A Global PLM strategy in Ford Motor Company

A Global PLM strategy in
Ford Motor Company
Dr. Richard Riff, Director
Office of the Technical Fellow
Ford Motor Company
Ford Proprietary
1
Overview
• A Global product strategy relies on a global PLM strategy
• A global PLM strategy is enabled by interoperability
• Interoperability must be achieved at all levels:
Ford CC-Max
Volvo S40
Mazda3
Primary
PrimaryTarget
Target
1. Geometry and
Topology
3.CAD metadata
(PMI,
annotation ,
Weld, layers &
groups)
2. Assembly
Hierarchy
Level
1
2
•
r
d
5-Door
F
o
c
4-Door
u
s
Wagon
Mazda5
independent of CAD tool
Volvo C70
4
5
6
8. CAD History Tree, Design
Intent, geometry
supporting info
7
8
9
Level-2
Interoperability across
PLM Processes and
Components
Increasing Levels of complexity
Level-1
Data & Tools Interoperability
across core design and
engineering activities
•
•
•
•
o
9. Common user
interface,
common data
model
5. Design-in-Context
– Tessellation,
7 PDM driven data
Precise, Onexchange, PMI
Demand
4. Interface to ancillary
products (CAx,
6. Associativity support
EESE, etc.)
(change notification)
3
F
3-Door
Next:
Next:Re-mastering
Re-mastering
Volvo V50
Product Definition (Geometry)
PMI & Metadata
Analysis and Attributes
PDM-Enabled
•
•
•
•
PDM
BOM
MFG Systems and Processes
Requirements& Assumptions
Ford Proprietary
Level-3
Interoperability across
global vehicle programs
• Global Platform
• Global Commodities
• Global Release & Change
Management
• Enabled by Standard
Information Model
2
Interoperability – Level 1
Product Creation Core Tools
• CAD Interoperability
– Working with geometry in one CAD tool with
reference geometry from another CAD tool
• PDM Interoperability
– Product Data is shared and exchanged between
multiple purpose product data management centers.
• Visualization-based Interoperability
– Product Data Pipeline
– Data sharing and collaboration across multiple design
and engineering disciplines using efficient product
data representation.
Ford Proprietary
3
C3PNG Levels of CAD Interoperability
Primary Target
Level
1
2
3
•
4
5
Next: Re-mastering
6
7
8
9
Increasing Levels of complexity
Ford Proprietary
4
Product Creation Systems
A Global PDM - Teamcenter Centric
Integrated
CAD/CAM/CAE/PIM and
Global Solution - PDM / CAD Overview
Visualization
P1.J+Platform
Landscape
Digital Factory (EMS)
Digital Product Structure
CC to
EMS
BOM
Authoring
 Over 16,000 Users
Distributed
Digital Vehicle
 Over 100 Vehicle Programs
AVBOM
 74 Data Distribution Servers
Integrated Clash
Management
IDEAS
CATIA V4 / V5
Teamcenter Engineering
with Multi -Site
Ford Proprietary
PDV
Issue Management
5
JT-Based Interoperability:
Multi-CAD Design in Context
Teamcenter Engineering
Benefits:
– Multi-CAD / Single PDM Environment
– JT Generation via Engineering
Translation Services
– JT Read Capabilities in CATIA V5 and
IDEAS
– Seamless Integration. No manual
translation/exchange is necessary
History:
JT Read/Write
– Began Development in 2001
– Initial Production in 2003
– Currently Deployed World-wide
IDEAS
12/8/2005
Copyright © Ford Motor Company, 2005 - Ford Proprietary
Ford Proprietary
CATIA V5
6
6
Vision Along the JT Pipeline
360 Exteriors Environment & Studio
Animations
Full Vehicle
Buck
Plant
Visualization
1st Buck
“On Road”
Ergo-based
Serviceability
(1996)
(1998)
(1999)
(2000)
Mfg PMI
(2000)
Released
Content
Service
Manuals
(2000)
(2001)
Digital Occupant
(2001)
Dealers
360 Interiors EnvironmentCatalogs
& Studio
Ford GT
Marketing
Colors
PD and Mfg
Illustrations
Marketing
1st Marketing
For 20 Vehicles Process from JT
(2007)
Service Tools
“InClass”
Digital
Pre-Assembly
(2003)
Swept Volume (2004)
for Serviceability
(2005)
(2005)
(2006)
(2006)
Options & Specs Images
(2007)
Wheels
Photo-Realistic
Engineering
LIVE Reviews
(2007)
Immersive
Buck
(2007)
“Shadowed”
Underhood
Drawings
Interactive
Service Pubs
(2007)
(2008)
Safety Cage
Ford Proprietary
Web-based Build
Powertrain
and Price
(2008)
7
JT Pipeline
JT Enabled Interoperability across core PD tools
Services
PD/KBE
TCVis
IooDraw
VisJack
IooDraw
VSP
Adobe Illustr.
PDV
3DsMax
AutoTrol
TCViTransCabels
PDV
Indirect
PDV
Jack
PDV
Jack
Jack
TCe
Jack
TCe
DTCe
Buck
DVVT
Buck
VVT
JT Pipeline
Mfg
TCM
eMS
Jack
FIDES
PartViewer
EMS Planner
DASSAULT SYSTEMES Confidential
PTO
CAE Mashing
TessOnDemand
ePEds
PTO Buck
9
Ford
Proprietary
Corp Design
ICIDO
Opticore
Bunkspeed
9
Global CAE Strategy
• BOA – Bill of Analysis
• Clear link between CAD and CAE
Teamcenter Based Integration
CAD
BOM
CAD
Component
CAE
Component
Ford Proprietary
CAE Model
CAE Results
10
Achieving Geometric Compatibility
Requires Aligned BOM, CAD and DPA Processes
BOM Authoring
Project Mgmt
D&R Engineer
Weight
Finance
Primary Designer
Digital Buck
IPS
PPM
Vehicle Operations
Package
Service
Recyclability
CD338
Yes
Yes
U387
Yes
Yes
Yes
C170
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Single Bill of Material with a Defined Maturity
and Freeze Cadence
D385/6
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
P415
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
D471
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
S197
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Configured CAD Data Aligned to BOM
• Production End Item Based Design Solutions
CAD Authoring / Config
• Collaboration Structure for Layouts and Studies
• Manufacturing Structures aligned to BOP
Zone Layout / Digital Validation
Management and Delivery of
Geometric Compatibility
• Cascade System and Comp Design
Requirements
• Validates Digital Control Models
• Manages Geometric Issues and
Resolution
Ford Proprietary
11
Digital Pre-Assembly
DPA 0
DPA 1
DPA 2
DPA 3
Function
Static
Nominal
Taisen
Craftsmanship
Tolerance
• Dynamic
displacement
• Movement
• Heat
Clearances
• Variation
• Clearances
• Positional
correctness
• Interface
completeness
DPA Owner:
Block Leaders
DPA Owner:
Block Leaders
UN & UP
UN & UP
DPA 4
DPA 5
DPA 6
Service
Mfg/
Assembly
Package/
Ergo
• Design
Appearance
• Margins/
Flushness
• Grains / Gloss
• VSA Focus
studies agreed
by Design,
Program & VO
• Removal
• Access
• Damageability
DPA Owner:
Craftsmanship
DPA Owner:
Craftsmanship
DPA Owner:
FCSD
DPA Owner: VO
& SBU ME
DPA Owner:
Basic Design
Package
UP
UP
UN & UP
UN & UP
UN & UP
Craftsmanship
Specifications
Appearance
Tolerance
Service
Specification
Mfg/Assembly
Package/Ergo
• Formability
• Assembly
Process
• Plant Floor
Ergonomics
•
•
•
•
•
Ingress/egress
Reach
Vision
Accessibility
Spatial
Relationships
Requirements
Verification
DPA Assessments
Geometric Verification, Compliance to Standards
Functional
Specifications
• Material
• Key Life
• Component
Nominal Taisen
• Component
System &
interface
requirements.
• Exterior
• Interior
• Under Hood
• Acceptance
Criteria for
Component
Variation
Ford Proprietary
• Component
Standards for
Service
• Component Mfg
Standards
• Component
Ergo Req
• Control specs
• Component
Package
Standards
• DFA Req
12
Fully Integrated Digital Prototyping
Environment
Mfg Rich Client
Teamcenter 2007
BOM
Authoring
ICM
CCDB
Rich Client
Thin Client
FIDES
ICM - Integrated Clash
Management
AVBOM
Issue
Management
IDEAS
CATIA V5
TC Vis
Clash Mgmt
Req. Mgmt
Integrated
Reporting
Digital Prototyping
Ford Proprietary
13
Significant impact on the Results
• Hard work on Process Improvement
• Maturation of Tools and Collaborative Capability
Ford Proprietary
14
Interoperability Level-2
Current Ford PLM Environment
Ford Proprietary
15
Current Ford Network Landscape
Ford Proprietary
16
C3P NG Deployment Landscape
• Multi-Site data sharing established across all sites
• Each site can exchange data with any other site
• Consolidation effort is currently under way
Digital Buck Sites
Teamcenter Sites
Legend
1) pbtdm01.petersburg.ford.com
RUSSIA
# Host.servername (location)
1) Otosan_Koaceli.136.10.106.11
TURKEY
2
3
1
1) Eccha1.Pd3.ford.com (Dearborn)
2) dsc164033.pd3.ford.com (Dearborn)
3) Waptdm.ba.ford.com (Wayne)
4) Tcptdm.ba.ford.com (Twin cities)
5) vcs007.vcs.visteon.com
USA
5
4
6
1) Cautdm.Cuautitlan.ford.com
MEXICO
11
8
7
COUNTRY
Pink: Need to confirm if receiving dbucks
1) Srvsun.cambiano.ford.com
ITALY
Red: Scheduled decommission
1) Mkdbd13b.neihl.ford.com
2) G1db02.niehl.ford.com
3) Dffa017.aachen.ford.com
4) Slc3psrv.saarlouis.ford.com
GERMANY
1) gkc3p1.genk.ford.com
BELGIUM
1) wasv104.warley.ford.com
2) U1db02.dunton.ford.com
UK
1) uvg003.c3p.mazda.co.jp
JAPAN
1) Vac3pser.valencia.ford.com
SPAIN
1) Chnbuck.chongqing.ford.com (changan)
2) C3pnj01.nanjing.ford.com
3) Fcobuck.nanjingrec.ford.com
4) Jmcdbuck.nanchang.ford.com
CHINA
9
1) edms.taiwan.ford.com
TAIWAN
1) 19.199.50.46
PHILIPPINES
10
1) Bratdm4.nordeste.ford.com (Camacari)
2) Bratdm1.saobernardo.ford.com
BRAZIL
1) argtdm.arg.ford.com (Pacheco)
ARGENTINA
No Dbuck currently (Chennai)
INDIA
1) Foapdv.fcs.foa.ford.com
AUSTRALIA
2
1
3
4
5
Ford Proprietary
17
Sharing information across
all PLM systems and tools
Electrical Domain
Business
BusinessSystems
Systems
Model Based Design
Issue MGR
Virtual Verification
HiL Validation
WERS
AIMS
Product Creation Systems
TeamCenter UA
• User Interface
• Workflow manager
Requirement
Management
Communication
Functional
Definitions
MPNR
Parts Lib
CCAS
AVBOM
Ford Proprietary
18
Systems Engineering Framework
Integrating CAD/CAE and VSEM
VSEM
C3P – PD/Mfg.
C3P - CAE
1
Holistic Cross – Domain Requirements Management
Aligning functional requirements systematically across software, electronics, mechanical
3
2
Mechatronics
Architecture (applied to
Holistic Req. Mgt. Solution
VSEM)
supporting requirements,
parameters,
calibration, test, etc.
Manage Requirements and Validations in context of
vehicle / functional structure
5
4
C3P / VSEM
Convergence
CAE Data
Management
4a
2a
3a
VSEM 2010
Project
SetK / eFDVS
Requirements
Mgt.
Ford Proprietary
CAE/Req./Test
Data Mgt.
4b
Mfg. Feasibility
19
VSEM Infrastructure: Information Architecture
Black Box
Other
Domains
PLM Product Development Data Back bone
Vehicle, Features, CAE,SW -part, HW-part….
Electrical Domain Design information
(Sand box level)
White Box
Model Based Design
Virtual Verification
HiL Validation
TeamCenter UA
• User Interface
• Workflow manager
Requirement
Management
Communication
Functional
Definitions
Global Enterprise information
Electrical domain information
• Leveraging standard data exchange formats
• Minimize the number of E/E development tools
Page 20
Local information in point tools
Defined Exchange formats
• Leverage existing Corporate infrastructure
• Global data replication supporting LCC development
• Allow best-in-class design tool usage
20
Ford Proprietary
Interoperability – Level 3
Business Transformation
Old Way
New Way
Regional
Global
Global Platforms
Program Centric
Global Commodities
Differentiated Top Hats
Ford Proprietary
21
C1 TECHNOLOGIES BEGAN THE PROCESS
Ford C-Max
Volvo S40
Mazda3
F
3-Door
o
r
d
5-Door
Volvo C70
F
o
c
4-Door
u
s
Wagon
Volvo V50
Mazda5
"If you look at C1, it's almost a microcosm of what
we're trying to do in the enterprise as a whole,''
"Having a very strong and capable platform - and on
top of that you put very unique products that are
unique not just in how they look but are very
consistent with the individual brand DNA.'' - Derrick
Kuzak
Ford Proprietary
22
Key Business Drivers Summary
Key Business Drivers:
 Capability
o
Provide an integrated Process/Methods/Tools Solution set with
improved capabilities versus today
o
Improve Vertical integration within Brands
o
Required to provide BIC capability for Product Creation (Time to
Market, Efficiency, Quality)
 Commonality
o
Enable product commonality cross brand (Platform, Commodities,
etc.)
o
Improve Horizontal integration across Brands
o
Required to support increased cross brand technology sharing (e.g.
CD3s, C1, EU-CD, B2e, etc.)
Ford Proprietary
23
Global Product Creation Hierarchy of Enablers
Reduce Time to Market
Business Priorities
Reduce Cost
Increase Profitability
Capability & Commonality
Commonality
Key Business
Strategies
Distributed Engineering
(LPEA, Commodities,
PTO)
Cross-brand
Manufacturing
Platform
Consolidation &
Part Commonality
Cross-brand
Purchasing
Cross Brand Efficiencies in Product Creation
Major Process/
Data /
IT Enablers*
Commonality
Governance
GPDS and
common
Processes
C3P-NG
Single
Product
Definition
Common BOM
(Eng, Purch,
and Manuf)*
Transparent
part number
structure
Other Key enablers include: Engineering & Manufacturing Standards, Systems Library
Proposed Framework for prioritizing Process/ Methods/ IT Enablers
Ford Proprietary
24
Release Management
Current Capabilities
•
Automated processes exist mostly within given toolsets and functions
–
–
•
Hybrid Solutions exist at key functional or organizational touch-points
within the Product Lifecycle
–
–
•
Time based triggers (BOM Scrub to meet milestones)
Less Formal Approval Required (Early Vehicle Program Changes)
Wide variation in CAD release methods cross functions
–
•
CAD & Engineering (CAD / BOM Reconciliation)
Engineering & Purchasing (Part / Supplier Sourcing)
Non-Automated workflow processes tend to be found at soft-points
within our processes.
–
–
•
CAD Change Management Workflows (TeamCenter Engineering)
Worldwide Engineering Release System (Home-grown)
Powertrain, Chassis, Body and across Vehicle/PT Development Centers
Overall loss of business efficiency due to:
–
–
Variation in methods on global programs - vehicle teams follow different process based upon localized
methods
Audit-based process adds unnecessary time and complexity to release/change process, and false sense of
integrity of release/change event
Ford Proprietary
25
Strategic Workflow Direction
Metrics produced directly from the process
Business Process Metrics & Reports
Users interact with a single process
 Removes complexity
 Users don’t have to know the whole
process
CPE
Purchasing
Manufacturing
Engineering
PPM
Process is mapped and codified:
 Scaleable
 Captures intellectual property
CAD Designer
TCe
CMMS3
MPNR
AIMS
WERS
WIPS
Back office environment is hidden from users
Ford Proprietary
26
Global P-Release and Change
Management
Objective:
• Deliver streamlined global Process for P-Release and Change
Management built upon the principle of ensuring BOM and
supporting virtual data accurate and validated prior to P-Release
and all production changes by:
– Use of common global process across all functions and supporting
global supplier business environment: eliminates process variation
across CBG and/or Engineering Functions.
– Bundling virtual data into a single Teamcenter object to support virtual
review, validation and signoff in Teamcenter: eliminates data re-entry,
elimination of CAD information in WERS, eliminates use of review
and signoff functionality in PPM Audit.
– Providing pre-validation tools to ensure that all of the data in the virtual
environment supporting the release/change is aligned to the BOM
(production drawings/CCTM, in-context DPA validation): eliminates
need for PPM Audit validation checks.
Ford Proprietary
27
Example: New Global
Purchasing Strategy
• Global supply base - “Aligned Business Framework”
• Reduce key supplier base 50%,
– Mutual profitability and improving quality
– Two or three global suppliers per commodity
• Regional suppliers on an exception basis
• Develop “Commodity Business Plan”
–
–
–
–
–
100+ sets of components
Reduce complexity and what is the
Migration plan with suppliers
Technology
Manufacturing footprint
Ford Proprietary
28
New Global Purchasing Strategy 
New Information and Interfaces
Component
Group 1
Strategy
Global
Sourcing
Area 1
ABF
Supplier
1
Component
Group 2
Strategy
Global
Sourcing
Area 2
ABF
Supplier
2
Global
Sourcing
Area 200
ABF
Supplier
200
Vehicle
Program 1
Bill of
Material
1
Component
Group 100
Strategy
Ford Proprietary
29
New Global Purchasing Strategy 
New Information and Interfaces
Component
Group 1
Strategy
Component
Group 2
Strategy
Vehicle
Program 1
Global
Sourcing
Area 1
ABF
Supplier 1
Global
Sourcing
Area 2
ABF
Supplier 2
Global
Sourcing
Area 200
ABF
Supplier
200
Bill of
Material 1
Component
Group 100
Strategy
Ford Proprietary
30
New Global Purchasing Strategy 
New Information and Interfaces
Component
Group 1
Strategy
Component
Group 2
Strategy
Component
Group 100
Strategy
Bill of
Material
1
Global
Sourcing
Area 1
ABF
Supplier
1
Global
Sourcing
Area 2
ABF
Supplier
2
Global
Sourcing
Area
200
ABF
Supplier
200
Vehicle
Program
1
Ford Proprietary
31
New Global Purchasing Strategy 
New Information and Interfaces
Component
Group 1
Strategy
Global
Sourcing
Area 1
Component
Group 2
Strategy
Global
Sourcing
Area 2
Vehicle
Program
1
ABF
Supplier
1
ABF
Supplier
2
Bill of
Material
1
Component
Group 100
Strategy
Global
Sourcing
Area 200
Ford Proprietary
ABF
Supplier
200
32
New Global Purchasing Strategy 
New Information and Interfaces
Component
Group 1
Strategy
Global
Sourcing
Area 1
Component
Group 2
Strategy
Global
Sourcing
Area 2
Vehicle
Program
1
ABF
Supplier
1
ABF
Supplier
2
Bill of
Material
1
Component
Group 100
Strategy
Global
Sourcing
Area
200
Ford Proprietary
ABF
Supplier
200
33
Business Information Standards and Integration
Enable Cross Functional Collaboration
Process – What work needs to be done when
(e.g. GPDS process specifies timing and deliverables of gateways)
Methods – How to do the work
(e.g. business rules and workflow to complete process deliverables)
Information
Data at the point of decision
(e.g. What does “Fuel System” mean? Does “Fuel
System” mean the same thing to an engineer in Europe
and an engineer in FNA?)
Tools
Applications – software customized to Ford’s needs
(e.g. PeopleSoft, WERS, CMMS, ACM, SOE/SOF, etc.)
Infrastructure – network, computers, operating system, DB
To deliver the collaboration required for Ford’s global transformation information
needs to have the same meaning to all stakeholders globally. Information needs to
comply with documented and accessible standards
Ford Proprietary
34
Information Standards for the Industrial Backbone: Driving Efficiencies and Integration
Working with Global Platform
Programs and Process
Owners to leverage
standardized information to
deliver GPDS efficiencies
and cross-functional
integration
PAF
Nodes in
TCe
PAF
Nodes in
TC Mfg.
Manufacturing
Engineering
Efficiencies
BOM
lines w/
PAF
CAE
templates
in PAF
CAE NGD
Efficiencies
CBP
content
in PAF
Structured
Assumptions
in PAF
CBP
content
in PAF
BOM
lines w/
PAF
BOM
lines w/
PAF
Commonality
and Complexity
by PAF
Robust
inclusion of CBP
direction upfront
Automatic
validation of CBP
direction in BOM
Cross platform control
of commonality and
complexity
Platform
Deployments:
•B
• CD
•C
Results: increased business
satisfaction from IT delivery,
defragmentation of IT
landscape
Examples:
• PAF enables
Global
Commodity Hub
effectiveness
Wiring
Interior
Chassis
Vehicle GVPA
(Version 2.3.2)
Exterior
Power Source
Compartment
• Sunsetting of
GPA simplifies
IT deliverables
Body Structure
Ford Proprietary
Key Business Tools Impacted - Current
Cycle Plan
1
495
496
497
498
499
500
503
504
506
507
509
510
UID; PAF
01.01.01 Front Floor
Front Floor Pan
Rocker Panel Assembly - Front Floor
Rocker Panel - Front Floor
P525: Achieve weight reduction thru reduced WB
by 189mm
Torque Box U22x/P525: Torque box and front
longitudinal is common and c/o P415
Front Floor pan U22x: New front floor pan.
P525: New 1-piece floorpan (front half is
geometrically similar to U22x, rear is new).
Note: Front seat attachment points are common
between U22x and P525. 2R P525 attachment
points c/o P415 crew cab.
Rocker Reinforcement New - Rocker
reinforcement for U22x to meet FMVSS208.
New - P525 Rocker reinforcement to
accommodate new design
Cross Member #1 Assembly - First Row Seat
Cross Member #1
Cross Member # 1 U22x/P525 - Carryover P415
Cross Member #2 Assembly - Second Row Seat
Cross Member # 2 U22x: c/o U22x
Cross Member #2
P525: Modified U22x (stamping common with
U22x with body mount cage nuts and reinf
removed)
Cross Member #3 Assembly - Front Floor Rear
Cross Member #3
Cross Member # 3 U22x: c/o U22x
P525: c/o P415
Longitudinal Rail - Under Front Floor P525: New
Mid F/A Members between Cross Member #1 and
#3
Rails/ Members floor side New - P525
Floor Side Inners (side sill) New - P525 for length.
New U22x
PAF; BMI
Cost QPIP
GRM
ADrivers
P525 - CI
cpscDetail
P525 ABC
U22x ABC
U22x TCI
C
2011
2011
2011
2011
U22x U
U22x U
P415 XP
U22x P
2011
U22x P
2011
2011
U22x P
U22x U
N/A
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
System Default
C
N
C
M
Proposed
C
Proposed
N
Proposed
Proposed
N
N
2012
2011
2012
2012
2011
2011
2011
ASAP
U22x
P415
U22x
U22x
XU
U
XP
U
Proposed
Static, Apvd
PDF File
No
Yes
Proposed
No
Yes
Proposed
No
Yes
Proposed
GRM
No
Yes
P415
XP
Proposed
No
No
No Basis
U
Proposed
No
P415
P415
U
U
Proposed
Proposed
No
No
GREM 100
Map to PAF in
Process Indexed
TS
Tracker
Target
Setting
PSA/Targets
PAF; PSA
LOU Scrub
NPI
GMCD
GPLUS
No
No
No
System Default
N
N
C
C
C
N
CPSCII/PAF
Indexed Stub
AVBOM II Scrub
Assumption
Scrub
P525 - TCI
P525 - TCI
U22x - TCI
FilterFlags
Longitudinal Rail - Under Front Floor
Front Floor Side Member Extension
Reinforcement - Front Floor Side Member
Comments
PAFDetails
WordAssumptions
U22x ABC CI
Structured Assumption Index
00.00.00 Complete Vehicle System
01.00.00 Body System
01.01.00 Body Structure Subsystem
518
520
534
P525 Variants
Program Direction
CPSC Word
Assumptions (SALT)
RowID
AVBOM II Creation
U22x Variants
CPSCII/PAF
Indexed Stub
WA Revisions
GCH-CBP
WAConversion
• Part Address Func.
(PAF)
• CPSC II
• Base Part to Commodity
• BOM file scope (PT/VL)
• Engineering Modules
• Features, and PAF rel.
MappedMetrics
EPIC Business Information Standards and Quality
Vignette Drivers
EPIC Business Information Standards and Quality
New process
for creating
information
standards 
sustainable
standards and
quality
U22x TCI Status
Mapping of all the Base Parts globally That
fulfill the Same Function
Support Long term
Sustainment
Enablers (Bus. and IT)
Transition to Long term
Sustainment
Bus. and IT
P525 - TCI Status
Part Address Function: Globally agreed
Taxonomy of Part Functions
U22x Based On MY
Clean
Up Data
Master source for which CSS contains
which CPSC
Long term
Sustain.
Plan
PAF in
CBP
Revolutionary  New info. Req.
Evolutionary  Clean up existing
Governance  Info. Scorecard
Ad-hoc
Clean up
Tooling
Std. &
Clean up
Plan
CSS (Usage)
Interior Trim
PMT 3 FSAO - B7CTB Bracket - Park Brake Cable to Frame or Body Brakes
PMT 3 FSAO - Chassis
Wheels Tires Jacks and Equipment
PMT 4 FSAO - DTSE
Driveline
PMT 4 FSAO - PTSE
Powertrain Mounts
PMT 3 FSAO - F6QGZ Tube - Hydraulic Electrical Control Unit (HECU) to Brakes
PMT 1 FSAO - Body Exterior
Fixed Glazing
PMT 5 FSAO - EESE
Power Supply
PMT 5 FSAO - IC2ZD Speaker - Park Assistance Module
Body and Security Electronics
PMT 2 FSAO - Body Interior
Interior Trim
PMT 4 FSAO - XYVDH Clutch Assembly
JD3VG Clutch Disc
8S9Z7 Clutch Pressure Plate
030501 PMT 4 FSAO - PTSE
Dressed Engine
Closures and Lids BIW
010205 PMT 1 FSAO - U3XTF Hood Support - Stay / Prop Rod
060603
040401
050401
020307
060603
011105
030603
131301
010604
080102
P525 - Based On MY
EPIC Business Information Standards and Quality
Std. &
Clean up
POC
Unique ID Part Address Function (PAF)
CPSC
(Usage) PMT(Usage) (Usage;Co (Usage;Component Usage)
010507 PMT 2 FSAO - Body Interior
Prefix (Ford Base (Ford Suffix
Level Part) Part) (Ford Part) Name(Ford Part)
0 CN15 A31017 AAW CVR ASY QTR WHL/HS TR
1
W712474 S439 CLIP 8X16X0.8+1.2 PNL PSH IN STL
0 8V51 2251 AB CLP BRK LN TO RR AX
0 7M59
1040 HA WT WHL BAL
0
W500034 S442 BOLT M10X30 HF 8
0
W520415 S442 NUT M12 HF 8
0 CN15 2263 DA TUB ASY FRT WHL BRK
0 CN15 A29710 AA GL QTR WDO
0
W500125 S415 BOLT-M10X1.5X65 HEX FLANGE HEAD
0 3W83 15K864 AA SPKR-PRK AID
0 CN15 N20356 AA INS FRT DR O/S PNL SND
0 8V21 7540 DC CL DSC & PLT ASY
1 8V21 7550 DB DSC ASY CL FRT
1 8V21 7563 DC PLT & CVR ASY CL PRESS
0
W520413 S442 NUT M8 HF 8
0 CN15 16A931 AA PROP ASY HOD SUPT
Engineering Interactions
Information
Standards
Governing Interfaces
Current
State
Data Asses
The Global Core Engineering Common
Systems Structure (CSS)
Agree
Interfaces
U22x Based On Program
Information quality
metrics assessing
compliance with
information
standards
Synthesis
Decomposition
Six Sigma analysis
of cross-functional
information
interfaces Required
to deliver strategies
Stakeholders
&
Governance
Information Standards Example:
CPSC II / Part Address Function – standardizing vehicle
systems / part functions / base parts
Systems
Scope
PAF in
PAF in
Mfg. Eng. Assump.
Information quality
metrics assessing “fit
for purpose”
Criteria
of
Merit
Projects
Scope
PAF in
BOM
Cross-Functional
and Global
Information
exchange required to
deliver strategies
Principles
Org.
Scope
PAF in
DPA
Data Maturity Model
(who gives what to
whom, when, and at
what quality)
EPIC Business
Strategies and
Objectives
Information Standard Development Process
Business Technical
Scope
Scope
Working with “left hand side”
organizations to deploy
standards – PAF example
PAF in
EIC CAD.
EPICBusiness
BusinessInformation
InformationStandards
Standardsand
andQuality
Quality(BISQ)
(BISQ)project
projectanswers
answers“what
“whatare
arethe
theglobal
global
• •EPIC
informationstandards
standardsrequired
requiredtotodeliver
deliverthe
theEPIC
EPICbusiness
businessobjectives
objectives
information
UseaaSystems
SystemsEngineering
Engineeringapproach
approachstarting
startingfrom
fromEPIC
EPICobjectives
objectivesand
andstrategies
strategies
• •Use
Endresults:
results:support
supportfor
forEPIC
EPICproject
projectteams
teamsininintegration,
integration,and
andEPIC
EPICInformation
InformationStandards
StandardsScorecard
Scorecard
• •End
Systems Engineering
and Lean Six Sigma
Approach
EPIC BISQ: using methods known and trusted by the business
Systems Engineering Applied to EPIC Cross-Functional and Cross-Project Information Integration
Creating robust global
information standards for the
industrial backbone
P525 - Based On Program
Defining the information
landscape required to deliver
EPIC and OneFord
SAL/CPA
Tracker
Key
Commodities v6
High Hurt Complexity
Commodities
CPSC II; Commodity
Code -> PAF
CPSC II; Commodity
Code -> PAF
PSA
Top 100 Tooling v9
Part Mgt
(Investment Efficiency)
Enterprise Search “cpm” => Core Program Mgmt
Process and Tools Integration => PAMS Prod Assumpt Mgt Sys =>
Product Assumptions Mgt Sys PAMS – PMTI Review Ver 1f.ppt
p. 19 of 16
List, not Indexed
pbarrow/rmille10
Proprietary
GIS 25.01, S + 3
Business Results:
Manufacturing Engineering: Without PAF
we can’t contain the requirements of a
global Manufacturing Engineering process
Digital Innovation: PAF based reporting
drives CAD-BOM alignment, and the CAD
structure
Attributes (NVH): It’s going to greatly
improve the process for engineers, enable
identifying issues early, and constantly
staying on the status of the CAD
Global Material Cost: Detailed BOM
comparisons that took weeks can be done
in minutes, it’s a major enabler for us
Program Management: prior solutions
addressed multiple symptoms, they never
provided a platform the business can cross
functionally converge, I feel [with PAF] we
now have the critical mass
35
Thank You
36