. Huge quantities of bio mass is available, but bio mass is
not added to the soil.

Pest and disease control, use of non-pesticide methods.
Sl.No. Particulars
Not so good farmer: Bishnupada
Ghosh
K.Khamar
BRINJAL(2)
Best farmer:Sambhuram D/B
1.
Area

0.5 pava = 0.12 kani

1 pava = 0.25 kani
2.
Seed

Own seed

Purchased from the shop
3.
Soil type

Sandy loam

Sandy loam
4.
Irrigation facility


Same
5.
Nursery raising

The land is located near the
stream
In the month of Karthika (SepOct)
15-20 days
Tilling byplough
Application of complex fertilizers
Preparation of basins
Watering the land
Flood irrigation, diverting the


Same period
30 days

Same process

Same process
6.
7.

Land preparation 



Transplantation 

Page 67 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
8.
9.
Fertilizer
application
Disease control
Ghosh
K.Khamar


water from the stream
Transplantation
Super Phospate (SP) – 20 kg
Murate of Potash (MoP) – 2 kg

Super Phospate (SP) – 20 kg
Murate of Potash (MoP) – 5 kg
Urea – 5 kg
Urea – 5 kg
Phuradon – 100 gr
Phuradon – 300 gr

Mixing all the chemicals and
broadcosting before ploughing
with buffalos
This farmer uses more chemical

Mixing all the chemicals and
broadcosting before ploughing
with buffalos

Major disease/pests: Stem
necrosis, stem borer
Control: 100 gr Endryn with 16
ltr water

Major disease/pest: Stem
borer/stem necrosis
Control: Prepare the granules
400-500 no. with Phuradon and
Cow dung mixture
Keep the granules near the plant
and cover them with soil
This process should be at
flowering stage only, but should
not at pod stage
It should not touch the plant.
Keep atleast 2’ distance.
After 3 days water the saplings








10.
Irrigation
support

Weekly once

11.
Harvesting

First harvesting at Magh month
(after 2 months of
transplantation)
Starting from 20-25 kg per week
Gradually increased to 50 kg
The crop could not withstand for
longer period due to pest and
weak growth
Harvested for 2 months only








Leaf folder
Control: Medicine from private
stores as prescribed by the shop
keeper
Weekly once
First harvesting at Magh month
(after 2 months of
transplantation)
Starting from 50-150 kg per
week
Gradually the quantity is
increased to 200-250 kg per
week
Harvesting till Baisakh month
(For 3 months, nearly 12 weeks)
Page 68 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
12.
Price
Ghosh
K.Khamar

Rs.3 per kg



Productivity is 3 times higher
Rs.30- 35 per kg
The price is 10 times higher
Key points

Pest watching and management.

Supervision

Use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides should be reduced.
Sl.No. Particulars
Best farmer: Sambhuram D/B
TOMATO
Not so good farmer:Chandramoni
D/B
1.
Average
yield/kani

1920 kg/kani

800 kg/kani
2.
Net Extent of
Tomato

0.38 kani

0.5 kani
3.
Method


Mixed vegetable alongwith
Brinjal, chillies, onion and potato
4.
Process of land
preparation and
soil fertility
improvement



Mixed vegetable alongwith leafy
vegetable, lady’s finger, bitter
guard and onions
No tractor tillage
Plough by bullock
Application of compost to
furrows – 500 baskets
(Relatively 3 ½ times more)




Tractor tillage
Ploughing by bullock plough
Furrow making
Adding compost to furrows– 200
baskets
Cover with soil
Preparation of basins



Application of chemical
fertilizers. Preparationof
complex of Super Phospate (SP)
+ Urea + Murate of Potash (MoP)
Top dressing with chemical
fertilizer complex 3 days before
the transplantation
Plant protection chemical as
prescribed by Agriculture
Extension officer


Page 69 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars

5.
Process of
compost
preparation

6.
Application of
chemical
fertilizers

Seed
SP – 10 kg
Urea: 6 kg

Farm yard manure and little bio
mass is added to heap

SP – 3 kg
Urea: 4 – 5 kg
MoP: 4 kg

7.
Purchase of PPC from private
shop
Composted with FYM and bio
mass
D/B
He knows that urea is not good
for the plant. It boosts up the
growth of the plant without
strength. Finally it bends down
and dies. But still uses the urea.
Same process, but seed is local
variety
MoP: 1 kg
8.
Nursery raising

During September

Department of Agriculture
Variety: Exactly not known but
HYV
Same time
9.
Transplantation

20-25 days aged saplings

20-25 days aged saplings
10.
Irrigation
management


Twice a week
Hero Honda (diesel based) mini
generator is used to lift the
water


11.
Diseases and
management

Major disease observed: Flower
Dropping, Stem borer, pod borer
Flower dropping and stem borer
is more
Control measure: Phuradon
granules are kept in the basins
Phuradon is prescribed by Block
Level Extension Worker
Pod borer is manageable
No measures are taken. He
knows that ash works well. It was
shortage, he didn’t get from
others also.
Ash is applied to other crops as
pod borer in tomato is
manageable, but needs for other

Twice a week
There is a stream nearby, water
level is increased by constructing
a nala bund across the stream
and flood irrigation (gravity flow)
is done.
Major disease observed: Flower
Dropping, Stem borer, pod borer
Flower dropping and stem borer
is more
Control measure: Phuradon
granules are kept in the basins
Pod borer is manageable
Applied ash, it works well













Page 70 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
12.
Application of
pesticide

13.
Soil Testing

14.
Staking

15.
Harvesting

16.
Price
17.
Yield
crops.
Pesticide is not used. He thinks
of no use.
D/B

PPC mixed with water is sprayed
through can shower.

Not done



Done in September (6 months
back), but no report is received
till date
Done after 1 month of
transplantation
First harvesting after 40 days of
transplantation
Size: Relatively bigger
Rs.40 per kg


Done after 1 month of
transplantation
First harvesting after 40 days of
transplantation
Size: Relatively smaller
Rs.30-35 per kg

40 kg/week for 18 weeks

40 kg/week for 10 weeks

Key points

Soil quality is important.

Quality and process of composting is required

Page 71 of 161
3.22.2.5 Name of the crop: CAULIFLOWER
Sl.No. Particulars
Not so good farmer: Surjya D/B
Best farmer: Budhu Ch D/B
1.
Area

0.5 kani

0.5 kani
2.
Seed
3.
Nursery
preparation





Purchased from private shops
100 gr seed
Rs.150/Agar month
During Dec 4th week – Jan 1st
Week
Provided some support for shade
with local leaves and branches
Duration 20-25 days
Bed size is 3.0* 1.5 mtr
Soil and Cow dung mixture is
applied to fertile the soil
Tractor tilling
Application of fertilizers and FYM
Plough by buffalos
The soil should become dust
Alignment – 18” * 10”
Make furrows
Water the furrows
Loosen the soil with pick axe in
the furrows
Prepare basins







Purchased from private shops
100 gr seed
Rs.175/- to Rs.200/Same period and same process
Duration 20-22 days
Bed size is 3.0* 2.0 mtr
Same process to fertile soil

Same process
Before ploughing, applied the
mixture of
Urea – 5 kg

Before ploughing applied the
mixture as recommended by
BLW
Urea – 5 kg




4.
Preparation of
main field









5.
Fertilizer
application

DAP – 12 kg
DAP – 12 kg
SP – 12 kg
SP – 10 kg
Dung – 2500 kg


After ploughing Apply the mix of
Oil cake, phuradon and FYM
Oil Cake – 12 kg
Dung is applied after
transplantation

Phuradon – 100 gr
Page 72 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
Powdered Cow dung

6.
Transplantation


7.
Fertilizer
application after
plantation

Apply the dried and powdered
cow dung dust mixed with oil
cake and phuradon into furrows
Transplant the 3” height saplings
Loosen the soil in the basins

Same process

Urea - 5 kg
Applied cow dung after
transplantation
8 days after transplantation
apply the mix of following (2nd
time)
Oil cake – 20 kg
DAP – 12 kg
Urea - 5 kg
SP - 12 kg
DAP – 12 kg
Dung – 500 kg
SP - 12 kg
8 days after transplantation
apply the mix of following (2nd
time)
Oil cake – 12 kg


8.
9.
Irrigation
Management
Diseases, Pests
and deficiencies
- control









Dung –200 kg
For the first 3 days after
transplantation: 2 times in
morning and evening
Then onwards once in a week
Micro nutrient deficiency: Color
of leaves is changed to yellow.
This is observed after 20 days of
transplantation
Control: Liquid pesticide
(Dasarukh) recommended by
shop keeper
100 gr of Dasarukh mixed with
20-25 ltr water and sprayed
Sprayed 3 times
If the symptoms are not
controlled remove the plants
from the field to prevent other
plants









For the first 3 days daily once
only
Then weekly once
Black caterpillar. This is
identified in the field. Its size is
2” and it cuts the leaf and plant.
Control: Pick and remove the
caterpillar from the field.
If it is not controlled spray
Dasarukh.
Mix 200 gr Dasarukh with 20 ltr
water and spray 3-4 times.
Red color beetle
It cuts the leaves.
Spray Endryn . Mix 100 gr Endryn
with 20 ltr water and spray 4-5
times.
After rains at the ending stage of
the crop one type of pest is
identified.
No medicine is given. If the
medicine is given the residues
Page 73 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars




10.
Water
management




will remain in the cauliflower and
harm the consumers
Harvest the attacked cauliflower
soon after with this type of pest
is identified and sell it
Leaf borer
They are found under the leaves
and near the plant
Identify the beetles and remove
them from the field
stream is nearby
Pumped water for critical
irrigation support
Rent for the pump set with
generator is Rs100 per hour
Total hours of water required is
10-12 hours per crop
11.
Soil profile

Sandy soil
12.
Harvesting

Last week of Magh to Phalgun (
March)
Harvesting for 3-4 weeks
Before rainy season starts
Weight of a cauliflower was 0.5-2
kg
Total quantity: 40 quintal
Initial price was Rs. 25-30 per kg
and at the end of the season the
price was Rs.4-5 per kg
Total earned Rs.40,000
Expenditure was 20,000 – 22,000








Same process


8-10 hours per crop
Sandy soil


From Phalgun to Chaith month
(March-April)
8 weeks

0.5 kg to 2 kg


30 quintal
Same price


Rs.40,000
Expenditure was just Rs.6000/only
Key points

Increasing size of cauliflower: Urea, DAP and SP

Timely availability of tillers
Page 74 of 161

Water scarcity

Fertilizer scarcity

Supervision

Page 75 of 161
3.22.2.6 Name of the crop: LADY’S FINGER
Sl.No. Particulars
Not so good farmer:
Not so good farmer:
1.
Area

0.5 kani

0.5 kani
2.
Seed

Own seed

Own seed
3.
Land preparation 
Application of cow dung: 40-60
baskets approximately 20-25
quintal
Plough with buffalo
Application of chemical fertilizers
Urea – 5 kg


Plough the land with buffalos
Application of cow dung – 15
quintals
Application of mix of fertilizers –
15 -20 kg





SP – 15 kg
MoP – 15 kg
Seed Dibbling

5.
Irrigation



Second time ploughing
Preparation of furrows @ 1.5’
interval
Arrange big furrows to allow the
excess water to drain out
Seed dibbling in the last week of
Chaitr or first month of Baisakhi
Dibble the seed
Cover with soil
Only rainfed no irrigation
6.
Pests, Diseases


Red colored pest
Control: 100 gr Endrin mixed



4.

Same

Same


Red colored sucking pest
Control: Applied ash with some
Page 76 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
Not so good farmer:





7.
Harvesting





with water is sprayed
Bisa / leaf folder
250 gr of Endrin mixed with
water is sprayed
All prescription by the shop
keeper
For Flower Dropping – Endryn is
sprayed
For Sucking pest: Endryn and ash
is sprayed
Started in the month of Jaisth
Harvesting period for 3 months
Initial yield was 15-20 kg.
Gradually upto 30-35 kg per
week
Total yield 10 quintal
Rs.10,000 to Rs.12000/-
Not so good farmer:


PPC as prescribed by the private
shop keeper
For Flower Dropping – Endryn is
sprayed
For Sucking pest: Endryn and ash
is sprayed

Same

Initial yield was 20 kg, gradually
increased to 50 kg and came
down to 20 kg per week
Total 10 quintal
Income is Rs.12000/-


Key points

Pesticide usage is high

Timely inputs are not available

Good quality seed influences the production

Controlling Flower dropping is important

Endryn is banned is not available. The farmers don’t know the name of the pesticide. They ask for Endryn
to control the pest. The shop keeper gives something else equal to it
Page 77 of 161
3.22.3
Production Systems Analysis - Horticulture
3.22.3.1 Name of the Fruit: PINEAPPLE
Sl.No. Particulars
Not so good farmer: Chitta D/B
Best farmer: Budh Ch. D/B
1.
Area

2 kani

3 kani
2.
Variety

Local variety

Local variety
3.
Land type

Tila land (upland)

Same
4.
Duration of the
crop

1 year

Same
5.
Durability of
offsets

4 years

Same
6.
No. of offsets

1000

800
7.
Source of offsets



Own farm
8.
Alignment

250 from own farm
750 purchased from other
farmers @ Rs.5/- each
4’ * 3’

5’ * 5’
9.
Pitting


6” * 6” round shape
Add 250 gr of dried cow dung
powder to pit
Add bio mass



Same size
Add 1 kg of cow dung powder
Add bio mass
After 1 month of pitting
During Ashad month
Cover with soil

Same process
Bamboo fencing

Same
10.
Plantation
11.
Fencing







12.
Pest control

Nil, Not required

Nil, Not required
13.
Weeding in the
basins

2 times a year

Same
14.
Removing jungle

2 times a year

Same
15.
Harvesting


Same
16.
No. of fruits

After one year in the month of
Jaisht
Year 1: 1
Year 2: 2

Same
Page 78 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
Not so good farmer: Chitta D/B
Best farmer: Budh Ch. D/B
Year 3: 3
Year 4: 4
Year 5: Nil

17.
Size of the fruit

18.
Price

19.
Income

Not all the offsets give fruits in
first year. Only 50%
0.5 kg to 1.25 kg
Rs.10 per kg initially and
gradually the price goes down to
Rs.5 – Rs.6
Year 1: Rs. 2,000 to Rs.2,500/Year 2: Rs. 4,000 to Rs.5,000/-

Same


Year 1: Rs. 3,000 to Rs.4,000/Year 2: Rs. 6,000 to Rs.7,000/Year 3: Rs.10,000 to Rs.12,000/-
20.
Expenditure



It is one time investment
Rainfed crop
Every year, application of FYM
and bio mass, soil work in the
basins is required


Every year doubles the income
Same
Key points

Preparation of basins to maintain moisture

Digging Contour lines to harvest soil and moisture

No soil work is done

Adding bio mass and FYM increases production

Soil work in basins

Application of silt can increase the production
Page 79 of 161
Production System Analysis - PLANTATION
Sl.No. Particulars
BAMBOO CULTIVATION
Dasarath D/B (Tila plantation)
Agur D/B (Bastu plantation)
1.
Area

0.5 kani

0.5 kani
2.
Type of the land
3.
Variety
cultivated (No.
and unit cost)



Tilla (Up land)
Exclusively bamboo plantation
Jai – 15 @ Rs.50/Barak – 10 @ Rs.100/-
Muli – 70 @ Rs 10/-








Same
In Bastu
Makal – 1 @ RS.100/Rupoi – 1 @ Rs.50/Barak – 1 @ Rs.100/Jai – 1 @ Rs. 80/Muli – 1 @ Rs.15/Bethwa – 1 @ Rs.50/-

Planted in year 2008 ( 3 years )
Makal – 20 @ Rs.60/-
4.
Age of the plants

(Barak is of good quality. Muli
variety gives early production)
Planted in year 2005 (6 years)
5.
Present size

20 mtr length

20-22 mtr length
6.
Pitting and
plantation





2’ * 2’ * 2’ size pits
Spacing 10’ * 10’
Exposed to sunlight for 30 days
Applied FYM and bio mass to pits
Plantation






Basins are prepared
Wire fencing



Same size
Spacing 30’ * 30’
Exposed to sunlight for 15 days
Bio mass is burnt in the pits (This
is a good practice as perceived by
the people)
Basins are prepared

7.
Fencing
8.
Source of
irrigation

Rain water

Rain water
9.
Soil work

Once in a year

Same
10.
Productivity


Sold Barak – 20 * Rs.150/Muli gives as high as 30 logs
(branches) per bush
Rs.15000/- per year
Starts after 4th year


Sold Muli 100 No. * Rs 25/Rupai gives as high as 50
branches per bush
Rs.2000/- per year
Starts after 4th year




Bamboo fencing
Key points

Fertility of the soil, ordinary loam is most suitable, Duas, bora mitti is also good
Page 80 of 161

Fertility in the basins

Muli variety is best

Flowering should not come. It kills the buds and 1 year production will be lost

Muli is most prone to budding

No practice to prevent this.
Page 81 of 161
3.22.3.3 Name of the crop: ARIKANUT
Sl.No. Particulars
Household Plantation Bahardur D/B
Area plantation: Bhakta D/B
1.
Location

Household

Tila (Upland)
2.
No. of plants

55

100
3.
Area

Including household 0.5 kani

0.25 kani
4.
Year of
plantation

2008

2006
5.
Present size
(2011)

4 mtr

10 mtr
6.
Variety

Local

Local
7.
Life

20 years

20 years
8.
Spacing

4’ distance

2.5’ * 2.5’
9.
Pitting and
Plantation
Size: 1’ *1’ * 1’
Same process
Application of
fertilizers/FYM
Size: 8” * 8” * 4”
Plantation
Cover the plant with the soil
Application of Cow dung to the
pit: 1.0 to 1.5 kg added with soil


10.






Bio mass is burnt in the pit
200 gr of DAP, Cow dung mixed
with soil and applied to the pit.
11.
Irrigation


For first 10 days daily twice
12.
Fencing

For first 8 days, daily twice is
required
Bamboo fencing

Same
13.
Soil Fertility

Soil work twice in a year

14.
Pest and disease
control




15.
Yield

Bud Necrosis
Control: 25 gr of Endosolphan
and BHC 50% with 4 ltr water
After 5 years
16.
Income

Nil so far
After 1 year the basin is
palasided with bamboo sticks.
Added bio mass and cow dung to
enrich the soil
Bud Necrosis
Control: 50 gr of Endosolphan
and BHC 50% with 4 ltr water
Same
Year 1: 4-5 kg per plant
First year production -400 kg
Rs. 30,000 (Rs.100 per kg)




Key points

Fertilizers and Fencing is important
Page 82 of 161
Name of the crop: RUBBER PLANTATION
Sl.No. Particulars
Dasarath D/B
Agur D/B
1.
Area

4 kani

4 kani
2.
Land type

Tila (Upland)

Tila (Upland)
3.
Year of
plantation

2000

2008
4.
No. of plants

300

320
5.
Source of
material

Rubber Board

Kumarghat
6.
Financial support 
BLOCK

Own
7.
Cost of material
and preparation


Rubber plants: Nil
Pitting – Rs.6000/-
8.
Nursery raising

Mandwi Block supplied the
raised plants






Cost of stump – 10.50
Transportation – 2.00
Poly thin cover – 2.00
Transportation – 1.00
Nursery raising by self
Filling of bags
Soil – 6 kg
Dung – 250 gr
SP – 100 gr
Page 83 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
Dasarath D/B
Agur D/B
Urea – 50 gr
9.
Alignment

15’ * 12’

Same
10.
Size of the pits

1.5” * 1.5” * 2.5”

Same
11.
Plantation and
fencing





Fencing with bamboo – Cost is
Rs.10,000/Staking is provided





Plantation was done
Fencing was provided
Staking is provided
Mix of SP, Rock Phospate (RP),
Potash – 1 kg per plant
Applied to the plant in the basin
Once in a year
Cow dung – Nil
Medicine – Nil
Soil work in the basins was done
12.
Application of
manures and
fertilizers


13.
Diseases and
management

No knowledge on diseases

14.
Pruning

Method: Bud on the top portion
of the plant is cut to allow more
branches to come up


15.
Irrigation
support

Not provided

After 1 year
Bud on the top portion of the
plant is twisted and tied with
rubber band for 21 days as
prescribed by the Department
Not provided
16.
Mortality rate

Nil
17.
Replacing
casualties

Nil



Stump mortality – 0
Plant Mortality - 25
Replaced with new plants
18.
Harvesting
rubber latex

The plant requires 6 years for
appropriate level of maturity.
Tapping started from 2006.
Strip the small section of bark at
a slight angle on the trunk at the
height of man to facilitate latex
drainage. The process is called
Tapping.
When a particular area of the
tree is tapped out, a new portion
of the tree will be tapped.
It generally takes six years for a
tapped area to heal sufficiently

Starts from 6 years after
plantation




Page 84 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
Dasarath D/B








19.
Processing









20.
Yield


Agur D/B
to be tapped again
Then the farmer will extract from
other side
The latex is extracted alternative
day
Each plant produced half a cup
of latex
6th year/plant – 200-250 gr
Till 11 years 50 gr/plant/year is
increased
Rubber can be extracted 10
months in a year
Add 1.5 ltr of water to 2 ltr of

latex (Rubber milk) – Step A
Add 100 gr of diluted acid to 4 ltr
of water. – Step B
Then add 100 gr of acid mixed
water (Step B) to the blend of
Step A
Pore this blend of A & B into the
tray (Generally it is square
shaped).
This tray is of different sizes
This acid mixture is roled twice
through a machine (look like
sugarcane extractor)
Water is separated from the
latex
Pure rubber is the final output
This rubber is dried under smoke
for 7-8 days
Ready to pack and sell
Per annum 12 quintal @ Rs.22

per kg. The present price is
Rs.210/kg
Key points

Fertilizer application – 2 times a year

Disease control

Getting knowledge about rubber culture, diseases, control etc
Page 85 of 161

To heal the strip, ‘rubber foot’ is required. This fastens the growth of skin on stripped portion

This is supplied by Rubber board

Requires 250 gr/plant. Cost of rubber foot is Rs.50/kg

During dry season, irrigation facility is required for better yield. To fetch water from the streams/ponds,
pump with generator is required.
Page 86 of 161
3.22.4
Production Systems Analysis – Livestock, Poultry, Fisheries
3.22.4.1 Large Ruminants
Sl.No. Particulars
1.
Cattle possess
ANIL DEBBARMA

Cows – 7 (1 Jersey and6 local)
Jersey cow is breeded
SAMBHU DEB DEB

5 Country breed (1 ½ year old –
1, 3 yr old – 1, 6 months old calf)
3 years old cow is giving milk

1 local cow is giving milk
2.
Whether cattle
shed is available

Yes

Yes
3.
Whether land
owned

Yes, 4 kani

Yes
4.
Whether the
fodder is
available from
land

Yes2 kanis of Paddy

Yes, 2 kani Paddy
5.
Milk yield




1 ltr in the morning
Maximum milk production was
1.5 ltr per shift, daily 2 shifts
6.
Fodder


2 ltr in the morning
The maximum milk production
by the Jersey cow was 7 ltr per
day
Dry fodder only
Green fodder is not available
other than open grazing
During the standing crop for 6
months only dry fodder is given
at the shed. No open grazing
during standing crop
Oil cake – 10 kg/month @
Rs.22.50
Paddy husk – 10 tins/month @
40 kg/tin. Cost of tin husk is
Rs.50/Jaggery – 10 kg/month @ Rs.40/Vaccine is given 2 time in a year
By ARDD


Same
During standing crop open
grazing is in his tila land.


Same,
Husk is not purchased, available
at home


Treatment by Government
Veterinary Assistant
Rs.200/- per visit




Not given
Crossed with breeding bull
Available with local farmer
Free of cost

7.
Feed


8.
Health
management


Free of cost
9.
AI



AI service is available at door
step
Sub centre is located within the
watershed project area
Page 87 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars
ANIL DEBBARMA




10.
Milk marketing
11.
Insurance
12.
Drinking water






Cost of AI one time is Rs.150/Veterinary Assistant executes AI
AI is given to Jersey breed cow
only (Successful in 2nd attempt)
No focused attention to local
cows
Sold to market
Good quality milk was sold at
Rs.20/- per ltr
Present price is Rs.25/- per ltr
No practice
Only loanees will do
No constraint
SAMBHU DEB DEB

Domestic consumption

Nil

No constraint
Key points

AI service is available

Health service is available

ARDD sub centre exists in the watershed project area

Fodder is not a constraint

No Drinking water problem

Feed is not given properly: Oil cake, jaggery is to be given

Other farmers do not sell milk, only domestic consumption

Major problem is mobility during standing crop
Page 88 of 161
3.22.4.2 BACK YARD POULTRY
Sl.No. Particulars
1.
No. of birds
2.
Source of birds
BISHURAM D/B




3.
Breed




MANU D/B
Big – 40
Small – 30
Own. Commercial birds are also
grown
2-3 days old chicks are brought
from nearby town
The cost of the chick is Rs.40/100 birds lot is rose per crop
Local and Layer breed (Kuroiler
variety)
The ration of cocks is higher in
this variety (70:30)
Yes, poultry shed is also available




Big – 15
Small – 6
This farmer also brings chicks
from nearby town and grown
20-25 chicks lot per crop

Kuroiler layer breed


Grown in back yard
Small place is arranged in back
yard for the poultry birds


Mix of 5 kg husk and 1 kg feed
daily
Cost is same

Same
4.
Whether they
are grown in
back yard

5.
Feed

6.
Diseases and
management




Mixture of 10 kg husk and 5 kg
feed daily
Cost of husk – 30/- per kg
Cost of feed – 27/- per kg
RKD and sneezing
Vaccination – By the farmer
7.
Predation

Nil

Nil
8.
Laying eggs


Starts from 6 months age
10-12 eggs every day from all
birds
Kuroiler – upto 6 months
Local breed – Upto 3 months
Cost of the egg is Rs.5-6 local
price
After 6 months the birds are sold
Weight 3 – 6 kg
Cost of live bird is Rs.400 – Rs500
per kg
Monthly once the shed is
cleaned with lime and phenol

Same



Birds sold so far are 200 birds
Weight of the bird 3-4 kg
Cost of live bird is Rs.180 per kg

The place is cleaned daily with
phenol
Application of lime powder once
in a week



9.
Selling live birds



10.
Back yard
management


Page 89 of 161
Key points

Place in back yard

Sufficient feed

Providing paddy husk with feed

Timely vaccination

Timely medicine

Clean shed

Vitamins

Deworming

Minimum 100 birds is viable

8 + 1 is a viable unit.
Page 90 of 161
3.22.4.3 INLAND FISHERIES
Sl.No. Particulars
Not so good farmer: SUKURAM D/B
Best farmer: SUKUMONI D/B
5Kani
1.
Area
10 Kani
2.
Average yield/
kani/year

160 – 170 kg

175 kg
3.
Average size/fish
4.
Average price/kg



Size: 1st catch 200-250 gr
Size: 2nd catch 700-800 gr
Rs. 110/-



Rs.115/-
5.
Duration of the
cycle

2 years

2-3 years
6.
Nursery

Size of the pond for nursery is 1
kani. This pond is separate from
the main pond. This is not a
partition of the main pond.
Source of fish seed is a private
farm, Agarthala
Quantity of seed – 10 packets @
1.00 lakh each
Rovu – 5 packets @ Rs.700/-

Separate pond of 1 kani size

Source of the seed is same
Katla – 3 packets @ Rs.900/-

Quantity is 5-7 packets @ 1.00
lakh in each packet
Rovu – 3 packets


Picket – 2 packets @ Rs.500/-
Katla – 2 packets


Picket – 1 packet
Duration: 75-90 days
Period: March to May
Same price
 Duration: 90 days
 Period: April to June
Note: Compared to other farmer 3
times more Fish seed is used
7.
Preparation of
nursery




Application of Fish poison to kill
all the existing stock in the pond.
30 gr of Endryn is used
Application of lime: 2 packets @
8kg each
Method: Mix the lime powder in
the water and pore in all corners

Same process
Page 91 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars

8.
9.
Feed

management in
the nursery pond

Preparation of
main pond




10.
Transfer of
fingerlings to
main pond

11.
Feed



of the pond
After 1 week release the
fingerlings.
On the 2nd day of releasing, 3 kg
of Maida flour and 10 kg of oil
cake.
Start with little and increase the
quantity gradually
Once in 15-20 days
Drag the net in the pond to catch
all the existing big size fish
2 Partitions were made to the
pond
Roavu (part)and Katla in one
pond, and Roavu(part) and
picket in other pond; Picket and
Katla are of same nature)
Release in the month of June
280 kg of feed (16 kg /kani)
Once in a month
Purchased in the market/private
shop

This farmer gives more quantity
of feed.
Maida flour – 1.5 kg and oil cake
3-4 kg
Other processes are same

Same process

In the month of July


210 kg of feed every month (52
kg /kani)
In addition 250 kg of poultry
excreta every month
Relatively 3 times more quantity
of feed
Same process


Lime powder 56 kg once in winter
Same process

Sandy loam

2-3 years (Release of new
fingerlings)
Same process




12.
Disease
management



13.
Netting



14.
Type of the soil
in the fish pond
15.
Duration of crop

16.
Harvesting fish

Disease: Decay of fins in winter
Medicine: As prescribed by
Fisheries Extension officer of
Mandwi block.
Lime powder 240 kg once in
winter.
Netting is important to keep the
fish active and alert. This also
helps the fish to roam around
and find the meal
Monthly once
Sandy loam
2 years (Release of new
fingerlings)
First harvesting starts in the
month of Sep till Oct

Page 92 of 161
Sl.No. Particulars



2nd catch in Dec till Feb giving
rest in Nov
17.
Quantity of fish
harvested


1st Catch: 600-700 kg
2nd catch: 2000-2500 kg
18.
Sale

Price



Sold at Ranirbazar (a small size
town nearby)
Grading was done
Quality and size and variety wise
Rs100 to Rs120 per kg
19.
 Size: 1st catch 250-350 gr
 Size: 2nd catch 700-800 gr
 1st Catch: 200-250 kg
 2nd catch: 400-500 kg
Compared to other farmer
Productivity is higher

Same

Rs.110 to Rs 120 per kg
Key points

Every month the netting is important. More the netting is and higher the productivity.

Soil quality also makes difference. Sandy loam soil is good

Feed quality and quantity matters the yield. Adding poultry excreta also increases the productivity.
Page 93 of 161
3.22.5
Livelihood Analysis
3.22.5.1 INCENSE STICK MAKING
Sl.No. Particulars
1.
Procurement of
raw bamboo
2.
Process of
making into thin
sticks










3.
Final product
4.
Tools required
5.
Workers
required
6.
Time required


7.
Marketing

8.
Income








Locally purchased
Makal variety
Small size – Rs.40/Big size – Rs.100/The long green fresh log is cut
into 9’ pieces using saw
Chaffer to chaff into small tiny
sticks
Drying the sticks under sun light.
2 days are required in rainy days
and 1 day is sufficient in non
rainy days.
Roll them using legs
Bundle the sticks
Raw incense sticks of 3.5 kg from
a bamboo log
Saw
Big knife to cut into 9’ pieces
Fining tool
Tape to measure
To cut a long log 2 adults and 2
children work at their home.

Same

Same

Same

Same


Same
It is a part time activity for them
4 hours of all above
To make 10 kg of sticks 2 days
full time of a person is required
Sold within the project area. A
middleman supplies the bamboo
logs and buys back from them
10 kg of sticks is Rs.200/Cost of one log is Rs.120/Profit is Rs.80/- per 2 days

Same

Same

Same
Key points
Page 94 of 161

Middlemen are involved in this activity. A local person who holds valid license from Forest Department to
buy and sell the bamboo is the middleman. He supplies raw logs to the workers and collects the processed
material back. He just pays very meager amount to the workers.

200 families are involved in this project area

They should be organized into SHGs and strengthened

Credit support is required initially

Getting license should be explored

Gradually the people should be involved in the value chain process.
Page 95 of 161
3.22.6
Best Practices, Constraints, Programme Actions
3.22.6.1 Paddy
Advantages and disadvantages as perceived by the farmer
Sl.No Particular
Advantage
1
Yield
550 kg per kani, normal method –
400 kg
2
Expenditure
Less seed is required
Less labour for transplantation
Disadvantage
1 ½ time higher expenditure on
labour for weeding. He does not
have weeder
If weeder is available, less labour
3
Labor
Low pesticide
4
Pests and diseases
Low
5
Usage of Pesticide
Low
6
Fertilisers
7
Irrigation water
More labour for transplantation
More fertilizer is required for
SRI
Less water is required. Water is
stored not in the paddy field, but
in the water ways provided.
Issues in SRI

Availability of fertilizers is a constraint as SRI demands more fertilizers

Weeders and markers are not available

Pump set is required to fetch water from the stream or pond during dry spells

Either the existing fish ponds are silted up or fish pond is not available.
Programme Actions

Providing markers and weeders through custom hiring centre

Re-excavation or excavation of new fish ponds under NRM

Promoting Composting methodologies

Promoting seed preservation, seed treatment and non chemical pest management methods
Page 96 of 161
3.22.6.2 Vegetable
Farmers involved in discussion: Abdul Khaliq chowdhury, Abdul Monir, Azizul Haq Chowdhury, Akar Ali
Chowdhury, Abdul Mathin Chowdhury.
Best Practices

Mixed vegetable cultivation: is more profitable than mono cropping. Many farmers are cultivating
potato, chillies, cauliflower, tomato, beans, brinjal, lady’s finger, etc.

Soil fertility Improvement: Soil is fertile and very deep. Nonetheless farmers apply farm yard manure
and fertilizer as well. Cow dung is taken from the heap. There is no practice of adding bio mass and
silt/soil to cow dung, through the bio mass is abundant. As recommended by the Agriculture
extension officer, farmers apply SSP, MoP, Urea, DAP and RP. However, cow dung is taken from the
heap and applied directly to the field. Dried and powdered cow dung is applied in basins for
improving soil fertility.

Seed: Seed is purchased from the licensed dealer. As perceived by the farmers seed purchased from
the shop is giving better yields. Because, the seed is treated and certified. Seed treatment: The
farmers treat their own seed. 1 gr of seed treatment chemical mixed with 1 ltr is sprinkled on the
seed.

Treatment of seedlings: 2-5 gram of seed treatment chemical is added with 1-5 ltr of water and
stirred well. Dip the seedlings in this chemical mix water for 30 minutes before transplantation. This
process helps to prevent pest attack and diseases.

Preparation of land: Land preparation is given higher importance. The land is tilled with power tiller.
Then ploughing with bullocks. Cow dung and chemical fertilizer is applied to the land. Once this
process is over, deep furrows are made. Deep furrows are further loosened with pick axe to make the
soil very loose and flexible. Basins are also made after transplantation. Farmers do hard work to make
the soil into dust/powder.

Irrigation: Critical irrigation support is provided with the water fetched from the stream or fish pond
by a diesel pump

Use of bio/Organic fertilsers: Neem is available, but is not used. However, bio fertilizers such as
Phospate Soluble Paste (PSP), azotobactor, etc. Rizobiam is also used for fixing nitrozen.

Weeding and earthing up: Weeding is done manually. Earthing up in basins, etc.

Pest control: Endryn, phuradon and endosolphan, melathian, rogor are used heavily, which is not a
good practice. Very limited farmers use ash to control diseases. Ash is sprinkled on the plant to control
afids, stem borer, route worm etc. Identifying diseased plants and removing from the field is also in
practice. Fresh cow dung mixed with water and stirred is sprayed when pesticide is not available. The
result was good. To control early/late blight during the cloudy climate, Dasarukh, a pesticide is used,
Page 97 of 161
especially in potato. Mencojeb powder mixed with water and stirred is sprinkled on the crop to
control this. Phuradon granules are used heavily for all types of vegetables to control stem
borer/stem necrosis.
Constraints:

Seed: Adequate seed is not available. Timely, seed is not available.

Fertilisers: Depended heavily on chemical fertilizers. Adequate quantity of fertilizer is not available.
Cow dung is directly used. Low population of livestock resulting in scarcity of cow dung. Without
knowing the characteristics of the soil, all the farmers apply chemical fertilizers uniformly.

Diseases and pests: Incidence of pests and diseases is low. However, farmers use chemical pesticides
only.

Support services: After observing the symptoms, farmers consult the BLW. The office of BLW is
located within the project area. Based on the recommendation by the BLW, farmers use pesticides.
FFS is not conducted. Most of the times farmers explain the symptoms

Knowledge gap: Farmers don’t know the process of composting and using the biomass. Though the
neem trees exist in the area, farmers don’t know the non chemical pest and disease control methods.

Irrigation: The vegetable are depend on rains. Winter and summer vegetable are also grown. The
fields located nearby the stream or the fields with fish pond can provide critical irrigation support.
But, availability of diesel pump is a problem.
Programme actions:

Seed:
o Tie up with Agri Deptt. for foundation seed and improved varieties.
o Promoting seed preservation techniques to ensure farmers’ own, free, quality seed.
o Promoting bio chemical based seed treatment methodologies

Promoting Compost
o Compost methodologies
o Free compost pit under NRM
o Recycling the compost

Promoting non chemical pest management practices
o Preparation of bio extractions
o Promotion of Panta Mitra shops
Page 98 of 161

Improving knowledge and skills (Capacity Building)
o Seed preserving
o Seed treatment
o Soil fertility improvement, composting methods, application of biomass
o Non chemical pest management methods using locally available organic material
o Preparation and use of bio extractions
o Knowledge on pests and diseases.

Support services
o Panta mitra shop
o Conducting FFS
o Field level handholding
o Excavation of fish ponds for critical irrigation
o Custom hiring centre to make the implements available.

Credit support
o For preparation of land, making furrows and basins.
3.22.6.3 Livestock
Best Practices

Livestock is for multipurpose: Oxens are used to plough the land. The high breed cows/buffalos are
not useful for ploughing as they don’t have humps

Availability of fodder: As the rainfall is high, the green fodder is available. When the standing crop is
not in the fields, open grazing is allowed. Those who own tila land (upland in which only plantation is
done) have more advantage to feed the cattle during standing crop.

Feed: Supplementary feed is also given to the cross breed cows. The feed and oil cake is being
provided

Availability of paddy husk: As the paddy is the major crop in the area, the dry fodder is abundant for
those who own land. If sufficient quantity of husk is not available from the land, farmers purchase the
husk and preserve.
Page 99 of 161

AI: Artificial insemination is in practice. AI centre exist within the project area in some village. Door
step service is available.

Treatment: The veterinary assistant visits the cattle and provides door step service on payment of
Rs.200/- per visit.

Separate shed for the cattle: Almost all farmers provide separate shelter for the cattle, because, the
rainfall is high. The space is available in their household (bastu). Trees are abundant for providing
shade.

Marketing facilities: Milk is sold locally at Rs.25/- per litre. Many farmers keep for domestic
consumption. The project area is nearby the local market. A local milk vendor collects milk to supply
to hotels and shops.
Constraints:

Low population: The present cattle population is very low... Very few people possess livestock

Credit: The major constraint to increase livestock population is lack of credit. The interest rates are
higher with the money lenders. They charge Rs.3-4 per Rs.100/- per month. The interest rate in SHGs
is Rs.3/- per month per Rs.100/-.

Fodder: During standing crop season, the fodder is not available. Because open grazing is not
possible. The area is either covered with water or paddy crop. The mobility is restricted. Those who
don’t have land do not possess livestock.

Health: Health camps are not organized. Low level of knowledge on diseases and vaccination.
Programme actions:


Credit support to increase the population:
o
Organise farmers into SHGs
o
Provide credit support to SHGs both men, women and mixed.
Fodder
o

Providing saplings/stumps/seed of High yielding varieties
Community managed vaccination and health support system
o
Identification of interested farmer who can serve the cattle rearers
o
Providing training on health management in collaboration with ARDD.
o
Preparation of vaccine calendar
o
Administration of vaccines
Page 100 of 161


o
Cost sharing by the beneficiaries
o
Organising health camps with ARDD
Breed improvement
o
Promoting improved breed with the interested farmers for milk production
o
AI in collaboration with ARDD
Improving knowledge and skills (Capacity Building)
o
Orientation on health management
Page 101 of 161
3.22.6.4 Goat Rearing
Farmer involved in discussions: Johur Ali and others
Best Practices/Opportunities

10-12 goats in a flack is the highest flack in the area

Green fodder is abundant. Green grass, paddy grass, Jack fruit leaves, creeper varieties are available.

The returns are good, Present price of mutton is Rs.300/- per kg. 5 kg of live goat is sold at Rs.1000/to Rs.1200/-. Market is good
Constraints/Limitations

Big flack is not manageable as the open grazing is restricted during standing crop.

Access to credit is limitation

Interest rates are higher

Stall feeding is costly

Improved fodder is not available for stall feeding

No proper knowledge on diseases
Programme actions

Providing credit support to the poor duly organizing them into SHGs

Providing knowledge and skills on disease management

Providing high yielding fodder varieties.
Page 102 of 161
3.23 MANANGEMENT ACTION PLAN
3.23.1 AGRICULTURE, VEGETABLES
Paddy is the main agriculture crop. Government made several successful efforts in promoting
SRI. But, many farmers did not continue SRI after Government withdrawn promotional
incentives. It was found that use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers is high. Availability of bio
mass is abundant, however, there are very limited efforts by the farmers to use the biomass
effectively and convert it into compost manure. Farmers depend on Agriculture store/Private
shops for seed. There is scope to reduce the cost of cultivation, increase the production,
productivity and thereby increase in net returns. There are farmers who are producing high
yield by adapting costly and chemical practices. This strategy is neither helpful for the farmer
nor the land. Therefore, paradigm shift is needed. First, the best practices in a package would
be introduced on promotional basis with very limited number of farmers. On the success of
such efforts, other farmers would be taken on exposure. These farmers would then take up on
scale. The promotional activities would be with intensive facilitation under “Adaptive Trials”.
For upscale activities, required training and orientation would be provided under “Capacity
Building” and credit would be made available through SHGs for certain activities that needed
financial support. Therefore, it is not free. Since, Watershed Committee and SHGs took
responsibility to recover the loan given to the members, more number of farmers/members
can be covered.
Sl.No.
1
2
Particulars/Issue
Seed
Soil Fertility
Improvement and
preparation of land
Strategy

Promotion of farmers’
own seed

Tie up with Agriculture
Research Stations

Promoting Composting
methodologies

Identification of useful
decomposable biomass

Facilitation to fill, turn
up the bio mass and
produce the compost
Proposed activity
Seed production
Seed bank: 1 Seed bank in the watershed would
be promoted through an active SHG. The SHG in
guidance of WSC will set norms for recovery and
management.
Compost pits for the crops vegetable, paddy and
pulses; horticulture and plantation will be dug
under NRM component.
Proper practices in land preparation and
production of compost will be supported under
Productivity Enhancement (PE) activities.
Promotional incentive of 8 person days @
Rs.118/- as per revised Minimum wages is
proposed for adding bio mass and turning up.
Under Scaling up, there will not be any
promotional incentive. An amount of Rs.100/per pit for facilitation through village volunteers
Page 103 of 161
Sl.No.
Particulars/Issue
Strategy
Proposed activity
and User Groups is proposed.
3
Pest management
practices

Promoting Non
chemical bio pesticides

Identification of
suitable methods
Preparation of bio pesticides
Promoting NPM practices: In the 3rd year, on
promotional basis, an incentive of Rs.200/- per
kani will be provided. In the subsequent years,
for facilitation, Rs.100/- per kani is proposed.
4
Inter cultivation

Make agriculture
implements available
Custom hiring centre
5
Irrigation facility

Providing critical
irrigation
Individual farm ponds are proposed under NRM
For those whose lands are on the bank of natural
and perennial stream, Honda diesel sets will be
made available. The SHG will take loan from the
WSC to purchase the set. The SHG will rent the
set to its members on a nominal fee less than
the open market hire charges of Rs.200/- per
hour. If possible, the activity can be tied up with
the subsidy scheme of Department of
Agriculture.
6
Methodology

Promoting SRI in the
case of paddy
SRI: Department of Agriculture is providing
Rs.264/- per kani for a list of inputs and
practices. Same is proposed under IWMP also, in
convergence of Department of Agriculture.
7
Awareness

Conducting on field
trainings
Farmers’ Field Schools, Field demos, Exposures,
etc.
8
Institution Building

Organise farmers into
SHGs (Men SHGs,
Mixed SHGs is already
in practice)
Organise and strengthen SHGs
9
Timely Credit

Route Livelihood fund
through SHGs to the
beneficiaries.
Revolving the Livelihood fund, make the
livelihood fund available timely.

Grant to the village,
but revolving loan to
SHG and SHG members
Page 104 of 161
Sl.No.
10
Particulars/Issue
Marketing linkages
Strategy

Promote collective
marketing
Proposed activity
Market supply agreements with the shop
keepers
3.23.2 HORTICULTURE and PLANTATION
Sl.No.
1
2
Particulars/Issue
Strategy
Plantation and
maintenance for
next two years

Soil Fertility
Improvement

Proposed activity
Plantation would done
by the project under
NRM
Plantation of HYV orchard varieties
Bio fertilizers not
chemical fertilizers
Every farmer under plantation or horticulture
would be supported with a compost pit.
Providing maintenance support
Proper practices in land preparation and
production of compost will be supported
under Productivity Enhancement (PE)
activities. Promotional incentive of 8 person
days @ Rs.118/- as per revised Minimum
wages is proposed for adding bio mass and
turning up.
Under Scaling up, there will not be any
promotional incentive. An amount of Rs.100/per pit for facilitation through village
volunteers and User Groups is proposed.
3
Pest management
practices

Promoting Non chemical
bio pesticides
Preparation of bio pesticides

Identification of suitable
methods
Promoting NPM practices: In the 3rd year, on
promotional basis, an incentive of Rs.200/- per
kani will be provided. In the subsequent years,
for facilitation, Rs.100/- per kani is proposed.
4
Awareness

Conducting on field
trainings
Farmers’ Field Schools, Field demos,
Exposures, etc.
5

Organise farmers into
SHGs (Men SHGs, Mixed
SHGs is already in
practice)
Page 105 of 161
6
7
Timely Credit
Marketing linkages

Route Livelihood fund
through SHGs to the
beneficiaries.

Grant to the village, but
revolving loan to SHG
and SHG members

Promote collective
marketing
keepers
3.23.3 LIVESTOCK AND FISHERIES
Sl.No.
Particulars/Issue
1
Fodder support
Strategy

Fodder promotion
Proposed activity
Plantation of fodder trees
Better storage practices
Promotion of fodder plots
2
Breed
improvement

Tie up with ARDD
Artificial insemination in the case of
livestock. 50% of the amount will be paid
by IWMP for AI services through ARDD.
3
Health
management

Building the knowledge of
farmers
Group based awareness activities

Health camps
Regular meetings
Health camps in convergence with ARDD.
4
Awareness

Conducting on field trainings
Awareness activities
5
Institution
Building

Organise farmers into SHGs
(Men SHGs, Mixed SHGs is
already in practice)
6
Timely Credit

Route Livelihood fund through
SHGs to the beneficiaries.

Grant to the village, but
revolving loan to SHG and SHG
members

Promote collective marketing
7
Marketing
linkages
keepers
Page 106 of 161
Fisheries

Credit support and trainings
Productivity enhancement
Re-excavation of existing fish ponds
Formation of new farm ponds
3.23.4 LIVELIHOODS


Bastu Plantation: In the bastu where adequate space for raising fruit plants is available, bastu plantation is
proposed. This will increase their household availability of fruits and thereby income.
o
Coconut – 4 plants, jack fruit - 1 plant, Guava – 3 plants, Ariknut – 15 plants, Papaya – 5 plants and
Lemon – 2 plants; total – 30 plants will be given to each beneficiary.
o
Besides supply of plants, cost of digging the pits, fertilizer application and PPC will also be
provided.
Kitchen garden: In the bastu, for those who do not have any other benefit and for those who are
interested to improve their income, kitchen garden activity is proposed.
Sl.No
1
2
3
4
Name of the crop
Bhendi 50 gr
Ash Guard 50 gr
Bottle Guard 50 gr
Beetle Guard 50 gr
Total
Quantity
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Unit
KG
KG
KG
KG
Rate/
Total
Unit
Amount
1600
80
1000
50
1000
50
2000
100
280

100 beneficiaries will be identified for skill development in various livelihood activities.

Credit support will be made available through SHGs which is repayable.
Page 107 of 161
4 CHAPTER – 4 Institutional Building and Project Management
4.1 Details of Watershed Committee (WC)
Sl.No. Name
1
CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY - 4
1
2
3
Female
ST
UG
SMALL FARMER
Age
Education designation
32
12
PRESIDENT
RESPONSIBILITY
ASSIGNED
ABEI
Male
ST
SHG
LAND LESS
21
12
SECRETARY
C,DEGH
MEMBER
ABEI
MEMBER
ABEI
2
Smt.Rina
Debbarma
Sri Shyamal D/B
3
Sri Mangal D/B
Male
ST
UG
MARGINAL FARMER
4
Sri Naresh D/B
Male
ST
UG
SMALL FARMER
32
32
5
Sri Bijoy D/B
Male
ST
SHG
LANDLESS
49
8
MEMBER
ABEI
6
Smt Bina Rani D/B
Female
ST
SHG
LANDLESS
39
10
MEMBER
ABEI
7
Sri Mangal D/B
Male
ST
UG
MARGINAL FARMER
42
8
MEMBER
ABEI
8
Sri Nihar Sur
Male
GEN
UG
SMALL FARMER
45
12
MEMBER
ABEI
9
GEN
UG
SMALL FARMER
43
BA
MEMBER
ABEI
10
Sri
Narayan Male
Bardhan
Smt Parbati Das
Female
SC
SHG
LANDLESS
32
10
MEMBER
ABEI
11
Md Naru Mia
Male
MINORITY
SHG
MARGINAL FARMER
35
11
MEMBER
ABEI
12
Sri Wakhirai D/B
Male
ST
37
BA
WDT MEMBER
EGH
13
Sri Ranjit D/B
Male
ST
SHG
MARGINAL FARMER
30
10
MEMBER
ABEI
14
Sri Gopal D/B
Male
ST
UG
SMALL FARMER
50
5
MEMBER
ABEI
15
10
10
16
17
18
(NOTE- Member wise details of SHGs, UGs & Watershed Committee has to be enclosed as annexures. The details includes the Name, Husband name and Caste)
In column 18 only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.
A.
PNP and PRA
B.
Planning
C.
Maintenance of Accounts
D.
Signing of cheques and making payments
E.
Supervision of construction activities
F.
Cost Estimation
G.
Verification & Measurement
H.
Record of labour employed
I.
Social Audit
J.
Any other (please specify).
4.2 WDT Particulars:
1
2
3
Names of
WDT
Members
Sl. No.
Name of the PIA
Siddhartha
D/B
,
Debasish
Deb
4
5
6
7
8
9
M/F Age Qualification Description
Role /
Date of
/ Experience of
Function
Appointment
professional
##
of WDT
training
Member
M
33
Agri
Graduate
M
45
-- do-
M
47
.Graduate
M
54
.Graduate
Wakhirai
D/B
1
Supdt.of
AgricultureMandwiAgri.Sub- Satyandra
Division,Mandwi.
Debnath.
Govt.
Service-5 yrs
Govt.
Service12yrsGovt.Service21 yrs
Govt.
Service-22
Team
leader
17-12-2009
Member
-do-
Member
-do-
Member
-do-
Page 109 of 161
yrs
*In column 7 only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.
A.
PNP and PRA
B.
Planning
C.
Maintenance of Accounts
D.
Signing of cheques and making payments
E.
Supervision of construction activities
F.
Cost Estimation
G.
Verification & Measurement
H.
Record of labour employed
I.
Social Audit
J.
4.3 PIA particulars
1
2
Particulars of PIA
Sl. No.
i
Date of Selection of PIA
26-10-2009
ii
Type of organization #
iii
Name of Organization
Deptt.of Agriculture
iv
Designation & Address
Supdt.of Agriculture(PIA)
A Line Department (Agriculture)
MandwiAgri.Sub-Division,Mandwi
v
Telephone
0381 2347292
vi
Fax
0381 2347292
Page 110 of 161
vii
E. Mail
# In column no. 8.1.6 (1), only the letter assigned to each type, as given below, needs to be typed.
A
Line Dept.
B
Autonomous organization
C
Govt. Institute
D
Research Bodies
E
Zila Parishad
F
Intermediate Panchayat
G
Voluntary Organisations
H
4.4 Bank Account Details
2
3
-
-
Dabda
gang
UB
I.W.M.
TGB
MANDW
I
20-022010
SB
Name & Designation of
authorized persons who
operate the account
50933
current/others)
Account type (savings/
-
Name of the Bank and
Branch where project
account has been
opened.
Date of opening the
account in the Bank
-
Name & Designation of
authorized persons who
operate the account
Account
Number
Account Number
-
Date of
opening
the
account
in the
Bank
Watershed Committee (WC)account details
current/others)
Name of
the Bank
and
Branch
where
project
account
has been
opened.
Account type (savings/
DRDA Project Account details
Name of Watershed
committee.
1
Secretary,
WSC and
Core
Member,
Page 111 of 161
P
WDT
Page 112 of 161
4.5
Institutional Mechanisms, Records and Registers
4.5.1 Flow Chart of Institutional Arrangement from District to watershed level
SLNA
CEO
WCDC
DPO
PIA OFFICE
SA
IWMP
PROJECT
MICRO
WSC
MICRO
WSC
SECRETARY
SECRETARY
WDT
MEMBERS
MICRO
WSC
SECRETARY
4.5.2 Fund Flow mechanisms – flow chart
DoLR, GoI
SLNA
PIA
WSC
4.5.3 List of Watershed Records to be maintained
4.5.3.1 DPR
4.5.3.2 Beneficiaries list as per the annexures and tables mentioned in the DPR
4.5.3.3 Inward file (Letters)
4.5.3.4 Outward file (Letters)
4.5.3.5 GOs and Circulars
4.5.3.6 WSC Minutes
4.5.3.7 Estimates
4.5.3.8 Administration sanction letters
4.5.3.9 Technical Sanction letters
4.5.3.10 Work orders
4.5.3.11 Measurement Book
4.5.3.12 Cash Book
4.5.3.13 Bank Pass Book
4.5.3.14 Cheque issue register
4.5.3.15 Funds receipts register
4.5.3.16 Receipts
Page 114 of 161
4.5.3.17 Payment Vouchers
4.5.3.18 Invoices
4.5.3.19 Muster Rolls
4.5.3.20 Assets Register
4.6 Documents of Agreements:
4.6.1 Watershed Committee Registration certificate (Annexure-1)
4.6.2 MoU – PIA – DWDU, PIA – WC (Annexure-2)
4.6.3 Resolution of Gram Sabha, Aam Sabha, WC approving action plan# (Annexure-3)
(#the resolution should be done village wise and needs to be approved in Gram/Aam Sabha)
4.7 Project Implementation
Project Implementation Strategy including coordination and monitoring of implementation process, DWDU and other
coordination mechanism. (Describe in detail ).
The project will be implemented by the PIA, i.e. Superintendent of Agriculture, Mandwi However
WDT is not full time, they are on regular roles also. Watershed is additional responsibility for
them. The project implementation would be based on the process guidelines of Tripura state for
IWMP.
Page 115 of 161
5 CHAPTER – 5 Management/Action Plan
5.1 Description on methodology of plan adopted
5.1.1 Awareness generation interventions
(Kalajatha/ Nukkad Natak, Video show, Exposure, Wall painting, door to door campaign, posters, pamphlets, village
meeting etc)
Initial Gram Sabha was conducted in the watershed villages to explain the objectives of IWMP.
Through Gram Panchayat, information was sent to all the households of watershed area in all
Gram Paanchayats. Gram Sabha was conducted on 12Aug 2010 at Lalitbazar. The following
Guests & officers were attended this meeting.
.Honble E.M (Agri) TTAADC
.Sri Saradindu Das C.E.O SLNA
.Sri Hirendra Debbarma D.P.O (W)
 Sri Debajyoti Banik, Superintend Agriculture (PIA), Mandwi
 Debasish Deb, Agriculture Officer, Mandwi
 Siddhartha D/B, A.S.O Sumili
 Wakhirai D/B, VLW, Mandwi
Total members present were approximately 300.
Page 116 of 161
5.1.2 Initial Orientation program
(Concept seeding, About Watershed/Watershed Management/Importance of peoples participation in planning
and implementation.)
In the Gram Sabha conducted, initial orientation was conducted. In this process, objectives of
IWMP, its duration, costs, area covered, no. of households, type of interventions allowed etc.
were explained to the public. This meeting requested full participation of communities
throughout the project period which will be ended by March 2014.
.
5.1.3 Formation process UGs & Watershed Committee
5.1.3.1
Watershed committee was formed in the Gram Sabha in which the quorum was
present. Gram Sabha unanimously elected the Watershed Development Committee
on 12 Aug 2010. This Gram Sabha was conducted at D.B.Nagar Gram Panchayat.
5.1.3.2
User Groups were formed based on the watershed area, initially. But, later on
rigorous process was adapted to form User Groups. During DPR preparation, all the
cadastral maps of watershed area were collected and joined them together
properly. On the map the following steps were followed:

Delineation of watershed boundary

Delineation of gram panchayat boundaries

Delineation of ward boundaries

Delineation of User Groups based on the homogeneity, joining all the
adjacent farmers together.

Finally the list of UG members was prepared. (Annexure- 7)
Page 117 of 161
5.2 DPR preparation process:
5.2.1 Training: 5 days training programme was organized at ATMA training centre, Agarthala
during 20 – 24 Sep, 2010 by WASSAN team on DPR preparation, methodologies and
processes. In this training programme WDT member was participated.
5.2.2 After completion of training course, Dy.PO,West Tripura, and C.E.O SLNA &other Resource
persons conducted training programme to other WDT members, Watershed Secretaries and
Presidents. This training was organised at Pragya Bhawan Gorkhabasti Agartala on 29 th Sept
2010. In this training/workshop, detailed plan of action was chalked for preparation of DPR
including teams.
5.2.3 Village Volunteers: Based on the action plan, volunteers from watershed villages were
identified. Training programme to these volunteers was organized at WC office,
Lalitbazar on household data collection and Land Use plan.
5.2.4 Household survey and Land Use plan: The village volunteers, after training, collected
door to door survey and every plot data by visiting households and fields as well.
Format for House hold data collection: Annexure- 4
Format for Land Use plan: Annexure – 5
5.2.5 Training on Computer Software: Computer operators were identified for data entry of
Household data and Land use plan. A training programme on data entry was organised at
SIPARD, Agarthala by WASSAN team, during 2-3 November 2010.
5.2.6 Data Collection and PRA exercises –Secondary Data Collection was collected from the
records of Agriculture office and Revenue records from the Tahasildar office. Socio
Economic Survey was done by the village volunteers during the month of OctoberNovember 2010. Existing CBO details especially SHG details were collected. The details
Page 118 of 161
are furnished at Annexure-6. Participatory Rural Appraisal tools such as Social map,
resource mapping, transect walk were utilized. Drinking water samples, soil samples
were collected and the results were obtained from the concerned agency. Migration,
cropping pattern and other details were collected through Focused Group Discussions
and PRA exercises. A team of village volunteers, Watershed Committee, Gram
Panchayat, WDT members had a transact walk to locate watershed boundaries. Later
Social Mapping and Resource Mapping exercises were conducted in the village.
5.3 Planning Process:
5.3.1 PNP:
Participatory Net planning methodology was adapted for collection of land use plan. A
team trained volunteers and Watershed Secretary; WDT members completed this process
during the month of Feb 2011. Input measurements were also collected for preparation of
detailed estimates for each work
5.3.2 FGDs:
Focused Group Discussions were organized based on the typologies derived through the
data collected and entered to the computer. From such discussions interventions for
productivity enhancement in agriculture, livestock; livelihood development were derived
at.
Page 119 of 161
5.3.3 IB and CB plans:
Based on the observations during the DPR process, PRA exercises, LUP and Household
data analysis, Focused Group Discussions plans were Institution Building and Capacity
Building were prepared.
5.3.4 Mapping:
Social Mapping, Resource mapping was done. UGs, Wards, Gram Panchayat and Watershed
boundaries were delineated on Cadastral map. The watershed boundary was also delineated
on Google Earth. (Photoes were inserted in the document)
5.3.5 Hydro-geological Survey:
Water resource survey was also conducted during the LUP process. However, the common
works such as re-execution of earthen drains, community tanks were identified during the
process of transect walk and same were incorporated in the DPR. Ground water status was
also collected.
5.3.6 Data entry:
A excel based programme was designed by WASSAN for data entry. This gives summery
tables for DPR and detailed and abstract of estimates, works and interventions as well.
5.3.7 Consolidation & preparation of DPR document:
Consolidation and preparation of DPR document was done by Watershed Secretary, WDT
members, PIA and WASSAN member in the month of june 2011.
5.3.8 Approval by Aam Sabha/Gram Sabha
For taking approval by Gram Sabha, a meeting was convened at
LalitBazar_______________ on 14.09.2011_________. This meeting was chaired by _Rina
DebBarma_______________. The following decisions were taken in the Gram Sabha.

Page 120 of 161



The DPR was approved by Gram Sabha (Unanimously/with a majority of _______)
5.4 Details of User Groups with code numbers
Sl.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Name of the GP
D.B NAGAR
D.B NAGAR
D.B NAGAR
D.B NAGAR
D.B NAGAR
D.B NAGAR
D.B NAGAR
D.B NAGAR
South sibnagar
South sibnagar
Paschim Barjala
E.D.B.Nagar
E.D.B.Nagar
E.D.B.Nagar
E.D.B.Nagar
East Noabadi
East Noabadi
East Noabadi
East Noabadi
East Noabadi
East Noabadi
East Noabadi
East Noabadi
Kobra Khamar
Kobra Khamar
SRC Nagar
SRC Nagar
Kobra Khamar
SRC Nagar
Laxmi pur
Laxmi pur
Laxmi pur
Laxmi pur
Name of the ward
1
2
6
5
6
5
3
4
1
4
1
3
3
1
2
4
3
1
4
2
2
4
3
1
6
2
3
1
2
5
5
5
5
Name of the UG
Mahespur-1
Mahespur-2
Gangasondar
Sonamoni nagar
UttarSonamani nagar
Rohisardar para
Hariraikobra
Kalikapua
Astalunga
Ramchandra sardar para
Bhadraminhi
Jagatbondhu para
Sat para
Bhuban chantai-1
Bhuban chantai-2
Sibaram thakur para
Murabari
Maharam Chowdhury Para
Harinamora
Jagatramthakur para
Ramdurga thakur para
Golak Thakur Para
Rammohan Thakur Para
Talmora
Chockbasta
Gobinda Sadar Para
Kalisankar Thakur Para
Talmora
Sibjamdar Para
Dinabandhu Para
Ramnath Kobra Para
Kanthamoni
Sonacharan
UG CODE
MSP-1
MSP-2
GSP
SNM
USNM
RSP
HKP
KP
ATLG
RCSP
BMP
JBP
STP
BC-1
BC-2
STP
MB
MCP
HM
JTP
RDP
GTP
RTP
TM
CB
GSP
KSTP
TM
SJP
DBP
RKP
KTM
SCN
Page 121 of 161
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Laxmi pur
DurgaNagar
DurgaNagar
DurgaNagar
DurgaNagar
Briddhanagar
Briddhanagar
Briddhanagar
6
1
3
2
2
10
2
2
Sibadurga Para
Ratan Nagar
Asta jangal
Kaitorabari
Tatua
Kalinagar Para
Jagadishpur
Khas Noagaon
SDP
RN
ASTJ
KB
TA
KNP
JDP
KSN
Page 122 of 161
6 Communication and Capacity Building Plan
6.1 Details of Capacity Building
It was observed during the DPR preparation through several exercises that the awareness levels of the different stakeholders on several
components of IWMP are very low.
The stakeholders are:

Watershed Committee

Watershed Secretary

UG members

SHG members

Labour groups

Paddy farmers

Vegetable farmers

Livestock rearers

Goat rearers

Fish farmers

Back yard poultry rearers

Other livelihoods
The Themes are:

Natural Resource management
Page 123 of 161



o
Soil and Moisture conservation
o
Water Resource Development
o
Horticulture: Plantation, Soil Fertility improvement, proning, pest control
o
Plantation: Rubber, Bamboo, Ariknut – Soil selection, alignment, pitting, Plantation, inter cultivation, disease and pest
management, harvesting, etc.
Soil Fertility improvement
o
Composting methods
o
Bio fertilisers
o
Application of bio mass
Productivity Enhancement in Agriculture
o
Package of practices
o
Non pesticide management practices
o
Irrigation management
o
Value addition
Productivity Enhancement in Livestock
o
Large Ruminants
o
Small Ruminants
o
Breed improvement
o
Fodder
o
Feed
Page 124 of 161
o
Health
o
Vaccination

Productivity Enhancement in Fisheries
o
Nursery management
o
Netting practices
o
Feed and health management

Livelihood development

Skill training

Improved practices

6.2 Details of Material Development
The material will be developed by SLNA with the support of Resource Organisations and Training Institutes
6.3 Details of Modules Development
The modules will be developed by SLNA with the support of Resource Organisations and Training Institutes
6.4 List of Training Institutes/ Resource Organisations identified
6.4.1
H.R.C Nagicherra
6.4.2
SIPARD, Agarthala
6.4.3
T-SAMETI Lembucherra
6.4.4
WASSAN, Hyderabad
Page 125 of 161
6.5 Funding available for Capacity Building activities at different phases and levels
Sl. No.
1
2
3
Project phases
Preparatory
phase
Work
implementation
phase
Consolidation
phase
Total
Sl. No.
Project phases
1
Preparatory
phase
Work
implementation
phase
2
3
Consolidation
phase
Total
Budget allocation at different levels
SLNA
WCDC
PIA
0.2%
0.5%
2.3%
Total
3.0%
0.1%
0.3%
1.2%
1.5%
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.5%
0.3%
0.9%
3.8%
5.0%
Budget allocation for different sub-components
Awareness building
Community Training
Total
organization
0.57%
0.57%
1.16%
2.30%
0.29%
0.29%
0.57%
1.15%
0.09%
0.09%
0.17%
0.35%
0.95%
0.95%
1.90%
3.80%
Page 126 of 161
6.6 Details of Capacity Building activities
Category
of
trainees
Sl.No.
LEVEL
Theme
Sub
Theme
Awareness/
Comm. Org/
Trg
No. of
participants
No.
of
days
Venue of
training
(Village/
Block/Dist
/ State/
Outside
Residential/
Non
Residential
Rec.Cost/ Day/
parti
Non-Rec
Cost/ Day/
parti
Page 127 of 161
Total
cost
7 PROPOSED WORKS AND BUDGET DETAILS
7.1 UG wise list of beneficiaries and proposed works (INDIVIDUAL) ANNEXURE- 10
7.2 List of proposed works (community/common) ANNEXURE - 11
7.3 Year wise list of works to be taken up including list of beneficiaries ANNEXURE – 12
7.4 SUMMARY OF WORKS SHOWING CONVERGENCE DETAILS (INDIVIDUAL) ANNEXURE – 13
7.5 Abstract of Phasing of works (year wise)
TOTAL AREA
SL.
N
O.
A
2
3
COMPON
ENT
BENEFI
T:
COMM
ON/
INDIVID
UAL
1588 COST/HA
YEAR 1
ACTIVITY/
WORK
ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY
COMM TUBE
ON
WELL
COMM COMMUN
ON
ITY POND
SUB TOTAL A
CAPACITY BUILDING
UNIT
DESCRI
PTION
PHY
.
FIN
15000 TOTAL AMOUNT
YEAR 2
PH
Y.
FIN
YEAR 3
PHY
.
FIN
YEAR 4
PHY.
FIN
YEAR 5
PHY
.
FIN
23820000
CONS PHASE
(6,7 YRS)
PH
Y.
TOTAL
PH
Y.
FIN
IWMP
CONV
ERGE
NCE
NO
44
550000
44
550000
550000
NO
4
400000
950000
4
400000
950000
400000
950000
0
71460
214380
71460
214380
0
0
B
SLNA
LEVEL
WCDC
COMM
ON
COMM
SLNA
LEVEL
WCDC
23820
59550
23820
59550
0
23820
0
23820
23820
11910
0
35730
0
0
DEPT
FIN
Page 128 of 161
2800
SL.
N
O.
COMPON
ENT
BENEFI
T:
COMM
ON/
INDIVID
UAL
(DWDU)
LEVEL
ON
PIA
LEVEL
COMM
ON
YEAR 1
ACTIVITY/
WORK
UNIT
DESCRI
PTION
PHY
.
(DWDU)
LEVEL
AWARENE
SS
BUILDING
COMMUN
ITY
ORGANIS
ATION
TRAINING
SUB
TOTAL B
PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT
YEAR 2
PH
Y.
FIN
YEAR 3
PHY
.
FIN
YEAR 4
FIN
PHY.
CONS PHASE
(6,7 YRS)
YEAR 5
PHY
.
FIN
PH
Y.
FIN
TOTAL
PH
Y.
FIN
CONV
ERGE
NCE
IWMP
71460
64314
23820
23820
21438
21438
0
226290
226290
71460
64314
15721
2
36921
0
23820
23820
21438
21438
0
226290
226290
47640
11910
0
47640
11910
0
40494
11910
0
40494
0
452580
1191000
452580
119100
0
0
2
198300
198300
0
119100
345390
119100
DEPT
FIN
0
C
1
INFRAST
RUCTURE
AGRICUL
TURE
INTERVE
NTIONS
COMM
ON
CUSTOM
HIRING
CENTRE
NO
INDIVID
UAL
SRI
KANI
INDIVID SEED
UAL
BANK
NO
PROMOTIONAL INCENTIVES - SOIL FERTILITY
VEGETABL
E
(Ugs*farm
er)
3
INDIVID
UAL
KANI
INDIVID
UAL
PULSES
KANI
INDIVID
UAL
PADDY
KANI
FACILITATION FOR SCALING UP - SOIL
FERTILITY MANAGEMENT
0
0
0
0
2
19830
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
125
33000
313
82500
625
16500
0
125
0
330000
231
3
610500
0
61050
0
DoAgl
0
0
0
0
1
25000
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
25000
25000
0
DoAgl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
77408
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
77408
77408
0
0
0
0
0
41
38704
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
38704
38704
0
ARDD
0
0
0
0
82
77408
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
77408
77408
0
ARDD
0
ARDD
0
0
Page 129 of 161
SL.
N
O.
COMPON
ENT
BENEFI
T:
COMM
ON/
INDIVID
UAL
YEAR 1
ACTIVITY/
WORK
UNIT
DESCRI
PTION
INDIVID VEGETABL
UAL
E
KANI
INDIVID
UAL
PULSES
KANI
INDIVID
UAL
PADDY
KANI
PROMOTIONAL INCENTIVES - NPM
METHODOLOGIES
INDIVID VEGETABL
UAL
E
KANI
INDIVID
UAL
PULSES
KANI
INDIVID
UAL
PADDY
KANI
FACILITATION FOR SCALING UP - NPM
METHODOLOGIES
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
COMM
ON
LIVESTOK
INTERVE
NTIONS
INDIVID
UAL
COMM
ON
INDIVID
UAL
PHY
.
YEAR 2
PH
Y.
FIN
YEAR 3
PHY
.
FIN
YEAR 4
FIN
PHY.
CONS PHASE
(6,7 YRS)
YEAR 5
FIN
PHY
.
FIN
PH
Y.
TOTAL
PH
Y.
FIN
IWMP
CONV
ERGE
NCE
DEPT
ARDD
FIN
0
0
0
0
0
0
205
20500
205
20500
205
0
615
41000
41000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
8200
82
8200
82
0
246
16400
16400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
205
20500
205
20500
205
0
615
41000
41000
0
0
0
0
82
16400
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
16400
16400
0
0
0
0
41
8200
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
8200
8200
0
0
0
0
82
16400
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
16400
16400
205
0
123000
123000
36900
36900
123000
123000
VEGETABL
E
KANI
0
0
0
0
0
0
410
41000
820
82000
820
0
PULSES
KANI
0
0
0
0
0
0
123
12300
246
24600
246
0
PADDY
KANI
0
0
0
0
0
0
410
41000
820
82000
820
0
615
205
0
SPRAYER
ARTIFICIA
L
INSEMINA
TION
CATTLE
HEALTH
CAMP
VACCINAT
ION
NO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO
0
0
0
0
10
1100
20
2200
30
3300
50
5500
110
12100
6050
6050
ARDD
NO
0
0
0
0
2
30000
2
30000
2
30000
4
60000
10
150000
45000
10500
0
ARDD
NO
0
0
0
0
100
5000
200
10000
100
5000
100
5000
500
25000
12500
12500
ARDD
Page 130 of 161
SL.
N
O.
COMPON
ENT
BENEFI
T:
COMM
ON/
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
YEAR 1
ACTIVITY/
WORK
FODDER
PLOTS
FISHERIES
REVOLVIN
G FUND
(8%)
FACILITATI
ON/ PARA
WORKER
UNIT
DESCRI
PTION
PHY
.
YEAR 2
PH
Y.
FIN
YEAR 3
PHY
.
FIN
NO
0
0
0
0
10
NO
0
0
41
41000
140
SHG
0
0
0
0
MONT
HS
0
2000
14000
0
PHY.
41000
60000
17333
85
CONS PHASE
(6,7 YRS)
YEAR 5
PHY
.
FIN
PH
Y.
FIN
TOTAL
PH
Y.
FIN
IWMP
CONV
ERGE
NCE
DEPT
ARDD
FISHERIE
S
FIN
20
4000
20
4000
0
0
50
10000
5000
26
26000
22
22000
0
0
229
229000
0
5000
22900
0
2008930
200893
0
0
4064650
180000
309660
0
0
96805
0
10044
65
24
SUB
TOTAL C
LIVELIHOOD DEVELOPMENT
FIN
YEAR 4
10044
65
24
60000
13626
65
24
60000
52710
0
72
0
0
0
0
432
447120
447120
0
0
0
0
0
432
120960
120960
0
400500
180000
0
D
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
BASTU
PLANTS
KITCHEN
GARDEN
TAILORIN
G
MACHINE
S
BAND
PARTY
SKILL
DEVELOP
MENT
REVOLVIN
G FUND
NO
0
0
0
0
432
NO
0
0
0
0
432
44712
0
12096
0
NO
0
0
0
0
30
15000
0
0
0
0
0
30
150000
150000
0
NO
0
0
0
0
3
88050
0
0
0
0
3
88050
88050
0
NO
0
0
0
20
30000
54893
5
30
45000
54893
5
50
75000
100
150000
1335870
150000
133587
0
0
5
0
23800
0
0
0
1
5317
0
0
0
5317
5317
0
0
NATURAL RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
E
INDIVID
UAL
LAND
LEVEL
NO
0
0
0
1
Page 131 of 161
MGNRE
GA
SL.
N
O.
COMPON
ENT
BENEFI
T:
COMM
ON/
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
WRD
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
COMM
ON
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
YEAR 1
ACTIVITY/
WORK
JUNGLE
CLEAR
CATTLE
PROOF
TRENCH
SAND
REMOVAL
UNIT
DESCRI
PTION
PHY
.
YEAR 2
PH
Y.
FIN
YEAR 3
PHY
.
FIN
YEAR 4
FIN
PHY.
CONS PHASE
(6,7 YRS)
YEAR 5
PHY
.
FIN
PH
Y.
FIN
FIN
TOTAL
PH
Y.
CONV
ERGE
NCE
IWMP
DEPT
FIN
MGNRE
GA
NO
0
0
0
0
2
3264
0
0
0
0
2
3264
3264
0
NO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO
0
0
0
0
1
17015
0
0
0
0
1
17015
17015
0
WHS
COMMUN
ITY TANK
RE-EXFISHPOND
PERCOLAT
ION TANK
FARM
POND
NO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
9
1650330
0
165033
0
0
NO
0
16503
30
NO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO
0
0
0
0
41
140
229
0
1030037
2
0
650672
4
RUBBER
KANI
0
0
0
0
70
329
102
0
98773
9
11164
45
0
0
0
11566
66
34933
57
0
0
0
58568
40
76213
8
0
NO
0
22991
27
501
5371940
0
0
37936
48
53719
40
KANI
0
0
0
0
45
21295
1
0
0
0
0
45
212951
0
21295
1
MGNRE
GA
RUBBER
BOARD
BAMBO
O
MISSION
37625
BAMBO
O
MISSION
BAMBOOBARAK
BAMBOOBARAK
2ND YEAR
MAINT
BAMBOOBARAK
3RD YEAR
MAINT
BAMBOOMULI
BAMBOOMULI 2ND
YR MAINT
KANI
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
44
37625
22
0
0
44
37625
0
MGNRE
GA
0
KANI
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
18304
44
18304
0
18304
KANI
0
0
0
0
25
29530
0
0
0
0
0
25
295300
0
29530
0
KANI
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
33908
0
0
25
33908
0
33908
Page 132 of 161
BAMBO
O
MISSION
BAMBO
O
MISSION
BAMBO
O
MISSION
SL.
N
O.
COMPON
ENT
HORTI
F
G
H
SOIL
FERTILITY
SUB
TOTAL E
DPR
PREPARA
TION
MONITO
RING
EVALUAT
ION
BENEFI
T:
COMM
ON/
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
INDIVID
UAL
YEAR 1
ACTIVITY/
WORK
UNIT
DESCRI
PTION
PHY
.
YEAR 2
PH
Y.
FIN
YEAR 3
PHY
.
FIN
BAMBOOMULI 3RD
YR MAINT
KANI
0
0
0
0
0
BANANA
KANI
0
0
0
0
COCONUT
ELACHI
LEMON
JACK
FRUIT
KAGAJI
LIME
KANI
0
0
0
KANI
0
0
KANI
0
KANI
LITCHI
FIN
118
0
12717
76
0
29
0
0
0
0
0
0
KANI
0
MANGO
KANI
ORANGE
PAPAYA
PINEAPPL
E
COMPOST
PIT
YEAR 4
PHY.
PHY
.
73
0
79796
4
199
11654
9
16
65820
43
14
47400
7
26700
29
0
21
85639
21
87639
28
0
0
6
36078
3
18539
18
0
0
0
18
9
0
0
0
22
15
41842
14027
1
17
0
80684
20166
4
KANI
0
0
0
0
8
2
8165
9
KANI
0
0
0
0
20
30661
21744
8
4
45101
KANI
0
0
0
0
7
5
NO
0
0
0
439
0
0
50
0
39494
57
28692
98599
4
10255
410
21923
88941
6
68649
35
984
0
FIN
YEAR 5
396
974
25
FIN
PH
Y.
FIN
TOTAL
PH
Y.
CONV
ERGE
NCE
IWMP
DEPT
FIN
BAMBO
O
MISSION
25
10192
0
390
4185564
0
10192
41855
64
88
355010
355010
0
NHM
COCONU
T
BOARD/
NHM
50
175715
175715
0
NHM
70
283463
283463
0
NHM
27
159853
159853
0
NHM
72924
38984
3
44
195450
195450
0
NHM
80
731777
731777
0
NHM
19
72570
72570
0
NHM
26
33744
28618
2
50
548730
548730
0
NHM
7
28692
19
79306
0
0
55495
64
835
262
0
1875410
2661936
6
79306
112524
6
119097
70
0
75016
4
14709
596
238200
238200
0
43
612
10192
21158
24
CONS PHASE
(6,7 YRS)
17264
1
10161
4
11018
5
10523
5
23820
0
NHM
MGNRE
GA
230
78606
78606
80988
238200
238200
0
78606
78606
80988
238200
238200
0
Page 133 of 161
SL.
N
O.
I
J
COMPON
ENT
ADMINIS
TRATION
WSC
LEVEL
PIA
LEVEL
DPO
LEVEL
SLNA
LEVEL
SUB
TOTAL I
CONSOLI
DATION
GRAND
TOTAL
BENEFI
T:
COMM
ON/
INDIVID
UAL
YEAR 1
ACTIVITY/
WORK
UNIT
DESCRI
PTION
PHY
.
FIN
YEAR 2
PH
Y.
PHY
.
FIN
YEAR 4
PHY.
FIN
YEAR 5
PHY
.
FIN
CONS PHASE
(6,7 YRS)
PH
Y.
TOTAL
PH
Y.
FIN
IWMP
238200
14292
0
23820
0
14292
0
23820
0
14292
0
23820
0
1191000
714600
119100
0
47640
47640
47640
47640
47640
238200
238200
47640
47640
47640
0
47640
47640
0
47640
47640
0
47640
47640
0
238200
238200
238200
0
119100
0
238169
70
0
476400
0
0
0
177179
0
0
50
0
50742
67
0
0
984
0
12741
507
0
0
974
0
89803
12
0
0
612
0
68341
40
714600
0
0
0
1191000
0
1710600
CONV
ERGE
NCE
DEPT
FIN
14292
0
23820
0
142920
0
FIN
YEAR 3
0
2382000
262
0
1191000
3949461
6
0
0
15677
646
7.6 SUMMARY OF WORKS SHOWING CONVERGENCE DETAILS (COMMUNITY) ANNEXURE - 14
Page 134 of 161
3030
8 CHAPTER – 8: ABSTRACT OF WORKS
S.
No
Component
1 Entry Point
Activities ( 4
%)
2 Institution &
Capacity
Building (5%)
3 Productivity
Enhancement
(13%)
4 Livelihoods for
Assetless
(10%)
5 Natural
Resource
Management
(50 %)
6 Consolidation
phase (5%)
7 Administration
- 10%
8 DPR
preparation 1%
9 Monitoring 1%
10 Evoluation 1%
Total
1 year
2nd year
3rd year
Phy Fin (Rs.) Phy Fin (Rs.) Phy
Fin (Rs.)
(No)
(No)
(No)
0 950000
0
0
0
0
4th year
Phy Fin (Rs.)
(No)
0
0
0
345390
0
369210
0
119100
0
0
0
41000
0
1733385
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
476400
0
476400
0
476400
0
476400
0
0
0
0
238200
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
78606
0
0
0
0
0
0
78606
0
0 1771790
50 3949457
50 5074267
984 10255410
984 12741507
0
5th year
Phy Fin (Rs.)
(No)
0
0
6th & 7th years
Phy Fin (Rs.)
(No)
0
0
Total
Phy
Fin (Rs.)
(No)
0
950000
119100
0
119100
0
119100
0
1191000
0 1362665
0
527100
0
400500
0
4064650
0
0
0
0
0
0
2382000
612 5549564
0
0 2620
26619366
0
974 6864935
0 1191000
0
1191000
476400
0
0
0
2382000
0
0
0
0
0
238200
78606
0
80988
0
0
0
238200
78606
0
80988
0
0
0
238200
0 1710600 2620
39494616
974 8980312
612 6834140
Page 135 of 161
9 CHAPTER – 9: Convergence Plan
9.1 CONVERGENCE PLAN
9.1.1 INDIVIDUAL WORKS
DEPT
MGNREG
A
CATEGORY
SMC
SOIL
FERTILITY
WRD
NAME OF THE
STRUCTURE/WORK
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
SAND REMOVAL
KANI
COMPOST PIT
VERMICOMPOST
FARM POND
NO
NO
NO
PERCOLATION TANK
NO
RE-EX-FISHPOND
NO
Total
Units
UNIT
COST
Total cost
NO.OF
FARMERS/
BENEFICIARIES
CONVERGE
NCE
Page 136 of 161
DEPT
CATEGORY
NAME OF THE
STRUCTURE/WORK
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
WHS
NO
Total
Units
UNIT
COST
Total cost
NO.OF
FARMERS/
BENEFICIARIES
CONVERGE
NCE
Grand
Total
Page 137 of 161
9.1.2 COMMON WORKS
NAME
OF GP
1
2
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
(NO/RMT/KANI)
BUND
LENGTH
(WHS/SAND
BAG)
NA
NO.
OF
UNITS
LOCATION/ UG
NAME OF THE WORK
SIZE
Soil
Type
BDN
KHASNOAGAOU
PE
CUSTOM HIRING CENTRE
NA
NA
NO
1
99150
99150
3
EDBN
BHUBAN CHANTAI
WRD
COMMUNITY TANK
[">500, 3 ha"]
HARD
NO
25
1
183369
183370
2
3
EDBN
BHUBAN CHANTAI
WRD
COMMUNITY TANK
[">500, 3 ha"]
HARD
NO
24
1
176155
176155
2
4
DBN
MAHESHPUR-1
WRD
COMMUNITY TANK
[">500, 3 ha"]
HARD
NO
24
1
176155
176155
2
5
SRC
KALISANKAR PARA
WRD
COMMUNITY TANK
[">500, 3 ha"]
HARD
NO
24
1
176155
176155
2
SL.NO.
UNIT
COST
TOTAL
COST
Year of
preference
(1/2/3/4/5)
NRM
CATEGORY
Page 138 of 161
9.2 Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio
S.No.
Name of the activity
Total Cost (Rs.)
Total Benefit
expected *
BCR
Remarks
(Rs.)
EPA
NRM
PE
Livelihood for Asset less
Institution and Capacity
building
Overall
*kindly relate this with table no. 10.3 (expected outcomes)
Page 139 of 161
10 CHAPTER – 10: EXPECTED OUTCOMES
10.1 Good Practices in the village
10.2 Lessons Learnt
10.3 “Expected Outcomes” in details
10.4 “Expected Outcomes” Summary (Quantifiable indicators)
1
2
3
4
5
6
S.
No.
Item
Unit of
measurement
Pre-project
Status
Expected Post-project
Status
Remarks
1
Status of water table (Depth to Ground water
level)
Meters
Less than 1.00 Less than 1.00 mtr
mtr
2
Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated
No.
0
24
3
Quality of drinking water
Description
Not safe
Safe
4
Availability of drinking water
Description
Shortage of
72000 lpd
(50%)
Adequate availability
5
Increase in irrigation potential
Hec.
Present
potential as
per the
Atleast 400 ha of land
would get assured
critical irrigation
WHSs are
proposed
Farm ponds (125),
WHSs (24) would
provide critical
Page 140 of 161
records is ha
6
Change in cropping/ land use pattern
7
Area under agricultural crop
I
Area under single crop
Description
Present land
use is largely
paddy
Hec.
irrigation
Alongwith paddy
vegetable crops would
be promoted.
Area under
Vegetable crops
would be increased
to 60 ha from
16 oha
480
480 ha of fallow
land would
brought under
cultivation
288
Ii
Area under double crop
Hec.
Iii
Area under multiple crop
Hec.
79 150
70
34
8
Net increase in crop production area
Hec.
9
Increase in area under Vegetation/Forest
Hec.
10
Increase in area under horticulture
Hec.
As per the
proposed land use
this area would be
brought under
irrigation
In addition to
Household
Plantation in 18.32
ha
45
160
More then 100 ha
will be brought
under Horti
Page 141 of 161
plantation
11
Increase in area under fuel
Hec.
Sufficient
--
12
Increase in area under Fodder
Hec.
0
2 ha
13
Increase in milk production
Litres/day
Info not
available
50% higher than
present
14
Environmental Impact
18
50
Revolving fund
would be provided
to SHGs
Fodder availability
is sufficient at
present.
Change in Soil Loss
Perenniality of flow and change in Run-off
Recharge of ground water
14
No. of SHGs Promoted
No.
15
Increase in no. of livelihoods
No.
16
Increase in income
Rs.
2000 per
month
8000 per month
Income will be
increased through
Horti
plantation,Fishries
and mandays
generation.
17
Status of Migration
No.
157
nil
More mandays
would be
Page 142 of 161
generated to check
migration
18
SHG Federations formed
No.
19
Credit linkage with banks
Rs.
20
Resource use agreements
21
WDF collection & management
Rs.
22
Summary of lessons learnt
Description
nil
5
Steps would be
taken to form
atleast 5 SHG
federation
0
As per the guidelines
10.5 Backward and Forward Linkages
(A)
1
2
3
4
Type of Marketing Facility
Name of the institution
Pre-project (no.)
Expected post project status
Backward linkages
(i)
Seed certification
(ii)
Seed supply system
(iii) Fertilizer supply system
(iv) Pesticide supply system
Page 143 of 161
(v) Credit institutions
(vi) Water supply
(vii) Extension services
(viii) Nurseries
(ix) Tools/machinery suppliers
(x) Price Support system
(xi) Labour
(xii) Any other (please specify)
(B)
Forward linkages
(i)
Harvesting/threshing machinery
(ii)
Storage (including cold storage)
(iii) Road network
(iv) Transport facilities
(v) Markets / Mandis
(vi) Agro and other Industries
(vii) Milk and other collection centres
(viii) Labour
(ix) Any other (please specify)
Page 144 of 161
1
Location –District, mandal, village, watershed location map
2
watershed Map for IWMP Project (Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral & Topo Sheet)
3
Social Map (along with photos & paper drawing)-with Existing Structure
4
Resource Map (along with photos & paper drawing)and Land Type
5
Drainage Map (with numbering)
6
Map showing existing structures
a. Proposed action plan map
b. Land use/Land cover map
c. Slope map
d. Soil and land capability class maps
e. GIS maps
Page 145 of 161
10.1
10.2
Annexure – 8: List of Beneficiaries for Kitchen Garden
Annexure – 9: UG wise list of Beneficiaries with proposed Works (Individual)
10.3 Annexure – 10: UG wise list of Beneficiaries with proposed Works (Community)
10.4 Annexure – 11: Year wise list of works and list of Beneficiaries
10.5 Annexure – 12: Summary of works (Individual) – convergence details
10.6 Annexure – 13: Summary of works (Community) – convergence details
10.7 Annexure – 14: Model Estimates
10.8 Annexure – 15: Detailed Estimates for Community Works
Page 146 of 161
RESOLUTION OF GRAM SAVHA :
Page 147 of 161
Page 148 of 161
Page 149 of 161
Page 150 of 161
Page 151 of 161
Page 152 of 161
Page 153 of 161
Page 154 of 161
Page 155 of 161
Page 156 of 161
Page 157 of 161
Page 158 of 161
Page 159 of 161
Page 160 of 161
Page 161 of 161

DABDAGANG UB MICRO WATERSHED

Transcription

Similar documents

Technical Sheet - Microbes Biosciences

Revel Casino News 2013

Khiet Luong Pennsylvania Environmental Council 1315 W alnut

AZOMITE granular - Down To Earth Fertilizer

THE SURGE July 2016

NEW SOLUTION

MT55 | Mini Tracked Loaders

Bromeliaceae

- StopWaste.org

here