Trattamento con i nuovi farmaci nei pazienti sottoposti a trapianto di
Transcription
Trattamento con i nuovi farmaci nei pazienti sottoposti a trapianto di
Trattamento con i nuovi farmaci nei pazienti sottoposti a trapianto di fegato Maria Rosaria Piras SSD Coordinamento Trapianto di Fegato Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu Cagliari 19 dicembre 2015 Treatment Pre-LT with the Goal of Preventing HCV Recurrence Strategy 1: Treat to Cure Antiviral Antiviral Therapy Therapy LT for 12-24 wks 100% HCV-free post-LT SVR No SVR 100% HCV- infected post-LT Strategy 2: Treat to Achieve HCV RNA Undectability Antiviral Therapy until HCV RNA negative for ≥ 4 wks On-Treatment Response LT Follow up 95% HCV-free post-LT if HCV RNA negative at LT Treatment Pre-LT with the Goal of Preventing HCV Recurrence Strategy 1: Treat to Cure Antiviral Antiviral Therapy Therapy LT for 12-24 wks 100% HCV-free post-LT SVR No SVR 100% HCV- infected post-LT Shorter duration of therapy Strategy 2: Treat to Achieve HCV RNA Undectability Antiviral Therapy until HCV RNA negative for ≥TND 4 wks High % of patients achieve LT Follow up HCV RNA on DAAs On-Treatment Response 95% HCV-free post-LT if HCV RNA negative at LT Post-Transplant HCV Recurrence in patients in whom HCV RNA was non detectable for 28 days prior to transplant No Recurrence (n=29) Recurrence (n=10) Cirrhosis + HCC CTP ≤ 7 MELD exception for HCC 48 wks or LT No AEs due to SOF/RBV No recurrence in 24/25 (96%) of patients who maintained HCV RNA TND >28 days 0 . 28 28 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360 Days with HCV RNA Continuously TND Prior to Liver Transplant Curry MP et al, Gastroenterology 2015 390 National program for early access to SOF therapy in Italy for patients with chronic hepatitis C in liver LT waiting list 47 ITACOPS, AISF 2016 (227/243 pazienti, 93.5%) N=227 HCC 47% GT 1/2/3/4 TE 55% HBsAg+ 5 HIV 10 MELD 13 (6-24) CTP 8 (5-12) SOF/RBV safe and effective also in decompensated cirrhosis 227 PATIENTS 87 53 pts pts completed treatment 100 pts OLT 47 patients HCV RNA negative for > 4 wks at OLT 3 pts bridge therapy 44 pts stop therapy 1 pt: medical decision 1 donor anti-HCV 1 donor HCV RNA Negative:3 pts SVR12:100% Positive:5 pts Negative:39 pts SVR12: 87% 3030pts pts discontinued therapy 10 10 pts died for complications of cirrhosis 53 pts HCV RNA negative for < 4 wks or still positive at OLT 34 pts bridge therapy 2 deaths (MOF) Positive:1 pts Negative:31 pts SVR12: 97% 19 pts stop therapy 3 deaths Positive:6 pts Negative:10 pts SVR12:62.5% Advanced cirrhosis N=60 Post-LT N=53 DCV 60 mg QD Follow-up SOF 400 mg QD +RBV Week 0 Week 12 Week 24 SVR 12 § HCV GT 1-75% (GT1a 57%) § IL28B non CC 78% § Naive or experienced patients § DAA failures allowed except NS5A § HCC allowed § CTP B-C 80% Advanced cirrhosis patients with treatment interrupted by LT could receive an additional 12 wks of treatment immediately post-LT Week 36 Cirrhotic Patients Transplanted During Treatment: Ally-1 Study *Discontinued RBV after 11 days due to hyperbilirubinemia resulting from post-LT biliary obstruction Centro Trapianti di Fegato - Pancreas A.O. Brotzu Direttore Dott. Fausto Zamboni Cirrhotic Patients Transplanted During Treatment: Cirrhotic Patient Transplanted During Treatment Pre-transplant SOF+LDV PA 1b TND (23 days) Cirrhotic Patient Transplanted During Treatment Post-transplant HCV - None *Discontinued RBV after 11 days due to hyperbilirubinemia resulting from post-LT biliary obstruction Post-Transplant Antiviral Therapy Prevent graft loss Prevent extra-hepatic complications Reverse complications of decompensation Timing of Post-LT Therapy Early therapy better How early is “early” ? Basic requirements • Prevent histological injury/fibrosis • Reduce likelihood of cholestatic hepatitis • Simplify evaluation of abnormal liver tests Safety and efficacy studies used ≥ 6 months post-LTà interpret as “clinically stable” • Stable renal function, resolved anemia, low dose PPI,stable immunosuppression • Dose interruption very unlikely European DCV Compassionate Use Program • N=80 • Male 70% • White 93% • Median age 58 yr • TE 69% • HCV RNA 6.2 log IU/ml • GT1 87% (a=32%) • HBV coinfection 6% • ≥ post LT 3.3 yrs(0.3-21) • Cirrhosis 43% • CTP B/C 43% • MELD > 15 22% • FCH 11% • RBV 30% • TAC 74% • CsA 21% • Everolimus11% • Sirolimus 2% • MMF 51% • Steroids 16% 24 wks Well tolerated No significant DDI No Rejection Herzer K et al. AASLD 2015 SVR (mITT) by Liver Disease Status Herzer K et al. AASLD 2015 U.S. DCV Expanded Access: Post-transplant Cohort 100 97 100 80 SVR12 (%) N=62 (treatment available N=42) Age 59 yrs HCV RNA ≥5 log IU/ml GT 1/2/3 n% 49/12/57 F3/F4 69% Decompensated cirrhosis 31% MELD n% <9 (37) 10-15 (61) >16 (42) HCC 26% FCH 16% Dual kidney/LT 7% TAC 47% CSA 12% Everolimus/sirolimus 15% MMF 75% Steroids 18% Well tolerated No significant DDI No rejection 60 40 20 32 0 33 • • • 32 33 GT 1 8 8 8 8 GT 3 1 GT 1 patient experienced post-treatment relapse Additionally, 1 GT 2 patient in the post-transplant cohort achieved SVR12 NS5A sequencing (population based) in relapse patient identified Y93H RAV Brown RS et al. EASL 2016, poster SAT-251 (modified) Patients With Fibrosing Cholestatic Hepatitis Patient 1 2 3 4 5 HCV GT 1 3 1a 3 3 Treatment Weeks of Treatment Reason for Discontinuation Bilirubin Normalized at EOT DCV+SOF DCV+SOF DCV+SOF DCV+SOF DCV+SOF 24 17 12 10 24 Headachea Insurance denial Pruritusa - Yes Yes Yes No Yes SVR12 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes • Among the 62 enrolled patients, 8 had FCH, of whom 5 had data at post-treatment Week 12 • All 5 showed rapid viral decline and achieved SVR12 • General improvements from baseline in MELD score and total bilirubin levels were observed Brown RS et al. EASL 2016, poster SAT-251 Treatment after LT: Solar-1 and Solar-2 SOF + LDV ± RBV N=667 Pre-Post LT CTP B/C N=323 Post-LT CTP B/C N=112 Safe and well tolerated irrespective of the degree of decompensation or whether patients were pre- or-post LT Analysis excluded 13 patients transplanted prior to posttreatment Week (FU) 12 with HCV RNA <LLOQ at last measurement prior to transplant, and 3 pretransplant patients who were CTP A at baseline. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Gane, AASLD, 2015, 1049 Centro Trapianti di Fegato - Pancreas A.O. Brotzu Direttore Dott. Fausto Zamboni Patient Disposition: Post-transplant Cohort Startedtreatment treatmentn=49 n=49(+(+6 6retreated) retreated) Started SOF+RBV n=34/ SOF+RBV n=1 SOF+RBV(compassionate (compassionateuse) use)=20/ =20/SOF+NS5A SOF+NS5Ai n=34/ SOF+RBV n=1 Completed treatment N = 48 (87%) Ongoing treatment N =7 Discontinued prematurely N=0 Adverse events anemia N =1 5 (27%) Treatment outcome available N = 47 Treatment outcome pending N=1 Demographic and Baseline DiseaseCharacteristics SOF/RBV N=21 SOF/NS5Ai±RBV N=34 Male 84% 80% 88% Median age 50 yr (34-67) 56 (46-67) 50(34-67) TE 68%(P-INF+RBV/SOF+RBV) 14 (67%) 24 (70%) HCV RNA ≥6 log IU/ml (4-8) ≥6 (4-8) ≥6 log (3-8) GT1-54%(GT1a 22%)/GT2(6%)GT3(18%)GT4(22%) 43/9/24/24% 65/3/12/20% HBV-HDV coinfection N=1 1 0 HCC 52% 12 (57%) 16 (47%) Months from LT ≥ 6 (6-144) 6-134 6-144 F3-F4 = 54% 18 (90%) 6 (18%) Cirrhosis 34% CTP A 90%/B 10% 10 6 FCH N=2 (4%) 1 1 RBV 82% 21 32 TAC/CSA/Everolimus/MMF/Steroids %(73-5-22-69-16) 12/2/7/11/4 28/1/5/27/5 Centro Trapianti di Fegato - Pancreas A.O. Brotzu Direttore Dott. Fausto Zamboni 12 Week 0 24 36 48 SVR 24 N=21 SOF + RBV 67% N=27 SOF/LDV ± RBV SVR12 100% N=8 SOF/ DAC + RBV SVR12 100% SVR24 N=6 Centro Trapianti di Fegato e Rene-Pancreas A.O. Brotzu Direttore Dott. Fausto Zamboni 24 12 Week 0 36 48 SVR 24 N=21 SOF + RBV 67% N=27 SOF/LDV + RBV SVR12 N=8 SOF/ DAC + RBV SVR12 Well tolerated No significant DDI No rejection FCH N=1 GT3 SOF + RBV NR= 7 100% 100% SVR 100% SVR24 N=6 GT1b=3 (F3=1/cirrhosis=2) GT 3 =2 (F3=1/cirrhosis=1) GT4 =1 (cirrhosis=1) Centro Trapianti di Fegato - Pancreas A.O. Brotzu Direttore Dott. Fausto Zamboni DAAs Failure: Retreatment with NS5Ai SVR 24 = 100% (N=6/6) SOF+LDV+RBV (n=4) SOF+DAC+RBV (n=2) 0 24 weeks 4/4 2/2 SOF/LDV + RBV SOF/DAC +RBV 1-Conclusions • Treatment of HCV infection in patients awaiting LT is a good strategy to prevent HCV graft infection: it will increase survival an simplify post-LT follow-up • Viral clearance may be associated with improvement in liver function, leading to delisting in some cases • Treatment is not recommended in patients with very advanced liver disease • All patients with HCV infection after LT are candidates for IFN-free antiviral therapy • Treatment is recommended at an early stage of hepatitis C recurrence, preferably when patients are in stable condition • In those cases of early recurrence (cholestatic forms) treatment shoud be administered as soon as the diagnosis is made Complicanze pre e post Trapianto di fegato SSD Coordinamento Trapianto di Fegato A.O. Brotzu - Cagliari fpost-OLT à NAFLD Insufficienza renale acuta più frequente nel post operatorio Dott.ssa Laura Mameli Dott.Francesco Sanna Direttore: Dott.ssa Maria Rosaria Piras Patogenesi multifatoriale e fattori in parte comuni a iperlipemia e diabete Stile di vita, modifiche immunosoppressione Osteopenia e fratture spontanee frequenti soprattutto I° semestre post-OLT Centro Trapianti Fegato - Pancreas Patogenesià m. colestatica, deficit e sintesi ed assorbimento vit.D, A.O.Brotzu - Cagliari Malnutrizione, ipogonadismo, immobilità, diuretici, rapida perdita massa, recente Direttore: Dott.Cise Fausto Zamboni Osteopenia e fratture spontanee frequenti ° semestre post-OLT Patogenesi multiffatoriale: m. colestatiche, deficit sintesi e metabolismo vit.D deficit assorbimanto calcio, malnutrizione, ipoginadismo, allettamento, diuretici rapida perdita massa ossea primo periodo post-OLT, terapia immunosoppressiva, IRC jatrogena Calcio, vit. D e bifosfonati evidenza utilità Orlistat Complicanze pre e post Trapianto di fegato SSD Coordinamento Trapianto di Fegato A.O. Brotzu - Cagliari fpost-OLT à NAFLD Insufficienza renale acuta più frequente nel post operatorio Dott.ssa Laura Mameli Dott.Francesco Sanna Direttore: Dott.ssa Maria Rosaria Piras Patogenesi multifatoriale e fattori in parte comuni a iperlipemia e diabete Stile di vita, modifiche immunosoppressione Osteopenia e fratture spontanee frequenti soprattutto I° semestre post-OLT Centro Trapianti Fegato - Pancreas Patogenesià m. colestatica, deficit e sintesi ed assorbimento vit.D, A.O.Brotzu - Cagliari Malnutrizione, ipogonadismo, immobilità, diuretici, rapida perdita massa, recente Direttore: Dott.Cise Fausto Zamboni Osteopenia e fratture spontanee frequenti ° semestre post-OLT Patogenesi multiffatoriale: m. colestatiche, deficit sintesi e metabolismo vit.D deficit assorbimanto calcio, malnutrizione, ipoginadismo, allettamento, diuretici GRAZIE rapida perdita massa ossea primo periodo post-OLT, terapia immunosoppressiva, IRC jatrogena Calcio, vit. D e bifosfonati evidenza utilità Orlistat Treatment after LT Paritaprevir/R § N=34 § All GT1 § F2=≤2 § TN & TE § CNIs adjustement for § ABT450/RTV § Mild AEs § 5 patients recived EPO Kwo et al, NEJM 2014 + Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir + RBV LDV/SOF+RBV for Treatment of FCH After Liver Transplantation SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2: Fibrosing Cholestatic Hepatitis (US and EU) 12 Week 0 n=7 LDV/SOF + RBV n=4 LDV/SOF + RBV 36 24 SVR12 SVR12 12 Weeks LDV/SOF+RBV n=7 24 Weeks LDV/SOF+RBV n=4 59 (56–65) 56 (52–64) 6 (86) 3 (75) Median HCV RNA, log10 IU/mL (range) 6.6 (4.9–8.0) 6.4 (5.8–7.7) Median years from transplant (range) 1.0 (0.4–1.6) 0.3 (0.2–0.4) Median total bilirubin, mg/dL (range) 5.8 (1.6–12.4) 11 (1.5– 28.1) Median GGT, U/L (range) 446 (234–1332) 602 (47–740) Median ALT, IU/L (range) 174 (71–211) 165 (62–220) 89 (36–94) 75 (69–103) Median age, y (range) Male, n (%) Median CLcr, mL/min (range) FCH, fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis Forns, EASL, 2015, P0779 100% SVR European DCV Compassionate Use Program SVR (mITT) by Genotype LDV/SOF+RBV for Treatment of FCH After Liver Transplantation 12 Weeks LDV/SOF+RBV n=7 24 Weeks LDV/SOF+RBV n=4 50 (34–67) 56 (52–64) 85 3 (75) Median HCV RNA, log10 IU/mL (range) ≥4 (4.0–8.0) 6.4 (5.8–7.7) Median months from transplant (range) 1.0 (0.4–1.6) 0.3 (0.2–0.4) Median total bilirubin, mg/dL (range) 5.8 (1.6–12.4) 11 (1.5– 28.1) Median GGT, U/L (range) 446 (234–1332) 602 (47–740) Median ALT, IU/L (range) 174 (71–211) 165 (62–220) 89 (36–94) 75 (69–103) Median age, y (range) Male, n (%) Median CLcr, mL/min (range) FCH, fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis Forns, EASL, 2015, P0779 Results: Post-Transplant Virologic Response SOF N=40 GT1=83% Cirrhosis 40% + RBV N=104 GT1=85% Cirrhosis 50% FCH 50% 70% 24 weeks N=40 GT1=83% Cirrhosis 40% 70% NO DDI No rejection 59% Charlton SVR 12 Forns SVR 12 Samuel SVR 12 Charlton M et al , Gastroenterology 2015, Forns X et al Gastroenterology 2015, Samuel D et al EASL 2014 HCV Infection and Liver Transplantation HCV infection is the 1° cause of liver transplantation in industrialized countries BUT • Universal reinfection after LT • Negative impact on long-term survival • Up to 1/3 of HCV transplanted patients will develop an accelerated course to cirrhosis within 5 yrs following LT Recurrence prevention Berenguer M et al Hepatology 2000;32:852-858Neumann UP et al Transplantation 2004: 77:226-231, Belli L et al Liver Transpl 2007;13:733-740, Burra P et al J Hepatol 2013 Liver toxicity associated with antiviral therapy Two case reports with SOF-based therapies Sofosbuvir + NS5A inhibitors treatment in decompensated HCV cirrhosis. ü Mithocondrial damageà lactic acidosis (SOF/ RBV?) à decompensation in 35 pts with advanced diseases (Welker et al J Hepatol 2016 Editorial: Hoofnagle J Hepatol 2016) Dyson et al. J. Hepatol 2016:64;234-238 SVR12 by HCV Genotype and by cohort: ALLY-1 Study Patients with relapse: DCV + SOF + RBV 24 wks § No DDI § No graft rejection § Well tolerated Poodard F et al EASL 2015 Patients With Dual Kidney / Liver Transplant Post-transplant Cohort Parameter Age, median (range) years Male, n (%) Race, n (%) White Black / African American HCV genotype, n (%) 1 3 Cirrhosis, n (%) Diabetes, n (%) Creatinine clearance, median (range) mL/min/ 1.73m3 SVR12, n (%) DCV+SOF N=4 68.5 (61–79) 4 (100) 3 (75) 1 (25) 2 (50) 2 (50) 3 (75) 4 (100) 73.3 (55.5– 91.2) 4 (100) Brown RS et al., EASL 2016, poster SAT-251 • Among the 62 enrolled patients, 4 had dual kidney / liver transplants • 3 with cirrhosis • All diabetic • All receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression • All patients completed 24-week of treatment • All patients achieved SVR12 Results: Post-Transplant Virologic Response SOF N=40 GT1=83% Cirrhosis 40% + RBV N=104 GT1=85% Cirrhosis 50% FCH 50% 70% 24 weeks N=40 GT1=83% Cirrhosis 40% 70% NO DDI No rejection 59% Charlton SVR 12 Forns SVR 12 Samuel SVR 12 Charlton M et al , Gastroenterology 2015, Forns X et al Gastroenterology 2015, Samuel D et al EASL 2014 Treatment after Liver Transplantation SOF Author + N Simeprevir GT 1 ± RBV Cirrhosis 12-24 weeks RBV SVR Brown R 1 131 82% 60% 22% 91% Pupapon S 2 109 100% 29% 22% 91% Te H 3 40 100% 35% (F3F4) 0% 71% Treatment safe and well tolerated 1-2 AASLD 2014, 3 EASL 2015 SVR12 Rates Among Patients with Recurrent HCV Post-Liver Transplant LDV/SOF+RBV 12 weeks LDV/SOF+RBV 24 weeks LDV/SOF 12 weeks 102/ 104/ 107 105 F0–F3 58/ 60 56/ 58 CTP A SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2 40/ 11/ 11 41 Kwok, et al. 28/ 28 Shoreibah, et al. 18/ 18 Hassett, et al. Real-World (Non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic) Gane, AASLD, 2015, 1049; Kwok, AASLD 2015, 1101; Shoreibah, AASLD 2015, 1174; Hassett, AASLD, 2015, LB-28