Smart Grid to Provide Capacity Relief to
Transcription
Smart Grid to Provide Capacity Relief to
Smart Grid to Provide Capacity Relief to Distribution Utilities Jim Blackman & ML Chan Quanta Technology, LLC Raleigh, NC 27607 September 8, 2008 Agenda Introducing Quanta Services & Quanta Technology Smart Grid Overview Capacity-Relief Smart Grid Applications Technology architecture Functionalities Benefits Industry Experience Implementation Roadmap Discussion © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 2 Quanta Services The largest North American consulting, engineering, construction firm specialized in serving the energy and telecommunications industries Over 16,000 employees and $3.1 B in 2007 revenue (annualized) In Canada with Allteck (Vancouver) and EHV Underground (Toronto) T&D Primary Services: Consulting, Planning, Design and Engineering Construction and EPC Projects Maintenance and Testing Emergency Restoration Outsourcing © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 3 Quanta Services - Organization Quanta Services Electric & Gas Allteck Line Contractors Arby Construction Bradford Brothers Dashiell Dillard Smith Construction InfraSource Underground Irby Construction MJ Electric Mears Group North Houston Pole Line PAR Electric Potelco Quanta Energized Services Quanta Government Solutions Quanta Technology RA Waffensmith Realtime Utility Engineers Sumter Utilities Telecom & Cable Blair Park/Sunesys Driftwood Electrical Fiber Technologies Golden State Utility HL Chapman Pipeline Manual Brothers North Sky Communications Pauley Construction Professional Teleconcepts Spalj Construction Trawick Construction Underground Construction VCI Telecom WC Communications Ancillary Services Croce Electric Intermountain Electric Mears Group The Ryan Company Wireless Advanced Technologies Conti Communications Global Enercom Spectrum Construction © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 4 Quanta Technology’s Services Strategic infrastructure planning and asset management Equipment condition, design and maintenance standards assessment System protection and automation “Smart Grid” development Enterprise systems integration Sustainable energy portfolio assessment Staff training © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 5 Quanta Technology Smart Grid Offerings Business Case studies Roadmap development Enterprise system design and acquisition consulting System acceptance testing & commissioning Process change analysis Implementation of Smart Grid applications Holding company, Quanta Services, provides EPC services © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 6 Quanta Technology Consultant Experience in Smart Grid PG&E Duke Energy SCE ComEd Puget Sound Energy Alinta BGE CLP ConEd National Grid Dominion Energy PEPCO Holding Benton PUD (Australia) (Hong Kong) ENMAX BC Hydro Manitoba Hydro METC T&D System Planning & Technology Studies Load Forecasting AMI / Demand Side Management/Load Management System Automation Planning & Implementation Enterprise IT System Knowledge Transfer © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 7 Consultant Power System Planning & Load Forecasting AMI and DSM/DR/LM System Automation, EMS, SCADA & DMS IEDs & System Protection Richard Brown X X X Jim Burke X X X ML Chan X Johan Enslin X Trevor Hall X X Power Electronics Yi Hu X X X X X X X Farid Katiraei X Damir Novosel X X Edmund Philips X X John Spare X X Hahn Tram X X X Eric Udren X X X X Bob Uluski X X X X Lee Willis X X Bartosz Wojszczyk X X Enterprise IT System Regulatory Assistance X X X Wind, Renewables & DG X X X X X X X X X X X X © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. X X X X X X X Page 8 What is Smart Grid? Smart Grid is a vision for electric utilities: Utilities and consumers will accrue values through the convergence of power delivery and information technologies Applied to G, T, D and customer sectors Not a set of shrink-wrapped solutions; the set and scope are unique to each utility, in the context of traditional capacity engineering and planning © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 9 Smart Grid Business Drivers: New Business Environment T TR PI N FO O Y EN M VE O PR SG IM CA RB O N Asset Management T VI Demand Response I CT Renewable Resources, DGs & PHEVs Operational Efficiency U D O PR Greenhouse Gases Customer Satisfaction System Reliability © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. T RELIABILITY & QUALITY OF SUPPLY Optimal Capacity Relief Power Quality Page 10 Smart Grid leverages on enablers “Sensors” Communications Infrastructure Enterprise Information Integration Regulatory Support Corporate Culture: A Holistic Approach © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 11 Capacity Relief Smart Grid Applications Value – Optimal capacity to meet the load Optimality Lifecycle cost – investment and O&M Service reliability Carbon footprint Capacities of substation transformers, feeders, and distribution transformers (pole top & vaults) Realized through system planning & operations technologies © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 12 Smart Grid Capacity-Relief Technologies Operational Technologies •Integrated vol/var control (IVVC) •Substation Peak Load Mgmt •Feeder Peak Load Mgmt •Integration with DERs (Demand Response, PHEVs, DGs and Renewable) Optimal Capacity •Sub transformers •Feeders •Dist. Transformers Planning Technologies © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. •Use of AMI meter data •Monitored load data •Spatial Load Forecasting Page 13 IVVC – How It Works DPF Application SCADA Server IVVC Application Voltage Reg Controller Line Voltage Regulators Feeder Locations Substation Host Processor Cap Bank Controller PLC Substation © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 14 Acquire Field Data Cap bank status, feeder voltage DPF Application SCADA Server IVVC Application Voltage Reg Controller Feeder voltage and load, regulator tap position Load, voltage, real and reactive power, tap position Line Voltage Regulators Feeder Locations Substation Host Processor Cap bank stage “A” and “B” status Bus voltage, tap position Cap Bank Controller PLC Substation © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 15 Run Powerflow Calcs DPF Application DPF Results IVVC Application SCADA Server Real time field data Voltage Reg Controller Line Voltage Regulators Feeder Locations Substation Host Processor Cap Bank Controller PLC Substation © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 16 Determine Optimal Solution DPF Application DPF Results SCADA Server IVVC Application Optimal switching plan for cap banks, LTC and reg Voltage Reg Controller Line Voltage Regulators Feeder Locations Substation Host Processor Cap Bank Controller PLC Substation © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 17 Execute optimal switch plan DPF Application SCADA Server Switch bank on/off IVVC Application Voltage Reg Controller Raise/Lower Taps Optimal switching plan Line Voltage Regulators Feeder Locations Substation Host Processor Switch bank stage A/B on/off Raise/Lower Taps Cap Bank Controller PLC Substation © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 18 Benefits of IVVC Reduce line losses (energy kWh); carbon footprint benefits Reduce capacity needs (kW) Maintain satisfactory delivery voltage to customers Could be ~ 2% lower kWh losses; ~4% capacity reduction © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 19 Implementation Challenges/Opportunities Utilities in SE USA and West Canada Integrate DMS/SCADA system with GIS Communications with all field devices (feeder & substations) Can leverage AMI meters for End-of-Line voltage readings; has been a barrier for IVVC implementation © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 20 Feeder Peak Load Management Objective: Reduce peak demand on feeders/substations by periodically shifting load between connected feeders to achieve better balance Must have significant load diversity between feeders 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 21 Feeder Peak Load Management - Benefits Reduction of peak demand on individual substations Defer capacity addition Reduce individual substation demand charges Reduction of peak demand on individual feeders; could be 5%, depending on customer mix Reduction of electrical losses Total losses with balanced load < Total losses with one heavily loaded feeder and one lightly loaded feeder Reduced kVA demand as a result © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 22 Substation Peak Load Management Similar technology solution as for Feeder Peak Load Management Takes advantage of load diversities among substation transformer banks Similar types of benefits Defer substation capacity Reduce demand charges at substations Benefits depend on the degree of load diversities; could be ~ 5% demand reduction © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 23 Feeder and Substation Peak Load Management DMS/SCADA System ST Load Forecasting Distribution Power Flow Substation Peak Load Mgmt Feeder Peak Load Mgmt IVVC 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 L9 Data concentrator Substation 2 Substation 1 Data concentrator T1 R B1 B8 R AS9 F2 S F10 R7 R L2 Distribution Transformer L1 L10 T2 F3 L3 L7 Communications Network L8 L11 F11 F4 L12 F12 S15 © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. L4 L5 S56 L6 n.o. S67 Page 24 Implementation Challenges/Opportunities Western utility in USA Integrate DMS/SCADA system with GIS Communications with all field devices (feeder & substations) Lacking time-synchronized loading data for forecasting loading factors Feeder and Substation Peak Load Management need to be coordinated © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 25 System Configuration for IVVC, Feeder & Substation Peak Load Management Public Internet Access Application Server Application Server Application Server SOA Bus Virtual Data Mart Non-operational Data EMS or DMS Operationa l Data Line Automation Devices & Metering Data Concentrators IEDs and Meters at Substations Data Concentrators AMI Meters © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 26 Integration with Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) Demand Response, DGs, PHEVs & Renewable Demand Response (DR) shifts peak load Direct control of end-use loads (e.g., AC, WH) Critical Peak Pricing/Real-Time Pricing/TOD Rates Renewable (wind, solar PV) & DGs with energy storage PHEVs as energy supply sources for customers © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 27 Integrating DERs Advanced Monitoring, Communications & Control Energy Storage Customer Portal Advanced Monitoring, Communications & Control Dynamic Systems Control PHEV Distribution Operations Data Management Distributed Generation & Storage Smart End-Use Devices Courtesy of EPRI for source image © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 28 Communications Infrastructure for Integration of DERs External Data Access AMI Mgmt Mgmt AMI System System Field Crew 3rd Parties Customers Back-Office & Operational Systems Web Access Back Haul Communication AMI Config & Maintenance Meter Data Data Meter Mgmt Sys Sys Mgmt Access Communication Meters & Premise Gateways Home Area Network Bi-directional R/T Access Utility Wide Comm. Neighborhood Neighborhood Aggregation Aggregation Monitoring SA, DA, AM Local Comm. PG PG Monitoring, DA, AM DG DA, AM, DSM/DR System Ops, Power Mgmt & DSM T&D Equipment © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Distribution Equipment Page 29 Smart Grid Technologies for Integrating DERs AMI System Residential Residential // C&I C&I Fixed Fixed Networks Networks AMI meters with HAN Zigbee for communications Home energy management system with smart charger system for PHEVs Smart appliances & smart thermostats Microgrid interface controller Customer Portal Systems for energy management © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 30 Benefits with DERs & Industry Experience DR programs ~ 5-10% peak load reduction <1% energy saving; minor reduction of carbon footprint Hard to forecast the end-use load shapes with high certainty PHEVs, DG and Renewable kW reduction depends on resource penetration & behavior Smartness of controllers Industry experience still limited Need accurate and robust load shape forecast by small areas © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 31 Spatial Load Forecasting With AMI metering With end-use load shape data © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 32 Spatial Load Forecasting Model Small area load forecast, taking into account neighboring area dynamics Top down hierarchical approach for forecasting – region, area, sub-area, sub-subarea, small area Bottom-up analysis to determine the curve fit for each area’s forecast Geo-structure data; integrated with GIS © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 33 Start with Small Area Data More analysis. Compare to system total etc. b- a su are to ll te ma ca s llo & A s ea ar Ag g an reg d at An e al d a yz ta e Summary: Bottom-Up Analysis: Top Down Forecast End with Small Area Forecast © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 34 Resulting Load Forecast for Each Area 20+ year planning horizon AMI meters provide excellent load database; even end-use based End-uses for PHEVs, rooftop PVs, DR programs, data centers MVA Horizon year load Load history A Time © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 35 Benefits from Spatial Load Forecasting Reduce error margin (e.g., from about 6% to 3%); substantial capital investment savings Challenges Appropriate input data gaps Easy to use and properly designed tools Utilities begin to appreciate the value of Spatial Load Forecasting © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 36 Harvesting Capacity Values from AMI Systems AMI meter data allows for Transformer load management system More accurate loading data at various times for tighter margin load forecast Major capacity benefits Value of information AMI system infrastructure enables these Smart Grid capacity-related applications and other additional ones © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 37 What should Ontario utilities do next? Conduct a Smart Grid business case study for each utility to establish a strategy Develop a Smart Grid roadmap System specification, acquisition, development management, acceptance testing and commissioning for various systems Field program deployment Training and maintenance support Need to be integrated with other Smart Grid applications to implement the Smart Grid solutions; open system architecture and standard communications protocol © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 38 Challenges Facing Utilities in Smart Grid Confusing as to what Smart Grid is about; thus having difficulty to start Technology-focused; not value-driven Need to develop a business case, and then a roadmap Implement by integrating with legacy equipment and systems Open system standard and communications protocols Continue to plan for “dumb” capacity projects, and to harden the systems © 2008 Quanta Technology, Inc. Page 39 Thank You